![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 22:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
A article about record chart failing WP:GNG with no WP:SIGCOV. Its chart listing on English Wikipedia is sourced using Facebook and/or Blogspot, both of which are considered as unreliable. The article's citations are majoritively supported by WP:BLOGS, other than I couldn't any reliable sources to proof that it's notable with significant coverage from secondary reliable sources and also independent of the subject. — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 13:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per WP:A7. (non-admin closure) BangJan1999 21:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced BLP, searches come up with mainly educational writer namesakes. Karnataka ( talk) 22:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax/attack article. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable TikToker (?). Beyond mentions in TikTok videos and a subreddit, I could find nothing on him. 0 coverage in RS. ULPS ( talk) 21:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
I created this article before the SNGs were deprecated. Subject earned two caps for the Guinea-Bissau national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Asif Ali (actor). WP:ATD-R. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Amal Neerad. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Anwar Rasheed. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dileesh Pothan. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Only one lead role, nothing else notable. Fails WP:NACTOR.
I am also nominating the following related pages because fails WP:NACTOR.
Film | Role | Notes | Notable |
---|---|---|---|
Karam Dosa | Second lead | Shivakumar Ramachandravarapu has a bigger character. No 2 reliable reviews. | Yes |
Nenosta | Lead | No article. No 2 reliable reviews. | No |
Mahanati | Supporting/cameo | portrayed actor NTR | Yes |
Kudi Yedamaithe | Supporting | Yes |
DareshMohan ( talk) 03:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks "significant coverage" ( WP:ORGDEPTH) in " independent" reliable sources about the organization itself. Also lacks WP:DIVERSE. Sources are mostly sensationalized coverage and routine news surrounding controversies or such statements since its members are celebrities ( WP:INHERITORG). Inherent notability (assumed by media) has resulted in articles about its establishment and objectives and not based on their contributions or impact. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7 Non-admin closure. Vulcan's Forge ( talk) 18:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Only source is a 6 year old article (that I can't access from this neck of the woods anyhow) that is titled "...Gujarat could have an ISL, I-League team soon". My BEFORE can not find anything only the similar named state football team, therefore I thinks the article should be deleted now and re-created if/when a team actually is formed in the future. Josey Wales Parley 20:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Upstairs, Downstairs episodes. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable episode, sources in article are IMDb and a factfile website with plot summaries. BEFORE searches give where to watch and a few passing mentions with brief plot summary when describing the TV series this stems from. Karnataka ( talk) 20:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This article fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. The person is not elected representative, representing government at any level and sources are also scarce. Admantine123 ( talk) 19:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
judges who have held... state/province–wide office.They're a judge on the highest court of a state with 241 million inhabitants, this is an easy keep. TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk) 21:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. All of the current sources are primary, user generated, or otherwise unreliable. I used the WP:VG/S Google searches and found only one reliable source, but at two sentences/paragraphs about the subject it's hardly significant. A more general Google search turned up only the usual primary sources, databases, forums, social media posts, etc. Woodroar ( talk) 19:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to William Robertson Coe. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Only notable through his son. Google and perplexity.ai have nothing. Wire723 ( talk) 18:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Only primary sources provided. No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 11:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
12:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to assess new sources brought up in the deletion discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:47, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Most of the coverage is about the rainbow flag incident which is not WP:SIGCOV about her and would be better placed in the relevant bilateral relations article. LibStar ( talk) 10:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
12:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability(with a long note about what trivial type sources don't help). The sources we have seem to provide that at this point. — siro χ o 22:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as I'm not really seeing significant coverage around the event itself, other than mentions and reports of the fixtures. Fails WP:NRIVALRY as again no significant coverage of the matches. In my opinion, not really suitable for an encyclopedic article as it's only really relevant to Saracens, and reads as WP:FANCRUFT. I suggested a redirect to a specific section on Saracens F.C. but was reverted. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 09:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
References
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails in WP:GNG , WP:BIO Worldiswide ( talk) 03:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:BIO for any biography because the subject of the article doesn't have any notable honours or nominations, no particularly notable contributions, or an entry in any country's national biography. As this biography fails all three points, it is eligible for deletion. All mentions I could find of the subject are trivial: mostly primarily talking about works that he played a part in. I don't see how we could disambig this or merge it, so deletion seems to be the only solution. Grumpylawnchair ( talk) 03:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
*::Keep per Siroxo.
Okoslavia (
talk)
04:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
A restaurant that only gets local coverage/reviews. Would need wider coverage as per WP:AUD to meet GNG or WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 03:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as the article has basically been rewritten since the nomination. Please review new additions to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.WP:AUD is part of WP:NCORP, so the arguments that if fails that do not work for me. Peaceray ( talk) 22:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
[a]t least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source. And based on the abundant other reviews I don't think there's any question that it passes the other elements of NCORP, viz.
ha[ving] been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I don't really see the NOTTRAVEL argument here -- the existing article may have some unencyclopedic bits, but it doesn't seem to me that it is wholly or irreparably unencyclopedic (and TBH I'd guess the overemphasis on reviews probably comes from defensive editing to pass NCORP), so that's more of a cleanup issue. My keep is weak mostly because although the technical requirements of the rules are met, I'm just not presuaded this is the best way to approach this encyclopedically. I'd much rather have a more full-featured List of restaurants in Seattle (or sublists) and merge all these articles there. But as no plausible merge target currently exists and we face a simple question of whether to include encyclopedic information about this restaurant as a standalone article or not at all, I'm not seeing a case for deletion. -- Visviva ( talk) 01:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per sources identified. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
does not pass notability requirements Medarduss ( talk) 16:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CLYDE
TALK TO ME/
STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't
mention me)
18:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTNEWS. Article created as a product of recentism, shown by the fact that there have not been significant updates for over three years. The shipments have not affcted the fuel shortages in Venezuela as a whole, and any important details of the event are already covered in said article or at the Iran-Venezuela relations article. NoonIcarus ( talk) 15:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CLYDE
TALK TO ME/
STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't
mention me)
18:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Notability MrBauer24 ( talk) 18:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
No such proof that China has "invaded" Ukraine. At best this is Crystal ball and propaganda. At worst this is complete and total fake news as this hasn't happened. CaribDigita ( talk) 18:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Addition of separate articles: First Kejriwal ministry, Second Kejriwal ministry, Third Kejriwal ministry & there no separate articles for other Indian chief ministers. DSP2092 talk 16:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. - this should be viewed as a PROD (not quite a BLPPROD). Nosebagbear ( talk) 17:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, the notability test for actors is not satisfied just because the article lists roles, and requires external validation of the significance of his roles through reliable source coverage about him and/or noteworthy acting awards. But the only "reference" cited here at all is a Q&A interview in which he's answering questions about himself in the first person on a non-notable blog, which is not a reliable source or a carrier of notability at all. Bearcat ( talk) 16:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone is interested in working on this page in Draft space, contact me or WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This list is a mere copy of the related category at the time of its creation in 2015 without the subcategories (including American children's novels and other significant omissions), plus some random books since added. No one since my original suggestion in 2015 has made any attempt to improve the page and it has very few page views. Robina Fox ( talk) 15:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Estonian Shipping Company. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since May. No indications of significant coverage in secondary sources after a basic BEFORE search, only primary sources. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 15:39, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus Nosebagbear ( talk) 17:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't get a presumption of notability from WP:NBAD as reaching the final of a 2016 BWF International Series does not meet that criterion. Also worth noting that that tournament only had a semi-final and final so reaching the final is not as impressive as it might seem. More importantly, Skaric needs to comply with WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC to have an article. The current sources fall way short. In my searches, including a Chilean search, I found only trivial mentions in El Deportero, Guyana Times and Stabroek News. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. The sourcing here is not even remotely reliable enough to verify that the topic even really exists in a meaningful sense.. Steven Walling • talk 07:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The concept of "intellectual disability in animals" does not seem to exist. It is not a topic studied in the context of eg veterinary medicine or biology. There are no reliable sources in the article and no such sources could be found or have been provided. See the section Talk:Intellectual_disability_in_animals#Does_the_concept_of_"intellectual_disability"_exist_in_animals? for further discussion. TempusTacet ( talk) 15:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of .hack characters. ✗ plicit 14:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Like Ovan, despite being sourced and well written. This article also mostly build up with trivia articles/sources like passing mentions from games reviews. It has zero WP:SIGCOV. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 14:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment Only good source I could find is this but .hack is not that explored when compared to other RPGs in the West so I guess there is not much else to search. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be completely WP:SYNTH. PepperBeast (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable: out of the sources in the article, neither can contribute to passing WP:GNG (1: database entry, not significant coverage, 2: interview, not independent). During a WP:BEFORE, only one source came up that might satisfy contributing to GNG: [30]. However, this is a local news source with a writer that may possibly be a relative of Lunde's (same last name). Based on this lack of sourcing, I think this fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:NBIO. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Failed judicial nominee that does not pass WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 13:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Failed judicial nominee that does not meet WP:GNG and has a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 13:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable song from a non notable album. This hymm got no hits to significant coverage in reliable sources during my WP:BEFORE. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 13:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Tragic death, but Poraz is not notable. Any relevant and properly sourced information can be included in Abduction and killing of Nachshon Wachsman, where I have added an image of him in the "Search and rescue" section. Mooonswimmer 12:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Topics like this are typically required to meet WP:LASTING, rather than the more liberal standard of WP:GNG, simply because any early death will receive local news coverage that Wikipedia may not be the right place for. Nobody has made a substantive argument that the coverage here passes that standard, and I'll note in passing that NY Post is a deprecated sources. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 11:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
12:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
References provided fail to establish WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC as there is no significant in-depth coverage of Montiel contained within. From the database sources available, WP:NBAD doesn't seem to be met either as her only 'claim' to notability is a runner up in a tournament at the lowest level of the tour, the 2016 BWF Future Series. According to BWF, she only ever won one match, which doesn't give me confidence that WP:SIGCOV can be found. An Argentine source search yields nothing better than what we already have and nor do Google searches. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
All positions that looks political are for the Rotary Club. Available coverages are press releases. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eternal Champion. Discussion and analysis of the sources supports the conclusion that there is insufficient coverage of Erekosë qua Erekosë to justify a standalone article. signed, Rosguill talk 02:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable book character. This appears to be an article fit for Fandom, not Wikipedia. The previous AfD (from 2018) yielded a few book sources but to me this does not appear sufficient for WP:GNG, as they focus on the books rather than the character. All references in the article are to the book series the character appears in. – Muboshgu ( talk) 02:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we have source analysis.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz
Humbug!
07:59, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia treats creative works ... in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works. The reference to these is plot and not encyclopaedic discussion. They are essentially to be discounted as primary sources. So what we have left at this time are the sources raised in the previous AfD. Two of these were found, but the suggestion is that this was a non exhaustive list. If there are more, we should consider them. However, looking at these two we have:
That is Erekosë is identified up front with the Eternal Champion, although it clearly is more involved than that. Yet the nuance is about plot. What the author does not do is to look at Erekosë and discuss the character as a concept, discussing development, design, reception, significane or influence. Rather it is the concept of the Eternal Champion that gains such treatment. Mentions of Erekosë in this work are all about the specific plot element. An example:“he cleverly interwove the otherwise disparate worlds and quests of a whole stable of heroes: Urlik, Erekosë (the Eternal Champion), Corum Jhaelen ...
So here Erekosë, along with John Daker, is the name of the character, and the concept being discussed is the Eternal Champion.“John Daker has not merely gone to bed John Daker and awoken Erekosë, but—as The Eternal Champion’s sequel Phoenix in Obsidian will demonstrate more explicitly—has awoken to his own destiny as the self-conscious embodiment of the Eternal Champion, the occupier of that subject-position who is able to recall his own previous incarnations, and to feel the weight of the endless battles he is constantly reborn to fight.”
The title of the paper is indicative of the content. The paper is discussing the writing of Moorcock, using the concept and sequence of the Eternal Champion as its source material. That Erekosë is the name of the champion is incidental to the thesis of the paper, and, indeed the context of the chosen source material. Per czar, there is no analysis of the specific character of Erekosë here. The mentions are again specifically about plot.Michael Moorcock’s The Eternal Champion (1970) has a simple enough plot. Humans on a parallel Earth call to their aid an eternal champion, Erekosë, to help them rid the world of the Evil Ones, the Eldren
And herein lies a small amount of analysis that is also mirrored in your Black Gate source. Because the reason that Hoey is looking at this book is because, in the character of Erekosë, there is an incarnation of the eternal champion who commits two genocides and yet is not treated as evil. As you say, it is this incarnation that interests Hoey. He is interested in how this is carried off linguistically, but it is relevant to the thesis that Erekosë has done something we would generally be inclined to disapprove of (genocide of the human race). The character's actions are important to his choice of subject material in conducting the analysis. So, to run this through GNG, we have here and below two reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The question is whether they reach the threshold of significance.My interest in this book, however, lies elsewhere, namely in how Moorcock succeeds in portraying a hero who is unremittingly destructive and commits two great acts of genocide and yet does not turn into a villain.
Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.so Hoey is relevant. Yet we are still left with the question as to whether we can write an article that discusses
the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works.These sources are not really enough for that. We have a character and any page on the character is going to be almost all plot, even with these sources. Almost, but not entirely. I expect that Erekosë would better be dealt with on the page of the Eternal Champion, which, as you say, is in poor shape. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
likely won't be covered encyclopedicly here. Daranios ( talk) 10:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Clearly not being deleted but feel arguments to keep on the award are probably going to need a guideline level discussion before they become authoritative given that we do seem to delete quite a lot of the winners. Spartaz Humbug! 07:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Unremarkable former child actor who's only claim seems to be winning a child actor award aged 12. No evidence of further film participation or notability from existing credit. Fails WP:NACTOR. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 06:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because I think some of these comments here are advocating Keeping this article without stating that opinion in BOLD font. The discussion seems to rest on the question, is winning
Bangladesh National Film Award for Best Child Artist enough to establish GNG? Looking over the list on that page of previous winners, my guesstimate is about half of them have Wikipedia articles, likely based on future accomplishments.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
07:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Roman Catholic Diocese of Middlesbrough. The claim to standalone notability has not had much support, and a valid ATD has been proposed and not contested. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP/ WP:SIGCOV. C&P move from draftspace. Kleuske ( talk) 15:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third, final relist for more input
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
06:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO, with all sources online and in the article being either statistics or routine coverage. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 06:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be a WP:BLP1E - shock jock known for one shock incident. BD2412 T 06:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Graduating from college and having a few exhibitions is insufficient to establish notability for an artist. BD2412 T 06:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
No evidence found that this location is or has ever been notable. The article's only citation is to the USGS GNIS verifying that there was once a site with this name. The only other verification I could find was old topographic maps (most recent from 1947) showing the site with that name, absolutely nothing else since then. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 04:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable Greek/American soccer player. A bit difficult to search for as she is overshadowed by the 2000-born USA player. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG and has a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 04:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability or a year - Altenmann >talk 03:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure)
The articles were all put out near the day of the release. They are at the very least press releases and raise doubt on their sponsored/pay to play nature. This browser game does not seem to be notable for anything in particular and the coverage died down right after its release. Kate the mochii ( talk) 03:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to TurboDuo#Marketing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a subject that on the surface would feel like there's a lot of discussion because of how outlandish and honestly petty it was, but in actuality doesn't. After Polygon Man was a surprise in terms of reception I figured I may be wrong and look through sources for Johnny Turbo. However:
Similar outcomes when trying to do web crawls through Kotaku, Polygon, Siliconera, Destructoid, GamesRadar, etc. There's no discussion about this character. The whole point of this extensive WP:BEFORE is to show that despite belief that due to its notoriety as a bad campaign, it's not notable as a subject on its own. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 02:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Slam (magazine). Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
The magazine was the football spinoff of Slam (magazine) but only released one issue more than a decade ago. Instead of deleting, I propose redirecting the article. -- ZooBlazer talk 01:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
I am not able to find any reliable sources or reviews for this film, other than profiles. Upper Deck Guy ( talk) 02:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
widespread and consistentper the guideline. Likewise, movieXclusive has no clear staff page or detailed editorial policies, and USEBYOTHERS is even weaker (based on Google/Google Books at least). Otherwise I'm unable to find sufficient sources and will probably vote weak delete later, but I'm aware of the language barrier here and might take another look again at TWL and Baidu to find sources if I have energy for that.I had another look and was unable to find sufficient sources, and remain unconvinced on the reliability of existing reviews. However, I am not proficient at Chinese or Cantonese and had to rely heavily on the unreliable Google Translate, so on the balance this is a Weak Delete . Siroxo and Mushy Yank, if you find more sources please ping me. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 10:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC) Updated on 22:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
clear-cut reliable sources, in the sense of addressing every possible concern. Adjudicating the fine points of reliability is not something the AFD process is really suited for; we have a whole separate board for that. As we are assembled here to decide whether an article should be deleted, as a rule, any genuine doubts about the appropriateness of deletion should be resolved against deletion. (2) To the extent the existence of an article on the Cantonese Wikipedia weighs at all, it should be in favor of retention, since it shows that an independent community of editors who share our encyclopedic purpose decided that this was worthy of an article. I would consider that one of various secondary indicia of notability here, along with the existence of a Baidu article. (3) An awful lot of content from 2007 is nowhere to be found today (or is buried UnGoogleably behind paywalls) (or was never online to begin with), so I don't think our difficult in locating clear-cut RS reviews is likely to indicate their actual absence. In sum, as there doesn't seem to be any real problem with verifiability or encyclopedicity, and especially as there is at least a prima facie case that the GNG is met, I think the balance of considerations weighs in favor of retention here. -- Visviva ( talk) 02:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "由陳德森監製、李伯達執導的新片「鬼計」昨天在香港開鏡,參與演出的演員包括曾志偉的兒子曾國祥、尹子維、谷祖琳也參加開鏡儀式,陳德森解釋,雖然片名是「鬼計」,但其實是一部驚悚懸疑片。... 「鬼計」雖然昨天開鏡,其實早已拍攝四天 ... 在「鬼計」裡,曾國祥飾演靈異節目的導演,因為收視跌到谷底,被尹子維飾演的監製譏笑,為了突破收視率,曾國祥找來自殺未遂人士上節目表演各種自殺方法,雖然收視告捷,卻引來更多危機。「鬼計」的劇本很有創意,光是構思自殺方式,就讓編劇想破頭,還得忙著四處蒐集資料。"
From Google Translate: "Produced by Teddy Chan and directed by Xavier Lee, the new film Dead Air opened shooting in Hong Kong yesterday. The actors involved in the performance include Eric Tsang's son Derek Tsang, Terence Yin, and Jo Kuk who also participated in the opening ceremony. Teddy Chan explained that although the title of the film is "Dead Air", it is actually a thriller and suspense film. ... Although Dead Air started filming yesterday, it has already been filmed for four days... In Dead Air, Derek Tsang plays the director of a supernatural show. Because the ratings fell to the bottom, he was ridiculed by the producer played by Terence Yin. In order to break through the ratings, Derek Tsang recruited suicide attempters to perform various suicide methods on the show. Although the ratings were successful, it caused more crises. The script of "Dead Air" is very creative. Just thinking about the method of suicide made the screenwriter want to break his head, and he was busy collecting information everywhere."
The article notes: "由陳德森導演的電影《鬼計》昨舉行開鏡拜神儀式,出席演員包括曾國祥、黎耀祥、谷祖琳、黃浩 然、謝雪心及尹子維等,影片將在衛視電影台獨家首播。 曾國祥在片中飾演一名電視台導演,由於這是他首次擔正演出,加上稍後還要拍劉國昌執導的 ..."
From Google Translate: "The film Dead Air directed by Xavier Lee held a shooting worship ceremony yesterday, attended by actors including Zeng Guoxiang, Li Yaoxiang, Gu Zulin, Huang Hao Ran, Xie Xuexin and Yin Ziwei, etc., the film will exclusively premiere on Satellite TV Movie Channel. Zeng Guoxiang played the role of a TV director in the film, because this is his first performance, and he will be filming the film directed by Liu Guochang later."
The article notes: "另外,唐寧在片中首次扮演大肚女鬼,更要駁長發演出。甚少拍鬼片的她,雖然相信世界上有鬼但卻不會太驚,相信不刻意去想及拜過神便沒問題,而且媽咪也會為她祈禱。幸而故事環繞在電視台發生,不用去偏僻恐怖地方拍攝。而她雖聽過電視台不少怪異事,卻從未遇過怪事。至於拍鬼片經驗較多的谷祖琳,今次乃飾演電視台監製,是女版俞琤,故沒有感情線。"
From Google Translate: "In addition, Tang Ning played the female ghost with a belly for the first time in the film, and she even had to cut her long hair. She seldom makes ghost films, although she believes that there are ghosts in the world, she will not be too shocked. She believes that it will be fine if she does not deliberately think about it and worship God, and her mother will pray for her. Fortunately, the story revolves around the TV station, and there is no need to go to remote and scary places to shoot. And although she has heard many weird things on TV, she has never encountered any strange things. As for Gu Zulin, who has more experience in making ghost films, this time she plays the role of a TV station producer. She is the female version of Yu Teng, so there is no emotional line."
The article notes: "唐寧在戲中飾演大肚女鬼,首次擔演女鬼的她,駁了一頭長發配合角色。 ... 唐寧日前在郊區拍攝被殺後,曾國祥為她接生的一幕戲,場面很恐怖血腥,其餘大部分場景則在電影台內拍攝 ... 首次擔正的曾國祥日前在郊外拍攝,大髀內側慘被蚊狂叮 ..."
From Google Translate: "Tang Ning played the female ghost with a big belly in the play. It was her first time to play the role of a female ghost, and she parted her long hair to match the role. ... A few days ago, Tang Ning filmed the scene where Zeng Guoxiang delivered her baby after she was killed in the suburbs. The scene was horrific and bloody. Most of the other scenes were filmed in the movie station. ... Zeng Guoxiang, who took the lead for the first time, was filming in the suburbs a few days ago, and the inside of his big thigh was bitten by mosquitoes."
The article notes: "唐寧、谷祖琳、曾國祥及尹子維等昨日齊到清水灣,參與新片《鬼計》開鏡拜神儀式。唐寧飾演腹 大便便的女鬼,日前還拍攝一場血淋淋的生仔戲份,"
From Google Translate: "Tang Ning, Gu Zulin, Zeng Guoxiang and Yin Ziwei all came to Clear Water Bay yesterday to participate in the opening ceremony of the new film "Dead Air". Tang Ning played the female ghost with a belly poop, and she also filmed a bloody birth scene a few days ago,"
The article notes: "飾演女鬼的唐寧透露,該片已拍攝了多天,她謂第一場拍攝的戲份便是由曾國祥替她接生BB"
From Google Translate: "Tang Ning, who played the female ghost for the first time, revealed that the film has been filming for several days. She said that Zeng Guoxiang delivered her baby in the first filming scene BB"
The article notes: "戲中唐寧與曾國祥有一段感情戲,而唐寧更首次要駁長發扮演女鬼,自言甚少拍鬼片的她相信世界上是有鬼的,記者問她是否害怕拍這類型的戲時,她答道:「《鬼計》故事主要描述電視台發生的怪事,我喺電視台就冇遇過鬼怪事,不過聽聞過好多怪異事件,我相信唔刻意去諗,同埋拜過神會無問題嘅,而且媽咪都會幫我祈禱,所以都唔會太驚嘅。 」"
From Google Translate: "In the film, Tang Ning and Zeng Guoxiang had a relationship scene, and Tang Ning even refuted long-haired female ghost for the first time. She said that she seldom made ghost films and believed that there are ghosts in the world. When the reporter asked her if she was afraid of filming this type of scene , she replied: "The story of "Dead Air" mainly describes the strange things that happened on the TV station. I have never encountered ghosts and strange things on the TV station, but I have heard of many strange things. Yes, and Mommy will help me pray, so I won’t be too surprised.”"
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a how-to guide that seems more appropriate for a project like Wikiversity. However, how-to guides on home theaters seem like they might be off-topic for that project, too, so I'm bringing it up for discussion to see if there's a better home for this. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Article I created in 2008 before I understood that the presumption of notability in NFOOTBALL ultimately required compliance with WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage available; just routine match reports and contract announcements like this. Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney ( talk) 00:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Narada Productions. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NALBUM. Only source is associated with label. Answers.com 'source' is inexplicable, really. Not a notable compilation. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
00:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!*
00:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bill Goldberg. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTV. No SIGCOV, only a few passing mentions. 〜 Festucalex • talk 05:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
00:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!*
00:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 22:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
A article about record chart failing WP:GNG with no WP:SIGCOV. Its chart listing on English Wikipedia is sourced using Facebook and/or Blogspot, both of which are considered as unreliable. The article's citations are majoritively supported by WP:BLOGS, other than I couldn't any reliable sources to proof that it's notable with significant coverage from secondary reliable sources and also independent of the subject. — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 13:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per WP:A7. (non-admin closure) BangJan1999 21:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced BLP, searches come up with mainly educational writer namesakes. Karnataka ( talk) 22:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax/attack article. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable TikToker (?). Beyond mentions in TikTok videos and a subreddit, I could find nothing on him. 0 coverage in RS. ULPS ( talk) 21:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
I created this article before the SNGs were deprecated. Subject earned two caps for the Guinea-Bissau national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Asif Ali (actor). WP:ATD-R. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 20:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Amal Neerad. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Anwar Rasheed. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dileesh Pothan. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks significant coverage in "independent" reliable sources about the company itself. No inherent notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage won't count. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Only one lead role, nothing else notable. Fails WP:NACTOR.
I am also nominating the following related pages because fails WP:NACTOR.
Film | Role | Notes | Notable |
---|---|---|---|
Karam Dosa | Second lead | Shivakumar Ramachandravarapu has a bigger character. No 2 reliable reviews. | Yes |
Nenosta | Lead | No article. No 2 reliable reviews. | No |
Mahanati | Supporting/cameo | portrayed actor NTR | Yes |
Kudi Yedamaithe | Supporting | Yes |
DareshMohan ( talk) 03:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, lacks "significant coverage" ( WP:ORGDEPTH) in " independent" reliable sources about the organization itself. Also lacks WP:DIVERSE. Sources are mostly sensationalized coverage and routine news surrounding controversies or such statements since its members are celebrities ( WP:INHERITORG). Inherent notability (assumed by media) has resulted in articles about its establishment and objectives and not based on their contributions or impact. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 20:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7 Non-admin closure. Vulcan's Forge ( talk) 18:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Only source is a 6 year old article (that I can't access from this neck of the woods anyhow) that is titled "...Gujarat could have an ISL, I-League team soon". My BEFORE can not find anything only the similar named state football team, therefore I thinks the article should be deleted now and re-created if/when a team actually is formed in the future. Josey Wales Parley 20:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Upstairs, Downstairs episodes. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable episode, sources in article are IMDb and a factfile website with plot summaries. BEFORE searches give where to watch and a few passing mentions with brief plot summary when describing the TV series this stems from. Karnataka ( talk) 20:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This article fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. The person is not elected representative, representing government at any level and sources are also scarce. Admantine123 ( talk) 19:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
judges who have held... state/province–wide office.They're a judge on the highest court of a state with 241 million inhabitants, this is an easy keep. TulsaPoliticsFan ( talk) 21:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. All of the current sources are primary, user generated, or otherwise unreliable. I used the WP:VG/S Google searches and found only one reliable source, but at two sentences/paragraphs about the subject it's hardly significant. A more general Google search turned up only the usual primary sources, databases, forums, social media posts, etc. Woodroar ( talk) 19:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to William Robertson Coe. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Only notable through his son. Google and perplexity.ai have nothing. Wire723 ( talk) 18:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Only primary sources provided. No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 11:22, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
12:24, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to assess new sources brought up in the deletion discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:47, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Most of the coverage is about the rainbow flag incident which is not WP:SIGCOV about her and would be better placed in the relevant bilateral relations article. LibStar ( talk) 10:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
12:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability(with a long note about what trivial type sources don't help). The sources we have seem to provide that at this point. — siro χ o 22:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as I'm not really seeing significant coverage around the event itself, other than mentions and reports of the fixtures. Fails WP:NRIVALRY as again no significant coverage of the matches. In my opinion, not really suitable for an encyclopedic article as it's only really relevant to Saracens, and reads as WP:FANCRUFT. I suggested a redirect to a specific section on Saracens F.C. but was reverted. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 09:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
References
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails in WP:GNG , WP:BIO Worldiswide ( talk) 03:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:BIO for any biography because the subject of the article doesn't have any notable honours or nominations, no particularly notable contributions, or an entry in any country's national biography. As this biography fails all three points, it is eligible for deletion. All mentions I could find of the subject are trivial: mostly primarily talking about works that he played a part in. I don't see how we could disambig this or merge it, so deletion seems to be the only solution. Grumpylawnchair ( talk) 03:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
*::Keep per Siroxo.
Okoslavia (
talk)
04:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:04, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
A restaurant that only gets local coverage/reviews. Would need wider coverage as per WP:AUD to meet GNG or WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 03:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as the article has basically been rewritten since the nomination. Please review new additions to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.WP:AUD is part of WP:NCORP, so the arguments that if fails that do not work for me. Peaceray ( talk) 22:58, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
[a]t least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source. And based on the abundant other reviews I don't think there's any question that it passes the other elements of NCORP, viz.
ha[ving] been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I don't really see the NOTTRAVEL argument here -- the existing article may have some unencyclopedic bits, but it doesn't seem to me that it is wholly or irreparably unencyclopedic (and TBH I'd guess the overemphasis on reviews probably comes from defensive editing to pass NCORP), so that's more of a cleanup issue. My keep is weak mostly because although the technical requirements of the rules are met, I'm just not presuaded this is the best way to approach this encyclopedically. I'd much rather have a more full-featured List of restaurants in Seattle (or sublists) and merge all these articles there. But as no plausible merge target currently exists and we face a simple question of whether to include encyclopedic information about this restaurant as a standalone article or not at all, I'm not seeing a case for deletion. -- Visviva ( talk) 01:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep per sources identified. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:24, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
does not pass notability requirements Medarduss ( talk) 16:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CLYDE
TALK TO ME/
STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't
mention me)
18:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTNEWS. Article created as a product of recentism, shown by the fact that there have not been significant updates for over three years. The shipments have not affcted the fuel shortages in Venezuela as a whole, and any important details of the event are already covered in said article or at the Iran-Venezuela relations article. NoonIcarus ( talk) 15:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CLYDE
TALK TO ME/
STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't
mention me)
18:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Notability MrBauer24 ( talk) 18:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
No such proof that China has "invaded" Ukraine. At best this is Crystal ball and propaganda. At worst this is complete and total fake news as this hasn't happened. CaribDigita ( talk) 18:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Addition of separate articles: First Kejriwal ministry, Second Kejriwal ministry, Third Kejriwal ministry & there no separate articles for other Indian chief ministers. DSP2092 talk 16:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. - this should be viewed as a PROD (not quite a BLPPROD). Nosebagbear ( talk) 17:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor, not properly sourced as passing WP:NACTOR. As always, the notability test for actors is not satisfied just because the article lists roles, and requires external validation of the significance of his roles through reliable source coverage about him and/or noteworthy acting awards. But the only "reference" cited here at all is a Q&A interview in which he's answering questions about himself in the first person on a non-notable blog, which is not a reliable source or a carrier of notability at all. Bearcat ( talk) 16:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone is interested in working on this page in Draft space, contact me or WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This list is a mere copy of the related category at the time of its creation in 2015 without the subcategories (including American children's novels and other significant omissions), plus some random books since added. No one since my original suggestion in 2015 has made any attempt to improve the page and it has very few page views. Robina Fox ( talk) 15:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Estonian Shipping Company. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since May. No indications of significant coverage in secondary sources after a basic BEFORE search, only primary sources. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 15:39, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus Nosebagbear ( talk) 17:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't get a presumption of notability from WP:NBAD as reaching the final of a 2016 BWF International Series does not meet that criterion. Also worth noting that that tournament only had a semi-final and final so reaching the final is not as impressive as it might seem. More importantly, Skaric needs to comply with WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC to have an article. The current sources fall way short. In my searches, including a Chilean search, I found only trivial mentions in El Deportero, Guyana Times and Stabroek News. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. The sourcing here is not even remotely reliable enough to verify that the topic even really exists in a meaningful sense.. Steven Walling • talk 07:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The concept of "intellectual disability in animals" does not seem to exist. It is not a topic studied in the context of eg veterinary medicine or biology. There are no reliable sources in the article and no such sources could be found or have been provided. See the section Talk:Intellectual_disability_in_animals#Does_the_concept_of_"intellectual_disability"_exist_in_animals? for further discussion. TempusTacet ( talk) 15:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of .hack characters. ✗ plicit 14:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Like Ovan, despite being sourced and well written. This article also mostly build up with trivia articles/sources like passing mentions from games reviews. It has zero WP:SIGCOV. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 14:42, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment Only good source I could find is this but .hack is not that explored when compared to other RPGs in the West so I guess there is not much else to search. Tintor2 ( talk) 22:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be completely WP:SYNTH. PepperBeast (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable: out of the sources in the article, neither can contribute to passing WP:GNG (1: database entry, not significant coverage, 2: interview, not independent). During a WP:BEFORE, only one source came up that might satisfy contributing to GNG: [30]. However, this is a local news source with a writer that may possibly be a relative of Lunde's (same last name). Based on this lack of sourcing, I think this fails WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:NBIO. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Failed judicial nominee that does not pass WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 13:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Failed judicial nominee that does not meet WP:GNG and has a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 13:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:07, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable song from a non notable album. This hymm got no hits to significant coverage in reliable sources during my WP:BEFORE. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONG. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 13:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Tragic death, but Poraz is not notable. Any relevant and properly sourced information can be included in Abduction and killing of Nachshon Wachsman, where I have added an image of him in the "Search and rescue" section. Mooonswimmer 12:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Topics like this are typically required to meet WP:LASTING, rather than the more liberal standard of WP:GNG, simply because any early death will receive local news coverage that Wikipedia may not be the right place for. Nobody has made a substantive argument that the coverage here passes that standard, and I'll note in passing that NY Post is a deprecated sources. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:18, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 11:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
12:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
References provided fail to establish WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC as there is no significant in-depth coverage of Montiel contained within. From the database sources available, WP:NBAD doesn't seem to be met either as her only 'claim' to notability is a runner up in a tournament at the lowest level of the tour, the 2016 BWF Future Series. According to BWF, she only ever won one match, which doesn't give me confidence that WP:SIGCOV can be found. An Argentine source search yields nothing better than what we already have and nor do Google searches. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:16, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
All positions that looks political are for the Rotary Club. Available coverages are press releases. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 10:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eternal Champion. Discussion and analysis of the sources supports the conclusion that there is insufficient coverage of Erekosë qua Erekosë to justify a standalone article. signed, Rosguill talk 02:20, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable book character. This appears to be an article fit for Fandom, not Wikipedia. The previous AfD (from 2018) yielded a few book sources but to me this does not appear sufficient for WP:GNG, as they focus on the books rather than the character. All references in the article are to the book series the character appears in. – Muboshgu ( talk) 02:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we have source analysis.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz
Humbug!
07:59, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia treats creative works ... in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works. The reference to these is plot and not encyclopaedic discussion. They are essentially to be discounted as primary sources. So what we have left at this time are the sources raised in the previous AfD. Two of these were found, but the suggestion is that this was a non exhaustive list. If there are more, we should consider them. However, looking at these two we have:
That is Erekosë is identified up front with the Eternal Champion, although it clearly is more involved than that. Yet the nuance is about plot. What the author does not do is to look at Erekosë and discuss the character as a concept, discussing development, design, reception, significane or influence. Rather it is the concept of the Eternal Champion that gains such treatment. Mentions of Erekosë in this work are all about the specific plot element. An example:“he cleverly interwove the otherwise disparate worlds and quests of a whole stable of heroes: Urlik, Erekosë (the Eternal Champion), Corum Jhaelen ...
So here Erekosë, along with John Daker, is the name of the character, and the concept being discussed is the Eternal Champion.“John Daker has not merely gone to bed John Daker and awoken Erekosë, but—as The Eternal Champion’s sequel Phoenix in Obsidian will demonstrate more explicitly—has awoken to his own destiny as the self-conscious embodiment of the Eternal Champion, the occupier of that subject-position who is able to recall his own previous incarnations, and to feel the weight of the endless battles he is constantly reborn to fight.”
The title of the paper is indicative of the content. The paper is discussing the writing of Moorcock, using the concept and sequence of the Eternal Champion as its source material. That Erekosë is the name of the champion is incidental to the thesis of the paper, and, indeed the context of the chosen source material. Per czar, there is no analysis of the specific character of Erekosë here. The mentions are again specifically about plot.Michael Moorcock’s The Eternal Champion (1970) has a simple enough plot. Humans on a parallel Earth call to their aid an eternal champion, Erekosë, to help them rid the world of the Evil Ones, the Eldren
And herein lies a small amount of analysis that is also mirrored in your Black Gate source. Because the reason that Hoey is looking at this book is because, in the character of Erekosë, there is an incarnation of the eternal champion who commits two genocides and yet is not treated as evil. As you say, it is this incarnation that interests Hoey. He is interested in how this is carried off linguistically, but it is relevant to the thesis that Erekosë has done something we would generally be inclined to disapprove of (genocide of the human race). The character's actions are important to his choice of subject material in conducting the analysis. So, to run this through GNG, we have here and below two reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The question is whether they reach the threshold of significance.My interest in this book, however, lies elsewhere, namely in how Moorcock succeeds in portraying a hero who is unremittingly destructive and commits two great acts of genocide and yet does not turn into a villain.
Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.so Hoey is relevant. Yet we are still left with the question as to whether we can write an article that discusses
the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works.These sources are not really enough for that. We have a character and any page on the character is going to be almost all plot, even with these sources. Almost, but not entirely. I expect that Erekosë would better be dealt with on the page of the Eternal Champion, which, as you say, is in poor shape. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:08, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
likely won't be covered encyclopedicly here. Daranios ( talk) 10:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Clearly not being deleted but feel arguments to keep on the award are probably going to need a guideline level discussion before they become authoritative given that we do seem to delete quite a lot of the winners. Spartaz Humbug! 07:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Unremarkable former child actor who's only claim seems to be winning a child actor award aged 12. No evidence of further film participation or notability from existing credit. Fails WP:NACTOR. Bungle ( talk • contribs) 06:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because I think some of these comments here are advocating Keeping this article without stating that opinion in BOLD font. The discussion seems to rest on the question, is winning
Bangladesh National Film Award for Best Child Artist enough to establish GNG? Looking over the list on that page of previous winners, my guesstimate is about half of them have Wikipedia articles, likely based on future accomplishments.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:44, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
07:02, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Roman Catholic Diocese of Middlesbrough. The claim to standalone notability has not had much support, and a valid ATD has been proposed and not contested. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:11, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP/ WP:SIGCOV. C&P move from draftspace. Kleuske ( talk) 15:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third, final relist for more input
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
06:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO, with all sources online and in the article being either statistics or routine coverage. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 06:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be a WP:BLP1E - shock jock known for one shock incident. BD2412 T 06:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Graduating from college and having a few exhibitions is insufficient to establish notability for an artist. BD2412 T 06:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
No evidence found that this location is or has ever been notable. The article's only citation is to the USGS GNIS verifying that there was once a site with this name. The only other verification I could find was old topographic maps (most recent from 1947) showing the site with that name, absolutely nothing else since then. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 04:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable Greek/American soccer player. A bit difficult to search for as she is overshadowed by the 2000-born USA player. Natg 19 ( talk) 04:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG and has a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 04:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability or a year - Altenmann >talk 03:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure)
The articles were all put out near the day of the release. They are at the very least press releases and raise doubt on their sponsored/pay to play nature. This browser game does not seem to be notable for anything in particular and the coverage died down right after its release. Kate the mochii ( talk) 03:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to TurboDuo#Marketing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a subject that on the surface would feel like there's a lot of discussion because of how outlandish and honestly petty it was, but in actuality doesn't. After Polygon Man was a surprise in terms of reception I figured I may be wrong and look through sources for Johnny Turbo. However:
Similar outcomes when trying to do web crawls through Kotaku, Polygon, Siliconera, Destructoid, GamesRadar, etc. There's no discussion about this character. The whole point of this extensive WP:BEFORE is to show that despite belief that due to its notoriety as a bad campaign, it's not notable as a subject on its own. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 02:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Slam (magazine). Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
The magazine was the football spinoff of Slam (magazine) but only released one issue more than a decade ago. Instead of deleting, I propose redirecting the article. -- ZooBlazer talk 01:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
I am not able to find any reliable sources or reviews for this film, other than profiles. Upper Deck Guy ( talk) 02:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:32, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
widespread and consistentper the guideline. Likewise, movieXclusive has no clear staff page or detailed editorial policies, and USEBYOTHERS is even weaker (based on Google/Google Books at least). Otherwise I'm unable to find sufficient sources and will probably vote weak delete later, but I'm aware of the language barrier here and might take another look again at TWL and Baidu to find sources if I have energy for that.I had another look and was unable to find sufficient sources, and remain unconvinced on the reliability of existing reviews. However, I am not proficient at Chinese or Cantonese and had to rely heavily on the unreliable Google Translate, so on the balance this is a Weak Delete . Siroxo and Mushy Yank, if you find more sources please ping me. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 10:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC) Updated on 22:33, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
clear-cut reliable sources, in the sense of addressing every possible concern. Adjudicating the fine points of reliability is not something the AFD process is really suited for; we have a whole separate board for that. As we are assembled here to decide whether an article should be deleted, as a rule, any genuine doubts about the appropriateness of deletion should be resolved against deletion. (2) To the extent the existence of an article on the Cantonese Wikipedia weighs at all, it should be in favor of retention, since it shows that an independent community of editors who share our encyclopedic purpose decided that this was worthy of an article. I would consider that one of various secondary indicia of notability here, along with the existence of a Baidu article. (3) An awful lot of content from 2007 is nowhere to be found today (or is buried UnGoogleably behind paywalls) (or was never online to begin with), so I don't think our difficult in locating clear-cut RS reviews is likely to indicate their actual absence. In sum, as there doesn't seem to be any real problem with verifiability or encyclopedicity, and especially as there is at least a prima facie case that the GNG is met, I think the balance of considerations weighs in favor of retention here. -- Visviva ( talk) 02:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "由陳德森監製、李伯達執導的新片「鬼計」昨天在香港開鏡,參與演出的演員包括曾志偉的兒子曾國祥、尹子維、谷祖琳也參加開鏡儀式,陳德森解釋,雖然片名是「鬼計」,但其實是一部驚悚懸疑片。... 「鬼計」雖然昨天開鏡,其實早已拍攝四天 ... 在「鬼計」裡,曾國祥飾演靈異節目的導演,因為收視跌到谷底,被尹子維飾演的監製譏笑,為了突破收視率,曾國祥找來自殺未遂人士上節目表演各種自殺方法,雖然收視告捷,卻引來更多危機。「鬼計」的劇本很有創意,光是構思自殺方式,就讓編劇想破頭,還得忙著四處蒐集資料。"
From Google Translate: "Produced by Teddy Chan and directed by Xavier Lee, the new film Dead Air opened shooting in Hong Kong yesterday. The actors involved in the performance include Eric Tsang's son Derek Tsang, Terence Yin, and Jo Kuk who also participated in the opening ceremony. Teddy Chan explained that although the title of the film is "Dead Air", it is actually a thriller and suspense film. ... Although Dead Air started filming yesterday, it has already been filmed for four days... In Dead Air, Derek Tsang plays the director of a supernatural show. Because the ratings fell to the bottom, he was ridiculed by the producer played by Terence Yin. In order to break through the ratings, Derek Tsang recruited suicide attempters to perform various suicide methods on the show. Although the ratings were successful, it caused more crises. The script of "Dead Air" is very creative. Just thinking about the method of suicide made the screenwriter want to break his head, and he was busy collecting information everywhere."
The article notes: "由陳德森導演的電影《鬼計》昨舉行開鏡拜神儀式,出席演員包括曾國祥、黎耀祥、谷祖琳、黃浩 然、謝雪心及尹子維等,影片將在衛視電影台獨家首播。 曾國祥在片中飾演一名電視台導演,由於這是他首次擔正演出,加上稍後還要拍劉國昌執導的 ..."
From Google Translate: "The film Dead Air directed by Xavier Lee held a shooting worship ceremony yesterday, attended by actors including Zeng Guoxiang, Li Yaoxiang, Gu Zulin, Huang Hao Ran, Xie Xuexin and Yin Ziwei, etc., the film will exclusively premiere on Satellite TV Movie Channel. Zeng Guoxiang played the role of a TV director in the film, because this is his first performance, and he will be filming the film directed by Liu Guochang later."
The article notes: "另外,唐寧在片中首次扮演大肚女鬼,更要駁長發演出。甚少拍鬼片的她,雖然相信世界上有鬼但卻不會太驚,相信不刻意去想及拜過神便沒問題,而且媽咪也會為她祈禱。幸而故事環繞在電視台發生,不用去偏僻恐怖地方拍攝。而她雖聽過電視台不少怪異事,卻從未遇過怪事。至於拍鬼片經驗較多的谷祖琳,今次乃飾演電視台監製,是女版俞琤,故沒有感情線。"
From Google Translate: "In addition, Tang Ning played the female ghost with a belly for the first time in the film, and she even had to cut her long hair. She seldom makes ghost films, although she believes that there are ghosts in the world, she will not be too shocked. She believes that it will be fine if she does not deliberately think about it and worship God, and her mother will pray for her. Fortunately, the story revolves around the TV station, and there is no need to go to remote and scary places to shoot. And although she has heard many weird things on TV, she has never encountered any strange things. As for Gu Zulin, who has more experience in making ghost films, this time she plays the role of a TV station producer. She is the female version of Yu Teng, so there is no emotional line."
The article notes: "唐寧在戲中飾演大肚女鬼,首次擔演女鬼的她,駁了一頭長發配合角色。 ... 唐寧日前在郊區拍攝被殺後,曾國祥為她接生的一幕戲,場面很恐怖血腥,其餘大部分場景則在電影台內拍攝 ... 首次擔正的曾國祥日前在郊外拍攝,大髀內側慘被蚊狂叮 ..."
From Google Translate: "Tang Ning played the female ghost with a big belly in the play. It was her first time to play the role of a female ghost, and she parted her long hair to match the role. ... A few days ago, Tang Ning filmed the scene where Zeng Guoxiang delivered her baby after she was killed in the suburbs. The scene was horrific and bloody. Most of the other scenes were filmed in the movie station. ... Zeng Guoxiang, who took the lead for the first time, was filming in the suburbs a few days ago, and the inside of his big thigh was bitten by mosquitoes."
The article notes: "唐寧、谷祖琳、曾國祥及尹子維等昨日齊到清水灣,參與新片《鬼計》開鏡拜神儀式。唐寧飾演腹 大便便的女鬼,日前還拍攝一場血淋淋的生仔戲份,"
From Google Translate: "Tang Ning, Gu Zulin, Zeng Guoxiang and Yin Ziwei all came to Clear Water Bay yesterday to participate in the opening ceremony of the new film "Dead Air". Tang Ning played the female ghost with a belly poop, and she also filmed a bloody birth scene a few days ago,"
The article notes: "飾演女鬼的唐寧透露,該片已拍攝了多天,她謂第一場拍攝的戲份便是由曾國祥替她接生BB"
From Google Translate: "Tang Ning, who played the female ghost for the first time, revealed that the film has been filming for several days. She said that Zeng Guoxiang delivered her baby in the first filming scene BB"
The article notes: "戲中唐寧與曾國祥有一段感情戲,而唐寧更首次要駁長發扮演女鬼,自言甚少拍鬼片的她相信世界上是有鬼的,記者問她是否害怕拍這類型的戲時,她答道:「《鬼計》故事主要描述電視台發生的怪事,我喺電視台就冇遇過鬼怪事,不過聽聞過好多怪異事件,我相信唔刻意去諗,同埋拜過神會無問題嘅,而且媽咪都會幫我祈禱,所以都唔會太驚嘅。 」"
From Google Translate: "In the film, Tang Ning and Zeng Guoxiang had a relationship scene, and Tang Ning even refuted long-haired female ghost for the first time. She said that she seldom made ghost films and believed that there are ghosts in the world. When the reporter asked her if she was afraid of filming this type of scene , she replied: "The story of "Dead Air" mainly describes the strange things that happened on the TV station. I have never encountered ghosts and strange things on the TV station, but I have heard of many strange things. Yes, and Mommy will help me pray, so I won’t be too surprised.”"
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
This is a how-to guide that seems more appropriate for a project like Wikiversity. However, how-to guides on home theaters seem like they might be off-topic for that project, too, so I'm bringing it up for discussion to see if there's a better home for this. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Article I created in 2008 before I understood that the presumption of notability in NFOOTBALL ultimately required compliance with WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage available; just routine match reports and contract announcements like this. Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney ( talk) 00:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Narada Productions. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NALBUM. Only source is associated with label. Answers.com 'source' is inexplicable, really. Not a notable compilation. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 20:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
00:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!*
00:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bill Goldberg. Liz Read! Talk! 04:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTV. No SIGCOV, only a few passing mentions. 〜 Festucalex • talk 05:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
00:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!*
00:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)