So I just wanted to say the reason I know the school has around 1800 students is because I am in the school. As a student.it says on the class charts that it’s around 1800 people in school in total. JammyDole ( talk) 20:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, ToBeFree, some more eyes on this poorly sourced and edited piece would be great. Also, is the most recent editor evading an earlier user block? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Tagging for future reference. Drmies, Melcous, this is a rather easy one, just a lot of unsourced, poorly written fancrap. I'll get to it within a few days if you don't first. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 11:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
The article Dave McDonald (radio personality) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article already seems to have been a magnet for edit warrers and COI editors, causing trouble that seems hardly worth the effort to police in the context of the minimal notability of the subject
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Deb (
talk) 12:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
For all your help on this website. It is always nice to see other IP addresses helping to positively contribute to this website. Cheers, 47.227.95.73 ( talk) 11:09, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Ohnoitsjamie, when you have a moment, please take a look at [1], as well as the edits to the article that led there. A new editor has met resistance re: original research that gets into controversial BLP territory, and is talking about publishing a piece off-Wiki to then use it as reference here. I'm leaning toward ANI, but any suggestions you have otherwise will be appreciated. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 22:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
For future reference it should probably go to UAA. DatGuy Talk Contribs 06:25, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, here's another free time project, should you feel so inclined. Lots of promotional/COI history, and a series of poorly sourced 'awards', including for non notable student years. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 ( talk) 18:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Two questions, Drmies. The first is whether you see any sources that confirm place of birth, which has been the focus of much recent vandalism. The second is whether there's anything that can, or ought to be done about the disruptive 2404:160 IP range. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 21:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
History of apparent WP:COI at these two bios. Drmies, Melcous, I've started things rolling. Feel free to have a look, time permitting. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Two bios we've noticed before, Drmies: Julie Budd and Richard Grayson (writer). Might be legit, but there have been several accounts that look like paid contributors. Your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
I did you one better. After seeing the CU blocks I placed earlier, I ran CU and found that HeddaLettis = Jiaxing Wu = Myrtle Mankiller. So here's what I think: there are probably more. If you have a minute, you could look through some of these histories and see if there's others that look similar in terms of behavior. And we'll need an SPI, so we can start tagging them. I'm about to make some chilaquiles, though. Oh, I don't know if they're related to User:66CATMAN etc.--see the SPI there. Those point to a different part of the country, so I think that's not the same person. But who knows! Drmies ( talk) 21:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
🤣 Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 03:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Ohnoitsjamie or ToBeFree, I've tried to get some response on broadening a rangeblock here [13] without success, so I'm reaching out to individual admins. Have also tried contacting the blocking admin [14]. I could just devote my evenings to reverting 80% of what emanates from this block evasion, which has been tied to this SPI [15]. Thanks for any help. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:6126 ( talk) 15:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm willing to block the range, but not a hard block. I still want to hear what the reason is for the hard block: that must mean socking. If, by tomorrow or so, there's a huge influx of new vandalism, I'll consider that. I looked at the articles that the partial block applies to, and it's quiet there, and some have long-term protection. If need be, we could protect others. Binksternet, you've worked on some of those articles to revert our vandal. So let's revisit this, tomorrow or the day after--does that work for you? In the absence of more information this is the best I can do. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 22:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Another day, another IP. Can a passing admin help clean up and rev/delete all the copyvio at Tracey Rose? Thanks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:D600 ( talk) 02:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Returning from a week away. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 21:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, please have a look at the puff job bio writing by Imc5howl ( talk · contribs). I started working on Joseph W. Underwood, which is truly dreadful. Warren G. Phillips is in fairly bad shape, as well. Best, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 03:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Ohnoitsjamie, return of the WP:LTA IP range at covid related articles. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 15:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Roy Smith, Drmies, based on edit history, is there any way Nycbrooklynjesus2003 ( talk · contribs) is not a sock? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 23:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
I can give 3rr and OR warnings to the new user, but would like some more eyes on this first. Drmies, your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 13:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Eng derson7es ( talk · contribs). What thinketh thou, Drmies? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 16:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, your warnings didn't slow 2409:4063:4B92:B744:0:0:BB4A:A30F ( talk · contribs) down much. Time for a time out. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 18:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
If I revert, it likely won't go well. Drmies, ToBeFree, your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 02:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, please block them, and their socks. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your tireless efforts against vandal contributors, and those abusing multiple accounts! BlueNoise ( Désorienté? It's just purple) 05:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
Drmies, is there any way HerbRudnick ( talk · contribs) is not HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs)? Hope all's well, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Because what's a new day without another glitch at home? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A ( talk) 04:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, looks like a public relations production. Have a look if you have the time and inclination. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 ( talk) 15:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, 65.182.144.2 ( talk · contribs) quacks like a long time alternate of HerbRudnick ( talk · contribs), HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs), etc. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Morning, Drmies. I present 173.22.225.250 ( talk · contribs), who wrote this over a year ago [18], and is another likely sock of HerbRudnick ( talk · contribs), HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs) and 65.182.144.2 ( talk · contribs). Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 11:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Ugh. A nightmare of WP:ELs and a memorial listing of non notables, mostly added by a WP:COI. If I removed them, I'd probably be warned for vandalism, if not excessive callousness. I've pinged Drmies too much--anyone else want to have a look? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Blimey – I had a look back through the history. You aren't wrong about the whitewashing and a whole load of other problematic editing. I'd just seen a few isolated issues but it's only now I look more carefully and suddenly it all looks a bit CIR, or something. Sheesh. DBaK ( talk) 01:05, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers, a heads up. I'm pinging you because my reversion at Virginia Highlander unknowingly matched yours at Chincoteague Pony. I've also reverted off-topic rambles at several other articles. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 05:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
But figured I'd wait until they edited [19]. Thanks, Drmies. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:55, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
What do you think, Drmies--AfD? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
In addition to the obvious, there's at least a little copyright violation in the recent edits. Any assistance re: the article and new WP:SPA will be appreciated-- Drmies, ToBeFree, Deepfriedokra? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 23:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, hope you're well. I refer you to [20], where we have a COI who's used several accounts and has added promotional and likely copyright violation content to the biography. I imagine some rev/deletion is in order. Whether user sanctions are appropriate I leave to administrative discretion.
It's 63 here today. Crazy. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Deepfriedokra, am I wrong to see this as part of a persistent attempt by Mr. Isaacs to circumvent lengthy discussions at COI, at his talk page, and at the article talk page [21]? If so, please tell me. In general, I think the user is ripe for an ANI report now--there is no edit they aren't willing to fight over at any article. Thanks, and happy holiday. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Deepfriedokra, circling back to this for the umpteenth time. User hasn't learned to add objective prose [24] or eschew copyright violations [25] and is now adding himself to multiple articles. It's all sourced, and a persistent COI issue. Shall I open another thread at COI? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I think this should be reverted to its pre-March 14th version. Your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, continuation from last year--looks like block evasion, with IPs. Watching basketball, I presume. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hmm, I have never seen a static IPv6 address before, you're a lucky one here. My IP used to be static for years too, unfortunately switched over to dynamic CGNAT a year ago. No more simple and easy game server hosting for me :( AP 499D25 ( talk) 11:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, you know. Could use a lot of trimming, and may need to be protected against long term COI involvement. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, the usual. I tagged this mess, but really think the recent edits just need to be reverted. Thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, may I ask why "we don't do family trees" on Wikipedia? I've been contributing to a few articles for a while now, adding information to the "Marriages and Issue" section (which is very common on lots of personal articles). You've deleted the information I added to Claro M. Recto article and I wanted to know why, since his issue is quite relevant (some of his grandsons were politicians, actors or writers). Thanks for your time. 46.222.76.209 ( talk) 13:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Defamatory and racist comment at a Black WP:BLP: [26]. Drmies or ToBeFree, your thoughts about rev/deletion? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Not that I usually take much interest, but on the train home tomorrow night I'll be keeping an eye out for this [28]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Bbb23, this could use protection again. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
I agree that looks way too much like Lima16 to be a coincidence. Blocked, thanks for the heads up. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 15:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with the latest sock. Meters ( talk) 21:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
And a new temporary IP. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:6D87:F1C3:F0DA:5249 ( talk) 22:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Something fun. Drmies, what the hell? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
EdJohnston, Tamzin, you were blocking admins for Wildhorse3 ( talk · contribs) and Sitush7 ( talk · contribs). Any chance Greentree0 ( talk · contribs) is related? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 22:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, for this gem [29] you've already narrowly blocked. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, I'm pinging you not so much to join the discussion [32], as to offer an opportunity to clean up the COI messes if you have time and opportunity. As always, no expectation, and I may take a shot at one or more of the articles myself.
Thank you for improving the Claude Gauvreau page. I have added citations as you suggested. Would you like to remove the
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (April 2023) |
tag? Thanks again! Chadgadya ( talk) 14:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Melcous, Drmies, the usual. A long term COI project that could use more trimming. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:B51F:3AC4:56DD:685A ( talk) 04:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Another day, another IP. 76.119.253.82 ( talk) 08:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Ohnoitsjamie, Deepfriedokra, Bbb23, I came across these over the weekend: Karlsruhe Zoo, Early modern philosophy, Culture of Detroit, being edited by newly registered accounts that are quickly discarded. Mostly the edits are innocuous, primarily wikilinking--often overdone, with some attempts at copyediting. There are many more articles and users involved. Most are here for a day, then disappear. Does this appear to be merely a concerted school based effort to learn how to edit, or is something else going on? ANI is locked just now--your input is appreciated. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:3CC9:DF67:D4F5:F1C3 ( talk) 19:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your numerous efforts against vandalism. Novo Tape (She/Her) My Talk Page 16:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC) |
I can't keep adding maintenance templates; there's always a new WP:COI account at work. Melcous, should you have time and inclination. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
I know that a nickname would be defeating the point of editing anonymously, but do you have a shorter name I could refer to you by? LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Shrugs. We had storms this evening. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:9409:D210:7DC4:1CB ( talk) 03:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Bob! How's it going? Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 18:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
...is in order, per [34]. For the record, I had no personal interest in this, as was implied, and my report did ping the admin who was involved. Wiki doesn't need me, and the feeling is mutual. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, Acroterion: [35]. Sometimes I don't know anymore if a user is clinically disturbed or just too young to be left alone at a keyboard. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Hm. After Bbb23 gave me crap about my ANI report, accused me of trolling and closed it posthaste [37], this resolution: [38]. Bbb, mostly you assisted old 99, but you've had a penchant for gratuitous insult [39]. Don't bother responding--I mean no ill will, but further comment here will be deleted. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
For the moment. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:124:52C2:4E4B:4AD1 ( talk) 02:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Nice seeing you pop up again. Hope things have been going well. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 07:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this and the other reverts. Could you direct me to the sockfarm (SPI case-pages, etc) in question. Thanks. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 10:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
More for myself than others. Older and increasingly prone to disorientation. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:18D0:2F84:4011:2D47 ( talk) 18:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
I thought your comment at this ANI thread was a bit harsh on a seemingly good faith new user. Although you were right to revert the edits, "I've requested your account be blocked" is a very rough response to someone seeking clarification.
I'm glad this user was given proper guidance by Shirt58.
Please remember to assume good faith and don't bite the newbies. MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk) 11:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't last long. They rarely do. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:A8C2:7EBA:3F8D:9B40 ( talk) 16:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
I think we just edit collided on Christians Against Poverty reverting the well intentioned but surprisingly destructive "improvements" from StarHeroine. I haven't even bothered to address edits where it's just overlinking, as I'm not very deft at reverting and I'm still pretty new to editing overall, but so many of the "grammer editts" and "punctuation" are actively worsening the encyclopedia, it drives me up a wall!
Thanks for the great work you're doing to keep things tidy and MOS-appropriate round here, I've only absorbed a small amount of the MOS conventions so far so I'm sticking to the things I know. Great to bump into so many skilled contributors like yourself who are super on top of this stuff, hope to keep learning and join the ranks of en.wiki protectors ☺️🤠 Chiselinccc ( talk) 07:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I haven't pinged you in a dog's age, Melcous, but this report [50] of obvious COI has been ignored, and if you're interested, you know how to clean this sort of thing up. Hope you're very well, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Acknowledgmant for Courcelles, whose talk page I can not access. Thanks and cheers. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
For some reason, this is my identity today. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:B58E:2993:33B8:D5A1 ( talk) 15:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Because Xfinity wifi out here breaks down when the wind blows harder than a butterfly's wings flap. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:DC52:F9CA:9008:1FC4 ( talk) 00:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Melcous, I'm pinging you for input, and because I don't want to revert every edit by Smnesbitt ( talk · contribs). But is there any reason to keep school group photos, wherein the subject is shown among many others? Sigh. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Sometimes I have to unplug and reboot. Which is an apt metaphor while recovering from Covid. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:7010:DDC5:E734:17EB ( talk) 15:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
You know, it would be even better if you had an account, so you can keep fighting vandalism. Hope you're doing well with Covid! *wink* 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥( ContainThisEmber?) 15:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. Ceoil ( talk) 02:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I'm User:The Troutinator and I noticed that you removed a considerable chunk of sourced content from Internationalisation. Could you please explain this? Thanks, The Troutinator 🐟 - Slap me | What I've slapped 03:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)*
ToBeFree, I really don't believe this. If the page isn't corrected and the block reversed, I'll start a thread at ANI. This is gang up on IP crap. Thank you,
2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk) 18:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
BTW, while you're in the neighborhood, it looks like a lot of the recently deleted content at American College of Surgeons was not only promotional but copyright violation. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
No need to respond, but Drmies, what the hell? [52]. And thank you, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
If you're up for it, Melcous, Chris Chapman (producer). And hope you're well. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, GorillaWarfare, ToBeFree, if anyone's about, a rev/deletion at WWPR-FM is probably merited. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I saw the message I gave you a while back and recognized you. It's hard to remember all helpful IP addresses. Cheers, 47.227.95.73 ( talk) 00:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I present the irrepressible 173.22.225.250 ( talk · contribs) and alias 65.182.144.2 ( talk · contribs), alter egos of HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs), who left us on a high note [53], among other socks. No response to COI, even after a six month block. And no holiday from their home base [54]. Maybe nothing actionable, but unrepentant block evasion is always worth a look. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I see you have said that there was something illegally copyrighted from the Deadline article about the deal Sony Pictures Entertainment made. I have looked at both articles and there was nothing was copied or pasted from either site. 71.68.129.162 ( talk) 14:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
These are hellacious. I've opened a report at COI, but it's quiet as a church there. Drmies, have a look when you can, especially at Pirateer. I'd revert all the recent ax grinding and petty personal history, but it's a big chunk, someone will see that an IP did it and think it's vandalism. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Hmm. Notable? And the walled garden of albums and songs? What think you, Drmies? If not, what's the best approach to having this and related articles reviewed? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:A9BA:C0F8:7222:D5F6 ( talk) 21:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I've requested a block on this IP range, but this also needs to be rev/deleted [57]. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for this edit.
--WikiUser1234945-- (
talk) 16:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Just saw it, Drmies. Should the whole mess of edits be rev/deleted as defamatory? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Drizzling lightly today, so of course the Wifi must have broke. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E13F:8936:C820:C22A ( talk) 17:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this and perhaps help out, Drmies? Seems like the most asinine thing for me to start a thread at 3rr noticeboard, but it's pretty clearly a COI with a disruptive gene. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
If we ever meet in person, we shall celebrate by unraveling a sweater. DMacks ( talk) 03:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 16:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I'm sure you've run into this, as have other admins. For the better part of the last week, I've gone down the rabbit hole of identifying and reverting new accounts editing in concert. Most aren't sufficiently competent, and indulge primarily in overlinking, sometimes to interestingly irrelevant pages and topics [61]. This is clearly an organized endeavor, though it's largely been disruptive and as far as I can tell is operating without transparency--nobody has volunteered just what school or entity has oversight. So, I'm wary of motive and suspicious that there's a lot of socking going on. It's all apparently innocuous, but the bottom line is that they seem to enjoy disrupting as much as improving articles, moving from one tagged piece (they seem to favor articles with advert templates) to another. Is there any point to pursuing the broader behavior at ANI, or is it best handled page-by-page, one account at a time? The latter would call for dozens of separate, cherry-picked reports. A few of many recently targeted articles are [62], [63], [64], and [65]. Thanks for your thoughts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, any chance Outlawgirl109 ( talk · contribs) and Editor35924 ( talk · contribs) are not the same, based on edits here alone [67]? Also a similar certainty in their own copy editing gifts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 19:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63,
Just wanted to message you clarifying why your request for deletion of the Government People Group page draft was not correct. You mentioned it read as brochure material, however the language used fits in line with Wikipedia rules and regulations and uses only factual, non promotional language. Also the conflict of interest has been declared on the users page, therefore also complying with wikipedia rules of declaring interests. Your deletion request (G11) has been reverted by a moderator (not myself). GPG Communications ( talk) 10:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Until I find my way back. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:A55D:AC7D:CD54:BBE9 ( talk) 16:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm looking at Nick Maughan and Nick Maughan Foundation, and probably more bios by the editors behind these, but the Maughan pieces are a start. Unrelated is Robert Barnes (attorney), but there's a similar whiff of paid editing there. Drmies, Melcous, I drop these not with the expectation that you 'fix' them on a Friday night or this weekend, so much as to get your take and have more eyes on these. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Please forgive my intrusion on your user talk, IP, but a ping from the Professor demands attention. Your continued needling of our friends from the plains has its risks. Tread carefully, mon ami. Tide rolls 03:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
So I offer this, Drmies: the usual overlinking edits by Andray Leonchik ( talk · contribs), but what has caught my attention are the AI-generated copy edits back in August. I've reverted some, and wonder if this is actionable, and what Wiki's policy is on such 'contributions.' At the very least, they're noticeably verbose and promotional in tone. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
And here we are, waiting to return to my home 2601. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:D8E9:8F84:47A1:F1C1 ( talk) 01:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, here's an impressive piece of COI. The external links section is a doozy. Have a look when you have a month free. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, another promotional bio, newly minted. Have a look at your convenience. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Though you might be an IP, I still greatly appreciate your efforts to clean up vandalism. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 (The Garage) 17:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC) |
Bad weather and multiple power outage later.... 2601:19E:4180:6D50:84CC:595A:A3AE:9B1 ( talk) 04:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! Alexeyevitch( talk) 22:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[71]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, first, condolences on today's game. Second, your thoughts on how much, if any of this, belongs here : [72]. And Happy New, etc. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Okay, here's another one, Drmies, with apologies for pinging you too much in the new year. I can't revert the whitewashing here [73], and am wondering about a lot of unsourced work by that account. Thanks, and thanks for helping out at Jump Associates. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Go to the talk page, press “learn more about this page” and it says “ The terms "extremist", "terrorist" and "freedom fighter" should be avoided” Battalion of allah ( talk) 11:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Well, here's a fine mare's nest of a biography written by WP:COI accounts. The first problem is the notice of death, unsourced and without support that I can find so far online. More deeply embedded are the bits of generally laudatory original research sprinkled throughout, presumably personal assessments by colleagues and/or students. Thoughts, Melcous, Drmies? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Any astrophysicists editing here? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Followed a thread you started, Drmies--see [76]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Backup on this would be appreciated, Drmies. I prefer not to keep reverting here because I don't know the subject, but it looks like a lot of original research and dubious sourcing [77]. Have a look when you're able. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:09, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Okay, let's try this one. Drmies, in addition to edit warring at the cat article, the two new accounts working at Domestic short-haired cat and Holland Lop look like socks or meatpuppets. Thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 23:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, maybe you can weigh in at User_talk:WhatamIdoing#"Underlinked". Drmies ( talk) 15:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Well I looked at that one--with a predictable result. I've been trying to clean out Category:Articles with a promotional tone from November 2011 and now, after cleaning out dozens of articles, I can't see straight anymore. Take care and stay warm, Drmies ( talk) 00:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Leaving breadcrumbs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:FC5D:2927:11BD:DF5 ( talk) 03:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up the overlinking at chronic cough! Have a wonderful weekend, thanks for all that you do here! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) |
You removed my section on Woodstock High School vs Woodstock North High School you said “we don’t do rivalries” who is we and why did you remove it AldoZarate79 ( talk) 03:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hardly know where to begin. Drmies, have a look when so inclined. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, I'm trying not to paste a COI tag on this, which would be well merited given the recent edits by a close friend. The long section of quotes and overall tone, including assessments of work sourced to the artist's website, are problematic. More input welcome. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I just came across this and noticed your involvement, Drmies--and Acroterion as well. Are middle schools even considered notable here? I'm thinking AfD, though I can't open one. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Thank you for your help with the person/sockpuppets attempting to edit Cliff Cash's page. I thought I should mention that I have received several automated notices that somebody has been trying to log in to Wikipedia using my username. I have to assume that it's the same person. They have failed, and I am not really worried about them actually succeeding; I don't get the impression that they're capable of hacking my account. But it is very annoying, especially since I politely asked them to stop. Is there any way to escalate this? Mehendri Solon ( talk) 21:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Breadcrumbs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:D8DA:7D4C:8099:C3E4 ( talk) 21:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Thoughts, Drmies? Latest edits look like fanprose to me. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:D8DA:7D4C:8099:C3E4 ( talk) 17:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, can we get a rev/delete at Gary Allen (runner)? I'm surprised it wasn't done already. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Ugh. Has been made absolutely wretched by a couple of COI accounts. Any talk page stalkers want to have a go at this? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, what a mess. I was looking to revert back to September, but even that doesn't alleviate the issues. Nor remove all the photo name-drops.
Snowed in today. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 12:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Ah well. More breadcrumbs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:B5B5:46AC:4F0D:7F08 ( talk) 07:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I've just noticed how long this talk page is (nice anti vandal work btw). Would you mind setting up archiving, or just deleting some old stuff? Cheers, —Matrix(!) ( a good person!) Citation not needed at all; thank you very much 18:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, sorry i saw your comment after i removed my notice on your talk page. I did go back and re-read it and undid my revision. My apologies. Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 01:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I found a genre that's as bad as school and university articles--ballet companies. Melcous, Drmies, the Houston piece is a mess of unsourced, promotional content and non notable performers, which seems to be the rule rather than an exception. In this case, we can largely thank an edit by a company employee back in 2018. When you have free time, take a look and let me know what you think. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 19:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits reverting vandalism. It is always a pleasant surprise to see an IP doing my job. ItsCheck ( talk) 06:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
and another temporary account. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:ECCE:7D2C:D24B:CA6F ( talk) 21:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
It feels more appropriate to say it here rather than in that thread on their talk page - hopefully it won't be a case of a loutsock given the edits are identical. I hope they don't cross that bridge, as it'll probably get burnt behind them pretty quickly. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, when you have the time, I'd appreciate a glance at this. One WP:SPA appears to be using two registered accounts and an IP, and it's gotten to be a bit of a pain keeping track. Cheers and happy March! 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 14:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Bio apparently created and tended by the spouse. Drmies, Melcous, I suppose the first question is whether the subject is notable--I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but I'm a sentimental sort. As for the content, it's pretty much free of sources since, what, 2007? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 21:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Who is Ttpdepartment a sock of? Someone who's wrong on the internet ( talk) 06:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
The usual mass of longterm and poorly sourced COI contributions-- Drmies, Melcous, have a look at your convenience. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 23:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Part of the article on Genghis Khan’s haplogroups proposes that R1b was the Royal Family lineage based on some corpses that were discovered in Tavan Tolgoi, in the study entitled ‘Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen’s family and her possible kinship with Genghis Khan’.
However, the study itself failed to establish any direct political or biological relationship of these bodies to Genghis Khan, which makes this statement in the Wikipedia article very misleading.
The authors of the article propose that the bodies found were of a Mongolian queen and suggest this woman was a daughter of Genghis Khan, but in the same paragraph the authors also admit that the ages at death of the female corpses do not align with the ages that Genghis Khan’s daughters are recorded to have died, nor the number of children they were recorded as having in their lifetime. After four (admittedly failed) attempts at establishing hypothetical connecting circumstances to Genghis Khan (which the authors of the study admit are impossible due to conflicting historical evidence) they finally try to suggest that these women belonged to the Hongirad/Khongirad/Konyrat clan and even imply that Konyrats were overwhelmingly R1b.
However, genetic studies of the Konyrat people in Kazakhstan (which can be found in the Wikipedia article entitled ‘Y-DNA haplogroups in Kazakh tribes’) who are the direct descendants of the Khongirad of Mongolia, display R1b at an extremely low frequency, occurring in only 2 samples out of 90.
86 out of the 90 Konyrat tested showed they belonged to haplogroup C2c1a1a1, the same haplogroup that Dayan Khan, a descendant of Genghis Khan and khagan of the Yuan dynasty, was also confirmed to carry. In my opinion this failure to confirm a kinship with Genghis Khan needs to be made clearer in the article as the author of this part of the article asserts the R1B hypothesis far too confidently and doesn’t reflect the admissions of doubt that the authors of the study actually included. Tartarfornow ( talk) 21:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Another article with major sourcing problems that has become target practice for a bunch of new editors, none of whom is actually helping with the root issues. Drmies, any thoughts on how to best handle this? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Another one, Drmies: [87]. Ten edits and they're off to the races. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve literally all of the articles on the English Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 13:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
After pruning the most commercial "Book" section I've ever seen, I glanced at the history and ended up blocking the main contributor. Perhaps you and Melcous can help prune this a bit? Drmies ( talk) 15:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, can you take a look at recent edits there that changed population data without a source? More to the point, [93] has been doing that at multiple articles--a lot of their recent edits seem to be focused on inflating Hindu populations, and they generally look disruptive. I can take this to ANI, but I haven't had much luck there of late. Thanks and cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Latest temporary avatar. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF ( talk) 02:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, just wondering if you have considered archiving some topics on this talk page, as it has gotten pretty long an hard to navigate. Thanks. CanonNi ( talk) 03:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[94]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
More eyes here-- Drmies, probably a lot more of the soapboxing can be cut. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Though you're an IP, I appreciate your efforts on fighting vandalism. Keep it coming. -- Wesoree ( talk· contribs) 15:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Good job at Bilbo Baggins. Keep it up! – DreamRimmer ( talk) 04:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Sorry, not sorry, Drmies. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
On another front, Drmies, HeddaLettis returns [95]. I've missed this [96]; [97]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
If you have time and an inclination, Melcous, this was messed up last month by a promotional WP:SPA. I don't know whether the whole thing ought be reverted, or just cherry-picked to bring it to a passably neutral version. Hope you're well! 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your message to me at WP:AIV. I've posted an answer to you there. JBW ( talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
JBW, per the report at AIV, [98] has continued. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Well, here's another WP:CIR account [99] that can't be reported to AIV, but continues to edit cluelessly. As for blocking IPs who game the system, I can't edit in transit between CT and NY, because all the ranges have been blocked. So I wait until I return home. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 11:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I see your comment about not being able to edit in transit because of blocked ranges. It seems much more likely than not that someone with as much experience of editing as you have has made a deliberate decision not to create an account, and therefore you may have no interest in the following comments, in which case you will of course ignore them, but I offer them for you to consider if you choose to. I started out as an IP editor, without an account. I didn't see any reason to create an account, since I could edit perfectly well without one. Very likely I would have continued in that way for many years, were it not for the fact that one day I found I couldn't edit at the local library, because of a block on the IP address. Back home, I created an account, intending to use it only if I suffered from a block again, as I didn't see any reason to bother to log in to the account, since I could edit perfectly well without doing so. However, after a while I started using the account, more or less because it was there, so I might as well use it. In fact, as time went on I discovered more and more advantages in having an account. You probably know what a lot of them are, and may not care much about them, but here are a few of them. I have never again been unable to edit because of blocks, even though there have been times when not just the library, but my home IP address has been rangeblocked. Having an account makes it easier for other editors to contact you if they want to, because they can use methods such as pings. Very often editors don't even bother to take the extra bit of trouble needed to contact an IP editor at all. Even worse, as I'm sure you know, is the fact that many editors treat IP editors with contempt, as though they were automatically vandals or criminals, or even if they don't go that far, at the least they tend not to listen to anything an IP editor says. And so on and so on... I gradually found more and more advantages to having an account. Well, very likely you know all that, and have decided that even so you don't want an account, in which case that's absolutely fine as far as I'm concerned. (I'm not one of the editors who think that IP editors are an inferior breed.) However, I just offer you these comments to consider if you feel like doing so.
JBW (
talk) 21:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Why are you accusing me of "inflating population data" when every single edit related to population I make is backed up with a more recent statistic? They aren't unsourced or poorly sourced at all, and if I did forget to add a source, instead of lazily reverting edits, you could simply find the source I used online. BasedGigachad ( talk) 21:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, I've looked a little further at the edit history, and it's dreadful. Personal opinion, promotional tone, unsourced and sometimes spurious content, and addition of sources that have no relation to content. The volume of deleted warnings at their talk page in just a few months alone is a red flag. Thanks for the one week block--I'd advocate for much longer, especially after the accusation that I'm your sock. Okay, back to semi-retirement. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
So I just wanted to say the reason I know the school has around 1800 students is because I am in the school. As a student.it says on the class charts that it’s around 1800 people in school in total. JammyDole ( talk) 20:36, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, ToBeFree, some more eyes on this poorly sourced and edited piece would be great. Also, is the most recent editor evading an earlier user block? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Tagging for future reference. Drmies, Melcous, this is a rather easy one, just a lot of unsourced, poorly written fancrap. I'll get to it within a few days if you don't first. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 11:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
The article Dave McDonald (radio personality) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article already seems to have been a magnet for edit warrers and COI editors, causing trouble that seems hardly worth the effort to police in the context of the minimal notability of the subject
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Deb (
talk) 12:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
For all your help on this website. It is always nice to see other IP addresses helping to positively contribute to this website. Cheers, 47.227.95.73 ( talk) 11:09, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Ohnoitsjamie, when you have a moment, please take a look at [1], as well as the edits to the article that led there. A new editor has met resistance re: original research that gets into controversial BLP territory, and is talking about publishing a piece off-Wiki to then use it as reference here. I'm leaning toward ANI, but any suggestions you have otherwise will be appreciated. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 22:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
For future reference it should probably go to UAA. DatGuy Talk Contribs 06:25, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, here's another free time project, should you feel so inclined. Lots of promotional/COI history, and a series of poorly sourced 'awards', including for non notable student years. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 ( talk) 18:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Two questions, Drmies. The first is whether you see any sources that confirm place of birth, which has been the focus of much recent vandalism. The second is whether there's anything that can, or ought to be done about the disruptive 2404:160 IP range. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 21:49, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
History of apparent WP:COI at these two bios. Drmies, Melcous, I've started things rolling. Feel free to have a look, time permitting. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Two bios we've noticed before, Drmies: Julie Budd and Richard Grayson (writer). Might be legit, but there have been several accounts that look like paid contributors. Your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
I did you one better. After seeing the CU blocks I placed earlier, I ran CU and found that HeddaLettis = Jiaxing Wu = Myrtle Mankiller. So here's what I think: there are probably more. If you have a minute, you could look through some of these histories and see if there's others that look similar in terms of behavior. And we'll need an SPI, so we can start tagging them. I'm about to make some chilaquiles, though. Oh, I don't know if they're related to User:66CATMAN etc.--see the SPI there. Those point to a different part of the country, so I think that's not the same person. But who knows! Drmies ( talk) 21:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
🤣 Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 03:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Ohnoitsjamie or ToBeFree, I've tried to get some response on broadening a rangeblock here [13] without success, so I'm reaching out to individual admins. Have also tried contacting the blocking admin [14]. I could just devote my evenings to reverting 80% of what emanates from this block evasion, which has been tied to this SPI [15]. Thanks for any help. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:6126 ( talk) 15:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm willing to block the range, but not a hard block. I still want to hear what the reason is for the hard block: that must mean socking. If, by tomorrow or so, there's a huge influx of new vandalism, I'll consider that. I looked at the articles that the partial block applies to, and it's quiet there, and some have long-term protection. If need be, we could protect others. Binksternet, you've worked on some of those articles to revert our vandal. So let's revisit this, tomorrow or the day after--does that work for you? In the absence of more information this is the best I can do. Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 22:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Another day, another IP. Can a passing admin help clean up and rev/delete all the copyvio at Tracey Rose? Thanks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:D600 ( talk) 02:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Returning from a week away. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 21:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, please have a look at the puff job bio writing by Imc5howl ( talk · contribs). I started working on Joseph W. Underwood, which is truly dreadful. Warren G. Phillips is in fairly bad shape, as well. Best, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 03:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Ohnoitsjamie, return of the WP:LTA IP range at covid related articles. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 15:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Roy Smith, Drmies, based on edit history, is there any way Nycbrooklynjesus2003 ( talk · contribs) is not a sock? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 23:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
I can give 3rr and OR warnings to the new user, but would like some more eyes on this first. Drmies, your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 13:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Eng derson7es ( talk · contribs). What thinketh thou, Drmies? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 16:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, your warnings didn't slow 2409:4063:4B92:B744:0:0:BB4A:A30F ( talk · contribs) down much. Time for a time out. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 18:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
If I revert, it likely won't go well. Drmies, ToBeFree, your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:83FA ( talk) 02:18, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, please block them, and their socks. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your tireless efforts against vandal contributors, and those abusing multiple accounts! BlueNoise ( Désorienté? It's just purple) 05:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
Drmies, is there any way HerbRudnick ( talk · contribs) is not HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs)? Hope all's well, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Because what's a new day without another glitch at home? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A ( talk) 04:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, looks like a public relations production. Have a look if you have the time and inclination. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 ( talk) 15:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Drmies, 65.182.144.2 ( talk · contribs) quacks like a long time alternate of HerbRudnick ( talk · contribs), HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs), etc. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Morning, Drmies. I present 173.22.225.250 ( talk · contribs), who wrote this over a year ago [18], and is another likely sock of HerbRudnick ( talk · contribs), HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs) and 65.182.144.2 ( talk · contribs). Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 11:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Ugh. A nightmare of WP:ELs and a memorial listing of non notables, mostly added by a WP:COI. If I removed them, I'd probably be warned for vandalism, if not excessive callousness. I've pinged Drmies too much--anyone else want to have a look? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Blimey – I had a look back through the history. You aren't wrong about the whitewashing and a whole load of other problematic editing. I'd just seen a few isolated issues but it's only now I look more carefully and suddenly it all looks a bit CIR, or something. Sheesh. DBaK ( talk) 01:05, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers, a heads up. I'm pinging you because my reversion at Virginia Highlander unknowingly matched yours at Chincoteague Pony. I've also reverted off-topic rambles at several other articles. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 05:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
But figured I'd wait until they edited [19]. Thanks, Drmies. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:55, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
What do you think, Drmies--AfD? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
In addition to the obvious, there's at least a little copyright violation in the recent edits. Any assistance re: the article and new WP:SPA will be appreciated-- Drmies, ToBeFree, Deepfriedokra? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 23:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, hope you're well. I refer you to [20], where we have a COI who's used several accounts and has added promotional and likely copyright violation content to the biography. I imagine some rev/deletion is in order. Whether user sanctions are appropriate I leave to administrative discretion.
It's 63 here today. Crazy. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Deepfriedokra, am I wrong to see this as part of a persistent attempt by Mr. Isaacs to circumvent lengthy discussions at COI, at his talk page, and at the article talk page [21]? If so, please tell me. In general, I think the user is ripe for an ANI report now--there is no edit they aren't willing to fight over at any article. Thanks, and happy holiday. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Deepfriedokra, circling back to this for the umpteenth time. User hasn't learned to add objective prose [24] or eschew copyright violations [25] and is now adding himself to multiple articles. It's all sourced, and a persistent COI issue. Shall I open another thread at COI? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I think this should be reverted to its pre-March 14th version. Your thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, continuation from last year--looks like block evasion, with IPs. Watching basketball, I presume. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hmm, I have never seen a static IPv6 address before, you're a lucky one here. My IP used to be static for years too, unfortunately switched over to dynamic CGNAT a year ago. No more simple and easy game server hosting for me :( AP 499D25 ( talk) 11:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, you know. Could use a lot of trimming, and may need to be protected against long term COI involvement. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, the usual. I tagged this mess, but really think the recent edits just need to be reverted. Thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, may I ask why "we don't do family trees" on Wikipedia? I've been contributing to a few articles for a while now, adding information to the "Marriages and Issue" section (which is very common on lots of personal articles). You've deleted the information I added to Claro M. Recto article and I wanted to know why, since his issue is quite relevant (some of his grandsons were politicians, actors or writers). Thanks for your time. 46.222.76.209 ( talk) 13:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Defamatory and racist comment at a Black WP:BLP: [26]. Drmies or ToBeFree, your thoughts about rev/deletion? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Not that I usually take much interest, but on the train home tomorrow night I'll be keeping an eye out for this [28]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Bbb23, this could use protection again. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
I agree that looks way too much like Lima16 to be a coincidence. Blocked, thanks for the heads up. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 15:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with the latest sock. Meters ( talk) 21:28, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
And a new temporary IP. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:6D87:F1C3:F0DA:5249 ( talk) 22:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Something fun. Drmies, what the hell? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
EdJohnston, Tamzin, you were blocking admins for Wildhorse3 ( talk · contribs) and Sitush7 ( talk · contribs). Any chance Greentree0 ( talk · contribs) is related? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 22:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, for this gem [29] you've already narrowly blocked. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, I'm pinging you not so much to join the discussion [32], as to offer an opportunity to clean up the COI messes if you have time and opportunity. As always, no expectation, and I may take a shot at one or more of the articles myself.
Thank you for improving the Claude Gauvreau page. I have added citations as you suggested. Would you like to remove the
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (April 2023) |
tag? Thanks again! Chadgadya ( talk) 14:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Melcous, Drmies, the usual. A long term COI project that could use more trimming. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:B51F:3AC4:56DD:685A ( talk) 04:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Another day, another IP. 76.119.253.82 ( talk) 08:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Ohnoitsjamie, Deepfriedokra, Bbb23, I came across these over the weekend: Karlsruhe Zoo, Early modern philosophy, Culture of Detroit, being edited by newly registered accounts that are quickly discarded. Mostly the edits are innocuous, primarily wikilinking--often overdone, with some attempts at copyediting. There are many more articles and users involved. Most are here for a day, then disappear. Does this appear to be merely a concerted school based effort to learn how to edit, or is something else going on? ANI is locked just now--your input is appreciated. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:3CC9:DF67:D4F5:F1C3 ( talk) 19:16, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your numerous efforts against vandalism. Novo Tape (She/Her) My Talk Page 16:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC) |
I can't keep adding maintenance templates; there's always a new WP:COI account at work. Melcous, should you have time and inclination. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
I know that a nickname would be defeating the point of editing anonymously, but do you have a shorter name I could refer to you by? LilianaUwU ( talk / contribs) 02:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Shrugs. We had storms this evening. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:9409:D210:7DC4:1CB ( talk) 03:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Bob! How's it going? Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 18:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
...is in order, per [34]. For the record, I had no personal interest in this, as was implied, and my report did ping the admin who was involved. Wiki doesn't need me, and the feeling is mutual. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, Acroterion: [35]. Sometimes I don't know anymore if a user is clinically disturbed or just too young to be left alone at a keyboard. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Hm. After Bbb23 gave me crap about my ANI report, accused me of trolling and closed it posthaste [37], this resolution: [38]. Bbb, mostly you assisted old 99, but you've had a penchant for gratuitous insult [39]. Don't bother responding--I mean no ill will, but further comment here will be deleted. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
For the moment. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:124:52C2:4E4B:4AD1 ( talk) 02:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Nice seeing you pop up again. Hope things have been going well. LilianaUwU ( talk / contributions) 07:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this and the other reverts. Could you direct me to the sockfarm (SPI case-pages, etc) in question. Thanks. -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 10:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
More for myself than others. Older and increasingly prone to disorientation. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:18D0:2F84:4011:2D47 ( talk) 18:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there,
I thought your comment at this ANI thread was a bit harsh on a seemingly good faith new user. Although you were right to revert the edits, "I've requested your account be blocked" is a very rough response to someone seeking clarification.
I'm glad this user was given proper guidance by Shirt58.
Please remember to assume good faith and don't bite the newbies. MarchOfTheGreyhounds ( talk) 11:55, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! Drmies ( talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't last long. They rarely do. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:A8C2:7EBA:3F8D:9B40 ( talk) 16:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
I think we just edit collided on Christians Against Poverty reverting the well intentioned but surprisingly destructive "improvements" from StarHeroine. I haven't even bothered to address edits where it's just overlinking, as I'm not very deft at reverting and I'm still pretty new to editing overall, but so many of the "grammer editts" and "punctuation" are actively worsening the encyclopedia, it drives me up a wall!
Thanks for the great work you're doing to keep things tidy and MOS-appropriate round here, I've only absorbed a small amount of the MOS conventions so far so I'm sticking to the things I know. Great to bump into so many skilled contributors like yourself who are super on top of this stuff, hope to keep learning and join the ranks of en.wiki protectors ☺️🤠 Chiselinccc ( talk) 07:48, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I haven't pinged you in a dog's age, Melcous, but this report [50] of obvious COI has been ignored, and if you're interested, you know how to clean this sort of thing up. Hope you're very well, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Acknowledgmant for Courcelles, whose talk page I can not access. Thanks and cheers. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
For some reason, this is my identity today. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:B58E:2993:33B8:D5A1 ( talk) 15:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Because Xfinity wifi out here breaks down when the wind blows harder than a butterfly's wings flap. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:DC52:F9CA:9008:1FC4 ( talk) 00:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Melcous, I'm pinging you for input, and because I don't want to revert every edit by Smnesbitt ( talk · contribs). But is there any reason to keep school group photos, wherein the subject is shown among many others? Sigh. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Sometimes I have to unplug and reboot. Which is an apt metaphor while recovering from Covid. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:7010:DDC5:E734:17EB ( talk) 15:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
You know, it would be even better if you had an account, so you can keep fighting vandalism. Hope you're doing well with Covid! *wink* 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥( ContainThisEmber?) 15:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. Ceoil ( talk) 02:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I'm User:The Troutinator and I noticed that you removed a considerable chunk of sourced content from Internationalisation. Could you please explain this? Thanks, The Troutinator 🐟 - Slap me | What I've slapped 03:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 18:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)*
ToBeFree, I really don't believe this. If the page isn't corrected and the block reversed, I'll start a thread at ANI. This is gang up on IP crap. Thank you,
2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (
talk) 18:22, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
BTW, while you're in the neighborhood, it looks like a lot of the recently deleted content at American College of Surgeons was not only promotional but copyright violation. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 18:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
No need to respond, but Drmies, what the hell? [52]. And thank you, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:16, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
If you're up for it, Melcous, Chris Chapman (producer). And hope you're well. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, GorillaWarfare, ToBeFree, if anyone's about, a rev/deletion at WWPR-FM is probably merited. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I saw the message I gave you a while back and recognized you. It's hard to remember all helpful IP addresses. Cheers, 47.227.95.73 ( talk) 00:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I present the irrepressible 173.22.225.250 ( talk · contribs) and alias 65.182.144.2 ( talk · contribs), alter egos of HeddaLettis ( talk · contribs), who left us on a high note [53], among other socks. No response to COI, even after a six month block. And no holiday from their home base [54]. Maybe nothing actionable, but unrepentant block evasion is always worth a look. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I see you have said that there was something illegally copyrighted from the Deadline article about the deal Sony Pictures Entertainment made. I have looked at both articles and there was nothing was copied or pasted from either site. 71.68.129.162 ( talk) 14:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
These are hellacious. I've opened a report at COI, but it's quiet as a church there. Drmies, have a look when you can, especially at Pirateer. I'd revert all the recent ax grinding and petty personal history, but it's a big chunk, someone will see that an IP did it and think it's vandalism. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Hmm. Notable? And the walled garden of albums and songs? What think you, Drmies? If not, what's the best approach to having this and related articles reviewed? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:A9BA:C0F8:7222:D5F6 ( talk) 21:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I've requested a block on this IP range, but this also needs to be rev/deleted [57]. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for this edit.
--WikiUser1234945-- (
talk) 16:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Just saw it, Drmies. Should the whole mess of edits be rev/deleted as defamatory? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Drizzling lightly today, so of course the Wifi must have broke. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E13F:8936:C820:C22A ( talk) 17:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this and perhaps help out, Drmies? Seems like the most asinine thing for me to start a thread at 3rr noticeboard, but it's pretty clearly a COI with a disruptive gene. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
If we ever meet in person, we shall celebrate by unraveling a sweater. DMacks ( talk) 03:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 16:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, I'm sure you've run into this, as have other admins. For the better part of the last week, I've gone down the rabbit hole of identifying and reverting new accounts editing in concert. Most aren't sufficiently competent, and indulge primarily in overlinking, sometimes to interestingly irrelevant pages and topics [61]. This is clearly an organized endeavor, though it's largely been disruptive and as far as I can tell is operating without transparency--nobody has volunteered just what school or entity has oversight. So, I'm wary of motive and suspicious that there's a lot of socking going on. It's all apparently innocuous, but the bottom line is that they seem to enjoy disrupting as much as improving articles, moving from one tagged piece (they seem to favor articles with advert templates) to another. Is there any point to pursuing the broader behavior at ANI, or is it best handled page-by-page, one account at a time? The latter would call for dozens of separate, cherry-picked reports. A few of many recently targeted articles are [62], [63], [64], and [65]. Thanks for your thoughts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, any chance Outlawgirl109 ( talk · contribs) and Editor35924 ( talk · contribs) are not the same, based on edits here alone [67]? Also a similar certainty in their own copy editing gifts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 19:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63,
Just wanted to message you clarifying why your request for deletion of the Government People Group page draft was not correct. You mentioned it read as brochure material, however the language used fits in line with Wikipedia rules and regulations and uses only factual, non promotional language. Also the conflict of interest has been declared on the users page, therefore also complying with wikipedia rules of declaring interests. Your deletion request (G11) has been reverted by a moderator (not myself). GPG Communications ( talk) 10:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Until I find my way back. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:A55D:AC7D:CD54:BBE9 ( talk) 16:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I'm looking at Nick Maughan and Nick Maughan Foundation, and probably more bios by the editors behind these, but the Maughan pieces are a start. Unrelated is Robert Barnes (attorney), but there's a similar whiff of paid editing there. Drmies, Melcous, I drop these not with the expectation that you 'fix' them on a Friday night or this weekend, so much as to get your take and have more eyes on these. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Please forgive my intrusion on your user talk, IP, but a ping from the Professor demands attention. Your continued needling of our friends from the plains has its risks. Tread carefully, mon ami. Tide rolls 03:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
So I offer this, Drmies: the usual overlinking edits by Andray Leonchik ( talk · contribs), but what has caught my attention are the AI-generated copy edits back in August. I've reverted some, and wonder if this is actionable, and what Wiki's policy is on such 'contributions.' At the very least, they're noticeably verbose and promotional in tone. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
And here we are, waiting to return to my home 2601. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:D8E9:8F84:47A1:F1C1 ( talk) 01:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, here's an impressive piece of COI. The external links section is a doozy. Have a look when you have a month free. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, another promotional bio, newly minted. Have a look at your convenience. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Though you might be an IP, I still greatly appreciate your efforts to clean up vandalism. The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 (The Garage) 17:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC) |
Bad weather and multiple power outage later.... 2601:19E:4180:6D50:84CC:595A:A3AE:9B1 ( talk) 04:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! Alexeyevitch( talk) 22:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[71]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Drmies, first, condolences on today's game. Second, your thoughts on how much, if any of this, belongs here : [72]. And Happy New, etc. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Okay, here's another one, Drmies, with apologies for pinging you too much in the new year. I can't revert the whitewashing here [73], and am wondering about a lot of unsourced work by that account. Thanks, and thanks for helping out at Jump Associates. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Go to the talk page, press “learn more about this page” and it says “ The terms "extremist", "terrorist" and "freedom fighter" should be avoided” Battalion of allah ( talk) 11:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Well, here's a fine mare's nest of a biography written by WP:COI accounts. The first problem is the notice of death, unsourced and without support that I can find so far online. More deeply embedded are the bits of generally laudatory original research sprinkled throughout, presumably personal assessments by colleagues and/or students. Thoughts, Melcous, Drmies? Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Any astrophysicists editing here? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 00:14, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Followed a thread you started, Drmies--see [76]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 02:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Backup on this would be appreciated, Drmies. I prefer not to keep reverting here because I don't know the subject, but it looks like a lot of original research and dubious sourcing [77]. Have a look when you're able. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:09, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Okay, let's try this one. Drmies, in addition to edit warring at the cat article, the two new accounts working at Domestic short-haired cat and Holland Lop look like socks or meatpuppets. Thoughts? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 23:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, maybe you can weigh in at User_talk:WhatamIdoing#"Underlinked". Drmies ( talk) 15:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Well I looked at that one--with a predictable result. I've been trying to clean out Category:Articles with a promotional tone from November 2011 and now, after cleaning out dozens of articles, I can't see straight anymore. Take care and stay warm, Drmies ( talk) 00:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Leaving breadcrumbs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:FC5D:2927:11BD:DF5 ( talk) 03:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up the overlinking at chronic cough! Have a wonderful weekend, thanks for all that you do here! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) |
You removed my section on Woodstock High School vs Woodstock North High School you said “we don’t do rivalries” who is we and why did you remove it AldoZarate79 ( talk) 03:29, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hardly know where to begin. Drmies, have a look when so inclined. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, I'm trying not to paste a COI tag on this, which would be well merited given the recent edits by a close friend. The long section of quotes and overall tone, including assessments of work sourced to the artist's website, are problematic. More input welcome. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I just came across this and noticed your involvement, Drmies--and Acroterion as well. Are middle schools even considered notable here? I'm thinking AfD, though I can't open one. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Thank you for your help with the person/sockpuppets attempting to edit Cliff Cash's page. I thought I should mention that I have received several automated notices that somebody has been trying to log in to Wikipedia using my username. I have to assume that it's the same person. They have failed, and I am not really worried about them actually succeeding; I don't get the impression that they're capable of hacking my account. But it is very annoying, especially since I politely asked them to stop. Is there any way to escalate this? Mehendri Solon ( talk) 21:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Breadcrumbs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:D8DA:7D4C:8099:C3E4 ( talk) 21:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Thoughts, Drmies? Latest edits look like fanprose to me. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:D8DA:7D4C:8099:C3E4 ( talk) 17:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, can we get a rev/delete at Gary Allen (runner)? I'm surprised it wasn't done already. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 16:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Ugh. Has been made absolutely wretched by a couple of COI accounts. Any talk page stalkers want to have a go at this? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, Melcous, what a mess. I was looking to revert back to September, but even that doesn't alleviate the issues. Nor remove all the photo name-drops.
Snowed in today. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 12:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Ah well. More breadcrumbs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:B5B5:46AC:4F0D:7F08 ( talk) 07:03, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I've just noticed how long this talk page is (nice anti vandal work btw). Would you mind setting up archiving, or just deleting some old stuff? Cheers, —Matrix(!) ( a good person!) Citation not needed at all; thank you very much 18:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, sorry i saw your comment after i removed my notice on your talk page. I did go back and re-read it and undid my revision. My apologies. Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 01:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I found a genre that's as bad as school and university articles--ballet companies. Melcous, Drmies, the Houston piece is a mess of unsourced, promotional content and non notable performers, which seems to be the rule rather than an exception. In this case, we can largely thank an edit by a company employee back in 2018. When you have free time, take a look and let me know what you think. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 19:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your edits reverting vandalism. It is always a pleasant surprise to see an IP doing my job. ItsCheck ( talk) 06:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
and another temporary account. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:ECCE:7D2C:D24B:CA6F ( talk) 21:09, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
It feels more appropriate to say it here rather than in that thread on their talk page - hopefully it won't be a case of a loutsock given the edits are identical. I hope they don't cross that bridge, as it'll probably get burnt behind them pretty quickly. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, when you have the time, I'd appreciate a glance at this. One WP:SPA appears to be using two registered accounts and an IP, and it's gotten to be a bit of a pain keeping track. Cheers and happy March! 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 14:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Bio apparently created and tended by the spouse. Drmies, Melcous, I suppose the first question is whether the subject is notable--I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but I'm a sentimental sort. As for the content, it's pretty much free of sources since, what, 2007? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 21:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Who is Ttpdepartment a sock of? Someone who's wrong on the internet ( talk) 06:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
The usual mass of longterm and poorly sourced COI contributions-- Drmies, Melcous, have a look at your convenience. Cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 23:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Part of the article on Genghis Khan’s haplogroups proposes that R1b was the Royal Family lineage based on some corpses that were discovered in Tavan Tolgoi, in the study entitled ‘Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen’s family and her possible kinship with Genghis Khan’.
However, the study itself failed to establish any direct political or biological relationship of these bodies to Genghis Khan, which makes this statement in the Wikipedia article very misleading.
The authors of the article propose that the bodies found were of a Mongolian queen and suggest this woman was a daughter of Genghis Khan, but in the same paragraph the authors also admit that the ages at death of the female corpses do not align with the ages that Genghis Khan’s daughters are recorded to have died, nor the number of children they were recorded as having in their lifetime. After four (admittedly failed) attempts at establishing hypothetical connecting circumstances to Genghis Khan (which the authors of the study admit are impossible due to conflicting historical evidence) they finally try to suggest that these women belonged to the Hongirad/Khongirad/Konyrat clan and even imply that Konyrats were overwhelmingly R1b.
However, genetic studies of the Konyrat people in Kazakhstan (which can be found in the Wikipedia article entitled ‘Y-DNA haplogroups in Kazakh tribes’) who are the direct descendants of the Khongirad of Mongolia, display R1b at an extremely low frequency, occurring in only 2 samples out of 90.
86 out of the 90 Konyrat tested showed they belonged to haplogroup C2c1a1a1, the same haplogroup that Dayan Khan, a descendant of Genghis Khan and khagan of the Yuan dynasty, was also confirmed to carry. In my opinion this failure to confirm a kinship with Genghis Khan needs to be made clearer in the article as the author of this part of the article asserts the R1B hypothesis far too confidently and doesn’t reflect the admissions of doubt that the authors of the study actually included. Tartarfornow ( talk) 21:59, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Another article with major sourcing problems that has become target practice for a bunch of new editors, none of whom is actually helping with the root issues. Drmies, any thoughts on how to best handle this? Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Another one, Drmies: [87]. Ten edits and they're off to the races. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 04:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve literally all of the articles on the English Wikipedia! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you make an account to gain a bunch of privileges. Happy editing! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 13:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
After pruning the most commercial "Book" section I've ever seen, I glanced at the history and ended up blocking the main contributor. Perhaps you and Melcous can help prune this a bit? Drmies ( talk) 15:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, can you take a look at recent edits there that changed population data without a source? More to the point, [93] has been doing that at multiple articles--a lot of their recent edits seem to be focused on inflating Hindu populations, and they generally look disruptive. I can take this to ANI, but I haven't had much luck there of late. Thanks and cheers, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Latest temporary avatar. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:E004:1418:F10B:6EBF ( talk) 02:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, just wondering if you have considered archiving some topics on this talk page, as it has gotten pretty long an hard to navigate. Thanks. CanonNi ( talk) 03:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[94]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 13:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
More eyes here-- Drmies, probably a lot more of the soapboxing can be cut. Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Though you're an IP, I appreciate your efforts on fighting vandalism. Keep it coming. -- Wesoree ( talk· contribs) 15:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC) |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Good job at Bilbo Baggins. Keep it up! – DreamRimmer ( talk) 04:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
Sorry, not sorry, Drmies. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 03:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
On another front, Drmies, HeddaLettis returns [95]. I've missed this [96]; [97]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 17:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
If you have time and an inclination, Melcous, this was messed up last month by a promotional WP:SPA. I don't know whether the whole thing ought be reverted, or just cherry-picked to bring it to a passably neutral version. Hope you're well! 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your message to me at WP:AIV. I've posted an answer to you there. JBW ( talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
JBW, per the report at AIV, [98] has continued. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Well, here's another WP:CIR account [99] that can't be reported to AIV, but continues to edit cluelessly. As for blocking IPs who game the system, I can't edit in transit between CT and NY, because all the ranges have been blocked. So I wait until I return home. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 11:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I see your comment about not being able to edit in transit because of blocked ranges. It seems much more likely than not that someone with as much experience of editing as you have has made a deliberate decision not to create an account, and therefore you may have no interest in the following comments, in which case you will of course ignore them, but I offer them for you to consider if you choose to. I started out as an IP editor, without an account. I didn't see any reason to create an account, since I could edit perfectly well without one. Very likely I would have continued in that way for many years, were it not for the fact that one day I found I couldn't edit at the local library, because of a block on the IP address. Back home, I created an account, intending to use it only if I suffered from a block again, as I didn't see any reason to bother to log in to the account, since I could edit perfectly well without doing so. However, after a while I started using the account, more or less because it was there, so I might as well use it. In fact, as time went on I discovered more and more advantages in having an account. You probably know what a lot of them are, and may not care much about them, but here are a few of them. I have never again been unable to edit because of blocks, even though there have been times when not just the library, but my home IP address has been rangeblocked. Having an account makes it easier for other editors to contact you if they want to, because they can use methods such as pings. Very often editors don't even bother to take the extra bit of trouble needed to contact an IP editor at all. Even worse, as I'm sure you know, is the fact that many editors treat IP editors with contempt, as though they were automatically vandals or criminals, or even if they don't go that far, at the least they tend not to listen to anything an IP editor says. And so on and so on... I gradually found more and more advantages to having an account. Well, very likely you know all that, and have decided that even so you don't want an account, in which case that's absolutely fine as far as I'm concerned. (I'm not one of the editors who think that IP editors are an inferior breed.) However, I just offer you these comments to consider if you feel like doing so.
JBW (
talk) 21:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Why are you accusing me of "inflating population data" when every single edit related to population I make is backed up with a more recent statistic? They aren't unsourced or poorly sourced at all, and if I did forget to add a source, instead of lazily reverting edits, you could simply find the source I used online. BasedGigachad ( talk) 21:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Drmies, I've looked a little further at the edit history, and it's dreadful. Personal opinion, promotional tone, unsourced and sometimes spurious content, and addition of sources that have no relation to content. The volume of deleted warnings at their talk page in just a few months alone is a red flag. Thanks for the one week block--I'd advocate for much longer, especially after the accusation that I'm your sock. Okay, back to semi-retirement. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |