![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete Seems to fail WP:NGEO, cannot find any notable sources online to prove otherwise. Article has been unreferenced for 16 years. Tooncool64 ( talk) 23:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
I did consider rewriting and refactoring this, which would have involved completely overhauling and even renaming the article, from the sources that I found. Then I noticed the edit history. Written in 2007 by Djolsen ( talk · contribs) this pointed to a now-defunct WWW site named djolsen that was run by David and Justine Olsen that offered tours to tourists, and the article even advertised the tours. I'm not going to waste my time rescuing an advertisement. A proper article, at least from the histories and documents that I have found, wouldn't be at this title, and wouldn't have any of this content. Delete.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 22:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is currently an WP:OR essay. As it stands, it makes more sense to gradually build the "History" section of the Economy of Azerbaijan and create a standalone article if the "History" section in that article becomes large enough to warrant a standalone article. Having two separate articles on the same topic is at this point going to worsen the quality of both articles and make it harder for editors to craft comprehensive encyclopedic on Azerbaijan's economic history. Thenightaway ( talk) 15:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 22:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject doesn't appear to be notable. PepperBeast (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion due to previous AfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
20:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable former station. The article says nothing of substance, and neither do the cited sources; this should be redirected to Sabor line. The author already contested my notability tag, so I am not going to redirect myself as it will surely be contested. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
A search is hard given the medicare domain and spinal surgeries, but I am unable to find anything that would convey notability to this software, nor a potential ATD. Survived PROD (courtesy @ Explicit: as the only still active editor from PROD discussions) so we're here Star Mississippi 17:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Results are limited to routine announcements and other churnalism, nothing in depth to come even close to N:CORP. Star Mississippi 18:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS3959, notability not established with substantive independent sources Reywas92 Talk 20:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
20:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Meki. Daniel ( talk) 22:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
not passed WP:N. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha ( 🧾 - 💬) 22:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to honor the request and also because there is no consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Sirfurboy
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://jriiejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/JRIIE-6-2-008.pdf | ![]() |
![]() |
~ The school is not the research subject but just one of the schools where quantitive data fed into the study. | ~ Partial |
https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE02479405 | ![]() |
![]() |
~ The writer speaks of getting a job in the school but in the context of an ethnographic study of the town | ~ Partial |
https://search.proquest.com/openview/b7c32ea085f926e1880fcab2ac38d350/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Meki school is one of those visited as part of the Phenomenological Study of High School Cultural Immersion Programs | ~ Partial |
http://thesisbank.jhia.ac.ke/id/eprint/5252 | ![]() |
![]() |
? Attempts to access the paper after registering for it lead to a "forbidden" message. Unable to review. | ✘ No |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lre.12111 | ![]() |
![]() |
~ This is a study of the environmental perceptions of school students, including students at MCS. It is not about the school. | ~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject has never been champion and lacks acheivements. In my opinion, being ranked #9 on one website in Kickboxing, a loss in Boxing with no other notable acheivements and mostly passing mentions/event results is not sufficient to meet WP:GNG and WP:NKICK. Lethweimaster ( talk) 15:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dentistry. Daniel ( talk) 22:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Zero independent and reliable sources covering the subject. Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT. Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
There's no indication of WP:NCORP and I wasn't able to turn up much on a WP:BEFORE. BuySomeApples ( talk) 20:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Absolute non-entity in academia (no position anywhere, a grand total of 2 publications on Scopus, and no citations), with a minor social media presence. Hardly merits an article. Ostalgia ( talk) 20:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
running w[ith] the fucking fashy [sic] grifters[6], which comes really close. It being social media, it's not something we'd use to source an article, but I'd say it sort of excuses DE's comment. Ostalgia ( talk) 07:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Euchre variants. Daniel ( talk) 22:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The article is a collection of uncited information about variations to the game of Euchre, much of which is now far better covered and cited at Euchre and Euchre variants. For example:
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I am unconvinced this is a notable fictional topic and it fails WP:GNG. In my opinion, a Spawn (franchise) article should be created, but literally nothing from this article is salvageable anyway. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 19:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:POET, looks promotional. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 18:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The ABP Reference is ABP Brand Wire frontline, downtoearth and outlook business are Website Author profiles. The subject fails to meet WP:GNG. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 18:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG, NLIST and WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Article is a largely unsourced programming guide for a television channel. No sources showing this meets GNG as a stand alone topic, or NLIST showing WP:IS WP:RS showing this has been discussed as a group. BEFORE found nothing but other programming guides. I can find nothing that would make this a notable list, but if sources are ever found, this article would need TNT. // Timothy :: talk 18:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet the general notability guidelines, or WP:CREATIVE. I am not finding reliable sources to add to this article WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 18:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Legislative Assembly of Zabaykalsky Krai. Liz Read! Talk! 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN. The assembly has no article. One of the two listed chairmen has no article, and there is no indication in the poorly written article about Anatoly Romanov that he was a chairman of this body, despite the unencyclopedic list of his credentials in the lead. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Procedural Keep, this needs to go to WP:RFD and this article was never even tagged as being part of an AFD which makes it ineligible. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to delete this page to correct an error. The page created under the name " Telsiz ve Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti" should be named "Türkiye Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti." Therefore, I would like to move it, but since there is a redirect page with this name, I am unable to do so. Hence, it is necessary to delete this page first. Arceonix ( talk) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't think this page fits any of the WP:CSD criteria but clearly does not meet WP:GNG. Purely a short description of a non notable fictional planet. CoconutOctopus talk 15:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
I think we should keep that article, it's just a fictional exoplanet like the characters, and there a petition to change the name Kleper 22B to Namek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcygnus ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per WP:A7. (non-admin closure) Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Total WP:BIO failure. Disputed draftification. For the avoidance of doubt, this nomination is to delete and to consider Salting 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Democracy Collaborative as an AtD. Consensus below not to retain, but no objection to a redirect from those !voting delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate that this is a notable concept. Thenightaway ( talk) 10:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
UTC)
A generative economy results when one actor’s production leads to the creation of new innovations that were not necessarily intended by the original inventor.Although just an interview, Kelly is not even mentioned at all, leading me to believe the interviewee Youngjin Yoo believes they are actually coining the term themselves. For the term itself to be notable, there needs to be more than just a definition of the term - and all I can find are either definitions from primary sources, or definitions quoted verbatim from Kelly.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
14:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
बिनोद थारू ( talk) 04:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysis and synthesis of primary source material to advance a position, which is explicitly prohibited by the original research policy.
The result was draftify. Daniel ( talk) 22:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (music). Primary purpose appears to be promoting a new group - WP:PROMO. At best, WP:TOOSOON based on the comments of reviewers while it was in draft. Geoff | Who, me? 13:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 1. "CULTURE K-WAVE HYBE's New Girl Group Final Member Lineup Revealed: Which 'R U NEXT' Contestants Made It?". International Business Times. 3 September 2023. |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 2. ^ Jeong, Seung-min (2023-09-02). "'알유넥스트' 여정 마무리...하이브 차기 걸그룹 '아일릿' 결성" [‘RU Next’ journey concludes... Hive’s next girl group ‘Illit’ formed]. MHN Sports / MHN KPOP NEWS (in Korean). Retrieved 2023-09-02. |
Promo about video teaser | 3. ^ "하이브 새 걸그룹 누구?...'알유넥스트', 티저 영상 공개" [Who is Hybe's new girl group?...'RU Next', teaser video released]. MBN (in Korean). 7 June 2023 – via Naver. |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 4. ^ Dash, Pratyusha (2023-09-02). "R U Next? unveils the final lineup and name of HYBE and BELIFT LAB's newest girl group". Pinkvilla. Retrieved 2023-09-02. |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 5. ^ Yoon, So-yeon (2023-09-03). "'R U Next?' winners form girl group I'LL-IT ahead of debut". Korea JoongAng Daily. Retrieved 2023-09-03. |
Not a ref | 6. ^ Circle Digital Chart: |
Not a ref | 7. ^ Billboard South Korea Songs Chart: |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 8. ^ Go, In-hye (October 10, 2023). "아일릿, 좌충우돌 첫 여행 리얼리티…'아일 라이크 잇'" [I'll-It, first travel reality show with ups and downs...'I'll Like It'] (in Korean). Newsis. Retrieved October 24, 2023 – via Naver. |
The result was delete. Consensus of editors is that the sources presented here do not qualify as reliable or having significant coverage within them. Daniel ( talk) 21:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of the sources in the article, only 2 are not primary sources. One is a passing mention and another is an interview. Thus, this article does not pass WP:BIO. Spinixster (chat!) 13:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Cagayan de Oro. I'm not sure what is meant here by "retarget" as this page is not a redirect so I'll just understand this as support for a Merge to this article. Liz Read! Talk! 17:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Tagged as unsourced from 2009, no effort made to both expand and add reliable secondary sources. Presumed to be notable, per WP:NPOL, are "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage." JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 11:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Blimp. Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
NARTIST fail. Only plausible non-primary source has been the Scotsman. Article is citebombed to hell (for example, I don't think source 7 even mentions the same person). Fermiboson ( talk) 06:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as there is an intention from an editor to improve this article during this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
08:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Non notable politicians also failed Wikipedia:Notability (politics) Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 08:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[16] [17] [18] [19] [20] Wasilatlovekesy ( talk) 07:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG (non-significant coverage in sources) J2m5 ( talk) 08:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors and lord mayors of Parramatta. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN (has not received significant press coverage) and fails WP:GNG (insufficient sources with significant coverage, relies largely on single source). Propose redirect to List of mayors and lord mayors of Parramatta. J2m5 ( talk) 08:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Leonard Blussé. Liz Read! Talk! 07:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Rhino Entertainment. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or go to WP:REFUND. Otherwise, I think as a draft, this article would just become a CSD G13 in six months. Draftifying is only effective if there is an editor who wants to work on a draft. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:NPOL. Pretty self-explanatory. Never held elected office, no significant media coverage. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 05:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no RS coverage of the subject. The subject is a non-notable consultant. Thenightaway ( talk) 12:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per new sources added. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 01:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NWEB. This article cites the subject's website and other self-published sources so there are essentially no references. I couldn't find any on a BEFORE search. This was deleted previously and never should have been re-created. Chris Troutman ( talk) 04:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting so that additions to the article since nomination can be assessed to see if they provide enough SIGCOV to establish notability. This discussion really isn't about the subject matter but whether adequate independent, secondary sources can be located over the next week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Looks like an advert with a list of services. In other languages, the page has already been removed. MaxBokstf ( talk) 03:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Still not a proper deletion rationale (it doesn't really matter what has happened on the Russian Wikipedia) but unlike the other AFD by this nominator, here there is support for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Insignificant filmmaker, Russian Wikipedia article deleted [21].-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 05:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Inadequate deletion rationale from new editor Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
An insignificant person, an ordinary victim of the Holocaust. Russian Wikipedia article deleted [22]. -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 03:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a rough consensus to Delete this article on BLP grounds with a few vocal oppositions to this. Having closed the previous AFD on a very similar subject, I hope we don't return to AFD a third time to argue about Santos' misdeeds. The message I get from comments here is that there has to be a consensus on the article talk page for this sort of article split. Future attempts to recreate articles on this subject without a consensus on the talk page of the main article will inevitably end up back at AFD so please take the time to do this according to the book. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Per this AfD of a very similar fork a few months ago. A slightly different focus, but still the same underlying BLP and POVFORK issues. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The previous AfD was underlain by the summerlong talk page discussion I alluded to in my nomination, which was formally closed as establishing no consensus to split off an article like this. While that does not mean that consensus is against splitting off an article at all, it definitely does mean that consensus should be on the side of a proposed split before it is made. And since this split was made without even bothering to initiate any such discussion, it is by definition against consensus, an even stronger argument for deletion than POVFORK.
As to which, it boggles my mind that you would so completely ignore the quoted language from POVFORK. It's there for a reason. It's there because when you say "in most circumstances it says forks are OK", you should probably go to some length to enumerate those situations when they are not. POVFORK is one of them.
To keep returning to the idée fixe you have about the content being identical is to so widely miss the point I am making (nor would I be the only one) that I wonder if you are trying to do so on purpose. It is how the split article would use that content ... as basically a bill of indictment. When it is within the article, we can justify it in the broader context of a warts-and-all biography. As a stand-alone, it is as TulsaPoliticsFan} observed at the other AfD a "dumping ground", a "bad stuff about George Santos" (or in this case "lies George Santos tells or told on himself" (and would you include in that article times where his stories have checked out?). It would be by definition not neutral.
And really, there is not the urgency to make the article smaller that you seem to feel. The servers will not crash because it is too big. It is better that when we split the article, we do it right rather than do it fast. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Dumping ground???
And in any event, yes, Santos himself will always be notable by virtue of having served, however briefly, in a national legislature (After all, we have an article about a woman who served in the U.S. Senate for one day, although to be fair that's not the only thing she's notable for). But whether that long-term notability requires a separate article on his biographical misrepresentations is an entirely different question. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to LGBT reproduction. I think a Merge is a valid closure as it was mentioned by several editors advocating deletion. As for student editors, some of their work that I've seen is worthwhile but it very rare for them to return to edit the project after the school term is over. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Per consensus at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 8#LGBTQ+ Production of Family. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️⚧️) 02:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for either a Merge or Userfying this article to the page creator's sandbox.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe that the article passes WP:NPOL. There is not much significant coverage on the subject and she has not held high enough office to warrant an article. GoldMiner24 Talk 02:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to University of California, Irvine School of Physical Sciences. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Declined A7 per "a7 not applicable to schools". Personally I think a university affiliated math circle is still an organization, not a school, but I digress, here we are now.
Fails WP:NORG. No coverage found in WP:ORGIND sources. A412 ( Talk • C) 01:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Outreach activities include the UCI Math Circle, an enrichment program for secondary school students...or something like that. XOR'easter ( talk) 10:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
21:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Very confusing article. Nominally it is about the phrase/concept of "care in the community" yet beyond the title/first line of the lead it is not mentioned at all. Most of the article is a collection of vaguely (if at all) linked topics including "community care", then descends further into talking about mental health care and reform and ongoing changes, none of which have anything to do with the specific phrase "care in the community".
Of the first 5 references cited, a Control + F search reveals that not a single one even contains the word "community" let alone the phrase "care in the community".
There is one news article which mentions this topic by name, namely this, which suggests it was a policy introduced in 1990 and scrapped in 1998, yet this article is so vague it covers a range of random mental health developments from the 1960s to 2015.
Overall, I think the problem with this article is that whilst it is nominally about the phrase/concept of "care in the community", it has essentially become about mental and social care in the United Kingdom.
It should be merged with the relevant sections of Mental health in the United Kingdom and Social care in England. Elshad ( talk) 23:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A couple more editors providing input here would assist with forming consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
01:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It's clear that there are sources out there and I appreciate the time that has gone into tracking them down. Hopefully they will be used to improve this article. I see no support for Deletion and a rough consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Far as I can tell doesn't meet WP:NBIO. Some GBooks hits in Finnish but done where he is the primary focus of anything, merely mentions. CoconutOctopus talk 15:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
00:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Draftification is not deletion, the WP:TNT essay describes a process of
blow it up and start over, i.e. completely removing all existing content. I don't see much difference between "delete" and "drafity and delete all existing content", nor do I understand why either would be appropriate here. Ljleppan ( talk) 14:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete Seems to fail WP:NGEO, cannot find any notable sources online to prove otherwise. Article has been unreferenced for 16 years. Tooncool64 ( talk) 23:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
I did consider rewriting and refactoring this, which would have involved completely overhauling and even renaming the article, from the sources that I found. Then I noticed the edit history. Written in 2007 by Djolsen ( talk · contribs) this pointed to a now-defunct WWW site named djolsen that was run by David and Justine Olsen that offered tours to tourists, and the article even advertised the tours. I'm not going to waste my time rescuing an advertisement. A proper article, at least from the histories and documents that I have found, wouldn't be at this title, and wouldn't have any of this content. Delete.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 22:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
This article is currently an WP:OR essay. As it stands, it makes more sense to gradually build the "History" section of the Economy of Azerbaijan and create a standalone article if the "History" section in that article becomes large enough to warrant a standalone article. Having two separate articles on the same topic is at this point going to worsen the quality of both articles and make it harder for editors to craft comprehensive encyclopedic on Azerbaijan's economic history. Thenightaway ( talk) 15:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 22:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject doesn't appear to be notable. PepperBeast (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion due to previous AfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
20:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable former station. The article says nothing of substance, and neither do the cited sources; this should be redirected to Sabor line. The author already contested my notability tag, so I am not going to redirect myself as it will surely be contested. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
A search is hard given the medicare domain and spinal surgeries, but I am unable to find anything that would convey notability to this software, nor a potential ATD. Survived PROD (courtesy @ Explicit: as the only still active editor from PROD discussions) so we're here Star Mississippi 17:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Results are limited to routine announcements and other churnalism, nothing in depth to come even close to N:CORP. Star Mississippi 18:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS3959, notability not established with substantive independent sources Reywas92 Talk 20:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
20:56, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Meki. Daniel ( talk) 22:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
not passed WP:N. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha ( 🧾 - 💬) 22:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to honor the request and also because there is no consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Sirfurboy
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://jriiejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/JRIIE-6-2-008.pdf | ![]() |
![]() |
~ The school is not the research subject but just one of the schools where quantitive data fed into the study. | ~ Partial |
https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE02479405 | ![]() |
![]() |
~ The writer speaks of getting a job in the school but in the context of an ethnographic study of the town | ~ Partial |
https://search.proquest.com/openview/b7c32ea085f926e1880fcab2ac38d350/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Meki school is one of those visited as part of the Phenomenological Study of High School Cultural Immersion Programs | ~ Partial |
http://thesisbank.jhia.ac.ke/id/eprint/5252 | ![]() |
![]() |
? Attempts to access the paper after registering for it lead to a "forbidden" message. Unable to review. | ✘ No |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lre.12111 | ![]() |
![]() |
~ This is a study of the environmental perceptions of school students, including students at MCS. It is not about the school. | ~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject has never been champion and lacks acheivements. In my opinion, being ranked #9 on one website in Kickboxing, a loss in Boxing with no other notable acheivements and mostly passing mentions/event results is not sufficient to meet WP:GNG and WP:NKICK. Lethweimaster ( talk) 15:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dentistry. Daniel ( talk) 22:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Zero independent and reliable sources covering the subject. Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT. Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
There's no indication of WP:NCORP and I wasn't able to turn up much on a WP:BEFORE. BuySomeApples ( talk) 20:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Absolute non-entity in academia (no position anywhere, a grand total of 2 publications on Scopus, and no citations), with a minor social media presence. Hardly merits an article. Ostalgia ( talk) 20:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
running w[ith] the fucking fashy [sic] grifters[6], which comes really close. It being social media, it's not something we'd use to source an article, but I'd say it sort of excuses DE's comment. Ostalgia ( talk) 07:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Euchre variants. Daniel ( talk) 22:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The article is a collection of uncited information about variations to the game of Euchre, much of which is now far better covered and cited at Euchre and Euchre variants. For example:
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I am unconvinced this is a notable fictional topic and it fails WP:GNG. In my opinion, a Spawn (franchise) article should be created, but literally nothing from this article is salvageable anyway. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 19:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:POET, looks promotional. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 18:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The ABP Reference is ABP Brand Wire frontline, downtoearth and outlook business are Website Author profiles. The subject fails to meet WP:GNG. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 18:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 18:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG, NLIST and WP:NOTTVGUIDE. Article is a largely unsourced programming guide for a television channel. No sources showing this meets GNG as a stand alone topic, or NLIST showing WP:IS WP:RS showing this has been discussed as a group. BEFORE found nothing but other programming guides. I can find nothing that would make this a notable list, but if sources are ever found, this article would need TNT. // Timothy :: talk 18:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet the general notability guidelines, or WP:CREATIVE. I am not finding reliable sources to add to this article WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 18:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Legislative Assembly of Zabaykalsky Krai. Liz Read! Talk! 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN. The assembly has no article. One of the two listed chairmen has no article, and there is no indication in the poorly written article about Anatoly Romanov that he was a chairman of this body, despite the unencyclopedic list of his credentials in the lead. Bbb23 ( talk) 16:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Procedural Keep, this needs to go to WP:RFD and this article was never even tagged as being part of an AFD which makes it ineligible. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to delete this page to correct an error. The page created under the name " Telsiz ve Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti" should be named "Türkiye Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti." Therefore, I would like to move it, but since there is a redirect page with this name, I am unable to do so. Hence, it is necessary to delete this page first. Arceonix ( talk) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't think this page fits any of the WP:CSD criteria but clearly does not meet WP:GNG. Purely a short description of a non notable fictional planet. CoconutOctopus talk 15:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
I think we should keep that article, it's just a fictional exoplanet like the characters, and there a petition to change the name Kleper 22B to Namek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcygnus ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per WP:A7. (non-admin closure) Deltaspace42 ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Total WP:BIO failure. Disputed draftification. For the avoidance of doubt, this nomination is to delete and to consider Salting 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Democracy Collaborative as an AtD. Consensus below not to retain, but no objection to a redirect from those !voting delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
There is nothing to indicate that this is a notable concept. Thenightaway ( talk) 10:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
UTC)
A generative economy results when one actor’s production leads to the creation of new innovations that were not necessarily intended by the original inventor.Although just an interview, Kelly is not even mentioned at all, leading me to believe the interviewee Youngjin Yoo believes they are actually coining the term themselves. For the term itself to be notable, there needs to be more than just a definition of the term - and all I can find are either definitions from primary sources, or definitions quoted verbatim from Kelly.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
14:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
बिनोद थारू ( talk) 04:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysis and synthesis of primary source material to advance a position, which is explicitly prohibited by the original research policy.
The result was draftify. Daniel ( talk) 22:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (music). Primary purpose appears to be promoting a new group - WP:PROMO. At best, WP:TOOSOON based on the comments of reviewers while it was in draft. Geoff | Who, me? 13:48, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 1. "CULTURE K-WAVE HYBE's New Girl Group Final Member Lineup Revealed: Which 'R U NEXT' Contestants Made It?". International Business Times. 3 September 2023. |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 2. ^ Jeong, Seung-min (2023-09-02). "'알유넥스트' 여정 마무리...하이브 차기 걸그룹 '아일릿' 결성" [‘RU Next’ journey concludes... Hive’s next girl group ‘Illit’ formed]. MHN Sports / MHN KPOP NEWS (in Korean). Retrieved 2023-09-02. |
Promo about video teaser | 3. ^ "하이브 새 걸그룹 누구?...'알유넥스트', 티저 영상 공개" [Who is Hybe's new girl group?...'RU Next', teaser video released]. MBN (in Korean). 7 June 2023 – via Naver. |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 4. ^ Dash, Pratyusha (2023-09-02). "R U Next? unveils the final lineup and name of HYBE and BELIFT LAB's newest girl group". Pinkvilla. Retrieved 2023-09-02. |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 5. ^ Yoon, So-yeon (2023-09-03). "'R U Next?' winners form girl group I'LL-IT ahead of debut". Korea JoongAng Daily. Retrieved 2023-09-03. |
Not a ref | 6. ^ Circle Digital Chart: |
Not a ref | 7. ^ Billboard South Korea Songs Chart: |
Mill routine entertainment news for serial reality tv shows and contestants | 8. ^ Go, In-hye (October 10, 2023). "아일릿, 좌충우돌 첫 여행 리얼리티…'아일 라이크 잇'" [I'll-It, first travel reality show with ups and downs...'I'll Like It'] (in Korean). Newsis. Retrieved October 24, 2023 – via Naver. |
The result was delete. Consensus of editors is that the sources presented here do not qualify as reliable or having significant coverage within them. Daniel ( talk) 21:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of the sources in the article, only 2 are not primary sources. One is a passing mention and another is an interview. Thus, this article does not pass WP:BIO. Spinixster (chat!) 13:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Cagayan de Oro. I'm not sure what is meant here by "retarget" as this page is not a redirect so I'll just understand this as support for a Merge to this article. Liz Read! Talk! 17:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Tagged as unsourced from 2009, no effort made to both expand and add reliable secondary sources. Presumed to be notable, per WP:NPOL, are "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage." JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 11:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Blimp. Liz Read! Talk! 03:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
NARTIST fail. Only plausible non-primary source has been the Scotsman. Article is citebombed to hell (for example, I don't think source 7 even mentions the same person). Fermiboson ( talk) 06:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion as there is an intention from an editor to improve this article during this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:49, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
08:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Non notable politicians also failed Wikipedia:Notability (politics) Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 08:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[16] [17] [18] [19] [20] Wasilatlovekesy ( talk) 07:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG (non-significant coverage in sources) J2m5 ( talk) 08:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors and lord mayors of Parramatta. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN (has not received significant press coverage) and fails WP:GNG (insufficient sources with significant coverage, relies largely on single source). Propose redirect to List of mayors and lord mayors of Parramatta. J2m5 ( talk) 08:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Leonard Blussé. Liz Read! Talk! 07:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Rhino Entertainment. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or go to WP:REFUND. Otherwise, I think as a draft, this article would just become a CSD G13 in six months. Draftifying is only effective if there is an editor who wants to work on a draft. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:NPOL. Pretty self-explanatory. Never held elected office, no significant media coverage. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 05:21, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
There is no RS coverage of the subject. The subject is a non-notable consultant. Thenightaway ( talk) 12:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per new sources added. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 01:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NWEB. This article cites the subject's website and other self-published sources so there are essentially no references. I couldn't find any on a BEFORE search. This was deleted previously and never should have been re-created. Chris Troutman ( talk) 04:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting so that additions to the article since nomination can be assessed to see if they provide enough SIGCOV to establish notability. This discussion really isn't about the subject matter but whether adequate independent, secondary sources can be located over the next week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Looks like an advert with a list of services. In other languages, the page has already been removed. MaxBokstf ( talk) 03:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Still not a proper deletion rationale (it doesn't really matter what has happened on the Russian Wikipedia) but unlike the other AFD by this nominator, here there is support for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Insignificant filmmaker, Russian Wikipedia article deleted [21].-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 05:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Inadequate deletion rationale from new editor Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
An insignificant person, an ordinary victim of the Holocaust. Russian Wikipedia article deleted [22]. -- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 03:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a rough consensus to Delete this article on BLP grounds with a few vocal oppositions to this. Having closed the previous AFD on a very similar subject, I hope we don't return to AFD a third time to argue about Santos' misdeeds. The message I get from comments here is that there has to be a consensus on the article talk page for this sort of article split. Future attempts to recreate articles on this subject without a consensus on the talk page of the main article will inevitably end up back at AFD so please take the time to do this according to the book. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Per this AfD of a very similar fork a few months ago. A slightly different focus, but still the same underlying BLP and POVFORK issues. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The previous AfD was underlain by the summerlong talk page discussion I alluded to in my nomination, which was formally closed as establishing no consensus to split off an article like this. While that does not mean that consensus is against splitting off an article at all, it definitely does mean that consensus should be on the side of a proposed split before it is made. And since this split was made without even bothering to initiate any such discussion, it is by definition against consensus, an even stronger argument for deletion than POVFORK.
As to which, it boggles my mind that you would so completely ignore the quoted language from POVFORK. It's there for a reason. It's there because when you say "in most circumstances it says forks are OK", you should probably go to some length to enumerate those situations when they are not. POVFORK is one of them.
To keep returning to the idée fixe you have about the content being identical is to so widely miss the point I am making (nor would I be the only one) that I wonder if you are trying to do so on purpose. It is how the split article would use that content ... as basically a bill of indictment. When it is within the article, we can justify it in the broader context of a warts-and-all biography. As a stand-alone, it is as TulsaPoliticsFan} observed at the other AfD a "dumping ground", a "bad stuff about George Santos" (or in this case "lies George Santos tells or told on himself" (and would you include in that article times where his stories have checked out?). It would be by definition not neutral.
And really, there is not the urgency to make the article smaller that you seem to feel. The servers will not crash because it is too big. It is better that when we split the article, we do it right rather than do it fast. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Dumping ground???
And in any event, yes, Santos himself will always be notable by virtue of having served, however briefly, in a national legislature (After all, we have an article about a woman who served in the U.S. Senate for one day, although to be fair that's not the only thing she's notable for). But whether that long-term notability requires a separate article on his biographical misrepresentations is an entirely different question. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to LGBT reproduction. I think a Merge is a valid closure as it was mentioned by several editors advocating deletion. As for student editors, some of their work that I've seen is worthwhile but it very rare for them to return to edit the project after the school term is over. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Per consensus at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 8#LGBTQ+ Production of Family. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️⚧️) 02:34, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for either a Merge or Userfying this article to the page creator's sandbox.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe that the article passes WP:NPOL. There is not much significant coverage on the subject and she has not held high enough office to warrant an article. GoldMiner24 Talk 02:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to University of California, Irvine School of Physical Sciences. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Declined A7 per "a7 not applicable to schools". Personally I think a university affiliated math circle is still an organization, not a school, but I digress, here we are now.
Fails WP:NORG. No coverage found in WP:ORGIND sources. A412 ( Talk • C) 01:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Outreach activities include the UCI Math Circle, an enrichment program for secondary school students...or something like that. XOR'easter ( talk) 10:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
21:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Very confusing article. Nominally it is about the phrase/concept of "care in the community" yet beyond the title/first line of the lead it is not mentioned at all. Most of the article is a collection of vaguely (if at all) linked topics including "community care", then descends further into talking about mental health care and reform and ongoing changes, none of which have anything to do with the specific phrase "care in the community".
Of the first 5 references cited, a Control + F search reveals that not a single one even contains the word "community" let alone the phrase "care in the community".
There is one news article which mentions this topic by name, namely this, which suggests it was a policy introduced in 1990 and scrapped in 1998, yet this article is so vague it covers a range of random mental health developments from the 1960s to 2015.
Overall, I think the problem with this article is that whilst it is nominally about the phrase/concept of "care in the community", it has essentially become about mental and social care in the United Kingdom.
It should be merged with the relevant sections of Mental health in the United Kingdom and Social care in England. Elshad ( talk) 23:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A couple more editors providing input here would assist with forming consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
01:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It's clear that there are sources out there and I appreciate the time that has gone into tracking them down. Hopefully they will be used to improve this article. I see no support for Deletion and a rough consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 04:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Far as I can tell doesn't meet WP:NBIO. Some GBooks hits in Finnish but done where he is the primary focus of anything, merely mentions. CoconutOctopus talk 15:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
00:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Draftification is not deletion, the WP:TNT essay describes a process of
blow it up and start over, i.e. completely removing all existing content. I don't see much difference between "delete" and "drafity and delete all existing content", nor do I understand why either would be appropriate here. Ljleppan ( talk) 14:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:02, 30 December 2023 (UTC)