The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet
WP:BIO.
The article is about The first doctor from the United Arab Emirates to specialize in cardiology for pediatrics, which appears to be very specific and not something worthy of notability.
She is also the chairperson of some committees, but they don't appear to be of importance. I couldn't find any information on the internet to verify notability.
Lolekek (
talk) 17:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Snow close. The result was delete. Bishonen | tålk 21:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The articles in Nigerian newspapers (Guardian, Telegraph, Vanguard, Sun) seem to be undisclosed paid articles, which appears to be a common practice in the country, see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Nigerian_sources_on_paid_article. The Benzinga and Yahoo Finance references are the same article (the Yahoo article being a reprint of the Benzinga one). It doesn't look like a sponsored post, but opinions on the reliability of Benzinga seem mixed ( [1]). The Bloomberg "Profile and Biography" is akin to a wikidata entry and contains almost no meaningful info, and doesn't count towards notability. AvBuyer is a marketplace for aircraft and not a source that would indicate notability. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 23:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability PepperBeast (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
An unsourced article on a non-notable fictional location. I can find no actual significant coverage in reliable sources that discuss this fictional country - the best I can find are mentions in summaries of the one story it appeared in. As far as I can find, the reference to a Thomas Fortenberry making comparisons to Marvel Comics in the last paragraph is just based on comments on this page, which is obviously not a reliable source. As the one story that the location appeared in does not have an article on its own, I can find no suitable redirect targets as an WP:ATD. Rorshacma ( talk) 23:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Notability established after recent additions. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 00:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I can't find definitive proof of any notability of this man. Most of the google results are for a professor of engineering, but that's a different guy who passed in 2023. The lack of a Polish wikipedia article, while not a deal breaker, is a bit suspicious. The handful of books appear to be the other guy as well. The only source I found was [4] but it appears to have mostly been pulled from here and they outright say there that there's almost no information about him. Wizardman 22:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Any sources to be found online are self-published and scant on information or self-published and primary sources. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 22:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I can find no indication that "Axborough" exists. The OS mapping 1:25k has an "Axborough Wood", but not a settlement called "Axborough". The article has been unsourced since its creation in 2005. (I came across it while working on the Unsourced Backlog project, where I'm going through the intersection of Unsourced and Category:Mountains and hills of the United Kingdom.) Pam D 22:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
There was a quite extensive Axborough Wood in the 18th century, per ISBN 9780851152769 page 122, next to what in the 9th century was Wulfweardig ( Wolverley) Lea. That same book confirms on page 124 that Axbourough Hill gave its name to the Farm and the Wood, and they are both where this article claims them to be, and has the important sentence when talking about the Wolverley boundary at Axborough Hill that "The adjacent land was open common waste until 1778.". I'm sure that the "spurious" charter of A.D. 866 by Burgred to Worcester monastery laid out in Della Hooke's book has a happy place in the Wolverley article if Crouch, Swale or someone feels like pushing that article back 2 centuries using this new source.
But as for this article: All this is in a study of land charters from pre-Norman Conquest times. No village. Ever. Delete.
The result was delete. A rough consensus was reached that the subject's awards and 3rd party references were not sufficiently substantial to warrant an article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Marked for notability since September 2021. No major awards or recognition to meet WP:ARTIST. Hardly any article links to this. LibStar ( talk) 23:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk) 03:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Allyson sits there as a contributor to that dialogue, adding her vision to the way we see our country. Not enough to meet WP:NARTIST. Jfire ( talk) 04:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 11:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi 21:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary WP:CFORK from Ridley Scott, which does not meet WP:NLIST; would not be a helpful redirect to main biography. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 20:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unopposed. Sandstein 19:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Only sources are self-published, can't find any sources online. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO or WP:GNG AlexandraAVX ( talk) 19:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted per criterion A10. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Fork of Ukrainian People's Republic (or rather misuse of article namespace) that should be userfied to User:Numberyy/sandbox or User:Numberyy/Ukrainian People's Republic. — andrybak ( talk) 19:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Czechoslovakia at the 1976 Winter Olympics#Bobsleigh. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (engage) 17:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG; No in-depth coverage of this bobsleigh athlete on any news websites, and he has/had never received medal record. Corresponding article on Czech Wikipedia is also an unsourced stub. We can assume his bobsleigh career has ended given that he is 74 years old. CuteDolphin712 ( talk) 19:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as WP:G5, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JKLlamera. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 21:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP of a barangay chairman and councilman, who has not held any notable public office and does not pass WP:NPOL. Mccapra ( talk) 19:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I am sufficiently convinced that notability can be demonstrated through sources for the subject of this article. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (gas) 17:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO for the following reasons.
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-6900 - primary source and not part of Wikipedia's notability criteria.
2. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199576128.001.0001/acref-9780199576128 - Primary source and it's just a listing so not significant.
3. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/dh/tag/manuscript-studies/ - a blog with no consensus on its reliability.
4. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/peter-beal-FBA/ - the website for an academy that he is a member of.
Nothing that satisfies WP:NACADEMIC and general notability should always come before the alternative notability criteria. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 18:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 06:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO due to lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary independent sources.
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-11819 - Primary source = directory listing.
2. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/robin-cooper-FBA/ - non independent source because they are a member of this academy.
Fails WP:NACADEMIC because they don't hold a named chair or a distinguished professor appointment. Plus, WP:POKEMON asks the question, does Wikipedia need an entry for every member of this academy? Some of these humanities people are notable, but many aren't so it seems like the author has applied the pokemon test in the inverse. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 17:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 06:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO for the following reasons
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-17948 - just a directory so it's primary.
2. The Writer's Directory, vol. 31, part 6 (London: St. James Press, 2013), p. 1220. - Routine writers directory. Therefore, it's primary.
3. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/richard-gray-FBA/ - He works at The British Academy so it's not independent and it's primary.
Fails WP:NACADEMIC because he doesn't hold a named chair and The British Academy is not as prestigious as National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics. Plus, WP:Pokémon test may apply here. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 17:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 06:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBASIC for the following reasons
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540891.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-13901 - this isn't even his profile and the source isn't reliable.
2. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/anthony-guest - this is an academic profile but he wasn't a named chair or a distinguished professor so it fails WP:NACADEMIC
3. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/50906/page/5769 - This is a routine press announcement that he passed the bar like many run of the mill lawyers do. Plus, it's a routine press announcement so it's primary.
4. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/51578/supplement/8 just another listing showing another appointment that doesn't meet any of the alternative notability criteria for living people. Plus, it's a routine press announcement so it's primary
5. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/anthony-guest-FBA/ - This source isn't independent because he's a member and it's a primary source. Plus, The British Academy isn't the same as a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics) so again this fails WP:NACADEMIC Signal Crayfish ( talk) 16:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore, Guest's extensive publication list suggest that a great deal of critical engagement with his legal work should be found in scholarly articles and reviews; I don't think, for all the reasons listed above, that this is necessary to establish notability, but a quick search should settle the matter if others disagree. Cheers, —17:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC).
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
This subject (not the same as Wolaita Sodo University) fails GNG and NCORP. The citations provided are ROUTINE and my BEFORE search (in English) only found content about the university, not this college. I can't speak to what else might be in Amharic. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 16:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep. Mach61 ( talk) 19:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
Fails wp:anybio
https://londonlibrarymembership.b2clogin.com/londonlibrarymembership.onmicrosoft.com/B2C_1A_SusiOrSspr_SAML/samlp/sso/login - just links to a login page
https://www.lennoxberkeley.org.uk/articles/bach-and-lennox-berkeley - is written by the composer so isn't independent or secondary.
https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095530447 - is a routine discography on a reference site that isn't regarded as a reliable source and has no relationship to Oxford University
http://www.musography.co.uk/Page%202.html - musicography is just a miscellaneous music blog
https://www.britishmusicsociety.co.uk/2024/01/christopher-brown-24-preludes-and-fugues/ - This is a routine book review
This composer also fails WP:MUSICBIO tand WP:COMPOSER because they havent had any significant major label releases, they haven't contributed to any notable soundtracks or performed with any notable ensembles and as far as I can see they have no named chair at a major university. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 14:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikidata I created a new Wikidata entity so that the Authority Control could be addressed. I added quite a lot of referenced statements before I realised that there was already an entity in existence and linked to the French Wikipedia article. I have now merged these entities into one and tidied up the surviving one. See: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123574568 SpookiePuppy ( talk) 16:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Some sources are provided in the article. However, editors did not come to an agreement on whether the level of coverage is sufficient to demonstrate the notability of the subject. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (confabulate) 17:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NWEB and GNG. Many of these citations fail WP:SPS. The Haaretz cite is a mere mention. The PhD dissertation talks little about the subject and are in the footnotes as much as in the body, which is weak. Everything else (ynet, tech.walla, mako, makorrishon) are interviews and so, aren't independent so there's not much for notability of this subject. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
"The "Shugar Zaza" thing about Pokémon undoubtedly draws on the personal experience of Trager and Paz, who even managed to predict the madness that will take over the world more than six months in advance"I don't see SIGCOV there, regardless that the source is RS. And, a single article along with aformentioned dissertation still seems too low for GNG. Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
"did you notice that you are answering to a comment"Yes.
"...a bit premature, doesn't it?"No. Sometimes I decide to let editors cast wrong !votes and say nothing. Other times when I see someone saying something like a given source is SIGCOV and I don't see it, I ask how. I examined each of the citations present and did a BEFORE search ahead of this nomination, so it doesn't seem to me unreasonable to question why other editors would interpret sources differently. Normal people ask questions and discuss. If you take offense at my questioning of your logic, maybe AfD isn't for you since argument is typical in these discussions. Chris Troutman ( talk) 18:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 14:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 17:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 14:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Notability and content are not under dispute but the translation seems to be a problem. I would be concerned that draftification would bring the article out of the eye of those who might improve it. Instead, tagging and/or bringing to the attention of relevant WikiProjects may be a better way forward. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (palaver) 17:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Direct translation of ja-wiki article with no attribution, possible machine translation. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 13:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Direct translation of ja-wiki article with no attribution, possible machine translation. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2022, unreferenced since 2008. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND, no real coverage beyond reviews on fan sites and similar. The dewiki article seems to have a total of one maybe reliable source for the purposes of notability, but I can't find anything else. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 11:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I can find coverage of Thiha Zaw and Hein Thiha Zaw but nothing about this much less notable namesake. It was initially a BLP PROD but it was contested with the addition of the 3 sources currently cited in the article, none of which seem to work. I managed to find Soccerway, which merely confirms that he sat as an unused sub for 5 matches in 2019. I'm not seeing anything even close to WP:SPORTBASIC #5 for this particular Thiha Zaw. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
His name in Burmese is "ညီညီလွင်" and I can't find any coverage that would meet even WP:SPORTBASIC #5, the bare minimum requirement for all sportspeople. It seems his only claim to fame is playing in one friendly match. I'm not seeing any evidence that this person qualifies for their own article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Lack of coverage found when searching "အောင်သိုက်", "Aung Thike" and "Aung Thaik". I can't find evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC #5, the bare minimum requirement. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find any significant coverage in Hungarian or Slovak media. MY Nitra covers him scoring 4 goals in a match but the article lacks depth on him as an individual. Paraméter is a passing mention in the Hungarian language. Lacks evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hasn't played professionally since 2020 and insufficient coverage for WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC in my searches. His name is "Δημήτρης Ρασπάς" in Greek. Phile News mentions him scoring in the Europa League and then going on military service. Since that military service, he seems to have disappeared into the amateur tiers of Cyprus. Phile News mentions him again in 2022 but it's just a transfer announcement with no independent analysis. There are further copied and pasted transfer announcements in subsequent years. In 2023, we have Sport FM and, in 2024, we have Cyprus Times. Transfer announcements that are copied and pasted from the club websites are not acceptable for SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hwali. Bold merge of duplicative short pages. (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 21:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
merged with Hwali Babakathy ( talk) 10:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Run of the mill trade organization that do not appear to meet the standard for WP:NCORP. Graywalls ( talk) 10:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Manama, Zimbabwe. Bold merge of duplicative short pages, no further discussion necessary (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 21:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Merged with Manama, Zimbabwe Babakathy ( talk) 09:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I've tried to sort this article out but most of the sources used to create this article were written by Kris Gopalakrishnan - the startup village's chief mentor. The two remaining sources, BBC and Reuters are reliable but two reliable sources oestensibly liften from a press release do not make this subject notable. Therefore, it fails WP:NCORP 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 08:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The references I checked are either broken or don't support the claims they are footnoting, and I had to remove some potential libel that failed verification. I'm not sure the title represents a term that's used by reliable sources, and it seems like the topic of different approaches to and the history of immigration enforcement is already covered by Illegal immigration to the United States and articles linked from there. This article has been an orphan since 2019, so it seems authors of other articles are not linking to this term, which may be more evidence it's not in widespread use? -- Beland ( talk) 08:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 11:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be a dictionary definition, which is prohibited per WP:DICTIONARY. TWOrantulaTM ( enter the web) 04:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 07:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable organization, promotional article. All of the sources in the article are journal articles about pneumonia. – Muboshgu ( talk) 07:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This person is not notable. Most of the article is given over to promotion of some causes. – Muboshgu ( talk) 07:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This page is created to defame the the country mentioned in it and not only this page but the author Ghalbeyakh of this page created and edited multiple pages to defame the respected parties such as Qatari soft power, Qatari involvement in higher education in the United States, Soft power and more. These are the pages edited by the author which seems to have a propaganda against a nation/party. some of his edits are marked as vandalism already. This author particularly seems to harming the authenticity of the Wikipedia policies. I would like to have a chance to prove this. Isouf Qaleed ( talk) 06:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. All sources given are primary sources and the few mentions of the organisation in reliable sources are trivial. Yue 🌙 05:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources given. Even the name doesn't disambiguate correctly from John II, Lord of Beirut, and all sources I can find are about other Johns of Ibelin (often either the aforementioned or John, Old Lord of Beirut). ChaotıċEnby( talk · contribs) 03:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 04:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a personal essay written that largely summarizes Caroline Sturdy Colls' excavation of Treblinka. I'm quite surprised that it's lasted this long, but I hesitated in PRODing it because I thought something could be salvaged out of this once the literal essay ("I hope to present a deeper understanding of...") has been deleted. Kazamzam ( talk) 03:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced music bio from 2007. WP:BEFORE yields very little, and far from meeting WP:MUSICBIO. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
School fails NCORP. The Banglanews24 cite is a mere mention. Banglapedia says nothing about this school. The Ministry of Education cite is ROUTINE. The first academia.edu cite only mentions this school; the second says nothing at all about it. The Prothom Alo and Daily Campus are ok but I think that's too little for GNG. I worry this is a stealth advertisement, as most of the content is not cited. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
2024-01 ✗ deleted
← 2024-01 ✗
PROD
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Complex/
Rational 03:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing is insufficient. A redirect may be created as a matter of editorial discretion, but there's no clear target here. Star Mississippi 14:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine business news and annoucements scope_creep Talk 18:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 19:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 22:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 00:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:V or WP:GNG. Searching for sources returned nothing formal, a few passing references on social media sites. Page also appears to be an abandoned draft. grungaloo ( talk) 00:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
It's enough, for two years we have not created pages for these individual mass waves of attacks against Ukraine and kept them instead at Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure (2022–present). This standard was first broken with 29 December 2023 Russian strikes on Ukraine, I proposed its merger however it had been the largest of such kind of waves and most people opposed the proposal, fair enough. Then 2 January 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine was created, unlike the earlier this one was a regular wave and its article remains very short, I've proposed its merger and for now enjoys widespread support. And now this article was created. At Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure (2022–present)#Timeline you can see how there have been several dozens of these types of attacks, just look at the see also section of this article, we cannot and should not give articles to each of these attacks, much less after two years since they started. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 00:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 15:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 00:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
My WP:BEFORE can't find any independent coverage, cites mostly to primary sources and the article doesn't attempt to demonstrate notability, only a WP:DATABASE for the awards going from 2015-2017. I don't believe this meets the advice at WP:NAWARDS nor the policies of the GNG. The article lists current as 2024, but the sources website for that says that this is the first year these have been present. So I get the sense that this might even be the conflation of two different but similar events with the same generic name. I'll note that the page was previously deleted, it would be best to review the comments there as well: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Television Style Awards microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish· growths) 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 00:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable organisation. Article orphaned for a decade. Sources are mostly WP:PRIMARY. Article is basically WP:PROMO. PepperBeast (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 00:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Just a dog trainer who has participated in some TV shows. I don't see much notability. By looking up Adrian Stoica on Google and scrolling down a bit I already get results from different people named this way. I also found no sources from 2022 or before talking about him after looking up his name. I had to use a more specific search in Romanian and got some sources which don't look like the most appropriate [47] [48] [49]. I do not believe this person is notable. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 00:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The page says the full article will be available in the printed edition on newsstands. The article notes: "Adrian Stoica, 36 anni, carughese di origini rumene, e Paola Bonomo marianese 35enne, si sono aggiudicati rispettivamente i titoli di campione europeo e campionessa italiana nella disciplina, nella specialità Sky Awi. Particolare è la storia di Adrian che ha trasformato una passione in un lavoro. «Sono nato in Romania – racconta Stoica – sono arrivato in Italia a 20 anni e ho lavorato per 14 anni in un’azienda locale specializzata nella produzione di mattonelle»."
From Google Translate: "Adrian Stoica, 36 years old, from Carugha of Romanian origins, and Paola Bonomo from Mariana, 35 years old, won the titles of European champion and Italian champion respectively in the discipline, in the Sky Awi specialty. The story of Adrian is particular, as he transformed a passion into a job. «I was born in Romania – says Stoica – I arrived in Italy at the age of 20 and worked for 14 years in a local company specialized in the production of tiles»."
The article notes: "Dog Trainer esperto in «divertimento del cane e con il cane», attraverso la sua specializzazione sul Gioco e sugli Sport cinofili. Ex stuntman e da sempre sportivo, grazie al Disc Dog Adrian è diventato in breve tempo un professionista riconosciuto ben oltre l’Europa: negli ultimi 5 anni ha conquistato con la sua Rory due titoli di Campione del Mondo (UFO: Open 2016 e Throw & Catch 2014) e con vari cani ben 22 coppe di Campione Europeo nelle varie federazioni internazionali."
From Google Translate: "Dog Trainer expert in «fun for the dog and with the dog», through his specialization in games and dog sports. A former stuntman and always a sportsman, thanks to the Disc Dog Adrian has quickly become a professional recognized far beyond Europe: in the last 5 years he has won two World Champion titles with his Rory (UFO: Open 2016 and Throw & Catch 2014) and with various dogs 22 European Champion Cups in the various international federations."
The article notes: "Un nuovo record per Adrian Stoica e Rory. La coppia a sei zampe, formata da un istruttore e dal suo animale, si è vista confermare anche nel 2016 il titolo di Campioni Europei nel «Disc dog» (qui vi avevamo raccontato la Disc dog mania in Italia). Quest’anno l’impresa è stata da record: i due hanno, infatti, conquistato i sei titoli europei disponibili nelle tre federazioni internazionali più prestigiose e giocate in Europa: AWI, UFO e Skyhoundz."
From Google Translate: "A new record for Adrian Stoica and Rory. The six-legged couple, made up of an instructor and his animal, saw their title of European Champions in the «Disc dog» confirmed again in 2016 (here we told you about the Disc dog mania in Italy). This year the feat was record-breaking: the two have, in fact, won the six European titles available in the three most prestigious international federations played in Europe: AWI, UFO and Skyhoundz."
The article notes: "Adrian has eight dogs that he works with – they can work individually or separately like we saw with Hurricane on AGT, but he hasn’t decided yet if he is going to bring over another of his dogs for the Las Vegas act. But it's not a problem as Hurricane can work with all his other dogs."
The article notes: "For the semifinal appearance, Stoica and Hurricane performed a routine where Stoica attempts to do garden work — a comedic bit that led the judges to proclaim that the act is “Vegas ready,” per the entertainment site Gold Derby. Stoica and Hurricane’s act during the finals, set to Queen’s “Crazy Little Thing Called Love,” showed Hurricane helping Stoica prep for a date with Vergara."
The article notes: "Now, with this victory, Stoica has earned the $1 million prize and a headlining slot in Las Vegas. According to his “AGT” bio, Stoica has been performing with Hurricane for roughly eight years. The act previously reached the semifinals of “Italia’s Got Talent” in 2017 and participated in “Romania’s Got Talent” in 2018 and 2022."
The article notes: "În anul 2017, românii au ajuns și la “Italienii au talent”: Adrian Stoica, un dresor de câini, a primit patru de “Da” din partea juriului, datorită numărului său de pe scenă. Un an mai târziu, Adrian Stoica a participat și la “Românii au talent”."
From Google Translate: "In 2017, the Romanians also reached "Italians have talent": Adrian Stoica, a dog trainer, received four "Yes" from the jury, thanks to his number on stage. A year later, Adrian Stoica also participated in "Romanians have talent"."
The article notes: "La coreografia canina di Adrian Stoica. Parte seduto su un divano, deciso a mangiarsi un paninazzo di quelli che si ricordano. Poi, però, a fare compagnia ad Adrian Stoica sul palco (e a «ricordargli» della dieta in corso) arrivano i suoi due meravigliosi cani. Con cui, in pratica, l’uomo mette in scena una divertente coreografia sulla difficoltà a rimanere in forma. Una performance che sorprende e che convince."
From Google Translate: "Adrian Stoica's canine choreography. He leaves sitting on a sofa, determined to eat a sandwich of the ones he remembers. Then, however, his two wonderful dogs arrive to keep Adrian Stoica company on stage (and to "remind" him of his ongoing diet). With which, in practice, the man stages a fun choreography on the difficulty of staying fit. A performance that surprises and convinces."
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet
WP:BIO.
The article is about The first doctor from the United Arab Emirates to specialize in cardiology for pediatrics, which appears to be very specific and not something worthy of notability.
She is also the chairperson of some committees, but they don't appear to be of importance. I couldn't find any information on the internet to verify notability.
Lolekek (
talk) 17:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Snow close. The result was delete. Bishonen | tålk 21:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The articles in Nigerian newspapers (Guardian, Telegraph, Vanguard, Sun) seem to be undisclosed paid articles, which appears to be a common practice in the country, see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Nigerian_sources_on_paid_article. The Benzinga and Yahoo Finance references are the same article (the Yahoo article being a reprint of the Benzinga one). It doesn't look like a sponsored post, but opinions on the reliability of Benzinga seem mixed ( [1]). The Bloomberg "Profile and Biography" is akin to a wikidata entry and contains almost no meaningful info, and doesn't count towards notability. AvBuyer is a marketplace for aircraft and not a source that would indicate notability. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 23:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability PepperBeast (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
An unsourced article on a non-notable fictional location. I can find no actual significant coverage in reliable sources that discuss this fictional country - the best I can find are mentions in summaries of the one story it appeared in. As far as I can find, the reference to a Thomas Fortenberry making comparisons to Marvel Comics in the last paragraph is just based on comments on this page, which is obviously not a reliable source. As the one story that the location appeared in does not have an article on its own, I can find no suitable redirect targets as an WP:ATD. Rorshacma ( talk) 23:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Notability established after recent additions. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 00:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I can't find definitive proof of any notability of this man. Most of the google results are for a professor of engineering, but that's a different guy who passed in 2023. The lack of a Polish wikipedia article, while not a deal breaker, is a bit suspicious. The handful of books appear to be the other guy as well. The only source I found was [4] but it appears to have mostly been pulled from here and they outright say there that there's almost no information about him. Wizardman 22:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Any sources to be found online are self-published and scant on information or self-published and primary sources. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 22:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I can find no indication that "Axborough" exists. The OS mapping 1:25k has an "Axborough Wood", but not a settlement called "Axborough". The article has been unsourced since its creation in 2005. (I came across it while working on the Unsourced Backlog project, where I'm going through the intersection of Unsourced and Category:Mountains and hills of the United Kingdom.) Pam D 22:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
There was a quite extensive Axborough Wood in the 18th century, per ISBN 9780851152769 page 122, next to what in the 9th century was Wulfweardig ( Wolverley) Lea. That same book confirms on page 124 that Axbourough Hill gave its name to the Farm and the Wood, and they are both where this article claims them to be, and has the important sentence when talking about the Wolverley boundary at Axborough Hill that "The adjacent land was open common waste until 1778.". I'm sure that the "spurious" charter of A.D. 866 by Burgred to Worcester monastery laid out in Della Hooke's book has a happy place in the Wolverley article if Crouch, Swale or someone feels like pushing that article back 2 centuries using this new source.
But as for this article: All this is in a study of land charters from pre-Norman Conquest times. No village. Ever. Delete.
The result was delete. A rough consensus was reached that the subject's awards and 3rd party references were not sufficiently substantial to warrant an article. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Marked for notability since September 2021. No major awards or recognition to meet WP:ARTIST. Hardly any article links to this. LibStar ( talk) 23:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk) 03:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Allyson sits there as a contributor to that dialogue, adding her vision to the way we see our country. Not enough to meet WP:NARTIST. Jfire ( talk) 04:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 11:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Guerillero
Parlez Moi 21:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary WP:CFORK from Ridley Scott, which does not meet WP:NLIST; would not be a helpful redirect to main biography. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 20:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unopposed. Sandstein 19:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Only sources are self-published, can't find any sources online. Doesn't meet WP:NBIO or WP:GNG AlexandraAVX ( talk) 19:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted per criterion A10. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 07:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Fork of Ukrainian People's Republic (or rather misuse of article namespace) that should be userfied to User:Numberyy/sandbox or User:Numberyy/Ukrainian People's Republic. — andrybak ( talk) 19:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Czechoslovakia at the 1976 Winter Olympics#Bobsleigh. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (engage) 17:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG; No in-depth coverage of this bobsleigh athlete on any news websites, and he has/had never received medal record. Corresponding article on Czech Wikipedia is also an unsourced stub. We can assume his bobsleigh career has ended given that he is 74 years old. CuteDolphin712 ( talk) 19:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as WP:G5, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JKLlamera. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 21:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP of a barangay chairman and councilman, who has not held any notable public office and does not pass WP:NPOL. Mccapra ( talk) 19:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I am sufficiently convinced that notability can be demonstrated through sources for the subject of this article. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (gas) 17:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO for the following reasons.
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-6900 - primary source and not part of Wikipedia's notability criteria.
2. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199576128.001.0001/acref-9780199576128 - Primary source and it's just a listing so not significant.
3. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/dh/tag/manuscript-studies/ - a blog with no consensus on its reliability.
4. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/peter-beal-FBA/ - the website for an academy that he is a member of.
Nothing that satisfies WP:NACADEMIC and general notability should always come before the alternative notability criteria. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 18:02, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 06:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO due to lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary independent sources.
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-11819 - Primary source = directory listing.
2. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/robin-cooper-FBA/ - non independent source because they are a member of this academy.
Fails WP:NACADEMIC because they don't hold a named chair or a distinguished professor appointment. Plus, WP:POKEMON asks the question, does Wikipedia need an entry for every member of this academy? Some of these humanities people are notable, but many aren't so it seems like the author has applied the pokemon test in the inverse. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 17:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 06:11, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ANYBIO for the following reasons
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-17948 - just a directory so it's primary.
2. The Writer's Directory, vol. 31, part 6 (London: St. James Press, 2013), p. 1220. - Routine writers directory. Therefore, it's primary.
3. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/richard-gray-FBA/ - He works at The British Academy so it's not independent and it's primary.
Fails WP:NACADEMIC because he doesn't hold a named chair and The British Academy is not as prestigious as National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics. Plus, WP:Pokémon test may apply here. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 17:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 06:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBASIC for the following reasons
1. https://www.ukwhoswho.com/display/10.1093/ww/9780199540891.001.0001/ww-9780199540884-e-13901 - this isn't even his profile and the source isn't reliable.
2. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/anthony-guest - this is an academic profile but he wasn't a named chair or a distinguished professor so it fails WP:NACADEMIC
3. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/50906/page/5769 - This is a routine press announcement that he passed the bar like many run of the mill lawyers do. Plus, it's a routine press announcement so it's primary.
4. https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/51578/supplement/8 just another listing showing another appointment that doesn't meet any of the alternative notability criteria for living people. Plus, it's a routine press announcement so it's primary
5. https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/anthony-guest-FBA/ - This source isn't independent because he's a member and it's a primary source. Plus, The British Academy isn't the same as a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics) so again this fails WP:NACADEMIC Signal Crayfish ( talk) 16:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore, Guest's extensive publication list suggest that a great deal of critical engagement with his legal work should be found in scholarly articles and reviews; I don't think, for all the reasons listed above, that this is necessary to establish notability, but a quick search should settle the matter if others disagree. Cheers, —17:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC).
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
This subject (not the same as Wolaita Sodo University) fails GNG and NCORP. The citations provided are ROUTINE and my BEFORE search (in English) only found content about the university, not this college. I can't speak to what else might be in Amharic. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 16:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep. Mach61 ( talk) 19:14, 6 February 2024 (UTC)( non-admin closure)
Fails wp:anybio
https://londonlibrarymembership.b2clogin.com/londonlibrarymembership.onmicrosoft.com/B2C_1A_SusiOrSspr_SAML/samlp/sso/login - just links to a login page
https://www.lennoxberkeley.org.uk/articles/bach-and-lennox-berkeley - is written by the composer so isn't independent or secondary.
https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095530447 - is a routine discography on a reference site that isn't regarded as a reliable source and has no relationship to Oxford University
http://www.musography.co.uk/Page%202.html - musicography is just a miscellaneous music blog
https://www.britishmusicsociety.co.uk/2024/01/christopher-brown-24-preludes-and-fugues/ - This is a routine book review
This composer also fails WP:MUSICBIO tand WP:COMPOSER because they havent had any significant major label releases, they haven't contributed to any notable soundtracks or performed with any notable ensembles and as far as I can see they have no named chair at a major university. Signal Crayfish ( talk) 14:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Wikidata I created a new Wikidata entity so that the Authority Control could be addressed. I added quite a lot of referenced statements before I realised that there was already an entity in existence and linked to the French Wikipedia article. I have now merged these entities into one and tidied up the surviving one. See: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123574568 SpookiePuppy ( talk) 16:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Some sources are provided in the article. However, editors did not come to an agreement on whether the level of coverage is sufficient to demonstrate the notability of the subject. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (confabulate) 17:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NWEB and GNG. Many of these citations fail WP:SPS. The Haaretz cite is a mere mention. The PhD dissertation talks little about the subject and are in the footnotes as much as in the body, which is weak. Everything else (ynet, tech.walla, mako, makorrishon) are interviews and so, aren't independent so there's not much for notability of this subject. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
"The "Shugar Zaza" thing about Pokémon undoubtedly draws on the personal experience of Trager and Paz, who even managed to predict the madness that will take over the world more than six months in advance"I don't see SIGCOV there, regardless that the source is RS. And, a single article along with aformentioned dissertation still seems too low for GNG. Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
"did you notice that you are answering to a comment"Yes.
"...a bit premature, doesn't it?"No. Sometimes I decide to let editors cast wrong !votes and say nothing. Other times when I see someone saying something like a given source is SIGCOV and I don't see it, I ask how. I examined each of the citations present and did a BEFORE search ahead of this nomination, so it doesn't seem to me unreasonable to question why other editors would interpret sources differently. Normal people ask questions and discuss. If you take offense at my questioning of your logic, maybe AfD isn't for you since argument is typical in these discussions. Chris Troutman ( talk) 18:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 14:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 17:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Ganesha811 (
talk) 14:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Notability and content are not under dispute but the translation seems to be a problem. I would be concerned that draftification would bring the article out of the eye of those who might improve it. Instead, tagging and/or bringing to the attention of relevant WikiProjects may be a better way forward. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (palaver) 17:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Direct translation of ja-wiki article with no attribution, possible machine translation. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 13:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Direct translation of ja-wiki article with no attribution, possible machine translation. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2022, unreferenced since 2008. Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND, no real coverage beyond reviews on fan sites and similar. The dewiki article seems to have a total of one maybe reliable source for the purposes of notability, but I can't find anything else. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 11:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I can find coverage of Thiha Zaw and Hein Thiha Zaw but nothing about this much less notable namesake. It was initially a BLP PROD but it was contested with the addition of the 3 sources currently cited in the article, none of which seem to work. I managed to find Soccerway, which merely confirms that he sat as an unused sub for 5 matches in 2019. I'm not seeing anything even close to WP:SPORTBASIC #5 for this particular Thiha Zaw. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
His name in Burmese is "ညီညီလွင်" and I can't find any coverage that would meet even WP:SPORTBASIC #5, the bare minimum requirement for all sportspeople. It seems his only claim to fame is playing in one friendly match. I'm not seeing any evidence that this person qualifies for their own article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Lack of coverage found when searching "အောင်သိုက်", "Aung Thike" and "Aung Thaik". I can't find evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC #5, the bare minimum requirement. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find any significant coverage in Hungarian or Slovak media. MY Nitra covers him scoring 4 goals in a match but the article lacks depth on him as an individual. Paraméter is a passing mention in the Hungarian language. Lacks evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Hasn't played professionally since 2020 and insufficient coverage for WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC in my searches. His name is "Δημήτρης Ρασπάς" in Greek. Phile News mentions him scoring in the Europa League and then going on military service. Since that military service, he seems to have disappeared into the amateur tiers of Cyprus. Phile News mentions him again in 2022 but it's just a transfer announcement with no independent analysis. There are further copied and pasted transfer announcements in subsequent years. In 2023, we have Sport FM and, in 2024, we have Cyprus Times. Transfer announcements that are copied and pasted from the club websites are not acceptable for SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hwali. Bold merge of duplicative short pages. (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 21:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
merged with Hwali Babakathy ( talk) 10:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Run of the mill trade organization that do not appear to meet the standard for WP:NCORP. Graywalls ( talk) 10:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Manama, Zimbabwe. Bold merge of duplicative short pages, no further discussion necessary (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 21:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Merged with Manama, Zimbabwe Babakathy ( talk) 09:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I've tried to sort this article out but most of the sources used to create this article were written by Kris Gopalakrishnan - the startup village's chief mentor. The two remaining sources, BBC and Reuters are reliable but two reliable sources oestensibly liften from a press release do not make this subject notable. Therefore, it fails WP:NCORP 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 08:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The references I checked are either broken or don't support the claims they are footnoting, and I had to remove some potential libel that failed verification. I'm not sure the title represents a term that's used by reliable sources, and it seems like the topic of different approaches to and the history of immigration enforcement is already covered by Illegal immigration to the United States and articles linked from there. This article has been an orphan since 2019, so it seems authors of other articles are not linking to this term, which may be more evidence it's not in widespread use? -- Beland ( talk) 08:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 11:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be a dictionary definition, which is prohibited per WP:DICTIONARY. TWOrantulaTM ( enter the web) 04:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 07:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable organization, promotional article. All of the sources in the article are journal articles about pneumonia. – Muboshgu ( talk) 07:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This person is not notable. Most of the article is given over to promotion of some causes. – Muboshgu ( talk) 07:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This page is created to defame the the country mentioned in it and not only this page but the author Ghalbeyakh of this page created and edited multiple pages to defame the respected parties such as Qatari soft power, Qatari involvement in higher education in the United States, Soft power and more. These are the pages edited by the author which seems to have a propaganda against a nation/party. some of his edits are marked as vandalism already. This author particularly seems to harming the authenticity of the Wikipedia policies. I would like to have a chance to prove this. Isouf Qaleed ( talk) 06:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. All sources given are primary sources and the few mentions of the organisation in reliable sources are trivial. Yue 🌙 05:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources given. Even the name doesn't disambiguate correctly from John II, Lord of Beirut, and all sources I can find are about other Johns of Ibelin (often either the aforementioned or John, Old Lord of Beirut). ChaotıċEnby( talk · contribs) 03:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 04:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a personal essay written that largely summarizes Caroline Sturdy Colls' excavation of Treblinka. I'm quite surprised that it's lasted this long, but I hesitated in PRODing it because I thought something could be salvaged out of this once the literal essay ("I hope to present a deeper understanding of...") has been deleted. Kazamzam ( talk) 03:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 04:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced music bio from 2007. WP:BEFORE yields very little, and far from meeting WP:MUSICBIO. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
School fails NCORP. The Banglanews24 cite is a mere mention. Banglapedia says nothing about this school. The Ministry of Education cite is ROUTINE. The first academia.edu cite only mentions this school; the second says nothing at all about it. The Prothom Alo and Daily Campus are ok but I think that's too little for GNG. I worry this is a stealth advertisement, as most of the content is not cited. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
2024-01 ✗ deleted
← 2024-01 ✗
PROD
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Complex/
Rational 03:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sourcing is insufficient. A redirect may be created as a matter of editorial discretion, but there's no clear target here. Star Mississippi 14:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine business news and annoucements scope_creep Talk 18:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 19:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 22:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 00:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:V or WP:GNG. Searching for sources returned nothing formal, a few passing references on social media sites. Page also appears to be an abandoned draft. grungaloo ( talk) 00:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
It's enough, for two years we have not created pages for these individual mass waves of attacks against Ukraine and kept them instead at Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure (2022–present). This standard was first broken with 29 December 2023 Russian strikes on Ukraine, I proposed its merger however it had been the largest of such kind of waves and most people opposed the proposal, fair enough. Then 2 January 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine was created, unlike the earlier this one was a regular wave and its article remains very short, I've proposed its merger and for now enjoys widespread support. And now this article was created. At Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure (2022–present)#Timeline you can see how there have been several dozens of these types of attacks, just look at the see also section of this article, we cannot and should not give articles to each of these attacks, much less after two years since they started. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 00:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 15:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 00:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
My WP:BEFORE can't find any independent coverage, cites mostly to primary sources and the article doesn't attempt to demonstrate notability, only a WP:DATABASE for the awards going from 2015-2017. I don't believe this meets the advice at WP:NAWARDS nor the policies of the GNG. The article lists current as 2024, but the sources website for that says that this is the first year these have been present. So I get the sense that this might even be the conflation of two different but similar events with the same generic name. I'll note that the page was previously deleted, it would be best to review the comments there as well: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Television Style Awards microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish· growths) 17:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 00:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable organisation. Article orphaned for a decade. Sources are mostly WP:PRIMARY. Article is basically WP:PROMO. PepperBeast (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 00:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Just a dog trainer who has participated in some TV shows. I don't see much notability. By looking up Adrian Stoica on Google and scrolling down a bit I already get results from different people named this way. I also found no sources from 2022 or before talking about him after looking up his name. I had to use a more specific search in Romanian and got some sources which don't look like the most appropriate [47] [48] [49]. I do not believe this person is notable. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 00:17, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The page says the full article will be available in the printed edition on newsstands. The article notes: "Adrian Stoica, 36 anni, carughese di origini rumene, e Paola Bonomo marianese 35enne, si sono aggiudicati rispettivamente i titoli di campione europeo e campionessa italiana nella disciplina, nella specialità Sky Awi. Particolare è la storia di Adrian che ha trasformato una passione in un lavoro. «Sono nato in Romania – racconta Stoica – sono arrivato in Italia a 20 anni e ho lavorato per 14 anni in un’azienda locale specializzata nella produzione di mattonelle»."
From Google Translate: "Adrian Stoica, 36 years old, from Carugha of Romanian origins, and Paola Bonomo from Mariana, 35 years old, won the titles of European champion and Italian champion respectively in the discipline, in the Sky Awi specialty. The story of Adrian is particular, as he transformed a passion into a job. «I was born in Romania – says Stoica – I arrived in Italy at the age of 20 and worked for 14 years in a local company specialized in the production of tiles»."
The article notes: "Dog Trainer esperto in «divertimento del cane e con il cane», attraverso la sua specializzazione sul Gioco e sugli Sport cinofili. Ex stuntman e da sempre sportivo, grazie al Disc Dog Adrian è diventato in breve tempo un professionista riconosciuto ben oltre l’Europa: negli ultimi 5 anni ha conquistato con la sua Rory due titoli di Campione del Mondo (UFO: Open 2016 e Throw & Catch 2014) e con vari cani ben 22 coppe di Campione Europeo nelle varie federazioni internazionali."
From Google Translate: "Dog Trainer expert in «fun for the dog and with the dog», through his specialization in games and dog sports. A former stuntman and always a sportsman, thanks to the Disc Dog Adrian has quickly become a professional recognized far beyond Europe: in the last 5 years he has won two World Champion titles with his Rory (UFO: Open 2016 and Throw & Catch 2014) and with various dogs 22 European Champion Cups in the various international federations."
The article notes: "Un nuovo record per Adrian Stoica e Rory. La coppia a sei zampe, formata da un istruttore e dal suo animale, si è vista confermare anche nel 2016 il titolo di Campioni Europei nel «Disc dog» (qui vi avevamo raccontato la Disc dog mania in Italia). Quest’anno l’impresa è stata da record: i due hanno, infatti, conquistato i sei titoli europei disponibili nelle tre federazioni internazionali più prestigiose e giocate in Europa: AWI, UFO e Skyhoundz."
From Google Translate: "A new record for Adrian Stoica and Rory. The six-legged couple, made up of an instructor and his animal, saw their title of European Champions in the «Disc dog» confirmed again in 2016 (here we told you about the Disc dog mania in Italy). This year the feat was record-breaking: the two have, in fact, won the six European titles available in the three most prestigious international federations played in Europe: AWI, UFO and Skyhoundz."
The article notes: "Adrian has eight dogs that he works with – they can work individually or separately like we saw with Hurricane on AGT, but he hasn’t decided yet if he is going to bring over another of his dogs for the Las Vegas act. But it's not a problem as Hurricane can work with all his other dogs."
The article notes: "For the semifinal appearance, Stoica and Hurricane performed a routine where Stoica attempts to do garden work — a comedic bit that led the judges to proclaim that the act is “Vegas ready,” per the entertainment site Gold Derby. Stoica and Hurricane’s act during the finals, set to Queen’s “Crazy Little Thing Called Love,” showed Hurricane helping Stoica prep for a date with Vergara."
The article notes: "Now, with this victory, Stoica has earned the $1 million prize and a headlining slot in Las Vegas. According to his “AGT” bio, Stoica has been performing with Hurricane for roughly eight years. The act previously reached the semifinals of “Italia’s Got Talent” in 2017 and participated in “Romania’s Got Talent” in 2018 and 2022."
The article notes: "În anul 2017, românii au ajuns și la “Italienii au talent”: Adrian Stoica, un dresor de câini, a primit patru de “Da” din partea juriului, datorită numărului său de pe scenă. Un an mai târziu, Adrian Stoica a participat și la “Românii au talent”."
From Google Translate: "In 2017, the Romanians also reached "Italians have talent": Adrian Stoica, a dog trainer, received four "Yes" from the jury, thanks to his number on stage. A year later, Adrian Stoica also participated in "Romanians have talent"."
The article notes: "La coreografia canina di Adrian Stoica. Parte seduto su un divano, deciso a mangiarsi un paninazzo di quelli che si ricordano. Poi, però, a fare compagnia ad Adrian Stoica sul palco (e a «ricordargli» della dieta in corso) arrivano i suoi due meravigliosi cani. Con cui, in pratica, l’uomo mette in scena una divertente coreografia sulla difficoltà a rimanere in forma. Una performance che sorprende e che convince."
From Google Translate: "Adrian Stoica's canine choreography. He leaves sitting on a sofa, determined to eat a sandwich of the ones he remembers. Then, however, his two wonderful dogs arrive to keep Adrian Stoica company on stage (and to "remind" him of his ongoing diet). With which, in practice, the man stages a fun choreography on the difficulty of staying fit. A performance that surprises and convinces."