From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2023

01 January 2023

Reason: IP users keep adding false information. Noktonissian ( talk) 15:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. El_C 18:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring removal of lolicon tag, despite themes of lolicon being in the story description Samalik16 ( talk) 17:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 18:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: George VI is an important monarch in British History. Hodakatokyoboy ( talk) 20:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter ( talk) 20:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: George V is an important historical monarch. Hodakatokyoboy ( talk) 20:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DMacks ( talk) 21:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced death claims. General Ization Talk 22:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There is one IPv6 (/64) that has been a continual problem, but several new accounts also. DMacks ( talk) 00:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Consistent vandalism by IP users SKAG123 ( talk) 22:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: See @ User:El_C's edit summary from September. Page was recently recreated based on unreliable sources, with notability still not established. I redirected it again. If there is a way to separately protect the page from being recreated without AfC, that might be worth considering. DFlhb ( talk) 00:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ DFlhb The way may be to move it to draft without leaving a redirect and salt the mainspace title. I'd be down to do the move, would need an admin to salt the mainspace title though. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 01:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I've removed wikilinks to the redirect, so that we wouldn't have a (tempting) red link. DFlhb ( talk) 01:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that'll do the job. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined for now. Vigorous discussion is valid on talkpages. Seems mostly one editor doing the disruption, who has already been reported to ANI and has also now stated they are retired. If the problem continues beyond this time, feel free to re-request. DMacks ( talk) 21:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked: Eposty ( talk · contribs). via ANI DMacks ( talk) 23:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 00:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is constantly the target of pov-pushing. HistoryofIran ( talk) 02:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing attempts by IP/mobile to add unverified information CT55555( talk) 19:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined: warn the user appropriately and then report to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long term abuse. 2600:1700:4974:6C00:B5AB:33C4:8D9A:DE8B ( talk) 21:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I'm also not convinced that there is enough recent disruption to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP on several ranges over the last two weeks vandalizing with fake information about station history. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 05:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks and Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 05:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 03:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DMacks ( talk) 03:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker ( talk) 10:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Astoriaaldrich ( talk) 03:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Family list name, Astor origins, religion not correct. Needs to be corrected. Astors were Jewish. Ethnicity tajik. Block needs to be removed and information corrected. reply

Not unprotected It's exactly this edit-dispute that led to the protection. No end-runs around talk-page consensus are allowed. DMacks ( talk) 03:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent copyright violation: There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, and the IP deliberately ignores this. Ymblanter ( talk) 09:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm not 100% sure if the alleged exception described at commons:Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Ukraine#Freedom_of_panorama ( permanent link) might apply to a building damaged by a current war, so I don't necessarily see this protection as a strict copyright enforcement – but it's clear that the editing is disruptive, so...
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 11:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent addition of factually incorrect info, the IP is I believe logged out editing from Bezawada16 user. I've reverted 3 times in the last 2 days, temporary ECP could be beneficial or else blocking the user with Semi protection would also be helpful — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 12:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I have warned the user about the edit warring policy and blocked the IP from logged-out editing for a week. This should suffice to either stop the edit war or to justify an WP:ANEW report as soon as this continues. In case that really doesn't solve the problem, please re-request. Semi-protection, that is, as semi-protection is not yet proven ineffective. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent violations of WP:GS/RUSUKR (ECP restriction on Russo-Ukrainian War topics) during the open RM. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 07:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Talk namespace is exempt. Ymblanter ( talk) 09:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
RM discussions are not, though. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Yes, this is correct. I do not know what the best solution would be, especially given that the RM outcome is obvious. Ymblanter ( talk) 11:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Ah sorry, Ymblanter, I had misread that, I think. I agree that the talk namespace is exempt from ECP, yet the restriction applies to the discussion. Okay. Hm. Semi-protection might be an option to reduce the noise, but I don't yet see a need for this when looking at the non-autoconfirmed edits alone. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I'll decline this for now and try to have an eye on it. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Birth Place has been changed. As per documents his birth place is Attabira Odisha Sukant Kadam ( talk) 09:49, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 17:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter ( talk) 17:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Temporary protections have been applied previously, but the vandalism always immediately returns. Xurizuri ( talk) 12:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker ( talk) 13:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Disruption has been going on for more than a year; might as well do this. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – While this is not so heavily used, the formatting is quite complicated and as the history of the template shows, almost any non-template-editor who has tried to edit it has left it worse than when started. Muhandes ( talk) 14:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

02 January 2023

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. May also be used to warn admins and other editors. BeeSpeed1989 ( talk) 20:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Your user page is already automatically "semi-protected" by Filter 803. There has not been a single attempt to edit it yet. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It is semi-protected? Yes, it’s in progress. BeeSpeed1989 ( talk) 21:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in IP vandalism likely related to him losing a recent tournament match. Wham2001 ( talk) 22:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced death claims. General Ization Talk 22:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator JBW. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continuing after protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 22:49, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 22:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. BangJan1999 22:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done. Edit war over the CSD template has stopped and article sent to AfD. Will keep an eye on it. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism Trikekus ( talk) 00:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Can we please get indefinite semi? That level of protection was working fine, until it was removed in May 2022. Basically more than half of edit since then has been vandalism—the constant reversion is wasting the time of too many editors. Aza24 (talk) 23:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edits from IP address users appear to be attempts to make good faith edits, not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 04:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopper can't accept that something fictional happens in 2023. (I could also be gravely mistaken about this, but I don't know Zardoz.). LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 23:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Isabelle Belato, please see https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/zardoz-1974. LilianaUwU, rollback is to be used for obvious vandalism and this wasn't even vandalism. You used it five times on that article to reinstate incorrect information. If, as you say, you "don't know Zardoz", you certainly should not be using rollback in that way. Further misuse may result in revocation of your access to it – it is a privilege, not a right. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Sdrqaz: Thanks for the heads up. Considering the mistake was explained and corrected, protection won't be necessary. Apologies for being so hasty. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I appreciate the response and unprotection, Isabelle. Marking as Not done. Sdrqaz ( talk) 02:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated and continuous vandalism, adding Donald Trump and Nick Fuentes to the 'People' section FishOfIvory ( talk) 01:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. (There's also not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.) Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 04:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated, totally unsourced, additions about a sequel, that has not even been confirmed, let alone the title, or actors - Arjayay ( talk) 17:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 09:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism frequently repeated by numerous IPs. -. David Biddulph ( talk) 06:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP-farm editwarring because (s)he does not believe that Dublin and Lublin can be confused. By now, 3 IPs are blocked in this case. The Banner  talk 11:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see why full protection is needed. What is need is for the IP to engage to a discussion.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The same IP editor removed the Dublin link from Lublin Airport's article so I've reverted that too. doktorb words deeds 11:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Tusk001 ( talk) 10:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 13:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is one lines mentined caste Koery or Kurmi. Actually he is Koery not kurmi. please give permission to edit this page so that I can write authentic information,. Even in the below sectioned and also in all news paper and channels it's mentioned he is Koery by caste. 49.36.33.240 ( talk) 10:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. -- Euryalus ( talk) 10:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Change the Closer section in Major works to: Closer

Carucci's first significant body of work is first and foremost about the nuclear family but also touches upon the universal topics of intimacy, mother-daughter relationships, the female body, and mortality. Her parents, grandparents, and partner are the central players, each of whom she portrays gently but unflinchingly in her images. Her color photographs work with a definite color palette, with mesmerizing quality to the serene vivid reds and blues set against the myriad tones of bare skin. With her unique approach to making work, one that merges both planned, staged, and well-lit photographs, simultaneously with openness to the intuitive and spontaneous process, she creates images that highlight the depths of the beauties and pain of being human.

Delete the section Pain

Add the section MIDLIFE Elinor’s vivid descriptions of Midlife depict the complicated, layered aspects of life that affect both men and women on an intimate level in an immersive and up-close look at these important years. Through love, generations, family, women's health, and intimacy, Midlife tells the story of getting older during the middle of life. Midlife is a universal period for us all, yet this reach narrative is absent from our cultural dialogue, and in this body of work by Carucci’s asks the viewrs to look thoroughly and to collectively see what is so often unseen.

Elinor carucci (
talk) 
22:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Declined Better to be brought up on the article talk-page. Lectonar ( talk) 09:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by editors through unexplained edit summary See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130885484 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130886860 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130889234 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130891367. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130553699 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130553767 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130738439

Joe de Jointe ( talk) 14:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked., both users are already blocked for edit-warring Ymblanter ( talk) 11:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent vandalism Titus Gold ( talk) 13:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 13:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple attempts of similar controversial changes which have already been discussed on talk page. Unregistered users are mostly responsible Titus Gold ( talk) 13:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive almost 3 weeks ago. Lectonar ( talk) 13:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 10:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page needs indefinite protection due to persistant removal of sourced info. Semsûrî ( talk) 14:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian ( talk) 21:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 15:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Different IP editors have been changing "2293", the date in which the film is set, to "2023". This has occured about a dozen times starting on 2022-12-31. Peaceray ( talk) 17:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 21:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Transfer rumours causing lots of disruptive editing. Deal close, protect for one week. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 19:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Similarly to Snowdonia, there continue to be multiple attempts of similar controversial changes which have already been discussed on talk page. Unregistered users are mostly responsible. Titus Gold ( talk) 13:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recently, the example of publicity of Elon Musk's jet traffic has been added to the Streisand Effect wikipedia page. There have been multiple reverts of the edits, attempting to exclude the legitimate example from usage on the page. There have, by my count, been 10 separate reversions related to this content in the last 24 hours. Hlposts ( talk) 17:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Comment: Of note is that this article has received so much attention in large part because it's been the subject of at least two prominent posts to /r/ElonJetTracker. I agree it should be temporarily semi-protected. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done. While there might be merit in discussing whether that's a good example or not, edit warring to remove it is not the way to go, so I've protected the page in the hopes editors will use the talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See alternate page: Draft:Ayush Srivastava, related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ayushsrivastava0. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 20:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistently recurring vandalism from users attempting to refactor the article into a hoax about the fictional film, as well as other frequently unhelpful, disruptive, or unsourced edits. silvia ( User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 21:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. vandalism from many users/ltas/socks Wesoree ( Talk) 16:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring going on. MasterMatt12 (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OZOO (t) (c) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. vandalism from many users/ltas/socks Wesoree ( Talk) 16:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring going on. MasterMatt12 (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OZOO (t) (c) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

03 January 2023

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editwarring over a template. The Banner  talk 10:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced change of team. Spike 'em ( talk) 14:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has gone on regularly enough for over a year. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandals. -. David Biddulph ( talk) 15:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly sourced information. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk)20:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war / pov-pushen. The Banner  talk 01:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 01:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC):  Requesting immediate archiving... ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 01:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Restart of a prior edit war. The Banner  talk 01:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This seems to have been resolved by a two-weeks block. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Elizium23 ( talk) 14:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Edit-warring seems to have been stopped now that Hobbs has been sworn in. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Elizium23 ( talk) 14:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Elizium23 ( talk) 14:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users repeatedly add rumored projects that too unsourced. FrB.TG ( talk) 18:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Seems like people are insistent on changing Katie Hobbs to Kari Lake Tartar Torte 20:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. TartarTorte: I've p-blocked one of the IP ranges and added the article to my watchlist. If the issue persists, feel free to message me. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Sounds good thanks! Tartar Torte 22:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – restarted edit war / pov-pushen. The Banner  talk 01:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 01:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject currently in the news. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 03:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hasn't even been 4 hours as TFA and it's already been vandalized. ZLEA T\ C 03:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Zsinj Talk 04:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring for IP. This page needs to be protected indefinitely. LancedSoul ( talk) 17:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by hopping IP over the last week or so. - FlightTime ( open channel) 17:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequent for semi-protection in my opinion-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: May need higher protection, even with normal protection, they are still getting reverted. 45BearsFan ( talk) 02:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High fluidity of it being a "Breaking News, and developing story". cut down on the risk of "rumors and false information" being released 66.115.210.70 ( talk) 05:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user(s) keeps reverting information here without an edit summary despite their changes impacting several parts of this article. This has persisted regardless of requests being made. Wozal ( talk) 18:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined warn and discuss with the IP and, if they continue, report them to WP:ANEW. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: continuous vandalization for no reason. User writing this has talked to users involved, and they have said that it was a "random page about a random show nobody cares about", so I am requesting for it to be protected. 木炭六十八 ( talk) 19:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. JoshuaInWiki ( talk) 01:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: More disruptive editing CJ-Moki ( talk) 01:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

CJ-Moki, talk pages are usually not protected. See WP:ATPROT for details.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Several editors using the page as a forum (see WP:NOTFORUM). CJ-Moki ( talk) 02:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: this case is about to go to appeal and people feel passionately about it.

this page has recently been vandalized and we expect it will be subject to aggressive vandalism in the coming months Stumpy2121 ( talk) 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is still seeing a high rate of disruptive editing, with vandalism and unsourced additions. Most of the problematic edits are coming from IP users. The page was unprotected a week ago, so a longer period of protection may be needed. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 07:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 10:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) re- blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar ( talk) 10:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The template is only used in about 15 pages and is not important enough to warrant pp-template. The protected admin User:Ansh666 is now not an admin anymore. CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 02:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:38, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: There is not disruption from autoconfirmed editors on the page. Semi-protection should be applied, not superprotection. Maine 🦞 06:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: As an admin involved with editing the article and having to revdel some pretty ugly talk page vandalism, I would recommend leaving it unchanged and keeping the extended confirmed protection active. ("Superprotection" as stated above is the wrong term.) Fuzheado | Talk 07:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected: I can't see any reason to end the extended confirmed protection early. Pinging ToBeFree as an FYI. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Same. Thanks for the ping. This waa done in response to the disruption still present after semi-protection and is limited to 3 days. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Some minor changes have to be done, and information should be added Vanilabar ( talk) 08:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user(s) keeps reverting information here without an edit summary despite their changes impacting several parts of this article. This has persisted regardless of requests being made. Wozal ( talk) 18:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined warn and discuss with the IP and, if they continue, report them to WP:ANEW. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: continuous vandalization for no reason. User writing this has talked to users involved, and they have said that it was a "random page about a random show nobody cares about", so I am requesting for it to be protected. 木炭六十八 ( talk) 19:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. JoshuaInWiki ( talk) 01:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: More disruptive editing CJ-Moki ( talk) 01:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

CJ-Moki, talk pages are usually not protected. See WP:ATPROT for details.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Several editors using the page as a forum (see WP:NOTFORUM). CJ-Moki ( talk) 02:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: this case is about to go to appeal and people feel passionately about it.

this page has recently been vandalized and we expect it will be subject to aggressive vandalism in the coming months Stumpy2121 ( talk) 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is still seeing a high rate of disruptive editing, with vandalism and unsourced additions. Most of the problematic edits are coming from IP users. The page was unprotected a week ago, so a longer period of protection may be needed. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 07:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 10:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) re- blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar ( talk) 10:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit warring in article between two relatively new editors. — kashmīrī  TALK 13:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: Both editors warned about edit warring. If they persist, consider going to WP:AN/3. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism where a joke disambiguation screenshot from September 2022 is still being circulated, and new/IP users check to see if it's real and have a go at adding it back when they see it's not there. Belbury ( talk) 15:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This is a frequent target of sockpuppets and IPs of LTA Jinnifer (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jinnifer/Archive). A 6 month protect due to Jinnifer's activity expired in December. Please reprotect. MrOllie ( talk) 16:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from IPs and new accounts. -. David Biddulph ( talk) 14:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in article about living person Southdevonian ( talk) 15:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:23, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Over the past year this article has repeatedly been edited by a variety of IPs making near-identical edits, to remove maintenance tags and add unsourced claims. Dorsetonian ( talk) 17:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton ( talk) 18:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr.Pinsky ( talk) 18:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian ( talk) 19:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war about flags. The Banner  talk 11:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Daniel Case. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism related to the subject's recent arrest. GPL93 ( talk) 12:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Edits by admins only. Makes sure no other users can edit it. Elijah Wilder ( talk) 16:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This is the same editor who has been adding serial commas to articles and has realised that the alternative is to remove one item from a list of three to ensure the absence of the serial comma isn't noticed. - SchroCat ( talk) 14:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also rangeblocked 174.204.64.0/20 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)) for two years as they have resumed the same activity that led to the one-year block that had expired in November. Since the other Washington state-based Verizon IP they used is far enough outside the range that MediaWiki will not let me include it in the block, and indeed someone that mobile may find other IPs to use, the protection is needed as well. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent inclusion of unsourced or unrelated material, also vandalism such as the section "Notable Legislation and Accomplishments as an Assembly Member: None." has been removed, but requesting protection. GeorgeBailey ( talk) 14:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thank you! I appreciate it. GeorgeBailey ( talk) 17:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi GeorgeBailey, if these additions continue, they will be block evasion that can be dealt with by reverting and reporting the sockpuppetry at WP:SPI or (in obvious, ongoing cases) WP:AIV. This should be sufficient for now; the edit frequency is pretty low. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection. Elijah Wilder ( talk) 17:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. No rationale provided, no history of disruption visible, and the page is already quasi-semiprotected by an edit filter. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 17:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

04 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 20:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass blanking by sockpuppet accounts. Some1 ( talk) 22:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- RegentsPark ( comment) 23:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by sockpuppets, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrshivamrai. bonadea contributions talk 23:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done -- RegentsPark ( comment) 23:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Many users are vandalising the page. Some are adding non major parties in infobox. XYZ 250706 ( talk) 16:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism will never stop if you let people edit 128.254.249.8 ( talk) 21:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Misgendering. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 00:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ ToBeFree: This was only because a person who was scheduled for execution was transgender. That person in question has now been executed so essentially that page no longer needs protecting, it is this page that now requires the protection: List of people executed in the United States in 2023. Inexpiable ( talk) 21:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring and constant reversion, see /info/en/?search=Talk:WikiLeaks#Improper_editing. Temporary protection needed for things to cool down. Softlemonades ( talk) 18:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment The conflict on this page was initiated when examining a recent addition with clear BLP content. I removed the content, sourced exclusively to a defunct website "Focus Ecuador". Further examination of recent content additions found multiple other problems with thin-sourcing of BLP content: things like Daily Beast, HuffPo contributor platform, international business times. The editor who added these problematic areas is keen to restore them, without regard to the higher standard of sourcing required for living person content, as they have made clear on talk. Cambial foliar❧ 18:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
    As pointed out on the Talk page cited, big issues include a HuffPo senior reporter being removed, I didnt object to the IBTimes removal Ive done it a lot and made sure it was removed when I restored other content, and Ive repeatedly asked the editor to not bulk remove every Daily Beast citation without discussion or even reading the articles or looking at the authors which include definite experts like Kevin Poulsen. Theyve admitted removing articles without knowing it despite being told Softlemonades ( talk) 21:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
    The editor who added these problematic areas is keen to restore them Ive asked you to just to discuss the changes and you just revert them again and ignore WP:BRD. At this point thats all I want especially since you removed at least some things like the Washington Post without knowing it or looking at them
    without regard to the higher standard of sourcing required for living person content I disagree and think its an odd thing to say about stuff that includes how much money WikiLeaks raised through Bitcoin Softlemonades ( talk) 21:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 03:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – almost all recent edits in history have been disruptive, low volume but article title makes it prone to it. Will120 ( talk) 06:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected, let us try pending changes first-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonsense about "adrod 13" (sic) put in by multiple IPs. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 07:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be some confusion at to the topic of this article as there is a new album to be released with the same name. Skipple 19:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of user vandalism. Discographymen ( talk) 21:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The user has not responded to any warnings. Help me to how to stop these repeated vandalism.

AIV is thataway. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 05:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing RowanJ LP2 ( talk) 20:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 01:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 10:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been vandalism since December 16. Please revert the page to pre Dec16 and protect it. Stmarksblr ( talk) 06:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar ( talk) 08:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The population figures in this article have been changing repeatedly for weeks. Largoplazo ( talk) 01:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The disruption by autoconfirmed accounts doesn't rise to the level where extend-confirmed protection would be needed. I have watchlisted. Lectonar ( talk) 10:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandals changing the dates of his first tenure in office. For outgoing presidents, the term ends on December 31. Not January 1. This is a widespread dating format on other articles for Brazilian presidents. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 02:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron 32 12:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Brendan Miller. Graywalls ( talk) 04:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment This was previously proposed 4 days ago; BLP subject has edited the page again after the previous request, but stopped 3 days ago. Unclear whether he could have seen the COI warnings (see linked COI noticeboard discussion). Regardless, if allowed under WP:IAR, I support page protection, to nudge the subject into using the talk page and avoid him risking sanctions, since I believe he edited his page with rare good faith. DFlhb ( talk) 05:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined Even protecting the page will not make sure the IP, be they Brendan Miller or not, will use the article talk-page. I would follow what is spelled out at WP:BLPEDIT, and repeatedly link to WP:BIOSELF in edit summaries and talk-page warnings; even with changing IP adresses this ought to be seen after some time. Lectonar ( talk) 08:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly controversial figure and no protection doesn't seem to make sense. A lot of edits are either vandalism or their reverts. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 2601:150:100:86F4:0:0:0:69 ( talk · contribs) blocked by ComplexRational. Jayron 32 12:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High number of recent edits and reversions due to current events. JefferyClark ( talk) 11:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Jayron 32 12:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Long term pattern of IPs making random date changes -- FMSky ( talk) 11:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less than one such edit per month; which is not excessive. -- Jayron 32 12:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/new account vandalism/disruptive editing. Protection log documents repeated protection needed going back over many years. — Archer1234 ( talk) 12:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely.-- RegentsPark ( comment) 14:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; protected six times in the past. Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 12:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Edits are not vandalism. Jayron 32 12:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
With apologies, Jayron32, I seem to have decision conflicted. At the same time you declined to protect I went with one year of pending changes protection due to the low level but steady history of vandalism and other disruptive edits with a few constructive edits mixed in, including over the last couple of months. You're welcome to remove my protection if you think it's best. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 12:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No problem. You're fine. -- Jayron 32 12:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 12:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The disruptive edits are few and far between, and at least for the last 4 weeks come from the same IP. At need report to an apppropriate noticeboard. Lectonar ( talk) 12:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Okay SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 13:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Very high level of IP Vandalism ANewPreson ( talk) 15:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism attempts to change the name of the manager. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 19:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some users are vandalizing the page.  Waqar  ( talk) 13:46, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 13:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Okay!  Waqar  ( talk) 13:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - Who is John Galt? 15:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 19:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/poorly sourced content. GlatorNator ( talk) 13:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 19:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/poorly sourced content. GlatorNator ( talk) 13:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/poorly sourced content. GlatorNator ( talk) 13:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive by disruption by IPs and new users. Editorkamran ( talk) 13:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Disruption still happening. Editorkamran ( talk) 18:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring and IP socking. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 17:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Less Unless ( talk) 19:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

05 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism. Sjö ( talk) 15:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP Jumping editor repeatedly adding hyperbolic and promotional content over the last month. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Unaware that you had already done this, I gave the article six months of protection, because as noted both here and at ANEW this user has been going on doing this since October. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So much vandalism due to active election. Bbraxtonlee ( talk) 18:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 19:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 17:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 19:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP disruption. Last page protection had a 3 day duration. Maleschreiber ( talk) 22:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has gone on for over a year; no reason for you to have to keep coming back here. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Per suggestion on Talk page - this is to address the addition of unsourced content which looks like WP:OR by an IP editor - as it is possible IP editor is not aware that other editors are trying to communicate with them. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long term abuse. 2605:8D80:324:F7E:746D:BA83:634:7CE9 ( talk) 17:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: "Humorous" vandalism from pupils who are at the school, including https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mascalls_Academy&diff=1104063059&oldid=1104062877 Tbf69 20:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. it is at a Wikidefcon 3 level,as this is a new political figure.there is a high level of vandalism because people are using it as a forum of sorts. ItsMeKeys ( talk) 21:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre 🚐 02:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive-by IP's are bent on inserting WP:UNDUE content into the article whilst violating WP:WAR, WP:DUE and WP:BRD. This is a hot topic currently due to the Mahsa Amini protests. A talk page section was made, but they deliberately ignore it. -. LouisAragon ( talk) 23:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think we need extended-confirmed protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 03:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 06:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two months of genre-warring from Thailand IPs in a wide range starting with 2001:FB1:14_:... Binksternet ( talk) 07:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased IP vandalism/promo edits. Izzy Moony Hi new friend! 08:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-Term abuse sock of User:Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse Sock of User:Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse Vandalism as sock of User:Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – page is the subject of many unsourced edits reporting that the subject is now employed by or in talks with Mississippi State University. always forever ( talk) 03:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is subject to persistent long-term efforts by various IP or inexperienced editors to tweak this page (likely due to the figures very important role in history). Unfortunately, the vast majority of recent changes have been more disruptive than constructive and have had to be instantly reverted by experienced editors. I would suggest that having this page open has become a time sink and waste of community time. Iskandar323 ( talk) 10:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This does seem long-term but let's see if this calms it down first. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption since the last two weeks. - SUN EYE 1 11:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This is for making sure I can confirm no one removes themselves from the list. Ilovejames5 :) 10:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The protection policy requires that user subpages aren't protected pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause and I don't believe that a subpage is likely to be modified nor that the purpose you're intending to use it for requires it to be protected. Focus on the articles rather than making a personal list of editors you've warned. I won't decline this so other admins can have a look and see what they think. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined This provides enough reason for the moment, as there has been no disruption. I personally would refrain from maintaining such a list (it seems somehow to go against the "spirit" of Wikipedia, and if you intend to warn plenty of people with say changing IPs, it would quickly become rather unwieldy), and I concur with my esteemed colleague above. Lectonar ( talk) 12:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP disruption. HistoryofIran ( talk) 11:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an ip is constantly making changes to the number of soundtrack albums without a source. The ip has been reverted by multiple editors and continues to vandalize the page. JOJ Hutton 12:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 12:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Its multiple IPs did you even do any investigation? Why are you an admin?-- JOJ Hutton 13:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. for two weeks. Jojhutton, please re-report if the block is evaded, and/or report obvious block evasion at WP:AIV if it happens. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi protection due to consistent meatpuppetry (different Bangladeshi IPs). See edit history. Beshogur ( talk) 15:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on in the history going back to 2020. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Article is the target of joke edits by some of the subject's students.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. For a day. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Navjot Singh ( talk) 19:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vio disruption resuming a week after the last protection period ended (less than a day after MusikBot removed the padlock). Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 19:17, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Increasing amounts of IP vandalism MrEarlGray ( talk) 13:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 17:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Less Unless ( talk) 17:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Less Unless ( talk) 17:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lemonaka ( talk) 14:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I am not sure if protecting this page is desirable ... the logs show it has never been protected despite continuous vandalism. Semi-protection would leave IP editors with nowhere to report false positives, which do happen. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Daniel Case, I fell for this first too. The reports page is at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports, though. The talk page of the shell around these reports should (at least theoretically) never see any reports. That said, keeping some of the disruption on this specific talk page rather than elsewhere could even be desirable.
I guess if there's actually a need for semi-protection, those who deal with it will request or implement it. Lemonaka has never edited the page. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
You meant Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives, right? Daniel Case ( talk) 16:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ ToBeFree@ Daniel Case Thanks for advice, I just came up with this because I saw a lot of vandalism in history Since Dec 31. Lemonaka ( talk) 17:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Comment: worth nothing that this, along with It's Just That Way, and Where Have You Gone is more than likely WP:LTA/AC. Skipple 21:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – subject appears to be in the news recently due to some controversial remarks leading to an uptick in vandalism from various IP editors. Skipple 21:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

06 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has being changing value for months without providing sources. Latest edit behavior shows we can't assume good faith anymore and IP is clearly a troll or vandal. McSly ( talk) 18:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Pblocked a range from the page, and a few others they've been editing disruptively. Let me know if there is still a problem. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WPEditor42 ( talkcontribs) 21:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism following previous protection period 2603:7000:8E03:7457:E167:6DFF:7E7A:1A18 ( talk) 23:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Talbert Swan is a public figure and social critic whose public positions result in persistent vandalism to his page and frequent violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Non credible sources are referenced to slander a living subject by his critics. This page needs to be protected. Mjones3927 ( talk) 19:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most activity this month has been your cleanup. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:46, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Daniel Case The above user has been reverting sourced edits on the Swan page and I have asked them to take to talk page. Instead, they have refused to and disruptively edited. Pennsylvania2 ( talk) 21:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
So it was a good thing I declined the report then ... Daniel Case ( talk) 21:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Logged out socking editor continues to disruptively stalk my talk page. Spike 'em ( talk) 23:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. If the troll comes back, I'll do a longer range block or semi-protection. Let me know. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Range blocked for one week. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
(searches, searches) ah, at Special:Contributions/193.207.0.0/16 it is. Thanks :) ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No problem. There was an existing block that was about to expire they was noted LTA, so we'll see if it has to be lengthened. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Needs to be protected. Every single time prior to a thread on Reddit about Louis Conradt being released, people attempt to edit political history, and omit sources. 64.231.234.195 ( talk) 23:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: (or at least, one long enough to stop the nonsense). Persistent vandalism – The disruptive editing started as soon as the protection expired. Please note that a) similar disruption (regarding the picture) has been taking place on Commons (leading to the image being fully protected) and b) the edit requests on the article's talk page that keep being declined (as they go against what the source says). M.Bitton ( talk) 01:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I completely agree. This silliness has been going on for much to long now. At least a two months protection. -- Fama Clamosa ( talk) 01:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I concur. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 01:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nothing in the month of October. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 24.114.44.8 ( talk) 03:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Threshold for protecting a talk page is higher than for an article. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long term abuse. 24.114.44.8 ( talk) 03:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

And it just keeps getting worse Philipnelson99 ( talk) 04:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High levels of vandalism, see [1] for cause, IPs persistently removing references to Algeria or falsely claiming photographs of lions taken in Algeria were actually taken in Morocco. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 05:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Downgrade to auto confirmed: Please remove the ECP and downgrade it to semi-protection to prevent one sockpuppet from returning. Otherwise, please use the pending edits mode. Imperial meter ( talk) 19:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 06:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: There is a draft at Draft:Mark Wiens which in my view meets the WP:AFC acceptance criteria of having a greater than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion discussion. It is a borderline notability article, which is fine. A prior version has been deleted at AfD, but in 2017. Things have moved on with Wiens since then. I have no concerns that it may well be sent straight to AfD, since the community can decide its fate. There is a lengthy discussion at the AFC Helpdesk. It might be seen that this request is sidestepping that discussion, which is why I have linked to it - to seek to ensure that is not so, and that there can be no accusations of forum shopping. 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Happy to accept the article from AfC now, with sufficient sources, but would encourage semi-protection in any case as I am aware this page has a little bit of a history!. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 18:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Mattdaviesfsic: Unprotected here. If disruption ensues, please request protection, but I'd rather not protect as a pre-emptive measure. Sdrqaz ( talk) 04:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – New user editwarring over infobox image, open discussion on talk. Please return to statusquo while discussion is on. - FlightTime Phone ( open channel) 02:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined: They've been warned now so if they continue to edit war report them to WP:ANEW. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP add largely unsourced content included non existent channels and program list John123521 ( Talk- Contib.) 03:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated non neutral POV edits by unregistered user. No attempt to seek consensus through TALK page despite requests from 2 editors. Aemilius Adolphin ( talk) 03:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined: Warn the editor appropriately and, if they continue, report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Seems to be editwarring (largely by anon accounts) re: whether it is a "racial slur" or "ethnic slur." Has already been discussed twice on Talk Page, but changes continue. See also here: https://www.propastop.org/eng/2023/01/05/why-propagandists-are-battling-to-redefine-vatnik/ Korossyl ( talk) 03:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated non NPOV edits by unregistered user. No attempt to reach consensus despite requests from different editors. See article talk page. Aemilius Adolphin ( talk) 06:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined: Warn the editor appropriately and, if they continue, report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Persistent page move warring, despite previous RM consensus not to move. Have been moved at least 3 times in the last month. – robertsky ( talk) 07:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Move protected indefinitely. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 08:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:57, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New accounts and IPs vandalizing article over the last few days. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Change to indefinite semi-protection. Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 10:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Considering the history the article prior to its increased protection (first to full, then down to extended when that was introduced), it does not seem like a good idea open the floodgates. Favonian ( talk) 11:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hes with holding general information regarding the identity of hiss family members. Ive been working on this case for over a year. You're order by the CIA to change it. 24.75.165.55 ( talk) 12:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – The Reptilian Cabal trumps the CIA. Favonian ( talk) 13:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: ten years since protection and no apparent vandalism. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 13:16, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected 10 years is probably enough. Let's see what happens. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

He is an innocent man with good points involving protecting his family 188.95.207.154 ( talk) 12:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done It is not clear what text you would like changed in the article. Please include what text you want added or removed, and include a rationale and a source for the requested change. Jayron 32 14:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of uncited infobox edits over the past week. Chronikhiles ( talk) 10:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP editing Iaof2017 ( talk) 12:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new and IP editors vandalizing BLP for past 2 days. Schazjmd  (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep ( talk) 19:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some user(s) sometimes ruin this page with bad formatting. JSH-alive/ talk/ cont/ mail 12:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism including BLP-vio Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 16:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep ( talk) 19:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism including BLP-vio Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 17:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep ( talk) 19:13, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

07 January 2023

Reason: Easy way to vandalise very important page like i do for demonstration 2001:818:E801:C000:15D4:245E:3018:BD0F ( talk) 18:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Nthep ( talk) 18:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
But I did vandalism on that page so its not preemptive 2001:818:E801:C000:15D4:245E:3018:BD0F ( talk) 18:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No, we'll deal with it another way. Nthep ( talk) 19:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Vandalizing a page yourself just so it gets protected will only lead to the page remaining unprotected and you getting blocked. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Plandu ( talk) 19:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 2600:4040:498D:100:E9F8:F2C7:AE70:4712 ( talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. PhilKnight ( talk) 20:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Extremely severe BLP violations; Long term sock-puppetry.. 2605:8D80:400:7E3:5CF2:94FC:603F:8A81 ( talk) 23:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

That was 4 days ago and it was taken care of. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting semi. Different IPs from Australia making the same unsourced changes, possibly the same person. Looking as well to be applied to related articles The Secret Life of Pets 2 and The Secret Life of Pets (franchise) which have also been affected by those same IPs - Gouleg🛋️  harass/ hound (she/her) 14:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sock magnet.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There are unconfirmed reports that he is going to change from France to Algeria in international football. Several different IPs have been editing it writing this (5 of them) today (it just got reverted). Even though it was only one revert, given 5 different IPs were editing it, I think that shows it might need page protection to prevent addition of rumoured but unfinalized information. RedPatch ( talk) 16:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism edits by unregistered users Jayanthkumar123 ( talk) 16:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by IP users. The subject is a defendant in an ongoing high-profile criminal trial in the US. KyleJoan talk 17:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism CT55555( talk) 17:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The IP edits are ongoing. Requesting prioritisation of this protection request please. CT55555( talk) 21:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Requesting user is page creator, however, I will back that a majority of the IP edits on this page since creation have been nothing but vandalism or violations of WP:NPOV. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is just getting silly, insults combined with original research. Doug Weller talk 18:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. SunilNevlaFan 03:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IP continues to remove references and sourced information, no response to attempts to talk on their talk page. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent IP and unregistered user disruption. Novemberjazz 17:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs/new editors persistently changing "Arabian Gulf" to "Persian Gulf". Archer1234 ( u· t· c) 22:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam ( talk) 22:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and literal spam with 'primary sources' and refusal to specify any pages supposedly linked to the quotes. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 02:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Coordinated vandalism Pedro.phf1 ( talk) 03:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Most recent edit is from 2019. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced information about a revival - all that was confirmed was that talks had begun but no deal confirmed, no date, no judges, just confirmation that a network was talking to the show's creators. Either way not encyclopaedic or factual to keep adding that "season 4 is coming". >> Lil-unique1 ( talk)19:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 09:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism / constant edit reverts from different IP addresses, that are located to one place. Andor127 ( talk) 21:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 09:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 05:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 10:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 05:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 10:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Removing talk page access on User talk:Montgomery alligator might be needed, as the blocked user continues to post off-topic. Chris Troutman ( talk) 22:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done It would be better to ask the blocking admin to remove talk page access, but it also appears the user has stopped posting off-topic messages. Will keep an eye. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Please add protection to the page, The page faces constant attacks of spam, wrong info entered and so on . Change the protection to Semi-protected at least.

✨Ashish Legend✨

05:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – An IP is adding political claims based on a social media post, but (so far) we have no proof that the social media account is really the BLP it claims to be. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 06:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Needs higher protections. Looks like user Fourthords is vandalizing the Wikipedia page by deleting the page for Louis Conradt - and re-directing to his suicide instead of his Wikipedia? 64.231.234.195 ( talk) 09:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Favonian ( talk) 11:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The IP stating, " I'll keep changing it forever". Kansas Bear ( talk) 16:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Mishary94 ( talk) 20:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • I'm surprised! There is an anonymous IP that puts false information more than 14 times in just four months, and every time I apply for protection, it is rejected for a different reason. How can I protect this article then? Can someone help me with this, I'm fed up with this anonymous IP -- Mishary94 ( talk) 00:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a tiresomely slow-burning edit war on this page by various random IP/novel editors to remove a certain body of slightly raunchy historical material - this has spiked in the last six months (though it dates back as far as 2018), resulting in time-wasting edits far outweighing constructive editing of late. Iskandar323 ( talk) 20:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant edits by IP address changing the winners of the years during WW2 to German Generals. I.E. Vandalism. Paulpat99 ( talk) 21:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Nonsense. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 00:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There’s no disruption going on, so let’s just slap an ECP on it for “arbitration”. 2605:8D80:400:7E3:5CF2:94FC:603F:8A81 ( talk) 03:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism and edits without citing sources by anonymous and registered users. Please consider at least semi-protection for this page. Thank you. Johnnycorns5354 ( talk) 07:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: We need semi-protection, as newbies & IPs aren't waiting for official tallies to be announced, per ballot. They're changing numbers constantly, every second & creating confusion, let alone making the page difficult to edit. GoodDay ( talk) 19:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Anachronist. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism. 73.67.145.30 ( talk) 19:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism, page was recently unprotected and the issues returned. BRDude70 ( talk) 22:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

08 January 2023

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Dallavid ( talk) 19:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. Lots of IPs from Phillips Academy (subject of article) in a revert-war over the Alex Shieh Center. May be an internal school dispute spilling onto wikipedia. Also consider semi-protecting The Phillips Academy Poll as that was the section deleted from Phillips Academy and Alex Shieh is the Chief Pollster listed on the page. 2600:1000:B12E:93EE:4D46:E90D:6632:5FD4 ( talk) 02:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism likely to continue until after new manager has been appointed. David Biddulph ( talk) 09:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 23:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism almost immediately after previous protection expired. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 18:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Edits may also contain violations of WP:BLP. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism in the last 24 hours. Page has previously been protected. Suggest a period of semi-protection for a month RM-Taylor ( talk) 19:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism due to speculation about his changes in sponsorship. Please block edit requests from users with no accounts. PerlDreamer ( talk) 20:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: consistent vandalism and adding of unsourced or poorly sourced information. SKAG123 ( talk) 23:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: In the last few hours minutes this redirect has been vandalised numerous times by multiple IPs. Might be a good idea to temporarily semi-protect it. AP 499D25 ( talk) 00:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism. This happens a lot with the TFA. Professor Penguino ( talk) 02:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Full protection. Possible BLP violation, a discussion is open at BLP/N but edit war is ongoing Gitz ( talk) ( contribs) 03:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

It's not stopping [9]. I will no longer revert but suggest in case of protection to restore the wrong version (with no BLP violation) Gitz ( talk) ( contribs) 20:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07 using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 17:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Otherwise, the /40 range could be blocked: Special:Contributions/2A02:85F:F000:0:0:0:0:0/40. There was a ton of disruption from that range yesterday. Binksternet ( talk) 17:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enough apparently productive edits coming off that range that this seems like the better option. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continued overlinking, despite warnings. - FlightTime ( open channel) 18:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced data. Nehme 1499 18:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism. 73.67.145.30 ( talk) 20:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Regular vandalism from various caste POV pushing accounts. Low-quality edits in poor English. Ixudi ( talk) 12:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Page is still on "In the news", which means it is highly visible from the main page. Poodle23 ( talk) 15:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: pro-nazi editing - this page was basically accepting the insane premises of the book, one of the most famous Nazi party tracts - I'm fixing it and just got the first serious pushback Victoryodaiken ( talk) 23:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The edits you've made are unsourced and violate our original research policies. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined per above. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive redirect overwriting resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran ( talk) 01:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 04:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Or indef, vandalism has occurred for since April with no signs of stopping ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 04:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 04:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits from IPs. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 05:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Mobile editor constantly vandalising 'infobox' content. GoodDay ( talk) 06:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Edit warring by multiple parties. Adakiko ( talk) 09:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Special:Contribs/136.158.66.0/25. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: to prevent further restoring of the article per the recent consensus at AFD. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:548B:F232:1D21:9246 ( talk) 03:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the redirect target is also at AFD. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The data on these pages are at risk of being changed because of bias from certain ethnic groups. User Editors are more reliable, as we can discuss any changes to frequencies based on the actual data and references. In fact, all pages with heavy information like specific Y-DNA lineages and their Distribution tables should be protected from such unsourced edits. The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 11:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

09 January 2023

Reason: The data on these pages are at risk of being changed because of bias from certain ethnic groups. User Editors are more reliable, as we can discuss any changes to frequencies based on the actual data and references. In fact, all pages with heavy information like specific Y-DNA lineages and their Distribution tables should be protected from such unsourced edits. The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 11:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant vandalism by the same IP range sock Snowflake91 ( talk) 13:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection, as same as yesterday, high level of IP vandalism on this article. Yesterday, Qarachar Noyan was protected as well due to edits of similar IPs starting with 103. Beshogur ( talk) 14:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Joeykai, the user had been blocked to prevent further edit warring, and there has been none since. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently as a ref he made a call some people disagree with. Sjö ( talk) 16:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Don't we all... BusterD ( talk) 00:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [ ] 16:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant removal of sourced content by the same IP, who seems to be User:Dealer07 who has been blocked indefinitely. Iaof2017 ( talk) 16:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 01:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Significant cultures like these that have contributed to early human history are always subject to vandalism by people with agendas, hence the history of disruptions on this page. Protection will prevent disruptive editors with from clearing information they don't like. The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 12:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. There's been no disruption since the last protection expired, and pages are not protected preemptively. Feel free to re-report if problems resume. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by the same IP, who's also removing sourcend content on "The Motto (Tiësto and Ava Max song)" article. Iaof2017 ( talk) 19:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 01:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Increased vandalism from IP editors. Izzy Moony Hi new friend! 11:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. BusterD ( talk) 00:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The data on these pages are at risk of being changed because of bias from certain ethnic groups. User Editors are more reliable, as we can discuss any changes to frequencies based on the actual data and references. In fact, all pages with heavy information like specific Y-DNA lineages and their Distribution tables should be protected from such unsourced edits. This article in particular (look at the revision history) has had lots of citations removed by Arab centrists who are against North Africans (Berbers/Amazigh). The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 12:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the protection policy linked virtually everywhere on this page. BusterD ( talk) 00:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring. 2A01:B747:84D:344:1879:7F57:B614:B7BB ( talk) 13:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. Requester is the only contributor to this page in past four days. BusterD ( talk) 00:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is rather slow-burning vandalism which I would normally consider managable through normal editing, but a serious BLP violation was on the page for more than 24hours, so protected. Page could use with a few more watchers. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 16:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruptive edits in last 24 hours. BusterD ( talk) 01:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has a history of COI edits. Also edits that are copy/paste from the artist's website, from bouncing IPs and new accounts. PigeonChickenFish ( talk) 23:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs, unsourced info, breaching of WP:NOTVGUIDE. The Banner  talk 01:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Unregistered users vandalising the page Abhishek K Menon ( talk) 20:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 09:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – long history of protections, pc insufficient. Will120 ( talk) 06:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined One instance of minor vandalism since unprotection. Right now, I think we're at stable level. Please feel free to rerequest if disruption picks up. Kosack ( talk) 08:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism from ips. Sahaib ( talk) 21:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism on a blp. Sahaib ( talk) 22:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Uh hoohdsff 88.242.86.38 ( talk) 04:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection of this page should be reduced because it is an author who is very famous. I collect information about famous people and send them to Wikipedia. This helps a lot to your users. Little Angel IVF ( talk) 05:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The draft isn't protected. If you want to have the article-page unprotected, please have the draft accepted first. Lectonar ( talk) 09:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs due to a very recent on-field incident. GPL93 ( talk) 04:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – indef ECP; repeatedly recreated vanity g11 page. –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 16:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected –  Muboshgu ( talk) 16:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Muboshgu: You applied semi-create-protection; this does nothing as the page is in mainspace and cannot be created by new users regardless of protection. –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 17:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
disregard, protection level corrected while I was replying –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 17:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Was protected twelve years ago with not much vandalism or disruption since. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 15:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 16:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Started as soon as the last PP expired, asking for a longer one this time around as the protection log shows this is not going to go away anytime soon. Gotitbro ( talk) 11:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption was more than 2 weeks ago...no edits at all until your edit from today. Afaics, far from needing permant semi-protection. If another admin disagrees: feel free to protect. Lectonar ( talk) 14:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs and new accounts, including nationalistic and discriminating editing. Iaof2017 ( talk) 12:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 14:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruption every 2 or 3 days is not enough disruption to semiprotect the article. Lectonar ( talk) 14:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – False death claims. Lard Almighty ( talk) 19:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 20:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

10 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit warring on BLP article about allegations of sexual misconduct. Needs either semi-protection or pending changes. 10mmsocket ( talk) 17:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Subject of the article has recently died, and is now being targeted with anti-vaccination related vandalism. [10] [11] [12] [13] 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 20:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Reaper Eternal. Complex/ Rational 23:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was already protected once after anonymous IP continued to remove template, ignoring talk page requests to discuss/stop. Protection expired, IP is right back at it, removing template with no explanation and without adding anything to the article. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 20:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 22:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated unsourced additions ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/ Rational 23:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner  talk 23:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has been disrupted by various IPs for months, in some cases reverting each other. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 23:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

NFL teams

Reason: I am requesting page protection for all NFL playoff teams until February 19, 2022, a week after the Super Bowl LVIII. Once a team loses in the playoffs it instantly leads to childish changes of the ownership in the infobox to the winning teams quarterback or stars. These childish posts are quickly screenshotted and end up on meme pages fueling more vandalism. To prevent this I am requesting page protection from IP editors as the damage of IP vandals far outweighs any value from valid IP editors over the next five weeks. I will request lowering of page protection after two weeks for defeated teams, the period of time in which these immature vandalism sprees usually ends. Words in the Wind( talk) 05:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: I'm going to let another, more experienced administrator review the request, but would like to note to Words in the Wind that, per our protection policies, we generally do not protect pages pre-emptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi Words in the Wind and Isabelle Belato, the pages where actual recent vandalism occurred are now protected as suggested (2023, not 2022, though; I only noticed when Twinkle told me the date is in the past...). If, later, there's actual recent disruption on the remaining pages, please individually re-request protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by IP editor who simply refuses to understand WP:SPS and WP:UGC. 10mmsocket ( talk) 22:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. by HJ Mitchell — Maile ( talk) 22:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WPEditor42 ( talkcontribs) 02:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No point in letting IPs and new users edit the page. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 17:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: New account and IP disruption. Maleschreiber ( talk) 18:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced WP:DOB by ip-hoppers. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

NFC Championship Game ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Everyone always changes it so it says “yOu GEt tO bEaT tHe pAcKeRs.” It’s a highly disruptive, irritating edit. Eg224 ( talk) 02:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism on highly used shortcut. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 23:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. since genre warring seems to be continually recurring. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content are added again after 4 days under a different IP. Unsourced contents are also added weeks ago. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 01:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: New user SnoopyBird reverting to keep in video whose license is not yet verified. Also would be happy to have the copyright status verified, or for someone else to explain copy vio to him. Given that the article is about the storming of the federal complex in Brazil, there is a high probability of various hijinks. Elinruby ( talk) 03:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Different new editor now at my talk page telling me it's all cool because it's from a YouTube channel (!). I suppose it's possible, but I have never heard of that, this guy doesn't look like an admin, and the article has already had one copyvio removed. Leaving talk page section up for reference for now Elinruby ( talk) 04:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Page has been moved, and really this doesn't sound like an issue warranting protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Militant groups

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced content by the same IP hopping user. Gotitbro ( talk) 11:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For both. Lectonar ( talk) 08:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent NPOV violations on a BLP. Lard Almighty ( talk) 13:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Has stopped after warning. Lectonar ( talk) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism going back and forth since the fifth of this month. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined has died down; please relist at need. Lectonar ( talk) 08:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been subject to the "Persian Gulf" / "Arabian Gulf" controversy for years. Temporary protection has not dissuaded IPs and new accounts from disruptively and repeatedly changing "Arabian Gulf" to "Persian Gulf" throughout the article. I think it is time for indefinite semi-protection. Archer1234 ( t· c) 14:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected Seems like a spike, so pending-changes should do it after some initial semi-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 12:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Previous IP editor given topic block on this page. But same person has now popped up with a new IP address in the same name. Block evasion should be stopped as behaviour has not changed. 10mmsocket ( talk) 12:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 12:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism to the {{ Article for deletion}} template and reintroduction of unsourced information into a biography of a living person. Semi-protection would be helpful for at least the duration of the deletion discussion. Worldbruce ( talk) 14:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected until midnight UTC after the AfD is scheduled to end. Protection can be extended if the AfD is relisted. Complex/ Rational 16:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP user who claims to be Gladu has repeatedly removed information relating to COVID misinformation over the past few days. HamOntPoliFiend ( talk) 15:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

There is a lot of news happening in Gilgit-Baltistan following TTP announcement to form a parallel government in Pakistan including Gilgit-Baltistan. There are protests in GB to join India in some parts. https://www.firstpost.com/world/ttp-challenges-pakistans-sovereignty-declares-own-government-11917812.html https://www.rferl.org/a/pakistan-taliban-end-cease-fire/32152531.html

https://www.firstpost.com/world/pakistan-protests-rock-pok-as-gilgit-baltistan-demands-reunion-with-india-11960152.html 
Rq88187 (
talk) 
14:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
We cannot unilaterally make these changes here. Take it to Talk:Gilgit-Baltistan. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 15:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done – Consensus at Talk:Gilgit-Baltistan required. Favonian ( talk) 16:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

{{ request edit}} change word 'Bishangarh' to 'Kishangarh'.

मरुप्रदेश (
talk) 
15:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not done that article does not exist, nothing to change. — xaosflux Talk 15:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism based on recent sports related events. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: He had a good game, for which he's rewarded with persistent vandalism here. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 18:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Revolving door of IPs adding this block of OR about things they claim the bible predicted. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 19:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 19:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Increased disruption since November. HistoryofIran ( talk) 19:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Learnt about what is required. Cwengo ( talk) 13:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This page isn't protected, and so does not need to be unprotected. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 15:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because we can't add verified details on this page as user is lost the account. मरुप्रदेश ( talk) 15:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The account user lost his account. No one can add verified information of Bishangarh. मरुप्रदेश ( talk) 15:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The account user lost his account no one can edit verified information about Bishangarh. मरुप्रदेश ( talk) 15:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ मरुप्रदेश: please stop filing requests for pages that are not protected, it is becoming disruptive. — xaosflux Talk 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – With the end of support coming tomorrow, IP editors have been repeatedly changing the support status prematurely. I think semi-protection is needed for the time being. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 22:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wave of IPs/new accounts trying to change country. Mellk ( talk) 03:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected as arbitration enforcement-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting protection for First Iraqi–Kurdish War and Iraqi no-fly zones conflict. These articles have recently experienced mass infobox edits (and associated edit warring) by the dynamic IP 86.141.92.231/86.137.14.137, whose edits (involving grandiose claims of "Iraqi victory") consistently fail verification and who is temporarily blocked for violating the 3RR per an AN3 report. (The IP has also engaged in edit warring and misrepresentation of sources at Iraqi invasion of Iran, but seems to have stopped after a particularly egregious instance of misrepresentation was pointed out.) Because this specific IP address will not be blocked for long and may change dynamically in short order, I am requesting extended-confirmed protection to minimize the potential for further disruptive editing. Thank you for your consideration, TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 06:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The film releases in 24 hours, and protecting it from vandalism it has become cumbersome. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, Edit war. Sneha996 ( talk) 20:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained content removals by IP hopper on dynamic range. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 ( talk) 20:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Vanamonde93. Favonian ( talk) 20:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Extremely high level of IP vandalism. Professor Penguino ( talk) 21:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 21:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Rampant deletion of facts and data regarding the article. Facts being deleted are facts but are being trolled. Dominicanarquia ( talk) 03:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sock activity since June 9th. Magherbin ( talk) 08:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sock continues to edit since the expiry of protection on January 2nd. Magherbin ( talk) 09:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding mistakes (living in North Macedonia in the 1990s) and anti-Serbian POV. The Banner  talk 21:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib ( talk) 21:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, apologies for not reacting on time-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. DB1729 talk 04:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Loads of vandalism from ip addresses that change. Buttress Onion ( talk) 22:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

11 January 2023

Reason: Repeated vandalism and anti-Semitism, see https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zeno_of_Citium&diff=1132540498&oldid=1132538916 Red Phoenician ( talk) 23:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There is only a single user involved here; protection isn't appropriate. I haven't the time needed to investigate a block. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-addition of uncited material in violation of WP:VERIFY and WP:BURDEN. Onel5969 TT me 13:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: An IP-hopping individual from the Netherlands appears deadset on including unsubstantiated (and refuted) content regarding a stunt performer & actor to this page. BOTTO ( TC) 14:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term persistent disruption over many months from similar IPs. Iskandar323 ( talk) 18:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Four different IPs (43.229.88.175, 43.241.192.189, 103.240.205.83 and 43.241.192.211) keep making the same disruptive edit over and over again without any justification for their changes and despite having been told to stop. A look at their contribution pages strongly suggest that it is the same person using different IPs. I've already reported this problem before and the page was protected for 2 weeks, but as soon as the protection was over, the vandalism resumed. I'm therefore requesting a longer protection for the page. Thanks in advance. Johnn Francis ( talk) 23:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam ( talk) 00:51, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism on highly-used shortcut. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 ( talk) 23:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [ ] 23:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent deletion of the section of lgbtq in the capital 2603:300C:204:9D00:D4D6:92B6:A324:5196 ( talk) 23:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Isabelle Belato. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary frenzy regarding his alleged acting skills. Can it have a break please?. DBaK ( talk) 23:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (aptly enough). elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 04:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Technically non-autoconfirmed users aren't allowed to edit this topic anyway. It's true however that this may become irrelevant in some time. Volunteer Marek 05:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The confirmed sock edited some days ago; the account you are currently in dispute with is not a confirmed sock. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:47, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since we have four different requests for the same set of socks, let me elaborate on why I have declined them all. 1) At least some of the accounts reported for socking were not found to be socks. 2) We have constructive edits by IPs during the same period. 3) For most of these articles, we have two socks in ~2 months; this would be borderline for protection in any case. 4) The socks were all autoconfirmed, meaning we would need EC-protection to have stopped them; and that requires a greater threshold of disruption to be met. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm going to be honest: I was wrong requesting looser edit protection for this article. In less than two weeks it has attracted a lot of IP and newly established editors wanting to add inappropriate material, very few that have actually anything constructive to contribute. Please make this an semi edit protection again; IPs and newly established editors can always use the talk page to request changes to be made. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was worth a try. Lectonar ( talk) 08:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP trying to change what the sourced material says through edit-warring. -. LouisAragon ( talk) 07:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant trolling. Semi-protecting for a month or two might help. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots05:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 06:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Waqar 💬 08:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Callanecc, thank you! Waqar 💬 09:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs making the same fictitious change, contradicting the cited ref. David Biddulph ( talk) 10:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 10:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs ( talk) 12:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 13:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Disruption, unsourced material — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 12:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 13:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing vandalism, most recently in December 2022 but it also happened earlier. I had applied and received protection for this page earlier but only for a short time span. Can we please protect this page from non-confirmed editors indefinitely? It's quite time consuming to keep protecting this page from vandalism. EMsmile ( talk) 12:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ EMsmile: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see sufficient vandal edits to justify protection at the moment, and certainly not for indefinite semi-protection. SmartSE ( talk) 13:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA ip-farm (See: User talk:The Banner/Archives/2023/January#Greek airport vandal (investigation running). The Banner  talk 12:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I'll take a look at your notes and see if there's something better I can do. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Waqar 💬 14:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection. 24february2022 ( talk) 13:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined@ 24february2022: Please read Wikipedia:Protection policy before making any further protection requests. Favonian ( talk) 13:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. See User talk:Tezateza and article talk page. Selfstudier ( talk) 13:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - I can't see how this page falls within the scope of the Israel-Palestine conflict, as the material is about a controversy involving antisemitism generally and Palestine does not seem to be mentioned at all. Consider the edit warring noticeboard if the conflict cannot be resolved through discussion with the new user. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
WP:A/I/PIA refers to the Arab Israeli conflict in general, "broadly construed", not just Israel and Palestine. ("the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces") The edit notice says the article partially relates to AI conflict. Note there is material concerning the Israel Lebanon war as well as the Gaza report. The editor already refused to participate in discussion. These single purpose, low edit count, new accounts are typical for the AI area. Anyway never mind, I can see that you do not want (or cannot) protect the article "partially" so I will deal with it another way. Selfstudier ( talk) 15:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
You're right, my (ancient) reading of the Arbcom decision was that the scope was specifically Israel and Palestine, but it seems to have been expanded to include all Arab-Jewish conflict worldwide. But you're also right that I can't protect part of an article, and I'm not keen to protect an entire article on an American human rights activist under the scope of these particular sanctions, as I'd be protecting a lot of material that's clearly out of scope. The sanction says that you are free to revert to enforce the ECP requirement without regard to 3RR, although it's not really a good idea to lean on that freedom too much. However, if the editor continues to be evidently only here to right great wrongs, you could ask that they be blocked. WP:ANI or WP:ANEW would be appropriate for that, depending on the circumstances. I'll also watchlist the article. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 18:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Waqar 💬 14:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - the vandalizing users have been blocked, and there are several administrators already watching the article, so protection doesn't seem to be necessary at this time. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MetalDiablo666, using IPs in and around El Segundo, California. Binksternet ( talk) 17:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by non-logged in user. User has changed the track listing for this Riverdale TV show episode to the track listing for the album Nickelodeon Celebration Parade 2005. 24.143.190.162 ( talk) 15:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. If they show up on another IP range, ping me and I'll block that one too. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Non-logged in user is vandalising this page in the same way as they have repeatedly vandalised the "Chapter Thirty-One: A Night to Remember" page. 24.143.190.162 ( talk) 15:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. See above. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Please protect it until at least a few days after the holiday, which is January 22 this year.

Near the holiday this page is repeatedly modified by people who have strong opinions about The One True meaning, name, customs of the holiday. But the holiday is celebrated in many different places, with different overlapping meanings, names, and customs.

It seems to happen every year. M.boli ( talk) 16:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The main article at Graham Hancock has been semi-protected for years, but following press coverage we've seen an uptick in disruptive IP edits to related pages:

So requesting semi-protection for those. –  Joe ( talk) 16:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

All semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the pages will be automatically unprotected. Joe Roe, if this starts up again after protection expires I'd argue that this sort of editing is overt vandalism and falls under the exemption clause of WP:INVOLVED, but if you're worried about blowback feel free to ping me and I'll protect for longer. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediate return of vandalism from globally locked User:Dealer07 using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 17:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Favonian ( talk) 19:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 18:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP keeps going against consensus reached at related RFC, held in Dec 2022. GoodDay ( talk) 17:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP continues to go against a related RFC result. -- GoodDay ( talk) 17:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Previous category removal vandalism which caused protection has resumed anew. Nate ( chatter) 18:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 20:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent WP:NOTAFORUM violations. SunilNevlaFan 16:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - talk pages can only reasonably be protected for a few hours at a time, perhaps a day at the very most, and the inappropriate messages are so infrequent that it wouldn't make a difference. I have added an editnotice to the page, hopefully that will help. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Two more articles being targeted by LTA IPs from Tunisia- just like MBC 4, List of programmes broadcast by MBC 4, and Women's interest channel (all of which have already been protected). Magitroopa ( talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 and 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long-term abuse. 45.152.124.99 ( talk) 21:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long-term abuse. 45.152.125.111 ( talk) 21:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent repeated vandalism - same change by multiple IPs. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 22:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

12 January 2023

Reason: Mobile editor going against related-RFC result. GoodDay ( talk) 18:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting removal of creation protection for a draft move to take place. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 16:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting removal of creation protection for a draft move to take place. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 17:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 00:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ FMSky: I see the problem but we need to escalate. Let me know if more needed later. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs with repetitive disruptive edits. Archer1234 ( t· c) 01:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Harassing IP. - FlightTime ( open channel) 01:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And another admin blocked the latest IP. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP blanking and vandalism. I think semi-protection for 24-48 hours would be prudent. Professor Penguino ( talk) 02:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Bagasirma ( talk · contribs) blocked by Zsinj. Protection doesn't seem needed. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism, infobox damaged. I was forced to use Twinkle to revert to the last stable revision. Professor Penguino ( talk) 02:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: I protected this, despite being a contributor to this page, per WP:IAR, given the slow response times here. This is on the main page, and the vandalism rate is high. I welcome review by any other admin here. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done: I'm happy to endorse this protection Vanamonde93. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. RolandR ( talk) 02:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I would consider full protection, but I suspect nobody wants that; talk it out, please. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized a bunch again after the latest (1-year) protection expired. With the kinds of atrocities this man is committing, which are only escalating (see 2021–2023 Myanmar civil war), I don't see any clear end in sight to the disruption that is going to come to the page. It is time for indefinite. 25stargeneral ( talk) 02:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected Protected indefinitely; enough is enough. A prominent enough figure that we shouldn't have obvious vandalism on his page for any length of time. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Higher level of vandalism on a BLP. 159.196.100.171 ( talk) 04:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 05:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been getting intermittent disruptive editing since the start of the invasion. HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith ( talk) 05:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and changing agreed information based on petty biases. Itsahardknocklife ( talk) 05:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC)  Tbhotch 04:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: More vandalism. Indefinite protection per WP:ARBCOVID. Either indef semi or indef ECP. 110.150.88.223 ( talk) 06:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptions. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 06:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 07:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page was inundated with scammers attempting to steal cryptocurrency donations. It promoted a significant amount of spam, as well as at least six external links, all of which led to GitHub repositories asking for donations. All future edits must be discussed on the talk page, so the page must be protected. 38.25.15.67 ( talk) 03:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: The number of edits probably isn't enough to justify protection but given what's being added I believe that it's problematic enough to warrant protection - probably pending changes but I'd like a second opinion. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's a tough call but I hate the idea of leaving the article wide open for future scammers and I am unable to monitor the article forever so I support indefinite pending changes (or two years if indefinite bends a rule somewhere, or long term semi-protection). Johnuniq ( talk) 07:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Almost a textbook case for pending-changes protection, imho. 6 months for starters, and I have watchlisted. More eyes on the article might be helpful. Lectonar ( talk) 09:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Disruptive persistent editing by ip against guidance/consensus over a month. Suggest two months. Cinderella157 ( talk) 09:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous one-year protection expired just two months ago. We're in for the long haul. Favonian ( talk) 10:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and WP:CRYSTAL violations about whether he's going to change teams. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 10:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack ( talk) 11:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP addresses keep on using old poster despite a new poster has been released. Centcom08 ( talk) 13:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is there a need to use the newest poster? Is this laid down somewhere in the Manual of Style? This is a disagreement, but not necessarily something which should be solved via page-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 13:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wikipedia:Communication is required. This is a content dispute with experienced editors using revert warring to enforce an opinion instead of discussing the change. The page is full-protected and I have removed the image, pending a discussion that I will start momentarily to determine which poster should be used. If the image is restored against consensus I will start using the block button instead. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 14:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Thunivu Received positive review among critics and public 61.3.226.244 ( talk) 10:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not doneAlready, correctly, brought up at the article talk page. Favonian ( talk) 10:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The level of IP editing and number of unsourced or mistaken edits has reached the the level of disruption. NB I'm involved. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 09:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - one good-faith but malformed edit does not a pattern of disruptive editing make. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Averyfunkydude23 ( talk) 13:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., I'm not obviously seeing a "high level of IP vandalism", can you supply specific diffs and explain how they relate to WP:VANDALISM? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I request you to reduce protection on Varisu page so that general public users can easily contribute since users Theoder2055 and BangaloreNorth are spreading negativity about the film in the name of reviews based on personal hatred against Vijay eventhough the film reviews are mostly positive from critics and audience. 58.8.255.121 ( talk) 12:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This is a very good argument if you want your request rejected out of hand, especially as the matter is being discussed on the talk page. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 12:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined Discussion to be continued on the appropriate talk-page. Lectonar ( talk) 13:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of content by IPs. Netherzone ( talk) 14:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Will watch the page in case they start up again from a different connection. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there are no vandalism on this page since and now have reliable sources on this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.163.84 ( talk) 17:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Protection does tend to prevent unwanted activity, be it vandalism or advertisement. At any rate, this article has way too long a history of such disruption, not to mention sock-puppetry, for protection to be lifted. Should it be possible for someone to create a draft living up to Wikipedia's standards with regard to notability etc., it should be submitted through Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Favonian ( talk) 17:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Favonian Hey, This page is also have in other languages, can it be create directly ? 117.227.108.205 ( talk) 18:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No! Favonian ( talk) 18:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Favonian Ok, If it is created by reliable sources then it be created directly ? 117.227.108.205 ( talk) 18:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Block evasion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blogs19/Archive. Favonian ( talk) 18:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because no vandalism since long and have pages in other languages. 117.227.108.205 ( talk) 18:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Article is not, and never has been, protected. What a gratifying amount of attention this noticeboard receives from Jadabpur today. Favonian ( talk) 18:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Block evasion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blogs19/Archive. Favonian ( talk) 18:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Please semi protect. Anonymous editors keep making disruptive edits and adding unnecessary spacing. Jdavi333 ( talk) 16:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is (why I don't know) a BLP/vandal magnet, Just asking for semi or pending changes. - FlightTime ( open channel) 16:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is persistent but not of high frequency; let's try PC protection, and re-evaluate if the rate ticks up. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP on the rampage. Given the topic, another year of semi-protection is likely in order. Bon courage ( talk) 17:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected Protected indefinitely given the protection history, but Bon courage, please report the user to AIV if they repeat their disruption after their last warning. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 17:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Appeared to be a good-faith dispute, but given the user talk discussion IP appears to be unwilling to engage, and some IP-hopping is occurring. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Vanamonde93. Favonian ( talk) 18:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: BLP issues; IPs and newly registered editors have been changing the forward's active team despite the lack of evidence that he has been signed by anyone other than Leeds. Suggest protecting until a reliable source reports that he has indeed been signed by Wigan or anyone else.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of persistent vandalism from IP editors ARose Wolf 20:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits by new users and IPs for the past >month. –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 20:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism pushing Serbian POV. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 15:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not vandalism; how to present the content from the IHF website is a matter of judgement. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring (see page history and my last edit summary). GizzyCatBella 🍁 16:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Bit of a stretch for the ARBCOM EC restriction; and in any case this is a single user, best handled by blocking if the behavior persists. Warn them, please; I see no evidence that any attempt has been made to communicate with them. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite administrator only move protection: Pages subject to a page-name dispute. Per WP:MOVP. – Treetoes023 ( talk) 16:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I see no evidence of disruptive page moves. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page has been protected for 10 months. The user who was edit warring on the page has been blocked. No reason to keep it protected. DarrellWinkler ( talk) 17:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The protection is a logged arbitration enforcement, not to be easily lifted. I notice that you have already been informed about these matters on your talk page. Favonian ( talk) 17:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

13 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 18:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 19:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 19:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals are at this page already, it's high profile and an evolving event. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 22:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 22:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism Marcelus ( talk) 17:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This isn't vandalism: see WP:NOTVAND. However, there may be issues with sourcing. Marcelus, please warn the IP appropriately about needing to support their edits with reliable sources, report them to AIV if the behavior continues, and list the page here if it continues with multiple IPs. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It’s okay Vanamonde93, the IP has been blocked. No need for a page protection. GizzyCatBella 🍁 22:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: On 9 January 2023, user DawnSP removed entries of two new singles released under Zhang Zhehan's name, including their references to the official lyric videos and Apple Music, on the English, Chinese and Japanese versions of his Wikipedia page. The note user DawnSP has written for their edit said "controversial content(there's no proof that the two newly released singles were recorded by Zhang Zhehan)", is introducing a conspiracy theory suggesting songs released officially on music platforms under the artist name "Zhang Zhehan" are not by Zhang himself. Hence, this song removal edit is inappropriate to do on Wikipedia. I have since restored the entries of his new singles on the English version. Previously in 2022, there had been many single purpose accounts who edited Zhang's Wikipedia page, which prompted the page to be protected until 30 December 2022. Since the lifting of the protection on his page, it is evident that single purpose accounts are returning to remove new updates about Zhang. I hereby request protection of Zhang Zhehan's Wikipedia page to prevent future vandalism from occurring. Durianpizza1991 ( talk) 00:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Just because the other three Avengers films are protected 2806:109F:13:6F8C:5D99:24C0:8E9A:EC19 ( talk) 02:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

So, I'm not going to this. As a general rule, we want articles to be open for anyone to edit. We do restrict editing on articles when there is a lot a vandalism being done to them, or if so many bad edits are being made that we need to monitor them before they go live, but at least for now, this article is not having these problems. If you notice that problems pop up, just list it here again. I'm going to add an official declined notice so the archiving bot will remove this entry. Cheers. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: regular attempts to add unreferenced content about the race of the perpetrators from IP addresses. CT55555( talk) 23:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Some IP & new user keeps adding false info & photo. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 01:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 08:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – News broke that he was facing a felony charge, and some IPs are committing some BLP violations. Why? I Ask ( talk) 03:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing, vandalism RowanJ LP ( talk) 02:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to parent's recent death. Noahpeaslee11 ( talk) 05:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Different IP addresses are being used to add false information in article. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo fele. 09:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See also the delete log. BangJan1999 01:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruption (in violation of WP:COI and WP:PROMO) from multiple, connected IP addresses. Novemberjazz 03:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Highly controversial political incident involving a living person; article has already seen repeated vandalism. DecafPotato ( talk) 03:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The overall proportion of edits that are vandalism seems low right now. I think the downsides of semi-protection would exceed the benefits right now. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP Filipino game player (LGBT community). Article, created past September, suffers persistent vandalism. Alexcalamaro ( talk) 07:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:EthanGaming0467. Binksternet ( talk) 07:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Regular IP vandalism Toofllab ( talk) 05:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 11:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing made by another user while correcting outdated brand page. This fast fashion brand is in the media lately and as media is quoting Wikipedia, the public is getting misled that the brand is still under LVMH when they are in fact not. I tried to update information of the actual group they are under with references but it keeps getting removed. It is not known when LVMH dropped them, but the year the other group took over will be crucial information, which is why I am citing them in the references. The other user seems to want to hide all that new information and just keep adding fluff like listing all the 37 countries the stores are located. Requesting page to be protected. Thank you. 2404:E801:2003:2430:792C:F613:F2EE:9CFE ( talk) 09:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for raising page protection. I had hope it will not come to this. Charles and Keith is an independent company while Valiram Group is a retailer group selling Charles and Keith products (similar to it selling other products and brands). The phrase The brand is currently under Malaysia-based retail and lifestyle group Valiram Group indicates Charles and Keith is now another brand under their group while it is not. LVMH purchased a 20% stake and subsequently their stake is sold back to the company. This is actually a content dispute and slowly becoming disruptive editing by IP editor. Thanks. Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 09:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I was the one who updated the LVMH reference. You can choose to paraphase if you are so offended by the particular statement. I am just pointing out they are no longer affiliated to LVMH as they have been portraying and in fact now under Valiram. That is the truth. Why are you hiding the facts that they also listed fast fashion, specializes in selling footwear? That is disruptive editing.
This is not the venue for content dispute. I had updated the buyback by the Wongs here but you had insisted on adding Valiram Group which simply sells C&K products. C&K is not under Valiram Group's management, unless as the other editor had said here that it is not owned by valiram. going by this logic, coach, michael kors, versace, victoria secret, bvlgari are also owned by valiram? which you agreed to here listing the group they are under is important and Noone is saying Valiram owns them, hence the word under but C&K is simply not under them at all. This is a case of righting great wrongs but introducing the wrongs here. Casting aspersions and outright lying is rather unacceptable here also. -- Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 10:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar ( talk) 10:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: high level of IP vandalism on this article.miscerants using local offensive language pls permanently disable edits on this article Corrector1786 ( talk) 11:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 11:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 13:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Still continuing. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of vandalism by IP editors to this bio of living person. Geoff | Who, me? 13:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Controversial topic ( Black Lives Matter), recently in the news, and IPs doing this [14] [15] starship .paint ( exalt) 14:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long-term problems with attempts by software development companies adding linkspam of one sort or another. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 13:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recreation of recently deleted article, by COI editors. Needs to go through AfC. Onel5969 TT me 15:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator DMacks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing / vandalism from a lot of IP editors based on the fact this NFL player is in the news. Lots of discussion regarding who he'll play for and if he'll be released. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-Protection: Evidently being targeted for meatpuppetry. Generalrelative ( talk) 17:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Given the blatant trolling and vandalism, support. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that's enough time for it to die down. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lettler hellocontribs 17:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent attempts by mostly IPs to add "glubby" as a common name, despite not being able to find reliable sources that use that name and no activity on the talk page. Trikekus (:3) 23:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined per Jamie but come back if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 20:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: See talk page. An IP user, presumably the same person with a very narrow range of interests, has repeatedly added the prefix "Sir" before the subject's name, despite an explanation note saying this is not true, and an open invitation to discuss on the talk page. The user has been repeatedly active in recent days. There was pending changes before, but I've seen pages indefinitely protected for less sockpuppetry than this one. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 14:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring to add that she is transgender to the lead, WP:BLP. Two IP blocks could also potentially be effective, this appears to be one editor adding the same content. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 20:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. From someone who is likely an IP-hopper. — 3PPYB6 ( T / C / L)20:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Also from that same IP-hopper. — 3PPYB6 ( T / C / L)20:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I don't know what the policy is, but can I like, mass-request protection for these pages? All of them are persistently being vandalized with a "Turning Red sucks" kind of an edit summary: Talk:James Hong, Talk:Ludwig Göransson, Talk:Sandra Oh, Talk:Rosalie Chiang, Talk:Julia Cho, Talk:Domee Shi, and the previous two requests I made. Thanks.3PPYB6 ( T / C / L)20:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's an LTA so I think that's fair. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done, by various admins for various duration-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent trolling. One of several that need to be safeguarded. $chnauzer 20:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle. Favonian ( talk) 20:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism JoshuaInWiki ( talk) 15:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Lemonaka ( talk) 17:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. ManaliJain ( talk) 18:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive edits by multiple IPs. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 16:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined pending changes was enabled yesterday and there have only been three reverted edits since then. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Around 14 edits in the past couple days, but the page has since been protected by another admin. Thanks! ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 18:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is seeing persistent IP/new user disruptive editing to remove material. Iskandar323 ( talk) 19:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.
Donald Albury 19:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Graham Hancock is not a pseudoscientific and does promote pseudoscientific. He is a journalist. Moderators with an agenda should not be able to label or stigmatize anyone and by by labeling a "pseudoscientific" is wrong. Graham Hancock is a British writer/journalist who writes and discusses theories involving ancient civilizations and lost lands. 204.141.132.10 ( talk) 19:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • does promote pseudoscientific views
204.141.132.10 ( talk) 19:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 19:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

14 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Seems like a bunch of ips are being used as proxies to spam Tamzin's user talk page. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 20:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

They are admin and active right now, I hope they can take care of this. Ymblanter ( talk) 20:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I always prefer that pages in my userspace not be semi'd, but if it reaches the point where it's a drain on anti-vandalism resources, I have no objection to a brief semi. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., just in case Ymblanter ( talk) 20:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ymblanter: it looks like the vandal has moved to accounts. Possibly an LTA? — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 20:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already globally locked Ymblanter ( talk) 21:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Seem that semi is ineffective. Should probably be upgraded to ecp. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page Target of a unnamed LTA. Airtransat236 ( talk | contribs) 23:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper repeatedly overwriting redirect with unsourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done. I've also blocked part of the range that has been editing disruptively this and other articles. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated as spam pages by multiple IPs, but page name in itself isn't invalid. BangJan1999 00:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of violent and sexual content to this article by IP editors. I have reported the most recent IP editor to ARV but similar text was added earlier in the month from a different IP, so also requesting page protection. Tacyarg ( talk) 02:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Anwegmann ( talk) 02:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Professor Penguino ( talk) 22:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It looks like this was the featured daily article yesterday. The vandalism has subsided now that it's not the daily article. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 01:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Nate ( chatter) 23:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 04:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent unsourced additions by IPs Loopy30 ( talk) 23:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Repeated misuse of edit request feature. BangJan1999 00:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looking at the history doesn't seem like there is enough disruption to need protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated redirect overwrites with unsourced content; same IP group as with other redirects like Derana TV and Mobitel (Sri Lanka). Jalen Folf (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Normally this wouldn't be enough activity to justify by itself but when considered in combination with the disruption on the other redirects it's justified. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. HeartCat1 talk ctrbs 06:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Leading figure in 2022 Brazilian election (and target of conspiracy theories), controversial figure, page has already been vandalized. Paris1127 ( talk) 06:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'd normally go shorter but given the nature of the editing and article I've gone for a month. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been vandalised several times in the last few days. John of Reading ( talk) 09:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring and disruptive edits from most likely one editor via a couple of different IPs. Warnings given on IP talk pages and through edit summaries already, but it continues. R Prazeres ( talk) 09:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Linter errors on the user page, 1 obsolete font tag + 1 tidy font link bug. User talk page is currently full protected so I had to post the request here.

One replacement only; <font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> --> [[User talk:Graham87|<span style="color:green;">87</span>]]. Sheep ( talkhe/him) 00:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Done; thank you. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... For the bot. Favonian ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Linter errors on the user talk page, 3 obsolete font tags + 1 tidy font link bug reported; there are actually five obsolete font tags.

Replacements:

  1. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]] '''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) --> ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</span>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]] '''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</span>]])
  2. <font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> --> [[User talk:Graham87|<span style="color:green;">87</span>]] Sheep ( talkhe/him) 00:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC
 Done; thank you. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... For the bot. Favonian ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would be incredibly helpful to have page protection on this page, largely due to the nature of the events which took place. This page occasionally attracts vandals (mostly IPs), so I think PP would be helpful here to let editors get on "with the important stuff"...!. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 06:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pages are also not protected preemptively. Pending changes could be considered but I don't think it'll actually help on this article due to the one-off nature and content of the disruptive editing. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Continual edit warring. There is a discussion on the talk page, but the protagonists seem to have given up on that and have, despite my efforts, continued to edit war. Full protection would force them to use the talk page. Phil Bridger ( talk) 09:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 10:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Disruptive and unsourced edit again and again. Yuugone ( talk) 07:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Another IP is added the same content [16]. Yuugone ( talk) 11:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated daily unsourced edits, mostly concerning his height. Zamekrizeni ( talk) 12:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is a constant vandal target for IPs. Valenciano ( talk) 14:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Donald Albury 15:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Anonymous user(s) has been changing the track listing for this 14-year-old album without any provided sources. Googling their changes comes up with nothing. Warned user a few days ago, but the edits continued. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:47, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Donald Albury 15:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Peter181 ( talk) 11:47, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page has been heavily been vandalised with unsourced claims. Loibird90 ( talk) 12:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. HeartCat1 talk ctrbs 16:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I need to upload a personal image to my page. Previously, my wikipedia profile had a picture of someone else. I was alerted to this mistake by several people. I requested Wikipedia to change it. I see now that the wrong picture has been removed. I would like to add my portrait to my page, but I have not been allowed to make this addition via the Edit Source -> Visual tab. Please help. Maha A. Maamoun ( talk) 11:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia does not allow deep linking to other websites; you need to upload it to Wikimedia Commons first under an appropriate content licence assuming you hold the copyright to the image. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done per above. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper repeatedly making an unsourced change. Protect or, possibly, range block. Dhtwiki ( talk) 13:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Range blocked by Materialscientist for 31 hours. No new activity since then. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Comment: 87.196.73.57 made the same disruptive edit at 14:11, which I recently reverted. Dhtwiki ( talk) 17:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Block-evading IP blocked as well. Favonian ( talk) 18:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of vanity article. Onel5969 TT me 14:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: in 1962 Nelson Mandela arrives in Morocco and not algeria on his clandestine trip for military training and to get support for the armed struggle 196.119.34.200 ( talk) 15:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 15:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spam ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Continued undiscussed moves. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 19:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done for 4 days. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps adding unsourced content after being warned in edit summaries and talk page. Mike  Allen 17:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 86.125.62.114 ( talk · contribs) blocked by Donald Albury. - Donald Albury 18:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
They are back at it under another IP. Mike  Allen 20:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Donald Albury 20:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Talk page of an editor who has not edited since 2007 that has been vandalised multiple times today by an IP-hopping banned editor. -- Ferien ( talk) 20:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Primefac. Favonian ( talk) 20:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Donald Albury 20:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Media speculation about a trade has fans trying to change the player's club, plus some random straightup vandalism thrown in. Schazjmd  (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian ( talk) 20:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

15 January 2023

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. Semi- is ineffective as the LTA just comes back on autoconfirmed accounts ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Barkeep49. I would request no one ECP the page except as an absolute last resort, as I feel ECPs of admins' talk pages run counter to accountability (not meant as a criticism of all cases where they occur; sometimes it's the least bad option). Thank you. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 22:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent disruption (and also copyvios) by proxy IPs ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 22:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 23:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 23:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: That's 7 reverts so far today, of edits accusing this referee of being biased in favour of one sports team. I'm not a football fan, but I'm guessing someone just lost a match! DFlhb ( talk) 22:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism resulting from TFA appearance. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Should be create protected - repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 22:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 00:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Not much else constructive coming from IPs on this page, many are socks, or are causing disruption. Socking resumed within hours of last time protection expired. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 00:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent socking and disruption by socks of User:Jellywings19 and others. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Socking resumed within 48 hours of last protection expiring. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism from IP Users after throwing three interceptions in the first half of the Chargers-Jags playoff game lol. Swagging ( talk) 02:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Socking resumed less than 48 hours after protection last expired, needs long term protection due to socking by banned user Jellywings19 Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 23:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 23:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Not much constructive coming from IPs on this page, many are socks, or are causing disruption. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Socking resumed within 48 hours of last time protection expired. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A plethora of IPs keep adding improperly sourced information about Barr's personal life sourced from social media, including depression and the end of a relationship. Its overly personal and not relevant. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk)23:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Loads of good faith edits. Also lots of unsourced edits as well. Bbraxtonlee ( talk) 23:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 05:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – target of trolling. protect main page too. $chnauzer 05:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This show has attracted a lot of negative attention online, which brings the inevitable vandalism to the article. JDDJS ( talk to mesee what I've done) 23:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

It's not the NFL Playoffs without having vandalism on NFL related pages lol. Swagging ( talk) 02:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass trolling on this and the main page. $chnauzer 05:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uncited changes. Nswix ( talk) 03:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs/new users adding unsourced info consistently. Ab207 ( talk) 04:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – mass trolling target. protect this and the main page, please. $chnauzer 05:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – mass troll target. $chnauzer 05:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent removal of cited content and edit warring by multiple IPs. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 05:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: LTA abuse SunilNevlaFan 05:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – troll target. $chnauzer 06:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – troll target. $chnauzer 06:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Similar edit as blocked sockpuppets with different IPs. Yuugone ( talk) 07:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There have been multiple disruptive edits in the past days to the article made by IP users, like removing big amount of content or adding various technical data to the article without providing any reliable sources for these changes. BlackFlanker ( talk) 22:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't appear to have been disruptively edited in three days. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of unnecessary fan editing from anonymous users. Aniruddh 05:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. Sjö ( talk) 10:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 10:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent unsourced material by multiple editors. CastJared ( talk) 08:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 11:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Nonsense edits and edit summaries by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 11:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent edit-warring; non-logged-in users keep removing sourced content and replacing it with unsourced Lost Cause myths about Union war crimes. Tulzscha ( talk) 12:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 13:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need to change the protection to reviewing edits by new users. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: Kailash29792 The article has been semi-protected since Christmas. Are you requesting that we lower the protection to pending changes? The high frequency of editing, which will only increase with a lowered level of protection, speaks against it. Favonian ( talk) 10:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No, and this request may be declined. Because what I sought, to change the protection level to what it's like in Chennai Express, isn't possible here. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
DeclinedFavonian ( talk) 11:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: It contains erroneous subjective opinions and blatant personal misrepresentations. It reflects very badly on the objectivity and validity of information presented by Wikipedia. 2603:900B:308:940A:F013:CA94:9A31:AA8F ( talk) 08:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 10:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: this page has been actively monitored for over two years, with no signs of vandalism or rash article creation. I want to ask that this page gets decreased in page protection. GenesisGSE ( talk) 09:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Clearly, you are referring to the article, which is create-protected, rather than the unprotected draft, so I've changed the request accordingly. Earlier today, you submitted the draft through AFC, where it was rejected. The draft was then deleted, following your own request. Now you want to create it in main space? Sorry, but that looks like an attempt pull a fast one. Favonian ( talk) 10:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spam by IP hopper. Just blocked as 79.177.114.23 and quickly came back as 154.121.41.240. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done for 2 days and new IP blocked for spam. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky ( talk) 16:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi was needed in 2015 for BLP issues created by a list of station personalities that became a magnet for grievances about pledge drives. Special:Diff/861475968 removed this section in 2018, and semi is not necessary. The protecting admin, FreeRangeFrog, has not been active since August 2015. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 16:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

UnprotectedFavonian ( talk) 16:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive editing dating back to December 12, 2022. Poodle23 ( talk) 15:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I wouldn’t call it persistent, but there have been a couple instances. Think this request was from a newer user not really understanding the process. United States Man ( talk) 15:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian ( talk) 16:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 ( talk) 18:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I second this. Several new SPAs have appeared and are adding nonsense templates and legal threats (in Italian, for some reason) to the article as well as the talk page. MrOllie ( talk) 19:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Needs semi-protection. A swarm of newly-created accounts are deleting sourced content, and repeatedly tagging for speedy deletion. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 20:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 21:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sudden mass of IP joke/fantasy edits - Arjayay ( talk) Arjayay ( talk) 20:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 20:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism over and over by sockpuppets of banned user Αθλητικά, constantly changing erroneously the tiebreaker criteria over and over such as here and here. The page 2022–23 Super League Greece was extended protected for the same reason, I will ask for extended protection again. Tranquill Komnin ( talk) 11:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent attempts by an IP to promote this concept as a serious one, and to remove sourced content showing that it is widely regarded as pseudoscience. GrindtXX ( talk) 21:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: As predicted, high levels of vandalism for a NFL team following a playoff loss. Words in the Wind( talk) 22:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

"High levels" is a bit of an exaggeration, Words in the Wind. 🙂 There has been one single actual attempt to vandalize the page today. The rest was caused by well-meaning editors who didn't actually undo the edit. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hah this is true, I didn't review all the in-between edits. Thank you nonetheless for the page protection. Words in the Wind( talk) 22:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

16 January 2023

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A controversial subject. A number of instances of vandalism from IP users have had to be reverted over the past few days, as well as unsourced additions of content. - GA Melbourne ( talk) 22:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Numerous temporary protections have failed to curb disruption, which has also increased following the subject's recent death. Complex/ Rational 01:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Endless disruption from IP accounts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 01:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC)  Tbhotch 02:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 02:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent dynamic IP vandalism. – Meena13:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent DE on TFA. Curbon7 ( talk) 22:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined No longer on the main page and not a high-traffic article. Will reconsider if disruptive editing continues following its TFA run. Complex/ Rational 01:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – sockpuppets' target. Lemonaka ( talk) 18:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Johnuniq ( talk) 06:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Also Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) and Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Please semiprotect due to long-term disruptive editing by a previously blocked dynamic IP in Chile (whack-a-mole): 201.188.152.4 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS); 201.188.147.99 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS); 191.113.207.80 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS);

Now editing again (and being reverted) as 191.113.207.225 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 20:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ Esowteric: I protected Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore for a long period as it has been similarly protected before and you have explained some issues on article talk. Please try to engage the IP on the other talk pages. If needed, post again with examples of WP:VAND. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:BLP violations based on confusion--an athlete with the same name has been arrested for murder. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 03:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users keep editing the capacity of the stadium with the wrong numbers. The capacity is at 20,000 but people keep changing it to other numbers. User:Yellow alligator 23:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – please make the protection longer. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 00:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 03:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. Anwegmann ( talk) 04:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Issues with persistent addition of unsourced, or poorly sourced content from bouncing IPs and new users. PigeonChickenFish ( talk) 06:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High Level of vandalism due to political differences. Please add this ip to white list only. Puritha ( talk) 03:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done It's not possible to allow an IP to edit through protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated posting of false draftification messages by IP editor. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Moderate level of IP vandalism - this person's job is under threat as it is, and if Chelsea do decide to pull the trigger (with Chelsea being Chelsea), there's a good chance vandalism will only increase? PeachyBum07 ( talk) 06:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing and IP vandalism RowanJ LP ( talk) 06:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. As with many current events, disruption can't be avoided; on the other hand, many IP edits are constructive. The article is well watched to boot. Lectonar ( talk) 09:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The decision was made in the AfD to salt this, but it appears it was not put in place. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 10:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Lectonar ( talk) 12:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I would like to request a decrease in page protection so that any editor can help make edits to this draft and so it can be moved if deemed necessary. This article was protected a long time ago enough time has passed for there to be no issues with IP edits or moves to the main space.

Furthermore, I would like to continue working on this draft and I believe we owe this article another go instead of giving up on it. GenesisGSE ( talk) 10:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The draft isn't protected, the article is. When the draft has been accepted after being submitted for review, the article can be unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 12:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persisting IP disruption to add unsourced material. Iskandar323 ( talk) 07:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be once again attracting silliness and throwaway accounts. Is PC a good way of getting the article a break from this, please?. DBaK ( talk) 09:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of petty vandalism as he's currently in the news. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 15:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – For the last one year, the page has been repeatedly disrupted by IP users who are replacing the sourced content with unsourced details. The pages like this one are targeted by dedicated WP:SPAs who spend their whole day disrupting this project. So it needs a long-term semi-protection. NitinMlk ( talk) 19:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. It's strange that such a short article would attract so much anonymous IP disruption over its history. While the rate of disruption is slow, it's long-term. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 19:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

"False News provider of the year" (Jada Derana). Delete Puritha ( talk) 03:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 16:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The filer had already removed the offending text themselves anyhow. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Too many people cause a disruptive editing in this article relating to HBO. CastJared ( talk) 07:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, another IP tried to start an edit war. CastJared ( talk) 11:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should carry us through the next episode. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page should not be moved. move=sysop (indefinite). However, all users to edit the page, per Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease#PBS Kids. Solaris5296 ( talk) 18:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Move protected. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, I wonder what he did today to get that much unwelcome attention. Sjö ( talk) 19:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Favonian ( talk) 21:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Critical WP:ARBIPA good article. Vandalized immediately after 1-year semi expired. 25stargeneral ( talk) 08:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: ip vandalism due to the event currently happening. Huz98 ( talk) 08:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should give things enough time to cool down. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attempts to keep a link on Talk:Press that leads to a spam link in a diff from another talk page's archive are coming from a series of unrelated IP addresses. Largoplazo ( talk) 21:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 21:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

17 January 2023

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there has been no vandalism on Damar Hamlin since unprotection. It seems 3 weeks was too long to protect in the first place, and given how the more notable figure was only protected once, see no reason for protection to continue here. 71.125.36.50 ( talk) 16:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The request makes no sense. Damar Hamlin and Tee Higgins are two different articles. There was significant disruptive activity from anonymous IP addresses just prior to protection. It has a week to go. If you want to change something, make an edit request on the talk page. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because this protection is almost 2 years ago because persistent editing never happened in the last 2 years. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The duration of existing protection is irrelevant. The declined edit requests on the talk page suggest that protection is still needed. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because sock puppetry is no longer active in the past 2 years. Solaris5296 ( talk) 18:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The request has a false premise, as sockpuppets editing that article as recently as 8 months ago have been blocked. Semi protection prevents their new accounts from disrupting the article. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Was protected over a decade ago due to BLP violations. Given that the subject is no longer alive, this no longer applies. Partofthemachine ( talk) 20:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected This may be a mistake just based on the subject's last name, but it has been over 12 years on a BLP protection and the subject is now deceased. Protecting admin is no longer active, so I will test out unprotection. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 23:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Muboshgu: My first thought when I saw this article title was "that's a name that just begs for drive-by vandalism." We'll see how it goes. At the very least, it would likely be a good candidate for PCP. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Anachronist, it was my first thought too, but Tits group, Tits alternative, and Tits metric seem to get by without needing protection (not to say they are un-vandalized). –  Muboshgu ( talk) 23:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rgalo10. Airtransat236 ( talk | contribs) 20:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption including WP:BLP violations about amount of children with partner. TylerBurden ( talk) 22:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps adding content that failed verification and ignoring the explanation that I left on the talk page. M.Bitton ( talk) 00:17, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by troll IP; see their IP range 5.120.0.0/16, the vast majority of their edits since December 2021 have been reverted. HistoryofIran ( talk) 17:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. I dropped a range block. Want to wait, HistoryofIran, and see how that works? It's less work than semi-protection. ;) Drmies ( talk) 23:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Well, I guess I didn't think about it properly when requesting the protection. This is good, thanks. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 23:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because disruptive editing never in the last 3 weeks, plus not many protections applied so far. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This was upgraded to semi-protection from CRASHlock late last month. Also, "not many protections applied so far" only applies to the past few years. It was last protected in 2015 and put on indefinite CRASHlock at the same time (as that prot was temporary). — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected per reasoning given above. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 22:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it was protected for almost 3 quarters of a year, disruptive editing no longer active. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The protection applied here looks like a natural escalation - the last protection lasted 6 months and, clearly, issues cropped back up in short order. Note that CRASHlock was attempted first and removed in favour of the six-month prot in 2021. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected. There is no reason to go against the normal escalation practice. We'll let it expire as scheduled, and then reprotect for a longer duration if disruption resumes. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because disruptive editing was no longer active in the last 30 days. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The indef semi is an escalation from indef CRASHlock, the implication being that CRASHlock was being overwhelmed. (CRASHlock does not work on pages seeing high volumes of edits.) — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected. The escalation from PCP was applied only last month by Materialscientist. Again, please examine the edit history and protection history before making these requests, and please try to trust that administrators know what they are doing and have good reasons to escalate to indef semi from PCP. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protected for 8 years. However, move=sysop (indefinite), per Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase#PBS Kids. Solaris5296 ( talk) 18:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The duration of protection is irrelevant to the continued need to protect, and that need is highly evident on the talk page, which shows many declined edit requests that would have otherwise been disruptive edits to the article. However, move protection has been applied. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
OK, but you at least you have done this. Solaris5296 ( talk) ( contribs) 22:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Weird, unexplainable recent IP vandalism: altering year of birth; removing a college team he played for from the infobox; changing the years in which he played for the other college team etc. Seems like one person using several IPs with a vendetta against this player. Asking for maybe a month's protection to deter future abuse? SportsGuy789 ( talk) 18:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper disruption resumed shortly after protection expired. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 22:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See history.  //  Timothy ::  talk  23:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sario528 ( talk) 23:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. palmiped Talk 00:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The article is already salted under the title Petzone, so this title should be salted too to prevent any further evasion of the protection. (Requesting here rather than doing it myself since I'm arguably involved.). Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protected because of a single disruptive editor who is probably no longer active. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ GB fan: What say you? Do you think it's reasonable to unprotect at this time? — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 08:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
If an admin wants to unprotect the redirect to allow IPs to edit it again, I do not mind. The protection probably has not stopped any legitimate edits from happening in the last five years. ~ GB fan 09:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Partofthemachine, please take a moment to explain which steps of thought led to this request. What happened; where is the reason? How did you notice this specific protection? Is there something you'd like to change while logged out? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Occasionally I will go through logs of pages that were indefinitely protected many years ago, to see if they should be unprotected. In this case, I did not realize that said page was a redirect. Partofthemachine ( talk) 17:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected. The reasoning given is speculative and asssumed incorrectly that the title was an article rather than a redirect. @ Partofthemachine: The duration that an article has been protected is irrelevant to whether it needs to remain protected. Duration should not be the sole reason to request downgrading protection. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Last round of protection expired Dec 24, since then, multiple IP edits and newly-created accounts attempting POV edits. All of them ignore talk page warnings and do no discussion. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 17:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors vandalizing article. Bahooka ( talk) 22:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of content without reason by multiple anonymous users. –DMartin 01:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User:dmartin969 carrying out vandalism and an EW, reshuffling content, inserting copyrighted material without proper attribution, that is not relevant for the subject. See Talk:Southern Federal District. 78.55.133.227 ( talk) 02:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
On top: User:dmartin969 not engaging in talk page beside being pinged by two users. 78.55.133.227 ( talk) 02:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I have been monitoring the discussion on the talk page but haven't had anything to add. I stand by my request for protection. –DMartin 02:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Edited by an admin ( User:IronGargoyle) that took part in an WP:EW and then protected by that admin abusing their admin rights, leaving the page in a vandalised state that violates copyright rules of the WMF. That is bad for the reputation of the English Wikipedia as well as for the Wikimedia Foundation. Please undo. 78.55.133.227 ( talk) 02:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP appears to be making mess, with whatever he's trying to do. GoodDay ( talk) 01:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 03:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Chris G. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary Extended Confirmed Protection: Persistent Sockpuppetry — It was edit by Globally banned username Rgalo10 as he continued to block evasion. 47.21.129.98 ( talk) 05:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism and regular content deletion by 2600:1702:3560:ee0:2c58:e002:2f85:a828 Nativecrusader ( talk) 19:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 06:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because of very-long term vandalism no longer active for years. 3 years ago it was protected. 3 years is enough. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ JBW: You protected this in 2019. The phone is now obsolete, although because of that the only edits we'd be seeing from anonymous IP editors and unconfirmed accounts are likely to be disruptive. What do you think? ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Unprotected @ Solaris5296 and Anachronist: I think that after 3 years we can afford to give this another try. JBW ( talk) 23:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yes, it's still move-protected, and that's the way it's gonna be. Favonian ( talk) 06:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term vandalism by IP editors, including a total article hijack. 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

One IP editor has been blocked, but at least on other from the same range has been actively vandalising the article 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
All has quietened down. Likely no longer required. 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 23:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn by requestor. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 05:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 different IPs have vandalized in the last hour. Wikipedialuva ( talk) 02:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC)  Tbhotch 04:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Regular attempts to make changes to the lead of the article which had been agreed upon by recent discussion. 10 reverts in the last month Titus Gold ( talk) 23:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Netherzone ( talk) 04:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism over the last week or two. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 06:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to unnecessary editing and revisions Xander Wu ( talk) 10:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky ( talk) 07:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism in terms of the person's titles. Eduardm ( talk) 09:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking only at the back and forth for the last 10 days, and the talk-page, my guess is that a precisely formulated RFC might be needed to form consensus. Lectonar ( talk) 09:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 15:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Seems like it was protected a few days ago, however the vandalism appears to have resumed shortly after it expired. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Very active WP:BLP vandals over the past couple of days.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/ Rational 16:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because disruptive editors edited this page are no longer active. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Given the hellacious protection log, I get the feeling unprotection is asking for trouble. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's not for trouble. Solaris5296 ( talk) ( contribs) 22:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Solaris5296: Yes, it is. Please examine the editing history and protection history before you make more requests like this. Besides the now-blocked disruptive editors, there have been disruptive IP address edits. Protection escalated naturally to indefinite. I'll leave it up to the protecting administrator El C to decide if unprotection is warranted. I would say, not at this time. Because Windows 7 is not receiving updates anymore, there is likely no reason to make further substantive changes to the article, so the only edits likely to occur from unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP addresses are vandal edits. There is nothing preventing these editors from proposing edits on the talk page. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
OK, so {{Not protected}}. Solaris5296 ( T) ( C) ( WA) 01:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not yet, wait for the protecting administrator to weigh in. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 03:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotectedEl C hasn't edited since New Year, so I'm calling it. The history of the article shows that we're better off keeping the protection in place. Favonian ( talk) 10:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edits made by the Tribal Government are being overwritten by external sources that aren't affiliated with the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Sonnymattera ( talk) 16:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Sources are not required to be affiliated with the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Independent sources. Favonian ( talk) 16:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. HistoryofIran ( talk) 16:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. This year already three times from different ranges but with the same working modus. The Banner  talk 11:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Tables being messed up, constant inaccurate values Btiker ( talk) 13:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 13:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor using different IP addresses repeatedly making same OR edits: 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:c145:8245:cff7:a0a3; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:4d88:fc83:c68f:7b6d

Similar series of different IP addresses were used to make same OR edits to main Lost Girl article: 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:b518:385b:f3f0:9d1e; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:58a:7363:7675:7783; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:c950:6949:4fdf:5357; 2605:8d80:680:6c1b:cd56:321a:db64:1687; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:4d68:5732:5e25:5094

Main article had to be protected. This problematic editor is now playing an endurance game with sub-articles. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo. 15:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740::/64 for two weeks. Favonian ( talk) 17:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 21:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

18 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued disruption and vandalism after protection expired: [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]. Has previously been protected 6 times in escalating increments up to the recent one for 3 months which expired in December 2021 and has been vandalized repeatedly since —  Shibbolethink ( ) 16:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism by various IPs across multiple different ranges ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. Using cheap language. Pri2000( talk) 19:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I request a long semi protection (6 months/1 year/permanent), instead of PC protection. Almost all edits to this page by non-autoconfirmed users have been unhelpful. See history. It is spamming my watchlist and using volunteer time. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 20:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see what happens in 6 months; no change made to longer-term PC protection. Complex/ Rational 01:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 21:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing vandalism from IP replacing Devo content with Yellow Magic Orchestra content. Bahooka ( talk) 01:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and bizarre vandalism. $chnauzer 01:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of multiple IPs. Iaintfaking ( talk) 02:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi-protection - Egregious WP:BLP violations. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 22:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One batch of BLP-violating edits reverted, otherwise low-traffic article, no pattern of recent disruption. Complex/ Rational 01:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editing recently increased - adding spurious edits. It is a particular issue on the article Talk page today. Geoff | Who, me? 23:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection – IPs inserting poorly sourced content (using Wiki-based sites) for two days continuously. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 23:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations by IP editors over the last month (have requested Oversight look at them). Thanks. Tacyarg ( talk) 23:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done for the bot ( Mz7's note about turning the article into a redirect was archived for some reason). Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – world's oldest person has passed away, should have protection on a page like this. Réunion ( talk!) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Much recent vandalism and disruption such as WP:BLP violations. TylerBurden ( talk) 01:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring by IPs. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 02:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This seems a case of edit warring. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Enter Demoman ( talk) 22:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: For reasons that are beyond me, this page is a constant target for disruption from IPs and unregistered users. Requesting longer-term protection. Novemberjazz 03:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 05:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. vandalism from many ips, and unconfirmed users Wesoree ( Talk) 19:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indeed it is. Lectonar ( talk) 08:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs changing coach's team based on media speculation. Schazjmd  (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Should this be protected against IP editors? I see an edit summary making reference to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior, and I suspect the large number of IP edits to this article, some of which are rather dubious, are from this person? I would have already added this protection, but I am editing the article as well and would like an opinion from someone uninvolved. Thanks! -- Beland ( talk) 07:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As can be seen in the history, this article goes sometimes weeks with not being edited at all, so semi-protection would be overkill. Let's see how pending-changes does. I have watchlisted. Lectonar ( talk) 08:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism over several weeks. Anwegmann ( talk) 19:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 09:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Lauriswift911 ( talk) 06:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined @ Lauriswift911: last IP edit was about 5 days ago, and the talk-page of the user you keep reverting is still a redlink. So time to start talking, or go to an appropriate noticeboard. Lectonar ( talk) 09:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: This tiny, 87x40 image (used on a whopping 16 pages) seems to have been indefinitely fully upload-protected in 2009. Presumably, it was used in some ubiquitous template, but this seems to no longer be the case, making the protection unnecessary (?). jp× g 03:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption of IP User:86.30.30.70 and their sock User:Nattypc ( talk · contribs · count). - FlightTime ( open channel) 03:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 10:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Blanking of page by different IP addresses. RisingTzar ( talk) 13:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AfD leaning heavily towards keep atm. Lectonar ( talk) 14:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: No reason to have ECP, at least anymore--article is calm and does not have any contentious or objectionable content. DecafPotato ( talk) 20:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

let's hear from the last protecting admin...@ Favonian:: any thoughts on that? Lectonar ( talk) 08:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The article was protected because it's a target of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/My Royal Young. The last formalized sock report from this drawer was in June 2022, but I'm not sure they're gone for good. zzuuzz has experience with this specimen and may be more up-to-date on their status. Favonian ( talk) 09:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Special:Contributions/112.206.116.89/20 + ... The probabilities have not significantly changed, IMO. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected – Old socks don't die, and they don't even fade away. Favonian ( talk) 11:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Favonian: I would add that semi-protection could be an option. Many other targets have semi-protection. It appears autoconfirmed throwaways are not the problem they may have been and it may be interesting to test the waters. On the other hand, rather notably, this article should be considered a centrepiece of their activities. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user Defeedme still IP-hopping and disruptively editing the article, not showing any signs of stopping this tactic. Wes sideman ( talk) 13:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is pending-changes protected, which means that the disruptive edits don't go "live". Disruption is not heavy enough to warrant semi-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 14:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level or IP vandalism, unauthorized multiple edits providing false information Mranonymous170 ( talk) 14:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 14:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 14:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced information repeatedly added by IP users. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially IP 80.xxx, 2 edits in the last 2 days. Lectonar ( talk) 14:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand ( talk · contribs) sockmaster has found a new toy. Unlikely that this 2020 videogame image would need to be updated again anyway. Belbury ( talk) 15:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism -- this has become such a large problem that some editors have questioned its legitimacy as a notable article. Requesting a stronger level of protection than before. HackerKnownAs ( talk) 19:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib ( talk) 20:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

19 January 2023

Reason: Constant vandalism and change of sourced content. Possible sockpuppetry by Jabranek using multiple IPs. 86.137.14.180 ( talk) 18:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Endorse this. There's been highly disruptive editing going on over the last few months. – Austronesier ( talk) 20:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Daniel Case: Can you please revert the edit the vandal made before getting muted? They added a misleading source which contradicts the already sourced content. 81.155.96.162 ( talk) 21:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
See here on why admins don't do this and aren't supposed to. You're free to put in a request on the talk page. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AbelAndCain ( talk) 01:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Some Youtuber encouraged their views to add to the page. Meanderingbartender ( talk) 09:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because Dr. Joseph Muscat is no longer the Prime Minister of Malta and has now moved into the private sector. Marfar2 ( talk) 21:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unnecesary reverts keep being made by an IP user over an infobox change despite the fact that there is no set guidelines in place on how an image montage should look, and there were previous discussions about this on U.S. city articles like the one for New York City. There is no reason for these reversions to keep being made. - Evelyn Marie ( leave a message · contributions) 20:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Evelyn Marie ( talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. because she violated 3RR. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Aryvaaa ( talk) 14:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two accounts strongly suspected of sockpuppetry and under investigation are edit warring and repeatedly adding and pushing the same content to the article despite a talk page discussion. Neither sockpuppets are extended confirmed, so make this protection to stop the disruptive editing and edit war. Their edits are 100% disruptive. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disrupting editing/edit-warring by the IPs. Some1 ( talk) 12:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Apparent COI editing by various IPs and an infrequent editor whose name matches the article subject. SPECIFICO talk 15:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 15:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by newly registered or IP users. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – For the last six months, anons are adding an unsourced claim in this article and also in Makhaya Ntini. I opened a discussion one year ago (see here), but they aren't interested in discussion or even in citing any reliable source. So the article needs semi-protection to stop this disruption. NitinMlk ( talk) 19:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 06:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced content by IP address editors. Maurice Oly ( talk) 21:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, primarily coming from IPs. Magitroopa ( talk) 22:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Continued insertion of false/unsourced information since page protection expired — chaetodipus ( talk) 06:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The Secret Life of Pets and The Secret Life of Pets (franchise) as well for the same reason. — chaetodipus ( talk) 08:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent alteration of sourced material. — Czello 09:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and on-going disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic ( TALK!) 01:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP users are adding unsourced content or not following manual of style. Telenovelafan215 ( talk) 01:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR RowanJ LP ( talk) 04:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent page history is just a mess of roaming IP vandalism and reverts. Iskandar323 ( talk) 05:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Multiple articles targeted by socks of Belteshazzar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of disruptive edits by socks of Belteshazzar. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar/Archive. Each of these pages has been disruptively edited by multiple socks of Belteshazzar more than three times recently. Most of these pages are in the Wikipedia space and would not normally see much legitimate editing from the new and anonymous users who would be covered by the semi-protection. As always, protection may inconvenience some people but I think it is worth it if we can dissuade Belteshazzar from constantly reinstating their bad edits using new IP addresses. other affected editors can always use the Talk pages to request changes. DanielRigal ( talk) 20:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The edits in question only fixed problems and added useful content. By contrast, Daniel's revert restores borderline BLP violations, since some of that wording might make it sound like the authors of the letter are partly to blame for the disastrous repercussions. If that page is protected, it should be full protection, with that last revert undone. 103.103.3.6 ( talk) 20:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
That's another of their socks. This demonstrates their persistence, their astonishing brazenness and their complete lack of respect for Wikipedia. DanielRigal ( talk) 20:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's been going on for a few years now sadly. After this user is blocked they always leave messages on their talk-page but not in a single one have they ever apologized, serious lack of self-reflection. They are using a vpn service but they will likely be back on accounts as well. I am watching many articles so I will easily identify their behavior. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 21:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
On second thought, I have semi-protected all except the last (it had not seen much disruption) for varying lengths of time. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done As done as will happen for now; for the bot. Lectonar ( talk) 11:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: This article receives a great deal of discussion. It would be helpful to the experienced editors who watch the article if accounts were confirmed before commenting. Please review the "A few points..." discussion. Thanks!. Nemov ( talk) 18:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I’d like to add that previous year articles also had their talk pages semi-protected, so it isn't without precedent. Sir Jack Hopkins ( talk) 19:05, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Agreed, especially considering the issues we’ve had with problematic unregistered IPs, most recently one who was both disruptive and vitriolic towards other users. TheScrubby ( talk) 04:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by a newly registered account, somewhat of a edit war. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 05:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 08:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs ( talk) 11:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack ( talk) 11:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article is caught up in the Persian Gulf naming dispute with editors disruptively changing "Arabian Gulf" to "Persian Gulf". Less than 48 hours after the latest page protection expired, the disruptive editing has resumed. —. Archer1234 ( t· c) 03:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: I've leave this for Lectonar since it's effectively a decision about whether the pending changes is sufficient or if it should be upgraded to semi protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I think for now we're fine...2 days of calm after end of semi-protection, and then 3 disruptive edits today. I have watchlisted, and will up to semi if it becomes unmanageable. Lectonar ( talk) 11:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
update: Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Many users are changing his club when the transfer news has not been confirmed by a valid source, e.g. official website of either club. His year of birth and goals and appearances stats has been vandalised as well Jeremy Hulber ( talk) 13:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. He seems to be changing clubs a lot; I saw in the logs that I already protected the page in 2016 :). Lectonar ( talk) 13:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Because of a recent controversy, it has been vandalized by IP several time e.g. they added death of the person! 1/2 weeks of semi protection would be nice. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 13:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Whatever the point of today's additions are, they clearly are in some violation of WP:NOT.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection - repeatedly recreated. 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 08:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Have you got the right article title? No logs under this one. Lectonar ( talk) 08:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Unknown target. Favonian ( talk) 16:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of vandalism/speculative editing after page protection expired. Couple of days should suffice, as he may have changed clubs by then [22]. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected for longer due to the resumption of vandalism immediately after the previous block. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  Lefcentreright   Discuss  16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of WP:OR. SSSB ( talk) 16:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. WP:LTA/VXFC flogging one of their favorite dead horses. Favonian ( talk) 17:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR RowanJ LP ( talk) 17:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I question whether 3 days is sufficient time to develop consensus for such a drastic action, but I trust the closing admin's judgement. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content since the previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 17:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also blocked one of the IP-hopping users as they've been adding unsourced content across many film articles. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by an IP and newly registered user — El Millo ( talk) 19:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editor removing independent verifiable content and sourcing. ARose Wolf 17:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

There has been longtime intermittent SPA and COI editing on this page. SPECIFICO talk 17:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Meanwhile the IP is back with an autocofirmed account with similar history of apparent COI. SPECIFICO talk 20:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ SPECIFICO: watch what you write in edit summaries, WP:OUTING is policy. I am investigating the article. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 20:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 21:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 21:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shouldn't have come off, this page gets vandalised far too much. Govvy ( talk) 21:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Kinu. Favonian ( talk) 21:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: This (and alternative capitalization Super smash flash 2) should be unprotected to allow them to redirect to Super Smash Flash#Super Smash Flash 2. From there, they can probably be goldlocked again if needed. DecafPotato ( talk) 20:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected Article has been salted for nearly 15 years despite only being created twice (first time speedy deleted, second time AfD consensus to delete), no reason for ongoing protection at this point. This is probably a good example for why indef protection should be avoided in most cases. @ DecafPotato: Feel free to add a redirect. If someone replaces the article with a redirect, then it's probably worthwhile to take it to AfD to ensure consensus hasn't changed. Otherwise, I don't see any need to protect these redirects. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 20:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
made the redirect--thank you! DecafPotato ( talk) 20:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

20 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Estopedist1 ( talk) 21:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 22:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 22:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 23:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Lots of people flocking to edit this after his death and vandals are out. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 23:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done by Moncrief ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long term edit warring, as well as sock puppetry, from many unregistered users. Should be protected for quite a while. 72.68.134.254 ( talk) 20:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If sockpuppet accounts are suspected here, please report to WP:SPI. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 23:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection:Sockpuppetry. 47.54.20.187 ( talk) 22:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done Thanks for caring, though. :) / gen -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 22:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I was about to accept this request and set ECP for one month based on the high number of reversions by multiple editors. I think ECP might be a good idea for a bit. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 22:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
There's a logic to why it's not ECP'd. Happy to discuss why, but I'll leave it at that. I've left a note in the protection log to this effect as well. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 22:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the additional context. I concur with not increasing the page protection level. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 23:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 01:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users adding an unsourced list of military dictatorships. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 01:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit war imminent -- little attempt by @Binksternet to reach consensus before repeated deletions. Incorrect application of WP:BLPPRIVACY and inconsistent reasoning for subsequent re-deletion. ~ subtleache talk 03:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – far too many ips have been mistaking this as the subject's answering service. $chnauzer 04:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Increasing number of edits by unregistered users possibly due to imminent presidential election to be held before 14 September 2023 Bcmh ( talk) 06:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not saying it won't need to be protected at some point before the election. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent increase in general disruption. Includes vandalism, good faith incompetence, and WP:LTA/UAK. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" ( work / talk) 06:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 07:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. The Banner  talk 09:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 11:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm, restarted shortly after expiry of an earlier protection. The Banner  talk 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it resumes after this protection I'd agree with going long-term or indef. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 11:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. The Banner  talk 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 11:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One IP and a second range have been doing a number on this page with vandalism. The one IP was issued a 31-hour block, but another IP is doing the work from the second range. Something larger is needed. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 04:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 14:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism on same entry by multiple IPs. Changes are the same each time. Carter00000 ( talk) 09:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week. This is a portal and subject to restrictions on the Arab Israeli conflict., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 14:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 12:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 12:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Long-term sockpuppetry. 188.124.93.127 ( talk) 10:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian ( talk) 11:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Long-term abuse has resumed. 216.201.9.162 ( talk) 10:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian ( talk) 11:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pages about the next Turkish general election

Temporary semi-protection: Erdoğan said the elections might be early but there isn't an official announcement yet (and legally there can't be until late March), but IPs and new users take his speeches literally and edit the pages to reflect his speculations. I'm requesting a semi-protection until 20 March. Betseg ( talk) 13:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. For all pages; I have looked at all the pages...nowhere has disruption risen to the level which would make semi-protection needed at this time. So please relist if disruption picks up. Note: If any other admin wants to protect, go right ahead. Lectonar ( talk) 13:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of NPOV content sourced only to a Reddit post by various IPs/new accounts. Aoidh ( talk) 15:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism. For now temporary semi-protection and indefinite full move protection (no need for this page to be moved). Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 14:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various users (most likely the same), adding extremely unsourced information about a Thailand version. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 14:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – House of Yahweh sock nonsense. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 14:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of disruptive IP interventions, at least one of which has been blocked as a proxy IP, on a contentious topics/sanctions page. Iskandar323 ( talk) 15:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of new-account vandalism. Seasider53 ( talk) 15:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Both this and Rick and Morty (season 6) have new users and IPs constantly adding a clone of a main character with the same voice actress to the main characters index, and it's getting really tiring constantly reverting them. I was told to do dispute resolution earlier, but these are new users or non-users who I don't trust know about the talk page. Unnamed anon ( talk) 15:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits from a block-evading IP-hopper. Adding cast member(s) without citing published reliable source(s) to verify. Previous protection was for 1-week. —. Archer1234 ( t· c) 16:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs (likely socks) keep coming in and making the same changes, making unsourced claims and removing references. Paris1127 ( talk) 18:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 20:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent WP:BLP violations going back to December 3, unsourced place of birth. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 18:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by various IP editors and users. Theoder2055 ( talk) 19:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

21 January 2023

Reason: High level of vandalism from new users despite being semi-protected. Requesting higher level of page protection HackerKnownAs ( talk) 17:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. N Panama 84534 20:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP and New User vandalism Jean-de-Nivelle ( talk) 20:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive talk notices from IPs. A week should suffice ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some LTA Troll. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 23:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism. Media attention reporting that Hipkins is going to be PM, many disruptive edits have been made and reverted as a result. It may be useful to protect until Tuesday, after the official confirmation. Carolina2k22(talk)(edits) 00:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 03:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 23:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA RowanJ LP ( talk) 05:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I need to ask an important question for this user. 27.72.144.249 ( talk) 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Page was protected to prevent harassment by a logged-out user. It stands to reason that this IP is the same person. — C.Fred ( talk) 03:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
That's a load of horse****, but fine! 27.72.144.249 ( talk) 03:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Well, that's not the only reason. If it were just 1 user then I would've just let them get blocked. But I have been getting annoyed by a lot of IP trolls lately so I decided I should jsut protect it for a week. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Blaze, like myself, is a regular target for IP vandals since we both revert a LOT of vandalism. Moops T 04:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Ensure that it does not get vandalized, especially since it's about a Wikipedian, while allowing the user that the userbox is about and other users to help improve it. MasterMatt12 💬Contributions 04:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. These are persistent and have been going on for months on end. Other country Wikipedia articles, like Cyprus, Italy, etc. are permanently semi-protected. Is it possible to extend the same protection to the Malta article too? It's very frustrating to keep rolling back attacks for all this time.

Zugraga talk 08:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is been a report of an edit war. CastJared ( talk) 09:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent and aggressive IP vandalism. Upwards of 16+ times. Reported already to AIV. I am a regular patroller and reverter of vandalism, so I get frequent heat from the IP vandals. Whatever the maximum allowed personal talk page protection is, I request that please. TY Moops T 04:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by IPs and new users. Only few edits made by these users are constructive. IntegerSequences ( talk | contribs) 05:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KFC ( 🔔📝) 06:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done User pages are automatically protected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism/edit warring in past two days. Caldorwards4 ( talk) 06:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Unregistered contributor replaces content with uncited and incorrect material, and will not engage on talk page. Sandcherry ( talk) 22:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:53, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant IP vandalism despite explanation from multiple users and repeated removal of existing sourced material. Suugaapio ( talk) 23:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Warn the user appropriately and then report to WP:AIV, WP:ANEW or WP:ANI as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A user insists on boldly splitting HomePod to HomePod (1st generation) and HomePod (2nd generation) (with a cut&paste move, in the former case), despite having repeatedly been reverted by me and two other users. Don't think this rises to the level of a sustained behavioral issue, so I'm merely requesting page protection, so both of the latter pagess can remain redirects until there is any consensus for a split. Cheers, DFlhb ( talk) 01:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This would need extended-confirmed protection which I don't believe is warranted in this instance as such this is should be dealt with as either a content-dispute or a conduct issue (edit warring and copy & paste move). Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Ensure that it does not get vandalized, especially since it's about a Wikipedian, while allowing the user that the userbox is about and other users to help improve it. MasterMatt12 💬Contributions 04:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Ensure that it does not get vandalized, especially since it's about a Wikipedian, while allowing the user that the userbox is about and other users to help improve it. MasterMatt12 💬Contributions 04:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant date tampering from multiple IPs, generally making the same exact changes every time. ResPM ( T🔈 🎵C) 11:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP #1 claims there's been no killing (which might put this in BLP re supposed victim and the two accused whose conviction was quashed) and accuses Wikipedia editors of falsehood and more. IP #2 seems to know IP #1, calls IP #1 by name, refers to IP#1's workplace, so now we have accusations of trolling, bullying, whatever. NebY ( talk) 11:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: constant vandalism and disruptive editing Muhajir ( talk) 11:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because vandalism. KFC ( 🔔📝) 12:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DrKay ( talk) 12:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This needed extended-confirmed protection due to one IP started an edit war. CastJared ( talk) 14:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP spam, likely the same person using different addresses based on identical messages. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 15:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 16:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

22 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user edit warring over contest winner. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 13:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I semi-protected for 3 days. Over 500 edits today, almost all from IPs. I see no hope of sorting out the edit warring. Let's see if thinghs are calmer after the protection ends in three days. Donald Albury 21:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A number of disruptive new accounts have been making identical edits regarding the network's programming. WCQuidditch 19:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. It wasn't "a number of disruptive new accounts", it was just one. Other than that, there was no disruption since October. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 22:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Seems like we edit-conflicted on this, Anachronist. There are four blocked/locked accounts I see that edited the article on 20 and 21 January. The account names are similar, but they're not one single account. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Sdrqaz: I stand corrected. I was just looking at the first part of those long usernames. Thanks. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Partofthemachine ( talk) 21:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Donald Albury. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donald Albury ( talkcontribs) 22:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 22:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 20:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian ( talk) 20:53, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP editors disrupting BLP of boxer who had a match today. Schazjmd  (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP editors disrupting BLP of boxer who had a match today. Schazjmd  (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

List of _____ vehicles

Temporary semi-protection: These articles are favorite targets of a prolific LTA vandal who changes IPs every time one is blocked, throughout multiple wide ranges. Prior to being semi-protected a month ago, some of these articles were vandalized 3-4 times per week. Now that protection has expired, they are under attack again by the same LTA. -- Sable232 ( talk) 16:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not all of those articles have been vandalized recently, and the remaining ones have been vandalized once each since protection ended. I think this request is a bit premature. Donald Albury 21:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Somehow this request is from December... ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Whoosh! I missed that. Donald Albury 22:22, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The date was incorrect; I copied the previous request and forgot to remove the timestamp and re-sign. -- Sable232 ( talk) 22:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I still do not see any recent edits on half of those articles, and only one instance of vandalism on each of the others. Donald Albury 22:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Favonian ( talkcontribs) 20:53, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the past few months, IP editors have been repeatedly warring over a single edit (adding that Bush won via the Supreme Court case), which isn't factually correct. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 18:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Reliable sources writing articles about this very page, extremely high target for vandalism. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 22:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. On going BLP vios from IPs with derogatory words — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 17:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism/ deletion of cited content - at least 8 separate occasions in the last 3 days by at least 2 separate IP ranges. BilCat ( talk) 22:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA attacks. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 04:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 17:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: by Sro23 ( talk · contribs). and ComplexRational Daniel Case ( talk) 04:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Google Doodle has driven a lot of traffic to this page. Including vandals of course. Issues with IPs and named accounts. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting semi-protection: In the last several days there seems to have been a lot of vandalism and addition of unsourced content, mostly from IPs and new users. AP 499D25 ( talk) 05:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Templates used in MediaWiki namespace should be protected. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The page might seem to be already protected, but only the history has been merged. I agree with protecting the page as it's used in MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-CT. I guess noone would complain if I did, but it can't hurt to let someone else perform the protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Template protected indefinitely. I've gone for template editor protection as that was what was used for its predecessor and that while it is used in the interface it's not widely seen by people inexperienced with Wikipedia. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of repeated vandalism despite clear notes in the article. Anwegmann ( talk) 00:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been targeted multiple times over the last few days with users spamming edits to get to the 10 edit for autoconfirmed, then vandalizing the page. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 02:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This looks like more of an issue for WP:SPI instead. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I am an AFC reviewer and I accept Draft:Kamal Choudhary. Appears to have been salted to protect creation of a singer. This draft is about an academic. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 07:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

UnprotectedFavonian ( talk) 10:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA RowanJ LP ( talk) 01:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page is highly vandalized and is being edited out of fun. Loibird90 ( talk) 01:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Spam 171.100.233.77 ( talk) 03:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism, attacks by WP:LTA. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 03:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Just FYI, It seems like these accounts are all globally locked now. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Unprotected article regarding Israel-Palestine. Onetwothreeip ( talk) 07:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 06:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Despite being semi-protected, the page still continues to get persistent disruptive editing from new users. HackerKnownAs ( talk) 07:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . TheNumtums2023 ( talk) 08:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 10:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Please ping me if that doesn't help. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been an edit war on this page going back to October 2022, in which the infobox has been changed and reverted at least a dozen times by multiple parties. The editors involved have not used the talk page. Requesting full protection until talk page consensus has been reached. Bartzyx ( talk) 14:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 15:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke ( talkcontribs) 18:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 19:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor consistently inserting original research. Luciferian Thomas 16:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor making repeated personal attacks [23] [24] [25]. This is within the area of WP:UYGHUR, and community-authorized discretionary sanctions are in force for that page. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 18:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IP User. I believe the issue has not been addressed satisfactorily as of yet on the talk page.   Aloha27  talk  20:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – sock activity. see corresponding draft, Draft:Quill (company). – robertsky ( talk) 17:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done. I'm leaving the draft unprotected for now. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet ( talk) 21:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Looking over the history of this page, a long term semi should do the trick. -- RegentsPark ( comment) 22:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 18:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No rationale provided. Favonian ( talk) 19:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

23 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks have been going into editing disputes on this article dating back to only 5 days ago. (I bet this is going to be rejected lol). Poodle23 ( talk) 18:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Last reverted edit was on the 19th, so as predicted, Not done. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP keeps removing content. Also person recently passed away so page is undergoing an extremely higher than normal amount of edits RedPatch ( talk) 18:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Almost every edit to this page by a new user is vandalism. While the volume of vandalism isn't huge, the fact that 90% of the articles recent edits are vandalism by new and unregistered users and subsequent reversions is tedious to deal with, and long-term semi-protection would be appreciated. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been a recent dispute surrounding the topic, which is why there have been a lot of destructive edits made by IP addresses. Trying to remove well sourced content. Gothamk ( talk) 18:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The annual vandalism and unhelpful editing of this article around January 26 has started. Requesting temporary full protection for one week. Melcous ( talk) 21:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. We don't protect pages pre-emptively. Page is already under indefinite pending changes which restricts autoconfirmed editors. Zero disruption from extended confirmed folks. We reserve full protection for cases in which experienced editors are editing the page disruptively. BusterD ( talk) 00:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated and similar lead edits by non-registered users, similarly to Snowdonia which has since been protected. Titus Gold ( talk) 22:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a couple of days. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Continued disruption not long after unprotection. Curbon7 ( talk) 00:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Angelovitalex1968 ( talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD ( talk) 00:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 00:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD ( talk) 00:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protected 2600:1700:D510:EF30:A815:6379:5FEF:396A ( talk) 02:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping editor is warring with several editors over an ill-advised style change. Started in October 2022 with this edit. 25stargeneral ( talk) 03:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This sockmaster regularly uses autoconfirmed sleepers. Someone who's wrong on the internet ( talk) 22:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined While the vandal who likes to target this article and its talk page with such sleepers has been quite active lately, all those socks have been indeffed and there has been no such editing to the page since it was semi'ed 16 hours ago. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Topic is associated with the contentious topics of critical race theory and postcolonialism. Talk page indicates the page may have been flagged as "personal opinion" based on the agendas of editors rather than any factual basis. 24.188.161.176 ( talk) 04:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 05:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP hijinks, Ukrainian-Russian topics - restricted to auto confirmed users Volunteer Marek 05:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP and user vandalism related to ethnicity and country of origin, persistent across multiple IPs across several months (back at least until December 2020. - car chasm ( talk) 00:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected Lectonar ( talk) 09:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC) Lectonar ( talk) 09:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-editors are edit-warring with some editors over content that have been recently discussed on its talk page. Possible WP:BLOCKEVASION? Ckfasdf ( talk) 06:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Supported - for what that's worth. I came here requesting semi-protection, but see that Ckfasdf has already logged a request. -- Merbabu ( talk) 08:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Result - https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=1999_East_Timorese_crisis&oldid=1135213676 - has been semi protected for 6 months. JarrahTree 09:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done For the bot. Lectonar ( talk) 09:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This BLP is attracting an increasing amount of IP vandalism due to the subject standing in an election this weekend. Decided to send it here as I'm marginally involved (have worked a bit on the article). – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. BangJan1999 10:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 10:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent unexplained changes and edit warring by Indonesia based LTA editor using numerous different IP's making blocks ineffective. TylerBurden ( talk) 12:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected Lectonar ( talk) 13:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protection for the page expired and now there is persistent IP vandalism after multiple IP bans. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Range blocked, let me know if it keeps up. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
FYI it's continuing. Sheep ( talkhe/him) 14:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism after page protection expired. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
They've immediately returned again under a different IP (which has now been whacked actually). Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I adjusted the rangeblock a bit. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
They're back @ ScottishFinnishRadish. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Just protect the pages, please. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 14:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Beacuse endless whack-a-mole is only going to risk excessive collateral damage. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 14:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor(s) who disagree with critical reviews repeatedly removing content from the reception section while making unfounded and untrue accusations of "cherry-picking" or "self-promotion.". silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 10:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Recently requested protection here, and more test edits and vandalism has ensued since. Being one of the most high profile football players in the world makes this article extremely vulnerable to disruption. TylerBurden ( talk) 10:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian ( talk) 15:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring with an editor removing sourced information. The Banner  talk 14:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined There is a report on this issue at WP:AN3, and frankly I don't see the need for full protection at this time. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – He is a controversial figure as part of the Azov Battalion, so the article attracts consistent periodic disruptive edits calling him a Nazi, etc. HappyWith ( talk) 15:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism due to rumoured signing with English club Arsenal Idiosincrático ( talk) 17:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A quick Google search indicates that the trade is happening, it just hasn't happened yet. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A bot (User: JJMC89 bot) removed the approved new logo update request leading to inaccurate information on the page. If the protection is not granted, please guide me on how to protect the page from further misleading edits. Thank you. Regards, Techsap25 ( talk) 07:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hmmm...Wikipedia can be edited by anyone; protection is the exception, not the rule. Lectonar ( talk) 09:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi @ Lectonar, thank you for reviewing my request. The wrong edit issue was resolved and the correct logo was restored, please see: /info/en/?search=User_talk:JJMC89#Removed_Black_Box_New_Logo
But today again the same bot @ JJMC89 bot has removed the approved logo although the logo has a suitable non-free use rationale, please see /info/en/?search=File:Blackbox_logo.png Could you please guide me with some other Wikipedia guidelines or processes that will help in protecting the right information if the page protection is not possible in this case. Thank you again. Regards, Techsap25 ( talk) 14:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Techsap25: I believe the issue was that the uploader, EchidnaLives, added the non-free use rationale template with a bare URL for the article, rather than just the article name, which broke the template. Therefore, JJMC89 bot could not tell that the image was properly tagged, because it wasn't. I think I have fixed the issue. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of poorly sourced (preprints, blogs) content by IP. Austronesier ( talk) 15:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-standing problem with IP vandalism. Vandalism restarted immediately after end of last one-month protection. Meters ( talk) 19:10, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Vandalism has been going on for the past 24 hours, semi protection hasn't stopped it. 2A01:CB1C:545:7600:ED41:15A4:C86:D44D ( talk) 21:17, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 21:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm hoping this level of protection will suffice for the editors currently edit warring. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is one report of an edit war between 2 users, due to unsourced content. CastJared ( talk) 17:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - they seem to have stopped. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hello, I inserted a valid, referenced and related quote into a suitable section of this article (see my initial edit: 1), however user Marcelus keep removing it without providing a valid justification ( 1, 2).

In my talk page he claimed that it should be removed because "I don't really see how this separate qoute enriches article" ( 1), "We don't really need" ( 2 - by the way, he wrote it himself alone, so it should have been "I don't need"), "In my opinion, the section "Political views" comprehensively describes the issue."( 3), but these are not valid justifications and is only his own opinion which is not supported by any Wikipedia's rules. Basically, he was writing different justifications again and again.

Marcelus also claims that the quote should be completely removed because in the Mackevičius' article it is written that "Šenavičienė claims that the account faithfully reflects the thoughts of Mackevičius himself, more than his testimonies written after his imprisonment, facing the death penalty" (the reference is not accessible online, so it is not even possible to check if it is really written like that in the reference). But that's not a valid justification to remove a quote either because it does not say that his post-imprisonment letters are not reliable and should not be described. Another user Cukrakalnis also noted (see: 1) that Marcelus' actions of censoring this quote are not valid according to Wikipedia's rules, but Marcelus ignores this.

The quote he keep removing is an excerpt from a letter which Mackevičius wrote when imprisoned saying that "The Lithuanian nation is hardworking, honest, religious, so it is worth my life. I am waiting freedom of my people as it was retribution...". Another referenced sentence in the article also say that "Mackevičius' main goal is the rebirth of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth"", but it does not deny the fact that he fought for the Lithuanian nation (in his own words - his people).

Consequently, please take actions against Marcelus' provoking of revert warring in this article. We don't need to continue this and the quote must stay as it does not violate any Wikipedia's rules.

By the way, there is a case at administrators noticeboard (see: HERE) which claim that Marcelus' actions are disruptive as he was calling a notable Lithuanian scientist and minister of education Zigmas Zinkevičius as "chauvinistic pig" (see Marcelus' edits here: 1, 2). Such personal attacks against a famous Lithuanian should not be tolerated in Wikipedia. But it seems the disruption is spreading into another article - Antanas Mackevičius. Please stop this. -- Pofka ( talk) 18:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - content dispute. While no policy compels removal of the quote, nor does policy compel its inclusion - you will need to discuss and reach consensus on this issue. If you do not agree with Marcelus' rationale for removing the quote, you can request a third opinion or try dispute resolution. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector: Marcelus keep removing it despite the fact that third user (Cukrakalnis) also opposed his actions. -- Pofka ( talk) 19:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
In the absence of disruptive editing (like vandalism or revert warring) we do not protect pages to enforce one user's preferred version over another. Please try dispute resolution. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector I give proper reasoning on @ Pofka talk page, he ignored it Marcelus ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector: So we accept removal of content and the one whose content get removed should seek for third opinion (two users support that it should stay)? I think that user who want to remove other user added referenced content should seek for others support to remove it. -- Pofka ( talk) 19:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Pofka I really hoped that after the ban was lifted, less than a month ago, you came back as a changed man. Meanwhile, you are back to your old practices. On your talk page, I wrote exactly why a quote introduced in such a way violates the WP:QUOTE rules. But you simply ignored it, in addition you wrote untruthfully that the only reason I removed the quote is my own unjustified, personal preference.
In short:
  • you put the quote in the form of a motto, not in the body of the article.
  • the source is uncertain, AM's testimony was given in Polish and Russian, your quote comes from a random website in Lithuanian
  • researchers who are quoted in the text claim that AM's testimony does not reflect his intentions honestly, because it was given on death row, etc. Quoting him directly, without such context, suggests otherwise
  • the quote you chose is not even representative of what is contained in AM's testimony, since he gives various motivations that are partially mutually exclusive
I wrote you all this on your talk page, but you ignored it. Marcelus ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Marcelus and Pofka: this report is closed. Take your content dispute to an appropriate forum and do not edit this section again. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection request Repeated introduction into the lead by IP of accusations that the BLP is a genocide denier based on a flimsy source + BLP's own (Serbian) Facebook page (accusation is already included as an accusation in the body). IP has been warned by me on their talk page but does not engage on article talk. Pincrete ( talk) 18:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. I have partblocked the IP from the article. They can discuss this material's inclusion on the talk page. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

24 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Sources reporting he has been traded - teams haven't made an official announcement. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 18:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - multiple sources considered reliable for sporting news indicate that the trade is a done deal. I don't see why we need to wait for an official announcement, and you are edit warring. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I'm just going by WP:SPORTSTRANS. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 22:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is still IPs making editing disruption after semi-protection is removed, as Rhain is reverting certain IP edits to prevent disruption. CastJared ( talk) 19:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism appears to be sporadic, with several good faith edits by new users and IPs mixed in. I'd recommend reporting these accounts to WP:AIV when they pop up. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Even for this page, there is currently unusually high actiivity, mainly from IP users, of adding unsourced numbers, specifically targeting India (vs. China) and the UN world total in the lede. T*U ( talk) 21:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term abuse from multiple different registered editors. Possibly socks?. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 00:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IPs adding unsourced cast/changing characters. Mike  Allen 18:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection The series Velma has been removed from the page twice now by the same IP user despite it being in the franchise, and it seems like this will continue so long as the first season is airing due to public backlash. JayleyMq ( talk) 00:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam ( talk) 01:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP editors are having fun vandalizing the page right now. Protecting it would stop this for now. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: 1. Removing my text from an article that should be in an article. 2. The use of other states as their own, in particular the Mamluk Sultanate, the Golden Horde, which have nothing to do with the Kazakh people, Kazakhstan. 3. Rewriting history of Kazakhstan. 4. There are no sources for this article. Lauriswift911 ( talk) 00:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The article seems to have a steady stream of disruption, with most edits in the past few months being vandalism or reversion of vandalism. TornadoLGS ( talk) 03:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Usage of Fictitious references. Ranadhira ( talk) 03:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Homophobic edits - see article history. Socks.  //  Timothy ::  talk  02:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Supahot71 ( talk · contribs). That should take care of the recent vandals. Otherwise, I note, the article has not needed protection in the past 16 years and it looks like there has not been other recent vandalism/disruption. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from fans (6 in last month I believe). Infrequently edited, and today I removed some vandalism which had been left for a long time. Previously protected, pending changes would be ideal. 2A02:C7C:AE91:2B00:3186:9C74:3E11:DBB5 ( talk) 04:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect overwrites with copyvios resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing by IPs Isi96 ( talk) 06:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: vandalism, edit except the administration Ammar Idris Muhammad ( talk) 04:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. No article by that name exists or has existed on the English Wikipedia. If you're referring to this article you created on the Simple English Wikipedia, please use that wiki's processes instead. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Many cases of vandalism by IP, changing "soccer" to "football" as opposed to WP:NCFA. SuperJew ( talk) 08:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm writing behalf of Dr. Erfan Qaneeifard, This page belongs to Dr. Erfan Qaneeifard, he can provide a support document.

This information on this Page has been Arashtabar ( talk) 06:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done. This is the English-language Wikipedia; we have no authority over articles on the Farsi Wikipedia like fa:عرفان قانعی‌فرد. Please use that wiki's processes to resolve any problems you might have. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Industry players using the site for self promotion without any citations or references. Jonjon723723 ( talk) 09:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 10:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit history reveals lots of confusing edits that keep inserting the fake name "Ambatukam" in to the article. Ambatukam is not a real name but a meme which is phonetically similar to "Batu Khan". I believe this page will be very popular with vandals for years to come if not extended confirmed locked. NSFW: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ambatukam Hunan201p ( talk) 10:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 11:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism to the article such as changing subject's name to a meme. This is related to the previous protection request for Batu Khan. Hunan201p ( talk) 11:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 11:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of article redirected through AfD. Onel5969 TT me 13:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. Favonian ( talk) 15:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 15:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing based on conspiracy rumors that this person is secretly dead. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of disruptive editing by IP and newly registered users since the 19th. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP getting Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. JeffUK 17:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian ( talk) 18:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. Persistent vandalism by IP. Mooonswimmer 17:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/ Rational 18:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal/someone with a grudge has this page in their sights. Was previously protected for a week and vandal returned as soon as protection dropped. Can we get a month, please?. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amaury17:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 18:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained removal of references. Twice. IP user has been warned 2x.   Aloha27  talk  20:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: 1. Removing my text from an article that should be in an article. 2. The use of other states as their own, in particular the Mamluk Sultanate, the Golden Horde, which have nothing to do with the Kazakh people, Kazakhstan. 3. Rewriting history of Kazakhstan. 4. There are no sources for this article. Lauriswift911 ( talk) 00:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC) (Moved from WP:RFPP/E) reply

@ Lauriswift911: This section is for requesting an edit to a protected article - the page you've listed isn't protected. Did you perhaps mean to post this under WP:RFPP/I to request an admin adds protection instead? Aidan9382 ( talk) 18:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Aidan9382: yes, i need semi-protect in article. User:Lauriswift911 18:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Lauriswift911: Alright, I've moved your request to here. Aidan9382 ( talk) 18:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky ( talk) 12:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran ( talk) 14:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP disruption, multiple IPs attempting to revert the same edit without any justification TheGEICOgecko ( talk) 17:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 18:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: No IP edits in the past month have been constructive at all. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 18:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:18, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

25 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Heavy editing (42,000 views in past day) due to encounter with PSG. Much vandalism and disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 04:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by unregistered user with dynamic IP. Austronesier ( talk) 19:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP and removal of page sources. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 21:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP editor, that IP range that IP editor used is already blocked on other article due to disruptive editing. Ckfasdf ( talk) 12:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Rather than add more pages to their partial block, they are now blocked sitewide. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: In the news regarding a reported signing. Page is being changed based on anonymous sources. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - there is a difference between citing an anonymous source, and citing a reliable publication which is referring to unnamed sources. Protection won't be necessary if you stop revert warring. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses have been posting personal attacks, inappropriate political agenda and conspiracy theories, harassment such as attempting to dox other editors by repeatedly asking questions that have nothing to do with improving the article. — YoungForever (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - some of the IP editors seem to be making valid points about presentation of sources, which protection would stifle. I've blocked some of the more aggressive IP ranges, and if that's not good enough I'll happily expand them; I've watchlisted the page. In future you can report incidents like this to WP:ANI for a faster response, or even WP:EMERGENCY if you are threatened. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruption, with WP:BLP overtones. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 17:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: The article is still seeing daily new user disruptive editing despite being semi-protected. Again, requesting extended confirmed protection and a block of the disruptive users. HackerKnownAs ( talk) 17:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of through the end of the current protection, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 ( talk) 18:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should cover it through the actual event. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Excessive vandalism and disruptive editing in the past month and a half. Knightoftheswords281 ( talk) 02:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page was salted in 2009 because of promotional article creation about a musician unrelated to the rapper Future. It should be unprotected and made a redirect to that page. Partofthemachine ( talk) 00:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected and redirect created. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP sockpuppets. Clyde H. Mapping ( talk) 23:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: In consistency with the pages for Chris Hipkins and Jacinda Ardern, I feel this new page should be protected. I think it's highly likely there will be some hateful IP vandalism towards Ardern on the page at some point in the future. I'm not an expert on protection policy but I do feel I should insist on precaution to prevent misogynistic rants and headaches for editors who have to tidy them up. Aubernas ( talk) 03:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP user 71.191.179.16; was recently blocked for vandalizing the page and many others, and went right back after his block was done. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 04:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine ( talk) 04:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Small edit war over whether it was a protest, massacre or incident. MaterialWorks (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Fully, until 27 January. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection; currently pending-changes protected but vandalism has been occurring in the past two days, plus Australia Day is tomorrow and a controversial subject in modern Australia, so I'm being bold an requesting indefinite protection. Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 10:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: persistent IP vandalism — DVRTed ( Talk) 13:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Semi-protected, until 4 February. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock IPs. Paytime ( talk) 19:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA RowanJ LP ( talk) 22:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruption. Again. Fuck. I don't care if the semi-protection is indefinite or temporary. This shit just needs to stop. This should have been protected years ago. And now there's a second reason these IPs are disrupting too.

As before, there is the same stupid shit of IPs and new users constantly adding a clone of a main character and a car to the main character box such as here today and earlier this month refusing to go to the fucking talk page.

I am so sick of this. These people refuse to go to the fucking talk page and ignore the clearly written hidden note, in fact removing it in most cases. I am so fucking tired of this. I know I keep saying this, but I really fucking am. They need to be forced onto the fucking talk page if they refuse to read a hidden note.

However, there is also the case that at least in this first disruptive edit, as well as another edit here, and a third one here, I can already predict that people will be adding that Justin Roiland is no longer part of the show. There is now more than enough disruption to protect this page. Unnamed anon ( talk) 06:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Edit warring by block evading IP. TylerBurden ( talk) 11:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 98Tigerius ( talk) 11:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism, misinformation are spreading by opposition party of Bangladesh Sartaj267 11:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Petty vandalism from IPs changing e.g. death date to 2027. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive IP on 24 January and another on 22 January. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Should be ECP'd in accordance with other articles about the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Compusolus ( talk) 12:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Username: Kuru is displaying Vandalism; deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge. We are restoring the article back to the successful edit but keep having issues with this user for sabotage attempts on getting this submission approved. Could we please option for protection on this page so their deliberate deletion of edits won't harm the submission? Thank you for your time. Devydevdev09 ( talk) 13:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 15:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since protection expired on 19 January, two IPs have edited it. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine ( talk) 18:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 20:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Barrage of spammers adding toll-free support lines (at least 10 attempts in the past couple of hours). Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term edit warring from college employees, three new socks ChrisK240 ( talk · contribs), Jradwan97 ( talk · contribs), and BSCIRA ( talk · contribs) so far today. BSCIRA has admitted paid status, but is currently blocked for username violations. MrOllie ( talk) 19:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not an employee. ChrisK240 ( talk) 20:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
As much as I appreciate you speaking for me, my affiliation is not of what you describe. Thanks! Jradwan97 ( talk) 20:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Rather than educate, and acknowledge that a mistake was made, you opt to protect a page with bad information on it. I have followed ALL of the protocols that have been communicated to me. I have affiliated. I have updated the username. I have posted the need for update on the Talk page. All I have received from MrOllie is punitive and accusatory behavior. This is unacceptable in a community where I am simply trying to update citable facts. This has gotten out of hand. ChrisKatBSC ( talk) 20:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Justlettersandnumbers. Favonian ( talk) 20:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism on Kapil Patil, someone removing sourced material. 223.187.97.214 ( talk) 11:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent IP vandalism ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. For two weeks. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from numerous accounts and IPs recommenced on the same day that the previous protection expired (2022-12-11). Requesting page protection because this article appears to be a target for vandals. Kbseah ( talk) 18:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is being plagued with vandalism, unsourced claims and widespread disinformation. It appears as though Anthony Gordon is currently trending through news outlets. Ashleyknowsthings ( talk) 21:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 22:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

26 January 2023

Reason: Too many disruption of edits by multiple IPs. CastJared ( talk) 17:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is an edit war between an editor and 2 IPs, violation of BLP as well. CastJared ( talk) 18:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: because of editor and vandalism except Administrator owner Ammar Idris Muhammad Ammar Idris Muhammad ( talk) 19:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – You are (again) referring to simple:Mraimdy. Direct requests to the administrators on that Wiki. Favonian ( talk) 19:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

semi-protection: Kindly I want my own page to be for confirmed users. Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 20:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Except in cases of persistent vandalism, user talk pages should remain accessible to all users. Favonian ( talk) 20:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 20:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Annamalai Kuppusamy has been salted due to repeated creation of the page after Multiple deletion as the article fail meet Wikipedia:Notability. currently he is president of BJP for the Indian state of Tamil nadu. A state level politician who had received significant press coverage since then and meets general notability guideline, so please remove page creation protection, So that Annamalai Kuppusamy can be reviewed again. Thankyou Perumalism ( talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The mainspace target being salted has no bearing on whether or not a draft will get reviewed. In fact, if it had passed muster, the reviewer would be the one filing this request, not you. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 18:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected – Await approval of draft at WP:AFC. Favonian ( talk) 20:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

In the second paragraph, I suggest editors remove Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and provide a better example to demonstrate the "AI effect." OCR is *not* a good example. The 4th citation references content published in 1991. AI has a HUGE influence on the development and adoption of OCR technology. OCR companies like Transkribus market themselves as a place where "AI meets historical documents." FnordY2K ( talk) 04:37, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – This suggestion rightly belongs at Talk:Artificial Intelligence (EP). Favonian ( talk) 20:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Replace [clarification needed] in introductory paragraph with: Any formulas known are no more computationally efficient than testing numbers with brute force, by individually checking divisibility by smaller primes. 134.114.223.245 ( talk) 04:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 20:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-Protection WP:VAND, WP:EDITWAR, WP:GENREWAR by anonymous IPs from Brazil. Progrock70s ( talk) 08:38, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note that the reporting editor Progrock70s is a disruptive editor and his genre warring is the root cause for the problem on that page; his behavior previously led to full protection on another page [26]. He uses shortcuts such WP:GENREWAR etc. because he saw them in comments directed at him (see the history of warnings in talk history). He is feuding with a supposedly Brazilian IP editor, but also with the usual watchers of Thin Lizzy pages. — Alalch E. 19:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked: Progrock70s ( talk · contribs) blocked by Hammersoft. Favonian ( talk) 20:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done As Favonian noted, Progrock70s has been blocked for three days. As Progrock70s was reverting against everyone, that should stop the edit warring and need for protection. I will continue to monitor for a while. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vulnerable to vandalism CSCM01 ( talk) 23:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生MelanieN ( talk) 23:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism CSCM01 ( talk) 23:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生MelanieN ( talk) 23:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: On Vala clan, there is a edit war by Kingrajput12. Kingrajput12 removing sourced material. 223.187.97.214 ( talk) 11:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: there is a edit war by Kingrajput12 on Sarvaiya page and removing sourced material. 223.187.97.214 ( talk) 11:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, content dispute-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Consistent IP vandalism. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

"The film marks the first Pixar film solely directed by a woman." to "The film marks the second Pixar film solely directed by a woman.", as the first was Bao. Or maybe they meant "The film marks the first full-length Pixar film solely directed by a woman."? StolenStatue ( talk) 02:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This seems like a quibble that should be discussed on Talk:Turning Red, not something that can unilaterally be done here due to the ambiguity. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 23:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Jéské Couriano The talk page is extended confirmed protected. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 23:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done. I changed "film" to "feature film" to resolve the ambiguity. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 04:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Change the word African-American to black woman. The writer and director of the upcoming television series is Canadian Jamaican. 2601:5C5:200:4FBC:B9A8:2403:9743:F0D8 ( talk) 00:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

To clarify, the passage being objected to is On November 12, 2021, Stella Meghie was announced as writer and director, making her the first African-American director to helm a Walt Disney Animation Studios project. (There are other uses of "African(-)American" in the article that are used in different contexts.) — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 02:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done. See the instructions at the top. There has been no edit request on the talk page. Discussions concerning article content should take place there. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 04:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Ron Rafael Shimshilashvili Muhammad Musaiyab ( talk) 06:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Stop violating Wikipedia's copyright policy or you'll be blocked! Favonian ( talk) 09:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporarily Semi-protection:

Persistent disruptive editing by IP. IP User keeps deleting sources wording, and keeps attacking other users. User was warned more than 4 times, yet keeps the same spamming. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 22:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fragrant Peony, I have locked the article because this is a content dispute, with you on one side and both the IP and Binksternet on the other side. The IP has started a thread on the talk page. That's where you need to work this out.  MelanieN ( talk) 23:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hello MelanieN;
As a matter of fact; Dalida's official short film and documentary done by Paris Match and featuring her own brother is called: Dalida l’Egyptienne : les premières années. [27]
The Wiki article of Dalida has a template stating: { This article may be written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view. Please clean it up to conform to a higher standard of quality, and to make it neutral in tone. (September 2021) }
Many Western fans have been constantly and systematically deleting her Egyptian link, even though her own family members massively document it as a huge part of her identity, till the point that she made a song calling Egypt her homeland.
I tried to make the article as neutral as possible, and not so Western-biased, and indeed supported by sources.
The Egyptian-born Franco-Italian singer Dalida is renowned worldwide for her top-selling musical records. But in Egypt, she was a national symbol. Before emerging on the French stage, Dalida made her debut in Egyptian cinema. In 1986, Dalida returned to her birthplace to reflect on her past and star in the film The Sixth Day by Youssef Chahine. In this talk, we will follow Dalida’s journey from Egypt to France and back again to make her last film. [28]
With all due respect, you kept the biased edits, even though I am the one who brought many sources and an official documentary created by her own family members. Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 00:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your note, Fragrant Peony, but this is not the place for such explanations. That needs to be done on the article talk page, where you and the others can hopefully reach agreement/consensus. The protection gives you two days to do that. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I fully respect that MelanieN, I am kindly only asking why you kept a fan POV over actual sources I presented. Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 01:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The protecting admin doesn't and isn't expected, actually not even allowed, to make a decicsion regarding content, see this; the full protection is implemented to prevent disruption/edit-warring. Consensus has to be found on the talk-page of the protected article. Lectonar ( talk) 08:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 11:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeatedly targeted by vandal IPs. Nicodene ( talk) 02:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism of page. [29] 45.40.14.83 ( talk) 03:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple persistant vandals. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk) 06:18, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism of page. Muhammad Musaiyab ( talk) 06:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Draft has been deleted. Lectonar ( talk) 08:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply


Reason: Communications person for FuboTV (Wikijen7 and EncyclopediaEditor0, which are the same person — Jennifer Press) has made several edits without disclosure, in violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies. TheMediaHistorian ( talk) 06:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This really shouldn't be solved via page-protection; COI editing is strongly discouraged, but not explicitly forbidden. Direct the COI editors to the pertaining talk-page(s) please, see WP:COIEDIT. If they edit disruptively, they can be warned off and be dealt with on a case by case basis. Lectonar ( talk) 13:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Racist vandalism. 7 revisions by various users have been RD2'd in the past month. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 09:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think consideration should be given to indefinite semi-protection. Looking at the past three months on this talk page, it appears that every edit by an unregistered user has been unproductive and has been deleted. Many of them needed to be revdel'ed as well. I will propose this at the page.  MelanieN ( talk) 15:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply


Reason: High levels of vandalism. Anonymous users continue to keep editing and posting incorrect Royal Rumble stats which does not reflect a true account for new users looking for information. Kylo47 ( talk) 09:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 10:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – If you look over the page history, it seems like every week or two for basically forever (while the page was unprotected) an IP will come and try to edit the article to present the joke theory as if it were a real theory, presumably because it's funnier presented that way. IMO, having been protected 3 times already and it still happening, it probably needs an indef semi protection. Endwise ( talk) 10:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 13:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of unsourced editing from IPs/new accounts. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 11:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP edits. KyleJoan talk 12:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A history of repeated removal of the word "fuck" contrary to WP:BOWDLERIZE and WP:NOTCENSORED. — Kodiologist ( t) 13:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined There have been no edits to this article since November 2022. Do not file reports like this. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
What do you mean by "reports like this"? Is it that protection is only considered when the repeated disruptive editing is recent? — Kodiologist ( t) 16:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Kodiologist: Yes. Sdrqaz ( talk) 18:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page continues to be edited by anonymous sources with incorrect information around the Royal Rumble stats, such as the ‘Total Eliminations’ records for men competitors section. I have put the correct info back to normal after numerous battles with anonymous users. Kylo47 ( talk) 13:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism (mostly anti-Semitism) Elina9k ( talk) 13:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: vandalism - adding fake members to the band line-up. BRM-Chrysalis ( talk) 14:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last occurrence was 3 days ago. Lectonar ( talk) 14:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 15:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent removal of sourced content by IPs ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 16:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 18:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA#ARBPIA_General_Sanctions RowanJ LP ( talk) 17:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden ( talk) 18:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing IP and unregistered user disruption. Novemberjazz 19:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined I'm not really seeing that most of the IP edits are disruptive. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and violations of WP:BLP. Novemberjazz 19:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated sabotage regarding personnel dispute at the university. Edits made only from unregistered accounts, e.g., IPs 146.241.104.4 and 81.235.168.26. Propagandaman ( talk) 20:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator 331dot. for a week. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. by DatGuy Daniel Case ( talk) 04:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing within this past month, primarily coming from IPs. Magitroopa ( talk) 20:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – almost all recent edits have been IP vandalism. The Midnite Wolf ( talk) 20:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  Lefcentreright   Discuss  21:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 21:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC) 21:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP editor repeatedly adding an external link to a badly written journal article, probably a predatory publisher, probably the author of the article is the IP editor. Apocheir ( talk) 21:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator DatGuy. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Rangeblocked at 174.240.64.0/22 for now. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

29 January 2023

Reason: Multiple attempts by IP and newly-created users at reverting information provided by reliable sources and moving the article name without discussion or consensus. Possible WP:Sock activity as well. WMrapids ( talk) 17:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Do you want move-protection as well as semi-protection? Daniel Case ( talk) 22:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Yes, this seems appropriate. It would prevent further edit warring and would promote discussions regarding possible moves. WMrapids ( talk) 23:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked: LordSidiousOfPeru ( talk · contribs). blocked from the article for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Repeated changing/adding non-English by multiple IPs. Adakiko ( talk) 21:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 22:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 09:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs keep re-adding Category:French culture despite the fact that Category:French mascots is the subcategory. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 01:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit about 6 days ago. Lectonar ( talk) 09:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Ballyworld ( talk) 01:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 02:29, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism, though only temporary should be needed imo. DecafPotato ( talk) 02:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs adding club moves based on rumours, no official reports. 2 different IPs changed to two different teams in past few hours RedPatch ( talk) 02:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done Two edits, that's really not enough to warrant semi-protection. Drmies ( talk) 03:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Stereorock ( talk) 02:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and unsourced edits. TornadoLGS ( talk) 03:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: To prevent IP vandalism. Since it's my onw user page, I hope it will not be a problem to grant me extended-confirmed protection (indefinite, both edit and move). — Akshadev ( talk) 03:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined See WP:UPROT. No disruption yet. Lectonar ( talk) 08:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive edits and IP block evasion due to BLP violation. CastJared ( talk) 04:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of sourced content by IPs. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 04:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This just one of those controversial people that's always going to have vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 05:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP addresses have been disruptive editing by repeatedly adding original research genres and ignoring hidden comments non-stop. — YoungForever (talk) 05:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 2600:4041:79F9:C700:0:0:0:0/64 ( talk · contribs). DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Two IP vandals today alone. WP:Weather has a well-known sock master who hops IP addresses vandalizing and causing problems on weather-related articles. Not sure if it is them, but vandalism seems to be the game on this article today. Elijahandskip ( talk) 05:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Make that 3 IPs today. Elijahandskip ( talk) 05:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs (but same user) are trolling the article. L'Oiseau Lybre ( talk) 05:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Severe BLP violation due to IP disruption of edits. CastJared ( talk) 07:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High number of unsourced changes by IPs. BilletsMauves €500 07:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by an UP user and a newly registered user. BilCat ( talk) 08:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. See my talk page. The Banner  talk 09:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism. DragonofBatley ( talk) 09:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not any, really, that I can see. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continued vandalism over the last few days Suonii180 ( talk) 10:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Lightoil ( talk) 11:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:NOTAFORUM disruption resumed after previous protection expired. SunilNevlaFan 12:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of another month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Thesixserra ( talk) 12:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple unsourced content added after protection is removed, too many IPs, disrupt edits itself. CastJared ( talk) 13:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, there is a vandalism. CastJared ( talk) 16:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DVRTed ( Talk) 14:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 14:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Paginated the page history w/ 500 entries, still not a single edit that hasn't been reverted/revdel'ed, and they all seem fairly "recent." — DVRTed ( Talk) 14:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Note: See WP:ATPROT...article talk-pages aren't ususally protected, except for very heavy disruption. I don't think the level for protection has been reached here. Lectonar ( talk) 14:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect for 12 hours; some ill-advised maestro de espanol in the U.S. is having students read Wikipedia articles and vandalism is the inevitable, foreseeable result. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Distruptive editing Immeasurable radiance ( talk) 15:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP. Lectonar ( talk) 15:50, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism because of a recent political event Atyuttam ( talk) 16:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ever since the Disney World attraction closed on January 23, multiple IP editors have been trying to change the page. However, there are three attractions with the same name, but only one closed. Please take a look at the edit history, you will see lots of edit-sparring going on. A lot of drive-by IP changes need to be undone. It is getting out of hand. JlACEer ( talk) 16:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. User:worldgiant ( talk) 16:25 , 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Page is continuously edited by IPs to remove well-sourced material by editors affiliated with Crush Music management company. See talk page and edit history over the last year. parqs ( talk) 17:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Chennai Super Kings Lover ( talk) 17:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism since recent expiry of year-long semi protection. RolandR ( talk) 17:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restore one year semi-protection after vandalism volume has returned. Fuzheado | Talk 06:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP disruption. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 18:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 06:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and unverified users keep removing refs and replacing with nonsense. Paris1127 ( talk) 18:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 19:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sustained high level of IP vandalism/edit warring. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 19:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, multiple editors trying to include the same thing about Iranian mythology without reliable sources. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 19:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 20:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Fuzheado | Talk 06:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 20:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To force paid editing by multiple IPs to talk page requests. S0091 ( talk) 20:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been consistent since the last protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 20:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC's not cutting it. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 21:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Izno. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam ( talk) 22:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. -- lomrjyo  talk 00:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – Persistent sockpuppetry (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand). Partofthemachine ( talk) 00:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi protection of a few weeks' duration requested due to the ongoing vandalism. — kashmīrī  TALK 01:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. — kashmīrī  TALK 01:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 01:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Consistent vandalism and disruptive editing due to controversial topic and current news cycle, temporary protection may allow productive discussion about merges and the topic to be undertaken instead of the mess that keeps occuring with IPs and new accounts. ✯✬✩ InterestGather ( talk) 02:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP activity adding incorrect transfer RedPatch ( talk) 02:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Two different new accounts now have attempted more than once to insert promotional content into the article. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 03:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Been vandalized so much by socks and IPs recently for whatever reason. Why? I Ask ( talk) 03:30, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Not enough recent activity to warrant protection. Fuzheado | Talk 05:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring involving autoconfirmed accounts. Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced info to a BLP article. Admins, please review editor conduct to see if any further action is needed. TornadoLGS ( talk) 05:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User blocked for 24 hours for edit warring. Fuzheado | Talk 05:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeatedly vandalized by IP edits. If approved, this would be the eighth time that the talk page has been protected, with the last time being on January 6th. Since the last protection, 19 edits have been made to the talk page. 10 of them are edits that had to be reverted and the remaining 9 edits were the reverting edits. Given that "Tag: Revert" and "Tags: Revert" appear a combined 230 times in the last 500 edits with an assumed ~230 additional edits made to undo those edits, I am requesting a month or more of temporary protection. -- Super Goku V ( talk) 05:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For some reason, this talk page has been a strange attractor of vandalism. Having previously been semi-protected for a week and a month, a 3-month period is warranted. Fuzheado | Talk 06:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This series has not yet been aired. However, looking at the IP edits in the article's history, you can see they added false info. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 05:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP continously adding failed verification content. 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 05:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Fuzheado I think you forgot to do the protect the page action. 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 07:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Sorry about that, now protected. - Fuzheado | Talk 07:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks! 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 08:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High-volume of disruptions for a recently released film Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 07:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 07:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP editors who are not respecting Wikipedia consensus on an artist's nationality. Ss 112 08:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would appreciate a mix of temporary semi-protection and 6 months pending changes being applied to the page to help fend off the recent spate of vandalism that has unfortunately accompanied the abrupt exponential rise in traffic to the page in the wake of the firm's damning revelations regarding stock market manipulation by a controversial Indian tycoon. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is there enough problematic activity to make a blanket conclusion about curtailing IP editing? Seems that there has been substantial contribution by anons, and 6 months is a long time for any kind of remedy. Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I appreciate your concerns, Fuzheado. Yes, anons have actively contributed to the page in the past 48 hours, some clearly in a constructive manner, but a disproportionate number of them have also indulged in crass vandalism. What has concerned me is that the page seem to be short on watchers to be able to fend off the same in real time, and this has lead to unenviable situations with readers stumbling across mala fide content and then taking to Twitter to highlight the same. To illustrate: edits like these stood for hours before I detected and reversed them. Heck, the latest edit, a couple hours ago, was an anon making unexplained change to the number in infobox, which remained intact despite the very telling edit summary. The firm's revelations have had a ripple effect on the Indian stock market, which is likely to continue when they open again after weekend. A temporary semi-protection will thus help deal with immediate vandalism, while a PC will bring more eyes to the article, while also concurrently allowing constructive anonymous IP contributions. If 6 months is excessive, how about giving it a trial run for a month? Regards, MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 21:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa ( talk) 10:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previously protected for 2 months. Fuzheado | Talk 13:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Even though it was explained and well sourced in the talk page, people continue to do the wrong edits. Short summary: The film M3GAN is counted as a 2022 release globally per Box Office Mojo and The Numbers, but had its American cinema release in 2023. Vestigium Leonis ( talk) 11:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: I can believe that this is an immediate need given the issue. However, since this is a popular article and could benefit from editors, what is the proposed protection period? Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I would probably go for a 1 month semi-protection. It should be sufficient to cool this "back and forth" off. I think that BOM and The Numbers as sources are clear enough, but maybe there is a clarification needed on the talk page on how to treat releases that are split in 2 years due to for example releases in different countries in the last week of 2022 and first week of 2023. Vestigium Leonis ( talk) 14:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent recreation of uncited article. Onel5969 TT me 12:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is this really vandalism or a content dispute about notability and WP:RS? Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy ( talk) 13:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 13:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yuugone ( talk) 13:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 16:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

30 January 2023

Mantrot Mishra Mantrotmishra1 ( talk) 09:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Empty request. Favonian ( talk) 09:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

King john didn't voluntarily agree to magna carta, the barons put him under duress and because of this the vatican (pope) doesn't recognize the legitimacy of magna carta. 185.111.131.198 ( talk) 13:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 15:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Add user greypebbled (previously invited) Greypebbled ( talk) 02:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not doneGreypebbled, you were invited to visit the Teahouse, not to become a host. Favonian ( talk) 17:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Undo this revert. The other version more accurately reflects the sources and is better structured, but no one seems to even consider actual content. 87.5.213.83 ( talk) 06:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 17:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: It is not the official information and it contains spoilers. The film is currently in its theatrical run and we want to remove the incorrect information. Sakshimalik21 ( talk) 09:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 09:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not to mention we don't remove spoilers just for being spoilers. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 20:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi-protected in 2015 due to BLP violations. Given that the subject of the article is no longer alive, I don't think this is a concern anymore. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – The article already gets periodic "visits" from auto-confirmed sockpuppets. Combining this with the frequent IP disruption on the talk page, I must conclude that unprotecting the article is not a good idea. Favonian ( talk) 18:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: n 94.17.233.161 ( talk) 15:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The singer just participated at the Moldovan national selection for the Eurovision Song Contest. Jo Buffay ( talk) 17:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Get Draft:Nikko T. to a level suitable of publication, then submit it to WP:Articles for creation. Favonian ( talk) 17:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Favonian: damn, I only see this discussion now. I noticed the page in the WP namespace and didn't realise it was there because the target was protected... I have listed the article to AfD... -- Luk talk 13:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is suddenly getting disrupted by multiple new users/Ips (in other words, sock/meatpuppets) who amongst other things lack WP:CIR and dont know what WP:COMMON NAME is. For more info, see [30]. HistoryofIran ( talk) 15:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-standing consensus is that only league (and/or state league in Brazil) appearances and goals are included in the infobox. Persistent adding of all career statistics by IP users. Davidlofgren1996 ( talk) 15:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been subjected to both vandalism and unhelpful edits frequently from IPs lately. JDDJS ( talk to mesee what I've done) 15:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last such edits were almost 2 days ago. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject is awaiting a court verdict regarding his sentencing. Persistent IP vandalism. Gtgamer79 ( talk) 15:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Roundish t c) 18:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Let's see how this works before we go to PC. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from the same type of IP editor resumed as soon as the 7-day block ended. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 19:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page is related to the Twitter files controversy and has begun to attract SPA new accounts. Talk page discussion needs to be encouraged. SPECIFICO talk 20:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

In agreement with request & description of situation. GoodDay ( talk) 20:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been an ongoing IP edit war about basic facts with no sourcing or explanations from anyone (on topics such as cost of the project, opening date, height, etc.). I’m not sure what the motivation is, but there is a lot that cannot be confirmed. Hydra88 ( talk) 20:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like there's been any edit warring for a week. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP of blocked user Rhea564 back with the same disruptions, soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 20:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocked user Rhea564 whose sock-puppetry resulted in protection of Ranbir Kapoor filmography, is making similar disruptions here. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 20:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 73.67.145.30 ( talk) 20:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous blanking of content by IPs, to promote WP:FRINGE (see conspiracy section). Unlikely to abate anytime soon as can be seen by the page's history, a mid-term protection is needed. Gotitbro ( talk) 21:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem to have been any edit warring of the type described for a couple of months. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP additions of death dates and past tense without an actual source for death. Doc Strange Mailbox Logbook 21:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Includes references to Taiwan being supposedly part of the PRC etc. — twotwofourtysix( talk || edits) 23:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is being heavily targeted by IP socks of the long term vandal Belteshazzar who is dominating the Talk page and making sensible discussion among other editors all but impossible. DanielRigal ( talk) 23:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Other than that "vandal", no one has even attempted to discuss the article's content. 2001:B07:646D:82DC:A84:9DFF:FE8B:58A ( talk) 23:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I am trying to invite participation but, while the vandal stomps all over the place, other people are not likely to feel welcome to contribute. It may well be that the lack of participation reflects a view that other editors are happy with the content as it is and that no change is needed but we need to allow for that discussion to happen if anybody (other than the vandal) wants to have it. Given the level of disruption being caused, I feel that locking anonymous editors out for a period is the lesser evil here. DanielRigal ( talk) 23:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
After the "vandal" edited the article somewhat extensively, no change was made for over a month, until a mass reversion of everything that account had done occurred on December 12. [31]. So that could be interpreted as other editors being happy with the revisions that had been made. In fact, had anyone else edited that article in that time, Bbb23's mass reversions likely wouldn't have touched that article. 79.27.179.171 ( talk) 00:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Belteshazzar, we see you changing your IP after each and every edit. This page is not yet another venue for you to try to defend your indefensible behaviour. Go away. If that article needs editing then Wikipedians in good standing will edit it. All you are doing is making that harder for them. DanielRigal ( talk) 00:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It would be easy for any Wikipedian to greatly improve that article, as they would only have to undo your revert. They might improve it even further, but that is definitely the place to start. 151.32.114.255 ( talk) 00:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
This is exactly the relentless, utterly shameless, IP hopping disruption that I am talking about. This clearly shows why the semi-protection I am requesting is needed. DanielRigal ( talk) 00:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by long-term vandal who has also targeted the parent page. wizzito | say hello! 00:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been protected many times before and the issue remains. Iamreallygoodatcheckers t@lk 03:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More than a year of IP hopping edits against Template:Infobox person/doc. No response to article talk page thread. Meters ( talk) 04:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done This appears to be an ongoing edit war since 2012 over whether or not the cause of death was childbirth. Sources therein indicate the IP is correct, and other editors disagree. But this is definitely not an issue for page protection. — Maile ( talk) 17:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of disruption this month (well, this article is always being disrupted one way or another tbh). HistoryofIran ( talk) 12:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Some outright racist commentary being used to harass veteran Wikipedia users as well. I quote: "...it will remain, so leave the information alongside it, rabid persian nationalist" [32] - LouisAragon ( talk) 13:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected – 3 months. Also blocked one IP for the insult. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Somewhat recent AfD resulted in merging content to another article as the subject wasn't independently notable. Now being restored. ~Styyx Talk? 13:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. User:worldgiant ( talk) 13:34 , 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected – Indefinitely per WP:ARBIPA. Caste-relatd edit warring. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Days ago, there are certain IPs, partially vandalize this article. CastJared ( talk) 13:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various disruptive edits by IPs today. Kj cheetham ( talk) 14:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Only a week after the last protection expired and we've already had another new account trying to restore the article. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous edit warring since August. IPs and registered editors keep parroting fringe POV which contradicts sources, but never heed instructions to start discussion and reach consensus at article talk page. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Additional comments: I have removed a table containing contentious, poorly sourced material which had become, essentially, a sneaky way of reproducing the conflicting and disputed content from this long-AfD'ed article. I have encouraged editors to participate at the article talk page in the hopes that consensus can be reached, rather than reinstate the table, thereby resulting in more edit-warring. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 18:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected – 3 months. If any registered accounts continue to revert, consider warning them with {{ uw-ew}}. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 17:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurrence of persistent vandalism/nonsensical editing after end of previous protection period. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 18:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

31 January 2023

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Favonian ( talk) 17:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Disruption happens a few times a month - would be suitable for pending changes. wizzito | say hello! 00:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Maile66. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A good amount of false information added by IP users. Ludkrillex ( talk) 01:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is an edit war between 2 editors, due to unsourced content. CastJared ( talk) 03:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, there is an original research. CastJared ( talk) 04:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been maybe three such edits in the last two days. I don't think protection is warranted at this point. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would appreciate a mix of temporary semi-protection and 6 months pending changes being applied to the page to help fend off the recent spate of vandalism that has unfortunately accompanied the abrupt exponential rise in traffic to the page in the wake of the firm's damning revelations regarding stock market manipulation by a controversial Indian tycoon. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is there enough problematic activity to make a blanket conclusion about curtailing IP editing? Seems that there has been substantial contribution by anons, and 6 months is a long time for any kind of remedy. Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I appreciate your concerns, Fuzheado. Yes, anons have actively contributed to the page in the past 48 hours, some clearly in a constructive manner, but a disproportionate number of them have also indulged in crass vandalism. What has concerned me is that the page seem to be short on watchers to be able to fend off the same in real time, and this has lead to unenviable situations with readers stumbling across mala fide content and then taking to Twitter to highlight the same. To illustrate: edits like these stuck around for hours before I detected and reversed them. Heck, the latest edit, a couple hours ago, was an anon making unexplained change to the number in infobox, which remained intact despite the very telling edit summary. The firm's revelations have had a ripple effect on the Indian stock market, which is likely to continue when they open again after weekend. A temporary semi-protection will thus help deal with immediate vandalism, while a PC will bring more eyes to the article, while also concurrently allowing constructive anonymous IP contributions. If 6 months is excessive, how about giving it a trial run for a month? Regards, MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 21:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I won't speak for Andrew on this, but I think from what you've said PC sounds like the better idea. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi Daniel Case, anon vandalism has been recurring with unenviable regularity on this highly trafficked page in consequence of the continuing effects of Hindenburg's report. So all this hemming and hawing strikes me as bit perplexing. Of greater concern is that the vandalism is sticking around for hours before being expunged. I proffer you semi the page for a few days and apply PC for a month. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 06:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will give the registered editors time (more than enough, I think) to clean up the page and stabilize it. Let me know when you feel you've done that and then we can talk about going to indefinite PC. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks, that works. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs of User:Isupportkimilsung adding unsourced poorly translated info. Paris1127 ( talk) 06:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 88.245.16.0/21 ( talk · contribs). blocked for a week Daniel Case ( talk) 20:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping user keeps adding who they personally think should be "The Greatest Indian" even though the official poll didn't include these people. Bennv123 ( talk) 08:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: Each of the IPs involved were placed on a one-week block by Daniel Case — Maile ( talk) 02:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Favonian ( talk) 17:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range from Malaysia continously changing the count for acts awarded a first-place trophy from 3 to 4 in the lead when Chart history section shows, there were only 3 acts (Ateez, NewJeans, Monsta X) awarded the first-place trophy. 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 08:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Dear, Wikipedia there are people who are trying to manipulate and claim the residency of murcanyo Town and they have been changing the information for the past weeks which is wrong and inappropriate please protect the page and never allow the manipulaters to change the information of murcanyo and its history Thank you. Bursaalax122 ( talk) 09:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The page has suffered a lot of unknown IP vandalism, fan edits and misleading derogatory edits. Thus requesting complete protection to the page. Wiki Master World ( talk) 09:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like there's been any seriously disruptive editing for a day. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared ( talk) 10:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared ( talk) 10:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please read the protection policy linked everywhere on this page. Only three IP contributions in the last three weeks. We reserve indefinite protection to articles where lesser regimes have been tried and failed. BusterD ( talk) 03:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by Several IPs invading the page. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 11:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. There just one IP caused an edit war days ago. CastJared ( talk) 11:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Latest IP vandalism was more than ten days ago. BusterD ( talk) 03:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. There is some IP vandalism and caused BLP violation. CastJared ( talk) 11:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IP vandalism in past four days. BusterD ( talk) 03:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yuugone ( talk) 11:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing: Due to a widely publicized recent disputed fringe study, people are constantly editing the article to claim horses were present in America before the Spanish. The talk page consensus appears to be that this is fringe content, or at least the claims that this is fringe have gone unanswered and no responses whatsoever have been made in support of this study, while several reasons to ignore it, including a published expert opinion, have been posted. Recommend that the article be protected temporarily since this claim is making the rounds in various internet fora and leading to these unproductive unilateral edits. Things should fully quiet down in a few weeks/months once people move on. ☲Fireyair☲ ( talk) 11:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Already has pending changes, and not a tremendous amount of activity. Fuzheado | Talk 23:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs or newly registered editors keep making non-constructive edits in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 13:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most recent edits to this article have been disruption from IPs. TornadoLGS ( talk) 19:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 23:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Persistent Vandalism. Talk page of a blocked editor being repeatedly vandalised by ISP/vandal accounts. No need for it to be editable. Lard Almighty ( talk) 20:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. BusterD ( talk) 03:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke ( talkcontribs) 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing. 172.58.204.213 ( talk) 20:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 23:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: As much fun as reverting the vandalism on this page is, due to all the viewership of the game there's been a crazy amount of it since he's taken over as QB Gatemansgc ( TɅ̊LK) 21:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 21:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Public figure with a very high risk of page vandalism due to threats on social media pages. Masandejas07 ( talk) 23:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the protection policy linked many places on this page. No IP edits since October. Nobody besides yourself has edited this page since December. BusterD ( talk) 03:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Someone is editwarring to put a prod on the article despite it being contested. The Banner  talk 00:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: SeeAlsoPolice ( talk · contribs) blocked by DanCherek. Favonian ( talk) 17:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism from IP Address due to a miscue in the AFC Championship game Swagging ( talk) 03:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Favonian ( talk) 17:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 03:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous protection of one week had expired. Fuzheado | Talk 23:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Supposedly made a bad call in a recent game, I dunno, I don't watch football. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 03:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian ( talk) 17:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Change the duration of the WP:ECP to indefinite; there could be vandalism once the current protection, set for expiry on Feb 25 2023 (see log), expires, since it's a controversial topic nowadays. RapMonstaXY ( talk) 07:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP's have been changing the names of wrestlers in the Match section. Untamed1910 ( talk) 13:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been featured in a viral post by Twitter account "Depths of Wikipedia" and has been the subject of an edit war primarily regarding the picture of a toast with eyes. Suggest temporary full protection for some days. Bedivere ( talk) 13:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by newly created accounts. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian ( talk) 17:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Mass additions (over 50 today) of unsourced claims Arjayay ( talk) 16:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Frequent vandalism target and is experiencing more vandalism based on having played in the NFL semi-finals yesterday. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing, removing cited information with no reliable sources for their reasoning ScrabbleRunner ( talk) 16:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continual vandalism (removal of mentions of sexual abuse allegations) Kac Calhoon ( talk) 17:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range hopper is persistently adding vandalism. – The Grid ( talk) 18:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Within the past ten days, near-daily additions of unsourced content by a roving IP who won't heed instructions to provide said sources. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 19:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing and apparently relentless introduction of point of view and unsourced materials on the theme of criminality. CT55555( talk) 20:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see any reason to apply indefinite ECP to this page at this time. None of these accounts are autoconfirmed (though one is close), so let's progress as we normally do. Katie talk 02:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hello, due to disruption in this article in the past (mass-removal of content) it was highly edit-protected. However, user Marcelus still recently tried to himself removal a large part of a well-referenced and extensive section in this article (see: 1, 2). His actions were opposed by user Cukrakalnis ( 1, 2), but user Marcelus again tried to remove the content himself (see: 1). Then a third party user GizzyCatBella intervened and also reverted Marcelus' removal (see: 1) and said that it should be discussed first.

Consequently, a RFC was started (see: Coat of arms of Lithuania#RfC: content of the section on Belarus) to solve the dispute between users with different opinions and to reach a WP:CONS what should be done with the disputed section. The RFC is still not over (closed) yet and there is no clear WP:CONS what should be done, so no changes should be made to the disputed content.

However, another user Piotrus left his comment at RFC and tried to remove the section nearly entirely as well (see: 1).

I myself restored the content to a version which was at the start of the RFC so that anyone interested could leave their opinions at RFC (it is impossible to understand the purpose of RFC with content removed) and said that if there will not be any WP:CONS when this RFC is over (closed) then we will use other Wikipedia's procedures to solve this dispute at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests (see my edits and explanations with pinging of the related users: 1, 2).

However, user Marcelus ignores my and other users good will suggestions to solve this dispute according to Wikipedia's procedures and continues to himself (without any WP:CONS at RFC) remove the content from the disputed section ( 1, 2). So he do not follow Wikipedia's procedures for dispute resolution and clearly do not seek for a WP:CONS and aggressively provokes conflicts with other users ( WP:ICANTHEARYOU).

Moreover, Marcelus also openly expressed his personal opinion why this content describing Polish Army's atrocities against Lithuanians and Belarusians should be removed by such words: "badmouthing of Poland (...) Basically, the whole Belarusian part should be rewritten" ( 1) or "the article is suppose to be about history of coat of arms, not an excuse to spread anti-Polish propaganda" ( 2) and it raises further concerns about his aggressive actions which possibly violate the WP:NPOV and WP:NOTCENSORED.

Since "The contentious topics procedure applies to this page" (see this article's talk page template), urgent protection actions are required to this article and I believe that WP:TOPICBAN should be considered for user Marcelus because he (unlike Piotrus) do not listen to other users good will requests, explanations and want to do everything as he prefers himself (this clearly is not WP:COLLABORATE). We certainly do not need revert warring, but he is actively provoking it by ignoring RFC, so intervention by administrators is required because he ignores warnings by other users.

For a context: there also is a case at the administrators noticeboard already about Marcelus' actions in another Lithuania-related article (see: HERE) where he ignored other users requests, explanations (similar behavior in a Lithuanian topic). -- Pofka ( talk) 20:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Another Pofka attempt to ban me from the topic where he wants to push his own narrative.
Currently, the section duplicates the content of the entry 1st Belarusian Regiment (which did not exist when the RfC was created), and is also simply off-topic, since the section should primarily describe the use of a CoA similar to the CoA of Lithuania in Belarus, but in the meantime half describes the history of the institution of the Lithuanian state, since the regiment was part of the Lithuanian army. In addition, it describes in bizarre detail the alleged (because based on a single memoir) maltreatment of Lithuanian and Belarusian symbols by the Polish military.
The creation of the 1st Belarusian Regiment slogan has made the RfC obsolete.
@ Pofka it is accepted custom to inform the user on whom the report is made, but I see that in your attempt to remove me from Wikipedia you are forgetting all the rules. Marcelus ( talk) 21:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD ( talk) 04:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Spike in vandal edits from anonymous IP editors once again. Requesting temporary semi-protection. Yue 🌙 21:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib ( talk) 22:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 02:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Gemini (astrology) has been edited to misrepresent the dates given in a cited source 7 times by 5 IP editors in January. Cancer (astrology) has been changed in a similar way 9 times in January. Request semi-protection. Jc3s5h ( talk) 22:54, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism by IP address users after NFL player Travis Kelce called the Mayor of Cincinnati out in an interview. Darth-Wiki-Man ( talk) 23:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing resumed after unprotection a few days ago, including egregious BLP violations ( diff), borderline ( diff, diff) and blatant ( diff) vandalism, and generally subpar edits bordering on disruption ( diff, diff, diff, diff). The article has been protected and unprotected twice now; it would probably benefit from a more extended period of protection. Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 00:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark ( talk) 01:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rgalo10. Airtransat236 ( talk | contribs) 02:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous one year ECP expired two weeks ago, so I feel comfortable renewing that now. Katie talk 02:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism of a recently died actress. BattleshipMan ( talk) 00:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is currenty a slowburning edit war going on with the contents of the infobox, The IP continues to restore a more trivial version without any explanations. — TAnthony Talk 00:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped several days ago.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. There has been continuous vandalism in this page for a couple of days now. I would like to request for this page to be protected to lessen it. Loibird90 ( talk) 01:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like this has happened for a couple of days now (ironically). Daniel Case ( talk) 18:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Racism-related vandalism, on this BLP article, three times very recently. CT55555( talk) 02:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. 2605:b100:700::/41 for a month. Favonian ( talk) 12:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – AAA video game title that was released recently and has received mixed reviews. Article has seen a lot of unconstructive edits and occasional vandalism. A temporary semi edit protection should be sufficient, for when things cool down. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor repeatedly making edits over the last couple of weeks and refuses to take to discussion or give a reason. Request temporary IP block. Erp ( talk) 07:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator jpgordon for two weeks. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High volume of vandalism and non-constructive edits Onetwothreeip ( talk) 07:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have stopped yesterday. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Misinformation about hallacas being tamales, they're not, I removed the wrong information and added the right one, but some people may try to change it soon. DemonioEkani ( talk) 08:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been maybe 20 edits, mostly constructively intended from what I can see, to this article in the last two months. Just not high-volume enough to worry. And we do not protect articles because we think people might edit disruptively. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 09:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ten days ago, it would have been a different story. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For reasons that elude me, anonymous editors keep wanting to put Djokovic first at 22 Grand Slams, even though Nadal did it earlier and we list them chronologically. CWenger ( ^@) 15:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I would like to request that... (Your edit request here) . 2405:201:A008:F063:E8B9:F691:2B2E:F8C4 ( talk) 19:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Empty request. Favonian ( talk) 20:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Too many unsourced content after semi protection expired. CastJared ( talk) 03:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 13:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of edit-warring by IPs replacing the redirect. A temporary protection would be useful. AllyD ( talk) 07:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Favonian ( talk) 12:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism — N Panama 84534 11:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: KFC is was Unprotected 119.95.103.16 ( talk) 11:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Article is and will remain semi-protected. Favonian ( talk) 11:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Current rumors (unofficial transfer reports) which lead IPs to preemptively update the article. Felida97 ( talk) 14:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack ( talk) 14:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IP vandalism, high level, serious BLP attacks. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Was previously semi-protected for 3 months. Fuzheado | Talk 15:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2023

01 January 2023

Reason: IP users keep adding false information. Noktonissian ( talk) 15:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. El_C 18:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurring removal of lolicon tag, despite themes of lolicon being in the story description Samalik16 ( talk) 17:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 18:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: George VI is an important monarch in British History. Hodakatokyoboy ( talk) 20:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter ( talk) 20:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: George V is an important historical monarch. Hodakatokyoboy ( talk) 20:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DMacks ( talk) 21:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced death claims. General Ization Talk 22:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There is one IPv6 (/64) that has been a continual problem, but several new accounts also. DMacks ( talk) 00:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Consistent vandalism by IP users SKAG123 ( talk) 22:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: See @ User:El_C's edit summary from September. Page was recently recreated based on unreliable sources, with notability still not established. I redirected it again. If there is a way to separately protect the page from being recreated without AfC, that might be worth considering. DFlhb ( talk) 00:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ DFlhb The way may be to move it to draft without leaving a redirect and salt the mainspace title. I'd be down to do the move, would need an admin to salt the mainspace title though. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 01:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I've removed wikilinks to the redirect, so that we wouldn't have a (tempting) red link. DFlhb ( talk) 01:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that'll do the job. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined for now. Vigorous discussion is valid on talkpages. Seems mostly one editor doing the disruption, who has already been reported to ANI and has also now stated they are retired. If the problem continues beyond this time, feel free to re-request. DMacks ( talk) 21:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked: Eposty ( talk · contribs). via ANI DMacks ( talk) 23:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 00:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is constantly the target of pov-pushing. HistoryofIran ( talk) 02:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing attempts by IP/mobile to add unverified information CT55555( talk) 19:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined: warn the user appropriately and then report to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long term abuse. 2600:1700:4974:6C00:B5AB:33C4:8D9A:DE8B ( talk) 21:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. I'm also not convinced that there is enough recent disruption to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP on several ranges over the last two weeks vandalizing with fake information about station history. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 05:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks and Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 05:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 03:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DMacks ( talk) 03:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker ( talk) 10:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . Astoriaaldrich ( talk) 03:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Family list name, Astor origins, religion not correct. Needs to be corrected. Astors were Jewish. Ethnicity tajik. Block needs to be removed and information corrected. reply

Not unprotected It's exactly this edit-dispute that led to the protection. No end-runs around talk-page consensus are allowed. DMacks ( talk) 03:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent copyright violation: There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, and the IP deliberately ignores this. Ymblanter ( talk) 09:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm not 100% sure if the alleged exception described at commons:Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Ukraine#Freedom_of_panorama ( permanent link) might apply to a building damaged by a current war, so I don't necessarily see this protection as a strict copyright enforcement – but it's clear that the editing is disruptive, so...
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 11:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent addition of factually incorrect info, the IP is I believe logged out editing from Bezawada16 user. I've reverted 3 times in the last 2 days, temporary ECP could be beneficial or else blocking the user with Semi protection would also be helpful — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 12:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I have warned the user about the edit warring policy and blocked the IP from logged-out editing for a week. This should suffice to either stop the edit war or to justify an WP:ANEW report as soon as this continues. In case that really doesn't solve the problem, please re-request. Semi-protection, that is, as semi-protection is not yet proven ineffective. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent violations of WP:GS/RUSUKR (ECP restriction on Russo-Ukrainian War topics) during the open RM. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 07:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Talk namespace is exempt. Ymblanter ( talk) 09:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
RM discussions are not, though. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Yes, this is correct. I do not know what the best solution would be, especially given that the RM outcome is obvious. Ymblanter ( talk) 11:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Ah sorry, Ymblanter, I had misread that, I think. I agree that the talk namespace is exempt from ECP, yet the restriction applies to the discussion. Okay. Hm. Semi-protection might be an option to reduce the noise, but I don't yet see a need for this when looking at the non-autoconfirmed edits alone. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I'll decline this for now and try to have an eye on it. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Birth Place has been changed. As per documents his birth place is Attabira Odisha Sukant Kadam ( talk) 09:49, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 10:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 17:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter ( talk) 17:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Temporary protections have been applied previously, but the vandalism always immediately returns. Xurizuri ( talk) 12:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker ( talk) 13:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Disruption has been going on for more than a year; might as well do this. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – While this is not so heavily used, the formatting is quite complicated and as the history of the template shows, almost any non-template-editor who has tried to edit it has left it worse than when started. Muhandes ( talk) 14:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

02 January 2023

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High level of IP vandalism. May also be used to warn admins and other editors. BeeSpeed1989 ( talk) 20:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Your user page is already automatically "semi-protected" by Filter 803. There has not been a single attempt to edit it yet. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It is semi-protected? Yes, it’s in progress. BeeSpeed1989 ( talk) 21:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in IP vandalism likely related to him losing a recent tournament match. Wham2001 ( talk) 22:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unsourced death claims. General Ization Talk 22:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator JBW. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continuing after protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 22:49, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 22:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. BangJan1999 22:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done. Edit war over the CSD template has stopped and article sent to AfD. Will keep an eye on it. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism Trikekus ( talk) 00:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Can we please get indefinite semi? That level of protection was working fine, until it was removed in May 2022. Basically more than half of edit since then has been vandalism—the constant reversion is wasting the time of too many editors. Aza24 (talk) 23:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The edits from IP address users appear to be attempts to make good faith edits, not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 04:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopper can't accept that something fictional happens in 2023. (I could also be gravely mistaken about this, but I don't know Zardoz.). LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 23:48, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Isabelle Belato, please see https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/zardoz-1974. LilianaUwU, rollback is to be used for obvious vandalism and this wasn't even vandalism. You used it five times on that article to reinstate incorrect information. If, as you say, you "don't know Zardoz", you certainly should not be using rollback in that way. Further misuse may result in revocation of your access to it – it is a privilege, not a right. Sdrqaz ( talk) 01:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Sdrqaz: Thanks for the heads up. Considering the mistake was explained and corrected, protection won't be necessary. Apologies for being so hasty. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I appreciate the response and unprotection, Isabelle. Marking as Not done. Sdrqaz ( talk) 02:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated and continuous vandalism, adding Donald Trump and Nick Fuentes to the 'People' section FishOfIvory ( talk) 01:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. (There's also not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.) Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 04:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated, totally unsourced, additions about a sequel, that has not even been confirmed, let alone the title, or actors - Arjayay ( talk) 17:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte ( talk) 09:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism frequently repeated by numerous IPs. -. David Biddulph ( talk) 06:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP-farm editwarring because (s)he does not believe that Dublin and Lublin can be confused. By now, 3 IPs are blocked in this case. The Banner  talk 11:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see why full protection is needed. What is need is for the IP to engage to a discussion.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The same IP editor removed the Dublin link from Lublin Airport's article so I've reverted that too. doktorb words deeds 11:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Tusk001 ( talk) 10:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 13:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is one lines mentined caste Koery or Kurmi. Actually he is Koery not kurmi. please give permission to edit this page so that I can write authentic information,. Even in the below sectioned and also in all news paper and channels it's mentioned he is Koery by caste. 49.36.33.240 ( talk) 10:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. -- Euryalus ( talk) 10:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Change the Closer section in Major works to: Closer

Carucci's first significant body of work is first and foremost about the nuclear family but also touches upon the universal topics of intimacy, mother-daughter relationships, the female body, and mortality. Her parents, grandparents, and partner are the central players, each of whom she portrays gently but unflinchingly in her images. Her color photographs work with a definite color palette, with mesmerizing quality to the serene vivid reds and blues set against the myriad tones of bare skin. With her unique approach to making work, one that merges both planned, staged, and well-lit photographs, simultaneously with openness to the intuitive and spontaneous process, she creates images that highlight the depths of the beauties and pain of being human.

Delete the section Pain

Add the section MIDLIFE Elinor’s vivid descriptions of Midlife depict the complicated, layered aspects of life that affect both men and women on an intimate level in an immersive and up-close look at these important years. Through love, generations, family, women's health, and intimacy, Midlife tells the story of getting older during the middle of life. Midlife is a universal period for us all, yet this reach narrative is absent from our cultural dialogue, and in this body of work by Carucci’s asks the viewrs to look thoroughly and to collectively see what is so often unseen.

Elinor carucci (
talk) 
22:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Declined Better to be brought up on the article talk-page. Lectonar ( talk) 09:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by editors through unexplained edit summary See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130885484 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130886860 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130889234 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130891367. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130553699 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130553767 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130738439

Joe de Jointe ( talk) 14:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked., both users are already blocked for edit-warring Ymblanter ( talk) 11:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent vandalism Titus Gold ( talk) 13:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 13:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple attempts of similar controversial changes which have already been discussed on talk page. Unregistered users are mostly responsible Titus Gold ( talk) 13:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive almost 3 weeks ago. Lectonar ( talk) 13:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr Salvus 10:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page needs indefinite protection due to persistant removal of sourced info. Semsûrî ( talk) 14:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian ( talk) 21:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 15:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Different IP editors have been changing "2293", the date in which the film is set, to "2023". This has occured about a dozen times starting on 2022-12-31. Peaceray ( talk) 17:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 21:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Transfer rumours causing lots of disruptive editing. Deal close, protect for one week. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 19:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Similarly to Snowdonia, there continue to be multiple attempts of similar controversial changes which have already been discussed on talk page. Unregistered users are mostly responsible. Titus Gold ( talk) 13:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recently, the example of publicity of Elon Musk's jet traffic has been added to the Streisand Effect wikipedia page. There have been multiple reverts of the edits, attempting to exclude the legitimate example from usage on the page. There have, by my count, been 10 separate reversions related to this content in the last 24 hours. Hlposts ( talk) 17:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Comment: Of note is that this article has received so much attention in large part because it's been the subject of at least two prominent posts to /r/ElonJetTracker. I agree it should be temporarily semi-protected. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done. While there might be merit in discussing whether that's a good example or not, edit warring to remove it is not the way to go, so I've protected the page in the hopes editors will use the talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See alternate page: Draft:Ayush Srivastava, related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ayushsrivastava0. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 20:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 21:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistently recurring vandalism from users attempting to refactor the article into a hoax about the fictional film, as well as other frequently unhelpful, disruptive, or unsourced edits. silvia ( User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 21:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. vandalism from many users/ltas/socks Wesoree ( Talk) 16:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring going on. MasterMatt12 (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OZOO (t) (c) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. vandalism from many users/ltas/socks Wesoree ( Talk) 16:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Constant edit warring going on. MasterMatt12 (talk) 20:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OZOO (t) (c) 21:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

03 January 2023

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editwarring over a template. The Banner  talk 10:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced change of team. Spike 'em ( talk) 14:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has gone on regularly enough for over a year. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandals. -. David Biddulph ( talk) 15:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly sourced information. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk)20:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting earlier-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war / pov-pushen. The Banner  talk 01:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 01:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC):  Requesting immediate archiving... ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 01:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Restart of a prior edit war. The Banner  talk 01:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This seems to have been resolved by a two-weeks block. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Elizium23 ( talk) 14:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Edit-warring seems to have been stopped now that Hobbs has been sworn in. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Elizium23 ( talk) 14:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Elizium23 ( talk) 14:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users repeatedly add rumored projects that too unsourced. FrB.TG ( talk) 18:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Seems like people are insistent on changing Katie Hobbs to Kari Lake Tartar Torte 20:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. TartarTorte: I've p-blocked one of the IP ranges and added the article to my watchlist. If the issue persists, feel free to message me. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Sounds good thanks! Tartar Torte 22:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – restarted edit war / pov-pushen. The Banner  talk 01:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 01:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject currently in the news. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 03:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hasn't even been 4 hours as TFA and it's already been vandalized. ZLEA T\ C 03:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Zsinj Talk 04:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring for IP. This page needs to be protected indefinitely. LancedSoul ( talk) 17:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by hopping IP over the last week or so. - FlightTime ( open channel) 17:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too infrequent for semi-protection in my opinion-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: May need higher protection, even with normal protection, they are still getting reverted. 45BearsFan ( talk) 02:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High fluidity of it being a "Breaking News, and developing story". cut down on the risk of "rumors and false information" being released 66.115.210.70 ( talk) 05:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user(s) keeps reverting information here without an edit summary despite their changes impacting several parts of this article. This has persisted regardless of requests being made. Wozal ( talk) 18:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined warn and discuss with the IP and, if they continue, report them to WP:ANEW. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: continuous vandalization for no reason. User writing this has talked to users involved, and they have said that it was a "random page about a random show nobody cares about", so I am requesting for it to be protected. 木炭六十八 ( talk) 19:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. JoshuaInWiki ( talk) 01:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: More disruptive editing CJ-Moki ( talk) 01:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

CJ-Moki, talk pages are usually not protected. See WP:ATPROT for details.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Several editors using the page as a forum (see WP:NOTFORUM). CJ-Moki ( talk) 02:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: this case is about to go to appeal and people feel passionately about it.

this page has recently been vandalized and we expect it will be subject to aggressive vandalism in the coming months Stumpy2121 ( talk) 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is still seeing a high rate of disruptive editing, with vandalism and unsourced additions. Most of the problematic edits are coming from IP users. The page was unprotected a week ago, so a longer period of protection may be needed. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 07:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 10:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) re- blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar ( talk) 10:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The template is only used in about 15 pages and is not important enough to warrant pp-template. The protected admin User:Ansh666 is now not an admin anymore. CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 02:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:38, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: There is not disruption from autoconfirmed editors on the page. Semi-protection should be applied, not superprotection. Maine 🦞 06:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: As an admin involved with editing the article and having to revdel some pretty ugly talk page vandalism, I would recommend leaving it unchanged and keeping the extended confirmed protection active. ("Superprotection" as stated above is the wrong term.) Fuzheado | Talk 07:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected: I can't see any reason to end the extended confirmed protection early. Pinging ToBeFree as an FYI. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Same. Thanks for the ping. This waa done in response to the disruption still present after semi-protection and is limited to 3 days. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 11:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Some minor changes have to be done, and information should be added Vanilabar ( talk) 08:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user(s) keeps reverting information here without an edit summary despite their changes impacting several parts of this article. This has persisted regardless of requests being made. Wozal ( talk) 18:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined warn and discuss with the IP and, if they continue, report them to WP:ANEW. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: continuous vandalization for no reason. User writing this has talked to users involved, and they have said that it was a "random page about a random show nobody cares about", so I am requesting for it to be protected. 木炭六十八 ( talk) 19:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. JoshuaInWiki ( talk) 01:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: More disruptive editing CJ-Moki ( talk) 01:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

CJ-Moki, talk pages are usually not protected. See WP:ATPROT for details.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Several editors using the page as a forum (see WP:NOTFORUM). CJ-Moki ( talk) 02:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 06:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: this case is about to go to appeal and people feel passionately about it.

this page has recently been vandalized and we expect it will be subject to aggressive vandalism in the coming months Stumpy2121 ( talk) 07:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page is still seeing a high rate of disruptive editing, with vandalism and unsourced additions. Most of the problematic edits are coming from IP users. The page was unprotected a week ago, so a longer period of protection may be needed. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 07:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 08:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 10:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) re- blocked with talk page editing disallowed. Lectonar ( talk) 10:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit warring in article between two relatively new editors. — kashmīrī  TALK 13:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: Both editors warned about edit warring. If they persist, consider going to WP:AN/3. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism where a joke disambiguation screenshot from September 2022 is still being circulated, and new/IP users check to see if it's real and have a go at adding it back when they see it's not there. Belbury ( talk) 15:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This is a frequent target of sockpuppets and IPs of LTA Jinnifer (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jinnifer/Archive). A 6 month protect due to Jinnifer's activity expired in December. Please reprotect. MrOllie ( talk) 16:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:46, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism from IPs and new accounts. -. David Biddulph ( talk) 14:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in article about living person Southdevonian ( talk) 15:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:23, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Over the past year this article has repeatedly been edited by a variety of IPs making near-identical edits, to remove maintenance tags and add unsourced claims. Dorsetonian ( talk) 17:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton ( talk) 18:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr.Pinsky ( talk) 18:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian ( talk) 19:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war about flags. The Banner  talk 11:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Daniel Case. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism related to the subject's recent arrest. GPL93 ( talk) 12:37, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Edits by admins only. Makes sure no other users can edit it. Elijah Wilder ( talk) 16:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This is the same editor who has been adding serial commas to articles and has realised that the alternative is to remove one item from a list of three to ensure the absence of the serial comma isn't noticed. - SchroCat ( talk) 14:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also rangeblocked 174.204.64.0/20 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)) for two years as they have resumed the same activity that led to the one-year block that had expired in November. Since the other Washington state-based Verizon IP they used is far enough outside the range that MediaWiki will not let me include it in the block, and indeed someone that mobile may find other IPs to use, the protection is needed as well. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent inclusion of unsourced or unrelated material, also vandalism such as the section "Notable Legislation and Accomplishments as an Assembly Member: None." has been removed, but requesting protection. GeorgeBailey ( talk) 14:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thank you! I appreciate it. GeorgeBailey ( talk) 17:00, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi GeorgeBailey, if these additions continue, they will be block evasion that can be dealt with by reverting and reporting the sockpuppetry at WP:SPI or (in obvious, ongoing cases) WP:AIV. This should be sufficient for now; the edit frequency is pretty low. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 16:53, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection. Elijah Wilder ( talk) 17:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. No rationale provided, no history of disruption visible, and the page is already quasi-semiprotected by an edit filter. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 17:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

04 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 20:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass blanking by sockpuppet accounts. Some1 ( talk) 22:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- RegentsPark ( comment) 23:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by sockpuppets, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrshivamrai. bonadea contributions talk 23:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done -- RegentsPark ( comment) 23:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Many users are vandalising the page. Some are adding non major parties in infobox. XYZ 250706 ( talk) 16:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism will never stop if you let people edit 128.254.249.8 ( talk) 21:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Misgendering. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 00:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ ToBeFree: This was only because a person who was scheduled for execution was transgender. That person in question has now been executed so essentially that page no longer needs protecting, it is this page that now requires the protection: List of people executed in the United States in 2023. Inexpiable ( talk) 21:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring and constant reversion, see /info/en/?search=Talk:WikiLeaks#Improper_editing. Temporary protection needed for things to cool down. Softlemonades ( talk) 18:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment The conflict on this page was initiated when examining a recent addition with clear BLP content. I removed the content, sourced exclusively to a defunct website "Focus Ecuador". Further examination of recent content additions found multiple other problems with thin-sourcing of BLP content: things like Daily Beast, HuffPo contributor platform, international business times. The editor who added these problematic areas is keen to restore them, without regard to the higher standard of sourcing required for living person content, as they have made clear on talk. Cambial foliar❧ 18:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
    As pointed out on the Talk page cited, big issues include a HuffPo senior reporter being removed, I didnt object to the IBTimes removal Ive done it a lot and made sure it was removed when I restored other content, and Ive repeatedly asked the editor to not bulk remove every Daily Beast citation without discussion or even reading the articles or looking at the authors which include definite experts like Kevin Poulsen. Theyve admitted removing articles without knowing it despite being told Softlemonades ( talk) 21:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
    The editor who added these problematic areas is keen to restore them Ive asked you to just to discuss the changes and you just revert them again and ignore WP:BRD. At this point thats all I want especially since you removed at least some things like the Washington Post without knowing it or looking at them
    without regard to the higher standard of sourcing required for living person content I disagree and think its an odd thing to say about stuff that includes how much money WikiLeaks raised through Bitcoin Softlemonades ( talk) 21:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 03:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – almost all recent edits in history have been disruptive, low volume but article title makes it prone to it. Will120 ( talk) 06:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected, let us try pending changes first-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonsense about "adrod 13" (sic) put in by multiple IPs. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 07:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to be some confusion at to the topic of this article as there is a new album to be released with the same name. Skipple 19:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of user vandalism. Discographymen ( talk) 21:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The user has not responded to any warnings. Help me to how to stop these repeated vandalism.

AIV is thataway. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 05:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing RowanJ LP2 ( talk) 20:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 01:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 10:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been vandalism since December 16. Please revert the page to pre Dec16 and protect it. Stmarksblr ( talk) 06:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar ( talk) 08:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The population figures in this article have been changing repeatedly for weeks. Largoplazo ( talk) 01:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The disruption by autoconfirmed accounts doesn't rise to the level where extend-confirmed protection would be needed. I have watchlisted. Lectonar ( talk) 10:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandals changing the dates of his first tenure in office. For outgoing presidents, the term ends on December 31. Not January 1. This is a widespread dating format on other articles for Brazilian presidents. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 02:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jayron 32 12:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Brendan Miller. Graywalls ( talk) 04:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Comment This was previously proposed 4 days ago; BLP subject has edited the page again after the previous request, but stopped 3 days ago. Unclear whether he could have seen the COI warnings (see linked COI noticeboard discussion). Regardless, if allowed under WP:IAR, I support page protection, to nudge the subject into using the talk page and avoid him risking sanctions, since I believe he edited his page with rare good faith. DFlhb ( talk) 05:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined Even protecting the page will not make sure the IP, be they Brendan Miller or not, will use the article talk-page. I would follow what is spelled out at WP:BLPEDIT, and repeatedly link to WP:BIOSELF in edit summaries and talk-page warnings; even with changing IP adresses this ought to be seen after some time. Lectonar ( talk) 08:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly controversial figure and no protection doesn't seem to make sense. A lot of edits are either vandalism or their reverts. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 2601:150:100:86F4:0:0:0:69 ( talk · contribs) blocked by ComplexRational. Jayron 32 12:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High number of recent edits and reversions due to current events. JefferyClark ( talk) 11:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Jayron 32 12:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Long term pattern of IPs making random date changes -- FMSky ( talk) 11:55, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less than one such edit per month; which is not excessive. -- Jayron 32 12:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/new account vandalism/disruptive editing. Protection log documents repeated protection needed going back over many years. — Archer1234 ( talk) 12:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely.-- RegentsPark ( comment) 14:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; protected six times in the past. Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 12:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Edits are not vandalism. Jayron 32 12:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
With apologies, Jayron32, I seem to have decision conflicted. At the same time you declined to protect I went with one year of pending changes protection due to the low level but steady history of vandalism and other disruptive edits with a few constructive edits mixed in, including over the last couple of months. You're welcome to remove my protection if you think it's best. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 12:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No problem. You're fine. -- Jayron 32 12:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 12:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The disruptive edits are few and far between, and at least for the last 4 weeks come from the same IP. At need report to an apppropriate noticeboard. Lectonar ( talk) 12:15, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Okay SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 13:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Very high level of IP Vandalism ANewPreson ( talk) 15:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism attempts to change the name of the manager. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:09, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 19:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some users are vandalizing the page.  Waqar  ( talk) 13:46, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 13:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Okay!  Waqar  ( talk) 13:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - Who is John Galt? 15:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 19:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/poorly sourced content. GlatorNator ( talk) 13:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 19:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/poorly sourced content. GlatorNator ( talk) 13:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/poorly sourced content. GlatorNator ( talk) 13:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive by disruption by IPs and new users. Editorkamran ( talk) 13:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Disruption still happening. Editorkamran ( talk) 18:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring and IP socking. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 17:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Less Unless ( talk) 19:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

05 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring vandalism. Sjö ( talk) 15:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP Jumping editor repeatedly adding hyperbolic and promotional content over the last month. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Unaware that you had already done this, I gave the article six months of protection, because as noted both here and at ANEW this user has been going on doing this since October. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – So much vandalism due to active election. Bbraxtonlee ( talk) 18:29, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 19:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 17:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel ( Talk) 19:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP disruption. Last page protection had a 3 day duration. Maleschreiber ( talk) 22:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has gone on for over a year; no reason for you to have to keep coming back here. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Per suggestion on Talk page - this is to address the addition of unsourced content which looks like WP:OR by an IP editor - as it is possible IP editor is not aware that other editors are trying to communicate with them. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long term abuse. 2605:8D80:324:F7E:746D:BA83:634:7CE9 ( talk) 17:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: "Humorous" vandalism from pupils who are at the school, including https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mascalls_Academy&diff=1104063059&oldid=1104062877 Tbf69 20:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. it is at a Wikidefcon 3 level,as this is a new political figure.there is a high level of vandalism because people are using it as a forum of sorts. ItsMeKeys ( talk) 21:24, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Andre 🚐 02:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Drive-by IP's are bent on inserting WP:UNDUE content into the article whilst violating WP:WAR, WP:DUE and WP:BRD. This is a hot topic currently due to the Mahsa Amini protests. A talk page section was made, but they deliberately ignore it. -. LouisAragon ( talk) 23:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think we need extended-confirmed protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 03:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 06:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two months of genre-warring from Thailand IPs in a wide range starting with 2001:FB1:14_:... Binksternet ( talk) 07:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased IP vandalism/promo edits. Izzy Moony Hi new friend! 08:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toddst1 ( talk) 00:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-Term abuse sock of User:Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse Sock of User:Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse Vandalism as sock of User:Brianmagallano. LG-Gunther :  Talk  03:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – page is the subject of many unsourced edits reporting that the subject is now employed by or in talks with Mississippi State University. always forever ( talk) 03:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is subject to persistent long-term efforts by various IP or inexperienced editors to tweak this page (likely due to the figures very important role in history). Unfortunately, the vast majority of recent changes have been more disruptive than constructive and have had to be instantly reverted by experienced editors. I would suggest that having this page open has become a time sink and waste of community time. Iskandar323 ( talk) 10:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This does seem long-term but let's see if this calms it down first. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:06, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption since the last two weeks. - SUN EYE 1 11:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This is for making sure I can confirm no one removes themselves from the list. Ilovejames5 :) 10:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The protection policy requires that user subpages aren't protected pre-emptively protected without good reason or cause and I don't believe that a subpage is likely to be modified nor that the purpose you're intending to use it for requires it to be protected. Focus on the articles rather than making a personal list of editors you've warned. I won't decline this so other admins can have a look and see what they think. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined This provides enough reason for the moment, as there has been no disruption. I personally would refrain from maintaining such a list (it seems somehow to go against the "spirit" of Wikipedia, and if you intend to warn plenty of people with say changing IPs, it would quickly become rather unwieldy), and I concur with my esteemed colleague above. Lectonar ( talk) 12:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP disruption. HistoryofIran ( talk) 11:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an ip is constantly making changes to the number of soundtrack albums without a source. The ip has been reverted by multiple editors and continues to vandalize the page. JOJ Hutton 12:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 12:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Its multiple IPs did you even do any investigation? Why are you an admin?-- JOJ Hutton 13:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. for two weeks. Jojhutton, please re-report if the block is evaded, and/or report obvious block evasion at WP:AIV if it happens. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi protection due to consistent meatpuppetry (different Bangladeshi IPs). See edit history. Beshogur ( talk) 15:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. This has been going on in the history going back to 2020. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Article is the target of joke edits by some of the subject's students.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:41, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. For a day. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:44, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Navjot Singh ( talk) 19:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vio disruption resuming a week after the last protection period ended (less than a day after MusikBot removed the padlock). Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 19:17, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Increasing amounts of IP vandalism MrEarlGray ( talk) 13:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 17:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Less Unless ( talk) 17:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Less Unless ( talk) 17:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lemonaka ( talk) 14:05, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I am not sure if protecting this page is desirable ... the logs show it has never been protected despite continuous vandalism. Semi-protection would leave IP editors with nowhere to report false positives, which do happen. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:48, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Daniel Case, I fell for this first too. The reports page is at Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports, though. The talk page of the shell around these reports should (at least theoretically) never see any reports. That said, keeping some of the disruption on this specific talk page rather than elsewhere could even be desirable.
I guess if there's actually a need for semi-protection, those who deal with it will request or implement it. Lemonaka has never edited the page. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
You meant Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives, right? Daniel Case ( talk) 16:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ ToBeFree@ Daniel Case Thanks for advice, I just came up with this because I saw a lot of vandalism in history Since Dec 31. Lemonaka ( talk) 17:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Comment: worth nothing that this, along with It's Just That Way, and Where Have You Gone is more than likely WP:LTA/AC. Skipple 21:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lemonaka ( talk) 20:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:36, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – subject appears to be in the news recently due to some controversial remarks leading to an uptick in vandalism from various IP editors. Skipple 21:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

06 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has being changing value for months without providing sources. Latest edit behavior shows we can't assume good faith anymore and IP is clearly a troll or vandal. McSly ( talk) 18:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Pblocked a range from the page, and a few others they've been editing disruptively. Let me know if there is still a problem. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WPEditor42 ( talkcontribs) 21:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism following previous protection period 2603:7000:8E03:7457:E167:6DFF:7E7A:1A18 ( talk) 23:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Talbert Swan is a public figure and social critic whose public positions result in persistent vandalism to his page and frequent violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Non credible sources are referenced to slander a living subject by his critics. This page needs to be protected. Mjones3927 ( talk) 19:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most activity this month has been your cleanup. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:46, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Daniel Case The above user has been reverting sourced edits on the Swan page and I have asked them to take to talk page. Instead, they have refused to and disruptively edited. Pennsylvania2 ( talk) 21:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply
So it was a good thing I declined the report then ... Daniel Case ( talk) 21:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Logged out socking editor continues to disruptively stalk my talk page. Spike 'em ( talk) 23:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. If the troll comes back, I'll do a longer range block or semi-protection. Let me know. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Range blocked for one week. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
(searches, searches) ah, at Special:Contributions/193.207.0.0/16 it is. Thanks :) ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No problem. There was an existing block that was about to expire they was noted LTA, so we'll see if it has to be lengthened. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Needs to be protected. Every single time prior to a thread on Reddit about Louis Conradt being released, people attempt to edit political history, and omit sources. 64.231.234.195 ( talk) 23:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: (or at least, one long enough to stop the nonsense). Persistent vandalism – The disruptive editing started as soon as the protection expired. Please note that a) similar disruption (regarding the picture) has been taking place on Commons (leading to the image being fully protected) and b) the edit requests on the article's talk page that keep being declined (as they go against what the source says). M.Bitton ( talk) 01:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I completely agree. This silliness has been going on for much to long now. At least a two months protection. -- Fama Clamosa ( talk) 01:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I concur. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 01:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nothing in the month of October. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 24.114.44.8 ( talk) 03:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Threshold for protecting a talk page is higher than for an article. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long term abuse. 24.114.44.8 ( talk) 03:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

And it just keeps getting worse Philipnelson99 ( talk) 04:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High levels of vandalism, see [1] for cause, IPs persistently removing references to Algeria or falsely claiming photographs of lions taken in Algeria were actually taken in Morocco. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 05:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 05:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Downgrade to auto confirmed: Please remove the ECP and downgrade it to semi-protection to prevent one sockpuppet from returning. Otherwise, please use the pending edits mode. Imperial meter ( talk) 19:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 06:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: There is a draft at Draft:Mark Wiens which in my view meets the WP:AFC acceptance criteria of having a greater than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion discussion. It is a borderline notability article, which is fine. A prior version has been deleted at AfD, but in 2017. Things have moved on with Wiens since then. I have no concerns that it may well be sent straight to AfD, since the community can decide its fate. There is a lengthy discussion at the AFC Helpdesk. It might be seen that this request is sidestepping that discussion, which is why I have linked to it - to seek to ensure that is not so, and that there can be no accusations of forum shopping. 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Happy to accept the article from AfC now, with sufficient sources, but would encourage semi-protection in any case as I am aware this page has a little bit of a history!. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 18:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Mattdaviesfsic: Unprotected here. If disruption ensues, please request protection, but I'd rather not protect as a pre-emptive measure. Sdrqaz ( talk) 04:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – New user editwarring over infobox image, open discussion on talk. Please return to statusquo while discussion is on. - FlightTime Phone ( open channel) 02:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined: They've been warned now so if they continue to edit war report them to WP:ANEW. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP add largely unsourced content included non existent channels and program list John123521 ( Talk- Contib.) 03:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated non neutral POV edits by unregistered user. No attempt to seek consensus through TALK page despite requests from 2 editors. Aemilius Adolphin ( talk) 03:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined: Warn the editor appropriately and, if they continue, report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Seems to be editwarring (largely by anon accounts) re: whether it is a "racial slur" or "ethnic slur." Has already been discussed twice on Talk Page, but changes continue. See also here: https://www.propastop.org/eng/2023/01/05/why-propagandists-are-battling-to-redefine-vatnik/ Korossyl ( talk) 03:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated non NPOV edits by unregistered user. No attempt to reach consensus despite requests from different editors. See article talk page. Aemilius Adolphin ( talk) 06:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined: Warn the editor appropriately and, if they continue, report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Persistent page move warring, despite previous RM consensus not to move. Have been moved at least 3 times in the last month. – robertsky ( talk) 07:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Move protected indefinitely. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 08:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:57, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New accounts and IPs vandalizing article over the last few days. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Change to indefinite semi-protection. Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 10:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Considering the history the article prior to its increased protection (first to full, then down to extended when that was introduced), it does not seem like a good idea open the floodgates. Favonian ( talk) 11:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hes with holding general information regarding the identity of hiss family members. Ive been working on this case for over a year. You're order by the CIA to change it. 24.75.165.55 ( talk) 12:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – The Reptilian Cabal trumps the CIA. Favonian ( talk) 13:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: ten years since protection and no apparent vandalism. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 13:16, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected 10 years is probably enough. Let's see what happens. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:43, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

He is an innocent man with good points involving protecting his family 188.95.207.154 ( talk) 12:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done It is not clear what text you would like changed in the article. Please include what text you want added or removed, and include a rationale and a source for the requested change. Jayron 32 14:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of uncited infobox edits over the past week. Chronikhiles ( talk) 10:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP editing Iaof2017 ( talk) 12:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new and IP editors vandalizing BLP for past 2 days. Schazjmd  (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep ( talk) 19:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some user(s) sometimes ruin this page with bad formatting. JSH-alive/ talk/ cont/ mail 12:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism including BLP-vio Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 16:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep ( talk) 19:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism including BLP-vio Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 17:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep ( talk) 19:13, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

07 January 2023

Reason: Easy way to vandalise very important page like i do for demonstration 2001:818:E801:C000:15D4:245E:3018:BD0F ( talk) 18:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Nthep ( talk) 18:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
But I did vandalism on that page so its not preemptive 2001:818:E801:C000:15D4:245E:3018:BD0F ( talk) 18:56, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No, we'll deal with it another way. Nthep ( talk) 19:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Vandalizing a page yourself just so it gets protected will only lead to the page remaining unprotected and you getting blocked. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Plandu ( talk) 19:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 2600:4040:498D:100:E9F8:F2C7:AE70:4712 ( talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. PhilKnight ( talk) 20:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Extremely severe BLP violations; Long term sock-puppetry.. 2605:8D80:400:7E3:5CF2:94FC:603F:8A81 ( talk) 23:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

That was 4 days ago and it was taken care of. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting semi. Different IPs from Australia making the same unsourced changes, possibly the same person. Looking as well to be applied to related articles The Secret Life of Pets 2 and The Secret Life of Pets (franchise) which have also been affected by those same IPs - Gouleg🛋️  harass/ hound (she/her) 14:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sock magnet.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There are unconfirmed reports that he is going to change from France to Algeria in international football. Several different IPs have been editing it writing this (5 of them) today (it just got reverted). Even though it was only one revert, given 5 different IPs were editing it, I think that shows it might need page protection to prevent addition of rumoured but unfinalized information. RedPatch ( talk) 16:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism edits by unregistered users Jayanthkumar123 ( talk) 16:42, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by IP users. The subject is a defendant in an ongoing high-profile criminal trial in the US. KyleJoan talk 17:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism CT55555( talk) 17:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The IP edits are ongoing. Requesting prioritisation of this protection request please. CT55555( talk) 21:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Requesting user is page creator, however, I will back that a majority of the IP edits on this page since creation have been nothing but vandalism or violations of WP:NPOV. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is just getting silly, insults combined with original research. Doug Weller talk 18:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. SunilNevlaFan 03:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IP continues to remove references and sourced information, no response to attempts to talk on their talk page. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 01:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recent IP and unregistered user disruption. Novemberjazz 17:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 02:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs/new editors persistently changing "Arabian Gulf" to "Persian Gulf". Archer1234 ( u· t· c) 22:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:37, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam ( talk) 22:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and literal spam with 'primary sources' and refusal to specify any pages supposedly linked to the quotes. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 02:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Coordinated vandalism Pedro.phf1 ( talk) 03:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Most recent edit is from 2019. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced information about a revival - all that was confirmed was that talks had begun but no deal confirmed, no date, no judges, just confirmation that a network was talking to the show's creators. Either way not encyclopaedic or factual to keep adding that "season 4 is coming". >> Lil-unique1 ( talk)19:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 09:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism / constant edit reverts from different IP addresses, that are located to one place. Andor127 ( talk) 21:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 09:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 05:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 10:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Dealer07, using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 05:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless ( talk) 10:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Removing talk page access on User talk:Montgomery alligator might be needed, as the blocked user continues to post off-topic. Chris Troutman ( talk) 22:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done It would be better to ask the blocking admin to remove talk page access, but it also appears the user has stopped posting off-topic messages. Will keep an eye. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Please add protection to the page, The page faces constant attacks of spam, wrong info entered and so on . Change the protection to Semi-protected at least.

✨Ashish Legend✨

05:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – An IP is adding political claims based on a social media post, but (so far) we have no proof that the social media account is really the BLP it claims to be. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 06:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Needs higher protections. Looks like user Fourthords is vandalizing the Wikipedia page by deleting the page for Louis Conradt - and re-directing to his suicide instead of his Wikipedia? 64.231.234.195 ( talk) 09:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Favonian ( talk) 11:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The IP stating, " I'll keep changing it forever". Kansas Bear ( talk) 16:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Mishary94 ( talk) 20:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.— cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 20:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply
  • I'm surprised! There is an anonymous IP that puts false information more than 14 times in just four months, and every time I apply for protection, it is rejected for a different reason. How can I protect this article then? Can someone help me with this, I'm fed up with this anonymous IP -- Mishary94 ( talk) 00:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a tiresomely slow-burning edit war on this page by various random IP/novel editors to remove a certain body of slightly raunchy historical material - this has spiked in the last six months (though it dates back as far as 2018), resulting in time-wasting edits far outweighing constructive editing of late. Iskandar323 ( talk) 20:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant edits by IP address changing the winners of the years during WW2 to German Generals. I.E. Vandalism. Paulpat99 ( talk) 21:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Nonsense. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 00:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There’s no disruption going on, so let’s just slap an ECP on it for “arbitration”. 2605:8D80:400:7E3:5CF2:94FC:603F:8A81 ( talk) 03:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism and edits without citing sources by anonymous and registered users. Please consider at least semi-protection for this page. Thank you. Johnnycorns5354 ( talk) 07:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: We need semi-protection, as newbies & IPs aren't waiting for official tallies to be announced, per ballot. They're changing numbers constantly, every second & creating confusion, let alone making the page difficult to edit. GoodDay ( talk) 19:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Anachronist. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism. 73.67.145.30 ( talk) 19:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:38, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism, page was recently unprotected and the issues returned. BRDude70 ( talk) 22:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

08 January 2023

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Dallavid ( talk) 19:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as arbitration enforcement-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. Lots of IPs from Phillips Academy (subject of article) in a revert-war over the Alex Shieh Center. May be an internal school dispute spilling onto wikipedia. Also consider semi-protecting The Phillips Academy Poll as that was the section deleted from Phillips Academy and Alex Shieh is the Chief Pollster listed on the page. 2600:1000:B12E:93EE:4D46:E90D:6632:5FD4 ( talk) 02:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 22:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism likely to continue until after new manager has been appointed. David Biddulph ( talk) 09:58, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 23:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism almost immediately after previous protection expired. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 18:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Edits may also contain violations of WP:BLP. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism in the last 24 hours. Page has previously been protected. Suggest a period of semi-protection for a month RM-Taylor ( talk) 19:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism due to speculation about his changes in sponsorship. Please block edit requests from users with no accounts. PerlDreamer ( talk) 20:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: consistent vandalism and adding of unsourced or poorly sourced information. SKAG123 ( talk) 23:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: In the last few hours minutes this redirect has been vandalised numerous times by multiple IPs. Might be a good idea to temporarily semi-protect it. AP 499D25 ( talk) 00:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism. This happens a lot with the TFA. Professor Penguino ( talk) 02:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Full protection. Possible BLP violation, a discussion is open at BLP/N but edit war is ongoing Gitz ( talk) ( contribs) 03:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

It's not stopping [9]. I will no longer revert but suggest in case of protection to restore the wrong version (with no BLP violation) Gitz ( talk) ( contribs) 20:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Dealer07 using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 17:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Otherwise, the /40 range could be blocked: Special:Contributions/2A02:85F:F000:0:0:0:0:0/40. There was a ton of disruption from that range yesterday. Binksternet ( talk) 17:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enough apparently productive edits coming off that range that this seems like the better option. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continued overlinking, despite warnings. - FlightTime ( open channel) 18:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced data. Nehme 1499 18:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism. 73.67.145.30 ( talk) 20:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Regular vandalism from various caste POV pushing accounts. Low-quality edits in poor English. Ixudi ( talk) 12:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Page is still on "In the news", which means it is highly visible from the main page. Poodle23 ( talk) 15:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: pro-nazi editing - this page was basically accepting the insane premises of the book, one of the most famous Nazi party tracts - I'm fixing it and just got the first serious pushback Victoryodaiken ( talk) 23:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The edits you've made are unsourced and violate our original research policies. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined per above. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive redirect overwriting resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran ( talk) 01:40, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 04:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Or indef, vandalism has occurred for since April with no signs of stopping ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 04:27, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 04:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits from IPs. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 05:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Mobile editor constantly vandalising 'infobox' content. GoodDay ( talk) 06:35, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Edit warring by multiple parties. Adakiko ( talk) 09:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Special:Contribs/136.158.66.0/25. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: to prevent further restoring of the article per the recent consensus at AFD. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:548B:F232:1D21:9246 ( talk) 03:57, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the redirect target is also at AFD. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The data on these pages are at risk of being changed because of bias from certain ethnic groups. User Editors are more reliable, as we can discuss any changes to frequencies based on the actual data and references. In fact, all pages with heavy information like specific Y-DNA lineages and their Distribution tables should be protected from such unsourced edits. The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 11:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:50, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

09 January 2023

Reason: The data on these pages are at risk of being changed because of bias from certain ethnic groups. User Editors are more reliable, as we can discuss any changes to frequencies based on the actual data and references. In fact, all pages with heavy information like specific Y-DNA lineages and their Distribution tables should be protected from such unsourced edits. The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 11:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:52, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant vandalism by the same IP range sock Snowflake91 ( talk) 13:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection, as same as yesterday, high level of IP vandalism on this article. Yesterday, Qarachar Noyan was protected as well due to edits of similar IPs starting with 103. Beshogur ( talk) 14:58, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Joeykai, the user had been blocked to prevent further edit warring, and there has been none since. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently as a ref he made a call some people disagree with. Sjö ( talk) 16:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Don't we all... BusterD ( talk) 00:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [ ] 16:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant removal of sourced content by the same IP, who seems to be User:Dealer07 who has been blocked indefinitely. Iaof2017 ( talk) 16:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 01:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Significant cultures like these that have contributed to early human history are always subject to vandalism by people with agendas, hence the history of disruptions on this page. Protection will prevent disruptive editors with from clearing information they don't like. The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 12:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. There's been no disruption since the last protection expired, and pages are not protected preemptively. Feel free to re-report if problems resume. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by the same IP, who's also removing sourcend content on "The Motto (Tiësto and Ava Max song)" article. Iaof2017 ( talk) 19:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 01:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Increased vandalism from IP editors. Izzy Moony Hi new friend! 11:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. BusterD ( talk) 00:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The data on these pages are at risk of being changed because of bias from certain ethnic groups. User Editors are more reliable, as we can discuss any changes to frequencies based on the actual data and references. In fact, all pages with heavy information like specific Y-DNA lineages and their Distribution tables should be protected from such unsourced edits. This article in particular (look at the revision history) has had lots of citations removed by Arab centrists who are against North Africans (Berbers/Amazigh). The Watchlist Editor ( talk) 12:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the protection policy linked virtually everywhere on this page. BusterD ( talk) 00:42, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit warring. 2A01:B747:84D:344:1879:7F57:B614:B7BB ( talk) 13:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. Requester is the only contributor to this page in past four days. BusterD ( talk) 00:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is rather slow-burning vandalism which I would normally consider managable through normal editing, but a serious BLP violation was on the page for more than 24hours, so protected. Page could use with a few more watchers. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Johnny Au ( talk/ contributions) 16:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No disruptive edits in last 24 hours. BusterD ( talk) 01:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has a history of COI edits. Also edits that are copy/paste from the artist's website, from bouncing IPs and new accounts. PigeonChickenFish ( talk) 23:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 01:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by IPs, unsourced info, breaching of WP:NOTVGUIDE. The Banner  talk 01:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai ( talk) 19:19, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Unregistered users vandalising the page Abhishek K Menon ( talk) 20:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 09:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – long history of protections, pc insufficient. Will120 ( talk) 06:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined One instance of minor vandalism since unprotection. Right now, I think we're at stable level. Please feel free to rerequest if disruption picks up. Kosack ( talk) 08:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism from ips. Sahaib ( talk) 21:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism on a blp. Sahaib ( talk) 22:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Uh hoohdsff 88.242.86.38 ( talk) 04:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection of this page should be reduced because it is an author who is very famous. I collect information about famous people and send them to Wikipedia. This helps a lot to your users. Little Angel IVF ( talk) 05:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The draft isn't protected. If you want to have the article-page unprotected, please have the draft accepted first. Lectonar ( talk) 09:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs due to a very recent on-field incident. GPL93 ( talk) 04:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – indef ECP; repeatedly recreated vanity g11 page. –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 16:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected –  Muboshgu ( talk) 16:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Muboshgu: You applied semi-create-protection; this does nothing as the page is in mainspace and cannot be created by new users regardless of protection. –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 17:01, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply
disregard, protection level corrected while I was replying –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 17:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: Was protected twelve years ago with not much vandalism or disruption since. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 15:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 16:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Started as soon as the last PP expired, asking for a longer one this time around as the protection log shows this is not going to go away anytime soon. Gotitbro ( talk) 11:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption was more than 2 weeks ago...no edits at all until your edit from today. Afaics, far from needing permant semi-protection. If another admin disagrees: feel free to protect. Lectonar ( talk) 14:54, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs and new accounts, including nationalistic and discriminating editing. Iaof2017 ( talk) 12:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 14:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruption every 2 or 3 days is not enough disruption to semiprotect the article. Lectonar ( talk) 14:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – False death claims. Lard Almighty ( talk) 19:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 20:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

10 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edit warring on BLP article about allegations of sexual misconduct. Needs either semi-protection or pending changes. 10mmsocket ( talk) 17:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Subject of the article has recently died, and is now being targeted with anti-vaccination related vandalism. [10] [11] [12] [13] 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 20:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Reaper Eternal. Complex/ Rational 23:05, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was already protected once after anonymous IP continued to remove template, ignoring talk page requests to discuss/stop. Protection expired, IP is right back at it, removing template with no explanation and without adding anything to the article. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 20:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 22:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated unsourced additions ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/ Rational 23:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. The Banner  talk 23:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Has been disrupted by various IPs for months, in some cases reverting each other. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 23:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

NFL teams

Reason: I am requesting page protection for all NFL playoff teams until February 19, 2022, a week after the Super Bowl LVIII. Once a team loses in the playoffs it instantly leads to childish changes of the ownership in the infobox to the winning teams quarterback or stars. These childish posts are quickly screenshotted and end up on meme pages fueling more vandalism. To prevent this I am requesting page protection from IP editors as the damage of IP vandals far outweighs any value from valid IP editors over the next five weeks. I will request lowering of page protection after two weeks for defeated teams, the period of time in which these immature vandalism sprees usually ends. Words in the Wind( talk) 05:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: I'm going to let another, more experienced administrator review the request, but would like to note to Words in the Wind that, per our protection policies, we generally do not protect pages pre-emptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi Words in the Wind and Isabelle Belato, the pages where actual recent vandalism occurred are now protected as suggested (2023, not 2022, though; I only noticed when Twinkle told me the date is in the past...). If, later, there's actual recent disruption on the remaining pages, please individually re-request protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by IP editor who simply refuses to understand WP:SPS and WP:UGC. 10mmsocket ( talk) 22:25, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. by HJ Mitchell — Maile ( talk) 22:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WPEditor42 ( talkcontribs) 02:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No point in letting IPs and new users edit the page. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 17:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: New account and IP disruption. Maleschreiber ( talk) 18:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced WP:DOB by ip-hoppers. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

NFC Championship Game ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Everyone always changes it so it says “yOu GEt tO bEaT tHe pAcKeRs.” It’s a highly disruptive, irritating edit. Eg224 ( talk) 02:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism on highly used shortcut. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 23:59, 8 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. since genre warring seems to be continually recurring. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced content are added again after 4 days under a different IP. Unsourced contents are also added weeks ago. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 01:12, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: New user SnoopyBird reverting to keep in video whose license is not yet verified. Also would be happy to have the copyright status verified, or for someone else to explain copy vio to him. Given that the article is about the storming of the federal complex in Brazil, there is a high probability of various hijinks. Elinruby ( talk) 03:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Different new editor now at my talk page telling me it's all cool because it's from a YouTube channel (!). I suppose it's possible, but I have never heard of that, this guy doesn't look like an admin, and the article has already had one copyvio removed. Leaving talk page section up for reference for now Elinruby ( talk) 04:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Page has been moved, and really this doesn't sound like an issue warranting protection. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Militant groups

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of sourced content by the same IP hopping user. Gotitbro ( talk) 11:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For both. Lectonar ( talk) 08:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent NPOV violations on a BLP. Lard Almighty ( talk) 13:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Has stopped after warning. Lectonar ( talk) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism going back and forth since the fifth of this month. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 14:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined has died down; please relist at need. Lectonar ( talk) 08:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been subject to the "Persian Gulf" / "Arabian Gulf" controversy for years. Temporary protection has not dissuaded IPs and new accounts from disruptively and repeatedly changing "Arabian Gulf" to "Persian Gulf" throughout the article. I think it is time for indefinite semi-protection. Archer1234 ( t· c) 14:17, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected Seems like a spike, so pending-changes should do it after some initial semi-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 12:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Previous IP editor given topic block on this page. But same person has now popped up with a new IP address in the same name. Block evasion should be stopped as behaviour has not changed. 10mmsocket ( talk) 12:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 12:57, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism to the {{ Article for deletion}} template and reintroduction of unsourced information into a biography of a living person. Semi-protection would be helpful for at least the duration of the deletion discussion. Worldbruce ( talk) 14:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected until midnight UTC after the AfD is scheduled to end. Protection can be extended if the AfD is relisted. Complex/ Rational 16:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP user who claims to be Gladu has repeatedly removed information relating to COVID misinformation over the past few days. HamOntPoliFiend ( talk) 15:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

There is a lot of news happening in Gilgit-Baltistan following TTP announcement to form a parallel government in Pakistan including Gilgit-Baltistan. There are protests in GB to join India in some parts. https://www.firstpost.com/world/ttp-challenges-pakistans-sovereignty-declares-own-government-11917812.html https://www.rferl.org/a/pakistan-taliban-end-cease-fire/32152531.html

https://www.firstpost.com/world/pakistan-protests-rock-pok-as-gilgit-baltistan-demands-reunion-with-india-11960152.html 
Rq88187 (
talk) 
14:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
We cannot unilaterally make these changes here. Take it to Talk:Gilgit-Baltistan. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 15:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done – Consensus at Talk:Gilgit-Baltistan required. Favonian ( talk) 16:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

{{ request edit}} change word 'Bishangarh' to 'Kishangarh'.

मरुप्रदेश (
talk) 
15:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not done that article does not exist, nothing to change. — xaosflux Talk 15:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 19:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism based on recent sports related events. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: He had a good game, for which he's rewarded with persistent vandalism here. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 18:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Revolving door of IPs adding this block of OR about things they claim the bible predicted. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 19:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 19:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Increased disruption since November. HistoryofIran ( talk) 19:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Learnt about what is required. Cwengo ( talk) 13:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This page isn't protected, and so does not need to be unprotected. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 15:24, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because we can't add verified details on this page as user is lost the account. मरुप्रदेश ( talk) 15:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The account user lost his account. No one can add verified information of Bishangarh. मरुप्रदेश ( talk) 15:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The account user lost his account no one can edit verified information about Bishangarh. मरुप्रदेश ( talk) 15:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This page isn't currently protected. — xaosflux Talk 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ मरुप्रदेश: please stop filing requests for pages that are not protected, it is becoming disruptive. — xaosflux Talk 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 20:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – With the end of support coming tomorrow, IP editors have been repeatedly changing the support status prematurely. I think semi-protection is needed for the time being. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 22:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wave of IPs/new accounts trying to change country. Mellk ( talk) 03:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected as arbitration enforcement-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting protection for First Iraqi–Kurdish War and Iraqi no-fly zones conflict. These articles have recently experienced mass infobox edits (and associated edit warring) by the dynamic IP 86.141.92.231/86.137.14.137, whose edits (involving grandiose claims of "Iraqi victory") consistently fail verification and who is temporarily blocked for violating the 3RR per an AN3 report. (The IP has also engaged in edit warring and misrepresentation of sources at Iraqi invasion of Iran, but seems to have stopped after a particularly egregious instance of misrepresentation was pointed out.) Because this specific IP address will not be blocked for long and may change dynamically in short order, I am requesting extended-confirmed protection to minimize the potential for further disruptive editing. Thank you for your consideration, TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 06:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The film releases in 24 hours, and protecting it from vandalism it has become cumbersome. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:38, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, Edit war. Sneha996 ( talk) 20:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained content removals by IP hopper on dynamic range. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 ( talk) 20:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Vanamonde93. Favonian ( talk) 20:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Extremely high level of IP vandalism. Professor Penguino ( talk) 21:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 21:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Rampant deletion of facts and data regarding the article. Facts being deleted are facts but are being trolled. Dominicanarquia ( talk) 03:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sock activity since June 9th. Magherbin ( talk) 08:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sock continues to edit since the expiry of protection on January 2nd. Magherbin ( talk) 09:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs adding mistakes (living in North Macedonia in the 1990s) and anti-Serbian POV. The Banner  talk 21:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib ( talk) 21:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, apologies for not reacting on time-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. DB1729 talk 04:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Loads of vandalism from ip addresses that change. Buttress Onion ( talk) 22:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

11 January 2023

Reason: Repeated vandalism and anti-Semitism, see https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Zeno_of_Citium&diff=1132540498&oldid=1132538916 Red Phoenician ( talk) 23:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There is only a single user involved here; protection isn't appropriate. I haven't the time needed to investigate a block. Vanamonde ( Talk) 20:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued re-addition of uncited material in violation of WP:VERIFY and WP:BURDEN. Onel5969 TT me 13:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: An IP-hopping individual from the Netherlands appears deadset on including unsubstantiated (and refuted) content regarding a stunt performer & actor to this page. BOTTO ( TC) 14:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term persistent disruption over many months from similar IPs. Iskandar323 ( talk) 18:09, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Four different IPs (43.229.88.175, 43.241.192.189, 103.240.205.83 and 43.241.192.211) keep making the same disruptive edit over and over again without any justification for their changes and despite having been told to stop. A look at their contribution pages strongly suggest that it is the same person using different IPs. I've already reported this problem before and the page was protected for 2 weeks, but as soon as the protection was over, the vandalism resumed. I'm therefore requesting a longer protection for the page. Thanks in advance. Johnn Francis ( talk) 23:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam ( talk) 00:51, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism on highly-used shortcut. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 ( talk) 23:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [ ] 23:14, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent deletion of the section of lgbtq in the capital 2603:300C:204:9D00:D4D6:92B6:A324:5196 ( talk) 23:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Isabelle Belato. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary frenzy regarding his alleged acting skills. Can it have a break please?. DBaK ( talk) 23:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 01:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (aptly enough). elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 04:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Technically non-autoconfirmed users aren't allowed to edit this topic anyway. It's true however that this may become irrelevant in some time. Volunteer Marek 05:07, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The confirmed sock edited some days ago; the account you are currently in dispute with is not a confirmed sock. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by confirmed sockpuppets Reiner Gavriel ( talk) 00:47, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since we have four different requests for the same set of socks, let me elaborate on why I have declined them all. 1) At least some of the accounts reported for socking were not found to be socks. 2) We have constructive edits by IPs during the same period. 3) For most of these articles, we have two socks in ~2 months; this would be borderline for protection in any case. 4) The socks were all autoconfirmed, meaning we would need EC-protection to have stopped them; and that requires a greater threshold of disruption to be met. Vanamonde ( Talk) 05:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm going to be honest: I was wrong requesting looser edit protection for this article. In less than two weeks it has attracted a lot of IP and newly established editors wanting to add inappropriate material, very few that have actually anything constructive to contribute. Please make this an semi edit protection again; IPs and newly established editors can always use the talk page to request changes to be made. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was worth a try. Lectonar ( talk) 08:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP trying to change what the sourced material says through edit-warring. -. LouisAragon ( talk) 07:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant trolling. Semi-protecting for a month or two might help. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots05:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 06:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 08:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Waqar 💬 08:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Callanecc, thank you! Waqar 💬 09:35, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs making the same fictitious change, contradicting the cited ref. David Biddulph ( talk) 10:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 10:40, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs ( talk) 12:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 13:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Disruption, unsourced material — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 12:56, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 13:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing vandalism, most recently in December 2022 but it also happened earlier. I had applied and received protection for this page earlier but only for a short time span. Can we please protect this page from non-confirmed editors indefinitely? It's quite time consuming to keep protecting this page from vandalism. EMsmile ( talk) 12:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ EMsmile: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see sufficient vandal edits to justify protection at the moment, and certainly not for indefinite semi-protection. SmartSE ( talk) 13:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA ip-farm (See: User talk:The Banner/Archives/2023/January#Greek airport vandal (investigation running). The Banner  talk 12:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I'll take a look at your notes and see if there's something better I can do. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:57, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Waqar 💬 14:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection. 24february2022 ( talk) 13:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined@ 24february2022: Please read Wikipedia:Protection policy before making any further protection requests. Favonian ( talk) 13:23, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. See User talk:Tezateza and article talk page. Selfstudier ( talk) 13:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - I can't see how this page falls within the scope of the Israel-Palestine conflict, as the material is about a controversy involving antisemitism generally and Palestine does not seem to be mentioned at all. Consider the edit warring noticeboard if the conflict cannot be resolved through discussion with the new user. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
WP:A/I/PIA refers to the Arab Israeli conflict in general, "broadly construed", not just Israel and Palestine. ("the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces") The edit notice says the article partially relates to AI conflict. Note there is material concerning the Israel Lebanon war as well as the Gaza report. The editor already refused to participate in discussion. These single purpose, low edit count, new accounts are typical for the AI area. Anyway never mind, I can see that you do not want (or cannot) protect the article "partially" so I will deal with it another way. Selfstudier ( talk) 15:27, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
You're right, my (ancient) reading of the Arbcom decision was that the scope was specifically Israel and Palestine, but it seems to have been expanded to include all Arab-Jewish conflict worldwide. But you're also right that I can't protect part of an article, and I'm not keen to protect an entire article on an American human rights activist under the scope of these particular sanctions, as I'd be protecting a lot of material that's clearly out of scope. The sanction says that you are free to revert to enforce the ECP requirement without regard to 3RR, although it's not really a good idea to lean on that freedom too much. However, if the editor continues to be evidently only here to right great wrongs, you could ask that they be blocked. WP:ANI or WP:ANEW would be appropriate for that, depending on the circumstances. I'll also watchlist the article. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 18:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Waqar 💬 14:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - the vandalizing users have been blocked, and there are several administrators already watching the article, so protection doesn't seem to be necessary at this time. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:19, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MetalDiablo666, using IPs in and around El Segundo, California. Binksternet ( talk) 17:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism by non-logged in user. User has changed the track listing for this Riverdale TV show episode to the track listing for the album Nickelodeon Celebration Parade 2005. 24.143.190.162 ( talk) 15:17, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. If they show up on another IP range, ping me and I'll block that one too. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Non-logged in user is vandalising this page in the same way as they have repeatedly vandalised the "Chapter Thirty-One: A Night to Remember" page. 24.143.190.162 ( talk) 15:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. See above. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 15:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Please protect it until at least a few days after the holiday, which is January 22 this year.

Near the holiday this page is repeatedly modified by people who have strong opinions about The One True meaning, name, customs of the holiday. But the holiday is celebrated in many different places, with different overlapping meanings, names, and customs.

It seems to happen every year. M.boli ( talk) 16:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The main article at Graham Hancock has been semi-protected for years, but following press coverage we've seen an uptick in disruptive IP edits to related pages:

So requesting semi-protection for those. –  Joe ( talk) 16:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

All semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the pages will be automatically unprotected. Joe Roe, if this starts up again after protection expires I'd argue that this sort of editing is overt vandalism and falls under the exemption clause of WP:INVOLVED, but if you're worried about blowback feel free to ping me and I'll protect for longer. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediate return of vandalism from globally locked User:Dealer07 using IPs from Greece. Binksternet ( talk) 17:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Favonian ( talk) 19:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 18:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP keeps going against consensus reached at related RFC, held in Dec 2022. GoodDay ( talk) 17:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP continues to go against a related RFC result. -- GoodDay ( talk) 17:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Previous category removal vandalism which caused protection has resumed anew. Nate ( chatter) 18:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 20:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent WP:NOTAFORUM violations. SunilNevlaFan 16:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - talk pages can only reasonably be protected for a few hours at a time, perhaps a day at the very most, and the inappropriate messages are so infrequent that it wouldn't make a difference. I have added an editnotice to the page, hopefully that will help. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Two more articles being targeted by LTA IPs from Tunisia- just like MBC 4, List of programmes broadcast by MBC 4, and Women's interest channel (all of which have already been protected). Magitroopa ( talk) 17:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 and 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long-term abuse. 45.152.124.99 ( talk) 21:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection: Long-term abuse. 45.152.125.111 ( talk) 21:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:14, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent repeated vandalism - same change by multiple IPs. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 22:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

12 January 2023

Reason: Mobile editor going against related-RFC result. GoodDay ( talk) 18:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting removal of creation protection for a draft move to take place. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 16:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting removal of creation protection for a draft move to take place. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 17:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:53, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 00:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ FMSky: I see the problem but we need to escalate. Let me know if more needed later. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs with repetitive disruptive edits. Archer1234 ( t· c) 01:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Harassing IP. - FlightTime ( open channel) 01:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And another admin blocked the latest IP. Johnuniq ( talk) 01:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP blanking and vandalism. I think semi-protection for 24-48 hours would be prudent. Professor Penguino ( talk) 02:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Bagasirma ( talk · contribs) blocked by Zsinj. Protection doesn't seem needed. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism, infobox damaged. I was forced to use Twinkle to revert to the last stable revision. Professor Penguino ( talk) 02:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: I protected this, despite being a contributor to this page, per WP:IAR, given the slow response times here. This is on the main page, and the vandalism rate is high. I welcome review by any other admin here. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done: I'm happy to endorse this protection Vanamonde93. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. RolandR ( talk) 02:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I would consider full protection, but I suspect nobody wants that; talk it out, please. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized a bunch again after the latest (1-year) protection expired. With the kinds of atrocities this man is committing, which are only escalating (see 2021–2023 Myanmar civil war), I don't see any clear end in sight to the disruption that is going to come to the page. It is time for indefinite. 25stargeneral ( talk) 02:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected Protected indefinitely; enough is enough. A prominent enough figure that we shouldn't have obvious vandalism on his page for any length of time. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Higher level of vandalism on a BLP. 159.196.100.171 ( talk) 04:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel ( talk) 05:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been getting intermittent disruptive editing since the start of the invasion. HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith ( talk) 05:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and changing agreed information based on petty biases. Itsahardknocklife ( talk) 05:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. (CC)  Tbhotch 04:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: More vandalism. Indefinite protection per WP:ARBCOVID. Either indef semi or indef ECP. 110.150.88.223 ( talk) 06:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptions. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 06:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 07:32, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page was inundated with scammers attempting to steal cryptocurrency donations. It promoted a significant amount of spam, as well as at least six external links, all of which led to GitHub repositories asking for donations. All future edits must be discussed on the talk page, so the page must be protected. 38.25.15.67 ( talk) 03:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: The number of edits probably isn't enough to justify protection but given what's being added I believe that it's problematic enough to warrant protection - probably pending changes but I'd like a second opinion. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's a tough call but I hate the idea of leaving the article wide open for future scammers and I am unable to monitor the article forever so I support indefinite pending changes (or two years if indefinite bends a rule somewhere, or long term semi-protection). Johnuniq ( talk) 07:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Almost a textbook case for pending-changes protection, imho. 6 months for starters, and I have watchlisted. More eyes on the article might be helpful. Lectonar ( talk) 09:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Disruptive persistent editing by ip against guidance/consensus over a month. Suggest two months. Cinderella157 ( talk) 09:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous one-year protection expired just two months ago. We're in for the long haul. Favonian ( talk) 10:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and WP:CRYSTAL violations about whether he's going to change teams. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 10:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack ( talk) 11:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP addresses keep on using old poster despite a new poster has been released. Centcom08 ( talk) 13:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is there a need to use the newest poster? Is this laid down somewhere in the Manual of Style? This is a disagreement, but not necessarily something which should be solved via page-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 13:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wikipedia:Communication is required. This is a content dispute with experienced editors using revert warring to enforce an opinion instead of discussing the change. The page is full-protected and I have removed the image, pending a discussion that I will start momentarily to determine which poster should be used. If the image is restored against consensus I will start using the block button instead. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. — Mx. Granger ( talk · contribs) 14:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Thunivu Received positive review among critics and public 61.3.226.244 ( talk) 10:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not doneAlready, correctly, brought up at the article talk page. Favonian ( talk) 10:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The level of IP editing and number of unsourced or mistaken edits has reached the the level of disruption. NB I'm involved. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 09:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - one good-faith but malformed edit does not a pattern of disruptive editing make. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 13:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Averyfunkydude23 ( talk) 13:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., I'm not obviously seeing a "high level of IP vandalism", can you supply specific diffs and explain how they relate to WP:VANDALISM? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I request you to reduce protection on Varisu page so that general public users can easily contribute since users Theoder2055 and BangaloreNorth are spreading negativity about the film in the name of reviews based on personal hatred against Vijay eventhough the film reviews are mostly positive from critics and audience. 58.8.255.121 ( talk) 12:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This is a very good argument if you want your request rejected out of hand, especially as the matter is being discussed on the talk page. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 12:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined Discussion to be continued on the appropriate talk-page. Lectonar ( talk) 13:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of content by IPs. Netherzone ( talk) 14:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Will watch the page in case they start up again from a different connection. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there are no vandalism on this page since and now have reliable sources on this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.226.163.84 ( talk) 17:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Protection does tend to prevent unwanted activity, be it vandalism or advertisement. At any rate, this article has way too long a history of such disruption, not to mention sock-puppetry, for protection to be lifted. Should it be possible for someone to create a draft living up to Wikipedia's standards with regard to notability etc., it should be submitted through Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Favonian ( talk) 17:45, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Favonian Hey, This page is also have in other languages, can it be create directly ? 117.227.108.205 ( talk) 18:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No! Favonian ( talk) 18:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Favonian Ok, If it is created by reliable sources then it be created directly ? 117.227.108.205 ( talk) 18:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Block evasion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blogs19/Archive. Favonian ( talk) 18:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because no vandalism since long and have pages in other languages. 117.227.108.205 ( talk) 18:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Article is not, and never has been, protected. What a gratifying amount of attention this noticeboard receives from Jadabpur today. Favonian ( talk) 18:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Block evasion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blogs19/Archive. Favonian ( talk) 18:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Please semi protect. Anonymous editors keep making disruptive edits and adding unnecessary spacing. Jdavi333 ( talk) 16:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is (why I don't know) a BLP/vandal magnet, Just asking for semi or pending changes. - FlightTime ( open channel) 16:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism is persistent but not of high frequency; let's try PC protection, and re-evaluate if the rate ticks up. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP on the rampage. Given the topic, another year of semi-protection is likely in order. Bon courage ( talk) 17:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected Protected indefinitely given the protection history, but Bon courage, please report the user to AIV if they repeat their disruption after their last warning. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 17:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Appeared to be a good-faith dispute, but given the user talk discussion IP appears to be unwilling to engage, and some IP-hopping is occurring. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Vanamonde93. Favonian ( talk) 18:43, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: BLP issues; IPs and newly registered editors have been changing the forward's active team despite the lack of evidence that he has been signed by anyone other than Leeds. Suggest protecting until a reliable source reports that he has indeed been signed by Wigan or anyone else.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of persistent vandalism from IP editors ARose Wolf 20:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No constructive edits by new users and IPs for the past >month. –  dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 20:46, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Sdrqaz ( talk) 20:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism pushing Serbian POV. Pelmeen10 ( talk) 15:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not vandalism; how to present the content from the IHF website is a matter of judgement. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring (see page history and my last edit summary). GizzyCatBella 🍁 16:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Bit of a stretch for the ARBCOM EC restriction; and in any case this is a single user, best handled by blocking if the behavior persists. Warn them, please; I see no evidence that any attempt has been made to communicate with them. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite administrator only move protection: Pages subject to a page-name dispute. Per WP:MOVP. – Treetoes023 ( talk) 16:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I see no evidence of disruptive page moves. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page has been protected for 10 months. The user who was edit warring on the page has been blocked. No reason to keep it protected. DarrellWinkler ( talk) 17:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. The protection is a logged arbitration enforcement, not to be easily lifted. I notice that you have already been informed about these matters on your talk page. Favonian ( talk) 17:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

13 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 18:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 19:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. The Banner  talk 19:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals are at this page already, it's high profile and an evolving event. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 22:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 22:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP vandalism Marcelus ( talk) 17:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This isn't vandalism: see WP:NOTVAND. However, there may be issues with sourcing. Marcelus, please warn the IP appropriately about needing to support their edits with reliable sources, report them to AIV if the behavior continues, and list the page here if it continues with multiple IPs. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It’s okay Vanamonde93, the IP has been blocked. No need for a page protection. GizzyCatBella 🍁 22:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: On 9 January 2023, user DawnSP removed entries of two new singles released under Zhang Zhehan's name, including their references to the official lyric videos and Apple Music, on the English, Chinese and Japanese versions of his Wikipedia page. The note user DawnSP has written for their edit said "controversial content(there's no proof that the two newly released singles were recorded by Zhang Zhehan)", is introducing a conspiracy theory suggesting songs released officially on music platforms under the artist name "Zhang Zhehan" are not by Zhang himself. Hence, this song removal edit is inappropriate to do on Wikipedia. I have since restored the entries of his new singles on the English version. Previously in 2022, there had been many single purpose accounts who edited Zhang's Wikipedia page, which prompted the page to be protected until 30 December 2022. Since the lifting of the protection on his page, it is evident that single purpose accounts are returning to remove new updates about Zhang. I hereby request protection of Zhang Zhehan's Wikipedia page to prevent future vandalism from occurring. Durianpizza1991 ( talk) 00:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Just because the other three Avengers films are protected 2806:109F:13:6F8C:5D99:24C0:8E9A:EC19 ( talk) 02:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

So, I'm not going to this. As a general rule, we want articles to be open for anyone to edit. We do restrict editing on articles when there is a lot a vandalism being done to them, or if so many bad edits are being made that we need to monitor them before they go live, but at least for now, this article is not having these problems. If you notice that problems pop up, just list it here again. I'm going to add an official declined notice so the archiving bot will remove this entry. Cheers. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: regular attempts to add unreferenced content about the race of the perpetrators from IP addresses. CT55555( talk) 23:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Some IP & new user keeps adding false info & photo. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 01:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 08:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – News broke that he was facing a felony charge, and some IPs are committing some BLP violations. Why? I Ask ( talk) 03:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing, vandalism RowanJ LP ( talk) 02:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to parent's recent death. Noahpeaslee11 ( talk) 05:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Different IP addresses are being used to add false information in article. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo fele. 09:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – See also the delete log. BangJan1999 01:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:40, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruption (in violation of WP:COI and WP:PROMO) from multiple, connected IP addresses. Novemberjazz 03:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Highly controversial political incident involving a living person; article has already seen repeated vandalism. DecafPotato ( talk) 03:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The overall proportion of edits that are vandalism seems low right now. I think the downsides of semi-protection would exceed the benefits right now. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP Filipino game player (LGBT community). Article, created past September, suffers persistent vandalism. Alexcalamaro ( talk) 07:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:EthanGaming0467. Binksternet ( talk) 07:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Regular IP vandalism Toofllab ( talk) 05:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 11:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing made by another user while correcting outdated brand page. This fast fashion brand is in the media lately and as media is quoting Wikipedia, the public is getting misled that the brand is still under LVMH when they are in fact not. I tried to update information of the actual group they are under with references but it keeps getting removed. It is not known when LVMH dropped them, but the year the other group took over will be crucial information, which is why I am citing them in the references. The other user seems to want to hide all that new information and just keep adding fluff like listing all the 37 countries the stores are located. Requesting page to be protected. Thank you. 2404:E801:2003:2430:792C:F613:F2EE:9CFE ( talk) 09:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for raising page protection. I had hope it will not come to this. Charles and Keith is an independent company while Valiram Group is a retailer group selling Charles and Keith products (similar to it selling other products and brands). The phrase The brand is currently under Malaysia-based retail and lifestyle group Valiram Group indicates Charles and Keith is now another brand under their group while it is not. LVMH purchased a 20% stake and subsequently their stake is sold back to the company. This is actually a content dispute and slowly becoming disruptive editing by IP editor. Thanks. Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 09:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I was the one who updated the LVMH reference. You can choose to paraphase if you are so offended by the particular statement. I am just pointing out they are no longer affiliated to LVMH as they have been portraying and in fact now under Valiram. That is the truth. Why are you hiding the facts that they also listed fast fashion, specializes in selling footwear? That is disruptive editing.
This is not the venue for content dispute. I had updated the buyback by the Wongs here but you had insisted on adding Valiram Group which simply sells C&K products. C&K is not under Valiram Group's management, unless as the other editor had said here that it is not owned by valiram. going by this logic, coach, michael kors, versace, victoria secret, bvlgari are also owned by valiram? which you agreed to here listing the group they are under is important and Noone is saying Valiram owns them, hence the word under but C&K is simply not under them at all. This is a case of righting great wrongs but introducing the wrongs here. Casting aspersions and outright lying is rather unacceptable here also. -- Justanothersgwikieditor ( talk) 10:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar ( talk) 10:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: high level of IP vandalism on this article.miscerants using local offensive language pls permanently disable edits on this article Corrector1786 ( talk) 11:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 11:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 13:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Still continuing. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of vandalism by IP editors to this bio of living person. Geoff | Who, me? 13:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Escalating from previous protections. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Controversial topic ( Black Lives Matter), recently in the news, and IPs doing this [14] [15] starship .paint ( exalt) 14:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long-term problems with attempts by software development companies adding linkspam of one sort or another. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 13:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recreation of recently deleted article, by COI editors. Needs to go through AfC. Onel5969 TT me 15:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator DMacks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing / vandalism from a lot of IP editors based on the fact this NFL player is in the news. Lots of discussion regarding who he'll play for and if he'll be released. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary Semi-Protection: Evidently being targeted for meatpuppetry. Generalrelative ( talk) 17:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Given the blatant trolling and vandalism, support. Slatersteven ( talk) 17:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that's enough time for it to die down. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lettler hellocontribs 17:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent attempts by mostly IPs to add "glubby" as a common name, despite not being able to find reliable sources that use that name and no activity on the talk page. Trikekus (:3) 23:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined per Jamie but come back if necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 20:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: See talk page. An IP user, presumably the same person with a very narrow range of interests, has repeatedly added the prefix "Sir" before the subject's name, despite an explanation note saying this is not true, and an open invitation to discuss on the talk page. The user has been repeatedly active in recent days. There was pending changes before, but I've seen pages indefinitely protected for less sockpuppetry than this one. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 14:03, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring to add that she is transgender to the lead, WP:BLP. Two IP blocks could also potentially be effective, this appears to be one editor adding the same content. GorillaWarfare (she/her •  talk) 20:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. From someone who is likely an IP-hopper. — 3PPYB6 ( T / C / L)20:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Also from that same IP-hopper. — 3PPYB6 ( T / C / L)20:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I don't know what the policy is, but can I like, mass-request protection for these pages? All of them are persistently being vandalized with a "Turning Red sucks" kind of an edit summary: Talk:James Hong, Talk:Ludwig Göransson, Talk:Sandra Oh, Talk:Rosalie Chiang, Talk:Julia Cho, Talk:Domee Shi, and the previous two requests I made. Thanks.3PPYB6 ( T / C / L)20:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's an LTA so I think that's fair. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done, by various admins for various duration-- Ymblanter ( talk) 20:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent trolling. One of several that need to be safeguarded. $chnauzer 20:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle. Favonian ( talk) 20:42, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism JoshuaInWiki ( talk) 15:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Lemonaka ( talk) 17:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:27, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP vandalism. ManaliJain ( talk) 18:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive edits by multiple IPs. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 16:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined pending changes was enabled yesterday and there have only been three reverted edits since then. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Around 14 edits in the past couple days, but the page has since been protected by another admin. Thanks! ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 18:58, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is seeing persistent IP/new user disruptive editing to remove material. Iskandar323 ( talk) 19:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.
Donald Albury 19:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Graham Hancock is not a pseudoscientific and does promote pseudoscientific. He is a journalist. Moderators with an agenda should not be able to label or stigmatize anyone and by by labeling a "pseudoscientific" is wrong. Graham Hancock is a British writer/journalist who writes and discusses theories involving ancient civilizations and lost lands. 204.141.132.10 ( talk) 19:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • does promote pseudoscientific views
204.141.132.10 ( talk) 19:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 19:11, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

14 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Seems like a bunch of ips are being used as proxies to spam Tamzin's user talk page. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 20:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

They are admin and active right now, I hope they can take care of this. Ymblanter ( talk) 20:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I always prefer that pages in my userspace not be semi'd, but if it reaches the point where it's a drain on anti-vandalism resources, I have no objection to a brief semi. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., just in case Ymblanter ( talk) 20:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ymblanter: it looks like the vandal has moved to accounts. Possibly an LTA? — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 20:50, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already globally locked Ymblanter ( talk) 21:06, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Seem that semi is ineffective. Should probably be upgraded to ecp. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page Target of a unnamed LTA. Airtransat236 ( talk | contribs) 23:18, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper repeatedly overwriting redirect with unsourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done. I've also blocked part of the range that has been editing disruptively this and other articles. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Recreated as spam pages by multiple IPs, but page name in itself isn't invalid. BangJan1999 00:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of violent and sexual content to this article by IP editors. I have reported the most recent IP editor to ARV but similar text was added earlier in the month from a different IP, so also requesting page protection. Tacyarg ( talk) 02:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Anwegmann ( talk) 02:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Professor Penguino ( talk) 22:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It looks like this was the featured daily article yesterday. The vandalism has subsided now that it's not the daily article. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 01:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Nate ( chatter) 23:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 04:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent unsourced additions by IPs Loopy30 ( talk) 23:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Repeated misuse of edit request feature. BangJan1999 00:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looking at the history doesn't seem like there is enough disruption to need protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 04:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated redirect overwrites with unsourced content; same IP group as with other redirects like Derana TV and Mobitel (Sri Lanka). Jalen Folf (talk) 05:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Normally this wouldn't be enough activity to justify by itself but when considered in combination with the disruption on the other redirects it's justified. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. HeartCat1 talk ctrbs 06:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Leading figure in 2022 Brazilian election (and target of conspiracy theories), controversial figure, page has already been vandalized. Paris1127 ( talk) 06:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'd normally go shorter but given the nature of the editing and article I've gone for a month. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been vandalised several times in the last few days. John of Reading ( talk) 09:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit-warring and disruptive edits from most likely one editor via a couple of different IPs. Warnings given on IP talk pages and through edit summaries already, but it continues. R Prazeres ( talk) 09:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Linter errors on the user page, 1 obsolete font tag + 1 tidy font link bug. User talk page is currently full protected so I had to post the request here.

One replacement only; <font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> --> [[User talk:Graham87|<span style="color:green;">87</span>]]. Sheep ( talkhe/him) 00:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Done; thank you. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... For the bot. Favonian ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Linter errors on the user talk page, 3 obsolete font tags + 1 tidy font link bug reported; there are actually five obsolete font tags.

Replacements:

  1. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]] '''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) --> ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</span>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]] '''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</span>]])
  2. <font color="green">[[User talk:Graham87|87]]</font> --> [[User talk:Graham87|<span style="color:green;">87</span>]] Sheep ( talkhe/him) 00:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC
 Done; thank you. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... For the bot. Favonian ( talk) 09:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would be incredibly helpful to have page protection on this page, largely due to the nature of the events which took place. This page occasionally attracts vandals (mostly IPs), so I think PP would be helpful here to let editors get on "with the important stuff"...!. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 06:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pages are also not protected preemptively. Pending changes could be considered but I don't think it'll actually help on this article due to the one-off nature and content of the disruptive editing. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Continual edit warring. There is a discussion on the talk page, but the protagonists seem to have given up on that and have, despite my efforts, continued to edit war. Full protection would force them to use the talk page. Phil Bridger ( talk) 09:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 10:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Disruptive and unsourced edit again and again. Yuugone ( talk) 07:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:40, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Another IP is added the same content [16]. Yuugone ( talk) 11:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated daily unsourced edits, mostly concerning his height. Zamekrizeni ( talk) 12:33, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is a constant vandal target for IPs. Valenciano ( talk) 14:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Donald Albury 15:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Anonymous user(s) has been changing the track listing for this 14-year-old album without any provided sources. Googling their changes comes up with nothing. Warned user a few days ago, but the edits continued. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:47, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Donald Albury 15:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Peter181 ( talk) 11:47, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page has been heavily been vandalised with unsourced claims. Loibird90 ( talk) 12:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. HeartCat1 talk ctrbs 16:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I need to upload a personal image to my page. Previously, my wikipedia profile had a picture of someone else. I was alerted to this mistake by several people. I requested Wikipedia to change it. I see now that the wrong picture has been removed. I would like to add my portrait to my page, but I have not been allowed to make this addition via the Edit Source -> Visual tab. Please help. Maha A. Maamoun ( talk) 11:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia does not allow deep linking to other websites; you need to upload it to Wikimedia Commons first under an appropriate content licence assuming you hold the copyright to the image. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done per above. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 12:37, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper repeatedly making an unsourced change. Protect or, possibly, range block. Dhtwiki ( talk) 13:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Range blocked by Materialscientist for 31 hours. No new activity since then. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Comment: 87.196.73.57 made the same disruptive edit at 14:11, which I recently reverted. Dhtwiki ( talk) 17:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Block-evading IP blocked as well. Favonian ( talk) 18:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of vanity article. Onel5969 TT me 14:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:28, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: in 1962 Nelson Mandela arrives in Morocco and not algeria on his clandestine trip for military training and to get support for the armed struggle 196.119.34.200 ( talk) 15:11, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 15:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spam ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Continued undiscussed moves. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 19:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done for 4 days. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps adding unsourced content after being warned in edit summaries and talk page. Mike  Allen 17:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 86.125.62.114 ( talk · contribs) blocked by Donald Albury. - Donald Albury 18:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
They are back at it under another IP. Mike  Allen 20:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Donald Albury 20:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Talk page of an editor who has not edited since 2007 that has been vandalised multiple times today by an IP-hopping banned editor. -- Ferien ( talk) 20:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Primefac. Favonian ( talk) 20:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Donald Albury 20:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Media speculation about a trade has fans trying to change the player's club, plus some random straightup vandalism thrown in. Schazjmd  (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian ( talk) 20:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

15 January 2023

Temporary extended protection: Sockpuppetry. Semi- is ineffective as the LTA just comes back on autoconfirmed accounts ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Barkeep49. I would request no one ECP the page except as an absolute last resort, as I feel ECPs of admins' talk pages run counter to accountability (not meant as a criticism of all cases where they occur; sometimes it's the least bad option). Thank you. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 22:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent disruption (and also copyvios) by proxy IPs ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 22:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 23:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 23:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: That's 7 reverts so far today, of edits accusing this referee of being biased in favour of one sports team. I'm not a football fan, but I'm guessing someone just lost a match! DFlhb ( talk) 22:00, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism resulting from TFA appearance. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Should be create protected - repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 22:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 00:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Not much else constructive coming from IPs on this page, many are socks, or are causing disruption. Socking resumed within hours of last time protection expired. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 00:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:09, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Persistent socking and disruption by socks of User:Jellywings19 and others. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:50, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Socking resumed within 48 hours of last protection expiring. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism from IP Users after throwing three interceptions in the first half of the Chargers-Jags playoff game lol. Swagging ( talk) 02:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Socking resumed less than 48 hours after protection last expired, needs long term protection due to socking by banned user Jellywings19 Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 23:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 23:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Not much constructive coming from IPs on this page, many are socks, or are causing disruption. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Socking resumed within 48 hours of last time protection expired. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Long term problems with persistent sockpuppetry on this article by Jellywings19 socks. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 02:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A plethora of IPs keep adding improperly sourced information about Barr's personal life sourced from social media, including depression and the end of a relationship. Its overly personal and not relevant. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk)23:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 00:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Loads of good faith edits. Also lots of unsourced edits as well. Bbraxtonlee ( talk) 23:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:58, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky ( talk) 05:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – target of trolling. protect main page too. $chnauzer 05:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This show has attracted a lot of negative attention online, which brings the inevitable vandalism to the article. JDDJS ( talk to mesee what I've done) 23:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

It's not the NFL Playoffs without having vandalism on NFL related pages lol. Swagging ( talk) 02:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass trolling on this and the main page. $chnauzer 05:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uncited changes. Nswix ( talk) 03:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs/new users adding unsourced info consistently. Ab207 ( talk) 04:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – mass trolling target. protect this and the main page, please. $chnauzer 05:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – mass troll target. $chnauzer 05:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent removal of cited content and edit warring by multiple IPs. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 05:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: LTA abuse SunilNevlaFan 05:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:05, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – troll target. $chnauzer 06:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 06:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – troll target. $chnauzer 06:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Similar edit as blocked sockpuppets with different IPs. Yuugone ( talk) 07:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There have been multiple disruptive edits in the past days to the article made by IP users, like removing big amount of content or adding various technical data to the article without providing any reliable sources for these changes. BlackFlanker ( talk) 22:34, 14 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't appear to have been disruptively edited in three days. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of unnecessary fan editing from anonymous users. Aniruddh 05:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:06, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. Sjö ( talk) 10:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 10:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent unsourced material by multiple editors. CastJared ( talk) 08:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 11:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Nonsense edits and edit summaries by IP hopper. Jalen Folf (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 11:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent edit-warring; non-logged-in users keep removing sourced content and replacing it with unsourced Lost Cause myths about Union war crimes. Tulzscha ( talk) 12:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 13:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need to change the protection to reviewing edits by new users. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: Kailash29792 The article has been semi-protected since Christmas. Are you requesting that we lower the protection to pending changes? The high frequency of editing, which will only increase with a lowered level of protection, speaks against it. Favonian ( talk) 10:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
No, and this request may be declined. Because what I sought, to change the protection level to what it's like in Chennai Express, isn't possible here. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
DeclinedFavonian ( talk) 11:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: It contains erroneous subjective opinions and blatant personal misrepresentations. It reflects very badly on the objectivity and validity of information presented by Wikipedia. 2603:900B:308:940A:F013:CA94:9A31:AA8F ( talk) 08:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 10:42, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: this page has been actively monitored for over two years, with no signs of vandalism or rash article creation. I want to ask that this page gets decreased in page protection. GenesisGSE ( talk) 09:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Clearly, you are referring to the article, which is create-protected, rather than the unprotected draft, so I've changed the request accordingly. Earlier today, you submitted the draft through AFC, where it was rejected. The draft was then deleted, following your own request. Now you want to create it in main space? Sorry, but that looks like an attempt pull a fast one. Favonian ( talk) 10:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spam by IP hopper. Just blocked as 79.177.114.23 and quickly came back as 154.121.41.240. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 13:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done for 2 days and new IP blocked for spam. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky ( talk) 16:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:32, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi was needed in 2015 for BLP issues created by a list of station personalities that became a magnet for grievances about pledge drives. Special:Diff/861475968 removed this section in 2018, and semi is not necessary. The protecting admin, FreeRangeFrog, has not been active since August 2015. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 16:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

UnprotectedFavonian ( talk) 16:28, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive editing dating back to December 12, 2022. Poodle23 ( talk) 15:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I wouldn’t call it persistent, but there have been a couple instances. Think this request was from a newer user not really understanding the process. United States Man ( talk) 15:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian ( talk) 16:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 ( talk) 18:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I second this. Several new SPAs have appeared and are adding nonsense templates and legal threats (in Italian, for some reason) to the article as well as the talk page. MrOllie ( talk) 19:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Needs semi-protection. A swarm of newly-created accounts are deleting sourced content, and repeatedly tagging for speedy deletion. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 20:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 21:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sudden mass of IP joke/fantasy edits - Arjayay ( talk) Arjayay ( talk) 20:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 20:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism over and over by sockpuppets of banned user Αθλητικά, constantly changing erroneously the tiebreaker criteria over and over such as here and here. The page 2022–23 Super League Greece was extended protected for the same reason, I will ask for extended protection again. Tranquill Komnin ( talk) 11:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 18:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent attempts by an IP to promote this concept as a serious one, and to remove sourced content showing that it is widely regarded as pseudoscience. GrindtXX ( talk) 21:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: As predicted, high levels of vandalism for a NFL team following a playoff loss. Words in the Wind( talk) 22:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

"High levels" is a bit of an exaggeration, Words in the Wind. 🙂 There has been one single actual attempt to vandalize the page today. The rest was caused by well-meaning editors who didn't actually undo the edit. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hah this is true, I didn't review all the in-between edits. Thank you nonetheless for the page protection. Words in the Wind( talk) 22:19, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:13, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

16 January 2023

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A controversial subject. A number of instances of vandalism from IP users have had to be reverted over the past few days, as well as unsourced additions of content. - GA Melbourne ( talk) 22:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Numerous temporary protections have failed to curb disruption, which has also increased following the subject's recent death. Complex/ Rational 01:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Endless disruption from IP accounts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 01:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC)  Tbhotch 02:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 02:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 02:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent dynamic IP vandalism. – Meena13:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 17:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent DE on TFA. Curbon7 ( talk) 22:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined No longer on the main page and not a high-traffic article. Will reconsider if disruptive editing continues following its TFA run. Complex/ Rational 01:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – sockpuppets' target. Lemonaka ( talk) 18:44, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Johnuniq ( talk) 06:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Also Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) and Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Please semiprotect due to long-term disruptive editing by a previously blocked dynamic IP in Chile (whack-a-mole): 201.188.152.4 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS); 201.188.147.99 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS); 191.113.207.80 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS);

Now editing again (and being reverted) as 191.113.207.225 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS). Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 20:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ Esowteric: I protected Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore for a long period as it has been similarly protected before and you have explained some issues on article talk. Please try to engage the IP on the other talk pages. If needed, post again with examples of WP:VAND. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:BLP violations based on confusion--an athlete with the same name has been arrested for murder. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 03:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users keep editing the capacity of the stadium with the wrong numbers. The capacity is at 20,000 but people keep changing it to other numbers. User:Yellow alligator 23:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – please make the protection longer. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 00:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 03:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. Anwegmann ( talk) 04:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Issues with persistent addition of unsourced, or poorly sourced content from bouncing IPs and new users. PigeonChickenFish ( talk) 06:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High Level of vandalism due to political differences. Please add this ip to white list only. Puritha ( talk) 03:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done It's not possible to allow an IP to edit through protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated posting of false draftification messages by IP editor. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 06:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Moderate level of IP vandalism - this person's job is under threat as it is, and if Chelsea do decide to pull the trigger (with Chelsea being Chelsea), there's a good chance vandalism will only increase? PeachyBum07 ( talk) 06:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing and IP vandalism RowanJ LP ( talk) 06:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. As with many current events, disruption can't be avoided; on the other hand, many IP edits are constructive. The article is well watched to boot. Lectonar ( talk) 09:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The decision was made in the AfD to salt this, but it appears it was not put in place. Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 10:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected Lectonar ( talk) 12:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I would like to request a decrease in page protection so that any editor can help make edits to this draft and so it can be moved if deemed necessary. This article was protected a long time ago enough time has passed for there to be no issues with IP edits or moves to the main space.

Furthermore, I would like to continue working on this draft and I believe we owe this article another go instead of giving up on it. GenesisGSE ( talk) 10:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined The draft isn't protected, the article is. When the draft has been accepted after being submitted for review, the article can be unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 12:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persisting IP disruption to add unsourced material. Iskandar323 ( talk) 07:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be once again attracting silliness and throwaway accounts. Is PC a good way of getting the article a break from this, please?. DBaK ( talk) 09:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of petty vandalism as he's currently in the news. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 15:26, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – For the last one year, the page has been repeatedly disrupted by IP users who are replacing the sourced content with unsourced details. The pages like this one are targeted by dedicated WP:SPAs who spend their whole day disrupting this project. So it needs a long-term semi-protection. NitinMlk ( talk) 19:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. It's strange that such a short article would attract so much anonymous IP disruption over its history. While the rate of disruption is slow, it's long-term. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 19:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

"False News provider of the year" (Jada Derana). Delete Puritha ( talk) 03:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 16:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The filer had already removed the offending text themselves anyhow. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 16:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Too many people cause a disruptive editing in this article relating to HBO. CastJared ( talk) 07:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, another IP tried to start an edit war. CastJared ( talk) 11:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should carry us through the next episode. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page should not be moved. move=sysop (indefinite). However, all users to edit the page, per Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease#PBS Kids. Solaris5296 ( talk) 18:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Move protected. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism, I wonder what he did today to get that much unwelcome attention. Sjö ( talk) 19:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator GiantSnowman. Favonian ( talk) 21:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Critical WP:ARBIPA good article. Vandalized immediately after 1-year semi expired. 25stargeneral ( talk) 08:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:35, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: ip vandalism due to the event currently happening. Huz98 ( talk) 08:25, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should give things enough time to cool down. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attempts to keep a link on Talk:Press that leads to a spam link in a diff from another talk page's archive are coming from a series of unrelated IP addresses. Largoplazo ( talk) 21:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 21:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

17 January 2023

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there has been no vandalism on Damar Hamlin since unprotection. It seems 3 weeks was too long to protect in the first place, and given how the more notable figure was only protected once, see no reason for protection to continue here. 71.125.36.50 ( talk) 16:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The request makes no sense. Damar Hamlin and Tee Higgins are two different articles. There was significant disruptive activity from anonymous IP addresses just prior to protection. It has a week to go. If you want to change something, make an edit request on the talk page. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because this protection is almost 2 years ago because persistent editing never happened in the last 2 years. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The duration of existing protection is irrelevant. The declined edit requests on the talk page suggest that protection is still needed. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because sock puppetry is no longer active in the past 2 years. Solaris5296 ( talk) 18:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The request has a false premise, as sockpuppets editing that article as recently as 8 months ago have been blocked. Semi protection prevents their new accounts from disrupting the article. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Was protected over a decade ago due to BLP violations. Given that the subject is no longer alive, this no longer applies. Partofthemachine ( talk) 20:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected This may be a mistake just based on the subject's last name, but it has been over 12 years on a BLP protection and the subject is now deceased. Protecting admin is no longer active, so I will test out unprotection. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 23:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Muboshgu: My first thought when I saw this article title was "that's a name that just begs for drive-by vandalism." We'll see how it goes. At the very least, it would likely be a good candidate for PCP. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Anachronist, it was my first thought too, but Tits group, Tits alternative, and Tits metric seem to get by without needing protection (not to say they are un-vandalized). –  Muboshgu ( talk) 23:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rgalo10. Airtransat236 ( talk | contribs) 20:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption including WP:BLP violations about amount of children with partner. TylerBurden ( talk) 22:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper keeps adding content that failed verification and ignoring the explanation that I left on the talk page. M.Bitton ( talk) 00:17, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by troll IP; see their IP range 5.120.0.0/16, the vast majority of their edits since December 2021 have been reverted. HistoryofIran ( talk) 17:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. I dropped a range block. Want to wait, HistoryofIran, and see how that works? It's less work than semi-protection. ;) Drmies ( talk) 23:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Well, I guess I didn't think about it properly when requesting the protection. This is good, thanks. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 23:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because disruptive editing never in the last 3 weeks, plus not many protections applied so far. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This was upgraded to semi-protection from CRASHlock late last month. Also, "not many protections applied so far" only applies to the past few years. It was last protected in 2015 and put on indefinite CRASHlock at the same time (as that prot was temporary). — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected per reasoning given above. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 22:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it was protected for almost 3 quarters of a year, disruptive editing no longer active. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The protection applied here looks like a natural escalation - the last protection lasted 6 months and, clearly, issues cropped back up in short order. Note that CRASHlock was attempted first and removed in favour of the six-month prot in 2021. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected. There is no reason to go against the normal escalation practice. We'll let it expire as scheduled, and then reprotect for a longer duration if disruption resumes. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because disruptive editing was no longer active in the last 30 days. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:45, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The indef semi is an escalation from indef CRASHlock, the implication being that CRASHlock was being overwhelmed. (CRASHlock does not work on pages seeing high volumes of edits.) — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected. The escalation from PCP was applied only last month by Materialscientist. Again, please examine the edit history and protection history before making these requests, and please try to trust that administrators know what they are doing and have good reasons to escalate to indef semi from PCP. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protected for 8 years. However, move=sysop (indefinite), per Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase#PBS Kids. Solaris5296 ( talk) 18:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected. The duration of protection is irrelevant to the continued need to protect, and that need is highly evident on the talk page, which shows many declined edit requests that would have otherwise been disruptive edits to the article. However, move protection has been applied. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
OK, but you at least you have done this. Solaris5296 ( talk) ( contribs) 22:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Weird, unexplainable recent IP vandalism: altering year of birth; removing a college team he played for from the infobox; changing the years in which he played for the other college team etc. Seems like one person using several IPs with a vendetta against this player. Asking for maybe a month's protection to deter future abuse? SportsGuy789 ( talk) 18:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper disruption resumed shortly after protection expired. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 22:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See history.  //  Timothy ::  talk  23:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sario528 ( talk) 23:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. palmiped Talk 00:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The article is already salted under the title Petzone, so this title should be salted too to prevent any further evasion of the protection. (Requesting here rather than doing it myself since I'm arguably involved.). Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protected because of a single disruptive editor who is probably no longer active. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ GB fan: What say you? Do you think it's reasonable to unprotect at this time? — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 08:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
If an admin wants to unprotect the redirect to allow IPs to edit it again, I do not mind. The protection probably has not stopped any legitimate edits from happening in the last five years. ~ GB fan 09:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Partofthemachine, please take a moment to explain which steps of thought led to this request. What happened; where is the reason? How did you notice this specific protection? Is there something you'd like to change while logged out? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 12:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Occasionally I will go through logs of pages that were indefinitely protected many years ago, to see if they should be unprotected. In this case, I did not realize that said page was a redirect. Partofthemachine ( talk) 17:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected. The reasoning given is speculative and asssumed incorrectly that the title was an article rather than a redirect. @ Partofthemachine: The duration that an article has been protected is irrelevant to whether it needs to remain protected. Duration should not be the sole reason to request downgrading protection. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Last round of protection expired Dec 24, since then, multiple IP edits and newly-created accounts attempting POV edits. All of them ignore talk page warnings and do no discussion. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 17:11, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors vandalizing article. Bahooka ( talk) 22:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of content without reason by multiple anonymous users. –DMartin 01:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User:dmartin969 carrying out vandalism and an EW, reshuffling content, inserting copyrighted material without proper attribution, that is not relevant for the subject. See Talk:Southern Federal District. 78.55.133.227 ( talk) 02:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
On top: User:dmartin969 not engaging in talk page beside being pinged by two users. 78.55.133.227 ( talk) 02:08, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I have been monitoring the discussion on the talk page but haven't had anything to add. I stand by my request for protection. –DMartin 02:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator IronGargoyle. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Edited by an admin ( User:IronGargoyle) that took part in an WP:EW and then protected by that admin abusing their admin rights, leaving the page in a vandalised state that violates copyright rules of the WMF. That is bad for the reputation of the English Wikipedia as well as for the Wikimedia Foundation. Please undo. 78.55.133.227 ( talk) 02:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP appears to be making mess, with whatever he's trying to do. GoodDay ( talk) 01:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 03:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Chris G. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary Extended Confirmed Protection: Persistent Sockpuppetry — It was edit by Globally banned username Rgalo10 as he continued to block evasion. 47.21.129.98 ( talk) 05:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism and regular content deletion by 2600:1702:3560:ee0:2c58:e002:2f85:a828 Nativecrusader ( talk) 19:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 05:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 06:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because of very-long term vandalism no longer active for years. 3 years ago it was protected. 3 years is enough. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ JBW: You protected this in 2019. The phone is now obsolete, although because of that the only edits we'd be seeing from anonymous IP editors and unconfirmed accounts are likely to be disruptive. What do you think? ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Unprotected @ Solaris5296 and Anachronist: I think that after 3 years we can afford to give this another try. JBW ( talk) 23:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Yes, it's still move-protected, and that's the way it's gonna be. Favonian ( talk) 06:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short term vandalism by IP editors, including a total article hijack. 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:57, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

One IP editor has been blocked, but at least on other from the same range has been actively vandalising the article 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
All has quietened down. Likely no longer required. 🇺🇦  FiddleTimtrent  FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 23:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn by requestor. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 05:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 different IPs have vandalized in the last hour. Wikipedialuva ( talk) 02:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC)  Tbhotch 04:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 08:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Regular attempts to make changes to the lead of the article which had been agreed upon by recent discussion. 10 reverts in the last month Titus Gold ( talk) 23:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Netherzone ( talk) 04:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent IP vandalism over the last week or two. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 06:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to unnecessary editing and revisions Xander Wu ( talk) 10:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky ( talk) 07:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism in terms of the person's titles. Eduardm ( talk) 09:23, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking only at the back and forth for the last 10 days, and the talk-page, my guess is that a precisely formulated RFC might be needed to form consensus. Lectonar ( talk) 09:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 15:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Seems like it was protected a few days ago, however the vandalism appears to have resumed shortly after it expired. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Very active WP:BLP vandals over the past couple of days.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/ Rational 16:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer because disruptive editors edited this page are no longer active. Solaris5296 ( talk) 17:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Given the hellacious protection log, I get the feeling unprotection is asking for trouble. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's not for trouble. Solaris5296 ( talk) ( contribs) 22:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Solaris5296: Yes, it is. Please examine the editing history and protection history before you make more requests like this. Besides the now-blocked disruptive editors, there have been disruptive IP address edits. Protection escalated naturally to indefinite. I'll leave it up to the protecting administrator El C to decide if unprotection is warranted. I would say, not at this time. Because Windows 7 is not receiving updates anymore, there is likely no reason to make further substantive changes to the article, so the only edits likely to occur from unconfirmed accounts and anonymous IP addresses are vandal edits. There is nothing preventing these editors from proposing edits on the talk page. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC) reply
OK, so {{Not protected}}. Solaris5296 ( T) ( C) ( WA) 01:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not yet, wait for the protecting administrator to weigh in. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 03:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotectedEl C hasn't edited since New Year, so I'm calling it. The history of the article shows that we're better off keeping the protection in place. Favonian ( talk) 10:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edits made by the Tribal Government are being overwritten by external sources that aren't affiliated with the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Sonnymattera ( talk) 16:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Sources are not required to be affiliated with the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Independent sources. Favonian ( talk) 16:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. HistoryofIran ( talk) 16:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. This year already three times from different ranges but with the same working modus. The Banner  talk 11:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Tables being messed up, constant inaccurate values Btiker ( talk) 13:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 13:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editor using different IP addresses repeatedly making same OR edits: 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:c145:8245:cff7:a0a3; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:4d88:fc83:c68f:7b6d

Similar series of different IP addresses were used to make same OR edits to main Lost Girl article: 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:b518:385b:f3f0:9d1e; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:58a:7363:7675:7783; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:c950:6949:4fdf:5357; 2605:8d80:680:6c1b:cd56:321a:db64:1687; 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740:4d68:5732:5e25:5094

Main article had to be protected. This problematic editor is now playing an endurance game with sub-articles. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo. 15:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. 2607:fea8:4f9f:9740::/64 for two weeks. Favonian ( talk) 17:00, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 20:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 21:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

18 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued disruption and vandalism after protection expired: [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]. Has previously been protected 6 times in escalating increments up to the recent one for 3 months which expired in December 2021 and has been vandalized repeatedly since —  Shibbolethink ( ) 16:38, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism by various IPs across multiple different ranges ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:13, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. Using cheap language. Pri2000( talk) 19:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I request a long semi protection (6 months/1 year/permanent), instead of PC protection. Almost all edits to this page by non-autoconfirmed users have been unhelpful. See history. It is spamming my watchlist and using volunteer time. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 20:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see what happens in 6 months; no change made to longer-term PC protection. Complex/ Rational 01:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 21:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing vandalism from IP replacing Devo content with Yellow Magic Orchestra content. Bahooka ( talk) 01:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and bizarre vandalism. $chnauzer 01:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of multiple IPs. Iaintfaking ( talk) 02:11, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi-protection - Egregious WP:BLP violations. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 22:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One batch of BLP-violating edits reverted, otherwise low-traffic article, no pattern of recent disruption. Complex/ Rational 01:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editing recently increased - adding spurious edits. It is a particular issue on the article Talk page today. Geoff | Who, me? 23:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection – IPs inserting poorly sourced content (using Wiki-based sites) for two days continuously. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 23:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations by IP editors over the last month (have requested Oversight look at them). Thanks. Tacyarg ( talk) 23:35, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done for the bot ( Mz7's note about turning the article into a redirect was archived for some reason). Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – world's oldest person has passed away, should have protection on a page like this. Réunion ( talk!) 00:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Much recent vandalism and disruption such as WP:BLP violations. TylerBurden ( talk) 01:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and edit warring by IPs. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 02:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This seems a case of edit warring. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Enter Demoman ( talk) 22:46, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: For reasons that are beyond me, this page is a constant target for disruption from IPs and unregistered users. Requesting longer-term protection. Novemberjazz 03:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 05:51, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. vandalism from many ips, and unconfirmed users Wesoree ( Talk) 19:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indeed it is. Lectonar ( talk) 08:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs changing coach's team based on media speculation. Schazjmd  (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Should this be protected against IP editors? I see an edit summary making reference to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hong Kong geography warrior, and I suspect the large number of IP edits to this article, some of which are rather dubious, are from this person? I would have already added this protection, but I am editing the article as well and would like an opinion from someone uninvolved. Thanks! -- Beland ( talk) 07:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As can be seen in the history, this article goes sometimes weeks with not being edited at all, so semi-protection would be overkill. Let's see how pending-changes does. I have watchlisted. Lectonar ( talk) 08:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism over several weeks. Anwegmann ( talk) 19:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 09:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 09:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Lauriswift911 ( talk) 06:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined @ Lauriswift911: last IP edit was about 5 days ago, and the talk-page of the user you keep reverting is still a redlink. So time to start talking, or go to an appropriate noticeboard. Lectonar ( talk) 09:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: This tiny, 87x40 image (used on a whopping 16 pages) seems to have been indefinitely fully upload-protected in 2009. Presumably, it was used in some ubiquitous template, but this seems to no longer be the case, making the protection unnecessary (?). jp× g 03:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption of IP User:86.30.30.70 and their sock User:Nattypc ( talk · contribs · count). - FlightTime ( open channel) 03:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 10:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Blanking of page by different IP addresses. RisingTzar ( talk) 13:23, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AfD leaning heavily towards keep atm. Lectonar ( talk) 14:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: No reason to have ECP, at least anymore--article is calm and does not have any contentious or objectionable content. DecafPotato ( talk) 20:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

let's hear from the last protecting admin...@ Favonian:: any thoughts on that? Lectonar ( talk) 08:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The article was protected because it's a target of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/My Royal Young. The last formalized sock report from this drawer was in June 2022, but I'm not sure they're gone for good. zzuuzz has experience with this specimen and may be more up-to-date on their status. Favonian ( talk) 09:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Special:Contributions/112.206.116.89/20 + ... The probabilities have not significantly changed, IMO. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected – Old socks don't die, and they don't even fade away. Favonian ( talk) 11:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Favonian: I would add that semi-protection could be an option. Many other targets have semi-protection. It appears autoconfirmed throwaways are not the problem they may have been and it may be interesting to test the waters. On the other hand, rather notably, this article should be considered a centrepiece of their activities. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked user Defeedme still IP-hopping and disruptively editing the article, not showing any signs of stopping this tactic. Wes sideman ( talk) 13:38, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is pending-changes protected, which means that the disruptive edits don't go "live". Disruption is not heavy enough to warrant semi-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 14:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level or IP vandalism, unauthorized multiple edits providing false information Mranonymous170 ( talk) 14:00, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 14:04, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 14:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced information repeatedly added by IP users. Tacyarg ( talk) 14:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially IP 80.xxx, 2 edits in the last 2 days. Lectonar ( talk) 14:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand ( talk · contribs) sockmaster has found a new toy. Unlikely that this 2020 videogame image would need to be updated again anyway. Belbury ( talk) 15:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism -- this has become such a large problem that some editors have questioned its legitimacy as a notable article. Requesting a stronger level of protection than before. HackerKnownAs ( talk) 19:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib ( talk) 20:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

19 January 2023

Reason: Constant vandalism and change of sourced content. Possible sockpuppetry by Jabranek using multiple IPs. 86.137.14.180 ( talk) 18:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Endorse this. There's been highly disruptive editing going on over the last few months. – Austronesier ( talk) 20:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Daniel Case: Can you please revert the edit the vandal made before getting muted? They added a misleading source which contradicts the already sourced content. 81.155.96.162 ( talk) 21:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
See here on why admins don't do this and aren't supposed to. You're free to put in a request on the talk page. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AbelAndCain ( talk) 01:50, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Some Youtuber encouraged their views to add to the page. Meanderingbartender ( talk) 09:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because Dr. Joseph Muscat is no longer the Prime Minister of Malta and has now moved into the private sector. Marfar2 ( talk) 21:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unnecesary reverts keep being made by an IP user over an infobox change despite the fact that there is no set guidelines in place on how an image montage should look, and there were previous discussions about this on U.S. city articles like the one for New York City. There is no reason for these reversions to keep being made. - Evelyn Marie ( leave a message · contributions) 20:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Evelyn Marie ( talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. because she violated 3RR. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Aryvaaa ( talk) 14:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two accounts strongly suspected of sockpuppetry and under investigation are edit warring and repeatedly adding and pushing the same content to the article despite a talk page discussion. Neither sockpuppets are extended confirmed, so make this protection to stop the disruptive editing and edit war. Their edits are 100% disruptive. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:55, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disrupting editing/edit-warring by the IPs. Some1 ( talk) 12:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 23:31, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Apparent COI editing by various IPs and an infrequent editor whose name matches the article subject. SPECIFICO talk 15:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Paper9oll ( 🔔📝) 15:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by newly registered or IP users. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – For the last six months, anons are adding an unsourced claim in this article and also in Makhaya Ntini. I opened a discussion one year ago (see here), but they aren't interested in discussion or even in citing any reliable source. So the article needs semi-protection to stop this disruption. NitinMlk ( talk) 19:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 06:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced content by IP address editors. Maurice Oly ( talk) 21:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, primarily coming from IPs. Magitroopa ( talk) 22:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Continued insertion of false/unsourced information since page protection expired — chaetodipus ( talk) 06:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The Secret Life of Pets and The Secret Life of Pets (franchise) as well for the same reason. — chaetodipus ( talk) 08:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent alteration of sourced material. — Czello 09:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and on-going disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic ( TALK!) 01:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP users are adding unsourced content or not following manual of style. Telenovelafan215 ( talk) 01:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR RowanJ LP ( talk) 04:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent page history is just a mess of roaming IP vandalism and reverts. Iskandar323 ( talk) 05:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Multiple articles targeted by socks of Belteshazzar

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent re-addition of disruptive edits by socks of Belteshazzar. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar/Archive. Each of these pages has been disruptively edited by multiple socks of Belteshazzar more than three times recently. Most of these pages are in the Wikipedia space and would not normally see much legitimate editing from the new and anonymous users who would be covered by the semi-protection. As always, protection may inconvenience some people but I think it is worth it if we can dissuade Belteshazzar from constantly reinstating their bad edits using new IP addresses. other affected editors can always use the Talk pages to request changes. DanielRigal ( talk) 20:07, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The edits in question only fixed problems and added useful content. By contrast, Daniel's revert restores borderline BLP violations, since some of that wording might make it sound like the authors of the letter are partly to blame for the disastrous repercussions. If that page is protected, it should be full protection, with that last revert undone. 103.103.3.6 ( talk) 20:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
That's another of their socks. This demonstrates their persistence, their astonishing brazenness and their complete lack of respect for Wikipedia. DanielRigal ( talk) 20:53, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It's been going on for a few years now sadly. After this user is blocked they always leave messages on their talk-page but not in a single one have they ever apologized, serious lack of self-reflection. They are using a vpn service but they will likely be back on accounts as well. I am watching many articles so I will easily identify their behavior. Psychologist Guy ( talk) 21:06, 17 January 2023 (UTC) reply
On second thought, I have semi-protected all except the last (it had not seen much disruption) for varying lengths of time. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done As done as will happen for now; for the bot. Lectonar ( talk) 11:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: This article receives a great deal of discussion. It would be helpful to the experienced editors who watch the article if accounts were confirmed before commenting. Please review the "A few points..." discussion. Thanks!. Nemov ( talk) 18:54, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I’d like to add that previous year articles also had their talk pages semi-protected, so it isn't without precedent. Sir Jack Hopkins ( talk) 19:05, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Agreed, especially considering the issues we’ve had with problematic unregistered IPs, most recently one who was both disruptive and vitriolic towards other users. TheScrubby ( talk) 04:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 11:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by a newly registered account, somewhat of a edit war. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 05:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 08:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs ( talk) 11:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack ( talk) 11:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article is caught up in the Persian Gulf naming dispute with editors disruptively changing "Arabian Gulf" to "Persian Gulf". Less than 48 hours after the latest page protection expired, the disruptive editing has resumed. —. Archer1234 ( t· c) 03:33, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: I've leave this for Lectonar since it's effectively a decision about whether the pending changes is sufficient or if it should be upgraded to semi protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 10:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I think for now we're fine...2 days of calm after end of semi-protection, and then 3 disruptive edits today. I have watchlisted, and will up to semi if it becomes unmanageable. Lectonar ( talk) 11:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
update: Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Many users are changing his club when the transfer news has not been confirmed by a valid source, e.g. official website of either club. His year of birth and goals and appearances stats has been vandalised as well Jeremy Hulber ( talk) 13:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. He seems to be changing clubs a lot; I saw in the logs that I already protected the page in 2016 :). Lectonar ( talk) 13:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Because of a recent controversy, it has been vandalized by IP several time e.g. they added death of the person! 1/2 weeks of semi protection would be nice. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 13:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Whatever the point of today's additions are, they clearly are in some violation of WP:NOT.   – Skywatcher68 ( talk) Skywatcher68 ( talk) 15:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 15:43, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection - repeatedly recreated. 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 08:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Have you got the right article title? No logs under this one. Lectonar ( talk) 08:51, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Unknown target. Favonian ( talk) 16:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of vandalism/speculative editing after page protection expired. Couple of days should suffice, as he may have changed clubs by then [22]. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected for longer due to the resumption of vandalism immediately after the previous block. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  Lefcentreright   Discuss  16:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 16:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of WP:OR. SSSB ( talk) 16:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. WP:LTA/VXFC flogging one of their favorite dead horses. Favonian ( talk) 17:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR RowanJ LP ( talk) 17:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I question whether 3 days is sufficient time to develop consensus for such a drastic action, but I trust the closing admin's judgement. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content since the previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 17:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also blocked one of the IP-hopping users as they've been adding unsourced content across many film articles. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by an IP and newly registered user — El Millo ( talk) 19:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editor removing independent verifiable content and sourcing. ARose Wolf 17:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

There has been longtime intermittent SPA and COI editing on this page. SPECIFICO talk 17:59, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Meanwhile the IP is back with an autocofirmed account with similar history of apparent COI. SPECIFICO talk 20:32, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ SPECIFICO: watch what you write in edit summaries, WP:OUTING is policy. I am investigating the article. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 20:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 21:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 21:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Shouldn't have come off, this page gets vandalised far too much. Govvy ( talk) 21:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Kinu. Favonian ( talk) 21:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotection: This (and alternative capitalization Super smash flash 2) should be unprotected to allow them to redirect to Super Smash Flash#Super Smash Flash 2. From there, they can probably be goldlocked again if needed. DecafPotato ( talk) 20:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected Article has been salted for nearly 15 years despite only being created twice (first time speedy deleted, second time AfD consensus to delete), no reason for ongoing protection at this point. This is probably a good example for why indef protection should be avoided in most cases. @ DecafPotato: Feel free to add a redirect. If someone replaces the article with a redirect, then it's probably worthwhile to take it to AfD to ensure consensus hasn't changed. Otherwise, I don't see any need to protect these redirects. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 20:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
made the redirect--thank you! DecafPotato ( talk) 20:41, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

20 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Estopedist1 ( talk) 21:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 22:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 22:42, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 23:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Lots of people flocking to edit this after his death and vandals are out. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 23:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done by Moncrief ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 00:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Long term edit warring, as well as sock puppetry, from many unregistered users. Should be protected for quite a while. 72.68.134.254 ( talk) 20:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If sockpuppet accounts are suspected here, please report to WP:SPI. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 23:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended-confirmed protection:Sockpuppetry. 47.54.20.187 ( talk) 22:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done Thanks for caring, though. :) / gen -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 22:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I was about to accept this request and set ECP for one month based on the high number of reversions by multiple editors. I think ECP might be a good idea for a bit. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 22:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
There's a logic to why it's not ECP'd. Happy to discuss why, but I'll leave it at that. I've left a note in the protection log to this effect as well. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 22:44, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the additional context. I concur with not increasing the page protection level. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 23:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine ( talk) 01:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users adding an unsourced list of military dictatorships. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 01:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit war imminent -- little attempt by @Binksternet to reach consensus before repeated deletions. Incorrect application of WP:BLPPRIVACY and inconsistent reasoning for subsequent re-deletion. ~ subtleache talk 03:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – far too many ips have been mistaking this as the subject's answering service. $chnauzer 04:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Increasing number of edits by unregistered users possibly due to imminent presidential election to be held before 14 September 2023 Bcmh ( talk) 06:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not saying it won't need to be protected at some point before the election. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 07:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent increase in general disruption. Includes vandalism, good faith incompetence, and WP:LTA/UAK. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" ( work / talk) 06:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 07:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. The Banner  talk 09:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 11:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm, restarted shortly after expiry of an earlier protection. The Banner  talk 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it resumes after this protection I'd agree with going long-term or indef. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 11:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. The Banner  talk 10:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm ( TCGE) 11:40, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One IP and a second range have been doing a number on this page with vandalism. The one IP was issued a 31-hour block, but another IP is doing the work from the second range. Something larger is needed. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 04:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 14:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated vandalism on same entry by multiple IPs. Changes are the same each time. Carter00000 ( talk) 09:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week. This is a portal and subject to restrictions on the Arab Israeli conflict., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 14:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 12:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 12:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Long-term sockpuppetry. 188.124.93.127 ( talk) 10:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian ( talk) 11:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Long-term abuse has resumed. 216.201.9.162 ( talk) 10:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian ( talk) 11:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pages about the next Turkish general election

Temporary semi-protection: Erdoğan said the elections might be early but there isn't an official announcement yet (and legally there can't be until late March), but IPs and new users take his speeches literally and edit the pages to reflect his speculations. I'm requesting a semi-protection until 20 March. Betseg ( talk) 13:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. For all pages; I have looked at all the pages...nowhere has disruption risen to the level which would make semi-protection needed at this time. So please relist if disruption picks up. Note: If any other admin wants to protect, go right ahead. Lectonar ( talk) 13:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of NPOV content sourced only to a Reddit post by various IPs/new accounts. Aoidh ( talk) 15:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism. For now temporary semi-protection and indefinite full move protection (no need for this page to be moved). Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 14:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from various users (most likely the same), adding extremely unsourced information about a Thailand version. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 14:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – House of Yahweh sock nonsense. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 14:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent spate of disruptive IP interventions, at least one of which has been blocked as a proxy IP, on a contentious topics/sanctions page. Iskandar323 ( talk) 15:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of new-account vandalism. Seasider53 ( talk) 15:36, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Both this and Rick and Morty (season 6) have new users and IPs constantly adding a clone of a main character with the same voice actress to the main characters index, and it's getting really tiring constantly reverting them. I was told to do dispute resolution earlier, but these are new users or non-users who I don't trust know about the talk page. Unnamed anon ( talk) 15:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits from a block-evading IP-hopper. Adding cast member(s) without citing published reliable source(s) to verify. Previous protection was for 1-week. —. Archer1234 ( t· c) 16:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs (likely socks) keep coming in and making the same changes, making unsourced claims and removing references. Paris1127 ( talk) 18:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 18:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 20:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent WP:BLP violations going back to December 3, unsourced place of birth. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 18:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism by various IP editors and users. Theoder2055 ( talk) 19:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

21 January 2023

Reason: High level of vandalism from new users despite being semi-protected. Requesting higher level of page protection HackerKnownAs ( talk) 17:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. N Panama 84534 20:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP and New User vandalism Jean-de-Nivelle ( talk) 20:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive talk notices from IPs. A week should suffice ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 23:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some LTA Troll. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 23:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism. Media attention reporting that Hipkins is going to be PM, many disruptive edits have been made and reverted as a result. It may be useful to protect until Tuesday, after the official confirmation. Carolina2k22(talk)(edits) 00:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 03:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 23:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA RowanJ LP ( talk) 05:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I need to ask an important question for this user. 27.72.144.249 ( talk) 03:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Page was protected to prevent harassment by a logged-out user. It stands to reason that this IP is the same person. — C.Fred ( talk) 03:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
That's a load of horse****, but fine! 27.72.144.249 ( talk) 03:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Well, that's not the only reason. If it were just 1 user then I would've just let them get blocked. But I have been getting annoyed by a lot of IP trolls lately so I decided I should jsut protect it for a week. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Blaze, like myself, is a regular target for IP vandals since we both revert a LOT of vandalism. Moops T 04:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Ensure that it does not get vandalized, especially since it's about a Wikipedian, while allowing the user that the userbox is about and other users to help improve it. MasterMatt12 💬Contributions 04:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. These are persistent and have been going on for months on end. Other country Wikipedia articles, like Cyprus, Italy, etc. are permanently semi-protected. Is it possible to extend the same protection to the Malta article too? It's very frustrating to keep rolling back attacks for all this time.

Zugraga talk 08:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is been a report of an edit war. CastJared ( talk) 09:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 09:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent and aggressive IP vandalism. Upwards of 16+ times. Reported already to AIV. I am a regular patroller and reverter of vandalism, so I get frequent heat from the IP vandals. Whatever the maximum allowed personal talk page protection is, I request that please. TY Moops T 04:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by IPs and new users. Only few edits made by these users are constructive. IntegerSequences ( talk | contribs) 05:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KFC ( 🔔📝) 06:43, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done User pages are automatically protected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:13, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism/edit warring in past two days. Caldorwards4 ( talk) 06:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Unregistered contributor replaces content with uncited and incorrect material, and will not engage on talk page. Sandcherry ( talk) 22:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:53, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Constant IP vandalism despite explanation from multiple users and repeated removal of existing sourced material. Suugaapio ( talk) 23:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Warn the user appropriately and then report to WP:AIV, WP:ANEW or WP:ANI as appropriate. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A user insists on boldly splitting HomePod to HomePod (1st generation) and HomePod (2nd generation) (with a cut&paste move, in the former case), despite having repeatedly been reverted by me and two other users. Don't think this rises to the level of a sustained behavioral issue, so I'm merely requesting page protection, so both of the latter pagess can remain redirects until there is any consensus for a split. Cheers, DFlhb ( talk) 01:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This would need extended-confirmed protection which I don't believe is warranted in this instance as such this is should be dealt with as either a content-dispute or a conduct issue (edit warring and copy & paste move). Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Ensure that it does not get vandalized, especially since it's about a Wikipedian, while allowing the user that the userbox is about and other users to help improve it. MasterMatt12 💬Contributions 04:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Ensure that it does not get vandalized, especially since it's about a Wikipedian, while allowing the user that the userbox is about and other users to help improve it. MasterMatt12 💬Contributions 04:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 09:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant date tampering from multiple IPs, generally making the same exact changes every time. ResPM ( T🔈 🎵C) 11:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP #1 claims there's been no killing (which might put this in BLP re supposed victim and the two accused whose conviction was quashed) and accuses Wikipedia editors of falsehood and more. IP #2 seems to know IP #1, calls IP #1 by name, refers to IP#1's workplace, so now we have accusations of trolling, bullying, whatever. NebY ( talk) 11:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: constant vandalism and disruptive editing Muhajir ( talk) 11:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because vandalism. KFC ( 🔔📝) 12:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DrKay ( talk) 12:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This needed extended-confirmed protection due to one IP started an edit war. CastJared ( talk) 14:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP spam, likely the same person using different addresses based on identical messages. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 15:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 16:05, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

22 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user edit warring over contest winner. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 13:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I semi-protected for 3 days. Over 500 edits today, almost all from IPs. I see no hope of sorting out the edit warring. Let's see if thinghs are calmer after the protection ends in three days. Donald Albury 21:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A number of disruptive new accounts have been making identical edits regarding the network's programming. WCQuidditch 19:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. It wasn't "a number of disruptive new accounts", it was just one. Other than that, there was no disruption since October. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 22:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Seems like we edit-conflicted on this, Anachronist. There are four blocked/locked accounts I see that edited the article on 20 and 21 January. The account names are similar, but they're not one single account. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:56, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Sdrqaz: I stand corrected. I was just looking at the first part of those long usernames. Thanks. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:52, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Partofthemachine ( talk) 21:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator Donald Albury. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donald Albury ( talkcontribs) 22:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP violations. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 22:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 20:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian ( talk) 20:53, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP editors disrupting BLP of boxer who had a match today. Schazjmd  (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP editors disrupting BLP of boxer who had a match today. Schazjmd  (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

List of _____ vehicles

Temporary semi-protection: These articles are favorite targets of a prolific LTA vandal who changes IPs every time one is blocked, throughout multiple wide ranges. Prior to being semi-protected a month ago, some of these articles were vandalized 3-4 times per week. Now that protection has expired, they are under attack again by the same LTA. -- Sable232 ( talk) 16:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not all of those articles have been vandalized recently, and the remaining ones have been vandalized once each since protection ended. I think this request is a bit premature. Donald Albury 21:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Somehow this request is from December... ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 21:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Whoosh! I missed that. Donald Albury 22:22, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The date was incorrect; I copied the previous request and forgot to remove the timestamp and re-sign. -- Sable232 ( talk) 22:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I still do not see any recent edits on half of those articles, and only one instance of vandalism on each of the others. Donald Albury 22:30, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Favonian ( talkcontribs) 20:53, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the past few months, IP editors have been repeatedly warring over a single edit (adding that Bush won via the Supreme Court case), which isn't factually correct. Herbfur (Eric, He/Him) ( talk) 18:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 23:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite full protection: Reliable sources writing articles about this very page, extremely high target for vandalism. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 22:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. On going BLP vios from IPs with derogatory words — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 17:33, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism/ deletion of cited content - at least 8 separate occasions in the last 3 days by at least 2 separate IP ranges. BilCat ( talk) 22:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:LTA attacks. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 04:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 17:24, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: by Sro23 ( talk · contribs). and ComplexRational Daniel Case ( talk) 04:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Google Doodle has driven a lot of traffic to this page. Including vandals of course. Issues with IPs and named accounts. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 01:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Requesting semi-protection: In the last several days there seems to have been a lot of vandalism and addition of unsourced content, mostly from IPs and new users. AP 499D25 ( talk) 05:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Templates used in MediaWiki namespace should be protected. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The page might seem to be already protected, but only the history has been merged. I agree with protecting the page as it's used in MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-CT. I guess noone would complain if I did, but it can't hurt to let someone else perform the protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Template protected indefinitely. I've gone for template editor protection as that was what was used for its predecessor and that while it is used in the interface it's not widely seen by people inexperienced with Wikipedia. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of repeated vandalism despite clear notes in the article. Anwegmann ( talk) 00:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been targeted multiple times over the last few days with users spamming edits to get to the 10 edit for autoconfirmed, then vandalizing the page. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 02:02, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – This looks like more of an issue for WP:SPI instead. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 06:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: I am an AFC reviewer and I accept Draft:Kamal Choudhary. Appears to have been salted to protect creation of a singer. This draft is about an academic. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 07:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

UnprotectedFavonian ( talk) 10:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA RowanJ LP ( talk) 01:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page is highly vandalized and is being edited out of fun. Loibird90 ( talk) 01:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Spam 171.100.233.77 ( talk) 03:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism, attacks by WP:LTA. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 03:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Just FYI, It seems like these accounts are all globally locked now. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Unprotected article regarding Israel-Palestine. Onetwothreeip ( talk) 07:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 06:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Despite being semi-protected, the page still continues to get persistent disruptive editing from new users. HackerKnownAs ( talk) 07:05, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . TheNumtums2023 ( talk) 08:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 10:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Please ping me if that doesn't help. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been an edit war on this page going back to October 2022, in which the infobox has been changed and reverted at least a dozen times by multiple parties. The editors involved have not used the talk page. Requesting full protection until talk page consensus has been reached. Bartzyx ( talk) 14:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 15:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke ( talkcontribs) 18:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 19:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor consistently inserting original research. Luciferian Thomas 16:34, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor making repeated personal attacks [23] [24] [25]. This is within the area of WP:UYGHUR, and community-authorized discretionary sanctions are in force for that page. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 18:49, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IP User. I believe the issue has not been addressed satisfactorily as of yet on the talk page.   Aloha27  talk  20:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – sock activity. see corresponding draft, Draft:Quill (company). – robertsky ( talk) 17:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done. I'm leaving the draft unprotected for now. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet ( talk) 21:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Looking over the history of this page, a long term semi should do the trick. -- RegentsPark ( comment) 22:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 86.146.145.235 ( talk) 18:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No rationale provided. Favonian ( talk) 19:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

23 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP socks have been going into editing disputes on this article dating back to only 5 days ago. (I bet this is going to be rejected lol). Poodle23 ( talk) 18:36, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Last reverted edit was on the 19th, so as predicted, Not done. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 20:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP keeps removing content. Also person recently passed away so page is undergoing an extremely higher than normal amount of edits RedPatch ( talk) 18:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Almost every edit to this page by a new user is vandalism. While the volume of vandalism isn't huge, the fact that 90% of the articles recent edits are vandalism by new and unregistered users and subsequent reversions is tedious to deal with, and long-term semi-protection would be appreciated. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 00:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been a recent dispute surrounding the topic, which is why there have been a lot of destructive edits made by IP addresses. Trying to remove well sourced content. Gothamk ( talk) 18:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:35, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The annual vandalism and unhelpful editing of this article around January 26 has started. Requesting temporary full protection for one week. Melcous ( talk) 21:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. We don't protect pages pre-emptively. Page is already under indefinite pending changes which restricts autoconfirmed editors. Zero disruption from extended confirmed folks. We reserve full protection for cases in which experienced editors are editing the page disruptively. BusterD ( talk) 00:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated and similar lead edits by non-registered users, similarly to Snowdonia which has since been protected. Titus Gold ( talk) 22:21, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a couple of days. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 03:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Continued disruption not long after unprotection. Curbon7 ( talk) 00:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Angelovitalex1968 ( talk · contribs) blocked by BusterD. BusterD ( talk) 00:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 00:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD ( talk) 00:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protected 2600:1700:D510:EF30:A815:6379:5FEF:396A ( talk) 02:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping editor is warring with several editors over an ill-advised style change. Started in October 2022 with this edit. 25stargeneral ( talk) 03:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This sockmaster regularly uses autoconfirmed sleepers. Someone who's wrong on the internet ( talk) 22:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined While the vandal who likes to target this article and its talk page with such sleepers has been quite active lately, all those socks have been indeffed and there has been no such editing to the page since it was semi'ed 16 hours ago. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Topic is associated with the contentious topics of critical race theory and postcolonialism. Talk page indicates the page may have been flagged as "personal opinion" based on the agendas of editors rather than any factual basis. 24.188.161.176 ( talk) 04:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 05:45, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP hijinks, Ukrainian-Russian topics - restricted to auto confirmed users Volunteer Marek 05:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP and user vandalism related to ethnicity and country of origin, persistent across multiple IPs across several months (back at least until December 2020. - car chasm ( talk) 00:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. + Pending-changes protected Lectonar ( talk) 09:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC) Lectonar ( talk) 09:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-editors are edit-warring with some editors over content that have been recently discussed on its talk page. Possible WP:BLOCKEVASION? Ckfasdf ( talk) 06:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Supported - for what that's worth. I came here requesting semi-protection, but see that Ckfasdf has already logged a request. -- Merbabu ( talk) 08:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Result - https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=1999_East_Timorese_crisis&oldid=1135213676 - has been semi protected for 6 months. JarrahTree 09:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done For the bot. Lectonar ( talk) 09:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This BLP is attracting an increasing amount of IP vandalism due to the subject standing in an election this weekend. Decided to send it here as I'm marginally involved (have worked a bit on the article). – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 11:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. BangJan1999 10:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar ( talk) 10:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent unexplained changes and edit warring by Indonesia based LTA editor using numerous different IP's making blocks ineffective. TylerBurden ( talk) 12:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected Lectonar ( talk) 13:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Protection for the page expired and now there is persistent IP vandalism after multiple IP bans. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Range blocked, let me know if it keeps up. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
FYI it's continuing. Sheep ( talkhe/him) 14:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism after page protection expired. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
They've immediately returned again under a different IP (which has now been whacked actually). Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I adjusted the rangeblock a bit. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 13:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
They're back @ ScottishFinnishRadish. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:59, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Just protect the pages, please. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 14:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Beacuse endless whack-a-mole is only going to risk excessive collateral damage. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 14:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor(s) who disagree with critical reviews repeatedly removing content from the reception section while making unfounded and untrue accusations of "cherry-picking" or "self-promotion.". silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 10:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Recently requested protection here, and more test edits and vandalism has ensued since. Being one of the most high profile football players in the world makes this article extremely vulnerable to disruption. TylerBurden ( talk) 10:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 16:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:49, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian ( talk) 15:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent edit warring with an editor removing sourced information. The Banner  talk 14:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined There is a report on this issue at WP:AN3, and frankly I don't see the need for full protection at this time. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:03, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – He is a controversial figure as part of the Azov Battalion, so the article attracts consistent periodic disruptive edits calling him a Nazi, etc. HappyWith ( talk) 15:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism due to rumoured signing with English club Arsenal Idiosincrático ( talk) 17:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A quick Google search indicates that the trade is happening, it just hasn't happened yet. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A bot (User: JJMC89 bot) removed the approved new logo update request leading to inaccurate information on the page. If the protection is not granted, please guide me on how to protect the page from further misleading edits. Thank you. Regards, Techsap25 ( talk) 07:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hmmm...Wikipedia can be edited by anyone; protection is the exception, not the rule. Lectonar ( talk) 09:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi @ Lectonar, thank you for reviewing my request. The wrong edit issue was resolved and the correct logo was restored, please see: /info/en/?search=User_talk:JJMC89#Removed_Black_Box_New_Logo
But today again the same bot @ JJMC89 bot has removed the approved logo although the logo has a suitable non-free use rationale, please see /info/en/?search=File:Blackbox_logo.png Could you please guide me with some other Wikipedia guidelines or processes that will help in protecting the right information if the page protection is not possible in this case. Thank you again. Regards, Techsap25 ( talk) 14:50, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Techsap25: I believe the issue was that the uploader, EchidnaLives, added the non-free use rationale template with a bare URL for the article, rather than just the article name, which broke the template. Therefore, JJMC89 bot could not tell that the image was properly tagged, because it wasn't. I think I have fixed the issue. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of poorly sourced (preprints, blogs) content by IP. Austronesier ( talk) 15:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-standing problem with IP vandalism. Vandalism restarted immediately after end of last one-month protection. Meters ( talk) 19:10, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:37, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Vandalism has been going on for the past 24 hours, semi protection hasn't stopped it. 2A01:CB1C:545:7600:ED41:15A4:C86:D44D ( talk) 21:17, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 21:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm hoping this level of protection will suffice for the editors currently edit warring. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is one report of an edit war between 2 users, due to unsourced content. CastJared ( talk) 17:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - they seem to have stopped. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hello, I inserted a valid, referenced and related quote into a suitable section of this article (see my initial edit: 1), however user Marcelus keep removing it without providing a valid justification ( 1, 2).

In my talk page he claimed that it should be removed because "I don't really see how this separate qoute enriches article" ( 1), "We don't really need" ( 2 - by the way, he wrote it himself alone, so it should have been "I don't need"), "In my opinion, the section "Political views" comprehensively describes the issue."( 3), but these are not valid justifications and is only his own opinion which is not supported by any Wikipedia's rules. Basically, he was writing different justifications again and again.

Marcelus also claims that the quote should be completely removed because in the Mackevičius' article it is written that "Šenavičienė claims that the account faithfully reflects the thoughts of Mackevičius himself, more than his testimonies written after his imprisonment, facing the death penalty" (the reference is not accessible online, so it is not even possible to check if it is really written like that in the reference). But that's not a valid justification to remove a quote either because it does not say that his post-imprisonment letters are not reliable and should not be described. Another user Cukrakalnis also noted (see: 1) that Marcelus' actions of censoring this quote are not valid according to Wikipedia's rules, but Marcelus ignores this.

The quote he keep removing is an excerpt from a letter which Mackevičius wrote when imprisoned saying that "The Lithuanian nation is hardworking, honest, religious, so it is worth my life. I am waiting freedom of my people as it was retribution...". Another referenced sentence in the article also say that "Mackevičius' main goal is the rebirth of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth"", but it does not deny the fact that he fought for the Lithuanian nation (in his own words - his people).

Consequently, please take actions against Marcelus' provoking of revert warring in this article. We don't need to continue this and the quote must stay as it does not violate any Wikipedia's rules.

By the way, there is a case at administrators noticeboard (see: HERE) which claim that Marcelus' actions are disruptive as he was calling a notable Lithuanian scientist and minister of education Zigmas Zinkevičius as "chauvinistic pig" (see Marcelus' edits here: 1, 2). Such personal attacks against a famous Lithuanian should not be tolerated in Wikipedia. But it seems the disruption is spreading into another article - Antanas Mackevičius. Please stop this. -- Pofka ( talk) 18:29, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - content dispute. While no policy compels removal of the quote, nor does policy compel its inclusion - you will need to discuss and reach consensus on this issue. If you do not agree with Marcelus' rationale for removing the quote, you can request a third opinion or try dispute resolution. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector: Marcelus keep removing it despite the fact that third user (Cukrakalnis) also opposed his actions. -- Pofka ( talk) 19:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
In the absence of disruptive editing (like vandalism or revert warring) we do not protect pages to enforce one user's preferred version over another. Please try dispute resolution. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:21, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector I give proper reasoning on @ Pofka talk page, he ignored it Marcelus ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Ivanvector: So we accept removal of content and the one whose content get removed should seek for third opinion (two users support that it should stay)? I think that user who want to remove other user added referenced content should seek for others support to remove it. -- Pofka ( talk) 19:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Pofka I really hoped that after the ban was lifted, less than a month ago, you came back as a changed man. Meanwhile, you are back to your old practices. On your talk page, I wrote exactly why a quote introduced in such a way violates the WP:QUOTE rules. But you simply ignored it, in addition you wrote untruthfully that the only reason I removed the quote is my own unjustified, personal preference.
In short:
  • you put the quote in the form of a motto, not in the body of the article.
  • the source is uncertain, AM's testimony was given in Polish and Russian, your quote comes from a random website in Lithuanian
  • researchers who are quoted in the text claim that AM's testimony does not reflect his intentions honestly, because it was given on death row, etc. Quoting him directly, without such context, suggests otherwise
  • the quote you chose is not even representative of what is contained in AM's testimony, since he gives various motivations that are partially mutually exclusive
I wrote you all this on your talk page, but you ignored it. Marcelus ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Marcelus and Pofka: this report is closed. Take your content dispute to an appropriate forum and do not edit this section again. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:28, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection request Repeated introduction into the lead by IP of accusations that the BLP is a genocide denier based on a flimsy source + BLP's own (Serbian) Facebook page (accusation is already included as an accusation in the body). IP has been warned by me on their talk page but does not engage on article talk. Pincrete ( talk) 18:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. I have partblocked the IP from the article. They can discuss this material's inclusion on the talk page. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

24 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Sources reporting he has been traded - teams haven't made an official announcement. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 18:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - multiple sources considered reliable for sporting news indicate that the trade is a done deal. I don't see why we need to wait for an official announcement, and you are edit warring. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 19:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I'm just going by WP:SPORTSTRANS. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 22:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is still IPs making editing disruption after semi-protection is removed, as Rhain is reverting certain IP edits to prevent disruption. CastJared ( talk) 19:08, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Vandalism appears to be sporadic, with several good faith edits by new users and IPs mixed in. I'd recommend reporting these accounts to WP:AIV when they pop up. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Even for this page, there is currently unusually high actiivity, mainly from IP users, of adding unsourced numbers, specifically targeting India (vs. China) and the UN world total in the lede. T*U ( talk) 21:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term abuse from multiple different registered editors. Possibly socks?. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 00:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IPs adding unsourced cast/changing characters. Mike  Allen 18:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:40, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Temporary semi-protection The series Velma has been removed from the page twice now by the same IP user despite it being in the franchise, and it seems like this will continue so long as the first season is airing due to public backlash. JayleyMq ( talk) 00:48, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam ( talk) 01:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP editors are having fun vandalizing the page right now. Protecting it would stop this for now. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: 1. Removing my text from an article that should be in an article. 2. The use of other states as their own, in particular the Mamluk Sultanate, the Golden Horde, which have nothing to do with the Kazakh people, Kazakhstan. 3. Rewriting history of Kazakhstan. 4. There are no sources for this article. Lauriswift911 ( talk) 00:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.  MelanieN ( talk) 01:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The article seems to have a steady stream of disruption, with most edits in the past few months being vandalism or reversion of vandalism. TornadoLGS ( talk) 03:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Usage of Fictitious references. Ranadhira ( talk) 03:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Homophobic edits - see article history. Socks.  //  Timothy ::  talk  02:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: Supahot71 ( talk · contribs). That should take care of the recent vandals. Otherwise, I note, the article has not needed protection in the past 16 years and it looks like there has not been other recent vandalism/disruption. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from fans (6 in last month I believe). Infrequently edited, and today I removed some vandalism which had been left for a long time. Previously protected, pending changes would be ideal. 2A02:C7C:AE91:2B00:3186:9C74:3E11:DBB5 ( talk) 04:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent redirect overwrites with copyvios resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing by IPs Isi96 ( talk) 06:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Callanecc ( talkcontribslogs) 07:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: vandalism, edit except the administration Ammar Idris Muhammad ( talk) 04:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined. No article by that name exists or has existed on the English Wikipedia. If you're referring to this article you created on the Simple English Wikipedia, please use that wiki's processes instead. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Many cases of vandalism by IP, changing "soccer" to "football" as opposed to WP:NCFA. SuperJew ( talk) 08:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm writing behalf of Dr. Erfan Qaneeifard, This page belongs to Dr. Erfan Qaneeifard, he can provide a support document.

This information on this Page has been Arashtabar ( talk) 06:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done. This is the English-language Wikipedia; we have no authority over articles on the Farsi Wikipedia like fa:عرفان قانعی‌فرد. Please use that wiki's processes to resolve any problems you might have. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Industry players using the site for self promotion without any citations or references. Jonjon723723 ( talk) 09:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 10:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Edit history reveals lots of confusing edits that keep inserting the fake name "Ambatukam" in to the article. Ambatukam is not a real name but a meme which is phonetically similar to "Batu Khan". I believe this page will be very popular with vandals for years to come if not extended confirmed locked. NSFW: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ambatukam Hunan201p ( talk) 10:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 11:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism to the article such as changing subject's name to a meme. This is related to the previous protection request for Batu Khan. Hunan201p ( talk) 11:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 11:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent recreation of article redirected through AfD. Onel5969 TT me 13:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Sergecross73. Favonian ( talk) 15:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 15:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing based on conspiracy rumors that this person is secretly dead. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of disruptive editing by IP and newly registered users since the 19th. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP getting Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. JeffUK 17:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian ( talk) 18:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection. Persistent vandalism by IP. Mooonswimmer 17:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Complex/ Rational 18:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal/someone with a grudge has this page in their sights. Was previously protected for a week and vandal returned as soon as protection dropped. Can we get a month, please?. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:44, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amaury17:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 18:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unexplained removal of references. Twice. IP user has been warned 2x.   Aloha27  talk  20:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: 1. Removing my text from an article that should be in an article. 2. The use of other states as their own, in particular the Mamluk Sultanate, the Golden Horde, which have nothing to do with the Kazakh people, Kazakhstan. 3. Rewriting history of Kazakhstan. 4. There are no sources for this article. Lauriswift911 ( talk) 00:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC) (Moved from WP:RFPP/E) reply

@ Lauriswift911: This section is for requesting an edit to a protected article - the page you've listed isn't protected. Did you perhaps mean to post this under WP:RFPP/I to request an admin adds protection instead? Aidan9382 ( talk) 18:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Aidan9382: yes, i need semi-protect in article. User:Lauriswift911 18:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Lauriswift911: Alright, I've moved your request to here. Aidan9382 ( talk) 18:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky ( talk) 12:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. HistoryofIran ( talk) 14:08, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP disruption, multiple IPs attempting to revert the same edit without any justification TheGEICOgecko ( talk) 17:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 18:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: No IP edits in the past month have been constructive at all. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 18:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:18, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

25 January 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Heavy editing (42,000 views in past day) due to encounter with PSG. Much vandalism and disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 04:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by unregistered user with dynamic IP. Austronesier ( talk) 19:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP and removal of page sources. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 21:33, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism by IP editor, that IP range that IP editor used is already blocked on other article due to disruptive editing. Ckfasdf ( talk) 12:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Rather than add more pages to their partial block, they are now blocked sitewide. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: In the news regarding a reported signing. Page is being changed based on anonymous sources. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - there is a difference between citing an anonymous source, and citing a reliable publication which is referring to unnamed sources. Protection won't be necessary if you stop revert warring. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses have been posting personal attacks, inappropriate political agenda and conspiracy theories, harassment such as attempting to dox other editors by repeatedly asking questions that have nothing to do with improving the article. — YoungForever (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined - some of the IP editors seem to be making valid points about presentation of sources, which protection would stifle. I've blocked some of the more aggressive IP ranges, and if that's not good enough I'll happily expand them; I've watchlisted the page. In future you can report incidents like this to WP:ANI for a faster response, or even WP:EMERGENCY if you are threatened. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 02:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruption, with WP:BLP overtones. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 17:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:39, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: The article is still seeing daily new user disruptive editing despite being semi-protected. Again, requesting extended confirmed protection and a block of the disruptive users. HackerKnownAs ( talk) 17:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of through the end of the current protection, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 ( talk) 18:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should cover it through the actual event. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Excessive vandalism and disruptive editing in the past month and a half. Knightoftheswords281 ( talk) 02:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page was salted in 2009 because of promotional article creation about a musician unrelated to the rapper Future. It should be unprotected and made a redirect to that page. Partofthemachine ( talk) 00:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Unprotected and redirect created. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:04, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP sockpuppets. Clyde H. Mapping ( talk) 23:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: In consistency with the pages for Chris Hipkins and Jacinda Ardern, I feel this new page should be protected. I think it's highly likely there will be some hateful IP vandalism towards Ardern on the page at some point in the future. I'm not an expert on protection policy but I do feel I should insist on precaution to prevent misogynistic rants and headaches for editors who have to tidy them up. Aubernas ( talk) 03:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:51, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP user 71.191.179.16; was recently blocked for vandalizing the page and many others, and went right back after his block was done. BrickMaster02 ( talk) 04:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine ( talk) 04:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Small edit war over whether it was a protest, massacre or incident. MaterialWorks (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Fully, until 27 January. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection; currently pending-changes protected but vandalism has been occurring in the past two days, plus Australia Day is tomorrow and a controversial subject in modern Australia, so I'm being bold an requesting indefinite protection. Thiscouldbeauser ( talk) 10:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: persistent IP vandalism — DVRTed ( Talk) 13:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Semi-protected, until 4 February. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock IPs. Paytime ( talk) 19:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA RowanJ LP ( talk) 22:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruption. Again. Fuck. I don't care if the semi-protection is indefinite or temporary. This shit just needs to stop. This should have been protected years ago. And now there's a second reason these IPs are disrupting too.

As before, there is the same stupid shit of IPs and new users constantly adding a clone of a main character and a car to the main character box such as here today and earlier this month refusing to go to the fucking talk page.

I am so sick of this. These people refuse to go to the fucking talk page and ignore the clearly written hidden note, in fact removing it in most cases. I am so fucking tired of this. I know I keep saying this, but I really fucking am. They need to be forced onto the fucking talk page if they refuse to read a hidden note.

However, there is also the case that at least in this first disruptive edit, as well as another edit here, and a third one here, I can already predict that people will be adding that Justin Roiland is no longer part of the show. There is now more than enough disruption to protect this page. Unnamed anon ( talk) 06:14, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Edit warring by block evading IP. TylerBurden ( talk) 11:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 98Tigerius ( talk) 11:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism, misinformation are spreading by opposition party of Bangladesh Sartaj267 11:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Petty vandalism from IPs changing e.g. death date to 2027. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive IP on 24 January and another on 22 January. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Should be ECP'd in accordance with other articles about the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Compusolus ( talk) 12:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Username: Kuru is displaying Vandalism; deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia, in a variety of languages, presenting the sum of all human knowledge. We are restoring the article back to the successful edit but keep having issues with this user for sabotage attempts on getting this submission approved. Could we please option for protection on this page so their deliberate deletion of edits won't harm the submission? Thank you for your time. Devydevdev09 ( talk) 13:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 15:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since protection expired on 19 January, two IPs have edited it. Sdrqaz ( talk) 15:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine ( talk) 18:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 20:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Barrage of spammers adding toll-free support lines (at least 10 attempts in the past couple of hours). Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term edit warring from college employees, three new socks ChrisK240 ( talk · contribs), Jradwan97 ( talk · contribs), and BSCIRA ( talk · contribs) so far today. BSCIRA has admitted paid status, but is currently blocked for username violations. MrOllie ( talk) 19:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not an employee. ChrisK240 ( talk) 20:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
As much as I appreciate you speaking for me, my affiliation is not of what you describe. Thanks! Jradwan97 ( talk) 20:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Rather than educate, and acknowledge that a mistake was made, you opt to protect a page with bad information on it. I have followed ALL of the protocols that have been communicated to me. I have affiliated. I have updated the username. I have posted the need for update on the Talk page. All I have received from MrOllie is punitive and accusatory behavior. This is unacceptable in a community where I am simply trying to update citable facts. This has gotten out of hand. ChrisKatBSC ( talk) 20:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Already protected by administrator Justlettersandnumbers. Favonian ( talk) 20:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism on Kapil Patil, someone removing sourced material. 223.187.97.214 ( talk) 11:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent IP vandalism ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. For two weeks. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edits from numerous accounts and IPs recommenced on the same day that the previous protection expired (2022-12-11). Requesting page protection because this article appears to be a target for vandals. Kbseah ( talk) 18:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 22:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is being plagued with vandalism, unsourced claims and widespread disinformation. It appears as though Anthony Gordon is currently trending through news outlets. Ashleyknowsthings ( talk) 21:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian ( talk) 22:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

26 January 2023

Reason: Too many disruption of edits by multiple IPs. CastJared ( talk) 17:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is an edit war between an editor and 2 IPs, violation of BLP as well. CastJared ( talk) 18:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: because of editor and vandalism except Administrator owner Ammar Idris Muhammad Ammar Idris Muhammad ( talk) 19:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – You are (again) referring to simple:Mraimdy. Direct requests to the administrators on that Wiki. Favonian ( talk) 19:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

semi-protection: Kindly I want my own page to be for confirmed users. Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 20:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Except in cases of persistent vandalism, user talk pages should remain accessible to all users. Favonian ( talk) 20:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 20:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Annamalai Kuppusamy has been salted due to repeated creation of the page after Multiple deletion as the article fail meet Wikipedia:Notability. currently he is president of BJP for the Indian state of Tamil nadu. A state level politician who had received significant press coverage since then and meets general notability guideline, so please remove page creation protection, So that Annamalai Kuppusamy can be reviewed again. Thankyou Perumalism ( talk) 14:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The mainspace target being salted has no bearing on whether or not a draft will get reviewed. In fact, if it had passed muster, the reviewer would be the one filing this request, not you. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 18:15, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not unprotected – Await approval of draft at WP:AFC. Favonian ( talk) 20:30, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

In the second paragraph, I suggest editors remove Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and provide a better example to demonstrate the "AI effect." OCR is *not* a good example. The 4th citation references content published in 1991. AI has a HUGE influence on the development and adoption of OCR technology. OCR companies like Transkribus market themselves as a place where "AI meets historical documents." FnordY2K ( talk) 04:37, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – This suggestion rightly belongs at Talk:Artificial Intelligence (EP). Favonian ( talk) 20:35, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Replace [clarification needed] in introductory paragraph with: Any formulas known are no more computationally efficient than testing numbers with brute force, by individually checking divisibility by smaller primes. 134.114.223.245 ( talk) 04:52, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 20:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-Protection WP:VAND, WP:EDITWAR, WP:GENREWAR by anonymous IPs from Brazil. Progrock70s ( talk) 08:38, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Note that the reporting editor Progrock70s is a disruptive editor and his genre warring is the root cause for the problem on that page; his behavior previously led to full protection on another page [26]. He uses shortcuts such WP:GENREWAR etc. because he saw them in comments directed at him (see the history of warnings in talk history). He is feuding with a supposedly Brazilian IP editor, but also with the usual watchers of Thin Lizzy pages. — Alalch E. 19:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked: Progrock70s ( talk · contribs) blocked by Hammersoft. Favonian ( talk) 20:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done As Favonian noted, Progrock70s has been blocked for three days. As Progrock70s was reverting against everyone, that should stop the edit warring and need for protection. I will continue to monitor for a while. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vulnerable to vandalism CSCM01 ( talk) 23:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生MelanieN ( talk) 23:47, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism CSCM01 ( talk) 23:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Yamaguchi先生MelanieN ( talk) 23:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: On Vala clan, there is a edit war by Kingrajput12. Kingrajput12 removing sourced material. 223.187.97.214 ( talk) 11:48, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: there is a edit war by Kingrajput12 on Sarvaiya page and removing sourced material. 223.187.97.214 ( talk) 11:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, content dispute-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Consistent IP vandalism. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 21:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

"The film marks the first Pixar film solely directed by a woman." to "The film marks the second Pixar film solely directed by a woman.", as the first was Bao. Or maybe they meant "The film marks the first full-length Pixar film solely directed by a woman."? StolenStatue ( talk) 02:36, 23 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This seems like a quibble that should be discussed on Talk:Turning Red, not something that can unilaterally be done here due to the ambiguity. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 23:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Jéské Couriano The talk page is extended confirmed protected. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 23:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Done. I changed "film" to "feature film" to resolve the ambiguity. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 04:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Change the word African-American to black woman. The writer and director of the upcoming television series is Canadian Jamaican. 2601:5C5:200:4FBC:B9A8:2403:9743:F0D8 ( talk) 00:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

To clarify, the passage being objected to is On November 12, 2021, Stella Meghie was announced as writer and director, making her the first African-American director to helm a Walt Disney Animation Studios project. (There are other uses of "African(-)American" in the article that are used in different contexts.) — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 02:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not done. See the instructions at the top. There has been no edit request on the talk page. Discussions concerning article content should take place there. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 04:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Ron Rafael Shimshilashvili Muhammad Musaiyab ( talk) 06:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Stop violating Wikipedia's copyright policy or you'll be blocked! Favonian ( talk) 09:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporarily Semi-protection:

Persistent disruptive editing by IP. IP User keeps deleting sources wording, and keeps attacking other users. User was warned more than 4 times, yet keeps the same spamming. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 22:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fragrant Peony, I have locked the article because this is a content dispute, with you on one side and both the IP and Binksternet on the other side. The IP has started a thread on the talk page. That's where you need to work this out.  MelanieN ( talk) 23:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hello MelanieN;
As a matter of fact; Dalida's official short film and documentary done by Paris Match and featuring her own brother is called: Dalida l’Egyptienne : les premières années. [27]
The Wiki article of Dalida has a template stating: { This article may be written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view. Please clean it up to conform to a higher standard of quality, and to make it neutral in tone. (September 2021) }
Many Western fans have been constantly and systematically deleting her Egyptian link, even though her own family members massively document it as a huge part of her identity, till the point that she made a song calling Egypt her homeland.
I tried to make the article as neutral as possible, and not so Western-biased, and indeed supported by sources.
The Egyptian-born Franco-Italian singer Dalida is renowned worldwide for her top-selling musical records. But in Egypt, she was a national symbol. Before emerging on the French stage, Dalida made her debut in Egyptian cinema. In 1986, Dalida returned to her birthplace to reflect on her past and star in the film The Sixth Day by Youssef Chahine. In this talk, we will follow Dalida’s journey from Egypt to France and back again to make her last film. [28]
With all due respect, you kept the biased edits, even though I am the one who brought many sources and an official documentary created by her own family members. Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 00:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your note, Fragrant Peony, but this is not the place for such explanations. That needs to be done on the article talk page, where you and the others can hopefully reach agreement/consensus. The protection gives you two days to do that. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I fully respect that MelanieN, I am kindly only asking why you kept a fan POV over actual sources I presented. Thank you. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 01:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
The protecting admin doesn't and isn't expected, actually not even allowed, to make a decicsion regarding content, see this; the full protection is implemented to prevent disruption/edit-warring. Consensus has to be found on the talk-page of the protected article. Lectonar ( talk) 08:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian ( talk) 11:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeatedly targeted by vandal IPs. Nicodene ( talk) 02:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism of page. [29] 45.40.14.83 ( talk) 03:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple persistant vandals. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk) 06:18, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:35, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism of page. Muhammad Musaiyab ( talk) 06:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Draft has been deleted. Lectonar ( talk) 08:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply


Reason: Communications person for FuboTV (Wikijen7 and EncyclopediaEditor0, which are the same person — Jennifer Press) has made several edits without disclosure, in violation of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies. TheMediaHistorian ( talk) 06:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined This really shouldn't be solved via page-protection; COI editing is strongly discouraged, but not explicitly forbidden. Direct the COI editors to the pertaining talk-page(s) please, see WP:COIEDIT. If they edit disruptively, they can be warned off and be dealt with on a case by case basis. Lectonar ( talk) 13:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Racist vandalism. 7 revisions by various users have been RD2'd in the past month. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 09:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think consideration should be given to indefinite semi-protection. Looking at the past three months on this talk page, it appears that every edit by an unregistered user has been unproductive and has been deleted. Many of them needed to be revdel'ed as well. I will propose this at the page.  MelanieN ( talk) 15:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply


Reason: High levels of vandalism. Anonymous users continue to keep editing and posting incorrect Royal Rumble stats which does not reflect a true account for new users looking for information. Kylo47 ( talk) 09:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar ( talk) 10:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – If you look over the page history, it seems like every week or two for basically forever (while the page was unprotected) an IP will come and try to edit the article to present the joke theory as if it were a real theory, presumably because it's funnier presented that way. IMO, having been protected 3 times already and it still happening, it probably needs an indef semi protection. Endwise ( talk) 10:37, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough for semi-protection. Lectonar ( talk) 13:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of unsourced editing from IPs/new accounts. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 11:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 11:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive IP edits. KyleJoan talk 12:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A history of repeated removal of the word "fuck" contrary to WP:BOWDLERIZE and WP:NOTCENSORED. — Kodiologist ( t) 13:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined There have been no edits to this article since November 2022. Do not file reports like this. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
What do you mean by "reports like this"? Is it that protection is only considered when the repeated disruptive editing is recent? — Kodiologist ( t) 16:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Kodiologist: Yes. Sdrqaz ( talk) 18:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Page continues to be edited by anonymous sources with incorrect information around the Royal Rumble stats, such as the ‘Total Eliminations’ records for men competitors section. I have put the correct info back to normal after numerous battles with anonymous users. Kylo47 ( talk) 13:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism (mostly anti-Semitism) Elina9k ( talk) 13:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: vandalism - adding fake members to the band line-up. BRM-Chrysalis ( talk) 14:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last occurrence was 3 days ago. Lectonar ( talk) 14:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 15:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent removal of sourced content by IPs ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 16:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz ( talk) 18:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:AIPIA#ARBPIA_General_Sanctions RowanJ LP ( talk) 17:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:41, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden ( talk) 18:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 19:25, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Ongoing IP and unregistered user disruption. Novemberjazz 19:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined I'm not really seeing that most of the IP edits are disruptive. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and violations of WP:BLP. Novemberjazz 19:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeated sabotage regarding personnel dispute at the university. Edits made only from unregistered accounts, e.g., IPs 146.241.104.4 and 81.235.168.26. Propagandaman ( talk) 20:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator 331dot. for a week. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. by DatGuy Daniel Case ( talk) 04:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing within this past month, primarily coming from IPs. Magitroopa ( talk) 20:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – almost all recent edits have been IP vandalism. The Midnite Wolf ( talk) 20:51, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  Lefcentreright   Discuss  21:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 21:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC) 21:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IP editor repeatedly adding an external link to a badly written journal article, probably a predatory publisher, probably the author of the article is the IP editor. Apocheir ( talk) 21:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator DatGuy. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 23:06, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:31, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Rangeblocked at 174.240.64.0/22 for now. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 22:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

29 January 2023

Reason: Multiple attempts by IP and newly-created users at reverting information provided by reliable sources and moving the article name without discussion or consensus. Possible WP:Sock activity as well. WMrapids ( talk) 17:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Do you want move-protection as well as semi-protection? Daniel Case ( talk) 22:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Yes, this seems appropriate. It would prevent further edit warring and would promote discussions regarding possible moves. WMrapids ( talk) 23:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked: LordSidiousOfPeru ( talk · contribs). blocked from the article for a month. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary protection: Repeated changing/adding non-English by multiple IPs. Adakiko ( talk) 21:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ZaniGiovanni ( talk) 22:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Lectonar ( talk) 09:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs keep re-adding Category:French culture despite the fact that Category:French mascots is the subcategory. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 01:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit about 6 days ago. Lectonar ( talk) 09:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Ballyworld ( talk) 01:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 02:29, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism, though only temporary should be needed imo. DecafPotato ( talk) 02:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs adding club moves based on rumours, no official reports. 2 different IPs changed to two different teams in past few hours RedPatch ( talk) 02:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done Two edits, that's really not enough to warrant semi-protection. Drmies ( talk) 03:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Stereorock ( talk) 02:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and unsourced edits. TornadoLGS ( talk) 03:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: To prevent IP vandalism. Since it's my onw user page, I hope it will not be a problem to grant me extended-confirmed protection (indefinite, both edit and move). — Akshadev ( talk) 03:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined See WP:UPROT. No disruption yet. Lectonar ( talk) 08:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive edits and IP block evasion due to BLP violation. CastJared ( talk) 04:05, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of sourced content by IPs. ser! ( chat to me - see my edits) 04:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This just one of those controversial people that's always going to have vandalism. Nswix ( talk) 05:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP addresses have been disruptive editing by repeatedly adding original research genres and ignoring hidden comments non-stop. — YoungForever (talk) 05:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 2600:4041:79F9:C700:0:0:0:0/64 ( talk · contribs). DatGuy Talk Contribs 12:47, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Two IP vandals today alone. WP:Weather has a well-known sock master who hops IP addresses vandalizing and causing problems on weather-related articles. Not sure if it is them, but vandalism seems to be the game on this article today. Elijahandskip ( talk) 05:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Make that 3 IPs today. Elijahandskip ( talk) 05:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs (but same user) are trolling the article. L'Oiseau Lybre ( talk) 05:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Severe BLP violation due to IP disruption of edits. CastJared ( talk) 07:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High number of unsourced changes by IPs. BilletsMauves €500 07:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by an UP user and a newly registered user. BilCat ( talk) 08:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by LTA IP-farm. See my talk page. The Banner  talk 09:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of vandalism. DragonofBatley ( talk) 09:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not any, really, that I can see. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continued vandalism over the last few days Suonii180 ( talk) 10:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Lightoil ( talk) 11:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: WP:NOTAFORUM disruption resumed after previous protection expired. SunilNevlaFan 12:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of another month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar ( talk) 15:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Thesixserra ( talk) 12:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Multiple unsourced content added after protection is removed, too many IPs, disrupt edits itself. CastJared ( talk) 13:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, there is a vandalism. CastJared ( talk) 16:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. — DVRTed ( Talk) 14:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 14:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Paginated the page history w/ 500 entries, still not a single edit that hasn't been reverted/revdel'ed, and they all seem fairly "recent." — DVRTed ( Talk) 14:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Note: See WP:ATPROT...article talk-pages aren't ususally protected, except for very heavy disruption. I don't think the level for protection has been reached here. Lectonar ( talk) 14:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect for 12 hours; some ill-advised maestro de espanol in the U.S. is having students read Wikipedia articles and vandalism is the inevitable, foreseeable result. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Distruptive editing Immeasurable radiance ( talk) 15:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP. Lectonar ( talk) 15:50, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism because of a recent political event Atyuttam ( talk) 16:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ever since the Disney World attraction closed on January 23, multiple IP editors have been trying to change the page. However, there are three attractions with the same name, but only one closed. Please take a look at the edit history, you will see lots of edit-sparring going on. A lot of drive-by IP changes need to be undone. It is getting out of hand. JlACEer ( talk) 16:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. User:worldgiant ( talk) 16:25 , 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Page is continuously edited by IPs to remove well-sourced material by editors affiliated with Crush Music management company. See talk page and edit history over the last year. parqs ( talk) 17:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Chennai Super Kings Lover ( talk) 17:41, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism since recent expiry of year-long semi protection. RolandR ( talk) 17:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restore one year semi-protection after vandalism volume has returned. Fuzheado | Talk 06:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: IP disruption. SNUGGUMS ( talk / edits) 18:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fuzheado | Talk 06:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and unverified users keep removing refs and replacing with nonsense. Paris1127 ( talk) 18:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 19:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Sustained high level of IP vandalism/edit warring. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 19:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, multiple editors trying to include the same thing about Iranian mythology without reliable sources. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 19:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) 20:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already done by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Fuzheado | Talk 06:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky ( talk) 20:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To force paid editing by multiple IPs to talk page requests. S0091 ( talk) 20:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been consistent since the last protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 20:45, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist ( talk) 06:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PC's not cutting it. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 21:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Izno. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam ( talk) 22:52, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. -- lomrjyo  talk 00:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Create protection – Persistent sockpuppetry (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand). Partofthemachine ( talk) 00:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 01:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi protection of a few weeks' duration requested due to the ongoing vandalism. — kashmīrī  TALK 01:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism. — kashmīrī  TALK 01:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander ( talk) 01:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Consistent vandalism and disruptive editing due to controversial topic and current news cycle, temporary protection may allow productive discussion about merges and the topic to be undertaken instead of the mess that keeps occuring with IPs and new accounts. ✯✬✩ InterestGather ( talk) 02:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 05:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP activity adding incorrect transfer RedPatch ( talk) 02:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Two different new accounts now have attempted more than once to insert promotional content into the article. Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 03:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Been vandalized so much by socks and IPs recently for whatever reason. Why? I Ask ( talk) 03:30, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined Not enough recent activity to warrant protection. Fuzheado | Talk 05:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring involving autoconfirmed accounts. Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced info to a BLP article. Admins, please review editor conduct to see if any further action is needed. TornadoLGS ( talk) 05:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User blocked for 24 hours for edit warring. Fuzheado | Talk 05:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Repeatedly vandalized by IP edits. If approved, this would be the eighth time that the talk page has been protected, with the last time being on January 6th. Since the last protection, 19 edits have been made to the talk page. 10 of them are edits that had to be reverted and the remaining 9 edits were the reverting edits. Given that "Tag: Revert" and "Tags: Revert" appear a combined 230 times in the last 500 edits with an assumed ~230 additional edits made to undo those edits, I am requesting a month or more of temporary protection. -- Super Goku V ( talk) 05:31, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. For some reason, this talk page has been a strange attractor of vandalism. Having previously been semi-protected for a week and a month, a 3-month period is warranted. Fuzheado | Talk 06:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This series has not yet been aired. However, looking at the IP edits in the article's history, you can see they added false info. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 05:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP continously adding failed verification content. 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 05:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 06:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Fuzheado I think you forgot to do the protect the page action. 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 07:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Sorry about that, now protected. - Fuzheado | Talk 07:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks! 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 08:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High-volume of disruptions for a recently released film Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 07:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 07:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP editors who are not respecting Wikipedia consensus on an artist's nationality. Ss 112 08:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would appreciate a mix of temporary semi-protection and 6 months pending changes being applied to the page to help fend off the recent spate of vandalism that has unfortunately accompanied the abrupt exponential rise in traffic to the page in the wake of the firm's damning revelations regarding stock market manipulation by a controversial Indian tycoon. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is there enough problematic activity to make a blanket conclusion about curtailing IP editing? Seems that there has been substantial contribution by anons, and 6 months is a long time for any kind of remedy. Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I appreciate your concerns, Fuzheado. Yes, anons have actively contributed to the page in the past 48 hours, some clearly in a constructive manner, but a disproportionate number of them have also indulged in crass vandalism. What has concerned me is that the page seem to be short on watchers to be able to fend off the same in real time, and this has lead to unenviable situations with readers stumbling across mala fide content and then taking to Twitter to highlight the same. To illustrate: edits like these stood for hours before I detected and reversed them. Heck, the latest edit, a couple hours ago, was an anon making unexplained change to the number in infobox, which remained intact despite the very telling edit summary. The firm's revelations have had a ripple effect on the Indian stock market, which is likely to continue when they open again after weekend. A temporary semi-protection will thus help deal with immediate vandalism, while a PC will bring more eyes to the article, while also concurrently allowing constructive anonymous IP contributions. If 6 months is excessive, how about giving it a trial run for a month? Regards, MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 21:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa ( talk) 10:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previously protected for 2 months. Fuzheado | Talk 13:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Even though it was explained and well sourced in the talk page, people continue to do the wrong edits. Short summary: The film M3GAN is counted as a 2022 release globally per Box Office Mojo and The Numbers, but had its American cinema release in 2023. Vestigium Leonis ( talk) 11:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: I can believe that this is an immediate need given the issue. However, since this is a popular article and could benefit from editors, what is the proposed protection period? Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I would probably go for a 1 month semi-protection. It should be sufficient to cool this "back and forth" off. I think that BOM and The Numbers as sources are clear enough, but maybe there is a clarification needed on the talk page on how to treat releases that are split in 2 years due to for example releases in different countries in the last week of 2022 and first week of 2023. Vestigium Leonis ( talk) 14:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent recreation of uncited article. Onel5969 TT me 12:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is this really vandalism or a content dispute about notability and WP:RS? Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy ( talk) 13:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 13:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yuugone ( talk) 13:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless ( talk) 16:47, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 18:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

30 January 2023

Mantrot Mishra Mantrotmishra1 ( talk) 09:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Empty request. Favonian ( talk) 09:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

King john didn't voluntarily agree to magna carta, the barons put him under duress and because of this the vatican (pope) doesn't recognize the legitimacy of magna carta. 185.111.131.198 ( talk) 13:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 15:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Add user greypebbled (previously invited) Greypebbled ( talk) 02:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not doneGreypebbled, you were invited to visit the Teahouse, not to become a host. Favonian ( talk) 17:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Undo this revert. The other version more accurately reflects the sources and is better structured, but no one seems to even consider actual content. 87.5.213.83 ( talk) 06:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 17:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: It is not the official information and it contains spoilers. The film is currently in its theatrical run and we want to remove the incorrect information. Sakshimalik21 ( talk) 09:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian ( talk) 09:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Not to mention we don't remove spoilers just for being spoilers. — Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 20:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Semi-protected in 2015 due to BLP violations. Given that the subject of the article is no longer alive, I don't think this is a concern anymore. Partofthemachine ( talk) 02:48, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – The article already gets periodic "visits" from auto-confirmed sockpuppets. Combining this with the frequent IP disruption on the talk page, I must conclude that unprotecting the article is not a good idea. Favonian ( talk) 18:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: n 94.17.233.161 ( talk) 15:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The singer just participated at the Moldovan national selection for the Eurovision Song Contest. Jo Buffay ( talk) 17:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not unprotected – Get Draft:Nikko T. to a level suitable of publication, then submit it to WP:Articles for creation. Favonian ( talk) 17:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Favonian: damn, I only see this discussion now. I noticed the page in the WP namespace and didn't realise it was there because the target was protected... I have listed the article to AfD... -- Luk talk 13:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is suddenly getting disrupted by multiple new users/Ips (in other words, sock/meatpuppets) who amongst other things lack WP:CIR and dont know what WP:COMMON NAME is. For more info, see [30]. HistoryofIran ( talk) 15:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-standing consensus is that only league (and/or state league in Brazil) appearances and goals are included in the infobox. Persistent adding of all career statistics by IP users. Davidlofgren1996 ( talk) 15:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article has been subjected to both vandalism and unhelpful edits frequently from IPs lately. JDDJS ( talk to mesee what I've done) 15:53, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last such edits were almost 2 days ago. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject is awaiting a court verdict regarding his sentencing. Persistent IP vandalism. Gtgamer79 ( talk) 15:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Roundish t c) 18:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected indefinitely. Let's see how this works before we go to PC. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from the same type of IP editor resumed as soon as the 7-day block ended. Sammi Brie (she/her •  tc) 19:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: This page is related to the Twitter files controversy and has begun to attract SPA new accounts. Talk page discussion needs to be encouraged. SPECIFICO talk 20:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

In agreement with request & description of situation. GoodDay ( talk) 20:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 21:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There has been an ongoing IP edit war about basic facts with no sourcing or explanations from anyone (on topics such as cost of the project, opening date, height, etc.). I’m not sure what the motivation is, but there is a lot that cannot be confirmed. Hydra88 ( talk) 20:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like there's been any edit warring for a week. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP of blocked user Rhea564 back with the same disruptions, soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 20:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Blocked user Rhea564 whose sock-puppetry resulted in protection of Ranbir Kapoor filmography, is making similar disruptions here. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 20:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 73.67.145.30 ( talk) 20:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous blanking of content by IPs, to promote WP:FRINGE (see conspiracy section). Unlikely to abate anytime soon as can be seen by the page's history, a mid-term protection is needed. Gotitbro ( talk) 21:38, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem to have been any edit warring of the type described for a couple of months. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP additions of death dates and past tense without an actual source for death. Doc Strange Mailbox Logbook 21:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Includes references to Taiwan being supposedly part of the PRC etc. — twotwofourtysix( talk || edits) 23:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is being heavily targeted by IP socks of the long term vandal Belteshazzar who is dominating the Talk page and making sensible discussion among other editors all but impossible. DanielRigal ( talk) 23:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Other than that "vandal", no one has even attempted to discuss the article's content. 2001:B07:646D:82DC:A84:9DFF:FE8B:58A ( talk) 23:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I am trying to invite participation but, while the vandal stomps all over the place, other people are not likely to feel welcome to contribute. It may well be that the lack of participation reflects a view that other editors are happy with the content as it is and that no change is needed but we need to allow for that discussion to happen if anybody (other than the vandal) wants to have it. Given the level of disruption being caused, I feel that locking anonymous editors out for a period is the lesser evil here. DanielRigal ( talk) 23:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
After the "vandal" edited the article somewhat extensively, no change was made for over a month, until a mass reversion of everything that account had done occurred on December 12. [31]. So that could be interpreted as other editors being happy with the revisions that had been made. In fact, had anyone else edited that article in that time, Bbb23's mass reversions likely wouldn't have touched that article. 79.27.179.171 ( talk) 00:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Belteshazzar, we see you changing your IP after each and every edit. This page is not yet another venue for you to try to defend your indefensible behaviour. Go away. If that article needs editing then Wikipedians in good standing will edit it. All you are doing is making that harder for them. DanielRigal ( talk) 00:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
It would be easy for any Wikipedian to greatly improve that article, as they would only have to undo your revert. They might improve it even further, but that is definitely the place to start. 151.32.114.255 ( talk) 00:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
This is exactly the relentless, utterly shameless, IP hopping disruption that I am talking about. This clearly shows why the semi-protection I am requesting is needed. DanielRigal ( talk) 00:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by long-term vandal who has also targeted the parent page. wizzito | say hello! 00:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been protected many times before and the issue remains. Iamreallygoodatcheckers t@lk 03:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More than a year of IP hopping edits against Template:Infobox person/doc. No response to article talk page thread. Meters ( talk) 04:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done This appears to be an ongoing edit war since 2012 over whether or not the cause of death was childbirth. Sources therein indicate the IP is correct, and other editors disagree. But this is definitely not an issue for page protection. — Maile ( talk) 17:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of disruption this month (well, this article is always being disrupted one way or another tbh). HistoryofIran ( talk) 12:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Some outright racist commentary being used to harass veteran Wikipedia users as well. I quote: "...it will remain, so leave the information alongside it, rabid persian nationalist" [32] - LouisAragon ( talk) 13:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected – 3 months. Also blocked one IP for the insult. Let me know if the problem continues. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Somewhat recent AfD resulted in merging content to another article as the subject wasn't independently notable. Now being restored. ~Styyx Talk? 13:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism. User:worldgiant ( talk) 13:34 , 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected – Indefinitely per WP:ARBIPA. Caste-relatd edit warring. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Days ago, there are certain IPs, partially vandalize this article. CastJared ( talk) 13:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 1 year. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various disruptive edits by IPs today. Kj cheetham ( talk) 14:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:03, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Only a week after the last protection expired and we've already had another new account trying to restore the article. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continuous edit warring since August. IPs and registered editors keep parroting fringe POV which contradicts sources, but never heed instructions to start discussion and reach consensus at article talk page. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 16:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Additional comments: I have removed a table containing contentious, poorly sourced material which had become, essentially, a sneaky way of reproducing the conflicting and disputed content from this long-AfD'ed article. I have encouraged editors to participate at the article talk page in the hopes that consensus can be reached, rather than reinstate the table, thereby resulting in more edit-warring. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 18:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected – 3 months. If any registered accounts continue to revert, consider warning them with {{ uw-ew}}. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 17:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Recurrence of persistent vandalism/nonsensical editing after end of previous protection period. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 18:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

31 January 2023

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. MaterialWorks (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Favonian ( talk) 17:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Disruption happens a few times a month - would be suitable for pending changes. wizzito | say hello! 00:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Maile66. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: A good amount of false information added by IP users. Ludkrillex ( talk) 01:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 ( talk) 19:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: There is an edit war between 2 editors, due to unsourced content. CastJared ( talk) 03:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Also, there is an original research. CastJared ( talk) 04:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been maybe three such edits in the last two days. I don't think protection is warranted at this point. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would appreciate a mix of temporary semi-protection and 6 months pending changes being applied to the page to help fend off the recent spate of vandalism that has unfortunately accompanied the abrupt exponential rise in traffic to the page in the wake of the firm's damning revelations regarding stock market manipulation by a controversial Indian tycoon. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Question: Is there enough problematic activity to make a blanket conclusion about curtailing IP editing? Seems that there has been substantial contribution by anons, and 6 months is a long time for any kind of remedy. Fuzheado | Talk 13:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I appreciate your concerns, Fuzheado. Yes, anons have actively contributed to the page in the past 48 hours, some clearly in a constructive manner, but a disproportionate number of them have also indulged in crass vandalism. What has concerned me is that the page seem to be short on watchers to be able to fend off the same in real time, and this has lead to unenviable situations with readers stumbling across mala fide content and then taking to Twitter to highlight the same. To illustrate: edits like these stuck around for hours before I detected and reversed them. Heck, the latest edit, a couple hours ago, was an anon making unexplained change to the number in infobox, which remained intact despite the very telling edit summary. The firm's revelations have had a ripple effect on the Indian stock market, which is likely to continue when they open again after weekend. A temporary semi-protection will thus help deal with immediate vandalism, while a PC will bring more eyes to the article, while also concurrently allowing constructive anonymous IP contributions. If 6 months is excessive, how about giving it a trial run for a month? Regards, MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 21:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply
I won't speak for Andrew on this, but I think from what you've said PC sounds like the better idea. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Hi Daniel Case, anon vandalism has been recurring with unenviable regularity on this highly trafficked page in consequence of the continuing effects of Hindenburg's report. So all this hemming and hawing strikes me as bit perplexing. Of greater concern is that the vandalism is sticking around for hours before being expunged. I proffer you semi the page for a few days and apply PC for a month. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 06:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will give the registered editors time (more than enough, I think) to clean up the page and stabilize it. Let me know when you feel you've done that and then we can talk about going to indefinite PC. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Thanks, that works. MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs of User:Isupportkimilsung adding unsourced poorly translated info. Paris1127 ( talk) 06:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: 88.245.16.0/21 ( talk · contribs). blocked for a week Daniel Case ( talk) 20:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopping user keeps adding who they personally think should be "The Greatest Indian" even though the official poll didn't include these people. Bennv123 ( talk) 08:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Note: Each of the IPs involved were placed on a one-week block by Daniel Case — Maile ( talk) 02:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
User(s) blocked. Favonian ( talk) 17:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range from Malaysia continously changing the count for acts awarded a first-place trophy from 3 to 4 in the lead when Chart history section shows, there were only 3 acts (Ateez, NewJeans, Monsta X) awarded the first-place trophy. 🍊 Paper9oll 🍊 ( 🔔📝) 08:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Dear, Wikipedia there are people who are trying to manipulate and claim the residency of murcanyo Town and they have been changing the information for the past weeks which is wrong and inappropriate please protect the page and never allow the manipulaters to change the information of murcanyo and its history Thank you. Bursaalax122 ( talk) 09:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: The page has suffered a lot of unknown IP vandalism, fan edits and misleading derogatory edits. Thus requesting complete protection to the page. Wiki Master World ( talk) 09:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like there's been any seriously disruptive editing for a day. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared ( talk) 10:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared ( talk) 10:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please read the protection policy linked everywhere on this page. Only three IP contributions in the last three weeks. We reserve indefinite protection to articles where lesser regimes have been tried and failed. BusterD ( talk) 03:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by Several IPs invading the page. Fragrant Peony ( talk) 11:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. There just one IP caused an edit war days ago. CastJared ( talk) 11:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Latest IP vandalism was more than ten days ago. BusterD ( talk) 03:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. There is some IP vandalism and caused BLP violation. CastJared ( talk) 11:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IP vandalism in past four days. BusterD ( talk) 03:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yuugone ( talk) 11:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing: Due to a widely publicized recent disputed fringe study, people are constantly editing the article to claim horses were present in America before the Spanish. The talk page consensus appears to be that this is fringe content, or at least the claims that this is fringe have gone unanswered and no responses whatsoever have been made in support of this study, while several reasons to ignore it, including a published expert opinion, have been posted. Recommend that the article be protected temporarily since this claim is making the rounds in various internet fora and leading to these unproductive unilateral edits. Things should fully quiet down in a few weeks/months once people move on. ☲Fireyair☲ ( talk) 11:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Already has pending changes, and not a tremendous amount of activity. Fuzheado | Talk 23:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: IPs or newly registered editors keep making non-constructive edits in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 13:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD ( talk) 03:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most recent edits to this article have been disruption from IPs. TornadoLGS ( talk) 19:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 23:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Full protection: Persistent Vandalism. Talk page of a blocked editor being repeatedly vandalised by ISP/vandal accounts. No need for it to be editable. Lard Almighty ( talk) 20:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. BusterD ( talk) 03:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. L ke ( talkcontribs) 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing. 172.58.204.213 ( talk) 20:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 23:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: As much fun as reverting the vandalism on this page is, due to all the viewership of the game there's been a crazy amount of it since he's taken over as QB Gatemansgc ( TɅ̊LK) 21:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done -- Bongwarrior ( talk) 21:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Public figure with a very high risk of page vandalism due to threats on social media pages. Masandejas07 ( talk) 23:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read the protection policy linked many places on this page. No IP edits since October. Nobody besides yourself has edited this page since December. BusterD ( talk) 03:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Someone is editwarring to put a prod on the article despite it being contested. The Banner  talk 00:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked: SeeAlsoPolice ( talk · contribs) blocked by DanCherek. Favonian ( talk) 17:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism from IP Address due to a miscue in the AFC Championship game Swagging ( talk) 03:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Favonian ( talk) 17:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 03:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous protection of one week had expired. Fuzheado | Talk 23:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Supposedly made a bad call in a recent game, I dunno, I don't watch football. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 03:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian ( talk) 17:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Change the duration of the WP:ECP to indefinite; there could be vandalism once the current protection, set for expiry on Feb 25 2023 (see log), expires, since it's a controversial topic nowadays. RapMonstaXY ( talk) 07:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case ( talk) 22:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several IP's have been changing the names of wrestlers in the Match section. Untamed1910 ( talk) 13:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been featured in a viral post by Twitter account "Depths of Wikipedia" and has been the subject of an edit war primarily regarding the picture of a toast with eyes. Suggest temporary full protection for some days. Bedivere ( talk) 13:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by newly created accounts. Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian ( talk) 17:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Mass additions (over 50 today) of unsourced claims Arjayay ( talk) 16:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Frequent vandalism target and is experiencing more vandalism based on having played in the NFL semi-finals yesterday. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing, removing cited information with no reliable sources for their reasoning ScrabbleRunner ( talk) 16:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Continual vandalism (removal of mentions of sexual abuse allegations) Kac Calhoon ( talk) 17:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range hopper is persistently adding vandalism. – The Grid ( talk) 18:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Within the past ten days, near-daily additions of unsourced content by a roving IP who won't heed instructions to provide said sources. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 19:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing and apparently relentless introduction of point of view and unsourced materials on the theme of criminality. CT55555( talk) 20:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see any reason to apply indefinite ECP to this page at this time. None of these accounts are autoconfirmed (though one is close), so let's progress as we normally do. Katie talk 02:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Hello, due to disruption in this article in the past (mass-removal of content) it was highly edit-protected. However, user Marcelus still recently tried to himself removal a large part of a well-referenced and extensive section in this article (see: 1, 2). His actions were opposed by user Cukrakalnis ( 1, 2), but user Marcelus again tried to remove the content himself (see: 1). Then a third party user GizzyCatBella intervened and also reverted Marcelus' removal (see: 1) and said that it should be discussed first.

Consequently, a RFC was started (see: Coat of arms of Lithuania#RfC: content of the section on Belarus) to solve the dispute between users with different opinions and to reach a WP:CONS what should be done with the disputed section. The RFC is still not over (closed) yet and there is no clear WP:CONS what should be done, so no changes should be made to the disputed content.

However, another user Piotrus left his comment at RFC and tried to remove the section nearly entirely as well (see: 1).

I myself restored the content to a version which was at the start of the RFC so that anyone interested could leave their opinions at RFC (it is impossible to understand the purpose of RFC with content removed) and said that if there will not be any WP:CONS when this RFC is over (closed) then we will use other Wikipedia's procedures to solve this dispute at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests (see my edits and explanations with pinging of the related users: 1, 2).

However, user Marcelus ignores my and other users good will suggestions to solve this dispute according to Wikipedia's procedures and continues to himself (without any WP:CONS at RFC) remove the content from the disputed section ( 1, 2). So he do not follow Wikipedia's procedures for dispute resolution and clearly do not seek for a WP:CONS and aggressively provokes conflicts with other users ( WP:ICANTHEARYOU).

Moreover, Marcelus also openly expressed his personal opinion why this content describing Polish Army's atrocities against Lithuanians and Belarusians should be removed by such words: "badmouthing of Poland (...) Basically, the whole Belarusian part should be rewritten" ( 1) or "the article is suppose to be about history of coat of arms, not an excuse to spread anti-Polish propaganda" ( 2) and it raises further concerns about his aggressive actions which possibly violate the WP:NPOV and WP:NOTCENSORED.

Since "The contentious topics procedure applies to this page" (see this article's talk page template), urgent protection actions are required to this article and I believe that WP:TOPICBAN should be considered for user Marcelus because he (unlike Piotrus) do not listen to other users good will requests, explanations and want to do everything as he prefers himself (this clearly is not WP:COLLABORATE). We certainly do not need revert warring, but he is actively provoking it by ignoring RFC, so intervention by administrators is required because he ignores warnings by other users.

For a context: there also is a case at the administrators noticeboard already about Marcelus' actions in another Lithuania-related article (see: HERE) where he ignored other users requests, explanations (similar behavior in a Lithuanian topic). -- Pofka ( talk) 20:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Another Pofka attempt to ban me from the topic where he wants to push his own narrative.
Currently, the section duplicates the content of the entry 1st Belarusian Regiment (which did not exist when the RfC was created), and is also simply off-topic, since the section should primarily describe the use of a CoA similar to the CoA of Lithuania in Belarus, but in the meantime half describes the history of the institution of the Lithuanian state, since the regiment was part of the Lithuanian army. In addition, it describes in bizarre detail the alleged (because based on a single memoir) maltreatment of Lithuanian and Belarusian symbols by the Polish military.
The creation of the 1st Belarusian Regiment slogan has made the RfC obsolete.
@ Pofka it is accepted custom to inform the user on whom the report is made, but I see that in your attempt to remove me from Wikipedia you are forgetting all the rules. Marcelus ( talk) 21:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. BusterD ( talk) 04:01, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Spike in vandal edits from anonymous IP editors once again. Requesting temporary semi-protection. Yue 🌙 21:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib ( talk) 22:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katie talk 02:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Gemini (astrology) has been edited to misrepresent the dates given in a cited source 7 times by 5 IP editors in January. Cancer (astrology) has been changed in a similar way 9 times in January. Request semi-protection. Jc3s5h ( talk) 22:54, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protection: Frequent vandalism by IP address users after NFL player Travis Kelce called the Mayor of Cincinnati out in an interview. Darth-Wiki-Man ( talk) 23:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Disruptive editing resumed after unprotection a few days ago, including egregious BLP violations ( diff), borderline ( diff, diff) and blatant ( diff) vandalism, and generally subpar edits bordering on disruption ( diff, diff, diff, diff). The article has been protected and unprotected twice now; it would probably benefit from a more extended period of protection. Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 00:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shadow4dark ( talk) 01:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katie talk 02:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rgalo10. Airtransat236 ( talk | contribs) 02:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Previous one year ECP expired two weeks ago, so I feel comfortable renewing that now. Katie talk 02:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism of a recently died actress. BattleshipMan ( talk) 00:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is currenty a slowburning edit war going on with the contents of the infobox, The IP continues to restore a more trivial version without any explanations. — TAnthony Talk 00:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined, seems to have stopped several days ago.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. There has been continuous vandalism in this page for a couple of days now. I would like to request for this page to be protected to lessen it. Loibird90 ( talk) 01:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like this has happened for a couple of days now (ironically). Daniel Case ( talk) 18:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Racism-related vandalism, on this BLP article, three times very recently. CT55555( talk) 02:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. 2605:b100:700::/41 for a month. Favonian ( talk) 12:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – AAA video game title that was released recently and has received mixed reviews. Article has seen a lot of unconstructive edits and occasional vandalism. A temporary semi edit protection should be sufficient, for when things cool down. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: IP editor repeatedly making edits over the last couple of weeks and refuses to take to discussion or give a reason. Request temporary IP block. Erp ( talk) 07:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Already protected by administrator jpgordon for two weeks. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High volume of vandalism and non-constructive edits Onetwothreeip ( talk) 07:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have stopped yesterday. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Misinformation about hallacas being tamales, they're not, I removed the wrong information and added the right one, but some people may try to change it soon. DemonioEkani ( talk) 08:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been maybe 20 edits, mostly constructively intended from what I can see, to this article in the last two months. Just not high-volume enough to worry. And we do not protect articles because we think people might edit disruptively. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Vandalism Ghdfghmp ( talk) 09:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ten days ago, it would have been a different story. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For reasons that elude me, anonymous editors keep wanting to put Djokovic first at 22 Grand Slams, even though Nadal did it earlier and we list them chronologically. CWenger ( ^@) 15:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case ( talk) 18:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

I would like to request that... (Your edit request here) . 2405:201:A008:F063:E8B9:F691:2B2E:F8C4 ( talk) 19:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Not done – Empty request. Favonian ( talk) 20:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Indefinite semi-protection: Too many unsourced content after semi protection expired. CastJared ( talk) 03:18, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian ( talk) 13:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: High level of edit-warring by IPs replacing the redirect. A temporary protection would be useful. AllyD ( talk) 07:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

User(s) blocked. Favonian ( talk) 12:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: Persistent vandalism — N Panama 84534 11:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 13:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Reason: KFC is was Unprotected 119.95.103.16 ( talk) 11:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Declined – Article is and will remain semi-protected. Favonian ( talk) 11:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Current rumors (unofficial transfer reports) which lead IPs to preemptively update the article. Felida97 ( talk) 14:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack ( talk) 14:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anon IP vandalism, high level, serious BLP attacks. Wes sideman ( talk) 15:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Was previously semi-protected for 3 months. Fuzheado | Talk 15:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook