![]() |
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing good to suggest improvement aside from some of the usual links. Definitely not outstanding, from what I see, as an actor and there are no good sources to establish a martial artist article. Not to mention, this orphaned article has not improved even in the slightest since starting in August 2008 and there are no signs of it happening. Notifying author Debonairjdj. SwisterTwister talk 23:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Borderline notability at best, and clear promotionalism. Very little of the article is devoted to the association, but more to the industry in general. What is being promoted, as one might expect, is the industry, not the association , but that still is promotionalism. See , for example, all of section 2.
It's cited only to the organizations site. It reads like a copyvio as well, but I can't follow up on the details of a site in that language. DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found absolutely nothing and it seems to have unsurprisingly been started by the band themselves. Either this band existed and it was very local and low-key or it never actually existed, but either way this article from November 2005 is unacceptable. Subsequently, once this is deleted and a redirect can be restored to The Program (disambiguation). SwisterTwister talk 22:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:BAND, the subject has not been covered by enough non-trivial publications/media. As it stands now, the page only references the band's Soundcloud and Youtube pages, and through my searches, I haven't been able to find enough coverage for this group to merit their own article. Upjav ( talk) 22:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Hanwha. Courcelles ( talk) 00:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure if this company is notable as the article says it built the first PVC plant in South Korea and I found an article saying the parent company Hanwha is the nation's 10th largest conglomerate of its country. The best my searches found were here, here, here and here. At best, it seems it may be notable especially in Korea but from the article's current state and no outstandingly good sources, I'm not sure. SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, no outstanding issues raised at AfD. — Spaceman Spiff 14:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I previously proded this for notability issues but the creating editor removed the prod and all the prose. Now with no prose t is useless and even with the prose the notability is still a problem.
ww2censor (
talk)
20:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
delete Non-notable elementary and middle school. No substantial information included in article - just an external link Calvinballing ( talk) 14:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable book. TheGGoose ( talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Book lacks sources that indicate notability. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable phrase. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect at will, of course Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
No notability is known about this fictional neighborhood in the animated series The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron. May it's never heard or defined in the show. This will have to be deleted or become a redirect. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This is WP:CRYSTAL sourced from one company's marketing puff. Anything that needs to be said is already said in their article at JP Aerospace. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 17:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
A band article lacking sources that indicate notability. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unable to find sources that this is notable, or at least exists. TheGGoose ( talk) 16:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Subject lacks sources found that it's notable. Could be a copyvio of its website. TheGGoose ( talk) 16:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:RHaworth per WP:A10, "Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic, First-time user experience". North America 1000 22:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The page appears to be a sandbox in the main namespace, so my first thought was that it should be moved somewhere (e.g. Talk:First-time user experience/sandbox). But it's a page which seems to largely duplicate material from First-time user experience: it seems to have been copied from an older version of the article ( Special:Permalink/528867443). This sandbox page was created several months ago by a user who has not edited since a couple of days after they created the page; shortly after creating the page, they completely overhauled First-time user experience, so maybe they were a newbie that thought a copy of the older version needed to be / should be kept for archive/backup purposes. I can't find any relevant policies that deal with this situation, nor a CSD criterion that seems like it would apply, but it seems to me to be common sense that this should be deleted. — Bilorv (talk) (c) (e) 14:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Myanma general election, 2015. Courcelles ( talk) 00:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Article on some by-elections that were eventually cancelled. As a result, I don't believe this is a notable topic, and the cancellation is already mentioned in Myanma general election, 2015#Cancellation of by-elections. Number 5 7 12:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The article has only just been deleted via PROD and recreated for no apparent reason. He has made no professional appearances and fails WP:GNG too. Spiderone 12:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete this page? Donnaruma is not famous enough for you? lol, wikipedia lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.239.232.85 ( talk) 15:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of longest films. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 17:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE with unclear inclusion criteria. Films that are notable for their length are already covered by List of longest films. Don Cuan ( talk) 10:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur and author. Cited sources are not convincing. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 10:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Singapore Management University. While opinion was divided over this discussion, the rough consensus seems to be that the references provided do not quite rise to the level required by our notability guidelines. If the topic is not notable, our main choices are delete, redirect, and merge. Out of these, the arguments for merging were the most persuasive, given the relationship of SMU to its school of accounting, and the precedent of how other similar topics are covered on Wikipedia. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable school, not notable in its own right, fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. Whilst I think deletion is the best option, I would accept a move back to draftspace, since I believe it was wrongly accepted at AFC, or a merge with Singapore Management University. Joseph2302 ( talk) 09:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
"concerns I raised... weren't addressed". Addressing them = cleanup.
"rewritten completel". Rewriting = cleanup. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 15:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as architect of questionable notability. Quis separabit? 22:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Matt Berninger. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 15:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND. Binksternet ( talk) 19:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I believe this person to be a non-notable rapper. The article only has one source, which is a dead link. The archived version, however, shows that it is basically just a "blurb" on this artist's only album, on a vendor site. I'm unable to find reviews or coverage that meet RS standards and would establish that this person is notable. Fyddlestix ( talk) 03:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The article is trivial WP:FANCRUFT. Koala15 ( talk) 23:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Been 21 days, so soft deleting this. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
non notable. Not even its own release, but rather part of a larger set L1A1 FAL ( talk) 22:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Another 21-day old AFD, so a soft delete Courcelles ( talk) 00:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Rare release, with no citations, nothing to denote notability L1A1 FAL ( talk) 22:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to stethoscope. There's clear consensus here that this should not exist as a stand-alone article. Less clear agreement on which of delete/merge/redirect is the right alternative. Selective merge seems a reasonable average of the various options. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlike some 3D printed objects (such as firearms, for security concerns, or spacecraft) I see little reason for this to be a separate article from stethoscope. Westroopnerd ( talk) 22:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Bollywood films of 2015. Swarm ♠ 21:21, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Not enough content. We already have a list on highest-grossing Bollywood films - List of highest-grossing Indian films. Frankie talk 22:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jujutacular ( talk) 21:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 21:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. The nominator didn't create a clear delete !vote, and instead queried whether the subject is notable or not. Two other editors have provided rationales, and the merge discussion, if any, can take place on the talk page. Cheers. ( non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 00:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Is it notable? It was founded by Hsuan Hua (or in his honor, I'm not sure). It is led by Hen**g Sure. It is affiliated with the Dharma Realm Buddhist University. All these topics have Wikipedia content. Perhaps BBM should, too, but I don't know. -- Lhimec ( talk) 21:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG, and not enough prominence to satisfy WP:NSONGS. Basically, the song did not excite comment from the media. Binksternet ( talk) 19:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
-- CFCF 🍌 ( email) 18:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to SaskTel. Courcelles ( talk) 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I was actually going to redirect this to SaskTel but as it's fully mentioned there or is there something to support a move there, I'm not sure if deleting is a better option. My searches found here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 18:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to a better consensus and possibly some improvement if possible; my searches found the following results here (fades by page 4), here, here, here, here and here (a search at Newspapers Archive also found nothing). He seems well known and notable in his field but I'm not sure if this can be improved and, if it can, it certainly needs better sources. Inviting the still most active users @ Agent 86, Tevildo, and SlimJim: for comment. SwisterTwister talk 18:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. After being relisted twice there's clearly no consensus regarding deletion. While I respect the debate outlined with Kraxler's opinion, there's still no other delete opinions that have come into light during the duration of this discussion. ( non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a blogger and writer, resting entirely on primary sources with not a shred of reliable source coverage in sight. While there's enough of a claim of notability here (past nominee for the Lambda Literary Awards) that he could qualify for an article in principle, that's still conditional on the quality of sourcing that can be provided to support the article, and is not a freebie that exempts a person from having to satisfy our sourcing rules. I've searched both Google and newspapers.com for improved sourcing, and found nothing — I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody else can find better sourcing, perhaps in a news database that I don't have access to, but he has to be better sourced than this before he can keep an article on Wikipedia. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 17:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete for now Weak Keep -Does not meet notability standards for author or creative professional as it stands, due to no reliable secondary sources. However, some quotes of editorial reviews found
here: The 4 Lambda Literary Award nominations qualify him under WP:Any Bio. Prolific writer, though all his books are self-published, per
this description of Bellhue Press: " All of these books are by gay poet and pioneering activist, speaker, and authority on gender issues, Perry Brass". Article is only a few days old, author could still be adding sources.
ABF99 (
talk)
04:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- I am a former gay bookstore owner (Liberty Books, Austin TX 1988-1994) and 'zine publisher/editor (White Crane Journal, 1996-2003) and activist/contributor to the "Gay Spirituality Movement." I have known of Perry Brass through all of these. White Crane Journal published reviews of his books (Summer, 2000 & Fall, 2007) and ads. I now work as a freelance editor with Lethe Press and know of Perry Brass as organizer of the annual Rainbow Book Show in New York City http://rainbowbookfair.org/author/perrybrass. I know Perry Brass as a longtime gay activist, gay community organizer, and gay publishing activist. He is a writer/contributor to Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/perry-brass/. I think he is notable in American gay cultural history. Tobyjohnso ( talk) 17:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The article notes:
Dr. Hugh Howard Young and Perry Manual Brass were married Friday at the Manhattan Marriage Bureau in New York. Alisa Fuentes, an employee of the city clerk’s office, officiated.
...
Mr. Brass, also 65, is the author of “King of Angels,” a novel, and a playwright whose drama “Night Chills,” about the AIDS crisis, was presented Off Off Broadway in 1984. In 1969, he was among the founders of the Gay Liberation Front, a group that emerged after the disturbances at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village. In 1973, he helped found the Gay Men’s Health Project clinic in Manhattan.
Mr. Brass, who graduated from New York University, is a son of the late Louis Brass and the late Helen Landy Brass, who lived in Savannah, Ga.
Mr. Brass was not at the Stonewall bar when the battles with the police broke out in June 1969. “If everybody who says they were there actually were there, it would have filled Yankee Stadium,” he said.
Still, what happened at the Stonewall motivated him and others to form the Gay Liberation Front. As for the idea that he would someday be married, he said, “I used to joke that it made about as much sense as gay divorce.” In those volatile days, he said, “we wanted to explode the mores of the world.”
Those mores had certainly been ruffled by the time he met Dr. Young in Central Park on the last day of November 1980. Mr. Brass was walking his dog, Willie, and Dr. Young was crossing the park on his way to church.
The article notes:
New York poet Perry Brass was so distressed by the beating death of 21-year-old gay college student Matthew Shepard that, within hours of hearing the news from Wyoming last October, he wrote "Matthew's Lullaby."
By e-mail, he shared his phrases about the universal need for safety and comfort with friends across the country, including Craig Carnahan, music director for the Twin Cities Gay Men's Chorus.
Months later, Carnahan was commissioned by baritone Chad Furman to write a piece - "Matthew's Lullaby" - for the chorus' 18th-season concert. Brass' poem was suggested as the libretto, for which Carnahan created a gentle, melodic lullaby.
The composer says, "Of the hundreds of responses I read to Matthew Shepard's murder, few were as eloquent as Perry Brass' moving poem with its images of home and warmth and sanctuary and peace - a profound response to a horrific event."
The article notes:
"All Men," Sunday, Lionheart Gay Theatre, Leo Lerner Uptown Center, 4520 N. Beacon St.; 769-5199: A hit at the 1987 Los Angeles Fringe Theatre Festival, Perry Brass' play combines narration, poetry, monologues and fiction to provide miniature portraits of gay men-from drag to butch, from rich to poor, and across several generations. What results is a portrait of a community in turbulent transition. H. Richardson Michaels directs and performs with the playwright. The second and final performance is Jan. 17.
The article notes:
Poet/novelist Brass lives in New York City and has published 13 books. They include "Sex-Charge" and "The Lover of My Soul," collections of poetry; "How To Survive Your Own Gay Life," "Mirage," "Albert of The Book of Man" and "Angel Lust." He is a six-time finalist for Lambda Literary Awards and won an Ippy Award from Independent Publisher Magazine in 2001 for "Warlock: A Novel of Possesion."
The article notes:
Craig Carnahan was disturbed while attending a vigil for Matthew Shepard shortly after the 21-year-old gay college student was murdered in Wyoming last October.
"The emotions that night were rage, anger and fear," he said. "I had friends who literally were afraid to come out of their houses for days afterward, they were so afraid."
Carnahan, music director of the Twin Cities Gay Men's Chorus, was looking for a different response to the killing that sent the nation soul-searching. He found it in a poem written by Perry Brass, a New York City poet.
"He'd written it the day after Matthew Shepard's death," said Carnahan. "But it wasn't a requiem; it wasn't angry, it was a lullaby. It never really mentions Matthew or his death, though you know what he's reacting to, yet it's universal, about people who fall because of being disenfranchised, yet who seek and finally find a safe haven. It was filled with images of warmth and humanity, of resting and being understood. It's about finding a safe place called home."
...
It isn't the first time Carnahan has worked with poet Brass. "I first became aware of Perry when the chorus was recording `Heartbeats,' our contribution to the AIDS Quilt Songbook," said Carnahan. "Chris DeBlasio had set a beautiful poem by him, the most spectacular song on the record, I think. I met him and in 1996 the New York Gay Men's Chorus commissioned me to set his work `Waltzes for Men.'
"He's a sensitive and musical poet - surprising, I suppose, since the other thing he does is write a gay science-fiction serial . . . all about gay aliens. Maybe that should be set to music next."
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
No reliable external references, no indication of notability of the series. Westroopnerd ( talk) 17:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't think this is a notable theory/area of study - the article is sourced exclusively to papers by a single researcher (Moin Rahman), and none of the papers have significant citations or coverage in other, independent sources. Many of the links in the "external links" section are, again, to the author's own papers on scribd, or to news articles that don't even mention Moin Rahman or "high velocity human factors." I'll admit that this is not my area of expertise, but I can find no evidence that this is a notable or recognized theory/area of study. Fyddlestix ( talk) 03:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Article was (basically) written by two editors, both of whom -- if different -- appear to have a COI; Article has major issues with tone, lack of evidence, and dead links; Artist does not meet WP:MUSBIO requirements for notability Hydronium Hydroxide ( talk) 03:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Juanita E. Thornton/Shepherd Park Neighborhood Library. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:BIO WP:1E Only known for one event and only local coverage at that. Most of the information here is already covered at Juanita E. Thornton/Shepherd Park Neighborhood Library which barely passes muster itself as a local library. Savonneux ( talk) 02:13, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Rojava Revolution. Courcelles ( talk) 00:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Already exists at Rojava Revolution, and in my opinion, the title doesn't warrant a redirect. Westroopnerd ( talk) 16:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 21:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable caste (with none of its contemporaries having pages of their own and no external references), at a page unlikely to be searched often enough to warrant a redirect. Westroopnerd ( talk) 16:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:OR bio about a hacker that cites no sources (and none seem to be available) and that is either promotional or defamatory depending upon ones point of view. Incidentally, the article should correctly be titled "An0n$iD", although even that does not help find any reliable sources. Abecedare ( talk) 15:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Well I think,there is small amount of information available about the defacer.I came to know about the defacer because my name and his name is similar(last part of name).I saw the article on wikia.com .And I came to know that there are many websites,hosting servers defaced by the defacer and also concluded by seeing the cache history of the web domains from google that the defacer has tried to depict some social issues on every deface pages.And sadly his twitter,facebook account links stated in wikia article are not working or maybe deleted by the social networks.Else more information should have been possible to extract from that links. Haxxorsid ( talk) 16:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
A WP:NEOLOGISM created as a piece of marketing by the Lazada Group. I can't find any evidence that this has received any coverage in high-quality sources. SmartSE ( talk) 15:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
No claim of separate notability from University of Karachi. Solomon 7968 12:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jahangirnagar University. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
No claim/evidence of independent notability from Jahangirnagar University. Solomon 7968 12:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The estate is not notable, notability claims are indirect, it is near notable houses, but not on any notable lists, it is in the style of Richard Morris Hunt or inspired by Frederick Law Olmsted, but no involvement by either. It has no reliable references, the article had external links , general references, and see also sections that referred to a nearby, not associated property, none of them applied to the subject of this article. Generic1139 ( talk) 12:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Brunswick Boat Group. If anyone wants to merge anything, it can be drawn from the redirect's history. Deor ( talk) 09:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Businesses are not inherently notable. The sources for this particular article are all first party sources. In fact, they are the company's website. I would generally suggest a merge to Brunswick Boat Group, but with the amount of small boat companies that belong to them; that article would be flooded soon. I propose to delete this article. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 11:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The past AfD linked a few places where this person is mentioned; but it only just mentioned her name. None of the sources listed here go into much detail, if any at all, in regards to the actual person this article is written for. The overwhelming majority of the references used are in regards to Pacifica Radio; and not Lynn Chadwick. She was one of the endless execs for this company and nothing really meets notability guidelines. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 11:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against redirecting. Swarm ♠ 21:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nowa ( talk) 07:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per consensus, non-notable company. Philg88 ♦ talk 12:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Essentially the same as the article deleted twice previously, once by speedy,oce by CSD. Promotional and not notable. The references are basically press releases or articles based on them ,or mere notices. The contents is promotional , using unsupported terms of praise "quickly with minimum effort" ; "correct value" and descriptions of its routine operations which are exactly like all used electronic commerce sites. Veryborderline notable at best, and borderline notability plus promotionalism is a reason for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 07:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
While the UK R&B chart is notable, I'd argue that this list of fairly arbitrary records from the chart is not; per WP:LISTN, the list's topic can be considered sufficiently notable if it has been discussed as a group in independent, reliable sources. As far as I have been able to tell, the sorts of chart records listed in this article (UK R&B chart records) have not been discussed by any reliable source, including even the Official Charts Company's news releases. This leads to another glaring issue; that the entire article's contents are original research, compiled in a piecemeal, unsystematic manner by its editors without reference to sources that specifically identify the artists and works as the holders of those records. Every single reference given in the article links to a single week of the chart, which is not at all informative when it comes to verifying whether the artist/song/album in question holds a record over the entire chart's history. For instance, to support the contention that JLS holds the record for most number-one albums on the chart, four references to individual chart weeks showing the four different albums at number one are given. Though this does support the claim that JLS have four number-one album on this chart, per WP:SYNTH, these sources do NOT support the contention that no other act has earned as many number-one albums on the chart and that JLS hold this record; indeed, there appear to be no sources that discuss this achievement in the context of that 'record' whatsoever. Nearly all of the 'records' and 'milestones' listed in the article suffer the same problem; therefore, in addition to the article's content being questionably noteworthy, it is also not verifiable. Mmrsofgreen ( talk) 07:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unclear notability. Marginal sources, but no apparent lasting significance. C628 ( talk) 05:29, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. RockMagnetist( talk) 16:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm nominating this because I can't find anything to suggest improvement (the article is orphaned as well) with my most successful searches here and here, nothing more than minor things and no significant links. I hope familiar users can attend to this if possible as he seems interesting and notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge tracks into Burial discography where it is already mentioned. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I tried my best to find any significant coverage of this, but failed. Links to Discogs and Musicbrainz are not enough to indicate notability for inclusion Wikipedia. This article would be, at best, a redirect to either Burial (Burial album) or Burial discography. 和DITOR E tails 04:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge tracks into, and redirect to, Burial discography. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 17:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
The EP lacks nobility in independent, reliable sources. This was the only reliable source I could find that even barely talked about the subject. 和DITOR E tails 04:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing to suggest better coverage including aside from Canada-based sources and the best from my searches being this (for judging a local music competition). None of the awards seem convincing enough to suggest notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 23:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Another open and shut case of non-notability and actually non-existence because their website is closed. My searches found absolutely nothing to suggest this ever received coverage and I thought of PRODing but I wanted comments especially if there's (albeit marginal possibility of) non-English sources). SwisterTwister talk 02:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Obviously non-notable actor and musician with my searches finding nothing good at all. A look at the history also shows considerable vandalism and other issues in 2007 and 2008 and no significant improvement has ever been made since starting in September 2007 by a SPA that may have been connected to the subject. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing to suggest better sourcing, notability and improvement with the best results here, here and here. Her radio show may have also ended as the links are now dead and there's hasn't been any recent coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Proposed railways in Sydney#'Christie' proposals, 2002 . -- RoySmith (talk) 01:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This article refers to a single proposal in a larger document that was never government policy. The document (the Christie report) has since been superseded by Sydney's Rail Future, which is government policy and contains a different plan for this area. Also, the page is wholly reliant on a single primary source – the Christie report itself. Mqst north ( talk) 06:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I found nothing at all to suggest better sourcing, notability and improvement with the best results here, here and here and finally there's no move target for this orphan that seemed to have been started by the subject (April 2008 and no significant changes since then). SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 17:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable writer. The prize she won does not seem to be very high-profile, and I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources (personal webpage and university faculty pages don't count). Reyk YO! 09:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep I looked on EBSCOhost and she has a substantial review from a journal in the database for her poetry. In addition, she is a regular contributor to Huffington Post, and several academic and literary journals. I'll hit Lexis Nexus later and see what I can find, but I think she's notable enough to keep. She is also the editor of several books that seem to be used as textbooks. Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 14:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep. At the very least, meets WP:BASIC with what's currently in the article, plus this, and this and this and this. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 17:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NFF and WP:NFILM. This film has not been released yet; and as per WP:NFF, it should not have an article. Yes, the Toronto International Film Festival is going to screen it, however, none of the sources state if the film is 100% finished. If you disregard that though, it fails WP:NFILM. 0 third party coverage. Google searching this one is difficult as it matches a location which isn't related to this film. If you look at the results that do come up; some are mirrors for the TIFF website listing, while others are promoted via the films production team. I don't feel this belongs here until it at least officially releases; and even then, only if it becomes notable. Appearing at a film festival doesn't assert notability, but if something comes out of said festival, then notability may become established later on. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 09:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This article only references the technique of one designer. This technique doesn't appear beyond her book, which is a primary source. It may make sense to merge with the existing needlepoint article. Ehgarrick ( talk) 23:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After being relisted twice, there's no consensus towards deletion or keeping the article.
I would like to note that DGG's comment is spot on. Just because an article has been around since '07 and hasn't had any significant work done, there are sources and there is literature out there, however, we need to reach out to our bilingual editors to assist in translation and sourcing. I suggest reaching out to the appropriate projects for tagging and assistance. ( non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Basically original research and my searches (with both names) found nothing good to suggest improvement and better understanding (the two listed sources are not enough to save it nor are significant). SwisterTwister talk 16:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
At best a content fork of Posttraumatic growth, with which this article shares a structure and a good deal of content.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 20:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable software. Fails WP:PRODUCT. Possible COI issue; see WP:COIN#ConEmu John Nagle ( talk) 19:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
"Note that a specific product or service may be notable on its own, without the company providing it being notable in its own right. In this case, an article on the product may be appropriate, and notability of the company itself is not inherited as a result."
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:CRYSTALBALL The Banner talk 20:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
After looking up this article's name, there seems to be nothing else about it online, at least in English, despite that it's said to be "famous". I also can't locate anything about the village of Sauram Garhi. Maybe there's details about it in Hindi or another language in its area (around Firozabad). Google Translate can't completely translate both the article name and the village name to Hindi. TheGGoose ( talk) 21:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. This discussion was closed on 7 September as soft redirect to Wiktionary by User:Sovereign Sentinel, a non-admin. In line with WP:DPR#NAC, I, an admin, have vacated this closure as it seems out of line with the consensus. I am re-closing as delete. Stifle ( talk) 09:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:DICDEF not a dictionary. The second source even cites the first one. There is an etymology if you look for it but it's neither interesting, nor clear enough to build an article around. Even fleshed out it would be a permastub with bad sources. Savonneux ( talk) 08:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
@
Savonneux: I appreciate and share your concerns for the integrity of Wikipedia, but the reason I believed that "
Fiddlesticks!" warrants inclusion as a Wikipedia entry is the fact of that interjection's roots in, and connection with
American Louisiana Cajun culture among
enslaved peoples in the early history of the United States, which I do think is interesting; and it is my intention that myself and other editors will expand that aspect of this subject further as the article is further developed and improved upon from stub status.
That story goes considerably beyond the mere etymology of a word as it would be set out in
Wiktionary, and is significant in its acknowledgement of African-American cultural traditions and contributions (often overlooked or given only
short shrift) to the broader
American folklore and culture of the United States.
When white plantation owners, as they often did, suppressed the use of African musical instruments by slaves, they deprived those people of their traditional means of cultural rhythmic expression. Their continuing need to enjoy musical traditions and express rhythm found new outlets in a number of different forms, one of which was straw beating on violins, or using "fiddlesticks", and the resultant concomitant expletive expression often muttered under ones breath back at their "Masters" and owners, that is the intended subject of this Wikipedia article. --- Professor JR ( talk) 10:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 06:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO or WP:ENT and hence, delete. Will withdraw if notability could be established. Regards — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 08:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced "recently developed" term. Neither source given uses the word "cupex" or mentions the supposed inventor of the process, M.R Bakhshandeh, and Google only has four or five results for "cupex" "copper leaching" and "cupex" "bakhshandeh", all of them Wikipedia mirrors. McGeddon ( talk) 07:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:UNSOURCED, WP:Notability Vin09 ( talk) 07:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Multiple third party sources have been uncovered in support of this particular event. See comment by Northamerica1000 for links. ( non-admin closure) The Undead Never Die ( talk) 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable event, trivial information. Even all that information is condensed on Comedy Central Roast#Roasts. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 06:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 20:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Very trivial game with just one reference and little notability beyond it being a variation on the Whac-A-Mole concept. Why have a stand alone article?I recommend deletion and possible merging of basic theme into the main Whac-A-Mole article. SpyMagician ( talk) 06:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm nominating simply because of the low amount of good sources with the current link now dead and unretrieveable at archive.org and I'm not finding any solid evidence of the listed book aside from this (which seems to be the new version of the dead link) and further searches found this and this. At best, this should be mentioned elsewhere as she may not be independently notable but there's no obvious target. Pinging author Aciram and possibly interested editor LadyofShalott (who wikified it a little). SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete as the only source for the article does not meet WP:RS. The content on the site was a blog, and has been shut down. Even if it were available it would not suffice. Scr★pIron IV 19:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. A7 nothing here indicates significance, and it should have been listed for speedy instead of AfD DGG ( talk ) 22:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
This may have been somewhat known locally in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and I'm simply nominating because the low amount of good solid sources to even at least suggest local notability; my searches were here, here, here and here. At best, this could be mentioned elsewhere but as an orphan there's no obvious target. SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet notability standards. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 05:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Adventures in Foam - Both nom & David agree it should be redirected so redirecting, I will say however this should've been done 4 days ago!. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 17:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet notability standards. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 04:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Not seeing sources that make her notable. Youtube not a good source Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing at all to suggest good third-party sources for improvement. There's no good move target for this article from March 2007 thus no alternative to deletion. SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOOPS, as the most notable job he's had is as an assistant coach to an NBA Development League (equivalent to Minor League Baseball) team. The only reference provided is not independent. It's hard to search for other sources because there appear to be a lot of other Brian Walshes in basketball, but the only other one I could find was from a non-RS website with a popup ad. The only way a person could be notable from the NBA Development League is if they have won an award or broken a record of some sort, which this person has not done. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 03:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found no outstandingly good results here, here and here. As an orphan, there' s no good move target and there are no solid signs of improvement (article has existed since June 2010). SwisterTwister talk 03:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
There are reliable sources that state Jose Perdomo was the doorman at The Dakota when John Lennon was killed and there are fringe-ish sources that state that José Sanjenis Perdomo (aka Sam Jenis) was a Cuban secret police agent who later became a CIA agent. Some of those sources state that the two are one and the same, probably to propagate the theory the CIA had Lennon killed. There is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources about anyone with this name, and it's a BLP violation if either man is alive. - Location ( talk) 03:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 06:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Article on a mall that was brought to AFD in 2007 and deleted. It was recreated in 2012 with no sources. I searched and could not find any sources. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 ( talk) 03:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Claims to be the largest mall in its area of India, but I can't find any sources to verify that. Currently the article is a mess, most sources are just directory listings. The award it won is too obscure to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 ( talk) 02:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, much less being signed to Atlantic Records, all I could find through Google was social media sites. Everymorning (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close: There was already an active discussion on Talk:Microsoft Spyware and as a result of that ongoing discussion, an active expansion-draft being written at Talk:Microsoft_Spyware/expansion. To nominate the main article for deletion without explicitly acknowledging the ongoing discussion and without also including the draft "expansion" article is poor form. I'm going to take off my "non-admin closure" hat and put on my "experienced editor" hat and recommend that no further attempts to delete this be done without further discussion on the article talk page. I'm putting my "non-admin closure" had to say that any future AFD of the article should also explicitly include the "draft expansion" sub-page, assuming that page still exists at the time. Since Talk-sub-page drafts fall under WP:MFD and articles fall under WP:AFD, the best way to handle it would be to list both at AFD as a joint nomination, then create a "placeholder" MFD that points back to the AFD. The placeholder is for the benefit of editors who patrol MFDs but not AFDs. As this is a non-admin closure, if you disagree, feel free to ask any admin to overturn my decision and reopen the discussion. I will trust his judgment. ( non-admin closure) davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 04:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
WP:POVFORK that is useless for disambiguation. RJaguar3 | u | t 01:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone thinks a redirect is appropriate (or if the discussion referred to by davidwr in the last comment below supports the existence of one), he or she may boldly create one. Deor ( talk) 09:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Being the father of guitarists Jimmie and Stevie Ray Vaughan isn't enough. Clarityfiend ( talk) 01:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Mr. Guye ( talk) 00:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
It has been asserted that pornographic awards with an article are prima facie non notable enough to meet WP:ANYBIO. Surely if an award is notable enough to meet the standard of an article it is notable enough to meet the standard of WP:ANYBIO. If they are not notable enough to meet the criteria of ANYBIO then it would follow they are not notable enough to meet the standard of a basic article. I am WP:BOLDly testing this double standard through practical application. Savonneux ( talk) 01:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG and lacks reliable third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by Gogo Dodo under G4 ( non-admin closure). Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 12:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG and is upcoming actor a case of WP:TOOSOON and lacks Reliable third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG and lacks Reliable third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing good to suggest improvement aside from some of the usual links. Definitely not outstanding, from what I see, as an actor and there are no good sources to establish a martial artist article. Not to mention, this orphaned article has not improved even in the slightest since starting in August 2008 and there are no signs of it happening. Notifying author Debonairjdj. SwisterTwister talk 23:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Borderline notability at best, and clear promotionalism. Very little of the article is devoted to the association, but more to the industry in general. What is being promoted, as one might expect, is the industry, not the association , but that still is promotionalism. See , for example, all of section 2.
It's cited only to the organizations site. It reads like a copyvio as well, but I can't follow up on the details of a site in that language. DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found absolutely nothing and it seems to have unsurprisingly been started by the band themselves. Either this band existed and it was very local and low-key or it never actually existed, but either way this article from November 2005 is unacceptable. Subsequently, once this is deleted and a redirect can be restored to The Program (disambiguation). SwisterTwister talk 22:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:BAND, the subject has not been covered by enough non-trivial publications/media. As it stands now, the page only references the band's Soundcloud and Youtube pages, and through my searches, I haven't been able to find enough coverage for this group to merit their own article. Upjav ( talk) 22:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Hanwha. Courcelles ( talk) 00:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure if this company is notable as the article says it built the first PVC plant in South Korea and I found an article saying the parent company Hanwha is the nation's 10th largest conglomerate of its country. The best my searches found were here, here, here and here. At best, it seems it may be notable especially in Korea but from the article's current state and no outstandingly good sources, I'm not sure. SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, no outstanding issues raised at AfD. — Spaceman Spiff 14:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I previously proded this for notability issues but the creating editor removed the prod and all the prose. Now with no prose t is useless and even with the prose the notability is still a problem.
ww2censor (
talk)
20:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
delete Non-notable elementary and middle school. No substantial information included in article - just an external link Calvinballing ( talk) 14:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable book. TheGGoose ( talk) 18:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Book lacks sources that indicate notability. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable phrase. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect at will, of course Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
No notability is known about this fictional neighborhood in the animated series The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron. May it's never heard or defined in the show. This will have to be deleted or become a redirect. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This is WP:CRYSTAL sourced from one company's marketing puff. Anything that needs to be said is already said in their article at JP Aerospace. — Cheers, Steelpillow ( Talk) 17:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
A band article lacking sources that indicate notability. TheGGoose ( talk) 17:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unable to find sources that this is notable, or at least exists. TheGGoose ( talk) 16:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Subject lacks sources found that it's notable. Could be a copyvio of its website. TheGGoose ( talk) 16:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:RHaworth per WP:A10, "Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic, First-time user experience". North America 1000 22:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The page appears to be a sandbox in the main namespace, so my first thought was that it should be moved somewhere (e.g. Talk:First-time user experience/sandbox). But it's a page which seems to largely duplicate material from First-time user experience: it seems to have been copied from an older version of the article ( Special:Permalink/528867443). This sandbox page was created several months ago by a user who has not edited since a couple of days after they created the page; shortly after creating the page, they completely overhauled First-time user experience, so maybe they were a newbie that thought a copy of the older version needed to be / should be kept for archive/backup purposes. I can't find any relevant policies that deal with this situation, nor a CSD criterion that seems like it would apply, but it seems to me to be common sense that this should be deleted. — Bilorv (talk) (c) (e) 14:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Myanma general election, 2015. Courcelles ( talk) 00:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Article on some by-elections that were eventually cancelled. As a result, I don't believe this is a notable topic, and the cancellation is already mentioned in Myanma general election, 2015#Cancellation of by-elections. Number 5 7 12:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The article has only just been deleted via PROD and recreated for no apparent reason. He has made no professional appearances and fails WP:GNG too. Spiderone 12:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete this page? Donnaruma is not famous enough for you? lol, wikipedia lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.239.232.85 ( talk) 15:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of longest films. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 17:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE with unclear inclusion criteria. Films that are notable for their length are already covered by List of longest films. Don Cuan ( talk) 10:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable entrepreneur and author. Cited sources are not convincing. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 10:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Singapore Management University. While opinion was divided over this discussion, the rough consensus seems to be that the references provided do not quite rise to the level required by our notability guidelines. If the topic is not notable, our main choices are delete, redirect, and merge. Out of these, the arguments for merging were the most persuasive, given the relationship of SMU to its school of accounting, and the precedent of how other similar topics are covered on Wikipedia. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 05:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable school, not notable in its own right, fails WP:GNG and WP:PROMO. Whilst I think deletion is the best option, I would accept a move back to draftspace, since I believe it was wrongly accepted at AFC, or a merge with Singapore Management University. Joseph2302 ( talk) 09:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
"concerns I raised... weren't addressed". Addressing them = cleanup.
"rewritten completel". Rewriting = cleanup. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 15:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as architect of questionable notability. Quis separabit? 22:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Matt Berninger. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 15:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND. Binksternet ( talk) 19:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I believe this person to be a non-notable rapper. The article only has one source, which is a dead link. The archived version, however, shows that it is basically just a "blurb" on this artist's only album, on a vendor site. I'm unable to find reviews or coverage that meet RS standards and would establish that this person is notable. Fyddlestix ( talk) 03:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The article is trivial WP:FANCRUFT. Koala15 ( talk) 23:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Been 21 days, so soft deleting this. Courcelles ( talk) 00:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
non notable. Not even its own release, but rather part of a larger set L1A1 FAL ( talk) 22:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Another 21-day old AFD, so a soft delete Courcelles ( talk) 00:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Rare release, with no citations, nothing to denote notability L1A1 FAL ( talk) 22:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to stethoscope. There's clear consensus here that this should not exist as a stand-alone article. Less clear agreement on which of delete/merge/redirect is the right alternative. Selective merge seems a reasonable average of the various options. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unlike some 3D printed objects (such as firearms, for security concerns, or spacecraft) I see little reason for this to be a separate article from stethoscope. Westroopnerd ( talk) 22:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Bollywood films of 2015. Swarm ♠ 21:21, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Not enough content. We already have a list on highest-grossing Bollywood films - List of highest-grossing Indian films. Frankie talk 22:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jujutacular ( talk) 21:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 21:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. The nominator didn't create a clear delete !vote, and instead queried whether the subject is notable or not. Two other editors have provided rationales, and the merge discussion, if any, can take place on the talk page. Cheers. ( non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 00:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Is it notable? It was founded by Hsuan Hua (or in his honor, I'm not sure). It is led by Hen**g Sure. It is affiliated with the Dharma Realm Buddhist University. All these topics have Wikipedia content. Perhaps BBM should, too, but I don't know. -- Lhimec ( talk) 21:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG, and not enough prominence to satisfy WP:NSONGS. Basically, the song did not excite comment from the media. Binksternet ( talk) 19:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
-- CFCF 🍌 ( email) 18:44, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to SaskTel. Courcelles ( talk) 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I was actually going to redirect this to SaskTel but as it's fully mentioned there or is there something to support a move there, I'm not sure if deleting is a better option. My searches found here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 18:37, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to a better consensus and possibly some improvement if possible; my searches found the following results here (fades by page 4), here, here, here, here and here (a search at Newspapers Archive also found nothing). He seems well known and notable in his field but I'm not sure if this can be improved and, if it can, it certainly needs better sources. Inviting the still most active users @ Agent 86, Tevildo, and SlimJim: for comment. SwisterTwister talk 18:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. After being relisted twice there's clearly no consensus regarding deletion. While I respect the debate outlined with Kraxler's opinion, there's still no other delete opinions that have come into light during the duration of this discussion. ( non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a blogger and writer, resting entirely on primary sources with not a shred of reliable source coverage in sight. While there's enough of a claim of notability here (past nominee for the Lambda Literary Awards) that he could qualify for an article in principle, that's still conditional on the quality of sourcing that can be provided to support the article, and is not a freebie that exempts a person from having to satisfy our sourcing rules. I've searched both Google and newspapers.com for improved sourcing, and found nothing — I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody else can find better sourcing, perhaps in a news database that I don't have access to, but he has to be better sourced than this before he can keep an article on Wikipedia. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 17:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete for now Weak Keep -Does not meet notability standards for author or creative professional as it stands, due to no reliable secondary sources. However, some quotes of editorial reviews found
here: The 4 Lambda Literary Award nominations qualify him under WP:Any Bio. Prolific writer, though all his books are self-published, per
this description of Bellhue Press: " All of these books are by gay poet and pioneering activist, speaker, and authority on gender issues, Perry Brass". Article is only a few days old, author could still be adding sources.
ABF99 (
talk)
04:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep -- I am a former gay bookstore owner (Liberty Books, Austin TX 1988-1994) and 'zine publisher/editor (White Crane Journal, 1996-2003) and activist/contributor to the "Gay Spirituality Movement." I have known of Perry Brass through all of these. White Crane Journal published reviews of his books (Summer, 2000 & Fall, 2007) and ads. I now work as a freelance editor with Lethe Press and know of Perry Brass as organizer of the annual Rainbow Book Show in New York City http://rainbowbookfair.org/author/perrybrass. I know Perry Brass as a longtime gay activist, gay community organizer, and gay publishing activist. He is a writer/contributor to Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/perry-brass/. I think he is notable in American gay cultural history. Tobyjohnso ( talk) 17:02, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The article notes:
Dr. Hugh Howard Young and Perry Manual Brass were married Friday at the Manhattan Marriage Bureau in New York. Alisa Fuentes, an employee of the city clerk’s office, officiated.
...
Mr. Brass, also 65, is the author of “King of Angels,” a novel, and a playwright whose drama “Night Chills,” about the AIDS crisis, was presented Off Off Broadway in 1984. In 1969, he was among the founders of the Gay Liberation Front, a group that emerged after the disturbances at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village. In 1973, he helped found the Gay Men’s Health Project clinic in Manhattan.
Mr. Brass, who graduated from New York University, is a son of the late Louis Brass and the late Helen Landy Brass, who lived in Savannah, Ga.
Mr. Brass was not at the Stonewall bar when the battles with the police broke out in June 1969. “If everybody who says they were there actually were there, it would have filled Yankee Stadium,” he said.
Still, what happened at the Stonewall motivated him and others to form the Gay Liberation Front. As for the idea that he would someday be married, he said, “I used to joke that it made about as much sense as gay divorce.” In those volatile days, he said, “we wanted to explode the mores of the world.”
Those mores had certainly been ruffled by the time he met Dr. Young in Central Park on the last day of November 1980. Mr. Brass was walking his dog, Willie, and Dr. Young was crossing the park on his way to church.
The article notes:
New York poet Perry Brass was so distressed by the beating death of 21-year-old gay college student Matthew Shepard that, within hours of hearing the news from Wyoming last October, he wrote "Matthew's Lullaby."
By e-mail, he shared his phrases about the universal need for safety and comfort with friends across the country, including Craig Carnahan, music director for the Twin Cities Gay Men's Chorus.
Months later, Carnahan was commissioned by baritone Chad Furman to write a piece - "Matthew's Lullaby" - for the chorus' 18th-season concert. Brass' poem was suggested as the libretto, for which Carnahan created a gentle, melodic lullaby.
The composer says, "Of the hundreds of responses I read to Matthew Shepard's murder, few were as eloquent as Perry Brass' moving poem with its images of home and warmth and sanctuary and peace - a profound response to a horrific event."
The article notes:
"All Men," Sunday, Lionheart Gay Theatre, Leo Lerner Uptown Center, 4520 N. Beacon St.; 769-5199: A hit at the 1987 Los Angeles Fringe Theatre Festival, Perry Brass' play combines narration, poetry, monologues and fiction to provide miniature portraits of gay men-from drag to butch, from rich to poor, and across several generations. What results is a portrait of a community in turbulent transition. H. Richardson Michaels directs and performs with the playwright. The second and final performance is Jan. 17.
The article notes:
Poet/novelist Brass lives in New York City and has published 13 books. They include "Sex-Charge" and "The Lover of My Soul," collections of poetry; "How To Survive Your Own Gay Life," "Mirage," "Albert of The Book of Man" and "Angel Lust." He is a six-time finalist for Lambda Literary Awards and won an Ippy Award from Independent Publisher Magazine in 2001 for "Warlock: A Novel of Possesion."
The article notes:
Craig Carnahan was disturbed while attending a vigil for Matthew Shepard shortly after the 21-year-old gay college student was murdered in Wyoming last October.
"The emotions that night were rage, anger and fear," he said. "I had friends who literally were afraid to come out of their houses for days afterward, they were so afraid."
Carnahan, music director of the Twin Cities Gay Men's Chorus, was looking for a different response to the killing that sent the nation soul-searching. He found it in a poem written by Perry Brass, a New York City poet.
"He'd written it the day after Matthew Shepard's death," said Carnahan. "But it wasn't a requiem; it wasn't angry, it was a lullaby. It never really mentions Matthew or his death, though you know what he's reacting to, yet it's universal, about people who fall because of being disenfranchised, yet who seek and finally find a safe haven. It was filled with images of warmth and humanity, of resting and being understood. It's about finding a safe place called home."
...
It isn't the first time Carnahan has worked with poet Brass. "I first became aware of Perry when the chorus was recording `Heartbeats,' our contribution to the AIDS Quilt Songbook," said Carnahan. "Chris DeBlasio had set a beautiful poem by him, the most spectacular song on the record, I think. I met him and in 1996 the New York Gay Men's Chorus commissioned me to set his work `Waltzes for Men.'
"He's a sensitive and musical poet - surprising, I suppose, since the other thing he does is write a gay science-fiction serial . . . all about gay aliens. Maybe that should be set to music next."
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
No reliable external references, no indication of notability of the series. Westroopnerd ( talk) 17:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't think this is a notable theory/area of study - the article is sourced exclusively to papers by a single researcher (Moin Rahman), and none of the papers have significant citations or coverage in other, independent sources. Many of the links in the "external links" section are, again, to the author's own papers on scribd, or to news articles that don't even mention Moin Rahman or "high velocity human factors." I'll admit that this is not my area of expertise, but I can find no evidence that this is a notable or recognized theory/area of study. Fyddlestix ( talk) 03:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Article was (basically) written by two editors, both of whom -- if different -- appear to have a COI; Article has major issues with tone, lack of evidence, and dead links; Artist does not meet WP:MUSBIO requirements for notability Hydronium Hydroxide ( talk) 03:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Juanita E. Thornton/Shepherd Park Neighborhood Library. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:BIO WP:1E Only known for one event and only local coverage at that. Most of the information here is already covered at Juanita E. Thornton/Shepherd Park Neighborhood Library which barely passes muster itself as a local library. Savonneux ( talk) 02:13, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Rojava Revolution. Courcelles ( talk) 00:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Already exists at Rojava Revolution, and in my opinion, the title doesn't warrant a redirect. Westroopnerd ( talk) 16:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 21:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable caste (with none of its contemporaries having pages of their own and no external references), at a page unlikely to be searched often enough to warrant a redirect. Westroopnerd ( talk) 16:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:OR bio about a hacker that cites no sources (and none seem to be available) and that is either promotional or defamatory depending upon ones point of view. Incidentally, the article should correctly be titled "An0n$iD", although even that does not help find any reliable sources. Abecedare ( talk) 15:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Well I think,there is small amount of information available about the defacer.I came to know about the defacer because my name and his name is similar(last part of name).I saw the article on wikia.com .And I came to know that there are many websites,hosting servers defaced by the defacer and also concluded by seeing the cache history of the web domains from google that the defacer has tried to depict some social issues on every deface pages.And sadly his twitter,facebook account links stated in wikia article are not working or maybe deleted by the social networks.Else more information should have been possible to extract from that links. Haxxorsid ( talk) 16:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
A WP:NEOLOGISM created as a piece of marketing by the Lazada Group. I can't find any evidence that this has received any coverage in high-quality sources. SmartSE ( talk) 15:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
No claim of separate notability from University of Karachi. Solomon 7968 12:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jahangirnagar University. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
No claim/evidence of independent notability from Jahangirnagar University. Solomon 7968 12:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The estate is not notable, notability claims are indirect, it is near notable houses, but not on any notable lists, it is in the style of Richard Morris Hunt or inspired by Frederick Law Olmsted, but no involvement by either. It has no reliable references, the article had external links , general references, and see also sections that referred to a nearby, not associated property, none of them applied to the subject of this article. Generic1139 ( talk) 12:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Brunswick Boat Group. If anyone wants to merge anything, it can be drawn from the redirect's history. Deor ( talk) 09:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Businesses are not inherently notable. The sources for this particular article are all first party sources. In fact, they are the company's website. I would generally suggest a merge to Brunswick Boat Group, but with the amount of small boat companies that belong to them; that article would be flooded soon. I propose to delete this article. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 11:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
The past AfD linked a few places where this person is mentioned; but it only just mentioned her name. None of the sources listed here go into much detail, if any at all, in regards to the actual person this article is written for. The overwhelming majority of the references used are in regards to Pacifica Radio; and not Lynn Chadwick. She was one of the endless execs for this company and nothing really meets notability guidelines. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 11:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against redirecting. Swarm ♠ 21:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nowa ( talk) 07:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Per consensus, non-notable company. Philg88 ♦ talk 12:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Essentially the same as the article deleted twice previously, once by speedy,oce by CSD. Promotional and not notable. The references are basically press releases or articles based on them ,or mere notices. The contents is promotional , using unsupported terms of praise "quickly with minimum effort" ; "correct value" and descriptions of its routine operations which are exactly like all used electronic commerce sites. Veryborderline notable at best, and borderline notability plus promotionalism is a reason for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 07:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
While the UK R&B chart is notable, I'd argue that this list of fairly arbitrary records from the chart is not; per WP:LISTN, the list's topic can be considered sufficiently notable if it has been discussed as a group in independent, reliable sources. As far as I have been able to tell, the sorts of chart records listed in this article (UK R&B chart records) have not been discussed by any reliable source, including even the Official Charts Company's news releases. This leads to another glaring issue; that the entire article's contents are original research, compiled in a piecemeal, unsystematic manner by its editors without reference to sources that specifically identify the artists and works as the holders of those records. Every single reference given in the article links to a single week of the chart, which is not at all informative when it comes to verifying whether the artist/song/album in question holds a record over the entire chart's history. For instance, to support the contention that JLS holds the record for most number-one albums on the chart, four references to individual chart weeks showing the four different albums at number one are given. Though this does support the claim that JLS have four number-one album on this chart, per WP:SYNTH, these sources do NOT support the contention that no other act has earned as many number-one albums on the chart and that JLS hold this record; indeed, there appear to be no sources that discuss this achievement in the context of that 'record' whatsoever. Nearly all of the 'records' and 'milestones' listed in the article suffer the same problem; therefore, in addition to the article's content being questionably noteworthy, it is also not verifiable. Mmrsofgreen ( talk) 07:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unclear notability. Marginal sources, but no apparent lasting significance. C628 ( talk) 05:29, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. RockMagnetist( talk) 16:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm nominating this because I can't find anything to suggest improvement (the article is orphaned as well) with my most successful searches here and here, nothing more than minor things and no significant links. I hope familiar users can attend to this if possible as he seems interesting and notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge tracks into Burial discography where it is already mentioned. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 16:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I tried my best to find any significant coverage of this, but failed. Links to Discogs and Musicbrainz are not enough to indicate notability for inclusion Wikipedia. This article would be, at best, a redirect to either Burial (Burial album) or Burial discography. 和DITOR E tails 04:12, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge tracks into, and redirect to, Burial discography. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 17:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
The EP lacks nobility in independent, reliable sources. This was the only reliable source I could find that even barely talked about the subject. 和DITOR E tails 04:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing to suggest better coverage including aside from Canada-based sources and the best from my searches being this (for judging a local music competition). None of the awards seem convincing enough to suggest notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 23:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Another open and shut case of non-notability and actually non-existence because their website is closed. My searches found absolutely nothing to suggest this ever received coverage and I thought of PRODing but I wanted comments especially if there's (albeit marginal possibility of) non-English sources). SwisterTwister talk 02:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Obviously non-notable actor and musician with my searches finding nothing good at all. A look at the history also shows considerable vandalism and other issues in 2007 and 2008 and no significant improvement has ever been made since starting in September 2007 by a SPA that may have been connected to the subject. SwisterTwister talk 05:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing to suggest better sourcing, notability and improvement with the best results here, here and here. Her radio show may have also ended as the links are now dead and there's hasn't been any recent coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Proposed railways in Sydney#'Christie' proposals, 2002 . -- RoySmith (talk) 01:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This article refers to a single proposal in a larger document that was never government policy. The document (the Christie report) has since been superseded by Sydney's Rail Future, which is government policy and contains a different plan for this area. Also, the page is wholly reliant on a single primary source – the Christie report itself. Mqst north ( talk) 06:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I found nothing at all to suggest better sourcing, notability and improvement with the best results here, here and here and finally there's no move target for this orphan that seemed to have been started by the subject (April 2008 and no significant changes since then). SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 17:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable writer. The prize she won does not seem to be very high-profile, and I can find no substantial coverage in reliable independent sources (personal webpage and university faculty pages don't count). Reyk YO! 09:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep I looked on EBSCOhost and she has a substantial review from a journal in the database for her poetry. In addition, she is a regular contributor to Huffington Post, and several academic and literary journals. I'll hit Lexis Nexus later and see what I can find, but I think she's notable enough to keep. She is also the editor of several books that seem to be used as textbooks. Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 14:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep. At the very least, meets WP:BASIC with what's currently in the article, plus this, and this and this and this. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Kraxler ( talk) 17:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NFF and WP:NFILM. This film has not been released yet; and as per WP:NFF, it should not have an article. Yes, the Toronto International Film Festival is going to screen it, however, none of the sources state if the film is 100% finished. If you disregard that though, it fails WP:NFILM. 0 third party coverage. Google searching this one is difficult as it matches a location which isn't related to this film. If you look at the results that do come up; some are mirrors for the TIFF website listing, while others are promoted via the films production team. I don't feel this belongs here until it at least officially releases; and even then, only if it becomes notable. Appearing at a film festival doesn't assert notability, but if something comes out of said festival, then notability may become established later on. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 09:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This article only references the technique of one designer. This technique doesn't appear beyond her book, which is a primary source. It may make sense to merge with the existing needlepoint article. Ehgarrick ( talk) 23:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After being relisted twice, there's no consensus towards deletion or keeping the article.
I would like to note that DGG's comment is spot on. Just because an article has been around since '07 and hasn't had any significant work done, there are sources and there is literature out there, however, we need to reach out to our bilingual editors to assist in translation and sourcing. I suggest reaching out to the appropriate projects for tagging and assistance. ( non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 01:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Basically original research and my searches (with both names) found nothing good to suggest improvement and better understanding (the two listed sources are not enough to save it nor are significant). SwisterTwister talk 16:27, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
At best a content fork of Posttraumatic growth, with which this article shares a structure and a good deal of content.
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 20:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable software. Fails WP:PRODUCT. Possible COI issue; see WP:COIN#ConEmu John Nagle ( talk) 19:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
"Note that a specific product or service may be notable on its own, without the company providing it being notable in its own right. In this case, an article on the product may be appropriate, and notability of the company itself is not inherited as a result."
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:CRYSTALBALL The Banner talk 20:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
After looking up this article's name, there seems to be nothing else about it online, at least in English, despite that it's said to be "famous". I also can't locate anything about the village of Sauram Garhi. Maybe there's details about it in Hindi or another language in its area (around Firozabad). Google Translate can't completely translate both the article name and the village name to Hindi. TheGGoose ( talk) 21:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. This discussion was closed on 7 September as soft redirect to Wiktionary by User:Sovereign Sentinel, a non-admin. In line with WP:DPR#NAC, I, an admin, have vacated this closure as it seems out of line with the consensus. I am re-closing as delete. Stifle ( talk) 09:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:DICDEF not a dictionary. The second source even cites the first one. There is an etymology if you look for it but it's neither interesting, nor clear enough to build an article around. Even fleshed out it would be a permastub with bad sources. Savonneux ( talk) 08:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
@
Savonneux: I appreciate and share your concerns for the integrity of Wikipedia, but the reason I believed that "
Fiddlesticks!" warrants inclusion as a Wikipedia entry is the fact of that interjection's roots in, and connection with
American Louisiana Cajun culture among
enslaved peoples in the early history of the United States, which I do think is interesting; and it is my intention that myself and other editors will expand that aspect of this subject further as the article is further developed and improved upon from stub status.
That story goes considerably beyond the mere etymology of a word as it would be set out in
Wiktionary, and is significant in its acknowledgement of African-American cultural traditions and contributions (often overlooked or given only
short shrift) to the broader
American folklore and culture of the United States.
When white plantation owners, as they often did, suppressed the use of African musical instruments by slaves, they deprived those people of their traditional means of cultural rhythmic expression. Their continuing need to enjoy musical traditions and express rhythm found new outlets in a number of different forms, one of which was straw beating on violins, or using "fiddlesticks", and the resultant concomitant expletive expression often muttered under ones breath back at their "Masters" and owners, that is the intended subject of this Wikipedia article. --- Professor JR ( talk) 10:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 06:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to pass WP:BIO or WP:ENT and hence, delete. Will withdraw if notability could be established. Regards — ☮ JAaron95 Talk 08:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced "recently developed" term. Neither source given uses the word "cupex" or mentions the supposed inventor of the process, M.R Bakhshandeh, and Google only has four or five results for "cupex" "copper leaching" and "cupex" "bakhshandeh", all of them Wikipedia mirrors. McGeddon ( talk) 07:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:UNSOURCED, WP:Notability Vin09 ( talk) 07:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Multiple third party sources have been uncovered in support of this particular event. See comment by Northamerica1000 for links. ( non-admin closure) The Undead Never Die ( talk) 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable event, trivial information. Even all that information is condensed on Comedy Central Roast#Roasts. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 06:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 20:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Very trivial game with just one reference and little notability beyond it being a variation on the Whac-A-Mole concept. Why have a stand alone article?I recommend deletion and possible merging of basic theme into the main Whac-A-Mole article. SpyMagician ( talk) 06:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm nominating simply because of the low amount of good sources with the current link now dead and unretrieveable at archive.org and I'm not finding any solid evidence of the listed book aside from this (which seems to be the new version of the dead link) and further searches found this and this. At best, this should be mentioned elsewhere as she may not be independently notable but there's no obvious target. Pinging author Aciram and possibly interested editor LadyofShalott (who wikified it a little). SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete as the only source for the article does not meet WP:RS. The content on the site was a blog, and has been shut down. Even if it were available it would not suffice. Scr★pIron IV 19:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. A7 nothing here indicates significance, and it should have been listed for speedy instead of AfD DGG ( talk ) 22:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
This may have been somewhat known locally in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and I'm simply nominating because the low amount of good solid sources to even at least suggest local notability; my searches were here, here, here and here. At best, this could be mentioned elsewhere but as an orphan there's no obvious target. SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet notability standards. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 05:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Adventures in Foam - Both nom & David agree it should be redirected so redirecting, I will say however this should've been done 4 days ago!. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 17:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet notability standards. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 04:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Not seeing sources that make her notable. Youtube not a good source Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 04:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found nothing at all to suggest good third-party sources for improvement. There's no good move target for this article from March 2007 thus no alternative to deletion. SwisterTwister talk 04:01, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOOPS, as the most notable job he's had is as an assistant coach to an NBA Development League (equivalent to Minor League Baseball) team. The only reference provided is not independent. It's hard to search for other sources because there appear to be a lot of other Brian Walshes in basketball, but the only other one I could find was from a non-RS website with a popup ad. The only way a person could be notable from the NBA Development League is if they have won an award or broken a record of some sort, which this person has not done. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 03:45, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 23:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches found no outstandingly good results here, here and here. As an orphan, there' s no good move target and there are no solid signs of improvement (article has existed since June 2010). SwisterTwister talk 03:22, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 00:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
There are reliable sources that state Jose Perdomo was the doorman at The Dakota when John Lennon was killed and there are fringe-ish sources that state that José Sanjenis Perdomo (aka Sam Jenis) was a Cuban secret police agent who later became a CIA agent. Some of those sources state that the two are one and the same, probably to propagate the theory the CIA had Lennon killed. There is no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources about anyone with this name, and it's a BLP violation if either man is alive. - Location ( talk) 03:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 06:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Article on a mall that was brought to AFD in 2007 and deleted. It was recreated in 2012 with no sources. I searched and could not find any sources. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 ( talk) 03:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Claims to be the largest mall in its area of India, but I can't find any sources to verify that. Currently the article is a mess, most sources are just directory listings. The award it won is too obscure to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 ( talk) 02:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, much less being signed to Atlantic Records, all I could find through Google was social media sites. Everymorning (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close: There was already an active discussion on Talk:Microsoft Spyware and as a result of that ongoing discussion, an active expansion-draft being written at Talk:Microsoft_Spyware/expansion. To nominate the main article for deletion without explicitly acknowledging the ongoing discussion and without also including the draft "expansion" article is poor form. I'm going to take off my "non-admin closure" hat and put on my "experienced editor" hat and recommend that no further attempts to delete this be done without further discussion on the article talk page. I'm putting my "non-admin closure" had to say that any future AFD of the article should also explicitly include the "draft expansion" sub-page, assuming that page still exists at the time. Since Talk-sub-page drafts fall under WP:MFD and articles fall under WP:AFD, the best way to handle it would be to list both at AFD as a joint nomination, then create a "placeholder" MFD that points back to the AFD. The placeholder is for the benefit of editors who patrol MFDs but not AFDs. As this is a non-admin closure, if you disagree, feel free to ask any admin to overturn my decision and reopen the discussion. I will trust his judgment. ( non-admin closure) davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 04:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
WP:POVFORK that is useless for disambiguation. RJaguar3 | u | t 01:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone thinks a redirect is appropriate (or if the discussion referred to by davidwr in the last comment below supports the existence of one), he or she may boldly create one. Deor ( talk) 09:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Being the father of guitarists Jimmie and Stevie Ray Vaughan isn't enough. Clarityfiend ( talk) 01:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Mr. Guye ( talk) 00:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
It has been asserted that pornographic awards with an article are prima facie non notable enough to meet WP:ANYBIO. Surely if an award is notable enough to meet the standard of an article it is notable enough to meet the standard of WP:ANYBIO. If they are not notable enough to meet the criteria of ANYBIO then it would follow they are not notable enough to meet the standard of a basic article. I am WP:BOLDly testing this double standard through practical application. Savonneux ( talk) 01:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 22:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG and lacks reliable third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by Gogo Dodo under G4 ( non-admin closure). Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 12:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG and is upcoming actor a case of WP:TOOSOON and lacks Reliable third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG and lacks Reliable third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:16, 30 August 2015 (UTC)