![]() |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is ostensibly about a junior surfing competition held in Ecuador in 2009, yet it barely mentions the event (and would not be titled that way anyway). Instead, the article is a collection of scattered facts about Surfing in Ecuador, which an article already exists for. There also seems to be a lot of WP:OR, not to mention that the "Surfing in Ecuador" section is plagiarized from the article of the same name. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 03:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
No refs and fails WP:CORP. Uhooep ( talk) 23:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 07:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
No inherently notable political position held. Fails WP:NPOL. Uhooep ( talk) 23:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Life TV Media. The other articles were not bundled and can be handled editorially or via another XfD, if needed. Star Mississippi 23:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
not notable Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A fuller deletion rationale, beyond two words, would be appreciated, one that indicated that a BEFORE had been completed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It does not seem like a consensus is likely to develop. No prejudice against re-nomination for deletion after a time. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
No evidence that any of the sources are both independent and reliable. It really doesn't matter what the subject says about itself and no matter how many sources mention it or quote its contributor, that still doesn't make for notability. This feels like one person's promotion of (their own?) web-site Velella Velella Talk 15:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Daily Nous has been cited by writers and media outlets... and by scholars, which strongly implies that the references contain only passing mentions to the website. Happy to be corrected by anyone with access the these sources; until then, this fails GNG. WJ94 ( talk) 16:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Daily Nous has been cited by writers and media outlets... and by scholars, which strongly implies that the references contain only passing mentions to the website." That's correct. Those references (currently numbered 8-18) are only there to support the claim about how material at Daily Nous is used by others. With the exception of #11, they are not substantially about Daily Nous. Justin Weinberg ( talk) 16:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
This site is subject-specific notable to folks interested in academic philosophy.Well, that's easily refuted: I'm very interested in academic philosophy, and I don't see how Daily Nous passes the relevant SNGs; furthermore, there is no SNG "to folks interested in academic philosophy"— WP:ORG or WP:WEB would be the relevant SNGs.
The number of mentions in major journalistic outlets and peer-reviewed journals establishes SSN: no, according to the guidelines, quantity of mentions is not the criterion. And I don't think the accusation of wikilawyering is helpful here: show us some qualifying coverage of the subject or award for the subject and I'll change my !vote; there's no "unusual stringency" here. Biogeographist ( talk)
if we don't have good sources, what could we really say about the blog that its about page doesn't?Apparently nothing, but I'd be happy to see someone show otherwise if possible. Biogeographist ( talk) 02:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted in a first AFD two years ago but this time there is no Consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Capital intensity#Capital-intensive industry. Star Mississippi 23:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Mostly dictionary definition and completely unsourced Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Accusation. RL0919 ( talk) 19:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Just a dictionary definition Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already brought to AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Big L. ✗ plicit 01:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
All sources used are unreliable according to WP:RSP. These sources include MusicBrainz, Album of the Year, Rate Your Music, Last.fm, Genius, and other, non-trivial sources.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Might be original research Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 23:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Does not pass WP:BAND under any criterion. Does not pass GNG either. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
15:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. A analysis of sources brought into this discussion by Atlantic306 would be helpful in determining whether or not this band passes GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 23:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Does not pass WP:MUSICBIO under any criterion. Not a GNG pass either. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
a country's national music chart.So no, not a notability pass per WP:MUSICBIO. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 16:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
15:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. An examination of further sources on this article subject mentioned by Atlantic306 would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Ivory Coast women's international footballers. Star Mississippi 23:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Ivory Coast women's international footballers. The subject played for the Ivory Coast women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. Just passing mentions like 1, 2 and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus due to lack of participation after three relists. Daniel ( talk) 23:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV found, fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Notability issues not addressed since October 2020. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️) 15:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
15:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This article about a novelist, screenwriter and television story editor has been tagged as needing more citations since 2007, and as an unreferenced BLP since March this year. His name makes it difficult to search for him, but I have carried out WP:BEFORE using his name plus "Geale" (alternative name given in article), the names of his books and the name of his collaborator. I can't find any sources to support the article. I therefore don't think he meets WP:NWRITER, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. (Included in deletion sorting lists for Colombia because the article says he lives there, and for the UK because I think he is British, or at least went to university in the UK.) Tacyarg ( talk) 20:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Insufficient sourcing to pass WP:NCHURCH, most of the sources are primary or lists that do not confer notability, BEFORE did not bring up better sources. Sohom ( talk) 23:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I am nominating "Lehi-Nephi", also known as the "Land of Nephi" for deletion. It does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. Specifically, it has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Also, as it was only ever mentioned in the Book of Mormon itself, and there is no generally-accepted correlation between Book of Mormon lands and known geographical locations, it is unlikely to ever receive any further coverage. Lastly, it has had a "Religious text primary" tag up since 2011(!) without any notable improvement in that timeframe. Trevdna ( talk) 23:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 23:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Does not have sources that indicate notability (two Youtube videos and a link to his storefront, plus a dead link that is not archived). I can't find any reliable sources that discuss him in any significant way. (Apparently there is more than one rapper that goes by this name.) The original article gave his real name as Ibrahim Kouacou, of which I can also not find any significant discussion. ... discospinster talk 21:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 23:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of this rugby player from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Can this page please not be deleted as I have been working hard to create pages for provincial players to grow the provincial game, this player has a lot of potential and will likely make Super Rugby next year so page is not worth being deleted.
The result was merge to 2022 Arizona wildfires. Daniel ( talk) 23:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No injuries or deaths and appears to be a run-of-the-mill wildfire. Noah, AA Talk 20:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The person does not meet WP:NPROF. My WP:BEFORE has not uncovered SIGCOV. Lightburst ( talk) 20:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. But this outcome may need reevaluation as political circumstances change. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Same as the Romanian Language and there is no difference between the languages its not even a dialect let alone a different language its just a different name of the same language and should be deleted or merged with Romanian Language article. Is la 🏳️⚧ 19:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep, rename - I'm definitely against deletion, and I'm not sure if a merge to Controversy over ethnic and linguistic identity in Moldova is really the correct choice. If we want to avoid confusion between Romanian language, Moldavian dialect, and this article, I propose a rename to Romanian language in Moldova, leaving the current page as a disambiguation. Frzzl talk; contribs 14:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While a case has been made for why a redirect isn't a viable ATD, there is no case made for removing copy from the article on Rapace. That, however, is also not integral to this AfD and the discussion can close while that conversation happens elswhere. Star Mississippi 00:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Both PROD and ATD-R options have been disputed, so sending to AfD per the most recent objectio for outright deletion. Rationale: No actual production news was reported to meet WP:NFF. The production info was being forecasted or reported a scheduled start. Being unreleased, it also has no reviews to contribute to notability. - 2pou ( talk) 19:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure where it can be assumed I did not understand your point. Probably when you replied saying it was not a biographical film about Rapace, but never mind. You will note that if the Rfds you mention are relevant or comparable, 2/5 had been kept as redirects to main actor/director. But there's no need to look for other redirects kept or deleted, as again, in the present case, sources tend to prove this film project is strongly associated with Rapace and this redirect being useful, I will leave it at that.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vijay Deverakonda as an ATD. Please feel free to retarget this redirect to the director or anywhere else if more suited. Daniel ( talk) 00:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Disputed Draftification. Fails WP:NFILM. Potentially WP:TOOSOON. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG, doesn't pass any WP:SNG. Sources cited are mostly referring to Diamondz Africa (his brand) and not him specifically. No significant coverage and promotional puff. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 17:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
15:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Collegiate summer baseball as a viable AtD. Star Mississippi 23:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
15:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
am unfortunately only seeing only passing mentions in reliable sources as well, can't see anything in WP:NTENNIS that may suggest notability and before search revealed no results. Just i yaya 14:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Collegiate summer baseball. Star Mississippi 23:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not finding enough secondary coverage about this league beyond routine reports, and everything currently sourced in the article is primary. As a result, this subject does not meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 14:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable, coverage does not meet the thresholds of WP:GNG, nor are any of the criteria at WP:NPROF fulfilled. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 14:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Only one (probably non-independent) source, a draft with the same content was declined. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination Withdrawn (non-admin closure) PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 03:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
No sources listed in article, WP:BEFORE found no sources to prove notabilty. PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 14:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
only one citation mentions the subject, the rest cite a notable descendant, doesn't meet notability. microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish) 14:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 00:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Apart from the notability problem tagged on the article itself, it is also a copyright problem, since it was created by a copy-and-paste move from Draft:Krithika Nelson to Krithika Nelson.
A quick WP:BEFORE didn't turn up any possible sources that are simultaneously published, reliable, secondary, and independent of the subject. — Wasell (T) 🇸🇪♡🇺🇦 14:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to TV 1 (Sri Lankan TV channel) and I will protect the redirect Star Mississippi 00:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated and redirected. It's not notable as a separate topic, this is the historical name for the now existing TV One (Sri Lankan TV channel). (please correct me if I'm wrong). JackFromWisconsin ( talk | contribs) 13:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Web scraping. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The article does not cite any sources and it's basically just web scraping but with blogs. Blog scraping, compared to other forms of scraping, doesn't seem to merit its own article.
SPA5CE!
talk about it
13:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
SPA5CE!
talk about it
13:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 19:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The cited references appear to be passing mentions of the subject or from self published sources. Not clear the subject passes WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO, or WP:NACADEMIC. 4meter4 ( talk) 12:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 00:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject is a CEO of a social media marketing company. Little to suggest NPEOPLE is met and WP:SOAP. JMWt ( talk) 10:08, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to SCMS Cochin School of Business. Star Mississippi 00:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Agree with the hathote from 2013 that the page does not meet the GNG. Nothing on the page suggests that this journal is notable. JMWt ( talk) 10:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCRYPTO. A WP:before search on gnews and DDG found only press releases and dubious crypto websites, with passing mentions scattered about. Ca talk to me! 10:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit). Star Mississippi 14:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
IT WAS MERGED into Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit). The name is seldom used officially and during train operations. Chinese Wikipedia has no article about it. Using Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit) is just fine. 阿南之人 ( talk) 10:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing remains insufficient Star Mississippi 00:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet requirements of WP:CORP. Coverage is routine churnalism about funding. SmartSE ( talk) 10:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Saunders Island, South Sandwich Islands#Local. Star Mississippi 00:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
No significant references on the page other than confirmation it exists. Land features on maps are not inherently significant. It is highly unlikely that there will be sufficient RS talking in depth about geographical features in Antarctica and the region - which to be clear, is almost entirely uninhabited - to show how they meet the notability criteria for en.wiki JMWt ( talk) 08:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
"barren of vegetation apart from lichens and some moss-covered patches. Most of the island is covered in ice."
"The volcano emits at least 145±59 tons per day of sulfur dioxide"
"chinstrap penguins form a breeding population of more than 100,000 couples"(in a very small area)
in its summit crater, which is fumarolically active, and there is widespread evidence of recent eruptions across the island."
The result was keep. AfD is not a vote, and early discussion didn't favor the keep camp despite its majority. As discussion continued, additional sources were identified and swayed discussion without further rebuttal from editors advocating other outcomes. signed, Rosguill talk 02:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
All of the non-primary sources that discuss him are mostly top ten lists that don't go into extensive detail, and the others are either from content farms screenrant and CBR, or simply talking about who'll be cast as him in the up-coming kraven movie. Industrial Insect (talk) 11:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
You've raised my hopes and dashed them quite expertly, sir. Bravo! BoomboxTestarossa ( talk) 13:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of available sources would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I would be willing to undelete and move this to draftspace if an editor is interested in working on it and commits to using the WP:AFC process for recreation. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. As always, musicians are not "inherently" notable enough for articles just because they and their music exist -- but existence is the only notability claim being attempted here, and the sourcing isn't getting him over
WP:GNG: two of the four footnotes are
primary sources that don't count as support for notability at all, a third comes from a limited circulation special-interest magazine that looks suspiciously more like a
WordPress blog than a GNG-worthy publication of record, and the only one that comes from a clearly GNG-worthy media outlet is a single newspaper piece announcing a private house concert -- but that doesn't satisfy NMUSIC's touring criterion in and of itself, because the subject is from
Manitoulin Island and the house concert was in
Sudbury, which hardly consitutes evidence of a large-scale national tour. (That's like saying that a musician had passed the national tour criterion by playing a small venue in New York City while personally living in Newark.)
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much more than just one piece of "almost-local guy does stuff" in one closely-adjacent-to-hometown newspaper for coverage.
Bearcat (
talk)
12:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
This artist meets the following criteria for inclusion in WP:NMUSIC "Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city." He has also contributed to more than one Juno- nominated album. For these reasons the page should be kept. It is in the process of being updated to better reflect his work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boogaloo77 ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analysis of the references added to the article would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
As a person working on this page who is new to Wiki, I find it disheartening to try to do things in the correct format, only to have them taken down. The page was in progress, as I have noted elsewhere. The page, as it is now, does not support the work this artist has done, so readers are no longer getting an accurate sense of Teilhard Frost's work. If references need to be formatted differently, it would be helpful to change them, or to make suggestions to another editor (in this case, me) as to how they should be done. These references were chosen specifically to illustrate work the artist had done in their community and other artists they had collaborated with. As I have stated before, this artist meets the criteria of Wiki guidelines of being a known specialist in their field, in their city, but as you have pointed out, better sources need to be found. I believe those sources are out there, but finding them will take time. As a busy person, it would be good to know if there is an expected timeframe that the article should be completed by. Also, before the article is complete, it would be helpful if we could collaborate on improving it, rather than criticizing it before it is actually finished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boogaloo77 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability issues since 2011. Geoff | Who, me? 12:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. – Aidan721 ( talk) 16:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
provide reports beyond routine game coverage? It's hard to evaluate these sources when they are not present in the article. – Aidan721 ( talk) 13:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Essex County Cricket Club players. History remains should access to BNA be restored/established and sourcing found to spin back out. Star Mississippi 00:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I seem to mostly be finding databases but not much in depth detail. It seems his only known time playing cricket is playing in one first-class match and getting dismissed with a score of zero. Tartar Torte 18:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur. All references are from the same time period of approximately 30 days and written in promotional tone which indicates a possible press campaign and/or churnalism. The LA Weekly reference is clearly marked as a partnership article and not staff written. A WP:BEFORE found nothing better. CNMall41 ( talk) 20:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
20:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Previous expired PROD resulted in redirect, but recreation of an article should be treated as objection to that. Ergo, AfD. I would strongly suggest restoring the redirect; this album is not notable as would be demonstrated through appropriate coverage in reliable sources. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 20:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –– FormalDude (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable; the available sources are insufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG, as database entries are not considered WP:SIGCOV. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 21:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Enumeration and analysis of the reference material available would be much more helpful than just asserting that it exists.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I am unable to find any sources in any way supporting the content of this unreferenced article. None of the linked articles of purportedly related topics ( Shivaji, Maratha Empire, Sambhaji, Moropant, Jawhar, Vikramgad, etc.) make any mention of corresponding events in 1672, although this does broadly correspond to the time during which Shivaji was consolidating what would become the Maratha Empire. It is perhaps noteworthy that this is the only article on Wikipedia to use the term "Kolistan". signed, Rosguill talk 23:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nom confusion aside, it appears sourcing questions are resolved. Star Mississippi 15:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV, WP:BIO and WP:GNG. After almost 4 years since the previous AFD, I think it is the perfect time to start a new AFD, before he becomes a chaser on The Chase Australia in 2024. Tagged for notability since 2011. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page) 06:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
As the nominator, I have added references via Newspapers.com, if I ever decide to withdraw the article for deletion.
These are the references:
Nicholson, Sarah (2005-10-27). "Master knows best". The Courier-Mail. Archived from the original on 2023-10-22. Retrieved 2023-10-22.
Cunard ( talk) 11:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marquess of Ailsa. History remains should sources be found Star Mississippi 14:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Recreated after deletion, this nobleman's article still fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. The new sources added are not independent (COSCA) or provide significant coverage of the subject (Burke's Peerage and the 3 obituaries of his brother). See also the previous deletion discussion for an assessment of the existing sources. Pilaz ( talk) 13:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This article seems to be mostly promotional and relies on self-published or unreliable sources. Suggest that once those claims are removed, there is nothing notable left OwainDavies ( about)( talk) edited at 10:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Tom Morris (
talk)
12:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 ( talk) 11:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
A lack of significant sustained coverage, no sources exists outside the 23 July launch, even the ones that detail the launch talk about the leader/founder more than the party itself. Sohom ( talk) 11:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This Page has no verifiable citations and it provides many unverified claims. I suspect this to be made from someone related to the organisation. Yamantakks ( talk) 11:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
No notable event. No in-deep sources about the event, just passing mention or WP:ROUTINE results. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Whereas they do exist and the term is used I doubt the term is used enough to justify this article when we have the far better Data center article. As the info here is completely unsourced it might not be right to merge it to the data center article. Your thoughts? Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 07:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable author; article is unsourced. Natg 19 ( talk) 07:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and none likely to emerge. If editors are interested in discussing a merge, that can happen on the Talk. Star Mississippi 14:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heidelberg_University_Faculty_of_Philosophy_and_History, I believe most of the individual faculties of this university do not merit having separate articles. Indefensible ( talk) 03:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link) (and following the "Universität Heidelberg Theological faculty" subject link on this page shows another 22 potential sources in total).{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would help to get more opinions of the sources brought up in this discussion (along with those in the article).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The article lacks sufficient references to meet WP:ORG. Akshithmanya talk 04:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 14:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
User:Superatp PRODed this article, but I have dePRODed and brought to AfD for discussion, as it is not clear to me whether this should be removed. The institution is purportedly 133 years old, which suggests that evidence for notability should be discoverable. As I have noted in the article, in 1948 it was the subject of an FTC case that deemed it a diploma mill, which I would consider one point of notability. I would tend to support a move to draft for cleanup, as it is rather a mess. BD2412 T 04:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 00:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable local baseball league which doesn't pass WP:GNG, WP:NSPORT, or any other notability guideline. Let'srun ( talk) 03:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A source assessment would be very helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nader Shah's invasion of India. History remains if someone wants to source and merge anything. Star Mississippi 14:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails verification - no mention of "Skirmish of Chenab" in Singh or Gupta, the two main references. Singh does briefly mention an attack, but gives it no name and there is not enough here for WP:N. asilvering ( talk) 02:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we get some more opinions here on this article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not clear what the page is supposed to be about in the first place; notability isn't demonstrated, but I'm more inclined to think that the topic itself isn't encyclopaedic. Fermiboson ( talk) 06:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Coverage has been proven to exist Star Mississippi 14:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
(1)The article does not meet the test for notability. As per WP:N it has not received “significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.” The only third-party, reliable sources that make mention of Ekos are those that republish or refer to Ekos’ opinion polls, which are work produced by the article subject and not “independent of the subject”. No source makes significant reference to the company itself as a topic in any detail.
(2)The article does not have any reliable sources. The single only source the article has been built on is the website of Ekos, the subject company of the article itself. As per WP:RS this is self-published and not reliable.
(3)The article serves as a means of promotion. While relatively neutral in tone, the informational value of the article is to promote the service lines, locations and websites of the business. There is little to no information of encyclopedic relevance. As per WP:NOT Wikipedia is not a soapboax or means of promotion.
(4)The article's creation and editing is tainted by conflict of interest. The original creator of the article has acknowledged that they created the article in 2005 while an employee of the company (concerning in light of WP:COI). They continued to add and control edits in the years since as they remained and still remain an employee. There is evidence that at least one other regular contributor was also in a close working or personal relationship to the company and/or its ownership. Balancingakt ( talk) 01:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It would help with a Keep argument if the article had sources besides the company's website.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, there are still no independent, secondary sources in the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I've provided independent sources on the talk page, here. I would add them to the article if it weren't for my COI.-- Earl Andrew - talk 13:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 07:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:SYNTHed collection of a Lebanese government statements during the 2006 Lebanon War. Noting there is no other article for the other party, so this is an WP:NPOV violation. Statements representing the positions of all parties involved, which would ensure WP:NPOV, are already on the main page for the war. If any extraneous statements on this page are additive, they can be merged. Longhornsg ( talk) 01:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:10, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bill Kristol. Daniel ( talk) 00:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The subject does not pass WP:GNG. TipsyElephant ( talk) 01:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. – Joe ( talk) 07:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
A lot of coverage exists which has this man's name in it, but it appears to me that 99% of it is actually just about Alanis Morissette, his wife, and is either report on their 2010 marriage or is some other tabloid nonsense following her daily life which he happens to be a part of. I found no significant coverage discussing his music. He has an AllMusic page, but it only has five of his albums, no ratings from users let alone critics, and no bio. He doesn't even have an Album of the Year listing. If his sole notability is as another person's husband, I think his name should redirect to her page instead. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 00:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. We really need a few more editors to participate here and review the available sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete Bizarre. I was under the impression that The Source was a generally reliable publication and one of the leading hip-hop magazines as stated by QuietHere, but the profile of Souleye almost makes me inclined to believe this was some kind of sponsored piece. If not, it is abysmally poor journalism.
Souleye is not notable as a musician. He cannot inherit his wife's notability. What little coverage exists seems to be sponsored content/churnalism. Mooonswimmer 13:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails NCORP. Google News search gives zero results, general google search reveals only sponsored blogs, rankings and other SEO fluff. Article sources also all belong in the former two category. Fermiboson ( talk) 05:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk#Administrative and municipal status is the compromise that emerged over the past week. RL0919 ( talk) 04:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
As the peculiar name suggests, what evidence there is indicates this is/was a rail stop and not a settlement. Looking at the Russian version, I see that it was designated a село, but even given the vague nature of the term, there's no evidence that there was or is a village/whatever there; indeed, I cannot find a feature on GMaps or anything similar which I can identify as this place. Mangoe ( talk) 21:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete I'm functionally illiterate in Russian, so I can't read the sources for myself, but all the article says is "This is a place in the middle of nowhere" and basically nothing else. If something important goes on there or we get more information, we can resurrect it. ❤History Theorist❤ 02:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
"Inhabited locality status is also never given to (yet or already) unpopulated areas"- sorry, but here we have an example of exactly that occurring. The population was recorded as zero in 2002 and zero in 2010 according to RU Wiki, yet it became a selo in 2004?Saying it previously had another status at another time is neither here nor there unless it is demonstrated that there was ever a real settlement at this location - 2004 is when it became a selo, which is the status you're arguing gives it legal recognition.
"From NGEO's point of view, whether a place is Sakhalin Oblast is a village, a selo, a station, a junction, or a settlement does not matter; what matters that they are all officially recognized rural localities of identical status"- yet this list includes things that are palpably not villages? And at least 20,000 of Russia's 150,000 rural settlements are unpopulated? So what we're talking about aren't actually places that are required at any level to be populated in order to keep their status under Russian law, and can receive that status when not populated? FOARP ( talk) 13:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
"The article says it's a rural locality, not a settlement"- then in what way does it pass GEOLAND, which is basically directed to settlements, not mere locations (which have to pass WP:GNG)? Isn't this actually a reason to delete? FOARP ( talk) 09:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
*Keep Like, did any of you Poindexters consult GMaps and GSV? It's a place. Jesus Christ.
142.126.146.27 (
talk)
15:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: At the moment I see no consensus here, as arguments on both sides are rather weak. Ignoring GEOLAND because it's a guideline is not very persuasive to me, nor is the argument without supporting evidence that the population is the staff of a railway station. Conversely, a one-time population of 2 doesn't suggest that this meets the common-sense definition of a populated place. Further evidence as to whether this meets GEOLAND would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Vanamonde (
Talk)
03:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus of editors here, especially following the relist, is that SIGCOV is not met. My reading of the discussion is these concerns were not adequately addressed, hence closing as delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete, a WP:BEFORE check reveals almost entirely primary sources or routine coverage, and very little or no significant coverage. This is reflected in the article which cites only one non-primary source, which is routine coverage of an event the subject participated in. 5225C ( talk • contributions) 00:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Articles from British Speedway, his clubs, etc. are fine for fact-checking, but are not really independent third-party coverageAgreed, that is not significant coverage and should not be relied on to establish notability 5225C ( talk • contributions) 07:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Vote-stacking: Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions (which may be made known by a userbox, user category, or prior statement). One of the four users you messaged about this discussion has a userbox identifying themselves as a fan of speedway, another two you have had prior interactions with about the topic confirming you had at least a strong idea of their opinion, and the fourth literally has "SpeedwayInfo" as a username. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 07:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A "keep" closure was overturned at
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 October 30
* Pppery *
it has begun...
15:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
15:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is ostensibly about a junior surfing competition held in Ecuador in 2009, yet it barely mentions the event (and would not be titled that way anyway). Instead, the article is a collection of scattered facts about Surfing in Ecuador, which an article already exists for. There also seems to be a lot of WP:OR, not to mention that the "Surfing in Ecuador" section is plagiarized from the article of the same name. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 03:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
No refs and fails WP:CORP. Uhooep ( talk) 23:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 07:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
No inherently notable political position held. Fails WP:NPOL. Uhooep ( talk) 23:36, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Life TV Media. The other articles were not bundled and can be handled editorially or via another XfD, if needed. Star Mississippi 23:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
not notable Chidgk1 ( talk) 14:57, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A fuller deletion rationale, beyond two words, would be appreciated, one that indicated that a BEFORE had been completed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It does not seem like a consensus is likely to develop. No prejudice against re-nomination for deletion after a time. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
No evidence that any of the sources are both independent and reliable. It really doesn't matter what the subject says about itself and no matter how many sources mention it or quote its contributor, that still doesn't make for notability. This feels like one person's promotion of (their own?) web-site Velella Velella Talk 15:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Daily Nous has been cited by writers and media outlets... and by scholars, which strongly implies that the references contain only passing mentions to the website. Happy to be corrected by anyone with access the these sources; until then, this fails GNG. WJ94 ( talk) 16:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Daily Nous has been cited by writers and media outlets... and by scholars, which strongly implies that the references contain only passing mentions to the website." That's correct. Those references (currently numbered 8-18) are only there to support the claim about how material at Daily Nous is used by others. With the exception of #11, they are not substantially about Daily Nous. Justin Weinberg ( talk) 16:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
This site is subject-specific notable to folks interested in academic philosophy.Well, that's easily refuted: I'm very interested in academic philosophy, and I don't see how Daily Nous passes the relevant SNGs; furthermore, there is no SNG "to folks interested in academic philosophy"— WP:ORG or WP:WEB would be the relevant SNGs.
The number of mentions in major journalistic outlets and peer-reviewed journals establishes SSN: no, according to the guidelines, quantity of mentions is not the criterion. And I don't think the accusation of wikilawyering is helpful here: show us some qualifying coverage of the subject or award for the subject and I'll change my !vote; there's no "unusual stringency" here. Biogeographist ( talk)
if we don't have good sources, what could we really say about the blog that its about page doesn't?Apparently nothing, but I'd be happy to see someone show otherwise if possible. Biogeographist ( talk) 02:34, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted in a first AFD two years ago but this time there is no Consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Capital intensity#Capital-intensive industry. Star Mississippi 23:35, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Mostly dictionary definition and completely unsourced Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Accusation. RL0919 ( talk) 19:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Just a dictionary definition Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already brought to AFD so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Big L. ✗ plicit 01:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
All sources used are unreliable according to WP:RSP. These sources include MusicBrainz, Album of the Year, Rate Your Music, Last.fm, Genius, and other, non-trivial sources.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
18:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Might be original research Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 23:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Does not pass WP:BAND under any criterion. Does not pass GNG either. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
15:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. A analysis of sources brought into this discussion by Atlantic306 would be helpful in determining whether or not this band passes GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 23:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Does not pass WP:MUSICBIO under any criterion. Not a GNG pass either. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
a country's national music chart.So no, not a notability pass per WP:MUSICBIO. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 16:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
15:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. An examination of further sources on this article subject mentioned by Atlantic306 would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Ivory Coast women's international footballers. Star Mississippi 23:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Ivory Coast women's international footballers. The subject played for the Ivory Coast women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. Just passing mentions like 1, 2 and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 23:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus due to lack of participation after three relists. Daniel ( talk) 23:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV found, fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Notability issues not addressed since October 2020. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️) 15:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
15:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This article about a novelist, screenwriter and television story editor has been tagged as needing more citations since 2007, and as an unreferenced BLP since March this year. His name makes it difficult to search for him, but I have carried out WP:BEFORE using his name plus "Geale" (alternative name given in article), the names of his books and the name of his collaborator. I can't find any sources to support the article. I therefore don't think he meets WP:NWRITER, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. (Included in deletion sorting lists for Colombia because the article says he lives there, and for the UK because I think he is British, or at least went to university in the UK.) Tacyarg ( talk) 20:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Insufficient sourcing to pass WP:NCHURCH, most of the sources are primary or lists that do not confer notability, BEFORE did not bring up better sources. Sohom ( talk) 23:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I am nominating "Lehi-Nephi", also known as the "Land of Nephi" for deletion. It does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. Specifically, it has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Also, as it was only ever mentioned in the Book of Mormon itself, and there is no generally-accepted correlation between Book of Mormon lands and known geographical locations, it is unlikely to ever receive any further coverage. Lastly, it has had a "Religious text primary" tag up since 2011(!) without any notable improvement in that timeframe. Trevdna ( talk) 23:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 23:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Does not have sources that indicate notability (two Youtube videos and a link to his storefront, plus a dead link that is not archived). I can't find any reliable sources that discuss him in any significant way. (Apparently there is more than one rapper that goes by this name.) The original article gave his real name as Ibrahim Kouacou, of which I can also not find any significant discussion. ... discospinster talk 21:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 23:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of this rugby player from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Can this page please not be deleted as I have been working hard to create pages for provincial players to grow the provincial game, this player has a lot of potential and will likely make Super Rugby next year so page is not worth being deleted.
The result was merge to 2022 Arizona wildfires. Daniel ( talk) 23:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No injuries or deaths and appears to be a run-of-the-mill wildfire. Noah, AA Talk 20:48, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The person does not meet WP:NPROF. My WP:BEFORE has not uncovered SIGCOV. Lightburst ( talk) 20:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. But this outcome may need reevaluation as political circumstances change. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Same as the Romanian Language and there is no difference between the languages its not even a dialect let alone a different language its just a different name of the same language and should be deleted or merged with Romanian Language article. Is la 🏳️⚧ 19:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Keep, rename - I'm definitely against deletion, and I'm not sure if a merge to Controversy over ethnic and linguistic identity in Moldova is really the correct choice. If we want to avoid confusion between Romanian language, Moldavian dialect, and this article, I propose a rename to Romanian language in Moldova, leaving the current page as a disambiguation. Frzzl talk; contribs 14:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While a case has been made for why a redirect isn't a viable ATD, there is no case made for removing copy from the article on Rapace. That, however, is also not integral to this AfD and the discussion can close while that conversation happens elswhere. Star Mississippi 00:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Both PROD and ATD-R options have been disputed, so sending to AfD per the most recent objectio for outright deletion. Rationale: No actual production news was reported to meet WP:NFF. The production info was being forecasted or reported a scheduled start. Being unreleased, it also has no reviews to contribute to notability. - 2pou ( talk) 19:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure where it can be assumed I did not understand your point. Probably when you replied saying it was not a biographical film about Rapace, but never mind. You will note that if the Rfds you mention are relevant or comparable, 2/5 had been kept as redirects to main actor/director. But there's no need to look for other redirects kept or deleted, as again, in the present case, sources tend to prove this film project is strongly associated with Rapace and this redirect being useful, I will leave it at that.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:07, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Vijay Deverakonda as an ATD. Please feel free to retarget this redirect to the director or anywhere else if more suited. Daniel ( talk) 00:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Disputed Draftification. Fails WP:NFILM. Potentially WP:TOOSOON. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 19:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG, doesn't pass any WP:SNG. Sources cited are mostly referring to Diamondz Africa (his brand) and not him specifically. No significant coverage and promotional puff. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 17:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 13:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
15:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Collegiate summer baseball as a viable AtD. Star Mississippi 23:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
15:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. There is no indication of significant independent coverage beyond routine game coverage. – Aidan721 ( talk) 14:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:36, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
am unfortunately only seeing only passing mentions in reliable sources as well, can't see anything in WP:NTENNIS that may suggest notability and before search revealed no results. Just i yaya 14:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Collegiate summer baseball. Star Mississippi 23:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not finding enough secondary coverage about this league beyond routine reports, and everything currently sourced in the article is primary. As a result, this subject does not meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 14:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable, coverage does not meet the thresholds of WP:GNG, nor are any of the criteria at WP:NPROF fulfilled. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 14:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Only one (probably non-independent) source, a draft with the same content was declined. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination Withdrawn (non-admin closure) PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 03:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
No sources listed in article, WP:BEFORE found no sources to prove notabilty. PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 14:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
only one citation mentions the subject, the rest cite a notable descendant, doesn't meet notability. microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish) 14:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 00:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Apart from the notability problem tagged on the article itself, it is also a copyright problem, since it was created by a copy-and-paste move from Draft:Krithika Nelson to Krithika Nelson.
A quick WP:BEFORE didn't turn up any possible sources that are simultaneously published, reliable, secondary, and independent of the subject. — Wasell (T) 🇸🇪♡🇺🇦 14:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to TV 1 (Sri Lankan TV channel) and I will protect the redirect Star Mississippi 00:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated and redirected. It's not notable as a separate topic, this is the historical name for the now existing TV One (Sri Lankan TV channel). (please correct me if I'm wrong). JackFromWisconsin ( talk | contribs) 13:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Web scraping. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The article does not cite any sources and it's basically just web scraping but with blogs. Blog scraping, compared to other forms of scraping, doesn't seem to merit its own article.
SPA5CE!
talk about it
13:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
SPA5CE!
talk about it
13:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 19:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The cited references appear to be passing mentions of the subject or from self published sources. Not clear the subject passes WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO, or WP:NACADEMIC. 4meter4 ( talk) 12:31, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 00:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Subject is a CEO of a social media marketing company. Little to suggest NPEOPLE is met and WP:SOAP. JMWt ( talk) 10:08, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to SCMS Cochin School of Business. Star Mississippi 00:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Agree with the hathote from 2013 that the page does not meet the GNG. Nothing on the page suggests that this journal is notable. JMWt ( talk) 10:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCRYPTO. A WP:before search on gnews and DDG found only press releases and dubious crypto websites, with passing mentions scattered about. Ca talk to me! 10:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit). Star Mississippi 14:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
IT WAS MERGED into Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit). The name is seldom used officially and during train operations. Chinese Wikipedia has no article about it. Using Line 3 (Ningbo Rail Transit) is just fine. 阿南之人 ( talk) 10:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing remains insufficient Star Mississippi 00:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet requirements of WP:CORP. Coverage is routine churnalism about funding. SmartSE ( talk) 10:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Saunders Island, South Sandwich Islands#Local. Star Mississippi 00:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
No significant references on the page other than confirmation it exists. Land features on maps are not inherently significant. It is highly unlikely that there will be sufficient RS talking in depth about geographical features in Antarctica and the region - which to be clear, is almost entirely uninhabited - to show how they meet the notability criteria for en.wiki JMWt ( talk) 08:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
"barren of vegetation apart from lichens and some moss-covered patches. Most of the island is covered in ice."
"The volcano emits at least 145±59 tons per day of sulfur dioxide"
"chinstrap penguins form a breeding population of more than 100,000 couples"(in a very small area)
in its summit crater, which is fumarolically active, and there is widespread evidence of recent eruptions across the island."
The result was keep. AfD is not a vote, and early discussion didn't favor the keep camp despite its majority. As discussion continued, additional sources were identified and swayed discussion without further rebuttal from editors advocating other outcomes. signed, Rosguill talk 02:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
All of the non-primary sources that discuss him are mostly top ten lists that don't go into extensive detail, and the others are either from content farms screenrant and CBR, or simply talking about who'll be cast as him in the up-coming kraven movie. Industrial Insect (talk) 11:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
You've raised my hopes and dashed them quite expertly, sir. Bravo! BoomboxTestarossa ( talk) 13:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of available sources would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I would be willing to undelete and move this to draftspace if an editor is interested in working on it and commits to using the WP:AFC process for recreation. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. As always, musicians are not "inherently" notable enough for articles just because they and their music exist -- but existence is the only notability claim being attempted here, and the sourcing isn't getting him over
WP:GNG: two of the four footnotes are
primary sources that don't count as support for notability at all, a third comes from a limited circulation special-interest magazine that looks suspiciously more like a
WordPress blog than a GNG-worthy publication of record, and the only one that comes from a clearly GNG-worthy media outlet is a single newspaper piece announcing a private house concert -- but that doesn't satisfy NMUSIC's touring criterion in and of itself, because the subject is from
Manitoulin Island and the house concert was in
Sudbury, which hardly consitutes evidence of a large-scale national tour. (That's like saying that a musician had passed the national tour criterion by playing a small venue in New York City while personally living in Newark.)
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much more than just one piece of "almost-local guy does stuff" in one closely-adjacent-to-hometown newspaper for coverage.
Bearcat (
talk)
12:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
This artist meets the following criteria for inclusion in WP:NMUSIC "Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city." He has also contributed to more than one Juno- nominated album. For these reasons the page should be kept. It is in the process of being updated to better reflect his work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boogaloo77 ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analysis of the references added to the article would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
As a person working on this page who is new to Wiki, I find it disheartening to try to do things in the correct format, only to have them taken down. The page was in progress, as I have noted elsewhere. The page, as it is now, does not support the work this artist has done, so readers are no longer getting an accurate sense of Teilhard Frost's work. If references need to be formatted differently, it would be helpful to change them, or to make suggestions to another editor (in this case, me) as to how they should be done. These references were chosen specifically to illustrate work the artist had done in their community and other artists they had collaborated with. As I have stated before, this artist meets the criteria of Wiki guidelines of being a known specialist in their field, in their city, but as you have pointed out, better sources need to be found. I believe those sources are out there, but finding them will take time. As a busy person, it would be good to know if there is an expected timeframe that the article should be completed by. Also, before the article is complete, it would be helpful if we could collaborate on improving it, rather than criticizing it before it is actually finished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boogaloo77 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability issues since 2011. Geoff | Who, me? 12:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 03:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORT. – Aidan721 ( talk) 16:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
provide reports beyond routine game coverage? It's hard to evaluate these sources when they are not present in the article. – Aidan721 ( talk) 13:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:30, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Essex County Cricket Club players. History remains should access to BNA be restored/established and sourcing found to spin back out. Star Mississippi 00:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I seem to mostly be finding databases but not much in depth detail. It seems his only known time playing cricket is playing in one first-class match and getting dismissed with a score of zero. Tartar Torte 18:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur. All references are from the same time period of approximately 30 days and written in promotional tone which indicates a possible press campaign and/or churnalism. The LA Weekly reference is clearly marked as a partnership article and not staff written. A WP:BEFORE found nothing better. CNMall41 ( talk) 20:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
20:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 15:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Previous expired PROD resulted in redirect, but recreation of an article should be treated as objection to that. Ergo, AfD. I would strongly suggest restoring the redirect; this album is not notable as would be demonstrated through appropriate coverage in reliable sources. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 20:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –– FormalDude (talk) 13:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Not notable; the available sources are insufficient to establish notability per WP:GNG, as database entries are not considered WP:SIGCOV. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 21:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Enumeration and analysis of the reference material available would be much more helpful than just asserting that it exists.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
I am unable to find any sources in any way supporting the content of this unreferenced article. None of the linked articles of purportedly related topics ( Shivaji, Maratha Empire, Sambhaji, Moropant, Jawhar, Vikramgad, etc.) make any mention of corresponding events in 1672, although this does broadly correspond to the time during which Shivaji was consolidating what would become the Maratha Empire. It is perhaps noteworthy that this is the only article on Wikipedia to use the term "Kolistan". signed, Rosguill talk 23:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:18, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nom confusion aside, it appears sourcing questions are resolved. Star Mississippi 15:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV, WP:BIO and WP:GNG. After almost 4 years since the previous AFD, I think it is the perfect time to start a new AFD, before he becomes a chaser on The Chase Australia in 2024. Tagged for notability since 2011. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 ( his talk page) 06:43, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
As the nominator, I have added references via Newspapers.com, if I ever decide to withdraw the article for deletion.
These are the references:
Nicholson, Sarah (2005-10-27). "Master knows best". The Courier-Mail. Archived from the original on 2023-10-22. Retrieved 2023-10-22.
Cunard ( talk) 11:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marquess of Ailsa. History remains should sources be found Star Mississippi 14:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Recreated after deletion, this nobleman's article still fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. The new sources added are not independent (COSCA) or provide significant coverage of the subject (Burke's Peerage and the 3 obituaries of his brother). See also the previous deletion discussion for an assessment of the existing sources. Pilaz ( talk) 13:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This article seems to be mostly promotional and relies on self-published or unreliable sources. Suggest that once those claims are removed, there is nothing notable left OwainDavies ( about)( talk) edited at 10:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Tom Morris (
talk)
12:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 ( talk) 11:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
A lack of significant sustained coverage, no sources exists outside the 23 July launch, even the ones that detail the launch talk about the leader/founder more than the party itself. Sohom ( talk) 11:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This Page has no verifiable citations and it provides many unverified claims. I suspect this to be made from someone related to the organisation. Yamantakks ( talk) 11:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
No notable event. No in-deep sources about the event, just passing mention or WP:ROUTINE results. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Whereas they do exist and the term is used I doubt the term is used enough to justify this article when we have the far better Data center article. As the info here is completely unsourced it might not be right to merge it to the data center article. Your thoughts? Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 07:27, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable author; article is unsourced. Natg 19 ( talk) 07:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:15, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and none likely to emerge. If editors are interested in discussing a merge, that can happen on the Talk. Star Mississippi 14:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Per /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heidelberg_University_Faculty_of_Philosophy_and_History, I believe most of the individual faculties of this university do not merit having separate articles. Indefensible ( talk) 03:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link) (and following the "Universität Heidelberg Theological faculty" subject link on this page shows another 22 potential sources in total).{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (
link)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would help to get more opinions of the sources brought up in this discussion (along with those in the article).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The article lacks sufficient references to meet WP:ORG. Akshithmanya talk 04:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Star Mississippi 14:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
User:Superatp PRODed this article, but I have dePRODed and brought to AfD for discussion, as it is not clear to me whether this should be removed. The institution is purportedly 133 years old, which suggests that evidence for notability should be discoverable. As I have noted in the article, in 1948 it was the subject of an FTC case that deemed it a diploma mill, which I would consider one point of notability. I would tend to support a move to draft for cleanup, as it is rather a mess. BD2412 T 04:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 00:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable local baseball league which doesn't pass WP:GNG, WP:NSPORT, or any other notability guideline. Let'srun ( talk) 03:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A source assessment would be very helpful here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nader Shah's invasion of India. History remains if someone wants to source and merge anything. Star Mississippi 14:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails verification - no mention of "Skirmish of Chenab" in Singh or Gupta, the two main references. Singh does briefly mention an attack, but gives it no name and there is not enough here for WP:N. asilvering ( talk) 02:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we get some more opinions here on this article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:51, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Not clear what the page is supposed to be about in the first place; notability isn't demonstrated, but I'm more inclined to think that the topic itself isn't encyclopaedic. Fermiboson ( talk) 06:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Coverage has been proven to exist Star Mississippi 14:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
(1)The article does not meet the test for notability. As per WP:N it has not received “significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.” The only third-party, reliable sources that make mention of Ekos are those that republish or refer to Ekos’ opinion polls, which are work produced by the article subject and not “independent of the subject”. No source makes significant reference to the company itself as a topic in any detail.
(2)The article does not have any reliable sources. The single only source the article has been built on is the website of Ekos, the subject company of the article itself. As per WP:RS this is self-published and not reliable.
(3)The article serves as a means of promotion. While relatively neutral in tone, the informational value of the article is to promote the service lines, locations and websites of the business. There is little to no information of encyclopedic relevance. As per WP:NOT Wikipedia is not a soapboax or means of promotion.
(4)The article's creation and editing is tainted by conflict of interest. The original creator of the article has acknowledged that they created the article in 2005 while an employee of the company (concerning in light of WP:COI). They continued to add and control edits in the years since as they remained and still remain an employee. There is evidence that at least one other regular contributor was also in a close working or personal relationship to the company and/or its ownership. Balancingakt ( talk) 01:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It would help with a Keep argument if the article had sources besides the company's website.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, there are still no independent, secondary sources in the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I've provided independent sources on the talk page, here. I would add them to the article if it weren't for my COI.-- Earl Andrew - talk 13:23, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 07:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:SYNTHed collection of a Lebanese government statements during the 2006 Lebanon War. Noting there is no other article for the other party, so this is an WP:NPOV violation. Statements representing the positions of all parties involved, which would ensure WP:NPOV, are already on the main page for the war. If any extraneous statements on this page are additive, they can be merged. Longhornsg ( talk) 01:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:10, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bill Kristol. Daniel ( talk) 00:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
The subject does not pass WP:GNG. TipsyElephant ( talk) 01:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. – Joe ( talk) 07:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
A lot of coverage exists which has this man's name in it, but it appears to me that 99% of it is actually just about Alanis Morissette, his wife, and is either report on their 2010 marriage or is some other tabloid nonsense following her daily life which he happens to be a part of. I found no significant coverage discussing his music. He has an AllMusic page, but it only has five of his albums, no ratings from users let alone critics, and no bio. He doesn't even have an Album of the Year listing. If his sole notability is as another person's husband, I think his name should redirect to her page instead. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 00:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. We really need a few more editors to participate here and review the available sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete Bizarre. I was under the impression that The Source was a generally reliable publication and one of the leading hip-hop magazines as stated by QuietHere, but the profile of Souleye almost makes me inclined to believe this was some kind of sponsored piece. If not, it is abysmally poor journalism.
Souleye is not notable as a musician. He cannot inherit his wife's notability. What little coverage exists seems to be sponsored content/churnalism. Mooonswimmer 13:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails NCORP. Google News search gives zero results, general google search reveals only sponsored blogs, rankings and other SEO fluff. Article sources also all belong in the former two category. Fermiboson ( talk) 05:10, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk#Administrative and municipal status is the compromise that emerged over the past week. RL0919 ( talk) 04:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
As the peculiar name suggests, what evidence there is indicates this is/was a rail stop and not a settlement. Looking at the Russian version, I see that it was designated a село, but even given the vague nature of the term, there's no evidence that there was or is a village/whatever there; indeed, I cannot find a feature on GMaps or anything similar which I can identify as this place. Mangoe ( talk) 21:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete I'm functionally illiterate in Russian, so I can't read the sources for myself, but all the article says is "This is a place in the middle of nowhere" and basically nothing else. If something important goes on there or we get more information, we can resurrect it. ❤History Theorist❤ 02:02, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
"Inhabited locality status is also never given to (yet or already) unpopulated areas"- sorry, but here we have an example of exactly that occurring. The population was recorded as zero in 2002 and zero in 2010 according to RU Wiki, yet it became a selo in 2004?Saying it previously had another status at another time is neither here nor there unless it is demonstrated that there was ever a real settlement at this location - 2004 is when it became a selo, which is the status you're arguing gives it legal recognition.
"From NGEO's point of view, whether a place is Sakhalin Oblast is a village, a selo, a station, a junction, or a settlement does not matter; what matters that they are all officially recognized rural localities of identical status"- yet this list includes things that are palpably not villages? And at least 20,000 of Russia's 150,000 rural settlements are unpopulated? So what we're talking about aren't actually places that are required at any level to be populated in order to keep their status under Russian law, and can receive that status when not populated? FOARP ( talk) 13:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
"The article says it's a rural locality, not a settlement"- then in what way does it pass GEOLAND, which is basically directed to settlements, not mere locations (which have to pass WP:GNG)? Isn't this actually a reason to delete? FOARP ( talk) 09:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
*Keep Like, did any of you Poindexters consult GMaps and GSV? It's a place. Jesus Christ.
142.126.146.27 (
talk)
15:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: At the moment I see no consensus here, as arguments on both sides are rather weak. Ignoring GEOLAND because it's a guideline is not very persuasive to me, nor is the argument without supporting evidence that the population is the staff of a railway station. Conversely, a one-time population of 2 doesn't suggest that this meets the common-sense definition of a populated place. Further evidence as to whether this meets GEOLAND would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Vanamonde (
Talk)
03:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus of editors here, especially following the relist, is that SIGCOV is not met. My reading of the discussion is these concerns were not adequately addressed, hence closing as delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete, a WP:BEFORE check reveals almost entirely primary sources or routine coverage, and very little or no significant coverage. This is reflected in the article which cites only one non-primary source, which is routine coverage of an event the subject participated in. 5225C ( talk • contributions) 00:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Articles from British Speedway, his clubs, etc. are fine for fact-checking, but are not really independent third-party coverageAgreed, that is not significant coverage and should not be relied on to establish notability 5225C ( talk • contributions) 07:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Vote-stacking: Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions (which may be made known by a userbox, user category, or prior statement). One of the four users you messaged about this discussion has a userbox identifying themselves as a fan of speedway, another two you have had prior interactions with about the topic confirming you had at least a strong idea of their opinion, and the fourth literally has "SpeedwayInfo" as a username. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 07:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A "keep" closure was overturned at
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 October 30
* Pppery *
it has begun...
15:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
* Pppery *
it has begun...
15:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)