|
|||
25 April 2024 |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: ( successful, unsuccessful) |
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3
I moved them to User:Ottawahitech/Bill 28 (British Columbia) notes. Please keep the talk page for discussion of the article. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic ( talk) 17:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Howdy @Ottawahitech , You just assessed as C-level Quality for the new BC Transplant Society. And too often there are negative comments by wikipedia users. So hope is okay to say THank You for being first contributor after my creation of the article. And also Level C that says needs more information and references is very accurate so I am thankful for your assessment. And also adding categories to the Talk page. I was hoping health editors with more knowledge about the subject or sector would be contributing sooner. So am glad you added something.
Cheers ! Canuckle ( talk) 00:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I removed a question you posed on Talk:Homelessness in Vancouver because talk pages exist to discuss the article, not the subject. Perhaps you can ask your question at one of the reference desks instead. World's Lamest Critic ( talk) 03:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Regarding my reversion of your recent edit to Public housing in Canada – please review MOS:OVERLINK and Wikipedia:Red link. Thanks, Citobun ( talk) 17:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Mkdw talk 01:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Companies of Canada established in 1972 to Category:Canadian companies established in 1972 per C2C: Hugo999 ( talk) 12:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop with disruptive edits such as this: [ [1]]. Faking ignorance that you don't know where it goes and asking other editors to clean up after you is unacceptable. 2605:8D80:687:8040:E50B:A21E:AF0D:66AB ( talk) 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Listen there isn't a campaign to silence you here. The problem is low quality edits. If you look at your last homeless edit, it is of poor quality and is re-wording a news story. There isn't any meaningful information being added. If you are having such problems with reverts and apparently having your stuff deleted maybe it is time to re-evaluate and review the WP:GNG? SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 10:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
You participated in the discussion at Talk:Homelessness in Vancouver about adding the category "economy of Vancouver". There was consensus not to keep that category. I think it is reasonable to assume that the same applies to every other article on homelessness. When working collaboratively, it is important to accept that others may not agree with you and to go along with the consensus. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic ( talk) 16:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey bud - nice job tagging all those airports for WikiProject Canada! Cheers, PK T(alk) 22:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Talk:Bill_28_(British_Columbia).
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You appear to be engaged in an edit war. Please discuss instead of reverting. SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 00:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. You are now creating pages, redirecting them to other pages and linking your newly created page. This is completely ridiculous and it is obvious you are not adhering to WP:NPOV. SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 11:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC) SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 11:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ruth Ibanez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Narutolovehinata5: You have tagged this page within two minutes of its creation. Have you done wp:Before? Ottawahitech ( talk) 13:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
It doesn't look like anyone alerted you about this yet:
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
I'm just the messenger. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 12:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 17:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Dear Ottawahitech, I highly appreciated the (mutual) 'categorization-motivation' in 2016/17, and truly hope that the unexpected Wikipedia-block (at least for me personally) will not last indefinitely. My best wishes and greetings,
Roland zh (
talk) 20:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Innovators by nationality has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 01:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Category:Women humanitarians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Sastre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
PepperBeast (talk) 23:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:Patent holders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 01:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
If you're interested in en.wp content, have you considered requesting an unblock and addressing the reasons for your block? It's been years and I can't think of why WP:STANDARD wouldn't apply. VQuakr ( talk) 00:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Seychellois women by role indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ForsythiaJo ( talk) 21:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
@ Just Step Sideways, in 2022 you restored my talk age access but qualified this by saying I could only use this access:
As I have told you on several occasions, I have no interest in appealing my indef-block but I would like to know, for example, if I am free to remove the box at the top of this page which implies that I have left wikipedia of my own free will. Ottawahitech ( talk) 16:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:New York World journalists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 12:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
|
|||
25 April 2024 |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: ( successful, unsuccessful) |
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3
I moved them to User:Ottawahitech/Bill 28 (British Columbia) notes. Please keep the talk page for discussion of the article. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic ( talk) 17:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Howdy @Ottawahitech , You just assessed as C-level Quality for the new BC Transplant Society. And too often there are negative comments by wikipedia users. So hope is okay to say THank You for being first contributor after my creation of the article. And also Level C that says needs more information and references is very accurate so I am thankful for your assessment. And also adding categories to the Talk page. I was hoping health editors with more knowledge about the subject or sector would be contributing sooner. So am glad you added something.
Cheers ! Canuckle ( talk) 00:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I removed a question you posed on Talk:Homelessness in Vancouver because talk pages exist to discuss the article, not the subject. Perhaps you can ask your question at one of the reference desks instead. World's Lamest Critic ( talk) 03:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Regarding my reversion of your recent edit to Public housing in Canada – please review MOS:OVERLINK and Wikipedia:Red link. Thanks, Citobun ( talk) 17:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Mkdw talk 01:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Companies of Canada established in 1972 to Category:Canadian companies established in 1972 per C2C: Hugo999 ( talk) 12:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop with disruptive edits such as this: [ [1]]. Faking ignorance that you don't know where it goes and asking other editors to clean up after you is unacceptable. 2605:8D80:687:8040:E50B:A21E:AF0D:66AB ( talk) 17:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Listen there isn't a campaign to silence you here. The problem is low quality edits. If you look at your last homeless edit, it is of poor quality and is re-wording a news story. There isn't any meaningful information being added. If you are having such problems with reverts and apparently having your stuff deleted maybe it is time to re-evaluate and review the WP:GNG? SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 10:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
You participated in the discussion at Talk:Homelessness in Vancouver about adding the category "economy of Vancouver". There was consensus not to keep that category. I think it is reasonable to assume that the same applies to every other article on homelessness. When working collaboratively, it is important to accept that others may not agree with you and to go along with the consensus. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic ( talk) 16:52, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey bud - nice job tagging all those airports for WikiProject Canada! Cheers, PK T(alk) 22:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Talk:Bill_28_(British_Columbia).
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You appear to be engaged in an edit war. Please discuss instead of reverting. SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 00:28, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. You are now creating pages, redirecting them to other pages and linking your newly created page. This is completely ridiculous and it is obvious you are not adhering to WP:NPOV. SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 11:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC) SuperMarioWikiEditor ( talk) 11:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ruth Ibanez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
@ Narutolovehinata5: You have tagged this page within two minutes of its creation. Have you done wp:Before? Ottawahitech ( talk) 13:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
It doesn't look like anyone alerted you about this yet:
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
I'm just the messenger. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 12:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 17:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Dear Ottawahitech, I highly appreciated the (mutual) 'categorization-motivation' in 2016/17, and truly hope that the unexpected Wikipedia-block (at least for me personally) will not last indefinitely. My best wishes and greetings,
Roland zh (
talk) 20:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Innovators by nationality has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 01:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Category:Women humanitarians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Sastre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
PepperBeast (talk) 23:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 13 § Road accidents and incidents on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 06:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:Patent holders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 01:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
If you're interested in en.wp content, have you considered requesting an unblock and addressing the reasons for your block? It's been years and I can't think of why WP:STANDARD wouldn't apply. VQuakr ( talk) 00:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Seychellois women by role indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ForsythiaJo ( talk) 21:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
@ Just Step Sideways, in 2022 you restored my talk age access but qualified this by saying I could only use this access:
As I have told you on several occasions, I have no interest in appealing my indef-block but I would like to know, for example, if I am free to remove the box at the top of this page which implies that I have left wikipedia of my own free will. Ottawahitech ( talk) 16:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:New York World journalists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 12:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)