|
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Greg, I just undid three edit request fulfillments by a newbie editor who apparently did not read the talk page discussions, nor check the requested text/content against what the sources say and the respective page numbers. This is the second time this has happened with a new editor fulfilling requests. The articles are Reardon Building, Seven Arts Shop and La Rambla Building. If you have made an error on any of your edit requests you should probably close out those requests and start new ones so this does not keep happening, or at least make it more clear what the new request is with the correct information. Thank you. Netherzone ( talk) 00:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairglen Additions has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
AntientNestor ( talk) 13:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Spillman Engineering 3-Abreast Carousel has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
AntientNestor ( talk) 14:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Troy Laundry has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Lewis Josselyn (April 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lewis Josselyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Lewis Josselyn has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Del Monte Station has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 21:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: The Golden Bough (disambiguation) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 18:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors, as you did at
Draft:Lewis Josselyn. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Greg, please do not change or refactor other editors talk page comments, as you did to
Melcous critique of the source assessment table. You have been here many years, long enough to know about
WP:TPO.
Netherzone (
talk) 18:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
-
Comment: I simply placed inline comments to statements made by Melcous on the
Draft talk:Lewis Josselyn page. This is a common practice in the most text exchanges. I did not delete or alter anything of what Melcous said, just made the comment, for example for source 1: " I've added the author's name:
Jennie V. Cannon. The table of contents is
here. Lewis Josselyn is listed in the Appendix 7 - Biographies of Carmel and Berkeley Artists with the full biography
here. The biography includes 19 source citations." - My comments have now been added as a "reply" to Melcous's statement. I will avoid making "inline comments" in the future.
Greg Henderson (
talk) 21:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- The WP venue is not the same as texting or email exchanges or social media chats, it's an encyclopedia, and you need to preserve threading by using indents correctly. If you had read the link above on editing other users talk page messages, you would have seen that the guideline states:
you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving or interpolating your own replies to individual points. This causes confusion with who said what and obscures the original editor's intent.
This edit of yours completely decontextualized and fragmented Melcous' rationale and made it look like all she had to say was this:Greghenderson2006 the fact that you do not know how to write neutrally and without puffery even when you are writing a supposed source assessment table is concerning
, thus completely neutralizing the strength of her argument. Netherzone ( talk) 21:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)- I did not know about this rule. Thanks for pointing this out as I will not do this in the future. To your point about writing an assessment table, I followed the guidelines regarding this here: Template:Source assess table. I feel I have done an adequate job, using the WP:GNG and WP:PHOTOGRAPHER guidelines, to show (a) independent sources, (b) provided reasons why they are reliable, and (c) and made the assessment that the source provides significant coverage.
- It seems clear to me that Josselyn's body of work and secondary sources demonstrate he meets the basic criteria for general notability. Greg Henderson ( talk) 22:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- The WP venue is not the same as texting or email exchanges or social media chats, it's an encyclopedia, and you need to preserve threading by using indents correctly. If you had read the link above on editing other users talk page messages, you would have seen that the guideline states:
|
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Greg, I just undid three edit request fulfillments by a newbie editor who apparently did not read the talk page discussions, nor check the requested text/content against what the sources say and the respective page numbers. This is the second time this has happened with a new editor fulfilling requests. The articles are Reardon Building, Seven Arts Shop and La Rambla Building. If you have made an error on any of your edit requests you should probably close out those requests and start new ones so this does not keep happening, or at least make it more clear what the new request is with the correct information. Thank you. Netherzone ( talk) 00:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fairglen Additions has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
AntientNestor ( talk) 13:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Spillman Engineering 3-Abreast Carousel has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
AntientNestor ( talk) 14:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Troy Laundry has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Lewis Josselyn (April 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lewis Josselyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Lewis Josselyn has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Del Monte Station has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 21:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: The Golden Bough (disambiguation) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 18:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Please do not
delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors, as you did at
Draft:Lewis Josselyn. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be
vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Greg, please do not change or refactor other editors talk page comments, as you did to
Melcous critique of the source assessment table. You have been here many years, long enough to know about
WP:TPO.
Netherzone (
talk) 18:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
-
Comment: I simply placed inline comments to statements made by Melcous on the
Draft talk:Lewis Josselyn page. This is a common practice in the most text exchanges. I did not delete or alter anything of what Melcous said, just made the comment, for example for source 1: " I've added the author's name:
Jennie V. Cannon. The table of contents is
here. Lewis Josselyn is listed in the Appendix 7 - Biographies of Carmel and Berkeley Artists with the full biography
here. The biography includes 19 source citations."
- My comments have now been added as a "reply" to Melcous's statement. I will avoid making "inline comments" in the future.
Greg Henderson (
talk) 21:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- The WP venue is not the same as texting or email exchanges or social media chats, it's an encyclopedia, and you need to preserve threading by using indents correctly. If you had read the link above on editing other users talk page messages, you would have seen that the guideline states:
you should not break up another editor's text by interleaving or interpolating your own replies to individual points. This causes confusion with who said what and obscures the original editor's intent.
This edit of yours completely decontextualized and fragmented Melcous' rationale and made it look like all she had to say was this:Greghenderson2006 the fact that you do not know how to write neutrally and without puffery even when you are writing a supposed source assessment table is concerning
, thus completely neutralizing the strength of her argument. Netherzone ( talk) 21:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)- I did not know about this rule. Thanks for pointing this out as I will not do this in the future. To your point about writing an assessment table, I followed the guidelines regarding this here: Template:Source assess table. I feel I have done an adequate job, using the WP:GNG and WP:PHOTOGRAPHER guidelines, to show (a) independent sources, (b) provided reasons why they are reliable, and (c) and made the assessment that the source provides significant coverage.
- It seems clear to me that Josselyn's body of work and secondary sources demonstrate he meets the basic criteria for general notability. Greg Henderson ( talk) 22:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- The WP venue is not the same as texting or email exchanges or social media chats, it's an encyclopedia, and you need to preserve threading by using indents correctly. If you had read the link above on editing other users talk page messages, you would have seen that the guideline states: