Do you like
Huey Lewis and The News? Their early work was a little too new wave for this user's tastes, but when
Sports came out in '83, this user thinks they really came into their own, commercially and artistically. The whole album has a clear, crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the songs a big boost. He's been compared to
Elvis Costello, but this user thinks Huey has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humor. In '87, Huey released
this, Fore, their most accomplished album. This user thinks their undisputed masterpiece is "
Hip to Be Square", a song so catchy, most people probably don't listen to the lyrics. But they should, because it's not just about the pleasures of conformity, and the importance of trends, it's also a personal statement about the band itself.
I once had an imposter who accused me of “promoting prostitution” like it was a sanctionable offense on Wikipedia. And also seemed convinced I had admin-level privileges. True story:
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Dronebogus1
Anti-troll services
99% of the time you never need to go to Administrator’s Noticeboard: Incedents. It rarely solves anything. For run of the mill vandalism and trolling see any of the following:
”Are we to understand that you have decided that the hill you intend to die on is ... a userbox? You're willing to court a block because you insist on having a particular userbox on your user page? Are you serious?” —
User:Ravenswing[5]
“Honestly, if you're more scared of homosexuality than Covid-19 or fascism, you don't need to be editing history articles, either.” —
user:Ian.thomson[6]
Bizarre
WP:GARAGEBAND that resulted in some rather baffled and annoyed AfD editors (and an example of why using wanton onstage destruction as a publicity gimmick is liable to backfire when nobody wants to risk personal injury and property destruction to host you):
“Mad” Mike Hughes, a 64-year-old daredevil who who may or may not have believed in the above conspiracy theory and died after the steam-powered rocket he was flying in a supposed attempt to prove the Earth is flat crashed. You can’t make this stuff up.
New Haven-style pizza, which is quite frankly bizarre to someone whose idea of pizza is “500 toppings at minimum, extra mozzarella doesn’t count as a topping as it should be the default”
Actual argument on The Incredible Worlds of Wally McDoogle talk page I’ve archived for posterity
For reference, TIWoWmD was a Christian take on those “gross-out, wacky, goofy, kuh-razy, tOtAlLy RaDiCaL kidz adventure bookz” of the 90s and early-to-mid 2000s. But here’s the unedited argument:
“
Toasted Time Traveler has got to be way older than 2006
No way! I've been following them; but not since last year, and that one's new to me, so it has to be somewhere in 2006. Also, the order is so out of wack! My life as a smashed burrito with extra hot sauce (or something like that) was the first book, polluted pond scum was like the tenth book! Get it right, someone!!! And can someone make a page on Ronald Kidd? Author of at least three books; Sizzle & Splat, and Monkey Town are the ones I know off the top of my head.
”
This reminds me of those two dweeb fish arguing about Mega Weenie Monday at Weenie Hut Jr.’s in
that one episode of
SpongeBob.
This user thinks New England should break apart from theNortheastern United States to form its own census region — because think about it...why should the Red Sox and Yankees inhabit the same census region? I mean, that is just ridiculous...
NO ATFE
This user says that in a perfect worldAlcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives is a convenience store not a gov't agency.
This user thinks the restoration of the COMECON would have positive consequences to the global economy.
This user feels he has been made invisible and no one cares or knows of what this user feels, knows or exists for, this user will kill anyone who ignores him again, if they have stopped and then start again; arr what the hell, I'll kill them any way, EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
This user is a heterosexualmale, but enjoys when females (only one at a time), preferably taller than himself, pat him on the head. Thus this user is headpatsexual.
This user lives on
Fort Campbell. His home is physically located in Tennessee. However, his mailing address is in Kentucky. Therefore he is unsure in which state he lives. Perhaps it is both.
This user is a
pedant and dislikes the vast difference in style and colour scheme between individual users'
userboxes and would prefer there to be an official standard.
This user does not care about whether
Québec will be part of
Canada, as Québec's foreign policy were it to gain independence would remain dependent on that of Canada due to their hopeless position in the event of a war.
🔫 = 🗽
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. - T. Jefferson One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - J. Story To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them. - G. Mason "Gun control" is a job-safety program for criminals. - J.R. Lott Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound. - L.N. Smith Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth. - G. Washington Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars. To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace. - G. Washington
The fact that this contributor may be personally related to the subject, does not preclude him from originally writing a professional neutral point of view on historical articles regarding a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's which is the subject. More importantly, the contributor for the fact that he may be personally related, has provided a wealth of firsthand data, knows through the oral tradition and provided supporting citations, is an authority as far as search and research for many years on the subject. There is no evidence of makeup nor embellishment of the facts surrounding the subject. 
So, it can be argued that many of these are biographical articles, that happens to have a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance; or on the other side, a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance biography that happens to be contributed by a personally and well-versed related person. 
The articles have been reviewed by academia history scholar (third parties) that are not personally or professionally connected to the contributor nor to the subject, analyzing the sources and citations. And in their opinion, even though there may exist a conflict of interest or a moral hazard, they are neutral point of view, and properly disclosed in the contributor's user page, as it is Wikipedia policy.
This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles:
The fact that this contributor may be personally related to the subject, does not preclude him from originally writing a professional neutral point of view on historical articles regarding a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's which is the subject. More importantly, the contributor for the fact that he may be personally related, has provided a wealth of firsthand data, knows through the oral tradition and provided supporting citations, is an authority as far as search and research for many years on the subject. There is no evidence of makeup nor embellishment of the facts surrounding the subject. 
So, it can be argued that many of these are biographical articles, that happens to have a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance; or on the other side, a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance biography that happens to be contributed by a personally and well-versed related person. 
The articles have been reviewed by academia history scholar (third parties) that are not personally or professionally connected to the contributor nor to the subject, analyzing the sources and citations. And in their opinion, even though there may exist a conflict of interest or a moral hazard, they are neutral point of view, and properly disclosed in the contributor's user page, as it is Wikipedia policy.
^Full disclosure if you don’t get it: it’s just the random article button. My point is that if you’re complaining about total systemic bias on Wikipedia then you’re ignoring about 98% of its largely rote content and focusing on controversial stuff you personally disagree with
Do you like
Huey Lewis and The News? Their early work was a little too new wave for this user's tastes, but when
Sports came out in '83, this user thinks they really came into their own, commercially and artistically. The whole album has a clear, crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the songs a big boost. He's been compared to
Elvis Costello, but this user thinks Huey has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humor. In '87, Huey released
this, Fore, their most accomplished album. This user thinks their undisputed masterpiece is "
Hip to Be Square", a song so catchy, most people probably don't listen to the lyrics. But they should, because it's not just about the pleasures of conformity, and the importance of trends, it's also a personal statement about the band itself.
I once had an imposter who accused me of “promoting prostitution” like it was a sanctionable offense on Wikipedia. And also seemed convinced I had admin-level privileges. True story:
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Dronebogus1
Anti-troll services
99% of the time you never need to go to Administrator’s Noticeboard: Incedents. It rarely solves anything. For run of the mill vandalism and trolling see any of the following:
”Are we to understand that you have decided that the hill you intend to die on is ... a userbox? You're willing to court a block because you insist on having a particular userbox on your user page? Are you serious?” —
User:Ravenswing[5]
“Honestly, if you're more scared of homosexuality than Covid-19 or fascism, you don't need to be editing history articles, either.” —
user:Ian.thomson[6]
Bizarre
WP:GARAGEBAND that resulted in some rather baffled and annoyed AfD editors (and an example of why using wanton onstage destruction as a publicity gimmick is liable to backfire when nobody wants to risk personal injury and property destruction to host you):
“Mad” Mike Hughes, a 64-year-old daredevil who who may or may not have believed in the above conspiracy theory and died after the steam-powered rocket he was flying in a supposed attempt to prove the Earth is flat crashed. You can’t make this stuff up.
New Haven-style pizza, which is quite frankly bizarre to someone whose idea of pizza is “500 toppings at minimum, extra mozzarella doesn’t count as a topping as it should be the default”
Actual argument on The Incredible Worlds of Wally McDoogle talk page I’ve archived for posterity
For reference, TIWoWmD was a Christian take on those “gross-out, wacky, goofy, kuh-razy, tOtAlLy RaDiCaL kidz adventure bookz” of the 90s and early-to-mid 2000s. But here’s the unedited argument:
“
Toasted Time Traveler has got to be way older than 2006
No way! I've been following them; but not since last year, and that one's new to me, so it has to be somewhere in 2006. Also, the order is so out of wack! My life as a smashed burrito with extra hot sauce (or something like that) was the first book, polluted pond scum was like the tenth book! Get it right, someone!!! And can someone make a page on Ronald Kidd? Author of at least three books; Sizzle & Splat, and Monkey Town are the ones I know off the top of my head.
”
This reminds me of those two dweeb fish arguing about Mega Weenie Monday at Weenie Hut Jr.’s in
that one episode of
SpongeBob.
This user thinks New England should break apart from theNortheastern United States to form its own census region — because think about it...why should the Red Sox and Yankees inhabit the same census region? I mean, that is just ridiculous...
NO ATFE
This user says that in a perfect worldAlcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives is a convenience store not a gov't agency.
This user thinks the restoration of the COMECON would have positive consequences to the global economy.
This user feels he has been made invisible and no one cares or knows of what this user feels, knows or exists for, this user will kill anyone who ignores him again, if they have stopped and then start again; arr what the hell, I'll kill them any way, EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.
This user is a heterosexualmale, but enjoys when females (only one at a time), preferably taller than himself, pat him on the head. Thus this user is headpatsexual.
This user lives on
Fort Campbell. His home is physically located in Tennessee. However, his mailing address is in Kentucky. Therefore he is unsure in which state he lives. Perhaps it is both.
This user is a
pedant and dislikes the vast difference in style and colour scheme between individual users'
userboxes and would prefer there to be an official standard.
This user does not care about whether
Québec will be part of
Canada, as Québec's foreign policy were it to gain independence would remain dependent on that of Canada due to their hopeless position in the event of a war.
🔫 = 🗽
No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. - T. Jefferson One of the ordinary modes, by which tyrants accomplish their purposes without resistance, is, by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - J. Story To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them. - G. Mason "Gun control" is a job-safety program for criminals. - J.R. Lott Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound. - L.N. Smith Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth. - G. Washington Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars. To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace. - G. Washington
The fact that this contributor may be personally related to the subject, does not preclude him from originally writing a professional neutral point of view on historical articles regarding a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's which is the subject. More importantly, the contributor for the fact that he may be personally related, has provided a wealth of firsthand data, knows through the oral tradition and provided supporting citations, is an authority as far as search and research for many years on the subject. There is no evidence of makeup nor embellishment of the facts surrounding the subject. 
So, it can be argued that many of these are biographical articles, that happens to have a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance; or on the other side, a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance biography that happens to be contributed by a personally and well-versed related person. 
The articles have been reviewed by academia history scholar (third parties) that are not personally or professionally connected to the contributor nor to the subject, analyzing the sources and citations. And in their opinion, even though there may exist a conflict of interest or a moral hazard, they are neutral point of view, and properly disclosed in the contributor's user page, as it is Wikipedia policy.
This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles:
The fact that this contributor may be personally related to the subject, does not preclude him from originally writing a professional neutral point of view on historical articles regarding a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's which is the subject. More importantly, the contributor for the fact that he may be personally related, has provided a wealth of firsthand data, knows through the oral tradition and provided supporting citations, is an authority as far as search and research for many years on the subject. There is no evidence of makeup nor embellishment of the facts surrounding the subject. 
So, it can be argued that many of these are biographical articles, that happens to have a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance; or on the other side, a historian's or politician's or writer's or fine art collector's historical significance biography that happens to be contributed by a personally and well-versed related person. 
The articles have been reviewed by academia history scholar (third parties) that are not personally or professionally connected to the contributor nor to the subject, analyzing the sources and citations. And in their opinion, even though there may exist a conflict of interest or a moral hazard, they are neutral point of view, and properly disclosed in the contributor's user page, as it is Wikipedia policy.
^Full disclosure if you don’t get it: it’s just the random article button. My point is that if you’re complaining about total systemic bias on Wikipedia then you’re ignoring about 98% of its largely rote content and focusing on controversial stuff you personally disagree with