User:B137/Contributions

/Archive

Howdy, Your CSD:U1 requests have been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Nakon 05:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, render 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The page that was deleted as an expired PROD, has been subsequently contested and restored - see User talk:Ronhjones#Murray & Roberts. It's up to you if you wish to consider WP:AfD Ronhjones   ^(Talk) 13:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NAD 3020, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ARCAM and Peak power. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Panorama Tower you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 ( talk) 13:01, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply

The article Panorama Tower you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Panorama Tower for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 ( talk) 13:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Town Center One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curtain wall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Harvester 1066, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cab. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hall, New York may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{OntarioCountyNY-geo-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Icon paint.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Yeah that was my basic feeling too - I suspect that most stations were much like the other ones, so separate articles didn't seem worthwhile. If you ever saw a complete list somewhere, I'd be happy to wiki-ize it. Maury Markowitz ( talk) 15:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Macro camera shot effect foreground up close clear background blurry.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC) reply

It might be a good idea to identify yourself with a link to your previous username. There are quite a few talk page comments using it and therefore could confuse some people (like me). Astronaut ( talk) 17:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, B137. You have new messages at Astronaut's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Astronaut ( talk) 04:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metropolitan Miami (development), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tallest buildings in Miami, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Four Seasons Hotel and Tower. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC) reply

What on Earth does Arvida = 'Arthur Vinning Davis' mean? Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Oiyarbepsy: I have no idea but it was redlinked from the article Country Walk, Florida. I did not take the time to rewrite the article it can be fatiguing dealing with the poorly written Miami articles. B137 ( talk) 04:59, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Now nominated for deletion. If you don't know what it means, you shouldn't create it. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 05:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Oiyarbepsy: That is what it means, but I will fix it in the article. St. Joe Company is a modern incarnation of Arvida, which was apparently responsible for some of the poor construction in south Dade that took place in a suburban housing boom of the 80s and early 90s when inspections were being rubber stamped. Lennar Corporation is similarly involved. B137 ( talk) 05:09, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Oh, so you do known what it means. Arvida is a valid redirect, but this one is pretty nonsensical. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 05:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Oiyarbepsy: Yes, and I agree with it being deleted. I shouldn't have been so hasty. To be transparent I did almost find the link humourous, which may have persuaded me to botch it. B137 ( talk) 05:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Oiyarbepsy: Lo and behold, a one time contributor changed it from Lennar to Arvida (ARthur VIning DAvis): /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Peanutsandbutter without understanding project syntax. B137 ( talk) 05:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transportation in South Florida, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Real Deal and Vice City. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:1969 Bristol Mountain trail map and prices.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Imperial2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC) reply

I've closed the FLRC nomination of List of tallest buildings in Miami you made; as far as I can tell you never actually posted it to WP:FLRC and so no one ever saw it that you didn't directly invite. Feel free to renominate it correctly in the future. -- Pres N 18:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC) reply

• @ PresN: What did I do wrong? As far as the article I improved the sourcing somewhat but it is still fairly dubious. I had a feeling something like that was going on. I edited the FLRC so many times I thought someone important would see it eventually. B137 ( talk) 18:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC) reply

• The instructions are at WP:FLRC; there are five steps to posting a new FLRC nomination and you skipped number 4. By not actually adding the new nomination to WP:FLRC, no one knew the nomination existed unless they had a direct link to it. Since the nomination had been sitting stale for 6 months, I just went ahead and closed it. Feel free to make a new nomination if you want, just make sure to do all 5 steps this time. -- Pres N 04:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 11 Times Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 42nd Street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

BayLink

added a link pointing to Washington Avenue

Diverging diamond interchange

added a link pointing to Brighton, New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lowe Boats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lowe Boats until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Undead Never Die ( talk) 11:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC) reply

I tried to remove some of the quote that might be seen as too lengthy or inappropriate. Do you think this is better or should I just remove all of the content? Don't care either way, just saw that there was more to be said about the building. Will remove if you feel that's better. Grump International ( talk) 22:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Grump International: If it's a direct quote from the Miami Herald then its not appropriate without "" or a quote box. In this case a direct quote is not appropriate. It should be reworded but with useful information kept. B137 ( talk) 22:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC) reply

I see that you already did a quotation but such a lengthy quotation is not appropriate here, and the article already mentions the retail square footage. B137 ( talk) 22:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Route capacity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Route. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Warining light. Since you had some involvement with the Warining light redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox; talk 20:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panorama Tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Base. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC) reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

From: Help talk:Related changes Help with linked pages not showing in RecentChangesLinked

In this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:RecentChangesLinked&hideminor=0&target=User%3AB137%2FContributions, the recent (all) edits to Margaret Pace Park are not showing, even though it is correctly linked without a redirect from User:B137/Contributions. It does show up for the RecentChangesLinked to Alice Wainwright Park, where it is linked from a Greater Miami template. My subpage has well over 200 links on it, is there a limit to the number of links whose recent changes will be shown? Note: this has nothing to do with selecting more or older changes to show. Even when they were the most recent edits of a linked page, they did not show. Thank you. B137 ( talk) 03:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC) reply

I'm looking into this, and I see where the issue is stemming from (there is a missing entry in the pagelinks table), but I'm not sure why yet. It may be a bug in MediaWiki. Asking around. —  Earwig  ^talk 05:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Okay, this appears to be a known issue ( T117332). A null edit fixed it, as expected. —  Earwig  ^talk 05:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you. A null edit specifically to the page, or to a tech page to solve the issue on a larger scale? If this is happening to me for any other link I am not aware of it, but will try the purge trick if I see it again. I use User:B137/Contributions as my watchlist. B137 ( talk) 05:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Right, a null edit to User:B137/Contributions. As I understand it, that tells MediaWiki to rebuild the link data for that page, which can sometimes become corrupted. I don't think there is a way for us regular folk to update link data for a bunch of pages en masse, since it's hard on the server. —  Earwig  ^talk 05:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manhattanization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page California Street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 432 Park Avenue page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Uh, FYI, we do have the right to remove material from our own talk pages, dumb vandal user:B137. And you're a bold-faced liar if you think that my editions are supposedly "vandalous" in nature. And you are a hypocrite if you expect someone else not to remove stuff from their own talk page while you remove stuff from your own. 174.23.104.46 ( talk) 12:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm B137. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:174.23.104.46 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I recognize that I stepped out of bounds in trying to be slick with warning message. B137 ( talk) 12:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

@ LjL, Jeh, and B137: I'll leave this here for all of you since you were also targeted. Feel free to undo the damage. This user's IP range has been blocked due to block evasion and effectively sockpuppetry, aside from all the attacking. Please notify an admin immediately if the same behavior arises from anyone. — Smuckola (talk) 04:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Smuckola, B137, LjL, and Jeh: LOL, "damage...." It is not "damage" or "attacking" to post a countering viewpoint against, or a question about, someone's invalid or valid concern. But it is damage and uncivil to falsely call a counter-reply or question a term like "damage" or "vandalism" or "attacking," etc. 97.117.60.246 ( talk) 11:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, your edit(s) creating a disambiguation page Downtown Miami make an apparently appropriate distinction between the historic downtown business core and a greater downtown area. But it has left about 300 incoming links that need to be disambiguated. Perhaps you are familiar with the area, and could help sort these out? It is easy to help by going to https://tools.wmflabs.org/dplbot/dab_fix_list.php?title=Downtown_Miami and clicking on "fix" for any one item that you can possibly fix. If the links are not fixed, it is likely many of them will be de-linked by editors participating in wp:DPL like myself, who are not familiar with the area. I hope you can help. Either way, thank you for your contributions. do ncr am 05:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Doncram: Sure I will help. I can tell you what is not appropriate though, a mass removal of the links that lead to " Downtown Miami". While there be some over linking, I have tried to only link a limited number of occurrences in pages I have worked on. One way to make a distinction is that if it is in the middle of a sentence and 'Downtown' is capitalized then it is likely refering to the greater area, and if course if it uses 'greater' or 'area'. But 'downtown Miami' would almost certainly refer to the core, what was historically referred to as just 'downtown' when the neighborhoods around it were not with high rises or needing to spammed in a way of putting it. B137 ( talk) 15:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Thank you. I agree that mass removal of links that have been set up, instead of properly disambiguating them, would be unfortunate. I hate editors going around and destroying connections that have been set up; it is part of why I participate in the wp:DPL project, to try to limit the damage that it sometimes does. Anyhow, I see now that there are no incoming links to Downtown Miami remaining; i hope you were able to fix/save them. Cheers, -- do ncr am 19:42, 28 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Little Havana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miami River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC) reply

I'm confused. Greater Downtown Miami says Central Business District is a nickname, but Central Business District (Miami) is a separate article. -- NE2 18:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply

@ NE2: I know. A lot of even the more broad and skeletal Miami articles are in dire need of rewriting to get up to par. Other than the main article, many have been written quite colorfully outside of a normal template, and are out of date at that. B137 ( talk) 19:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transportation in South Florida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WLRN. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Wrong dab. Xx236 ( talk) 13:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Seybold Building

added a link pointing to John Seybold

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

added a link pointing to High dynamic range

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 10.2 surround sound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UHD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC) reply

On 21 December 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eckwersheim derailment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Eckwersheim derailment in November 2015 is the only fatal accident of the TGV since it entered commercial service in 1981? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eckwersheim derailment. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pioneer SX-1980, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Impedance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:John Deere DB120 48 row planter.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi Daniel. So good to see you're still active on here. I think the last time we spoke on wiki was 5 years ago. I thought that you had quit like so many others. I'm happy to see you are still around. Caden cool 23:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Thiel Audio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.   Velella   ^{Velella Talk}   22:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC) reply

It seems for years you have created and maintained a bias empire on this article. If you continue this behaviour, I need to report you fabrication of facts and synthesis of unrelated material. If you don't want to be labeled as a vandal, you need to refrain from such behavior. Berkserker ( talk) 03:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Berkserker: The material is all cited. Koppen is one single arbitration entity that bases on one metric. Other than spam tourism, very few adamantly maintain that southeastern Florida is "truly tropical", as they weasel word it. B137 ( talk) 03:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Citing news reports of invasive species dying or proving the existence of cold snaps isn't climatology. Cold snaps occur in most tropical zones outside the extreme proximity of the equator, it is just part of the climate. The cold snaps also affect the mean temps, if it didn't then the average would be over 75 Fahrenheit. Since cold snaps are already in the data, the classification is correct. Also invasive species in other regions with tropical climates also die from cold snaps. All these irrelevant details are presented in a synthesis to create a biased point of view, let alone all the little details and figures slightly being buffered to help this cause. The article in its entirety has just one purpose, to debunk its classification. Even with all the citations and "proofs" laid out in the article, you are actually proving it is a tropical climate not otherwise. All those are a part of the climate definition like I just said. And yes, mean temp. is just a single criterion to determine climate (which is met by +5 degrees), also precipitation and other factors determine a region's climate. South Florida has all the tropical climate types (monsoonal, savanna, rainforest) in different regions, and exhibits all their characteristics accurately. Berkserker ( talk) 03:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Berkserker: It barely meets the criteria for January. Weather in January and February is unique for a nearly tropical location, in that it is on the northern fringes and landlocked. B137 ( talk) 04:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply

It is well above the threshold, please don't make me repeat this one more time. Questioning 4-5 degrees of difference is like claiming Boston has a subtropical climate or Los Angeles and San Francisco have the same winter averages. I can come up with a million examples like this. Then somebody else can come up and claim that North Florida is tropical. What you are doing here is no different. Berkserker ( talk) 05:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply

With recently updated figures, it is several degrees above Koppen's threshold, but that is just one metric, it is not the end all be all. B137 ( talk) 19:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply

This statement is incorrect. Check your sources. Berkserker ( talk) 05:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Daniel, I am not here to get you blocked or anything, I am just expecting some cooperation and respect (both to me and scholars). Berkserker ( talk) 04:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I have been fairly busy in real life but let me just break the fourth wall here and say this is a ridiculous overreaction. The article starts out with and only includes that is is a tropical climate according to Koppen in the first paragraph. But to say a place that has recorded snow flurries and has had multiple instances of freezing weather, as well as weather that kills tropical flora and fauna, and then you add to that that it is literally outside the tropics and is also landlocked to the north, allowing occasional cold fronts that align just right to have little modification from water as Key West sees and even Miami Beach sees, enough for their all time record low to be five degrees Fahrenheit over Miami's. And when I say the data has recently changed. I mean that Miami (and much of the United States) moved up a half step in plant hardiness rating for the 2012 update, so if anything climate chage/AGW is now relevant to the discussion. The monthly averages chart has increased over the past five years as well.

• http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/yos/resource/JetStream/global/climate_max.htm Frost is mentioned for some climates but for tropicals there is no mention of frost danger.
• This USDA research center is title "Subtropical Horticulture Research" http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=60-38-05-00 - The only mention of [not sub]tropical research is for their location in Puerto Rico.
• Even tourism and advertising sites (who try to spam the great weather) refer to Miami as subtropical: http://www.miamihabitat.com/Miami-Weather_en.asp
• http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-01-21/news/fl-thin-blooded-floridians-20110121_1_community-blood-centers-south-florida-blood-thickness You can do your own Google searches and determine what, or how much of what, passes as sufficient evidence, but I suppose you may only tout Koppen, who painted the world with a broad brush going by a single climate metric.

Where are your and your scholars' sources? And how about an explanation for Koppen's single metric to determine the world's climate? B137 ( talk) 01:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Berkserker ( talk) 18:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High Sheldon Wind Farm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wyoming County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, render.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Marchjuly ( talk) 05:53, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Marchjuly: I put the image back into the article where it belongs and corrected the article link on the image page. There are several fair use images on the page. If this one still doesn't pass for some reason, then check the rest. B137 ( talk) 07:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gangway connection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 17 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The article ÏCE Condominiums at York Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi ( talk) 09:49, 20 August 2016 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on SkyscraperPage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John Jaffar Janardan ( talk) 08:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, render.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kingdom Tower, Jeddah, render.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Transit map page, your edit caused a missing references list ( help | help with group references). ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pointe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:03, 13 October 2016 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikistalker. Since you had some involvement with the Wikistalker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 22:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:SteamTractor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 03:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 85 bridge collapse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midtown Walmart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midtown Walmart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Prevan ( talk) 02:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Biggest clock. Since you had some involvement with the Biggest clock redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 04:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi! I was wondering what the new official name of the station is (and would like to move both the Wikipedia article and the Commonscat accordingly) – on MDT plans and the website, it's referred to as Brickell City Centre (Eighth Street); station signage on StreeView footage from January 2017 doesn't yet make any mention of the Brickell City Centre. Do you by any chance have any further info or better yet official documentation?     FDMS  4    14:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC) reply

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=1R1zIzg92FHco4d_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_85GHR6N4GFVpwot&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs ( talk) 17:01, 24 June 2017 (UTC) reply

"affect editing" D: B137 ( talk) 01:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Porteclefs:I answered no and it ended promptly, because upon trying yes, it got too specific and while I can overall glean the political conflicts out of the project in general, it is hard to put them in specific writing from my abstract overall perception. B137 ( talk) 02:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the note ... just wow. I think the best thing to do is to ignore him at the moment. Graham 87 01:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC) reply

I cannot remember how I related to the world at the age of 11. I suspect there are things best left alone. thanks for the heads up. JarrahTree 02:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YouTube fame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube fame (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 15:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the image you added to Pavement light. I'd been wanting an image like that, and I still can't figure out how I managed to miss seeing it. It really improves the article. HLHJ ( talk) 00:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

@ HLHJ: Because it's from '09 but I just uploaded it today after seeing the page feature. I have a couple more from a photo shoot in the antique shop where it came from, but they are blurrier. The shop is now closed as well. B137 ( talk) 00:29, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Ah, that would explain it. I'm glad you uploaded it. If you want to upload the others, feel free. In thumb size they might be perfectly sharp, and different angles might be useful to anyone trying to determine something specific about it. The article is already pretty crammed with images, though, and the one you uploaded is excellent, so don't fash it either way. HLHJ ( talk) 00:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

@ HLHJ: Here's one with the flash on, good detail but cancels out the light thru the glass. It could be cropped to remove the wide angle. B137 ( talk) 00:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

That's good, it shows detail, including the colour, well. I think the other one shows the basic idea better, but I'm linked to this one from the caption in the article. Thank you again. HLHJ ( talk) 00:54, 4 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bristol Mountain Ski Resort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gore Mountain ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-Crown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New York population. Since you had some involvement with the New York population redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  —  Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs)  23:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Icon Bay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icon Bay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 06:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC) reply

I notice you seem to be adding unsourced commentary about weather data to various articles. I was going to leave a warning on your talk page, then noticed you have an eye-popping 25,000+ edits. Please stop adding unsourced content to articles, even if you know it's correct. Unsourced contend lessens the quality of Wikipedia as a source, and undermines the hard work of other editors. Thanks. Magnolia677 ( talk) 11:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Phoenixville, Pennsylvania are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD ^v2.0 08:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Boiling Springs, Pennsylania. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#Boiling Springs, Pennsylania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ezhao02 ( talk) 21:30, 9 June 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest charlotte. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest charlotte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest san francisco. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest san francisco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 16:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest in the United States. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Tallest in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 13:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Duntech has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Enough to avoid an A7, but no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 20:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply

StarM 17:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Stats grok. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia: Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 23#Stats grok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC) reply

I want you to go to the Draft: List of CSX Train Symbols press at the content table Significant Yard Jobs and Transfers and draw the railyard

A tag has been placed on Murderapolis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 October 27. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 10:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC) reply

AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 20:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Port St. Lucie, Florida, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I was unable to find a US Census Bureau report on the PSL population for 2020. Donald Albury 14:19, 8 September 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Donald Albury: the source has the Estimates and the decennial Censuses of 2010 and 2020. 204,851 is the April 1 2020 number not 2019 estimate which was already in the article. B137 ( talk) 18:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

I apolgize for my misreading of the citations. The page was confusing. You added the 2020 population to the Demographics section, but not to the lead paragraph or to the infobox at the top of the page and left the 2019 estimates in all three places. I have fixed that. - Donald Albury 19:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Syracuse Skyline 01 cropped.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yates County, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancaster County. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Court Justice and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Court Justice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 05:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC) reply

The article Starcraft Marine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No RS, no attempt at notability, entire article is a brochure

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BrigadierG ( talk) 22:50, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Jalen Folf (talk) 17:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2016 New York drought, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humid climate.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Could you please provide a reliable source for the change you made at the highest elevation for Miami-Dade County, Florida. You left the citation for the previous entry in the infobox, so that the figure you entered is not supported by the cited source. Donald Albury 13:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:1101 panorama tower render medium for wiki fair use.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{ Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wahweap, Arizona, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wahweap, Arizona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Longyearbyen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bear Island.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, 1 Southside Park, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC) reply

PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 22:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC) reply

The article One World Trade Center (Long Beach) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pretty standard skyscraper. Unable to locate any significant non-local coverage about this tower. Sole source is Emporis, and then a source about how something else surpassed it in height.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC) reply

♠ PMC♠ (talk) 05:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Natg 19 ( talk) 22:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I appreciated your update to the climate narrative in the Nashua, New Hampshire, article. I reverted it, however, because it was unreferenced. When you provide the references that will support your new figures, could you also please update the climate table directly below the narrative paragraph, so that the data is consistent throughout? Thank you very much! Ken Gallager ( talk) 12:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Ken Gallager: Better revert the new climate box showing 1991 to 2020 data too then because that's where the numbers came from. B137 ( talk) 22:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Got it. Then please update the text, since your update brought it to our attention. And please take heed of the comment below and avoid making things personal. Best wishes, -- Ken Gallager ( talk) 12:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Nashua, New Hampshire. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Read WP:CIVIL, search for "avoid name-calling". Your edit summary would generally be good for a block. And your edit is still uncited, for both statements. There is a difference between a statement being accurate and a statement being usable on Wikipedia, see WP:V. Tarl N. ( discuss) 04:39, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, B137. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1 Southside Park, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC) reply