TALK PAGE ARCHIVES:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DavidLeighEllis. |
sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.176.123.205 ( talk) 22:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I believe my edit to Abu Qatada to be a view shared by all. I do not quite understand your revert. 178.110.232.229 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for removing vandalism from my talk page. Enjoy!! Denisarona ( talk) 09:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC) |
I find the portrayal of our Guyanese Indian woman very defamatory, disparaging and offensive to an Guyanese Indian Community. It is NOT based on historical facts and official government records. Rather, it cites novels where the author blatantly disregards facts to create a fictional view of Guyanese Indian women in order to profit from it. I highly suggest you study Guyana history and the indentured labors before you peruse to be an authority on it. Do not spread propaganda with limited knowledge on the subject matter . Thanks DKShyam.
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
...but you have to admit it's funny, in a creepy kind of way. [1] E Eng 22:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello David, You are an intelligent man, do you realize that delete Mr. Massimo Rizzoli, a world-renowned martial artist resident in Italy and how to clear the " Giotto" of the martial arts in Italy.
In addition, each ignorant asshole wants to delete the pages and pages without knowing a fuck !!!!!!!!! is not your case, you are a good person.
Thanks for reversing the nonsense on my user page. I enjoyed your page! SeoMac ( talk) 00:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I think you might have misread the changelog in the Admin Intervention against Vandalism page. Sro23 was reverting malicious edits by Gstigler, who kept blanking the page in order to replace it with his own single report. It's not a big deal, but you seem well-established and you'd probably know better than me how to resolve a conflict like this. Have a good day! Jergling ( talk) 21:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Good Afternoon David, my edit to the Ad Astra page was in fact intentional. You can see here that the slogan of the Boner Society is indeed Ad Astra. http://www.maximumfun.org/tags/boner-society — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.158.100 ( talk) 03:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
... and I love the pictures you've displayed. Thanks for contributing, and keep up the great work! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Why do you think it's appropriate to cite people as "born to Jewish parents" when it's irrelevant to them? Why not cite people as "born to Catholic parents?" or other religion? Also Jewish is a religion and not an ethnicity, Just ask any rabbi or clergy. I have no idea why wikis believe it's an ethnicity. Maybe you can explain the reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.150.246.93 ( talk) 01:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
content of this article is clearly a troll. it is funny for few seconds, but it disrupts the factual perspective of wikipedia that majority of folks are relying on. Idk why this summary was constantly ommited, but let me see if this stays here this time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.31.232 ( talk) 23:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! that was random wiki that I randomly ran across but regardless, thanks for the timely support! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.56.31.232 (
talk) 00:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
It's just a test :)
I just want to create a new sub page Wikipedia:WikiProject_Berbers/Members
Because i want to create a header for this project--
Anẓar (
talk) 03:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello DavidLeighEllis,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pigfucker for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Umais Bin Sajjad ( talk) 08:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The Keep votes here were not at all convincing for addressing the advert-toned state and instead were saying "It must be notable....even without solid sourcing". This is best relisted and closed by an experienced admin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello and congrats on 2,603 edits! Feel free to ask me about things you have questions for or if you just need advice or anything. You can always contact me on my talk page. Have fun editing! :) Hawkeye75 ( talk) 02:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Please be advised that this user is current blocked on RationalWiki for multiple counts of vandalism. Nerd271 ( talk) 01:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
This is personal between him and I because he blocked me on RationalWiki. I'm not tryin to disrupt Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lehcar RW ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
It's not often I turn to my watchlist to find the same editor reverting vandalism on multiple pages I've been watching. Your efforts to keep the vandals and crazies at bay does not go unnoticed. Chris Troutman ( talk) 01:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC) |
I apologize if you where unclear on each change I made. I was short in brief in my explanations and would have required someone to read the previous reasons for removal of content. I did mark each change with an explanation either with regards to current removal or previous removal to reflect progress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tekeek ( talk • contribs) 21:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
is this the guys edit page? i have a few questions for the man. if anyone can call or get a hold of him, let me know. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.3.178.3 ( talk) 03:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
no, im not taking about the elie wiesel. im talking about the guy they told me about that deletes your wikipedia because it is 'irrelevent or vandalism'. is this the man im talking to that just responded to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.3.178.3 ( talk) 03:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DavidLeighEllis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Recently came across fb meme comparing 1st paras. Of black, LGBT, etc pride. Came to white pride very diff. Connotation. Wondering if you could edit and place QUOTATIONS MARKS around "White Pride" as it is a saying as defined by the word "slogan" (I would like to see CAPS, BOLD, in order to differentiate from the other movements. Thank you. LANDORICARDO ( talk) 01:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DavidLeighEllis! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 19:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
I am so sorry for the disruptive edits! Just saw your emails. I left myself logged in at the Uni where I teach. Figure some blokes had a jolly chuckle on this one! They're always getting one over on Brent! Won't happen again. Knowledgeymcknowledge ( talk) 21:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
This message is here to inform you that a template series you were involved in editing, Uw-consensus, has been nominated for deletion. The deletion discussion can be found here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk) 00:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, DavidLeighEllis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello DavidLeighEllis! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Morality in Media (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
David, I did not edit the page for the Peloponnesian War. You must have confused IPs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.75.11.230 ( talk) 01:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "magicaly". Since you had some involvement with the "magicaly" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user ( talk) 07:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Category:Recreation by city on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 16:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
TALK PAGE ARCHIVES:
1
2
3
4
5
6
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DavidLeighEllis. |
sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.176.123.205 ( talk) 22:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I believe my edit to Abu Qatada to be a view shared by all. I do not quite understand your revert. 178.110.232.229 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Many thanks for removing vandalism from my talk page. Enjoy!! Denisarona ( talk) 09:11, 29 May 2016 (UTC) |
I find the portrayal of our Guyanese Indian woman very defamatory, disparaging and offensive to an Guyanese Indian Community. It is NOT based on historical facts and official government records. Rather, it cites novels where the author blatantly disregards facts to create a fictional view of Guyanese Indian women in order to profit from it. I highly suggest you study Guyana history and the indentured labors before you peruse to be an authority on it. Do not spread propaganda with limited knowledge on the subject matter . Thanks DKShyam.
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
...but you have to admit it's funny, in a creepy kind of way. [1] E Eng 22:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello David, You are an intelligent man, do you realize that delete Mr. Massimo Rizzoli, a world-renowned martial artist resident in Italy and how to clear the " Giotto" of the martial arts in Italy.
In addition, each ignorant asshole wants to delete the pages and pages without knowing a fuck !!!!!!!!! is not your case, you are a good person.
Thanks for reversing the nonsense on my user page. I enjoyed your page! SeoMac ( talk) 00:13, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I think you might have misread the changelog in the Admin Intervention against Vandalism page. Sro23 was reverting malicious edits by Gstigler, who kept blanking the page in order to replace it with his own single report. It's not a big deal, but you seem well-established and you'd probably know better than me how to resolve a conflict like this. Have a good day! Jergling ( talk) 21:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Good Afternoon David, my edit to the Ad Astra page was in fact intentional. You can see here that the slogan of the Boner Society is indeed Ad Astra. http://www.maximumfun.org/tags/boner-society — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.158.100 ( talk) 03:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
... and I love the pictures you've displayed. Thanks for contributing, and keep up the great work! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Why do you think it's appropriate to cite people as "born to Jewish parents" when it's irrelevant to them? Why not cite people as "born to Catholic parents?" or other religion? Also Jewish is a religion and not an ethnicity, Just ask any rabbi or clergy. I have no idea why wikis believe it's an ethnicity. Maybe you can explain the reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.150.246.93 ( talk) 01:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
content of this article is clearly a troll. it is funny for few seconds, but it disrupts the factual perspective of wikipedia that majority of folks are relying on. Idk why this summary was constantly ommited, but let me see if this stays here this time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.31.232 ( talk) 23:38, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! that was random wiki that I randomly ran across but regardless, thanks for the timely support! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.56.31.232 (
talk) 00:14, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
It's just a test :)
I just want to create a new sub page Wikipedia:WikiProject_Berbers/Members
Because i want to create a header for this project--
Anẓar (
talk) 03:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello DavidLeighEllis,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pigfucker for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Umais Bin Sajjad ( talk) 08:15, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
The Keep votes here were not at all convincing for addressing the advert-toned state and instead were saying "It must be notable....even without solid sourcing". This is best relisted and closed by an experienced admin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello and congrats on 2,603 edits! Feel free to ask me about things you have questions for or if you just need advice or anything. You can always contact me on my talk page. Have fun editing! :) Hawkeye75 ( talk) 02:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Please be advised that this user is current blocked on RationalWiki for multiple counts of vandalism. Nerd271 ( talk) 01:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
This is personal between him and I because he blocked me on RationalWiki. I'm not tryin to disrupt Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lehcar RW ( talk • contribs) 01:33, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
It's not often I turn to my watchlist to find the same editor reverting vandalism on multiple pages I've been watching. Your efforts to keep the vandals and crazies at bay does not go unnoticed. Chris Troutman ( talk) 01:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC) |
I apologize if you where unclear on each change I made. I was short in brief in my explanations and would have required someone to read the previous reasons for removal of content. I did mark each change with an explanation either with regards to current removal or previous removal to reflect progress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tekeek ( talk • contribs) 21:04, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
is this the guys edit page? i have a few questions for the man. if anyone can call or get a hold of him, let me know. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.3.178.3 ( talk) 03:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
no, im not taking about the elie wiesel. im talking about the guy they told me about that deletes your wikipedia because it is 'irrelevent or vandalism'. is this the man im talking to that just responded to me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.3.178.3 ( talk) 03:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DavidLeighEllis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Recently came across fb meme comparing 1st paras. Of black, LGBT, etc pride. Came to white pride very diff. Connotation. Wondering if you could edit and place QUOTATIONS MARKS around "White Pride" as it is a saying as defined by the word "slogan" (I would like to see CAPS, BOLD, in order to differentiate from the other movements. Thank you. LANDORICARDO ( talk) 01:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DavidLeighEllis! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 19:49, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
I am so sorry for the disruptive edits! Just saw your emails. I left myself logged in at the Uni where I teach. Figure some blokes had a jolly chuckle on this one! They're always getting one over on Brent! Won't happen again. Knowledgeymcknowledge ( talk) 21:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
This message is here to inform you that a template series you were involved in editing, Uw-consensus, has been nominated for deletion. The deletion discussion can be found here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) ( talk) 00:31, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, DavidLeighEllis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello DavidLeighEllis! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Morality in Media (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 10:46, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
David, I did not edit the page for the Peloponnesian War. You must have confused IPs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.75.11.230 ( talk) 01:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "magicaly". Since you had some involvement with the "magicaly" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Not a very active user ( talk) 07:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Category:Recreation by city on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 16:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)