The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 23:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 17:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The page has been tagged for six months as needing reliable sources, but nothing has been done. If we remove everything that is unsourced then there is nothing left. So either someone should improve it or it should be deleted. Ldm1954 ( talk) 22:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
So either someone should improve it or it should be deleted.. I am sorry but no: either he deserves an article or the page should be deleted. Afd is about deletion not cleanup. Again,I will improve the page, but that's not the point. Anyone nominating a page for deletion should look for sources before doing so. Which is apparently not the case here. Thanks.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
If we remove everything that is unsourced then there is nothing left.was not even true. There was one source and NINE links to notable films in which he played (not to mention an IMDb page, which, although not considered reliable for notability should have given you an idea that you would have to dig a little bit further than a tag on the page before initiating this). You could at least have checked that, in my opinion, even if you didn't want to bother searching the internet, not even for a minute. Please have a look at the page now so that we can avoid wasting more time on this. Thanks.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 01:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you improve it then I will reverse my nomination,but although the page is vastly improved, you don't. Instead you say
I expect that you can validate that he was in those films,concerning his (selected) feature films, but even though this second bizarre request is immediately fulfilled, you still don't withdraw. No, instead you demand the names of the characters he plays when a simple click gives you most of them; and sources for all of his tv roles, when some are presented and external links allow you to verify most of the rest. In the meantime, you repeatedly state that most of the content of the page needs to be deleted if unsourced. It has not occurred to you that the actor looks quite notable enough by now? No? And that this is the only point of this discussion. I have no further comments. So much for saving other people's time. I stand more than ever by my Speedy Keep !vote, and will not edit the article any further. You can do it if you wish. Keep up the good work! - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't see any evidence of notability per WP:NTOUR, which requires at least a modicum of sourcing of the tour as a tour--a setlist and a few references about dates and audiences is not enough. Drmies ( talk) 22:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kentucky Educational Television. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Could be converted to list and merged into main KET article. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 21:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by mover. ( non-admin closure) TarnishedPath talk 01:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
nonnotable banker per
WP:SINGLEEVENT, noted only by a bank scandal; also no notability by association (he was not personally involved in scandals; only wa involved as CEO) -
Altenmann
>talk
20:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not only is this consensus almost unanimous, I don't think I've ever seen Cunard argue for Deletion before. When they can't find reliable sources, they probably don't exist. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
An online search does not reveal in-depth significant coverage of this person to meet our criteria for a notable businessperson, nor an artist/fashion designer. There are several people who share the same name, but all I'm finding on this Jin Koh is social media, primary sources and user-submitted content. Seems to also be a paid COI entry. Fails WP:NBUSINESSPERSON, WP:CREATIVE, WP:GNG. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone ( talk) 20:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
References
*Update Looks like a SPAM email was sent to Jin Koh. Below is the sender and what it says: Greg Henderson ( talk) 00:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
From: Olivier Laurence <olivierlaurence@wikipedian.world> Date: Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:39 PM Subject: URGENT NOTICE: Wikipedia Article for Deletion - Immediate Action Required. To: takahito@gmail.com <takahito@gmail.com>, jin@bodygram.com <jin@bodygram.com> Hi Jin, I trust everything is well with you. I am Olivier Laurence, an experienced Wikipedia administrator and editor with over 20 years of experience, and I'm writing to you as part of the "Article for Deletion" Evaluation team. You may view my Wikipedia administrator account below: /info/en/?search=User:Olivier I wanted to bring your attention to an important matter impacting your live Wikipedia article. Your Wikipedia page was recently tagged and nominated for deletion due to concerns about its compliance with the Wikipedia standards; your page is listed below. Please review your Wikipedia page here: /info/en/?search=Jin_Koh Maintaining a Wikipedia article is an enormous responsibility and we appreciate your contributions to the platform thus far. However, all Wikipedia pages must comply with our content and notability rules to remain on the platform. Failure to address the highlighted concern may result in the page being moved to the spam list, leading to a temporary ban of five years or a permanent ban, at the discretion of Wikipedia moderators. If you are not interested in improving the page, kindly acknowledge this, and I will proceed with the deletion process. Note that once details are submitted for the deletion log, the same content and title cannot be reused. If you have any questions or require assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us at the same email address. Regards Senior Wikipedia Administrator and Editor Olivier Laurence |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR/ WP:GNG or have an obvious WP:ATD. Notability is not inherited. Boleyn ( talk) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have an obvious WP:ATD. It doesn't appear to be a specific term written about. Boleyn ( talk) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Spicy per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I actually just want an admin to IAR delete this. This is yet another recreation attempting to bypass the salting of B Major (musician), B Major (Music Producer), and B Major (South African musician). Page creator admits to being a sockpuppet Mach61 ( talk) 19:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO/ WP:GNG or have an obvious WP:ATD. Successful career but not quite notable; 14 years in CAT:NN doesn't appear to be just neglect. Boleyn ( talk) 19:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG/ WP:GNG or have an obvious WP:ATD. It exists but isn't notable. Boleyn ( talk) 18:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No consensus at last AfD, low participation. It is hard to read through the fact that this is written by a nearly-WP:SPA in a promotional way, but it doesn't appear that there are the sources available online to establish he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so I really hope we can now find a consensus, either way. Boleyn ( talk) 18:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable person, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, BEFORE searches bring up one blog and a bunch of stuff about an actor with similar name. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. v/r - Seawolf35 T-- C 17:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find enough to show it meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 17:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Routine investors news, no single good reliable source; Reuters is not about this company; fails WP NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 16:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
17:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists and there is some coverage, but not enough yo meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 14:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
17:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lists of endangered languages. Owen× ☎ 23:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicated article. See Lists of endangered languages. It was a redirect since 2009 until the author's recent edits. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 16:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Sanskrit is the mother of all Indo-European languages. All in all, it would be an extremely poor article even if there weren't already another article that accomplishes the same function, but better; but given there is, the article should absolutely be deleted post-haste. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 09:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
At best, a bit of overly enthusiast in-universe writing or an attempt to promote the film.
[38] Created in 2004, tagged with needing additional citations since 2010, and only sourced to the sites connected to the film and geocities-ish sites. But this is just a non-notable character from a small, independent film. I searched Google, ebsco, proquest, newspapers.com, proquest, and archive.org. From the Vimeo listing (my emph) Iranian-English director Kivmars Bowling has found a new way to bring period drama to a modern audience and bring this original story to life.
[39] Nothing in the archived director statement or any other marketing materials claims the movie is based on a real person (press kit:
[40]). The movie was in production when the article was created (see
[41] from the film's blog: The script was written in 2002/3 and we shot the film in England in 2004.
). Our article links to
[42] which has documents that purport to be official government documents but are likely made for the film). (I think the movie is of questionable notability (zero published reviews) but the claim that it was the last movie be filmed with "Kodachrome 40 Super 8 film"
[43] is interesting but I can't find any independent, reliable sources repeating the claim. I think creating a fresh article on the film if sources are found would be the path forward.)
Skynxnex (
talk)
14:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Not finding any meaningful coverage in reliable secondary sources. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Cielquiparle ( talk) 13:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Doubtful notability. Most of the sources look to be just mentions and run-of-the-mill. Article itself is basically WP:PROMO. PepperBeast (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
07:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Not meeting GNG, ANYBIO. Only found one reliable source: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-22854440, the rest are press-releases-like stuff. BoraVoro ( talk) 10:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find any SIGCOV of him so he fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 12:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 23:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I wonder if there’s any appetite for this proposed deletion. To my mind, the article is a complete mess. Not only is it almost entirely a synthesis of material, but I’m not convinced it warrants an article even if that problem were resolved.
All such an article would do is summarise the "types of nationalism" contained within the Template:Nationalism_sidebar, but given those types already all have their own articles, does that information actually need to be repeated here in an article of its own? Yr Enw ( talk) 08:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 04:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The basis of this article's notability isn't for the bulding, and there's insufficient sources available to satisfy WP:NCORP,which is the relevant guidelines since it is about the theatre as an organization rather than the structure in which it was located in. Graywalls ( talk) 07:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPath talk 15:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO, WP:ENT or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 18:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
20:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional analysis of the available reference material would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Database record, no info except photo | 1. "David Paterson". United Agents. |
Official video on Youtube, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV about the subject | 2. ^ "Silverchair - Emotion Sickness (Official Video)". YouTube. 28 September 2012. Archived from the original on 19 December 2021. |
Official video on Youtube, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV about the subject | 3. ^ The chicken or the egg? |
From above | |
Database record for event, no info about subject, has links to other subjects, notability is not inherited | https://www.ausstage.edu.au/pages/event/65671 |
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Barely any noteworthy coverage out there. None of the sources here are independent. Aintabli ( talk) 06:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Completely unnotable mayor holding unnotable offices in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Previously nomination in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable offices in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Previously nomination in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 06:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 21:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
No source includes a very detailed account of the skirmish or attributes any significance to it and its aftermath. A separate article is unnecessary. On a different note, none of the sources here include exact page numbers. Several other articles created by the same editor were deleted based on the lack of WP:V. Aintabli ( talk) 06:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable mayor of a small town in California. A Wikipedia article for a different El Monte mayor, Ernest Gutierrez, was recently deleted as he was found to be non-notable. Also nominating another mayor of the same town who is equally non-notable:
Delete both per nom. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 06:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 03:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
The sources are small author profiles on websites he wrote for and a press release for getting a non-notable award. There is no claim to notability or significance in the article. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 06:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No consensus established after multiple relistings. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
This page had been converted to a redirect to Yeomanry Cavalry until today, when I reverted it back to bring it to AfD. At its previous state, it was eligible for WP:G14; however, with the history of the page that I brough back in its current state, I was wondering what consensus would be on what to do with this. Redirecting to Yeomanry Cavalry seems to be an issue as that page is not a disambiguation page or serving a similar function. Tartar Torte 19:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Created by a single purpose editor. The references are either primary or mostly small one line mentions in mainstream press. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 04:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Regardless of COI, experienced (and non-ip) editors here all have consensus for a keep. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Here's a young man who made the papers in 2018 and started an organization--but none of the info on either rises to the level of notability by our standards. Also, the article was written up by one of the many, many socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Factsonlyplease39/Archive, Best Known For writing up truly awful and poorly verified biographies. Drmies ( talk) 23:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
04:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and while I'm not sure one will develop on the Talk with respect to merger, it's clear one isn't going to develop here. Star Mississippi 15:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NALBUMS and GNG. This has been repeatedly redirected and restored making this redirect costly. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, so far editors are split between delete, redirect and keep. If I were closing I'd be interested in more discussion as to whether/why the sources show notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
04:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources raised helped consensus (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Article about an unincorporated community, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:GEOLAND. As always, unincorporated neighbourhoods or communities within larger municipalities are not "inherently" notable enough for their own standalone articles as separate topics from their parent municipality -- it depends on the depth of reliable GNG-worthy sourcing about the community that can be shown to demonstrate that it has standalone notability as a separate topic, and a community that can't be shown to meet the necessary standard of sourcing just gets a redirect to the parent place.
But except for just one article in a local-interest magazine, which isn't enough coverage to meet GNG all by itself, this is otherwise referenced entirely to
primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, like maps and content self-published by the municipal government. In addition, it warrants note that this was created at the incorrect title "Mayfield West, Canada", in defiance of
MOS:CANNEIGH, in an attempt to bypass the fact that the correct title already existed as a redirect to Caledon.
So the appropriate remedy here is to delete this, and restore the original redirect to
Caledon, Ontario, because this isn't the kind of sourcing that it takes to get an unincorporated community over GEOLAND.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
It's a shame to see a 19th century village being obscured by a 1974 housing development that nicked its name and tacked "West" onto the end. And no mention of this in Caledon, Ontario#History.Mayfield. A small Village in the Townships of Chinguacousy, County Peel, 7 miles from Brampton, the County Town, and 27 from Toronto.
Archdekin, F., hotel keeper
Archdekin, P., farmer
[…]
— McEvoy, Henry (1869). The Province of Ontario Gazetteer and Directory. Toronto: Robertson & Cook., p.304
Uncle G ( talk) 06:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
And I didn't mention Caledon, Ontario#History idly. This article's first source is all about that, but ironically not used in that article at all. Because a Wikipedia editor has decided to write up the town's history in an article about a "service centre", a totally obscure place to put it. More irony: the first source is indeed false sourcing for this article, because it doesn't actually talk about any "rural service centre" at all.
Uncle G ( talk) 15:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given a rather recent claimant of sourcing, this is to provide opportunity to produce the same
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
04:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep im gonna lose my mind if all of this gets deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielg532 ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 04:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Sources based mostly on a few of the subject's publications; while an early to mid-career researcher accomplished in their specific field, but otherwise not notable. Reads somewhat as promotional. Jfo17 ( talk) 04:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closed as no consensus after 3 weeks of discussions and relistings. Weak keep comments lean towards GNG but consensus is not clearly established. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 04:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about a band, and not found sources to add. It has been tagged as relying on primary sources since 2007. It has no footnotes and the two external links are an interview and the archived page for the band's website. I do not think it mets WP:NMUSIC. Tacyarg ( talk) 20:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
04:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep/nomination withdrawn. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 05:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Upcoming film. Coverage is mostly based on in-passing mentions and press releases. Seems like WP:TOOSOON, but it will likely be notable within a few months (scheduled for November). Draftify until then? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Meitei culture#Animals and birds. where a rescope can happen, if needed Star Mississippi 15:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Looks to be author's WP:SYNTHESIS PepperBeast (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep. No proper deletion rationale. Nominator is also now blocked, which doesn't help the case. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Over 150+ dead links, 90% article is almost cited with dead links, either needs to be restructured entirely or deleted until. Systumm ( talk) 02:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Meitei culture as a natural ATD. Owen× ☎ 23:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Purely WP:SYNTHESIS PepperBeast (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Meitei culture as a natural ATD. Owen× ☎ 23:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be WP:SYNTHESIS PepperBeast (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This is basically a synthesis created for purposes of WP:Peacock. PepperBeast (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This is basically a synthesis created for purposes of WP:Peacock. PepperBeast (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Too few references + not meeting notability guidelines. Avishai11 ( talk) 01:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Appearing to not meet references/notability guidelines, among other things. Avishai11 ( talk) 01:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. Does not meet WP:NFILM as there is nothing showing this is even filming, no release date, etc. Also fails WP:GNG. CNMall41 ( talk) 00:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD removed. Insignificant name that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 00:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG; the sole example of independent coverage is [51], which includes a little bit of description beyond the routine signing announcement, but does not make a case for GNG on its own. I was unable to find additional coverage searching online for various substrings of the subject's name combined with teams that he has played for. signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Database | 1. "Iqbal Al Ghuzat: Profile". Soccerway. Retrieved 2 July 2023. |
404 | 2. ^ "Mantan Pemain Persipa Gabung PSG". www.lingkarmulia.com (in Indonesian). Retrieved 6 March 2021. |
404 appears to be a game recap | 3. ^ "Hasil Persis Solo Vs PSG Pati: Laskar Samber Nyawa Menang Dua Gol Tanpa Balas" (in Indonesian). sportstars.id. 26 September 2021. Retrieved 26 September 2021. |
404 appears to be a game recap | 4. ^ "Hasil Bekasi City vs Persela Lamongan Skor Akhir 2-1, Pekan 1 Liga 2 2022-2023" (in Indonesian). mediabola.net. 29 August 2022. Retrieved 29 August 2022. |
Game recap does not mention subject | 5. ^ "Hasil Bekasi City vs Nusantara Skor Akhir 2-0" (in Indonesian). mediabola.net. 27 September 2022. Retrieved 27 September 2022. |
Mill sports recruiting news | 6. ^ "Dewa United FC Perkenalkan Rekrutan Pertamanya Iqbal Al Ghuzat". bolaskor.com. 26 May 2023. Retrieved 26 May 2023. |
Game recap does not mention subject | 7. ^ "Hasil Liga 1: Dewa United Kalahkan Arema FC 1-0". sport.detik.com. 2 July 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2023. |
The result was merge to Characters of the Tekken series#Josie Rizal. ✗ plicit 00:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This is an odd one, but hear me out. I think this article has problems on a few fronts, namely that there's really at the core not a lot to say, the whole article could be summarized in a list entry easily. But the bigger issue is the core of the reception, well pretty much *all* the reception, is something in a week's span or less, and says a lot of the same thing over and over. I don't feel that makes it notable per WP:SUSTAINED. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 20:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
The article in its lamentable current state reads more like a brief collection of vague examples within the very broad concept of time poverty. I'd say an article on this particular phrase is more suited for Wikitionary than for Wikipedia. A concise definition and any brief etymological/historical context of the expression is all that's needed. Mooonswimmer 20:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 23:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 17:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The page has been tagged for six months as needing reliable sources, but nothing has been done. If we remove everything that is unsourced then there is nothing left. So either someone should improve it or it should be deleted. Ldm1954 ( talk) 22:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
So either someone should improve it or it should be deleted.. I am sorry but no: either he deserves an article or the page should be deleted. Afd is about deletion not cleanup. Again,I will improve the page, but that's not the point. Anyone nominating a page for deletion should look for sources before doing so. Which is apparently not the case here. Thanks.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
If we remove everything that is unsourced then there is nothing left.was not even true. There was one source and NINE links to notable films in which he played (not to mention an IMDb page, which, although not considered reliable for notability should have given you an idea that you would have to dig a little bit further than a tag on the page before initiating this). You could at least have checked that, in my opinion, even if you didn't want to bother searching the internet, not even for a minute. Please have a look at the page now so that we can avoid wasting more time on this. Thanks.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 01:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you improve it then I will reverse my nomination,but although the page is vastly improved, you don't. Instead you say
I expect that you can validate that he was in those films,concerning his (selected) feature films, but even though this second bizarre request is immediately fulfilled, you still don't withdraw. No, instead you demand the names of the characters he plays when a simple click gives you most of them; and sources for all of his tv roles, when some are presented and external links allow you to verify most of the rest. In the meantime, you repeatedly state that most of the content of the page needs to be deleted if unsourced. It has not occurred to you that the actor looks quite notable enough by now? No? And that this is the only point of this discussion. I have no further comments. So much for saving other people's time. I stand more than ever by my Speedy Keep !vote, and will not edit the article any further. You can do it if you wish. Keep up the good work! - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't see any evidence of notability per WP:NTOUR, which requires at least a modicum of sourcing of the tour as a tour--a setlist and a few references about dates and audiences is not enough. Drmies ( talk) 22:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kentucky Educational Television. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Could be converted to list and merged into main KET article. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 21:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn by mover. ( non-admin closure) TarnishedPath talk 01:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
nonnotable banker per
WP:SINGLEEVENT, noted only by a bank scandal; also no notability by association (he was not personally involved in scandals; only wa involved as CEO) -
Altenmann
>talk
20:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not only is this consensus almost unanimous, I don't think I've ever seen Cunard argue for Deletion before. When they can't find reliable sources, they probably don't exist. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
An online search does not reveal in-depth significant coverage of this person to meet our criteria for a notable businessperson, nor an artist/fashion designer. There are several people who share the same name, but all I'm finding on this Jin Koh is social media, primary sources and user-submitted content. Seems to also be a paid COI entry. Fails WP:NBUSINESSPERSON, WP:CREATIVE, WP:GNG. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone ( talk) 20:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
References
*Update Looks like a SPAM email was sent to Jin Koh. Below is the sender and what it says: Greg Henderson ( talk) 00:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
From: Olivier Laurence <olivierlaurence@wikipedian.world> Date: Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 2:39 PM Subject: URGENT NOTICE: Wikipedia Article for Deletion - Immediate Action Required. To: takahito@gmail.com <takahito@gmail.com>, jin@bodygram.com <jin@bodygram.com> Hi Jin, I trust everything is well with you. I am Olivier Laurence, an experienced Wikipedia administrator and editor with over 20 years of experience, and I'm writing to you as part of the "Article for Deletion" Evaluation team. You may view my Wikipedia administrator account below: /info/en/?search=User:Olivier I wanted to bring your attention to an important matter impacting your live Wikipedia article. Your Wikipedia page was recently tagged and nominated for deletion due to concerns about its compliance with the Wikipedia standards; your page is listed below. Please review your Wikipedia page here: /info/en/?search=Jin_Koh Maintaining a Wikipedia article is an enormous responsibility and we appreciate your contributions to the platform thus far. However, all Wikipedia pages must comply with our content and notability rules to remain on the platform. Failure to address the highlighted concern may result in the page being moved to the spam list, leading to a temporary ban of five years or a permanent ban, at the discretion of Wikipedia moderators. If you are not interested in improving the page, kindly acknowledge this, and I will proceed with the deletion process. Note that once details are submitted for the deletion log, the same content and title cannot be reused. If you have any questions or require assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us at the same email address. Regards Senior Wikipedia Administrator and Editor Olivier Laurence |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR/ WP:GNG or have an obvious WP:ATD. Notability is not inherited. Boleyn ( talk) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:N or have an obvious WP:ATD. It doesn't appear to be a specific term written about. Boleyn ( talk) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Spicy per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I actually just want an admin to IAR delete this. This is yet another recreation attempting to bypass the salting of B Major (musician), B Major (Music Producer), and B Major (South African musician). Page creator admits to being a sockpuppet Mach61 ( talk) 19:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO/ WP:GNG or have an obvious WP:ATD. Successful career but not quite notable; 14 years in CAT:NN doesn't appear to be just neglect. Boleyn ( talk) 19:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This has some coverage but doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG/ WP:GNG or have an obvious WP:ATD. It exists but isn't notable. Boleyn ( talk) 18:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No consensus at last AfD, low participation. It is hard to read through the fact that this is written by a nearly-WP:SPA in a promotional way, but it doesn't appear that there are the sources available online to establish he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so I really hope we can now find a consensus, either way. Boleyn ( talk) 18:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable person, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPEOPLE, BEFORE searches bring up one blog and a bunch of stuff about an actor with similar name. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. v/r - Seawolf35 T-- C 17:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find enough to show it meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 17:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Routine investors news, no single good reliable source; Reuters is not about this company; fails WP NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 16:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
17:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists and there is some coverage, but not enough yo meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 14:11, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
17:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lists of endangered languages. Owen× ☎ 23:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicated article. See Lists of endangered languages. It was a redirect since 2009 until the author's recent edits. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 16:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Sanskrit is the mother of all Indo-European languages. All in all, it would be an extremely poor article even if there weren't already another article that accomplishes the same function, but better; but given there is, the article should absolutely be deleted post-haste. Brusquedandelion ( talk) 09:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
At best, a bit of overly enthusiast in-universe writing or an attempt to promote the film.
[38] Created in 2004, tagged with needing additional citations since 2010, and only sourced to the sites connected to the film and geocities-ish sites. But this is just a non-notable character from a small, independent film. I searched Google, ebsco, proquest, newspapers.com, proquest, and archive.org. From the Vimeo listing (my emph) Iranian-English director Kivmars Bowling has found a new way to bring period drama to a modern audience and bring this original story to life.
[39] Nothing in the archived director statement or any other marketing materials claims the movie is based on a real person (press kit:
[40]). The movie was in production when the article was created (see
[41] from the film's blog: The script was written in 2002/3 and we shot the film in England in 2004.
). Our article links to
[42] which has documents that purport to be official government documents but are likely made for the film). (I think the movie is of questionable notability (zero published reviews) but the claim that it was the last movie be filmed with "Kodachrome 40 Super 8 film"
[43] is interesting but I can't find any independent, reliable sources repeating the claim. I think creating a fresh article on the film if sources are found would be the path forward.)
Skynxnex (
talk)
14:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Not finding any meaningful coverage in reliable secondary sources. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSONG. Cielquiparle ( talk) 13:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Doubtful notability. Most of the sources look to be just mentions and run-of-the-mill. Article itself is basically WP:PROMO. PepperBeast (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
07:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Not meeting GNG, ANYBIO. Only found one reliable source: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-22854440, the rest are press-releases-like stuff. BoraVoro ( talk) 10:10, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find any SIGCOV of him so he fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 12:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 23:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I wonder if there’s any appetite for this proposed deletion. To my mind, the article is a complete mess. Not only is it almost entirely a synthesis of material, but I’m not convinced it warrants an article even if that problem were resolved.
All such an article would do is summarise the "types of nationalism" contained within the Template:Nationalism_sidebar, but given those types already all have their own articles, does that information actually need to be repeated here in an article of its own? Yr Enw ( talk) 08:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 04:24, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The basis of this article's notability isn't for the bulding, and there's insufficient sources available to satisfy WP:NCORP,which is the relevant guidelines since it is about the theatre as an organization rather than the structure in which it was located in. Graywalls ( talk) 07:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPath talk 15:34, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO, WP:ENT or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 18:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
02:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
20:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional analysis of the available reference material would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Database record, no info except photo | 1. "David Paterson". United Agents. |
Official video on Youtube, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV about the subject | 2. ^ "Silverchair - Emotion Sickness (Official Video)". YouTube. 28 September 2012. Archived from the original on 19 December 2021. |
Official video on Youtube, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV about the subject | 3. ^ The chicken or the egg? |
From above | |
Database record for event, no info about subject, has links to other subjects, notability is not inherited | https://www.ausstage.edu.au/pages/event/65671 |
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Barely any noteworthy coverage out there. None of the sources here are independent. Aintabli ( talk) 06:27, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Completely unnotable mayor holding unnotable offices in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Previously nomination in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable offices in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Previously nomination in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 06:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 21:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
No source includes a very detailed account of the skirmish or attributes any significance to it and its aftermath. A separate article is unnecessary. On a different note, none of the sources here include exact page numbers. Several other articles created by the same editor were deleted based on the lack of WP:V. Aintabli ( talk) 06:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable mayor of a small town in California. A Wikipedia article for a different El Monte mayor, Ernest Gutierrez, was recently deleted as he was found to be non-notable. Also nominating another mayor of the same town who is equally non-notable:
Delete both per nom. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 06:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 03:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
The sources are small author profiles on websites he wrote for and a press release for getting a non-notable award. There is no claim to notability or significance in the article. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 06:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No consensus established after multiple relistings. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
This page had been converted to a redirect to Yeomanry Cavalry until today, when I reverted it back to bring it to AfD. At its previous state, it was eligible for WP:G14; however, with the history of the page that I brough back in its current state, I was wondering what consensus would be on what to do with this. Redirecting to Yeomanry Cavalry seems to be an issue as that page is not a disambiguation page or serving a similar function. Tartar Torte 19:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Created by a single purpose editor. The references are either primary or mostly small one line mentions in mainstream press. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 04:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
05:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Regardless of COI, experienced (and non-ip) editors here all have consensus for a keep. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Here's a young man who made the papers in 2018 and started an organization--but none of the info on either rises to the level of notability by our standards. Also, the article was written up by one of the many, many socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Factsonlyplease39/Archive, Best Known For writing up truly awful and poorly verified biographies. Drmies ( talk) 23:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
04:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and while I'm not sure one will develop on the Talk with respect to merger, it's clear one isn't going to develop here. Star Mississippi 15:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NALBUMS and GNG. This has been repeatedly redirected and restored making this redirect costly. Chris Troutman ( talk) 23:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, so far editors are split between delete, redirect and keep. If I were closing I'd be interested in more discussion as to whether/why the sources show notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
04:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources raised helped consensus (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Article about an unincorporated community, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:GEOLAND. As always, unincorporated neighbourhoods or communities within larger municipalities are not "inherently" notable enough for their own standalone articles as separate topics from their parent municipality -- it depends on the depth of reliable GNG-worthy sourcing about the community that can be shown to demonstrate that it has standalone notability as a separate topic, and a community that can't be shown to meet the necessary standard of sourcing just gets a redirect to the parent place.
But except for just one article in a local-interest magazine, which isn't enough coverage to meet GNG all by itself, this is otherwise referenced entirely to
primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, like maps and content self-published by the municipal government. In addition, it warrants note that this was created at the incorrect title "Mayfield West, Canada", in defiance of
MOS:CANNEIGH, in an attempt to bypass the fact that the correct title already existed as a redirect to Caledon.
So the appropriate remedy here is to delete this, and restore the original redirect to
Caledon, Ontario, because this isn't the kind of sourcing that it takes to get an unincorporated community over GEOLAND.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
It's a shame to see a 19th century village being obscured by a 1974 housing development that nicked its name and tacked "West" onto the end. And no mention of this in Caledon, Ontario#History.Mayfield. A small Village in the Townships of Chinguacousy, County Peel, 7 miles from Brampton, the County Town, and 27 from Toronto.
Archdekin, F., hotel keeper
Archdekin, P., farmer
[…]
— McEvoy, Henry (1869). The Province of Ontario Gazetteer and Directory. Toronto: Robertson & Cook., p.304
Uncle G ( talk) 06:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
And I didn't mention Caledon, Ontario#History idly. This article's first source is all about that, but ironically not used in that article at all. Because a Wikipedia editor has decided to write up the town's history in an article about a "service centre", a totally obscure place to put it. More irony: the first source is indeed false sourcing for this article, because it doesn't actually talk about any "rural service centre" at all.
Uncle G ( talk) 15:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given a rather recent claimant of sourcing, this is to provide opportunity to produce the same
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
04:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep im gonna lose my mind if all of this gets deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielg532 ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 04:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Sources based mostly on a few of the subject's publications; while an early to mid-career researcher accomplished in their specific field, but otherwise not notable. Reads somewhat as promotional. Jfo17 ( talk) 04:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closed as no consensus after 3 weeks of discussions and relistings. Weak keep comments lean towards GNG but consensus is not clearly established. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 04:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about a band, and not found sources to add. It has been tagged as relying on primary sources since 2007. It has no footnotes and the two external links are an interview and the archived page for the band's website. I do not think it mets WP:NMUSIC. Tacyarg ( talk) 20:35, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
00:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done
04:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep/nomination withdrawn. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 05:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Upcoming film. Coverage is mostly based on in-passing mentions and press releases. Seems like WP:TOOSOON, but it will likely be notable within a few months (scheduled for November). Draftify until then? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Meitei culture#Animals and birds. where a rescope can happen, if needed Star Mississippi 15:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Looks to be author's WP:SYNTHESIS PepperBeast (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep. No proper deletion rationale. Nominator is also now blocked, which doesn't help the case. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Over 150+ dead links, 90% article is almost cited with dead links, either needs to be restructured entirely or deleted until. Systumm ( talk) 02:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Meitei culture as a natural ATD. Owen× ☎ 23:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Purely WP:SYNTHESIS PepperBeast (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Meitei culture as a natural ATD. Owen× ☎ 23:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be WP:SYNTHESIS PepperBeast (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This is basically a synthesis created for purposes of WP:Peacock. PepperBeast (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This is basically a synthesis created for purposes of WP:Peacock. PepperBeast (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Too few references + not meeting notability guidelines. Avishai11 ( talk) 01:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Appearing to not meet references/notability guidelines, among other things. Avishai11 ( talk) 01:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. Does not meet WP:NFILM as there is nothing showing this is even filming, no release date, etc. Also fails WP:GNG. CNMall41 ( talk) 00:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD removed. Insignificant name that fails WP:NNAME, WP:NOTDICT and WP:GNG. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 00:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG; the sole example of independent coverage is [51], which includes a little bit of description beyond the routine signing announcement, but does not make a case for GNG on its own. I was unable to find additional coverage searching online for various substrings of the subject's name combined with teams that he has played for. signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Database | 1. "Iqbal Al Ghuzat: Profile". Soccerway. Retrieved 2 July 2023. |
404 | 2. ^ "Mantan Pemain Persipa Gabung PSG". www.lingkarmulia.com (in Indonesian). Retrieved 6 March 2021. |
404 appears to be a game recap | 3. ^ "Hasil Persis Solo Vs PSG Pati: Laskar Samber Nyawa Menang Dua Gol Tanpa Balas" (in Indonesian). sportstars.id. 26 September 2021. Retrieved 26 September 2021. |
404 appears to be a game recap | 4. ^ "Hasil Bekasi City vs Persela Lamongan Skor Akhir 2-1, Pekan 1 Liga 2 2022-2023" (in Indonesian). mediabola.net. 29 August 2022. Retrieved 29 August 2022. |
Game recap does not mention subject | 5. ^ "Hasil Bekasi City vs Nusantara Skor Akhir 2-0" (in Indonesian). mediabola.net. 27 September 2022. Retrieved 27 September 2022. |
Mill sports recruiting news | 6. ^ "Dewa United FC Perkenalkan Rekrutan Pertamanya Iqbal Al Ghuzat". bolaskor.com. 26 May 2023. Retrieved 26 May 2023. |
Game recap does not mention subject | 7. ^ "Hasil Liga 1: Dewa United Kalahkan Arema FC 1-0". sport.detik.com. 2 July 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2023. |
The result was merge to Characters of the Tekken series#Josie Rizal. ✗ plicit 00:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This is an odd one, but hear me out. I think this article has problems on a few fronts, namely that there's really at the core not a lot to say, the whole article could be summarized in a list entry easily. But the bigger issue is the core of the reception, well pretty much *all* the reception, is something in a week's span or less, and says a lot of the same thing over and over. I don't feel that makes it notable per WP:SUSTAINED. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 20:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
The article in its lamentable current state reads more like a brief collection of vague examples within the very broad concept of time poverty. I'd say an article on this particular phrase is more suited for Wikitionary than for Wikipedia. A concise definition and any brief etymological/historical context of the expression is all that's needed. Mooonswimmer 20:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)