![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
With only one match at the professional level, he is certainly not notable. FromCzech ( talk) 16:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 United States Senate election in Washington#Democratic primary. Unclear whether first V-A has been verified, nor whether that would constitute notability. History remains under the redirect should facts change. Star Mississippi 02:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Minor candidate for office. Fails WP:BIO, only media coverage is in the context of being a long-shot candidate. Chajusong ( talk) 18:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I was all set to redirect this article but then noticed that this is the 2nd AFD for this page. So, I'm relisting to ensure adequate consideration of its fate.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NSCHOOL which requires for profit educational institutions to pass WP:ORGCRIT. A google search yielded zero coverage in reliable secondary sources over the first three pages. There were however, no shortage of hits, virtually all of a promotional nature. Much of the article is unsourced. What sourcing there is, is very thin and mostly primary/affiliated sources. Many ref/cite links are dead. Article is so nakedly promotional that one could argue it should be deleted on that basis alone. Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Very few references, and the person is only mentioned in a list of other hundreds of disciples. No sign of independent notability. Jaunpurzada ( talk) 14:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Very few references, and the person is only mentioned in a list of other hundreds of disciples. No sign of independent notability. Jaunpurzada ( talk) 14:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to New Alresford. Star Mississippi 02:37, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable event page created by a COI trying to bolster another COI article they created. Cited only to itself. Softlavender ( talk) 22:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider redirect or Keep outcome given changes to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This temple no longer exists per https://goo.gl/maps/wu9p1uDYeo4aoXCJ8 Its website is not working, and its Facebook page is inactive. This article appears to have been written by someone with a close connection to the subject ( WP: COI). It also appears to be an advertisement masquerading as an article ( WP:PROMO) and cites no sources. Finally, the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements ( WP:Notability). - Ram1751 ( talk) 21:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Family of Joe Biden#Grandchildren. Consensus is she's not sufficiently notable for a standalone article Star Mississippi 02:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Notability is not inherited from famous relatives. This is a grandchild of an American president who has only received pagesix-gossip-celebrity-like coverage because of her last name. Maid of honor at a wedding, attending inaugurations and state visits abroad, etc... Zaathras ( talk) 22:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Notability is inherited from famous relatives) that is explicitly not a reason we use to keep articles in the Wikipedia. There is no argument or wiggle room here for your position. Period. There will be no further replies on this tangent. Zaathras ( talk) 21:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 05:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet notability guidelines. Per discussions, TIME and Forbes lists have been consistently rejected as standards for notability. The awards won, although prestigious, do not seem to cross the threshold for a Wikipedia page.
The individual highlighted has no publications, the tone used seems overtly narrative based, the content appears to have been written COI, and there seems to be little encyclopedic value brought by the article other than a litany of relatively noteworthy awards. Further, the classification of the individual as a "scientist" plainly fails the WP:SNG for academics. I do not believe the individual passes off on any particular SNG relating to people. I submit that the GNG is insufficient in this context as the standards espoused in the first deletion section would make achieving a full score on an AP exam, which hundreds of students do every year, warrant a Wikipedia page. Augend ( drop a line) 22:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
very little serious discussion, and thus see no reason to ignore WP:DPAFD, where a
reasonable amount of timehas clearly not passed. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 20:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion and Wikipedia is not written in news style. For example, routine news coverage of announcements, events, sports, or celebrities, while sometimes useful, is not by itself a sufficient basis for inclusion of the subject of that coverage. Augend ( drop a line) 05:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ramona (novel series)#Characters. ✗ plicit 23:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Minor character mentioned in one book of a children's series. No notability on her own as far as I can tell. The description of her is also very in-universe which is not what the Wikipedia is for. Jaguarnik ( talk) 21:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because [similar lack of notability]:
Jaguarnik ( talk) 21:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
No lasting coverage, all sources come from the same week or so and focus on the cat's death. See WP:BLP1E/ WP:ONEEVENT; the article also fails to show any real notability or significance of one of many briefly famous Internet cats. SilverTiger12 ( talk) 21:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Analysis of the sources
Pot Roast, a cat from Kansas City, Missouri, died on 16 February 2022. Pot Roast was profiled in The Pitch on 24 May 2021, which is eight months before her death. This shows that at least one source provided significant coverage about Pot Roast and was not about her death.
After Pot Roast died, she received substantial coverage in numerous articles including in international sources like The Independent and the Toronto Star and in national sources like NBC News, HuffPost, and People. The article in the Toronto Star is an especially strong source that contains detailed analysis and commentary about the cat. This satisfies Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Diversity of sources.
Pot Roast subsequently received significant coverage over six months after her death in NBC News, The Pitch, and Junkee. This satisfies Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Duration of coverage.
Sources
The article notes: "Pot Roast the cat went from being hidden in a sorority house to being TikTok famous. Her owner, whose name has been rescinded for privacy reasons, found Pot Roast during a college finals week her sophomore year in 2014. ... She ended up paying to stay a full two hours with Pot Roast and had someone drive her to the animal shelter immediately after the event in hopes of adopting her. PRO says the shelter was willing to let her adopt Pot Roast for only $20 and all of a sudden PRO was a cat mom."
The article provides 169 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Pot Roast was a toothless, black-and-white cat, who captured the heart of the internet with her laid-back personality, messy eating and assorted health problems. She grew to prominence on the account @PotRoastsMom, where her owner, who publicly identifies only as "Pot Roast's Mom," introduced her to the world. The account had more than 1.2 million followers. ... In the wake of Pot Roast's death in February, Pot Roast's mom was harassed and criticized for using jokes and dark humor to cope with the loss of her pet. That led to discussions about how followers on social media create parasocial relationships with the people and animals they see online. Since Pot Roast's passing, Pot Roast's Mom has adopted two new cats: Soup and Coupon.
The article notes: "A year after the death of Kansas City’s feline TikTok celebrity, Pot Roast’s Mom is taking stock of her life and setting new boundaries with her online community. Pot Roast’s Mom (whose name will remain anonymous for privacy reasons) has been creating TikTok videos since January 2021, most of which starred the legendary Pot Roast until her death in Feb. 2022. She has 1.2 million followers on TikTok and 144,000 on Instagram. "
The article provides 81 words of coverage about the subject and her owner. The article notes: "Pot Roast took the world by storm during the height of the pandemic. Unfortunately, Pot Roast passed away earlier this year, and many were worried they'd never see Pot Roast's Mom on the platform again. After Pot Roast's passing, her mom took some time before fostering new kittens. She eventually adopted one of them, amply named Faucet. She has been sharing their daily lives since, with a sprinkle of her own humor and Faucet's cute antics, making them a perfect pair."
The article provides 217 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "In February 2022, a black and white cat who had been diagnosed with feline immunodeficiency virus, or FIV, passed away. Pets dying, while devastating for the owners who love them, is not an uncommon occurrence – their lives are tragically much shorter than human ones, after all. What makes this example unique is the storm that followed. The cat, whose name was Pot Roast, had garnered a sizable TikTok following, and fans on the app eagerly awaited regular updates on their favourite internet famous cat. When Pot Roast passed away, her mother, known online as Pot Roast’s Mom, was bombarded with messages from strangers unimpressed with how she handled her cat’s health concerns."
The article notes: "I try not to pick favourites when it comes to pets, but Pot Roast the cat always held a special place in my heart. Toothless and ungroomed, with food debris often stuck in the fur under her chin, seven-year-old Pot Roast was best described as scraggly. Some even referred to her as a taxidermy cat in the sense that she didn’t appear healthy enough to be alive — indeed, she had several health issues, including feline herpes, autoimmune disease, allergies and stomatitis that necessitated the removal of her teeth and made her stop self-grooming. I was charmed and inspired by her refusal to die."
The article notes: "Pot Roast was a toothless black-and-white cat who was beloved on TikTok for her assortment of hats and messy eating habits. She had survived several health issues as a kitten, and many found her scraggly appearance endearing. After her unexpected death last month, fans were heartbroken. Some went as far as taking their grief out on Pot Roast’s owner, who had been harassed over Pot Roast’s health long before the cat became sick."
The article notes: "Pot Roast, TikTok’s most loved cat, has died following ongoing health issues, her owner has confirmed. In a video shared to the platform, her owner announced that Pot Roast had died at 1.47am on Wednesday 16 February. ... Pot Roast’s health had been declining in recent weeks after she tested positive for feline immunodeficiency virus, an infection which attacks the cat’s immune system."
The article notes: "Over the last year, Pot Roast and her owner captured the attention of millions on TikTok with their quirky personalities. The account has garnered more than 953,000 followers since its conception."
The article notes: "One TikTok user, Pot Roast's Mom, who shared videos of her scruffy cat, went viral during Winter 2020. But the vast audience she reached is now mourning the passing of Pot Roast the cat. ... The Kansas City-based TikToker regularly reached millions of viewers through clips of Pot Roast wearing cute or comical garb, the pet owner petting the happy cat, and syncing the cat's actions with music like many other TikToker creators do with music videos. Throughout the years of regular posts, Pot Roast's Mom was able to show TikTok viewers the calm and playful nature of the adopted cat while she was alive."
The article notes: "On Feb. 16 the beloved cat's owner (who has never revealed her name for privacy reasons) shared that the popular TikTok personality had passed away following a battle with feline immunodeficiency virus."
The article notes: "Ironically, Pot Roast became popular on TikTok for her appearance: Many people apparently thought she was dead or taxidermied, which her owner played up."
The article notes: "Pot Roast — a cat named after the “very special dish” served on “very special occasions” because her owner wanted to gobble her up with affection — has died. The fluffy black and white feline was a TikTok star thanks to her human’s funny videos that poked fun at the pet she very clearly adored."
The article notes: "Pot Roast as a cat would be someone I would follow and adore from afar. Pot Roast’s Mom is the element that made this whole situation viral. PRM is one of the most bleakly hilarious performers I have ever known. She matched a disgruntled feline to videos with songs, digitally accompanied narratives, and gentle snapshots of life—most always delivered with a combination of dirt dry sarcasm and, somehow, overwhelmingly supportive positive vibes. Pot Roast was not a cat on the internet. Pot Roast was a cat that seemed to belong to all of us. I spent enough time with videos of Pot Roast over the last few years that, would she have crossed my path at The Pitch offices, I would not not have been surprised. And then we lost her."
The article notes: "Pot Roast had become a celebrity on the social media app, with videos receiving more than 64 million likes total and a following of nearly one million, The Independent reported. Pot Roast’s owner had documented the cat’s declining health, and in a post on Feb. 8 explained that Pot Roast had been diagnosed with Feline Immunodeficiency Virus."
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 20:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
There is no substantive RS coverage of the subject. The subject is mentioned briefly in several non-RS (usually because he was part of a TV show panel where someone said something controversial}. The only RS that mentions him is an AP article that includes one quote by him in a story about participants in a conference (he was one such participant). Thenightaway ( talk) 19:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Many of these pages, however, ought to be individually re-evaluated and perhaps re-nominated for deletion, ideally after the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Telecommunications#Dialling codes in the United Kingdom concludes, so as to keep the conversion integrated. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
These area code articles do not meet WP:GNG. They are poorly sourced, contain a lot of WP:OR and unsourced material and do not assert any reason as to why these codes specifically over-and-above all others warrant standalone articles rather than entries in the List of dialling codes in the United Kingdom. Many of the sources are to lists of area codes that WP:EXIST which is not a reason to have a Wikipedia article on the topic. If all the poorly sourced, unsourced and OR material was removed, we would be left with a stub saying "01xxx is the area code for Town X", which is prime WP:NOTDIR territory.
The articles were previously PRODded and this was contested. I am bringing them to AfD to gather community consensus on whether they are worth keeping or should be deleted. Flip Format ( talk) 19:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the above stated reason:
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 23:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe the subject of the article can pass a notability check, nor do I believe the references used in the article count as "reliable secondary sources" as such. The bulk of them are pages confirming that the subject has won a number of minor competitions but none of them discuss the subject at any length. The article reads to me like it was created to promote the subject. In the edit history, most of the content added to the page comes from an anonymous IP, which is likely the subject of the article themselves.
Googling the subject of the article does not bring up any notable coverage such as in newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CeltBrowne ( talk • contribs) 18:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Mjroots ( talk) 11:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of independent, reliable sources exist for this person. Everything appears to be self-published, or trivial mentions, or the like. Jayron 32 18:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of numbered comets. RL0919 ( talk) 20:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
The only coverage is from databases and the announcements about the discoveries [6], the orbital elements [7] and the assosiation with a previous apparition [8] and thus the numbering [9]. They may sound enough, but this is just routine coverage for a numbered comet, and thus fails in WP:NASTCRIT, according to which multiple non-trivial published works, which contain significant commentary on the object are needed (eg. it doesn't have a dedicated page in Kronk's cometography). C messier ( talk) 17:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
From the sources presented, I don't think the subject of the article is notable per WP:GNG or WP:NDIRECTOR Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 17:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This list is horrendously outdated, shoddily made, and completely devoid of sources. Short of completely recreating it from scratch, it's beyond salvagable. 100.7.44.80 ( talk) 15:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was selective merge to Lake City High School. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 05:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Local high school student walkout. Not really notable. Does not appear to have gained any traction outside a small area. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. After a significant excising of promotional content, there are multiple WP:RS profiles to use for the remainder. RL0919 ( talk) 21:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This page should be deleted, frankly. I have never seen such a sketchy page, and it's furthermore rather unnotable Allan Nonymous ( talk) 13:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
14:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Person does not meet the notable people standard and died in 2017. Ryanharmany ( talk) 14:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of secondary state highways in Virginia. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable secondary road. Philroc ( talk) 04:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Richard Manitoba. ✗ plicit 00:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUMS. Mooonswimmer 12:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Actor whose roles have been either minor or in non-notable productions, so does not meet WP:NACTOR. DJ who has not been the subject of independent coverage, so does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Many sources are cited, but they are capsule bios provided by the subject or their publicist, brief mentions in photo captions, or primary source credits listing all actors in a production. The only hints of critical analysis are single sentences in three of the ten theater reviews:
This does not add up to significant attention by the world at large. They are an actor/DJ doing their job, but unless Wikipedia aspires to be a resume hosting service or an indiscriminate catalogue like IMDb, they should not be the subject of a stand alone encyclopedia article. Worldbruce ( talk) 11:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
A prolifically deleted page about a subject shown not to meet Wikipedia's general notability criteria at AfD. There's quite a lot of poorly sourced philanthropic puffery in this particular incarnation and some ugly citation bombing going on. Clearly the hand of PR has played a part in creating this entry. Icicle City ( talk) 09:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: What zhwp has articles on or not means absolutely nothing here, as each project has different notability standards. So can we get some discussion based on enwp content standards, please?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rob Chapman (guitarist) or a subsection thereof. There isn't consensus on that. Star Mississippi 02:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Sources on page mostly (if not entirely) do not provide for notability. Found limited coverage of their breakup which was mostly based on Chapman's statement and otherwise insubstantial, and nothing else of use. No apparent evidence of an NMUSIC pass either. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 08:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fairfield Stags men's basketball#Stags in the NBA Draft unless further sourcing appears. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. I couldn't find any media coverage, just a blank stats sheet for his NBA non-career. [11] Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of ABS-CBN Corporation subsidiaries#Others. ✗ plicit 00:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
A now closed restaurant that fails GNG. 1st source is dead, and the 3 others appear to be food blogs. LibStar ( talk) 04:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
t
c
08:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Charting and sales both insignificant. Other provided sources questionable in terms of reliability (Neither mentioned at WP:KO/RS but they don't look great). Couldn't find any additional coverage. Redirect to pH-1 (rapper). QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 17:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
I am busy irl now, so I will answer this after April 26. SHPG/수행평가 ( talk) 18:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Upon careful review of the Blue Energy Motors Wikipedia page, it has become apparent that the subject of the article does not exist, and there are no reliable sources to substantiate its claims. It has no significant coverage in independent, verifiable sources, which is essential to establish notability and adhere to Wikipedia's standards.
The article appears to be a hoax or a fabrication, and its content cannot be verified through credible sources. Lulakayd ( talk) 13:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Fatal Fury characters. ✗ plicit 14:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Minor character clearly fails WP:GNG. Despite well written, sources were mostly from unreliable and blogs. Also at reception section, those were full of passing mentions and listicles, thus showing zero WP:SIGCOV. GlatorNator ( ᴛ) 12:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Purely promotional article, if not anything needs WP:TNT. Though doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC either; sources either don't mention her, name drop her or are non-independent and primary in nature. Tayi Arajakate Talk 12:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Another Rafferty who has not made enough of a mark for himself. Co-director, co-producer and co-writer of the documentary The Atomic Cafe and writer of another isn't enough to satisfy WP:CREATIVE. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I don’t find any in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Created by an SPA who made numerous attempts to create and recreate this article and contributed nothing else. Mccapra ( talk) 08:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
A highly promotional article, with a lot of sockpuppetry surrounding its history. It's been repeatedly draftified / declined at AfC, so I thought an AfD discussion to establish a consensus on notability would probably be more useful than moving it to draft yet again. Girth Summit (blether) 11:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was procedural close as wrong venue. Deletion discussions for draftspace articles happen at WP:MFD. (non-admin closure) -- Finngall talk 14:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete:The Draft is just a wholly delusional mess created by an IP address which shares similar edits (vandalism, adding gibberish to pages, etc.) with the ones which added unnecessary taxoboxes to the page Francevillian biota and has also been edited by an unassuming Wikipedia admin without sufficient research. Rugoconites Tenuirugosus ( talk) 13:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be a straightforward case of Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article consists of the definition of a term (itself simply the combination of two everyday words) and the assertion that the term has been applied to various empires throughout history. I can't verify the second of the two cited sources, but the first is a fairly vague pontification on the alleged wonderfulness of nineteenth-century colonialism.
At the moment, I believe the article meets deletion criteria 8 (in that it fails to meet WP:GNG: that is:
A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
There are two cited sources, one of which (Giddings' 1900 book on empires of his own time) is WP:PRIMARY, and both of which are only citing the fact that the US has been described as a 'democratic empire'. Per WP:GNG, this is a 'trivial mention' that does not establish notability. The remainder of the article seems to be almost entirely WP:OR.
Furthermore, the article also meets criterion 14 (any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia) per WP:DICTIONARY.
There are one or two examples in HQRS where the terms 'Democratic empire' or 'the Democratic empire' have been used as epithets for the United States, but I cannot find any significant discussion of the meaning, history or significance of those terms in themselves (as opposed to the US) which would qualify this article under WP:GNG. I can believe that an article on the perception or naming of the US as a 'democratic empire' can be written, or one on Giddings' 1900 book that seems to praise (allegedly) democratic empires, but this article is so far from being either of those that any such article would have to start by completely removing this one. UndercoverClassicist ( talk) 12:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any decent coverage in Persian (رضا بیگدلو) and the article currently fails WP:SPORTBASIC #5. I note that his name seems to transliterate to "Reza Biqbelo" rather than the one used in the article. Nevertheless, I can find no WP:SIGCOV under any version of his name. Stats sites like Mackolik and Soccerway are all I can find and none of them indicate anything about his career that would make him likely to be notable. The NFT 'source' contains no significant coverage nor does it truly back up the claim made. In any case, even if the claim is true about him being the first Iranian footballer to have an NFT, it doesn't guarantee an article on its own, he would still need to have SIGCOV. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was re-draftify. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Was previously in draft but moved back by creator. Di Pizio still does not seem to pass WP:GNG and a source analysis will shortly follow. Please note that he appears to be mentioned in The Daily Telegraph but I am unable to access that article due to a paywall. Please also note that GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC both need more than one source so, even if that source does contain significant coverage, it's not enough on its own. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any good sources relating to this footballer within the guidelines of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG when searching "Kanan Jafarov" or "Kənan Cəfərov". Best I can find are stats pages like Soccerway and Football Database. His senior career to date seems to consist of one cup game and no league games. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a WP:SPS book. While I could agree that the Patriarchal text is WP:Notable, notability isn't inherited by a WP:SPS from its ancestors. tgeorgescu ( talk) 06:16, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kursaal. While there is a consensus to redirect, the redirect target may be discussed separately. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Contested prod. Refunded via RFU. Relisting as AFD. Original PROD was: No coverage whatsoever in RS, probably appropriate for a redirect to Doctor Who but fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be OR; I can't find mention of this term in any scholarly musical journals; appears to be a trope in legends or mythical stories, nothing related to music. Sourcing used is iffy, most don't appear RS. Oaktree b ( talk) 04:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
07:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to George Town, Penang#Public transportation. ✗ plicit 12:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTTRAVEL. The only example of a hop-on-hop-off article I could find, they are genuinely non-notable Ajf773 ( talk) 10:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. With clear sockpuppet and/or canvassed arguments discounted, the consensus is to delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Already deleted once, Looks non-notable Singer please check over the notability all are paid pieces of a normal cover. I removed one paid PR in Outlook India. Yousuf Ibn Ahmad ( talk) 15:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
To Oaktree b ( talk) Brother I have check all then I proceed for creation. I am alreay contributing lots of Wikipedia here and I know wht is promotion and wht is source news. You should show me a written proof that is paid otherwise stop this discussion. And for your kind info my page alreday review by a Wikipedia administrator. So just removed this deletion tag. Thanks. — Preceding signed comment added by Cinefilestudio ( talk • contribs) 13:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
100% No Oaktree b first if you said it's promotional or publicity then you have to explain or proof it to Wikipedia these source are promotional. I have checked all alsso see source Ibtimes India. And news 18. Or give me a written letter from the any of the news source which you are telling is promotional. Please don't waste further time of mine and wikipedia for this verified person. And close this discussion🙏. Cinefilestudio ( talk) 21:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More input is clearly necessary…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Note: All are notable news media has coverage this artist. If those not are reliable sources then which are? which is not significant coverage? I have found 2 times of India non promotional with news 18 hindi and bengali where the singer is based. Those are much enough significant coverage as per article brief data. And those are judging here to write non of those are clear sources thn pls brief me which is non notable and why with Proof. And which are notable news in india? Also note if this article should be deleted then this artist Santy_Sharma Wikipedia also should be deleted. I check and compare that anurag had much better news source from Santy Sharma. Cinefilestudio ( talk) 18:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Clearly promo, "Anurag Halder became a star from Zee Music's 'Kashtiyaan', now coming soon with his next song" | 1. "Anurag Halder जी म्यूजिक के 'कश्तियां' से बने स्टार, अब जल्द ला रहे अगला सॉन्ग". Zee News (in Hindi). Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo, "The joyous, sparkly and cheerful vibe of the song is perfect for taking a long romantic drive with your partner." | 2. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/news/singer-anurag-halder-happy-to-see-the-overwhelming-response-to-tere-naal/articleshow/99928398.cms |
Promo, interview | 3. ^ Desk, I. B. T. (21 August 2021). "Independent music will always be my first choice of working – Anurag Halder". www.ibtimes.co.in. Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo "Anurag Halder's charms when he forced the students to dance on the song 'Faasla'!" | 4. ^ "Anurag Halder का जलवा, जब Song 'Faasla' पर स्टूडेंट्स को झूमने पर कर दिया मजबूर!". News18 हिंदी (in Hindi). 10 October 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo "Anurag shares his experience at the launch of his new track at a hotel in Gurgaon" | 5. ^ https://www.bhaskar.com/local/delhi-ncr/gurgaon/news/lapadwas-romantic-music-is-very-much-liked-by-the-youth-anurag-halder-129402914.html |
Promo, interview | 6. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/bengali/music/singer-anurag-halder-says-performing-live-gives-him-an-adrenaline-rush/articleshow/100075018.cms |
Clearly promo, "Soak in the sunshine and feel the breeze of love with Lapadva by Anurag Halder" | 7. ^ "Soak in the sunshine and feel the breeze of love with Lapadva by Anurag Halder". |
Duplicate of #1 | 8. ^ "Anurag Halder जी म्यूजिक के 'कश्तियां' से बने स्टार, अब जल्द ला रहे अगला सॉन्ग". Zee News (in Hindi). Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo, "Tere Naal' Is Out Now: Singer Anurag Halder is back with a love song. The song is titled 'Tere Naal' in his voice. The music video is made." | 9. ^ https://bengali.abplive.com/entertainment/love-song-tere-naal-sung-by-anurag-halder-is-out-starring-aishwarya-sen-and-riddhish-chowdhury-976677 |
Clearly promo, "Anurag Halder New Song: Aishwarya-Riddish duet! Anurag Halder's voice released love song 'Tere Naal'" | 10. ^ https://bengali.news18.com/news/entertainment/anurag-halder-new-song-tere-naal-is-out-now-rds-1095572.html |
States they were at an event. | 11. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/city/allahabad/bharatanatyam-enthralls-all-at-iiit-a-cultural-fest/amp_articleshow/96123905.cms |
Clearly promo, "Check Out Latest Hindi 2020 Video Song 'Kashtiya' Sung By Anurag Halder" | 12. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/videos/entertainment/music/hindi/check-out-latest-hindi-2020-video-song-kashtiya-sung-by-anurag-halder/videoshow/75673864.cms?from=mdr |
The result was draftify. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
The election is not WP:N and relies on WP:FUTURE. Wiki is WP:NOTNEWS and this article is portraying that as it has little news coverage as is.
It is possible that it may become notable in the WP:FUTURE but we have no way of knowing that.
The article has not established individual any notability or and has no reason to be on the mainspace. Grahaml35 ( talk) 05:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:08, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep as is or send to draftspace?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet the standards of Wikipedia:Notability 1keyhole ( talk) 07:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable album, part of a promo-ring of articles about the band ( AfD), a movie created by the band producer ( AfD), and three other albums by the same band (all long since redirected), all by same editor (with no other interests). Only sources are extremely local coverage ( this is from the section "in the neighborhood / Hoboken", this newspaper has next to its general coverage also coverage per municipality or like here sub-municipality) because one of the singles raised money for a good cause. It's a British band, released in the Netherlands and worldwide, but got no attention beyond the village of the producer. Note that the album has no 5-star rating from Allmusic, it has one glowing "user" review who gave it 5 stars, which is meaningless. Fram ( talk) 07:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Sources have been found. ( non-admin closure) Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 15:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete, fails WP:NOLYMPICS Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 06:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "九○年,這名剛成年的小伙子,加入香港賽艇代表隊,成為全職運動員,先後出征亞運及奧運,... 最後以零點三五秒之差落敗,只得第四名,與獎牌擦身而過,但正正因為零點三五秒的遺憾,讓他領悟更多,成為日後努力的原動力,... 由於政府對運動員資助有限,入不敷支,鍾志樂無奈要向現實低頭,告別短短四年的職業運動員生涯。九六年,他開設體育用品公司,由入貨到送貨一腳踢,但運動從未有離開過他的生命,... 生活營營役役,除了工作,就是練習,試過近六年時間,他一年只放兩天假,卻從不叫苦。... ○五年,鍾志樂的事業已上軌道,兒時回憶再次走入生命,機緣巧合下,他與一眾志同道合的朋友組成龍舟隊,參加本地不同賽事,隨後被邀請加入香港龍舟協會,更當上香港代表隊總教練,"
From Google Translate: "In 1990, this young man who had just grown up joined the Hong Kong Rowing Team and became a full-time athlete. He went to the Asian Games and the Olympics successively. He was defeated by 0.35 seconds and only got fourth place and a medal. Passed by, but precisely because of the regret of 0.35 seconds, he learned more and became the driving force for his future efforts... Due to the limited government funding for athletes and unable to make ends meet, Zhong Zhile had no choice but to bow his head to reality , bid farewell to a short four-year career as a professional athlete. In 1996, he opened a sporting goods company, from the arrival of the goods to the delivery, but sports have never left his life,... Life camp and labor, in addition to work, is to practice, tried nearly six For a year, he only had two days off a year, but he never complained. ... In 20 years, Zhong Zhile's career was on the right track, and childhood memories came to life again. By chance, he formed a dragon boat team with a group of like-minded friends to participate in different local competitions, and was invited to join the Hong Kong Dragon Boat Association. He became the head coach of the Hong Kong team ..."
The article notes: "Olympic canoeist Chung Chi-lok has given up the sport which took him to Barcelona and has instead turned his attention to another water event - rowing. Chung, who took part in the double kayak event at the Olympic Games five months ago with veteran Luk Kwok-sun, stopped canoeing because he felt there was little development of the sport. But, ironically, the Hongkong Canoe Union have still nominated him for the prestigious Coca-Cola Sports Stars Awards. ... Chung went through a series of physiological tests at the HKSI and national rowing coach Chris Perry was so happy with the results that he offered the newcomer a scholarship."
The article notes: "Arnold Chung Chi-lok, chairman of the Hong Kong China Dragon Boat Association, was speaking days after the 2023 World Dragon Boat Racing Championships, which were to be held in Hong Kong next August, were moved to Thailand because of the quarantine rules that apply to all incoming travellers. ... He told the Post that his association wanted to bid to host the 2027 global championships, as well as revive Hong Kong’s annual International Dragon Boat Races. ... Chung intends to resurrect the International Dragon Boat Races, which until its last staging in 2018 attracted around 4,500 participants – but this too relies on an end to quarantine."
The article notes: "“Traditionally, dragon boats and paddles are made from teak and camphorwood and there are three different boat sizes. Today in international races, the stronger fibreglass is used and the boats are standardised in size,” says HKCDBA chairman Arnold Chung Chi Lok."
The article notes: ""It's not enough," said rower Chung Chi-lok. one of the "lucky" athletes to receive a grant. "But rowing is my interest and I want to do it when I am young. You can't expect to be heavily subsidised in Hong Kong." He was disappointed with the size of his grant. Having finished in sixth place in one of the canoeing events at the last Asian Games, he had applied as an elite athlete. "I don't understand why I was given so little," the 22-year-old said. "I was hoping to get $40,000." Chung's daily rowing practice starts at 6.00 am, followed by weightlifting and other physical exercises. For the past year, his life has centred around the institute: "I seldom go out. I go home every two weeks. My life is quite monotonous, but it's worth it. I want to see results from it.""
The article notes from Google Translate: "Zhong Zhile has bid for two international competitions for Hong Kong during his tenure, including the biennial Asian Dragon Boat Championships in 2020, but it was eventually canceled due to the pandemic. He originally expected that it would also be suspended in 2022, and planned to bid for Hong Kong in 2024."
The article notes: "HKCDBA chairman Arnold Chung Chi Lok explains: ... Chung, a former Hong Kong dragon boat team member and coach, says it is no easy feat to paddle in Victoria Harbour."
The article notes from Google Translate: "The World Dragon Boat Championships in August next year will be held in Thailand from Hong Kong. Chung Chi-lok, chairman of the Hong Kong Dragon Boat Federation, said today (September 1) that in the future, more sports competitions will be held in other countries due to Hong Kong’s pandemic prevention policies. ... Chung Chi-lok, chairman of the Hong Kong Dragon Boat Association, said in a radio interview that he regrets that the race could not be held in Hong Kong."
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, no significant coverage Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, only WP:ROUTINE coverage. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician duo, only WP:ROUTINE coverage Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1988–89 Burnley F.C. season. ✗ plicit 05:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete. Contested PROD. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Not even near the threshold of notability. All sources cover a recent appointment due to her father's position as mayor of North Dhaka. Notability is not inherited and position is not notable. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 04:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:PARTIAL and not enough individual articles to disambiguate. Someone looking for words made up from "-splain" will look for them in Wiktionary and other dictionaries. – Vipz ( talk) 04:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 05:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but should have been left in draft until enough WP:SIGCOV could be added to show it passes notability requirements. Onel5969 TT me 13:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The most neutrally written and interesting section Marius Pharmaceuticals#Testosterone and Hypogonadism has nothing to do with the company itself. PROMO and SPA piece ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of the proposed sources would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Likely to fail WP:NCORP. KH-1 ( talk) 03:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete, without prejudice against re-creation should further secondary sourcing arise. Because of the other issues, it's probably best not to draftify. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Promotional page, not given any special achivement. ☆★ Sanjeev Kumar ( talk) 19:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Table_1_Authors_singleyr_2021_pubs_since_1788_wopp_extracted_202209.xlsx
, from
[19]). We don't write biographies because people had a good year. We write them to recognize influential careers. I'm inclined towards deletion right now, since nothing is actually standing out as exceptional. Yes, the article was brought to AfD recently, and that might be grounds for a procedural close, but the arguments based on policies and guidelines had some very equivocal language, e.g., I'm not seeing much for quality secondary sources that would really establish notability though, so even with the citation metrics, it still would be possible that this could end up in the delete pile someday.Honestly, a relist might have been better than a close, so I'm fine this time with bringing the page back here. It has also been PROD'ed since then [20], indicating that the consensus in favor of notability is not total. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Top 10 citations
|
---|
|
The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work. NPROF even makes the effort to italicize that part. As you have just indicated as well as the source, this BLP subject does not fall under highly cited. If you're going to rely on criteria 1 alone there, it's very clear that the citations need to be exceptional, not just average, and that's been the context here. If we had some decent secondary source coverage, then we could have the combination of current citations + coverage justifying notability, but that isn't this subject currently. The average professor test isn't saying average professors are notable, but instead
When judged against the average impact of a researcher in a given field, does this researcher stand out as clearly more notable or more accomplished?The whole context and spirit of that guideline is that a professor stands out and falls into that highly cited category for their field.
Citation measures such as the h-index, g-index, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. They should be approached with caution because their validity is not, at present, completely accepted, and they may depend substantially on the citation database used. They are also discipline-dependent; some disciplines have higher average citation rates than others.Look through the archives of academics-and-educators AfD's for plenty of examples to see how the guideline is actually applied. Comparing to the averages for the field is absolutely commonplace. XOR'easter ( talk) 14:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 03:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
PRODded by Ranadhira ( talk · contribs) with rationale, referring to Rathore dynasty:
There is already a Rathore dynasty page for the historical clan and a surname page for the modern surname. Unnecessary copy of Rathore dynasty
This PROD, and several cleanup edits by the same user, was reverted by page creator Hanshingling ( talk · contribs), a user who claimed to be using a large language model and is now blocked per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruption; and then restored by Re Packer&Tracker ( talk · contribs). – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced since 2009. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗ plicit 03:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
"Peoples of the Caucasus" is already a region-based categorization of ethnic groups, so this is basically a list of ethnic groups that inhabit Iran but also happen to inhabit parts of the Caucasus, another region, which is very arbitrary. It's like having an article for "Peoples of Long Island in France" and include Italians, Arabs, and Jews there, because they inhabit both places. There could be a separate article for Caucasian immigrants in Iran with enough historical context, but it has to be named differently. There aren't also any sources that specifically categorize these groups together, if I'm not mistaken. I am also nominating the following page because it has the same problem:
Aintabli ( talk) 02:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable political adviser and pollster. 3 sources (Politico, The Guardian, The Spectator) included in the article are just Johnson's writer bio. Mooonswimmer 01:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:GNG with nothing else coming up online. JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs) 07:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 01:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 01:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
No sourcing, no assertion of notability Orange Mike | Talk 00:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ~Styyx Talk? 10:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Only relies on box office as a source, with no reviews nor other significant coverage found. Does not seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:NF. Tutwakhamoe ( talk) 00:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
With only one match at the professional level, he is certainly not notable. FromCzech ( talk) 16:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 United States Senate election in Washington#Democratic primary. Unclear whether first V-A has been verified, nor whether that would constitute notability. History remains under the redirect should facts change. Star Mississippi 02:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Minor candidate for office. Fails WP:BIO, only media coverage is in the context of being a long-shot candidate. Chajusong ( talk) 18:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I was all set to redirect this article but then noticed that this is the 2nd AFD for this page. So, I'm relisting to ensure adequate consideration of its fate.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NSCHOOL which requires for profit educational institutions to pass WP:ORGCRIT. A google search yielded zero coverage in reliable secondary sources over the first three pages. There were however, no shortage of hits, virtually all of a promotional nature. Much of the article is unsourced. What sourcing there is, is very thin and mostly primary/affiliated sources. Many ref/cite links are dead. Article is so nakedly promotional that one could argue it should be deleted on that basis alone. Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Very few references, and the person is only mentioned in a list of other hundreds of disciples. No sign of independent notability. Jaunpurzada ( talk) 14:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:36, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Very few references, and the person is only mentioned in a list of other hundreds of disciples. No sign of independent notability. Jaunpurzada ( talk) 14:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to New Alresford. Star Mississippi 02:37, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable event page created by a COI trying to bolster another COI article they created. Cited only to itself. Softlavender ( talk) 22:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider redirect or Keep outcome given changes to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This temple no longer exists per https://goo.gl/maps/wu9p1uDYeo4aoXCJ8 Its website is not working, and its Facebook page is inactive. This article appears to have been written by someone with a close connection to the subject ( WP: COI). It also appears to be an advertisement masquerading as an article ( WP:PROMO) and cites no sources. Finally, the subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements ( WP:Notability). - Ram1751 ( talk) 21:59, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Family of Joe Biden#Grandchildren. Consensus is she's not sufficiently notable for a standalone article Star Mississippi 02:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Notability is not inherited from famous relatives. This is a grandchild of an American president who has only received pagesix-gossip-celebrity-like coverage because of her last name. Maid of honor at a wedding, attending inaugurations and state visits abroad, etc... Zaathras ( talk) 22:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Notability is inherited from famous relatives) that is explicitly not a reason we use to keep articles in the Wikipedia. There is no argument or wiggle room here for your position. Period. There will be no further replies on this tangent. Zaathras ( talk) 21:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 05:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet notability guidelines. Per discussions, TIME and Forbes lists have been consistently rejected as standards for notability. The awards won, although prestigious, do not seem to cross the threshold for a Wikipedia page.
The individual highlighted has no publications, the tone used seems overtly narrative based, the content appears to have been written COI, and there seems to be little encyclopedic value brought by the article other than a litany of relatively noteworthy awards. Further, the classification of the individual as a "scientist" plainly fails the WP:SNG for academics. I do not believe the individual passes off on any particular SNG relating to people. I submit that the GNG is insufficient in this context as the standards espoused in the first deletion section would make achieving a full score on an AP exam, which hundreds of students do every year, warrant a Wikipedia page. Augend ( drop a line) 22:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
very little serious discussion, and thus see no reason to ignore WP:DPAFD, where a
reasonable amount of timehas clearly not passed. Dylnuge ( Talk • Edits) 20:37, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion and Wikipedia is not written in news style. For example, routine news coverage of announcements, events, sports, or celebrities, while sometimes useful, is not by itself a sufficient basis for inclusion of the subject of that coverage. Augend ( drop a line) 05:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ramona (novel series)#Characters. ✗ plicit 23:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Minor character mentioned in one book of a children's series. No notability on her own as far as I can tell. The description of her is also very in-universe which is not what the Wikipedia is for. Jaguarnik ( talk) 21:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because [similar lack of notability]:
Jaguarnik ( talk) 21:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
No lasting coverage, all sources come from the same week or so and focus on the cat's death. See WP:BLP1E/ WP:ONEEVENT; the article also fails to show any real notability or significance of one of many briefly famous Internet cats. SilverTiger12 ( talk) 21:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Analysis of the sources
Pot Roast, a cat from Kansas City, Missouri, died on 16 February 2022. Pot Roast was profiled in The Pitch on 24 May 2021, which is eight months before her death. This shows that at least one source provided significant coverage about Pot Roast and was not about her death.
After Pot Roast died, she received substantial coverage in numerous articles including in international sources like The Independent and the Toronto Star and in national sources like NBC News, HuffPost, and People. The article in the Toronto Star is an especially strong source that contains detailed analysis and commentary about the cat. This satisfies Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Diversity of sources.
Pot Roast subsequently received significant coverage over six months after her death in NBC News, The Pitch, and Junkee. This satisfies Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Duration of coverage.
Sources
The article notes: "Pot Roast the cat went from being hidden in a sorority house to being TikTok famous. Her owner, whose name has been rescinded for privacy reasons, found Pot Roast during a college finals week her sophomore year in 2014. ... She ended up paying to stay a full two hours with Pot Roast and had someone drive her to the animal shelter immediately after the event in hopes of adopting her. PRO says the shelter was willing to let her adopt Pot Roast for only $20 and all of a sudden PRO was a cat mom."
The article provides 169 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Pot Roast was a toothless, black-and-white cat, who captured the heart of the internet with her laid-back personality, messy eating and assorted health problems. She grew to prominence on the account @PotRoastsMom, where her owner, who publicly identifies only as "Pot Roast's Mom," introduced her to the world. The account had more than 1.2 million followers. ... In the wake of Pot Roast's death in February, Pot Roast's mom was harassed and criticized for using jokes and dark humor to cope with the loss of her pet. That led to discussions about how followers on social media create parasocial relationships with the people and animals they see online. Since Pot Roast's passing, Pot Roast's Mom has adopted two new cats: Soup and Coupon.
The article notes: "A year after the death of Kansas City’s feline TikTok celebrity, Pot Roast’s Mom is taking stock of her life and setting new boundaries with her online community. Pot Roast’s Mom (whose name will remain anonymous for privacy reasons) has been creating TikTok videos since January 2021, most of which starred the legendary Pot Roast until her death in Feb. 2022. She has 1.2 million followers on TikTok and 144,000 on Instagram. "
The article provides 81 words of coverage about the subject and her owner. The article notes: "Pot Roast took the world by storm during the height of the pandemic. Unfortunately, Pot Roast passed away earlier this year, and many were worried they'd never see Pot Roast's Mom on the platform again. After Pot Roast's passing, her mom took some time before fostering new kittens. She eventually adopted one of them, amply named Faucet. She has been sharing their daily lives since, with a sprinkle of her own humor and Faucet's cute antics, making them a perfect pair."
The article provides 217 words of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "In February 2022, a black and white cat who had been diagnosed with feline immunodeficiency virus, or FIV, passed away. Pets dying, while devastating for the owners who love them, is not an uncommon occurrence – their lives are tragically much shorter than human ones, after all. What makes this example unique is the storm that followed. The cat, whose name was Pot Roast, had garnered a sizable TikTok following, and fans on the app eagerly awaited regular updates on their favourite internet famous cat. When Pot Roast passed away, her mother, known online as Pot Roast’s Mom, was bombarded with messages from strangers unimpressed with how she handled her cat’s health concerns."
The article notes: "I try not to pick favourites when it comes to pets, but Pot Roast the cat always held a special place in my heart. Toothless and ungroomed, with food debris often stuck in the fur under her chin, seven-year-old Pot Roast was best described as scraggly. Some even referred to her as a taxidermy cat in the sense that she didn’t appear healthy enough to be alive — indeed, she had several health issues, including feline herpes, autoimmune disease, allergies and stomatitis that necessitated the removal of her teeth and made her stop self-grooming. I was charmed and inspired by her refusal to die."
The article notes: "Pot Roast was a toothless black-and-white cat who was beloved on TikTok for her assortment of hats and messy eating habits. She had survived several health issues as a kitten, and many found her scraggly appearance endearing. After her unexpected death last month, fans were heartbroken. Some went as far as taking their grief out on Pot Roast’s owner, who had been harassed over Pot Roast’s health long before the cat became sick."
The article notes: "Pot Roast, TikTok’s most loved cat, has died following ongoing health issues, her owner has confirmed. In a video shared to the platform, her owner announced that Pot Roast had died at 1.47am on Wednesday 16 February. ... Pot Roast’s health had been declining in recent weeks after she tested positive for feline immunodeficiency virus, an infection which attacks the cat’s immune system."
The article notes: "Over the last year, Pot Roast and her owner captured the attention of millions on TikTok with their quirky personalities. The account has garnered more than 953,000 followers since its conception."
The article notes: "One TikTok user, Pot Roast's Mom, who shared videos of her scruffy cat, went viral during Winter 2020. But the vast audience she reached is now mourning the passing of Pot Roast the cat. ... The Kansas City-based TikToker regularly reached millions of viewers through clips of Pot Roast wearing cute or comical garb, the pet owner petting the happy cat, and syncing the cat's actions with music like many other TikToker creators do with music videos. Throughout the years of regular posts, Pot Roast's Mom was able to show TikTok viewers the calm and playful nature of the adopted cat while she was alive."
The article notes: "On Feb. 16 the beloved cat's owner (who has never revealed her name for privacy reasons) shared that the popular TikTok personality had passed away following a battle with feline immunodeficiency virus."
The article notes: "Ironically, Pot Roast became popular on TikTok for her appearance: Many people apparently thought she was dead or taxidermied, which her owner played up."
The article notes: "Pot Roast — a cat named after the “very special dish” served on “very special occasions” because her owner wanted to gobble her up with affection — has died. The fluffy black and white feline was a TikTok star thanks to her human’s funny videos that poked fun at the pet she very clearly adored."
The article notes: "Pot Roast as a cat would be someone I would follow and adore from afar. Pot Roast’s Mom is the element that made this whole situation viral. PRM is one of the most bleakly hilarious performers I have ever known. She matched a disgruntled feline to videos with songs, digitally accompanied narratives, and gentle snapshots of life—most always delivered with a combination of dirt dry sarcasm and, somehow, overwhelmingly supportive positive vibes. Pot Roast was not a cat on the internet. Pot Roast was a cat that seemed to belong to all of us. I spent enough time with videos of Pot Roast over the last few years that, would she have crossed my path at The Pitch offices, I would not not have been surprised. And then we lost her."
The article notes: "Pot Roast had become a celebrity on the social media app, with videos receiving more than 64 million likes total and a following of nearly one million, The Independent reported. Pot Roast’s owner had documented the cat’s declining health, and in a post on Feb. 8 explained that Pot Roast had been diagnosed with Feline Immunodeficiency Virus."
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 20:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
There is no substantive RS coverage of the subject. The subject is mentioned briefly in several non-RS (usually because he was part of a TV show panel where someone said something controversial}. The only RS that mentions him is an AP article that includes one quote by him in a story about participants in a conference (he was one such participant). Thenightaway ( talk) 19:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Many of these pages, however, ought to be individually re-evaluated and perhaps re-nominated for deletion, ideally after the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Telecommunications#Dialling codes in the United Kingdom concludes, so as to keep the conversion integrated. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
These area code articles do not meet WP:GNG. They are poorly sourced, contain a lot of WP:OR and unsourced material and do not assert any reason as to why these codes specifically over-and-above all others warrant standalone articles rather than entries in the List of dialling codes in the United Kingdom. Many of the sources are to lists of area codes that WP:EXIST which is not a reason to have a Wikipedia article on the topic. If all the poorly sourced, unsourced and OR material was removed, we would be left with a stub saying "01xxx is the area code for Town X", which is prime WP:NOTDIR territory.
The articles were previously PRODded and this was contested. I am bringing them to AfD to gather community consensus on whether they are worth keeping or should be deleted. Flip Format ( talk) 19:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the above stated reason:
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 23:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I don't believe the subject of the article can pass a notability check, nor do I believe the references used in the article count as "reliable secondary sources" as such. The bulk of them are pages confirming that the subject has won a number of minor competitions but none of them discuss the subject at any length. The article reads to me like it was created to promote the subject. In the edit history, most of the content added to the page comes from an anonymous IP, which is likely the subject of the article themselves.
Googling the subject of the article does not bring up any notable coverage such as in newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CeltBrowne ( talk • contribs) 18:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Mjroots ( talk) 11:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of independent, reliable sources exist for this person. Everything appears to be self-published, or trivial mentions, or the like. Jayron 32 18:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of numbered comets. RL0919 ( talk) 20:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
The only coverage is from databases and the announcements about the discoveries [6], the orbital elements [7] and the assosiation with a previous apparition [8] and thus the numbering [9]. They may sound enough, but this is just routine coverage for a numbered comet, and thus fails in WP:NASTCRIT, according to which multiple non-trivial published works, which contain significant commentary on the object are needed (eg. it doesn't have a dedicated page in Kronk's cometography). C messier ( talk) 17:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
From the sources presented, I don't think the subject of the article is notable per WP:GNG or WP:NDIRECTOR Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 17:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This list is horrendously outdated, shoddily made, and completely devoid of sources. Short of completely recreating it from scratch, it's beyond salvagable. 100.7.44.80 ( talk) 15:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was selective merge to Lake City High School. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 05:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Local high school student walkout. Not really notable. Does not appear to have gained any traction outside a small area. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. After a significant excising of promotional content, there are multiple WP:RS profiles to use for the remainder. RL0919 ( talk) 21:08, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This page should be deleted, frankly. I have never seen such a sketchy page, and it's furthermore rather unnotable Allan Nonymous ( talk) 13:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
14:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Person does not meet the notable people standard and died in 2017. Ryanharmany ( talk) 14:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of secondary state highways in Virginia. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable secondary road. Philroc ( talk) 04:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Richard Manitoba. ✗ plicit 00:06, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUMS. Mooonswimmer 12:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Actor whose roles have been either minor or in non-notable productions, so does not meet WP:NACTOR. DJ who has not been the subject of independent coverage, so does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Many sources are cited, but they are capsule bios provided by the subject or their publicist, brief mentions in photo captions, or primary source credits listing all actors in a production. The only hints of critical analysis are single sentences in three of the ten theater reviews:
This does not add up to significant attention by the world at large. They are an actor/DJ doing their job, but unless Wikipedia aspires to be a resume hosting service or an indiscriminate catalogue like IMDb, they should not be the subject of a stand alone encyclopedia article. Worldbruce ( talk) 11:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
A prolifically deleted page about a subject shown not to meet Wikipedia's general notability criteria at AfD. There's quite a lot of poorly sourced philanthropic puffery in this particular incarnation and some ugly citation bombing going on. Clearly the hand of PR has played a part in creating this entry. Icicle City ( talk) 09:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: What zhwp has articles on or not means absolutely nothing here, as each project has different notability standards. So can we get some discussion based on enwp content standards, please?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rob Chapman (guitarist) or a subsection thereof. There isn't consensus on that. Star Mississippi 02:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Sources on page mostly (if not entirely) do not provide for notability. Found limited coverage of their breakup which was mostly based on Chapman's statement and otherwise insubstantial, and nothing else of use. No apparent evidence of an NMUSIC pass either. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 08:45, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fairfield Stags men's basketball#Stags in the NBA Draft unless further sourcing appears. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. I couldn't find any media coverage, just a blank stats sheet for his NBA non-career. [11] Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of ABS-CBN Corporation subsidiaries#Others. ✗ plicit 00:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
A now closed restaurant that fails GNG. 1st source is dead, and the 3 others appear to be food blogs. LibStar ( talk) 04:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
t
c
08:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Charting and sales both insignificant. Other provided sources questionable in terms of reliability (Neither mentioned at WP:KO/RS but they don't look great). Couldn't find any additional coverage. Redirect to pH-1 (rapper). QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 17:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
I am busy irl now, so I will answer this after April 26. SHPG/수행평가 ( talk) 18:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
06:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk)
13:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Upon careful review of the Blue Energy Motors Wikipedia page, it has become apparent that the subject of the article does not exist, and there are no reliable sources to substantiate its claims. It has no significant coverage in independent, verifiable sources, which is essential to establish notability and adhere to Wikipedia's standards.
The article appears to be a hoax or a fabrication, and its content cannot be verified through credible sources. Lulakayd ( talk) 13:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Fatal Fury characters. ✗ plicit 14:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Minor character clearly fails WP:GNG. Despite well written, sources were mostly from unreliable and blogs. Also at reception section, those were full of passing mentions and listicles, thus showing zero WP:SIGCOV. GlatorNator ( ᴛ) 12:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Purely promotional article, if not anything needs WP:TNT. Though doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC either; sources either don't mention her, name drop her or are non-independent and primary in nature. Tayi Arajakate Talk 12:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Another Rafferty who has not made enough of a mark for himself. Co-director, co-producer and co-writer of the documentary The Atomic Cafe and writer of another isn't enough to satisfy WP:CREATIVE. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I don’t find any in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Created by an SPA who made numerous attempts to create and recreate this article and contributed nothing else. Mccapra ( talk) 08:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
A highly promotional article, with a lot of sockpuppetry surrounding its history. It's been repeatedly draftified / declined at AfC, so I thought an AfD discussion to establish a consensus on notability would probably be more useful than moving it to draft yet again. Girth Summit (blether) 11:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was procedural close as wrong venue. Deletion discussions for draftspace articles happen at WP:MFD. (non-admin closure) -- Finngall talk 14:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete:The Draft is just a wholly delusional mess created by an IP address which shares similar edits (vandalism, adding gibberish to pages, etc.) with the ones which added unnecessary taxoboxes to the page Francevillian biota and has also been edited by an unassuming Wikipedia admin without sufficient research. Rugoconites Tenuirugosus ( talk) 13:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be a straightforward case of Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article consists of the definition of a term (itself simply the combination of two everyday words) and the assertion that the term has been applied to various empires throughout history. I can't verify the second of the two cited sources, but the first is a fairly vague pontification on the alleged wonderfulness of nineteenth-century colonialism.
At the moment, I believe the article meets deletion criteria 8 (in that it fails to meet WP:GNG: that is:
A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
There are two cited sources, one of which (Giddings' 1900 book on empires of his own time) is WP:PRIMARY, and both of which are only citing the fact that the US has been described as a 'democratic empire'. Per WP:GNG, this is a 'trivial mention' that does not establish notability. The remainder of the article seems to be almost entirely WP:OR.
Furthermore, the article also meets criterion 14 (any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia) per WP:DICTIONARY.
There are one or two examples in HQRS where the terms 'Democratic empire' or 'the Democratic empire' have been used as epithets for the United States, but I cannot find any significant discussion of the meaning, history or significance of those terms in themselves (as opposed to the US) which would qualify this article under WP:GNG. I can believe that an article on the perception or naming of the US as a 'democratic empire' can be written, or one on Giddings' 1900 book that seems to praise (allegedly) democratic empires, but this article is so far from being either of those that any such article would have to start by completely removing this one. UndercoverClassicist ( talk) 12:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any decent coverage in Persian (رضا بیگدلو) and the article currently fails WP:SPORTBASIC #5. I note that his name seems to transliterate to "Reza Biqbelo" rather than the one used in the article. Nevertheless, I can find no WP:SIGCOV under any version of his name. Stats sites like Mackolik and Soccerway are all I can find and none of them indicate anything about his career that would make him likely to be notable. The NFT 'source' contains no significant coverage nor does it truly back up the claim made. In any case, even if the claim is true about him being the first Iranian footballer to have an NFT, it doesn't guarantee an article on its own, he would still need to have SIGCOV. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:47, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was re-draftify. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Was previously in draft but moved back by creator. Di Pizio still does not seem to pass WP:GNG and a source analysis will shortly follow. Please note that he appears to be mentioned in The Daily Telegraph but I am unable to access that article due to a paywall. Please also note that GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC both need more than one source so, even if that source does contain significant coverage, it's not enough on its own. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I can't find any good sources relating to this footballer within the guidelines of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG when searching "Kanan Jafarov" or "Kənan Cəfərov". Best I can find are stats pages like Soccerway and Football Database. His senior career to date seems to consist of one cup game and no league games. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about a WP:SPS book. While I could agree that the Patriarchal text is WP:Notable, notability isn't inherited by a WP:SPS from its ancestors. tgeorgescu ( talk) 06:16, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:27, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kursaal. While there is a consensus to redirect, the redirect target may be discussed separately. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Contested prod. Refunded via RFU. Relisting as AFD. Original PROD was: No coverage whatsoever in RS, probably appropriate for a redirect to Doctor Who but fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 02:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:43, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be OR; I can't find mention of this term in any scholarly musical journals; appears to be a trope in legends or mythical stories, nothing related to music. Sourcing used is iffy, most don't appear RS. Oaktree b ( talk) 04:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
07:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to George Town, Penang#Public transportation. ✗ plicit 12:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTTRAVEL. The only example of a hop-on-hop-off article I could find, they are genuinely non-notable Ajf773 ( talk) 10:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. With clear sockpuppet and/or canvassed arguments discounted, the consensus is to delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Already deleted once, Looks non-notable Singer please check over the notability all are paid pieces of a normal cover. I removed one paid PR in Outlook India. Yousuf Ibn Ahmad ( talk) 15:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
To Oaktree b ( talk) Brother I have check all then I proceed for creation. I am alreay contributing lots of Wikipedia here and I know wht is promotion and wht is source news. You should show me a written proof that is paid otherwise stop this discussion. And for your kind info my page alreday review by a Wikipedia administrator. So just removed this deletion tag. Thanks. — Preceding signed comment added by Cinefilestudio ( talk • contribs) 13:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
100% No Oaktree b first if you said it's promotional or publicity then you have to explain or proof it to Wikipedia these source are promotional. I have checked all alsso see source Ibtimes India. And news 18. Or give me a written letter from the any of the news source which you are telling is promotional. Please don't waste further time of mine and wikipedia for this verified person. And close this discussion🙏. Cinefilestudio ( talk) 21:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More input is clearly necessary…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Note: All are notable news media has coverage this artist. If those not are reliable sources then which are? which is not significant coverage? I have found 2 times of India non promotional with news 18 hindi and bengali where the singer is based. Those are much enough significant coverage as per article brief data. And those are judging here to write non of those are clear sources thn pls brief me which is non notable and why with Proof. And which are notable news in india? Also note if this article should be deleted then this artist Santy_Sharma Wikipedia also should be deleted. I check and compare that anurag had much better news source from Santy Sharma. Cinefilestudio ( talk) 18:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Clearly promo, "Anurag Halder became a star from Zee Music's 'Kashtiyaan', now coming soon with his next song" | 1. "Anurag Halder जी म्यूजिक के 'कश्तियां' से बने स्टार, अब जल्द ला रहे अगला सॉन्ग". Zee News (in Hindi). Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo, "The joyous, sparkly and cheerful vibe of the song is perfect for taking a long romantic drive with your partner." | 2. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/news/singer-anurag-halder-happy-to-see-the-overwhelming-response-to-tere-naal/articleshow/99928398.cms |
Promo, interview | 3. ^ Desk, I. B. T. (21 August 2021). "Independent music will always be my first choice of working – Anurag Halder". www.ibtimes.co.in. Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo "Anurag Halder's charms when he forced the students to dance on the song 'Faasla'!" | 4. ^ "Anurag Halder का जलवा, जब Song 'Faasla' पर स्टूडेंट्स को झूमने पर कर दिया मजबूर!". News18 हिंदी (in Hindi). 10 October 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo "Anurag shares his experience at the launch of his new track at a hotel in Gurgaon" | 5. ^ https://www.bhaskar.com/local/delhi-ncr/gurgaon/news/lapadwas-romantic-music-is-very-much-liked-by-the-youth-anurag-halder-129402914.html |
Promo, interview | 6. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/bengali/music/singer-anurag-halder-says-performing-live-gives-him-an-adrenaline-rush/articleshow/100075018.cms |
Clearly promo, "Soak in the sunshine and feel the breeze of love with Lapadva by Anurag Halder" | 7. ^ "Soak in the sunshine and feel the breeze of love with Lapadva by Anurag Halder". |
Duplicate of #1 | 8. ^ "Anurag Halder जी म्यूजिक के 'कश्तियां' से बने स्टार, अब जल्द ला रहे अगला सॉन्ग". Zee News (in Hindi). Retrieved 30 April 2023. |
Clearly promo, "Tere Naal' Is Out Now: Singer Anurag Halder is back with a love song. The song is titled 'Tere Naal' in his voice. The music video is made." | 9. ^ https://bengali.abplive.com/entertainment/love-song-tere-naal-sung-by-anurag-halder-is-out-starring-aishwarya-sen-and-riddhish-chowdhury-976677 |
Clearly promo, "Anurag Halder New Song: Aishwarya-Riddish duet! Anurag Halder's voice released love song 'Tere Naal'" | 10. ^ https://bengali.news18.com/news/entertainment/anurag-halder-new-song-tere-naal-is-out-now-rds-1095572.html |
States they were at an event. | 11. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/city/allahabad/bharatanatyam-enthralls-all-at-iiit-a-cultural-fest/amp_articleshow/96123905.cms |
Clearly promo, "Check Out Latest Hindi 2020 Video Song 'Kashtiya' Sung By Anurag Halder" | 12. ^ https://m.timesofindia.com/videos/entertainment/music/hindi/check-out-latest-hindi-2020-video-song-kashtiya-sung-by-anurag-halder/videoshow/75673864.cms?from=mdr |
The result was draftify. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
The election is not WP:N and relies on WP:FUTURE. Wiki is WP:NOTNEWS and this article is portraying that as it has little news coverage as is.
It is possible that it may become notable in the WP:FUTURE but we have no way of knowing that.
The article has not established individual any notability or and has no reason to be on the mainspace. Grahaml35 ( talk) 05:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:08, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep as is or send to draftspace?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Fails to meet the standards of Wikipedia:Notability 1keyhole ( talk) 07:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable album, part of a promo-ring of articles about the band ( AfD), a movie created by the band producer ( AfD), and three other albums by the same band (all long since redirected), all by same editor (with no other interests). Only sources are extremely local coverage ( this is from the section "in the neighborhood / Hoboken", this newspaper has next to its general coverage also coverage per municipality or like here sub-municipality) because one of the singles raised money for a good cause. It's a British band, released in the Netherlands and worldwide, but got no attention beyond the village of the producer. Note that the album has no 5-star rating from Allmusic, it has one glowing "user" review who gave it 5 stars, which is meaningless. Fram ( talk) 07:13, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Sources have been found. ( non-admin closure) Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 15:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete, fails WP:NOLYMPICS Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 06:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "九○年,這名剛成年的小伙子,加入香港賽艇代表隊,成為全職運動員,先後出征亞運及奧運,... 最後以零點三五秒之差落敗,只得第四名,與獎牌擦身而過,但正正因為零點三五秒的遺憾,讓他領悟更多,成為日後努力的原動力,... 由於政府對運動員資助有限,入不敷支,鍾志樂無奈要向現實低頭,告別短短四年的職業運動員生涯。九六年,他開設體育用品公司,由入貨到送貨一腳踢,但運動從未有離開過他的生命,... 生活營營役役,除了工作,就是練習,試過近六年時間,他一年只放兩天假,卻從不叫苦。... ○五年,鍾志樂的事業已上軌道,兒時回憶再次走入生命,機緣巧合下,他與一眾志同道合的朋友組成龍舟隊,參加本地不同賽事,隨後被邀請加入香港龍舟協會,更當上香港代表隊總教練,"
From Google Translate: "In 1990, this young man who had just grown up joined the Hong Kong Rowing Team and became a full-time athlete. He went to the Asian Games and the Olympics successively. He was defeated by 0.35 seconds and only got fourth place and a medal. Passed by, but precisely because of the regret of 0.35 seconds, he learned more and became the driving force for his future efforts... Due to the limited government funding for athletes and unable to make ends meet, Zhong Zhile had no choice but to bow his head to reality , bid farewell to a short four-year career as a professional athlete. In 1996, he opened a sporting goods company, from the arrival of the goods to the delivery, but sports have never left his life,... Life camp and labor, in addition to work, is to practice, tried nearly six For a year, he only had two days off a year, but he never complained. ... In 20 years, Zhong Zhile's career was on the right track, and childhood memories came to life again. By chance, he formed a dragon boat team with a group of like-minded friends to participate in different local competitions, and was invited to join the Hong Kong Dragon Boat Association. He became the head coach of the Hong Kong team ..."
The article notes: "Olympic canoeist Chung Chi-lok has given up the sport which took him to Barcelona and has instead turned his attention to another water event - rowing. Chung, who took part in the double kayak event at the Olympic Games five months ago with veteran Luk Kwok-sun, stopped canoeing because he felt there was little development of the sport. But, ironically, the Hongkong Canoe Union have still nominated him for the prestigious Coca-Cola Sports Stars Awards. ... Chung went through a series of physiological tests at the HKSI and national rowing coach Chris Perry was so happy with the results that he offered the newcomer a scholarship."
The article notes: "Arnold Chung Chi-lok, chairman of the Hong Kong China Dragon Boat Association, was speaking days after the 2023 World Dragon Boat Racing Championships, which were to be held in Hong Kong next August, were moved to Thailand because of the quarantine rules that apply to all incoming travellers. ... He told the Post that his association wanted to bid to host the 2027 global championships, as well as revive Hong Kong’s annual International Dragon Boat Races. ... Chung intends to resurrect the International Dragon Boat Races, which until its last staging in 2018 attracted around 4,500 participants – but this too relies on an end to quarantine."
The article notes: "“Traditionally, dragon boats and paddles are made from teak and camphorwood and there are three different boat sizes. Today in international races, the stronger fibreglass is used and the boats are standardised in size,” says HKCDBA chairman Arnold Chung Chi Lok."
The article notes: ""It's not enough," said rower Chung Chi-lok. one of the "lucky" athletes to receive a grant. "But rowing is my interest and I want to do it when I am young. You can't expect to be heavily subsidised in Hong Kong." He was disappointed with the size of his grant. Having finished in sixth place in one of the canoeing events at the last Asian Games, he had applied as an elite athlete. "I don't understand why I was given so little," the 22-year-old said. "I was hoping to get $40,000." Chung's daily rowing practice starts at 6.00 am, followed by weightlifting and other physical exercises. For the past year, his life has centred around the institute: "I seldom go out. I go home every two weeks. My life is quite monotonous, but it's worth it. I want to see results from it.""
The article notes from Google Translate: "Zhong Zhile has bid for two international competitions for Hong Kong during his tenure, including the biennial Asian Dragon Boat Championships in 2020, but it was eventually canceled due to the pandemic. He originally expected that it would also be suspended in 2022, and planned to bid for Hong Kong in 2024."
The article notes: "HKCDBA chairman Arnold Chung Chi Lok explains: ... Chung, a former Hong Kong dragon boat team member and coach, says it is no easy feat to paddle in Victoria Harbour."
The article notes from Google Translate: "The World Dragon Boat Championships in August next year will be held in Thailand from Hong Kong. Chung Chi-lok, chairman of the Hong Kong Dragon Boat Federation, said today (September 1) that in the future, more sports competitions will be held in other countries due to Hong Kong’s pandemic prevention policies. ... Chung Chi-lok, chairman of the Hong Kong Dragon Boat Association, said in a radio interview that he regrets that the race could not be held in Hong Kong."
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, no significant coverage Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, only WP:ROUTINE coverage. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:18, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician duo, only WP:ROUTINE coverage Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1988–89 Burnley F.C. season. ✗ plicit 05:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable athlete. Contested PROD. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Not even near the threshold of notability. All sources cover a recent appointment due to her father's position as mayor of North Dhaka. Notability is not inherited and position is not notable. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 04:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:PARTIAL and not enough individual articles to disambiguate. Someone looking for words made up from "-splain" will look for them in Wiktionary and other dictionaries. – Vipz ( talk) 04:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 05:13, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Another contested draft/redirect with zero improvement. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON, but should have been left in draft until enough WP:SIGCOV could be added to show it passes notability requirements. Onel5969 TT me 13:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:22, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The most neutrally written and interesting section Marius Pharmaceuticals#Testosterone and Hypogonadism has nothing to do with the company itself. PROMO and SPA piece ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific analysis of the proposed sources would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Likely to fail WP:NCORP. KH-1 ( talk) 03:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete, without prejudice against re-creation should further secondary sourcing arise. Because of the other issues, it's probably best not to draftify. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 17:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Promotional page, not given any special achivement. ☆★ Sanjeev Kumar ( talk) 19:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Table_1_Authors_singleyr_2021_pubs_since_1788_wopp_extracted_202209.xlsx
, from
[19]). We don't write biographies because people had a good year. We write them to recognize influential careers. I'm inclined towards deletion right now, since nothing is actually standing out as exceptional. Yes, the article was brought to AfD recently, and that might be grounds for a procedural close, but the arguments based on policies and guidelines had some very equivocal language, e.g., I'm not seeing much for quality secondary sources that would really establish notability though, so even with the citation metrics, it still would be possible that this could end up in the delete pile someday.Honestly, a relist might have been better than a close, so I'm fine this time with bringing the page back here. It has also been PROD'ed since then [20], indicating that the consensus in favor of notability is not total. XOR'easter ( talk) 20:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Top 10 citations
|
---|
|
The most typical way of satisfying Criterion 1 is to show that the academic has been an author of highly cited academic work. NPROF even makes the effort to italicize that part. As you have just indicated as well as the source, this BLP subject does not fall under highly cited. If you're going to rely on criteria 1 alone there, it's very clear that the citations need to be exceptional, not just average, and that's been the context here. If we had some decent secondary source coverage, then we could have the combination of current citations + coverage justifying notability, but that isn't this subject currently. The average professor test isn't saying average professors are notable, but instead
When judged against the average impact of a researcher in a given field, does this researcher stand out as clearly more notable or more accomplished?The whole context and spirit of that guideline is that a professor stands out and falls into that highly cited category for their field.
Citation measures such as the h-index, g-index, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. They should be approached with caution because their validity is not, at present, completely accepted, and they may depend substantially on the citation database used. They are also discipline-dependent; some disciplines have higher average citation rates than others.Look through the archives of academics-and-educators AfD's for plenty of examples to see how the guideline is actually applied. Comparing to the averages for the field is absolutely commonplace. XOR'easter ( talk) 14:51, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 03:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
PRODded by Ranadhira ( talk · contribs) with rationale, referring to Rathore dynasty:
There is already a Rathore dynasty page for the historical clan and a surname page for the modern surname. Unnecessary copy of Rathore dynasty
This PROD, and several cleanup edits by the same user, was reverted by page creator Hanshingling ( talk · contribs), a user who claimed to be using a large language model and is now blocked per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruption; and then restored by Re Packer&Tracker ( talk · contribs). – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 17:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced since 2009. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 ( talk) 02:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗ plicit 03:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
"Peoples of the Caucasus" is already a region-based categorization of ethnic groups, so this is basically a list of ethnic groups that inhabit Iran but also happen to inhabit parts of the Caucasus, another region, which is very arbitrary. It's like having an article for "Peoples of Long Island in France" and include Italians, Arabs, and Jews there, because they inhabit both places. There could be a separate article for Caucasian immigrants in Iran with enough historical context, but it has to be named differently. There aren't also any sources that specifically categorize these groups together, if I'm not mistaken. I am also nominating the following page because it has the same problem:
Aintabli ( talk) 02:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable political adviser and pollster. 3 sources (Politico, The Guardian, The Spectator) included in the article are just Johnson's writer bio. Mooonswimmer 01:54, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:GNG with nothing else coming up online. JML1148 ( Talk | Contribs) 07:48, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 01:38, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 01:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
No sourcing, no assertion of notability Orange Mike | Talk 00:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ~Styyx Talk? 10:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Only relies on box office as a source, with no reviews nor other significant coverage found. Does not seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:NF. Tutwakhamoe ( talk) 00:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)