The result was Nomination Withdrawn. I Withdraw the nomination, but if the article is not improved within a few months I will be renominating it. (non-admin closure) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 18:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Poorly Written Article Written like an Advertisement. See WP:NOTADVERT (Speedy Deletion Denied for G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 23:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Another minor Walking Dead character. Once again all coverage is casting information and episode summaries, there is interviews but those arent independent. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Artist management company that fails WP:GNG. The sources provided in the article are all problematic: the first and last are listings of the company (zero depth of coverage), Discogs (also zero depth in this case) and AllMusic are unreliable and discuss the company's founder, not the company itself, and the rest are about the first band that the company represented but simply include a short quote of Warren Askew (the founder of the agency) without providing anything close to significant coverage of the company (or Askew). Pichpich ( talk) 22:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
* keep: meet all the requirements as a music manager on behalf of the company according to the Music Managers Forum, Please read the guidelines. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A04:4A43:429F:D4CE:C871:C1E7:4603:60D3 (
talk) 02:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
* Keep:It totally met all requirements to have a Wikipedia page as there's enough references — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Szilvia1234 (
talk •
contribs) 19:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Penalty (ice hockey). Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:DICTIONARY, this article isn't notable. It goes as far as to define slashing, and not much more can be said that isn't already said about it. Maccore Henni user talk Respond using tb, please. 22:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Stone Temple Pilots (2010 album). Eddie891 Talk Work 21:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NSONG or WP:GNG. Possible redirect to album, though I am not sure song title is unambiguous. Boleyn ( talk) 21:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that this meets WP:N in itself, or is worth, considering the lack of notability and sources, a redirect to Ugly Betty. Boleyn ( talk) 20:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ian Dorricott. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Mainly unsourced article with no evidence of notability, nor could I find any. Possible redirect to Ian Dorricott, but I wouldn't propose a merge as so much of this is unsourced. Boleyn ( talk) 20:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
He has produced work for notable publications, but I couldn't find evidence that he himself is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 20:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite the extensive length of the messages opposing deletion, this is actually a very straightforward closure, because the "delete" arguments are grounded in policy, while the "keeps" simply aren't. I don't see any point in a detailed analysis of why each of the arguments given for keeping fails, but to illustrate the points, I will describe two of them. Firstly, there is a total failure to grasp the point of WP:BURDEN. Not only is it contrary to Wikipedia policy to take the line "I believe that this article should be kept, but it's up to you to provide sources to show that it should", but it's also contrary to logic. Secondly, "there probably are refs out there" is a perfect example of Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#There must be sources. JBW ( talk) 20:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
I need more time to work on this. Herostratus ( talk) 22:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was move X-ray generator to X-ray machine. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Is this a WP:DICDEF, or a very poorly built disambiguation page? – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this in Draft space, let me know or go to WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Article was already deleted due to discussion here in August, due to subject not being notable. There has been no evolution in the subject's notability since then. Delete and WP:SALT. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 17:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Refs are passing mentions, profiles. scope_creep Talk 15:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Any GNG sources in the article are about the company, not the individual; they don't provide the significant coverage required to meet the standards of WP:GNG or WP:BASIC for a biographical article. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 12:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:ONEOTHER; only one other topic, but I think Microsoft Silverlight is the main one, so I added a link to Terry Silverlight in a hatnote on the target page; this doesn't really seem needed LOOKSQUARE ( 👤️· 🗨️) talk 13:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails General notability guideline. Not enough reliable, significant coverage. Most sources are just blogs or tabloid articles. Pabsoluterince ( talk) 11:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a consensus here against deletion. Improvement of the article (including splits elsewhere) can still be done/discussed. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
It's an essay. It's a good essay! But it's a terrible encyclopedia page. It's in no way objective and seeks to build a specific narrative. It uses quotes selectively to buttress this idea, and outside of the quotations uses subjective language for the same end. It's also somewhat incomprehensible, but that's no reason to delete a page rather than to fix it. Rather, the page exists solely to push a narrative, and doesn't do much besides for that. It's also just not a commonly-used term at all, as a quick Google search shows, so I'm doubtful it hits notability requirements. In sum: it's a subjective essay about a dubiously notable subject. But an interesting read, if it was on a blog somewhere, where it might belong. Bruhpedia ( talk) 10:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
journals and books aren't ipso facto optimal sources here ... need to be counterbalanced ... by more about Israeli views?! starship .paint ( RUN) 01:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
sourcing is either red or orange? -- Orgullomoore ( talk) 07:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 16:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:PLACEOUTCOMES. No notable source. Hongsy ( talk) 14:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
" Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable"), since many of them are not actually villages but instead farms, factories, military bases, pumps, shops etc. In this case Google translate tells me the name means "Thank you Hosseini" though I wouldn't necessarily read too much into that. The population is large enough that the place should eventually be converted into a village, though I don't see any evidence that this has happened. FOARP ( talk) 10:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 17:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus due to lack of participation. No prejudice to an immediate relisting at AfD if any editor desires. Daniel ( talk) 10:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
As with the company he cofounded, I am unable to locate anything independently written in reliable sources that address Beisel directly and in detail. There are few db style entries for the listings, but in my view they do not reach the threshold for biographical notability. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 15:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk) 18:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2014. Does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. PhD in 1993, h-index of 21 ( Web of Science) or 23 ( Scopus). The university website has a comprehensive list of achievements. Jähmefyysikko ( talk) 21:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is a borderline case regarding NPROF and I'm hopeful a consensus can be reached with a couple more editors participating and reviewing. Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Keep Political views of Javier Milei, Delete Political positions of Javier Milei, then move "Views" to "Positions" page title Liz Read! Talk! 07:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Two articles about the same sub-topic, Political positions of Javier Milei and Political views of Javier Milei, exist. Which, if any, of them should be replaced by a redirect to which target? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The discussion has run out of steam, and despite analysis of the sources, few editors have commented on them. Therefore, I don't see agreement of what to do, and the debate has been resisted too many times. No prejudice against renomination at a later date. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
No indication of being notable with terrible references. Draftified but not updated. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 07:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The organization is “notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.” Between 2021 and 2023, this subject has been the subject of:
— Slovenian Press Agency STA, the state-owned and highly reputable press agency, in at least three articles
— BalkanInsight (Serbia etc), a well-known international media in English with award-winning journalists from 7 countries
— Dnevnik, a major daily newspaper, established 1946, in at least three articles, two of which focus on the subject in-depth
— Slovenia Times, the leading Slovenian publication in English
— Večer, a major daily newspaper, established 1945, in a two-page feature article with in-depth coverage of the organization
These sources are referenced in the page. Topjur01 ( talk) 11:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
-- National TV Slovenia, state owned: TV news 1: https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/permisivna-vzgoja-je-vpeljana-v-vse-pore-nasega-zivljenja/665602 TV news 2: https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/kdo-stoji-za-mednarodno-policijsko-organizacijo-ipo-ki-je-pri-nas-pomagala-po-poplavah/679297
-- Delo, the most read national daily newspaper since 1945: Article 1: https://www.delo.si/tag/pomoc-za-prizadete/ Article 2: https://www.delo.si/nedelo/odziv-ljudi-je-fantasticen/
-- 24ur, the most read news portal in the country: Article 1: https://www.24ur.com/novice/slovenija/pomoc-rdeci-kriz.html
-- BIRN (Balkan Investigative Reporting Network, Serbia etc): https://birn.rs/mreza-parapolicijskih-organizacija-pravoslavni-templari-i-veze-sa-sns-om/
Topjur01 ( talk) 12:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The National TV Radio_and_Television_of_Montenegro occasionally hosta guests who represent the organization, see for example (this TV show is on Youtube but it is from the national tv: https:// (youtube) /mPxMhKQiLHk?si=3uvAEw4nQur5TvuJ&t=852 A major news website published a news item about the organization and its event: https://primorski.me/info/odrzano-predavanje-uloga-i-znacaj-mladih-u-kreiranju-bezbjednijeg-drustva/
For other countries, news items are in its language and hard to detect, but I guess 10+ sources from three countries should suffice. Topjur01 ( talk) 20:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need to hear from other editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Of the first 20 references, 19 are unsuitable to prove notabilty and one is a report on the conference. Its probably WP:PRIMARY. There is nothing in this first that proves the organisation is notable. Instead it is a whole a primary, links to their offices in different countries, but not enought to prove notability. Its a large international organisation but currently it still fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep Talk 23:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
This should suffice. Topjur01 ( talk) 19:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. The mere fact that two teams play each other does not constitute a rivalry. Only one of the sources provided on the page actually calls it a rivalry, and that source appears to be a blog as opposed to a reputable source. Alza08 ( talk) 08:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2008 Polish Air Force C-295 Mirosławiec crash. Daniel ( talk) 10:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:SINGLEEVENT notable only for one event, as a non-notable victim of a plane crash, zero sourcing after 15 years. Whatever content is useful should be placed at 2008 Polish Air Force C-295 Mirosławiec crash. No sources in translated versions that establish notability beyond being a crash victim. Macktheknifeau ( talk) 05:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
pilot
or the person's military rank to avoid confusion with the actor of the same name. A general is usually notable, and some of the claims in the existing article and its counterparts in other languages seem to indicate notability.
Eastmain (
talk •
contribs) 07:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The sources therein does not confer notability; they're mostly primary sources and does not give significant coverage to the subject. I do not think that the subject meet the notability criteria for academics either. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 06:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Ldm1954 ( talk) 03:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Novem Linguae ( talk · contribs) as "Mass deletion of pages added by RobertoSanchez1990. WP:G5 sockpuppet confirmed by checkuser. One of the articles currently at AFD looks like it's probably a hoax, so mass deletion rather than spending a bunch of time chasing down hoaxes seems warranted. I am keeping one page that had substantial edits from other users." (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Contested draftification. As the AFC reviewer said, "None of the sources indicate that Miami and Fukuoka will play each other on the stated date." Possible hoax. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 06:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to San Bernardino train disaster. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
This article covers the train engine involved in the San Bernardino train disaster, duplicating some of that article's material while only adding some unencyclopedic information on an otherwise standard train engine. Subject is not inherently notable and what notability exists is in the context of a subject already covered in the disaster article. I would also be content with a merge to redirect. Pbritti ( talk) 06:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
May 12th, 1989and that context of the mentioned article already exists in another. Toadette ( let's chat together) 16:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This has been tagged as relying on only a single source since 2011. A quick search on google scholar and google books shows that the biography cited here is more or less the only source that discusses Glass in detail, with a handful of later works referencing the biography. In my opinion, this clearly fails notability. SilverStar54 ( talk) 05:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The book notes: "The revival spread through the seminary, the schools, the hospital, and the area churches. Perhaps the deepest impact was made on Culpepper's friend, Wiley B. Glass, a much respected missionary. As Glass sat in the meetings, a man's face came before him and God seemed to be asking him about his attitude toward that man. Glass had hated the man for many years, and suddenly the Holy Spirit brought him under deep conviction."
The book notes: "One day while in a revival meeting, a respected missionary in China, Wiley B. Glass ran to his missionary friend C.L. Culpepper and, in great anguish, asked his friend to pray for him. Both men went to their knees, but Glass pale as death and groaning in his anxiety, was unable to express his agony in words. Culpepper prayed with him, and for him, several times during that day and into the next. Finally, on the evening of the second day, Glass came running to Culpepper and threw his arms around him."
The book notes: "In general, the revivals in Shandong were a spontaneous rural movement that Wiley B. Glass, who taught at a Baptist seminary in Huangxian in northeastern Shandong, compared to a "cattle stampede." Yet Glass also found it to be a genuinely "indigenous" Christianity in contrast to the liberal religion envisioned by the Shanghai-based leaders of the NCC (which he dubbed "a type of foreign-inspired modernism that the Chinese did not readily accept").""
The review notes: "In Higher Ground, Eloise Glass Cauthen presents the story of her missionary father, Wiley B. Glass, who served the Southern Baptist Mission in China for over forty years, ending his work there with the Japanese occupation of Hwanghsien in Shantung. Because of these circumstances his extensive diaries and all records were lost. When Mrs. Cauthen set out to write her father's life story she was dependent on her notes of conversations with her father, who lived into his nineties, clear of mind and always willing to recall details of past events and experiences. Mrs. Cauthen chose to use an autobiographical style to present her tribute to her great missionary father. This reviewer would have preferred a more straightforward narrative treatment instead of the use of the first person for the parental tale."
There is a separate death notice in the same newspaper here. The obituary notes: "A missionary to China for 42 years, Dr. Glass worked in Shantung province throughout his overseas career. He taught in the North China Baptist Theological Seminary, Hwanghsien, 34 years and served as its principal for eighth years. Interned by the Japanese early in World War II, he was repatriated to the States in 1943. He retired in 1945. A native of Franklin County, Tex., Dr. Glass graduated from Baylor University, Waco, with a B.A. degree and from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Ky., with a Master of Theology degree. He was awarded the honorary Doctor of Divinity degree by Baylor University in 1919."
The article notes: "the man who with his wife brought up five children in China, where Dr. Glass served as a theological teacher. Although he will be 80 Sept. 4. Dr. Glass expects to continue working, using as his motto three verses (5-8) from the second chapter of Philippians. "Let the mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus ...""
The article notes: "Dr. and Mrs. Glass were missionaries in North China more than 40 years for the Southern Baptist Convention. They had lived in Fort Worth since their return 10 years ago from a Japanese internment camp in China. They have spoken throughout the South in interest of foreign missions."
The article notes: "She was married to Mr. Gless after starting her mission work in China where Mr. Glass is also doing church work."
The article notes: "A native of Texas, Dr. Glass was interned by the Japanese before his return to the States. He is a graduate of Baylor University and holds the Th.M. degree from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He served as president of the Baptist Theological Seminary at Hwanghsien, China, from 1924 to 1931."
The article notes: "Wiley B. Glass and Jessie Pettigrew Glass, Mt. Pleasant, Texas, and Alice Barlow, Hope, Ark., are among the 1,236 American nationals aboard the Japanese ship Teia Maru to be exchanged at Mormugao, Portuguese India, for Japanese nationals from this country, according to an United Press story."
The article notes: "Tuesday night's speaker will be the Rev. Wiley B. Glass, who served many years as a missionary to China, having been appointed to that country in 1903. For several years he did evangelistic work in Laichow and was then transferred to teach in the seminary at Hwangshien. In 1916 he organized a church in Lungkow, China. He is now retired, living in this country."
The article notes: "He graduated from Baylor in 1901, spent a few years in seminary study, and then sailed for China—an adventurous undertaking some 30 years ago. He has been rewarded with great success as a Christian missionary, though, ... He has sent two daughters and a son back to finish Baylor and other American schools."
The article notes: "The pioneer missionary and Mrs. Glass were interned in a Jap concentration camp in 1942. Since their release from the camp in 1945, they have been making their home in Fort Worth. Although retired because of age, Dr. Glass stated he hope to be able to go back to China for further missionary work."
Cunard ( talk) 12:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Bolivian women's footballer, has played for her respective national team since 2021. I am unable to find the in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least three caps for the Kazakhstan women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bulgaria at the 1936 Winter Olympics. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOLYMPICS competing alone is not sufficient, this person did not medal. did a WP:BEFORE and cannot find any additional references for notability besides the competition record. lizthegrey ( talk) 19:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
65.200.160.160 (
talk) 05:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Malayalam films of 1981. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Article created in 2014 with three meh sources. Film doesn't seem to pass WP:NFILM, though sources may be available in a different language. There's a contested PROD earlier this month. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 03:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Herm. An editor says they have added content to the target article but this closure will ensure it's placed there. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
How is this poorly referernced list notable either in light of WP:GNG or WP:NLIST? We don't have an article about tenants of Herm. Being a tenant does not usually make one notable, unless this is a significant historical title which currently the article does not suggest is the case. Not sure if merging this to Herm makes sense but it could be considered a WP:ATD. I'll also translate a comment from ongoing pl wiki deletion discussion which seems quite well made: "The island is an integral part of one of the parishes (municipalities) of Guernsey and belongs entirely to the central authorities of the island (until 1949 it was owned by the Crown). The island is leased for a specified period of time (with the possibility of extension), and tenants sometimes sublet it further. This is no different from any other lease of state land in any country in the world - after all, we are talking about the lease of only approximately 150-200 ha, and there are many such areas in the world that have been leased for a long time (including islands). The list of people leasing given areas is not encyclopedic." (by User:Aotearoa). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The sources available (as seen online) does not scratch the general notability guidelines. As seen in the sources available on the entry, it is filled with "he said..." which makes them non-independent. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 04:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject is a Ugandan women's footballer who has appeared for her respective national team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The best sources I found were 1 and 2. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Notability of the article content is sparse and questionable with regards to its merits of being a sole article. I would opt to delete and merge the contents with either TNT Sports (United Kingdom) or ESPN in the United Kingdom as these articles would be more suitable for this content. S. Salim ( talk) 01:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Recently located sources satisfy the AFD nominator so I'm going to close this as Keep. Thank you to everyone who did legwork to locate sources mentioning or covering this article subject. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable beyond the famous mention by The Notorious B.I.G. Article (as Word Up (magazine)) was previously deleted in 2007 on the same grounds, and created around the same time under this name. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 01:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm not sure how "Less Resources" is an argument to Keep an article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The Snap Table seems to be a trademark of a particular tool, made by Swenson. I failed to find any mention of a generic use of the term in roofing. The particular tool does not seem to be notable, I have failed to locate any independent sources. Викидим ( talk) 01:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. after rellevant sources tracked down and added to the article (thank you!). Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Zero relevant Google News hits for "Mike Boon" comedian; no independent reliable sources in the article since its creation in 2006. BD2412 T 00:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. It's not sufficient to say you did a Google search or write "Passes GNG". If you want this article to be Kept, you need to present specific sources that other editors can examine and verify. The fact that editors who have a lot of AFD experience are still relying on WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is disappointing.
Should anyone want to work on a draft article, contact me or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 00:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Largely unsourced article on footballer with no evidence of notability. No sources found in my own search to satisfy WP:GNG. Mbdfar ( talk) 00:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The Wall Street Journal profile of the businessman, while nifty, is the only source on this subject that is acceptable, meaning that they fall below the WP:GNG threshold for inclusion. BD2412 T 00:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Only sources referenced in the article are databases and do not address the subject in-depth. BEFORE search shows no American nor Greek-language sources found. Tails Wx 00:55, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Little independent coverage outside Wikipedia itself. Two local news coverage sources with single sentence mentions and a self-published book but appears to fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:SUSTAINED. lizthegrey ( talk) 00:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. I Withdraw the nomination, but if the article is not improved within a few months I will be renominating it. (non-admin closure) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 18:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Poorly Written Article Written like an Advertisement. See WP:NOTADVERT (Speedy Deletion Denied for G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 23:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Another minor Walking Dead character. Once again all coverage is casting information and episode summaries, there is interviews but those arent independent. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Artist management company that fails WP:GNG. The sources provided in the article are all problematic: the first and last are listings of the company (zero depth of coverage), Discogs (also zero depth in this case) and AllMusic are unreliable and discuss the company's founder, not the company itself, and the rest are about the first band that the company represented but simply include a short quote of Warren Askew (the founder of the agency) without providing anything close to significant coverage of the company (or Askew). Pichpich ( talk) 22:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
* keep: meet all the requirements as a music manager on behalf of the company according to the Music Managers Forum, Please read the guidelines. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A04:4A43:429F:D4CE:C871:C1E7:4603:60D3 (
talk) 02:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
* Keep:It totally met all requirements to have a Wikipedia page as there's enough references — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Szilvia1234 (
talk •
contribs) 19:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Penalty (ice hockey). Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:DICTIONARY, this article isn't notable. It goes as far as to define slashing, and not much more can be said that isn't already said about it. Maccore Henni user talk Respond using tb, please. 22:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Stone Temple Pilots (2010 album). Eddie891 Talk Work 21:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NSONG or WP:GNG. Possible redirect to album, though I am not sure song title is unambiguous. Boleyn ( talk) 21:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that this meets WP:N in itself, or is worth, considering the lack of notability and sources, a redirect to Ugly Betty. Boleyn ( talk) 20:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ian Dorricott. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Mainly unsourced article with no evidence of notability, nor could I find any. Possible redirect to Ian Dorricott, but I wouldn't propose a merge as so much of this is unsourced. Boleyn ( talk) 20:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
He has produced work for notable publications, but I couldn't find evidence that he himself is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 20:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite the extensive length of the messages opposing deletion, this is actually a very straightforward closure, because the "delete" arguments are grounded in policy, while the "keeps" simply aren't. I don't see any point in a detailed analysis of why each of the arguments given for keeping fails, but to illustrate the points, I will describe two of them. Firstly, there is a total failure to grasp the point of WP:BURDEN. Not only is it contrary to Wikipedia policy to take the line "I believe that this article should be kept, but it's up to you to provide sources to show that it should", but it's also contrary to logic. Secondly, "there probably are refs out there" is a perfect example of Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#There must be sources. JBW ( talk) 20:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 20:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
I need more time to work on this. Herostratus ( talk) 22:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was move X-ray generator to X-ray machine. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Is this a WP:DICDEF, or a very poorly built disambiguation page? – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 18:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this in Draft space, let me know or go to WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Article was already deleted due to discussion here in August, due to subject not being notable. There has been no evolution in the subject's notability since then. Delete and WP:SALT. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 17:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Refs are passing mentions, profiles. scope_creep Talk 15:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. Any GNG sources in the article are about the company, not the individual; they don't provide the significant coverage required to meet the standards of WP:GNG or WP:BASIC for a biographical article. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 12:08, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:ONEOTHER; only one other topic, but I think Microsoft Silverlight is the main one, so I added a link to Terry Silverlight in a hatnote on the target page; this doesn't really seem needed LOOKSQUARE ( 👤️· 🗨️) talk 13:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails General notability guideline. Not enough reliable, significant coverage. Most sources are just blogs or tabloid articles. Pabsoluterince ( talk) 11:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is a consensus here against deletion. Improvement of the article (including splits elsewhere) can still be done/discussed. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
It's an essay. It's a good essay! But it's a terrible encyclopedia page. It's in no way objective and seeks to build a specific narrative. It uses quotes selectively to buttress this idea, and outside of the quotations uses subjective language for the same end. It's also somewhat incomprehensible, but that's no reason to delete a page rather than to fix it. Rather, the page exists solely to push a narrative, and doesn't do much besides for that. It's also just not a commonly-used term at all, as a quick Google search shows, so I'm doubtful it hits notability requirements. In sum: it's a subjective essay about a dubiously notable subject. But an interesting read, if it was on a blog somewhere, where it might belong. Bruhpedia ( talk) 10:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
journals and books aren't ipso facto optimal sources here ... need to be counterbalanced ... by more about Israeli views?! starship .paint ( RUN) 01:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
sourcing is either red or orange? -- Orgullomoore ( talk) 07:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 16:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:PLACEOUTCOMES. No notable source. Hongsy ( talk) 14:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
" Census tracts, Abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable"), since many of them are not actually villages but instead farms, factories, military bases, pumps, shops etc. In this case Google translate tells me the name means "Thank you Hosseini" though I wouldn't necessarily read too much into that. The population is large enough that the place should eventually be converted into a village, though I don't see any evidence that this has happened. FOARP ( talk) 10:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk) 17:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus due to lack of participation. No prejudice to an immediate relisting at AfD if any editor desires. Daniel ( talk) 10:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
As with the company he cofounded, I am unable to locate anything independently written in reliable sources that address Beisel directly and in detail. There are few db style entries for the listings, but in my view they do not reach the threshold for biographical notability. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 15:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk) 18:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2014. Does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. PhD in 1993, h-index of 21 ( Web of Science) or 23 ( Scopus). The university website has a comprehensive list of achievements. Jähmefyysikko ( talk) 21:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This is a borderline case regarding NPROF and I'm hopeful a consensus can be reached with a couple more editors participating and reviewing. Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Keep Political views of Javier Milei, Delete Political positions of Javier Milei, then move "Views" to "Positions" page title Liz Read! Talk! 07:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Two articles about the same sub-topic, Political positions of Javier Milei and Political views of Javier Milei, exist. Which, if any, of them should be replaced by a redirect to which target? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 17:08, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The discussion has run out of steam, and despite analysis of the sources, few editors have commented on them. Therefore, I don't see agreement of what to do, and the debate has been resisted too many times. No prejudice against renomination at a later date. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
No indication of being notable with terrible references. Draftified but not updated. Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 07:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The organization is “notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.” Between 2021 and 2023, this subject has been the subject of:
— Slovenian Press Agency STA, the state-owned and highly reputable press agency, in at least three articles
— BalkanInsight (Serbia etc), a well-known international media in English with award-winning journalists from 7 countries
— Dnevnik, a major daily newspaper, established 1946, in at least three articles, two of which focus on the subject in-depth
— Slovenia Times, the leading Slovenian publication in English
— Večer, a major daily newspaper, established 1945, in a two-page feature article with in-depth coverage of the organization
These sources are referenced in the page. Topjur01 ( talk) 11:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
-- National TV Slovenia, state owned: TV news 1: https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/permisivna-vzgoja-je-vpeljana-v-vse-pore-nasega-zivljenja/665602 TV news 2: https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/kdo-stoji-za-mednarodno-policijsko-organizacijo-ipo-ki-je-pri-nas-pomagala-po-poplavah/679297
-- Delo, the most read national daily newspaper since 1945: Article 1: https://www.delo.si/tag/pomoc-za-prizadete/ Article 2: https://www.delo.si/nedelo/odziv-ljudi-je-fantasticen/
-- 24ur, the most read news portal in the country: Article 1: https://www.24ur.com/novice/slovenija/pomoc-rdeci-kriz.html
-- BIRN (Balkan Investigative Reporting Network, Serbia etc): https://birn.rs/mreza-parapolicijskih-organizacija-pravoslavni-templari-i-veze-sa-sns-om/
Topjur01 ( talk) 12:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
The National TV Radio_and_Television_of_Montenegro occasionally hosta guests who represent the organization, see for example (this TV show is on Youtube but it is from the national tv: https:// (youtube) /mPxMhKQiLHk?si=3uvAEw4nQur5TvuJ&t=852 A major news website published a news item about the organization and its event: https://primorski.me/info/odrzano-predavanje-uloga-i-znacaj-mladih-u-kreiranju-bezbjednijeg-drustva/
For other countries, news items are in its language and hard to detect, but I guess 10+ sources from three countries should suffice. Topjur01 ( talk) 20:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need to hear from other editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 10:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Of the first 20 references, 19 are unsuitable to prove notabilty and one is a report on the conference. Its probably WP:PRIMARY. There is nothing in this first that proves the organisation is notable. Instead it is a whole a primary, links to their offices in different countries, but not enought to prove notability. Its a large international organisation but currently it still fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep Talk 23:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
This should suffice. Topjur01 ( talk) 19:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Not notable. The mere fact that two teams play each other does not constitute a rivalry. Only one of the sources provided on the page actually calls it a rivalry, and that source appears to be a blog as opposed to a reputable source. Alza08 ( talk) 08:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2008 Polish Air Force C-295 Mirosławiec crash. Daniel ( talk) 10:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:SINGLEEVENT notable only for one event, as a non-notable victim of a plane crash, zero sourcing after 15 years. Whatever content is useful should be placed at 2008 Polish Air Force C-295 Mirosławiec crash. No sources in translated versions that establish notability beyond being a crash victim. Macktheknifeau ( talk) 05:50, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
pilot
or the person's military rank to avoid confusion with the actor of the same name. A general is usually notable, and some of the claims in the existing article and its counterparts in other languages seem to indicate notability.
Eastmain (
talk •
contribs) 07:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The sources therein does not confer notability; they're mostly primary sources and does not give significant coverage to the subject. I do not think that the subject meet the notability criteria for academics either. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 06:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Ldm1954 ( talk) 03:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Novem Linguae ( talk · contribs) as "Mass deletion of pages added by RobertoSanchez1990. WP:G5 sockpuppet confirmed by checkuser. One of the articles currently at AFD looks like it's probably a hoax, so mass deletion rather than spending a bunch of time chasing down hoaxes seems warranted. I am keeping one page that had substantial edits from other users." (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Contested draftification. As the AFC reviewer said, "None of the sources indicate that Miami and Fukuoka will play each other on the stated date." Possible hoax. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 06:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to San Bernardino train disaster. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
This article covers the train engine involved in the San Bernardino train disaster, duplicating some of that article's material while only adding some unencyclopedic information on an otherwise standard train engine. Subject is not inherently notable and what notability exists is in the context of a subject already covered in the disaster article. I would also be content with a merge to redirect. Pbritti ( talk) 06:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
May 12th, 1989and that context of the mentioned article already exists in another. Toadette ( let's chat together) 16:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This has been tagged as relying on only a single source since 2011. A quick search on google scholar and google books shows that the biography cited here is more or less the only source that discusses Glass in detail, with a handful of later works referencing the biography. In my opinion, this clearly fails notability. SilverStar54 ( talk) 05:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The book notes: "The revival spread through the seminary, the schools, the hospital, and the area churches. Perhaps the deepest impact was made on Culpepper's friend, Wiley B. Glass, a much respected missionary. As Glass sat in the meetings, a man's face came before him and God seemed to be asking him about his attitude toward that man. Glass had hated the man for many years, and suddenly the Holy Spirit brought him under deep conviction."
The book notes: "One day while in a revival meeting, a respected missionary in China, Wiley B. Glass ran to his missionary friend C.L. Culpepper and, in great anguish, asked his friend to pray for him. Both men went to their knees, but Glass pale as death and groaning in his anxiety, was unable to express his agony in words. Culpepper prayed with him, and for him, several times during that day and into the next. Finally, on the evening of the second day, Glass came running to Culpepper and threw his arms around him."
The book notes: "In general, the revivals in Shandong were a spontaneous rural movement that Wiley B. Glass, who taught at a Baptist seminary in Huangxian in northeastern Shandong, compared to a "cattle stampede." Yet Glass also found it to be a genuinely "indigenous" Christianity in contrast to the liberal religion envisioned by the Shanghai-based leaders of the NCC (which he dubbed "a type of foreign-inspired modernism that the Chinese did not readily accept").""
The review notes: "In Higher Ground, Eloise Glass Cauthen presents the story of her missionary father, Wiley B. Glass, who served the Southern Baptist Mission in China for over forty years, ending his work there with the Japanese occupation of Hwanghsien in Shantung. Because of these circumstances his extensive diaries and all records were lost. When Mrs. Cauthen set out to write her father's life story she was dependent on her notes of conversations with her father, who lived into his nineties, clear of mind and always willing to recall details of past events and experiences. Mrs. Cauthen chose to use an autobiographical style to present her tribute to her great missionary father. This reviewer would have preferred a more straightforward narrative treatment instead of the use of the first person for the parental tale."
There is a separate death notice in the same newspaper here. The obituary notes: "A missionary to China for 42 years, Dr. Glass worked in Shantung province throughout his overseas career. He taught in the North China Baptist Theological Seminary, Hwanghsien, 34 years and served as its principal for eighth years. Interned by the Japanese early in World War II, he was repatriated to the States in 1943. He retired in 1945. A native of Franklin County, Tex., Dr. Glass graduated from Baylor University, Waco, with a B.A. degree and from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Ky., with a Master of Theology degree. He was awarded the honorary Doctor of Divinity degree by Baylor University in 1919."
The article notes: "the man who with his wife brought up five children in China, where Dr. Glass served as a theological teacher. Although he will be 80 Sept. 4. Dr. Glass expects to continue working, using as his motto three verses (5-8) from the second chapter of Philippians. "Let the mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus ...""
The article notes: "Dr. and Mrs. Glass were missionaries in North China more than 40 years for the Southern Baptist Convention. They had lived in Fort Worth since their return 10 years ago from a Japanese internment camp in China. They have spoken throughout the South in interest of foreign missions."
The article notes: "She was married to Mr. Gless after starting her mission work in China where Mr. Glass is also doing church work."
The article notes: "A native of Texas, Dr. Glass was interned by the Japanese before his return to the States. He is a graduate of Baylor University and holds the Th.M. degree from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He served as president of the Baptist Theological Seminary at Hwanghsien, China, from 1924 to 1931."
The article notes: "Wiley B. Glass and Jessie Pettigrew Glass, Mt. Pleasant, Texas, and Alice Barlow, Hope, Ark., are among the 1,236 American nationals aboard the Japanese ship Teia Maru to be exchanged at Mormugao, Portuguese India, for Japanese nationals from this country, according to an United Press story."
The article notes: "Tuesday night's speaker will be the Rev. Wiley B. Glass, who served many years as a missionary to China, having been appointed to that country in 1903. For several years he did evangelistic work in Laichow and was then transferred to teach in the seminary at Hwangshien. In 1916 he organized a church in Lungkow, China. He is now retired, living in this country."
The article notes: "He graduated from Baylor in 1901, spent a few years in seminary study, and then sailed for China—an adventurous undertaking some 30 years ago. He has been rewarded with great success as a Christian missionary, though, ... He has sent two daughters and a son back to finish Baylor and other American schools."
The article notes: "The pioneer missionary and Mrs. Glass were interned in a Jap concentration camp in 1942. Since their release from the camp in 1945, they have been making their home in Fort Worth. Although retired because of age, Dr. Glass stated he hope to be able to go back to China for further missionary work."
Cunard ( talk) 12:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Bolivian women's footballer, has played for her respective national team since 2021. I am unable to find the in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least three caps for the Kazakhstan women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bulgaria at the 1936 Winter Olympics. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOLYMPICS competing alone is not sufficient, this person did not medal. did a WP:BEFORE and cannot find any additional references for notability besides the competition record. lizthegrey ( talk) 19:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
65.200.160.160 (
talk) 05:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Malayalam films of 1981. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Article created in 2014 with three meh sources. Film doesn't seem to pass WP:NFILM, though sources may be available in a different language. There's a contested PROD earlier this month. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 03:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Herm. An editor says they have added content to the target article but this closure will ensure it's placed there. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
How is this poorly referernced list notable either in light of WP:GNG or WP:NLIST? We don't have an article about tenants of Herm. Being a tenant does not usually make one notable, unless this is a significant historical title which currently the article does not suggest is the case. Not sure if merging this to Herm makes sense but it could be considered a WP:ATD. I'll also translate a comment from ongoing pl wiki deletion discussion which seems quite well made: "The island is an integral part of one of the parishes (municipalities) of Guernsey and belongs entirely to the central authorities of the island (until 1949 it was owned by the Crown). The island is leased for a specified period of time (with the possibility of extension), and tenants sometimes sublet it further. This is no different from any other lease of state land in any country in the world - after all, we are talking about the lease of only approximately 150-200 ha, and there are many such areas in the world that have been leased for a long time (including islands). The list of people leasing given areas is not encyclopedic." (by User:Aotearoa). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The sources available (as seen online) does not scratch the general notability guidelines. As seen in the sources available on the entry, it is filled with "he said..." which makes them non-independent. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 04:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject is a Ugandan women's footballer who has appeared for her respective national team. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The best sources I found were 1 and 2. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Notability of the article content is sparse and questionable with regards to its merits of being a sole article. I would opt to delete and merge the contents with either TNT Sports (United Kingdom) or ESPN in the United Kingdom as these articles would be more suitable for this content. S. Salim ( talk) 01:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Recently located sources satisfy the AFD nominator so I'm going to close this as Keep. Thank you to everyone who did legwork to locate sources mentioning or covering this article subject. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable beyond the famous mention by The Notorious B.I.G. Article (as Word Up (magazine)) was previously deleted in 2007 on the same grounds, and created around the same time under this name. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 01:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm not sure how "Less Resources" is an argument to Keep an article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The Snap Table seems to be a trademark of a particular tool, made by Swenson. I failed to find any mention of a generic use of the term in roofing. The particular tool does not seem to be notable, I have failed to locate any independent sources. Викидим ( talk) 01:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. after rellevant sources tracked down and added to the article (thank you!). Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Zero relevant Google News hits for "Mike Boon" comedian; no independent reliable sources in the article since its creation in 2006. BD2412 T 00:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. It's not sufficient to say you did a Google search or write "Passes GNG". If you want this article to be Kept, you need to present specific sources that other editors can examine and verify. The fact that editors who have a lot of AFD experience are still relying on WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is disappointing.
Should anyone want to work on a draft article, contact me or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 00:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Largely unsourced article on footballer with no evidence of notability. No sources found in my own search to satisfy WP:GNG. Mbdfar ( talk) 00:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The Wall Street Journal profile of the businessman, while nifty, is the only source on this subject that is acceptable, meaning that they fall below the WP:GNG threshold for inclusion. BD2412 T 00:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Only sources referenced in the article are databases and do not address the subject in-depth. BEFORE search shows no American nor Greek-language sources found. Tails Wx 00:55, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Little independent coverage outside Wikipedia itself. Two local news coverage sources with single sentence mentions and a self-published book but appears to fail WP:SIGCOV and WP:SUSTAINED. lizthegrey ( talk) 00:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)