![]() |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The arguments against this page had been listed in June 2022 at Talk:John D. MacDonald#Merger Proposal. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
relatively innocuous practical jokes such as completely undressing women" (??!) — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Another non-notable LPTV. Just two sentences in the whole article. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 23:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Sources are mostly press releases, most likely doesn’t meet WP:NCORP. It reads like an advert as well. Seawolf35 T-- C 23:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Subject fails WP:JUDGE and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. The Wordsmith Talk to me 03:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete per WP:USCJN - [Magistrate judges] are.. "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider; very little sourcing for a biographical article Snickers2686 ( talk) 21:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion, see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandor Vadas.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIRS, has not received significant coverage from reliable sources DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Senegalese women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1 and 2. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me
23:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. References are either about the company, mentions, or otherwise unreliable (note - WP:NEWSORGINDIA). CNMall41 ( talk) 23:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Obscure map publisher, fails WP:SIRS and only cites company's website DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete agree with nomination. This is an insignificant company that lacks any notability. Lack potential for an article. Paul H. ( talk) 00:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow discussion of recently-provided sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me
22:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If someone wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or go to WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. References are of an announcement for the film (about five days ago) so this is likely WP:TOOSOON. I would redirect to Yash but the notability tag was removed so I am assuming the redirect would be objected to as well so letting users decide at AfD. CNMall41 ( talk) 22:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Footballer with very minor professional career and no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC has been provided. Even prior to WP:NSPORTS2022, this would have been a deletion candidate as he only played 10 minutes at professional level and has no apparent significant coverage. The best Indonesian source that I could find was Indosport, which was a squad list mention. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Tap and flap consonants. Daniel ( talk) 00:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
The only source listed that attests to the presence of this sound in a language says they're not sure if it's velar or palatal. And it's a conference paper from 2022. In addition to lacking significant coverage, WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:NOTLEAD may apply here. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voiced velar tap (2nd nomination). Nardog ( talk) 21:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, an Armenian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. I was barely even able to find mentions of the subject. Not to be confused with the politician of the same name. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Malian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I was barely even able to find mentions of the subject ( 1). JTtheOG ( talk) 21:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 21:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
A small company that previously owned a single radio station in the UK. I'm not even sure what this article is trying to say - the "2011 changes" section seems to be very obscure insider stuff. I'm not seeing anything here to prove notability, and nothing is coming up on a search except for links back to this article and an unrelated internet radio station with the same name. Flip Format ( talk) 20:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Subject fails WP:JUDGE and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. What coverage does exist is almost entirely passing mentions in articles about cases that she's served on. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete per WP:USCJN - [Magistrate judges] are.. "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider Snickers2686 ( talk) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
19:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 00:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:DICDEF. The mishmash collection of sources are about online harrassment in general, and at best mentions dogpiling in passing, failing WP:PASSING. Above all, it is not clear how dogpiling on the Internet is a distinct concept from when dogpiling occurs as a part of harrassment in a more enclosed group; a school setting, a workplace etc. (other than in scale, of course). Surely, dogpiling has existed in all social settings throughout history where you have a leader and others who latch on (examples from Greek Antiquity: ostracism, demagogue etc.).
The page even has an image, a staged picture showing a single derogatory message. A single message doesn't constitute dogpiling, and it only serves to highlight how confused this entry is. Geschichte ( talk) 13:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
13:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Examples of online abuse include flaming, doxing (online release of personal information without consent), impersonation, and public shaming.( Dogpiling (Internet)) and
Online shaming is a form of public shaming in which internet users are harassed, mocked, or bullied by other internet users online.( Online shaming) make scopes of these two article nearly indistinguishable.
The result was redirect all to their respective United States-X articles. If anyone wishes to merge any content, they can from the history behind the redirect, but I note AirshipJungleman29's comment which believes there isn't much (if anything) to merge. Daniel ( talk) 00:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
As the articles say nothing about the embassies, and as articles already exist covering bilateral relations, these should be deleted. Biruitorul Talk 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was redirect to The Simpsons (franchise)#Board and card games. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Couldn't find any web sources besides Simpsons or game fansites, couldn't find any books that had more than a mention. QuietCicada - Talk 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Pointless article. The only bit that’s actually about the embassy, about the new building, is already mentioned at Ivory Coast–United States relations. The rest duplicates that article. Biruitorul Talk 20:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 19:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, as these examples often can only be sourced from primary publisher announcements or secondary sources just repeating the announcements without any further reporting. This article included "This knowledge is important when buying used / old games and emphasizes the dependency on online services the publisher provides." in the body from its fifth edit until I removed it just now, indicating a WP:USEFUL-type (<- essay) misunderstanding of notability. Also, "restricted online functionality" can mean anything from "the leaderboards don't work" to "the game is completely gone". QuietCicada - Talk 19:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
complete blackhat SEO nonsense and otherwise non RS - this is a spam campaign, straight up, trying to fabricate notability. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep (weakly). Daniel ( talk) 00:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
At present, the article doesn't indicate that Kobla Ladzekpo meets NBIO, [WP:NMUSIC
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
19:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Characters of the Metal Gear series. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
In its current state, the article does not demonstrate the notability of Otacon, with a reception section made up entirely of lists that mean nothing, some of which could be considered questionable for inclusion such as "greatest Jewish characters in video games". My WP:BEFORE searches on WP:VG/SE, Google Books, and Google Scholar didn't seem to demonstrate anything that wasn't either plot summaries on analysis' on the themes of Metal Gear Solid 2. Would love to be proven wrong here, but Otacon unfortunately does not seem to be a character with standalone notability. Negative MP1 18:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure) Davest3r08 >:) ( talk) 15:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
No sustained notability, merge with NeoGAF IgelRM ( talk) 18:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Reliable Sources Have been Found (non-admin closure) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 15:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-Notable School, only one reference which is the schools own website, cited for expansion since 2019. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 16:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please remember !voting in this Discussion has been put on Hold as we are Waiting for Input from
ja:Wikipedia:Chatsubo, you are welcome to list any sources(preferably in Japanese) with significant coverage that seem reliable. And we will Verify with ja:Wikipedia:Chatsubo.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (
talk)
17:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Neutron imaging. Daniel ( talk) 00:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the subject does not pass WP:NACADEMIC or WP:BASIC in any way. There have been a small number of reviews of his work, yes, but the individual himself doesn't seem to be particularly notable, significantly covered, or have made a great impact in his discipline of Holocaust studies.
This was originally proposed for deletion but an editor removed that tag under WP:AUTHOR, but I don't see how Fischel would pass there either - WP:AUTHOR is for authors who have been influential or made an impact in some way, but he hasn't made an impact as an author either as far as I can tell. Jaguarnik ( talk) 17:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 00:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NRIVALRY due to a lack of independent, significant coverage. The only WP:SIGCOV source (#2) is from a Lubbock based outlet, which is WP:LOCAL. Per WP:NOPAGE, this can be covered at the articles for the respective teams. Let'srun ( talk) 16:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to United States-Country relations articles. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
These articles say nothing about their purported topic — the embassies of the United States in various African capitals — and as such should be deleted, per ample recent precedent. Biruitorul Talk 16:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 16:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable book. JJLiu112 ( talk) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) TheBritinator ( talk) 00:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable, poorly sourced pioneer from Tampa Florida with no information other than being dedicated to in a Congregational Church. Not to mention the article is orphaned, so there's no reason for this to exist. TheBritinator ( talk) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of sustained coverage. Some coverage exists for a controversy involving Raúl Ibañez but that is WP:BIO1E at best. Let'srun ( talk) 15:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of acquisitions by Oracle and extended confirmed-protected. Daniel ( talk) 23:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Company lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. articles about what staff members have done independently are not coverage about this business. Like the last spam that was deleted the same year this was recreated by a new SPA this is just spam. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 04:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be particularly notable. I doubt that anyone would even come to here if it was for him sharing the name of a very famous actor. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 07:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a lean towards keep at the moment, but the delete votes have valid arguments and this discussion could benefit from a bit of extra time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
13:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Apparent lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Eastern Daily Press is the subject's main source and although I'm not disputing its reliability for pages about East Anglia but this Eastern Daily Press article says "Alan Boswell Group has purchased the building in Rouen Road from media group Archant. Archant, which publishes the Eastern Daily Press and the Norwich Evening News, will remain in the building leasing one floor." so the subject and the source are connected. Most of EDP's coverage consists of routine press announcements that mainly consist of direct quotes from the subject but offer little in the way of synthesis, analysis and criticism leading to what I feel is a lack of significant coverage of this subject online. Other sources like this one are trade publications that ostensibly reprint press releases, same goes for Cambridgeshire live and I find it hard to believe that the subject's local Chamber of Commerce is independent of the subject. BigheadBigheadBighead ( talk) 12:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
UPE creation for individual of questionable notability. WP:NOT and TOU violations. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
UPE creation for individual of questionable notability. WP:NOT and TOU violations. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable.
pro forma rationale
|
---|
This song is not a notable subject, which refers to Wikipedia's concept of "notability" as a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. According to Wikipedia's deletion policy, an article whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline may be deleted (see WP:DELREASON#8). It is not notable because it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, and multiple such sources are generally expected (see WP:GNG; my WP:BEFORE did not reveal anything), it has not been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts, it has not won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy etc., and it has not been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups (see WP:NSONG). Editing or incubating can not compensate for the present lack of notability, and there is no indication that this could eventually prove to be a notable topic. Merging is inappropriate because no article would benefit from the addition of any of this content, which is not adequately sourced, using reliable sources, and redirection is also inappropriate because there is no suitable target to redirect to, since Zedned as a subject of encyclopedic coverage also fails notability criteria, and that article's AfD is progressing towards a consenus to delete. |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The game fails WP:GNG for the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The article contains map pages, WP:PRIMARY sources or blogs. My searches haven't produced something more meaningful. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Invalid deletion motivations by a new user. As a consequence, it snowed. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 18:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Suspicous academic, not sourced 25lucky ( talk) 10:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. It took the nominator one minute to open this random AfD. The rationale is largely incorrect. Closing it before it wastes scarce community resources. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 21:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
No notability, no reliable sources. Delete. Looks like promotion and advertisement 25lucky ( talk) 10:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. This AfD was started 1 minute after nominator's previous AfD and without a valid rationale. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 23:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hoax, not notable person; promotion 25lucky ( talk) 10:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy close. Per User:Liz: Agmaz & Luk Maz (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Schandona) in violation of ban or block) (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 23:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, not independent coverage and not notable company by its own 25lucky ( talk) 10:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP; no reliable sources and independent deep coverage; clear promotion 25lucky ( talk) 10:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
After the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hibox, an existing draft was amended and moved to mainspace. The sources still look like the same kind of press releases masquerading as business reporting ("Throughout the day, the students, facing financial challenges, radiated happiness as they received mystery boxes containing a wealth of educational resources"), there still is apparently not a single news source even mentioning the founder Le Van Hai, which one would expect from a neutral source about the company.
It still has the same kind of sources which contradict the basic facts in the article as well, e.g. the first source [36] claims it isn't an Indian company but a London-based one which was active elsewhere before it started in India.
All in all, very fishy (articlewise and businesswise), much hype and not a lot of substance, almost as if it is some pyramid scheme or scam. Fram ( talk) 09:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not pass WP:GNG or WP:PROF. An associate professor with an h-index of 15 ( WoS), and a single high-impact paper with 1390 citations coauthored with Richard Bader. The paper is about atoms in molecules theory, Bader's forte. Essén's second most highly cited paper only has 52 citations. His involvement in E-cat cold fusion controversy does not seem very notable either, but could be mentioned on the E-cat page. Jähmefyysikko ( talk) 09:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Melchior Ndadaye. Daniel ( talk) 23:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All I can find on this topic are brief mentions such as this, which note that this is a Burundian national holiday to commemorate the death of Melchior Ndadaye, something which is already encapsulated by a single sentence on the Ndadaye article. I do not see how this subject is independently notable or that this article a necessary fork owing to the amount of content available. - Indy beetle ( talk) 07:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Georgian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 07:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Complex/ Rational 13:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 07:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Subjects fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Just another run-of-the-mill video game employee lacking in notability that fails to assert notability besides being a non-notable musician. As for reliable sources, one source is through a paywall and is to promote a video game he was involved in, which I doubt highly asserts notability. The other is an announcement of his position as a director. The article has been created by COI editor who has since been banned for sock-puppetry, who since continues to ban-evade as an IP user. This has been dePRODded and recreated despite a successful PROD nomination in 2010 but was recreated in 2011; despite this, issues still remains unaddressed since 2017. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 09:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if anyone has a response to this nomination. Already PROD'd so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. The references I find are all from the same time period (within two weeks of each other) and read similar so likely an issue of WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Only one that isn't is from Keralakaumudi Daily which I am unsure is reliable or not. Seven Summits have been attempted by many so not likely to obtain the significant coverage required for notability until after she completes it. CNMall41 ( talk) 08:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus to delete, but encouragement of the consensus here is to re-scope and improve the article via editorial processes. Daniel ( talk) 00:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Besides the poor quality of this article, this article is also completely arbitrary and not encyclopaedic. It makes dubious claims as many of those in the article are not one-offs at all.
Sources are from it as dictionary term and about the cars itself, not the subject.
It is not unusual for these to be produced as one-offs. A notes to add to my rationale to delete, this is because of the questionable nature of this article.
Question is, should we include land speed record vehicles, ‘home-built’ racing cars, soap-box derby cars, modified cars, experimental aircrafts, luxury yachts, ocean liners, concept cars into this list? If we allow a list like this, then we’ll end up with an over-cluttered list. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This article allows to centralize many cases that do not have an article but they deserve one. Whether they have an article on other wikis or they don't have it. It is not easy to find some of these "unique items" that can make all together an interesting article.-- Mcapdevila ( talk) 21:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN and technically untenable on the longer term. Also an unnecessary content fork of the season articles. T v x1 23:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
06:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Sadly, this article on a long-lived company is only referenced by a single source (two sources appear in the list of references, however, they're syndicated articles). A WP:BEFORE on Google News and Google Books doesn't find anything to redeem it. Chetsford ( talk) 06:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:NFF: hasn't yet commenced principal photography. Sources cited say that filming was proposed to begin in July 2022, but all that's been announced so far is plans. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. [50] Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. [51] Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. [52] Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Only three sources, two of which comes from the same source. Nothing else found via WP:BEFORE except a couple of passing mentions. May I suggest a redirect to List of Emmerdale characters (2006) as an WP:ATD. (Oinkers42) ( talk) 06:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn [53]. Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Bosnian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches was this transactional announcement. Everything else that came up was passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 06:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 06:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. Star Mississippi 03:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches was this and this. Fails WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-Notable school, no citations, WP:BEFORE found no reliable sources. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 15:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is clear consensus that the article content should not be deleted, redirected, merged etc. Some editors believe that the article content should be reorganized, but no suggestion came close to achieving consensus so it is a matter for talkpage discussion rather than AFD. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
The existence of this article is essentially WP:SYNTH - it summarizes the events of two individually notable campaigns, but is not in itself notable, and it is not discussed as such in WP:RS. All the information in the article is summarized in either Mongol conquest of the Qara Khitai or Mongol conquest of the Khwarazmian Empire; this should probably either be deleted or redirected to Mongol invasions and conquests. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 18:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
06:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
essentially WP:SYNTH - it summarizes the events of two individually notable campaigns, but is not in itself notable, and it is not discussed as [a unique, separate topic] in WP:RS.Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 23:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As a closer, I have a few options available to me: Keep, Delete, Merge, Redirect, Draftify and Rename/Move. I can not "split off" this article into other articles or disambiguate it. Those are editorial decisions to be made by you all if it is decided that this article should be Kept. So most of this discussion here, while interesting, is besides the point and can occur on the article talk page if there is a consensus to Keep this article. Right now, I don't see a consensus so I'm relisting this discussion. As for any future contributions to this discussion, please keep them simple, realizing the limitations that a closer deals with, and move content-related discussions of what might happen later to this article to the article talk page. Thanks.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. Most of the available coverage is routine and local or not significant enough. Funny enough, there's this 2010 article in The San Diego Union-Tribune reporting that "Wikipedia officials have deleted the entry for Escondido Councilwoman Olga Diaz on their site, contending that she is not notable enough to have her own page on the popular online encyclopedia." Mooonswimmer 03:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Searching for this one was maddening: it seems that every third business in the state is either "Bright Star" something or "Brightstar" something else. The one good hit I got was a set of state statistical reports from the early 1900s which list it as a "post office". And that's all I can verify: on the maps it's a definite "there's no there there" crossroads. Mangoe ( talk) 03:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. JBW ( talk) 14:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2021.
Previous AfD ended in DELETE. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Article can't be redirected to
List of programmes broadcast by Zee Bangla as this page has been deleted. An aside, popularity is only important in that it may mean that there is some SIGCOV of the article subject, in itself though it doesn't establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTDATABASE, specifically the statement that "data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources." While List of backward-compatible games for Xbox One and Series X/S and List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360 have History sections putting the feature in context with the console's development and such, this article has only the list, sourced either to primary sources or YouTube videos. QuietCicada - Talk 01:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
This is a rail junction southeast of Bromide, Oklahoma, where the Kansas, Oklahoma and Gulf Railway spur going into Bromide junctions with the main rail line. I cannot find significant coverage of this location, and the passing mentions I can find are of this site as a rail junction. I do not see a basis for an article here. Hog Farm Talk 01:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I looked through Google Scholar and so forth, JSTOR, and Internet Archive. I found in Google Books insignificant references such as 1. a note that the length of track between Bromide and Bromide Junction was available be turned into a hiking trail, in brief a route description in a Interstate Commerce Commission Report, and in rate tables in postal and shippers guides for the United States and Canada. I found nothing in JSTOR and Internet Archive and a bunch of unrelated hits in Google Search. I found a lack of any reliable source that provides any documentation that Bromide Junction was ever an unincorporated or a populated place and notable in anyway. Paul H. ( talk) 03:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete this article. It seems there might be scope for article(s) on James Gillis (businessman) and/or Sarah Hayes Gillis, this can be considered elsewhere. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable location; ineligible for PROD because it was PRODded once before, and declined, because apparently this was the site of a train accident in 1916 that injured one person and resulted in a lawsuit: [61]. That source a) is a passing mention and b) specifically describes Gillis as a siding, and rail sidings are not notable (nor are they "unincorporated communities"). This is a clear failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. No other information found other than routine listings in rail tables: [62]. Nothing found in news. Satellite view shows an empty stretch of track in the middle of fields, with no human structures. And the bit about a fruitcake festival appears to be a snarky hoax, as a search for "Gillis" only turned up articles about people with that name, and "Gillis + fruitcake" turned up nothing at all. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 00:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Not independently notable, does not pass GNG. Best redirected to Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 00:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The arguments against this page had been listed in June 2022 at Talk:John D. MacDonald#Merger Proposal. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
relatively innocuous practical jokes such as completely undressing women" (??!) — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Another non-notable LPTV. Just two sentences in the whole article. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 23:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Sources are mostly press releases, most likely doesn’t meet WP:NCORP. It reads like an advert as well. Seawolf35 T-- C 23:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Subject fails WP:JUDGE and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. The Wordsmith Talk to me 03:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete per WP:USCJN - [Magistrate judges] are.. "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider; very little sourcing for a biographical article Snickers2686 ( talk) 21:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion, see
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandor Vadas.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIRS, has not received significant coverage from reliable sources DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Senegalese women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1 and 2. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me
23:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. References are either about the company, mentions, or otherwise unreliable (note - WP:NEWSORGINDIA). CNMall41 ( talk) 23:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Obscure map publisher, fails WP:SIRS and only cites company's website DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete agree with nomination. This is an insignificant company that lacks any notability. Lack potential for an article. Paul H. ( talk) 00:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow discussion of recently-provided sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me
22:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If someone wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or go to WP:REFUND Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. References are of an announcement for the film (about five days ago) so this is likely WP:TOOSOON. I would redirect to Yash but the notability tag was removed so I am assuming the redirect would be objected to as well so letting users decide at AfD. CNMall41 ( talk) 22:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Footballer with very minor professional career and no evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC has been provided. Even prior to WP:NSPORTS2022, this would have been a deletion candidate as he only played 10 minutes at professional level and has no apparent significant coverage. The best Indonesian source that I could find was Indosport, which was a squad list mention. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Tap and flap consonants. Daniel ( talk) 00:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
The only source listed that attests to the presence of this sound in a language says they're not sure if it's velar or palatal. And it's a conference paper from 2022. In addition to lacking significant coverage, WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:NOTLEAD may apply here. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voiced velar tap (2nd nomination). Nardog ( talk) 21:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, an Armenian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. I was barely even able to find mentions of the subject. Not to be confused with the politician of the same name. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Malian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I was barely even able to find mentions of the subject ( 1). JTtheOG ( talk) 21:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Uzbekistan women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 21:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
A small company that previously owned a single radio station in the UK. I'm not even sure what this article is trying to say - the "2011 changes" section seems to be very obscure insider stuff. I'm not seeing anything here to prove notability, and nothing is coming up on a search except for links back to this article and an unrelated internet radio station with the same name. Flip Format ( talk) 20:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Subject fails WP:JUDGE and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. What coverage does exist is almost entirely passing mentions in articles about cases that she's served on. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete per WP:USCJN - [Magistrate judges] are.. "not inherently notable" and per consensus at WP:Articles for deletion/Margaret J. Schneider Snickers2686 ( talk) 22:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
19:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 00:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:DICDEF. The mishmash collection of sources are about online harrassment in general, and at best mentions dogpiling in passing, failing WP:PASSING. Above all, it is not clear how dogpiling on the Internet is a distinct concept from when dogpiling occurs as a part of harrassment in a more enclosed group; a school setting, a workplace etc. (other than in scale, of course). Surely, dogpiling has existed in all social settings throughout history where you have a leader and others who latch on (examples from Greek Antiquity: ostracism, demagogue etc.).
The page even has an image, a staged picture showing a single derogatory message. A single message doesn't constitute dogpiling, and it only serves to highlight how confused this entry is. Geschichte ( talk) 13:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
13:33, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Examples of online abuse include flaming, doxing (online release of personal information without consent), impersonation, and public shaming.( Dogpiling (Internet)) and
Online shaming is a form of public shaming in which internet users are harassed, mocked, or bullied by other internet users online.( Online shaming) make scopes of these two article nearly indistinguishable.
The result was redirect all to their respective United States-X articles. If anyone wishes to merge any content, they can from the history behind the redirect, but I note AirshipJungleman29's comment which believes there isn't much (if anything) to merge. Daniel ( talk) 00:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
As the articles say nothing about the embassies, and as articles already exist covering bilateral relations, these should be deleted. Biruitorul Talk 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was redirect to The Simpsons (franchise)#Board and card games. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Couldn't find any web sources besides Simpsons or game fansites, couldn't find any books that had more than a mention. QuietCicada - Talk 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Pointless article. The only bit that’s actually about the embassy, about the new building, is already mentioned at Ivory Coast–United States relations. The rest duplicates that article. Biruitorul Talk 20:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 19:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE, as these examples often can only be sourced from primary publisher announcements or secondary sources just repeating the announcements without any further reporting. This article included "This knowledge is important when buying used / old games and emphasizes the dependency on online services the publisher provides." in the body from its fifth edit until I removed it just now, indicating a WP:USEFUL-type (<- essay) misunderstanding of notability. Also, "restricted online functionality" can mean anything from "the leaderboards don't work" to "the game is completely gone". QuietCicada - Talk 19:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
complete blackhat SEO nonsense and otherwise non RS - this is a spam campaign, straight up, trying to fabricate notability. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep (weakly). Daniel ( talk) 00:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
At present, the article doesn't indicate that Kobla Ladzekpo meets NBIO, [WP:NMUSIC
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
19:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Characters of the Metal Gear series. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
In its current state, the article does not demonstrate the notability of Otacon, with a reception section made up entirely of lists that mean nothing, some of which could be considered questionable for inclusion such as "greatest Jewish characters in video games". My WP:BEFORE searches on WP:VG/SE, Google Books, and Google Scholar didn't seem to demonstrate anything that wasn't either plot summaries on analysis' on the themes of Metal Gear Solid 2. Would love to be proven wrong here, but Otacon unfortunately does not seem to be a character with standalone notability. Negative MP1 18:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure) Davest3r08 >:) ( talk) 15:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
No sustained notability, merge with NeoGAF IgelRM ( talk) 18:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Reliable Sources Have been Found (non-admin closure) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 15:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-Notable School, only one reference which is the schools own website, cited for expansion since 2019. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 16:05, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please remember !voting in this Discussion has been put on Hold as we are Waiting for Input from
ja:Wikipedia:Chatsubo, you are welcome to list any sources(preferably in Japanese) with significant coverage that seem reliable. And we will Verify with ja:Wikipedia:Chatsubo.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (
talk)
17:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Neutron imaging. Daniel ( talk) 00:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 ( talk) 17:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, the subject does not pass WP:NACADEMIC or WP:BASIC in any way. There have been a small number of reviews of his work, yes, but the individual himself doesn't seem to be particularly notable, significantly covered, or have made a great impact in his discipline of Holocaust studies.
This was originally proposed for deletion but an editor removed that tag under WP:AUTHOR, but I don't see how Fischel would pass there either - WP:AUTHOR is for authors who have been influential or made an impact in some way, but he hasn't made an impact as an author either as far as I can tell. Jaguarnik ( talk) 17:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 00:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NRIVALRY due to a lack of independent, significant coverage. The only WP:SIGCOV source (#2) is from a Lubbock based outlet, which is WP:LOCAL. Per WP:NOPAGE, this can be covered at the articles for the respective teams. Let'srun ( talk) 16:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to United States-Country relations articles. The Wordsmith Talk to me 02:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
These articles say nothing about their purported topic — the embassies of the United States in various African capitals — and as such should be deleted, per ample recent precedent. Biruitorul Talk 16:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
The result was keep. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 16:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable book. JJLiu112 ( talk) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) TheBritinator ( talk) 00:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable, poorly sourced pioneer from Tampa Florida with no information other than being dedicated to in a Congregational Church. Not to mention the article is orphaned, so there's no reason for this to exist. TheBritinator ( talk) 16:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of sustained coverage. Some coverage exists for a controversy involving Raúl Ibañez but that is WP:BIO1E at best. Let'srun ( talk) 15:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of acquisitions by Oracle and extended confirmed-protected. Daniel ( talk) 23:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Company lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. articles about what staff members have done independently are not coverage about this business. Like the last spam that was deleted the same year this was recreated by a new SPA this is just spam. duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 04:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be particularly notable. I doubt that anyone would even come to here if it was for him sharing the name of a very famous actor. JDDJS ( talk to me • see what I've done) 07:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a lean towards keep at the moment, but the delete votes have valid arguments and this discussion could benefit from a bit of extra time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
13:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Apparent lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Eastern Daily Press is the subject's main source and although I'm not disputing its reliability for pages about East Anglia but this Eastern Daily Press article says "Alan Boswell Group has purchased the building in Rouen Road from media group Archant. Archant, which publishes the Eastern Daily Press and the Norwich Evening News, will remain in the building leasing one floor." so the subject and the source are connected. Most of EDP's coverage consists of routine press announcements that mainly consist of direct quotes from the subject but offer little in the way of synthesis, analysis and criticism leading to what I feel is a lack of significant coverage of this subject online. Other sources like this one are trade publications that ostensibly reprint press releases, same goes for Cambridgeshire live and I find it hard to believe that the subject's local Chamber of Commerce is independent of the subject. BigheadBigheadBighead ( talk) 12:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
UPE creation for individual of questionable notability. WP:NOT and TOU violations. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:38, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
UPE creation for individual of questionable notability. WP:NOT and TOU violations. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable.
pro forma rationale
|
---|
This song is not a notable subject, which refers to Wikipedia's concept of "notability" as a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. According to Wikipedia's deletion policy, an article whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline may be deleted (see WP:DELREASON#8). It is not notable because it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, and multiple such sources are generally expected (see WP:GNG; my WP:BEFORE did not reveal anything), it has not been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts, it has not won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy etc., and it has not been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups (see WP:NSONG). Editing or incubating can not compensate for the present lack of notability, and there is no indication that this could eventually prove to be a notable topic. Merging is inappropriate because no article would benefit from the addition of any of this content, which is not adequately sourced, using reliable sources, and redirection is also inappropriate because there is no suitable target to redirect to, since Zedned as a subject of encyclopedic coverage also fails notability criteria, and that article's AfD is progressing towards a consenus to delete. |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The game fails WP:GNG for the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. The article contains map pages, WP:PRIMARY sources or blogs. My searches haven't produced something more meaningful. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Invalid deletion motivations by a new user. As a consequence, it snowed. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 18:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Suspicous academic, not sourced 25lucky ( talk) 10:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. It took the nominator one minute to open this random AfD. The rationale is largely incorrect. Closing it before it wastes scarce community resources. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 21:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
No notability, no reliable sources. Delete. Looks like promotion and advertisement 25lucky ( talk) 10:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. This AfD was started 1 minute after nominator's previous AfD and without a valid rationale. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 23:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hoax, not notable person; promotion 25lucky ( talk) 10:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy close. Per User:Liz: Agmaz & Luk Maz (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Schandona) in violation of ban or block) (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 23:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, not independent coverage and not notable company by its own 25lucky ( talk) 10:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP; no reliable sources and independent deep coverage; clear promotion 25lucky ( talk) 10:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
After the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hibox, an existing draft was amended and moved to mainspace. The sources still look like the same kind of press releases masquerading as business reporting ("Throughout the day, the students, facing financial challenges, radiated happiness as they received mystery boxes containing a wealth of educational resources"), there still is apparently not a single news source even mentioning the founder Le Van Hai, which one would expect from a neutral source about the company.
It still has the same kind of sources which contradict the basic facts in the article as well, e.g. the first source [36] claims it isn't an Indian company but a London-based one which was active elsewhere before it started in India.
All in all, very fishy (articlewise and businesswise), much hype and not a lot of substance, almost as if it is some pyramid scheme or scam. Fram ( talk) 09:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not pass WP:GNG or WP:PROF. An associate professor with an h-index of 15 ( WoS), and a single high-impact paper with 1390 citations coauthored with Richard Bader. The paper is about atoms in molecules theory, Bader's forte. Essén's second most highly cited paper only has 52 citations. His involvement in E-cat cold fusion controversy does not seem very notable either, but could be mentioned on the E-cat page. Jähmefyysikko ( talk) 09:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Melchior Ndadaye. Daniel ( talk) 23:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. All I can find on this topic are brief mentions such as this, which note that this is a Burundian national holiday to commemorate the death of Melchior Ndadaye, something which is already encapsulated by a single sentence on the Ndadaye article. I do not see how this subject is independently notable or that this article a necessary fork owing to the amount of content available. - Indy beetle ( talk) 07:56, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Georgian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 07:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Complex/ Rational 13:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 07:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Subjects fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Just another run-of-the-mill video game employee lacking in notability that fails to assert notability besides being a non-notable musician. As for reliable sources, one source is through a paywall and is to promote a video game he was involved in, which I doubt highly asserts notability. The other is an announcement of his position as a director. The article has been created by COI editor who has since been banned for sock-puppetry, who since continues to ban-evade as an IP user. This has been dePRODded and recreated despite a successful PROD nomination in 2010 but was recreated in 2011; despite this, issues still remains unaddressed since 2017. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 09:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if anyone has a response to this nomination. Already PROD'd so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. The references I find are all from the same time period (within two weeks of each other) and read similar so likely an issue of WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Only one that isn't is from Keralakaumudi Daily which I am unsure is reliable or not. Seven Summits have been attempted by many so not likely to obtain the significant coverage required for notability until after she completes it. CNMall41 ( talk) 08:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus to delete, but encouragement of the consensus here is to re-scope and improve the article via editorial processes. Daniel ( talk) 00:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Besides the poor quality of this article, this article is also completely arbitrary and not encyclopaedic. It makes dubious claims as many of those in the article are not one-offs at all.
Sources are from it as dictionary term and about the cars itself, not the subject.
It is not unusual for these to be produced as one-offs. A notes to add to my rationale to delete, this is because of the questionable nature of this article.
Question is, should we include land speed record vehicles, ‘home-built’ racing cars, soap-box derby cars, modified cars, experimental aircrafts, luxury yachts, ocean liners, concept cars into this list? If we allow a list like this, then we’ll end up with an over-cluttered list. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 08:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
This article allows to centralize many cases that do not have an article but they deserve one. Whether they have an article on other wikis or they don't have it. It is not easy to find some of these "unique items" that can make all together an interesting article.-- Mcapdevila ( talk) 21:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
07:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTN and technically untenable on the longer term. Also an unnecessary content fork of the season articles. T v x1 23:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
06:25, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:48, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Sadly, this article on a long-lived company is only referenced by a single source (two sources appear in the list of references, however, they're syndicated articles). A WP:BEFORE on Google News and Google Books doesn't find anything to redeem it. Chetsford ( talk) 06:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:NFF: hasn't yet commenced principal photography. Sources cited say that filming was proposed to begin in July 2022, but all that's been announced so far is plans. Wikishovel ( talk) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. [50] Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:17, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. [51] Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. [52] Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Only three sources, two of which comes from the same source. Nothing else found via WP:BEFORE except a couple of passing mentions. May I suggest a redirect to List of Emmerdale characters (2006) as an WP:ATD. (Oinkers42) ( talk) 06:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn [53]. Eluchil404 ( talk) 00:09, 20 December 2023 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
The articles Cups (suit), Coins (suit), Batons (suit), Swords (suit) were created in 2019, duplicating longstanding content at Suit of cups, Suit of coins, Suit of wands, and Suit of swords, respectively. They should be merged if they have anything new. Dicklyon ( talk) 06:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Bosnian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches was this transactional announcement. Everything else that came up was passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 06:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 06:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. Star Mississippi 03:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches was this and this. Fails WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:04, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-Notable school, no citations, WP:BEFORE found no reliable sources. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 15:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is clear consensus that the article content should not be deleted, redirected, merged etc. Some editors believe that the article content should be reorganized, but no suggestion came close to achieving consensus so it is a matter for talkpage discussion rather than AFD. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:11, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
The existence of this article is essentially WP:SYNTH - it summarizes the events of two individually notable campaigns, but is not in itself notable, and it is not discussed as such in WP:RS. All the information in the article is summarized in either Mongol conquest of the Qara Khitai or Mongol conquest of the Khwarazmian Empire; this should probably either be deleted or redirected to Mongol invasions and conquests. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 18:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
@SUPERHEROLOGIST
06:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
essentially WP:SYNTH - it summarizes the events of two individually notable campaigns, but is not in itself notable, and it is not discussed as [a unique, separate topic] in WP:RS.Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 23:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As a closer, I have a few options available to me: Keep, Delete, Merge, Redirect, Draftify and Rename/Move. I can not "split off" this article into other articles or disambiguate it. Those are editorial decisions to be made by you all if it is decided that this article should be Kept. So most of this discussion here, while interesting, is besides the point and can occur on the article talk page if there is a consensus to Keep this article. Right now, I don't see a consensus so I'm relisting this discussion. As for any future contributions to this discussion, please keep them simple, realizing the limitations that a closer deals with, and move content-related discussions of what might happen later to this article to the article talk page. Thanks.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. Most of the available coverage is routine and local or not significant enough. Funny enough, there's this 2010 article in The San Diego Union-Tribune reporting that "Wikipedia officials have deleted the entry for Escondido Councilwoman Olga Diaz on their site, contending that she is not notable enough to have her own page on the popular online encyclopedia." Mooonswimmer 03:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Searching for this one was maddening: it seems that every third business in the state is either "Bright Star" something or "Brightstar" something else. The one good hit I got was a set of state statistical reports from the early 1900s which list it as a "post office". And that's all I can verify: on the maps it's a definite "there's no there there" crossroads. Mangoe ( talk) 03:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. JBW ( talk) 14:59, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2021.
Previous AfD ended in DELETE. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Article can't be redirected to
List of programmes broadcast by Zee Bangla as this page has been deleted. An aside, popularity is only important in that it may mean that there is some SIGCOV of the article subject, in itself though it doesn't establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:26, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTDATABASE, specifically the statement that "data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources." While List of backward-compatible games for Xbox One and Series X/S and List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360 have History sections putting the feature in context with the console's development and such, this article has only the list, sourced either to primary sources or YouTube videos. QuietCicada - Talk 01:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
This is a rail junction southeast of Bromide, Oklahoma, where the Kansas, Oklahoma and Gulf Railway spur going into Bromide junctions with the main rail line. I cannot find significant coverage of this location, and the passing mentions I can find are of this site as a rail junction. I do not see a basis for an article here. Hog Farm Talk 01:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I looked through Google Scholar and so forth, JSTOR, and Internet Archive. I found in Google Books insignificant references such as 1. a note that the length of track between Bromide and Bromide Junction was available be turned into a hiking trail, in brief a route description in a Interstate Commerce Commission Report, and in rate tables in postal and shippers guides for the United States and Canada. I found nothing in JSTOR and Internet Archive and a bunch of unrelated hits in Google Search. I found a lack of any reliable source that provides any documentation that Bromide Junction was ever an unincorporated or a populated place and notable in anyway. Paul H. ( talk) 03:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP: GEOLAND. Abadi are not notable. Hongsy ( talk) 02:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:11, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete this article. It seems there might be scope for article(s) on James Gillis (businessman) and/or Sarah Hayes Gillis, this can be considered elsewhere. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:54, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable location; ineligible for PROD because it was PRODded once before, and declined, because apparently this was the site of a train accident in 1916 that injured one person and resulted in a lawsuit: [61]. That source a) is a passing mention and b) specifically describes Gillis as a siding, and rail sidings are not notable (nor are they "unincorporated communities"). This is a clear failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. No other information found other than routine listings in rail tables: [62]. Nothing found in news. Satellite view shows an empty stretch of track in the middle of fields, with no human structures. And the bit about a fruitcake festival appears to be a snarky hoax, as a search for "Gillis" only turned up articles about people with that name, and "Gillis + fruitcake" turned up nothing at all. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 00:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Not independently notable, does not pass GNG. Best redirected to Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 00:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)