This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Shouldn't this draft (and possibly later article) be called Sequel to The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild or Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild Sequel? Calling it The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild 2 implies that it's the final title, which hasn't been confirmed. Icedmorning ( talk) 20:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps we could currently call the article itself "Untitled Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild Sequel", and in the bio/first paragraph refer to it as such: "The untitled sequel to Breath of the Wild (known as Sequel to Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild in early promotion) is an upcoming…”
This may be too verbose, however. Mia Clifford ( talk) 03:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
A title will be a same logo as Breath of the Wild 2 or a different logo as official announcement by Nintendo Direct/ E3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.143.194 ( talk) 05:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
In regards to this addition:
Please stop re-adding this. Sergecross73 msg me 02:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Untitled ''The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild'' sequel and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 27#Untitled ''The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild'' sequel until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Neocorelight ( Talk) 02:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 13#Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ebbedlila ( talk) 16:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
@
Popcornfud: Don't want to start an edit war over something silly 😊, but I do want to advocate a bit more to include: It was colloquially referred to as "the Breath of the Wild sequel" or "Breath of the Wild 2" until its official subtitle, Tears of the Kingdom, was announced in September 2022.
I don't think this is
WP:DUH -- this was effectively the working title in marketing
[1]
[2], online, and in publications for around 2 years (!) so it's important context for the Development and marketing section (though certainly not the lead).
This wasn't marketed as "Untitled Legend of Zelda game" or something, but specifically as a "Breath of the Wild sequel" — subtle but noteworthy difference that's not explicitly communicated in the official title. (Makes me wonder... was Majora's Mask marketed as a "Untitled Ocarina of Time sequel"? That would be interesting, if so...) Also worth noting it's wording based on a quote from the WaPo. Cheers, SiliconRed (he/him • talk) 17:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
The first teaser trailer was released in the E3 2019 Nintendo Direct, announcing the game as an untitled sequel to Breath of the Wildwhich I suppose covers this aspect well enough. SiliconRed (he/him • talk) 21:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
The game was announced at E3 2019 as a sequel to Breath of the Wild with some outlets using the colloquial title, "Breath of the Wild 2".
Think it's important to note the difference between "tears", crying, and "tears", rips? There's been some discussion and Nintendo confirmed it's the crying one. Legowerewolf ( talk) 18:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I will put the retail price of tears of the kingdom Senorleroy ( talk) 01:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
How should we talk about the leaks? There seems to be conflicting decisions being made by people reverting edits. Rossilaz ( talk) 14:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't we be commenting on the story, now that it's been leaked? MightyWeirdo ( talk) 06:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
The game is now out worldwide. This article is desperately overdue for a Gameplay section, as the core/added gameplay features have been covered in a litany of reliable, third-party sources for several months now. — CR4ZE ( T • C) 16:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There may be incorrect grammar in the articles lead, before the infobox. It states that "Link, the game's protagonist, is joined by Princess Zelda to defeat by a malevolent force seeking to destroy Hyrule." The 'by' in this sentence is not needed, grammatically incorrect and, if others agree, then it should be removed
83.177.155.88 ( talk) 12:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
References
As this has been contested by one or two users, can we get a consensus on whether we should be referring to the game's reception in the lead as "universal critical acclaim". Firstly, this kind of wording is rarely ever used now in articles, not least because it's overkill when only either "universal" or "critical" is necessary. Some also contest the fact that, despite attributing it to Metacritic directly, the wording of "universal" implies that the game received complete acclaim from all reviews involved, when this might not be the case. Otherwise, the existing wording can just feel like an attempt to make the game's reception sound lofty and noteworthy. I link to a previous talk page discussing the use of this phrasing here [ [8]], and ping @ Sergecross73:, @ Soetermans:, and @ Popcornfud:. Wikibenboy94 ( talk) 22:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is no section for this video game’s story. I think that many people trying to research it will turn to this website and get nothing about the story. 80.95.198.190 ( talk) 09:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
There have been many edits going back and forth about comparing the game to its predecessor. Since it is a direct sequel, I am in favor of it PhummyLW ( talk) 17:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change initial release to release; game is out everywhere. Mr51000 ( talk) 18:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Why don't you use aggregator
OpenCritic too in the reception sections?
https://opencritic.com/game/14343/the-legend-of-zelda-tears-of-the-kingdom
151.44.58.25 (
talk) 03:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)strike sock--
Ponyo
bons mots 21:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Do you have newer numbers regarding global sales? The latest information on this article refering to 10 million sold copies within three days of its release is now already three weeks old. 62.226.94.95 ( talk) 01:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Add about the bosses here??? Zora Champion Mipha XxColgeraIsCoolioxX ( talk) 00:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't "gloom" be capitalized? It isn't actually gloom, and it's capitalized in both the game and most media relating to it. 104.187.66.104 ( talk) 17:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To the gameplay part: add a part describing the addition of caves and wells, Bubbulfrogs and their gems due to their frequency and importance in certain major quests 193.200.82.62 ( talk) 22:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to change "action-adventure" to "open world action-adventure" Milovarki ( talk) 13:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The source for this: "Development of Tears of the Kingdom started in 2017 after Breath of the Wild was completed. Initially, new ideas were thought of for DLC but eventually it evolved into a new game when too many were gathered.[7][page needed]"
Should be this: " https://kotaku.com/breath-of-the-wild-is-getting-a-sequel-because-the-team-1835624233"
From the article: "Aonuma: Initially we were thinking of just DLC ideas, but then we had a lot of ideas and we said, “This is too many ideas, let’s just make one new game and start from scratch.”" GeminiContractor99 ( talk) 07:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to Game of the Year section:
Kinda Funny: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5jWxxrW2GA Siliconera: https://www.siliconera.com/siliconeras-overall-game-of-the-year-2023/ Shacknews: https://www.shacknews.com/article/138147/shacknews-goty-2023-zelda-totk Glentendo ( talk) 22:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
→Change the word "The" (with capitalized T) to "the" in the lead, after "Breath of the Wild (2017)". Marcelo373 ( talk) 23:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Oh, this is gonna be fun.
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit wars have occurred in the last month. Development is at a steady pace. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Cover art and gameplay screenshot images are tagged with the correct copyright status and are provided with a relevant fair use rationale. Image of Aonuma is under a CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Cover art is clearly necessary. Gameplay screenshot shows a crucial part of the gameplay. Feeling uncertain about the Aonuma image, but I'll allow it. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 03:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Link is sooooooooooooooooo hot!!
hyperbole <3 <3 <3
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 03:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead section adequately summarizes article. Fiction is out-of-universe. List incorporation policy does not apply. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | No bare URLs spotted. Reference section easy to spot. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | The article uses some sources considered to be situational per WP:VG/S. However, they are rarely ever used. There are way more reliable sources than situational sources. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | According to the Earwig report, the top result is a Discord page. Most of the pages, if not all, are reported as a false positive; game names are highlighted in red. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The gameplay, plot, development, and reception are covered - material that is adequate for a video game article. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article stays focused. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No recent edit wars. Development is at a steady pace. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Cover art and gameplay(?) screenshot have a valid non-free use rationale. Image of Aonuma is correctly licensed. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The gameplay screenshot gives a clear visual on what a crucial part of the gameplay looks like. Obviously, the cover art is relevant for a video game article, but I have mixed feeling about using the Aonuma image in the development section. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
TrademarkedTWOrantula, replied to your comments. The Night Watch (talk) 00:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Note: It has been a while since I've played any Zelda games (or video games in general D:). Expect me to get nothing.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Update the awards and nominations for GDCA 2024
| rowspan="8" | 24th Game Developers Choice Awards | Game of the Year | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost | style="text-align:center;" rowspan="8" | [1] |- | Best Audio | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Best Design | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Innovation Award | style="background: #9EFF9E; color: #000; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="yes table-yes2 notheme"|Won |- | Best Narrative | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Best Technology | style="background: #9EFF9E; color: #000; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="yes table-yes2 notheme"|Won |- | Best Visual Art | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Audience Award | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |}
source: https://gamechoiceawards.com/recipients Jebkerman420 ( talk) 15:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Shouldn't this draft (and possibly later article) be called Sequel to The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild or Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild Sequel? Calling it The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild 2 implies that it's the final title, which hasn't been confirmed. Icedmorning ( talk) 20:18, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps we could currently call the article itself "Untitled Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild Sequel", and in the bio/first paragraph refer to it as such: "The untitled sequel to Breath of the Wild (known as Sequel to Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild in early promotion) is an upcoming…”
This may be too verbose, however. Mia Clifford ( talk) 03:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
A title will be a same logo as Breath of the Wild 2 or a different logo as official announcement by Nintendo Direct/ E3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.194.143.194 ( talk) 05:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
In regards to this addition:
Please stop re-adding this. Sergecross73 msg me 02:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Untitled ''The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild'' sequel and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 27#Untitled ''The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild'' sequel until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Neocorelight ( Talk) 02:58, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 13#Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ebbedlila ( talk) 16:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
@
Popcornfud: Don't want to start an edit war over something silly 😊, but I do want to advocate a bit more to include: It was colloquially referred to as "the Breath of the Wild sequel" or "Breath of the Wild 2" until its official subtitle, Tears of the Kingdom, was announced in September 2022.
I don't think this is
WP:DUH -- this was effectively the working title in marketing
[1]
[2], online, and in publications for around 2 years (!) so it's important context for the Development and marketing section (though certainly not the lead).
This wasn't marketed as "Untitled Legend of Zelda game" or something, but specifically as a "Breath of the Wild sequel" — subtle but noteworthy difference that's not explicitly communicated in the official title. (Makes me wonder... was Majora's Mask marketed as a "Untitled Ocarina of Time sequel"? That would be interesting, if so...) Also worth noting it's wording based on a quote from the WaPo. Cheers, SiliconRed (he/him • talk) 17:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
The first teaser trailer was released in the E3 2019 Nintendo Direct, announcing the game as an untitled sequel to Breath of the Wildwhich I suppose covers this aspect well enough. SiliconRed (he/him • talk) 21:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
The game was announced at E3 2019 as a sequel to Breath of the Wild with some outlets using the colloquial title, "Breath of the Wild 2".
Think it's important to note the difference between "tears", crying, and "tears", rips? There's been some discussion and Nintendo confirmed it's the crying one. Legowerewolf ( talk) 18:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I will put the retail price of tears of the kingdom Senorleroy ( talk) 01:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
How should we talk about the leaks? There seems to be conflicting decisions being made by people reverting edits. Rossilaz ( talk) 14:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't we be commenting on the story, now that it's been leaked? MightyWeirdo ( talk) 06:58, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
The game is now out worldwide. This article is desperately overdue for a Gameplay section, as the core/added gameplay features have been covered in a litany of reliable, third-party sources for several months now. — CR4ZE ( T • C) 16:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There may be incorrect grammar in the articles lead, before the infobox. It states that "Link, the game's protagonist, is joined by Princess Zelda to defeat by a malevolent force seeking to destroy Hyrule." The 'by' in this sentence is not needed, grammatically incorrect and, if others agree, then it should be removed
83.177.155.88 ( talk) 12:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
References
As this has been contested by one or two users, can we get a consensus on whether we should be referring to the game's reception in the lead as "universal critical acclaim". Firstly, this kind of wording is rarely ever used now in articles, not least because it's overkill when only either "universal" or "critical" is necessary. Some also contest the fact that, despite attributing it to Metacritic directly, the wording of "universal" implies that the game received complete acclaim from all reviews involved, when this might not be the case. Otherwise, the existing wording can just feel like an attempt to make the game's reception sound lofty and noteworthy. I link to a previous talk page discussing the use of this phrasing here [ [8]], and ping @ Sergecross73:, @ Soetermans:, and @ Popcornfud:. Wikibenboy94 ( talk) 22:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is no section for this video game’s story. I think that many people trying to research it will turn to this website and get nothing about the story. 80.95.198.190 ( talk) 09:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
There have been many edits going back and forth about comparing the game to its predecessor. Since it is a direct sequel, I am in favor of it PhummyLW ( talk) 17:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change initial release to release; game is out everywhere. Mr51000 ( talk) 18:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Why don't you use aggregator
OpenCritic too in the reception sections?
https://opencritic.com/game/14343/the-legend-of-zelda-tears-of-the-kingdom
151.44.58.25 (
talk) 03:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)strike sock--
Ponyo
bons mots 21:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Do you have newer numbers regarding global sales? The latest information on this article refering to 10 million sold copies within three days of its release is now already three weeks old. 62.226.94.95 ( talk) 01:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Add about the bosses here??? Zora Champion Mipha XxColgeraIsCoolioxX ( talk) 00:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't "gloom" be capitalized? It isn't actually gloom, and it's capitalized in both the game and most media relating to it. 104.187.66.104 ( talk) 17:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To the gameplay part: add a part describing the addition of caves and wells, Bubbulfrogs and their gems due to their frequency and importance in certain major quests 193.200.82.62 ( talk) 22:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to change "action-adventure" to "open world action-adventure" Milovarki ( talk) 13:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The source for this: "Development of Tears of the Kingdom started in 2017 after Breath of the Wild was completed. Initially, new ideas were thought of for DLC but eventually it evolved into a new game when too many were gathered.[7][page needed]"
Should be this: " https://kotaku.com/breath-of-the-wild-is-getting-a-sequel-because-the-team-1835624233"
From the article: "Aonuma: Initially we were thinking of just DLC ideas, but then we had a lot of ideas and we said, “This is too many ideas, let’s just make one new game and start from scratch.”" GeminiContractor99 ( talk) 07:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add to Game of the Year section:
Kinda Funny: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5jWxxrW2GA Siliconera: https://www.siliconera.com/siliconeras-overall-game-of-the-year-2023/ Shacknews: https://www.shacknews.com/article/138147/shacknews-goty-2023-zelda-totk Glentendo ( talk) 22:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
→Change the word "The" (with capitalized T) to "the" in the lead, after "Breath of the Wild (2017)". Marcelo373 ( talk) 23:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Oh, this is gonna be fun.
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 05:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit wars have occurred in the last month. Development is at a steady pace. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Cover art and gameplay screenshot images are tagged with the correct copyright status and are provided with a relevant fair use rationale. Image of Aonuma is under a CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Cover art is clearly necessary. Gameplay screenshot shows a crucial part of the gameplay. Feeling uncertain about the Aonuma image, but I'll allow it. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 03:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Link is sooooooooooooooooo hot!!
hyperbole <3 <3 <3
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 03:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | ||
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead section adequately summarizes article. Fiction is out-of-universe. List incorporation policy does not apply. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | No bare URLs spotted. Reference section easy to spot. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | The article uses some sources considered to be situational per WP:VG/S. However, they are rarely ever used. There are way more reliable sources than situational sources. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | According to the Earwig report, the top result is a Discord page. Most of the pages, if not all, are reported as a false positive; game names are highlighted in red. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The gameplay, plot, development, and reception are covered - material that is adequate for a video game article. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article stays focused. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No recent edit wars. Development is at a steady pace. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Cover art and gameplay(?) screenshot have a valid non-free use rationale. Image of Aonuma is correctly licensed. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The gameplay screenshot gives a clear visual on what a crucial part of the gameplay looks like. Obviously, the cover art is relevant for a video game article, but I have mixed feeling about using the Aonuma image in the development section. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
TrademarkedTWOrantula, replied to your comments. The Night Watch (talk) 00:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Note: It has been a while since I've played any Zelda games (or video games in general D:). Expect me to get nothing.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Update the awards and nominations for GDCA 2024
| rowspan="8" | 24th Game Developers Choice Awards | Game of the Year | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost | style="text-align:center;" rowspan="8" | [1] |- | Best Audio | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Best Design | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Innovation Award | style="background: #9EFF9E; color: #000; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="yes table-yes2 notheme"|Won |- | Best Narrative | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Best Technology | style="background: #9EFF9E; color: #000; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="yes table-yes2 notheme"|Won |- | Best Visual Art | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |- | Audience Award | style="background:#FFC7C7; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-no" | Lost |}
source: https://gamechoiceawards.com/recipients Jebkerman420 ( talk) 15:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)