|
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I will add it to my watchlist, so you don't need to notify me, unless I don't respond when a response is expected.
|
Please leave a . |
You protected this page in July 2017 due to persistent disruptive editing. There has been only one edit since. Do you believe that continued protection of the talk page is warranted? 67.180.143.89 ( talk) 00:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
In Ike Altgens, I noticed that there have been various IPs that have attempted to add material cited to one particular conspiracy book, and I noticed that ScottishFinnishRadish has blocked most of those IPs for disruptive editing. I followed one of the not-blocked IPs to this discussion and saw another discussion a few sections down in which Binksternet pointed out that we were dealing with another manifestation of "UK Kennedy/Lincoln/Titanic IP". Due to the similarity of the edits in Ike Altgens, I suspect that the IP I reverted with this edit is also "UK Kennedy/Lincoln/Titanic IP". I'm not sure if anything needs to be done, but I thought I would bring it to your attention. Cheers! - Location ( talk) 15:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
I linked four different sources from local media, including videos and published reports, along a photo that I myself took, that the mill was destroyed and not simply damaged. I suggest taking a look at those sources in the previous edit. Jasonlong1212 ( talk) 12:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Following the indef you gave and Bishonen's page block, a brand new user has just turned up making the same arguments. Seems WP:DUCK to me, but do I need to do an SPI? DeCausa ( talk) 20:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Please help me in contributing constructively to Wikipedia on the subject in view of our discussion here. Rs Ekanayake 05:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Seems to think we are LinkedIn-- did not like the message from customer service. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 15:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Go to the talkpage and find consensus for your changes like everybody else is expected to do |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
How exactly is consensus building the issue when it's universally acknowledged that there's a factual dispute, and the question is whether i) to say in the text the facts are disputed or ii) to write an article which endorses as true one set of claims? This isn't an issue of characterization or opinion. Something either happened or did not happen. OckRaz talk 21:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your tireless reverting of edits flagged by Special:AbuseFilter/982. Considering how many of the additions are for anti-semitic reasons, it's good to see that stuff reverted. Galobtter ( talk) 23:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC) |
The edits being made about Bertrand " being the first to report that the hunter biden emails were a disinformation campaign" are incorrect and fraudulent. Bertrand reported on a letter written by former CIA officials, she herself did not assert that as an opinion or truth, the CIA did. Her job was to report on the CIA and their letter. This is false and libel. I have tried numerous times to edit this, but very biased and corrupt administrators keep changing it back. This is slander and the writer is libel. Please stop reverting it to the incorrect, slanderous paragraph. 67.87.101.25 ( talk) 02:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
I created THIS PAGE to organize my upload gallery long time ago, but now it has no use. this is a duplicated page. can you please delete it?
Please help me to delete it. Risantana ( talk) 05:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
Would you mind taking a look at User talk:Odenwald Monkey? This person's article edits have all been reverted, and they now spend their time promoting their pet conspiracy theory that Hitler didn't write Mein Kampf, because he was too stupid or uneducated to do so, so it must have been written by university professors, industrialists, and so on. It started with comments on Talk:Adolf Hitler and Talk:Mein Kampf and has most recently resulted in an attempt to add it to Mein Kampf with a (probably deliberately) false reference. The editor is very coy on their user page, to the point where I can't tell if I'm being played by a troll, or if I'm dealing with someone with an idee fixe.
In either case, though, they don't seem to be here to improve the encyclopedia. I'd appreciate your evaluation. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 04:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for helping me with that LTA on my talk page. I was wondering if temporary semi-protection could be added because I have received many attacks towards me here and on simple wiki. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:21, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
why PaUZz LYte ( talk) 22:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Now that I think about it for a second, there's something I don't understand about the edits you just made. In particular, there's nothing wrong with my contribution, and most of it's from the document, but you know what's so great about the groundless return that you didn't run a program like Huggle. I think it's a rollback that crosses the line and goes over the line. If you're online, please look at this and reflect on yourself. -- 220.77.173.83 ( talk) 11:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Come to think of it, what did you say when you first came to my discussion? Do you behave in your own way? You know that's prohibited, right? And when I edit a document, I start by leaving a summary in the summary, if not the source. If you leave a summary, you don't get rolled back or reversed very often. Or maybe there is. However, a little excessive rollback like Nim is enough to get bad criticism. Can you think about it before you do it? Why on earth did you do that? And please refrain from rolling back without any problems. Or you'll keep an eye on the blocker. -- 220.77.173.83 ( talk) 11:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, it seems the article Boeing 777X seems to have a protection level a bit too high. It is stated that many IP editors are negatively contributing to the stated page, but there is no statement regarding the fault of autoconfirmed users. If very few to no autoconfirmed users have negatively edited the page, can you please reduce protection to semi-protected? Thanks for your understanding. Super yoshi013021 ( talk) 21:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Please revoke from User:2001:8004:1330:4D49:151:D665:F697:7DBE. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
is not just a vandal in its own right, but evasion by Gay people suck dick. DMacks ( talk) 03:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Good morning Acroterion. Thank you for your edits removing the content I'd left on the talk page of the George Soros article, which I won't repeat here. I understand my edits were a violation of the rules on Biographies of Living People.
I apologise for breaking this rule and will ensure that I don't break this again. As I don't edit EN very often, if you have to remove my work or edits, or warn me, could you please leave something on my talk page to let me know what I've done wrong and where to find the rules to read up on it please?
It would help me to read the rules surrounding whatever I do wrong, so I understand for the future.
Many thanks,
Dane| Geld 00:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
That's creative predictive text you've got there? Johnbod ( talk) 03:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
nvm
Someone deleted my page even though I was still editing it I did nothing wrong and if I did please explain to me. The page is /info/en/?search=St_Mark%27s_CofE_School%2C_Southampton?wprov=sfla1 Parabelleum ( talk) 08:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Acroterion, I noticed you blocked a harassing IP. It has been partially revdelled, but thought worth noting there are also instances here and here if a full revdel is needed. Best, CMD ( talk) 00:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Acroterion, you should be aware of a discussion from two days ago here: User_talk:Herreshoffian. Thanks for your excellent work. Amigao ( talk) 02:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
When I asked this question and labelled him as such, it wasn't because of speculation or personal views, it's because some outlets (mostly jewish civil rights advocacy groups) have labelled him as a neo-nazi, and his rhetoric and actions also fit his categorization as well. Firekong1 ( talk) 13:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
I suggested a compromise. If you do not want to use primary sources to achieve accuracy (to be consistent, you should also delete biblical sources in the Christianity article and Poetic Edda sources in the Baldr article, and so forth, and so forth, and so forth), then let us DELETE the misleading passage. The truth: Norse deities can be killed, but they are not annihilated. Baldur will exist in Helheim and will lead the pantheon after Ragnarok. The passage you restored is misleading. 45.53.207.255 ( talk) 07:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Please see the reported incident on the False titles of nobility page, which you have protected. There is a false claim on the page through use of Wikipedia:Fictitious references. A simple check of what I have stated will show this to be true. Someone has corrupted the page to make a false claim. 82.129.53.90 ( talk) 12:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Please see the reported incident on the talk page of False titles of nobility page, which you have protected. There is a false claim on the page through use of Wikipedia:Fictitious references. A simple check of what I have stated will show this to be true. Someone has corrupted the page to make a false claim. 82.129.53.90 ( talk) 12:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
I suggest that the blocked range should be adjusted Into 2001:448a:20e0::/49, the blockade of 2001:448a:20e0:6e0b::/64 might be no effect.You can check [1] to confirm why I would say there might be no effect.
PS:The 2001:448a:20e0::/49 range was calculated from the records of IP activity in pages Talk:Yang (surname) and Yang (surname) by using a tool from ftools.toolforge.org(ip-range-calc). Rastinition ( talk) 00:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for supressing those edits. Did you want to hit this one too that has a presumption of guilt? https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Walt_Nauta&diff=prev&oldid=1159617113 Toddst1 ( talk) 14:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
That Hong Kong based user 103.249.33.10 appears to be adding tags such as Marxist and other statements in a unidirectional and similar manner to several articles (check their contribution log), often without sourcing. Might be something to look into. Thank you for reverting it. They have also made politically charged statements regarding Chinese Taipei / Taiwan, as well, which have been reverted. Perhaps a paid editor? But one with strong unidirectional bias. Top5a ( talk) 02:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
I was looking to take a stab at drafting a new article for post-finasteride syndrome that (I hope) will address the concerns raised about the original article. The page for PFS currently redirects to the article for Finasteride, and is also protected; is it possible for me to draft an article while this protection applies? If not, would it be possible to lift the protection on the article?
Best, Xardwen ( talk) 22:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Placed the requested move in queue. NYC is the largest city in the US; saying there was one solitary crash in the city is not specific. I guess if the word major is added, that could change the discussion. Knocksocksoff ( talk) 21:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, I saw that you reverted this , desiring to keep the note there. That was my first instinct as well and I was in the process of reverting it, but my brain had me do some extra digging because I was going to state that editors needed the reminder because of previous activity. Well, looking through the latest edits, it seems the comment note is causing more edits and not less. I point you to this and this. I think the IP has the right idea considering the latest edits might have been unnecessary if not for the note. I would love to know what you think. Inomyabcs ( talk) 23:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
I have created a new essay and would welcome some critique on the talk page there:
Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 23:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello mr Acroterion. I want you to block the user's NebY account for several reasons. First he always deleting any of my adding informations on pages from Wikipedia like zuijin, agathodaemon and others. Second even if I am asking him to help me with my adding more reliable informations and contents and pages he instead of helping me he keeps deleting any of my messages plus my informations. I ask you to block his account because he is not fair with me. 2A02:587:1F0A:AD00:D181:E7FE:B2E9:1F08 ( talk) 13:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
If I recall correctly, there was a series of socks a while ago who kept removing mentions of Armenian Highlands from the article. Can't remember the details, but if you look back for my contributions to the article you should find them. DuncanHill ( talk) 14:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
I don't want to poke any bees nest (particularly because, on a personal note, I have very little interest in curbing a possibly too-strong interpretation of MOS:GENDERID), but I don't think MOS:GENDERID has ever been held to apply to talk pages. On some level, I think that's a matter of practicality: even as to living persons, MOS:GENDERID has an exception for persons who were notable under there prior name, and, in close cases, it'd be hard to have the discussion if you were afraid saying the prior name might be against policy. (There's also always the possibility of someone applying IAR, which I think ... depending on your interpretation of the guideline, is currently applied to at least one page I can think of.)-- Jerome Frank Disciple 23:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
(including lists, redirects, disambiguation pages, category names, templates, etc."), so I figured it was worth flagging, but again I have no real desire to discourage too-strong enforcement :) Apologies for flagging an issue you were already aware of!-- Jerome Frank Disciple 23:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Uses the term "Modern Scientific Concensus". This is an obvious oxymoron. Further, it is of the three word type (i.e. all 2 word combinations of the 3 words are oxymorons). Is there a word for this?
You reverted this comment in the "talk" page almost faster than I created it. This makes me suspicious. If you are some kind of expert, you don't behave as one. If you are not, you have abused whatever power some process has emboldened you with.
For shame. WithGLEE ( talk) 12:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi where do you get that Spain used natives forced labor to conquest the indigenous peoples in the Americas ? JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa ( talk) 13:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I added sources but another problem happens when even local users dont mind, please fix format with leagues sorted by alphabet/region, if can 93.140.193.65 ( talk) 18:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
This article was semi-protected a while back, but it appears that the pending changes put in place was never reset. Since you were the last (active) admin to protect the page, could you please fix it? Thanks, 47.227.95.73 ( talk) 22:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello.!
Im Lucas and im new here. I just wanted to know, how to contact sumerians, ive got few questions to them and was just wondering how you talk ti them. 2A02:C7F:3E5F:B600:1C32:6853:786B:F9E0 ( talk) 01:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Please explain why MOS:PREFIXDASH does not apply in this case, like " Post–Cold War era". 2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 ( talk) 15:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Your user name reminds me of the Alchetron online encyclopedia project. Any etymological similarity? Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 04:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, you may remember me from the Boeing 777X protection reduction thing. I have noticed that the page Nyck de Vries has been vandalized pretty frequently lately by IP editors. Should we change protection to WP:SEMI? Super yoshi013021 ( talk) 23:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Recently Active Admin Acroterion! New user User:RealReel5 is adding links to dubious certification websites ( [2], [3]) and then pedantically arguing with the likes of Zefr and Oknazevad about why the spammy links are okay. Please take a look. Thanks! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Its my talk page, not yours. Bestarmy ( talk) 11:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Great image. I hope you'll use it elsewhere on Wikipedia.
The Nighthawks of Gaston County.
-- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 13:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your edit because in fact I was not editing others comments; I was editing my old comment from a while ago so I can update it to match my current views and my current username (I was "Shadow of the Starlit Sky" from March-May 2023). Sorry I forgot to put an edit summary for that - that must've been the source of the confusion. — Prodraxis { talk • contribs} (she/her) 23:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi You may have already done this by the time you read this but the user you just blocked is now abusing their TPA. Would you mind revoking it? Thanks. TLJ7863 ( talk) 17:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Project Chariot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this warning. The over-the-top attack came as a bit of a shock when I awoke to find it. Not only was it uncalled for, it revealed some serious reading comprehension issues and a failure to understand why AGF is so important. Thanks again. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 23:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Per Extraordinary Writ's talk page header announcing a few weeks off-project, I randomly selected you as an active admin who might be able to take action on editing restriction violations. EW was the notifying admin on the restriction, so I posted the matter to ANI at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Achar Sva editing restriction violation but did not receive any admin action in a day. If you are not able to or do not wish to respond to this discussion, please let me know and I'll pick another name out of the admin hat. Thank you! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 01:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Hello, im sure u are looking to hear literally anybody but me, but i have come here to ask, why have u threatened my article because of the reason: Unremarkable shipwreck? Ultimateyeetus ( talk) 00:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Can you also revdel Special:Diff/1170492196 by the same user and delete the user talk page? Jonteemil ( talk) 11:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Stop adding bias to the Noah’s ark Wikipedia page Brennan1111 ( talk) 23:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Why do you want to omit that BAP is Jewish? I mean he has spoke about it a dozen times and regards it as an influence, but it's also a biographical detail. 92.20.135.52 ( talk) 00:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Maybe you can give better advice. User talk:Livius Plinius#August 2023. Doug Weller talk 19:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
It’s ridiculous firstly that there was a “warning” placed when I just removed relatively new content from a page with disputed neutrality. Then my pointing that out is an attack? Where’s the fairness here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.16.115.131 ( talk • contribs)
On 23 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Ketch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Project Ketch proposed the detonation of a 24-kiloton nuclear device in Pennsylvania to create a natural-gas storage reservoir? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Ketch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Project Ketch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/her) 12:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
[4] and [5]. Thanks, Knitsey ( talk) 20:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Are you happy to block this BE sock of User:208.127.197.117? Mutt Lunker ( talk) 10:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
On 31 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Carryall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Project Carryall proposed the detonation of 23 nuclear devices in California to build a road? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Carryall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Project Carryall), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 ( talk) 00:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
173.66.105.21 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
You may want to revoke talkpage access. Thanks. 2601:601:51C:811:E15D:3D87:821D:CE85 ( talk) 00:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Instead of protecting your friends that wantonly edit with no regard to their actions why don't you get them to pay attention to what they're doing? You're clearly biased in favor of him becuase you didn't say jack squat to him. Now go prove you'll be fair by posting some warning on his talk page. 70.161.8.90 ( talk) 17:53, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted my personal sandbox page (spongiformidae) that I was using to learn how to edit Wikipedia - I put quite a lot of effort in and you've just deleted it as a 'hoax' Can you please restore the info as I'm not done. Clearly it's not "true" info, I didn't want to risk someone finding it in a real search by accident. It's not linked from any outside sources whatsoever, you've missed the mark here Spongiformidae ( talk) 19:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Re: User talk:Unselfstudier , I believe this is the same person who was impersonating you at User talk:Actoreon1. They edit the same talk pages i.e. BDS/UNHRC, both pushing the claim that BDS is based on Kristallnacht [6] [7] , neither use indenting & both follow @ Selfstudier around. Also User talk:JerusalemisthecapitalofIsrael - User talk:204.9.220.42. & Special:Contributions/98.186.29.6. No idea if this is any use, being as they're now blocked, but I figured I'd best tell you anyway. 🙂 DSQ ( talk) 23:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
But I am starting to feel WoW may be back. I found this edit (which may not shout out WoW to you) but said vandal called himself the “Phuerdai vandal on Wheels”, which raised my eyebrows. It could be an imposter, or the vandal admires Willy, but just let me know if he’s really returning to plague us all. Brachy08 (Talk) 10:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Keep on editing!! You are GREAT!!! :) Babysharkboss2 was here!! 20:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Honeycomb.io. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. lizthegrey ( talk) 17:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
My lord, after looking at the delete, it just dawned on me, the offensive username. Not very quick on the uptake this morning.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! About a year ago I made the Luxembourg Rebellion, Luxembourg Communist Rebellion , and Luxembourg Rebellions. The Luxembourg Rebellion faced a Contested deletion and was kept, the Luxembourg Rebellion was revised and the review said it was within wikipila policy. The articles are up for merging and I want to know what you think because they have all been “reviewed”, the person merging them has also proposed the merging of many other articles I have made so I would not be surprised if he comes to this talk page. With all that said I hope you can take a look at this situation. Thanks! LuxembourgLover ( talk) 13:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 08:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Greetings Acroterion, Ihikky deleted a paragraph on the Kingdom of Dagbon page that is reliably sourced. These sources have different arguments. 5 of these sources speak about the subject matter at hand which is the Ashanti invasion of Dagbon in the mid 18th century. The 6th source, which is a journal, is skeptical about this invasion. The paragraph provides the arguments of both sides including the historians for the invasion as well as the journal which criticized this invasion for being overexaggerated. Ihikky on the other hand deleted everything without proper explanation as to why. I shared this on the talk page, Talk:Kingdom of Dagbon#Ashanti Empire., so we can meet consensus, but he keeps deleting the entire paragraph without addressing on the talk page why everything must be deleted. Please can you have a look at this? Kwesi Yema ( talk) 18:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Clyde [trout needed] 14:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Don't you think you went overboard with WP:BLP on 2023 Lewiston shootings? When police name anybody in relation to a mass tragedy like that, he becomes a public figure almost immediately (news spreads extremely fast in this day and age), and our ability to protect the innocent is basically non-existent, even if there is evidence that he was falsely named. Going back and removing his name from previous discussions is simply ridiculous, especially when his name was added, what, 24 hours later? Esszet ( talk) 14:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
He's doing it again. I think this is clearly WP:NOTHERE and indefinite block is warranted. -- WikiLinuz ( talk) 00:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Acroterion, I did not think of modifying my edit summary in the reversion of an edit you just hid, same for another editor reverting at Talk:Free Palestine Movement, may want to hide those edit summaries as well. Thanks, nableezy - 13:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Burned memo- https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/alien.ufo/majestic_12/Burned%20Memo,%20pages%201-2%20burnedmemo-s1-pgs1-2.pdf
Magic Eyes Only- https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/alien.ufo/majestic_12/Flying%20Saucer%20Analytical%20Report%20rdlab_analyticalrpt2sept47.pdf 66.244.71.70 ( talk) 13:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Justyouraveragewikieditor ( talk) 11:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Acroterion,
I had used my user Sandbox for creating a draft of the article i intended to contribute to wikipedia. Could you please indicate how the use of sandbox to create a draft is violating the wikipedia's goals ? Thank you, Aparna
Aparna DS ( talk) 08:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
@Acroterion, thank you for your feedback. I do not intend to use wikipedia as a self promotion tool and neither it is a CV of mine or anybody that i was intending to post about. I used the wikipages Nirupama Rajendra and Maya Rao as reference and added few more sections that was relevant. I am working to cut it short as this was only a draft.. Aparna DS ( talk) 13:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Acroterion! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Just to know :"Not usual usage" what is meant by that? So I know how to deal with it,thank you. Labicanense ( talk) 18:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Can you ban this ip for longer? This isn’t the first instance of them being disruptive and pushing an agenda. Nagol0929 ( talk) 13:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
You closed this after 28 hours of discussion on that page. One admin suggested I go to that page. I did. The first person to reply on that page was 28 hours ago. Please revert your closing. This discussion is not a repetition of the other talk page. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 03:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
331dot's last 2 comments:
That's an issue for the article about the assassination itself, and you might want to review that talk page and its archive carefully before proposing it there, as it sounds like this general issue(if not the sources you use here) might have been brought up before now. As to this article, I agree that you probably could mention these claims in the context of theories, if it isn't already mentioned.
Then the only thing you can do is attempt to gain a consensus on the talk page of the assassination article, but you will need to do more than just repeat prior arguments to have any chance at succeeding. Personally I don't think you are likely to succeed, and it will likely be a long, hard effort, but that's what you can do. |
I did not just repeat prior arguments. There is much new info in the documentary. But you cut off discussion after 28 hours.
I noticed that there was only 34 hours of discussion at the other talk page you closed. If you don't count my note at the end of it pointing to the other discussion 17 days later. Most talk pages let discussions roll naturally off the page.
That first discussion was based solely on the trailer for the doc, and reviews. The trailer by itself was pretty extraordinary due to all the eyewitnesses. But for the 2nd discussion I had seen the full documentary. And it is much more extraordinary than the trailer. Many more eyewitnesses covering much more. We were having a good discussion on the 2nd talk page. I don't think your reasons for cutting it off are justified. Why not just let it go on as at most talk pages? That's what talk pages are for. I have edited many controversial topics on Wikipedia over 18 years, and have seen nothing like what you are doing. We were having a good discussion without insulting each other. Please revert your close. What's the worst that could happen? More talk? That's what talk pages are for. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 11:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey.
I'm not going to contest this, either here or on Commons, in no small part because copyright laws are hella complex. But, I think those images might actually have been uploaded properly. I took a look at the masthead of the paper through the Newspapers.com access in WP:LIB, and there's no copyright notice in it. I also couldn't spot one anywhere else on the first or last pages of the issue. You might want to take a closer look at the issue through the copy accessible via the library.
I do agree though that it was an entirely inappropriate pair of images. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 02:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
After all the headache I've had at WP:AIV with this IP and an experienced user, who is the IP a sock of? Reminded me a little of BKFIP, but the location is wrong.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits? The maps were biased (claiming Suriname controls the disputed territories and violates WP:NPOV. BoomGoesTheTrinitrotoluene ( talk) 14:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Can you please look at this ? [8] Ratnahastin ( talk) 12:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 18:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Given their prior (if sporadic) editing history of POV pushing regardless of the citations attached, I might have indeffed this editor per WP:NOTHERE. Ed [talk] [OMT] 18:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 08:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi sir,
I am curious where this three-revert rule applies to me. Please provide evidence. I have actually not reverted a single page. I am not even on one, yet you flagged my account as three. Why is this? DivineReality ( talk) 01:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
The statement I made was a highly neutral statement, that is pure fact, that is so embedded in Christianity- can it be more "neutral"? Or how would you define "neutral" It is not personal commentary, it is neutral explanation that is designed to make the text less ambiguous than it already is - as it seems biased towards the religion. The sentence "19th century priests - including Donders - showed no respect towards existing beliefs (including Winti) is by any standard not neutral, since: 1. Is authos's presonal opionion not covered in bibliography 2. Contains only half of the truth: most (if not all) missionaries does not show respect towards existing beliefs, becuase it does not go on par with Christianity 91.189.141.116 ( talk) 13:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Less than 2 weeks after the last 6-month block expires, somehow trouble finds them again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
By mistake, I pinged a different editor. I edit it back, to your username, but I don't know for sure if it notified you or not. Dante4786 ( talk) 04:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
You recently blocked [10] a disruptive IP. I suspect this account [11] is the same person. They left a comment defending the IP's edit and then made the same disruptive edit at Ronald Acuña Jr.. Nemov ( talk) 01:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
Hi Acroterion, can you rev/delete the latest BLP violation at Gary Allen (runner)? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking User:Xwpis ONOMA. I think you may want to just go ahead and remove TPA, I missed this horribly antisemitic comment on another page until I went looking through their previous contributions. This person definitely doesn't need to be allowed back. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 18:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
You recently blocked this IP range for personal attacks, but I'm seeing very similar IPs (like this one and this one) continuing to post on the talk page in question. Maybe not making personal attacks, but it feels like block evasion. Asking here because you did the original block and it's honestly not clear whether this is something that needs to be reported/where that would even happen/whether a block expansion is even warranted. Can't wrap my head around rangeblocks, but when I tried to look at contributions over a larger range the edit history seemed to line up. Paris1127 ( talk) 01:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Acroterion. I know you keep an eye on Comicsgate, which is frequently targeted by irate editors. If you have some time, it would be appreciated if you could keep an admin eye on Ethan Van Sciver for a while, too; I anticipate some talkpage sealioning. Grandpallama ( talk) 22:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Why did you revert this IP editor? I don't see it mentioned in the summary. -- David Tornheim ( talk) 00:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Would it be possible to help? A convoy supporter is removing well-sourced content. It appears that the edits are politically motivated - they wish to remove any content that is critical of the convoy occupation (e.g. anything referring to the class action lawsuit). They are also adding inaccurate content. Thanks! Helikon ( talk) 09:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your help!
Hello. Extended confirmed did make sense on the 20th anniversary, but it’s been 2 and a half years and the page is still extended. It could potentially be lowered to even pending changes or no protection, but extended confirmed is overkill as of now. CharlieEdited ( talk) 16:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
Hello Acroterion, I see that you've protected the violence against men article. I personally disagree with your move and request the move to be reversed, however I am happy to hear your thought process as I'm not up to code with page protection. You cite an IP persistently removing material without explanation. There was an explanation for the move on the talk page. This user has also only removed this content once before, which was a day ago so is that considered "persistent"? Further, this user has added well-sourced content, so I've assumed that the editor is acting in good faith. From what I see, it didn't need to be protected. — Panamitsu (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
is such an interesting word. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 03:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
I was trying to polish and refine the comments on the talk page for the Far Right, but you undid my revision. Why? Julkhamil ( talk) 16:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Acroterion! There is an ongoing discussion in the Amhara people talk page. This discussion began after a disagreement on when the Christianization of Amhara began, with me believing it started in the 4th century during the reign of Emperor Ezana and the other user "Socialwave597" believing it happened "in the late Aksumite period, as hinted in the missionary activities of King Degna Djan." Throughout the discussion I gave a lot of reliable sources, however to no avail. He (I don't kow if it is on purpose or not) misinterprets them and/or gives some excuse not to accept them as valid. He also provided some sources, however when you look at them they don't state what he said, on the contrary, some even prove my point. I saw that It was a waste of time and asked for a third opinion. Thankfully it was answered and the Administrator gave his opinion, which seemed to me that he wasn't certain or just tried to be as neutral as possible. Me and Socialwave597 made our proposals and have yet to been answered, it's been more than 2 weeks. I have no idea whether Admins respond back when giving third opinions but we really need a concrete answer so we can reach a consensus as fast as possible. Would you be able, if possible of course, to check the situation and possibly resolve this? Please let me know if I need to contact someone else or do something as I really have no clue of what to do, I'm kind of new to Wikipedia and I am just trying to solve this issue. Thanks! Javext ( talk) 22:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
See WP:ANI#Copyvio revdel requested for Back in Black. I've boldly deleted the passage based on that dodgy Guitar Player "citation". We need a solid RS for gushing fanpuffery, and I've seen unusable anonymous reviews in Allmusic and reaction videos which were better than that. I don't have the stomach to go over the rest of the article. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
I think it's warranted. Good close to that discussion. I got caught up in an edit conflict with you, wrote: Quick response before I block you for personal attacks. Source1mag [12] is a conspiracy theory site. Eg "Shocking Mini Hidden Camera Shows – Corporate, Big Pharma Plot to Fire Tucker Carlson" and "Bizarre Oddities: Oh My, Obama’s Brother Says Barack Sold His Soul to Satan To Join the Illuminati" The American Chronicle is no better. [13] Doug Weller talk 12:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Acroterion, it's been a while and I hope you are doing well. I decided a few days ago that I would see if I could make a low-key return to Wikipedia editing without too much anxiety, and the first thing I found was that Nsmutte had returned while I was gone... I came here to ask if you could help me with a renewed semi-protection of my user talk page, but I just noticed that you already did while I was typing the previous, so I'll change to a thank you! -- bonadea contributions talk 13:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Admin Acroterion will not let me refactor talk pages and is not engaging in an open way. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 01:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I am contesting your conduct as an admin. You have threatened to block me 3 times, which I find to be an unacceptable way to wield your ability to ban users. If you ban me for contesting your conduct, I only take it as further evidence that you have been given too much power as an admin because you are apparently able to overrule anyone who questions your conduct.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding You are threatening to block me on unjust grounds, and this is not ok conduct for an admin. The thread is Admin Acroterion will not let me refactor talk pages and is not engaging in an open way. Thank you. — Julkhamil ( talk) 01:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
You:
Subject: Inquiry Regarding Deletion of User Page
Hi there,
I recently noticed that my Wikipedia user page, which was dedicated to well-known saints with followers worldwide, has been deleted. I'm writing to inquire about the reason behind this deletion. I've observed similar pages for saints from various countries, including the USA, China, Japan, and India. like similar content what my page was so if similar content with other page can work what is issue for my page..?
Given this precedent, I'm curious as to what specific issue led to the removal of my page.
Could you please provide me with more information regarding the deletion and any guidelines or policies I may have inadvertently violated? I'm eager to ensure that any necessary adjustments are made to comply with Wikipedia's standards.
Thank you for your assistance.
Warm regards,
Yatharthgeeta24 Yatharthgeeta24 ( talk) 04:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Some people just need to stick to decaf. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 20:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no actual way of knowing that the claims of the four men being the ‘ones who organised a revolt’ are true. The only evidence is from reports of what happened which have changed over time, and their accuracy has been questions. There is no way of knowing that the four men actually were the only four who decided initially. That is just what is reported through popular media and what was reported as being said in unrecorded telephone conversations. Tge use of names when referring to the 9/11 commission report is also wrong as the simply says ‘native English’ or ‘native Arabic’ speaker. The voice recordings have never been made public just a transcript, so any attributions to individuals is not confirmed. The definitive claims of ‘these four men did x’ or ‘x said this’ when not a recorded call in wikivoice is a misuse of wikivoice. PicturePerfect666 ( talk) 16:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
I saw your message to 49.185.208.16. (Thanks for the backup, btw. It's good to know that someone else found that edit sketchy) Do you know if there's a discussion/policy that specifically addresses the issue of "Jew-tagging"? Or is it something that is enveloped by wp:rs and wp:undue? Joyous! Noise! 00:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
In this edit you said that consensus was to refer to ships without gender. I tried to find the consensus myself but failed to do so. Is it possible that you can share with me the link to the consensus? Thanks. — Panamitsu (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi – thanks for those blocks, looks like potentially a missed revdel over at Special:Contributions/SmBby. Tollens ( talk) 11:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I read your article.....and while I appreciate you asking me, I am not sure how much help I can be with it. (Although if you have specific questions from specific references, I might be able to help.) First off, I am not a bridge guy (I do mainly industrial buildings). AASHTO is kind of a world unto itself. Bridge design is a specialty area in structural (kind of like precast/prestressed). We use to gripe about the fact the SE exam was 20% bridge questions.....and we (i.e. building guys) were clueless. (I had to get AASTO's 16th/17th ed. and try to pick off the easy questions.....but I digress.)
All that being said, here is a good thread (with some references) on this topic on Eng-tips.com: [16]. Like some of the posters said: we tend to think more in terms of "redundancy" than "Fracture Critical". I am not sure if I've even heard that term before. Rja13ww33 ( talk) 20:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
On
29 March 2024 you stated I don't see this as a matter for arbitration, this looks like extended forum-shopping.
The
Arbitration Committee is part of the
dispute resolution process. I had legitimate reasons why I went to the ArbCom, which I will explain in the case if my request for extension is approved. You may even think I may have used a mistaken venue. But you stating that it looks like it is forum-shopping is an
ill-considered accusation of impropriety and is not assuming good faith. You are an administrator, please follow Wikipedia guidance. The
Assume Good Faith guideline clearly states,
Assuming good faith (AGF) means assuming that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when their actions are harmful. This is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. [...]
When disagreement occurs, try as best you can to explain and resolve the problem, not cause more conflict, and so give others the opportunity to reply in kind. Consider whether a dispute stems from different perspectives, and look for ways to reach consensus.
When doubt is cast on good faith, continue to assume good faith yourself when possible. Be civil and follow dispute resolution procedures, rather than attacking editors or edit-warring with them. If you wish to express doubts about the conduct of fellow Wikipedians, please substantiate those doubts with specific diffs and other relevant evidence, so that people can understand the basis for your concerns. Although bad conduct may seem to be due to bad faith, it is usually best to address the conduct without mentioning motives, which might intensify resentments all around.
According to the Administrator conduct policy,
Administrators should lead by example and, like all editors, should behave in a respectful, civil manner in their interactions with others. Administrators should follow Wikipedia policies and perform their duties to the best of their abilities.
Thanks. Thinker78 (talk) 21:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Yeah... so... let's just ignore that – Potato/ potahto! Hope you see what I was trying to do! I think my logic is sound, even if the geography isn't!!! MIDI ( talk) 09:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
This is not a hoax this is culturally significant local legend back by reputable news source. It also helps to further display the cultural impact the Chupacabra cryptid legend has stretched to other area of the world outside of mexico. Dancmaster ( talk) 17:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
...a couple times for "Jew tagging" and in general bad editing practices has picked up where they left off after the latest 3-month block expired: 2601:883:C201:8590:0:0:0:0/64 A good number of their recent edits involve some form of apparent anti-Jewish animus (e.g. [18] [19] [20]) or whitewash well-known antisemitic conspiracy theorists (e.g. [21] [22]), while others have simply been reverted for being unsourced or undue. As the most recent blocking admin, I thought I'd bring this to you first rather than give this person a platform at ANI. Cheers, Generalrelative ( talk) 01:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you please restore my user page until after phabricator.wikimedia.org/T363024 is resolved? The example links for reproducing the bug are no longer working. Otherwise, could you please recommend where/how I might post the exact same history so there's a working example the MediaWiki/Wikipedia devs can reference? Thank you! RDuckDev ( talk) 02:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Monsieur le ministre@heures, je ne veux pas vous faire perdre votre temps comme vous me le dites sur ma page de discussion. Je ne veux pas perdre mon temps. Vous pouvez fermer mon compte sur le Wikipédia de langue anglaise. Cordialement Laurange Jolicœur Héron du fleuve ( talk) 20:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I have written you an email. Ryan kh ( talk) 12:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
So I just partial-blocked my alt account from Wikipedia community and the template namespace (but disabled autoblock), and logged into it and visited https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%20community&action=edit. If I'd fully blocked the account, this would trigger an autoblock on my IP and this account; I'd like to try this, but this has caused me problems in the past. What happens if a partially blocked user attempts to edit one of these pages, and then logs out: is an autoblock applied, and if so, is it a full block, or is it limited to the scope of the original partial block? Nyttend ( talk) 21:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
|
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
If I leave a message for you: Please respond on your talk page. I will add it to my watchlist, so you don't need to notify me, unless I don't respond when a response is expected.
|
Please leave a . |
You protected this page in July 2017 due to persistent disruptive editing. There has been only one edit since. Do you believe that continued protection of the talk page is warranted? 67.180.143.89 ( talk) 00:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
In Ike Altgens, I noticed that there have been various IPs that have attempted to add material cited to one particular conspiracy book, and I noticed that ScottishFinnishRadish has blocked most of those IPs for disruptive editing. I followed one of the not-blocked IPs to this discussion and saw another discussion a few sections down in which Binksternet pointed out that we were dealing with another manifestation of "UK Kennedy/Lincoln/Titanic IP". Due to the similarity of the edits in Ike Altgens, I suspect that the IP I reverted with this edit is also "UK Kennedy/Lincoln/Titanic IP". I'm not sure if anything needs to be done, but I thought I would bring it to your attention. Cheers! - Location ( talk) 15:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
I linked four different sources from local media, including videos and published reports, along a photo that I myself took, that the mill was destroyed and not simply damaged. I suggest taking a look at those sources in the previous edit. Jasonlong1212 ( talk) 12:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Following the indef you gave and Bishonen's page block, a brand new user has just turned up making the same arguments. Seems WP:DUCK to me, but do I need to do an SPI? DeCausa ( talk) 20:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Please help me in contributing constructively to Wikipedia on the subject in view of our discussion here. Rs Ekanayake 05:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Seems to think we are LinkedIn-- did not like the message from customer service. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 15:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Go to the talkpage and find consensus for your changes like everybody else is expected to do |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
How exactly is consensus building the issue when it's universally acknowledged that there's a factual dispute, and the question is whether i) to say in the text the facts are disputed or ii) to write an article which endorses as true one set of claims? This isn't an issue of characterization or opinion. Something either happened or did not happen. OckRaz talk 21:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your tireless reverting of edits flagged by Special:AbuseFilter/982. Considering how many of the additions are for anti-semitic reasons, it's good to see that stuff reverted. Galobtter ( talk) 23:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC) |
The edits being made about Bertrand " being the first to report that the hunter biden emails were a disinformation campaign" are incorrect and fraudulent. Bertrand reported on a letter written by former CIA officials, she herself did not assert that as an opinion or truth, the CIA did. Her job was to report on the CIA and their letter. This is false and libel. I have tried numerous times to edit this, but very biased and corrupt administrators keep changing it back. This is slander and the writer is libel. Please stop reverting it to the incorrect, slanderous paragraph. 67.87.101.25 ( talk) 02:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
I created THIS PAGE to organize my upload gallery long time ago, but now it has no use. this is a duplicated page. can you please delete it?
Please help me to delete it. Risantana ( talk) 05:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
Would you mind taking a look at User talk:Odenwald Monkey? This person's article edits have all been reverted, and they now spend their time promoting their pet conspiracy theory that Hitler didn't write Mein Kampf, because he was too stupid or uneducated to do so, so it must have been written by university professors, industrialists, and so on. It started with comments on Talk:Adolf Hitler and Talk:Mein Kampf and has most recently resulted in an attempt to add it to Mein Kampf with a (probably deliberately) false reference. The editor is very coy on their user page, to the point where I can't tell if I'm being played by a troll, or if I'm dealing with someone with an idee fixe.
In either case, though, they don't seem to be here to improve the encyclopedia. I'd appreciate your evaluation. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 04:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for helping me with that LTA on my talk page. I was wondering if temporary semi-protection could be added because I have received many attacks towards me here and on simple wiki. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:21, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
why PaUZz LYte ( talk) 22:42, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Now that I think about it for a second, there's something I don't understand about the edits you just made. In particular, there's nothing wrong with my contribution, and most of it's from the document, but you know what's so great about the groundless return that you didn't run a program like Huggle. I think it's a rollback that crosses the line and goes over the line. If you're online, please look at this and reflect on yourself. -- 220.77.173.83 ( talk) 11:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Come to think of it, what did you say when you first came to my discussion? Do you behave in your own way? You know that's prohibited, right? And when I edit a document, I start by leaving a summary in the summary, if not the source. If you leave a summary, you don't get rolled back or reversed very often. Or maybe there is. However, a little excessive rollback like Nim is enough to get bad criticism. Can you think about it before you do it? Why on earth did you do that? And please refrain from rolling back without any problems. Or you'll keep an eye on the blocker. -- 220.77.173.83 ( talk) 11:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, it seems the article Boeing 777X seems to have a protection level a bit too high. It is stated that many IP editors are negatively contributing to the stated page, but there is no statement regarding the fault of autoconfirmed users. If very few to no autoconfirmed users have negatively edited the page, can you please reduce protection to semi-protected? Thanks for your understanding. Super yoshi013021 ( talk) 21:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Please revoke from User:2001:8004:1330:4D49:151:D665:F697:7DBE. - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
is not just a vandal in its own right, but evasion by Gay people suck dick. DMacks ( talk) 03:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Good morning Acroterion. Thank you for your edits removing the content I'd left on the talk page of the George Soros article, which I won't repeat here. I understand my edits were a violation of the rules on Biographies of Living People.
I apologise for breaking this rule and will ensure that I don't break this again. As I don't edit EN very often, if you have to remove my work or edits, or warn me, could you please leave something on my talk page to let me know what I've done wrong and where to find the rules to read up on it please?
It would help me to read the rules surrounding whatever I do wrong, so I understand for the future.
Many thanks,
Dane| Geld 00:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
That's creative predictive text you've got there? Johnbod ( talk) 03:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
nvm
Someone deleted my page even though I was still editing it I did nothing wrong and if I did please explain to me. The page is /info/en/?search=St_Mark%27s_CofE_School%2C_Southampton?wprov=sfla1 Parabelleum ( talk) 08:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Acroterion, I noticed you blocked a harassing IP. It has been partially revdelled, but thought worth noting there are also instances here and here if a full revdel is needed. Best, CMD ( talk) 00:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Acroterion, you should be aware of a discussion from two days ago here: User_talk:Herreshoffian. Thanks for your excellent work. Amigao ( talk) 02:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
When I asked this question and labelled him as such, it wasn't because of speculation or personal views, it's because some outlets (mostly jewish civil rights advocacy groups) have labelled him as a neo-nazi, and his rhetoric and actions also fit his categorization as well. Firekong1 ( talk) 13:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
I suggested a compromise. If you do not want to use primary sources to achieve accuracy (to be consistent, you should also delete biblical sources in the Christianity article and Poetic Edda sources in the Baldr article, and so forth, and so forth, and so forth), then let us DELETE the misleading passage. The truth: Norse deities can be killed, but they are not annihilated. Baldur will exist in Helheim and will lead the pantheon after Ragnarok. The passage you restored is misleading. 45.53.207.255 ( talk) 07:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Please see the reported incident on the False titles of nobility page, which you have protected. There is a false claim on the page through use of Wikipedia:Fictitious references. A simple check of what I have stated will show this to be true. Someone has corrupted the page to make a false claim. 82.129.53.90 ( talk) 12:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Please see the reported incident on the talk page of False titles of nobility page, which you have protected. There is a false claim on the page through use of Wikipedia:Fictitious references. A simple check of what I have stated will show this to be true. Someone has corrupted the page to make a false claim. 82.129.53.90 ( talk) 12:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
I suggest that the blocked range should be adjusted Into 2001:448a:20e0::/49, the blockade of 2001:448a:20e0:6e0b::/64 might be no effect.You can check [1] to confirm why I would say there might be no effect.
PS:The 2001:448a:20e0::/49 range was calculated from the records of IP activity in pages Talk:Yang (surname) and Yang (surname) by using a tool from ftools.toolforge.org(ip-range-calc). Rastinition ( talk) 00:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for supressing those edits. Did you want to hit this one too that has a presumption of guilt? https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Walt_Nauta&diff=prev&oldid=1159617113 Toddst1 ( talk) 14:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
That Hong Kong based user 103.249.33.10 appears to be adding tags such as Marxist and other statements in a unidirectional and similar manner to several articles (check their contribution log), often without sourcing. Might be something to look into. Thank you for reverting it. They have also made politically charged statements regarding Chinese Taipei / Taiwan, as well, which have been reverted. Perhaps a paid editor? But one with strong unidirectional bias. Top5a ( talk) 02:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
I was looking to take a stab at drafting a new article for post-finasteride syndrome that (I hope) will address the concerns raised about the original article. The page for PFS currently redirects to the article for Finasteride, and is also protected; is it possible for me to draft an article while this protection applies? If not, would it be possible to lift the protection on the article?
Best, Xardwen ( talk) 22:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Placed the requested move in queue. NYC is the largest city in the US; saying there was one solitary crash in the city is not specific. I guess if the word major is added, that could change the discussion. Knocksocksoff ( talk) 21:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Greetings, I saw that you reverted this , desiring to keep the note there. That was my first instinct as well and I was in the process of reverting it, but my brain had me do some extra digging because I was going to state that editors needed the reminder because of previous activity. Well, looking through the latest edits, it seems the comment note is causing more edits and not less. I point you to this and this. I think the IP has the right idea considering the latest edits might have been unnecessary if not for the note. I would love to know what you think. Inomyabcs ( talk) 23:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
I have created a new essay and would welcome some critique on the talk page there:
Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 23:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello mr Acroterion. I want you to block the user's NebY account for several reasons. First he always deleting any of my adding informations on pages from Wikipedia like zuijin, agathodaemon and others. Second even if I am asking him to help me with my adding more reliable informations and contents and pages he instead of helping me he keeps deleting any of my messages plus my informations. I ask you to block his account because he is not fair with me. 2A02:587:1F0A:AD00:D181:E7FE:B2E9:1F08 ( talk) 13:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
If I recall correctly, there was a series of socks a while ago who kept removing mentions of Armenian Highlands from the article. Can't remember the details, but if you look back for my contributions to the article you should find them. DuncanHill ( talk) 14:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
I don't want to poke any bees nest (particularly because, on a personal note, I have very little interest in curbing a possibly too-strong interpretation of MOS:GENDERID), but I don't think MOS:GENDERID has ever been held to apply to talk pages. On some level, I think that's a matter of practicality: even as to living persons, MOS:GENDERID has an exception for persons who were notable under there prior name, and, in close cases, it'd be hard to have the discussion if you were afraid saying the prior name might be against policy. (There's also always the possibility of someone applying IAR, which I think ... depending on your interpretation of the guideline, is currently applied to at least one page I can think of.)-- Jerome Frank Disciple 23:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
(including lists, redirects, disambiguation pages, category names, templates, etc."), so I figured it was worth flagging, but again I have no real desire to discourage too-strong enforcement :) Apologies for flagging an issue you were already aware of!-- Jerome Frank Disciple 23:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Uses the term "Modern Scientific Concensus". This is an obvious oxymoron. Further, it is of the three word type (i.e. all 2 word combinations of the 3 words are oxymorons). Is there a word for this?
You reverted this comment in the "talk" page almost faster than I created it. This makes me suspicious. If you are some kind of expert, you don't behave as one. If you are not, you have abused whatever power some process has emboldened you with.
For shame. WithGLEE ( talk) 12:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi where do you get that Spain used natives forced labor to conquest the indigenous peoples in the Americas ? JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa ( talk) 13:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I added sources but another problem happens when even local users dont mind, please fix format with leagues sorted by alphabet/region, if can 93.140.193.65 ( talk) 18:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
This article was semi-protected a while back, but it appears that the pending changes put in place was never reset. Since you were the last (active) admin to protect the page, could you please fix it? Thanks, 47.227.95.73 ( talk) 22:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello.!
Im Lucas and im new here. I just wanted to know, how to contact sumerians, ive got few questions to them and was just wondering how you talk ti them. 2A02:C7F:3E5F:B600:1C32:6853:786B:F9E0 ( talk) 01:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Please explain why MOS:PREFIXDASH does not apply in this case, like " Post–Cold War era". 2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 ( talk) 15:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Your user name reminds me of the Alchetron online encyclopedia project. Any etymological similarity? Regards, Thinker78 (talk) 04:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, you may remember me from the Boeing 777X protection reduction thing. I have noticed that the page Nyck de Vries has been vandalized pretty frequently lately by IP editors. Should we change protection to WP:SEMI? Super yoshi013021 ( talk) 23:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Recently Active Admin Acroterion! New user User:RealReel5 is adding links to dubious certification websites ( [2], [3]) and then pedantically arguing with the likes of Zefr and Oknazevad about why the spammy links are okay. Please take a look. Thanks! - Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Its my talk page, not yours. Bestarmy ( talk) 11:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Great image. I hope you'll use it elsewhere on Wikipedia.
The Nighthawks of Gaston County.
-- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 13:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your edit because in fact I was not editing others comments; I was editing my old comment from a while ago so I can update it to match my current views and my current username (I was "Shadow of the Starlit Sky" from March-May 2023). Sorry I forgot to put an edit summary for that - that must've been the source of the confusion. — Prodraxis { talk • contribs} (she/her) 23:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi You may have already done this by the time you read this but the user you just blocked is now abusing their TPA. Would you mind revoking it? Thanks. TLJ7863 ( talk) 17:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Project Chariot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this warning. The over-the-top attack came as a bit of a shock when I awoke to find it. Not only was it uncalled for, it revealed some serious reading comprehension issues and a failure to understand why AGF is so important. Thanks again. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 23:32, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Per Extraordinary Writ's talk page header announcing a few weeks off-project, I randomly selected you as an active admin who might be able to take action on editing restriction violations. EW was the notifying admin on the restriction, so I posted the matter to ANI at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Achar Sva editing restriction violation but did not receive any admin action in a day. If you are not able to or do not wish to respond to this discussion, please let me know and I'll pick another name out of the admin hat. Thank you! ~ Pbritti ( talk) 01:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
Hello, im sure u are looking to hear literally anybody but me, but i have come here to ask, why have u threatened my article because of the reason: Unremarkable shipwreck? Ultimateyeetus ( talk) 00:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Can you also revdel Special:Diff/1170492196 by the same user and delete the user talk page? Jonteemil ( talk) 11:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Stop adding bias to the Noah’s ark Wikipedia page Brennan1111 ( talk) 23:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Why do you want to omit that BAP is Jewish? I mean he has spoke about it a dozen times and regards it as an influence, but it's also a biographical detail. 92.20.135.52 ( talk) 00:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Maybe you can give better advice. User talk:Livius Plinius#August 2023. Doug Weller talk 19:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
It’s ridiculous firstly that there was a “warning” placed when I just removed relatively new content from a page with disputed neutrality. Then my pointing that out is an attack? Where’s the fairness here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.16.115.131 ( talk • contribs)
On 23 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Ketch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Project Ketch proposed the detonation of a 24-kiloton nuclear device in Pennsylvania to create a natural-gas storage reservoir? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Ketch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Project Ketch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron ( talk • contribs) (she/her) 12:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
[4] and [5]. Thanks, Knitsey ( talk) 20:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Are you happy to block this BE sock of User:208.127.197.117? Mutt Lunker ( talk) 10:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
On 31 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Carryall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Project Carryall proposed the detonation of 23 nuclear devices in California to build a road? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Carryall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Project Carryall), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 ( talk) 00:03, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
173.66.105.21 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
You may want to revoke talkpage access. Thanks. 2601:601:51C:811:E15D:3D87:821D:CE85 ( talk) 00:06, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Instead of protecting your friends that wantonly edit with no regard to their actions why don't you get them to pay attention to what they're doing? You're clearly biased in favor of him becuase you didn't say jack squat to him. Now go prove you'll be fair by posting some warning on his talk page. 70.161.8.90 ( talk) 17:53, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted my personal sandbox page (spongiformidae) that I was using to learn how to edit Wikipedia - I put quite a lot of effort in and you've just deleted it as a 'hoax' Can you please restore the info as I'm not done. Clearly it's not "true" info, I didn't want to risk someone finding it in a real search by accident. It's not linked from any outside sources whatsoever, you've missed the mark here Spongiformidae ( talk) 19:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Re: User talk:Unselfstudier , I believe this is the same person who was impersonating you at User talk:Actoreon1. They edit the same talk pages i.e. BDS/UNHRC, both pushing the claim that BDS is based on Kristallnacht [6] [7] , neither use indenting & both follow @ Selfstudier around. Also User talk:JerusalemisthecapitalofIsrael - User talk:204.9.220.42. & Special:Contributions/98.186.29.6. No idea if this is any use, being as they're now blocked, but I figured I'd best tell you anyway. 🙂 DSQ ( talk) 23:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
But I am starting to feel WoW may be back. I found this edit (which may not shout out WoW to you) but said vandal called himself the “Phuerdai vandal on Wheels”, which raised my eyebrows. It could be an imposter, or the vandal admires Willy, but just let me know if he’s really returning to plague us all. Brachy08 (Talk) 10:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Keep on editing!! You are GREAT!!! :) Babysharkboss2 was here!! 20:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Honeycomb.io. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. lizthegrey ( talk) 17:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
My lord, after looking at the delete, it just dawned on me, the offensive username. Not very quick on the uptake this morning.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! About a year ago I made the Luxembourg Rebellion, Luxembourg Communist Rebellion , and Luxembourg Rebellions. The Luxembourg Rebellion faced a Contested deletion and was kept, the Luxembourg Rebellion was revised and the review said it was within wikipila policy. The articles are up for merging and I want to know what you think because they have all been “reviewed”, the person merging them has also proposed the merging of many other articles I have made so I would not be surprised if he comes to this talk page. With all that said I hope you can take a look at this situation. Thanks! LuxembourgLover ( talk) 13:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 08:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Greetings Acroterion, Ihikky deleted a paragraph on the Kingdom of Dagbon page that is reliably sourced. These sources have different arguments. 5 of these sources speak about the subject matter at hand which is the Ashanti invasion of Dagbon in the mid 18th century. The 6th source, which is a journal, is skeptical about this invasion. The paragraph provides the arguments of both sides including the historians for the invasion as well as the journal which criticized this invasion for being overexaggerated. Ihikky on the other hand deleted everything without proper explanation as to why. I shared this on the talk page, Talk:Kingdom of Dagbon#Ashanti Empire., so we can meet consensus, but he keeps deleting the entire paragraph without addressing on the talk page why everything must be deleted. Please can you have a look at this? Kwesi Yema ( talk) 18:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Clyde [trout needed] 14:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Don't you think you went overboard with WP:BLP on 2023 Lewiston shootings? When police name anybody in relation to a mass tragedy like that, he becomes a public figure almost immediately (news spreads extremely fast in this day and age), and our ability to protect the innocent is basically non-existent, even if there is evidence that he was falsely named. Going back and removing his name from previous discussions is simply ridiculous, especially when his name was added, what, 24 hours later? Esszet ( talk) 14:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
He's doing it again. I think this is clearly WP:NOTHERE and indefinite block is warranted. -- WikiLinuz ( talk) 00:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Acroterion, I did not think of modifying my edit summary in the reversion of an edit you just hid, same for another editor reverting at Talk:Free Palestine Movement, may want to hide those edit summaries as well. Thanks, nableezy - 13:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Burned memo- https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/alien.ufo/majestic_12/Burned%20Memo,%20pages%201-2%20burnedmemo-s1-pgs1-2.pdf
Magic Eyes Only- https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/alien.ufo/majestic_12/Flying%20Saucer%20Analytical%20Report%20rdlab_analyticalrpt2sept47.pdf 66.244.71.70 ( talk) 13:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Justyouraveragewikieditor ( talk) 11:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Acroterion,
I had used my user Sandbox for creating a draft of the article i intended to contribute to wikipedia. Could you please indicate how the use of sandbox to create a draft is violating the wikipedia's goals ? Thank you, Aparna
Aparna DS ( talk) 08:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
@Acroterion, thank you for your feedback. I do not intend to use wikipedia as a self promotion tool and neither it is a CV of mine or anybody that i was intending to post about. I used the wikipages Nirupama Rajendra and Maya Rao as reference and added few more sections that was relevant. I am working to cut it short as this was only a draft.. Aparna DS ( talk) 13:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Acroterion! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Just to know :"Not usual usage" what is meant by that? So I know how to deal with it,thank you. Labicanense ( talk) 18:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Can you ban this ip for longer? This isn’t the first instance of them being disruptive and pushing an agenda. Nagol0929 ( talk) 13:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
You closed this after 28 hours of discussion on that page. One admin suggested I go to that page. I did. The first person to reply on that page was 28 hours ago. Please revert your closing. This discussion is not a repetition of the other talk page. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 03:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
331dot's last 2 comments:
That's an issue for the article about the assassination itself, and you might want to review that talk page and its archive carefully before proposing it there, as it sounds like this general issue(if not the sources you use here) might have been brought up before now. As to this article, I agree that you probably could mention these claims in the context of theories, if it isn't already mentioned.
Then the only thing you can do is attempt to gain a consensus on the talk page of the assassination article, but you will need to do more than just repeat prior arguments to have any chance at succeeding. Personally I don't think you are likely to succeed, and it will likely be a long, hard effort, but that's what you can do. |
I did not just repeat prior arguments. There is much new info in the documentary. But you cut off discussion after 28 hours.
I noticed that there was only 34 hours of discussion at the other talk page you closed. If you don't count my note at the end of it pointing to the other discussion 17 days later. Most talk pages let discussions roll naturally off the page.
That first discussion was based solely on the trailer for the doc, and reviews. The trailer by itself was pretty extraordinary due to all the eyewitnesses. But for the 2nd discussion I had seen the full documentary. And it is much more extraordinary than the trailer. Many more eyewitnesses covering much more. We were having a good discussion on the 2nd talk page. I don't think your reasons for cutting it off are justified. Why not just let it go on as at most talk pages? That's what talk pages are for. I have edited many controversial topics on Wikipedia over 18 years, and have seen nothing like what you are doing. We were having a good discussion without insulting each other. Please revert your close. What's the worst that could happen? More talk? That's what talk pages are for. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 11:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey.
I'm not going to contest this, either here or on Commons, in no small part because copyright laws are hella complex. But, I think those images might actually have been uploaded properly. I took a look at the masthead of the paper through the Newspapers.com access in WP:LIB, and there's no copyright notice in it. I also couldn't spot one anywhere else on the first or last pages of the issue. You might want to take a closer look at the issue through the copy accessible via the library.
I do agree though that it was an entirely inappropriate pair of images. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 02:37, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
After all the headache I've had at WP:AIV with this IP and an experienced user, who is the IP a sock of? Reminded me a little of BKFIP, but the location is wrong.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 18:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits? The maps were biased (claiming Suriname controls the disputed territories and violates WP:NPOV. BoomGoesTheTrinitrotoluene ( talk) 14:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Can you please look at this ? [8] Ratnahastin ( talk) 12:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 18:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Given their prior (if sporadic) editing history of POV pushing regardless of the citations attached, I might have indeffed this editor per WP:NOTHERE. Ed [talk] [OMT] 18:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 18:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 08:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi sir,
I am curious where this three-revert rule applies to me. Please provide evidence. I have actually not reverted a single page. I am not even on one, yet you flagged my account as three. Why is this? DivineReality ( talk) 01:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
The statement I made was a highly neutral statement, that is pure fact, that is so embedded in Christianity- can it be more "neutral"? Or how would you define "neutral" It is not personal commentary, it is neutral explanation that is designed to make the text less ambiguous than it already is - as it seems biased towards the religion. The sentence "19th century priests - including Donders - showed no respect towards existing beliefs (including Winti) is by any standard not neutral, since: 1. Is authos's presonal opionion not covered in bibliography 2. Contains only half of the truth: most (if not all) missionaries does not show respect towards existing beliefs, becuase it does not go on par with Christianity 91.189.141.116 ( talk) 13:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Less than 2 weeks after the last 6-month block expires, somehow trouble finds them again. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
By mistake, I pinged a different editor. I edit it back, to your username, but I don't know for sure if it notified you or not. Dante4786 ( talk) 04:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
You recently blocked [10] a disruptive IP. I suspect this account [11] is the same person. They left a comment defending the IP's edit and then made the same disruptive edit at Ronald Acuña Jr.. Nemov ( talk) 01:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
Hi Acroterion, can you rev/delete the latest BLP violation at Gary Allen (runner)? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 19:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking User:Xwpis ONOMA. I think you may want to just go ahead and remove TPA, I missed this horribly antisemitic comment on another page until I went looking through their previous contributions. This person definitely doesn't need to be allowed back. — The Hand That Feeds You: Bite 18:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
You recently blocked this IP range for personal attacks, but I'm seeing very similar IPs (like this one and this one) continuing to post on the talk page in question. Maybe not making personal attacks, but it feels like block evasion. Asking here because you did the original block and it's honestly not clear whether this is something that needs to be reported/where that would even happen/whether a block expansion is even warranted. Can't wrap my head around rangeblocks, but when I tried to look at contributions over a larger range the edit history seemed to line up. Paris1127 ( talk) 01:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Acroterion. I know you keep an eye on Comicsgate, which is frequently targeted by irate editors. If you have some time, it would be appreciated if you could keep an admin eye on Ethan Van Sciver for a while, too; I anticipate some talkpage sealioning. Grandpallama ( talk) 22:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Why did you revert this IP editor? I don't see it mentioned in the summary. -- David Tornheim ( talk) 00:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Would it be possible to help? A convoy supporter is removing well-sourced content. It appears that the edits are politically motivated - they wish to remove any content that is critical of the convoy occupation (e.g. anything referring to the class action lawsuit). They are also adding inaccurate content. Thanks! Helikon ( talk) 09:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your help!
Hello. Extended confirmed did make sense on the 20th anniversary, but it’s been 2 and a half years and the page is still extended. It could potentially be lowered to even pending changes or no protection, but extended confirmed is overkill as of now. CharlieEdited ( talk) 16:53, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
Hello Acroterion, I see that you've protected the violence against men article. I personally disagree with your move and request the move to be reversed, however I am happy to hear your thought process as I'm not up to code with page protection. You cite an IP persistently removing material without explanation. There was an explanation for the move on the talk page. This user has also only removed this content once before, which was a day ago so is that considered "persistent"? Further, this user has added well-sourced content, so I've assumed that the editor is acting in good faith. From what I see, it didn't need to be protected. — Panamitsu (talk) 12:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
is such an interesting word. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 03:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
I was trying to polish and refine the comments on the talk page for the Far Right, but you undid my revision. Why? Julkhamil ( talk) 16:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Acroterion! There is an ongoing discussion in the Amhara people talk page. This discussion began after a disagreement on when the Christianization of Amhara began, with me believing it started in the 4th century during the reign of Emperor Ezana and the other user "Socialwave597" believing it happened "in the late Aksumite period, as hinted in the missionary activities of King Degna Djan." Throughout the discussion I gave a lot of reliable sources, however to no avail. He (I don't kow if it is on purpose or not) misinterprets them and/or gives some excuse not to accept them as valid. He also provided some sources, however when you look at them they don't state what he said, on the contrary, some even prove my point. I saw that It was a waste of time and asked for a third opinion. Thankfully it was answered and the Administrator gave his opinion, which seemed to me that he wasn't certain or just tried to be as neutral as possible. Me and Socialwave597 made our proposals and have yet to been answered, it's been more than 2 weeks. I have no idea whether Admins respond back when giving third opinions but we really need a concrete answer so we can reach a consensus as fast as possible. Would you be able, if possible of course, to check the situation and possibly resolve this? Please let me know if I need to contact someone else or do something as I really have no clue of what to do, I'm kind of new to Wikipedia and I am just trying to solve this issue. Thanks! Javext ( talk) 22:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
See WP:ANI#Copyvio revdel requested for Back in Black. I've boldly deleted the passage based on that dodgy Guitar Player "citation". We need a solid RS for gushing fanpuffery, and I've seen unusable anonymous reviews in Allmusic and reaction videos which were better than that. I don't have the stomach to go over the rest of the article. Narky Blert ( talk) 21:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
I think it's warranted. Good close to that discussion. I got caught up in an edit conflict with you, wrote: Quick response before I block you for personal attacks. Source1mag [12] is a conspiracy theory site. Eg "Shocking Mini Hidden Camera Shows – Corporate, Big Pharma Plot to Fire Tucker Carlson" and "Bizarre Oddities: Oh My, Obama’s Brother Says Barack Sold His Soul to Satan To Join the Illuminati" The American Chronicle is no better. [13] Doug Weller talk 12:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Acroterion, it's been a while and I hope you are doing well. I decided a few days ago that I would see if I could make a low-key return to Wikipedia editing without too much anxiety, and the first thing I found was that Nsmutte had returned while I was gone... I came here to ask if you could help me with a renewed semi-protection of my user talk page, but I just noticed that you already did while I was typing the previous, so I'll change to a thank you! -- bonadea contributions talk 13:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Admin Acroterion will not let me refactor talk pages and is not engaging in an open way. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 01:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I am contesting your conduct as an admin. You have threatened to block me 3 times, which I find to be an unacceptable way to wield your ability to ban users. If you ban me for contesting your conduct, I only take it as further evidence that you have been given too much power as an admin because you are apparently able to overrule anyone who questions your conduct.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding You are threatening to block me on unjust grounds, and this is not ok conduct for an admin. The thread is Admin Acroterion will not let me refactor talk pages and is not engaging in an open way. Thank you. — Julkhamil ( talk) 01:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
You:
Subject: Inquiry Regarding Deletion of User Page
Hi there,
I recently noticed that my Wikipedia user page, which was dedicated to well-known saints with followers worldwide, has been deleted. I'm writing to inquire about the reason behind this deletion. I've observed similar pages for saints from various countries, including the USA, China, Japan, and India. like similar content what my page was so if similar content with other page can work what is issue for my page..?
Given this precedent, I'm curious as to what specific issue led to the removal of my page.
Could you please provide me with more information regarding the deletion and any guidelines or policies I may have inadvertently violated? I'm eager to ensure that any necessary adjustments are made to comply with Wikipedia's standards.
Thank you for your assistance.
Warm regards,
Yatharthgeeta24 Yatharthgeeta24 ( talk) 04:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Some people just need to stick to decaf. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 20:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no actual way of knowing that the claims of the four men being the ‘ones who organised a revolt’ are true. The only evidence is from reports of what happened which have changed over time, and their accuracy has been questions. There is no way of knowing that the four men actually were the only four who decided initially. That is just what is reported through popular media and what was reported as being said in unrecorded telephone conversations. Tge use of names when referring to the 9/11 commission report is also wrong as the simply says ‘native English’ or ‘native Arabic’ speaker. The voice recordings have never been made public just a transcript, so any attributions to individuals is not confirmed. The definitive claims of ‘these four men did x’ or ‘x said this’ when not a recorded call in wikivoice is a misuse of wikivoice. PicturePerfect666 ( talk) 16:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
I saw your message to 49.185.208.16. (Thanks for the backup, btw. It's good to know that someone else found that edit sketchy) Do you know if there's a discussion/policy that specifically addresses the issue of "Jew-tagging"? Or is it something that is enveloped by wp:rs and wp:undue? Joyous! Noise! 00:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
In this edit you said that consensus was to refer to ships without gender. I tried to find the consensus myself but failed to do so. Is it possible that you can share with me the link to the consensus? Thanks. — Panamitsu (talk) 00:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi – thanks for those blocks, looks like potentially a missed revdel over at Special:Contributions/SmBby. Tollens ( talk) 11:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I read your article.....and while I appreciate you asking me, I am not sure how much help I can be with it. (Although if you have specific questions from specific references, I might be able to help.) First off, I am not a bridge guy (I do mainly industrial buildings). AASHTO is kind of a world unto itself. Bridge design is a specialty area in structural (kind of like precast/prestressed). We use to gripe about the fact the SE exam was 20% bridge questions.....and we (i.e. building guys) were clueless. (I had to get AASTO's 16th/17th ed. and try to pick off the easy questions.....but I digress.)
All that being said, here is a good thread (with some references) on this topic on Eng-tips.com: [16]. Like some of the posters said: we tend to think more in terms of "redundancy" than "Fracture Critical". I am not sure if I've even heard that term before. Rja13ww33 ( talk) 20:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
On
29 March 2024 you stated I don't see this as a matter for arbitration, this looks like extended forum-shopping.
The
Arbitration Committee is part of the
dispute resolution process. I had legitimate reasons why I went to the ArbCom, which I will explain in the case if my request for extension is approved. You may even think I may have used a mistaken venue. But you stating that it looks like it is forum-shopping is an
ill-considered accusation of impropriety and is not assuming good faith. You are an administrator, please follow Wikipedia guidance. The
Assume Good Faith guideline clearly states,
Assuming good faith (AGF) means assuming that people are not deliberately trying to hurt Wikipedia, even when their actions are harmful. This is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. [...]
When disagreement occurs, try as best you can to explain and resolve the problem, not cause more conflict, and so give others the opportunity to reply in kind. Consider whether a dispute stems from different perspectives, and look for ways to reach consensus.
When doubt is cast on good faith, continue to assume good faith yourself when possible. Be civil and follow dispute resolution procedures, rather than attacking editors or edit-warring with them. If you wish to express doubts about the conduct of fellow Wikipedians, please substantiate those doubts with specific diffs and other relevant evidence, so that people can understand the basis for your concerns. Although bad conduct may seem to be due to bad faith, it is usually best to address the conduct without mentioning motives, which might intensify resentments all around.
According to the Administrator conduct policy,
Administrators should lead by example and, like all editors, should behave in a respectful, civil manner in their interactions with others. Administrators should follow Wikipedia policies and perform their duties to the best of their abilities.
Thanks. Thinker78 (talk) 21:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Yeah... so... let's just ignore that – Potato/ potahto! Hope you see what I was trying to do! I think my logic is sound, even if the geography isn't!!! MIDI ( talk) 09:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
This is not a hoax this is culturally significant local legend back by reputable news source. It also helps to further display the cultural impact the Chupacabra cryptid legend has stretched to other area of the world outside of mexico. Dancmaster ( talk) 17:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
...a couple times for "Jew tagging" and in general bad editing practices has picked up where they left off after the latest 3-month block expired: 2601:883:C201:8590:0:0:0:0/64 A good number of their recent edits involve some form of apparent anti-Jewish animus (e.g. [18] [19] [20]) or whitewash well-known antisemitic conspiracy theorists (e.g. [21] [22]), while others have simply been reverted for being unsourced or undue. As the most recent blocking admin, I thought I'd bring this to you first rather than give this person a platform at ANI. Cheers, Generalrelative ( talk) 01:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you please restore my user page until after phabricator.wikimedia.org/T363024 is resolved? The example links for reproducing the bug are no longer working. Otherwise, could you please recommend where/how I might post the exact same history so there's a working example the MediaWiki/Wikipedia devs can reference? Thank you! RDuckDev ( talk) 02:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Monsieur le ministre@heures, je ne veux pas vous faire perdre votre temps comme vous me le dites sur ma page de discussion. Je ne veux pas perdre mon temps. Vous pouvez fermer mon compte sur le Wikipédia de langue anglaise. Cordialement Laurange Jolicœur Héron du fleuve ( talk) 20:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I have written you an email. Ryan kh ( talk) 12:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
So I just partial-blocked my alt account from Wikipedia community and the template namespace (but disabled autoblock), and logged into it and visited https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia%20community&action=edit. If I'd fully blocked the account, this would trigger an autoblock on my IP and this account; I'd like to try this, but this has caused me problems in the past. What happens if a partially blocked user attempts to edit one of these pages, and then logs out: is an autoblock applied, and if so, is it a full block, or is it limited to the scope of the original partial block? Nyttend ( talk) 21:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)