 Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Hey sorry I haven't participated in the discussion as much, I got bogged down with work and life stuff. So anyway, I'm a bit confused about what the current status is for EF2 tornadoes that don't hurt anyone. Are we just doing the "soft" case-by-case approach where we just discuss it when it happens, and reach a consensus for each individual instance? The discussion has become so long-winded and convoluted I can't really make heads or tails of where things currently stand. Can you give me a "dumbed down" summary of what the current agreement is when it comes to no-injury EF2s? TornadoInformation12 ( talk) 15:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)TornadoInformation12
- 5+ EF2s for inclusion and then when an editor feels an EF0/EF1/EF2 was “high impact”. High impact can be included by anyone, and then once challenged, it discussed on the talk page.
- That is the “dumbed down” version of it. The formal RFC to add both of those to the criteria is ongoing right now, but so far, everyone (so far 8 editors) seems to be in support of both of them with no opposition. If all goes well, May 23, those will be formal criteria to use on articles. The
Weather Event Writer (
Talk Page) 15:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for the info! That all sounds good to me.
TornadoInformation12 ( talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)TornadoInformation12
Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Hey sorry I haven't participated in the discussion as much, I got bogged down with work and life stuff. So anyway, I'm a bit confused about what the current status is for EF2 tornadoes that don't hurt anyone. Are we just doing the "soft" case-by-case approach where we just discuss it when it happens, and reach a consensus for each individual instance? The discussion has become so long-winded and convoluted I can't really make heads or tails of where things currently stand. Can you give me a "dumbed down" summary of what the current agreement is when it comes to no-injury EF2s? TornadoInformation12 ( talk) 15:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)TornadoInformation12
- 5+ EF2s for inclusion and then when an editor feels an EF0/EF1/EF2 was “high impact”. High impact can be included by anyone, and then once challenged, it discussed on the talk page.
- That is the “dumbed down” version of it. The formal RFC to add both of those to the criteria is ongoing right now, but so far, everyone (so far 8 editors) seems to be in support of both of them with no opposition. If all goes well, May 23, those will be formal criteria to use on articles. The
Weather Event Writer (
Talk Page) 15:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok thanks for the info! That all sounds good to me.
TornadoInformation12 ( talk) 16:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)TornadoInformation12