Hi, I just came across this article. I expanded the section on soy and men's health. If you happen to come across current meta studies, you may want to add them to the article. CarlFromVienna ( talk) 10:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Thought you might want to weigh in on that. Cordially, O Govinda ( talk) 06:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Psychologist Guy!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dada Bhagwan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Tea critics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Just noting someone's started a thread about you at ANI, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § User: Psychologist Guy. Primefac ( talk) 18:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami has just been expanded and updated with new reliable sources, images, and media. As one of its most involved editors, your contribution would be very much appreciated. Many thanks. Regards, Cinosaur ( talk) 16:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi PG,
if I'd file a deletion request on this redirect to enable it as redlink - would it go through?
Kind regards, Tadarrius Bean ( talk) 16:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
@ OverlordQ: Thanks, but I've never wanted to write an article about Mr. Eades. I'm a foreigner; in my language we have less redirects and more redlinks.-- Tadarrius Bean ( talk) 16:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I've made the same mistake with Gordon Hempton. Shall I file a Template:Db?-- Tadarrius Bean ( talk) 18:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I'd been pointed to an article in the Journal of Controversial Ideas during a content dispute - it was a piece by John Turri trying to put forward that bias between political ideologies was more significant in the United States than racism. And I was like, hold up, this is the worst philosophical writing I've ever read! Just thoroughly bad scolasticism. Turri cited the same author multiple times as separate citations and then used those multiple citations (to one guy) to suggest something as established within the field. He badly paraphrased other authors, he made vast leaps in reasoning. I mean I read a business school journal about anthropocentric bias and AI "art" that week and Turri's paper still managed to be the worst paper I'd read all week. Then I found out about the anonymous zoophilia article and was like, "well this is basically the pseudo-academic equivalent to people freaking out that kids are 'identifying as cats' and going pee in a litter box." And then I read up on the founders and they were all EA people and, frankly, contemporary philosophy is pretty hostile even to regular utilitarians, let alone the weird eugenicist racist offspring of utilitarianism. So, yeah, based on those I thought I should put up a word of caution. But I felt I'd already wasted enough of my life on that rag so I did kind of half-ass it.
Anyway, appreciate you filling in some blanks there. Simonm223 ( talk) 18:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:OTHERSCOMMENTS - Please do not delete others' comments on the basis of being "off topic". See Wikipedia:TALKOFFTOPIC. Your opinion of what is off topic may differ from what others think is topic, "so be sure to err on the side of caution". 69.249.103.131 ( talk) 04:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The Veganism and Vegetarianism Barnstar | ||
Babysharkboss2 was here!! Hold me like a Grudge 15:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hi, I just came across this article. I expanded the section on soy and men's health. If you happen to come across current meta studies, you may want to add them to the article. CarlFromVienna ( talk) 10:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Thought you might want to weigh in on that. Cordially, O Govinda ( talk) 06:17, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Psychologist Guy!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dada Bhagwan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Tea critics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Just noting someone's started a thread about you at ANI, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § User: Psychologist Guy. Primefac ( talk) 18:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami has just been expanded and updated with new reliable sources, images, and media. As one of its most involved editors, your contribution would be very much appreciated. Many thanks. Regards, Cinosaur ( talk) 16:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi PG,
if I'd file a deletion request on this redirect to enable it as redlink - would it go through?
Kind regards, Tadarrius Bean ( talk) 16:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
@ OverlordQ: Thanks, but I've never wanted to write an article about Mr. Eades. I'm a foreigner; in my language we have less redirects and more redlinks.-- Tadarrius Bean ( talk) 16:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I've made the same mistake with Gordon Hempton. Shall I file a Template:Db?-- Tadarrius Bean ( talk) 18:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
I'd been pointed to an article in the Journal of Controversial Ideas during a content dispute - it was a piece by John Turri trying to put forward that bias between political ideologies was more significant in the United States than racism. And I was like, hold up, this is the worst philosophical writing I've ever read! Just thoroughly bad scolasticism. Turri cited the same author multiple times as separate citations and then used those multiple citations (to one guy) to suggest something as established within the field. He badly paraphrased other authors, he made vast leaps in reasoning. I mean I read a business school journal about anthropocentric bias and AI "art" that week and Turri's paper still managed to be the worst paper I'd read all week. Then I found out about the anonymous zoophilia article and was like, "well this is basically the pseudo-academic equivalent to people freaking out that kids are 'identifying as cats' and going pee in a litter box." And then I read up on the founders and they were all EA people and, frankly, contemporary philosophy is pretty hostile even to regular utilitarians, let alone the weird eugenicist racist offspring of utilitarianism. So, yeah, based on those I thought I should put up a word of caution. But I felt I'd already wasted enough of my life on that rag so I did kind of half-ass it.
Anyway, appreciate you filling in some blanks there. Simonm223 ( talk) 18:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:OTHERSCOMMENTS - Please do not delete others' comments on the basis of being "off topic". See Wikipedia:TALKOFFTOPIC. Your opinion of what is off topic may differ from what others think is topic, "so be sure to err on the side of caution". 69.249.103.131 ( talk) 04:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
The Veganism and Vegetarianism Barnstar | ||
Babysharkboss2 was here!! Hold me like a Grudge 15:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC) |