![]() |
The result was redirect to List of JAG characters#Lieutenant, Junior Grade Meg Austin, USN (JAGC). Liz Read! Talk! 00:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable character in cancelled TV series, redirect - the AtD - removed, so here we are. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to George J. Mitchell. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG, of the 6 sources in the article: source 1 is a government database entry, 2 is an income tax exempt form, 3 404 errors but appears to have been an IRS database entry, 4 and 5 are to the org itself and 6 also errors out but appears to have been a flyer for a university, none of these are WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS and a before search turned up empty for this institute showing partial matches for Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies and Mitchell Institute for Global Peace. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 11:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:GNG not meet in BLP Endrabcwizart ( talk) 15:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
No establishment of notability using WP:RS. Amigao ( talk) 20:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
16:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. If interested, begin a Merge/Redirect discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Nobleman from the peerage of Ireland, but without enough SIGCOV to justify a standalone article: fails WP:BIO / WP:GNG. BEFORE didn't turn up more sources than what is in the article, see the source assessment below.
Being a Deputy Lieutenant (DL) isn't particularly useful to assert notability either, since they are subordinates to the ceremonial county's
Lord-Lieutenant, "an honorary titular position usually awarded to a retired notable person in the county"
. In past AFDs, several biographies carrying the honorary title of DL resulted in deletion (see, for example,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir James Stronge, 2nd Baronet,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Birdwood,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commander Herbert Roff Newton). If it were newsworthy, one would expect some sort of coverage related to this, but it doesn't seem appear to exist in this specific case.
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Pilaz
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter W. Hammond (1998), The Complete Peerage. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Marie Louise McConville, Earl of Antrim's funeral to take place in Glenarm next week, The Irish News, 6 August 2021, accessed 3 July 2022 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Burke's Peerage, vol. 1 (1999), p. 90 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"DUNLUCE, Viscount" in Lucy Hume, ed., Debrett's People of Today (London: Debrett's, 2017), p. 1882 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" The Earl of Antrim, highcouncilofclandonald.com, accessed 3 July 2022 | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No | |
https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/pams-people-artist-hector-mcdonnell-sees-big-picture/31133678.html | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Richard Pococke, John McVeagh, Richard Pococke's Irish Tours (Irish Academic Press, 1995), p. 212 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Mark Bence-Jones, Burke's Guide to Country Houses: Volume I, Ireland (1978), p. 135 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"DUNLUCE , Viscount Randal Alexander St John McDonnell" in Sara Foster, Zoe Gullen, eds., Debrett's People of Today (London: Debrett's, 2002), p. 568 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" New Members appointed to the board of The Royal Parks", Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, accessed 28 July 2022 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Deputy Lieutenant Commissions, The Belfast Gazette, 31 January 2014, Notice ID: B-7586-1 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Kathleen O'Sullivan, " Glenarm Forest is NI’s first accredited QCC forest conservation project", agriland.co.uk, 9 November 2021, accessed 3 July 2022 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
provide thought and reflection based on primary sources, of which there is none here. That's because Spear's acts as a tertiary source whose stated goal is to be a "guide" to private client advisers. I also don't think this kind of information is SIGCOV, but others can chime in on this.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. BangJan1999 22:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable software. WP:VG/SE shows no significant coverage and barely any mentions in reliable sources. IceWelder [ ✉] 19:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deletion was declined in 2007 as supposedly notable but the article is still uncited despite being tagged as needing cites 15 years ago. If the company is any good they ought to be booming nowadays. Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Single source that is not WP:IS. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Richmond, British Columbia. Liz Read! Talk! 01:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Article about a city neighbourhood, not properly referenced as passing WP:GEOLAND. As always, city neighbourhoods are not automatically entitled to have standalone articles as separate topics from the city just because they exist: it has to be possible to write something substantial about the neighbourhood, referenced to a significant volume of coverage in reliable sources. But this is literally just "it exists, the end", referenced entirely to content self-published by the city government and a shopping mall (i.e. not independent third-party sources), which simply isn't good enough. At this level of depth, it only warrants a mention in the city's article rather than qualifying to have its own. Bearcat ( talk) 22:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
This notability failing, annotated yellow page entry like contents should be removed per deletion policy:
Graywalls ( talk) 22:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Acid Mothers Temple. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails both the general and album-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The article does not contain enough sources to pass GNG, and a BEFORE check did not find any more sources. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a small defunct local radio company and a minimally sourced separate article about its slightly larger (but still small, local and defunct) successor company following a merger. As always, companies are not "inherently" notable just because they existed, and have to show passage of
WP:CORPDEPTH on
reliable source coverage about them -- but Broadcast Alchemy is a completely unreferenced one-line stub that's been flagged for lacking references since 2009, and Secret Communications contextlessly lists one news article from a local business publication as an external link without actually using it to footnote any content, but even just a basic
WP:GNG pass requires a lot more than just one source.
I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with much better access to archived Cincinatti-area media from the nineties and naughts than I've got can find enough to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt either of them from having to be sourced properly -- and even if enough coverage can be found to salvage them, it still might not be clear that we would need two articles here instead of just one.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G11. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
No evidence found of any notability, sources are databases and press releases. Fram ( talk) 16:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Borderline WP:PROMO in parts and doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO. At first glance, Place and See might appear to be WP:SIGCOV but the content is entirely copied from Wikipedia so fails WP:RS standards. I can't find anything better in my WP:BEFORE. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a non-profit organization that seems to exist (possibly not anymore, website dead) solely to operate relay transmitters in a mountainous area. This is not "inherently" notable in its own right -- it isn't an originating broadcaster for the purposes of satisfying WP:BCAST, but simply contracts to help other broadcasting companies extend their signal service areas, so we would have to see passage of basic WP:CORP or WP:ORG criteria, specifically a depth and range of reliable sourcing that would get it over WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 16:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Lack of independent sources, fails notability qualifications for authors. Industrial Insect (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
"...despite the advances in CPUs and networks, 'The free lunch is over,' he said, referring to a March 2005 technical article by Herb Sutter, software architect at Microsoft and chair of the ISO C++ Standards Committee..."
"Are you familiar with the highly influential piece for programmers by Herb Sutter called 'The Free Lunch Is Over'? He wrote it in 2004..."
"Almost 15 years back—in March 2005—Herb Sutter, who was at Microsoft at the time, published his now famous paper, “The Free Lunch Is Over,” predicting nothing less than..."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G4 via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Syrian Air destinations Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
No indication this would ever meet any notability guideline. WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:PROMO. Kleuske ( talk) 13:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that this is a noteworthy banker because sources barely mentions him or he is giving interviews. Being a CEO of any bank is not an automatic WP:GNG pass and the reviewer deserves some trouting for accepting an UPE submitted draft. Emmanuel Oluwashina ( talk) 12:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 11:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Many sources in the article are primary, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to
List of The Andy Griffith Show characters
Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C..
Spinixster
(chat!)
07:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The sources cited are mostly articles written by him (i.e. not independent). This may be independent, but is extremely brief. This is reasonably in-depth, but not independent. From what I can see, they are quite some way from meeting the requirements of WP:BIO. SmartSE ( talk) 15:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a film producer, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for film producers. As always, film producers are not "inherently" notable just because they and their work exist, and have to show external validation of their significance in third party reliable sources -- but two of the three "references" are his own LinkedIn and his IMDb profile, which are not notability-building sources, and the only third-party source is a single article in a minor local-interest magazine, which isn't enough to singlehandedly vault him over GNG all by itself if it's the only starter source on the table.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have more and better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wētā Workshop. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a "creature, costume, armour, weapon and prop designer", not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for artists or film crew. The sole notability claim stated here is that he and his work exist, and the sole source is a book about a film series that he worked on, which likely mentions his name in passing but isn't strongly enough about him to carry him over GNG all by itself if it's the only reference on offer.
And while there is an inbound from another article about an award presented by a science fiction convention which this article has failed to note, "notability because award" does not automatically attach to just any award that exists: it requires the award to be one that media cover as news for the purposes of establishing that award's cultural significance, and does not attach to awards that require you to depend on the award's own self-published content about itself for sourcing (but even that award's article is depending 9/10 on self-published primary sourcing rather than third party media coverage).
So the award still isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt this person from having to have more and better sourcing than just a brief mention in one book about something else.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Paid article, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. – bradv 16:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜
15:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dominion Herbal College. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:GNG failure. COI creation by the software's developer. No hits at all with WP:VG/S's reliable source search, though that's understandable. Google News search finds nothing at all. Most basic google results are database entries, blogs, or written by the developer as well. Both of the current sources were commissions (acknowledged by the sources) by the developer. The reward, from "divita.eu" for "Best Game" in the Student category? Was issued by the developer as well. -- ferret ( talk) 14:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an "influencer, healthcare innovator, author, journalist and host", not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for any of those occupations. As always, Wikipedia is not a free
LinkedIn alternative on which people are entitled to have articles just because they exist -- meeting our inclusion test requires passing
WP:GNG on third party reliable source coverage about their work in order to establish its significance.
But the main notability claim here is that he exists, eight of the nine footnotes are
primary sources (staff or contributor profiles on the self-published websites of companies or organizations he's directly affiliated with, directory entries, press releases, etc.) that are not support for notability, and the one footnote that does come from a third party source is a fluff piece in a minor local-interest magazine that reads more like an advertorial than a real piece of objective journalism, and thus is not sufficient to singlehandedly vault him over GNG all by itself if all the rest of the sourcing is garbage.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
No dab page needed if it is just two things. A simple hatnote would apply. Llammakey ( talk) 13:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Per coordinates, this is not a hamlet but a farm with a few buildings (the exact coordinates come up under the name "Thomas N". Does not appear to meet notability criteria, other sources fail to confirm notability. Kazamzam ( talk) 13:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I tagged this for notability while gnoming about, and the article creator came back to the talk page to agree that they did not feel notability was met now that they were more experienced. The article has 8 sources. Only the 8th is a reliable secondary source that says anything significant, and it's a listicle of 10 games chosen by "Colin Spacetwinks" for Giant Bomb. Sources 1 and 3 are primary, while sources 2 is likely unreliable. Sources 4, 6 and 7 are probably unreliable, but also non-independent interviews. Source 5's reliability is irrelevant, as it's a trivial name drop. WP:VG/S uncovers nothing more. -- ferret ( talk) 13:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
This article was previously deleted through AFD (Articles for Deletion) under the following discussion: [21]. It was determined that the subject fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:MUSICBIO. The primary source of information about Ayesha Erotica can be found here: [22]. However, it is worth noting that the majority of the sources available are considered trivial and do not provide substantial coverage of the subject. DSP2092 talk 12:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Promotional in nature and references are suspect. Whitemancanjump23 ( talk) 05:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Lack of notability; not clear why this has been kept despite two previous nominations. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete I looked offline since coverage would predate the internet and found only a Melody Maker review. JSFarman ( talk) 17:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Only one Independence Building in this set index. The rest are various kinds of buildings named Independence, i.e. partial matches. Clarityfiend ( talk) 11:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator, who wants to try discussion on talk page first. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, and violates WP:SPORTSCRIT #5.
While an impressive effort, this article is better suited to a genealogy book than Wikipedia; the subject, while having a few dozen passing mentions over the years, lacks the significant and independent coverage required to construct a Wikipedia article. As a consequence of this, we see the article go into excessive background detail to fill it out - detail that we would normally expect to omit.
Of the 80 references, 36 don't mention Leslie Hood in any way, and several more refer to him only indirectly as "son" or "brother". Of the remainder, the majority are not only just passing mentions, but such trivial passing mentions that his name is only included in a list.
This can be seen in the following source analysis table:
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=RRShAQAAQBAJ&pg=PAPG130&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=VRMtAQAAMAAJ&pg=PAPA771&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=xF0rAwAAQBAJ&pg=PAPP147&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/1900olympicgames00mall/page/162/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015020212380&seq=874&q1=Hood | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=coo.31924104258136&seq=205 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/b28053382/page/58/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Letter might be significant coverage, although it doesn't focus on Leslie, but it lacks independence | ✘ No |
https://www.alpinejournal.org.uk/Contents/Contents_1908_files/AJ%201908%20Vol%2024%20287-292%20AC%20Proceedings.pdf#page=3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.alpinejournal.org.uk/Contents/Contents_1948_files/AJ56%201948%20386-402%20In%20Memoriam.pdf#page=20 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1243/JILE_PROC_1920_010_060_02?journalCode=jila | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/sim_the-lancet_1870-03-05_2427/page/362/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/thelancet18982/page/n1337/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19540114/065/0004 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k423824s/f644.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/10-85_apr_1890/10 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/12-113_dec_1894/4 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/12-114_jan_1895/6 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/24-253_jul_1926/58 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/26-272_dec_1932/8 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/40-319_oct_1948/14 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002627/19130208/381/0067 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002627/19160304/469/0080 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.yrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/YRCJ-2-6-1904-5.pdf#page=46 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.familyhistory.bdm.qld.gov.au/details/b15dd3592cb448d4d960e7481e73fc9cc5d8327236ef85f77b0d1949c0671f8c | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.cresta-run.com/about-the-smtc/history-of-the-club/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Darlington_Forge_Co | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://manchestervictorianarchitects.org.uk/index.php/buildings/ice-palace-derby-street-cheetham-manchester | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.museotorino.it/view/s/1e9d3aef61e24c96bb7f78f41d432066 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://livesonline.rcseng.ac.uk/client/en_GB/lives/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ASSET$002f0$002fSD_ASSET:378126/one?qu=%22RCS%3A+E005943%22&rt=false%7C%7C%7CIDENTIFIER%7C%7C%7CResource+Identifier | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.warwickandwarwick.com/resources/articles-library/unique-boer-war-world-war-i-dso-group-to-rnas-armoured-car-squadron | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
World Rugby 2020 - https://www.world.rugby/news/575375/five-forgotten-facts-about-first-ever-olympic-crunch | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.calmview.eu/SheffieldArchives/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=ESC%2F31 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Master of the Supreme Court 1933 | ![]() |
![]() |
? Not available online | ✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000033/19000120/029/0009 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Perspective:%201900%20Olympic%20file%20-%20Mystery%20of%20the%20Olympic%20team%20from...-a065476854 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000764/19540116/003/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0003369/19001103/088/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000337/19001011/027/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000385/18961113/158/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0004909/19040903/003/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000183/19110629/189/0011 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002446/19020111/314/0049 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002446/19110225/244/0053 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k2853078/f3.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0004660/18971002/126/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0003066/19001103/103/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000206/19121202/113/0009 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000206/19130310/089/0010 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000272/19270926/004/0004 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000272/19301029/007/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/150797163 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k4127941s/f2.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k4130447n/f6.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19120110.2.29.1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19240603.2.22 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19240604.2.81 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0004049/19480410/108/0009 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.retronews.fr/journal/le-soleil/18-decembre-1898/661/1817807/2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000653/19001110/008/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/18981003/063/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/18991130/003/0001 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/19000120/140/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/19000122/138/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000893/19010208/069/0004 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0001055/19120201/095/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000437/18961009/061/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000437/18971008/036/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000437/18980401/049/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000437/19080320/109/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000632/18941005/058/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000499/18720622/047/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000499/18760916/143/0005 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000500/18910514/059/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000500/18940202/004/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000632/18930429/049/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000266/18941222/033/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19311114/379/0012 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19321212/046/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19321212/046/0002 | ? | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19341113/315/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Either not notable or needs a rename. For example, the ESPN source [23] doesn't even mention Bob Short, while the first source, Defector [24] doesn't mention a "curse". Looking for better sources gave only 6 Google Hits in total [25] (!), which for such a high profile sport in the US is ridiculously low. Fram ( talk) 08:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Check weigher. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I think this article may be redundant:
We have an article for checkweigher, and the in-motion scale article says is in-motion scales are "also known as" checkweighers. The checkweigher article says that automatic checkweighers are also known as in-motion scales. The checkweigher article is the older of the two, and it has sources.
What do you think? HenryMP02 ( talk) 15:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Merge with
Check weigher.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
15:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have contradictor guidance here on Merge and Redirection. Just seeking an opinion or two to settle this difference of opinion on target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
08:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Possible renames can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 06:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I'm just not sure how this merits an article per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and I don't think the terminology passes WP:GNG either. Primary argument is INDISCRIMINATE, however. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 07:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Robbery Under Arms#Film, TV, or theatrical adaptations. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
A 1943 Australian radio adaptation of an 1882 novel, there is no evidence that the adaptation was in any way notable or had any enduring impact or RS coverage beyond programming announcements. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to BC Rail#CN era (2004– ). Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable railway point. – dlthewave ☎ 04:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Gauthier, Ontario#Northlands Park. Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable railway point. – dlthewave ☎ 04:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chandramukhi. I don't see a clear consensus here but I'm closing it as Redirect as I don't think it needs a third relisting. If someone feels that it's appropriate to Merge some content, feel free as long as there is attribution. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
First and foremost, see Wikipedia:Notability and fiction. This page adds nothing that is not in Chandramukhi or Chandramukhi 2. Most, if not all, of this article is only about the first film. This character is not original because the first film Chandramukhi is a remake of Manichitrathazhu (1993) and Apthamitra (The 2005 Tamil film is a scene-to-scene remake of this 2004 Kannada film by the same director).
Note: This move is a direct response to the consensus at Talk:Chandramukhi_(fictional_character)#Requested move 26 August 2023. Do the originals not matter? See the awards won at Manichitrathazhu#Awards, Shobana#Awards_and_recognitions and Apthamitra#Awards.
For context, watch these two videos [26] and [27]. They came before this [28] which regards the article in question. The article was not written based on those characters since they only had one film appearance which makes me wonder why the third version/second remake version is notable. DareshMohan ( talk) 02:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dandenong Thunder SC. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and GEOFEAT. Except a single external link to the obviously non-RS and rotten My Space link, this article is completely unsourced. My before search found trivial mentions (e.g., 1) and non-SIGCOV listings (e.g., from the local council). As such, I am proposing a redirect to Dandenong Thunder SC. However, a previous BLAR was contested (see history), and a previous incorrect A7 tag was declined, so AfD is better than BLARing again. I am surprised that this also passed NPP. VickKiang (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Basketball Court, Pavilion,Picnic Area, Playground, Public toilet, Soccer Fields, Tennis Court), so IMO GEOFEAT applies more, which requires a GNG pass, instead applies. I agree that natural reserves and natural parks should be evaluated using GEONATURAL, but this is not one of that case. VickKiang (talk) 00:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Big Magic#Mythological series. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 02:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Despite the length of this Wikipedia article, apart from a claim to have been interviewed for a 1990s book, this wrestler seems completely unnoticed by the media. The article is entirely cited to a wrestling stats website. I can't find any coverage online, apart from an occasional mention in relation to an event. Wikipedia isn't the place for fan pages, time for this article to go IMO. Sionk ( talk) 12:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Previously declined speedy otherwise I would have prodded this. Only a primary source provided. No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 01:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of United States political families (N). Feel free to Merge content to other relevant articles. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Prodded by IceBergYYC with "See WP:NOTGENEALOGY, only significant source discussing the family as a whole is arguably primary." and removed by author. I would agree that the main source, [30], a family member's own work building a family tree, is not independent or adequately reliable. The other sources are about individuals, not the family as a whole. The notable members are several generations apart and likely did not know each other, so this is really just a non-notable genealogy page rather than a cohesively notable family discussed together. Reywas92 Talk 01:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Not sure if I'm allowed to nominate a template here, but also nominating Template:Nelson family. The people listed here are merely distant cousins of each other so a navbox is not warranted. Reywas92 Talk 01:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to determine whether to Delete or selectively Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
This PR firm fails WP:COMPANY. Independent reliable sources are lacking. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to List of JAG characters#Lieutenant, Junior Grade Meg Austin, USN (JAGC). Liz Read! Talk! 00:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable character in cancelled TV series, redirect - the AtD - removed, so here we are. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:26, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to George J. Mitchell. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG, of the 6 sources in the article: source 1 is a government database entry, 2 is an income tax exempt form, 3 404 errors but appears to have been an IRS database entry, 4 and 5 are to the org itself and 6 also errors out but appears to have been a flyer for a university, none of these are WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS and a before search turned up empty for this institute showing partial matches for Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies and Mitchell Institute for Global Peace. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 11:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:GNG not meet in BLP Endrabcwizart ( talk) 15:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
No establishment of notability using WP:RS. Amigao ( talk) 20:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
16:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. If interested, begin a Merge/Redirect discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 00:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Nobleman from the peerage of Ireland, but without enough SIGCOV to justify a standalone article: fails WP:BIO / WP:GNG. BEFORE didn't turn up more sources than what is in the article, see the source assessment below.
Being a Deputy Lieutenant (DL) isn't particularly useful to assert notability either, since they are subordinates to the ceremonial county's
Lord-Lieutenant, "an honorary titular position usually awarded to a retired notable person in the county"
. In past AFDs, several biographies carrying the honorary title of DL resulted in deletion (see, for example,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir James Stronge, 2nd Baronet,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Birdwood,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commander Herbert Roff Newton). If it were newsworthy, one would expect some sort of coverage related to this, but it doesn't seem appear to exist in this specific case.
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Pilaz
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Peter W. Hammond (1998), The Complete Peerage. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Marie Louise McConville, Earl of Antrim's funeral to take place in Glenarm next week, The Irish News, 6 August 2021, accessed 3 July 2022 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Burke's Peerage, vol. 1 (1999), p. 90 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"DUNLUCE, Viscount" in Lucy Hume, ed., Debrett's People of Today (London: Debrett's, 2017), p. 1882 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" The Earl of Antrim, highcouncilofclandonald.com, accessed 3 July 2022 | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No | |
https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/life/pams-people-artist-hector-mcdonnell-sees-big-picture/31133678.html | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Richard Pococke, John McVeagh, Richard Pococke's Irish Tours (Irish Academic Press, 1995), p. 212 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Mark Bence-Jones, Burke's Guide to Country Houses: Volume I, Ireland (1978), p. 135 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
"DUNLUCE , Viscount Randal Alexander St John McDonnell" in Sara Foster, Zoe Gullen, eds., Debrett's People of Today (London: Debrett's, 2002), p. 568 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" New Members appointed to the board of The Royal Parks", Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, accessed 28 July 2022 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Deputy Lieutenant Commissions, The Belfast Gazette, 31 January 2014, Notice ID: B-7586-1 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
Kathleen O'Sullivan, " Glenarm Forest is NI’s first accredited QCC forest conservation project", agriland.co.uk, 9 November 2021, accessed 3 July 2022 | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
provide thought and reflection based on primary sources, of which there is none here. That's because Spear's acts as a tertiary source whose stated goal is to be a "guide" to private client advisers. I also don't think this kind of information is SIGCOV, but others can chime in on this.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. BangJan1999 22:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable software. WP:VG/SE shows no significant coverage and barely any mentions in reliable sources. IceWelder [ ✉] 19:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deletion was declined in 2007 as supposedly notable but the article is still uncited despite being tagged as needing cites 15 years ago. If the company is any good they ought to be booming nowadays. Chidgk1 ( talk) 18:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Single source that is not WP:IS. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Richmond, British Columbia. Liz Read! Talk! 01:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Article about a city neighbourhood, not properly referenced as passing WP:GEOLAND. As always, city neighbourhoods are not automatically entitled to have standalone articles as separate topics from the city just because they exist: it has to be possible to write something substantial about the neighbourhood, referenced to a significant volume of coverage in reliable sources. But this is literally just "it exists, the end", referenced entirely to content self-published by the city government and a shopping mall (i.e. not independent third-party sources), which simply isn't good enough. At this level of depth, it only warrants a mention in the city's article rather than qualifying to have its own. Bearcat ( talk) 22:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
This notability failing, annotated yellow page entry like contents should be removed per deletion policy:
Graywalls ( talk) 22:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Acid Mothers Temple. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails both the general and album-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The article does not contain enough sources to pass GNG, and a BEFORE check did not find any more sources. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a small defunct local radio company and a minimally sourced separate article about its slightly larger (but still small, local and defunct) successor company following a merger. As always, companies are not "inherently" notable just because they existed, and have to show passage of
WP:CORPDEPTH on
reliable source coverage about them -- but Broadcast Alchemy is a completely unreferenced one-line stub that's been flagged for lacking references since 2009, and Secret Communications contextlessly lists one news article from a local business publication as an external link without actually using it to footnote any content, but even just a basic
WP:GNG pass requires a lot more than just one source.
I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with much better access to archived Cincinatti-area media from the nineties and naughts than I've got can find enough to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt either of them from having to be sourced properly -- and even if enough coverage can be found to salvage them, it still might not be clear that we would need two articles here instead of just one.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G11. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
No evidence found of any notability, sources are databases and press releases. Fram ( talk) 16:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Borderline WP:PROMO in parts and doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:BIO. At first glance, Place and See might appear to be WP:SIGCOV but the content is entirely copied from Wikipedia so fails WP:RS standards. I can't find anything better in my WP:BEFORE. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a non-profit organization that seems to exist (possibly not anymore, website dead) solely to operate relay transmitters in a mountainous area. This is not "inherently" notable in its own right -- it isn't an originating broadcaster for the purposes of satisfying WP:BCAST, but simply contracts to help other broadcasting companies extend their signal service areas, so we would have to see passage of basic WP:CORP or WP:ORG criteria, specifically a depth and range of reliable sourcing that would get it over WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 16:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Lack of independent sources, fails notability qualifications for authors. Industrial Insect (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
"...despite the advances in CPUs and networks, 'The free lunch is over,' he said, referring to a March 2005 technical article by Herb Sutter, software architect at Microsoft and chair of the ISO C++ Standards Committee..."
"Are you familiar with the highly influential piece for programmers by Herb Sutter called 'The Free Lunch Is Over'? He wrote it in 2004..."
"Almost 15 years back—in March 2005—Herb Sutter, who was at Microsoft at the time, published his now famous paper, “The Free Lunch Is Over,” predicting nothing less than..."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G4 via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Syrian Air destinations Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
No indication this would ever meet any notability guideline. WP:NOTDATABASE, WP:PROMO. Kleuske ( talk) 13:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that this is a noteworthy banker because sources barely mentions him or he is giving interviews. Being a CEO of any bank is not an automatic WP:GNG pass and the reviewer deserves some trouting for accepting an UPE submitted draft. Emmanuel Oluwashina ( talk) 12:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 11:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Many sources in the article are primary, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to
List of The Andy Griffith Show characters
Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C..
Spinixster
(chat!)
07:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
15:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The sources cited are mostly articles written by him (i.e. not independent). This may be independent, but is extremely brief. This is reasonably in-depth, but not independent. From what I can see, they are quite some way from meeting the requirements of WP:BIO. SmartSE ( talk) 15:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a film producer, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for film producers. As always, film producers are not "inherently" notable just because they and their work exist, and have to show external validation of their significance in third party reliable sources -- but two of the three "references" are his own LinkedIn and his IMDb profile, which are not notability-building sources, and the only third-party source is a single article in a minor local-interest magazine, which isn't enough to singlehandedly vault him over GNG all by itself if it's the only starter source on the table.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have more and better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wētā Workshop. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a "creature, costume, armour, weapon and prop designer", not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for artists or film crew. The sole notability claim stated here is that he and his work exist, and the sole source is a book about a film series that he worked on, which likely mentions his name in passing but isn't strongly enough about him to carry him over GNG all by itself if it's the only reference on offer.
And while there is an inbound from another article about an award presented by a science fiction convention which this article has failed to note, "notability because award" does not automatically attach to just any award that exists: it requires the award to be one that media cover as news for the purposes of establishing that award's cultural significance, and does not attach to awards that require you to depend on the award's own self-published content about itself for sourcing (but even that award's article is depending 9/10 on self-published primary sourcing rather than third party media coverage).
So the award still isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt this person from having to have more and better sourcing than just a brief mention in one book about something else.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Paid article, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. – bradv 16:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜
15:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dominion Herbal College. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:GNG failure. COI creation by the software's developer. No hits at all with WP:VG/S's reliable source search, though that's understandable. Google News search finds nothing at all. Most basic google results are database entries, blogs, or written by the developer as well. Both of the current sources were commissions (acknowledged by the sources) by the developer. The reward, from "divita.eu" for "Best Game" in the Student category? Was issued by the developer as well. -- ferret ( talk) 14:40, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an "influencer, healthcare innovator, author, journalist and host", not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for any of those occupations. As always, Wikipedia is not a free
LinkedIn alternative on which people are entitled to have articles just because they exist -- meeting our inclusion test requires passing
WP:GNG on third party reliable source coverage about their work in order to establish its significance.
But the main notability claim here is that he exists, eight of the nine footnotes are
primary sources (staff or contributor profiles on the self-published websites of companies or organizations he's directly affiliated with, directory entries, press releases, etc.) that are not support for notability, and the one footnote that does come from a third party source is a fluff piece in a minor local-interest magazine that reads more like an advertorial than a real piece of objective journalism, and thus is not sufficient to singlehandedly vault him over GNG all by itself if all the rest of the sourcing is garbage.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
14:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
No dab page needed if it is just two things. A simple hatnote would apply. Llammakey ( talk) 13:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Per coordinates, this is not a hamlet but a farm with a few buildings (the exact coordinates come up under the name "Thomas N". Does not appear to meet notability criteria, other sources fail to confirm notability. Kazamzam ( talk) 13:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:11, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I tagged this for notability while gnoming about, and the article creator came back to the talk page to agree that they did not feel notability was met now that they were more experienced. The article has 8 sources. Only the 8th is a reliable secondary source that says anything significant, and it's a listicle of 10 games chosen by "Colin Spacetwinks" for Giant Bomb. Sources 1 and 3 are primary, while sources 2 is likely unreliable. Sources 4, 6 and 7 are probably unreliable, but also non-independent interviews. Source 5's reliability is irrelevant, as it's a trivial name drop. WP:VG/S uncovers nothing more. -- ferret ( talk) 13:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
This article was previously deleted through AFD (Articles for Deletion) under the following discussion: [21]. It was determined that the subject fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:MUSICBIO. The primary source of information about Ayesha Erotica can be found here: [22]. However, it is worth noting that the majority of the sources available are considered trivial and do not provide substantial coverage of the subject. DSP2092 talk 12:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Promotional in nature and references are suspect. Whitemancanjump23 ( talk) 05:42, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Lack of notability; not clear why this has been kept despite two previous nominations. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 13:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete I looked offline since coverage would predate the internet and found only a Melody Maker review. JSFarman ( talk) 17:43, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Only one Independence Building in this set index. The rest are various kinds of buildings named Independence, i.e. partial matches. Clarityfiend ( talk) 11:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator, who wants to try discussion on talk page first. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, and violates WP:SPORTSCRIT #5.
While an impressive effort, this article is better suited to a genealogy book than Wikipedia; the subject, while having a few dozen passing mentions over the years, lacks the significant and independent coverage required to construct a Wikipedia article. As a consequence of this, we see the article go into excessive background detail to fill it out - detail that we would normally expect to omit.
Of the 80 references, 36 don't mention Leslie Hood in any way, and several more refer to him only indirectly as "son" or "brother". Of the remainder, the majority are not only just passing mentions, but such trivial passing mentions that his name is only included in a list.
This can be seen in the following source analysis table:
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=RRShAQAAQBAJ&pg=PAPG130&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=VRMtAQAAMAAJ&pg=PAPA771&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=xF0rAwAAQBAJ&pg=PAPP147&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/1900olympicgames00mall/page/162/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015020212380&seq=874&q1=Hood | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=coo.31924104258136&seq=205 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/b28053382/page/58/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Letter might be significant coverage, although it doesn't focus on Leslie, but it lacks independence | ✘ No |
https://www.alpinejournal.org.uk/Contents/Contents_1908_files/AJ%201908%20Vol%2024%20287-292%20AC%20Proceedings.pdf#page=3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.alpinejournal.org.uk/Contents/Contents_1948_files/AJ56%201948%20386-402%20In%20Memoriam.pdf#page=20 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1243/JILE_PROC_1920_010_060_02?journalCode=jila | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/sim_the-lancet_1870-03-05_2427/page/362/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/thelancet18982/page/n1337/mode/2up | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19540114/065/0004 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k423824s/f644.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/10-85_apr_1890/10 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/12-113_dec_1894/4 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/12-114_jan_1895/6 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/24-253_jul_1926/58 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/26-272_dec_1932/8 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://issuu.com/stpetersyorkalumni/docs/40-319_oct_1948/14 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002627/19130208/381/0067 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002627/19160304/469/0080 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.yrc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/YRCJ-2-6-1904-5.pdf#page=46 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.familyhistory.bdm.qld.gov.au/details/b15dd3592cb448d4d960e7481e73fc9cc5d8327236ef85f77b0d1949c0671f8c | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.cresta-run.com/about-the-smtc/history-of-the-club/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.gracesguide.co.uk/Darlington_Forge_Co | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://manchestervictorianarchitects.org.uk/index.php/buildings/ice-palace-derby-street-cheetham-manchester | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.museotorino.it/view/s/1e9d3aef61e24c96bb7f78f41d432066 | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
https://livesonline.rcseng.ac.uk/client/en_GB/lives/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ASSET$002f0$002fSD_ASSET:378126/one?qu=%22RCS%3A+E005943%22&rt=false%7C%7C%7CIDENTIFIER%7C%7C%7CResource+Identifier | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.warwickandwarwick.com/resources/articles-library/unique-boer-war-world-war-i-dso-group-to-rnas-armoured-car-squadron | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
World Rugby 2020 - https://www.world.rugby/news/575375/five-forgotten-facts-about-first-ever-olympic-crunch | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.calmview.eu/SheffieldArchives/CalmView/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=ESC%2F31 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Master of the Supreme Court 1933 | ![]() |
![]() |
? Not available online | ✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000033/19000120/029/0009 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Perspective:%201900%20Olympic%20file%20-%20Mystery%20of%20the%20Olympic%20team%20from...-a065476854 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000764/19540116/003/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0003369/19001103/088/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000337/19001011/027/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000385/18961113/158/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0004909/19040903/003/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000183/19110629/189/0011 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002446/19020111/314/0049 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002446/19110225/244/0053 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k2853078/f3.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0004660/18971002/126/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0003066/19001103/103/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000206/19121202/113/0009 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000206/19130310/089/0010 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000272/19270926/004/0004 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000272/19301029/007/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/150797163 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k4127941s/f2.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k4130447n/f6.item | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19120110.2.29.1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19240603.2.22 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19240604.2.81 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0004049/19480410/108/0009 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.retronews.fr/journal/le-soleil/18-decembre-1898/661/1817807/2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000653/19001110/008/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/18981003/063/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/18991130/003/0001 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/19000120/140/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000893/19000122/138/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000893/19010208/069/0004 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0001055/19120201/095/0006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000437/18961009/061/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000437/18971008/036/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000437/18980401/049/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000437/19080320/109/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000632/18941005/058/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000499/18720622/047/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/BL/0000499/18760916/143/0005 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000500/18910514/059/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000500/18940202/004/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000632/18930429/049/0003 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000266/18941222/033/0008 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19311114/379/0012 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19321212/046/0002 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19321212/046/0002 | ? | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000687/19341113/315/0007 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Either not notable or needs a rename. For example, the ESPN source [23] doesn't even mention Bob Short, while the first source, Defector [24] doesn't mention a "curse". Looking for better sources gave only 6 Google Hits in total [25] (!), which for such a high profile sport in the US is ridiculously low. Fram ( talk) 08:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Check weigher. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I think this article may be redundant:
We have an article for checkweigher, and the in-motion scale article says is in-motion scales are "also known as" checkweighers. The checkweigher article says that automatic checkweighers are also known as in-motion scales. The checkweigher article is the older of the two, and it has sources.
What do you think? HenryMP02 ( talk) 15:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Merge with
Check weigher.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
15:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have contradictor guidance here on Merge and Redirection. Just seeking an opinion or two to settle this difference of opinion on target articles.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
16:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
08:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Possible renames can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 06:00, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
I'm just not sure how this merits an article per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and I don't think the terminology passes WP:GNG either. Primary argument is INDISCRIMINATE, however. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 07:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Robbery Under Arms#Film, TV, or theatrical adaptations. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
A 1943 Australian radio adaptation of an 1882 novel, there is no evidence that the adaptation was in any way notable or had any enduring impact or RS coverage beyond programming announcements. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to BC Rail#CN era (2004– ). Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable railway point. – dlthewave ☎ 04:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Gauthier, Ontario#Northlands Park. Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable railway point. – dlthewave ☎ 04:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chandramukhi. I don't see a clear consensus here but I'm closing it as Redirect as I don't think it needs a third relisting. If someone feels that it's appropriate to Merge some content, feel free as long as there is attribution. Liz Read! Talk! 03:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
First and foremost, see Wikipedia:Notability and fiction. This page adds nothing that is not in Chandramukhi or Chandramukhi 2. Most, if not all, of this article is only about the first film. This character is not original because the first film Chandramukhi is a remake of Manichitrathazhu (1993) and Apthamitra (The 2005 Tamil film is a scene-to-scene remake of this 2004 Kannada film by the same director).
Note: This move is a direct response to the consensus at Talk:Chandramukhi_(fictional_character)#Requested move 26 August 2023. Do the originals not matter? See the awards won at Manichitrathazhu#Awards, Shobana#Awards_and_recognitions and Apthamitra#Awards.
For context, watch these two videos [26] and [27]. They came before this [28] which regards the article in question. The article was not written based on those characters since they only had one film appearance which makes me wonder why the third version/second remake version is notable. DareshMohan ( talk) 02:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:44, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:49, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dandenong Thunder SC. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and GEOFEAT. Except a single external link to the obviously non-RS and rotten My Space link, this article is completely unsourced. My before search found trivial mentions (e.g., 1) and non-SIGCOV listings (e.g., from the local council). As such, I am proposing a redirect to Dandenong Thunder SC. However, a previous BLAR was contested (see history), and a previous incorrect A7 tag was declined, so AfD is better than BLARing again. I am surprised that this also passed NPP. VickKiang (talk) 02:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Basketball Court, Pavilion,Picnic Area, Playground, Public toilet, Soccer Fields, Tennis Court), so IMO GEOFEAT applies more, which requires a GNG pass, instead applies. I agree that natural reserves and natural parks should be evaluated using GEONATURAL, but this is not one of that case. VickKiang (talk) 00:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programmes broadcast by Big Magic#Mythological series. Liz Read! Talk! 03:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 02:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Despite the length of this Wikipedia article, apart from a claim to have been interviewed for a 1990s book, this wrestler seems completely unnoticed by the media. The article is entirely cited to a wrestling stats website. I can't find any coverage online, apart from an occasional mention in relation to an event. Wikipedia isn't the place for fan pages, time for this article to go IMO. Sionk ( talk) 12:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:57, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was draftify. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:31, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
01:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Previously declined speedy otherwise I would have prodded this. Only a primary source provided. No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 01:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of United States political families (N). Feel free to Merge content to other relevant articles. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Prodded by IceBergYYC with "See WP:NOTGENEALOGY, only significant source discussing the family as a whole is arguably primary." and removed by author. I would agree that the main source, [30], a family member's own work building a family tree, is not independent or adequately reliable. The other sources are about individuals, not the family as a whole. The notable members are several generations apart and likely did not know each other, so this is really just a non-notable genealogy page rather than a cohesively notable family discussed together. Reywas92 Talk 01:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Not sure if I'm allowed to nominate a template here, but also nominating Template:Nelson family. The people listed here are merely distant cousins of each other so a navbox is not warranted. Reywas92 Talk 01:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to determine whether to Delete or selectively Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
This PR firm fails WP:COMPANY. Independent reliable sources are lacking. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)