Index
|
||
Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Hi Darcyisverycute. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page or ask via the
NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Fullerton Cove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullerton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hucksters.net. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Foweirp ( talk) 19:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Namely Cheers,
Mach61 (
talk) 04:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
the capability to have pleasant and safer sexual practices that are free of violence, coercion, and discrimination
in "Mind-body dualism". If a quote cannot be located, it must be deleted, per
WP:Verifiability#Unsourced.
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
This award is given in recognition to Darcyisverycute for collecting more than 50 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh ( talk) 22:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
How did you make the rotated letters in your signature? Tedmcbur ( talk) 16:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
On 14 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Medicalisation of sexuality, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as a result of the medicalisation of sexuality, sexual disorders like erectile dysfunction have been used as a "penile health gauge" to measure general wellbeing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Medicalisation of sexuality. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Medicalisation of sexuality), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Index
|
||
Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Hi Darcyisverycute. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page or ask via the
NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:13, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Fullerton Cove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fullerton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hucksters.net. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Foweirp ( talk) 19:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Namely Cheers,
Mach61 (
talk) 04:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
the capability to have pleasant and safer sexual practices that are free of violence, coercion, and discrimination
in "Mind-body dualism". If a quote cannot be located, it must be deleted, per
WP:Verifiability#Unsourced.
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
This award is given in recognition to Darcyisverycute for collecting more than 50 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh ( talk) 22:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
How did you make the rotated letters in your signature? Tedmcbur ( talk) 16:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
On 14 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Medicalisation of sexuality, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as a result of the medicalisation of sexuality, sexual disorders like erectile dysfunction have been used as a "penile health gauge" to measure general wellbeing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Medicalisation of sexuality. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Medicalisation of sexuality), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)