This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Greetings! First off, I'd like to say I very much appreciate your comments and edits. I don't follow anyone, but I count you among the editors I enjoy running into. I also agree with your recent discussion closure at BLPN. My ask here is to please add to your closing comments and edit summaries: WP:NAC. Not everyone knows how to find User Rights, and routine, good-faith, and much needed closures might give someone else the wrong impression. I'm quite certain I've forgotten to tag myself before. My wall of text is now heavier than the actual issue, so I leave it there. Looking forward to more BLPN times, thank you, and cheers! JFHJr ( ㊟) 00:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Greetings. I have a query regarding the omission of her DOB at this discussion. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 22:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm TheDarkKnight433. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abbas Ansari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Why did you delete the whole source claiming the statement. Also, there is live discussion going in the talk page. Don't revert it without concensus. It's a vandalism of article. TheDarkKnight433 ( talk) 03:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Alexfotios ( talk) 21:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm getting to the point where I either need to step back from this Henyard nonsense or take it to AN/I. I will be ignoring the page unless there's something there that didn't come from SecretName101. Please tag me if anything develops that's actually worth engaging in. Simonm223 ( talk) 18:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I noticed that you recently reverted the entire article of Abbas Ansari. I wanted to inquire about the reason behind this action. The article was previously edited by a user named goodfacts, who is a known sock of someone and has been banned. The information in the article, including details about Abbas Ansari's involvement in multiple murder cases and the arrest of his wife, was sourced from reliable articles and is already included there. Furthermore, the structure of the article was concise and provided clear information. However, the recent edits made by the banned user resulted in fragmented sections and compromised the overall clarity of the article. Considering these factors, I believe it would be appropriate to revert to the previous version of the article for a more coherent presentation of the information. Thank you for your attention to this matter.Hii, I noticed that you recently reverted the entire article of Abbas Ansari. I wanted to inquire about the reason behind this action. 2402:8100:384C:2AA8:1505:7A5E:857D:D6D0 ( talk) 20:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Greetings! First off, I'd like to say I very much appreciate your comments and edits. I don't follow anyone, but I count you among the editors I enjoy running into. I also agree with your recent discussion closure at BLPN. My ask here is to please add to your closing comments and edit summaries: WP:NAC. Not everyone knows how to find User Rights, and routine, good-faith, and much needed closures might give someone else the wrong impression. I'm quite certain I've forgotten to tag myself before. My wall of text is now heavier than the actual issue, so I leave it there. Looking forward to more BLPN times, thank you, and cheers! JFHJr ( ㊟) 00:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Greetings. I have a query regarding the omission of her DOB at this discussion. Mac Dreamstate ( talk) 22:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm TheDarkKnight433. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Abbas Ansari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Why did you delete the whole source claiming the statement. Also, there is live discussion going in the talk page. Don't revert it without concensus. It's a vandalism of article. TheDarkKnight433 ( talk) 03:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Alexfotios ( talk) 21:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm getting to the point where I either need to step back from this Henyard nonsense or take it to AN/I. I will be ignoring the page unless there's something there that didn't come from SecretName101. Please tag me if anything develops that's actually worth engaging in. Simonm223 ( talk) 18:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I noticed that you recently reverted the entire article of Abbas Ansari. I wanted to inquire about the reason behind this action. The article was previously edited by a user named goodfacts, who is a known sock of someone and has been banned. The information in the article, including details about Abbas Ansari's involvement in multiple murder cases and the arrest of his wife, was sourced from reliable articles and is already included there. Furthermore, the structure of the article was concise and provided clear information. However, the recent edits made by the banned user resulted in fragmented sections and compromised the overall clarity of the article. Considering these factors, I believe it would be appropriate to revert to the previous version of the article for a more coherent presentation of the information. Thank you for your attention to this matter.Hii, I noticed that you recently reverted the entire article of Abbas Ansari. I wanted to inquire about the reason behind this action. 2402:8100:384C:2AA8:1505:7A5E:857D:D6D0 ( talk) 20:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)