The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn and consensus that article subject meets
WP:NPOLLizRead!Talk! 06:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
fails to meet basic WP:GNG. being former Vice-Chairman of the Punjab Bar Council doesn't makes the subject notable. —
Saqib (
talk |
contribs) 19:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comments - as a lawyer, not notable. Does the "
Punjab Assembly" rank as a sub-national parliamentary body? Then maybe.
Bearian (
talk) 16:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure if he was elected to the Punjab Assembly. I'm having trouble accessing the pap.gov.pk website to verify this. --—
Saqib (
talk |
contribs) 16:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
If he was elected to the assembly, that might help notability. Pakistan politics is not my area of expertise.
Oaktree b (
talk) 00:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to hear from more editors. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable lawyer, political roles seem trivial. I don't see much evidence in the prior AfD's either; people's feelings seem to have been hurt over some descriptions given of the person, but that's not really helpful for notability in AfD.
Oaktree b (
talk) 00:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The prior AfD was right because he meets (just barely) the
WP:NPOL criteria.
Jtrrs0 (
talk) 16:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: as was pointed out in the
last AfD, he clearly meets
WP:NPOL. He was a member of the
Punjab provincial assembly. See
[1]. I've also cleaned the article up to remove the more eggreious unsourced claims and promo material. I tried looking for more sources and could not find any. If people want to remove the claim he was vice-chairman of the Punjab Bar Council that is ok with me given I can't find any source for that, but that shouldn't affect notability which is established with simply being a member of a state-level legislature.
Jtrrs0 (
talk) 16:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I retract my nom for deletion as earlier I failed to verify whether he was a member of the Punjab Assembly. --—
Saqib (
talk |
contribs) 17:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn and consensus that article subject meets
WP:NPOLLizRead!Talk! 06:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
fails to meet basic WP:GNG. being former Vice-Chairman of the Punjab Bar Council doesn't makes the subject notable. —
Saqib (
talk |
contribs) 19:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comments - as a lawyer, not notable. Does the "
Punjab Assembly" rank as a sub-national parliamentary body? Then maybe.
Bearian (
talk) 16:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure if he was elected to the Punjab Assembly. I'm having trouble accessing the pap.gov.pk website to verify this. --—
Saqib (
talk |
contribs) 16:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
If he was elected to the assembly, that might help notability. Pakistan politics is not my area of expertise.
Oaktree b (
talk) 00:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to hear from more editors. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 23:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable lawyer, political roles seem trivial. I don't see much evidence in the prior AfD's either; people's feelings seem to have been hurt over some descriptions given of the person, but that's not really helpful for notability in AfD.
Oaktree b (
talk) 00:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The prior AfD was right because he meets (just barely) the
WP:NPOL criteria.
Jtrrs0 (
talk) 16:36, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: as was pointed out in the
last AfD, he clearly meets
WP:NPOL. He was a member of the
Punjab provincial assembly. See
[1]. I've also cleaned the article up to remove the more eggreious unsourced claims and promo material. I tried looking for more sources and could not find any. If people want to remove the claim he was vice-chairman of the Punjab Bar Council that is ok with me given I can't find any source for that, but that shouldn't affect notability which is established with simply being a member of a state-level legislature.
Jtrrs0 (
talk) 16:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Withdraw I retract my nom for deletion as earlier I failed to verify whether he was a member of the Punjab Assembly. --—
Saqib (
talk |
contribs) 17:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.