The result was delete. Whether to split off the entire list of MPs now in Colchester (UK Parliament constituency) into a new subarticle is something that can be done separately from this AfD if desired. Sandstein 19:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This information already exists in the Colchester (UK Parliament constituency) article which lists the MPs. I don't see why we should have an article listing the MPs of a constituency in a given period. GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk) 08:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not enough IRS, notability issues Less Unless ( talk) 14:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I have tried to bring the article back to a neutral form according to wikipedia policies. But in a less friendly way, the article is back to a negative form (which is not in accordance with wikipedia policies. According to WP:BLP1E we should avoid keeping the article (because most sources describe the company the same and the topic is notable for an event). A range of sources can be classified under WP:DEPS, And some of the sources don't even mention the information, which raises a lot of questions at WP:NPOV. Ciudatul ( talk) 10:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Why does this page exist? There is an exact identical sort of this page except it spans for all known border skirmishes until now. It fails WP:NOTABILITY.
There isn't really any reason this page should exist when it is pretty much a direct replica of the page Afghanistan–Pakistan border skirmishes except based in 2024. Noorullah ( talk) 23:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Less Unless ( talk) 14:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, credited roles in the acting career are only two i.e in Udaariyaan and Maitree respectively. Rest are uncredited roles , listed after his appearance in the Bigg Boss (Hindi season 17) reality show. Also personal life and career section also lacks enough sourcing to establish notibility. Imsaneikigai ( talk) 16:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
This BLP was deleted back in 2020 through AfD, still fails to meet basic GNG as well relevant WP:NMUSICIAN. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 17:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn and consensus that article subject meets WP:NPOL Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
fails to meet basic WP:GNG. being former Vice-Chairman of the Punjab Bar Council doesn't makes the subject notable. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 19:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to hear from more editors. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. then redirect. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
We no longer source radio station articles solely to databases and FCC records, since you can't meet the GNG that way — we need significant coverage. This was deleted via PROD two years ago for more-or-less that reason; it was recreated a few months later, and I had to procedural contest a new PROD on this version of the article. That said, our current standards are strict enough that I figured I'd just bring it to AfD myself. This could be redirected to the list of radio stations in North Dakota as an alternative to deletion, but owing to the double-prod a unilateral BLAR would be ill-advised. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As stated in deletion rationale, this was previously PROD'd so it is not eligible for Soft Deletion. Hoping for more participation as editors consider option to Delete or Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Less Unless ( talk) 14:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
While language is an issue, I cannot find notability as an athlete or a businessman. Owning a team isn't a path to guaranteed notability, which appears to be the only claim to notability. Not opposed to a redirect to Philippe_Ziade_(businessman)#Personal_life
NB: I was closer of prior AfD. REFUNDed as a soft delete at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Khalil_Ziade (courtesy @ Graeme Bartlett:) Star Mississippi 12:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support from editors for this article to be draftified. I hope the IP editor realizes that they will need to work to improve it and submit it to
WP:AFC for review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need some feedback on earlier relisting comment or on this article in general from other editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete (for now, might change) – All the sources, except for this one because I can't see the whole article, are interviews, press releases, about what this subject says (not about this subject), or mentions, which fall short of WP:SIGCOV. In addition I'm not convinced the group-mbc.com website is reliable at all. I can't find material online either. If the Ad-Diyar article has significant coverage (apparently you have to ask the publication) I would be okay with draftify. TLA tlak 02:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
A modelling agency that is no longer operating. Notability seems to rely on some of the models represented by the agency and the agency's owner but notability is not inherited. The sources advocate more for the owner rather than the agency although some are unavailable to me in Europe. Searches revealed almost nothing, but again that may be an issue with EU/ USA internet rules. Appears to fail WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 22:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 00:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Working writer, but I couldn't find sources to confirm he meets WP:GNG / WP:AUTHOR. Boleyn ( talk) 21:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Successful musician but I couldn't find sources to show he meets WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 21:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show he meets WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 21:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Cricketer BLP that fails WP:GNG. No indication of notabilty other than playing in the Under-19 World Cup. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Also substantial copyvio. Complex/ Rational 23:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Cannot find more than two or three sources on Google scholar User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 20:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
High-resolution spectral analysis of electrical brain activity before and during visually mediated social coordination revealed a marked depression in occipital alpha and rolandic mu rhythms during social interaction that was independent of whether behavior was coordinated or not. In contrast, a pair of oscillatory components (phi1 and phi2) located above right centro-parietal cortex distinguished effective from ineffective coordination: increase of phi1 favored independent behavior and increase of phi2 favored coordinated behavior.Meanwhile, this article says,
The study demonstrated a clear reduction in occipital lobe alpha wave and mu wave rhythms during social interaction. The evident suppression was independent of whether or not behavior was coordinated. In contrast, a pair of oscillatory components (phi-1 and phi-2) above the right centro-parietal cortex distinguished effective from ineffective coordination. An increase of phi-1 favored independent behavior and increase of phi-2 favored coordinated behavior.So, what wasn't ripped off from the press release was ripped off from the paper. Beyond the legal issues, we should have more respect for ourselves than to host material like this. XOR'easter ( talk) 18:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bari (caste). Star Mississippi 00:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show this is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 18:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to establish that this magazine is notable, or a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 18:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD contested. School cricket typically isn't considered notable. Eton v Harrow has historical significance, and Battle of the Blues (between Royal College and S. Thomas' College) is probably the only Sri Lankan schools match with comparative historical significance. The article also claims matches played at Test level, which is patent nonsense. In terms of references, refs 1, 2, 5 and 6 are the same and link to a summary page. Ref 3 is from 2008, so not sure how that is relevant to something in 2024. Ref 4 is WP:ROUTINE coverage. Refs 7 and 10 are Instagram, which typically isn't used as a source, and even if it is, how is this a reference?! Ref 8 is a YouTube video with a song. Ref 9 is WP:ROUTINE coverage. Source 11 simply previews the coming season's matches. None of these establish notability and seem very WP:REFBOMB-ish. Fails WP:NCRIC, WP:GNG, WP:EVENT. AA ( talk) 18:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Identical case to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lineage of Ether. From that discussion: "This has no secondary sources and reads like religious history homework more than a summary of a notable topic." Also, "As the nominee indicates, this subject has no secondary sources outside of apologists. Unlike the Genealogy of Jesus, there is little information outside of the Book of Mormon in regards to these individuals. Any possibly noteworthy information can be merged to other articles." and "per WP:NOR." The consensus of that discussion was to delete, and all of those arguments are applicable here as well. Trevdna ( talk) 17:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this article about an art gallery, and added two references to an exhibition. I do not see significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, however. An alternative might be to redirect to Jayhawk Theatre, which has a short, unreferenced section on this gallery. The article has been tagged as possibly not notable since 2017. Tacyarg ( talk) 17:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Unref BLP. Working actor with some success but doesn't meet WP:GNG / WP:NACTOR. Also this was written by someone with the username Ian Brooker. Boleyn ( talk) 17:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
nothing of any note found online - NOTE - school website triggered a fake Trojan alert Newhaven lad ( talk) 17:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors of Belfast#21st century 2. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Person fails notability guidelines, since prospective parlaimentary candidates aren't notable, neither are counciloors or lord mayors (of which she isn't even, only a deputy which is even less notable. Kathleen's bike ( talk) 15:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss redirect proposal (
WP:ATD).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
17:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 23:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:DRAFTIFY PFL seems to have gotten rid of rankings completely with no announcement. Can no longer access them, and fight cards are posted without the numbers. No update since the last event as well. So I suggest just draftifying it in case it ever returns. HeinzMaster ( talk) 17:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus from discussion participants that the article's sourcing, whilst filled with references of variable value and reliability, contained enough significant coverage in several sources contained to meet general notability, with a suggestion that cleanup editing may be able to better resolve some of the content issues with the article. ( non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) VRXCES ( talk) 23:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Almost everything at the reception section now are worthless. This source look like a sigcov [7], but if you actually see it only talks about its story not as a character. Meanwhile, this source is quite useful [8], I dont think its sigcov. Lets say indeed it is, then ot would be the only good source out there, while this one has a little bit content but looks kinda trivia [9]. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 08:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
16:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy GNG or WP:ARTIST. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 15:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy GNG requirements, nor the guideline for creative professionals at WP:ARTIST. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 15:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Rename to Ngendei and keep. Less Unless ( talk) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Notable if true, but I couldn't find sources to show it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 14:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
As noted in WP:NPOL, Wikipedia doesn't normally consider county councillors notable enough for a separate article, unless they've received significant press coverage. Likewise, being a candidate for national office doesn't normally meet WP:NPOL, absent substantial coverage in secondary sources, and I can find only routine local press coverage. Wikishovel ( talk) 14:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2007 Australian Drivers' Championship#Non-championship round. ✗ plicit 00:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG T v x1 14:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced since December 2009, no significant coverage to be found online when searching web, news or books. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NGEO. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 09:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm having trouble finding reliable secondary sources on this topic besides the book that originated this concept and few stray academic articles and blog posts. May fail WP:Notability, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:RS. I find the existing article somewhat inscrutable and it also feels a bit WP:FRINGE, but perhaps someone else is more familiar with this topic. Chase Kanipe ( talk) 14:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't meet WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG in absence of any significant and independent coverage about the player. Fails WP:NCRIC either, as he doesn't have participation in any of the matches listed in WP:OFFCRIC. Previously, it was soft deleted through AFD, but has again been created. RoboCric Let's chat 14:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This is interesting, but almost entirely unref'd and, Wikipedia is WP:NOTDICTIONARY PepperBeast (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Zero sources to support WP:GNG notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This article clearly fails WP:N which refers to the military conflict as the "Battle of Sangamner," seems more like a skirmish, sack or devastation (raid?). Found only two reliable sources which talks around this event but both contradict each other.
"We assembled the entire army and went in person with the army near Bijapur. Considering that the enemy was strong — and particularly the Pathan tribe is obstinate — [we thought that] such tactics should be adopted that he would become disappointed and defeated. Therefore, we decided upon imposing a pull [upon the enemy] by spreading the army in his territory. Accordingly we left Dilir Khan at a distance of three gaos, crossed the Bhima River and went on devastating the country right up to Jalnapur. We went to Jalnapur, made a halt for four days and plundered the market. A large wealth fell into [our] hands. Jalnapur is [at a distance of] four gaos from Aurangabad. Disregarding that the Prince was at that place [Aurangabad] [we] sacked the market. An immense wealth, besides gold, silver, elephants and horses was found [there].While we were marching on horseback towards the fort Pattagad with that [wealth] Ranmast Khan and Asaf Khan and Zabit Khan and five or seven such officers with eight or ten thousand troopers came in the way. We chastised them, captured horses and elephants and arrived at [fort] Patta. Then [we] sent the army again to wreak havoc in the [enemy] territory and sent Moropant, the prime minister, to capture the 27 forts of the Mughals that are in the province of Baglan and Khandesh and to capture territory and we [in person] halted at [fort] Patta."
King’s rearguard held theMughals for three days of hard fighting beforeMaratha commander Sidhoji Nimbalkar waseventually killed, along with about 2,000 of his men.The title is a fabricated one, which contradicts the criteria for creating an article about a military conflict. Note that most of the sources which mention this conflict as even a skirmish, falls under WP:RAJ. If it's notable enough then it could be merged into Deccan Wars or any other parent articles and moving/renaming the page to Battle of Jalna would be better but doesn't seem eligible for its own page with this title.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudsahab ( talk • contribs) 12:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 00:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Page has two unsourced sections, proposed deletion was removed with two citations added - these two citations have not satisfied the need for reliable, secondary citations on this page, of which I have previously been unable to find. CommissarDoggo Talk? 11:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "释德扬俗名史万峰。 1967 年出生在河南太康县一个干部家庭。童年时期,他的邻居(一个出家少林寺又返俗的老人)经常向他讲起当年身穿大红袈裟,遍游名山大川的游僧生活,并私下向他传授一些少林功夫,使他幼小的心灵充满了当和尚和学习少林武术的向往。 1983 年初中一毕业,他便向父母提出了到少林寺出家的要求。在他软硬磨下,父母亲也只好同意了他的选择。他来到了梦寐以求的少林寺,拜在首座僧素喜禅师门下为徒,成了年龄最小的一名和尚。寺里生活清苦枯燥,处处受到清规戒律的约束不说,光是练功的苦,就让他吃不消。"
From Google Translate: "Shi Deyang's common name is Shi Wanfeng. Born in 1967 in Taikang County, Henan into a cadre family. During his childhood, his neighbor (an old man who became a monk in the Shaolin Temple and returned to secular life) often told him about the life of a wandering monk who wore red cassocks and traveled to famous mountains and rivers. He also taught him some Shaolin Kungfu privately, which made his young mind Full of yearning to become a monk and learn Shaolin martial arts. After graduating from junior high school in 1983, he asked his parents to become a monk in the Shaolin Temple. After being pushed hard by him, his parents had no choice but to agree to his choice. He came to the Shaolin Temple that he dreamed of and became a disciple under the first monk, Zen Master Suxi, and became the youngest monk. Life in the temple was hard and boring, and not only was he bound by strict rules and regulations, but the hardship of practicing martial arts was too much for him."
The article notes: "释德扬大师1968年出生,15岁开始习武,是少林功夫第31代传人,曾担任多年少林寺武僧总教练。释德扬大师的徒弟中,比较为人熟知的当属电影《功夫》中“苦力强”、《叶问》中“武痴林”的扮演者释行宇。"
From Google Translate: "Master Shi Deyang was born in 1968 and started practicing martial arts at the age of 15. He is the 31st generation successor of Shaolin Kung Fu and has served as the head coach of Shaolin Temple monks for many years. Among Master Shi Deyang's apprentices, the more well-known ones are Shi Xingyu, who played "Coolie Strong" in the movie Kung Fu Hustle and "Wu Chi Lin" in Ip Man."
The article notes: "德扬大师现在是少林寺辈分最高的人,住持的辈分比他还低了两辈。对于有人说释永信是佛门CEO,每天开宝马,用手提电脑,有几个秘书,有大学生提出,这似乎有悖于僧人刻苦修行的形象,而德扬大师回应:“这有什么不可以的。”"
From Google Translate: "Master Deyang is now the most senior person in Shaolin Temple, and abbot Shi Yongxin is two generations below him. Some college students said that Shi Yongxin is the CEO of Buddhism. He drives a BMW every day, uses a laptop, and has several secretaries. This seems to go against the image of a monk practicing hard. Master Deyang responded: "What's wrong with this?""
The article notes: "The Emerald Dragon Martial Arts Academy hosted Grand Master Shi De Yang from the Shaolin Monastery in China — a 1500-year-old temple. He is the 31st Grand Master of the fighting monks and has lived in the monastery since he was nine. Considered the world's finest exponent of Shaolin kung fu, Shi De Yang was in Australia because the centre director, David Greenland, is his student."
The article notes: "On the wall were posters of the monk we had come to see, Shi De Yang. At 28, he is one of the senior monks, in charge of teaching initiates kung fu and Buddhist doctrine. One of the posters shows Shi standing on a mountain top kicking straight up into the air - literally doing the splits vertically, the flat of his foot aimed at the sky, an intense mask of martial resolve on his face. The posters were from performance tours of Japan. He entered the room from his study in the adjoining room. He wore an orange robe that left one of his baroquely muscled shoulders bare. He shook our hands and, signaling for us to wait, disappeared outside. He returned smiling, with three ice-cold bottles of water."
Cunard ( talk) 11:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Nothing of any note online - page reads like an extract from the advertising material - no sources Newhaven lad ( talk) 11:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, purpose of the article seems to be the promotion of winter resorts. Remsense 诉 22:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
It offers an opportunity for participants to immerse themselves in a variety of snow-related activities amidst the scenic Alpine landscapes.
It provides a chance for individuals and families to bond over shared experiences and create lasting memories amidst the snow-covered peaks.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
08:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I literary found nothing for the topic's existence here. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 08:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This company page fails to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, as most of its citations focus on trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. TCBT1CSI ( talk) 12:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This company page fails to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, as most of its citations focus on trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. TCBT1CSI ( talk) 12:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Perhaps merge and redirect to Comparison of image viewers. Difference between image viewer software and photo galleries not sufficient. The article also doesn't have large list of items or references. Not much improvement from last AfD, merging and redirecting seems to be the best solution IMO. Greatder ( talk) 06:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD was undone, but I stand by it. Coverage focuses on her relationship with her husband and very little on the album itself. Album can be restored later if more coverage crops up, but this is premature. Restore redirect to artist; I would also support draftification if it's preferred. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 03:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Database that does not seem to pass notability guidelines. Potentially a WP:COI as the editor who created the page is an author of 4 out of the 5 used sources. Mbdfar ( talk) 07:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete. I count no rational while searching for and found "Did you mean: "IndEx - Index of Exsiccatae"
[1] -wikipedia".
Twinkle1990 (
talk)
15:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Can't find sources actually discussing him to show notability. There is a Swedish article but that doesn't have such sources either. Doug Weller talk 07:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Ghanaian women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG. The article was previously draftified before being moved back into the mainspace by the original creator. JTtheOG ( talk) 07:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kenneth Erskine#Documentaries. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Only 1 notable role a decade ago. This information could be added to the Kenneth Erskine page instead if it is a fit. Moritoriko ( talk) 06:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 00:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG independent of the band, NMB48. A merge could overwhelm that article, particularly as this is an unreferenced BLP I don't think any of it should be copied over, though a redirect is a possible WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 06:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This story is pretty horrible, so I figured someone would have covered it. I couldn't find any independent secondary sources about this. I do not believe it is notable after searching around Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 05:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is sourced exclusively to primary sources, and I couldn't find any independent secondary sources who wrote anything in depth about the lemuelites. This seems to be an in-universe only concept so far Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 05:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
After removing a fringe theory that this guy originated the Polynesians from non experts, nothing is left except a book of mormon verse. This character isn't notable. Even the usual fringe types don't cover them. Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 05:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure how this passes WP:GNG. The only WP:SIGCOV I was able to find was the New York Times article. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 04:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
As a developer, researcher and evangelist of the TCP/IP protocols, Dan Lynch played a key role in driving global adoption of these protocols and fueling the Internet’s commercial success, public visibility and use.That's why he is notable. This will likely be a speedy keep. Jfire ( talk) 05:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. due to low participation. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Created when it was briefly in the news, but never attained sustained coverage nor came to fruition. A failed product could be notable, but it does not appear this one is. Without sourcing to verify this name is a thing (or helpful search), I don't think a redirect is of value. Note on searching, this is not' the cloud-based Schengen area visa processing system. Star Mississippi 02:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Pokémon Adventures#Black & White. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This part of Pokemon Adventures doesn't seem to be independently notable from its main series. The article is currently entirely cited to primary sources, and a source search reveals minimal at best sourcing about the arc. There doesn't seem to be enough to justify a split here. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 03:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a consensus to Merge this article but two different target articles suggested. I don't want to flip a coin so I'm relisting to see if a consensus can be reached on that question. Of course, content can be Merged to more than one article but XFDcloser can only handle one formal Merge target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a bureaucrat and businessperson, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for either occupation. The attempted notability claims here are entirely of the "person who has had jobs" variety, but absolutely none of said jobs are "inherently" notable in the absence of WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about his work in media -- but the article is referenced entirely to primary sources and blogs that are not support for notability, with not a single GNG-building source shown at all. Bearcat ( talk) 02:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no consensus here. What I'm not seeing is any support for Deletion. Editors who are arguing for a Redirection or Merge can start a discussion on the article talk page to pursue that option but that can happen outside of an AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Starting a formal AfD as an editor objects to this article being a redirect. This group's claim to fame is their Eurovision Song Contest 2016 appearance, and all references included in the article and through an internet search appear to pertain to that appearance. Per WP:ONEEVENT, I propose a redirect to Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2016, which is a good article and includes all notable endeavors by this group in greater detail and with additional context. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
02:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. No consensus here yet, we need some more discussion participants as there is a fundamental disagreement on interpreting
WP:MUSICBIO as it applies to this article, particularly in regards to criteria 10.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept, and it is unhelpful to readers to have a standalone page that can't be expanded past a stub. Mach61 18:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a statistics database. It seems entirely random to list the top 50 in a given event, with an international final only consisting of 8 or 9 competitors, whereas the wider field reaching as far down as top 50 are never talked about as an interconnected group. Why not top 25? Or top 100? Category:Year rankings in athletics is still a fledgling project, so it's time to nip it in the bud. Geschichte ( talk) 21:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference. WP:NOT doesn't say anything about lists having to be covered as a group (the word "group" only appears 4 times on that page in other contexts). I think the more relevant policy is WP:NLIST, which specifically says
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability, and I discussed the navigational/informational aids (in world lead lists and event lists) above. Thanks, -- Habst ( talk) 12:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source? No, the article doesn't reach any "conclusion" not stated by sources.
combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source? No, same reasoning.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Reviewing this discussion again, I don't see a consensus but I have some questions that were brought up by editors here. First, Top 60 does seem like an arbitrary cut-off point. But, as mentioned, this could be addressed through editing. And it does seem like Wikipedia has a variety of articles like this like
Athletics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's decathlon as mentioned so having an article with a table of sports results has an established place on the project. So, what I'm wondering is about this page move suggested, would editors arguing for Delete be okay if this content was moved to exist under the umbrella of a relevant WikiProject while the content was edited and improved? This would be with the caveat that the page couldn't just be moved back to main space. What do you think?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dance Dance Revolution. as an ATD. If you can find another place online that would house the content of this article, the content is still there in the page history. But the consensus is that this article is not suitable for Wikipedia today. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Complete list of unsourced trivia; no notability to warrant keeping. Loyalmoonie ( talk) 19:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
01:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given some of the "non-vote" comments made in this discussion, I see opinions that this page content should be merged elsewhere or, at a minimum, that this article page title should become a redirect to a target article. This isn't a "supervote", I just want to take into consideration all editors' voices. I'm relisting this discussion to hear feedback and suggestions from participants. Of course, as a relisted discussion, it can be closed at any time by another closer who sees a consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for references in 2023 but the article actually has no references since its inception in 2008. No reliable cites found in GSearch, GNews, GBooks and GNews Archives. Note that you might find several false positives as Batingaw, which means bell, is a common media related term. Alternatively, retarget to List of programs broadcast by People's Television Network. -- Lenticel ( talk) 01:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable businessman / journalist. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Outside of the socking and likely UPE, the company does not meet WP:NCORP. References are mentions, about films, or the founder. Others fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA or are otherwise unreliable. CNMall41 ( talk) 00:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mimi Soltysik. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable campaign by any stretch of the imagination, got fewer votes than several candidates without pages including Kotlikoff, La Riva, Kennedy MoMoChohan ( talk) 20:28, 01 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whether to split off the entire list of MPs now in Colchester (UK Parliament constituency) into a new subarticle is something that can be done separately from this AfD if desired. Sandstein 19:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This information already exists in the Colchester (UK Parliament constituency) article which lists the MPs. I don't see why we should have an article listing the MPs of a constituency in a given period. GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk) 08:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not enough IRS, notability issues Less Unless ( talk) 14:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I have tried to bring the article back to a neutral form according to wikipedia policies. But in a less friendly way, the article is back to a negative form (which is not in accordance with wikipedia policies. According to WP:BLP1E we should avoid keeping the article (because most sources describe the company the same and the topic is notable for an event). A range of sources can be classified under WP:DEPS, And some of the sources don't even mention the information, which raises a lot of questions at WP:NPOV. Ciudatul ( talk) 10:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Why does this page exist? There is an exact identical sort of this page except it spans for all known border skirmishes until now. It fails WP:NOTABILITY.
There isn't really any reason this page should exist when it is pretty much a direct replica of the page Afghanistan–Pakistan border skirmishes except based in 2024. Noorullah ( talk) 23:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Less Unless ( talk) 14:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, credited roles in the acting career are only two i.e in Udaariyaan and Maitree respectively. Rest are uncredited roles , listed after his appearance in the Bigg Boss (Hindi season 17) reality show. Also personal life and career section also lacks enough sourcing to establish notibility. Imsaneikigai ( talk) 16:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
This BLP was deleted back in 2020 through AfD, still fails to meet basic GNG as well relevant WP:NMUSICIAN. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 17:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn and consensus that article subject meets WP:NPOL Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
fails to meet basic WP:GNG. being former Vice-Chairman of the Punjab Bar Council doesn't makes the subject notable. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 19:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to hear from more editors. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. then redirect. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
We no longer source radio station articles solely to databases and FCC records, since you can't meet the GNG that way — we need significant coverage. This was deleted via PROD two years ago for more-or-less that reason; it was recreated a few months later, and I had to procedural contest a new PROD on this version of the article. That said, our current standards are strict enough that I figured I'd just bring it to AfD myself. This could be redirected to the list of radio stations in North Dakota as an alternative to deletion, but owing to the double-prod a unilateral BLAR would be ill-advised. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As stated in deletion rationale, this was previously PROD'd so it is not eligible for Soft Deletion. Hoping for more participation as editors consider option to Delete or Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Less Unless ( talk) 14:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
While language is an issue, I cannot find notability as an athlete or a businessman. Owning a team isn't a path to guaranteed notability, which appears to be the only claim to notability. Not opposed to a redirect to Philippe_Ziade_(businessman)#Personal_life
NB: I was closer of prior AfD. REFUNDed as a soft delete at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Khalil_Ziade (courtesy @ Graeme Bartlett:) Star Mississippi 12:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support from editors for this article to be draftified. I hope the IP editor realizes that they will need to work to improve it and submit it to
WP:AFC for review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need some feedback on earlier relisting comment or on this article in general from other editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete (for now, might change) – All the sources, except for this one because I can't see the whole article, are interviews, press releases, about what this subject says (not about this subject), or mentions, which fall short of WP:SIGCOV. In addition I'm not convinced the group-mbc.com website is reliable at all. I can't find material online either. If the Ad-Diyar article has significant coverage (apparently you have to ask the publication) I would be okay with draftify. TLA tlak 02:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
A modelling agency that is no longer operating. Notability seems to rely on some of the models represented by the agency and the agency's owner but notability is not inherited. The sources advocate more for the owner rather than the agency although some are unavailable to me in Europe. Searches revealed almost nothing, but again that may be an issue with EU/ USA internet rules. Appears to fail WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 22:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 00:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Working writer, but I couldn't find sources to confirm he meets WP:GNG / WP:AUTHOR. Boleyn ( talk) 21:43, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Successful musician but I couldn't find sources to show he meets WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 21:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show he meets WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 21:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Cricketer BLP that fails WP:GNG. No indication of notabilty other than playing in the Under-19 World Cup. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Also substantial copyvio. Complex/ Rational 23:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Cannot find more than two or three sources on Google scholar User:Sawerchessread ( talk) 20:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
High-resolution spectral analysis of electrical brain activity before and during visually mediated social coordination revealed a marked depression in occipital alpha and rolandic mu rhythms during social interaction that was independent of whether behavior was coordinated or not. In contrast, a pair of oscillatory components (phi1 and phi2) located above right centro-parietal cortex distinguished effective from ineffective coordination: increase of phi1 favored independent behavior and increase of phi2 favored coordinated behavior.Meanwhile, this article says,
The study demonstrated a clear reduction in occipital lobe alpha wave and mu wave rhythms during social interaction. The evident suppression was independent of whether or not behavior was coordinated. In contrast, a pair of oscillatory components (phi-1 and phi-2) above the right centro-parietal cortex distinguished effective from ineffective coordination. An increase of phi-1 favored independent behavior and increase of phi-2 favored coordinated behavior.So, what wasn't ripped off from the press release was ripped off from the paper. Beyond the legal issues, we should have more respect for ourselves than to host material like this. XOR'easter ( talk) 18:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bari (caste). Star Mississippi 00:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show this is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 18:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to establish that this magazine is notable, or a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 18:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD contested. School cricket typically isn't considered notable. Eton v Harrow has historical significance, and Battle of the Blues (between Royal College and S. Thomas' College) is probably the only Sri Lankan schools match with comparative historical significance. The article also claims matches played at Test level, which is patent nonsense. In terms of references, refs 1, 2, 5 and 6 are the same and link to a summary page. Ref 3 is from 2008, so not sure how that is relevant to something in 2024. Ref 4 is WP:ROUTINE coverage. Refs 7 and 10 are Instagram, which typically isn't used as a source, and even if it is, how is this a reference?! Ref 8 is a YouTube video with a song. Ref 9 is WP:ROUTINE coverage. Source 11 simply previews the coming season's matches. None of these establish notability and seem very WP:REFBOMB-ish. Fails WP:NCRIC, WP:GNG, WP:EVENT. AA ( talk) 18:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Identical case to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lineage of Ether. From that discussion: "This has no secondary sources and reads like religious history homework more than a summary of a notable topic." Also, "As the nominee indicates, this subject has no secondary sources outside of apologists. Unlike the Genealogy of Jesus, there is little information outside of the Book of Mormon in regards to these individuals. Any possibly noteworthy information can be merged to other articles." and "per WP:NOR." The consensus of that discussion was to delete, and all of those arguments are applicable here as well. Trevdna ( talk) 17:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE on this article about an art gallery, and added two references to an exhibition. I do not see significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, however. An alternative might be to redirect to Jayhawk Theatre, which has a short, unreferenced section on this gallery. The article has been tagged as possibly not notable since 2017. Tacyarg ( talk) 17:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Unref BLP. Working actor with some success but doesn't meet WP:GNG / WP:NACTOR. Also this was written by someone with the username Ian Brooker. Boleyn ( talk) 17:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
nothing of any note found online - NOTE - school website triggered a fake Trojan alert Newhaven lad ( talk) 17:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors of Belfast#21st century 2. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Person fails notability guidelines, since prospective parlaimentary candidates aren't notable, neither are counciloors or lord mayors (of which she isn't even, only a deputy which is even less notable. Kathleen's bike ( talk) 15:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss redirect proposal (
WP:ATD).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
17:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 23:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:DRAFTIFY PFL seems to have gotten rid of rankings completely with no announcement. Can no longer access them, and fight cards are posted without the numbers. No update since the last event as well. So I suggest just draftifying it in case it ever returns. HeinzMaster ( talk) 17:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus from discussion participants that the article's sourcing, whilst filled with references of variable value and reliability, contained enough significant coverage in several sources contained to meet general notability, with a suggestion that cleanup editing may be able to better resolve some of the content issues with the article. ( non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) VRXCES ( talk) 23:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Almost everything at the reception section now are worthless. This source look like a sigcov [7], but if you actually see it only talks about its story not as a character. Meanwhile, this source is quite useful [8], I dont think its sigcov. Lets say indeed it is, then ot would be the only good source out there, while this one has a little bit content but looks kinda trivia [9]. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 08:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
16:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy GNG or WP:ARTIST. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 15:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy GNG requirements, nor the guideline for creative professionals at WP:ARTIST. Heavy Grasshopper ( talk) 15:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Rename to Ngendei and keep. Less Unless ( talk) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Notable if true, but I couldn't find sources to show it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 14:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
As noted in WP:NPOL, Wikipedia doesn't normally consider county councillors notable enough for a separate article, unless they've received significant press coverage. Likewise, being a candidate for national office doesn't normally meet WP:NPOL, absent substantial coverage in secondary sources, and I can find only routine local press coverage. Wikishovel ( talk) 14:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2007 Australian Drivers' Championship#Non-championship round. ✗ plicit 00:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG T v x1 14:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced since December 2009, no significant coverage to be found online when searching web, news or books. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NGEO. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 09:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm having trouble finding reliable secondary sources on this topic besides the book that originated this concept and few stray academic articles and blog posts. May fail WP:Notability, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:RS. I find the existing article somewhat inscrutable and it also feels a bit WP:FRINGE, but perhaps someone else is more familiar with this topic. Chase Kanipe ( talk) 14:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't meet WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG in absence of any significant and independent coverage about the player. Fails WP:NCRIC either, as he doesn't have participation in any of the matches listed in WP:OFFCRIC. Previously, it was soft deleted through AFD, but has again been created. RoboCric Let's chat 14:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This is interesting, but almost entirely unref'd and, Wikipedia is WP:NOTDICTIONARY PepperBeast (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Zero sources to support WP:GNG notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This article clearly fails WP:N which refers to the military conflict as the "Battle of Sangamner," seems more like a skirmish, sack or devastation (raid?). Found only two reliable sources which talks around this event but both contradict each other.
"We assembled the entire army and went in person with the army near Bijapur. Considering that the enemy was strong — and particularly the Pathan tribe is obstinate — [we thought that] such tactics should be adopted that he would become disappointed and defeated. Therefore, we decided upon imposing a pull [upon the enemy] by spreading the army in his territory. Accordingly we left Dilir Khan at a distance of three gaos, crossed the Bhima River and went on devastating the country right up to Jalnapur. We went to Jalnapur, made a halt for four days and plundered the market. A large wealth fell into [our] hands. Jalnapur is [at a distance of] four gaos from Aurangabad. Disregarding that the Prince was at that place [Aurangabad] [we] sacked the market. An immense wealth, besides gold, silver, elephants and horses was found [there].While we were marching on horseback towards the fort Pattagad with that [wealth] Ranmast Khan and Asaf Khan and Zabit Khan and five or seven such officers with eight or ten thousand troopers came in the way. We chastised them, captured horses and elephants and arrived at [fort] Patta. Then [we] sent the army again to wreak havoc in the [enemy] territory and sent Moropant, the prime minister, to capture the 27 forts of the Mughals that are in the province of Baglan and Khandesh and to capture territory and we [in person] halted at [fort] Patta."
King’s rearguard held theMughals for three days of hard fighting beforeMaratha commander Sidhoji Nimbalkar waseventually killed, along with about 2,000 of his men.The title is a fabricated one, which contradicts the criteria for creating an article about a military conflict. Note that most of the sources which mention this conflict as even a skirmish, falls under WP:RAJ. If it's notable enough then it could be merged into Deccan Wars or any other parent articles and moving/renaming the page to Battle of Jalna would be better but doesn't seem eligible for its own page with this title.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudsahab ( talk • contribs) 12:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 00:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Page has two unsourced sections, proposed deletion was removed with two citations added - these two citations have not satisfied the need for reliable, secondary citations on this page, of which I have previously been unable to find. CommissarDoggo Talk? 11:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "释德扬俗名史万峰。 1967 年出生在河南太康县一个干部家庭。童年时期,他的邻居(一个出家少林寺又返俗的老人)经常向他讲起当年身穿大红袈裟,遍游名山大川的游僧生活,并私下向他传授一些少林功夫,使他幼小的心灵充满了当和尚和学习少林武术的向往。 1983 年初中一毕业,他便向父母提出了到少林寺出家的要求。在他软硬磨下,父母亲也只好同意了他的选择。他来到了梦寐以求的少林寺,拜在首座僧素喜禅师门下为徒,成了年龄最小的一名和尚。寺里生活清苦枯燥,处处受到清规戒律的约束不说,光是练功的苦,就让他吃不消。"
From Google Translate: "Shi Deyang's common name is Shi Wanfeng. Born in 1967 in Taikang County, Henan into a cadre family. During his childhood, his neighbor (an old man who became a monk in the Shaolin Temple and returned to secular life) often told him about the life of a wandering monk who wore red cassocks and traveled to famous mountains and rivers. He also taught him some Shaolin Kungfu privately, which made his young mind Full of yearning to become a monk and learn Shaolin martial arts. After graduating from junior high school in 1983, he asked his parents to become a monk in the Shaolin Temple. After being pushed hard by him, his parents had no choice but to agree to his choice. He came to the Shaolin Temple that he dreamed of and became a disciple under the first monk, Zen Master Suxi, and became the youngest monk. Life in the temple was hard and boring, and not only was he bound by strict rules and regulations, but the hardship of practicing martial arts was too much for him."
The article notes: "释德扬大师1968年出生,15岁开始习武,是少林功夫第31代传人,曾担任多年少林寺武僧总教练。释德扬大师的徒弟中,比较为人熟知的当属电影《功夫》中“苦力强”、《叶问》中“武痴林”的扮演者释行宇。"
From Google Translate: "Master Shi Deyang was born in 1968 and started practicing martial arts at the age of 15. He is the 31st generation successor of Shaolin Kung Fu and has served as the head coach of Shaolin Temple monks for many years. Among Master Shi Deyang's apprentices, the more well-known ones are Shi Xingyu, who played "Coolie Strong" in the movie Kung Fu Hustle and "Wu Chi Lin" in Ip Man."
The article notes: "德扬大师现在是少林寺辈分最高的人,住持的辈分比他还低了两辈。对于有人说释永信是佛门CEO,每天开宝马,用手提电脑,有几个秘书,有大学生提出,这似乎有悖于僧人刻苦修行的形象,而德扬大师回应:“这有什么不可以的。”"
From Google Translate: "Master Deyang is now the most senior person in Shaolin Temple, and abbot Shi Yongxin is two generations below him. Some college students said that Shi Yongxin is the CEO of Buddhism. He drives a BMW every day, uses a laptop, and has several secretaries. This seems to go against the image of a monk practicing hard. Master Deyang responded: "What's wrong with this?""
The article notes: "The Emerald Dragon Martial Arts Academy hosted Grand Master Shi De Yang from the Shaolin Monastery in China — a 1500-year-old temple. He is the 31st Grand Master of the fighting monks and has lived in the monastery since he was nine. Considered the world's finest exponent of Shaolin kung fu, Shi De Yang was in Australia because the centre director, David Greenland, is his student."
The article notes: "On the wall were posters of the monk we had come to see, Shi De Yang. At 28, he is one of the senior monks, in charge of teaching initiates kung fu and Buddhist doctrine. One of the posters shows Shi standing on a mountain top kicking straight up into the air - literally doing the splits vertically, the flat of his foot aimed at the sky, an intense mask of martial resolve on his face. The posters were from performance tours of Japan. He entered the room from his study in the adjoining room. He wore an orange robe that left one of his baroquely muscled shoulders bare. He shook our hands and, signaling for us to wait, disappeared outside. He returned smiling, with three ice-cold bottles of water."
Cunard ( talk) 11:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Nothing of any note online - page reads like an extract from the advertising material - no sources Newhaven lad ( talk) 11:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, purpose of the article seems to be the promotion of winter resorts. Remsense 诉 22:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
It offers an opportunity for participants to immerse themselves in a variety of snow-related activities amidst the scenic Alpine landscapes.
It provides a chance for individuals and families to bond over shared experiences and create lasting memories amidst the snow-covered peaks.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
08:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 11:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I literary found nothing for the topic's existence here. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 08:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This company page fails to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, as most of its citations focus on trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. TCBT1CSI ( talk) 12:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This company page fails to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, as most of its citations focus on trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. TCBT1CSI ( talk) 12:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Perhaps merge and redirect to Comparison of image viewers. Difference between image viewer software and photo galleries not sufficient. The article also doesn't have large list of items or references. Not much improvement from last AfD, merging and redirecting seems to be the best solution IMO. Greatder ( talk) 06:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD was undone, but I stand by it. Coverage focuses on her relationship with her husband and very little on the album itself. Album can be restored later if more coverage crops up, but this is premature. Restore redirect to artist; I would also support draftification if it's preferred. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 03:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Database that does not seem to pass notability guidelines. Potentially a WP:COI as the editor who created the page is an author of 4 out of the 5 used sources. Mbdfar ( talk) 07:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete. I count no rational while searching for and found "Did you mean: "IndEx - Index of Exsiccatae"
[1] -wikipedia".
Twinkle1990 (
talk)
15:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Can't find sources actually discussing him to show notability. There is a Swedish article but that doesn't have such sources either. Doug Weller talk 07:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Ghanaian women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG. The article was previously draftified before being moved back into the mainspace by the original creator. JTtheOG ( talk) 07:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kenneth Erskine#Documentaries. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Only 1 notable role a decade ago. This information could be added to the Kenneth Erskine page instead if it is a fit. Moritoriko ( talk) 06:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 00:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG independent of the band, NMB48. A merge could overwhelm that article, particularly as this is an unreferenced BLP I don't think any of it should be copied over, though a redirect is a possible WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 06:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This story is pretty horrible, so I figured someone would have covered it. I couldn't find any independent secondary sources about this. I do not believe it is notable after searching around Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 05:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is sourced exclusively to primary sources, and I couldn't find any independent secondary sources who wrote anything in depth about the lemuelites. This seems to be an in-universe only concept so far Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 05:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
After removing a fringe theory that this guy originated the Polynesians from non experts, nothing is left except a book of mormon verse. This character isn't notable. Even the usual fringe types don't cover them. Big Money Threepwood ( talk) 05:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure how this passes WP:GNG. The only WP:SIGCOV I was able to find was the New York Times article. 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 04:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
As a developer, researcher and evangelist of the TCP/IP protocols, Dan Lynch played a key role in driving global adoption of these protocols and fueling the Internet’s commercial success, public visibility and use.That's why he is notable. This will likely be a speedy keep. Jfire ( talk) 05:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. due to low participation. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Created when it was briefly in the news, but never attained sustained coverage nor came to fruition. A failed product could be notable, but it does not appear this one is. Without sourcing to verify this name is a thing (or helpful search), I don't think a redirect is of value. Note on searching, this is not' the cloud-based Schengen area visa processing system. Star Mississippi 02:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Pokémon Adventures#Black & White. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This part of Pokemon Adventures doesn't seem to be independently notable from its main series. The article is currently entirely cited to primary sources, and a source search reveals minimal at best sourcing about the arc. There doesn't seem to be enough to justify a split here. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 03:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is a consensus to Merge this article but two different target articles suggested. I don't want to flip a coin so I'm relisting to see if a consensus can be reached on that question. Of course, content can be Merged to more than one article but XFDcloser can only handle one formal Merge target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a bureaucrat and businessperson, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for either occupation. The attempted notability claims here are entirely of the "person who has had jobs" variety, but absolutely none of said jobs are "inherently" notable in the absence of WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about his work in media -- but the article is referenced entirely to primary sources and blogs that are not support for notability, with not a single GNG-building source shown at all. Bearcat ( talk) 02:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I see no consensus here. What I'm not seeing is any support for Deletion. Editors who are arguing for a Redirection or Merge can start a discussion on the article talk page to pursue that option but that can happen outside of an AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Starting a formal AfD as an editor objects to this article being a redirect. This group's claim to fame is their Eurovision Song Contest 2016 appearance, and all references included in the article and through an internet search appear to pertain to that appearance. Per WP:ONEEVENT, I propose a redirect to Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2016, which is a good article and includes all notable endeavors by this group in greater detail and with additional context. Grk1011 ( talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
02:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. No consensus here yet, we need some more discussion participants as there is a fundamental disagreement on interpreting
WP:MUSICBIO as it applies to this article, particularly in regards to criteria 10.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept, and it is unhelpful to readers to have a standalone page that can't be expanded past a stub. Mach61 18:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Seraphimblade Talk to me 05:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a statistics database. It seems entirely random to list the top 50 in a given event, with an international final only consisting of 8 or 9 competitors, whereas the wider field reaching as far down as top 50 are never talked about as an interconnected group. Why not top 25? Or top 100? Category:Year rankings in athletics is still a fledgling project, so it's time to nip it in the bud. Geschichte ( talk) 21:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference. WP:NOT doesn't say anything about lists having to be covered as a group (the word "group" only appears 4 times on that page in other contexts). I think the more relevant policy is WP:NLIST, which specifically says
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability, and I discussed the navigational/informational aids (in world lead lists and event lists) above. Thanks, -- Habst ( talk) 12:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source? No, the article doesn't reach any "conclusion" not stated by sources.
combine different parts of one source to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source? No, same reasoning.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Reviewing this discussion again, I don't see a consensus but I have some questions that were brought up by editors here. First, Top 60 does seem like an arbitrary cut-off point. But, as mentioned, this could be addressed through editing. And it does seem like Wikipedia has a variety of articles like this like
Athletics at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's decathlon as mentioned so having an article with a table of sports results has an established place on the project. So, what I'm wondering is about this page move suggested, would editors arguing for Delete be okay if this content was moved to exist under the umbrella of a relevant WikiProject while the content was edited and improved? This would be with the caveat that the page couldn't just be moved back to main space. What do you think?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dance Dance Revolution. as an ATD. If you can find another place online that would house the content of this article, the content is still there in the page history. But the consensus is that this article is not suitable for Wikipedia today. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Complete list of unsourced trivia; no notability to warrant keeping. Loyalmoonie ( talk) 19:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
01:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given some of the "non-vote" comments made in this discussion, I see opinions that this page content should be merged elsewhere or, at a minimum, that this article page title should become a redirect to a target article. This isn't a "supervote", I just want to take into consideration all editors' voices. I'm relisting this discussion to hear feedback and suggestions from participants. Of course, as a relisted discussion, it can be closed at any time by another closer who sees a consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Tagged for references in 2023 but the article actually has no references since its inception in 2008. No reliable cites found in GSearch, GNews, GBooks and GNews Archives. Note that you might find several false positives as Batingaw, which means bell, is a common media related term. Alternatively, retarget to List of programs broadcast by People's Television Network. -- Lenticel ( talk) 01:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable businessman / journalist. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Outside of the socking and likely UPE, the company does not meet WP:NCORP. References are mentions, about films, or the founder. Others fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA or are otherwise unreliable. CNMall41 ( talk) 00:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mimi Soltysik. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable campaign by any stretch of the imagination, got fewer votes than several candidates without pages including Kotlikoff, La Riva, Kennedy MoMoChohan ( talk) 20:28, 01 April 2024 (UTC)