The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Although there are many huge names in hardcore on this tour, I can't find independent, reliable, and non-trivial sources about it. Metal Injection and Kerrang! have some very short pieces on it which say no more than "This tour is happening", and Distorted Sound has a review of it which mostly focuses on the performances of the bands, and not the tour itself. There are many more short pieces that fall into one of these categories. pinktoebeans (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP of a subject of doubtful notability, created by a now-blocked user. Someone may see a glimmer of notability here I’ve overlooked. Mccapra ( talk) 22:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC with no chart or notable label activity backed by bad sourcing. Another drill rapper article in which the subject is hailed as some major figure of the genre with no evidence backing it up, while the only notable citations are mundane coverage of his criminal activity. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 19:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Only 2 small hits in Australian search engine trove. Sources 2, 4 and 5 are dead. Source 3 appears to be a blog source published by Wordpress. Source 6 is LinkedIn. LibStar ( talk) 23:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 06:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. One reference to an NFL weblink which has no statistics. Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Geoff | Who, me? 23:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Some of the sources such as this and this don't even mention Matthew Miles. Other sources are not WP:SIGCOV and unremarkable awards won. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 23:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Arthur J. Sills. Consensus for redirect to Arthur J. Sills. It can be further expanded in future if notability develops. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Contested prod - searched for independent sources for the unreferenced articles drive but couldn't find enough for NORG Ben Azura ( talk) 22:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Law firm Sills Cummis & Gross, which has offices in New York and Newark, N.J., started bringing back employees this month, managing partner Max Crane said. He said the plan was complicated by finances, politics, health and human nature. “You have to respect the psychological and emotional pieces of it,” he said.S0091 ( talk) 22:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The links on this page are all WP:Partial title matches, many of which are already linked from Nagaland. Ultimately, "Nagaland" is not ambiguous. This page is therefore not required. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 19:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Most coverage is routine funding coverage and routine "hottest growing startups" lists. As for other stuff: IndianWeb2 is the most in-depth source, but it's a blog. The two Entrepreneur sources are from contributors, which by WP:RSPSS are unreliable. Analytics Insight and Telegana Today look like interviews. ~ A412 talk! 19:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Lovely Sparrows. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 06:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Notability (music) as most sources are either interviews or unreliable sources.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Not notable, practically no coverage outside of one or two store pages. Citations are not deserving of saving this. (In hindsight, should have just requested for deletion initially.) detriaskies 16:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by an Admin. ( non-admin closure) --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 13:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
unreviewed music by non-notable musician, fails WP:NMUSIC microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish· growths) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I was unable to find any sources proving the notability of this individual, whether under the name "Lena Townsend" or "Lena Moncrieff/Lena Moncrieff Townsend"; the page has been marked as unreferenced since 2009. Most results about this specific person that I could find trace back to the English Wikipedia. She is noted as having a CBE, so that might prove her notability, but I can't find any sources that prove that she was in fact awarded a CBE. Jaguarnik ( talk) 15:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus to keep per NUNI established. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG and no WP:RS available. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Because the group or set is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable. Being included in a list doesn't justify a standalone article. IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 02:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not contain the significant coverage to meet the GNG. This technically survived a bulk AfD last year but that was more about other stations in the nomination than this one. Let'srun ( talk) 14:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
non-notable, advertorial User4edits ( talk) 12:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zig & Sharko#Spin-off. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Zig & Sharko#Spin-off. Contested BLAR, unreferenced, a BEFORE turns up nothing of use. Queen of Hearts 13:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are database records and BEFORE found promo, database records, nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 13:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. No penalty against a future article that is adequately sourced being written in Draft space and submitted to WP:AFC Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The article structure does not comply with MOS, it has no source, notability is questioned, or it could be Hoax. Vitaium ( talk) 11:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years, only mentions seen as refs, nothing found on pt.wiki JMWt ( talk) 10:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
This BLP about a headteacher is sourced to Debrett's, which is considered reliable, to Who's Who, which is in the list of perennial sources as unreliable, and to his articles in the HuffPost, which is not an independent source. I have not been able to find references to add. The article does not meet WP:THREE, and I don't think Moule is notable according to WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Tacyarg ( talk) 11:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page - and few substantial edits to it - for many years. I don't speak German but I'm not finding anything much which would point to notability, interested if anyone else can. JMWt ( talk) 09:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify to allow improvements to be made. ✗ plicit 14:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Rejected at AFC largely unsourced, fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN. Theroadislong ( talk) 09:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
CSMention269 ( talk) 11:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Asterix#In popular culture. Consensus to merge into Asterix#In popular culture. It can be further discussed in the talk page outside AfD if appropriate. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Lacks notability as a separate topic (and no obvious redirect target), unsourced and abandoned article. Prod was removed because "Being featured on postage stamps is a pretty huge honor for any topic, as such the topic asserts notability," but while the fact that Asterix postage stamps have been made shows the (undisputed) notability of Asterix, the indicated lack of notability is for the topic of this list, "Asterix on postage stamps" as a whole. Fram ( talk) 08:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. ✗ plicit 14:11, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 06:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Agreement to delete is unanimous. The two suggesting redirect make no clear case for why a redirect is needed. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Self promotional article. No sourcing from what Ive seen. GamerPro64 05:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 06:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 947 (radio station). Consensus for merging to radio station article, which can be further discussed outside AfD if appropriate. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Borderline, but I couldn't establish that Cowen meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Any WP:ATD, such as redirect to Come Dine With Me South Africa, wouldn't really be helpful to readers. Boleyn ( talk) 12:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
05:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable offices in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 06:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus for GNG and SIGCOV, with local coverage. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable club that hasn't competed in an FA cup competition Kivo ( talk) 14:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
04:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Laminar Research. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 04:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
No notable sourcing to this game. Was nominated for deletion all the way back in 2004 but didnt reach consensus. GamerPro64 04:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus met for NLIST and can be expanded further. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced; fails WP:NLIST. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 19:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be more of a How-To Article than a Wikipedia article. Relativity 20:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus for keep per the new additions. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:NSPORT. I couldn't find any secondary reliable and independent sources about her. Aintabli ( talk) 03:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The sense of the discussion was that while the subject potentially had a claim to notability, the existing sourcing did not provide significant coverage to validate the claim. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE only shows her appointment as the mayor WP:BLP1E? Fails NPOL and GNG Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 06:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
08:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
There are no sources per WP:GNG, does it fail WP:NACTOR. Ferret-o-meter ( talk) 05:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was No consensus. After much-extended time for discussion, opinion remains split between keeping and draftifying, but no one is suggesting that this content needs to be deleted outright, or that the subject is either devoid of current documentation, or unlikely to become unequivocally notable.
BD2412
T
02:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON article about a future election that there's just nothing of any real substance to say about it yet. The election is scheduled for October, which means absolutely nothing is happening with relation to the election yet as of January -- none of the races have any declared candidates yet, and with just a handful of exceptions even the incumbent mayor and councillors haven't announced whether they're running again yet or not, and we're months away from even being able to identify any of the issues that people will be basing their votes on.
Future "next" election articles are permitted at the federal and provincial levels, because there are always things for such an article to write about -- ongoing polling on the performance of the incumbent government, scandals, by-elections, and on and so forth -- but at the municipal level we just don't start articles about future elections until much, much closer to election day, because there just isn't anything meaningful to say about them, beyond "this is a thing that will happen", until much, much closer to election day. As of right now, the only other future municipal election in all of Canada that has an article at all is the imminent mayoral by-election in Mississauga, where we have actual known candidates and polling to write about, and even if the exact date is still up in the air we know that it has to happen by the spring at the latest.
So this can certainly be sandboxed in draft or userspace as a base, if the creator wishes, but there's no need for it to exist as an article until there's a lot more content to write about it than just "incumbent has not yet announced whether they're running again or not" over and over again.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some of the arguments above aren't doing a lot to persuade me P&G-wise, relisting for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
03:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus not established.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
I can find no coverage at all of this game, which was evidently not a success as the company closed within a year. It was also called "Draim Arena" in Swedish, so Swedish-language sources would theoretically be discoverable with that query. ~ L 🌸 ( talk) 02:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Marked for notability concerns since March 2022 and created by a single purpose editor so possibly promotional. I could not find significant coverage of him. Fails WP:BIO. The 2nd source provided is dead. LibStar ( talk) 00:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
02:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Educational consultant. All commenting expressed concern that sourcing failed to support a standalone article, and the target page seems appropriate as the organization was already mentioned as noted in the discussion. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
There are not enough verifiable sources to establish the notability of this education association. Although it seems to be an established and reputable organization, the only articles I could find about it were promotional in nature and outdated, such as this one: [25]. The association has been briefly mentioned by some major outlets in the past, [26] or [27], but that alone does not satisfy the notability criteria. There is no need to have a separate article about this organization, especially with the current, heavily promotional tone. Perhaps, if there is any relevant and useful information, it could be merged into the article of Educational consultant. Chiserc ( talk) 00:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
02:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Angelito Gatlabayan. ✗ plicit 00:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. The subject is the vice-mayor of a city of under 1 million people with no evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Author deleted PROD and added more sources. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
It's been tagged as no sources since 2017, and an additional search of a local news database also had no hits. Fails WP:SIGCOV. ~ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 15:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an arts journalist, not
properly referenced as passing notability criteria for journalists. As always, journalists are not "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to show external validation of their significance: notable journalism awards, third-party coverage and analysis about their work in sources independent of their own employer, and on and so forth. But seven of the eight footnotes here are just her own work metaverifying its own existence (or formerly metaverifying its own existence, because now it's all dead links across the board), and the last one is a
MySpace (!), meaning that absolutely none of them represent GNG-building coverage about Laura Thompson.
Again, you don't get a journalist over the bar by citing sources where she's the bylined author of coverage about other things, you get a journalist over the bar by citing sources where she's the written-about subject of coverage authored by other people, and nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have that kind of sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk)
01:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be draftified on request from people who are seriously intending to work on it. Sandstein 08:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG; the only example of significant coverage in an independent source is the cited Pontianak Tribun profile, coverage online is otherwise minimal or else non-independent. signed, Rosguill talk 16:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
potentialfor an article here? signed, Rosguill talk 15:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rugby League Conference. Content can be merged from history if desired. Sandstein 08:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Very minor amateur RL league which only existed briefly. Fails WP:GNG as no significant coverage exists. J Mo 101 ( talk) 20:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:ONEEVENT, this young man doesn't seem to me to be a suitable subject of a Wikipedia article. Basically teenager goes missing and is found 8 years later. Slightly unusual event, but with no lasting consequences. Sionk ( talk) 23:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG, or a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 18:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Although there are many huge names in hardcore on this tour, I can't find independent, reliable, and non-trivial sources about it. Metal Injection and Kerrang! have some very short pieces on it which say no more than "This tour is happening", and Distorted Sound has a review of it which mostly focuses on the performances of the bands, and not the tour itself. There are many more short pieces that fall into one of these categories. pinktoebeans (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 10:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP of a subject of doubtful notability, created by a now-blocked user. Someone may see a glimmer of notability here I’ve overlooked. Mccapra ( talk) 22:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMUSIC with no chart or notable label activity backed by bad sourcing. Another drill rapper article in which the subject is hailed as some major figure of the genre with no evidence backing it up, while the only notable citations are mundane coverage of his criminal activity. sixtynine • whaddya want? • 19:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Only 2 small hits in Australian search engine trove. Sources 2, 4 and 5 are dead. Source 3 appears to be a blog source published by Wordpress. Source 6 is LinkedIn. LibStar ( talk) 23:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 06:23, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. One reference to an NFL weblink which has no statistics. Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Geoff | Who, me? 23:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Some of the sources such as this and this don't even mention Matthew Miles. Other sources are not WP:SIGCOV and unremarkable awards won. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 23:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Arthur J. Sills. Consensus for redirect to Arthur J. Sills. It can be further expanded in future if notability develops. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Contested prod - searched for independent sources for the unreferenced articles drive but couldn't find enough for NORG Ben Azura ( talk) 22:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Law firm Sills Cummis & Gross, which has offices in New York and Newark, N.J., started bringing back employees this month, managing partner Max Crane said. He said the plan was complicated by finances, politics, health and human nature. “You have to respect the psychological and emotional pieces of it,” he said.S0091 ( talk) 22:38, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The links on this page are all WP:Partial title matches, many of which are already linked from Nagaland. Ultimately, "Nagaland" is not ambiguous. This page is therefore not required. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 19:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Most coverage is routine funding coverage and routine "hottest growing startups" lists. As for other stuff: IndianWeb2 is the most in-depth source, but it's a blog. The two Entrepreneur sources are from contributors, which by WP:RSPSS are unreliable. Analytics Insight and Telegana Today look like interviews. ~ A412 talk! 19:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Lovely Sparrows. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 06:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Notability (music) as most sources are either interviews or unreliable sources.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Not notable, practically no coverage outside of one or two store pages. Citations are not deserving of saving this. (In hindsight, should have just requested for deletion initially.) detriaskies 16:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by an Admin. ( non-admin closure) --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 13:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
unreviewed music by non-notable musician, fails WP:NMUSIC microbiologyMarcus ( petri dish· growths) 16:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
I was unable to find any sources proving the notability of this individual, whether under the name "Lena Townsend" or "Lena Moncrieff/Lena Moncrieff Townsend"; the page has been marked as unreferenced since 2009. Most results about this specific person that I could find trace back to the English Wikipedia. She is noted as having a CBE, so that might prove her notability, but I can't find any sources that prove that she was in fact awarded a CBE. Jaguarnik ( talk) 15:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus to keep per NUNI established. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG and no WP:RS available. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Because the group or set is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable. Being included in a list doesn't justify a standalone article. IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 02:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. Liz Read! Talk! 07:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not contain the significant coverage to meet the GNG. This technically survived a bulk AfD last year but that was more about other stations in the nomination than this one. Let'srun ( talk) 14:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
non-notable, advertorial User4edits ( talk) 12:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zig & Sharko#Spin-off. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Zig & Sharko#Spin-off. Contested BLAR, unreferenced, a BEFORE turns up nothing of use. Queen of Hearts 13:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are database records and BEFORE found promo, database records, nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 13:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. No penalty against a future article that is adequately sourced being written in Draft space and submitted to WP:AFC Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The article structure does not comply with MOS, it has no source, notability is questioned, or it could be Hoax. Vitaium ( talk) 11:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years, only mentions seen as refs, nothing found on pt.wiki JMWt ( talk) 10:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
This BLP about a headteacher is sourced to Debrett's, which is considered reliable, to Who's Who, which is in the list of perennial sources as unreliable, and to his articles in the HuffPost, which is not an independent source. I have not been able to find references to add. The article does not meet WP:THREE, and I don't think Moule is notable according to WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Tacyarg ( talk) 11:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page - and few substantial edits to it - for many years. I don't speak German but I'm not finding anything much which would point to notability, interested if anyone else can. JMWt ( talk) 09:16, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify to allow improvements to be made. ✗ plicit 14:22, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Rejected at AFC largely unsourced, fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICIAN. Theroadislong ( talk) 09:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
CSMention269 ( talk) 11:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Asterix#In popular culture. Consensus to merge into Asterix#In popular culture. It can be further discussed in the talk page outside AfD if appropriate. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Lacks notability as a separate topic (and no obvious redirect target), unsourced and abandoned article. Prod was removed because "Being featured on postage stamps is a pretty huge honor for any topic, as such the topic asserts notability," but while the fact that Asterix postage stamps have been made shows the (undisputed) notability of Asterix, the indicated lack of notability is for the topic of this list, "Asterix on postage stamps" as a whole. Fram ( talk) 08:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of stations owned by Innovate Corp.. ✗ plicit 14:11, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 06:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Agreement to delete is unanimous. The two suggesting redirect make no clear case for why a redirect is needed. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Self promotional article. No sourcing from what Ive seen. GamerPro64 05:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 05:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 06:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 947 (radio station). Consensus for merging to radio station article, which can be further discussed outside AfD if appropriate. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:55, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Borderline, but I couldn't establish that Cowen meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Any WP:ATD, such as redirect to Come Dine With Me South Africa, wouldn't really be helpful to readers. Boleyn ( talk) 12:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
05:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:00, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable offices in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 06:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus for GNG and SIGCOV, with local coverage. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable club that hasn't competed in an FA cup competition Kivo ( talk) 14:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
04:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Laminar Research. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 04:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
No notable sourcing to this game. Was nominated for deletion all the way back in 2004 but didnt reach consensus. GamerPro64 04:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus met for NLIST and can be expanded further. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced; fails WP:NLIST. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 19:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be more of a How-To Article than a Wikipedia article. Relativity 20:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
03:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus for keep per the new additions. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:NSPORT. I couldn't find any secondary reliable and independent sources about her. Aintabli ( talk) 03:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The sense of the discussion was that while the subject potentially had a claim to notability, the existing sourcing did not provide significant coverage to validate the claim. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:BEFORE only shows her appointment as the mayor WP:BLP1E? Fails NPOL and GNG Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 06:27, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
08:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:50, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
There are no sources per WP:GNG, does it fail WP:NACTOR. Ferret-o-meter ( talk) 05:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was No consensus. After much-extended time for discussion, opinion remains split between keeping and draftifying, but no one is suggesting that this content needs to be deleted outright, or that the subject is either devoid of current documentation, or unlikely to become unequivocally notable.
BD2412
T
02:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON article about a future election that there's just nothing of any real substance to say about it yet. The election is scheduled for October, which means absolutely nothing is happening with relation to the election yet as of January -- none of the races have any declared candidates yet, and with just a handful of exceptions even the incumbent mayor and councillors haven't announced whether they're running again yet or not, and we're months away from even being able to identify any of the issues that people will be basing their votes on.
Future "next" election articles are permitted at the federal and provincial levels, because there are always things for such an article to write about -- ongoing polling on the performance of the incumbent government, scandals, by-elections, and on and so forth -- but at the municipal level we just don't start articles about future elections until much, much closer to election day, because there just isn't anything meaningful to say about them, beyond "this is a thing that will happen", until much, much closer to election day. As of right now, the only other future municipal election in all of Canada that has an article at all is the imminent mayoral by-election in Mississauga, where we have actual known candidates and polling to write about, and even if the exact date is still up in the air we know that it has to happen by the spring at the latest.
So this can certainly be sandboxed in draft or userspace as a base, if the creator wishes, but there's no need for it to exist as an article until there's a lot more content to write about it than just "incumbent has not yet announced whether they're running again or not" over and over again.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Some of the arguments above aren't doing a lot to persuade me P&G-wise, relisting for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
03:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus not established.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
02:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
I can find no coverage at all of this game, which was evidently not a success as the company closed within a year. It was also called "Draim Arena" in Swedish, so Swedish-language sources would theoretically be discoverable with that query. ~ L 🌸 ( talk) 02:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Marked for notability concerns since March 2022 and created by a single purpose editor so possibly promotional. I could not find significant coverage of him. Fails WP:BIO. The 2nd source provided is dead. LibStar ( talk) 00:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
02:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Educational consultant. All commenting expressed concern that sourcing failed to support a standalone article, and the target page seems appropriate as the organization was already mentioned as noted in the discussion. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
There are not enough verifiable sources to establish the notability of this education association. Although it seems to be an established and reputable organization, the only articles I could find about it were promotional in nature and outdated, such as this one: [25]. The association has been briefly mentioned by some major outlets in the past, [26] or [27], but that alone does not satisfy the notability criteria. There is no need to have a separate article about this organization, especially with the current, heavily promotional tone. Perhaps, if there is any relevant and useful information, it could be merged into the article of Educational consultant. Chiserc ( talk) 00:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
02:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Angelito Gatlabayan. ✗ plicit 00:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL. The subject is the vice-mayor of a city of under 1 million people with no evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Author deleted PROD and added more sources. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
It's been tagged as no sources since 2017, and an additional search of a local news database also had no hits. Fails WP:SIGCOV. ~ฅ(ↀωↀ=) neko-chan nyan 15:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:29, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
01:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an arts journalist, not
properly referenced as passing notability criteria for journalists. As always, journalists are not "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to show external validation of their significance: notable journalism awards, third-party coverage and analysis about their work in sources independent of their own employer, and on and so forth. But seven of the eight footnotes here are just her own work metaverifying its own existence (or formerly metaverifying its own existence, because now it's all dead links across the board), and the last one is a
MySpace (!), meaning that absolutely none of them represent GNG-building coverage about Laura Thompson.
Again, you don't get a journalist over the bar by citing sources where she's the bylined author of coverage about other things, you get a journalist over the bar by citing sources where she's the written-about subject of coverage authored by other people, and nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have that kind of sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk)
01:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be draftified on request from people who are seriously intending to work on it. Sandstein 08:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG; the only example of significant coverage in an independent source is the cited Pontianak Tribun profile, coverage online is otherwise minimal or else non-independent. signed, Rosguill talk 16:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
potentialfor an article here? signed, Rosguill talk 15:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rugby League Conference. Content can be merged from history if desired. Sandstein 08:21, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Very minor amateur RL league which only existed briefly. Fails WP:GNG as no significant coverage exists. J Mo 101 ( talk) 20:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:ONEEVENT, this young man doesn't seem to me to be a suitable subject of a Wikipedia article. Basically teenager goes missing and is found 8 years later. Slightly unusual event, but with no lasting consequences. Sionk ( talk) 23:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find evidence that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG, or a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 18:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)