![]() |
The result was Speedy delete. (G5) — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs) 16:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable. All sources in the article fail to help it pass WP:GNG or WP:NBIO as they are not independent of Lawton. I will note that notability is not inherited, so the fact that he is the son of Geoff Lawton is irrelevant. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 23:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Algeria at the World Athletics Championships. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Contested draftification. Article is entirely unsourced and was draftified because of this. No improvement has been made in this regard. Would support draftification naturally. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 23:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable event; fails general notability guidelines and falls down on significant coverage (searching for more information only leads to Wikipedia mirror sites). Relies solely on one source, and some parts of the article are entirely unsourced and contravenes on original research guidance. Article was previously PRODded and objected, however keeping as a redirect would not add value given a lack of article or redirect for other Intervision contests. Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 13:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because this article also fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:ONESOURCE and WP:OR, as well as an additional issue with WP:SELFPUB:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist as there are a number of different outcomes sought.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NSINGER. UtherSRG (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style. (At least, I don't think there's any question that Hazara folk music is a notable topic, even if we don't currently do a good job of covering it.) In any event the BBC festival link I posted and the AfghanNews link Indefensible posted above would seem to meet the NBASIC requirement of
significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. And given that I don't think either of us have much skill in searching in the local languages, I would venture that there are likely to be considerably more sources out there. -- Visviva ( talk) 00:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability. searching his name in English gives almost nothing, even in Persian there are only very few things about him. the article says he won a gold medal at the Asian Championship in 2007 which is wrong (probably just a junior medal) he also never played in a pro league or even a major national tournament. Sports2021 ( talk) 23:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment. I removed some of the called out unverifiable information about a medal at the Asian Championships after attempting to verify (AFAICT the national team has never medaled in such a competition). That's not promising for this article, but I don't have a !vote as of now. — siro χ o 01:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Austin, Minnesota. Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Entirely unreferenced article which offers no indication of notability. None found prior to nomination. Dorsetonian ( talk) 19:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
no company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is) and WP:NARENA (
sporting arenas, stadia and other venues do not have presumed notability, and are expected to demonstrate notability through meeting the general notability guideline). Dorsetonian ( talk) 19:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Merge and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
can affect reliability.Plainly, this is a context-sensitive determination; e.g. nobody would seriously argue that two separate books published by the same university press are automatically the same source. But anyway, that's probably neither here nor there as far as this particular article goes.) -- Visviva ( talk) 22:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musical businessperson. No links found other than social media, no mentions in RS in Gnews. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to My Little Pony (2003 toyline)#My Little Pony: Pinkie Pie's Party (2008). Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Doing a WP:BEFORE search brings nothing reliable and significant besides the IGN review. The game's Metacritic page is also a ghost town of critic reviews. Sparkl talk 22:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
A relatively minor recurring character in DW, but there are literally no sources for her out there when I checked for BEFORE. There simply doesn't exist anything to justify GNG or SIGCOV, and the article already cites no sources. I'm not sure whether there are any good spots to redirect this article to, as she isn't mentioned at all in the Doctor Who Magazine article and I'm not sure if adding a mention there is a good idea or not, as that's the only good redirect target I can think of. Pokelego999 ( talk) 22:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
While a decently recurring element of the show that sees some occasional outside discussion, I simply can't find enough SIGCOV in order to justify its separation as an article. Most of the sources I found were trivial mentions, and while I found one scholar source and a couple of books giving a decent bit on it, I'm fairly certain it isn't enough to qualify as SIGCOV. A short description of the effect in another article would suffice, though whether that be in the main Doctor Who article or elsewhere, I'm not really sure of at this time. Pokelego999 ( talk) 22:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Redirect. With the round robin title swap presented below. I don't see a compelling case against preserving the history with some folks advocating for a merger, as a protected redirect could be done if necessary. Star Mississippi 01:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails the notability standard per WP:NACADEMIC. I have found no significant coverage of Kelly's contributions to the mathematical field or his particular field of mathematics. He seems to be an impressive mathematician, but unfortunately has not had much of a large influence. GuardianH ( talk) 22:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) GuardianH ( talk) 22:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider the complicated proposal from Russ Woodroofe.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable obstacle course racer. Is a competitor on American Ninja Warrior, but has not done anything notable (like winning it all). Natg 19 ( talk) 22:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable obstacle course racer. Had fleeting moments of fame for American Ninja Warrior, but overall non-notable. Natg 19 ( talk) 21:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
A BLP with scant sourcing, currently only referenced to databases. On review of search results, I can't find any English-language sourcing, and a comprehensive Greek-language search reveals the following sources:
Overall I just don't see a level of coverage in these sources that would meet the threshold of significant coverage required to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSCRIT. GGT ( talk) 20:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The article is unsourced. I was unable to find any relevant sources. Charsaddian ( talk) 20:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced WP:QUOTEFARM from 2015; seems to fail WP:NBIO. jlwoodwa ( talk) 19:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marquess of Waterford. Liz Read! Talk! 18:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:ANYBIO due to a lack of in-depth secondary coverage from reliable sources. Marquesses are not inherently notable ( also see AfD precedents), and this particular one never sat in the House of Lords, so WP:NPOL doesn't apply here either.
My personal source assessment follows:
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Pilaz
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patrick Freyne (2 May 2015). " Oh lord: next generation takes the keys to Waterford county". Irishtimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2016. | ~ WP:INTERVIEW | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Partial |
" Henry Nicholas de la Poer Beresford, 9th marquess of Waterford, * 1958". Geneall.net. Retrieved 30 March 2016. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" About". Le Poer Polo. 19 August 1987. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 30 March 2016. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.thephoenix.ie/article/earl-of-tyrones-tipple-richard-beresford/ | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Pilaz ( talk) 19:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Delete. WP:SNOW. Will tag for CSD G6. (non-admin closure) Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 15:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Recreated immediately after the previous AfD resulted in a consensus to delete. I don't believe it's technically eligible for G4 as the prose has changed, but it's still the same subject with the same notability problems. – bradv 18:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
After moving publications to the nation-wide newspaper the Sydney Morning Herald, he reviewed the venue again in 2022; re-evaluating the restaurant to a score of 15.5/20 in a ~970 word revieware transparently non-encyclopedic. JoelleJay ( talk) 05:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Only 2 paragraphs, a photo, & a link to google maps. All sources are unreliable. PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 18:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 20:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure that an attempted suicide is really notable. On top of that I don't think they should they be forced to have a biography on Wikipedia due to one unfortunate incident. See Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event and, even more importantly, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Presumption in favor of privacy. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Article I created in 2008 before I understood that the presumption of notability in NFOOTBALL needed to align with WP:GNG. Although this footballer played competitively in Chile and very briefly in Argentina and Switzerland, there is no WP:SIGCOV available in English-, German- or Spanish-language sources that indicates the GNG could be met. The only coverage available consists of database entries and routine match coverage like this. Jogurney ( talk) 16:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Earned one cap for the Lesotho national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. I found examples like this and this. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep: He is a player of a nation’s national team. That is notability enough. Even if it’s a stub. Amaekuma ( talk) 19:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 14:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable women's soccer player at Academy of Art University and the Puerto Rico women's national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. This was what I found. JTtheOG ( talk) 15:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 14:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Failed SIGCOV Stvbastian ( talk) 15:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not meeting notability requirements, sourcing and the article here read like a puffy resume, with only lists of places worked and business accomplishments, which are rather routine. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Piroshky Piroshky. Liz Read! Talk! 14:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not meeting requirements; sourcing is simply announcements that she's running for office. Non-notable businessperson otherwise. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
I found no good sources from my search. Fails to be notable. All the included sources are minor passing mentions. Ca talk to me! 10:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
13:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not meeting ACTOR, most are bit parts or one-offs. Sourcing is scant and mostly goes to social media sites. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and with no input after the relist, no indication one is forthcoming as editors disagree on the main point being contested. Necro, I think AB's suggestion of a discussion (at VP?) on Policy is going to be easier than protracted split discussions. That will solidify current consensus on honors systems. Star Mississippi 01:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kleuske ( talk) 10:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
This kind of analysis, from the Swedish state itself, extremely discounts the awards for the purposes of WP:ANYBIO#1.- Ljleppan ( talk) 08:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[By 1960s and 1970s,] the number of appointments to the orders had gradually increased considerably. In 1971 there were 1,240 appointments to the orders, of which 900 were within the Order of the North Star, and the total number of order holders in 1973 was estimated at just over 24,000. This was very high in comparison with, for example, Denmark, where about 200 decorations were awarded annually, and Norway only about 60.[8] Large categories of citizens who were eligible for an order under the current system also declined to receive one. This was interpreted as meaning that the order system had lost its function of expressing appreciation of citizens' achievements and that there was no longer any basis for state involvement in order matters[9]. [..] It was therefore proposed that no Swedish citizens should no longer be awarded the royal orders, that the Order of the Sword and the Order of Vasa should be laid to rest, and that the Order of the Seraphim and the Order of the North Star should only be available to the royal family. The decision was confirmed and the system ended on January 1, 1975.
2nd highest tier of 2nd highest decoration doesn't satisfy "well-known and significant award or honor".Which does, I'm afraid, show a lack of understanding, as I pointed out. I have no problem with being disagreed with (although you have shown in the past that you have a massive problem with it). I do have a problem with editors making claims that are patently based on incorrect assumptions, which do need to be pointed out. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
per WP:GNGon? Ljleppan ( talk) 09:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
13:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Flowery sourcing (the first source calls him the "great investor"); all I can find is PR-ish items. Not meeting notability requirements. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Batool might not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines (and for person particularly). It is important to demonstrate the subject's significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources that are independent of the subject. From the article, it's hard to see if the subject meets the criteria for notability. BoraVoro ( talk) 07:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
She received coverage in different news papers few of the references are as below:
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
13:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of .hack characters. Liz Read! Talk! 14:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Despite being sourced and well written. This article was mostly build up with trivia articles/sources like passing mentions from games reviews. It has zero WP:SIGCOV. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 13:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 14:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability criteria of WP:ORG and WP:NSOFT. It's WP:TOOSOON Lordofhunter ( talk) 12:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 01:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Has been (re)created and redirected a view times with the rationale that it's a puff piece on a non-notable, passing fad – which I tend to agree with. Taking it here to see if there is consensus to keep it a redirect. – Joe ( talk) 03:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment "A redirect might have been a viable option even 2 years ago, but considering that this platform is owned by HTC Corporation, which is striving to build something on the level of the Facebook's Meta, and has garnered media attention in recent months (Probably also in Chinese from the Taiwan media), I'm more inclined to retain and enhance the page." I’d rather ask the editors from Taiwan or those competent in Chinese to double check the media coverage in the manufacturer’s original language as well. -- Onetimememorial ( talk) 20:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Company making 'tiny homes'. "Best luxury tiny home builder" in The Spruce 2020 awards is the key claim to notability presented. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP - "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources..." Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:siroxo
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
architectural digest | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
digital trends | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
BBC | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
insider | ![]() |
![]() |
~ mostly about product not company | ✘ No |
the spruce | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
business insider | ![]() |
~ | ~ | ✘ No |
treehugger | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete as there was no consensus on a redirect target as an aTD Star Mississippi 01:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ACTORBIO and doesn't meet WP:GNG Monhiroe ( talk) 08:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
10:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf ( talk) 08:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Great British Nuclear is the trading name of British Nuclear Fuels Ltd, which already has a page. I've proposed the BNFL page is moved to here, until then this article should probably be deleted. Find out more: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/great-british-nuclear Dreichh ( talk) 11:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 01:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Content copied/translated, without attribution but apparently in good faith, from
simple:The Lighthouse of Lierna and/or
ru:Маяк Лиерны (озеро Комо), both of which were created by IP socks of globally-locked long-term hoax/nuisance editor
Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson, one of whose principal characteristics is his obsession with the village on of
Lierna and any- or everything connected to it.
No indication of encyclopaedic significance, nothing on Scholar ( [21], [22], [23]), JSTOR ( [24], [25], [26]) or Gbooks ( [27], [28], [29]).
As is usual with this editor, nothing he writes can be trusted: the column is not a stele, as the Simple-wiki page says it is (and thus ours too); there is no book by Nino Salvaneschi on Castiglioni listed in WorldCat]. The bronze bas-relief is apparently not connected in any way to the column and is not called "Il faro di Lierna"; an example of it was sold in 2019 as "Madonna col Bambino". Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 03:27, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Recreation of Marie Alix, Duchess of Schleswig-Holstein. Celia Homeford ( talk) 11:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bandra. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Only primary sources provided. Despite the age of the school, no significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 10:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to John Bolton#IRGC murder plot. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
No significant coverage to pass GNG. Only known for one event and being covered in the news for a brief period in 2022. YRhyre ( talk) 10:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The references in the article either don't mention Linnenbruegger at all or in passing. A web search finds no WP:SIGCOV. There may be offline sources but it seems doubtful to me. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on ( talk) 09:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no RS sourcing to establish the notability of the subject (and I note no RS sourcing to establish the notability of either of the two academic institutions the subject is purportedly associated with). BEFORE shows a number of publications talking to the subject's associations with these institutions, all of which appear to be authored by one G. Al Sheikh. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
07:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 03:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Soft deleted last month [33]. Still likely to fail WP:MUSICBIO/WP:GNG KH-1 ( talk) 05:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
07:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relists, keep has a numerical majority but weak arguments asserting that WP:NACTOR is met. signed, Rosguill talk 03:23, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Minor roles in television except one somewhat main character. No non-trivial mentions in additional sources found to demonstrate notability. Idell ( talk) 04:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relists, editors remain divided on whether the sourcing quite meets WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 03:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Youtuber. Fails WP:GNG. No notability. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Surprised there aren't sources out there to establish notability as this is one of the top game streamers on YouTube or Twitch (or both). I've deleted their article before speedy deletion but that was years ago and I'm suprised nothing has changed since then.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:siroxo
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prolific North | ![]() |
![]() |
~ ~310 words, mostly about subject's earnings | ~ Partial |
Tubefilter | ~ mostly interview, verifies and analyzes some statistics | ~ industry pub that disclosed a sponsor for the story | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Ana Ruiz Segarra, The University of Western Ontario | ![]() |
~ masters thesis | ~ 33 words of coverage. | ~ Partial |
CFP: Celebrities of Gaming: The 5th Jyväskylä Autumn Seminar | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Forbes profile | ![]() |
![]() |
~ | ✘ No |
Deadline | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Hollywood reporter | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
eonline | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
GameRant | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Bachelor thesis | ![]() |
![]() |
? | ✘ No |
AZCentral | ![]() |
![]() |
~ mostly routine (real estate etc), verifies profession and some subscriber counts | ~ Partial |
sportskeeda | ? | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Vogue | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
SVG | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
tuko | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
win.gg | ? | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Nicki Swift | ![]() |
~ Seems reliable for "gossip" type coverage and little more, we can't reliably source much more from it, esp due to BLP "We don't just report news, we editorialize it in a way that drives the conversation forward." | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Dexerto (initially presented below) | ![]() |
~ No specific flags so not "red" for this article, but it's primarily "gossip" type stuff mostly unsuitable for BLP; while the author seems fine, the source is widely considered unreliable on wikipedia. [47] [48] | ![]() |
~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
address[] the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. But in any event I think we have sufficient coverage to meet NBASIC's threshold of having
received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject,especially considering that
[i]f the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability.-- Visviva ( talk) 00:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Pure plot summary referenced to the works of fiction. Fails WP:NLIST/ WP:GNG. We don't even have list of characters in the Seafort Saga. I suggest delete or merge to Seafort_Saga#Characters. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable task force, one of hundreds such groups that think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations empanel each year. This one was not notable, does not have WP:SIGCOV, and the only sources per a WP:BEFORE check are reposting of the task force report and conspiracy theory website. Longhornsg ( talk) 06:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Not notable annual meeting that met a couple times never generated WP:SIGCOV to warrant WP:GNG, especially WP:ORG. If not delete, merge into University of California, San Diego, which took on the now-defunct role of meeting organizer, per this. Longhornsg ( talk) 07:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable international forum that was held once after a major summit, then garnered no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Longhornsg ( talk) 07:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Subject is not independently notable as a film maker or business person, perhaps something reflected in the extreme brevity of this biography. No RS coverage presented nor found with WP:BEFORE. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 20:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
This article fails WP:GNG. Has been unsourced for long. Should be deleted and content, if anything appears useful, should be moved to Ghanchi. Admantine123 ( talk) 05:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
fails in WP:SINGER nd no have secondery reliable sources Worldiswide ( talk) 07:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As the original title is
protected from creation, I'm pretty hesitant here. While the creator is already blocked, I will also note that ducking around create protection with unneeded disambiguation, spelling variations, and the like, is grounds for a
block from editing. Specific analysis of the sources used here would be very helpful, especially with the article having been created by a blocked sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
02:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: see previous relist comments
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
04:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. The entire list is non notable entries and is poorly sourced with only 2 sources. LibStar ( talk) 03:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. A bit surprised with this consensus as we have typically deleted these articles in other AFDs. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. Not one of the list entries is notable and the article is largely unsourced except for the top 2 entries of the list. LibStar ( talk) 03:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been.. The current article does, however, need some more sources. — siro χ o 09:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
6 of the 9 provided sources are from Blocks Magazine, a magazine for Lego fans. A search in gnews yields 2 hits. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 02:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. After being relisted twice there is no consensus to delete. I don't see any value in relisting a third time. (non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 00:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not notable; fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. WP:POLITICIAN does not apply as Souka's position was not one of a politician in the strict sense, but even if it did, it's explicitly a secondary criterion. Souka is occasionally mentioned in passing by Politico (see this collection of articles). None of those mentions constitute the significant coverage required to establish notability. Of the sources currently in the article, only source 1 is significant coverage. It's a good source in terms of establishing notability, but it's just one. Source 2 doesn't even mention her. This is not the coverage in multiple sources required to establish notability. Although Souka was every now and then noted in passing, she only received individual press attention during one event (note WP:BIO1E), and only from one news outlet. Results from WP:BEFORE corroborate this picture of an individual noted in passing but never in covered in detail. See, for example, 1, 2, 3. There was also this article, but this is not a reliable source (cf. WP:DAILYEXPRESS). Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, and thanks to multiple controversies, this bio of a European civil servant manages to get over the line based on English sources; additional sources may be available in Greek, French, and with variations in the spelling of her name (e.g. Eirini Souka). Cielquiparle ( talk) 07:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ("John Smith at Big Company said..." or "Mary Jones was hired by My University") that does not discuss the subject in detail.Discussion in detail goes beyond the mentions of Souka that I have described as "in passing". Actualcpscm ( talk) 11:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is very little discussion about the amount of biographical source material available about this particular individual. Specific discussion about this would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
01:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As of now, I see only two possible closures, Keep or No consensus as there is currently no support for Deletion of this article other than the nominator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. The sources are all tabloid garbage. I looked for better ones and found nothing useful. gnu 57 01:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, No indication of notability. PARVAGE talk! 06:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since May, no notability presented (ie: no significant coverage in RS) in article and none on WP:BEFORE. No awards, no chart listing/placements. Search actually gives you more articles about people and pets born without bones... Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).This is the case for Pure Noise Records. — siro χ o 02:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Van Wetten made five Eredivisie and three Eerste Divisie appearances. A web search finds two short articles in [53] and [54] but no WP:SIGCOV. There may be offline sources but it seems doubtful to me. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on ( talk) 00:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
*Delete Not sure if Sigcov is meeting here.
Okoslavia (
talk)
20:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, only references are food reviews. WWGB ( talk) 14:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Age | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Herald Sun | ![]() |
![]() |
? Paywalled | ✘ No |
Gourmet traveller | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
? Unknown |
Overall conclusions | ![]() |
~ | ![]() |
~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I don't think that this article meets the notability criteria in the guidelines about notability for musicians. He doesn't have significant coverage. Johnmarrys talk 15:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep: He is notable enough in his community, which this page caters for. Amaekuma ( talk) 19:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Taument made 22 appearances in one Eredivisie season and no further professional appearances. A web search finds passing mentions but no WP:SIGCOV. His brother Gaston is a notable footballer. There may be offline sources but it seems doubtful to me. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on ( talk) 00:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Speedy delete. (G5) — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs) 16:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable. All sources in the article fail to help it pass WP:GNG or WP:NBIO as they are not independent of Lawton. I will note that notability is not inherited, so the fact that he is the son of Geoff Lawton is irrelevant. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 23:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Algeria at the World Athletics Championships. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Contested draftification. Article is entirely unsourced and was draftified because of this. No improvement has been made in this regard. Would support draftification naturally. Schminnte ( talk • contribs) 23:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable event; fails general notability guidelines and falls down on significant coverage (searching for more information only leads to Wikipedia mirror sites). Relies solely on one source, and some parts of the article are entirely unsourced and contravenes on original research guidance. Article was previously PRODded and objected, however keeping as a redirect would not add value given a lack of article or redirect for other Intervision contests. Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 13:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because this article also fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:ONESOURCE and WP:OR, as well as an additional issue with WP:SELFPUB:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist as there are a number of different outcomes sought.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NSINGER. UtherSRG (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style. (At least, I don't think there's any question that Hazara folk music is a notable topic, even if we don't currently do a good job of covering it.) In any event the BBC festival link I posted and the AfghanNews link Indefensible posted above would seem to meet the NBASIC requirement of
significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. And given that I don't think either of us have much skill in searching in the local languages, I would venture that there are likely to be considerably more sources out there. -- Visviva ( talk) 00:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability. searching his name in English gives almost nothing, even in Persian there are only very few things about him. the article says he won a gold medal at the Asian Championship in 2007 which is wrong (probably just a junior medal) he also never played in a pro league or even a major national tournament. Sports2021 ( talk) 23:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment. I removed some of the called out unverifiable information about a medal at the Asian Championships after attempting to verify (AFAICT the national team has never medaled in such a competition). That's not promising for this article, but I don't have a !vote as of now. — siro χ o 01:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Austin, Minnesota. Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Entirely unreferenced article which offers no indication of notability. None found prior to nomination. Dorsetonian ( talk) 19:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
no company or organization is considered inherently notable. No organization is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of organization it is) and WP:NARENA (
sporting arenas, stadia and other venues do not have presumed notability, and are expected to demonstrate notability through meeting the general notability guideline). Dorsetonian ( talk) 19:51, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is support for a Merge and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
can affect reliability.Plainly, this is a context-sensitive determination; e.g. nobody would seriously argue that two separate books published by the same university press are automatically the same source. But anyway, that's probably neither here nor there as far as this particular article goes.) -- Visviva ( talk) 22:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musical businessperson. No links found other than social media, no mentions in RS in Gnews. Oaktree b ( talk) 22:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:22, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to My Little Pony (2003 toyline)#My Little Pony: Pinkie Pie's Party (2008). Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Doing a WP:BEFORE search brings nothing reliable and significant besides the IGN review. The game's Metacritic page is also a ghost town of critic reviews. Sparkl talk 22:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
A relatively minor recurring character in DW, but there are literally no sources for her out there when I checked for BEFORE. There simply doesn't exist anything to justify GNG or SIGCOV, and the article already cites no sources. I'm not sure whether there are any good spots to redirect this article to, as she isn't mentioned at all in the Doctor Who Magazine article and I'm not sure if adding a mention there is a good idea or not, as that's the only good redirect target I can think of. Pokelego999 ( talk) 22:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
While a decently recurring element of the show that sees some occasional outside discussion, I simply can't find enough SIGCOV in order to justify its separation as an article. Most of the sources I found were trivial mentions, and while I found one scholar source and a couple of books giving a decent bit on it, I'm fairly certain it isn't enough to qualify as SIGCOV. A short description of the effect in another article would suffice, though whether that be in the main Doctor Who article or elsewhere, I'm not really sure of at this time. Pokelego999 ( talk) 22:22, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Redirect. With the round robin title swap presented below. I don't see a compelling case against preserving the history with some folks advocating for a merger, as a protected redirect could be done if necessary. Star Mississippi 01:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails the notability standard per WP:NACADEMIC. I have found no significant coverage of Kelly's contributions to the mathematical field or his particular field of mathematics. He seems to be an impressive mathematician, but unfortunately has not had much of a large influence. GuardianH ( talk) 22:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC) GuardianH ( talk) 22:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider the complicated proposal from Russ Woodroofe.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable obstacle course racer. Is a competitor on American Ninja Warrior, but has not done anything notable (like winning it all). Natg 19 ( talk) 22:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable obstacle course racer. Had fleeting moments of fame for American Ninja Warrior, but overall non-notable. Natg 19 ( talk) 21:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
A BLP with scant sourcing, currently only referenced to databases. On review of search results, I can't find any English-language sourcing, and a comprehensive Greek-language search reveals the following sources:
Overall I just don't see a level of coverage in these sources that would meet the threshold of significant coverage required to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSCRIT. GGT ( talk) 20:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The article is unsourced. I was unable to find any relevant sources. Charsaddian ( talk) 20:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced WP:QUOTEFARM from 2015; seems to fail WP:NBIO. jlwoodwa ( talk) 19:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Marquess of Waterford. Liz Read! Talk! 18:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:ANYBIO due to a lack of in-depth secondary coverage from reliable sources. Marquesses are not inherently notable ( also see AfD precedents), and this particular one never sat in the House of Lords, so WP:NPOL doesn't apply here either.
My personal source assessment follows:
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Pilaz
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patrick Freyne (2 May 2015). " Oh lord: next generation takes the keys to Waterford county". Irishtimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2016. | ~ WP:INTERVIEW | ![]() |
![]() |
~ Partial |
" Henry Nicholas de la Poer Beresford, 9th marquess of Waterford, * 1958". Geneall.net. Retrieved 30 March 2016. | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
" About". Le Poer Polo. 19 August 1987. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 30 March 2016. | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.thephoenix.ie/article/earl-of-tyrones-tipple-richard-beresford/ | ![]() |
✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Pilaz ( talk) 19:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Delete. WP:SNOW. Will tag for CSD G6. (non-admin closure) Taking Out The Trash ( talk) 15:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Recreated immediately after the previous AfD resulted in a consensus to delete. I don't believe it's technically eligible for G4 as the prose has changed, but it's still the same subject with the same notability problems. – bradv 18:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
After moving publications to the nation-wide newspaper the Sydney Morning Herald, he reviewed the venue again in 2022; re-evaluating the restaurant to a score of 15.5/20 in a ~970 word revieware transparently non-encyclopedic. JoelleJay ( talk) 05:11, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 18:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Only 2 paragraphs, a photo, & a link to google maps. All sources are unreliable. PaulGamerBoy360 ( talk) 18:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 20:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure that an attempted suicide is really notable. On top of that I don't think they should they be forced to have a biography on Wikipedia due to one unfortunate incident. See Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event and, even more importantly, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Presumption in favor of privacy. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Article I created in 2008 before I understood that the presumption of notability in NFOOTBALL needed to align with WP:GNG. Although this footballer played competitively in Chile and very briefly in Argentina and Switzerland, there is no WP:SIGCOV available in English-, German- or Spanish-language sources that indicates the GNG could be met. The only coverage available consists of database entries and routine match coverage like this. Jogurney ( talk) 16:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 16:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Earned one cap for the Lesotho national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. I found examples like this and this. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep: He is a player of a nation’s national team. That is notability enough. Even if it’s a stub. Amaekuma ( talk) 19:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 14:44, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable women's soccer player at Academy of Art University and the Puerto Rico women's national football team. Unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. This was what I found. JTtheOG ( talk) 15:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 14:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Failed SIGCOV Stvbastian ( talk) 15:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not meeting notability requirements, sourcing and the article here read like a puffy resume, with only lists of places worked and business accomplishments, which are rather routine. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:46, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Piroshky Piroshky. Liz Read! Talk! 14:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not meeting requirements; sourcing is simply announcements that she's running for office. Non-notable businessperson otherwise. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
I found no good sources from my search. Fails to be notable. All the included sources are minor passing mentions. Ca talk to me! 10:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
13:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not meeting ACTOR, most are bit parts or one-offs. Sourcing is scant and mostly goes to social media sites. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus and with no input after the relist, no indication one is forthcoming as editors disagree on the main point being contested. Necro, I think AB's suggestion of a discussion (at VP?) on Policy is going to be easier than protracted split discussions. That will solidify current consensus on honors systems. Star Mississippi 01:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Kleuske ( talk) 10:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
This kind of analysis, from the Swedish state itself, extremely discounts the awards for the purposes of WP:ANYBIO#1.- Ljleppan ( talk) 08:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[By 1960s and 1970s,] the number of appointments to the orders had gradually increased considerably. In 1971 there were 1,240 appointments to the orders, of which 900 were within the Order of the North Star, and the total number of order holders in 1973 was estimated at just over 24,000. This was very high in comparison with, for example, Denmark, where about 200 decorations were awarded annually, and Norway only about 60.[8] Large categories of citizens who were eligible for an order under the current system also declined to receive one. This was interpreted as meaning that the order system had lost its function of expressing appreciation of citizens' achievements and that there was no longer any basis for state involvement in order matters[9]. [..] It was therefore proposed that no Swedish citizens should no longer be awarded the royal orders, that the Order of the Sword and the Order of Vasa should be laid to rest, and that the Order of the Seraphim and the Order of the North Star should only be available to the royal family. The decision was confirmed and the system ended on January 1, 1975.
2nd highest tier of 2nd highest decoration doesn't satisfy "well-known and significant award or honor".Which does, I'm afraid, show a lack of understanding, as I pointed out. I have no problem with being disagreed with (although you have shown in the past that you have a massive problem with it). I do have a problem with editors making claims that are patently based on incorrect assumptions, which do need to be pointed out. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
per WP:GNGon? Ljleppan ( talk) 09:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
13:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. ( non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:43, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Flowery sourcing (the first source calls him the "great investor"); all I can find is PR-ish items. Not meeting notability requirements. Oaktree b ( talk) 13:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Batool might not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines (and for person particularly). It is important to demonstrate the subject's significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources that are independent of the subject. From the article, it's hard to see if the subject meets the criteria for notability. BoraVoro ( talk) 07:02, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
She received coverage in different news papers few of the references are as below:
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
13:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of .hack characters. Liz Read! Talk! 14:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Despite being sourced and well written. This article was mostly build up with trivia articles/sources like passing mentions from games reviews. It has zero WP:SIGCOV. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 13:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 14:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability criteria of WP:ORG and WP:NSOFT. It's WP:TOOSOON Lordofhunter ( talk) 12:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 01:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Has been (re)created and redirected a view times with the rationale that it's a puff piece on a non-notable, passing fad – which I tend to agree with. Taking it here to see if there is consensus to keep it a redirect. – Joe ( talk) 03:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment "A redirect might have been a viable option even 2 years ago, but considering that this platform is owned by HTC Corporation, which is striving to build something on the level of the Facebook's Meta, and has garnered media attention in recent months (Probably also in Chinese from the Taiwan media), I'm more inclined to retain and enhance the page." I’d rather ask the editors from Taiwan or those competent in Chinese to double check the media coverage in the manufacturer’s original language as well. -- Onetimememorial ( talk) 20:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Company making 'tiny homes'. "Best luxury tiny home builder" in The Spruce 2020 awards is the key claim to notability presented. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP - "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. These criteria, generally, follow the general notability guideline with a stronger emphasis on quality of the sources..." Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:siroxo
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
architectural digest | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
digital trends | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
BBC | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
insider | ![]() |
![]() |
~ mostly about product not company | ✘ No |
the spruce | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
business insider | ![]() |
~ | ~ | ✘ No |
treehugger | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete as there was no consensus on a redirect target as an aTD Star Mississippi 01:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ACTORBIO and doesn't meet WP:GNG Monhiroe ( talk) 08:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
10:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Thryduulf ( talk) 08:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Great British Nuclear is the trading name of British Nuclear Fuels Ltd, which already has a page. I've proposed the BNFL page is moved to here, until then this article should probably be deleted. Find out more: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/great-british-nuclear Dreichh ( talk) 11:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 01:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Content copied/translated, without attribution but apparently in good faith, from
simple:The Lighthouse of Lierna and/or
ru:Маяк Лиерны (озеро Комо), both of which were created by IP socks of globally-locked long-term hoax/nuisance editor
Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson, one of whose principal characteristics is his obsession with the village on of
Lierna and any- or everything connected to it.
No indication of encyclopaedic significance, nothing on Scholar ( [21], [22], [23]), JSTOR ( [24], [25], [26]) or Gbooks ( [27], [28], [29]).
As is usual with this editor, nothing he writes can be trusted: the column is not a stele, as the Simple-wiki page says it is (and thus ours too); there is no book by Nino Salvaneschi on Castiglioni listed in WorldCat]. The bronze bas-relief is apparently not connected in any way to the column and is not called "Il faro di Lierna"; an example of it was sold in 2019 as "Madonna col Bambino". Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 03:27, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Recreation of Marie Alix, Duchess of Schleswig-Holstein. Celia Homeford ( talk) 11:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bandra. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Only primary sources provided. Despite the age of the school, no significant coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar ( talk) 10:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to John Bolton#IRGC murder plot. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
No significant coverage to pass GNG. Only known for one event and being covered in the news for a brief period in 2022. YRhyre ( talk) 10:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 11:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
The references in the article either don't mention Linnenbruegger at all or in passing. A web search finds no WP:SIGCOV. There may be offline sources but it seems doubtful to me. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on ( talk) 09:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no RS sourcing to establish the notability of the subject (and I note no RS sourcing to establish the notability of either of the two academic institutions the subject is purportedly associated with). BEFORE shows a number of publications talking to the subject's associations with these institutions, all of which appear to be authored by one G. Al Sheikh. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
07:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 03:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Soft deleted last month [33]. Still likely to fail WP:MUSICBIO/WP:GNG KH-1 ( talk) 05:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
07:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relists, keep has a numerical majority but weak arguments asserting that WP:NACTOR is met. signed, Rosguill talk 03:23, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Minor roles in television except one somewhat main character. No non-trivial mentions in additional sources found to demonstrate notability. Idell ( talk) 04:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relists, editors remain divided on whether the sourcing quite meets WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 03:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Youtuber. Fails WP:GNG. No notability. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Surprised there aren't sources out there to establish notability as this is one of the top game streamers on YouTube or Twitch (or both). I've deleted their article before speedy deletion but that was years ago and I'm suprised nothing has changed since then.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:siroxo
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prolific North | ![]() |
![]() |
~ ~310 words, mostly about subject's earnings | ~ Partial |
Tubefilter | ~ mostly interview, verifies and analyzes some statistics | ~ industry pub that disclosed a sponsor for the story | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Ana Ruiz Segarra, The University of Western Ontario | ![]() |
~ masters thesis | ~ 33 words of coverage. | ~ Partial |
CFP: Celebrities of Gaming: The 5th Jyväskylä Autumn Seminar | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Forbes profile | ![]() |
![]() |
~ | ✘ No |
Deadline | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Hollywood reporter | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
eonline | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
GameRant | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Bachelor thesis | ![]() |
![]() |
? | ✘ No |
AZCentral | ![]() |
![]() |
~ mostly routine (real estate etc), verifies profession and some subscriber counts | ~ Partial |
sportskeeda | ? | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Vogue | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
SVG | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
tuko | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
win.gg | ? | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Nicki Swift | ![]() |
~ Seems reliable for "gossip" type coverage and little more, we can't reliably source much more from it, esp due to BLP "We don't just report news, we editorialize it in a way that drives the conversation forward." | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Dexerto (initially presented below) | ![]() |
~ No specific flags so not "red" for this article, but it's primarily "gossip" type stuff mostly unsuitable for BLP; while the author seems fine, the source is widely considered unreliable on wikipedia. [47] [48] | ![]() |
~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
address[] the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. But in any event I think we have sufficient coverage to meet NBASIC's threshold of having
received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject,especially considering that
[i]f the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability.-- Visviva ( talk) 00:09, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Pure plot summary referenced to the works of fiction. Fails WP:NLIST/ WP:GNG. We don't even have list of characters in the Seafort Saga. I suggest delete or merge to Seafort_Saga#Characters. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:12, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable task force, one of hundreds such groups that think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations empanel each year. This one was not notable, does not have WP:SIGCOV, and the only sources per a WP:BEFORE check are reposting of the task force report and conspiracy theory website. Longhornsg ( talk) 06:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Not notable annual meeting that met a couple times never generated WP:SIGCOV to warrant WP:GNG, especially WP:ORG. If not delete, merge into University of California, San Diego, which took on the now-defunct role of meeting organizer, per this. Longhornsg ( talk) 07:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 05:24, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable international forum that was held once after a major summit, then garnered no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Longhornsg ( talk) 07:33, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman. Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Subject is not independently notable as a film maker or business person, perhaps something reflected in the extreme brevity of this biography. No RS coverage presented nor found with WP:BEFORE. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 20:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
This article fails WP:GNG. Has been unsourced for long. Should be deleted and content, if anything appears useful, should be moved to Ghanchi. Admantine123 ( talk) 05:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
fails in WP:SINGER nd no have secondery reliable sources Worldiswide ( talk) 07:18, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As the original title is
protected from creation, I'm pretty hesitant here. While the creator is already blocked, I will also note that ducking around create protection with unneeded disambiguation, spelling variations, and the like, is grounds for a
block from editing. Specific analysis of the sources used here would be very helpful, especially with the article having been created by a blocked sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
02:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: see previous relist comments
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26 (
spin me /
revolutions)
04:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. The entire list is non notable entries and is poorly sourced with only 2 sources. LibStar ( talk) 03:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. A bit surprised with this consensus as we have typically deleted these articles in other AFDs. Liz Read! Talk! 05:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. Not one of the list entries is notable and the article is largely unsourced except for the top 2 entries of the list. LibStar ( talk) 03:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been.. The current article does, however, need some more sources. — siro χ o 09:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
6 of the 9 provided sources are from Blocks Magazine, a magazine for Lego fans. A search in gnews yields 2 hits. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 02:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. After being relisted twice there is no consensus to delete. I don't see any value in relisting a third time. (non-admin closure) Dusti *Let's talk!* 00:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Not notable; fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. WP:POLITICIAN does not apply as Souka's position was not one of a politician in the strict sense, but even if it did, it's explicitly a secondary criterion. Souka is occasionally mentioned in passing by Politico (see this collection of articles). None of those mentions constitute the significant coverage required to establish notability. Of the sources currently in the article, only source 1 is significant coverage. It's a good source in terms of establishing notability, but it's just one. Source 2 doesn't even mention her. This is not the coverage in multiple sources required to establish notability. Although Souka was every now and then noted in passing, she only received individual press attention during one event (note WP:BIO1E), and only from one news outlet. Results from WP:BEFORE corroborate this picture of an individual noted in passing but never in covered in detail. See, for example, 1, 2, 3. There was also this article, but this is not a reliable source (cf. WP:DAILYEXPRESS). Actualcpscm ( talk) 20:29, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, and thanks to multiple controversies, this bio of a European civil servant manages to get over the line based on English sources; additional sources may be available in Greek, French, and with variations in the spelling of her name (e.g. Eirini Souka). Cielquiparle ( talk) 07:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Non-triviality is a measure of the depth of content of a published work, and how far removed that content is from a simple directory entry or a mention in passing ("John Smith at Big Company said..." or "Mary Jones was hired by My University") that does not discuss the subject in detail.Discussion in detail goes beyond the mentions of Souka that I have described as "in passing". Actualcpscm ( talk) 11:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is very little discussion about the amount of biographical source material available about this particular individual. Specific discussion about this would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
01:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As of now, I see only two possible closures, Keep or No consensus as there is currently no support for Deletion of this article other than the nominator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT. The sources are all tabloid garbage. I looked for better ones and found nothing useful. gnu 57 01:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG, No indication of notability. PARVAGE talk! 06:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 20:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since May, no notability presented (ie: no significant coverage in RS) in article and none on WP:BEFORE. No awards, no chart listing/placements. Search actually gives you more articles about people and pets born without bones... Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).This is the case for Pure Noise Records. — siro χ o 02:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Van Wetten made five Eredivisie and three Eerste Divisie appearances. A web search finds two short articles in [53] and [54] but no WP:SIGCOV. There may be offline sources but it seems doubtful to me. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on ( talk) 00:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
*Delete Not sure if Sigcov is meeting here.
Okoslavia (
talk)
20:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, only references are food reviews. WWGB ( talk) 14:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Age | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Herald Sun | ![]() |
![]() |
? Paywalled | ✘ No |
Gourmet traveller | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
? Unknown |
Overall conclusions | ![]() |
~ | ![]() |
~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I don't think that this article meets the notability criteria in the guidelines about notability for musicians. He doesn't have significant coverage. Johnmarrys talk 15:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk)
00:09, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep: He is notable enough in his community, which this page caters for. Amaekuma ( talk) 19:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Taument made 22 appearances in one Eredivisie season and no further professional appearances. A web search finds passing mentions but no WP:SIGCOV. His brother Gaston is a notable footballer. There may be offline sources but it seems doubtful to me. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on ( talk) 00:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)