I have decided to make a clean start due to the fact that I feel that I need to start fresh to make a better impact on Wikipedia. I hold no grudges against anyone, I simply feel that a clean start will be the best thing for me overall. Thanks very much and I hope I see you soon with another account. Aerospeed ( Talk) 17:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply

This is Aerospeed's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Hello, Aerospeed! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being " adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! WVRMad• Talk• Guestbook 19:59, 13 November 2010 (UTC) reply Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Aerospeed, I noticed that my article was declined for lack of references, which was unexpected and confusing to me. My article has around 60 sources, including news/reports published by Tencent and Sina, which are both among the most authoritative influential media and entertainment companies in China. This is my first time creating a wikipedia article and it would be really helpful if you could let me know which of my sources are not verifiable?

Hi, I've just taken on the GA review of Billy the Kid, and I am concerned at the poor state it is in. Having looked at the history of the article I note that your contributions to it have been fairly minimal: [1]; also, that the article has changed considerably since you nominated it with no further involvement from yourself. Because the topic is quite big, there is a lot of background reading involved in addition to the analysis of the article itself. I do work closely with nominators to bring articles up to GA level, so would be willing to do the work needed to help you or one of the significant contributors get it to GA. Though as there is a lot of work to be done, I'd like some reassurance that either you or someone else would be doing the work I suggest needs doing. If you feel that you no longer have the time or energy or willingness to get involved, then let me know, and we can close this GAN. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

I am closing the GAN as the article is too far from meeting GA criteria, and has clean up and citation needed tags on it. Generally it is better to nominate articles that you have worked on yourself, and feel meet the WP:Good article criteria. If you'd like some help with understanding the GA process, get in touch, and I'll talk you through doing a review, and in building an article to GA status. Regards SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 10:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, Aerospeed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Mimulus88 ( talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Marcos Kurtycz ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

At the request of the original editor (a friend) I have made further edits including changes to the footnotes. Before submitting this article for publication I would like to get your review to find out if the article in its present state corrects the reasons for it being originally declined. To be honest, I'm not sure I understand the reason for it being declined - that's why I'm requesting a review prior to attempting to publish. Thanks you.