The result was keep. Consensus among participants is that this article passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) BeanieFan11 ( talk) 01:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Procedural nomination in lieu of a malformed nomination by User:MercuryOxide, whose original reasoning was "Only has one sentence and 11 sources". I am neutral; further information below. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. A Google search doesn't return much. The creator of the article was only active between late February and early March 2011, and all except two of their edits are on this article, and the rest are also related to the topic, indicating possible COI: [1] Aintabli ( talk) 23:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be a self-promotional article written by an employee of Recompose (just like the Katrina Spade article). Even ignoring the self-promotion, it seems that Recompose fails to meet the notability criteria. Kitzing ( talk) 23:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
said the emissions and odors from NOR are expected to be minimal compared to other operations they review, including cremations, demolitions of asbestos-filled buildings and marijuana cultivation. Recompose’s air permit requires no visible emissions from the facility, adequate filters, no detectable odors and independent review by a third party every three months.)? That segment does not seem secondary to me. Or, perhaps a second source? The BBC coverage mentioned by Sionk (as currently cited in the article) seem to be entirely quotes from Spade and Carpenter-Boggs, so I'm excluding it from my consideration for now. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. A discussion about a possible rename can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Searches find only one secondary, in-depth coverage source (ref #1). Only other sources found are IMDb or primary. Unnotable. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 12:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The review notes: "It might seem a bit weird to watch someone reading a book through the television, but Goodnight Kiwi makes the stories burst into life. Colourful animations make the illustrations move and dance, and the celebrities breathe energy and rhythm into each story. Like any good book, Goodnight Kiwi transports you to another world for a few precious minutes, a sweet reprieve from the real world to appeal to frazzled adults and tired children alike."
The article notes: "... the Goodnight Kiwi is back. Having undergone a bit of a “glow-up”, our animated kiwi and his cat friend are on TVNZ OnDemand in a new series of short bedtime stories. The two icons are joined by some other slightly less famous Kiwis, like Jeremy Wells, Hilary Barry, the Topp Twins, Stacey Morrison and Oscar Kightley, as they read popular bedtime story books, with illustrations that come to life on screen. The first two episodes feature What Now’s Evander Brown reading The Bomb and Madeleine Sami and Jackie van Beek teaming up to read Baa Baa Smart Sheep. The latter duo are especially good at reading a bedtime story. So much so, that if the whole TV and film career ever falls over for them, they’d have a good back-up gig telling stories about smart sheep and quirky turkeys. Having these celebs reading New Zealand picture books is certainly a very cute way of bringing the Goodnight Kiwi back to our screens, but I have a really wild idea: why not bring him back for his original mission — marking the end of the TV transmission for the night?"
The article notes: "Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will read the Christmas Day story in TVNZ's revamped Goodnight Kiwi series. Ardern will read classic New Zealand children's book Hairy Maclary From Donaldson's Dairy by Lynley Dodd. ... TVNZ resurrected the Goodnight Kiwi brand last month, 25 years after Kiwi and his mate Cat last shut off the lights and put out the milk bottle to indicate TV2 was shutting down for the day."
The article notes: "These story sessions are in celebration of TVNZ and The Warehouse bringing back the cultural icon Goodnight Kiwi this week, with famous New Zealand celebrities reading aloud New Zealand bedtime stories. General manager of marketing Anna Lawrence says The Warehouse is thrilled to get behind the cause and help inspire a love of reading among young Kiwis."
The article notes: "Fair to say I just about hit the roof when I heard they were bringing back the Goodnight Kiwi. “TV doesn’t just end like it did back in the olden days,” I spat furiously, “this makes no sense!” Once I calmed down and actually read the press release it did actually make sense — in fact it sounded like a bloody good idea. The Goodnight Kiwi and his wee cat have picked out some classic Kiwi bedtime stories and wrangled some classic Kiwi talent to read them to us, and got some local artists to do animations for them so our eyes don’t get bored."
The article notes: "The iconic Goodnight Kiwi is returning to New Zealand screens next month with a plethora of local celebrities bringing the cultural icon back to life. The famed Kiwi was put to bed for the last time some 25 years ago with the arrival of 24-hour TV. But he will be resurrected with a new TVNZ OnDemand series that will see the animated bird and his cat cuddling up to celebrities who will read popular bedtime story books for young children. Kiwi and Cat's new friends include legendary entertainers the Topp Twins, Seven Sharp's Hilary Barry and Jeremy Wells, The Hits' Stacey Morrison, comedians Madeleine Sami, Jackie Van Beek, Urzila Carlson and Oscar Kightley, actors Dean O'Gorman and Jayden Daniels and What Now presenter Evander Brown."
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Packed with weasel words like 'assisted', 'helped', 'supported' and 'responsible', this biography of a sports promoter/manager and company CEO does not take us past WP:GNG - stood up on hyper-local media and conflation of the company's activities and his own notability. The company fails WP:NCORP and the subject has not been the recipient of any blue-linked award or recognition. Perhaps notable is the Alabama Sports Hall of Fame article naming a number of nationally notable inductees - of which the subject is not one. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 13:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more examination. Does the article have problems that can be improved through editing?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine business news and litigation links. scope_creep Talk 09:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More input on WP:CORP vs. prior AfD discussions please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 16:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis was alluded to but not present in the discussion yet. Right now though, there is no support for Deletion aside from the nomination statement.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Right lets look at these in turn
Of the 17 references, 8 are Non-rs. 4 fails WP:SIRS, 2 are WP:PRIMARY and 1 I can't see. It is a very poor listing of junk refs for this junk company that doesn't deserve an article on Wikipedia. There is simply no coverage to support an article that size. Its all scrap. scope_creep Talk 13:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Sources that primarily discuss purely such [(alleged) illegal] conduct cannot be used to establish an organization's notability under this guideline.but this is not too satisfying if the underlying principle is unclear. Instead, we can take a look at WP:ROUTINE's
... crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine.In a following sentence, it names (and links to) an essay somewhat controversial at AfD (at least by my memory, I could be wrong), WP:MILL. So what makes an event
run-of-the-mill? How can we tell that from the coverage? The question is whether the coverage of the various investigations, indictments, lawsuits and whatever is beyond what one might expect of a typical lawsuit or investigation of an entity (incidentally, for BIO articles, this is often the more correct criterion, better than the frequently misapplied 1E). The answer, is depth. Depth, analysis, the quality of the content for use as a source on Wikipedia, of course, is tied closely to the second question. WP:PRIMARY, again, seems quite rarely applied at AfD, but despite the difficulty, it is important to draw the distinction between fact, opinion and analysis. Neither "like other MLMs, this MLM does MLM things" nor "MLM critics criticise MLMs" are analysis of the subject of the article. The paragraph about startup fees, that part could be independent, but it wouldn't be secondary, because it wouldn't be analysis. There's no context there, it's just the facts. It should be needless to say, but the direct quotes are also not analysis. There is no significant coverage in the CBS article by our notability criteria.
The result was merge to Power Pack#Members. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The article is about a character from a comic book series. None of this article is cited to secondary sources. Searching the internet, I only found passing mentions (ex. Saying this character is in Power Pack, but not anything further than that). I do not believe there is enough to satisfy the WP:GNG. JackFromWisconsin ( talk | contribs) 18:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different Merge targets suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Altaic languages. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:FRINGE approach to a fairly widely rejected theory. Only has a couple of adherents who are publishing a proto-language reconstruction of a language family that itself isn't believed to have enough demonstrate to evidence. Clearly WP:PROFRINGE, lost of weasel-y language and the topic itself fails WP:GNG. Most of the citations are actually about Altaic (itself fairly widely rejected, but which clearly meets notability guidelines), not Proto-Altaic. Warrenmck ( talk) 20:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW (could also be WP:SK3). — David Eppstein ( talk) 01:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Has been an orphan for six years. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 22:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 21:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete - I think it is WP:TOOSOON. She had a children's book published this year " Yenebi's Drive to School" by Chronicle Books, but I don't see a way to bring this up to notable, yet. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No indication has been provided that there is enough source material available to sustain a full article on this subject. The arguments to keep are more saying that it should be notable, and very thin on demonstrating that it in fact is. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
"cited" only to the unitersity's website. search turns up nothing. ltbdl ( talk) 14:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Heidelberg has had a philosophy faculty for centuries (Hegel taught there!)
And it was for a long time the most important faculty in that university.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far the keep argument is more by hope and wishes than by evidence of sources, except one user whose sources have been refuted. Would like a chance to better consider sources before we close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz
Humbug! 21:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 20:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Already tagged with an essay-like and notability issue, I'm pretty sure the accounts of creator RsR110097 and contributor Rassnau952 are both Ricardo Sanin-Restrepo himself, who is mentioned 31 times in the article total and 15 times used as a reference. This looks like a shameless promotion ("TEP has been developed mainly by the Colombian legal and political philosopher Ricardo Sanín-Restrepo"). Even if the topic is notable, WP:TNT'ing without Sanin-Restrepo's input is a better idea. Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fencing at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's épée. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't think there's enough here to establish notability and I haven't succeeded in finding anything from other sources. Hmee2 ( talk) 19:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I can't find evidence for a village called Amaras in Azerbaijan today. It is not registered in Google Maps nor in OpenStreetMap, it appears on Bing Maps (first time I use that thing) but it appears twice in conflicting locations. The village does not have an Armenian Wikipedia page (it's in the Nagorno-Karabakh region), and on Azerbaijani Wikipedia the article deals with a former village. Per Google Scholar [44] I can find no evidence that a place called Amaras currently exists, again it appears that Amaras was a former village. This article's only source gives a 404 error.
I propose to delete this per WP:TNT, the notability of this former village has not been confirmed and everything would need to be rewritten in any case. Confusion has already led to this map in Commons [45] for example to show "Amaras" as a village recaptured by Azerbaijan even though it appears it does not exist today. If it is notable, someone will eventually write an article for it. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 17:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails BLP, GNG and BIO. Only sources are promo pieces for subject opening an ice cream shop. BEFORE showed nothing that meets GNG or BIO. BLP requires high quality sources. // Timothy :: talk 17:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The subject appears to be notable only for founding an obscure organisation (NSHSS); a mystery, because the article is labelled as "Sweden-related", this is a "national" organisation that seems to be untied to any clear nation, except perhaps the USA. The organisation's website protests (I think too much) that it is "not a scam", but see sample complaint: https://www.bbb.org/us/ga/brookhaven/profile/educational-consultant/the-national-society-of-high-school-scholars-0443-12000946/complaints
Also very strange to show a photo with Kento Masuda, an obscure musician, added by an editor with a (deliberately?) difficult name in Georgian script, who has been blocked for paid-for editing. Imaginatorium ( talk) 16:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced and not notable. Particleshow22 ( talk) 01:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This subject lacks coverage beyond passing mentions, thus failing WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 14:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 16:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This article is two sentences of numbers and a list of see also links. What I think could be added is more appropriate for Mining in New Zealand#Coal. — Panamitsu (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 16:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Badly sourced BLP with no indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC #5. The best sources found were Vecher, which mentions her twice in a match report, Kaz Football, which is just a squad listing, and Sports Arena, another squad list. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This was deleted as part of the bundle Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Air Nippon destinations with a very detailed rationale from User:FOARP linking to the the 2018 RFC on lists of airline destinations, which clearly confirms that we should not be hosting these lists on Wikipedia anywhere. This article was swiftly recreated following the previous AfD and I am not seeing how this new version addresses any of the concerns raised by FOARP.
There is no evidence that the destinations that FlyArystan fly to are covered significantly in reliable sources independent of the company. I would politely ask people to read the above RfC and AfD to understand the context of this nomination before !voting. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
"FlyArystan, Central Asia's largest LCC, is dedicated to providing budget-friendly travel opportunities in the region. The new route to China is a testament to the airline's expansion policy, catering to the demand for low-fare travel. Offering a base fare of 18,000 tenge, passengers can customize their travel experience based on their preferences. FlyArystan encourages travelers to seize this opportunity and immerse themselves in the vibrant atmosphere of Urumqi.
The result was speedy keep. Procedural Keep, nomination by sockpuppet, no support for Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
See the AFD for Leander Kills, the successor of this band. Only notable for reality show participation. Pottyantós WC ( talk) 09:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of islands of the Philippines#Romblon. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Article has been challenged for references since 2014. No reliable non-wiki mirror hits in Google, GNews and GNews Archives. Alternatively, retarget to List_of_islands_of_the_Philippines#Romblon -- Lenticel ( talk) 07:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
There's no sign that this small group meets WP:GNG, even if the article repeatedly tells us that "it is worth noting...". Cordless Larry ( talk) 07:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. and rename List of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine characters. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This is an odball, considering the contents of Category:Lists of Star Trek characters. Many Star Trek shows have lists of characters (on top of List of Star Trek characters, as well as the longer alphabetical List of Star Trek characters (A–F)). Only two ST shows have 'recurring' lists - DS9 (here) and List of recurring characters in Star Trek: Enterprise. I am unsure whether we want to rename this by removing 'recurring', or just redirect it to the List of ST characters? I'll note that many entries in Category:Star Trek: Deep Space Nine characters are unconsistently redirected either here or the alphabetical "all-ST" lists. Some cleanup is clearly needed here, and I think we can first discuss what to do with those two oddball "recurring" lists? My preferred suggestion would be to keep them, and rename them by removing recurring, but I am open to other ideas? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing a bunch of unreliable sources there are only four left and the four that are left I'm still iffy about. I'm only on the fence with them because another editor found an editorial staff member on LinkedIn. The sources left mostly detail product releases and that is it. They do not provide in depth coverage of the product in and of itself. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPath talk 06:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need a Redirect to a target ARTICLE not a target Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Book apparently published by the place it's promoting, thus, WP:SELFPUB. Fails WP:BK. Indic-lang original from let's just say someone who publishes a lot. Book title to get Ghits: no connection with Stewart Brand or Steve Jobs, the latter being who most know the quote from. Domain for one ref has its own WP:WPSPAM linkreport. CSD reverted. Anyone feeling up to it might wanna review the linked articles too (which are the only mainspace links to article).
Seems like the title maybe should redir to Whole Earth Catalog but not sure. Can be discussed. -- 47.155.41.104 ( talk) 03:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG as there is no qualifying RS covering this organization per a WP:BEFORE (also noting that there's been a notability tag on the article for 11 years). Much of the content is self-published or copied from the organization's better-known magazine Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Longhornsg ( talk) 05:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of rampage killers. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete or merge into List of rampage killers. Fails WP:NLIST, as there is not RS coverage of the items on the list being covered as a group, and this is just a WP:OR list of items. Longhornsg ( talk) 05:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Mohammad Hossein Bagherifard
Probable autobiography of Iranian filmmaker. The subject made a film, Uncle Saeed, which may or may not be notable, but currently exists as Draft:Uncle Saeed. The subject also states that they have made two more films, without verification. The article has been reference-bombed with links to web pages that have passing mentions of the film, and sometimes the filmmaker.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | http://www.entekhab.ir/ | Web site times out | ? | No | No | ? |
2 | cinemaorg.ir | A report by the Iranian film censorship agency,stating that Uncle Saeed was approved | Yes | No - Entries of the film and the filmmaker in a list | Yes | No |
3 | hashure.com | A blurb about the film | No. The blurb comes from the filmmaker. | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
4 | rottentomatoes.com | A short description of Uncle Saeed. Says that there are no reviews. | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
5 | filmfreeway.com | A blurb about the film. The same blurb as is used in 3. | No | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
6 | fftgawards.com | A list of films including Uncle Saeed | Probably | No, passing mention of film, and not of filmmaker | Probably | No |
7 | edukino.pl | A list of films qualifying for a Polish festival including Uncle Saeed | Yes | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
8 | festival-meihodo.com | A list of films in another festival | Yes | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
9 | halamostanad.ir | A list of Iranian films entered in a Japanese film festival | Yes | No, passing mention of film, and of filmmaker | Probably | No |
10 | mehrnews.com | Mention of an award received by Uncle Saeed. No information as to prestigiousness of award | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
11 | accoladecompetition.org | Mention of an award received by Uncle Saeed. No information as to prestigiousness of award | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
12 | teater.ir | Another list of awards with no information as to prestigiousness of award. | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
13 | njfilmawards.com | Mention of their award to Uncle Saeed in January 2023. No information as to prestige of award. | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
None of the references are significant. Some of them refer to awards received by the film, which apparently is entered in festivals of unknown prestige and sometimes have received awards of unknown prestige, and we know that the film industry has many vanity awards. The film may be notable, but the drafts have been declined, and further work may be required to establish notability. Even if the film were notable, the references are all passing mentions, with no significant coverage. If the film draft is accepted, a redirect from the filmmaker to the film may be in order, but we don't make redirects from article space to draft space, and the BLP needs deleting. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I think this article should be deleted, and a respective entry in Wiktionary created instead.
If it is too much to delete the article, remove all but the first paragraph and the External Links
Rick Jelliffe (
talk) 15:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In response, while there may be valid concerns about the Wikipedia article on " Christianese," outright deletion should be considered carefully. It may be more constructive to work on improving the article by addressing the issues raised, providing proper citations, and ensuring that it adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability and neutrality. Deleting the article should be a last resort if these efforts prove unsuccessful.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️) 04:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I think an article that has been around this long needs more discussion. I also don't think
User:TheChunky's concerns have been addressed. Is deletion or a cross-wiki redirect the best solution to what might be a content problem? Even the nominator makes the suggestion that part of this article might be preserved. But the important thing is that I don't currently see a consensus for any specific outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nike football boots. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 4 out of 5 references being unreliable. Footy-Boots.com, where 2 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public. The Instep, where one of the reference is from, is a blog. Unisportstore.com, where one of the reference is from lists the author as "anonymous" and is also a site which sells the products its reviewing which is a slight conflict of interest. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPath talk 02:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, please select an existing target article to Redirect to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Routine coverage, not sufficient to establish notability. Doesn't pass WP:CORP. Four of the references are from the company's own webpage and one is from Kickstarter. The only real source is BI. Uhooep ( talk) 13:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analysis of the proposed source material would be quite helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 08:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not pass WP:GNG due to a seeming lack of secondary sources. Let'srun ( talk) 01:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Multiplicity (subculture). Liz Read! Talk! 03:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Original redirecter @ ජපස: says: " WP:RGW alternate page to the psychologically accepted definition. This argument is not accepted as a real one. If it is, please identify better sources than the ones that were included and said basically nothing about "multiplicity" as being differentiated from dissociative identities"
Note: I as proposer take no stance on this yet, but am bringing to AfD to get perspective on keep, redirect, or delete. lizthegrey ( talk) 01:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Subject seemingly does not meet WP:GNG due to a lack of secondary references present either in the article or via a WP:BEFORE check. Open to redirecting this but not sure what makes sense as a target. Let'srun ( talk) 01:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nike football boots. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 5 out of 6 references being unreliable. Soccer Cleats, where one citation is from is a blog. Footy-Boots.com, where 4 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public. The final reference literally details the history of the brand and equipment through Nike adverts. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPath talk 02:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as a former beauty pageant winner. Let'srun ( talk) 02:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete The Virgin Island newspaper source used is fine, but that's all I can find about this individual. Nothing else we can use to source the article, not meeting BLP. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unneeded because only one entry listed in the dab page, when the Chinese-based group is the primary. RMXY ( talk) 00:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus among participants is that this article passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) BeanieFan11 ( talk) 01:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Procedural nomination in lieu of a malformed nomination by User:MercuryOxide, whose original reasoning was "Only has one sentence and 11 sources". I am neutral; further information below. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. A Google search doesn't return much. The creator of the article was only active between late February and early March 2011, and all except two of their edits are on this article, and the rest are also related to the topic, indicating possible COI: [1] Aintabli ( talk) 23:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be a self-promotional article written by an employee of Recompose (just like the Katrina Spade article). Even ignoring the self-promotion, it seems that Recompose fails to meet the notability criteria. Kitzing ( talk) 23:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
said the emissions and odors from NOR are expected to be minimal compared to other operations they review, including cremations, demolitions of asbestos-filled buildings and marijuana cultivation. Recompose’s air permit requires no visible emissions from the facility, adequate filters, no detectable odors and independent review by a third party every three months.)? That segment does not seem secondary to me. Or, perhaps a second source? The BBC coverage mentioned by Sionk (as currently cited in the article) seem to be entirely quotes from Spade and Carpenter-Boggs, so I'm excluding it from my consideration for now. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 11:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. A discussion about a possible rename can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Searches find only one secondary, in-depth coverage source (ref #1). Only other sources found are IMDb or primary. Unnotable. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 12:29, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The review notes: "It might seem a bit weird to watch someone reading a book through the television, but Goodnight Kiwi makes the stories burst into life. Colourful animations make the illustrations move and dance, and the celebrities breathe energy and rhythm into each story. Like any good book, Goodnight Kiwi transports you to another world for a few precious minutes, a sweet reprieve from the real world to appeal to frazzled adults and tired children alike."
The article notes: "... the Goodnight Kiwi is back. Having undergone a bit of a “glow-up”, our animated kiwi and his cat friend are on TVNZ OnDemand in a new series of short bedtime stories. The two icons are joined by some other slightly less famous Kiwis, like Jeremy Wells, Hilary Barry, the Topp Twins, Stacey Morrison and Oscar Kightley, as they read popular bedtime story books, with illustrations that come to life on screen. The first two episodes feature What Now’s Evander Brown reading The Bomb and Madeleine Sami and Jackie van Beek teaming up to read Baa Baa Smart Sheep. The latter duo are especially good at reading a bedtime story. So much so, that if the whole TV and film career ever falls over for them, they’d have a good back-up gig telling stories about smart sheep and quirky turkeys. Having these celebs reading New Zealand picture books is certainly a very cute way of bringing the Goodnight Kiwi back to our screens, but I have a really wild idea: why not bring him back for his original mission — marking the end of the TV transmission for the night?"
The article notes: "Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will read the Christmas Day story in TVNZ's revamped Goodnight Kiwi series. Ardern will read classic New Zealand children's book Hairy Maclary From Donaldson's Dairy by Lynley Dodd. ... TVNZ resurrected the Goodnight Kiwi brand last month, 25 years after Kiwi and his mate Cat last shut off the lights and put out the milk bottle to indicate TV2 was shutting down for the day."
The article notes: "These story sessions are in celebration of TVNZ and The Warehouse bringing back the cultural icon Goodnight Kiwi this week, with famous New Zealand celebrities reading aloud New Zealand bedtime stories. General manager of marketing Anna Lawrence says The Warehouse is thrilled to get behind the cause and help inspire a love of reading among young Kiwis."
The article notes: "Fair to say I just about hit the roof when I heard they were bringing back the Goodnight Kiwi. “TV doesn’t just end like it did back in the olden days,” I spat furiously, “this makes no sense!” Once I calmed down and actually read the press release it did actually make sense — in fact it sounded like a bloody good idea. The Goodnight Kiwi and his wee cat have picked out some classic Kiwi bedtime stories and wrangled some classic Kiwi talent to read them to us, and got some local artists to do animations for them so our eyes don’t get bored."
The article notes: "The iconic Goodnight Kiwi is returning to New Zealand screens next month with a plethora of local celebrities bringing the cultural icon back to life. The famed Kiwi was put to bed for the last time some 25 years ago with the arrival of 24-hour TV. But he will be resurrected with a new TVNZ OnDemand series that will see the animated bird and his cat cuddling up to celebrities who will read popular bedtime story books for young children. Kiwi and Cat's new friends include legendary entertainers the Topp Twins, Seven Sharp's Hilary Barry and Jeremy Wells, The Hits' Stacey Morrison, comedians Madeleine Sami, Jackie Van Beek, Urzila Carlson and Oscar Kightley, actors Dean O'Gorman and Jayden Daniels and What Now presenter Evander Brown."
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Packed with weasel words like 'assisted', 'helped', 'supported' and 'responsible', this biography of a sports promoter/manager and company CEO does not take us past WP:GNG - stood up on hyper-local media and conflation of the company's activities and his own notability. The company fails WP:NCORP and the subject has not been the recipient of any blue-linked award or recognition. Perhaps notable is the Alabama Sports Hall of Fame article naming a number of nationally notable inductees - of which the subject is not one. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 13:54, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for more examination. Does the article have problems that can be improved through editing?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine business news and litigation links. scope_creep Talk 09:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More input on WP:CORP vs. prior AfD discussions please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 16:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis was alluded to but not present in the discussion yet. Right now though, there is no support for Deletion aside from the nomination statement.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Right lets look at these in turn
Of the 17 references, 8 are Non-rs. 4 fails WP:SIRS, 2 are WP:PRIMARY and 1 I can't see. It is a very poor listing of junk refs for this junk company that doesn't deserve an article on Wikipedia. There is simply no coverage to support an article that size. Its all scrap. scope_creep Talk 13:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Sources that primarily discuss purely such [(alleged) illegal] conduct cannot be used to establish an organization's notability under this guideline.but this is not too satisfying if the underlying principle is unclear. Instead, we can take a look at WP:ROUTINE's
... crime logs, and other items that tend to get an exemption from newsworthiness discussions should be considered routine.In a following sentence, it names (and links to) an essay somewhat controversial at AfD (at least by my memory, I could be wrong), WP:MILL. So what makes an event
run-of-the-mill? How can we tell that from the coverage? The question is whether the coverage of the various investigations, indictments, lawsuits and whatever is beyond what one might expect of a typical lawsuit or investigation of an entity (incidentally, for BIO articles, this is often the more correct criterion, better than the frequently misapplied 1E). The answer, is depth. Depth, analysis, the quality of the content for use as a source on Wikipedia, of course, is tied closely to the second question. WP:PRIMARY, again, seems quite rarely applied at AfD, but despite the difficulty, it is important to draw the distinction between fact, opinion and analysis. Neither "like other MLMs, this MLM does MLM things" nor "MLM critics criticise MLMs" are analysis of the subject of the article. The paragraph about startup fees, that part could be independent, but it wouldn't be secondary, because it wouldn't be analysis. There's no context there, it's just the facts. It should be needless to say, but the direct quotes are also not analysis. There is no significant coverage in the CBS article by our notability criteria.
The result was merge to Power Pack#Members. Liz Read! Talk! 23:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The article is about a character from a comic book series. None of this article is cited to secondary sources. Searching the internet, I only found passing mentions (ex. Saying this character is in Power Pack, but not anything further than that). I do not believe there is enough to satisfy the WP:GNG. JackFromWisconsin ( talk | contribs) 18:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different Merge targets suggested.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Altaic languages. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
WP:FRINGE approach to a fairly widely rejected theory. Only has a couple of adherents who are publishing a proto-language reconstruction of a language family that itself isn't believed to have enough demonstrate to evidence. Clearly WP:PROFRINGE, lost of weasel-y language and the topic itself fails WP:GNG. Most of the citations are actually about Altaic (itself fairly widely rejected, but which clearly meets notability guidelines), not Proto-Altaic. Warrenmck ( talk) 20:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW (could also be WP:SK3). — David Eppstein ( talk) 01:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Has been an orphan for six years. Ktkvtsh ( talk) 22:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Edwardx ( talk) 21:53, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete - I think it is WP:TOOSOON. She had a children's book published this year " Yenebi's Drive to School" by Chronicle Books, but I don't see a way to bring this up to notable, yet. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No indication has been provided that there is enough source material available to sustain a full article on this subject. The arguments to keep are more saying that it should be notable, and very thin on demonstrating that it in fact is. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
"cited" only to the unitersity's website. search turns up nothing. ltbdl ( talk) 14:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Heidelberg has had a philosophy faculty for centuries (Hegel taught there!)
And it was for a long time the most important faculty in that university.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:37, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far the keep argument is more by hope and wishes than by evidence of sources, except one user whose sources have been refuted. Would like a chance to better consider sources before we close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz
Humbug! 21:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 20:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Already tagged with an essay-like and notability issue, I'm pretty sure the accounts of creator RsR110097 and contributor Rassnau952 are both Ricardo Sanin-Restrepo himself, who is mentioned 31 times in the article total and 15 times used as a reference. This looks like a shameless promotion ("TEP has been developed mainly by the Colombian legal and political philosopher Ricardo Sanín-Restrepo"). Even if the topic is notable, WP:TNT'ing without Sanin-Restrepo's input is a better idea. Wikipedia is not a WP:SOAPBOX. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fencing at the 2000 Summer Olympics – Women's épée. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't think there's enough here to establish notability and I haven't succeeded in finding anything from other sources. Hmee2 ( talk) 19:50, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:38, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I can't find evidence for a village called Amaras in Azerbaijan today. It is not registered in Google Maps nor in OpenStreetMap, it appears on Bing Maps (first time I use that thing) but it appears twice in conflicting locations. The village does not have an Armenian Wikipedia page (it's in the Nagorno-Karabakh region), and on Azerbaijani Wikipedia the article deals with a former village. Per Google Scholar [44] I can find no evidence that a place called Amaras currently exists, again it appears that Amaras was a former village. This article's only source gives a 404 error.
I propose to delete this per WP:TNT, the notability of this former village has not been confirmed and everything would need to be rewritten in any case. Confusion has already led to this map in Commons [45] for example to show "Amaras" as a village recaptured by Azerbaijan even though it appears it does not exist today. If it is notable, someone will eventually write an article for it. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 17:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 17:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails BLP, GNG and BIO. Only sources are promo pieces for subject opening an ice cream shop. BEFORE showed nothing that meets GNG or BIO. BLP requires high quality sources. // Timothy :: talk 17:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
The subject appears to be notable only for founding an obscure organisation (NSHSS); a mystery, because the article is labelled as "Sweden-related", this is a "national" organisation that seems to be untied to any clear nation, except perhaps the USA. The organisation's website protests (I think too much) that it is "not a scam", but see sample complaint: https://www.bbb.org/us/ga/brookhaven/profile/educational-consultant/the-national-society-of-high-school-scholars-0443-12000946/complaints
Also very strange to show a photo with Kento Masuda, an obscure musician, added by an editor with a (deliberately?) difficult name in Georgian script, who has been blocked for paid-for editing. Imaginatorium ( talk) 16:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced and not notable. Particleshow22 ( talk) 01:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This subject lacks coverage beyond passing mentions, thus failing WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 14:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 16:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This article is two sentences of numbers and a list of see also links. What I think could be added is more appropriate for Mining in New Zealand#Coal. — Panamitsu (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 16:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Badly sourced BLP with no indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC #5. The best sources found were Vecher, which mentions her twice in a match report, Kaz Football, which is just a squad listing, and Sports Arena, another squad list. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This was deleted as part of the bundle Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Air Nippon destinations with a very detailed rationale from User:FOARP linking to the the 2018 RFC on lists of airline destinations, which clearly confirms that we should not be hosting these lists on Wikipedia anywhere. This article was swiftly recreated following the previous AfD and I am not seeing how this new version addresses any of the concerns raised by FOARP.
There is no evidence that the destinations that FlyArystan fly to are covered significantly in reliable sources independent of the company. I would politely ask people to read the above RfC and AfD to understand the context of this nomination before !voting. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
"FlyArystan, Central Asia's largest LCC, is dedicated to providing budget-friendly travel opportunities in the region. The new route to China is a testament to the airline's expansion policy, catering to the demand for low-fare travel. Offering a base fare of 18,000 tenge, passengers can customize their travel experience based on their preferences. FlyArystan encourages travelers to seize this opportunity and immerse themselves in the vibrant atmosphere of Urumqi.
The result was speedy keep. Procedural Keep, nomination by sockpuppet, no support for Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
See the AFD for Leander Kills, the successor of this band. Only notable for reality show participation. Pottyantós WC ( talk) 09:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of islands of the Philippines#Romblon. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Article has been challenged for references since 2014. No reliable non-wiki mirror hits in Google, GNews and GNews Archives. Alternatively, retarget to List_of_islands_of_the_Philippines#Romblon -- Lenticel ( talk) 07:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
There's no sign that this small group meets WP:GNG, even if the article repeatedly tells us that "it is worth noting...". Cordless Larry ( talk) 07:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. and rename List of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine characters. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
This is an odball, considering the contents of Category:Lists of Star Trek characters. Many Star Trek shows have lists of characters (on top of List of Star Trek characters, as well as the longer alphabetical List of Star Trek characters (A–F)). Only two ST shows have 'recurring' lists - DS9 (here) and List of recurring characters in Star Trek: Enterprise. I am unsure whether we want to rename this by removing 'recurring', or just redirect it to the List of ST characters? I'll note that many entries in Category:Star Trek: Deep Space Nine characters are unconsistently redirected either here or the alphabetical "all-ST" lists. Some cleanup is clearly needed here, and I think we can first discuss what to do with those two oddball "recurring" lists? My preferred suggestion would be to keep them, and rename them by removing recurring, but I am open to other ideas? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG. After removing a bunch of unreliable sources there are only four left and the four that are left I'm still iffy about. I'm only on the fence with them because another editor found an editorial staff member on LinkedIn. The sources left mostly detail product releases and that is it. They do not provide in depth coverage of the product in and of itself. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPath talk 06:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, we need a Redirect to a target ARTICLE not a target Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Book apparently published by the place it's promoting, thus, WP:SELFPUB. Fails WP:BK. Indic-lang original from let's just say someone who publishes a lot. Book title to get Ghits: no connection with Stewart Brand or Steve Jobs, the latter being who most know the quote from. Domain for one ref has its own WP:WPSPAM linkreport. CSD reverted. Anyone feeling up to it might wanna review the linked articles too (which are the only mainspace links to article).
Seems like the title maybe should redir to Whole Earth Catalog but not sure. Can be discussed. -- 47.155.41.104 ( talk) 03:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Liz Read! Talk! 06:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG as there is no qualifying RS covering this organization per a WP:BEFORE (also noting that there's been a notability tag on the article for 11 years). Much of the content is self-published or copied from the organization's better-known magazine Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Longhornsg ( talk) 05:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of rampage killers. Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete or merge into List of rampage killers. Fails WP:NLIST, as there is not RS coverage of the items on the list being covered as a group, and this is just a WP:OR list of items. Longhornsg ( talk) 05:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Mohammad Hossein Bagherifard
Probable autobiography of Iranian filmmaker. The subject made a film, Uncle Saeed, which may or may not be notable, but currently exists as Draft:Uncle Saeed. The subject also states that they have made two more films, without verification. The article has been reference-bombed with links to web pages that have passing mentions of the film, and sometimes the filmmaker.
Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | http://www.entekhab.ir/ | Web site times out | ? | No | No | ? |
2 | cinemaorg.ir | A report by the Iranian film censorship agency,stating that Uncle Saeed was approved | Yes | No - Entries of the film and the filmmaker in a list | Yes | No |
3 | hashure.com | A blurb about the film | No. The blurb comes from the filmmaker. | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
4 | rottentomatoes.com | A short description of Uncle Saeed. Says that there are no reviews. | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
5 | filmfreeway.com | A blurb about the film. The same blurb as is used in 3. | No | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
6 | fftgawards.com | A list of films including Uncle Saeed | Probably | No, passing mention of film, and not of filmmaker | Probably | No |
7 | edukino.pl | A list of films qualifying for a Polish festival including Uncle Saeed | Yes | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
8 | festival-meihodo.com | A list of films in another festival | Yes | No, passing mention | Probably | No |
9 | halamostanad.ir | A list of Iranian films entered in a Japanese film festival | Yes | No, passing mention of film, and of filmmaker | Probably | No |
10 | mehrnews.com | Mention of an award received by Uncle Saeed. No information as to prestigiousness of award | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
11 | accoladecompetition.org | Mention of an award received by Uncle Saeed. No information as to prestigiousness of award | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
12 | teater.ir | Another list of awards with no information as to prestigiousness of award. | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
13 | njfilmawards.com | Mention of their award to Uncle Saeed in January 2023. No information as to prestige of award. | Yes | No, another passing mention | Probably | No |
None of the references are significant. Some of them refer to awards received by the film, which apparently is entered in festivals of unknown prestige and sometimes have received awards of unknown prestige, and we know that the film industry has many vanity awards. The film may be notable, but the drafts have been declined, and further work may be required to establish notability. Even if the film were notable, the references are all passing mentions, with no significant coverage. If the film draft is accepted, a redirect from the filmmaker to the film may be in order, but we don't make redirects from article space to draft space, and the BLP needs deleting. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:29, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 03:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I think this article should be deleted, and a respective entry in Wiktionary created instead.
If it is too much to delete the article, remove all but the first paragraph and the External Links
Rick Jelliffe (
talk) 15:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
In response, while there may be valid concerns about the Wikipedia article on " Christianese," outright deletion should be considered carefully. It may be more constructive to work on improving the article by addressing the issues raised, providing proper citations, and ensuring that it adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability and neutrality. Deleting the article should be a last resort if these efforts prove unsuccessful.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️) 04:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I think an article that has been around this long needs more discussion. I also don't think
User:TheChunky's concerns have been addressed. Is deletion or a cross-wiki redirect the best solution to what might be a content problem? Even the nominator makes the suggestion that part of this article might be preserved. But the important thing is that I don't currently see a consensus for any specific outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nike football boots. Liz Read! Talk! 03:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 4 out of 5 references being unreliable. Footy-Boots.com, where 2 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public. The Instep, where one of the reference is from, is a blog. Unisportstore.com, where one of the reference is from lists the author as "anonymous" and is also a site which sells the products its reviewing which is a slight conflict of interest. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPath talk 02:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, please select an existing target article to Redirect to.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Routine coverage, not sufficient to establish notability. Doesn't pass WP:CORP. Four of the references are from the company's own webpage and one is from Kickstarter. The only real source is BI. Uhooep ( talk) 13:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analysis of the proposed source material would be quite helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me 08:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 01:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 03:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not pass WP:GNG due to a seeming lack of secondary sources. Let'srun ( talk) 01:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Multiplicity (subculture). Liz Read! Talk! 03:46, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Original redirecter @ ජපස: says: " WP:RGW alternate page to the psychologically accepted definition. This argument is not accepted as a real one. If it is, please identify better sources than the ones that were included and said basically nothing about "multiplicity" as being differentiated from dissociative identities"
Note: I as proposer take no stance on this yet, but am bringing to AfD to get perspective on keep, redirect, or delete. lizthegrey ( talk) 01:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to XM Satellite Radio channel history#Channel mergers. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Subject seemingly does not meet WP:GNG due to a lack of secondary references present either in the article or via a WP:BEFORE check. Open to redirecting this but not sure what makes sense as a target. Let'srun ( talk) 01:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nike football boots. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
1) Per WP:NOTADVERT this at the very least needs WP:TNT 2) Fails WP:GNG with 5 out of 6 references being unreliable. Soccer Cleats, where one citation is from is a blog. Footy-Boots.com, where 4 citations are from does not list any editorial staff or policies and takes unpaid contributions from members of the public. The final reference literally details the history of the brand and equipment through Nike adverts. A google search does not uncover any additional WP:RS. Pure garbage. TarnishedPath talk 02:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG as a former beauty pageant winner. Let'srun ( talk) 02:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete The Virgin Island newspaper source used is fine, but that's all I can find about this individual. Nothing else we can use to source the article, not meeting BLP. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Unneeded because only one entry listed in the dab page, when the Chinese-based group is the primary. RMXY ( talk) 00:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)