GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 13:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 03:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Bulb-bulb! (I have no idea what it says...)
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 03:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Grammar is mostly clean. No typos spotted. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead section is of adequate length. Layout is correct per MOS:LAYOUT. Article is not infested with words found on the WTW list. Fiction is out-of-universe. List incorporation policy does not apply. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Reference section is present, and no bare URLs are spotted. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Sources used are mostly reliable. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Spotchecking is a bit iffy. There's a 50/50 text-source integrity. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Article is free of copyright violations, per Earwig. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Article has adequate information about conception and design, appearances, promotional material, and reception. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article stays focused. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Article is neutral. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article is stable. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Bulbasaur character artwork is tagged with a valid non-free use rationale. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The Bulbasaur art, the only image in the article, is relevant. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Six sources. Go! References are of this revision.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Nominator: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 13:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula ( talk · contribs) 03:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Bulb-bulb! (I have no idea what it says...)
TWOrantulaTM (
enter the web) 03:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Grammar is mostly clean. No typos spotted. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead section is of adequate length. Layout is correct per MOS:LAYOUT. Article is not infested with words found on the WTW list. Fiction is out-of-universe. List incorporation policy does not apply. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Reference section is present, and no bare URLs are spotted. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Sources used are mostly reliable. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Spotchecking is a bit iffy. There's a 50/50 text-source integrity. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Article is free of copyright violations, per Earwig. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Article has adequate information about conception and design, appearances, promotional material, and reception. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article stays focused. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Article is neutral. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Article is stable. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Bulbasaur character artwork is tagged with a valid non-free use rationale. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The Bulbasaur art, the only image in the article, is relevant. | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Six sources. Go! References are of this revision.