This is Primefac's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46Auto-archiving period: 15 days |
I noticed this and your post at BOTN. I wouldn't mind working on this. — Qwerfjkl talk 21:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
{
"Qwerfjkl": [
"Z0FBQUFBQm1IcWxrV1VQamw2TWZHY2xYSVFrSFhiTTYyNHRGUi1MeWlKcVoxTWx2b05Jd0Y0SDlWczVfaEp0NEtJbk01Zl9DRW9UV0lRMWRtN1B6VTdtaXZFMWxQUGxRX2VqWVVlT3UzbzljQ1VodHdvd0ZUTDNjUkE0XzFIZTNYVDBwaWdaUmhvYzI=",
"qwerfjklwikipedia@gmail.com",
"2024-04-16 16:52:46"
]
}
I have explained my rationale for the explicit piping at ill talk page. Your feedback is welcomed. Fabrickator ( talk) 17:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, you just reverted my deletion request and I want to explain my intention to you: the redirect behind Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis stores a history that another user wanted to keep - even though its contents are already merged into the multiple sclerosis diagnosis article. My primary idea is to move that history to Diagnostic criteria for MS to move the multiple sclerosis diagnosis to diagnosis of multiple sclerosis afterwards. That way we could keep the history of diagnosis of multiple sclerosis for now and can possibly decide later what exactly we will do with it. Tobiasi0 ( talk) 07:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for closing Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#AFI templates. However, as this was a recently created template and previous consensus was to delete, shouldn't a "no consensus" outcome result in the status quo? i.e. there is no consensus to re-create the template? -- wooden superman 12:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Could you please be more careful when doing "clean up post move" on TV season articles that have been moved from "Such and Such (season 1)" format to "Such and Such season 1"? The thing is that the page move affects the page, but didn't change the page's eponymous category — but if you do an indiscriminate search-and-replace on the season number in the page's text, it also changes the category and thus moves the page from the category that actually exists to a non-existent redlink (e.g. from Category:Brooklyn Nine-Nine (season 1) episodes to Category:Brooklyn Nine-Nine season 1 episodes — and on the last two runs of redlinked category cleanup, I've literally had to fix several dozen of these.
So when you're doing that cleanup job, it's really important that you take greater care not to mess up the "(season #) episodes" category in the process. Thanks. Bearcat ( talk) 14:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Primefac, in the open Conflict of interest management arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias ( T)( C) 19:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, something went wrong in 1217197913 where you removed a visible pipe character (not a whitespace) from a table cell in the middle of the article (not in shortdesc). – MwGamera ( talk) 14:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
no idea if i'm reading this right, but it looks like you intervened on Talk:Prachi, Gujarat in the past to remove some edits. the same user is back, now with an account, and, i imagine, now adding the same edits again [1] [2]. 81.187.192.168 ( talk) 16:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Primefac. Would you mind taking a look at {{
di-missing article links}} and {{
di-missing some article links}}? There are two parameters (|date=
and |articles=
) that probably should be filled by those using these templates, but neither parameter is mentioned on the templates' documetation pages. The |date=
parameter seems to add files tagged with these templates to
Category:Disputed non-free Wikipedia files, which is used by file reviewers and bots to check on files with
WP:NFCCE issues, while the |articles=
parameter allows those tagging files to or those trying to cleanup such files to identify the exact article or articles not complying with
WP:NFCC#10c. I've always used these parameters when using these template, but just noticed there's nothing mentioned about them of the files' documentation pages. I'm not sure if that's intentional or just an oversight; so, I thought I'd ask someone else to take a look. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 00:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
places the image in dated subcategoriesdoesn't say how it does this, i.e. that it needs a date parameter to be passed to it. Primefac ( talk) 11:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Primefac,
I realize you have a lot of responsibilities on Wikipedia and this one is probably way, way down on your list of priorities but is there any way this page can be brought up to date? I was looking for when a certain editor received AFC permissions and this page was where I directed since they didn't come up on the search feature. But the table only goes to February 2023 so it is a year out of date. And then, when I clicked on some names, they were actually requests from February 2024, not 2023 so I'm not sure how those wires got crossed. This definitely seems like a task that could be delegated to some AFC helper who is knowledgeable about tables and updating them (which is definitely not me!). But since on the Participants page, editors are directed to go to this one page, it seems like it should be kept up to date as much as possible. Yes, it's not urgent but I do think it's important when trying to get background information on an editor one has questions about. Many thanks for any help you can supply. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Primefac! I want to post a request to resign as an administrator. No great problem or anything, it's just that I haven't been very active in recent years and have taken almost no adminship actions. When I do post it is in articles, and I intend to keep doing that, but I've almost forgotten how to be an administrator. That is why I am posting here: I think there is a board where I should formally request to have my mop withdrawn, but I can't remember where it is. Directions please? Thanks! --MelanieN MelanieN ( talk) 19:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/@NickWhite this is a popular youtuber. I decided to edit a currently useless page with accurate information. NickWhiteArmy ( talk) 07:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Could you (or a talk page stalker) redact this edit summary (for RD2 reasons)? Thanks. Zinnober9 ( talk) 18:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration case to which you were a party, " Conflict of interest management", has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 17:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are doing well. On mrwiki, where I am admin too, there's a category "files not in use" with around 8,000 files in it, all of which need to be deleted. Is there a way to automate the task if it was here on enwiki? Maybe some script, or AWB, or maybe I will need to come up with pywikibot script. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with that so promptly, seems to be resolved now. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding a bot you blocked in 2022. The thread is Unbanning user User:Dušan Kreheľ (bot). Thank you. Nobody ( talk) 07:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
This is Primefac's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46Auto-archiving period: 15 days |
I noticed this and your post at BOTN. I wouldn't mind working on this. — Qwerfjkl talk 21:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
{
"Qwerfjkl": [
"Z0FBQUFBQm1IcWxrV1VQamw2TWZHY2xYSVFrSFhiTTYyNHRGUi1MeWlKcVoxTWx2b05Jd0Y0SDlWczVfaEp0NEtJbk01Zl9DRW9UV0lRMWRtN1B6VTdtaXZFMWxQUGxRX2VqWVVlT3UzbzljQ1VodHdvd0ZUTDNjUkE0XzFIZTNYVDBwaWdaUmhvYzI=",
"qwerfjklwikipedia@gmail.com",
"2024-04-16 16:52:46"
]
}
I have explained my rationale for the explicit piping at ill talk page. Your feedback is welcomed. Fabrickator ( talk) 17:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, you just reverted my deletion request and I want to explain my intention to you: the redirect behind Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis stores a history that another user wanted to keep - even though its contents are already merged into the multiple sclerosis diagnosis article. My primary idea is to move that history to Diagnostic criteria for MS to move the multiple sclerosis diagnosis to diagnosis of multiple sclerosis afterwards. That way we could keep the history of diagnosis of multiple sclerosis for now and can possibly decide later what exactly we will do with it. Tobiasi0 ( talk) 07:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for closing Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#AFI templates. However, as this was a recently created template and previous consensus was to delete, shouldn't a "no consensus" outcome result in the status quo? i.e. there is no consensus to re-create the template? -- wooden superman 12:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Could you please be more careful when doing "clean up post move" on TV season articles that have been moved from "Such and Such (season 1)" format to "Such and Such season 1"? The thing is that the page move affects the page, but didn't change the page's eponymous category — but if you do an indiscriminate search-and-replace on the season number in the page's text, it also changes the category and thus moves the page from the category that actually exists to a non-existent redlink (e.g. from Category:Brooklyn Nine-Nine (season 1) episodes to Category:Brooklyn Nine-Nine season 1 episodes — and on the last two runs of redlinked category cleanup, I've literally had to fix several dozen of these.
So when you're doing that cleanup job, it's really important that you take greater care not to mess up the "(season #) episodes" category in the process. Thanks. Bearcat ( talk) 14:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Primefac, in the open Conflict of interest management arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias ( T)( C) 19:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, something went wrong in 1217197913 where you removed a visible pipe character (not a whitespace) from a table cell in the middle of the article (not in shortdesc). – MwGamera ( talk) 14:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
no idea if i'm reading this right, but it looks like you intervened on Talk:Prachi, Gujarat in the past to remove some edits. the same user is back, now with an account, and, i imagine, now adding the same edits again [1] [2]. 81.187.192.168 ( talk) 16:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Primefac. Would you mind taking a look at {{
di-missing article links}} and {{
di-missing some article links}}? There are two parameters (|date=
and |articles=
) that probably should be filled by those using these templates, but neither parameter is mentioned on the templates' documetation pages. The |date=
parameter seems to add files tagged with these templates to
Category:Disputed non-free Wikipedia files, which is used by file reviewers and bots to check on files with
WP:NFCCE issues, while the |articles=
parameter allows those tagging files to or those trying to cleanup such files to identify the exact article or articles not complying with
WP:NFCC#10c. I've always used these parameters when using these template, but just noticed there's nothing mentioned about them of the files' documentation pages. I'm not sure if that's intentional or just an oversight; so, I thought I'd ask someone else to take a look. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 00:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
places the image in dated subcategoriesdoesn't say how it does this, i.e. that it needs a date parameter to be passed to it. Primefac ( talk) 11:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Primefac,
I realize you have a lot of responsibilities on Wikipedia and this one is probably way, way down on your list of priorities but is there any way this page can be brought up to date? I was looking for when a certain editor received AFC permissions and this page was where I directed since they didn't come up on the search feature. But the table only goes to February 2023 so it is a year out of date. And then, when I clicked on some names, they were actually requests from February 2024, not 2023 so I'm not sure how those wires got crossed. This definitely seems like a task that could be delegated to some AFC helper who is knowledgeable about tables and updating them (which is definitely not me!). But since on the Participants page, editors are directed to go to this one page, it seems like it should be kept up to date as much as possible. Yes, it's not urgent but I do think it's important when trying to get background information on an editor one has questions about. Many thanks for any help you can supply. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Primefac! I want to post a request to resign as an administrator. No great problem or anything, it's just that I haven't been very active in recent years and have taken almost no adminship actions. When I do post it is in articles, and I intend to keep doing that, but I've almost forgotten how to be an administrator. That is why I am posting here: I think there is a board where I should formally request to have my mop withdrawn, but I can't remember where it is. Directions please? Thanks! --MelanieN MelanieN ( talk) 19:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/@NickWhite this is a popular youtuber. I decided to edit a currently useless page with accurate information. NickWhiteArmy ( talk) 07:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Could you (or a talk page stalker) redact this edit summary (for RD2 reasons)? Thanks. Zinnober9 ( talk) 18:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The Arbitration case to which you were a party, " Conflict of interest management", has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 17:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are doing well. On mrwiki, where I am admin too, there's a category "files not in use" with around 8,000 files in it, all of which need to be deleted. Is there a way to automate the task if it was here on enwiki? Maybe some script, or AWB, or maybe I will need to come up with pywikibot script. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with that so promptly, seems to be resolved now. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding a bot you blocked in 2022. The thread is Unbanning user User:Dušan Kreheľ (bot). Thank you. Nobody ( talk) 07:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)