The sanity of this user is
disputed. Please refrain from conversing normally with this user.
Emergency user slap button
Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (
direct link)
Editors can a malfunctioning user to the
village stocks.
 | Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify her! |
| This is SilviaASH's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, in your edit here, which reverted a change by me, you say that "a reliable source pointing out that the story doesn't align with reality is actually useful information". I think this is a bit of a given that there is not a medicine you can drink to turn you into a middle school girl, and I think anyone alive today knows and agrees with that fact... No? So, as such, is this truly necessary? – Fpmfpm ( talk) 10:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- That said, I checked out the current version of the section and it looks pretty good – thanks for your edits. I do think it's pretty obvious that it's "not accurately representative of real life", though, considering the series has overarching sci-fi/fantasy premise… but it's not a big deal, only a little bit redundant/unnecessary. :) Feel free to let me know any thoughts if you want. –
Fpmfpm (
talk)
Fpmfpm (
talk) 11:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- While I would agree that most people above a certain age are likely aware that there isn't medicine that instantly de-ages you and changes your biological sex, I think the thing that less people are likely to be aware of is that transgender people exist in real life and utilize more mundane, difficult, and costly methods of changing their gender presentation, and that the series is often regarded as more absurd in light of this by trans folks and those who know them/know of them. However, it would constitute a SYNTH violation for us to write that ourselves citing sources on real life transgender matters that don't themselves draw a connection to Onimai. So I feel that the Anifem source pointing out and elaborating on the legal absurdity of transgender medical rights in Japan through the lens of the series is useful, because it allows us to note the series' unrealism with regards to trans issues for those not in the know (and we can't assume everyone already knows) without it constituting original research.
- With that said, I did respect the intention of your change, as stated in your edit summary, i.e., to keep the article on topic, which is why I sought to remedy that by removing specific details about the real life issues brought up in the article. I'm pleased to see that seems to have worked out as a compromise, so, yeah. Thank you very much for the feedback. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 14:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
*slurs*
|
|---|
|
Tranny c unt
1.219.65.113 (
talk) 11:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
|
I created the basis for an article here after finding a very indepth source on the topic. You may be interested in continuing to work on it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! silviaASH ( inquire within) 19:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
On 30 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lily Hoshikawa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joanna Cherry showed a printed copy of an Internet meme featuring Lily Hoshikawa during a UK parliamentary committee meeting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lily Hoshikawa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Lily Hoshikawa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
hi. sorry to bother you but someone reverted your addition of a trans woman to upskirt about a month ago. they say "gratuitous" and relevance, which seems pretty bogus to me. wikipedia is not censored and there's nothing obscene here. what they ended up doing was wiping all lgbt and people of color images from the article. i support your addition. 2603:8080:2C00:1E00:D909:33CA:7C8A:B66A ( talk) 00:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Cohost
Hello, BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Cohost, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of copyright disputes involving Nintendo
Hello, BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of copyright disputes involving Nintendo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
With regard to
this edit,
WP:FILMLEAD says, "Any summary of the film's critical reception should avoid synthesis, meaning it should reflect an overall consensus explicitly summarized by one or more reliable sources.
" For blockbuster films, this is usually easy. There are many sources that summarize critical reception of blockbuster films, such as
Entertainment Weekly and
Variety. There isn't a need for individual editors to make up their own
Rotten Tomatoes-style critical consensus, especially since Rotten Tomatoes already exists and be cited.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 02:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Talking dogs has been nominated for merging
Category:Talking dogs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 14:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AI-generated sources
Template:AI-generated sources has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. —
Alalch E. 01:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.
The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.
Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Click the button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
- Update your signature to fix the error.
- Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
Solution 3: Do nothing:
- In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like " Example ( talk)", one month from now.
If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For all of your great contributions to anime-related articles. Partofthemachine ( talk) 05:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hello, I made a draft and article about Cohost that was accepted. Apparently, you also made a draft earlier so I'm letting you know it exists now. Seems you were too early for the reliable sources to come out. Here's the article: Cohost. Unsure why you would AfD your own article when you can just manually move it to draftspace yourself though. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:09, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
The sanity of this user is
disputed. Please refrain from conversing normally with this user.
Emergency user slap button
Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (
direct link)
Editors can a malfunctioning user to the
village stocks.
|
| Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify her! |
| This is SilviaASH's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, in your edit here, which reverted a change by me, you say that "a reliable source pointing out that the story doesn't align with reality is actually useful information". I think this is a bit of a given that there is not a medicine you can drink to turn you into a middle school girl, and I think anyone alive today knows and agrees with that fact... No? So, as such, is this truly necessary? – Fpmfpm ( talk) 10:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- That said, I checked out the current version of the section and it looks pretty good – thanks for your edits. I do think it's pretty obvious that it's "not accurately representative of real life", though, considering the series has overarching sci-fi/fantasy premise… but it's not a big deal, only a little bit redundant/unnecessary. :) Feel free to let me know any thoughts if you want. –
Fpmfpm (
talk)
Fpmfpm (
talk) 11:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- While I would agree that most people above a certain age are likely aware that there isn't medicine that instantly de-ages you and changes your biological sex, I think the thing that less people are likely to be aware of is that transgender people exist in real life and utilize more mundane, difficult, and costly methods of changing their gender presentation, and that the series is often regarded as more absurd in light of this by trans folks and those who know them/know of them. However, it would constitute a SYNTH violation for us to write that ourselves citing sources on real life transgender matters that don't themselves draw a connection to Onimai. So I feel that the Anifem source pointing out and elaborating on the legal absurdity of transgender medical rights in Japan through the lens of the series is useful, because it allows us to note the series' unrealism with regards to trans issues for those not in the know (and we can't assume everyone already knows) without it constituting original research.
- With that said, I did respect the intention of your change, as stated in your edit summary, i.e., to keep the article on topic, which is why I sought to remedy that by removing specific details about the real life issues brought up in the article. I'm pleased to see that seems to have worked out as a compromise, so, yeah. Thank you very much for the feedback. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) ( inquire within) 14:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
*slurs*
|
|---|
|
Tranny c unt
1.219.65.113 (
talk) 11:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
|
I created the basis for an article here after finding a very indepth source on the topic. You may be interested in continuing to work on it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 17:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! silviaASH ( inquire within) 19:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
On 30 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lily Hoshikawa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joanna Cherry showed a printed copy of an Internet meme featuring Lily Hoshikawa during a UK parliamentary committee meeting? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lily Hoshikawa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Lily Hoshikawa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
hi. sorry to bother you but someone reverted your addition of a trans woman to upskirt about a month ago. they say "gratuitous" and relevance, which seems pretty bogus to me. wikipedia is not censored and there's nothing obscene here. what they ended up doing was wiping all lgbt and people of color images from the article. i support your addition. 2603:8080:2C00:1E00:D909:33CA:7C8A:B66A ( talk) 00:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Cohost
Hello, BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Cohost, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of copyright disputes involving Nintendo
Hello, BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of copyright disputes involving Nintendo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
With regard to
this edit,
WP:FILMLEAD says, "Any summary of the film's critical reception should avoid synthesis, meaning it should reflect an overall consensus explicitly summarized by one or more reliable sources.
" For blockbuster films, this is usually easy. There are many sources that summarize critical reception of blockbuster films, such as
Entertainment Weekly and
Variety. There isn't a need for individual editors to make up their own
Rotten Tomatoes-style critical consensus, especially since Rotten Tomatoes already exists and be cited.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 02:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Talking dogs has been nominated for merging
Category:Talking dogs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 14:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:AI-generated sources
Template:AI-generated sources has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. —
Alalch E. 01:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.
The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.
Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Click the button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
- Update your signature to fix the error.
- Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
Solution 3: Do nothing:
- In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like " Example ( talk)", one month from now.
If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
|
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For all of your great contributions to anime-related articles. Partofthemachine ( talk) 05:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hello, I made a draft and article about Cohost that was accepted. Apparently, you also made a draft earlier so I'm letting you know it exists now. Seems you were too early for the reliable sources to come out. Here's the article: Cohost. Unsure why you would AfD your own article when you can just manually move it to draftspace yourself though. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:09, 16 March 2024 (UTC)