The result was delete. The one "keep" opinion does not address the sourcing problems. Sandstein 07:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a cinematographer, not
properly referenced as passing notability criteria for cinematographers.
The only notability claim being attempted here is that his work exists, which isn't enough in and of itself -- the notability test for a cinematographer doesn't vest in listing his film and television credits, it vests in showing third-party reliable source media coverage externally validating the significance of his work: coverage about him, evidence that he has won or been nominated for major awards for his work, and on and so forth.
But this is referenced almost entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, like his IMDb profile and the self-published website of his own employer, with the closest thing to a reliable source being a specialty trade magazine that just links to his name being present on the cover without showing any evidence that he was the subject of any written content inside the magazine — and even if somebody can verify better than I've been able to that he was the subject of an actual article, it would still take more than just one source to get him over
WP:GNG anyway.
And even on his IMDb profile, the only awards listed there are regional (Leo) or specialty (Canadian Society of Cinematographers) awards that would be fine to add here if the article were sourced properly, but are not prominent enough to hand him an instant notability freebie without proper sourcing.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 13:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Article created and continues to be edited by COI editor who removed PROD tag on the basis that "We are in the process of editing this page, but we need the copy to be authorised, which can not be done in the timescale that you have provided, it will be carried out soon,". The organisation lacks "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", as a result failing WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder ( talk) 18:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 18:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Minor character in the book of Mormon with no independent reliable sources to establish their notability. Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 18:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. "'Nuf said" is not enough.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, defunct application for a defunct video recording service. This article was deleted for similar reasons via PROD in October 2006, but was restored two months later with the rationale "Software is widely used and provides an important missing link between PCs and popular ReplayTV", which I don't think hold up. Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 22:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd in 2006 so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems like a single event with limited ongoing impact so looks like it might not meet WP:LASTING. The refs appear to be WP:ROUTINE and more than 90% of the page is not sourced and therefore per WP:V could be removed. JMWt ( talk) 19:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any more support for a selective Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union referee, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Namibia national rugby union players. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Namibian rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Son of Godzilla. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A small article for a rather minor kaiju in the Godzilla series. While Kumonga did have a spider named after it, any other commentary I can find is scattered and weak at best. There doesn't seem to be enough for a full article here. I'd suggest a redirect to Son of Godzilla, Kumonga's main film appearance. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 21:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A rather short article, based around a minor character in the series. I found two book sources that give a good paragraph on him, but nothing more. Every news source is just Screen Rant, and I can't find anything bar the two above, and the few things you can scrape together really aren't enough for a whole article. I'd suggest a redirect to Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla, his debut film and most notable role. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 21:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, fails WP:NEVENT.
Specifically, this is an article about either Mexia Supermarket the business, or about the event of the food there becoming rotten and going off after the power was cut there.
If this is an article about Mexia Supermarket as a business, then its notability is not established as the only sources cited are local newspapers and an ~1 minute-long interview with the guy in charge of the clean-up on an Ancient Aliens-style speculative television program. Local newspapers alone cannot establish the notability of an article per WP:AUD. An interview with the guy in charge of the clean-up is not an independent source and in any event was not significant coverage.
If instead we look at this as an event, there's a clear lack of WP:LASTING coverage or WP:GEOSCOPE. The newspaper coverage was all in local papers and all comes in an approximate four-week period from 13 November 1999 to 9 December 1999, with no coverage at all in reliable, independent sources after that - the story had no WP:PERSISTENCE. As discussed above, the interview is not independent and not in a high quality source, but additionally the real subject of the show it was on was not this event but simply to use it to illustrate what would happen to food stockpiles if humanity suddenly disappeared.
A search on Newspapers.com and other sources failed to turn up anything further covering this business/event. For the avoidance of doubt, Google Maps is not a reliable source.
Ultimately this is just a very run-of-the-mill event common in communities around the world: "local thing smells bad and people complain". FOARP ( talk) 21:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Ehrmagerd, werds! Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PepperBeast (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bhojpuri language#Vocabulary. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Ehrmagerd, werds! Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PepperBeast (talk) 19:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Disputed draftify, non notable WP:NSCHOOL microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 19:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The nominator is cautioned not to make comments like "Thousands of mentally ill people kill other people across the world every year" which is an unsupported generalization that promotes stereotypes and is pure speculation on your part. If an editor wants to work on this in Draft space, let me know or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Thousands of mentally ill people kill other people across the world every year. This just happens to be after a 2017 stabbing, which was notable because of the far-right motivation. Also barely any coverage besides local. Lettlre ( talk) 19:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This article about Vinheteiro fails to meet WP:NMUSIC.
Details about Vinheteiro in the article are not cited in accordance with source, which makes it seem to have reach the requirement of WP:NMUSIC e.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro participated in Brazilian programs such as Jornal Nacional (seems to meet criteria 12), while the source 'Jornal Nacional' was about his video of playing of JN's theme song went viral. e.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro performed in China with local musicians (seems to meet criteria 4), yet the source was about his videos' popularity on Chinese online video platform, Bilibili, where he launched online music courses.
If the article is considered as Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube/Notability rather than WP:NMUSIC, I doubt its sources are significant enough to meet WP:GNG. -- EleniXDD※ Talk 07:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about an actor, and added a review of a film he was in. This is just a few words of coverage, however. I cannot see any other coverage in reliable, independent sources which does more than verify that he was in the film. The article has been tagged as possibly not notable since 2013. I do not think he meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Tacyarg ( talk) 18:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Unrelaible sources that do not even give roles for the subject so fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 17:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A reminder to the nominator that AFDs are not a way to get an article better sourced. WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. And if you "hate to do this" maybe think twice about what you are doing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I hate to do this to someone who clearly has done a lot of good work in their life, but she seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. There is practically no news coverage of her beyond WP:NOBITS. She has exactly one notable paper and while that does seem to get a bit of citing, it's probably not enough, as usually need multiple notable publications to be considered notable. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This BLP appears to be overly promotional, with many of the cited sources merely mentioning the subject without providing substantial coverage. clearly, the subject fails to meet the WP:GNG. Disregard the unreliable references used in the BLP. Additionally, it's worth noting that much of the article was contributed by Shaistakausar.pk ( talk · contribs) — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 16:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Nothing here indicates any kind of notability. The article has been around for a long time, and it's been in a poor state for a long time. Google proves that the organization exists, but I don't see anything that proves it should have an article here. Drmies ( talk) 16:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
The meaning of JarrahTree's comment in regard to the Nov. 2016 article is not quite clear to me but it is giving me enough pause that I'm chosing to close this discussion as a Soft Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This sounds like a case of WP:BLP1E. This guy is the deputy chairman of a minuscule (.5%< of the vote and no seats in any assembly whatsoever) far-right party. Occasionally, he has additionally received coverage as part of his political party, but this is probably WP:INHERITED notability. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very old, largely unreferenced article with what looks like an extensive history of COI editing (though not recent). Appears to have some coverage of a CEO changeover but I couldn't find anything that goes into detail about the organisation itself. I'd be equally happy with a merge if a suitable target is identified. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Not speedily as it has just come due for closure Star Mississippi 16:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Obvious WP:BLP1E violation. Relevant details can be merged into Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections Simonm223 ( talk) 15:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented, is not met. The event is significant and his role in it is substantial and well documented. Also #2,
The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, does not appear to be met. He just testified in front of Congress recently. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 16:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Clear violation of WP:BLP1E relevant details should be merged into Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections Simonm223 ( talk) 15:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented, is not met. The event is significant and his role in it is substantial and well documented. I say "weak" here because he has maintained a lower profile than Lev Parnas. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
unrelated. Jfire ( talk) 17:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Antiquization. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The video/film clearly lacks notability and the article appears to be originally researched for the most part. It is already appropiately covered in the article Antiquization. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 15:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of battles in Rajasthan#16th Century as a viable ATD since there was little input since all the socks were blocked and there's no sense of further coming Star Mississippi 14:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Reasons are listed below:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While I've struck the duplicate keep votes from a sock, there has not yet been enough participation (votes) to determine a consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 13:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Notability has not been adequately demonstrated BoraVoro ( talk) 11:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 13:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN#Current affairs. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Tagged as uncited since its creation in June 2016, likely to not pass WP:GNG. At worst, redirect to another suitable article. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 12:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This company does not meet the notability requirements. The references included are, bar one, based on press-releases or non-in-depth coverage. It's a non-notable holding company that was founded very recently. JeffUK 12:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
non-notable NPROF, sources are SPS, and more as per Talk page Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 11:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Chocolate Watchband. Star Mississippi 14:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not fulfill WP:NALBUM, one review on AllMusic and no other mention pops up on a Google or Archive.org search. Broc ( talk) 11:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hinayana (band). Star Mississippi 14:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not fulfill WP:NALBUM, no coverage in reliable sources. Broc ( talk) 11:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete: fails notability, GNG, SIGCOV, POET. Nirva20 ( talk) 04:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Nirva20 ( talk) 04:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Self-replicating machine. In the now cleaned up / stubbified form. Sandstein 07:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No consensus two years ago, and zero improvement since. The topic may be notable, but our execution is abysmally bad and begs for WP:TNT - after tiny prose lead, this is just a WP:IPC-violating list of random examples. I.e. this is another de facto list that fails WP:LISTN, a simple WP:INDISCRIMINATE listing of all instances self-replicating machines appeared in a work of fiction ( WP:NOTTVTROPES). If we were to approach it as an article, it falls WP:GNG, mostly WP:V and WP:OR). No prejudice to this being turned into a prose-based stub if anyone wants to work on this, but otherwise I think blanking/redirecting this would be best as 100% of the content we have here is unencyclopedic (TVTROPIS lists and OR). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
with a weight proportional to its treatment in the body of reliable, published material on the subject. This, of course, takes a lot more time, effort, and—frankly—skill than the typical TV Tropes approach.I'm all for leading by example. As Piotrus alludes to, I have rewritten (and thus fixed) quite a few articles similar to this one during the course of AfD discussions—see WP:Articles for deletion/Eco-terrorism in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Earth in science fiction (2nd nomination), WP:Articles for deletion/Space stations and habitats in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Supernovae in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Neptune in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Genies in popular culture (2nd nomination), WP:Articles for deletion/Battle of Thermopylae in popular culture, WP:Articles for deletion/Loch Ness Monster in popular culture (2nd nomination), and WP:Articles for deletion/Time viewer. I have also brought three X in fiction articles to WP:Featured article status: Mars in fiction, Venus in fiction, and Sun in fiction—the Venus one in collaboration with Piotrus who also did the initial cleanup there (I cleaned up the Mars one, and created the Sun one properly from the get-go).The hope is that when people see what it looks like when done properly, they will at minimum stop doing it improperly, and perhaps even start doing it properly. To some extent it seems to have worked: there are now a handful of editors who know how to write such articles and are willing to do so. Their levels of proficiency vary of course, but that's not a problem since it is a trainable skill—when I look at some of my earlier efforts I find them to be rather mediocre (which is still way preferable to outright bad, as the TV Tropes-style lists are). On the other hand it has not worked nearly as well as I would have liked it to—there are still a large number of editors, even experienced ones who should really know better, who do not understand or do not accept that WP:PROPORTION applies to fiction-related content and that such content thus needs to be demonstrated to be a significant aspect of the overarching topic by citing sources on the overarching topic. Removing unsourced (or inadequately-sourced) content and explaining the sourcing requirements sounds like it should be a straightforward way to maintain these kinds of articles, but it isn't always. In my experience, it is usually easier to get through to the editors who want to include something without the proper sourcing when the article is already in decent shape than during the cleanup stage. TompaDompa ( talk) 22:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sufficient reliable sources to show she meets WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 06:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find sources demonstrating notability. An alternative to deletion is a redirect to List of Lost characters. toweli ( talk) 08:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kota Kinabalu#shopping. where newly identified sourcing can be added to the existing mention. Consensus appears that sourcing isn't sufficient for a standalone. Star Mississippi 14:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Marked for notability concerns 11 months ago. A search for sources only found routine coverage rather than indepth coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 05:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 05:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Manpo Line. Randykitty ( talk) 15:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable railway station with no defining features or relevance. Fails WP:GNG and WP:STATION. Could be merged with Korean State Railway. OsmiumGuard ( talk) 15:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC) \
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of available source material would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 05:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 06:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable, closed distillery with no WP:RS on page, none that I could find, and none are likely to exist. Cabrils ( talk) 21:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion as there is are comments that are clearly an unbolded Keep here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of sources known to be available would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 05:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of United States national rugby union players. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, an American rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. A possible redirect target seems to be List of United States national rugby union players. JTtheOG ( talk) 04:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not sure why but this AFD did attract a bunch of new accounts for unknown reasons. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:Notability, and its also missing the main flight infobox. The whole article is missing so much information and is unorganized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZAviation21 ( talk • contribs) 4 April 2024 at 21:39 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Could have been procedurally kept anyway, since it was a redirect page when it was nominated. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 19:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This is title for village article, whch is not notable as per English wikipedia policies. It was earlier redirected to its district page, which is not meaningful. Arjunaraoc ( talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Non notable group. Just end up finding sources of other bands with the same name instead. GamerPro64 03:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 01:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A user posted about this on my talk page, wanting to remove the template. I've attempted to find any sort of coverage in RS, there doesn't appear to be any. Appears PROMO, with no charted singles or anything we'd use for musical notability standards. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. JBW ( talk) 21:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The article underwent AfD discussions in July 2023, leading to a "soft delete." However, it was reinstated in December 2023 by the same article creator, confirmed as a sockpuppet. Despite its restoration, the article fails to address the issues that prompted its removal in July 2023, particularly regarding WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Notably, in the Filmography section, nearly all entries list her as uncredited. The one exception where she is credited only features her in a supporting role. Ckfasdf ( talk) 15:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. We have a well presented nomination, and some productive discussion about the possible availability of sources. The other delete argument lacks basis in policy.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions) 02:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; has neither won a medal at an international competition, nor has she won the U.S. national championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; has neither won a medal at an international competition, nor has he won the U.S. national championships at the senior level. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Walgreens. History remains if someone wants to merge sourced material. Star Mississippi 01:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article about a non-notable subject. This is a proprietary software program used internally at a single company. The article currently has no sources, and I can't find any good sources to add; the most I've found is a few brief summaries in company publications and old newspaper articles. It might warrant a mention in the Walgreens article, but it doesn't need its own article. IagoQnsi ( talk) 02:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a possible Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A run of the mill local "cause" organization with little coverage beyond local area. Coverage in broader area sources are trivial, such as "Sykes had become an “attractive nuisance,” said Mike Splain, executive director of the Ventana Wilderness Alliance."
An article on company/organization needs significant, independent, reliable coverage in multiple sources and at least one of those needs to be a regional or national source. Graywalls ( talk) 02:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 01:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1966 FIFA World Cup squads#North Korea. Star Mississippi 01:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Redirect to 1966 North Korea World Cup Squad - [30]. Simione001 ( talk) 00:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The one "keep" opinion does not address the sourcing problems. Sandstein 07:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a cinematographer, not
properly referenced as passing notability criteria for cinematographers.
The only notability claim being attempted here is that his work exists, which isn't enough in and of itself -- the notability test for a cinematographer doesn't vest in listing his film and television credits, it vests in showing third-party reliable source media coverage externally validating the significance of his work: coverage about him, evidence that he has won or been nominated for major awards for his work, and on and so forth.
But this is referenced almost entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, like his IMDb profile and the self-published website of his own employer, with the closest thing to a reliable source being a specialty trade magazine that just links to his name being present on the cover without showing any evidence that he was the subject of any written content inside the magazine — and even if somebody can verify better than I've been able to that he was the subject of an actual article, it would still take more than just one source to get him over
WP:GNG anyway.
And even on his IMDb profile, the only awards listed there are regional (Leo) or specialty (Canadian Society of Cinematographers) awards that would be fine to add here if the article were sourced properly, but are not prominent enough to hand him an instant notability freebie without proper sourcing.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 17:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 13:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Article created and continues to be edited by COI editor who removed PROD tag on the basis that "We are in the process of editing this page, but we need the copy to be authorised, which can not be done in the timescale that you have provided, it will be carried out soon,". The organisation lacks "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", as a result failing WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder ( talk) 18:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 18:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Minor character in the book of Mormon with no independent reliable sources to establish their notability. Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 18:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. "'Nuf said" is not enough.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, defunct application for a defunct video recording service. This article was deleted for similar reasons via PROD in October 2006, but was restored two months later with the rationale "Software is widely used and provides an important missing link between PCs and popular ReplayTV", which I don't think hold up. Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 22:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd in 2006 so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems like a single event with limited ongoing impact so looks like it might not meet WP:LASTING. The refs appear to be WP:ROUTINE and more than 90% of the page is not sourced and therefore per WP:V could be removed. JMWt ( talk) 19:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any more support for a selective Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union referee, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Namibia national rugby union players. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Namibian rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Son of Godzilla. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A small article for a rather minor kaiju in the Godzilla series. While Kumonga did have a spider named after it, any other commentary I can find is scattered and weak at best. There doesn't seem to be enough for a full article here. I'd suggest a redirect to Son of Godzilla, Kumonga's main film appearance. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 21:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A rather short article, based around a minor character in the series. I found two book sources that give a good paragraph on him, but nothing more. Every news source is just Screen Rant, and I can't find anything bar the two above, and the few things you can scrape together really aren't enough for a whole article. I'd suggest a redirect to Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla, his debut film and most notable role. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 21:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, fails WP:NEVENT.
Specifically, this is an article about either Mexia Supermarket the business, or about the event of the food there becoming rotten and going off after the power was cut there.
If this is an article about Mexia Supermarket as a business, then its notability is not established as the only sources cited are local newspapers and an ~1 minute-long interview with the guy in charge of the clean-up on an Ancient Aliens-style speculative television program. Local newspapers alone cannot establish the notability of an article per WP:AUD. An interview with the guy in charge of the clean-up is not an independent source and in any event was not significant coverage.
If instead we look at this as an event, there's a clear lack of WP:LASTING coverage or WP:GEOSCOPE. The newspaper coverage was all in local papers and all comes in an approximate four-week period from 13 November 1999 to 9 December 1999, with no coverage at all in reliable, independent sources after that - the story had no WP:PERSISTENCE. As discussed above, the interview is not independent and not in a high quality source, but additionally the real subject of the show it was on was not this event but simply to use it to illustrate what would happen to food stockpiles if humanity suddenly disappeared.
A search on Newspapers.com and other sources failed to turn up anything further covering this business/event. For the avoidance of doubt, Google Maps is not a reliable source.
Ultimately this is just a very run-of-the-mill event common in communities around the world: "local thing smells bad and people complain". FOARP ( talk) 21:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Ehrmagerd, werds! Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PepperBeast (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bhojpuri language#Vocabulary. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Ehrmagerd, werds! Wikipedia is not a dictionary. PepperBeast (talk) 19:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Disputed draftify, non notable WP:NSCHOOL microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 19:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The nominator is cautioned not to make comments like "Thousands of mentally ill people kill other people across the world every year" which is an unsupported generalization that promotes stereotypes and is pure speculation on your part. If an editor wants to work on this in Draft space, let me know or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Thousands of mentally ill people kill other people across the world every year. This just happens to be after a 2017 stabbing, which was notable because of the far-right motivation. Also barely any coverage besides local. Lettlre ( talk) 19:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This article about Vinheteiro fails to meet WP:NMUSIC.
Details about Vinheteiro in the article are not cited in accordance with source, which makes it seem to have reach the requirement of WP:NMUSIC e.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro participated in Brazilian programs such as Jornal Nacional (seems to meet criteria 12), while the source 'Jornal Nacional' was about his video of playing of JN's theme song went viral. e.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro performed in China with local musicians (seems to meet criteria 4), yet the source was about his videos' popularity on Chinese online video platform, Bilibili, where he launched online music courses.
If the article is considered as Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube/Notability rather than WP:NMUSIC, I doubt its sources are significant enough to meet WP:GNG. -- EleniXDD※ Talk 07:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about an actor, and added a review of a film he was in. This is just a few words of coverage, however. I cannot see any other coverage in reliable, independent sources which does more than verify that he was in the film. The article has been tagged as possibly not notable since 2013. I do not think he meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Tacyarg ( talk) 18:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Unrelaible sources that do not even give roles for the subject so fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 17:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A reminder to the nominator that AFDs are not a way to get an article better sourced. WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. And if you "hate to do this" maybe think twice about what you are doing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I hate to do this to someone who clearly has done a lot of good work in their life, but she seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. There is practically no news coverage of her beyond WP:NOBITS. She has exactly one notable paper and while that does seem to get a bit of citing, it's probably not enough, as usually need multiple notable publications to be considered notable. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This BLP appears to be overly promotional, with many of the cited sources merely mentioning the subject without providing substantial coverage. clearly, the subject fails to meet the WP:GNG. Disregard the unreliable references used in the BLP. Additionally, it's worth noting that much of the article was contributed by Shaistakausar.pk ( talk · contribs) — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 16:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Nothing here indicates any kind of notability. The article has been around for a long time, and it's been in a poor state for a long time. Google proves that the organization exists, but I don't see anything that proves it should have an article here. Drmies ( talk) 16:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
The meaning of JarrahTree's comment in regard to the Nov. 2016 article is not quite clear to me but it is giving me enough pause that I'm chosing to close this discussion as a Soft Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This sounds like a case of WP:BLP1E. This guy is the deputy chairman of a minuscule (.5%< of the vote and no seats in any assembly whatsoever) far-right party. Occasionally, he has additionally received coverage as part of his political party, but this is probably WP:INHERITED notability. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 16:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Very old, largely unreferenced article with what looks like an extensive history of COI editing (though not recent). Appears to have some coverage of a CEO changeover but I couldn't find anything that goes into detail about the organisation itself. I'd be equally happy with a merge if a suitable target is identified. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Not speedily as it has just come due for closure Star Mississippi 16:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Obvious WP:BLP1E violation. Relevant details can be merged into Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections Simonm223 ( talk) 15:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented, is not met. The event is significant and his role in it is substantial and well documented. Also #2,
The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, does not appear to be met. He just testified in front of Congress recently. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 16:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Clear violation of WP:BLP1E relevant details should be merged into Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections Simonm223 ( talk) 15:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented, is not met. The event is significant and his role in it is substantial and well documented. I say "weak" here because he has maintained a lower profile than Lev Parnas. – Muboshgu ( talk) 16:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
unrelated. Jfire ( talk) 17:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Antiquization. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The video/film clearly lacks notability and the article appears to be originally researched for the most part. It is already appropiately covered in the article Antiquization. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 15:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of battles in Rajasthan#16th Century as a viable ATD since there was little input since all the socks were blocked and there's no sense of further coming Star Mississippi 14:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Reasons are listed below:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While I've struck the duplicate keep votes from a sock, there has not yet been enough participation (votes) to determine a consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 13:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Notability has not been adequately demonstrated BoraVoro ( talk) 11:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 13:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by ABS-CBN#Current affairs. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Tagged as uncited since its creation in June 2016, likely to not pass WP:GNG. At worst, redirect to another suitable article. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 12:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This company does not meet the notability requirements. The references included are, bar one, based on press-releases or non-in-depth coverage. It's a non-notable holding company that was founded very recently. JeffUK 12:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
non-notable NPROF, sources are SPS, and more as per Talk page Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 11:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Chocolate Watchband. Star Mississippi 14:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not fulfill WP:NALBUM, one review on AllMusic and no other mention pops up on a Google or Archive.org search. Broc ( talk) 11:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hinayana (band). Star Mississippi 14:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not fulfill WP:NALBUM, no coverage in reliable sources. Broc ( talk) 11:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete: fails notability, GNG, SIGCOV, POET. Nirva20 ( talk) 04:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Nirva20 ( talk) 04:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:37, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Self-replicating machine. In the now cleaned up / stubbified form. Sandstein 07:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No consensus two years ago, and zero improvement since. The topic may be notable, but our execution is abysmally bad and begs for WP:TNT - after tiny prose lead, this is just a WP:IPC-violating list of random examples. I.e. this is another de facto list that fails WP:LISTN, a simple WP:INDISCRIMINATE listing of all instances self-replicating machines appeared in a work of fiction ( WP:NOTTVTROPES). If we were to approach it as an article, it falls WP:GNG, mostly WP:V and WP:OR). No prejudice to this being turned into a prose-based stub if anyone wants to work on this, but otherwise I think blanking/redirecting this would be best as 100% of the content we have here is unencyclopedic (TVTROPIS lists and OR). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
with a weight proportional to its treatment in the body of reliable, published material on the subject. This, of course, takes a lot more time, effort, and—frankly—skill than the typical TV Tropes approach.I'm all for leading by example. As Piotrus alludes to, I have rewritten (and thus fixed) quite a few articles similar to this one during the course of AfD discussions—see WP:Articles for deletion/Eco-terrorism in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Earth in science fiction (2nd nomination), WP:Articles for deletion/Space stations and habitats in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Supernovae in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Neptune in fiction, WP:Articles for deletion/Genies in popular culture (2nd nomination), WP:Articles for deletion/Battle of Thermopylae in popular culture, WP:Articles for deletion/Loch Ness Monster in popular culture (2nd nomination), and WP:Articles for deletion/Time viewer. I have also brought three X in fiction articles to WP:Featured article status: Mars in fiction, Venus in fiction, and Sun in fiction—the Venus one in collaboration with Piotrus who also did the initial cleanup there (I cleaned up the Mars one, and created the Sun one properly from the get-go).The hope is that when people see what it looks like when done properly, they will at minimum stop doing it improperly, and perhaps even start doing it properly. To some extent it seems to have worked: there are now a handful of editors who know how to write such articles and are willing to do so. Their levels of proficiency vary of course, but that's not a problem since it is a trainable skill—when I look at some of my earlier efforts I find them to be rather mediocre (which is still way preferable to outright bad, as the TV Tropes-style lists are). On the other hand it has not worked nearly as well as I would have liked it to—there are still a large number of editors, even experienced ones who should really know better, who do not understand or do not accept that WP:PROPORTION applies to fiction-related content and that such content thus needs to be demonstrated to be a significant aspect of the overarching topic by citing sources on the overarching topic. Removing unsourced (or inadequately-sourced) content and explaining the sourcing requirements sounds like it should be a straightforward way to maintain these kinds of articles, but it isn't always. In my experience, it is usually easier to get through to the editors who want to include something without the proper sourcing when the article is already in decent shape than during the cleanup stage. TompaDompa ( talk) 22:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sufficient reliable sources to show she meets WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 06:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find sources demonstrating notability. An alternative to deletion is a redirect to List of Lost characters. toweli ( talk) 08:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kota Kinabalu#shopping. where newly identified sourcing can be added to the existing mention. Consensus appears that sourcing isn't sufficient for a standalone. Star Mississippi 14:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Marked for notability concerns 11 months ago. A search for sources only found routine coverage rather than indepth coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 05:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 05:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Manpo Line. Randykitty ( talk) 15:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable railway station with no defining features or relevance. Fails WP:GNG and WP:STATION. Could be merged with Korean State Railway. OsmiumGuard ( talk) 15:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC) \
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of available source material would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 05:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 06:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable, closed distillery with no WP:RS on page, none that I could find, and none are likely to exist. Cabrils ( talk) 21:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion as there is are comments that are clearly an unbolded Keep here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of sources known to be available would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 05:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of United States national rugby union players. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, an American rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. A possible redirect target seems to be List of United States national rugby union players. JTtheOG ( talk) 04:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not sure why but this AFD did attract a bunch of new accounts for unknown reasons. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:Notability, and its also missing the main flight infobox. The whole article is missing so much information and is unorganized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZAviation21 ( talk • contribs) 4 April 2024 at 21:39 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Could have been procedurally kept anyway, since it was a redirect page when it was nominated. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 19:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This is title for village article, whch is not notable as per English wikipedia policies. It was earlier redirected to its district page, which is not meaningful. Arjunaraoc ( talk) 03:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Non notable group. Just end up finding sources of other bands with the same name instead. GamerPro64 03:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 01:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A user posted about this on my talk page, wanting to remove the template. I've attempted to find any sort of coverage in RS, there doesn't appear to be any. Appears PROMO, with no charted singles or anything we'd use for musical notability standards. Oaktree b ( talk) 03:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. JBW ( talk) 21:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The article underwent AfD discussions in July 2023, leading to a "soft delete." However, it was reinstated in December 2023 by the same article creator, confirmed as a sockpuppet. Despite its restoration, the article fails to address the issues that prompted its removal in July 2023, particularly regarding WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Notably, in the Filmography section, nearly all entries list her as uncredited. The one exception where she is credited only features her in a supporting role. Ckfasdf ( talk) 15:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. We have a well presented nomination, and some productive discussion about the possible availability of sources. The other delete argument lacks basis in policy.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions) 02:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; has neither won a medal at an international competition, nor has she won the U.S. national championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; has neither won a medal at an international competition, nor has he won the U.S. national championships at the senior level. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Walgreens. History remains if someone wants to merge sourced material. Star Mississippi 01:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article about a non-notable subject. This is a proprietary software program used internally at a single company. The article currently has no sources, and I can't find any good sources to add; the most I've found is a few brief summaries in company publications and old newspaper articles. It might warrant a mention in the Walgreens article, but it doesn't need its own article. IagoQnsi ( talk) 02:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a possible Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
A run of the mill local "cause" organization with little coverage beyond local area. Coverage in broader area sources are trivial, such as "Sykes had become an “attractive nuisance,” said Mike Splain, executive director of the Ventana Wilderness Alliance."
An article on company/organization needs significant, independent, reliable coverage in multiple sources and at least one of those needs to be a regional or national source. Graywalls ( talk) 02:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 01:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1966 FIFA World Cup squads#North Korea. Star Mississippi 01:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Redirect to 1966 North Korea World Cup Squad - [30]. Simione001 ( talk) 00:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)