We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
- Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
- Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
- Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
- Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
- Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
- Research coordinators: run reference services
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Melbourne". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Scorch ( talk | ctrb) 10:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Alatskivi mõisa peahoone.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 3, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-09-03. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello Elekhh:
I wonder if you could give some guidelines on what should be fixed so that the article conforms better to the NPOV guidelines. I personally had a few doubts about the "emergent" bit, though that's how he was described on ArchDaily and, of course, the Design Philosophy section, which isn't that factual, though that's part of many architects' articles. I made an effort to base every statement on reliable third-party sources.
JamesCoulee ( talk) 12:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi James, I appreciate that you put a lot of effort in assuring verifiability and that is very hard to write NPOV articles on architects given that so much of architecture media is promotional. Overall the article has lots of citation overkill that seems to try to inflate importance by citing likely mirror and parrot pages. The 'design philosophy' section seems to be based on own statements, rather than critical review. The awards section is excessively inclusive, listing many non-awards (such as shortlisting). The exhibitions list seems also inflated by including every event in which he participated, rather than important exhibitions in which the subject had a key role - given that this is an encyclopaedia. Also, the lead should explain why is he notable per WP:CREATIVE. Hope the above is of help. -- ELEKHH T 13:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, Thanks for taking the time to pinpoint those aspects: they make sense to me. I'll try to mitigate these shortcomings. Should I give you a "heads up" once I do? Cheers! JamesCoulee ( talk) 17:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
My only concern is that the scope for the articles is not in fact identical. Perhaps it should be but in some cases I felt it needed to be a bit broader. Someone wanted to delete Colonial architecture of Bogor.. But I understand the desire for uniformity and consistency. On the other hand, whether a mosque is an example of colonial architecture is I think.. unclear. It is certainly colonial era architecture. :) As far as the Bogor article I would consider merging it to the broader target but then it seems a bit undue.. So now it's a history of Bogor article. I don't know.. Suggestions welcome. OrganicEarth ( talk) 01:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Actually I see it was an
Architecture of Bogor article which still wasn't broad enough for at least one editor..
OrganicEarth (
talk) 01:13, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm following Architecture of Indonesia that distinguishes between vernacular and colonial architecture. If it was "colonial era" than both from that period would be included. I would suggest before performing major changes as to how information is organised, is always good to discuss on the relevant WikiProject talkpage and with previous contributors. Sometimes is not clear from your stubs what your intentions are. -- ELEKHH T 01:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:David Faiman of the Ben-Gurion National Solar Energy Center.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 17, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-09-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Nembrotha cristata bunaken.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 23, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-09-23. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Just curious but why do you think some private Queenslander residence is worthy enough to belong in a inbox montage? There are no brownstones or townhouses in New York City's infobox montage. Nor are there any Georgian terraces in London's infobox imagery. Plus, a Queenslander is more relevant to an Architecture page than it is here. There is also a photo of the City Hall in the Governance section so why repeat it? It's been there for years and it fits/illustrates that section perfectly so why repeat it in the infobox? It's completely unnecessary. I don't appreciate the environment on some of these pages relating to Australian cities, because you and some other editors are very resistive to changes that are not your own. However I'm not going to retreat into submission just because you don't like my edits. I included the other bridge in the infobox because it shows how much of Brisbane is surrounded by water, and that much of the transport relies on water crossings. I also included the former Old State Library for its architectural heritage and significance. It's way more iconic than some tacky, crass man-made beach. Ashton 29 ( talk) 02:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- This discussion belongs to Talk:Brisbane. -- ELEKHH T 02:59, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Please continue debating at Talk page of Australian Greens. Minhle20002013 T 11:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
| You are invited! Join us remotely! | |
|---|---|
 |
|
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n03.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 26, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-10-26. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, thanks for the reminder and sorry for the delay. I'll work on it tonight and hopefully resolve all outstanding issues. Regards, Citobun ( talk) 02:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Simon's 1888 Gothenburg map.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on November 13, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-11-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Austria - Göttweig Abbey - 2015.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on November 26, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-11-26. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Here's a moody blue environmental shot:
Sca ( talk) 23:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Elekhh,
I am teaching a course on Italian Renaissance architecture and would like to engage you as an ambassador to help the students who will be editing pages on various architects, etc. from the 15th and 16th centuries. If you are able and willing, please let me know how we can be in touch about this.
Many thanks
nsatkinson Nsatkinson ( talk) 16:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can I interest you and page stalkers in participating in April? Up to £200 in Amazon vouchers and books up for grabs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 |
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Bathwick Hill, Bath, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 20:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
|
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Stockholm Central Station September 2013.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on April 30, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-04-30. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Canley didn't need a reason to revert your edit apart from 'discuss before removing content'. Every non-classic division has the 2PP listed and always has. I and others consider it quite informative. If you wish to get a consensus to change then please do so. Timeshift ( talk) 22:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Strange Canley doesn't need a reason, or to reflect on my reasoning... Strange how 'always' can have such a narrow meaning... Strange that 'informative' is supposedly synonimous with 'encyclopaedic'... -
ELEKHH
T 12:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- So then change the consensus. Otherwise it carries very little weight.
Timeshift (
talk) 12:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- When arguments 'carry very little weight' and consensus is defined by how things are done by those 'always' around you've got a non-open historic encyclopaedia. I thought Wikipedia aimed a bit higher. --
ELEKHH
T 12:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- The AEC themselves calculate both a 2PP and 2CP and adds them to the seat's results page in a layout very similar to what we've had for a very long time. Learn what non-classic means. We aren't adding 2PP in, you're taking 2PP out. If you want to, get consensus, and don't edit war away from the status quo whilst in progress. You're in the worst position on all counts. I advised that the content is 'informative' in response to your edit summary of 'irrelevant' 2pp so don't twist words. Walk away and move on before you dig a deeper hole. I'm embarrassed for the both of us. Timeshift ( talk) 12:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- When arguments 'carry very little weight' and consensus is defined by how things are done by those 'always' around you've got a non-open historic encyclopaedia. I thought Wikipedia aimed a bit higher. --
ELEKHH
T 12:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- I asked you to discuss it before removing long-standing content. Is that so unreasonable? You think it is "trivia", others disagree. One of the reasons why things are "always" done in a certain way and consensus is needed to change, is the scope of the alteration and the inconsistency that causes. Say you remove or change the order of the two-party distribution in Melbourne and Batman, were you intending to do the same for the other nine non-classic divisions at the 2013 election? And just the 2013 election or would you go back and remove or re-order the 2PP tables for every non-classic distribution at every election there was one? And all the full results pages? If not, I would argue that the inconsistency of piecemeal changes to two divisions at one election is more unencyclopedic than what you consider trivia. --
Canley (
talk) 12:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, happy to do so if that's your concern. Irrelevant 2pp counts between 2nd and 3rd candidates can be consistently removed - that's not how actual preferences flow. I don't remember seeing such trivial stats for other countries: so what might appear consistent (even if an error) for Australian politics, might just as well be inconsistent for the encylopaedia. -- ELEKHH T 12:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- So then change the consensus. Otherwise it carries very little weight.
Timeshift (
talk) 12:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm not doing your work. Remember you must leave the decade-long status quo as is until you can get a new consensus on a wikiproject ozpol talk page (not the article talk page as it affects many seats) and don't edit war or you might encounter sanctions. I am humouring you, yes... i'll guarantee you now that 2pp and 2cp remains in all non-classic divisions. Know when you've put your foot in it. I'm departing from this conversation now. Bye. Timeshift ( talk) 12:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- And I thought is our work to improve the encyclopaedia. But it seems yours is to guard the status quo from a decade ago. --
ELEKHH
T 12:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's as improved as it's going to be, with both the 2PP and 2CP remaining listed in the non-classic divisions (a term you hadn't heard of until now) at the AEC link, the ABC link, and the wikipedia link. If you think one should be removed against what the sources have and we've used for a decade with no logical reason to dispute it (until now) then you'll be very isolated - but don't take my word, please, test the consensus waters at wikiproject ozpol. Now i'm really departing. Bye. Timeshift ( talk) 13:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey, as someone who is likely to support some but not all of your proposed changes, please do take it to WT:AUP. Let's figure out how best to deal with it and then apply it across the board! :) Frickeg ( talk) 13:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Nice tramway place Garibaldi.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on June 13, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-06-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Elekhh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh Sorry it took so long for me to notice that you stopped participating in wp:WikiProject Architecture after being tremendously helpful to me on the talkpage there. Just hoping you will come back, in my opinion your presence did wonders for the w-project. Ottawahitech ( talk) 16:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
- Hi
Ottawahitech, good to hear that I was helpful! Haven't lost interest in WP Arch, I just simply don't have much time these days to wiki-edit... --
ELEKHH
T 22:06, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Good to hear! Ottawahitech ( talk) 00:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
Hello, Elekhh! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 18:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Babyrousa celebensis - Crane.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on May 13, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-05-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 05:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Dear Elekhh. "Muttersprachlich DE" liegt mir ebenfalls näher als "Near-native EN". - Du hast den bekannten Tokyo Bay Plan [File:Tokyo_Bay_Plan_by_Tange_1960.jpg] als FAIR USE bearbeitet. Hier in Holland haben wir ein ähnliches Problem mit der bekannten Zeitschrift Wendingen aus den 1920er Jahren. Total bestehen 116 Covers, von denen die Hälfte publiziert werden darf. Bei der übrigen Hälfte liegt das Sterbedatum der Cover-designers keine 70 Jahre zurück. Von diesen Covers sollten einige bedeutende als FAIR USE publiziert werden. Mit Deiner Erfahrung könntest Du vielleicht ein Vorbild nennen, wie wir vorgehen sollen. Vielleicht hättest Du sogar Zeit, einen Prototyp zu erstellen vom nebenstehenden Cover [File:Wendingen1924-8WMDudok.jpg], da er nominiert ist für Deletion in den nächsten Tagen. Wir haben die Absicht, ein FAIR USE für die folgenden international bedeutenden Wendingen-Covers zu bearbeiten im englischen Sprachraum:
- 1925-3/9 Frank Lloyd Wright (cover designer 1885-1987)
- 1920-10 Erich Mendelsohn (cover designer 1885-1987)
- 1924-3 Hermann Finsterlin (1887-1973) eigener cover
- 1929-7 Lyonel Feininger (cover designer 1890-1971)
- 1924-8 Willem Dudok (1884-1974) eigener cover, (nominiert für Deletion)
- 1925-11/12 Piet Kramer (cover designer 1890-1973)
Gruss Leuk2, 14:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Elekhh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.
Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Talk:Ice dam#Move to "Ice jam" to move "Ice dam" to "Ice jam". You may be interested in offering your opinion. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 15:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Elekhh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I note from your Edit that you don't regard The Herald-Sun (highest circulating daily paper in Australia) and/or Andrew Bolt (widely covered journalist in Print and TV) as a reliable source. There is a large number of articles on the internet referring to The Saturday Paper and its owner as actively having a left-wing agenda. Can you please advise who you may consider a reliable source ? I would have thought the well known right-wing position of The Herald-Sun and Bolt would make them extremely reliable sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael773623 ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please see my proposal to merge Category:Water supply companies in Malaysia to Category:Water companies of Malaysia Hugo999 ( talk) 10:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I saw your image Phase out of lightweight plastic bags around the world on this page Phase-out of lightweight plastic bags. I just updated Germany, they will implement a ban at July 2021 so the image won't be correct anymore. Maybe there's other countries who aren't in line with the page anymore too but I don't know. Just wanted to tell you, maybe you want to make a new image or remove this one? I'll leave it up to you. It's a good image. Greetings, Aquatic Ambiance ( talk) 16:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of Empire Arcade
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Empire Arcade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Signed, I Am Chaos ( talk) 17:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
- Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
- Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
- Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
- Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
- Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
- Research coordinators: run reference services
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Melbourne". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Scorch ( talk | ctrb) 10:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Alatskivi mõisa peahoone.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 3, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-09-03. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello Elekhh:
I wonder if you could give some guidelines on what should be fixed so that the article conforms better to the NPOV guidelines. I personally had a few doubts about the "emergent" bit, though that's how he was described on ArchDaily and, of course, the Design Philosophy section, which isn't that factual, though that's part of many architects' articles. I made an effort to base every statement on reliable third-party sources.
JamesCoulee ( talk) 12:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi James, I appreciate that you put a lot of effort in assuring verifiability and that is very hard to write NPOV articles on architects given that so much of architecture media is promotional. Overall the article has lots of citation overkill that seems to try to inflate importance by citing likely mirror and parrot pages. The 'design philosophy' section seems to be based on own statements, rather than critical review. The awards section is excessively inclusive, listing many non-awards (such as shortlisting). The exhibitions list seems also inflated by including every event in which he participated, rather than important exhibitions in which the subject had a key role - given that this is an encyclopaedia. Also, the lead should explain why is he notable per WP:CREATIVE. Hope the above is of help. -- ELEKHH T 13:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, Thanks for taking the time to pinpoint those aspects: they make sense to me. I'll try to mitigate these shortcomings. Should I give you a "heads up" once I do? Cheers! JamesCoulee ( talk) 17:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
My only concern is that the scope for the articles is not in fact identical. Perhaps it should be but in some cases I felt it needed to be a bit broader. Someone wanted to delete Colonial architecture of Bogor.. But I understand the desire for uniformity and consistency. On the other hand, whether a mosque is an example of colonial architecture is I think.. unclear. It is certainly colonial era architecture. :) As far as the Bogor article I would consider merging it to the broader target but then it seems a bit undue.. So now it's a history of Bogor article. I don't know.. Suggestions welcome. OrganicEarth ( talk) 01:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Actually I see it was an
Architecture of Bogor article which still wasn't broad enough for at least one editor..
OrganicEarth (
talk) 01:13, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm following Architecture of Indonesia that distinguishes between vernacular and colonial architecture. If it was "colonial era" than both from that period would be included. I would suggest before performing major changes as to how information is organised, is always good to discuss on the relevant WikiProject talkpage and with previous contributors. Sometimes is not clear from your stubs what your intentions are. -- ELEKHH T 01:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:David Faiman of the Ben-Gurion National Solar Energy Center.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 17, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-09-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Nembrotha cristata bunaken.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 23, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-09-23. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Just curious but why do you think some private Queenslander residence is worthy enough to belong in a inbox montage? There are no brownstones or townhouses in New York City's infobox montage. Nor are there any Georgian terraces in London's infobox imagery. Plus, a Queenslander is more relevant to an Architecture page than it is here. There is also a photo of the City Hall in the Governance section so why repeat it? It's been there for years and it fits/illustrates that section perfectly so why repeat it in the infobox? It's completely unnecessary. I don't appreciate the environment on some of these pages relating to Australian cities, because you and some other editors are very resistive to changes that are not your own. However I'm not going to retreat into submission just because you don't like my edits. I included the other bridge in the infobox because it shows how much of Brisbane is surrounded by water, and that much of the transport relies on water crossings. I also included the former Old State Library for its architectural heritage and significance. It's way more iconic than some tacky, crass man-made beach. Ashton 29 ( talk) 02:55, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- This discussion belongs to Talk:Brisbane. -- ELEKHH T 02:59, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Please continue debating at Talk page of Australian Greens. Minhle20002013 T 11:20, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
| You are invited! Join us remotely! | |
|---|---|
|
|
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Salle de lecture Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve n03.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 26, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-10-26. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh, thanks for the reminder and sorry for the delay. I'll work on it tonight and hopefully resolve all outstanding issues. Regards, Citobun ( talk) 02:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Simon's 1888 Gothenburg map.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on November 13, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-11-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 23:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Austria - Göttweig Abbey - 2015.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on November 26, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-11-26. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 01:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Here's a moody blue environmental shot:
Sca ( talk) 23:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Elekhh,
I am teaching a course on Italian Renaissance architecture and would like to engage you as an ambassador to help the students who will be editing pages on various architects, etc. from the 15th and 16th centuries. If you are able and willing, please let me know how we can be in touch about this.
Many thanks
nsatkinson Nsatkinson ( talk) 16:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can I interest you and page stalkers in participating in April? Up to £200 in Amazon vouchers and books up for grabs.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
|
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
File:Bathwick Hill, Bath, Somerset, UK - Diliff.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
Armbrust
The Homunculus 20:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
|
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Stockholm Central Station September 2013.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on April 30, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-04-30. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Canley didn't need a reason to revert your edit apart from 'discuss before removing content'. Every non-classic division has the 2PP listed and always has. I and others consider it quite informative. If you wish to get a consensus to change then please do so. Timeshift ( talk) 22:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Strange Canley doesn't need a reason, or to reflect on my reasoning... Strange how 'always' can have such a narrow meaning... Strange that 'informative' is supposedly synonimous with 'encyclopaedic'... -
ELEKHH
T 12:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- So then change the consensus. Otherwise it carries very little weight.
Timeshift (
talk) 12:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- When arguments 'carry very little weight' and consensus is defined by how things are done by those 'always' around you've got a non-open historic encyclopaedia. I thought Wikipedia aimed a bit higher. --
ELEKHH
T 12:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- The AEC themselves calculate both a 2PP and 2CP and adds them to the seat's results page in a layout very similar to what we've had for a very long time. Learn what non-classic means. We aren't adding 2PP in, you're taking 2PP out. If you want to, get consensus, and don't edit war away from the status quo whilst in progress. You're in the worst position on all counts. I advised that the content is 'informative' in response to your edit summary of 'irrelevant' 2pp so don't twist words. Walk away and move on before you dig a deeper hole. I'm embarrassed for the both of us. Timeshift ( talk) 12:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- When arguments 'carry very little weight' and consensus is defined by how things are done by those 'always' around you've got a non-open historic encyclopaedia. I thought Wikipedia aimed a bit higher. --
ELEKHH
T 12:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- I asked you to discuss it before removing long-standing content. Is that so unreasonable? You think it is "trivia", others disagree. One of the reasons why things are "always" done in a certain way and consensus is needed to change, is the scope of the alteration and the inconsistency that causes. Say you remove or change the order of the two-party distribution in Melbourne and Batman, were you intending to do the same for the other nine non-classic divisions at the 2013 election? And just the 2013 election or would you go back and remove or re-order the 2PP tables for every non-classic distribution at every election there was one? And all the full results pages? If not, I would argue that the inconsistency of piecemeal changes to two divisions at one election is more unencyclopedic than what you consider trivia. --
Canley (
talk) 12:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, happy to do so if that's your concern. Irrelevant 2pp counts between 2nd and 3rd candidates can be consistently removed - that's not how actual preferences flow. I don't remember seeing such trivial stats for other countries: so what might appear consistent (even if an error) for Australian politics, might just as well be inconsistent for the encylopaedia. -- ELEKHH T 12:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- So then change the consensus. Otherwise it carries very little weight.
Timeshift (
talk) 12:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm not doing your work. Remember you must leave the decade-long status quo as is until you can get a new consensus on a wikiproject ozpol talk page (not the article talk page as it affects many seats) and don't edit war or you might encounter sanctions. I am humouring you, yes... i'll guarantee you now that 2pp and 2cp remains in all non-classic divisions. Know when you've put your foot in it. I'm departing from this conversation now. Bye. Timeshift ( talk) 12:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- And I thought is our work to improve the encyclopaedia. But it seems yours is to guard the status quo from a decade ago. --
ELEKHH
T 12:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's as improved as it's going to be, with both the 2PP and 2CP remaining listed in the non-classic divisions (a term you hadn't heard of until now) at the AEC link, the ABC link, and the wikipedia link. If you think one should be removed against what the sources have and we've used for a decade with no logical reason to dispute it (until now) then you'll be very isolated - but don't take my word, please, test the consensus waters at wikiproject ozpol. Now i'm really departing. Bye. Timeshift ( talk) 13:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey, as someone who is likely to support some but not all of your proposed changes, please do take it to WT:AUP. Let's figure out how best to deal with it and then apply it across the board! :) Frickeg ( talk) 13:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Nice tramway place Garibaldi.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on June 13, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-06-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 00:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Elekhh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh Sorry it took so long for me to notice that you stopped participating in wp:WikiProject Architecture after being tremendously helpful to me on the talkpage there. Just hoping you will come back, in my opinion your presence did wonders for the w-project. Ottawahitech ( talk) 16:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
- Hi
Ottawahitech, good to hear that I was helpful! Haven't lost interest in WP Arch, I just simply don't have much time these days to wiki-edit... --
ELEKHH
T 22:06, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Good to hear! Ottawahitech ( talk) 00:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
Hello, Elekhh! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 18:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Elekhh,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Babyrousa celebensis - Crane.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on May 13, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-05-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 05:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Dear Elekhh. "Muttersprachlich DE" liegt mir ebenfalls näher als "Near-native EN". - Du hast den bekannten Tokyo Bay Plan [File:Tokyo_Bay_Plan_by_Tange_1960.jpg] als FAIR USE bearbeitet. Hier in Holland haben wir ein ähnliches Problem mit der bekannten Zeitschrift Wendingen aus den 1920er Jahren. Total bestehen 116 Covers, von denen die Hälfte publiziert werden darf. Bei der übrigen Hälfte liegt das Sterbedatum der Cover-designers keine 70 Jahre zurück. Von diesen Covers sollten einige bedeutende als FAIR USE publiziert werden. Mit Deiner Erfahrung könntest Du vielleicht ein Vorbild nennen, wie wir vorgehen sollen. Vielleicht hättest Du sogar Zeit, einen Prototyp zu erstellen vom nebenstehenden Cover [File:Wendingen1924-8WMDudok.jpg], da er nominiert ist für Deletion in den nächsten Tagen. Wir haben die Absicht, ein FAIR USE für die folgenden international bedeutenden Wendingen-Covers zu bearbeiten im englischen Sprachraum:
- 1925-3/9 Frank Lloyd Wright (cover designer 1885-1987)
- 1920-10 Erich Mendelsohn (cover designer 1885-1987)
- 1924-3 Hermann Finsterlin (1887-1973) eigener cover
- 1929-7 Lyonel Feininger (cover designer 1890-1971)
- 1924-8 Willem Dudok (1884-1974) eigener cover, (nominiert für Deletion)
- 1925-11/12 Piet Kramer (cover designer 1890-1973)
Gruss Leuk2, 14:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Elekhh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.
Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Talk:Ice dam#Move to "Ice jam" to move "Ice dam" to "Ice jam". You may be interested in offering your opinion. Cheers, HopsonRoad ( talk) 15:35, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Elekhh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I note from your Edit that you don't regard The Herald-Sun (highest circulating daily paper in Australia) and/or Andrew Bolt (widely covered journalist in Print and TV) as a reliable source. There is a large number of articles on the internet referring to The Saturday Paper and its owner as actively having a left-wing agenda. Can you please advise who you may consider a reliable source ? I would have thought the well known right-wing position of The Herald-Sun and Bolt would make them extremely reliable sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael773623 ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please see my proposal to merge Category:Water supply companies in Malaysia to Category:Water companies of Malaysia Hugo999 ( talk) 10:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I saw your image Phase out of lightweight plastic bags around the world on this page Phase-out of lightweight plastic bags. I just updated Germany, they will implement a ban at July 2021 so the image won't be correct anymore. Maybe there's other countries who aren't in line with the page anymore too but I don't know. Just wanted to tell you, maybe you want to make a new image or remove this one? I'll leave it up to you. It's a good image. Greetings, Aquatic Ambiance ( talk) 16:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of Empire Arcade
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Empire Arcade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Signed, I Am Chaos ( talk) 17:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)