The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LizRead!Talk! 16:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing found but passing mentions, no SIGCOV.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete I've never heard of it. And that's a bad sign. Even for a bottom-of-the-barrel diginet, this is obscurity incarnate.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 07:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per everyone else. This network was so low-profile, even for a low-profile network, that I'm not sure redirecting to
Get After It Media (one of the network's partners) would be worthwhile despite a mention there. (That its other partner, a cutlery manufacturer that is probably the "Frost" part of the network, does not appear to warrant an article is another potential strike, but
in and of itself means nothing.) National distribution (albeit on very minor stations) does not always lead to
significant coverage. WCQuidditch☎✎ 23:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LizRead!Talk! 16:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Nothing found but passing mentions, no SIGCOV.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete I've never heard of it. And that's a bad sign. Even for a bottom-of-the-barrel diginet, this is obscurity incarnate.
Sammi Brie (she/her •
t •
c) 07:34, 24 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per everyone else. This network was so low-profile, even for a low-profile network, that I'm not sure redirecting to
Get After It Media (one of the network's partners) would be worthwhile despite a mention there. (That its other partner, a cutlery manufacturer that is probably the "Frost" part of the network, does not appear to warrant an article is another potential strike, but
in and of itself means nothing.) National distribution (albeit on very minor stations) does not always lead to
significant coverage. WCQuidditch☎✎ 23:49, 24 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.