![]() |
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Art collective long tagged for notability-was up for a AFD late last year and was voted no consensus. Wgolf ( talk) 23:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Am slightly perturbed as to why User:Sukhvirlam has used the seemingly fake signature FrankUnderwood12 on their keep !vote but it doesn't change the outcome. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Explicitly states that the album release is "rumored". Smileguy91 Spread the knowledge! 01:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 23:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Obscure show with no refs or even notability at all.
All the Google hits I got were wiki links even.
Wgolf (
talk) 23:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Withdraw-This has to be a record for the quickest withdraw. Anyway as it turns out there is a alternate English title that was on the side bar that was not linked here
The Taste of Life-which I'm going to create a redirect for. Well sorry about that!
Wgolf (
talk)
23:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. The Snowager -is awake 13:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
I put a csd up-but this is nto a real show and a hoax-surprise it has been around this long! Wgolf ( talk) 22:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete as hoax. Basically inconceivable that a new series, supposedly around for over a year on the Disney Channel (which has a huge fan base), would not generate vast numbers of Google hits, reviews, commentary, fan pages, merchandise, etc. Every sign of a clear hoax. Calamondin12 ( talk) 16:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Prod that was removed by a IP-a article that comes across as more of a advertisement I believe. Wgolf ( talk) 21:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Tagged recently by Duffbeerforme for lack of notability. 1st AfD attracted no comments; hopefully we can resolve it this time. Boleyn ( talk) 20:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 13:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
not notable Fuddle ( talk) 22:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
No signs of reaching notable status Amortias ( T)( C) 19:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to WCW Nitro. Been up 3 weeks and and only one !vote so closing as redirect ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Can't find reliable, independent sources that support notability. Fisheriesmgmt ( talk) 17:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG, although it's not my area of expertise. Has been tagged for notability for seven years. Boleyn ( talk) 13:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable. Thin on content. Promotional. Tagged as needing citations since December DaveApter ( talk) 09:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MER-C 13:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Unwikified autobiography of a musician. Doesn't seem to have won any major awards, so notability hinges on WP:INHERIT. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 09:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
discussion shows that dish essentially doesn't exist anymore Adgggadggg ( talk) 14:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Here's the thing though: all those articles point to one restaurant that serves the dish and that restaurant no longer exists. You can't buy the ingredients at a market nor can you walk into any restaurant and ask them to prepare the off-menu item. It may be well-referenced, but so is every other dish in that article and I don't feel it to be completely necessary to have every dish in the articles to have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adgggadggg ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
How about just editing it to say that it used to be commonly found in Singapore? Adgggadggg ( talk) 16:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
After some digging around, I found out what this dish was. Nobody refers to it as "pig's fallopian tubes" but it is indeed still served in some places in Singapore. It's known as Kway Chap, and it pretty much consists of pig offals, including fallopian tubes, and rice noodle rolls. Would it be more appropriate then to change the name? I could list some references, but those are endless. Adgggadggg ( talk) 12:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet notability requirements and is purely advertising Mostlyoksorta ( talk) 18:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Appears non-notable, no secondary sources to be found. Ref's provided purely prove of existence. Jcmcc450 ( talk) 19:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
No "independent" in-depth coverage in web, books or news found (only press releases and passing mentions from member hotels and tourist organisations). Notability is not inherited from member organisations. GermanJoe ( talk) 23:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Spammy and weakly sourced article fails WP:NMUSIC. Careful about clicking on the links in the References! Logical Cowboy ( talk) 23:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Logical Cowboy, How you say this article is spammy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balaji E.M ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This is probably a talented and capable singer; but she appears not to come close to meeting WP:ACADEMIC. The world is chock-full of talented and capable singers holding down teaching jobs to survive; they are not notable. Ms Bobak has no in-depth coverage in reliable source to support her notability. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 23:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off show sourced only to the network. No indication of independent notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off show sourced mostly to the network. One possibly independent source gives it one sentence. No indication of notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off show sourced only to the network's website. No indication of notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off 'summer filler' show sourced only to the network. No indication of notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
A couple of mentions in local newspapers, in relation to a single incident, do not confer notability. This is a blogspot blog for pupils at one school, not any kind of significant website. Mogism ( talk) 19:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Unsure about notability-no refs, only one page links here. Maybe a redirect at best. Wgolf ( talk) 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Definitely a case of TOOSOON, sources are either irrelevant, (potentially) incorrect, or a single paragraph with no indication of notability. Primefac ( talk) 15:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 19:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Notability. No competitive bio at isuresults.com Hergilei ( talk) 13:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 14:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
While the cited reference does indicate that the truncate function may be used to expand the size of a file, no source is given, nor can one be found, to indicate that the term "up truncation" is used to describe this action, nor to indicate that performing this action has any given reason or benefit. As such, the description of the action here appears to be original research. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Possibly too soon, Nia Frazier goes to the tv show it appears also. Wgolf ( talk) 16:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This article cites no references, and I couldn't find any uses of this term in the French media in the sense used in the article. This appears to be original research. Gaullism and Blairism have articles because they are terms very widely used in the media, but this is not the case with the term Delanoiste. Liam987 (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Sources all self-published, doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC Seems to be WP:PROMO, unable to find additional WP:RS [20] ― Padenton | ☎ 18:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 03:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Fictional character that only appeared in a few episodes of a TV show from what I can tell Wgolf ( talk) 22:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Fictional character on a tv show who had only 2 appearances. Wgolf ( talk) 22:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Article appears to fail WP:ENT. From what I can find out his only main role to date appears to be as Lee Carter in EastEnders. WP:ENT states "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." I think it's too soon to make an article for Danny-Boy Hatchard, I suggest either deleting the article or re-directing to Lee Carter (EastEnders). That way, if Danny-Boy does become notable, we can simply take the redirect off. 5 albert square ( talk) 22:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
As far as I can see, does not meet WP:POLITICIAN: local politician, candidate for national office but not yet elected, only press coverage is in passing as a side-effect of covering a story on another politician The Anome ( talk) 20:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I put this as a BLP prod but I'm starting to wonder how real this is-of course its a bit hard to find Carlos Gonzalez since there is a bunch-so I did try to find Carlos Carlofer and the only result I could find is a car dealership in Florida (kind of instructing since Florida is mentioned) also the articles creator has the same name. Wgolf ( talk) 19:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to K.C. Undercover. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
per WP:NACTOR ― Padenton| ✉ 19:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Bbb23 per CSD A9 (music recording by redlinked artist and no indication of importance or significance). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 22:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. The band referred in the article does not have a Wiki page. Conflict of Interest writing. Cahk ( talk) 18:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable church. Article is a generic background of a generic church with one local newspaper reference. Article was prod-ed by another user, which was contested. ~EdGl ! 13:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic original research. Prod contested by creator. -- Finngall talk 15:58, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
An accountancy firm, which doens't appear to have received any independent 3rd party coverage by WP:NCORP. I am very suspicious about paid editing in this case given the large number of similar articles produced by what appears to be a WP:SOCKFARM. Le petit fromage ( talk) 15:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Novel published in 2013 with a suspiciously complete summary. Doesn't appear to have been the subject of any reviews. [22] Nobody appears to have read it on Goodreads either. The tone is also overly promotional, which suggests WP:COI. Le petit fromage ( talk) 14:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 22:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
non-notable show, part of a massive group of non-notable show articles created by puppets (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj and User talk:Tanns.25630 for background). References are mostly a bunch of cruft indicating merely that the show exists. Doug.( talk • contribs) 14:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator
The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete, please see AFC should you wish to re-submit this article. Nakon 03:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Author has contested prod repeatedly without addressing issues addressed by editor Postcard Cathy ( talk) 14:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Wait, wait, wait. I just now found this page. I still "don't get it". Is this a place where it is appropriate to repeat my initial protest of the deletion? All I see is a notice that teh content is "Unremarkable". I have tried to explain this elsewhere, on the page User talk:Okskyhi.
"I read this story just yesterday. The phrase C. and M. was so curious that I spent considerable time researching it's meaning. I went to wikipedia first and found nothing. Having found what I believe to be a very credible explanation, I believe it is reasonable to share this on wikipedia for other readers of Hemingway who are similarly curious about this obscure reference. Clearly it is an archaic phrase. And standing alone, it is certainly unremarkable. But I do not believe that Hemmingway has become so obscure or irrelevant as to delete this aid to understanding his writing. Okskyhi (talk) 11:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)"
Then there is this: Because you keep removing the proposed deletion withou making any improvements, I have nominated the article to be discussed for deletion. This nomination can not be deleted. Go to the page where it is being discussed and make your argument there on why the article should stay on wiki. Postcard Cathy (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
So I responded with my my confusion" I really don't get all the little syntax issues. I don't understand the advice given here or in help sections. Is THIS the page where the deletion is being discussed? Where is the link to the page where this deletion is being discussed? I don't get it.
When is someone going to explain why the phrase is "unremarkable". I have stated why I think it is useful to make the explanation of the phrase available in a universal resource like wikipedia. This is beginning to seem rather petty.
Is it enough of an edit for me to correct the spelling of Hemingway's name? Would it be enough of an edit for me to figure out how to properly insert links and citations? Would it be enough of an edit for me to create another page specifically for the short story "The Light of the World"? in the category:Short stories by Ernest Hemingway?
Okskyhi ( talk) 21:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Here is the place for the issue to be discussed and a consensus reached as to whether or not to keep or delete the article. If you want the article to be kept, I suggest you make a persuasive argument and improve the article so the article reflects the importance of the topic. The last time I saw the article, I was unclear as to why it should be a separate article and not merged with an already established article. Postcard Cathy ( talk) 01:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment. Interesting and important are not the same thing. And if you look up unremarkable in the dictionary, you will see the relevance in this context points more towards importance than interest. Postcard Cathy ( talk) 05:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Well. Thank you, *dendrites. At least Someone gets it. Perhaps I shall respond when I have more time and patience for this school yard nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:A:3580:E:65CF:8A17:C590:D667 ( talk) 22:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted CSD G7: Author requests deletion. The nominator is requesting deletion of a page he has created and there are no substantial edits other than by himself. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 14:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
already a page Al Hijr A.A.Wasif | Talk 13:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non- notable businessman. Quis separabit? 12:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles for Creation draft (essentially the same page) was rejected three times for not adequately asserting notability. Jc86035 ( talk • contributions) Use {{ ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
why would you delete this article of me , when i am new to writing articles and learning and improving day by day. He is a famouse actor in Srilanka. Thanks . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diya2012 ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability, not a single independent reliable source for more than half a decade. The content seems rather promotional. The references recently added by Varunksood do not represent independent coverage of the magazine and largely don't say what they're cited for. Huon ( talk) 13:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
This article differentiates itself from the Book "The Intelligent Investor". If this article is deleted then it could lead to user confusion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.203.104.110 ( talk) 00:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced, no assertion of notability. Jc86035 ( talk • contributions) Use {{ ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge all individual House of Hardcore event articles into House of Hardcore ( non-admin closure). Esquivalience t 00:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
WP:EVENT: One of several similar events produced for pay-per-view TV. Limited attendance at the arena. There appears to be no significant coverage, and what coverage there is appears to be routine reports on the event. (I'm not sure what category this belongs in but I settled for games or sports.) Sjö ( talk) 12:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Mid Level Bureaucrat. Non Notable. Does not meet Notability guidelines Uncletomwood ( talk) 11:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 04:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Not Notable. No WP:Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 07:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 04:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
After looking at WP:COMMONOUTCOMES#Hospitals, Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals#Notability, WP:ORG and WP:GNG, I couldn't establish its notability, or a useful redirect target. Google hits were mainly its address being noted or adverts, not actual coverage. Boleyn ( talk) 09:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
"Commment Well the AFD should be settled by the article being about a post-secondary school as well as a hospital. By the way, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is a major regional newspaper actually, and is covering this hospital which is outside of Pittsburgh. Thanks, though, it's a good idea to Google search on "Post-Gazette Ohio Valley Hospital", yields more besides CEO article and the maternity unit closing article:
The result was delete. Der yck C. 05:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
This Generic top-level domain registry operator
This would appear to demonstrate at least the significance of the business.
Uniregistry is a an internet business. It would be reasonable enough to judge its notability by its internet presence.
Within the "about 343,000 G-hits" and the "about 1,240 results", there seems to very little
significant coverage about this business in websites that are not hosts for press releases.
This business would appear to fail
the requirement for multiple, independent sources about businesses.
--
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
PS: I assert my right to be completely and utterly wrong, every now and then.
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
A million domain names under management in less than a year and a top five domain name registry. Surprised they weren't in here sooner. Keep. Nameboy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.144.94.21 ( talk) 21:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 17:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Apparently an WP:OR by single contributor; mostly quoting several sources to interpret indomania of some sense? – nafSadh did say 08:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Was moved to draft space to set up proper article, but article has only marginally improved since and has now been moved back. I do not think that this artist is notable enough for an own article. Dirk Beetstra T C 04:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Skinny Molly. Nakon 03:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I could find no sources to verify notability or sustain an article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Delete and redirect to Skinny Molly Jbh ( talk) 02:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Discussion with sockpuppet
|
---|
|
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Actor who was in just one brief role and that's it. Wgolf ( talk) 01:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Actor who basically has only small parts and that's it. Wgolf ( talk) 01:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Belle Air. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
A businessman who was the head of a unknown airline from what I can tell Wgolf ( talk) 01:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
The subject of the article does not meet the WP:GNG. It contains original research possibly from people close to the subject of the article. 8/9 of the current references are not independent of the subject and are not secondary sources because they were written by the subject of the article. Weedwacker ( talk) 01:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 03:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Googling doesn't turn up significant coverage about the subject as per the WP:GNG. Thus the subject should not have a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 06:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Fictional character from some tv show that mentions her being a minor character even. Wgolf ( talk) 00:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Tagged by Mikeblas 7 years ago, still unresolved. A couple of incoming links are potential redirect targets, such as Cognitive architecture and David E. Meyer. Boleyn ( talk) 10:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 04:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
There are not sufficient sources to satisfy any relevant notability criteria. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dynamic random-access memory. Nakon 03:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced since January 2010. Subject has no coverage outside of pages primarily discussing Prefetching or organizations that create and promote their versions of prefetch buffers. Mr. Guye ( talk) 21:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep. Looks like WP:SNOW. It's exactly the sort of technical subject one would expect to find in Wikipedia. Googling "Prefetch buffer" (with quotes) gives 29 in news, 1,930 in books and 56,000 generally. Clearly meets WP:GNG. There's an equivalent article in fr.wikipedia and 10 "What links here" articles. -Arb. ( talk) 23:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Eye shadow. Nakon 04:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a how to guide. I also suspect the author is posting the article merely to drive traffic to their own blog and YouTube channel, which would constitute WP:SPAM. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Didn't realise the issue of the how to. I also was just starting to build the article which is a very valid article for wikipedia as its something very well known and should be included. I hadn't finished adding additional vidoes and images. I was also linking to a howto video and page if this is also not correct fine, I just don't see an issue with linking to a video on the subject - fine no howto in the article but surely thats not an issue if its a procedue and its just a link. Beauty and the Boutique is not my site for info also, its just one of the many I was going to include. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok If I remove all the external links will this fix the issue and People can then add images and more to the topic. I have removed all external reference to any site so presume the article now doesn't have any issue only needs some images etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Strage as there is a page approved in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokey_Eyes This is a very specific makeup look that someone could quite easily be searching for. I am not sure why there is an issue there are articles of all sorts of things which are part of another sector, makeup wouldn't cover it correctly but if the view is kill the article then fine, but also kill the DE wiki article as the point is the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Yes I am a new editor - I also wanted to put some articles on Banknotes - British provincials and other but inder this view I couldn't as it should just go under banknotes ???? seems strange — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Nick, not sure what you want me to message on your page, cannot see anywhere to do that, if you are talking about sources for info pages here are well known brands and websites talking about it. You may not know about this but it is a very well known look. http://www.loreal-paris.co.uk/trends-and-tutorials/tutorials/make-up-tutorial/get-the-look-smokey?gclid=CID8nt_Ko8QCFWEOwwodwAIA9w# http://www.marieclaire.com/beauty/makeup/a134/smoky-eyes/ http://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/beauty/how-to/a31953/smoky-eye-hacks/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/08/gabrielle-union-makeup-best-celebrity-beauty_n_6631120.html This isn't someting I made up its something which people want to know about there are 11,900,000 results in google. If you want me to add these as a citation then fine, Like I say, I am new here and may have made a few mistakes but adding this into the system I don't feel was one of them, adding the "howto create the look maybe" although this because its a look, you cannot realy describe without saying how its done, or you can but its limited. I feel like a naughty person being told of when all I was doing was contributing but thats life I guess — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of prisons in Jamaica. MBisanz talk 03:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Juvenile correctional centres are not inherently notable. LibStar ( talk) 16:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
They seem to have achieved some level of success, but I couldn't confirm that they definitely meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Italian language article's notability seems to be questioned too. I've added several sources, but not sure they are reliable sources establishing notability. Managerpants tagged this for notability 7 years ago - still awaiting resolution. Hopefully, it'll get it now. Boleyn ( talk) 10:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to UEFA_Euro_2016_qualifying_Group_G. Consensus seems to be fairly clear against keeping the article. Anything sourced with *reliable* sources can be included in brief in the redirect target. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 01:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this match will have any lasting notability. A bog-standard qualification match that happened to have a few disgraceful incidents causing it to be abandoned - such things happen fairly regularly, and are rarely worthy of note. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments czar ⨹ 15:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Tagged by Sting au for notability 7 years ago; hopefully we can now get resolution. Boleyn ( talk) 09:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 03:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Sounds like a worthy organisation, so I hope someone proves me wrong. I could see some coverage, but not enough for WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Tagged for lack of WP:NOTABILITY by Aboutmovies 7 years ago, no one else has yet established its notability. Hopefully this can be resolved now. Boleyn ( talk) 09:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Was proposed for deletion as failing the main notability guideline. However the article was previously proposed for deletion back in 2007, so cannot be proposed for deletion again and am bringing it here. I can't see anything that suggests they meet the notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 09:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete. No sources. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 06:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
The previous nomination for this article was on irrelevant grounds. This company does not appear to meet notability standards: it has a common name, which confounds a Google (archive) test, but a search of the Boston Globe archives through 1980 returns 38 results, all consistent with incidental or promotional coverage, and it's a local company. Beyond that, there doesn't appear to be meaningful content in the article once advertisement is removed and there appears to be a substantial conflict-of-interest history. In the interest of full disclosure, I work in EMS in Greater Boston, and not for Action. Noophilic ( talk) 09:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Erotas (TV series). MBisanz talk 03:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable actor. Quis separabit? 20:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
non-notable. His role in founding Crocodile Cafe is not mentioned in our article, which lists other people as founders; his role in Capitol Hill Block Party is one of several co-founders only, a city's 40 under 40 translates as "not yet notable"; e-joint is not notable yet ; the section on his political opinions is not of encyclopedic interest DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There is enough coverage and association with notable ventures. If the article is not good enough then improve it. I also was initially skeptical about mentioning politics but it was picked up by a couple sources. Cptnono ( talk) 00:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES ( non-admin closure) nafSadh did say 22:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable and no reference. A.A.Wasif | Talk 07:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 01:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable, unreferenced. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 07:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This, one of thousands of aircraft crashes in 1942, is not a notable subject for a stand-alone article. The rationale for this article's existence appears to be the part of the WP:AIRCRASH guidelines which states that aircraft crashes involving wikinotable people may deserve their own articles. It is not a requirement that there be such an article, and there is not enough here to require it. We have an article of a single paragraph about a footballer (whose article probably only hangs on the notion that football players are automatically notable) - one of nine ex-Arsenal players who died in military service during WWII according to the one reliable source used in it - and another article about the crash that killed him, with two sentences of information that isn't already in the biography article. Also to be considered is that two other people who are much more notable than William Parr - Glenn Miller and John Denver - do not have stand-alone articles covering their deaths. Nor do David Watson (cricketer) or Ron Flockhart (racing driver). In my opinion it would be better to expand the biography article, using the sources already listed there, and then deleting this one. I don't see anything useful in keeping the title as a redirect, as a reader is not likely to be looking for William Parr by searching for a Lockheed Hudson crash. The term "1942 RAF Hudson Crash" is way too unspecific to be useful anyway; the Aviation Safety Network's user-edited wikibase lists 32 RAF Hudson crashes in 1942, and that is not an exhaustive list. I know it isn't exhaustive because one of the two sources used in the crash article (another database, covering 1942 aircraft crashes in south-west Britain only) lists another 17 RAF Hudson crashes in 1942 that aren't in the ASN wikibase. YSSYguy ( talk) 06:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Has been speedied. Peridon ( talk) 16:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
no evidence for notability; no third party sources DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
never a head coach; minor positions only. I'm no expert, but his college playing career does not seem notable either. DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Stub article that fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. I'm a fan of this band but they do not deserve a place on Wikipedia. There's websites like Metal Archives for stuff like this. It's another minor and underground band that doesn't need to be on here. Second Skin ( talk) 06:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Troutdale, Oregon. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be a small city park. Fails WP:N as there are no outside sources confirming any notability and despite several tags and requests for any sources, the articles creator continues to remove these tags. The only links provided are Yelp reviews and a MapQuest search, none of which establish why this small park is notable. JOJ Hutton 01:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable contest lacking support. A we search reveals nothing. Should probably include 1st Miami Beach Beauty Pageant and 2nd Miami Beach Beauty Pageant in this AfD. , reddogsix ( talk) 04:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 00:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
No real references that I can read. (This is the en wiki, after all). A search brought up self-published sources, I can't any references to the official public office he holds. His degree is confusing. He does scientific research for the president on carpet designs. He's a professor of decorative applied art. The whole article is very, very confusing and at best is so completely culturally out of touch with anything that I am familiar it resembles a hoax. Bfpage | leave a message 01:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
A defunct local advocacy group. Not notable at all. Only coverage was in local Toronto sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Safiel ( talk) 02:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Michig ( talk) 07:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Bogus article. There are sources pointing that such a thing never existed. The controversy is a very minor thing and this article gives undue weight to it. — ШαмıQ ✍ @ 04:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 14:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I fail to see how this list is encyclopedic... at all. It is just a laundry list of nicknames, many of which are either unsourced, or of drivers who aren't notable in the slightest. There is also no evidence that any nickname usage is widespread for the majority of these drivers. The article itself is also a total mess; no inclusion criteria whatsoever, formatting is all over the place, etc. Such a list may be appropriate for a fan Wikia, but not Wikipedia. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Michig ( talk) 07:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I fail to see how this list is encyclopedic... at all. It is just a laundry list of nicknames. There is also no evidence that any nickname usage is widespread for the majority of these subjects. The article itself is also a total mess; no inclusion criteria whatsoever, formatting is all over the place, etc. Such a list may be appropriate for a fan Wikia, but not Wikipedia. Some of these aren't even "nicknames", but either actual names (Baby Bertha was a specific car, not a "nickname"), or official/semi-official descriptions ("Home of British Motor Racing"). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leon County, Florida – Public safety. MBisanz talk 03:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication that the subject has received significant, independent, non-routine coverage in reliable sources. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 20:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Claims to fame are (1) being a county sheriff and (2) being an unsuccessful candidate for a statewide office. Does not meet WP:NPOL. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 06:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Secretary of one YMCA in Jamaica. Only source that perhaps covers the subject in-depth is a routine article reporting his death. Remaining references only mention him in passing. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 21:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment According to Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/Journals/Requests#Newspaperarchive, we should have access to The Gleaner's archive "in the next couple months". Suggest this AfD is closed as "no consensus" for now and revisited once the references become available. -Arb. ( talk) 11:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Willing to userfy or redirect on request. Nakon 02:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Untrue information. Marta Jandová and Václav Noid Bárta will represent the Czech Republic at the Eurovision Song Contest 2015, but they never formed a group called "Bohemia". The page cites no sources and is orphaned as well. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. j⚛e decker talk 02:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
"Straight person of the year" is not a notable award, and I see nothing else. DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per WP:CSD#A7. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 06:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I was going to put a BLP prod on this-but something seemed off when I saw the guys year of birth and the fact that the creator has the same name. Is this a hoax or what is this? Either way no eligible for wiki imo. Wgolf ( talk) 04:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 03:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 03:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Wrong Venue - Drafts get nominated at WP:MFD. – Davey2010 Talk 04:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Contents of the article are being merged to the main article. Doraemon25 ( talk) 02:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Wrong Venue - Drafts get nominated at WP:MFD. – Davey2010 Talk 04:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Article is not edited in the past six months. Doraemon25 ( talk) 02:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Seems to be entirely self-promotion --jpgordon ::==( o ) 15:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo per CSD G5 (creation by a banned or blocked user in violation of ban or block). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 00:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 03:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. The Banner talk 00:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wheatus. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable record label. Article is unsourced, and has had an "unsourced" tag on it for 6 years. I'm unable to locate any reliable sources that speak to or confirm this label's notability. Fyddlestix ( talk) 00:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 00:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film with no reliable sources Wgolf ( talk) 00:22, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable song Wgolf ( talk) 00:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable song Wgolf ( talk) 00:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 00:57, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film with only unreliable refs Wgolf ( talk) 00:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:13, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Art collective long tagged for notability-was up for a AFD late last year and was voted no consensus. Wgolf ( talk) 23:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Am slightly perturbed as to why User:Sukhvirlam has used the seemingly fake signature FrankUnderwood12 on their keep !vote but it doesn't change the outcome. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Explicitly states that the album release is "rumored". Smileguy91 Spread the knowledge! 01:37, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 23:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Obscure show with no refs or even notability at all.
All the Google hits I got were wiki links even.
Wgolf (
talk) 23:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Withdraw-This has to be a record for the quickest withdraw. Anyway as it turns out there is a alternate English title that was on the side bar that was not linked here
The Taste of Life-which I'm going to create a redirect for. Well sorry about that!
Wgolf (
talk)
23:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. The Snowager -is awake 13:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
I put a csd up-but this is nto a real show and a hoax-surprise it has been around this long! Wgolf ( talk) 22:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete as hoax. Basically inconceivable that a new series, supposedly around for over a year on the Disney Channel (which has a huge fan base), would not generate vast numbers of Google hits, reviews, commentary, fan pages, merchandise, etc. Every sign of a clear hoax. Calamondin12 ( talk) 16:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:32, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Prod that was removed by a IP-a article that comes across as more of a advertisement I believe. Wgolf ( talk) 21:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:27, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. No sources conform WP:RS. The Banner talk 21:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Tagged recently by Duffbeerforme for lack of notability. 1st AfD attracted no comments; hopefully we can resolve it this time. Boleyn ( talk) 20:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 13:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
not notable Fuddle ( talk) 22:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
No signs of reaching notable status Amortias ( T)( C) 19:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to WCW Nitro. Been up 3 weeks and and only one !vote so closing as redirect ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Can't find reliable, independent sources that support notability. Fisheriesmgmt ( talk) 17:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG, although it's not my area of expertise. Has been tagged for notability for seven years. Boleyn ( talk) 13:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable. Thin on content. Promotional. Tagged as needing citations since December DaveApter ( talk) 09:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MER-C 13:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Unwikified autobiography of a musician. Doesn't seem to have won any major awards, so notability hinges on WP:INHERIT. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 09:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
discussion shows that dish essentially doesn't exist anymore Adgggadggg ( talk) 14:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Here's the thing though: all those articles point to one restaurant that serves the dish and that restaurant no longer exists. You can't buy the ingredients at a market nor can you walk into any restaurant and ask them to prepare the off-menu item. It may be well-referenced, but so is every other dish in that article and I don't feel it to be completely necessary to have every dish in the articles to have an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adgggadggg ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
How about just editing it to say that it used to be commonly found in Singapore? Adgggadggg ( talk) 16:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
After some digging around, I found out what this dish was. Nobody refers to it as "pig's fallopian tubes" but it is indeed still served in some places in Singapore. It's known as Kway Chap, and it pretty much consists of pig offals, including fallopian tubes, and rice noodle rolls. Would it be more appropriate then to change the name? I could list some references, but those are endless. Adgggadggg ( talk) 12:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Fails to meet notability requirements and is purely advertising Mostlyoksorta ( talk) 18:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Appears non-notable, no secondary sources to be found. Ref's provided purely prove of existence. Jcmcc450 ( talk) 19:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
No "independent" in-depth coverage in web, books or news found (only press releases and passing mentions from member hotels and tourist organisations). Notability is not inherited from member organisations. GermanJoe ( talk) 23:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Spammy and weakly sourced article fails WP:NMUSIC. Careful about clicking on the links in the References! Logical Cowboy ( talk) 23:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Logical Cowboy, How you say this article is spammy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balaji E.M ( talk • contribs) 05:17, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This is probably a talented and capable singer; but she appears not to come close to meeting WP:ACADEMIC. The world is chock-full of talented and capable singers holding down teaching jobs to survive; they are not notable. Ms Bobak has no in-depth coverage in reliable source to support her notability. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 23:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off show sourced only to the network. No indication of independent notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:46, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off show sourced mostly to the network. One possibly independent source gives it one sentence. No indication of notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off show sourced only to the network's website. No indication of notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Once-off 'summer filler' show sourced only to the network. No indication of notability. Greykit ( talk) 19:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
A couple of mentions in local newspapers, in relation to a single incident, do not confer notability. This is a blogspot blog for pupils at one school, not any kind of significant website. Mogism ( talk) 19:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Unsure about notability-no refs, only one page links here. Maybe a redirect at best. Wgolf ( talk) 15:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( NPASR) ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:48, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Definitely a case of TOOSOON, sources are either irrelevant, (potentially) incorrect, or a single paragraph with no indication of notability. Primefac ( talk) 15:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 19:43, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Notability. No competitive bio at isuresults.com Hergilei ( talk) 13:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 14:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
While the cited reference does indicate that the truncate function may be used to expand the size of a file, no source is given, nor can one be found, to indicate that the term "up truncation" is used to describe this action, nor to indicate that performing this action has any given reason or benefit. As such, the description of the action here appears to be original research. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:59, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Possibly too soon, Nia Frazier goes to the tv show it appears also. Wgolf ( talk) 16:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This article cites no references, and I couldn't find any uses of this term in the French media in the sense used in the article. This appears to be original research. Gaullism and Blairism have articles because they are terms very widely used in the media, but this is not the case with the term Delanoiste. Liam987 (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Sources all self-published, doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC Seems to be WP:PROMO, unable to find additional WP:RS [20] ― Padenton | ☎ 18:47, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 03:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Fictional character that only appeared in a few episodes of a TV show from what I can tell Wgolf ( talk) 22:16, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Fictional character on a tv show who had only 2 appearances. Wgolf ( talk) 22:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Article appears to fail WP:ENT. From what I can find out his only main role to date appears to be as Lee Carter in EastEnders. WP:ENT states "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." I think it's too soon to make an article for Danny-Boy Hatchard, I suggest either deleting the article or re-directing to Lee Carter (EastEnders). That way, if Danny-Boy does become notable, we can simply take the redirect off. 5 albert square ( talk) 22:18, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
As far as I can see, does not meet WP:POLITICIAN: local politician, candidate for national office but not yet elected, only press coverage is in passing as a side-effect of covering a story on another politician The Anome ( talk) 20:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I put this as a BLP prod but I'm starting to wonder how real this is-of course its a bit hard to find Carlos Gonzalez since there is a bunch-so I did try to find Carlos Carlofer and the only result I could find is a car dealership in Florida (kind of instructing since Florida is mentioned) also the articles creator has the same name. Wgolf ( talk) 19:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to K.C. Undercover. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
per WP:NACTOR ― Padenton| ✉ 19:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Bbb23 per CSD A9 (music recording by redlinked artist and no indication of importance or significance). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 22:43, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. The band referred in the article does not have a Wiki page. Conflict of Interest writing. Cahk ( talk) 18:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable church. Article is a generic background of a generic church with one local newspaper reference. Article was prod-ed by another user, which was contested. ~EdGl ! 13:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic original research. Prod contested by creator. -- Finngall talk 15:58, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
An accountancy firm, which doens't appear to have received any independent 3rd party coverage by WP:NCORP. I am very suspicious about paid editing in this case given the large number of similar articles produced by what appears to be a WP:SOCKFARM. Le petit fromage ( talk) 15:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Novel published in 2013 with a suspiciously complete summary. Doesn't appear to have been the subject of any reviews. [22] Nobody appears to have read it on Goodreads either. The tone is also overly promotional, which suggests WP:COI. Le petit fromage ( talk) 14:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 22:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
non-notable show, part of a massive group of non-notable show articles created by puppets (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj and User talk:Tanns.25630 for background). References are mostly a bunch of cruft indicating merely that the show exists. Doug.( talk • contribs) 14:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator
The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete, please see AFC should you wish to re-submit this article. Nakon 03:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Author has contested prod repeatedly without addressing issues addressed by editor Postcard Cathy ( talk) 14:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Wait, wait, wait. I just now found this page. I still "don't get it". Is this a place where it is appropriate to repeat my initial protest of the deletion? All I see is a notice that teh content is "Unremarkable". I have tried to explain this elsewhere, on the page User talk:Okskyhi.
"I read this story just yesterday. The phrase C. and M. was so curious that I spent considerable time researching it's meaning. I went to wikipedia first and found nothing. Having found what I believe to be a very credible explanation, I believe it is reasonable to share this on wikipedia for other readers of Hemingway who are similarly curious about this obscure reference. Clearly it is an archaic phrase. And standing alone, it is certainly unremarkable. But I do not believe that Hemmingway has become so obscure or irrelevant as to delete this aid to understanding his writing. Okskyhi (talk) 11:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)"
Then there is this: Because you keep removing the proposed deletion withou making any improvements, I have nominated the article to be discussed for deletion. This nomination can not be deleted. Go to the page where it is being discussed and make your argument there on why the article should stay on wiki. Postcard Cathy (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
So I responded with my my confusion" I really don't get all the little syntax issues. I don't understand the advice given here or in help sections. Is THIS the page where the deletion is being discussed? Where is the link to the page where this deletion is being discussed? I don't get it.
When is someone going to explain why the phrase is "unremarkable". I have stated why I think it is useful to make the explanation of the phrase available in a universal resource like wikipedia. This is beginning to seem rather petty.
Is it enough of an edit for me to correct the spelling of Hemingway's name? Would it be enough of an edit for me to figure out how to properly insert links and citations? Would it be enough of an edit for me to create another page specifically for the short story "The Light of the World"? in the category:Short stories by Ernest Hemingway?
Okskyhi ( talk) 21:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Here is the place for the issue to be discussed and a consensus reached as to whether or not to keep or delete the article. If you want the article to be kept, I suggest you make a persuasive argument and improve the article so the article reflects the importance of the topic. The last time I saw the article, I was unclear as to why it should be a separate article and not merged with an already established article. Postcard Cathy ( talk) 01:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment. Interesting and important are not the same thing. And if you look up unremarkable in the dictionary, you will see the relevance in this context points more towards importance than interest. Postcard Cathy ( talk) 05:15, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Well. Thank you, *dendrites. At least Someone gets it. Perhaps I shall respond when I have more time and patience for this school yard nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:A:3580:E:65CF:8A17:C590:D667 ( talk) 22:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted CSD G7: Author requests deletion. The nominator is requesting deletion of a page he has created and there are no substantial edits other than by himself. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 14:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
already a page Al Hijr A.A.Wasif | Talk 13:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non- notable businessman. Quis separabit? 12:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles for Creation draft (essentially the same page) was rejected three times for not adequately asserting notability. Jc86035 ( talk • contributions) Use {{ ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
why would you delete this article of me , when i am new to writing articles and learning and improving day by day. He is a famouse actor in Srilanka. Thanks . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diya2012 ( talk • contribs) 20:32, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability, not a single independent reliable source for more than half a decade. The content seems rather promotional. The references recently added by Varunksood do not represent independent coverage of the magazine and largely don't say what they're cited for. Huon ( talk) 13:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
This article differentiates itself from the Book "The Intelligent Investor". If this article is deleted then it could lead to user confusion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.203.104.110 ( talk) 00:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced, no assertion of notability. Jc86035 ( talk • contributions) Use {{ ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge all individual House of Hardcore event articles into House of Hardcore ( non-admin closure). Esquivalience t 00:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
WP:EVENT: One of several similar events produced for pay-per-view TV. Limited attendance at the arena. There appears to be no significant coverage, and what coverage there is appears to be routine reports on the event. (I'm not sure what category this belongs in but I settled for games or sports.) Sjö ( talk) 12:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Mid Level Bureaucrat. Non Notable. Does not meet Notability guidelines Uncletomwood ( talk) 11:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 04:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Not Notable. No WP:Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 07:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 04:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
After looking at WP:COMMONOUTCOMES#Hospitals, Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals#Notability, WP:ORG and WP:GNG, I couldn't establish its notability, or a useful redirect target. Google hits were mainly its address being noted or adverts, not actual coverage. Boleyn ( talk) 09:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
"Commment Well the AFD should be settled by the article being about a post-secondary school as well as a hospital. By the way, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is a major regional newspaper actually, and is covering this hospital which is outside of Pittsburgh. Thanks, though, it's a good idea to Google search on "Post-Gazette Ohio Valley Hospital", yields more besides CEO article and the maternity unit closing article:
The result was delete. Der yck C. 05:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
This Generic top-level domain registry operator
This would appear to demonstrate at least the significance of the business.
Uniregistry is a an internet business. It would be reasonable enough to judge its notability by its internet presence.
Within the "about 343,000 G-hits" and the "about 1,240 results", there seems to very little
significant coverage about this business in websites that are not hosts for press releases.
This business would appear to fail
the requirement for multiple, independent sources about businesses.
--
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
PS: I assert my right to be completely and utterly wrong, every now and then.
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:31, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
A million domain names under management in less than a year and a top five domain name registry. Surprised they weren't in here sooner. Keep. Nameboy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.144.94.21 ( talk) 21:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 17:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Apparently an WP:OR by single contributor; mostly quoting several sources to interpret indomania of some sense? – nafSadh did say 08:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Was moved to draft space to set up proper article, but article has only marginally improved since and has now been moved back. I do not think that this artist is notable enough for an own article. Dirk Beetstra T C 04:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Skinny Molly. Nakon 03:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I could find no sources to verify notability or sustain an article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Delete and redirect to Skinny Molly Jbh ( talk) 02:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Discussion with sockpuppet
|
---|
|
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Actor who was in just one brief role and that's it. Wgolf ( talk) 01:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Actor who basically has only small parts and that's it. Wgolf ( talk) 01:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Belle Air. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
A businessman who was the head of a unknown airline from what I can tell Wgolf ( talk) 01:38, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
The subject of the article does not meet the WP:GNG. It contains original research possibly from people close to the subject of the article. 8/9 of the current references are not independent of the subject and are not secondary sources because they were written by the subject of the article. Weedwacker ( talk) 01:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 03:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Googling doesn't turn up significant coverage about the subject as per the WP:GNG. Thus the subject should not have a standalone article. AadaamS ( talk) 06:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Fictional character from some tv show that mentions her being a minor character even. Wgolf ( talk) 00:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Tagged by Mikeblas 7 years ago, still unresolved. A couple of incoming links are potential redirect targets, such as Cognitive architecture and David E. Meyer. Boleyn ( talk) 10:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 04:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
There are not sufficient sources to satisfy any relevant notability criteria. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dynamic random-access memory. Nakon 03:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced since January 2010. Subject has no coverage outside of pages primarily discussing Prefetching or organizations that create and promote their versions of prefetch buffers. Mr. Guye ( talk) 21:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep. Looks like WP:SNOW. It's exactly the sort of technical subject one would expect to find in Wikipedia. Googling "Prefetch buffer" (with quotes) gives 29 in news, 1,930 in books and 56,000 generally. Clearly meets WP:GNG. There's an equivalent article in fr.wikipedia and 10 "What links here" articles. -Arb. ( talk) 23:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Eye shadow. Nakon 04:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a how to guide. I also suspect the author is posting the article merely to drive traffic to their own blog and YouTube channel, which would constitute WP:SPAM. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Didn't realise the issue of the how to. I also was just starting to build the article which is a very valid article for wikipedia as its something very well known and should be included. I hadn't finished adding additional vidoes and images. I was also linking to a howto video and page if this is also not correct fine, I just don't see an issue with linking to a video on the subject - fine no howto in the article but surely thats not an issue if its a procedue and its just a link. Beauty and the Boutique is not my site for info also, its just one of the many I was going to include. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok If I remove all the external links will this fix the issue and People can then add images and more to the topic. I have removed all external reference to any site so presume the article now doesn't have any issue only needs some images etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Strage as there is a page approved in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smokey_Eyes This is a very specific makeup look that someone could quite easily be searching for. I am not sure why there is an issue there are articles of all sorts of things which are part of another sector, makeup wouldn't cover it correctly but if the view is kill the article then fine, but also kill the DE wiki article as the point is the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 16:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Yes I am a new editor - I also wanted to put some articles on Banknotes - British provincials and other but inder this view I couldn't as it should just go under banknotes ???? seems strange — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Nick, not sure what you want me to message on your page, cannot see anywhere to do that, if you are talking about sources for info pages here are well known brands and websites talking about it. You may not know about this but it is a very well known look. http://www.loreal-paris.co.uk/trends-and-tutorials/tutorials/make-up-tutorial/get-the-look-smokey?gclid=CID8nt_Ko8QCFWEOwwodwAIA9w# http://www.marieclaire.com/beauty/makeup/a134/smoky-eyes/ http://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/beauty/how-to/a31953/smoky-eye-hacks/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/08/gabrielle-union-makeup-best-celebrity-beauty_n_6631120.html This isn't someting I made up its something which people want to know about there are 11,900,000 results in google. If you want me to add these as a citation then fine, Like I say, I am new here and may have made a few mistakes but adding this into the system I don't feel was one of them, adding the "howto create the look maybe" although this because its a look, you cannot realy describe without saying how its done, or you can but its limited. I feel like a naughty person being told of when all I was doing was contributing but thats life I guess — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aharveywiki ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of prisons in Jamaica. MBisanz talk 03:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Juvenile correctional centres are not inherently notable. LibStar ( talk) 16:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
They seem to have achieved some level of success, but I couldn't confirm that they definitely meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Italian language article's notability seems to be questioned too. I've added several sources, but not sure they are reliable sources establishing notability. Managerpants tagged this for notability 7 years ago - still awaiting resolution. Hopefully, it'll get it now. Boleyn ( talk) 10:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to UEFA_Euro_2016_qualifying_Group_G. Consensus seems to be fairly clear against keeping the article. Anything sourced with *reliable* sources can be included in brief in the redirect target. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 01:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No evidence this match will have any lasting notability. A bog-standard qualification match that happened to have a few disgraceful incidents causing it to be abandoned - such things happen fairly regularly, and are rarely worthy of note. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments czar ⨹ 15:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Tagged by Sting au for notability 7 years ago; hopefully we can now get resolution. Boleyn ( talk) 09:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 03:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Sounds like a worthy organisation, so I hope someone proves me wrong. I could see some coverage, but not enough for WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Tagged for lack of WP:NOTABILITY by Aboutmovies 7 years ago, no one else has yet established its notability. Hopefully this can be resolved now. Boleyn ( talk) 09:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Was proposed for deletion as failing the main notability guideline. However the article was previously proposed for deletion back in 2007, so cannot be proposed for deletion again and am bringing it here. I can't see anything that suggests they meet the notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 09:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete. No sources. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 06:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
The previous nomination for this article was on irrelevant grounds. This company does not appear to meet notability standards: it has a common name, which confounds a Google (archive) test, but a search of the Boston Globe archives through 1980 returns 38 results, all consistent with incidental or promotional coverage, and it's a local company. Beyond that, there doesn't appear to be meaningful content in the article once advertisement is removed and there appears to be a substantial conflict-of-interest history. In the interest of full disclosure, I work in EMS in Greater Boston, and not for Action. Noophilic ( talk) 09:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Erotas (TV series). MBisanz talk 03:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable actor. Quis separabit? 20:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
non-notable. His role in founding Crocodile Cafe is not mentioned in our article, which lists other people as founders; his role in Capitol Hill Block Party is one of several co-founders only, a city's 40 under 40 translates as "not yet notable"; e-joint is not notable yet ; the section on his political opinions is not of encyclopedic interest DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep. There is enough coverage and association with notable ventures. If the article is not good enough then improve it. I also was initially skeptical about mentioning politics but it was picked up by a couple sources. Cptnono ( talk) 00:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES ( non-admin closure) nafSadh did say 22:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable and no reference. A.A.Wasif | Talk 07:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 01:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable, unreferenced. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 07:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This, one of thousands of aircraft crashes in 1942, is not a notable subject for a stand-alone article. The rationale for this article's existence appears to be the part of the WP:AIRCRASH guidelines which states that aircraft crashes involving wikinotable people may deserve their own articles. It is not a requirement that there be such an article, and there is not enough here to require it. We have an article of a single paragraph about a footballer (whose article probably only hangs on the notion that football players are automatically notable) - one of nine ex-Arsenal players who died in military service during WWII according to the one reliable source used in it - and another article about the crash that killed him, with two sentences of information that isn't already in the biography article. Also to be considered is that two other people who are much more notable than William Parr - Glenn Miller and John Denver - do not have stand-alone articles covering their deaths. Nor do David Watson (cricketer) or Ron Flockhart (racing driver). In my opinion it would be better to expand the biography article, using the sources already listed there, and then deleting this one. I don't see anything useful in keeping the title as a redirect, as a reader is not likely to be looking for William Parr by searching for a Lockheed Hudson crash. The term "1942 RAF Hudson Crash" is way too unspecific to be useful anyway; the Aviation Safety Network's user-edited wikibase lists 32 RAF Hudson crashes in 1942, and that is not an exhaustive list. I know it isn't exhaustive because one of the two sources used in the crash article (another database, covering 1942 aircraft crashes in south-west Britain only) lists another 17 RAF Hudson crashes in 1942 that aren't in the ASN wikibase. YSSYguy ( talk) 06:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Has been speedied. Peridon ( talk) 16:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
no evidence for notability; no third party sources DGG ( talk ) 05:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
never a head coach; minor positions only. I'm no expert, but his college playing career does not seem notable either. DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Stub article that fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. I'm a fan of this band but they do not deserve a place on Wikipedia. There's websites like Metal Archives for stuff like this. It's another minor and underground band that doesn't need to be on here. Second Skin ( talk) 06:48, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Troutdale, Oregon. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be a small city park. Fails WP:N as there are no outside sources confirming any notability and despite several tags and requests for any sources, the articles creator continues to remove these tags. The only links provided are Yelp reviews and a MapQuest search, none of which establish why this small park is notable. JOJ Hutton 01:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable contest lacking support. A we search reveals nothing. Should probably include 1st Miami Beach Beauty Pageant and 2nd Miami Beach Beauty Pageant in this AfD. , reddogsix ( talk) 04:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 00:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:52, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
No real references that I can read. (This is the en wiki, after all). A search brought up self-published sources, I can't any references to the official public office he holds. His degree is confusing. He does scientific research for the president on carpet designs. He's a professor of decorative applied art. The whole article is very, very confusing and at best is so completely culturally out of touch with anything that I am familiar it resembles a hoax. Bfpage | leave a message 01:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
A defunct local advocacy group. Not notable at all. Only coverage was in local Toronto sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Safiel ( talk) 02:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Michig ( talk) 07:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Bogus article. There are sources pointing that such a thing never existed. The controversy is a very minor thing and this article gives undue weight to it. — ШαмıQ ✍ @ 04:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 14:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I fail to see how this list is encyclopedic... at all. It is just a laundry list of nicknames, many of which are either unsourced, or of drivers who aren't notable in the slightest. There is also no evidence that any nickname usage is widespread for the majority of these drivers. The article itself is also a total mess; no inclusion criteria whatsoever, formatting is all over the place, etc. Such a list may be appropriate for a fan Wikia, but not Wikipedia. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:52, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Michig ( talk) 07:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I fail to see how this list is encyclopedic... at all. It is just a laundry list of nicknames. There is also no evidence that any nickname usage is widespread for the majority of these subjects. The article itself is also a total mess; no inclusion criteria whatsoever, formatting is all over the place, etc. Such a list may be appropriate for a fan Wikia, but not Wikipedia. Some of these aren't even "nicknames", but either actual names (Baby Bertha was a specific car, not a "nickname"), or official/semi-official descriptions ("Home of British Motor Racing"). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 10:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leon County, Florida – Public safety. MBisanz talk 03:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication that the subject has received significant, independent, non-routine coverage in reliable sources. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 20:12, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nakon 03:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Claims to fame are (1) being a county sheriff and (2) being an unsuccessful candidate for a statewide office. Does not meet WP:NPOL. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:39, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) — kikichugirl oh hello! 06:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Secretary of one YMCA in Jamaica. Only source that perhaps covers the subject in-depth is a routine article reporting his death. Remaining references only mention him in passing. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 21:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Comment According to Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/Journals/Requests#Newspaperarchive, we should have access to The Gleaner's archive "in the next couple months". Suggest this AfD is closed as "no consensus" for now and revisited once the references become available. -Arb. ( talk) 11:08, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Willing to userfy or redirect on request. Nakon 02:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Untrue information. Marta Jandová and Václav Noid Bárta will represent the Czech Republic at the Eurovision Song Contest 2015, but they never formed a group called "Bohemia". The page cites no sources and is orphaned as well. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. j⚛e decker talk 02:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
"Straight person of the year" is not a notable award, and I see nothing else. DGG ( talk ) 04:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted per WP:CSD#A7. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 06:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I was going to put a BLP prod on this-but something seemed off when I saw the guys year of birth and the fact that the creator has the same name. Is this a hoax or what is this? Either way no eligible for wiki imo. Wgolf ( talk) 04:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:14, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 03:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 03:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Wrong Venue - Drafts get nominated at WP:MFD. – Davey2010 Talk 04:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Contents of the article are being merged to the main article. Doraemon25 ( talk) 02:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Wrong Venue - Drafts get nominated at WP:MFD. – Davey2010 Talk 04:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Article is not edited in the past six months. Doraemon25 ( talk) 02:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Seems to be entirely self-promotion --jpgordon ::==( o ) 15:02, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo per CSD G5 (creation by a banned or blocked user in violation of ban or block). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 00:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nakon 03:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG, only known from WP:ONEEVENT. The Banner talk 00:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wheatus. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable record label. Article is unsourced, and has had an "unsourced" tag on it for 6 years. I'm unable to locate any reliable sources that speak to or confirm this label's notability. Fyddlestix ( talk) 00:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film Wgolf ( talk) 00:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film with no reliable sources Wgolf ( talk) 00:22, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable song Wgolf ( talk) 00:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 01:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable song Wgolf ( talk) 00:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 00:57, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Non notable film with only unreliable refs Wgolf ( talk) 00:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)