The result was redirect to List of Bulgaria women's international footballers. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Bulgaria women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 23:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to NHS ambulance services. Consensus is against a standalone article. History remains under the redirect if a merge is deemed necessary. Star Mississippi 23:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Mostly regurgiated article. "Ambulance services trust" is not a legal entity, as by defintion all are either NHS trusts or NHS foundation trusts, and none of the cited sources specifically mention this term.
The rest of the article is a regurgitation / duplicate of information covered at NHS ambulance services. Elshad ( talk) 12:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
00:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
It is a WP:DICDEF. The single source is a dictionary entry. [1] also defines the term as "used in commentaries on hospital statistics to describe the departure of a patient from hospital without distinguishing whether the patient departed alive or dead." It could perhaps be added to wikt:separation. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 14:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Originally prodded in 2010, and the article has not seen any more sigcov. There is a review on one of their bicycles but it seems to be more about the bike than the company, barely counting as one source. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 16:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 21:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Similar to this deletion discussion. This article is full of unsourced cruft and tables of statistics with no accompanied commentary. There are no sources that indicate that the subject of "Vienamese teams at the World Championship" is a notable topic. There is no reason to merge this article to any of the World Championship articles, as its simply statistics. – Pbrks ( t · c) 16:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While eligible for soft-deletion, this has been recently edited and so a soft-deletion is unlikely to 'stick'. Relisting for further consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 00:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This is not a G4, but issues and sourcing raised at the prior AfD don't appear to have changed. The promotional tone wouldn't be as much of an issue with independent sourcing to address it. Star Mississippi 13:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
16:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Protection Command. Daniel ( talk) 21:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Not sure this term is sufficiently specific to warrant an article. "Personal protection officer" is a generic term that could apply anywhere in the English-speaking world. Some of the references are newspaper article where the writer may have just used it as a generic term.
I can find no statutory footing for this term or published material from the Met clearly demonstrating that this is a term specific to the Met.
Overall is a vague article. Elshad ( talk) 22:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion - previously at AfD under another title.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Despite searching "İlqar Nəbiyev" and "Ilgar Nabiyev", I was unable to find any evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. The best that I could find was Milli, which is just a Q&A with no independent analysis at all. In any case, one source is not enough for GNG or SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable, seems to be defunct. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 21:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Few minor roles, but no real claim to fame. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 21:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 21:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The article currently has two sources, one of which is a dead link and the other isn't verified. BEFORE hasn't turned up anything, though sources may be available in other languages. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 20:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to EarthBound or an appropriate section thereof Star Mississippi 23:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Despite being a pretty well known character and the main face of Earthbound, there really isn't much being said about Ness. His entire reception is based around his Smash appearances, with most of it being summed up as "Ness is more known for Smash than Earthbound and is pretty fun to play." I did find this pretty good source while searching https://www.nintendojo.com/features/editorials/best-of-2012-the-church-of-ness-earthbounds-religious-overtones But I couldn't really find much more, as most discussion is just about Earthbound's plot than about Ness as a character. Given that Ness already has a section in the main Earthbound article, a merge there I feel would work as a perfect AtD, given that Ness has some legacy beyond his game, even if it isn't really enough for an article, in my book. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 20:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Failure of WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 20:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
No lasting coverage; all significant coverage I can find is from within two days of the incident. Otherwise only passing mentions in summary in ProQuest results, never exceeding about 2 sentences, mostly in relation to similar events in Nigeria. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 19:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per sourcing identified. Normally I'd relist for source assessment to see if any of the deletes changed, but these sources are an objective answer to the nomination and many of those !votes Star Mississippi 23:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
I did not find SIGCOV for that topic. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 16:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The Geographic Names Information System and the GEOnet Names Server do not satisfy the "legal recognition" requirement and are also unreliable for "populated place" designation.
Yet those are the only sources. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 18:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
legal recognitionthe populated place requirement.
So, judging from currently clear standards, it is IMO patently clear that this does not meet the populated places requirement and be deleted. But a hoax requires a bad-faith intention to trick the audience in believing that something is real. I don't find it to be the case here, as the article's creation was more due to laxer standards before that had no clear consensus on whether GNIS is enough by itself, allowing stubs such as this to be created. VickKiang (talk) 02:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
The Geographic Names Information System and the GEOnet Names Server do not satisfy the "legal recognition" requirement and are also unreliable for "populated place" designation. As such, GEOLAND is failed and this should be deleted. VickKiang (talk) 02:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete since WP:V precludes a redirect. Should that change, happy to restore the history for a redirect Star Mississippi 23:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Did not find any SIGCOV for this topic. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 16:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The Geographic Names Information System and the GEOnet Names Server do not satisfy the "legal recognition" requirement and are also unreliable for "populated place" designation.
The result was redirect to Imaginary chair. I have taken the suggestion to preemptively move wall sit to imaginary chair. But the move can be undone at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Issues have been raised regarding this name since 2005, and no RS has been provided to give this name since. Move relevant information into wall sit article and delete this unless RS can be given for this name. GnocchiFan ( talk) 15:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tindle Radio. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
A company that bought and then subsequently sold some local radio stations four years later. Trade press coverage revolves around the company buying and then selling its radio stations, nothing appears to be covered other than this. There is nothing here that could not be covered in the articles for the individual stations - it warrants a brief mention of the ownership transfers, rather than a full article. Flip Format ( talk) 15:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete as there are huge problems with general notability and NCROP as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpaul2030 ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment This is a difficult one to call as I am never in favour of article deletion. I think it passes notability but only just but, as Flip Fprmat says, the references are only related to the forming and selling of the company. However, to delete it means that the information which is contains will be lost. Merge with Tindle is another option, and maybe the best option, and ensure that the relevant information is transferred to the Tindle Radio article before it is merged as merge is another word for delete. Rillington ( talk) 11:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It seems like this discussion has resolved at least some confusion about how this topic is different than others. We should also expect more clarity on definitions from outside sources in the coming years. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Three reasons for nomination in AfD:
press releases or acquisition newsor
"fireman saves cat" news. -- Maddy from Celeste ( WAVEDASH) 16:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Sources discussing cisgenderism and cisnormativity
|
---|
|
"Cisgenderism (sometimes referred to as cisnormativity) ..."
"I also think the cisgenderism and cisnormativity articles can account (according to WP:NPOV) for research literature that indicates the terminology may be used synonymously"
Additional sources
|
---|
|
If you suspect a redundant article fork, check with people who watch the respective articles and participate in talk page discussions to see if the fork was justified. If the content fork was unjustified, the more recent article should be merged into the main article.For now, cisgenderism seems to be a distinct sociological/psychological concept that has gained traction in the research literature, so alternatives to deletion seem to be available. Beccaynr ( talk) 01:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
"As to WP:REDUNDANTFORK, that section of the guideline includes, If you suspect a redundant article fork, check with people who watch the respective articles"
journal articles investigating the topic at handis the soul and centre of WP:SECONDARY sourcing. As examples, I'd pick Boe & Baldwin, who tackle cisgenderism in family therapy [29]; Dalton, et al, who dissects coaching and managing people to (in part) avoid cisgenderism [30]; and Rogers, who looks at cisgenderism and hate crimes with secondary analysis of primary sources [31]. If you really want books instead of journals, I'd start with these: Ross explicitly discusses cisgenderism in relationship to homelessness and rehousing [32], just as Knott-Fayle & Peel do regarding qualitative research [33] and Knott-Fayle does solo regarding sports [34]. I am not suggesting that this is the end of the sourcing list, nor that they are the best sources; this is not my area of expertise. They are, however, solid and reliable sources in accordance with Wikipedia policy.
very few psychology or gender journal articles (half of them having Ansara as a co-author), did anyone even try to do a BEFORE search? gScholar comes back with hundreds of viable sources not authored by or with the Ansara that are both secondary and explanatory, and gBooks has even more.
Overall, there is simply no good policy-based reason to delete this article, and it improves the encyclopaedia to include it. The article needs work, but WP:DINC. As it stands, though, the article more than meets GNG and is worthy of inclusion. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 14:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
I also make a distinction between cissexism (i.e., the assumption that transsexual gender identities and sex embodiments are less legitimate than cissexual ones) and cisgenderism (i.e., the assumption that people who defy gender norms are less legitimate than people who conform to them), this distinction is noted in other sources [35] [36] so I think the article should clarify cissexism is a subset of cisgenderism rather than synonym (though often used that way). Additionally, this ngram search (admittedly an imperfect metric) shows that cisgenderism is a more common term than cissexism. [37]
Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ ( talk) 22:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to East Aceh Regency. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
AFD as PROD is likely to be contested. The club existed but sources didn't show that this club passes WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS. Sources shown the games that the team played, but no in-depth coverage of this team. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Only a corporator of an Municipal Corporation, just fought the election and got only 7848 votes see [38]. Doesn’t passes the WP:NPOL. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 14:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was speedy close. Superseded by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Coia (3rd nomination) which presents a deletion rationale (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Second attempt at non-notable deletion Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 10:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
No notable tag team, NO IN-DEEP coverage about them. Only worked on independent level. According to Cagematch, they only had 32 matches. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 12:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
A big page of self-promotion. Nothing of note. Links are purely to interviews and programme links. Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 11:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable radio presenter Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 11:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Almost every reference is a paper co-authored by Viega himself. Out of the three that aren't, two don't mention his name at all, and one uses a single quote from him. benǝʇᴉɯ 07:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Has been in notable shows, but she doesn't seem to be notable herself. Boleyn ( talk) 15:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further input on the source presented above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
07:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Youtube channel | 1. "Clare Lucy P - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 27 July 2020. |
Streaming site database page, nothing meets SIGCOV | MUBI, retrieved 18 November 2023 |
Streaming site database page, nothing meets SIGCOV | MUBI, retrieved 18 November 2023 |
TVGuide database page, nothing meets SIGCOV | 4. ^ "The Railway Children". TVGuide.com. Retrieved 18 November 2023. |
Cast list mention, nothing meets SIGCOV | 5. ^ Miles, Tina (21 April 2011). "Young Dracula children's series to be filmed in Liverpool". Liverpool Echo. Retrieved 18 November 2023. |
Cast list mention, nothing meets SIGCOV | 6. ^ Tzvetkova, Juliana (12 October 2017). Pop Culture in Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-4408-4466-9. |
Cast list mention, nothing meets SIGCOV | 7. ^ Melton, J. Gordon (1 October 2021). The Vampire Almanac: The Complete History. Visible Ink Press. ISBN 978-1-57859-754-3. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to review Timothy's source analysis and for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable local radio presenter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funky Snack ( talk • contribs) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Third attempt as page doesn't really give anything. Possible self-promotion Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 11:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable. Links and references are generic Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 10:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
No any single reliable source. Nexovia ( talk) 03:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against merging. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The concept of a debate camp doesn't seem to be notable in-and-of itself, with this page basically being a collection of primary sources linking to different camps. WP:BEFORE was difficult due to the deluge of primary sources, but I was unable to find consistent + independent coverage. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) Talk to Me! 11:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eternal Shadow
Talk
04:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jiangnan. This is a difficult discussion to assess consensus in, but my reading is that there is a consensus below not to retain the article. On that basis, I have chosen the redirect as an ATD to preserve the history and as it was suggested within the discussion but not objected to by those !voting delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
user:Newbamboo proposed to delete this article on the Chinese Wiki page, saying that it was "forcibly splicing irrelevant information together to conduct original research." And I did not see a direct introduction about Jianghuai People on Google Scholar, Google Books, and CNKI.The source given in the English article, the title seems to have little to do with Jianghuai People. 日期20220626 ( talk) 04:39, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. While I'm open to the argument put forward in the nomination, I think this subject and article could use more discussion to arrive at a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
SImple case of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Any notable resorts or entries can be accommodated at List of hotels: Countries M. Ajf773 ( talk) 08:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Treaty of Hadiach. Daniel ( talk) 00:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article reproduces the Treaty of Hadiach. There is no information here that is not in that article, so I do not propose a merge. You should delete that article and create a redirect. Marcelus ( talk) 19:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
proposed in a treaty but nowhere elseis objectively false; it was a somewhat notable idea throughout the 1650s and was of later historical significance during the January Uprising. This is clearly more tha just a one off idea. — Knightof theswords 14:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. There seems to be a rough consensus that some of the content in this article should be Merged but several options on what the target article should be.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Exists, and did work for regional media mainly. Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep: Yes she was a regional broadcaster but she was a leading presenter on Yorkshire Television for three decades. This is more than enough to demonstrate notability. Also, the article has plenty of independent references. Rillington ( talk) 10:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails WP:IS, primary, "Barnes is a patron of Yorkshire Air Ambulance", fails WP:SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth, name mentioned in list and caption | 1. "Yorkshire Air Ambulance Annual Report 2017" (PDF). Yorkshire Air Ambulance Annual Report. March 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 July 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2019. |
Fails WP:IS, primary, interview "The Prince of Wales Hospice welcomes three new Patrons, ITV Calendar presenters Gaynor, Christine and Du" | 2. ^ "Calendar Presenters Become Patrons". The Prince of Wales Hospice. 14 August 2020. Retrieved 20 October 2021. |
Interview, fails WP:IS | 3. ^ "TV Presenter Gaynor Barnes talks to Yorkshire Life". Yorkshire Life. 11 January 2010. Retrieved 31 January 2019. |
Fails WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 4. ^ Berry, Chris (13 May 2005). "The Southern 'softie' with northern grit". The Yorkshire Post. Archived from the original on 1 February 2019. Retrieved 31 January 2019. |
Primary, fails WP:IS, "Meet the team" promo | 5. ^ "Meet the team". ITV Calendar. 31 January 2019. |
Name mention, panelist, fails WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. | 6. ^ Zientek, Henryk (19 November 2008). "Help for entrepreneurs". Huddersfield Examiner. Retrieved 10 August 2010. |
Interview, fails WP:IS | 7. ^ TV Presenter Gaynor Barnes talks to Yorkshire Life Yorkshire Life, 11 January 2010 |
Routine news about programming change. Fails primary, fails WP:SIGCOV addressing subject directly and indepth | 8. ^ "John Shires and Gaynor Barnes to leave ITV News Calendar". ITV News. Retrieved 19 March 2021. |
Name listed, fails SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. | 9. ^ "RTS Yorkshire Programme Awards 2021". Royal Television Society. 15 January 2021. Retrieved 20 October 2021. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It would help for those editors who want to Keep this article to respond to the source analysis or bring forward some additional sources that could help establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Successful photographer, but I couldn't establish that he meets WP:N. Has been in CAT:NN for over 13 years. Boleyn ( talk) 21:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still ineligible for Soft Deletion. Some more participation here would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2018.
PROD removed with links to 2 sites with nothing more than blurbs about it, no indepth coverage. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:58, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No one is arguing for retention, and no indication any input is forthcoming. Star Mississippi 19:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Declined prod. Only 1 article links to this. Could not significant coverage of this individual in news and google books searches. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 11:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:MULTSOURCES - one source for its bankruptcy alone is not notable, nor did the experimental drugs ever leave trial stage. Cannot find any other sources. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 13:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eliminative materialism. History remains under the redirect for a merge, if desired Star Mississippi 18:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non significant coverage at [44] and [45] (they mention the term twice and once respectively. Cannot find any other verbatim usage. Suggest merging/redirecting to eliminative materialism if anything can be salvaged. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 13:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. Star Mississippi 18:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) No indication of notability, either. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject earned a couple of caps for the Dominican Republic women's national football team, but I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches was this; everything else was passing mentions. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Classified as a complementary and alternative medicine [49], which sets a high bar for notability without undue weight. I cannot find reliable sources providing significant coverage independent of its main author, Pat Ogden. Note that Ogden frequently co-authors with Janina Fisher, ideally there would be review material or robust studies without either of them as listed authors. Sources need to meet WP:MEDRS also. The article history has had multiple attempted insertions of copyvio and advertising/promotional material since creation. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 06:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Santos FC seasons. ✗ plicit 06:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The article contains one sentence and no references. 1keyhole ( talk) 05:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Te Unuhanga-a-Rangitoto / Mercer Bay. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Per
WP:ONEOTHER; this page should be deleted and redirected to
Te Unuhanga-a-Rangitoto / Mercer Bay as the primary topic for this River.
The topic which this is competing with, a Mercer Bay in Cumberland West Bay, is an obscure location that doesn't even warrant an article. Further, a Google News search for the past year finds no results for the bay in Cumberland West Bay, but over a dozen for Unuhanga-a-Rangitoto / Mercer Bay. BilledMammal ( talk) 04:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
However, AfD can be used to propose redirects; I expected that if I made this boldly it would be reverted or otherwise objected to and so I wanted to get consensus for it, and this is the appropriate venue for that. BilledMammal ( talk) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject lacks the needed coverage from independent sources to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 04:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Moot. Deletion is not being contemplated. Moves can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi 18:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Per
WP:ONEOTHER; this page should be deleted and redirected to
Waihemo / Shag River as the primary topic for this River.
Looking at pageviews, we see that Waihemo / Shag River receives over ten times the views of Shag River (Fiordland), demonstrating that it is primary by usage.
It also appears to be primary by long term significance; a search on Google News and Google Scholar shows that the vast majority of results are for the river in Otago. BilledMammal ( talk) 03:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
However, AfD can be used to propose redirects; I expected that if I made this boldly it would be reverted or otherwise objected to and so I wanted to get consensus for it, and this is the appropriate venue for that. BilledMammal ( talk) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourcing has been IDed that addresses both the nom and delete !votes. Star Mississippi 18:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Article has been unsourced since at least 2020. I have done a quick Google search and Google Scholar search but have been unable to find more reliable sources. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Despite difficulty, sources with sufficient coverage to meet WP:NBOOK were eventually identified. signed, Rosguill talk 02:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Article is reliant upon a single citation, which was added in September 2023 without adding additional content. I have done a quick Google search and Google Scholar search but have been unable to find more reliable sources. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It would be great if some of the sources brought up in this discussion could be added to this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for writers. As always, writers are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to show notability markers such as notable literary awards and/or the reception of
WP:GNG-worthy coverage about them and their work in real reliable sources -- but the only notability claim being attempted here is that his work exists, and the only source being cited is his "staff" profile on the
self-published website of his own publisher, which is not a notability-building source.
As I can't read Arabic, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with the necessary language skills and resource access can find enough improved sourcing to salvage it -- but nothing in this version of the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. This article needs additional review after article improvements.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No one has performed an analysis of the sources added or presented. If I had to close right now, I would close as no consensus. But I'm relisting in hope for a more definitive answer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Bulgaria women's international footballers. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Bulgaria women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 23:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to NHS ambulance services. Consensus is against a standalone article. History remains under the redirect if a merge is deemed necessary. Star Mississippi 23:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Mostly regurgiated article. "Ambulance services trust" is not a legal entity, as by defintion all are either NHS trusts or NHS foundation trusts, and none of the cited sources specifically mention this term.
The rest of the article is a regurgitation / duplicate of information covered at NHS ambulance services. Elshad ( talk) 12:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
00:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
It is a WP:DICDEF. The single source is a dictionary entry. [1] also defines the term as "used in commentaries on hospital statistics to describe the departure of a patient from hospital without distinguishing whether the patient departed alive or dead." It could perhaps be added to wikt:separation. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 14:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Originally prodded in 2010, and the article has not seen any more sigcov. There is a review on one of their bicycles but it seems to be more about the bike than the company, barely counting as one source. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 16:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 21:09, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Similar to this deletion discussion. This article is full of unsourced cruft and tables of statistics with no accompanied commentary. There are no sources that indicate that the subject of "Vienamese teams at the World Championship" is a notable topic. There is no reason to merge this article to any of the World Championship articles, as its simply statistics. – Pbrks ( t · c) 16:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While eligible for soft-deletion, this has been recently edited and so a soft-deletion is unlikely to 'stick'. Relisting for further consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 00:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This is not a G4, but issues and sourcing raised at the prior AfD don't appear to have changed. The promotional tone wouldn't be as much of an issue with independent sourcing to address it. Star Mississippi 13:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
16:57, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Protection Command. Daniel ( talk) 21:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Not sure this term is sufficiently specific to warrant an article. "Personal protection officer" is a generic term that could apply anywhere in the English-speaking world. Some of the references are newspaper article where the writer may have just used it as a generic term.
I can find no statutory footing for this term or published material from the Met clearly demonstrating that this is a term specific to the Met.
Overall is a vague article. Elshad ( talk) 22:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion - previously at AfD under another title.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Despite searching "İlqar Nəbiyev" and "Ilgar Nabiyev", I was unable to find any evidence of meeting WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. The best that I could find was Milli, which is just a Q&A with no independent analysis at all. In any case, one source is not enough for GNG or SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 21:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Not notable, seems to be defunct. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 21:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 07:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Few minor roles, but no real claim to fame. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 21:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 21:03, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The article currently has two sources, one of which is a dead link and the other isn't verified. BEFORE hasn't turned up anything, though sources may be available in other languages. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 20:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to EarthBound or an appropriate section thereof Star Mississippi 23:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Despite being a pretty well known character and the main face of Earthbound, there really isn't much being said about Ness. His entire reception is based around his Smash appearances, with most of it being summed up as "Ness is more known for Smash than Earthbound and is pretty fun to play." I did find this pretty good source while searching https://www.nintendojo.com/features/editorials/best-of-2012-the-church-of-ness-earthbounds-religious-overtones But I couldn't really find much more, as most discussion is just about Earthbound's plot than about Ness as a character. Given that Ness already has a section in the main Earthbound article, a merge there I feel would work as a perfect AtD, given that Ness has some legacy beyond his game, even if it isn't really enough for an article, in my book. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 20:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Failure of WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 20:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
No lasting coverage; all significant coverage I can find is from within two days of the incident. Otherwise only passing mentions in summary in ProQuest results, never exceeding about 2 sentences, mostly in relation to similar events in Nigeria. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 19:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per sourcing identified. Normally I'd relist for source assessment to see if any of the deletes changed, but these sources are an objective answer to the nomination and many of those !votes Star Mississippi 23:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
I did not find SIGCOV for that topic. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 16:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The Geographic Names Information System and the GEOnet Names Server do not satisfy the "legal recognition" requirement and are also unreliable for "populated place" designation.
Yet those are the only sources. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 18:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
legal recognitionthe populated place requirement.
So, judging from currently clear standards, it is IMO patently clear that this does not meet the populated places requirement and be deleted. But a hoax requires a bad-faith intention to trick the audience in believing that something is real. I don't find it to be the case here, as the article's creation was more due to laxer standards before that had no clear consensus on whether GNIS is enough by itself, allowing stubs such as this to be created. VickKiang (talk) 02:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
The Geographic Names Information System and the GEOnet Names Server do not satisfy the "legal recognition" requirement and are also unreliable for "populated place" designation. As such, GEOLAND is failed and this should be deleted. VickKiang (talk) 02:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete since WP:V precludes a redirect. Should that change, happy to restore the history for a redirect Star Mississippi 23:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Did not find any SIGCOV for this topic. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 16:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The Geographic Names Information System and the GEOnet Names Server do not satisfy the "legal recognition" requirement and are also unreliable for "populated place" designation.
The result was redirect to Imaginary chair. I have taken the suggestion to preemptively move wall sit to imaginary chair. But the move can be undone at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Issues have been raised regarding this name since 2005, and no RS has been provided to give this name since. Move relevant information into wall sit article and delete this unless RS can be given for this name. GnocchiFan ( talk) 15:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tindle Radio. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
A company that bought and then subsequently sold some local radio stations four years later. Trade press coverage revolves around the company buying and then selling its radio stations, nothing appears to be covered other than this. There is nothing here that could not be covered in the articles for the individual stations - it warrants a brief mention of the ownership transfers, rather than a full article. Flip Format ( talk) 15:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete as there are huge problems with general notability and NCROP as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpaul2030 ( talk • contribs) 08:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment This is a difficult one to call as I am never in favour of article deletion. I think it passes notability but only just but, as Flip Fprmat says, the references are only related to the forming and selling of the company. However, to delete it means that the information which is contains will be lost. Merge with Tindle is another option, and maybe the best option, and ensure that the relevant information is transferred to the Tindle Radio article before it is merged as merge is another word for delete. Rillington ( talk) 11:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It seems like this discussion has resolved at least some confusion about how this topic is different than others. We should also expect more clarity on definitions from outside sources in the coming years. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:47, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Three reasons for nomination in AfD:
press releases or acquisition newsor
"fireman saves cat" news. -- Maddy from Celeste ( WAVEDASH) 16:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Sources discussing cisgenderism and cisnormativity
|
---|
|
"Cisgenderism (sometimes referred to as cisnormativity) ..."
"I also think the cisgenderism and cisnormativity articles can account (according to WP:NPOV) for research literature that indicates the terminology may be used synonymously"
Additional sources
|
---|
|
If you suspect a redundant article fork, check with people who watch the respective articles and participate in talk page discussions to see if the fork was justified. If the content fork was unjustified, the more recent article should be merged into the main article.For now, cisgenderism seems to be a distinct sociological/psychological concept that has gained traction in the research literature, so alternatives to deletion seem to be available. Beccaynr ( talk) 01:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
"As to WP:REDUNDANTFORK, that section of the guideline includes, If you suspect a redundant article fork, check with people who watch the respective articles"
journal articles investigating the topic at handis the soul and centre of WP:SECONDARY sourcing. As examples, I'd pick Boe & Baldwin, who tackle cisgenderism in family therapy [29]; Dalton, et al, who dissects coaching and managing people to (in part) avoid cisgenderism [30]; and Rogers, who looks at cisgenderism and hate crimes with secondary analysis of primary sources [31]. If you really want books instead of journals, I'd start with these: Ross explicitly discusses cisgenderism in relationship to homelessness and rehousing [32], just as Knott-Fayle & Peel do regarding qualitative research [33] and Knott-Fayle does solo regarding sports [34]. I am not suggesting that this is the end of the sourcing list, nor that they are the best sources; this is not my area of expertise. They are, however, solid and reliable sources in accordance with Wikipedia policy.
very few psychology or gender journal articles (half of them having Ansara as a co-author), did anyone even try to do a BEFORE search? gScholar comes back with hundreds of viable sources not authored by or with the Ansara that are both secondary and explanatory, and gBooks has even more.
Overall, there is simply no good policy-based reason to delete this article, and it improves the encyclopaedia to include it. The article needs work, but WP:DINC. As it stands, though, the article more than meets GNG and is worthy of inclusion. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 14:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
I also make a distinction between cissexism (i.e., the assumption that transsexual gender identities and sex embodiments are less legitimate than cissexual ones) and cisgenderism (i.e., the assumption that people who defy gender norms are less legitimate than people who conform to them), this distinction is noted in other sources [35] [36] so I think the article should clarify cissexism is a subset of cisgenderism rather than synonym (though often used that way). Additionally, this ngram search (admittedly an imperfect metric) shows that cisgenderism is a more common term than cissexism. [37]
Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ ( talk) 22:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to East Aceh Regency. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
AFD as PROD is likely to be contested. The club existed but sources didn't show that this club passes WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS. Sources shown the games that the team played, but no in-depth coverage of this team. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:24, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Only a corporator of an Municipal Corporation, just fought the election and got only 7848 votes see [38]. Doesn’t passes the WP:NPOL. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 14:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was speedy close. Superseded by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Coia (3rd nomination) which presents a deletion rationale (non-admin closure) Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Second attempt at non-notable deletion Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 10:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
No notable tag team, NO IN-DEEP coverage about them. Only worked on independent level. According to Cagematch, they only had 32 matches. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 12:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
A big page of self-promotion. Nothing of note. Links are purely to interviews and programme links. Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 11:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable radio presenter Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 11:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Almost every reference is a paper co-authored by Viega himself. Out of the three that aren't, two don't mention his name at all, and one uses a single quote from him. benǝʇᴉɯ 07:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Has been in notable shows, but she doesn't seem to be notable herself. Boleyn ( talk) 15:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further input on the source presented above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
07:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Youtube channel | 1. "Clare Lucy P - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 27 July 2020. |
Streaming site database page, nothing meets SIGCOV | MUBI, retrieved 18 November 2023 |
Streaming site database page, nothing meets SIGCOV | MUBI, retrieved 18 November 2023 |
TVGuide database page, nothing meets SIGCOV | 4. ^ "The Railway Children". TVGuide.com. Retrieved 18 November 2023. |
Cast list mention, nothing meets SIGCOV | 5. ^ Miles, Tina (21 April 2011). "Young Dracula children's series to be filmed in Liverpool". Liverpool Echo. Retrieved 18 November 2023. |
Cast list mention, nothing meets SIGCOV | 6. ^ Tzvetkova, Juliana (12 October 2017). Pop Culture in Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-4408-4466-9. |
Cast list mention, nothing meets SIGCOV | 7. ^ Melton, J. Gordon (1 October 2021). The Vampire Almanac: The Complete History. Visible Ink Press. ISBN 978-1-57859-754-3. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to review Timothy's source analysis and for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:38, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable local radio presenter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funky Snack ( talk • contribs) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Third attempt as page doesn't really give anything. Possible self-promotion Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 11:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable. Links and references are generic Funky Snack ( Talk | Contribs) 10:59, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
No any single reliable source. Nexovia ( talk) 03:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against merging. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The concept of a debate camp doesn't seem to be notable in-and-of itself, with this page basically being a collection of primary sources linking to different camps. WP:BEFORE was difficult due to the deluge of primary sources, but I was unable to find consistent + independent coverage. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him) Talk to Me! 11:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eternal Shadow
Talk
04:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jiangnan. This is a difficult discussion to assess consensus in, but my reading is that there is a consensus below not to retain the article. On that basis, I have chosen the redirect as an ATD to preserve the history and as it was suggested within the discussion but not objected to by those !voting delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
user:Newbamboo proposed to delete this article on the Chinese Wiki page, saying that it was "forcibly splicing irrelevant information together to conduct original research." And I did not see a direct introduction about Jianghuai People on Google Scholar, Google Books, and CNKI.The source given in the English article, the title seems to have little to do with Jianghuai People. 日期20220626 ( talk) 04:39, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. While I'm open to the argument put forward in the nomination, I think this subject and article could use more discussion to arrive at a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
SImple case of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Any notable resorts or entries can be accommodated at List of hotels: Countries M. Ajf773 ( talk) 08:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Treaty of Hadiach. Daniel ( talk) 00:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article reproduces the Treaty of Hadiach. There is no information here that is not in that article, so I do not propose a merge. You should delete that article and create a redirect. Marcelus ( talk) 19:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
proposed in a treaty but nowhere elseis objectively false; it was a somewhat notable idea throughout the 1650s and was of later historical significance during the January Uprising. This is clearly more tha just a one off idea. — Knightof theswords 14:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. There seems to be a rough consensus that some of the content in this article should be Merged but several options on what the target article should be.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 07:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Exists, and did work for regional media mainly. Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep: Yes she was a regional broadcaster but she was a leading presenter on Yorkshire Television for three decades. This is more than enough to demonstrate notability. Also, the article has plenty of independent references. Rillington ( talk) 10:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails WP:IS, primary, "Barnes is a patron of Yorkshire Air Ambulance", fails WP:SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth, name mentioned in list and caption | 1. "Yorkshire Air Ambulance Annual Report 2017" (PDF). Yorkshire Air Ambulance Annual Report. March 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 July 2019. Retrieved 4 July 2019. |
Fails WP:IS, primary, interview "The Prince of Wales Hospice welcomes three new Patrons, ITV Calendar presenters Gaynor, Christine and Du" | 2. ^ "Calendar Presenters Become Patrons". The Prince of Wales Hospice. 14 August 2020. Retrieved 20 October 2021. |
Interview, fails WP:IS | 3. ^ "TV Presenter Gaynor Barnes talks to Yorkshire Life". Yorkshire Life. 11 January 2010. Retrieved 31 January 2019. |
Fails WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 4. ^ Berry, Chris (13 May 2005). "The Southern 'softie' with northern grit". The Yorkshire Post. Archived from the original on 1 February 2019. Retrieved 31 January 2019. |
Primary, fails WP:IS, "Meet the team" promo | 5. ^ "Meet the team". ITV Calendar. 31 January 2019. |
Name mention, panelist, fails WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. | 6. ^ Zientek, Henryk (19 November 2008). "Help for entrepreneurs". Huddersfield Examiner. Retrieved 10 August 2010. |
Interview, fails WP:IS | 7. ^ TV Presenter Gaynor Barnes talks to Yorkshire Life Yorkshire Life, 11 January 2010 |
Routine news about programming change. Fails primary, fails WP:SIGCOV addressing subject directly and indepth | 8. ^ "John Shires and Gaynor Barnes to leave ITV News Calendar". ITV News. Retrieved 19 March 2021. |
Name listed, fails SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. | 9. ^ "RTS Yorkshire Programme Awards 2021". Royal Television Society. 15 January 2021. Retrieved 20 October 2021. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It would help for those editors who want to Keep this article to respond to the source analysis or bring forward some additional sources that could help establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Successful photographer, but I couldn't establish that he meets WP:N. Has been in CAT:NN for over 13 years. Boleyn ( talk) 21:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still ineligible for Soft Deletion. Some more participation here would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:19, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2018.
PROD removed with links to 2 sites with nothing more than blurbs about it, no indepth coverage. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:58, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No one is arguing for retention, and no indication any input is forthcoming. Star Mississippi 19:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Declined prod. Only 1 article links to this. Could not significant coverage of this individual in news and google books searches. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 11:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:MULTSOURCES - one source for its bankruptcy alone is not notable, nor did the experimental drugs ever leave trial stage. Cannot find any other sources. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 13:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eliminative materialism. History remains under the redirect for a merge, if desired Star Mississippi 18:52, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Non significant coverage at [44] and [45] (they mention the term twice and once respectively. Cannot find any other verbatim usage. Suggest merging/redirecting to eliminative materialism if anything can be salvaged. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 13:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. Star Mississippi 18:50, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Guyana women's international footballers. I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) No indication of notability, either. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The subject earned a couple of caps for the Dominican Republic women's national football team, but I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found in my searches was this; everything else was passing mentions. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Classified as a complementary and alternative medicine [49], which sets a high bar for notability without undue weight. I cannot find reliable sources providing significant coverage independent of its main author, Pat Ogden. Note that Ogden frequently co-authors with Janina Fisher, ideally there would be review material or robust studies without either of them as listed authors. Sources need to meet WP:MEDRS also. The article history has had multiple attempted insertions of copyvio and advertising/promotional material since creation. Darcyisverycute ( talk) 06:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Santos FC seasons. ✗ plicit 06:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
The article contains one sentence and no references. 1keyhole ( talk) 05:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Te Unuhanga-a-Rangitoto / Mercer Bay. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 20:34, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Per
WP:ONEOTHER; this page should be deleted and redirected to
Te Unuhanga-a-Rangitoto / Mercer Bay as the primary topic for this River.
The topic which this is competing with, a Mercer Bay in Cumberland West Bay, is an obscure location that doesn't even warrant an article. Further, a Google News search for the past year finds no results for the bay in Cumberland West Bay, but over a dozen for Unuhanga-a-Rangitoto / Mercer Bay. BilledMammal ( talk) 04:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
However, AfD can be used to propose redirects; I expected that if I made this boldly it would be reverted or otherwise objected to and so I wanted to get consensus for it, and this is the appropriate venue for that. BilledMammal ( talk) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject lacks the needed coverage from independent sources to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 04:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was Moot. Deletion is not being contemplated. Moves can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi 18:49, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Per
WP:ONEOTHER; this page should be deleted and redirected to
Waihemo / Shag River as the primary topic for this River.
Looking at pageviews, we see that Waihemo / Shag River receives over ten times the views of Shag River (Fiordland), demonstrating that it is primary by usage.
It also appears to be primary by long term significance; a search on Google News and Google Scholar shows that the vast majority of results are for the river in Otago. BilledMammal ( talk) 03:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
However, AfD can be used to propose redirects; I expected that if I made this boldly it would be reverted or otherwise objected to and so I wanted to get consensus for it, and this is the appropriate venue for that. BilledMammal ( talk) 11:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourcing has been IDed that addresses both the nom and delete !votes. Star Mississippi 18:46, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Article has been unsourced since at least 2020. I have done a quick Google search and Google Scholar search but have been unable to find more reliable sources. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Despite difficulty, sources with sufficient coverage to meet WP:NBOOK were eventually identified. signed, Rosguill talk 02:02, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Article is reliant upon a single citation, which was added in September 2023 without adding additional content. I have done a quick Google search and Google Scholar search but have been unable to find more reliable sources. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. It would be great if some of the sources brought up in this discussion could be added to this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for writers. As always, writers are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because their work exists, and have to show notability markers such as notable literary awards and/or the reception of
WP:GNG-worthy coverage about them and their work in real reliable sources -- but the only notability claim being attempted here is that his work exists, and the only source being cited is his "staff" profile on the
self-published website of his own publisher, which is not a notability-building source.
As I can't read Arabic, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with the necessary language skills and resource access can find enough improved sourcing to salvage it -- but nothing in this version of the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. This article needs additional review after article improvements.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No one has performed an analysis of the sources added or presented. If I had to close right now, I would close as no consensus. But I'm relisting in hope for a more definitive answer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)