Hi, Dustfreeworld. I see you are editing numerous articles with biomedical content, so wanted to give you some information regarding our sourcing guidelines in that area, and how to write citations for most medical articles (depending on WP:CITEVAR).
Also, I see in your archive that someone alerted you in the past to the importance of discussing edits to gain consensus when editing a Featured article (eg schizophrenia and welding). You can propose and discuss additions on article talk when you see the bronze star in the top right corner of an article. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 11:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
boring long block of text; 08:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC); 12:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
|
---|
|
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Green wall, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I can see there's already been discussion on your page regarding issues with sourcing. Reverting my edits which were to remove unsourced content is not appropriate. Please read WP:REFB for a guide on how to properly add inline citations. Mr.weedle ( talk) 22:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC) Mr.weedle ( talk) 22:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
This template indicates that the article cites a sufficient number of reliable sources, but uses an inappropriate combination of inline citations and general references. All material in articles must be verifiable, but outside of featured articles and good articles Wikipedia does not require the use of inline citations...
4. Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.
7. Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Wikipedia's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy. What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption.
Standard rollback may only be used in certain situations – editors who misuse standard rollback (for example, by using it to reverse good-faith edits in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected) may have their rollback rights removed.
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sick building syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr ( talk) 15:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi User:Dustfreeworld. You recently reverted a change I made to keep safety within a section about characteristics of of the construction industry. You assert "Safety is not a “characteristic” of the industry. It’s a big problem caused by and also affecting the construction industry."
Previous edits of the construction article have created a logical hierarchy of four main headings: History, Sectors, Processes, Scale and characteristics. The latter's subsections included Economic activity, Employment, Sustainability, and (until you removed it) Safety. I do not share your view that this should be added to a main section of its own. Indeed, arguably, (a lack of) sustainability is an even greater problem with causes by and impacts upon the construction sector. I think the change you made warrants further discussion on the construction Talk page with other editors to establish a consensus for your move. You clearly have a strong interest in air and dust pollution-related matters, but, in my view, your focus on these areas is potentially skewing the construction article by making safety more prominent than other issues ( WP:Undue).
I propose to revert the change and invite you to discuss it there on the article Talk page (I have left a message there). If there is a consensus for a separate section, all well and good, but if not, safety should remain within the Scale and characteristics section. Thank you for reading. Paul W ( talk) 18:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vacosea ( talk) 04:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Just a word of friendly advice, an administrator has already commented on ANI saying that you did nothing sanctionable and no case should have been brought against you at ANI. Just stop posting there, the only way any sanction can be taken against you is by you talking yourself into trouble. You aren't being at all careful with your words, which is understandable as this situation has obviously got under your skin, but you need to stop using such emotive language. Just take a breather, and maybe strike out the Goebbels stuff and the sentences where you use the word "liar".
All the best. Boynamedsue ( talk) 16:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I presume you saw the talk page discussion? Doug Weller talk 19:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
“© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).”
“All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess”
See WP:COPYVIO. You recent addition to Wildfire appears to be copied directly from the article. Please summarize the relevant info in your own words, or if neccesary, use quotations. Crescent77 ( talk) 23:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Dustfreeworld - I've started talk page discussion on Lee's nationality [6]. While you claim sources have no "disagreement" on describing her as "Chinese-American", [7] many sources say the opposite and vary all over in how to describe Lee (including from Lee herself). Clear Looking Glass ( talk) 19:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Thanks for adding information and sources to Industrial Fasteners Institute. I originally wasn't confident that we could find many sources for, but I'm so glad that we were able to improve the article. I love the fun detail you added about the Titanic disaster. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 05:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |
You have nothing to worry about. I thought the study of 4.4 million Swedes was relevant enough to be written that way.
Regarding the economic theory, I thought that that was relevant for Dependency theory because of:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/abs/populism-in-place-the-economic-geography-of-the-globalization-backlash/98ED873D925E0590CB9A78AEC68BB439 and https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/abs/rising-inequality-as-a-threat-to-the-liberal-international-order/4CDE05DEB3AB076CE338E1AA4A9C8087
Regarding the page Deregulation: I think that that's inevitable as the pro and con sections are both incredibly short. I noticed that you left the undue weight template standing even after the texts from Populism were removed.
Regarding your suggestion to trim the theory down to three sentences or so, I will see what I can do. Lau737 ( talk) 14:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Mercury (element) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 20:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! | |
Hello Dustfreeworld, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
—
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝 ) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
— Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 16:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Dustfreeworld: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 04:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
-- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 04:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
many thanks for your xmas wishes, all the same to you Boynamedsue ( talk) 07:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Dustfreeworld: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year! | |
Hello Dustfreeworld: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary
blisters. |
I've been hanging on to an email from him he'd like to be used for his blp. I've had it for weeks and feel guilty about doing anything. I would say I'm losing my hair trying to know what to do and get the energy to do it, but I'm actually losing my hair - a lot - due to chemo that I hope will extend my life a few more months. Any chance you could take a look at it? It's far too long which is my basic problem. I can email i to you but if you don't want to, no problem. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 08:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'd just like to know why you changed the infobox in the way it is now. I know there might've been problems with sources, or something (I'm not that experienced with this), but I think my infobox structure was more informative and readable. Instead of deleting it, couldn't it have been better to find better sources for the text? This was my . Sorry if I missed something obvious, I'd just like to know. Gedditor ( talk) 17:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Dustfreeworld, you had temple back in the See Also section of the Air Pollution article and excluded Incense for being less toxic than joss paper. I cannot say anything about Incense, but I think, the Temple link is redundant in a such situation. It is obvious that the real source of air pollution is people, but we are not going to put them in, for ethical reasons. The same is applied to temples, in my opinion. Please review the issue from this point... Tosha Langue ( talk) 12:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
:-)
--
Dustfreeworld (
talk) 17:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)I figured it would be more appropriate for me to respond to the ANI discussion here, but yes I have engaged in WikiLove ( If this counts?) Regarding Sandy, I respect them as a user because they have always been frank (sometimes too frank haha) and they are very detailed with their edits. While I have had some heated discussions with them, they have made me better regarding sourcing and BLP articles since I was inexperienced before. Their recent comments about my behavior are a little disheartening and I think they are being too particular about some of my edits (especially about copying within Wikipedia), but I haven't faced any dishonesty from them as I have with NoonIcarus. Hopefully this clears things up somewhat and ask me anything else if you have other concerns! WMrapids ( talk) 17:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
You used to have a link about the health effects of power tools. Now I'm curious: aside from cordless drills getting much heavier since the 1980s (I can't think of any other plausible explanation for why I have more trouble with them now... ;-)
), what health effects do they have?
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 23:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Dustfreeworld, I got your message yesterday and I just wanted to thank you !
My draft should be soon reviewed I guess, as it has been posted since nearly 3 months.
I'm always happy to learn how to improve, which is a guide in my historian work and job.
Best regards Thémisté ( talk) 12:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
I noticed that you made your 5,000th edit to the English Wikipedia today. Congratulations on reaching that rare milestone. Out of every 500 new people who make their first edit, only about one achieves your volume. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 04:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vacosea ( talk) 19:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Dustfreeworld. I see you are editing numerous articles with biomedical content, so wanted to give you some information regarding our sourcing guidelines in that area, and how to write citations for most medical articles (depending on WP:CITEVAR).
Also, I see in your archive that someone alerted you in the past to the importance of discussing edits to gain consensus when editing a Featured article (eg schizophrenia and welding). You can propose and discuss additions on article talk when you see the bronze star in the top right corner of an article. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 11:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
boring long block of text; 08:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC); 12:09, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
|
---|
|
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Green wall, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I can see there's already been discussion on your page regarding issues with sourcing. Reverting my edits which were to remove unsourced content is not appropriate. Please read WP:REFB for a guide on how to properly add inline citations. Mr.weedle ( talk) 22:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC) Mr.weedle ( talk) 22:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
This template indicates that the article cites a sufficient number of reliable sources, but uses an inappropriate combination of inline citations and general references. All material in articles must be verifiable, but outside of featured articles and good articles Wikipedia does not require the use of inline citations...
4. Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.
7. Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Wikipedia's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy. What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption.
Standard rollback may only be used in certain situations – editors who misuse standard rollback (for example, by using it to reverse good-faith edits in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected) may have their rollback rights removed.
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sick building syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. VQuakr ( talk) 15:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi User:Dustfreeworld. You recently reverted a change I made to keep safety within a section about characteristics of of the construction industry. You assert "Safety is not a “characteristic” of the industry. It’s a big problem caused by and also affecting the construction industry."
Previous edits of the construction article have created a logical hierarchy of four main headings: History, Sectors, Processes, Scale and characteristics. The latter's subsections included Economic activity, Employment, Sustainability, and (until you removed it) Safety. I do not share your view that this should be added to a main section of its own. Indeed, arguably, (a lack of) sustainability is an even greater problem with causes by and impacts upon the construction sector. I think the change you made warrants further discussion on the construction Talk page with other editors to establish a consensus for your move. You clearly have a strong interest in air and dust pollution-related matters, but, in my view, your focus on these areas is potentially skewing the construction article by making safety more prominent than other issues ( WP:Undue).
I propose to revert the change and invite you to discuss it there on the article Talk page (I have left a message there). If there is a consensus for a separate section, all well and good, but if not, safety should remain within the Scale and characteristics section. Thank you for reading. Paul W ( talk) 18:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vacosea ( talk) 04:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Just a word of friendly advice, an administrator has already commented on ANI saying that you did nothing sanctionable and no case should have been brought against you at ANI. Just stop posting there, the only way any sanction can be taken against you is by you talking yourself into trouble. You aren't being at all careful with your words, which is understandable as this situation has obviously got under your skin, but you need to stop using such emotive language. Just take a breather, and maybe strike out the Goebbels stuff and the sentences where you use the word "liar".
All the best. Boynamedsue ( talk) 16:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I presume you saw the talk page discussion? Doug Weller talk 19:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
“© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).”
“All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess”
See WP:COPYVIO. You recent addition to Wildfire appears to be copied directly from the article. Please summarize the relevant info in your own words, or if neccesary, use quotations. Crescent77 ( talk) 23:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Dustfreeworld - I've started talk page discussion on Lee's nationality [6]. While you claim sources have no "disagreement" on describing her as "Chinese-American", [7] many sources say the opposite and vary all over in how to describe Lee (including from Lee herself). Clear Looking Glass ( talk) 19:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Thanks for adding information and sources to Industrial Fasteners Institute. I originally wasn't confident that we could find many sources for, but I'm so glad that we were able to improve the article. I love the fun detail you added about the Titanic disaster. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 05:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC) |
You have nothing to worry about. I thought the study of 4.4 million Swedes was relevant enough to be written that way.
Regarding the economic theory, I thought that that was relevant for Dependency theory because of:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/abs/populism-in-place-the-economic-geography-of-the-globalization-backlash/98ED873D925E0590CB9A78AEC68BB439 and https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/abs/rising-inequality-as-a-threat-to-the-liberal-international-order/4CDE05DEB3AB076CE338E1AA4A9C8087
Regarding the page Deregulation: I think that that's inevitable as the pro and con sections are both incredibly short. I noticed that you left the undue weight template standing even after the texts from Populism were removed.
Regarding your suggestion to trim the theory down to three sentences or so, I will see what I can do. Lau737 ( talk) 14:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Mercury (element) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 20:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! | |
Hello Dustfreeworld, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
—
Tenryuu 🐲 (
💬 •
📝 ) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
— Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 16:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Dustfreeworld: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 04:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
-- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 04:40, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
many thanks for your xmas wishes, all the same to you Boynamedsue ( talk) 07:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Dustfreeworld: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year! | |
Hello Dustfreeworld: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary
blisters. |
I've been hanging on to an email from him he'd like to be used for his blp. I've had it for weeks and feel guilty about doing anything. I would say I'm losing my hair trying to know what to do and get the energy to do it, but I'm actually losing my hair - a lot - due to chemo that I hope will extend my life a few more months. Any chance you could take a look at it? It's far too long which is my basic problem. I can email i to you but if you don't want to, no problem. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 08:37, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'd just like to know why you changed the infobox in the way it is now. I know there might've been problems with sources, or something (I'm not that experienced with this), but I think my infobox structure was more informative and readable. Instead of deleting it, couldn't it have been better to find better sources for the text? This was my . Sorry if I missed something obvious, I'd just like to know. Gedditor ( talk) 17:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Dustfreeworld, you had temple back in the See Also section of the Air Pollution article and excluded Incense for being less toxic than joss paper. I cannot say anything about Incense, but I think, the Temple link is redundant in a such situation. It is obvious that the real source of air pollution is people, but we are not going to put them in, for ethical reasons. The same is applied to temples, in my opinion. Please review the issue from this point... Tosha Langue ( talk) 12:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
:-)
--
Dustfreeworld (
talk) 17:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)I figured it would be more appropriate for me to respond to the ANI discussion here, but yes I have engaged in WikiLove ( If this counts?) Regarding Sandy, I respect them as a user because they have always been frank (sometimes too frank haha) and they are very detailed with their edits. While I have had some heated discussions with them, they have made me better regarding sourcing and BLP articles since I was inexperienced before. Their recent comments about my behavior are a little disheartening and I think they are being too particular about some of my edits (especially about copying within Wikipedia), but I haven't faced any dishonesty from them as I have with NoonIcarus. Hopefully this clears things up somewhat and ask me anything else if you have other concerns! WMrapids ( talk) 17:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
You used to have a link about the health effects of power tools. Now I'm curious: aside from cordless drills getting much heavier since the 1980s (I can't think of any other plausible explanation for why I have more trouble with them now... ;-)
), what health effects do they have?
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 23:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Dustfreeworld, I got your message yesterday and I just wanted to thank you !
My draft should be soon reviewed I guess, as it has been posted since nearly 3 months.
I'm always happy to learn how to improve, which is a guide in my historian work and job.
Best regards Thémisté ( talk) 12:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
I noticed that you made your 5,000th edit to the English Wikipedia today. Congratulations on reaching that rare milestone. Out of every 500 new people who make their first edit, only about one achieves your volume. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 04:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vacosea ( talk) 19:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)