The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 03:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Film appears to fail WP:NFILM, nothing but database listings. No reviews.
DEPROD with rationale "AfD it, not for PROD" DonaldD23 talk to me 21:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 21:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 22:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 22:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:VAGUEWAVE.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable security consultant. I can't find any sources that meet WP:42, and the only news results that come up from a search are a few interviews. >>> Ingenuity. talk(); 23:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
More leftovers from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Shop Corner, Virginia, where they were not individually discussed. Searching indicates that these are apparently named road junctions, not communities; I can find no indication that any of them meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG.
Also included in this nomination are:
The result was delete. no consensus for or on redirect location Star Mississippi 02:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability; known for his one role only on One Life to Live. Bgsu98 ( talk) 22:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I found nothing that shows notability. Non-notable producer. SL93 ( talk) 22:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
If Battle of Voznesensk (1920) is notable, it needs its article. Otherwise, a hatnote leading to Voznesensk (or any other article that mentions it) does the job. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 22:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Each bulleted entry should have a navigable (blue) link, normally as the entry itself (see the previous bullet), or in the description if the entry is red-linked or unlinked.Please familiarize yourself with these guidelines before calling other editors' comments
pure nonsense. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 14:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 22:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable event. Sources seem to be self-source, bare mention, affiliated, or routine. valereee ( talk) 22:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
A thorough Google search finds no reliable and verifiable sources that would support a claim of notability. The article has been around for a decade and has never been expanded beyond a few dozen words. Alansohn ( talk) 21:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 21:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Single-market show, unlikely to be notable. De-prodded with a source added, but it's from the market the show aired in. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "The series of programs, called Math Country, will be filmed in color, and used in teaching math to second and third grade students across the state, beginning in September of this year, Lawrence Holden, KET producer said today. Math Country teaches by dramatic and comic example rather than by the use of a teacher on television, Holden said. ... The three young parts in Math Country were cast after a state-wide Talent Search conducted by KET in October of 1977, when hundreds of children auditioned for the parts at eight locations over the state. Over 140 child actors were finalists and had their auditions recorded by KET. Many will have small parts in the series."
The article notes: "Currently in pre-production, "Math Country" is a multi-part dramatic series which will be used as an educational supplement by second- and third-grade mathematics students in Kentucky. "Math Country" tells the story of Carol Hardway and her two children, Martha and Jerry. The family lives on a farm owned by Cousin Lionel Hardway, a 12-year-old millionaire banker who does not have an understanding of math."
The article notes: "The day is gray and rainy. Inside an old barn where a scene from KET's newest in-school production, "Math Country," is being taped, it's damp. Pigeons squawk from the rafters while below, the director of the series discusses the next shot with his crew. Three teenage actors climb on hay bales, laughing and joking with one another while awaiting the next scene. It's a typical day on location."
The article notes: "The three regular roles open are Jerry Hardway, a scout who likes being outdoors and is very much like most youngsters; Martha Hardway, an athlete and similar ot most youngsters; and Lionel Hardway, a 12-year-old millionaire banker, totally ignorant of math and who doesn't want to learn anything. Also available are supporting roles such as classmates, children next door and visitors to "Math Country."
According to one of the first pages of the book, the index "contains reviews and award citations for the many formats of film, videorecordings, and television programming".The book notes: "Math Country [TV] Kentucky Educational TV Series 1979 15M (each of 30). Agency for Instructinal TV Newsletter 10:2 Win/Spr79".
This confirms that Math Country was reviewed in the Agency for Instructional TV Newsletter published by the Agency for Instructional Television.
The book notes: "Math Country. Mathematics. 15 mins.; Beta, VHS, 3/4U; 30 progs. A series that places special emphasis on additional and subtraction operations, and on geometric and numerical patterns. Ideal for second and third graders."
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW, no reason to prolong this discussion now notability is proven and all votes are keep with no active current discussions. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Only aired on one affiliate. De-prodded with sources added, but they're from the market the show aired in, suggesting the show is of local interest only. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "A unique 13-week news/variety television series that will combine both comic and serious elements -- and be hosted and reported by "little people" -- will be produced for KDOC/56 and begin airing on Saturday nights in April. Entitled "Short Ribbs," the show is the brainchild of show business veteran and dwarf Billy Barty, whose infectious personality has made him a TV favorite in comedies and kids' shows since the 1950s."
The review notes: "Prognosis: It could survive beyond its 13-week order, but only if it improves drastically and/or KDOC proves desperate for original product. The concept for "Short Ribbs," a new locally produced variety series, sounded a little bizarre but somewhat intriguing when it was first broached last spring. Creator and performer Billy Barty planned to take a group of little people and create a satirical world in which normal-size adults are the freaks. The potential for social commentary was immense. That, unfortunately, isn't quite the way it turned out. Sadly, "Short Ribbs" is a disaster on every level. It's a lowbrow waste of a fun concept, an embarrassing stab at comedy that's almost impossible to watch without covering one's eyes."
The article notes: "Come Saturday night, when his comedy-variety series “Short Ribbs” debuts on Orange County’s KDOC-TV Channel 56, Barty, 65, hopes the half-hour show will enable other little people “to act like regular people.” ... Another recurring character, also played by Barty, is a consumer reporter named David Halfowitz. The other cast members, Patty Maloney, Jimmy Briscoe and Joe Gieb, are all veterans of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus."
The article note: "Bill Winckler, 25, said the dwarf actor has ignored a contract guaranteeing him pay for each script plus a percentage of syndication profits. The show, in which Barty starred, is described as a "Saturday Night Live"- type show cast mostly with "little people." It ran from September to December on KDOC (Channel 56) in Anaheim. ... Winckler filed his small claims suit in January after repeatedly asking Barty about pay for the pilot and scripts, he said. Winckler said he began working on the scripts in December 1988 and continued to provide them while the show aired."
The article notes: "Actor Billy Barty was ordered in small claims court Monday to pay a Woodland Hills writer $1,300 for his work on a television show called "Short Ribbs." Writer Bill Winckler, 25, and Barty, 65, both claimed victory outside the Van Nuys Municipal Courtroom after a hearing in which Barty said that he employed Winckler for about a year but did not pay him because his work was not satisfactory. ... Winckler said that he began working with the dwarf actor in December 1988, when he drafted a pilot script for the show, which is described as being similar to "Saturday Night Live" but using mostly dwarfs. Barty was the star of the show."
The article notes: "Billy Barty is being sued by a TV writer who says the dwarf actor owes him $2,000 for his help on the brief-run show Short Ribbs. Bill Winckler, 25, of Woodland Hills, Calif., said Barty has ignored a contract guaranteeing him pay for each script plus a percentage of syndication profits."
The article notes: "Diminutive actor Billy Barty is being sued in small claims court by a television writer who says the star owes him $2,000 for his help on the briefly run TV show "Short Ribbs.""
The article notes: "Barty said he considered Monday’s decision a win because he didn’t have to award 10% of future syndication profits for his show, “Short Ribbs,” to writer-producer Bill Winckler."
The article notes: "Actor Billy Barty was ordered to pay $428 to a television show writer who claimed that he wasn’t paid for creating several comedy sketches. Burbank Municipal Court Commissioner Dennis H. Shanklin on Monday granted the award to Warren Taylor for sketches he wrote for “Short Ribbs,” which aired last year on KDOC-TV in Anaheim and is no longer in production."
The article notes: "Both Barty and Clavin Brack, general manager of KDOC, said they hope the 13-week series, entitled "Short Ribbs," will be picked up for syndication after its scheduled debut in April."
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Only source is 404. No better sources found. As an interstitial series it's unlikely to have attracted attention on its own. prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The book notes: "CBS mounted another literacy project in 1979 in collaboration with the Library of Congress, called "Read More About It." At the outset, the Library of Congress annually selected 10 to 25 CBS "special" programs from outlines and summaries of future programs submitted by the network. At the end of each broadcast a featured performer from the cast spoke to the audience for 30 seconds, urging them to visit local libraries and bookstores to explore several books related to the program's content. Those titles, and a single-page list of other books reflecting a variety of perspectives on the topics, were chosen by bibliographer and reference librarians at The Library of Congress. ... During each season into the 1990s, some 40 CBS programs are chosen by The Library of Congress for the "Read More About It" messages."
The article note: "CBS agrees: since 1979 the "Read More About It" project, a cooperative venture between the Library of Congress' Center for the Book and the CBS network, has been promoting book titles on the air after programs of special literary interest. Here's how it works. Take the first show, for example. ... This season, book lists will accompany telecasts of ... Twice a year, whe nCBS knows its advance schedule they get in touch with the Center for the Book and a dozen or so programs which seem suitable are selected for "Read More About It." Then the book lists are made. There has been no formal survey of the impact of "Read More About It," but librarians across the country have written letters indicating a high degree of positive response from their communities."
The article notes: ""The Gift" marks the third presentation of the "Read More About It" project which provides on-air information about books related to the subjects of selected television programs. The brainchild of Librarian of Congress Daniel J. Boorstin, the project was developed through the Library's Center for the Book, which is charged by a 1977 Act of Congress with creating ways to promote reading."
The article notes: "[Angela] Lansbury's appearance was part of CBS's Read More About It program. Now in its ninth season, Read More About It has proved that the book and the tube can complement, rather than just compete with, each other. The project, which grew out of the symposium Television, the Book, and the Classroom, was the brainchild of then Librarian of Congress Daniel Boorstin. In 1978 Boorstin presented to all three networks his idea for a program that would encourage reading through television. CBS was the first to act on his suggestion and a campaign of thirty-second announcements linking broadcasts with related books began. Last season, CBS involved more than forty movies, miniseries, and specials ins project, including ... The CBS announcements all follow a prescribed script, altered only slightly since the program's inception ... "
The book notes: "1979: Library of Congress and CBS television launch "Read More About It" TV spots, directing viewers to books with more information about program topics. Actor Richard Thomas presents the first spot, following the made-for-TV movie "All Quiet on the Western Front," about World War I."
The book notes: "The Library of Congress/CBS Television "Read More About It" book project is the Center for the Book's best known promotion. Thirty-second reading messages from the Library of Congress send viewers to their local libraries and bookstores to "read more about" the subject of the program. Since 1979, more than 300 major CBS Television programs have included these reading recommendations. An estimated 20 million viewers, the largest audience ever reached by a "Read More About It" message, saw the announcement that suggested good books about baseball during the fourth game of the World Series on October 20, 1990."
The article notes: "A book co-authored by Fairlawn resident Katina Z. Jones was under consideration for the CBS Read More About It segment that will air after the SunDAY, movie. ... The four titles chosen by the Library of Congress for the Read More AboutIt segment are Children Support: A Complete, Up to Date Authoritative Guide to Collecting Child Support (1985) by Marianne Takas; The Child SupportSurvivor's Guide (1984) by Barry T. Schnell; Making Fathers Pay: TheEnforcement of Child Support (1979) by David L. Chambers; and Runaway Father, the book by Richard L. Rashke that served as the inspiration for the TV movie script by Stephanie Liss."
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Non-notable actor. SL93 ( talk) 20:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW, no reason to prolong this discussion now notability is proven and all votes are keep with no active current (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with sources, but one is just a press release. I could hardly find anything better. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 20:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "The respondents are devoutly wishing for the same thing: a spot on a new cable-television show called "Inspiration, Please!" Billing itself as the first religious quiz show in TV history, "Inspiration, Please!" shuns sultry letter-turners and roulette-style wheels. The show's host is a Christian stand-up comic named Robert G. Lee, whose wife, Anne, calls him "the funny bone in the body of Christ." ... Inspiration, Please!" became a hit last year when it debuted on cable TV's Faith & Values channel, which is partly owned by a unit of cable giant Tele-Communications Inc. of Englewood, Colo. While the program's ratings are puny compared with shows on broadcast networks, Faith & Values says viewer response is strong. So strong, in fact, that the channel has ordered 52 new episodes and plans to make the program a daily feature this fall. ... But the success of "Inspiration, Please!" has made it the lightning rod in a storm over the soul of religious TV.To some viewers and rival religious broadcasters, "Inspiration, Please!" is proof that Faith & Values has sold out to mammon and Hollywood. ... "Inspiration, Please!" is taped in a cramped studio inside the historic 150-year-old Trinity Church on Wall Street in Manhattan."
The article notes: "Think of it as a mix of "Jeopardy!" without the greed, "Wheel of Fortune" without Vanna White, and other popular TV shows without the double entendres. What is left in "Inspiration, Please!" which bills itself as the first Bible quiz show, is an entertaining game that draws upon contestants' knowledge of the Bible and other spiritual resources. ... "Inspiration, Please!" is like a lot of other game shows in style with [Robert G.] Lee standing beside across a podium across from three contestants ready to pounce on buzzers in front of them."
The article notes: "Mann, 42, who shouts the answers while watching Jeopardy, answered an audition call for Inspiration, Please, a name inspired by the old quiz show Information, Please. The first 13 episodes, produced by Trinity Church in Manhattan, are scheduled for taping in mid-July. Beginning in October, they will appear on the Faith and Values Network, an interfaith cable station."
The article notes: "If you answered "lust," "the harp" and "Golgotha," you might be ready to audition for the "Inspiration Please?" TV game show, or at least to test your skills with a new book based on the show. The show, aired daily at 930 a.m. EDT on cable's Odyssey channel, recently completed taping 26 episodes. In November, Morrow will publish "The Inspiration Please? Trivia Quiz Book." A cross between "Trivial Pursuit" and "Wheel of Fortune," the 2-year-old show has won a following by taking a lighter approach to biblical literacy."
The article note: "Unto the Parish of Trinity Church there came an idea, and the idea was a weekly primetime TV religion game show. And verily, it came to pass. It's called "Inspiration, Please," a knock-off of an old radio and TV show called "Information, Please," and it starts in October on the Faith and Values Channel, which is carried on 1,450 cable systems piped into 24 million homes. ... Taping of the first 13 episodes starts in July at the Trinity Place studios in the heart of Wall Street. The grand prize is a trip for two to — of course — the Holy Land. The emcee is Roberg G. Lee, a Christian standup comic ..."
The article notes: "On the sleek set of the game show "Inspiration Please!," host Robert G. Lee is grilling his three contestants. "Which emperor made Christianity the Roman Empire's official religion?" ... This snappy half-hour game show on the Odyssey channel is part of a new brand of religious television."
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
TJ Hudson is a local politician who ran for a single statewide office. Treutlen County, Georgia is approximately 6,885. This is well below the threshold at least regional prominence defined under Wikipedia:POLOUTCOMES for local officials. I do not believe his candidacy does not pass the test that he could be referenced to such an unusual depth, range and volume of press coverage that her candidacy could be credibly claimed as much more special than everybody else's candidacies in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance (see Christine O'Donnell). He is an African-American first according to the article, but that is contradicted by List of first minority male lawyers and judges in Georgia. I believe that he therefore does not meet the notability standards for political figures. Mpen320 ( talk) 19:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Most likely non-notable football player according to WP:NCOLLATH. Additionally, there is only one source and it is a stats website. Capsulecap ( talk • contribs) 19:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
David Belle Isle is a local politician who ran for a single statewide office. Alpharetta, Georgia is approximately 67,213. This is well below the threshold at least regional prominence defined under Wikipedia:POLOUTCOMES. His candidacy does not pass the test that he could be referenced to such an unusual depth, range and volume of press coverage that her candidacy could be credibly claimed as much more special than everybody else's candidacies in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance (see Christine O'Donnell). I believe that he therefore does not meet the notability standards for political figures. Mpen320 ( talk) 19:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bathing#Bathing babies. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 20:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Violates WP:NOTGUIDE. Removing all the how-to stuff would get the article down to the very first sentence, so that is not a plausible option. Rewriting does not seem all that possible. Could be redirected to Bathing#Bathing babies. interstatefive ( talk) - just another roadgeek 19:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to George Floyd memorial (disambiguation)#Artwork. RL0919 ( talk) 21:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Completely subsumed by the disambiguation page George Floyd memorial (disambiguation), which is perfectly serviceable, much more comprehensive, and created by the same editor who made this one. On top of that, this page only features two links: one of which is to an actual article, but the other of which is to a short section of the article George Floyd Square occupied protest. Even if this page weren't wholly redundant to the other disambiguation page, there would still be no compelling argument for keeping it, because it only exists to link to one article and one relatively narrow portion of another. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Not notable, less than 30 citations in total for published papers (I could find only 2 papers, and they are both primary sources/original research) relating to BHDL on Scholar (note, many articles containing 'BHDL' are not related to the BHDL as defined on this Wikipedia page). Simple Google Search shows nothing about BHDL, have to use "double quotes" search function to find related results. No citations and references are dead/out-of-date/primary sources Hadal1337 ( talk) 18:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 21:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Minor fictional character in a Sri Lankan TV series, not even protagonist. The protag character or any other characters from series doesn't even have pages. Appears to be WP:PROMOTION for the actress. UtoD 17:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 21:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The term Jaiswar is not mentioned in any of the articles listed and thus fail WP:DABMENTION. I could not see any existing article with content that would support a redirect. older ≠ wiser 17:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 17:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
It's been over a year since I tagged this for notability and she still doesn't meet WP:ENT. No new major roles in films or television. No solo music career. Recommend redirect to GFriend. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 17:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. A total WP:SNOW deletion. JBW ( talk) 19:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Per this discussion at the Cricket Project, concerns and doubts have been raised about this trophy actually existing. All the sources hint at the possibility of giving the Test series between Bangladesh and India a name, but nothing from any reliable cricket source (ICC, Cricinfo, etc) have confirmed this to be the case. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pynns Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Same topic is found at Pynns Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 16:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The article lacks sufficient independent sourcing to demonstrate that Mr. Evans meets the requirements of the general notability guidelines and the subject specific notability guidelines for academics. It has previously been speedily deleted under G11, however it does not read as unambiguous promotion, and I think it's likely Mr. Evans does meet WP:NPROF - the article just doesn't show it. Please note this is a procedural nomination on my part - I am not !voting either keep or delete at this time, and I have done limited WP:BEFORE. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 16:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
References provide only passing mention of the organization and are mostly about polarity therapy, not the organization. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:ORGCRITE. Search finds nothing better. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mccapra. Hope you are doing well. Thanks for your inputs on this article . However it is the only Organisation globally certifying members as therapists in Polarity and hence I feel the nomination for deletion for this article is not correct. I request this article could stay for public interest and making Wikipedia a good informational platform. Kindly suggest. Thanks. Gardenkur ( talk) 02:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mccapra. Thanks for your reply. I understand it doesnt have substantial coverage. However the theraphy certified by it is widely recognised. For the informational sources based on that cant we include the organisation supporting it. Gardenkur ( talk) 07:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relists, we have some support for deletion, some for merging/redirection (but with different suggestions for where), and some for keeping (with a list of sources that was not responded to). Perhaps further discussion of the merge/redirect options elsewhere can produce a non-deletion solution, but at this point there is no consensus for deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 21:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Lack of notability or secondary sources that make it notable. Gabe114 ( talk) 17:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
16:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 16:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
i think this may be a hoax in terms of notability and even existence - I can't find anything in terms of sourcing to support it's inclusion much less existence, even their own website doesn't verify the content. I've searched google books, google news and newspapers for both Ethan Farrell (as it pertains to clothing/business as opposed to the young actor) and Ethan James and I can't find anything. A google search of "Embrace by Ethan James" for the perfume also brings back all Wikipedia mirrors. Their archived website doesn't even exist save for a placeholder and there really just isn't anything I can find to support a single statement here. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
doesn't appear to be a notable crime or person as tragic as it may be and despite the sentencing seeming excessive, it's pretty normal in these cases and this set of crimes doesn't appear to have received any significant national or international attention. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Fails WP:BIO. SL93 ( talk) 15:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Very poor low quality referencing, passing mentions and interviews. One film won an award. Potentially notable. scope_creep Talk 15:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
2008 no consensus shortly after launch. But other than run of the mill announcements following its launch, there is nothing to indicate ORG compliant sourcing. URL is dead, which makes me think alliance is no longer, and never established notability while it existed. Star Mississippi 13:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The article lacks sources, and a Google search found nothing. Appears to fail GNG, which wins over NFOOTY which is now gone. ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 13:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Assam cricketers. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. The recent trend at AFD has been more skepticism of sports biographies where the subject had minimal professional play, but in this case the subject's larger number of appearances and the possibility of non-English sources has led to the benefit of the doubt. RL0919 ( talk) 21:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
This app does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Having a large valuation or being part of an accelerator program does not make a company notable on its own. >>> Ingenuity. talk(); 14:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. My google was apparently broken when searching. Star Mississippi 21:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
I love this series, but cannot find any evidence of notability or any discussion of the series. Publisher is a redlink (and a BEFORE doesn't indicate notability on which to build a stub) so no viable merger. Star Mississippi 14:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "... But equally to blame is a lack of knowledge of other cultures and peoples or misconceptions, and one easy, entertainingly funny, yet useful way, to remedy this is to peruse this series of books, ironically named "The Xenophobe's Guides". Terming its mission to highlight the unique character and behaviour of various nationalities -- in a manner that is "almost guaranteed to cure xenophobia" through judicious dose of humour and the irrepressible laughter it engenders, the series was started in 1993 by Anne Taute "as a humorous take on the UK being an island nation and its prevailing attitude being 'us' (the British) and 'foreigners' (everyone else)". The humour is typically British -- wittily irreverent, deprecating (self-deprecating when needed) and uproariously hyperbolic at some points, though the writers are not necessarily only British, but, in many cases, hail from the country they seek to profile or have lived there extensively. Among them is Zhu Song, author of "The Xenophobe's Guide to the Chinese" (2010), who confesses she dislikes three phrases ... That sets the tone for the series, which presently comprises 32 installments, with all, except three, dealing with a specific nationality (the exceptions are the Scots, the Welsh and the Californians, who differ from the rest of their countrymen in taking "their beliefs so seriously that many lose touch with what doesn't need to be believed")."
The article notes: "The Xenophobe's Guides series has launched a couple more of its handy pocket sized guides to other nations, bringing the total to 10. Joining the guides to the English, Spanish, French, Germans, Aussies, Poles, Russians and Welsh are guides to the Greeks and the Swedes. The format is the same as the others, with chapters on humour, culture, health and hygiene and behaviour. As ever, the chapter on obsessions gives a valuable insight into the character of the people of the country."
The article notes: "The Xenophobe's Guides The last thing we would do is endorse xenophobia. And certainly these provocatively-titled books do nothing of the sort. In fact, their intent is to cure xenophobia through humor and honesty. Published in the UK (and hard to find in the US), these concise guides are frank, irreverent and intensely funny guides to the culture, beliefs, traditions and foibles of nations. Get the Russian or Polish guide for yourself, and give a gift of the American guide to your foreign partner. Then exchange copies. Your relationship will be the richer in the process. Xenophobes's Guide to the Russians [GA959·64 pp., softcover·$5.95] Americans [GA956·64 pp., softcover·$5.95] Poles [GA958·64 pp., softcover·$5.95]"
The book notes: "Greek to me. If you're already thinking about amusing (and cheap!) stocking fillers, Xenophobes Guides may be one answer. The new series has so far unleashed guides to the French, the Spanish, the Germans, the Aussies and, hold on, the English. They run to some 50 pages, cost £2.50 and are published by Ravette Books. The publishers set the irreverent tone at the outset by defining Xenophobia thus: "Greek noun — an irrational fear of foreigners, probably justified, always understandable".
The article notes: "Following last year's launch of five Xenophobe's Guides — English, Spanish, German, French and Aussies — three more of the lighthearted guides are on their way to bookshops. The new ones are The Xenophobe's Guides to the Welsh, the Poles and the Russians. Published by Ravette Books at £2.50 each, they are well worth reading before you visit any of the countries, or if like me you have relatives that hail from those parts of the world they can explain a lot!"
The article notes: " The Last Word on Swedes is the "Xenophobe's Guide to the Swedes" (Ravette Books Limited ISBN: 1 85304 741 4) written by Peter Berlin. The Xenophobe's Guides are a new series of books that take a wry, irreverent look at the character and behaviour of different nations. Now it is the Swedes' turn to be put under a magnifying glass. ... Time Keeping The Swedish businessman is likely to show up 15 minutes early for business appointments, start circling the block to kill the extra time, and get arrested for kerb crawling."
The article notes: "Den Grundgedanken dieser Reihe kann man so auffassen: Der sogenannte "Fremdenversteher" nimmt Klischees aufs Korn und macht sie dadurch lächerlich. Diese Fremdenversteher, die deutsche Ausgabe der britischen "Xenophobe's® Guides", wollen aber auch tatsächlich etwas über die Franzosen, Italiener, Engländer oder wie hier Isländer erzählen. Der Spagat macht es etwas schwierig, da es so doch zu einer Aneinanderreihung von Pauschalurteilen kommt. Es ist ja verwegen, solche Sätze in die Welt zu werfen: ..."
The article notes from Google Translate: "The basic idea of this series can be understood as follows: The so-called "stranger understander" makes fun of clichés and thereby makes them ridiculous. These foreigners, the German edition of the British "Xenophobe's® Guides", actually want to tell you something about the French, Italians, English or, as here, Icelanders. The balancing act makes it a bit difficult, as it results in a series of blanket judgments. It's audacious to throw such sentences out into the world: ..."
The article notes: "You don't have to go to China. You certainly won't have to spend years studying the language and culture of the Middle Kingdom. To acquire sufficient working wisdom on the subject to guide your company in its business, advise your anxious government, or simply add China to your understanding of the world just pay £2.50 and read this tiny book. Xenophobe's Guides claim to provide 'an ..."
The article notes: "Now, at 74, she has written a book. It's called The Xenophobe's Guide to the Kiwis and is part of a series put out by Sussex publisher Ravette. Cape Catley has taken on the New Zealand agency for the Ravette guides. ... Her brief for the xenophobe's guide was to write "a cheeky, non- politically correct but affectionate run-down on the Kiwi character". After years of working as a journalist, faithfully checking every statement and attributing them, she found it a novel experience to be able to make bold, sweeping statements about the Kiwi psyche and lifestyle. ... There are also xenophobe's guides to the Aussies, Americans, Chinese, English, Germans, and soon the Japanese."
The article notes: "J.C. Yang's The Xenophobe's Guide to the Chinese (Ravette, £2.50 pbk) is a witty and affectionately critical appraisal of about a quarter of humanity. The pseudonymous Yang, clearly British, deals with everything from food to noise, sex to calligraphy, lavatories to gambling. Xenophobe's Guides and their sisters, Bluffer's Guides, are outstanding value, absurdly underpriced. Buy now."
The article notes: "Argumentative, depressive, inebriated lotharios. These unfortunate qualities are the defining characteristics of the Scots, according to a controversial new guide book. ... The nation is reported as unhealthy, too, with a life expectancy two years less than the English - whom they detest - according to the Xenophobe's Guide to the Scots. The book, to be published this month, is aimed at travellers and businessmen preparing a visit. ... The latest in a series of guides to countries around the world, the book is designed to offer a light-hearted look at a nation's lifestyle and characteristics. The guide, however, has provoked irritation and confusion among Scottish academics and cultural societies."
The article notes: "Buy the book "Xenophobe's Guide to the English," a humorous but largely accurate look at the English culture and personality (there are Xenophobe guides to dozens of other nationalities, including Americans). It currently takes up to six weeks to get it, but this tongue-in-cheek look at the English is worth the wait."
The article notes: "SCOTS are an unemotional, republican lot - obsessed by the weather but uninterested in personal hygiene, according to a controversial new guide book.David Ross, the Scottish author, has sparked outrage in his attempts to reveal Scots' national characteristics. ... And in the forthcoming Xenophobe's Guide to the Scots Mr Ross writes ... The book is the latest in a series providing a light-hearted look at the lifestyle and characteristics of nations."
The article notes: "A controversial new guide book claims that Scots are argumentative, depressive drunkards obsessed with the weather. The Xenophobe's Guide to the Scots also says many people would prefer to see Sean Connery on the throne rather than the Queen and slams hygiene standards."
The article notes: "Ever the renaissance man, Opik has also turned his hand to literature, co-authoring "humorous" book The Xenophobe's Guide to the Estonians. On Amazon, it is selling for the cut price of pounds 3.79. One customer calls it "a mind-blowing piece of garbage"."
The article notes: "Paul's Bilton's slim volume The Xenophobe's Guide to the Swiss is an amusing insight into the Swiss national character."
The article notes: "Xenophobe's Guide to the French by Nick Yapp and Michel Syrett (Ravette Books pounds 2.50). 'The French produce the most beautiful paintings in the world and the ugliest wallpaper. They work hard, but are never seen to be working. Drive through France at any time of the day, week, month or year and 95% of the country appears to be uninhabited or fast asleep'. Short, aphoristic, seriously funny, not that xenophobic and almost entirely apt guide, perfect homework for the fortunate on ferry or plane."
The book notes: "Xenophoboe's Guide to the French by Nick Yapp and Michel Syrett (Ravette Books £3.50). 'The French produce the most beautiful paintings in the world and the ugliest wallpaper. They work hard, but are never seen to be working. Drive through France at any time of the day, week, month or year and 95% of the country appears to be uninhabited or fast asleep'. Short, aphoristic, seriously funny, not that xenophobic and almost entirely apt guide, perfect homework for the fortunate on ferry or plane."
The article notes: "Hard to resist a book entitled The Xenophobe's Guide to the Spanish (Ravette Books £2.50), one of a series which also covers the French, Germans, Australians — and the English — and is published on the premise that the more you know about people, the less you fear. It debunks the idea that Spanish men are pumped full of machismo and notes that despite bullfighting they are not generally cruel to animals. It also concludes that they view the British ..."
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW, strong policy based arguments, all in favour of keep. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 16:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
An internet search came up with just one independent source for this company, and it only pertained to a new type of crane that they had just obtained in 2021. The company fails WP:VERIFY as well as WP:CORPDEPTH for broad geographic coverage. If it has been in existance since 1969 it should not have been hard to find independent coverage for this company if they are a major player in their business. Blue Riband► 14:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG, lack of in-depth converge in independent RS. There is some coverage in publications of the University of California/Merced where she graduated and are not independent. Others are minor mentions or otherwise not Reliable Sources. MB 00:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need more participation here
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. consensus clear subsequent to relist (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV. I couldn't find anything at all on newspapers.com or GBooks. Deprodded right under the wire. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need a clearer consensus on whether the subject passes notability guidelines. If there are refs with sigcov founded, please add them to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
15:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Less sniping, more consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
03:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
The article provides 802 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "But for the most part, filming for the newest game show to hit television, "You Lie Like a Dog" on Animal Planet, has been free of incidents - and considering that half of the cast is of the four-legged variety, that's surprising. No dog bites or cat scratches, no misdirected skunk sprays. A turned-on turtle who had the hots for a wooden pull toy performed on cue, and a llama that does the limbo was well-behaved. ... In Round One, three contestants all claim to own the same pet, who's on stage with them. The ce lebrities try to determine "who's lying like a dog" by quizzing them about the animal's diet, tricks and bad habits. (On a recent episode, they asked the alleged owners of Rosie, a pug, to imitate her snore.)"
The article provides 167 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "A panel of celebrities (mostly quick-minded stand-ups like Kevin Meaney and Cathy Ladman) tries to sniff out the fibbers among a trio of alleged pet owners by asking such tricky questions as, "Where does the dog like to be scratched the best?" (Answer: on the butt.) It's not as simple as it seems. ... With helpful interspecies info (e.g., a demo of mouth-to-snout resuscitation) and all prize money going to animal charities (e.g., Helping Hands: Monkey Helpers for the Disabled), you'd have to be a real rat not to love this Dog."
The article provides 130 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "The cable network Animal Planet takes a bite out of the game show craze with its new entry, "You Lie Like a Dog" (7:30 p.m.). A flea-bitten variation on "To Tell the Truth," this show pits a panel of celebrities against three contestants all claiming to be telling the truth. In round one, three people all claim to own the same pet. Only a volley of celebrity questions (by the likes of Jimmie Walker, Fred Willard and Dr. Joyce Brothers) can ferret out the truth. While no one is going to emerge a millionaire from this game show, animals come out the real winners. The celebrity panelist with the most points at the end of the game will have a donation made to the animal charity of their choice."
The article notes: "Rudd and Rosie will have a chance to become known to a greater portion of the Long Beach region tonight, when the two appear on a taped comedy game show airing on cable. The show, You Lie Like a Dog, on the Animal Planet cable station, is scheduled for 11:30 p.m. Rudd will display his dog-owner skills to prove that he owns Rosie, who is 2 1/2 years old. Celebrity contestants will quiz Rudd on Rosie's favorite toys, weight, sleeping habits, and if he can, imitate her snore, said Rudd, a substitute teacher for the Long Beach Unified School District. The celebrities who collect the most points by matching owner and animal will have a monetary donation made to the animal charity of their choice, he said."
The article provides 85 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Cable's Animal Planet is introducing a game show to demonstrate that, of all the creatures in the animal kingdom, people are the least trustworthy. You Lie Like a Dog features J.D. Roberto presiding over three celebrity guests and three contestants, all of whom claim to own the same pet. It's up to the panel to determine who's lying like a dog by quizzing each contestant on day-to-day life with the pet. Airing each weeknight, Lie Like a Dog premieres tonight at 7:30 p.m. EST."
The article provides a few sentences of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "I told Mr. Goldstein that one of the shows on Animal Planet is called You Lie Like a Dog and involves contestants trying to figure out which panelist is fibbing about ownership of respective pets, along with other pet issues. "Well, not every single thing is intellectual," he noted. ... The show You Lie Like a Dog conjured instant images of the O.J. Simpson trial. And when I learned that the black beetle "thrives on dung and decay," I could have sworn I saw the soul of Jenny Jones staring out of its beady little eyes."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The last relist - please consider the new sources presented in the discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of One Day International cricket umpires. RL0919 ( talk) 16:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 40 Below Summer#Studio albums. (non-admin closure) –– FormalDude talk 23:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable album. Redirect to band's discography. Mooonswimmer 16:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
03:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more participation needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Following a relist for consensus 5 days ago, the main contribution has been a source assessment table. The arguments for keep cite the article meeting GNG, which the source table demonstrates. No other contributors have offered a rebuttal, and so this table adds weight to keep arguments over delete. Overall, a clear keep consensus. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E case. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 08:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The mystery behind why Bengaluru is covered in stickers of ‘angry Hanuman’ ( Scroll.in, 2017) | Much more than an interview, includes substantial independent content, as well as commentary from Philip Lutgendorf, Professor of Hindi and Modern Indian Studies, Girish Kumar, a taxi-driver, and Srinath, a shopkeeper who sells stickers. | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. "The image, vector-style, is everywhere in Bengaluru and in several other parts of Karnataka." |
✔ Yes | |
Karan Acharya, the man behind the viral Hanuman vector, wants to copyright the image ( Hindustan Times, 2018) | More than an interview, includes substantial independent content about Acharya, the sticker, and an upcoming comic book. | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. the image is "raging across the Capital, after turning into a nationwide phenomenon over the last couple of years." Also includes support for WP:BASIC notability with secondary content and context about Acharya and his career. |
✔ Yes | |
Meet Karan Acharya, the Bengaluru artist whose mythological images of common people are going viral (The Indian Express, 2020) | Much more than an interview, includes substantial independent content about Acharya and his career. | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. "Karan Acharya, a graphic artist from Bengaluru, has become an internet sensation after several of his digital artworks went viral on social media." The secondary content and context also supports WP:BASIC notability and demonstrates coverage for multiple events. |
✔ Yes | |
Meet Karan Acharya, the artist who was hailed by PM Modi in Mangaluru rally ( Daijiworld, 2018) | Mostly an interview, but includes independent content about career, biographical information, political reactions to the art. | value not understood Secondary content and context supports WP:BASIC notability. | ? Unknown | |
Will Shiva blues Trump Hanuman rage? ( The New Indian Express, 2017) | Includes independent content in addition to an interview | value not understood Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and his work is well-known, e.g. "Today, almost every other vehicle, especially cabs and private vehicles, sport the half-faced orange and black coloured Hanuman stickers." Also covers more than one event, e.g. "The man behind it — artiste Karan Acharya — is now back with a blue coloured Adi Yogi Shiva sticker [...] He has designed stickers for Jallikattu and Kambala as well." Secondary content and context supports WP:BASIC notability. |
? Unknown | |
Stoic Rama after Angry Hanuman: Artist Karan Acharya reveals what he plans next ( The Financial Express, 2018) | More than an interview, includes independent content about new art, the Hanuman t-shirt, his company, Paridhi Media Works, the copyright, and popularity of the Hanuman image. | value not understood Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and his work is well-known, e.g. "Karan’s ‘angry Hanuman’ has become so popular that even Prime Minister Narendra Modi underscored it in an election rally". Also covers more than one event by focusing on multiple works of art and future plans. Secondary content and context supports WP:BASIC notability. |
? Unknown | |
‘Pride of Mangaluru’: PM Modi lauds artist who created viral angry Hanuman image ( The News Minute, 2018) | Includes a focus on debate/criticism of the image, as well as praise from PM Modi | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. "It has been less than three years since the image was created and it has become a rage in many parts of the country including Bengaluru and New Delhi, where the image appears on the windshields of vehicles and on smartphone covers." |
✔ Yes | |
Man behind super viral Lord Hanuman poster, now comes up with PM Narendra Modi’s painting, ( The Financial Express, 2018) | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and his work is well-known, e.g. describing him as "probably one of the most popular graphic artists in India". Secondary content and context about reactions to his art, career, and new work supports WP:BASIC notability, and helps demonstrate coverage for more than one event. |
✔ Yes | ||
Vinay Bharadwaj to create first impression with Mundina Nildana poster ( The New Indian Express, 2019) | value not understood An announcement of a new work, demonstrating coverage of more than one event. | ? Unknown | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. There are no policy-based reasons to keep the article presented. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails WP:NSINGER. Previously deleted, this is the 2nd attempt. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Refs are profiles, event listings and interviews. No social media coverage, no streaming coverage, no secondary coverage. Fan page. scope_creep Talk 14:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kerala cricketers#K. RL0919 ( talk) 16:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 13:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 16:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 13:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Could only find press releases. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment: I created this article a decade ago. At the time, it seemed relevant to create stub articles for all shows currently airing or that had aired on major television networks regardless of how much information was known about them. I have no opinion on whether to keep or delete the article. — CobraWiki ( jabber | stuff )
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous
WP:PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
04:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
No sourcing found. Prod contested. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment: I created this article a decade ago. At the time, it seemed relevant to create stub articles for all shows currently airing on major television networks regardless of how much information was known about them. I have no opinion on whether to keep or delete the article. — CobraWiki ( jabber | stuff )
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous
WP:PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
04:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 15:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
No major roles in notable productions, nor press coverage. Fails WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 11:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of stuff: To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources.
We don't need a separate article for this; notable users of the CS-80 synthesizer can be covered, in context, in the main
Yamaha CS-80 article.
Popcornfud (
talk)
13:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Keith Boykin. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to Keith Boykin; The article is only notable in that it is associated with its creator. It only has one non-primary source, and I could not find any others that adress the website directly, just the creator of the website. ArcticSeeress ( talk) 12:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing, no consensus. No discussion in two weeks and no special reason to relist for a third time. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 10:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Not notable, no coverage Ironmatic1 ( talk) 03:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
10:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
12:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fox Feature Syndicate#Fox characters. History is available if anyone believes there is content that should be merged. RL0919 ( talk) 22:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I've prodded this last yaer with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". While it has been improved, I am afraid this hasn't been sufficient - the article is still just a publication history and plot summary, with zero evidence of significance (no reception, analysis, etc.). The only evidence of wider context is a sentence in the lead that describes the phenomane of WWII-era US patriotic superheroes (a likely notable topic), but that doesn't mean all such superheroes are notable. Some certainly are, but this one I am afraid does not. I recommend SOFTDELETE and redirecting to Fox_Feature_Syndicate#Fox_characters, maybe a small merge too. But unless we can find a reception of this that meets WP:SIGCOV and goes beyond one-two sentences of plot summary (as in the sources cited), I am afraid there is no compelling reason to keep this as a stand-alone entry (interestingly, it seems there is more coverage of its collectibe pinback button than of the chracter itself...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Goldsztajn (
talk)
07:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Melissa d'Arabian. RL0919 ( talk) 22:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Yet another contested prod. I got several hits on ProQuest, but most of them were along the lines of "Melissa d'Arabian, host of Ten Dollar Dinners, to do blah blah blah." Almost none were about the show itself, save for the one Longview source I added. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "Ten Dollar Dinners. The Food Network is a must-watch for the dining-obsessed who could save a few dollars by learning easy, cheap recipes. And Melissa d’Arabian’s “Ten Dollar Dinners” is a good place for the novice cook to start. She focuses on cheap and easy dinners that can feed a family and takes the pledge literally: four people, $10. Yes, she proves it is possible to eat Kale chips and shrimp scampi on a budget. The show airs weekdays on the Food Network."
The article notes: "... said Melissa d'Arabian, whose show "Ten Dollar Dinners" reflects the frugal yet tasty philosophy that earned her the top place in season five of "The Next Food Network Star," a kind of "American Idol" for the cooking set. ... Understanding simple flavor profile and having them at the ready is a big part of "Ten Dollar Dinners," which is premised on feeding a family of four for $10 or less."
The article notes: "ut d'Arabian had a few tricks up her sleeve that helped her ace the competition and earn her her own Food series, "Ten Dollar Dinners if With Melissa d'Arabian," which is still popular three seasons later. ... So by the time she wed her French-born husband, Philippe, at age 34 and produced four daughters over the next three years, she was well prepared to switch gears from helping the House of Mouse save cash and make wise investments to making the d'Arabian house run just as smoothly - and, via "Ten Dollar Dinners," the households of her frugal fans."
The article notes: "The new name of Melissa d'Arabian's Food Network series is Ten Dollar Dinners. ... The former Keller stay-at-home mom, who now lives near Seattle, won her own show Sunday night on The Next Food Network Star."
The article notes: "Just over a week ago, 40-year-old mom and self-taught cook Melissa d'Arabian of Kirkland, Wash., was named "The Next Food Network Star" for the show's fifth season. In her new show, "Ten Dollar Dinners," which premiered Sunday, d'Arabian shows viewers how to make creative, tasty meals while adhering to the promise of "four people, 10 bucks, infinite possibilities." Using her own recipes and tips culled from her experience as a home cook, d'Arabian's budget-friendly meals include approachable Parisian and Moroccan menus and sophisticated upgrades for everyday fare such as chicken or pork."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I found a few press releases announcing the show's hosts, but as we all know, press releases are WP:PRIMARY sources. It's also mentioned in passing in various articles about new shows debuting or being renewed on PAX, but that's the key phrase: "in passing". No reviews seem to have been published at any point in the show's history, nor did it do anything worthy of media attention outside a couple "Local X to appear on It's a Miracle" type human-interest stories which are not enough on their own to support the article. This show was just... there for its entire life. I'm not expecting FA-level coverage on a no-budget Christian show on a network that doesn't even exist anymore, but this one seems to have flown completely under the radar. However, the show's relatively long shelf life (six seasons) is the only reason I'm sending this to AFD and not PROD. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
The book provides 247 words of coverage about the subject. The book notes that It's a Miracle was first telecast September 6, 1998, and last telecast August 12, 2006. The book lists the hosts: Billy Dean (1998), Nia Peeples (1998–1999), Richard Thomas (1998–2003), and Roma Downey (2003–2004). The book notes: "Each episode of this inspirational series presented several incidents in which miracles had changed or saved the lives of people. Most segments used re-creations of the actual incidents, with the real people describing what had happened to them, and in some cases actually participating. After their stories had been told, some of them were introduced to the studio audience in the theater from which It's a Miracle originated. Among the topics were medical miracles, dreams and visions, guardian angels, premonitions, and warning voices. One segment told of a man who didn't understand why he had been drawn to the Hermosa Beach Pier until meeting a fisherman with whom he became friendly. He found that his kidneys were a perfect match for the fisherman's, who needed a transplant to save his life. In another a man survived the crash of his small plane when he was guided by an angelic presence, and got out of the burning plane just before it exploded. Each episode also included a few "miraculous moments"—short man-on-the-street-type interviews with people who related what they believed to have been miracles in their lives." The book provides one more paragraph about the show.
The article notes: "Producers of the PAX network show, It's a Miracle, thought the hospital would make a good location for filming a re-enactment of a "miracle," and it turned several hospital employees into actors. ... Actor Richard Thomas hosts the show, which began in 1998 and re-creates true-life accounts of miracles. ... The miracle filmed Monday was related to the story of Sandy Rish, 49, of Fullerton. She played herself in the film. ... At the hospital, the film crew shot in the radiology unit for an MRI scene, in an emergency room, in a patient room in acute rehabilitation and in an operating room. ... It's a Miracle -- a 60-minute reality-based show -- is aired locally at 8 p.m. Thursdays on Channel 8. Rish's story has yet to be scheduled."
The article notes: "Two different producers of the PAX TV cable station picked up on both of these stories separately, and a crew arrived in Wallowa County from Los Angeles last week to recreate the stories for its popular "It's a Miracle" program hosted by Roma Downey. ... Filming started on the Hileman story Sunday morning at the Wallowa County Sheriff's Office, the nerve center for the search for her in the fall of 2002. It was moved later in the day to the Dave Nelson place in Allen Canyon in rural Lostine. ... Filming continued until after dark and through Monday, when Mischelle Hileman and her parents, Benny and Jan, who live also live on Allen Canyon Road, were interviewed and filmed. ... Among those who played a part in the TV reenactment were Bill Lehr and Marilyn Siefert, the friends ..."
The article notes: "Richard Thomas, whose role as John-Boy in The Waltons was as wholesome as wholesome gets, will host family friendly PAX TV's show It's a Miracle, Paxson Communications Chairman Lowell "Bud" Paxson said Wednesday. Thomas joins actress Nia Peeples as co-host of the show, replacing country singer Billy Dean. The change is set for this Sunday. ... It's a Miracle is a one-hour weekly series that airs at 9 p.m. Sunday. The program tells stories of real-life miracles, such as a pet that saved family members' lives and the success of a young man who started life as a drug-addicted, abandoned baby."
The article notes: "Mike Downey's miraculous survival from a surfing accident in January will be a featured segment on an upcoming episode of TV's "It's a Miracle" on the Pax Network. A film crew was in town Friday and Saturday to interview those involved and to re-enact the accident that almost claimed the Los Osos resident and professional surfer's life. Christopher Poole, a freelance director working on Downey's story, has worked for the reality show since it began. Now entering its sixth season, the show will have eight new episodes, with the re-enactment of Downey's near-death experience set for airing in mid-October, said Poole. Actor Richard Thomas, of The Waltons fame, is the host of the show."
The article notes: "A feel-good story about a watch that lay at the bottom of Phillips Lake for 68 years until it was unearthed by a determined scuba diver will be featured early next year on the Pax Network show, "It's a Miracle." ... Hosted by actor Richard Thomas, "It's a Miracle" airs Thursdays at 8 p.m. on Channel 33. A four-member crew from Los Angeles will visit the Bangor area next week to begin filming for the 15-minute segment, which will combine interviews of the actual participants with recreated scenes."
The article notes: "The true story of a Fairfield man whose ring was lost last year in Waterville before it turned up in a box of golf clubs in Florida will air at 8 p.m. Thursday on the PAX TV show, "It's A Miracle." The show, hosted by Richard Thomas of "The Waltons" fame, is available through Adelphia cable as well as via regular broadcast in some areas. The show will recount the saga of Jonathan Klane, 41, of Fairfield, who lost a 70-year-old ring in February 2001. ... "It's a Miracle" producers contacted Klane last year after a story about his experience appeared in the Morning Sentinel as well as on the Internet. A television crew from California came to Waterville last June and filmed the show at locations including Larsen's Jewelry Store on Main Street, and Mail-It-Quik on College Avenue, according to Klane, who appears in the show."
The article notes: "The most enduring Pax original is "It's a Miracle" (10 p.m. weeknights), in which Richard Thomas ("The Waltons") introduces feel-good stories of reunions and rescues (tonight, a moose is saved!), all badly re-enacted but calculated to ensure a much better night's sleep than watching the news ever would."
The article notes: "It turns out that Pax is more successful when it doesn’t try to clone “Touched By an Angel.” Take “It’s a Miracle” (), for example. Starting its second season Thursday night at 8, “It’s a Miracle” is sort of a reality-based news show, Pax-style. Host Richard Thomas reports on modern-day miracles, which are told in reenactments and in interviews with the people who witnessed them. Corny as they may be, you’d have to have a heart made out of concrete not to like the stories on “It’s a Miracle,” especially the one about a beloved dog named Sailor who was so sick he would have been euthanized if not for the intervention of another dog named Angel."
The article notes: "It's a Miracle (Thursdays) can get pretty gooey, too, but unlike the superior "Twice in a Lifetime," it's a stranger-than-fiction approach to perfectly plausible events with more or less happy endings. Host Richard Thomas (John Boy on "The Waltons") lends some credibility because he projects sincerity. But the title, and worse, the melodramatic tone of the stories, seem excessive for the kinds of events the show chronicles."
The article notes: "Another TV veteran, Richard Thomas, plays the chipper host of It's a Miracle, beginning its second season on Thursday. The show is a hybrid of Rescue 911 and Dateline - the cheapie graphics recall the NBC newsmagazine. The show mixes tacky re-enactments of unusual incidents and interviews with those who lived through them. There are astonishing recoveries by a lifeless patient in the operating room and by a declining dog visited by a pooch named Angel."
The article notes: "Elizabeth's story will be profiled tonight on Pax network's It's A Miracle series, airing today at 8 p.m. on satellite networks and at 11 p.m. on cable. The episode, hosted by Roma Downey, will be a combination of a re-creation of the event and interviews with the family."
The article notes: "Marty Rosenblum is not an actor. He's the suite-catering supervisor at Gund Arena. But a friend who is a casting agent thought he would be just right for a part in Pax TV's "It's a Miracle.""
The article notes: "More than a year ago, Carol McAdams prepared for her television debut. The story of a dulcimer and her search for a connection to her father landed her a segment on PAX-TV's show It's a Miracle. The show is hosted by Richard Thomas, made famous by his role as John-Boy on the popular 1970s series The Waltons. McAdams' segment, titled Instrument of God, will air tonight at 8. ... McAdams re-enacted her story for a film crew in Asheboro in January 2001. Both Collectors Antique Mall and Evans Music Center were used as locations during taping. Richard Evans of Evans Music Center also is featured in McAdams' segment."
The article notes: "Actress-singer Nia Peeples will join country crooner Billy Dean as co-host of fledgling Pax TV's "It's a Miracle." ... Story categories include romantic miracles, answered prayers, angel encounters, medical miracles, good Samaritans, miracles from the animal kingdom and children's inspirational stories."
The article notes: "It's a Miracle. What it's about: Think Unsolved Mysteries meets Oprah. Producers re-create miracles, then interview the people involved. You'll hear about dogs who saved little boys from drowning and lovers who fell in love at an organ donors convention. Wait . . . the producers swear It's A Miracle won't turn into a sleazy, reality-based show. ... It's hosted by the odd-couple pair of Nia Peebles (Dance Party) and country singer Billy Dean. If the stories are boring, at least we know the hosts can sing and dance."
I will spend time looking at the second source, Peralta 2002 . The article says that actor Richard Thomas is the show's host, the show began in 1998, the show is in its fifth season, the show is 60 minutes, Peter Jackson is the field producer of the show, the show "re-creates true-life accounts of miracles", interviewing people involved in the miracle takes roughly a day, and filming takes two to three days. The article discusses the production details of an episode involving Sandy Sish who had had seizures. It says that San Clemente Hospital was chosen to reenact the "miracle" and that hospital employees became actors for the episode. The hospital employees who acted in the episode included a doctor from a San Clemente hospital, a nurse, a physical therapist, a radiologist, and two operating room surgical technicians. Further production details are that filming took place in "the radiology unit for an MRI scene, in an emergency room, in a patient room in acute rehabilitation and in an operating room". The substantial coverage of the production and background constitutes significant coverage of the television show.
These two sources are enough for It's a Miracle to meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. The other sources provide production details about other episodes; examples are Dickenson 2004 , Farrell 2003 , and Calder 2002 .
The article provides 67 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "It's a Miracle (Thursdays) can get pretty gooey, too, but unlike the superior "Twice in a Lifetime," it's a stranger-than-fiction approach to perfectly plausible events with more or less happy endings. Host Richard Thomas (John Boy on "The Waltons") lends some credibility because he projects sincerity. But the title, and worse, the melodramatic tone of the stories, seem excessive for the kinds of events the show chronicles."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
this is a WP:BLP1E with lots of other BLP implications - I fail to see how he's notable even for a crime, much less as an academic. PRAXIDICAE💕 11:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Limited participation and no agreement after two relists. RL0919 ( talk) 22:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept at last AFD because it was the last role for one of the actors, but this alone is not an assertation of notability if there is nothing else to say about the film. I was unable to find any actual reviews, just a bunch of obituaries on Rod Steiger that mentioned this movie in passing. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 10:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Bill that did not pass, and received no coverage beyond its introduction in the 117th United States Congress, i.e. failing WP:LASTING. Not to be confused with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which this bill sought to update. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
PRODded with notability concerns, but it had already been prodded in 2010 over unclear concerns about original research that likely regarded content that is no longer in the article. Only current source is IMDB, Allmovie has no reviews ( Part 1, Part 2), and the miniseries is not even on Rotten Tomatoes. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
The book provides 2.25 pages of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth (2003) U.S.; dir. Pierre de Lespinois; Evergreen Films/Discovery Channel. 2 49-min. parts; color. Producer, Bill Latka; writers, Brian Fagan, Sandra Gregory, Bill Latka; music, Dean Grinsfelder; narrators, Linda Hunt, John Slattery."
The book further notes: "Dramatic reenactments (including computer-generated images of extinct animals) show the lives of Homo Erectus, Neanderthals and early Cro-Magnons, including the use of fire and tools and the development of communications. There are several brief segments titled "How We Know What We Know" which discuss fossils and other evidence on which the program is based. ... This excellent documentary packs a lot of information into its little dramas. The first part is about humans whose bodies and brains were different from ours. The second part deals with anatomically-modern humans. Humans advance from scavengers to predators. People first speak not at all, then fluently. ... Of course the reenactments are speculative but they reflect sophisticated, up-to-date information about prehistoric man. ... The stories are dramatically effective precisely because they are convincing. The tale of the Neanderthals' failing in their last hunt is perhaps the saddest scene in any prehistoric film or TV show, while the story of the three incredibly brave Berringian women killing the mammoth is probably the most terrifying and awe-inspiring scene involving early humans. There are no films that do as much as this program to encourage respect for our ancient ancestors."
The article notes: "The series started yesterday with the premiere of Before We Ruled the Earth. The two-hour programme looked at the development of humankind from as far back as 1.7 million years ago in Africa. Hunt or be Hunted, the first part of the programme, featured the evolution of early humans, Homo Ergaster. In the world of scavengers, it was men against beasts. However over the years, men made major progress with the discovery of fire and various uses of stone. From scavengers, men became predators. ... To end the week-long series, dinosaurs come into focus in When Dinosaurs Ruled: At the Ends of the Earth. A far cry from the action-packed movie Jurassic Park, this documentary showcases the toughness of dinosaurs which survived the extreme heat of Australia and the icy cold of Antarctica."
The article notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth is an odyssey of evolution, from Homo ergaster in Africa at 1.7 million years ago, to Paleo-Indians living in North America at 11,000 years ago. Detailed recreations of hominid life over seven time periods, stunning wilderness locations, state of the art makeup effects and photo-realistic 3-D animated animals bring the past to life. Factual. Entertaining. Riveting."
The article notes: "SUNDAY ON THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL at 8 p.m. "Before We Ruled the Earth" airs two one-hour episodes, "Hunt or Be Hunted" about the Homo ergaster who scavenged to survive in Africa 1.7 million years ago, and "Mastering the Beast" about the Cro-Magnons 15,000 years ago, who possessed all of the abilities of modern humans: speech, reasoning skills and a belief in the afterlife. The program combines dramatizations with photo-realistic animated creatures."
The article notes (my bolding): "75. Sound Editing for Nonfiction Programming (Single or Multicamera): "American Experience: Seabiscuit," PBS; "American Masters: Joni Mitchell: Woman of Heart and Mind," PBS; "Before We Ruled the Earth," Discovery Channel; "James Cameron's Expedition: Bismarck," Discovery Channel; "Unchained Memories: Readings From the Slave Narratives," HBO."
The article profiles Pierre de Lespinois. The article notes: "In 1999 de Lespinois founded his own company Evergreen Films, based in Pacific Palisades, California. Impressed by Verne, Discovery Communications came knocking, which resulted in their 2001 co-development of Montreal-based Meteor Studios for the latest visual effects and digital animation. "In the first year, we delivered forty films," he says. A dozen more were due to wrap by Christmas, including Before We Ruled the Earth and Prehistoric Worlds, upcoming on Discovery."
The article notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth offers the latest scientific knowledge on evolution from early Homo sapiens' fight for survival over seven time periods. Speed: Without Limits takes viewers on a fast-paced look at the world behind the wheel."
The article notes: "Discovery Channel's Before We Ruled the Earth airs two one-hour episodes at 8 p.m. Sunday: "Hunt or Be Hunted" deals with the Homo ergaster who scavenged to survive in Africa 1.7 million years ago; "Mastering the Beast" is about the Cro-Magnons 15,000 years ago."
The article notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth. 8 p.m. Sunday on The Discovery Channel. A new two-hour special on evolution that examines the first days of our lives, or rather, our ancestors', from Africa's Homo ergaster 1.7 million years ago to the paleo-Indians of North America 11,000 years ago. Filmed in wilderness areas around the world, with dramatizations using photo-realistic animated creatures."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. no further discussion of sources following the initial relist, one more keep argument made since second relist. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 10:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 05:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more time to discuss the sources provided
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
03:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Participants rightly pointed out that county boards of education are not covered by WP:NPOL. The article may be re-created when the subject holds a country/state-wide office or when sufficient sources are available. Modussiccandi ( talk) 19:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable, fails WP:NPOL. Balchandra Upendra ( talk) 00:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. consensus appears keep, and no discussion for three days except for one more keep vote. Closing as there is a clear consensus and no active discussion. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 11:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination on behalf of the subject, whose request ( with permission) is copied below. Primefac ( talk) 10:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia:
I am the subject of a Wikipedia page named "Charles L. Venable." I am an art collector and retired museum profession who now does occasional consulting. I do not now consider myself a truly notable person, and never have. In fact, I do not know why a page on me was ever created in the first place.
Especially troubling is the fact that the page is regularly reedited in what I consider a negative tone and an unbalanced viewpoint. This happened yet again recently when someone updated the page with new and accurate information, only to have one or more other editors remove most of that information and to cast the page negatively to the point of disparagement in my opinion.
Therefore, I formally request that the page "Charles L. Venable" be permanently deleted.
Sincerely,
Charles L. Venable
If there's a Wikipedia policy that the subject's wishes take priority over notability guidelines- there isn't, just the recommendation that in borderline cases we acquiesce to their request. Primefac ( talk) 11:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete.CT55555 ( talk) 14:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment I think so far we have five or six single purpose accounts, whose entire edit history is on the topic of Mr Veneble. I would encourage who ever closes this to take a quick look at the edit history of each of the editors whose name is in red to assess if there is an unlikely pattern of new editors all starting their wikipedia journey on this specific page, or perhaps something else happening. CT55555 ( talk) 03:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
a look on the web for "dream pets" returns online games.
the only ref in the article is a book that refers to dream pets in only two pages. 何をしましたか? 那晚安啦。 07:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mongoose Publishing. Participants are encouraged to move over verifiable information as they see fit. Modussiccandi ( talk) 19:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
non-notable game, unsourced article FMSky ( talk) 06:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG. Local road, no claim of notability/significance. Sources confirm it exists, mention some rail crossing improvements, but do not demonstrate there is more than routine local coverage. MB 06:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft redirect to Tatts Group. Star Mississippi 14:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable organization failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The references aren't indicating any sign of notability. Chirota ( talk) 05:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tabcorp. Star Mississippi 14:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable organization failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The references aren't indicating any sign of notability. Chirota ( talk) 05:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Responding the the redirection of this article. There are a range of articles within Australian Lotteries that need improvement and better referencing. Including this one. Can I suggest that this page be redirected to /info/en/?search=The_Lottery_Corporation instead of Tabcorp. In May Tabcorp demerged its lottery and keno businesses and a new company was formed (The Lottery Corporation) and is independent from Tabcorp i.e. there is no legal or commercial relationship. The new company owns The Lott and all the State Government licences for lotteries in Australia, excluding Western Australia. The company is composed of the 100 year history of being the biggest lottery provider in Australia including owning all the State licenced businesses (NSW Lotteries, Tatteralls, SA Lotteries, Golden Casket) and previous companies such as Tatts Group. There is a lot of media coverage and documentation to verify the structure of this business and notoriety in Australia (Majority of Australian population have purchased a lottery product from the company's licencees at some point in time) That are also a major taxation source for State Governments.
If it suits, I am in the process of expanding the article relating to The Lottery Corporation with appropriate referencing and inclusion of The Lott and the lottery brands it represents. I am happy to take guidance on the best way forward to clean up that page and the other Australia Lotteries articles in Wikipedia. Mantuku ( talk) 04:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I'm nominating this page for deletion based on it being WP:DISPUTED and it lacking notability. I already marked it for normal deletion on the 19th, but it was removed by an admin a day later on the basis that its talk page merits an Articles of Deletion discussion be had. And I mean totally deleted, not a redirection or anything. The word "hitaikakushi" must be expunged.
The current Talk page is in agreement, however, that the article is both unnotable and flagrantly misleading at best. As was already stated there, the minuscule article's content has already been present in entirety on Yūrei for a while. Pretty sure this is WP:NOPAGE. It fits better within context in Yūrei. The article of clothing here does not even has its own Japanese page, as was stated before on the talk page.
Aside from all of that, it's just plain wrong (as was also discussed about in the talk page). The term "hitaikakushi" (額隠し) used in reference to this article of clothing is incredibly obscure to non-existent in Japanese sources. As shown in the talk page (yeah IDK if I have to keep restating that), the most comprehensive Japanese dictionaries do not list the triangular headpiece that yūrei wear as a definition for 額隠し. If you search up "額隠し" on Google you will not find any pictures of that headwear from Japanese results. The only currently proposed source that claims "hitaikakushi" is a valid word used to describe this head garment is Zack Davisson on both his blog [15] and book Yūrei: The Japanese Ghost. However, these non-academic, uncited sources seem to cross the threshold into WP:DUBIOUS. I also noted that "hitaikakushi" was among the last of a list of words he chose to describe this cloth.
The actual most commonly accepted name for this headwear is tenkan (天冠). In fact, it's the first word Zack Davisson uses in both of his writings on the topic. I don't think changing the article's name is enough. It should be deleted. There is an absolute dearth of reputable sources on the topic in Japanese. The only one I could find is [16] (again, 天冠 is used most here). I can find zero sound sources in English. The reason I proposed deletion in the first place was because I kept seeing this article of clothing being referred to as "hitaikakushi" in pop culture fandom spaces (basically the only other place besides academia that widely discusses these things). Everywhere on the English WEB calls this thing "hitaikakushi", a word Japanese people don't even use in that context, and it all traces back to this Wikipedia page. What's more interesting is that Zack Davisson's blog post and book were made in 2011, 5 years after the "Hitakakushi" page was originally created. He may have gotten it from here. Given how long it's been I wouldn't be surprised if it found its way into other English published media. This citogenesis can not go on any longer.
I originally planned to mark the page for Speedy Deletion before regular Deletion since I thought the case was clear-cut. I'm miffed that it's gone all the way here. In the end you'd be hard pressed to find any good sources for this article of clothing. Your best bet would be Japanese research papers and scholarly publications. Even then, I believe there wouldn't be enough content to add to the article to make it notable. It's weird that this stub has persisted for over 15 years and weirder that it's this hard to delete when it's been actively propagating misinfo. Apologies in advanced for my breaking of any of Wikipedia's myriad etiquette norms or rules or the like. I'm new (made an account solely for this) and never thought there'd be this many bureaucratic hoops to jump through. Hisouhihisouten ( talk) 05:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Candidates for political offices are not automatically notable - WP:NPOL - and subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG Melcous ( talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is clear that the sourcing Cunard identified is sufficient. Star Mississippi 14:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 April 19 didn't have a consensus to endorse or overturn the previous "no consensus" close, but numerous people recommended a new discussion that considers new sources presented during the DRV and the DRV instructions allow a new AFD when there isn't a consensus, so here we are. This is a procedural nomination; I am myself neutral. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 11:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
This is an encyclopedia entry about El Comité 1973. The entry provides three paragraphs of coverage about the magazine. From Google Translate:
According to a translation of es:Enciclopedia de la Literatura en México, "The Encyclopedia of Literature in Mexico (ELEM) is an encyclopedia on Mexican literature edited by the Fundación de las Letras Mexicanas, supported by the Ministry of Culture and the National Institute of Fine Arts and Literature of Mexico."The magazine El Comité 1973 is a Mexican, digital and bimonthly magazine produced since July 30, 2012 by the literary group "El Comité", dedicated to dissemination, criticism and literary creation. Its mission is to spread literary texts and visual works of different creators in order to increase the culture of people around the world. As for the year that is part of the name, 1973, it alludes to the date of the death of the poet Pablo Neruda, which, in some way, tries to be a tribute to this Nobel Prize winner, whom Gabriel García Márquez called: "the greatest 20th century poet in any language”."
This article was published by es:El Sol de Hidalgo. From Google Translate: "El Sol de Hidalgo is a local newspaper from the city of Pachuca de Soto, in Mexico. It is one of the newspapers with the highest circulation and sales in the city and in the state, one reason is that its cost is low compared to other newspapers. It is owned and a member of the Mexican Editorial Organization, the largest journalistic company in Mexico."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep, as per rationale provided by Cunard. Chirota ( talk) 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Every topo which shows this point indicates that it is one corner of a complicated rail junction. There's no sign of habitation in either maps or aerials. Mangoe ( talk) 04:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
despite no actual source being given. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)The list is reliably sourced, and people can easily check the information against the source
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Leftovers from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Shop Corner, Virginia; topographic maps and general searching confirm that these are named road junctions, not communities. Fail WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
Also included in this nomination are:
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current sources on the article are trivial. A google search doesn't turn up anything substantive. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current sources on the article are trivial. A google search doesn't turn up anything substantive. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to World Jewish Congress. Star Mississippi 17:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Non notable organisation; the sources only estabilsh that WP:ITEXISTS. Amisom ( talk) 10:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under New Page Patrol. No indication of notability under GNG or SNG. Only a stats reference. Tagged since April 26th with no further development North8000 ( talk) 02:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Zoe Abbott
This article about this financial consultant appears to have been written to praise her rather than to describe her neutrally. The text of the article does not establish how she is notable; based on the article, she could be notable, but she could be a run-of-the-mill investment consultant. A check of the references answers any question about whether this article should be kept. All of the references are either interviews of varying degrees of promotion, or puff pieces. There is no secondary coverage.
Number | Reference | Remarks | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Influencerhustle.com | An interview that appears to be promotional | No | Yes | No | |
2 | Voyagetampa.com | Another promotional interview | No | Yes | No | |
3 | Fox13news.com | A more neutral interview | Not really | Yes | No | |
4 | tricitydaily.com | An article that reads like an advertisement | No | Yes | No | |
5 | globalnewswire.com | Another interview | No | Yes | No | |
6 | Forbesindia.com | A story about the subject that reads like a puff piece | Yes | Yes | No | |
7 | Finance.yahoo.com | An interview that reads like an advertisement | No | Yes | No |
If she is notable, then this article should go into a bit bucket before a neutral editor starts a biography of a living person. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia articles about a person, company or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts.The globalnewswire.com source is a press release, reprinted at Finance.yahoo.com. Influencerhustle is "a World Wide Magazine that Organizes The very best of all Top Hustlers Truths and highlights their Greatest Successes to inspire future hustlers to trust the process even when times are rough, to be true to themselves and others around them, and to learn to give wisdom on what it takes to make a sturdy well seasoned Hustle" and does not appear to have published editorial policies. While tricitydaily.com claims to clearly separate sponsored content, the vague but glowing bylined post reads like ad copy, and the Fox13 source is her promoting her business with minimal independent content. I got a security warning for VoyageTampa so I have not reviewed it, and the Forbes India article is clearly marked as a paid post. An online search does not turn up secondary coverage in independent and reliable sources, so WP:GNG is also not supported. Beccaynr ( talk) 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Local association that governs yoga in a provincial town of 44 thousand people, relying mainly on primary sources. Not notable. Mccapra ( talk) 03:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable TV movie. Current sources in article are unreliable. Couldn't find any reliable sourcing, or even what network it aired on. Prod contested. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Kusma is right that this is really a move discussion. I wanted to close it anyway per WP:NOTBURO but decided there really needs to be a move discussion here given the impact on Epsilon numbers (mathematics). Any move discussion held should give consideration to the participation of editors here when determining that consensus. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
From internet search, I'm not sure that Vacuum permittivity or Relative permittivity is called the "epsilon number"; almost all results are about Epsilon numbers (mathematics). However, Epsilon 0 would be a valid disambiguation page that would include only Vacuum permittivity and Epsilon numbers (mathematics). If deleted or moved, Epsilon numbers (mathematics) will be moved to the base title. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 03:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Duplicates content in Chili pepper#Intensity and additional information only serves as advertisement for a company. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per WP:G11. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Promotional and unsourced BLP. Uses social media followers/users/streamers to assert notability. Blue Riband► 02:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There really isn't much to these relations, no embassies, no agreements. The article includes factoids such as Georgia supporting Kenya against terrorism and a bunch of Kenyan musicians performing in Georgia. LibStar ( talk) 02:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. G5, but for avoidance of further issues, this also would have been eligible to be deleted on notability guidelines so sockpuppetry is not the sole issue. Star Mississippi 16:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Half of the sources are either unreliable or search results on news websites. The other half of those sources are about films or TV series of which this person is one of the staff members (something like "X series by A. Najafzadeh will be released soon"). Looking for sources results in same sources provided in the articles and i guess there is no more sources about this person and/or his works. There is not enough coverage to establish WP:GNG even for films and TV series. Jeeputer ( talk) 03:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: as neither keep !vote is based in policy
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete as not meeting the notability standard for lists. RL0919 ( talk) 22:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Long list, but not a source in sight. None of these are verified in any way. Just like the other "list of people on the postage stamps of X", there is no interest in maintaining this topic, nor does there seem to be a reason to maintain this information. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. SL93 ( talk) 23:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Destination America#Former programming. ✗ plicit 03:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Not a notable show. Previously deleted via prod in 2019 Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 03:11, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Film appears to fail WP:NFILM, nothing but database listings. No reviews.
DEPROD with rationale "AfD it, not for PROD" DonaldD23 talk to me 21:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 21:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 22:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 22:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:VAGUEWAVE.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable security consultant. I can't find any sources that meet WP:42, and the only news results that come up from a search are a few interviews. >>> Ingenuity. talk(); 23:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
More leftovers from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Shop Corner, Virginia, where they were not individually discussed. Searching indicates that these are apparently named road junctions, not communities; I can find no indication that any of them meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG.
Also included in this nomination are:
The result was delete. no consensus for or on redirect location Star Mississippi 02:46, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability; known for his one role only on One Life to Live. Bgsu98 ( talk) 22:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I found nothing that shows notability. Non-notable producer. SL93 ( talk) 22:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
If Battle of Voznesensk (1920) is notable, it needs its article. Otherwise, a hatnote leading to Voznesensk (or any other article that mentions it) does the job. (CC) Tbhotch ™ 22:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Each bulleted entry should have a navigable (blue) link, normally as the entry itself (see the previous bullet), or in the description if the entry is red-linked or unlinked.Please familiarize yourself with these guidelines before calling other editors' comments
pure nonsense. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 14:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 22:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable event. Sources seem to be self-source, bare mention, affiliated, or routine. valereee ( talk) 22:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
A thorough Google search finds no reliable and verifiable sources that would support a claim of notability. The article has been around for a decade and has never been expanded beyond a few dozen words. Alansohn ( talk) 21:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 21:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Single-market show, unlikely to be notable. De-prodded with a source added, but it's from the market the show aired in. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "The series of programs, called Math Country, will be filmed in color, and used in teaching math to second and third grade students across the state, beginning in September of this year, Lawrence Holden, KET producer said today. Math Country teaches by dramatic and comic example rather than by the use of a teacher on television, Holden said. ... The three young parts in Math Country were cast after a state-wide Talent Search conducted by KET in October of 1977, when hundreds of children auditioned for the parts at eight locations over the state. Over 140 child actors were finalists and had their auditions recorded by KET. Many will have small parts in the series."
The article notes: "Currently in pre-production, "Math Country" is a multi-part dramatic series which will be used as an educational supplement by second- and third-grade mathematics students in Kentucky. "Math Country" tells the story of Carol Hardway and her two children, Martha and Jerry. The family lives on a farm owned by Cousin Lionel Hardway, a 12-year-old millionaire banker who does not have an understanding of math."
The article notes: "The day is gray and rainy. Inside an old barn where a scene from KET's newest in-school production, "Math Country," is being taped, it's damp. Pigeons squawk from the rafters while below, the director of the series discusses the next shot with his crew. Three teenage actors climb on hay bales, laughing and joking with one another while awaiting the next scene. It's a typical day on location."
The article notes: "The three regular roles open are Jerry Hardway, a scout who likes being outdoors and is very much like most youngsters; Martha Hardway, an athlete and similar ot most youngsters; and Lionel Hardway, a 12-year-old millionaire banker, totally ignorant of math and who doesn't want to learn anything. Also available are supporting roles such as classmates, children next door and visitors to "Math Country."
According to one of the first pages of the book, the index "contains reviews and award citations for the many formats of film, videorecordings, and television programming".The book notes: "Math Country [TV] Kentucky Educational TV Series 1979 15M (each of 30). Agency for Instructinal TV Newsletter 10:2 Win/Spr79".
This confirms that Math Country was reviewed in the Agency for Instructional TV Newsletter published by the Agency for Instructional Television.
The book notes: "Math Country. Mathematics. 15 mins.; Beta, VHS, 3/4U; 30 progs. A series that places special emphasis on additional and subtraction operations, and on geometric and numerical patterns. Ideal for second and third graders."
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW, no reason to prolong this discussion now notability is proven and all votes are keep with no active current discussions. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Only aired on one affiliate. De-prodded with sources added, but they're from the market the show aired in, suggesting the show is of local interest only. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "A unique 13-week news/variety television series that will combine both comic and serious elements -- and be hosted and reported by "little people" -- will be produced for KDOC/56 and begin airing on Saturday nights in April. Entitled "Short Ribbs," the show is the brainchild of show business veteran and dwarf Billy Barty, whose infectious personality has made him a TV favorite in comedies and kids' shows since the 1950s."
The review notes: "Prognosis: It could survive beyond its 13-week order, but only if it improves drastically and/or KDOC proves desperate for original product. The concept for "Short Ribbs," a new locally produced variety series, sounded a little bizarre but somewhat intriguing when it was first broached last spring. Creator and performer Billy Barty planned to take a group of little people and create a satirical world in which normal-size adults are the freaks. The potential for social commentary was immense. That, unfortunately, isn't quite the way it turned out. Sadly, "Short Ribbs" is a disaster on every level. It's a lowbrow waste of a fun concept, an embarrassing stab at comedy that's almost impossible to watch without covering one's eyes."
The article notes: "Come Saturday night, when his comedy-variety series “Short Ribbs” debuts on Orange County’s KDOC-TV Channel 56, Barty, 65, hopes the half-hour show will enable other little people “to act like regular people.” ... Another recurring character, also played by Barty, is a consumer reporter named David Halfowitz. The other cast members, Patty Maloney, Jimmy Briscoe and Joe Gieb, are all veterans of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus."
The article note: "Bill Winckler, 25, said the dwarf actor has ignored a contract guaranteeing him pay for each script plus a percentage of syndication profits. The show, in which Barty starred, is described as a "Saturday Night Live"- type show cast mostly with "little people." It ran from September to December on KDOC (Channel 56) in Anaheim. ... Winckler filed his small claims suit in January after repeatedly asking Barty about pay for the pilot and scripts, he said. Winckler said he began working on the scripts in December 1988 and continued to provide them while the show aired."
The article notes: "Actor Billy Barty was ordered in small claims court Monday to pay a Woodland Hills writer $1,300 for his work on a television show called "Short Ribbs." Writer Bill Winckler, 25, and Barty, 65, both claimed victory outside the Van Nuys Municipal Courtroom after a hearing in which Barty said that he employed Winckler for about a year but did not pay him because his work was not satisfactory. ... Winckler said that he began working with the dwarf actor in December 1988, when he drafted a pilot script for the show, which is described as being similar to "Saturday Night Live" but using mostly dwarfs. Barty was the star of the show."
The article notes: "Billy Barty is being sued by a TV writer who says the dwarf actor owes him $2,000 for his help on the brief-run show Short Ribbs. Bill Winckler, 25, of Woodland Hills, Calif., said Barty has ignored a contract guaranteeing him pay for each script plus a percentage of syndication profits."
The article notes: "Diminutive actor Billy Barty is being sued in small claims court by a television writer who says the star owes him $2,000 for his help on the briefly run TV show "Short Ribbs.""
The article notes: "Barty said he considered Monday’s decision a win because he didn’t have to award 10% of future syndication profits for his show, “Short Ribbs,” to writer-producer Bill Winckler."
The article notes: "Actor Billy Barty was ordered to pay $428 to a television show writer who claimed that he wasn’t paid for creating several comedy sketches. Burbank Municipal Court Commissioner Dennis H. Shanklin on Monday granted the award to Warren Taylor for sketches he wrote for “Short Ribbs,” which aired last year on KDOC-TV in Anaheim and is no longer in production."
The article notes: "Both Barty and Clavin Brack, general manager of KDOC, said they hope the 13-week series, entitled "Short Ribbs," will be picked up for syndication after its scheduled debut in April."
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 02:48, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Only source is 404. No better sources found. As an interstitial series it's unlikely to have attracted attention on its own. prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:05, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The book notes: "CBS mounted another literacy project in 1979 in collaboration with the Library of Congress, called "Read More About It." At the outset, the Library of Congress annually selected 10 to 25 CBS "special" programs from outlines and summaries of future programs submitted by the network. At the end of each broadcast a featured performer from the cast spoke to the audience for 30 seconds, urging them to visit local libraries and bookstores to explore several books related to the program's content. Those titles, and a single-page list of other books reflecting a variety of perspectives on the topics, were chosen by bibliographer and reference librarians at The Library of Congress. ... During each season into the 1990s, some 40 CBS programs are chosen by The Library of Congress for the "Read More About It" messages."
The article note: "CBS agrees: since 1979 the "Read More About It" project, a cooperative venture between the Library of Congress' Center for the Book and the CBS network, has been promoting book titles on the air after programs of special literary interest. Here's how it works. Take the first show, for example. ... This season, book lists will accompany telecasts of ... Twice a year, whe nCBS knows its advance schedule they get in touch with the Center for the Book and a dozen or so programs which seem suitable are selected for "Read More About It." Then the book lists are made. There has been no formal survey of the impact of "Read More About It," but librarians across the country have written letters indicating a high degree of positive response from their communities."
The article notes: ""The Gift" marks the third presentation of the "Read More About It" project which provides on-air information about books related to the subjects of selected television programs. The brainchild of Librarian of Congress Daniel J. Boorstin, the project was developed through the Library's Center for the Book, which is charged by a 1977 Act of Congress with creating ways to promote reading."
The article notes: "[Angela] Lansbury's appearance was part of CBS's Read More About It program. Now in its ninth season, Read More About It has proved that the book and the tube can complement, rather than just compete with, each other. The project, which grew out of the symposium Television, the Book, and the Classroom, was the brainchild of then Librarian of Congress Daniel Boorstin. In 1978 Boorstin presented to all three networks his idea for a program that would encourage reading through television. CBS was the first to act on his suggestion and a campaign of thirty-second announcements linking broadcasts with related books began. Last season, CBS involved more than forty movies, miniseries, and specials ins project, including ... The CBS announcements all follow a prescribed script, altered only slightly since the program's inception ... "
The book notes: "1979: Library of Congress and CBS television launch "Read More About It" TV spots, directing viewers to books with more information about program topics. Actor Richard Thomas presents the first spot, following the made-for-TV movie "All Quiet on the Western Front," about World War I."
The book notes: "The Library of Congress/CBS Television "Read More About It" book project is the Center for the Book's best known promotion. Thirty-second reading messages from the Library of Congress send viewers to their local libraries and bookstores to "read more about" the subject of the program. Since 1979, more than 300 major CBS Television programs have included these reading recommendations. An estimated 20 million viewers, the largest audience ever reached by a "Read More About It" message, saw the announcement that suggested good books about baseball during the fourth game of the World Series on October 20, 1990."
The article notes: "A book co-authored by Fairlawn resident Katina Z. Jones was under consideration for the CBS Read More About It segment that will air after the SunDAY, movie. ... The four titles chosen by the Library of Congress for the Read More AboutIt segment are Children Support: A Complete, Up to Date Authoritative Guide to Collecting Child Support (1985) by Marianne Takas; The Child SupportSurvivor's Guide (1984) by Barry T. Schnell; Making Fathers Pay: TheEnforcement of Child Support (1979) by David L. Chambers; and Runaway Father, the book by Richard L. Rashke that served as the inspiration for the TV movie script by Stephanie Liss."
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Non-notable actor. SL93 ( talk) 20:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW, no reason to prolong this discussion now notability is proven and all votes are keep with no active current (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Deprodded with sources, but one is just a press release. I could hardly find anything better. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 20:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "The respondents are devoutly wishing for the same thing: a spot on a new cable-television show called "Inspiration, Please!" Billing itself as the first religious quiz show in TV history, "Inspiration, Please!" shuns sultry letter-turners and roulette-style wheels. The show's host is a Christian stand-up comic named Robert G. Lee, whose wife, Anne, calls him "the funny bone in the body of Christ." ... Inspiration, Please!" became a hit last year when it debuted on cable TV's Faith & Values channel, which is partly owned by a unit of cable giant Tele-Communications Inc. of Englewood, Colo. While the program's ratings are puny compared with shows on broadcast networks, Faith & Values says viewer response is strong. So strong, in fact, that the channel has ordered 52 new episodes and plans to make the program a daily feature this fall. ... But the success of "Inspiration, Please!" has made it the lightning rod in a storm over the soul of religious TV.To some viewers and rival religious broadcasters, "Inspiration, Please!" is proof that Faith & Values has sold out to mammon and Hollywood. ... "Inspiration, Please!" is taped in a cramped studio inside the historic 150-year-old Trinity Church on Wall Street in Manhattan."
The article notes: "Think of it as a mix of "Jeopardy!" without the greed, "Wheel of Fortune" without Vanna White, and other popular TV shows without the double entendres. What is left in "Inspiration, Please!" which bills itself as the first Bible quiz show, is an entertaining game that draws upon contestants' knowledge of the Bible and other spiritual resources. ... "Inspiration, Please!" is like a lot of other game shows in style with [Robert G.] Lee standing beside across a podium across from three contestants ready to pounce on buzzers in front of them."
The article notes: "Mann, 42, who shouts the answers while watching Jeopardy, answered an audition call for Inspiration, Please, a name inspired by the old quiz show Information, Please. The first 13 episodes, produced by Trinity Church in Manhattan, are scheduled for taping in mid-July. Beginning in October, they will appear on the Faith and Values Network, an interfaith cable station."
The article notes: "If you answered "lust," "the harp" and "Golgotha," you might be ready to audition for the "Inspiration Please?" TV game show, or at least to test your skills with a new book based on the show. The show, aired daily at 930 a.m. EDT on cable's Odyssey channel, recently completed taping 26 episodes. In November, Morrow will publish "The Inspiration Please? Trivia Quiz Book." A cross between "Trivial Pursuit" and "Wheel of Fortune," the 2-year-old show has won a following by taking a lighter approach to biblical literacy."
The article note: "Unto the Parish of Trinity Church there came an idea, and the idea was a weekly primetime TV religion game show. And verily, it came to pass. It's called "Inspiration, Please," a knock-off of an old radio and TV show called "Information, Please," and it starts in October on the Faith and Values Channel, which is carried on 1,450 cable systems piped into 24 million homes. ... Taping of the first 13 episodes starts in July at the Trinity Place studios in the heart of Wall Street. The grand prize is a trip for two to — of course — the Holy Land. The emcee is Roberg G. Lee, a Christian standup comic ..."
The article notes: "On the sleek set of the game show "Inspiration Please!," host Robert G. Lee is grilling his three contestants. "Which emperor made Christianity the Roman Empire's official religion?" ... This snappy half-hour game show on the Odyssey channel is part of a new brand of religious television."
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
TJ Hudson is a local politician who ran for a single statewide office. Treutlen County, Georgia is approximately 6,885. This is well below the threshold at least regional prominence defined under Wikipedia:POLOUTCOMES for local officials. I do not believe his candidacy does not pass the test that he could be referenced to such an unusual depth, range and volume of press coverage that her candidacy could be credibly claimed as much more special than everybody else's candidacies in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance (see Christine O'Donnell). He is an African-American first according to the article, but that is contradicted by List of first minority male lawyers and judges in Georgia. I believe that he therefore does not meet the notability standards for political figures. Mpen320 ( talk) 19:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Most likely non-notable football player according to WP:NCOLLATH. Additionally, there is only one source and it is a stats website. Capsulecap ( talk • contribs) 19:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:35, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
David Belle Isle is a local politician who ran for a single statewide office. Alpharetta, Georgia is approximately 67,213. This is well below the threshold at least regional prominence defined under Wikipedia:POLOUTCOMES. His candidacy does not pass the test that he could be referenced to such an unusual depth, range and volume of press coverage that her candidacy could be credibly claimed as much more special than everybody else's candidacies in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance (see Christine O'Donnell). I believe that he therefore does not meet the notability standards for political figures. Mpen320 ( talk) 19:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bathing#Bathing babies. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 ( talk) 20:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Violates WP:NOTGUIDE. Removing all the how-to stuff would get the article down to the very first sentence, so that is not a plausible option. Rewriting does not seem all that possible. Could be redirected to Bathing#Bathing babies. interstatefive ( talk) - just another roadgeek 19:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to George Floyd memorial (disambiguation)#Artwork. RL0919 ( talk) 21:37, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Completely subsumed by the disambiguation page George Floyd memorial (disambiguation), which is perfectly serviceable, much more comprehensive, and created by the same editor who made this one. On top of that, this page only features two links: one of which is to an actual article, but the other of which is to a short section of the article George Floyd Square occupied protest. Even if this page weren't wholly redundant to the other disambiguation page, there would still be no compelling argument for keeping it, because it only exists to link to one article and one relatively narrow portion of another. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:53, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Not notable, less than 30 citations in total for published papers (I could find only 2 papers, and they are both primary sources/original research) relating to BHDL on Scholar (note, many articles containing 'BHDL' are not related to the BHDL as defined on this Wikipedia page). Simple Google Search shows nothing about BHDL, have to use "double quotes" search function to find related results. No citations and references are dead/out-of-date/primary sources Hadal1337 ( talk) 18:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 21:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Minor fictional character in a Sri Lankan TV series, not even protagonist. The protag character or any other characters from series doesn't even have pages. Appears to be WP:PROMOTION for the actress. UtoD 17:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 21:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The term Jaiswar is not mentioned in any of the articles listed and thus fail WP:DABMENTION. I could not see any existing article with content that would support a redirect. older ≠ wiser 17:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 17:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
It's been over a year since I tagged this for notability and she still doesn't meet WP:ENT. No new major roles in films or television. No solo music career. Recommend redirect to GFriend. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 17:24, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. A total WP:SNOW deletion. JBW ( talk) 19:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Per this discussion at the Cricket Project, concerns and doubts have been raised about this trophy actually existing. All the sources hint at the possibility of giving the Test series between Bangladesh and India a name, but nothing from any reliable cricket source (ICC, Cricinfo, etc) have confirmed this to be the case. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pynns Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Same topic is found at Pynns Brook, Newfoundland and Labrador Mebigrouxboy ( talk) 16:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
The article lacks sufficient independent sourcing to demonstrate that Mr. Evans meets the requirements of the general notability guidelines and the subject specific notability guidelines for academics. It has previously been speedily deleted under G11, however it does not read as unambiguous promotion, and I think it's likely Mr. Evans does meet WP:NPROF - the article just doesn't show it. Please note this is a procedural nomination on my part - I am not !voting either keep or delete at this time, and I have done limited WP:BEFORE. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 16:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
References provide only passing mention of the organization and are mostly about polarity therapy, not the organization. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:ORGCRITE. Search finds nothing better. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mccapra. Hope you are doing well. Thanks for your inputs on this article . However it is the only Organisation globally certifying members as therapists in Polarity and hence I feel the nomination for deletion for this article is not correct. I request this article could stay for public interest and making Wikipedia a good informational platform. Kindly suggest. Thanks. Gardenkur ( talk) 02:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Mccapra. Thanks for your reply. I understand it doesnt have substantial coverage. However the theraphy certified by it is widely recognised. For the informational sources based on that cant we include the organisation supporting it. Gardenkur ( talk) 07:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relists, we have some support for deletion, some for merging/redirection (but with different suggestions for where), and some for keeping (with a list of sources that was not responded to). Perhaps further discussion of the merge/redirect options elsewhere can produce a non-deletion solution, but at this point there is no consensus for deletion. RL0919 ( talk) 21:52, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Lack of notability or secondary sources that make it notable. Gabe114 ( talk) 17:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
16:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 16:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
i think this may be a hoax in terms of notability and even existence - I can't find anything in terms of sourcing to support it's inclusion much less existence, even their own website doesn't verify the content. I've searched google books, google news and newspapers for both Ethan Farrell (as it pertains to clothing/business as opposed to the young actor) and Ethan James and I can't find anything. A google search of "Embrace by Ethan James" for the perfume also brings back all Wikipedia mirrors. Their archived website doesn't even exist save for a placeholder and there really just isn't anything I can find to support a single statement here. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
doesn't appear to be a notable crime or person as tragic as it may be and despite the sentencing seeming excessive, it's pretty normal in these cases and this set of crimes doesn't appear to have received any significant national or international attention. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. Fails WP:BIO. SL93 ( talk) 15:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Very poor low quality referencing, passing mentions and interviews. One film won an award. Potentially notable. scope_creep Talk 15:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
2008 no consensus shortly after launch. But other than run of the mill announcements following its launch, there is nothing to indicate ORG compliant sourcing. URL is dead, which makes me think alliance is no longer, and never established notability while it existed. Star Mississippi 13:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:51, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The article lacks sources, and a Google search found nothing. Appears to fail GNG, which wins over NFOOTY which is now gone. ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 13:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Assam cricketers. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. The recent trend at AFD has been more skepticism of sports biographies where the subject had minimal professional play, but in this case the subject's larger number of appearances and the possibility of non-English sources has led to the benefit of the doubt. RL0919 ( talk) 21:57, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
This app does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Having a large valuation or being part of an accelerator program does not make a company notable on its own. >>> Ingenuity. talk(); 14:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. My google was apparently broken when searching. Star Mississippi 21:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
I love this series, but cannot find any evidence of notability or any discussion of the series. Publisher is a redlink (and a BEFORE doesn't indicate notability on which to build a stub) so no viable merger. Star Mississippi 14:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "... But equally to blame is a lack of knowledge of other cultures and peoples or misconceptions, and one easy, entertainingly funny, yet useful way, to remedy this is to peruse this series of books, ironically named "The Xenophobe's Guides". Terming its mission to highlight the unique character and behaviour of various nationalities -- in a manner that is "almost guaranteed to cure xenophobia" through judicious dose of humour and the irrepressible laughter it engenders, the series was started in 1993 by Anne Taute "as a humorous take on the UK being an island nation and its prevailing attitude being 'us' (the British) and 'foreigners' (everyone else)". The humour is typically British -- wittily irreverent, deprecating (self-deprecating when needed) and uproariously hyperbolic at some points, though the writers are not necessarily only British, but, in many cases, hail from the country they seek to profile or have lived there extensively. Among them is Zhu Song, author of "The Xenophobe's Guide to the Chinese" (2010), who confesses she dislikes three phrases ... That sets the tone for the series, which presently comprises 32 installments, with all, except three, dealing with a specific nationality (the exceptions are the Scots, the Welsh and the Californians, who differ from the rest of their countrymen in taking "their beliefs so seriously that many lose touch with what doesn't need to be believed")."
The article notes: "The Xenophobe's Guides series has launched a couple more of its handy pocket sized guides to other nations, bringing the total to 10. Joining the guides to the English, Spanish, French, Germans, Aussies, Poles, Russians and Welsh are guides to the Greeks and the Swedes. The format is the same as the others, with chapters on humour, culture, health and hygiene and behaviour. As ever, the chapter on obsessions gives a valuable insight into the character of the people of the country."
The article notes: "The Xenophobe's Guides The last thing we would do is endorse xenophobia. And certainly these provocatively-titled books do nothing of the sort. In fact, their intent is to cure xenophobia through humor and honesty. Published in the UK (and hard to find in the US), these concise guides are frank, irreverent and intensely funny guides to the culture, beliefs, traditions and foibles of nations. Get the Russian or Polish guide for yourself, and give a gift of the American guide to your foreign partner. Then exchange copies. Your relationship will be the richer in the process. Xenophobes's Guide to the Russians [GA959·64 pp., softcover·$5.95] Americans [GA956·64 pp., softcover·$5.95] Poles [GA958·64 pp., softcover·$5.95]"
The book notes: "Greek to me. If you're already thinking about amusing (and cheap!) stocking fillers, Xenophobes Guides may be one answer. The new series has so far unleashed guides to the French, the Spanish, the Germans, the Aussies and, hold on, the English. They run to some 50 pages, cost £2.50 and are published by Ravette Books. The publishers set the irreverent tone at the outset by defining Xenophobia thus: "Greek noun — an irrational fear of foreigners, probably justified, always understandable".
The article notes: "Following last year's launch of five Xenophobe's Guides — English, Spanish, German, French and Aussies — three more of the lighthearted guides are on their way to bookshops. The new ones are The Xenophobe's Guides to the Welsh, the Poles and the Russians. Published by Ravette Books at £2.50 each, they are well worth reading before you visit any of the countries, or if like me you have relatives that hail from those parts of the world they can explain a lot!"
The article notes: " The Last Word on Swedes is the "Xenophobe's Guide to the Swedes" (Ravette Books Limited ISBN: 1 85304 741 4) written by Peter Berlin. The Xenophobe's Guides are a new series of books that take a wry, irreverent look at the character and behaviour of different nations. Now it is the Swedes' turn to be put under a magnifying glass. ... Time Keeping The Swedish businessman is likely to show up 15 minutes early for business appointments, start circling the block to kill the extra time, and get arrested for kerb crawling."
The article notes: "Den Grundgedanken dieser Reihe kann man so auffassen: Der sogenannte "Fremdenversteher" nimmt Klischees aufs Korn und macht sie dadurch lächerlich. Diese Fremdenversteher, die deutsche Ausgabe der britischen "Xenophobe's® Guides", wollen aber auch tatsächlich etwas über die Franzosen, Italiener, Engländer oder wie hier Isländer erzählen. Der Spagat macht es etwas schwierig, da es so doch zu einer Aneinanderreihung von Pauschalurteilen kommt. Es ist ja verwegen, solche Sätze in die Welt zu werfen: ..."
The article notes from Google Translate: "The basic idea of this series can be understood as follows: The so-called "stranger understander" makes fun of clichés and thereby makes them ridiculous. These foreigners, the German edition of the British "Xenophobe's® Guides", actually want to tell you something about the French, Italians, English or, as here, Icelanders. The balancing act makes it a bit difficult, as it results in a series of blanket judgments. It's audacious to throw such sentences out into the world: ..."
The article notes: "You don't have to go to China. You certainly won't have to spend years studying the language and culture of the Middle Kingdom. To acquire sufficient working wisdom on the subject to guide your company in its business, advise your anxious government, or simply add China to your understanding of the world just pay £2.50 and read this tiny book. Xenophobe's Guides claim to provide 'an ..."
The article notes: "Now, at 74, she has written a book. It's called The Xenophobe's Guide to the Kiwis and is part of a series put out by Sussex publisher Ravette. Cape Catley has taken on the New Zealand agency for the Ravette guides. ... Her brief for the xenophobe's guide was to write "a cheeky, non- politically correct but affectionate run-down on the Kiwi character". After years of working as a journalist, faithfully checking every statement and attributing them, she found it a novel experience to be able to make bold, sweeping statements about the Kiwi psyche and lifestyle. ... There are also xenophobe's guides to the Aussies, Americans, Chinese, English, Germans, and soon the Japanese."
The article notes: "J.C. Yang's The Xenophobe's Guide to the Chinese (Ravette, £2.50 pbk) is a witty and affectionately critical appraisal of about a quarter of humanity. The pseudonymous Yang, clearly British, deals with everything from food to noise, sex to calligraphy, lavatories to gambling. Xenophobe's Guides and their sisters, Bluffer's Guides, are outstanding value, absurdly underpriced. Buy now."
The article notes: "Argumentative, depressive, inebriated lotharios. These unfortunate qualities are the defining characteristics of the Scots, according to a controversial new guide book. ... The nation is reported as unhealthy, too, with a life expectancy two years less than the English - whom they detest - according to the Xenophobe's Guide to the Scots. The book, to be published this month, is aimed at travellers and businessmen preparing a visit. ... The latest in a series of guides to countries around the world, the book is designed to offer a light-hearted look at a nation's lifestyle and characteristics. The guide, however, has provoked irritation and confusion among Scottish academics and cultural societies."
The article notes: "Buy the book "Xenophobe's Guide to the English," a humorous but largely accurate look at the English culture and personality (there are Xenophobe guides to dozens of other nationalities, including Americans). It currently takes up to six weeks to get it, but this tongue-in-cheek look at the English is worth the wait."
The article notes: "SCOTS are an unemotional, republican lot - obsessed by the weather but uninterested in personal hygiene, according to a controversial new guide book.David Ross, the Scottish author, has sparked outrage in his attempts to reveal Scots' national characteristics. ... And in the forthcoming Xenophobe's Guide to the Scots Mr Ross writes ... The book is the latest in a series providing a light-hearted look at the lifestyle and characteristics of nations."
The article notes: "A controversial new guide book claims that Scots are argumentative, depressive drunkards obsessed with the weather. The Xenophobe's Guide to the Scots also says many people would prefer to see Sean Connery on the throne rather than the Queen and slams hygiene standards."
The article notes: "Ever the renaissance man, Opik has also turned his hand to literature, co-authoring "humorous" book The Xenophobe's Guide to the Estonians. On Amazon, it is selling for the cut price of pounds 3.79. One customer calls it "a mind-blowing piece of garbage"."
The article notes: "Paul's Bilton's slim volume The Xenophobe's Guide to the Swiss is an amusing insight into the Swiss national character."
The article notes: "Xenophobe's Guide to the French by Nick Yapp and Michel Syrett (Ravette Books pounds 2.50). 'The French produce the most beautiful paintings in the world and the ugliest wallpaper. They work hard, but are never seen to be working. Drive through France at any time of the day, week, month or year and 95% of the country appears to be uninhabited or fast asleep'. Short, aphoristic, seriously funny, not that xenophobic and almost entirely apt guide, perfect homework for the fortunate on ferry or plane."
The book notes: "Xenophoboe's Guide to the French by Nick Yapp and Michel Syrett (Ravette Books £3.50). 'The French produce the most beautiful paintings in the world and the ugliest wallpaper. They work hard, but are never seen to be working. Drive through France at any time of the day, week, month or year and 95% of the country appears to be uninhabited or fast asleep'. Short, aphoristic, seriously funny, not that xenophobic and almost entirely apt guide, perfect homework for the fortunate on ferry or plane."
The article notes: "Hard to resist a book entitled The Xenophobe's Guide to the Spanish (Ravette Books £2.50), one of a series which also covers the French, Germans, Australians — and the English — and is published on the premise that the more you know about people, the less you fear. It debunks the idea that Spanish men are pumped full of machismo and notes that despite bullfighting they are not generally cruel to animals. It also concludes that they view the British ..."
The result was keep. per WP:SNOW, strong policy based arguments, all in favour of keep. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 16:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
An internet search came up with just one independent source for this company, and it only pertained to a new type of crane that they had just obtained in 2021. The company fails WP:VERIFY as well as WP:CORPDEPTH for broad geographic coverage. If it has been in existance since 1969 it should not have been hard to find independent coverage for this company if they are a major player in their business. Blue Riband► 14:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG, lack of in-depth converge in independent RS. There is some coverage in publications of the University of California/Merced where she graduated and are not independent. Others are minor mentions or otherwise not Reliable Sources. MB 00:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need more participation here
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. consensus clear subsequent to relist (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NTV. I couldn't find anything at all on newspapers.com or GBooks. Deprodded right under the wire. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need a clearer consensus on whether the subject passes notability guidelines. If there are refs with sigcov founded, please add them to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
15:31, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Less sniping, more consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
03:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
The article provides 802 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "But for the most part, filming for the newest game show to hit television, "You Lie Like a Dog" on Animal Planet, has been free of incidents - and considering that half of the cast is of the four-legged variety, that's surprising. No dog bites or cat scratches, no misdirected skunk sprays. A turned-on turtle who had the hots for a wooden pull toy performed on cue, and a llama that does the limbo was well-behaved. ... In Round One, three contestants all claim to own the same pet, who's on stage with them. The ce lebrities try to determine "who's lying like a dog" by quizzing them about the animal's diet, tricks and bad habits. (On a recent episode, they asked the alleged owners of Rosie, a pug, to imitate her snore.)"
The article provides 167 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "A panel of celebrities (mostly quick-minded stand-ups like Kevin Meaney and Cathy Ladman) tries to sniff out the fibbers among a trio of alleged pet owners by asking such tricky questions as, "Where does the dog like to be scratched the best?" (Answer: on the butt.) It's not as simple as it seems. ... With helpful interspecies info (e.g., a demo of mouth-to-snout resuscitation) and all prize money going to animal charities (e.g., Helping Hands: Monkey Helpers for the Disabled), you'd have to be a real rat not to love this Dog."
The article provides 130 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "The cable network Animal Planet takes a bite out of the game show craze with its new entry, "You Lie Like a Dog" (7:30 p.m.). A flea-bitten variation on "To Tell the Truth," this show pits a panel of celebrities against three contestants all claiming to be telling the truth. In round one, three people all claim to own the same pet. Only a volley of celebrity questions (by the likes of Jimmie Walker, Fred Willard and Dr. Joyce Brothers) can ferret out the truth. While no one is going to emerge a millionaire from this game show, animals come out the real winners. The celebrity panelist with the most points at the end of the game will have a donation made to the animal charity of their choice."
The article notes: "Rudd and Rosie will have a chance to become known to a greater portion of the Long Beach region tonight, when the two appear on a taped comedy game show airing on cable. The show, You Lie Like a Dog, on the Animal Planet cable station, is scheduled for 11:30 p.m. Rudd will display his dog-owner skills to prove that he owns Rosie, who is 2 1/2 years old. Celebrity contestants will quiz Rudd on Rosie's favorite toys, weight, sleeping habits, and if he can, imitate her snore, said Rudd, a substitute teacher for the Long Beach Unified School District. The celebrities who collect the most points by matching owner and animal will have a monetary donation made to the animal charity of their choice, he said."
The article provides 85 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Cable's Animal Planet is introducing a game show to demonstrate that, of all the creatures in the animal kingdom, people are the least trustworthy. You Lie Like a Dog features J.D. Roberto presiding over three celebrity guests and three contestants, all of whom claim to own the same pet. It's up to the panel to determine who's lying like a dog by quizzing each contestant on day-to-day life with the pet. Airing each weeknight, Lie Like a Dog premieres tonight at 7:30 p.m. EST."
The article provides a few sentences of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "I told Mr. Goldstein that one of the shows on Animal Planet is called You Lie Like a Dog and involves contestants trying to figure out which panelist is fibbing about ownership of respective pets, along with other pet issues. "Well, not every single thing is intellectual," he noted. ... The show You Lie Like a Dog conjured instant images of the O.J. Simpson trial. And when I learned that the black beetle "thrives on dung and decay," I could have sworn I saw the soul of Jenny Jones staring out of its beady little eyes."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The last relist - please consider the new sources presented in the discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of One Day International cricket umpires. RL0919 ( talk) 16:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 14:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 40 Below Summer#Studio albums. (non-admin closure) –– FormalDude talk 23:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable album. Redirect to band's discography. Mooonswimmer 16:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:06, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
03:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more participation needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Following a relist for consensus 5 days ago, the main contribution has been a source assessment table. The arguments for keep cite the article meeting GNG, which the source table demonstrates. No other contributors have offered a rebuttal, and so this table adds weight to keep arguments over delete. Overall, a clear keep consensus. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 06:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E case. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens ( talk) 08:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk)
14:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The mystery behind why Bengaluru is covered in stickers of ‘angry Hanuman’ ( Scroll.in, 2017) | Much more than an interview, includes substantial independent content, as well as commentary from Philip Lutgendorf, Professor of Hindi and Modern Indian Studies, Girish Kumar, a taxi-driver, and Srinath, a shopkeeper who sells stickers. | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. "The image, vector-style, is everywhere in Bengaluru and in several other parts of Karnataka." |
✔ Yes | |
Karan Acharya, the man behind the viral Hanuman vector, wants to copyright the image ( Hindustan Times, 2018) | More than an interview, includes substantial independent content about Acharya, the sticker, and an upcoming comic book. | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. the image is "raging across the Capital, after turning into a nationwide phenomenon over the last couple of years." Also includes support for WP:BASIC notability with secondary content and context about Acharya and his career. |
✔ Yes | |
Meet Karan Acharya, the Bengaluru artist whose mythological images of common people are going viral (The Indian Express, 2020) | Much more than an interview, includes substantial independent content about Acharya and his career. | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. "Karan Acharya, a graphic artist from Bengaluru, has become an internet sensation after several of his digital artworks went viral on social media." The secondary content and context also supports WP:BASIC notability and demonstrates coverage for multiple events. |
✔ Yes | |
Meet Karan Acharya, the artist who was hailed by PM Modi in Mangaluru rally ( Daijiworld, 2018) | Mostly an interview, but includes independent content about career, biographical information, political reactions to the art. | value not understood Secondary content and context supports WP:BASIC notability. | ? Unknown | |
Will Shiva blues Trump Hanuman rage? ( The New Indian Express, 2017) | Includes independent content in addition to an interview | value not understood Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and his work is well-known, e.g. "Today, almost every other vehicle, especially cabs and private vehicles, sport the half-faced orange and black coloured Hanuman stickers." Also covers more than one event, e.g. "The man behind it — artiste Karan Acharya — is now back with a blue coloured Adi Yogi Shiva sticker [...] He has designed stickers for Jallikattu and Kambala as well." Secondary content and context supports WP:BASIC notability. |
? Unknown | |
Stoic Rama after Angry Hanuman: Artist Karan Acharya reveals what he plans next ( The Financial Express, 2018) | More than an interview, includes independent content about new art, the Hanuman t-shirt, his company, Paridhi Media Works, the copyright, and popularity of the Hanuman image. | value not understood Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and his work is well-known, e.g. "Karan’s ‘angry Hanuman’ has become so popular that even Prime Minister Narendra Modi underscored it in an election rally". Also covers more than one event by focusing on multiple works of art and future plans. Secondary content and context supports WP:BASIC notability. |
? Unknown | |
‘Pride of Mangaluru’: PM Modi lauds artist who created viral angry Hanuman image ( The News Minute, 2018) | Includes a focus on debate/criticism of the image, as well as praise from PM Modi | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the work is the primary subject of this article, and is well-known, e.g. "It has been less than three years since the image was created and it has become a rage in many parts of the country including Bengaluru and New Delhi, where the image appears on the windshields of vehicles and on smartphone covers." |
✔ Yes | |
Man behind super viral Lord Hanuman poster, now comes up with PM Narendra Modi’s painting, ( The Financial Express, 2018) | Per
WP:CREATIVE#3, the collective body of work is the primary subject of this article, and his work is well-known, e.g. describing him as "probably one of the most popular graphic artists in India". Secondary content and context about reactions to his art, career, and new work supports WP:BASIC notability, and helps demonstrate coverage for more than one event. |
✔ Yes | ||
Vinay Bharadwaj to create first impression with Mundina Nildana poster ( The New Indian Express, 2019) | value not understood An announcement of a new work, demonstrating coverage of more than one event. | ? Unknown | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. There are no policy-based reasons to keep the article presented. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails WP:NSINGER. Previously deleted, this is the 2nd attempt. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Refs are profiles, event listings and interviews. No social media coverage, no streaming coverage, no secondary coverage. Fan page. scope_creep Talk 14:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kerala cricketers#K. RL0919 ( talk) 16:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 13:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 16:40, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 13:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:30, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Could only find press releases. Prod contested Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment: I created this article a decade ago. At the time, it seemed relevant to create stub articles for all shows currently airing or that had aired on major television networks regardless of how much information was known about them. I have no opinion on whether to keep or delete the article. — CobraWiki ( jabber | stuff )
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous
WP:PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
04:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
No sourcing found. Prod contested. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment: I created this article a decade ago. At the time, it seemed relevant to create stub articles for all shows currently airing on major television networks regardless of how much information was known about them. I have no opinion on whether to keep or delete the article. — CobraWiki ( jabber | stuff )
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion due to previous
WP:PROD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
04:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 15:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
No major roles in notable productions, nor press coverage. Fails WP:NACTOR. – Ploni ( talk) 11:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of stuff: To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources.
We don't need a separate article for this; notable users of the CS-80 synthesizer can be covered, in context, in the main
Yamaha CS-80 article.
Popcornfud (
talk)
13:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Keith Boykin. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to Keith Boykin; The article is only notable in that it is associated with its creator. It only has one non-primary source, and I could not find any others that adress the website directly, just the creator of the website. ArcticSeeress ( talk) 12:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing, no consensus. No discussion in two weeks and no special reason to relist for a third time. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 10:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Not notable, no coverage Ironmatic1 ( talk) 03:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
10:48, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
12:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fox Feature Syndicate#Fox characters. History is available if anyone believes there is content that should be merged. RL0919 ( talk) 22:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I've prodded this last yaer with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar.". While it has been improved, I am afraid this hasn't been sufficient - the article is still just a publication history and plot summary, with zero evidence of significance (no reception, analysis, etc.). The only evidence of wider context is a sentence in the lead that describes the phenomane of WWII-era US patriotic superheroes (a likely notable topic), but that doesn't mean all such superheroes are notable. Some certainly are, but this one I am afraid does not. I recommend SOFTDELETE and redirecting to Fox_Feature_Syndicate#Fox_characters, maybe a small merge too. But unless we can find a reception of this that meets WP:SIGCOV and goes beyond one-two sentences of plot summary (as in the sources cited), I am afraid there is no compelling reason to keep this as a stand-alone entry (interestingly, it seems there is more coverage of its collectibe pinback button than of the chracter itself...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Goldsztajn (
talk)
07:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to Melissa d'Arabian. RL0919 ( talk) 22:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Yet another contested prod. I got several hits on ProQuest, but most of them were along the lines of "Melissa d'Arabian, host of Ten Dollar Dinners, to do blah blah blah." Almost none were about the show itself, save for the one Longview source I added. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
The article notes: "Ten Dollar Dinners. The Food Network is a must-watch for the dining-obsessed who could save a few dollars by learning easy, cheap recipes. And Melissa d’Arabian’s “Ten Dollar Dinners” is a good place for the novice cook to start. She focuses on cheap and easy dinners that can feed a family and takes the pledge literally: four people, $10. Yes, she proves it is possible to eat Kale chips and shrimp scampi on a budget. The show airs weekdays on the Food Network."
The article notes: "... said Melissa d'Arabian, whose show "Ten Dollar Dinners" reflects the frugal yet tasty philosophy that earned her the top place in season five of "The Next Food Network Star," a kind of "American Idol" for the cooking set. ... Understanding simple flavor profile and having them at the ready is a big part of "Ten Dollar Dinners," which is premised on feeding a family of four for $10 or less."
The article notes: "ut d'Arabian had a few tricks up her sleeve that helped her ace the competition and earn her her own Food series, "Ten Dollar Dinners if With Melissa d'Arabian," which is still popular three seasons later. ... So by the time she wed her French-born husband, Philippe, at age 34 and produced four daughters over the next three years, she was well prepared to switch gears from helping the House of Mouse save cash and make wise investments to making the d'Arabian house run just as smoothly - and, via "Ten Dollar Dinners," the households of her frugal fans."
The article notes: "The new name of Melissa d'Arabian's Food Network series is Ten Dollar Dinners. ... The former Keller stay-at-home mom, who now lives near Seattle, won her own show Sunday night on The Next Food Network Star."
The article notes: "Just over a week ago, 40-year-old mom and self-taught cook Melissa d'Arabian of Kirkland, Wash., was named "The Next Food Network Star" for the show's fifth season. In her new show, "Ten Dollar Dinners," which premiered Sunday, d'Arabian shows viewers how to make creative, tasty meals while adhering to the promise of "four people, 10 bucks, infinite possibilities." Using her own recipes and tips culled from her experience as a home cook, d'Arabian's budget-friendly meals include approachable Parisian and Moroccan menus and sophisticated upgrades for everyday fare such as chicken or pork."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:31, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 19:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I found a few press releases announcing the show's hosts, but as we all know, press releases are WP:PRIMARY sources. It's also mentioned in passing in various articles about new shows debuting or being renewed on PAX, but that's the key phrase: "in passing". No reviews seem to have been published at any point in the show's history, nor did it do anything worthy of media attention outside a couple "Local X to appear on It's a Miracle" type human-interest stories which are not enough on their own to support the article. This show was just... there for its entire life. I'm not expecting FA-level coverage on a no-budget Christian show on a network that doesn't even exist anymore, but this one seems to have flown completely under the radar. However, the show's relatively long shelf life (six seasons) is the only reason I'm sending this to AFD and not PROD. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
The book provides 247 words of coverage about the subject. The book notes that It's a Miracle was first telecast September 6, 1998, and last telecast August 12, 2006. The book lists the hosts: Billy Dean (1998), Nia Peeples (1998–1999), Richard Thomas (1998–2003), and Roma Downey (2003–2004). The book notes: "Each episode of this inspirational series presented several incidents in which miracles had changed or saved the lives of people. Most segments used re-creations of the actual incidents, with the real people describing what had happened to them, and in some cases actually participating. After their stories had been told, some of them were introduced to the studio audience in the theater from which It's a Miracle originated. Among the topics were medical miracles, dreams and visions, guardian angels, premonitions, and warning voices. One segment told of a man who didn't understand why he had been drawn to the Hermosa Beach Pier until meeting a fisherman with whom he became friendly. He found that his kidneys were a perfect match for the fisherman's, who needed a transplant to save his life. In another a man survived the crash of his small plane when he was guided by an angelic presence, and got out of the burning plane just before it exploded. Each episode also included a few "miraculous moments"—short man-on-the-street-type interviews with people who related what they believed to have been miracles in their lives." The book provides one more paragraph about the show.
The article notes: "Producers of the PAX network show, It's a Miracle, thought the hospital would make a good location for filming a re-enactment of a "miracle," and it turned several hospital employees into actors. ... Actor Richard Thomas hosts the show, which began in 1998 and re-creates true-life accounts of miracles. ... The miracle filmed Monday was related to the story of Sandy Rish, 49, of Fullerton. She played herself in the film. ... At the hospital, the film crew shot in the radiology unit for an MRI scene, in an emergency room, in a patient room in acute rehabilitation and in an operating room. ... It's a Miracle -- a 60-minute reality-based show -- is aired locally at 8 p.m. Thursdays on Channel 8. Rish's story has yet to be scheduled."
The article notes: "Two different producers of the PAX TV cable station picked up on both of these stories separately, and a crew arrived in Wallowa County from Los Angeles last week to recreate the stories for its popular "It's a Miracle" program hosted by Roma Downey. ... Filming started on the Hileman story Sunday morning at the Wallowa County Sheriff's Office, the nerve center for the search for her in the fall of 2002. It was moved later in the day to the Dave Nelson place in Allen Canyon in rural Lostine. ... Filming continued until after dark and through Monday, when Mischelle Hileman and her parents, Benny and Jan, who live also live on Allen Canyon Road, were interviewed and filmed. ... Among those who played a part in the TV reenactment were Bill Lehr and Marilyn Siefert, the friends ..."
The article notes: "Richard Thomas, whose role as John-Boy in The Waltons was as wholesome as wholesome gets, will host family friendly PAX TV's show It's a Miracle, Paxson Communications Chairman Lowell "Bud" Paxson said Wednesday. Thomas joins actress Nia Peeples as co-host of the show, replacing country singer Billy Dean. The change is set for this Sunday. ... It's a Miracle is a one-hour weekly series that airs at 9 p.m. Sunday. The program tells stories of real-life miracles, such as a pet that saved family members' lives and the success of a young man who started life as a drug-addicted, abandoned baby."
The article notes: "Mike Downey's miraculous survival from a surfing accident in January will be a featured segment on an upcoming episode of TV's "It's a Miracle" on the Pax Network. A film crew was in town Friday and Saturday to interview those involved and to re-enact the accident that almost claimed the Los Osos resident and professional surfer's life. Christopher Poole, a freelance director working on Downey's story, has worked for the reality show since it began. Now entering its sixth season, the show will have eight new episodes, with the re-enactment of Downey's near-death experience set for airing in mid-October, said Poole. Actor Richard Thomas, of The Waltons fame, is the host of the show."
The article notes: "A feel-good story about a watch that lay at the bottom of Phillips Lake for 68 years until it was unearthed by a determined scuba diver will be featured early next year on the Pax Network show, "It's a Miracle." ... Hosted by actor Richard Thomas, "It's a Miracle" airs Thursdays at 8 p.m. on Channel 33. A four-member crew from Los Angeles will visit the Bangor area next week to begin filming for the 15-minute segment, which will combine interviews of the actual participants with recreated scenes."
The article notes: "The true story of a Fairfield man whose ring was lost last year in Waterville before it turned up in a box of golf clubs in Florida will air at 8 p.m. Thursday on the PAX TV show, "It's A Miracle." The show, hosted by Richard Thomas of "The Waltons" fame, is available through Adelphia cable as well as via regular broadcast in some areas. The show will recount the saga of Jonathan Klane, 41, of Fairfield, who lost a 70-year-old ring in February 2001. ... "It's a Miracle" producers contacted Klane last year after a story about his experience appeared in the Morning Sentinel as well as on the Internet. A television crew from California came to Waterville last June and filmed the show at locations including Larsen's Jewelry Store on Main Street, and Mail-It-Quik on College Avenue, according to Klane, who appears in the show."
The article notes: "The most enduring Pax original is "It's a Miracle" (10 p.m. weeknights), in which Richard Thomas ("The Waltons") introduces feel-good stories of reunions and rescues (tonight, a moose is saved!), all badly re-enacted but calculated to ensure a much better night's sleep than watching the news ever would."
The article notes: "It turns out that Pax is more successful when it doesn’t try to clone “Touched By an Angel.” Take “It’s a Miracle” (), for example. Starting its second season Thursday night at 8, “It’s a Miracle” is sort of a reality-based news show, Pax-style. Host Richard Thomas reports on modern-day miracles, which are told in reenactments and in interviews with the people who witnessed them. Corny as they may be, you’d have to have a heart made out of concrete not to like the stories on “It’s a Miracle,” especially the one about a beloved dog named Sailor who was so sick he would have been euthanized if not for the intervention of another dog named Angel."
The article notes: "It's a Miracle (Thursdays) can get pretty gooey, too, but unlike the superior "Twice in a Lifetime," it's a stranger-than-fiction approach to perfectly plausible events with more or less happy endings. Host Richard Thomas (John Boy on "The Waltons") lends some credibility because he projects sincerity. But the title, and worse, the melodramatic tone of the stories, seem excessive for the kinds of events the show chronicles."
The article notes: "Another TV veteran, Richard Thomas, plays the chipper host of It's a Miracle, beginning its second season on Thursday. The show is a hybrid of Rescue 911 and Dateline - the cheapie graphics recall the NBC newsmagazine. The show mixes tacky re-enactments of unusual incidents and interviews with those who lived through them. There are astonishing recoveries by a lifeless patient in the operating room and by a declining dog visited by a pooch named Angel."
The article notes: "Elizabeth's story will be profiled tonight on Pax network's It's A Miracle series, airing today at 8 p.m. on satellite networks and at 11 p.m. on cable. The episode, hosted by Roma Downey, will be a combination of a re-creation of the event and interviews with the family."
The article notes: "Marty Rosenblum is not an actor. He's the suite-catering supervisor at Gund Arena. But a friend who is a casting agent thought he would be just right for a part in Pax TV's "It's a Miracle.""
The article notes: "More than a year ago, Carol McAdams prepared for her television debut. The story of a dulcimer and her search for a connection to her father landed her a segment on PAX-TV's show It's a Miracle. The show is hosted by Richard Thomas, made famous by his role as John-Boy on the popular 1970s series The Waltons. McAdams' segment, titled Instrument of God, will air tonight at 8. ... McAdams re-enacted her story for a film crew in Asheboro in January 2001. Both Collectors Antique Mall and Evans Music Center were used as locations during taping. Richard Evans of Evans Music Center also is featured in McAdams' segment."
The article notes: "Actress-singer Nia Peeples will join country crooner Billy Dean as co-host of fledgling Pax TV's "It's a Miracle." ... Story categories include romantic miracles, answered prayers, angel encounters, medical miracles, good Samaritans, miracles from the animal kingdom and children's inspirational stories."
The article notes: "It's a Miracle. What it's about: Think Unsolved Mysteries meets Oprah. Producers re-create miracles, then interview the people involved. You'll hear about dogs who saved little boys from drowning and lovers who fell in love at an organ donors convention. Wait . . . the producers swear It's A Miracle won't turn into a sleazy, reality-based show. ... It's hosted by the odd-couple pair of Nia Peebles (Dance Party) and country singer Billy Dean. If the stories are boring, at least we know the hosts can sing and dance."
I will spend time looking at the second source, Peralta 2002 . The article says that actor Richard Thomas is the show's host, the show began in 1998, the show is in its fifth season, the show is 60 minutes, Peter Jackson is the field producer of the show, the show "re-creates true-life accounts of miracles", interviewing people involved in the miracle takes roughly a day, and filming takes two to three days. The article discusses the production details of an episode involving Sandy Sish who had had seizures. It says that San Clemente Hospital was chosen to reenact the "miracle" and that hospital employees became actors for the episode. The hospital employees who acted in the episode included a doctor from a San Clemente hospital, a nurse, a physical therapist, a radiologist, and two operating room surgical technicians. Further production details are that filming took place in "the radiology unit for an MRI scene, in an emergency room, in a patient room in acute rehabilitation and in an operating room". The substantial coverage of the production and background constitutes significant coverage of the television show.
These two sources are enough for It's a Miracle to meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. The other sources provide production details about other episodes; examples are Dickenson 2004 , Farrell 2003 , and Calder 2002 .
The article provides 67 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "It's a Miracle (Thursdays) can get pretty gooey, too, but unlike the superior "Twice in a Lifetime," it's a stranger-than-fiction approach to perfectly plausible events with more or less happy endings. Host Richard Thomas (John Boy on "The Waltons") lends some credibility because he projects sincerity. But the title, and worse, the melodramatic tone of the stories, seem excessive for the kinds of events the show chronicles."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
this is a WP:BLP1E with lots of other BLP implications - I fail to see how he's notable even for a crime, much less as an academic. PRAXIDICAE💕 11:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Limited participation and no agreement after two relists. RL0919 ( talk) 22:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept at last AFD because it was the last role for one of the actors, but this alone is not an assertation of notability if there is nothing else to say about the film. I was unable to find any actual reviews, just a bunch of obituaries on Rod Steiger that mentioned this movie in passing. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 10:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Bill that did not pass, and received no coverage beyond its introduction in the 117th United States Congress, i.e. failing WP:LASTING. Not to be confused with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which this bill sought to update. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
PRODded with notability concerns, but it had already been prodded in 2010 over unclear concerns about original research that likely regarded content that is no longer in the article. Only current source is IMDB, Allmovie has no reviews ( Part 1, Part 2), and the miniseries is not even on Rotten Tomatoes. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 04:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
The book provides 2.25 pages of coverage about the subject. The book notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth (2003) U.S.; dir. Pierre de Lespinois; Evergreen Films/Discovery Channel. 2 49-min. parts; color. Producer, Bill Latka; writers, Brian Fagan, Sandra Gregory, Bill Latka; music, Dean Grinsfelder; narrators, Linda Hunt, John Slattery."
The book further notes: "Dramatic reenactments (including computer-generated images of extinct animals) show the lives of Homo Erectus, Neanderthals and early Cro-Magnons, including the use of fire and tools and the development of communications. There are several brief segments titled "How We Know What We Know" which discuss fossils and other evidence on which the program is based. ... This excellent documentary packs a lot of information into its little dramas. The first part is about humans whose bodies and brains were different from ours. The second part deals with anatomically-modern humans. Humans advance from scavengers to predators. People first speak not at all, then fluently. ... Of course the reenactments are speculative but they reflect sophisticated, up-to-date information about prehistoric man. ... The stories are dramatically effective precisely because they are convincing. The tale of the Neanderthals' failing in their last hunt is perhaps the saddest scene in any prehistoric film or TV show, while the story of the three incredibly brave Berringian women killing the mammoth is probably the most terrifying and awe-inspiring scene involving early humans. There are no films that do as much as this program to encourage respect for our ancient ancestors."
The article notes: "The series started yesterday with the premiere of Before We Ruled the Earth. The two-hour programme looked at the development of humankind from as far back as 1.7 million years ago in Africa. Hunt or be Hunted, the first part of the programme, featured the evolution of early humans, Homo Ergaster. In the world of scavengers, it was men against beasts. However over the years, men made major progress with the discovery of fire and various uses of stone. From scavengers, men became predators. ... To end the week-long series, dinosaurs come into focus in When Dinosaurs Ruled: At the Ends of the Earth. A far cry from the action-packed movie Jurassic Park, this documentary showcases the toughness of dinosaurs which survived the extreme heat of Australia and the icy cold of Antarctica."
The article notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth is an odyssey of evolution, from Homo ergaster in Africa at 1.7 million years ago, to Paleo-Indians living in North America at 11,000 years ago. Detailed recreations of hominid life over seven time periods, stunning wilderness locations, state of the art makeup effects and photo-realistic 3-D animated animals bring the past to life. Factual. Entertaining. Riveting."
The article notes: "SUNDAY ON THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL at 8 p.m. "Before We Ruled the Earth" airs two one-hour episodes, "Hunt or Be Hunted" about the Homo ergaster who scavenged to survive in Africa 1.7 million years ago, and "Mastering the Beast" about the Cro-Magnons 15,000 years ago, who possessed all of the abilities of modern humans: speech, reasoning skills and a belief in the afterlife. The program combines dramatizations with photo-realistic animated creatures."
The article notes (my bolding): "75. Sound Editing for Nonfiction Programming (Single or Multicamera): "American Experience: Seabiscuit," PBS; "American Masters: Joni Mitchell: Woman of Heart and Mind," PBS; "Before We Ruled the Earth," Discovery Channel; "James Cameron's Expedition: Bismarck," Discovery Channel; "Unchained Memories: Readings From the Slave Narratives," HBO."
The article profiles Pierre de Lespinois. The article notes: "In 1999 de Lespinois founded his own company Evergreen Films, based in Pacific Palisades, California. Impressed by Verne, Discovery Communications came knocking, which resulted in their 2001 co-development of Montreal-based Meteor Studios for the latest visual effects and digital animation. "In the first year, we delivered forty films," he says. A dozen more were due to wrap by Christmas, including Before We Ruled the Earth and Prehistoric Worlds, upcoming on Discovery."
The article notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth offers the latest scientific knowledge on evolution from early Homo sapiens' fight for survival over seven time periods. Speed: Without Limits takes viewers on a fast-paced look at the world behind the wheel."
The article notes: "Discovery Channel's Before We Ruled the Earth airs two one-hour episodes at 8 p.m. Sunday: "Hunt or Be Hunted" deals with the Homo ergaster who scavenged to survive in Africa 1.7 million years ago; "Mastering the Beast" is about the Cro-Magnons 15,000 years ago."
The article notes: "Before We Ruled the Earth. 8 p.m. Sunday on The Discovery Channel. A new two-hour special on evolution that examines the first days of our lives, or rather, our ancestors', from Africa's Homo ergaster 1.7 million years ago to the paleo-Indians of North America 11,000 years ago. Filmed in wilderness areas around the world, with dramatizations using photo-realistic animated creatures."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. no further discussion of sources following the initial relist, one more keep argument made since second relist. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 10:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 05:44, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more time to discuss the sources provided
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
AssumeGoodWraith (
talk |
contribs)
03:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Participants rightly pointed out that county boards of education are not covered by WP:NPOL. The article may be re-created when the subject holds a country/state-wide office or when sufficient sources are available. Modussiccandi ( talk) 19:53, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable, fails WP:NPOL. Balchandra Upendra ( talk) 00:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
10:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. consensus appears keep, and no discussion for three days except for one more keep vote. Closing as there is a clear consensus and no active discussion. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter ( talk) 11:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination on behalf of the subject, whose request ( with permission) is copied below. Primefac ( talk) 10:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia:
I am the subject of a Wikipedia page named "Charles L. Venable." I am an art collector and retired museum profession who now does occasional consulting. I do not now consider myself a truly notable person, and never have. In fact, I do not know why a page on me was ever created in the first place.
Especially troubling is the fact that the page is regularly reedited in what I consider a negative tone and an unbalanced viewpoint. This happened yet again recently when someone updated the page with new and accurate information, only to have one or more other editors remove most of that information and to cast the page negatively to the point of disparagement in my opinion.
Therefore, I formally request that the page "Charles L. Venable" be permanently deleted.
Sincerely,
Charles L. Venable
If there's a Wikipedia policy that the subject's wishes take priority over notability guidelines- there isn't, just the recommendation that in borderline cases we acquiesce to their request. Primefac ( talk) 11:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete.CT55555 ( talk) 14:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment I think so far we have five or six single purpose accounts, whose entire edit history is on the topic of Mr Veneble. I would encourage who ever closes this to take a quick look at the edit history of each of the editors whose name is in red to assess if there is an unlikely pattern of new editors all starting their wikipedia journey on this specific page, or perhaps something else happening. CT55555 ( talk) 03:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
a look on the web for "dream pets" returns online games.
the only ref in the article is a book that refers to dream pets in only two pages. 何をしましたか? 那晚安啦。 07:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mongoose Publishing. Participants are encouraged to move over verifiable information as they see fit. Modussiccandi ( talk) 19:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
non-notable game, unsourced article FMSky ( talk) 06:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Does not meet GNG. Local road, no claim of notability/significance. Sources confirm it exists, mention some rail crossing improvements, but do not demonstrate there is more than routine local coverage. MB 06:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft redirect to Tatts Group. Star Mississippi 14:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable organization failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The references aren't indicating any sign of notability. Chirota ( talk) 05:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tabcorp. Star Mississippi 14:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable organization failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The references aren't indicating any sign of notability. Chirota ( talk) 05:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Responding the the redirection of this article. There are a range of articles within Australian Lotteries that need improvement and better referencing. Including this one. Can I suggest that this page be redirected to /info/en/?search=The_Lottery_Corporation instead of Tabcorp. In May Tabcorp demerged its lottery and keno businesses and a new company was formed (The Lottery Corporation) and is independent from Tabcorp i.e. there is no legal or commercial relationship. The new company owns The Lott and all the State Government licences for lotteries in Australia, excluding Western Australia. The company is composed of the 100 year history of being the biggest lottery provider in Australia including owning all the State licenced businesses (NSW Lotteries, Tatteralls, SA Lotteries, Golden Casket) and previous companies such as Tatts Group. There is a lot of media coverage and documentation to verify the structure of this business and notoriety in Australia (Majority of Australian population have purchased a lottery product from the company's licencees at some point in time) That are also a major taxation source for State Governments.
If it suits, I am in the process of expanding the article relating to The Lottery Corporation with appropriate referencing and inclusion of The Lott and the lottery brands it represents. I am happy to take guidance on the best way forward to clean up that page and the other Australia Lotteries articles in Wikipedia. Mantuku ( talk) 04:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I'm nominating this page for deletion based on it being WP:DISPUTED and it lacking notability. I already marked it for normal deletion on the 19th, but it was removed by an admin a day later on the basis that its talk page merits an Articles of Deletion discussion be had. And I mean totally deleted, not a redirection or anything. The word "hitaikakushi" must be expunged.
The current Talk page is in agreement, however, that the article is both unnotable and flagrantly misleading at best. As was already stated there, the minuscule article's content has already been present in entirety on Yūrei for a while. Pretty sure this is WP:NOPAGE. It fits better within context in Yūrei. The article of clothing here does not even has its own Japanese page, as was stated before on the talk page.
Aside from all of that, it's just plain wrong (as was also discussed about in the talk page). The term "hitaikakushi" (額隠し) used in reference to this article of clothing is incredibly obscure to non-existent in Japanese sources. As shown in the talk page (yeah IDK if I have to keep restating that), the most comprehensive Japanese dictionaries do not list the triangular headpiece that yūrei wear as a definition for 額隠し. If you search up "額隠し" on Google you will not find any pictures of that headwear from Japanese results. The only currently proposed source that claims "hitaikakushi" is a valid word used to describe this head garment is Zack Davisson on both his blog [15] and book Yūrei: The Japanese Ghost. However, these non-academic, uncited sources seem to cross the threshold into WP:DUBIOUS. I also noted that "hitaikakushi" was among the last of a list of words he chose to describe this cloth.
The actual most commonly accepted name for this headwear is tenkan (天冠). In fact, it's the first word Zack Davisson uses in both of his writings on the topic. I don't think changing the article's name is enough. It should be deleted. There is an absolute dearth of reputable sources on the topic in Japanese. The only one I could find is [16] (again, 天冠 is used most here). I can find zero sound sources in English. The reason I proposed deletion in the first place was because I kept seeing this article of clothing being referred to as "hitaikakushi" in pop culture fandom spaces (basically the only other place besides academia that widely discusses these things). Everywhere on the English WEB calls this thing "hitaikakushi", a word Japanese people don't even use in that context, and it all traces back to this Wikipedia page. What's more interesting is that Zack Davisson's blog post and book were made in 2011, 5 years after the "Hitakakushi" page was originally created. He may have gotten it from here. Given how long it's been I wouldn't be surprised if it found its way into other English published media. This citogenesis can not go on any longer.
I originally planned to mark the page for Speedy Deletion before regular Deletion since I thought the case was clear-cut. I'm miffed that it's gone all the way here. In the end you'd be hard pressed to find any good sources for this article of clothing. Your best bet would be Japanese research papers and scholarly publications. Even then, I believe there wouldn't be enough content to add to the article to make it notable. It's weird that this stub has persisted for over 15 years and weirder that it's this hard to delete when it's been actively propagating misinfo. Apologies in advanced for my breaking of any of Wikipedia's myriad etiquette norms or rules or the like. I'm new (made an account solely for this) and never thought there'd be this many bureaucratic hoops to jump through. Hisouhihisouten ( talk) 05:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Candidates for political offices are not automatically notable - WP:NPOL - and subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG Melcous ( talk) 12:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:57, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is clear that the sourcing Cunard identified is sufficient. Star Mississippi 14:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 April 19 didn't have a consensus to endorse or overturn the previous "no consensus" close, but numerous people recommended a new discussion that considers new sources presented during the DRV and the DRV instructions allow a new AFD when there isn't a consensus, so here we are. This is a procedural nomination; I am myself neutral. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 11:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
This is an encyclopedia entry about El Comité 1973. The entry provides three paragraphs of coverage about the magazine. From Google Translate:
According to a translation of es:Enciclopedia de la Literatura en México, "The Encyclopedia of Literature in Mexico (ELEM) is an encyclopedia on Mexican literature edited by the Fundación de las Letras Mexicanas, supported by the Ministry of Culture and the National Institute of Fine Arts and Literature of Mexico."The magazine El Comité 1973 is a Mexican, digital and bimonthly magazine produced since July 30, 2012 by the literary group "El Comité", dedicated to dissemination, criticism and literary creation. Its mission is to spread literary texts and visual works of different creators in order to increase the culture of people around the world. As for the year that is part of the name, 1973, it alludes to the date of the death of the poet Pablo Neruda, which, in some way, tries to be a tribute to this Nobel Prize winner, whom Gabriel García Márquez called: "the greatest 20th century poet in any language”."
This article was published by es:El Sol de Hidalgo. From Google Translate: "El Sol de Hidalgo is a local newspaper from the city of Pachuca de Soto, in Mexico. It is one of the newspapers with the highest circulation and sales in the city and in the state, one reason is that its cost is low compared to other newspapers. It is owned and a member of the Mexican Editorial Organization, the largest journalistic company in Mexico."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
05:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Keep, as per rationale provided by Cunard. Chirota ( talk) 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:10, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Every topo which shows this point indicates that it is one corner of a complicated rail junction. There's no sign of habitation in either maps or aerials. Mangoe ( talk) 04:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
despite no actual source being given. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 04:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)The list is reliably sourced, and people can easily check the information against the source
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Leftovers from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Shop Corner, Virginia; topographic maps and general searching confirm that these are named road junctions, not communities. Fail WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
Also included in this nomination are:
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current sources on the article are trivial. A google search doesn't turn up anything substantive. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All current sources on the article are trivial. A google search doesn't turn up anything substantive. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 04:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was merge to World Jewish Congress. Star Mississippi 17:52, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Non notable organisation; the sources only estabilsh that WP:ITEXISTS. Amisom ( talk) 10:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Reviewed under New Page Patrol. No indication of notability under GNG or SNG. Only a stats reference. Tagged since April 26th with no further development North8000 ( talk) 02:15, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:47, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Zoe Abbott
This article about this financial consultant appears to have been written to praise her rather than to describe her neutrally. The text of the article does not establish how she is notable; based on the article, she could be notable, but she could be a run-of-the-mill investment consultant. A check of the references answers any question about whether this article should be kept. All of the references are either interviews of varying degrees of promotion, or puff pieces. There is no secondary coverage.
Number | Reference | Remarks | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Influencerhustle.com | An interview that appears to be promotional | No | Yes | No | |
2 | Voyagetampa.com | Another promotional interview | No | Yes | No | |
3 | Fox13news.com | A more neutral interview | Not really | Yes | No | |
4 | tricitydaily.com | An article that reads like an advertisement | No | Yes | No | |
5 | globalnewswire.com | Another interview | No | Yes | No | |
6 | Forbesindia.com | A story about the subject that reads like a puff piece | Yes | Yes | No | |
7 | Finance.yahoo.com | An interview that reads like an advertisement | No | Yes | No |
If she is notable, then this article should go into a bit bucket before a neutral editor starts a biography of a living person. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia articles about a person, company or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts.The globalnewswire.com source is a press release, reprinted at Finance.yahoo.com. Influencerhustle is "a World Wide Magazine that Organizes The very best of all Top Hustlers Truths and highlights their Greatest Successes to inspire future hustlers to trust the process even when times are rough, to be true to themselves and others around them, and to learn to give wisdom on what it takes to make a sturdy well seasoned Hustle" and does not appear to have published editorial policies. While tricitydaily.com claims to clearly separate sponsored content, the vague but glowing bylined post reads like ad copy, and the Fox13 source is her promoting her business with minimal independent content. I got a security warning for VoyageTampa so I have not reviewed it, and the Forbes India article is clearly marked as a paid post. An online search does not turn up secondary coverage in independent and reliable sources, so WP:GNG is also not supported. Beccaynr ( talk) 06:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Local association that governs yoga in a provincial town of 44 thousand people, relying mainly on primary sources. Not notable. Mccapra ( talk) 03:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable TV movie. Current sources in article are unreliable. Couldn't find any reliable sourcing, or even what network it aired on. Prod contested. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Kusma is right that this is really a move discussion. I wanted to close it anyway per WP:NOTBURO but decided there really needs to be a move discussion here given the impact on Epsilon numbers (mathematics). Any move discussion held should give consideration to the participation of editors here when determining that consensus. Barkeep49 ( talk) 16:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
From internet search, I'm not sure that Vacuum permittivity or Relative permittivity is called the "epsilon number"; almost all results are about Epsilon numbers (mathematics). However, Epsilon 0 would be a valid disambiguation page that would include only Vacuum permittivity and Epsilon numbers (mathematics). If deleted or moved, Epsilon numbers (mathematics) will be moved to the base title. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 03:22, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Duplicates content in Chili pepper#Intensity and additional information only serves as advertisement for a company. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:07, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per WP:G11. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Promotional and unsourced BLP. Uses social media followers/users/streamers to assert notability. Blue Riband► 02:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. There really isn't much to these relations, no embassies, no agreements. The article includes factoids such as Georgia supporting Kenya against terrorism and a bunch of Kenyan musicians performing in Georgia. LibStar ( talk) 02:34, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. G5, but for avoidance of further issues, this also would have been eligible to be deleted on notability guidelines so sockpuppetry is not the sole issue. Star Mississippi 16:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Half of the sources are either unreliable or search results on news websites. The other half of those sources are about films or TV series of which this person is one of the staff members (something like "X series by A. Najafzadeh will be released soon"). Looking for sources results in same sources provided in the articles and i guess there is no more sources about this person and/or his works. There is not enough coverage to establish WP:GNG even for films and TV series. Jeeputer ( talk) 03:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: as neither keep !vote is based in policy
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete as not meeting the notability standard for lists. RL0919 ( talk) 22:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Long list, but not a source in sight. None of these are verified in any way. Just like the other "list of people on the postage stamps of X", there is no interest in maintaining this topic, nor does there seem to be a reason to maintain this information. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 01:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
No significant coverage. SL93 ( talk) 23:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Destination America#Former programming. ✗ plicit 03:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Not a notable show. Previously deleted via prod in 2019 Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 23:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)