The result was redirect to Bumper Films. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 23:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
I am unconvinced that WP:BIO is met. The only source present in the article which goes into any detail on the subject is this and my searches have not found any others. If that is the only in-depth coverage, we are short of having multiple sources which provide in-depth coverage. SmartSE ( talk) 22:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
no indication of notability Drowssap SMM 23:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This isn't appropriate for soft-deletion as the primary contributor is still actively editing the article. Relisting to form consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I hope recently found sources can find their way out of this AFD discussion and into the article itself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
WP:ADMASQ for non notable periodical. Fails WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE failed to find any useful sources. Current references are from the org itself, a one para "description' of the item, and a 404/server failure error. Puff piece. Note that the item is stated to have won the 'Diageo Africa Business Reporting Award', an award by a drinks manufacturer about which I can find no significant coverage, thus have concluded that it is a 'Marketing Award' for Diageo (to sell more drinks?), and does not confer notability. Refunded after soft delete at prior AfD, and renominated for a fuller discussion. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. "Seems notable" isn't sufficient, there needs to be some actual new sources brought to this discussion to address concerns in nomination statement. If this journal is "clearly notable", finding reliable sources shouldn't be difficult.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to consider sources presented by Watercheetah99 against our GNG guideline.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. UtherSRG (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
While the show itself is clearly notable, it's not clear that the list of individual episodes is necessary. At present, this page (as well as those for other years) uses only primary sources: one for the WW...DTM archive and one to Twitter. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 23:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 16:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Notability. not passed WP:NSPORTS or WP:JOURNALIST. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha ( 🧾 - 💬) 21:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Apart from conceiving and executing promotional campaigns targeted at the Media, Marketing & Television Trade online, it also offers similar services offline, thus providing clients with a 360 degree media service and marketing solution.E4M:
exchange4media was set up in year 2000 with the aim of publishing niche, relevant and quality publications for the marketing, advertising and media professionals.JoelleJay ( talk) 19:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Not enough independent WP:SIGCOV is present for this subject to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 18:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Editors are free to create a Redirect from this page title to an appropriate target article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Found absolutely zero significant coverage in my BEFORE, which included a newspaper search. Mach61 ( talk) 21:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
It's pretty much impossible to come up with a sensible inclusion criterion for this article (and others in the series). The current state of the selected inventions is a joke. Dicklyon ( talk) 19:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 01:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage of the band to be found anywhere. The article only relias on primary sources. The only argument for notability is that their albums were published by a notable indie label. In my opinion not enough to meet notability criteria. Broc ( talk) 18:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm not able to find any sources that satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC about this footballer. Passing mentions like ESP and FMF were all that I could find. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
In 2015, Vladimir Keptenari entered the Municipal Council on the list of Our Party. On January 15, 2018, he even took part in a hunger strike , which was then announced by PP advisers in protest against the pressure on advisers from the ruling PDM party.4; a blurb on his municipal councilor candidacy alongside 26 other candidacy blurbs 5; and another piece on his wife's accusations that has no coverage of him 6. Nowhere near enough coverage to meet GNG, let alone NPOL (which considers a lot of candidacy coverage routine).
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The subject, a Trinidadian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I have found in my searches is this interview. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable location. In a previous AfD, this article was converted to a redirect to El Dorado County, California, which in my opinion was a mistake as there is absolutely nothing to be said about this place and it is not mentioned in the county article at all. No mention of a Tylers Corner or Tylers was found in any of three histories of the region that I was able to access online: [19], [20], [21]. It's first labeled as Tylers Corner on the 1952 Aukum and Camino USGS topo maps: [22], but that's the only mention of this place I can find other than the cited sources, which are insufficient for notability. This is just an intersection that once had a few houses; that is not a community, as required by WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 20:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Run of the mill bureaucrat. As best I can tell, the subject is vice-president of "HR, IT and regulations" within the state-owned oil company. Thenightaway ( talk) 20:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Spammy list of non-notable entities, Wikipedia is not a product directory * Pppery * it has begun... 20:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The article says nothing about the purported subject and is instead a content fork of Equatorial Guinea–United States relations. — Biruitorul Talk 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is nothing that indicates the subject is notable. This is purely sourced to Azerbaijani government sources or sources that are not independent of the Azerbaijan government. Thenightaway ( talk) 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Those editors who want to create a Redirect from this page title to an appropriate target article or even a disambiguation page are free to do so. Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Article substantially falling afoul of WP:OR, with no sourcing to demonstrate the core concept and is simply rampant author description of the term. Only sections sourced are three lines about the Obama administration's foreign policy that referred to "America's Pacific Century" and would therefore be relevant on article's about his presidency. Rambling Rambler ( talk) 19:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The article has been around for a while but does not indicate any notability. (The founder apparently " worked with" HGTV, there's not much about it.) The sources are all PR material and I cannot find much in the way of third-party discussion of the company in reliable sources, beyond listings in seller websites, and promotional-type interviews or blog postings. ... discospinster talk 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This two-paragraph news article seems like a slam-dunk (i.e. SPEEDY) Merge&Redirect per WP:NOTNEWS; does not seem to meet WP:EVENT. I'm not sure why the two paragraphs were not simply added to British Library, with its own Level 4 header if necessary, under British Library#Electronic collections. Softlavender ( talk) 10:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards. All three of these prongs are met: this event had widespread national impact in the U.K., with the national library being taken offline for several months; it was widely covered in mainstream international news outlets such as the The New Yorker and New York Times, IT and cybersecurity-focused media such as The Register and Infosecurity Magazine, and museum and library journals such as Museums Journal and The Art Newspaper; and many of these articles contain detailed analysis or commentary about the wider impact of the event, e.g.
Museums, galleries and archives have been urged to tighten their cyber security following the massive ransomware attack on the British Libraryand
what can arts bodies do to combat ransomware threats?. Jfire ( talk) 19:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is more of a procedural Keep because after going to a lot of trouble editing this article and putting together a source table, the nominator twice said they wanted to Keep this article.
Please do not start an AFD discussion unless you are seeking to delete an article. It's not an appropriate vehicle to encourage other editors to find new sources for you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing this page for a couple of days mostly removing excessive external links to the organisation's website, boldly removing unsourced or improperly sourced content, verifying what I can and tagging what I can't verify. Then, I tried to improve the page by incorporating some secondary and tertiary sources but I've drawn a blank. I am confident that at this point I have explored WP:ATD but after putting together the source assessment table below it's become clear to me that there isn't actually enough significant coverage in independent secondary sources to form an objective overview of this British charity. I contemplated doing prod but doing so would have sent other editors on a wild goose chase for reliable secondary sources which I don't want to do. So I've arrived at the conclusion that AfD is the only way forward. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 16:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-search/-/charity-details/290767/governance | ? I think the charities register functions like Companies House in that organisations have to submit their own details but I could be wrong. | It's a legally binding document | Just a registry | ✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/menofvision00amyz/page/99/mode/2up | In this interview https://portal.ehri-project.eu/units/us-005578-irn504457-irn507288 this book's author discusses joining the "Jewish Relief Unit of the Jewish Committee for Relief Abroad, sponsored by the Central British Fund for German Jewry". Therefore, this source isn't independent because she's writing about an organisation that she was a member of. | I've had a good flick through the book and it's very well written, very thorough and well citated. | The book goes into a lot of depth about this organisation's formation. It's just a shame it's not independent. | ✘ No |
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jan/05/windermere-children-arek-hersh-survivor-bbc-drama | It's The Guardian | It's The Guardian | I added this source for verification purposes but it doesn't actually mention World Jewish Relief. | ✘ No |
http://www.wjr.org.uk/about-us/ | One of many links to the organisation's website that I removed from the page. | ~ Organisation's websites are reliable up to a point but we can't use them to support notability. | There's lot's of coverage about the organisation's history on their website but it's not independent and can't support notability | ✘ No |
https://search.worldcat.org/title/31047514?oclcNum=31047514 | World Cat lists this books publisher as (you guessed it) World Jewish Relief. | ~ Probably reliable up to a point but because it's not independent it's not reliable enough to support notability | It's a book about the organisation. | ✘ No |
https://www.gale.com/intl/essays/amy-zahl-gottlieb-central-british-fund-world-jewish-relief-first-ten-years | I added this source because it's easier to verify than checking Gottlieb's book out of a library but when I researched the author I realised that the author was part of the "Jewish Relief Unit of the Jewish Committee for Relief Abroad, sponsored by the Central British Fund for German Jewry" | I'm not disputing this historian's research skills and literary prowess. It's just a shame it's not independent because WP requires independent secondary sources to verify notability. | It's incredibly detailed and very well-referenced. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails NLIST. List was split from main article without discussion on Aug 30, 2023. This is an unneeded CFORK, much of the content violates WP:NOTTVGUIDE. No objection to restoring properly sourced material to main article. // Timothy :: talk 17:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Corruption in Azerbaijan. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is nothing that indicates that the subject is notable. There is no coverage of this organization from sources that are independent of the Azerbaijan government. If there is any content worth keeping, it can be merged with Corruption in Azerbaijan. Thenightaway ( talk) 19:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was draftify. Daniel ( talk) 22:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG, only a single source mentioning the topic (no other sources could be found). ChaotıċEnby( t · c) 17:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Context not found in any of the cited references. The battle name is not recognized by any of the historians. Seems like source manipulation Imperial [AFCND] 15:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Recently restored after a previous deletion, but without improvements. The article on this topic on Turkish Wikipedia has now been deleted ten times for lack of notability. Can we call it a day now? Mccapra ( talk) 13:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
This was a tourism initiative launched by the Saudi government in February 2019 and which a likely COI account immediately created a Wikipedia article for. There is nothing to indicate that this is notable. It has not been covered by reliable sources. It has solely been covered by sources that are not independent of the Saudi government. This Wikipedia article appears intended to promote a non-notable subject. Thenightaway ( talk) 14:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see no case made for draftification within the last !vote Star Mississippi 14:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Non notable musician. Jax 0677 ( talk) 13:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Mentions in Google Books seem to be trivial and not significant coverage. I can only find one source, and that's only about a data breach. I doubt one article about a data breach that happened to a website makes it notable. — MATRIX! ( a good person!) citation unneeded 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Despite playing 3 games of football in previous seasons, I can't find any evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG. Best sources appear to be a squad listing in Alyaum and a youth camp call up announcement in Sport KSA. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Played a single game in the second tier of Russia about 3 years ago before disappearing. I am not convinced that this passes WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG and the current article only uses database sources, which fail to confer notability. The best Russian sources that I could find were Redyarsk and FCDM, both of which were only passing mentions of the subject. Given that he seems to have disappeared, I don't think notability in the near future is that likely either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was not delete. There is no consensus about whether to merge the content instead, but that can continue to be discussed on the article talk page. Sandstein 13:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable interactive fiction title. The article currently contains significant coverage from one secondary source. A WP:BEFORE yields one more reliable review from GameTrailers [23]. But even with that considered, the article unfortunately falls short when taking a WP:THREE approach - if there is something else out there that is pretty clearly reliable significant coverage, happy to withdraw this nomination.
It may be said that the article inherits notability from its one award and IFDB status. The article's reliance on the IFDB is not in my view significant as a WP:USERG source. Even putting that aside, the cited #1 listings are based on an all-time poll of 223 users and a 2023 poll of 59 users - this is not particularly wide or significant.
It is hard to gauge the significance of the game receiving a XYZZY Award in 2012. It does have some clout. It seems to be a legacy community-voted award started by a defunct interactive fiction e-magazine and continued on a Wordpress blog by what I assume were original affiliates or community veterans. But the website lacks information and it doesn't seem to generate much external coverage outside that community, although I'm no expert in this space. I think the Wikipedia page overstates the importance of the awards based on how its sources are being quoted, but it's probably a needless rabbit hole to get deeper into that side of things. Open to views on whether these sort of awards do create an inheritable sort of notability of their own absent other coverage.
Thanks for any thoughts. VRXCES ( talk) 11:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Popular Resistance Committees. I find the rationale for redirecting more strong relative to our policies & guidelines than keep, and more numerous in support. Daniel ( talk) 07:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no WP:SIGCOV of him beyond the report of his death. I also tried searching for him on google before Oct 1, 2023, and found nothing on him. Given that sources only mention his death, I'd have proposed moving the page to Killing of Rafat Abu Hilal, but even that would not meet WP:GNG. VR talk 21:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted following a contested "keep" closure per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 December 22.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to Popular Resistance Committees - Where he is already mentioned. The reports of his death are primary sources and do not demonstrate notability. Are there any secondary sources that discuss the signficance of this person? Longhornsg adds one source but this is just an obituary put out by the popular resistance movement. It lacks independence, and, in that form, is a primary source. It is also very brief and has nothing from which an encyclopaedic article could be written. Without some secondary surces describing why this person is significant, I would suggest an encyclopaedic treatment is not possible. All we have is that he was the head of PRC's armed wing and killed in an airstrike, and we have that on two pages. Unless significance beyond this can be shown, redirect is the appropriate WP:ATD. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 09:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Fictional D&D city with major GNG issues; the article's only claim of notability is that this city has inspired the better-known fictional city of Ankh-Morpork. I don't see any SIGCOV sources in the article or elsewhere (although I could not access Bryce 2008 cited in Further reading; Lovett-Graff 1996 cited there as well mentions the city in passing but does not provide any in-depth analysis. I wouldn't hold much hopes as the source was found in the prior AfD, nobody could access it and that AfD which ended with keep verdict was sadly influenced by claims that I can at best describe as incorrect if not misleading (ex. "Covered in Encyclopedia of Fantasy and Horror Fiction." - false, as can be seen from the entry here). I suggest redirecting to Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser (merge is not necessary, the Ankh-Morpork reference is already there; that article probably should be renamed to the Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser series - I started a discussion at that article's talk about refocusing it, feel free to comment there) or perhaps Lankhmar – City of Adventure. PS. See also related older AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nehwon. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
There are no reliable sources in the article. There appears to be very little RS coverage of the subject, if any. The article appears to be intended to promote a non-notable consultant, which is not what WP is for. Thenightaway ( talk) 11:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While opinion seems close here, those arguing to Keep this article all have low edit counts and limited experience evaluating articles at AFD. I don't always look at the article in question but considering the previous AfD closed as Delete I thought I should look it over and I agree with those editor supporting Deletion about the low quality of the sources in this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Every source in the article is either non-independent (including interviews) or provided no significant coverage. BEFORE searches on Google and ProQuest remain unpromising Mach61 ( talk) 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Album produced by an artist deleted as not notable. See deletion discussions: for artist, and album Loved One. Imaginatorium ( talk) 06:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Album produced by an artist deleted as not notable. See deletion discussions: for artist, and album Loved One. Imaginatorium ( talk) 06:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to WVBG-LD. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; little if any WP:SIGCOV. Translator WVBG-LD can be kept because that station has a storied history (it used to relay a PBS station). Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Sources are not satisfactory. Surə 🗯 16:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thank you for doing the source analysis. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Being executive head of a region with a population of 64k in a non federal state does not confer notability. Effectively a mayor. Mccapra ( talk) 08:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Anyone out there willing to investigate this article and offer their educated opinion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Annoucement of government appointment, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 1. "E. N. Paşayevin Göygöl Rayon İcra Hakimiyyətinin başçısı təyin edilməsi haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Sərəncamı". Archived from the original on 2023-07-08. Retrieved 2022-07-27. |
Resume style biography published when they were appointed. Fails WP:IS this is pretty clearly from government sources | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Arxivlənmiş surət". Archived from the original on 2022-08-18. Retrieved 2022-08-18. |
Same reasoning as above, article opens with "According to the order signed by President Ilham Aliyev today, Elvin Nazim oglu Pashayev was appointed the head of Goygol District Executive Power" again I think this fails WP:IS | 3. ^ "Göygölün 39 yaşlı icra başçısı". Archived from the original on 2023-07-08. Retrieved 2022-07-27. |
From az.wp [31] | |
Government annoucement, fails WP:IS | 1. "Arxivlənmiş surət". 2022-07-27 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-08-18. |
Annoucement of government appointment, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 2. ↑ "E. N. Paşayevin Göygöl Rayon İcra Hakimiyyətinin başçısı təyin edilməsi haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Sərəncamı". 2023-07-08 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-07-27. |
Dup of #2 on en.wp (see above) | 3. ↑ "Arxivlənmiş surət". 2022-08-18 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-08-18. |
Dup of #3 on en.wp (see above) | 4. ↑ "Göygölün 39 yaşlı icra başçısı". 2023-07-08 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-07-27. |
Resume style biography published when they were appointed. Fails WP:IS this is pretty clearly from government sources | 5. ↑ "Göygölün yeni icra başçısı". 2023-07-08 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-07-27. |
Government annoucement, fails WP:IS | 6. ↑ "Arxivlənmiş surət". 2022-06-22 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-08-18. |
Youtube, video not available | EL: [32] |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Pursuant to the above, the sources I gathered were all company announcements: no significant coverage. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 03:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Married to the Sea#Drew. Daniel ( talk) 03:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Obscure, lacks enough coverage for WP:MUSICBIO DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 02:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No need for a redirect from this specific title. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 03:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Egregious POV fork originating from Wikipedia's fraught relationship with the use–mention distinction. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and any notable claims in this article should go on an article like history of cannabis. Remsense 留 01:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I don't see a consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Other sources report that the first known record of marijuana use is in the Book of Drugs, written about 2737 BC by the Chinese Emperor Shen Nung...Shennong (the Divine Farmer) is a myth, and no Chinese writing survives from anywhere within a millennium of the date given in the source. I haven't looked into what the "Book of Drugs" might refer to, but I'm guessing purely on subject matter background knowledge it's not attested pre-Han dynasty.History and migration of the word ma: unsourced, and given the statement má has been used to describe the hemp plant since before the invention of writing five-thousand years ago, not verifiable.Ma in poetry and song: Shi Jing mentions using 麻 as a fiber. Ok, this can go in Five Grains or Cannabis in China.Use of the word ma in other languages: the Japanese word is fully cognate. So what? Journalists used the word (which? 麻 or 大麻?)
when discussing cannabis regulations and law publicly (due to prohibition).When? Where? Which scholars and journalists? There's no source cited. And if there is a source for this, why can't it go in History of cannabis or Legal status of cannabis?Root of Mexican Spanish word marijuana: already at Marijuana (word) § Etymology, as noted above.Variations: belongs in Cannabis in China.Overall, there's no need for this article in an encyclopaedia. I'm sympathetic to syncretic articles that can exist so people don't have to chase down bits of information from three different articles, but I don't think this one passes muster. There's a deeply incorrect statement in the brief lead paragraph, unverifiable speculation, and the rest is misfiled. Still feeling Redirect. Folly Mox ( talk) 17:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, to get more feedback on the latest comment and Merge suggestion to a different target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I would just like to see further review of sources mentioned in the discussion and added to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Yet another short-lived post office in Kansas, this one is almost completely hopeless: there's no trace of it on the topos, and the GNIS entry is gone so there's no way to find out where that came from. And of course there's nothing there, although older topos show a "Brubaker Sch." a bit to the east of the spot indicated in the article. Mangoe ( talk) 04:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. UtherSRG (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails NCORP. Almost all of the sources cited here are promotional, sponsored segments or interviews with the founder published in local news sources. Other sources I've been able to find via Google and Google News are likewise sponsored content. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 03:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed at "soft delete", but contested at
WP:REFUND.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Limmji ( talk) 22:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It would be great to hear from more editors. It would also be helpful to review recently added sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources provided in the discussion suggest that GNG is met. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 04:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient reliable third-party sources for the establishment of the article/Wikipedia page. Helper201 ( talk) 03:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Support per the reasons I noted regarding lack of sources and notability. One news source from the Morning Star with limited information is not enough to make the party notable or to establish a Wikipedia page. Also, per the above oppose comment, not every UK political party has a Wikipedia page. There's no evidence for that. See
List of political parties in the United Kingdom#Local where there are many parties listed with elected representation that don't have a Wikipedia page and nor does the National Flood Prevention Party seen at
List of political parties in the United Kingdom#Nationwide. Transform doesn't even have a single elected representative at any level. The party as seen from the establishment of its website and when it uploaded its first YouTube video has actually existed for over 6 months, it was just officially founded just over a month ago (25 November 2023). However, its recent establishment is not a good reason to justify that it has a Wikipedia page, if anything it’s a reason against it having one until the party gets more recognition.
Helper201 (
talk) 01:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep There are sources on it already as mentions above, and seen Pink News talk to India W about it too. Jonjonjohny ( talk) 12:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG. This technically survived a bulk AfD earlier this year but there is a lack of sourcing to show this meets WP:N. Let'srun ( talk) 03:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It looks like the participating editors disagree with the nominator's judgment about existing SIGCOV. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
This article is little more than a play-by-play recap of a made for TV Desert Storm doc which, so far as I can tell, won no awards and shows no SIGCOV. If not TNT'd, it may be a candidate for merging into an article about Desert Storm or films related to same. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 03:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
I encourage editors to create that list article for Bolivian players and then this page could be redirected there. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
All I am able to find on this Bolivian women's footballer are a half-dozen sentences of independent coverage here, and two sentences from the same publication here. I do not believe this to be enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, though there might be some sources out there that I missed. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The subject, a Dominican women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this interview. There's a few quotes from her here as well, but everything else is just passing mentions. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kirtivarman II. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in the article and BEFORE and mentions, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. A basic genealogy expanded into a non-notable article. No objection to a redirect to Kirtivarman II // Timothy :: talk 02:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article and, maybe more importantly, no support for Deletion other than the nominator. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Clearly not notable for a standalone article. Per WP:NOPAGE, this more suitable as a section on the main Apple Watch page than an entire article. Fails WP:NEVENT, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:10YEAR. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 01:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Skweez Media. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
While Monarchy might have been notable for the awards its shows won, that doesn't roll up to Kulich, and I see no other path to biographic notability for him. Star Mississippi 00:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 01:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This article survived two no-consensus AfDs a number of years ago, but the arguments there are not convincing. The only source identified so far that discusses Anwar in detail is the self-published iUniverse Rebel Moms book, which is clearly not a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. My WP:BEFORE search found only a handful of non-independent interviews in various outlets as well as a little bit of Atlanta Voice coverage that doesn't rise to the level of WP:SIGCOV. That's not enough for notability under WP:BASIC or the GNG, in my view. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 01:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus below for the article to be renamed, but no agreement on exactly what (three variations of the same thing). Any editor is encouraged to editorially move this to the desired target as per normal processes for renaming articles, based on the support of the rename position here establishing a local consensus. Daniel ( talk) 03:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Not notable per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Redirect to University of Warsaw reverted. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Faculties, departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field.Have you checked if this isn't one of those exceptions? – Joe ( talk) 01:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 00:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced BLP on an Indian men's footballer who played seven pro games a few years ago and has been playing in state leagues ever since. All I found were passing mentions ( 2016, 2018, 2019, 2022, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 00:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bumper Films. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 23:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
I am unconvinced that WP:BIO is met. The only source present in the article which goes into any detail on the subject is this and my searches have not found any others. If that is the only in-depth coverage, we are short of having multiple sources which provide in-depth coverage. SmartSE ( talk) 22:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
no indication of notability Drowssap SMM 23:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This isn't appropriate for soft-deletion as the primary contributor is still actively editing the article. Relisting to form consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I hope recently found sources can find their way out of this AFD discussion and into the article itself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
WP:ADMASQ for non notable periodical. Fails WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE failed to find any useful sources. Current references are from the org itself, a one para "description' of the item, and a 404/server failure error. Puff piece. Note that the item is stated to have won the 'Diageo Africa Business Reporting Award', an award by a drinks manufacturer about which I can find no significant coverage, thus have concluded that it is a 'Marketing Award' for Diageo (to sell more drinks?), and does not confer notability. Refunded after soft delete at prior AfD, and renominated for a fuller discussion. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. "Seems notable" isn't sufficient, there needs to be some actual new sources brought to this discussion to address concerns in nomination statement. If this journal is "clearly notable", finding reliable sources shouldn't be difficult.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to consider sources presented by Watercheetah99 against our GNG guideline.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. UtherSRG (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
While the show itself is clearly notable, it's not clear that the list of individual episodes is necessary. At present, this page (as well as those for other years) uses only primary sources: one for the WW...DTM archive and one to Twitter. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 23:48, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 16:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Notability. not passed WP:NSPORTS or WP:JOURNALIST. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha ( 🧾 - 💬) 21:32, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Apart from conceiving and executing promotional campaigns targeted at the Media, Marketing & Television Trade online, it also offers similar services offline, thus providing clients with a 360 degree media service and marketing solution.E4M:
exchange4media was set up in year 2000 with the aim of publishing niche, relevant and quality publications for the marketing, advertising and media professionals.JoelleJay ( talk) 19:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Not enough independent WP:SIGCOV is present for this subject to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 18:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:07, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Editors are free to create a Redirect from this page title to an appropriate target article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Found absolutely zero significant coverage in my BEFORE, which included a newspaper search. Mach61 ( talk) 21:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
It's pretty much impossible to come up with a sensible inclusion criterion for this article (and others in the series). The current state of the selected inventions is a joke. Dicklyon ( talk) 19:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 01:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage of the band to be found anywhere. The article only relias on primary sources. The only argument for notability is that their albums were published by a notable indie label. In my opinion not enough to meet notability criteria. Broc ( talk) 18:33, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm not able to find any sources that satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC about this footballer. Passing mentions like ESP and FMF were all that I could find. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
In 2015, Vladimir Keptenari entered the Municipal Council on the list of Our Party. On January 15, 2018, he even took part in a hunger strike , which was then announced by PP advisers in protest against the pressure on advisers from the ruling PDM party.4; a blurb on his municipal councilor candidacy alongside 26 other candidacy blurbs 5; and another piece on his wife's accusations that has no coverage of him 6. Nowhere near enough coverage to meet GNG, let alone NPOL (which considers a lot of candidacy coverage routine).
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The subject, a Trinidadian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I have found in my searches is this interview. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable location. In a previous AfD, this article was converted to a redirect to El Dorado County, California, which in my opinion was a mistake as there is absolutely nothing to be said about this place and it is not mentioned in the county article at all. No mention of a Tylers Corner or Tylers was found in any of three histories of the region that I was able to access online: [19], [20], [21]. It's first labeled as Tylers Corner on the 1952 Aukum and Camino USGS topo maps: [22], but that's the only mention of this place I can find other than the cited sources, which are insufficient for notability. This is just an intersection that once had a few houses; that is not a community, as required by WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 20:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Run of the mill bureaucrat. As best I can tell, the subject is vice-president of "HR, IT and regulations" within the state-owned oil company. Thenightaway ( talk) 20:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Spammy list of non-notable entities, Wikipedia is not a product directory * Pppery * it has begun... 20:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The article says nothing about the purported subject and is instead a content fork of Equatorial Guinea–United States relations. — Biruitorul Talk 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is nothing that indicates the subject is notable. This is purely sourced to Azerbaijani government sources or sources that are not independent of the Azerbaijan government. Thenightaway ( talk) 20:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Those editors who want to create a Redirect from this page title to an appropriate target article or even a disambiguation page are free to do so. Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Article substantially falling afoul of WP:OR, with no sourcing to demonstrate the core concept and is simply rampant author description of the term. Only sections sourced are three lines about the Obama administration's foreign policy that referred to "America's Pacific Century" and would therefore be relevant on article's about his presidency. Rambling Rambler ( talk) 19:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The article has been around for a while but does not indicate any notability. (The founder apparently " worked with" HGTV, there's not much about it.) The sources are all PR material and I cannot find much in the way of third-party discussion of the company in reliable sources, beyond listings in seller websites, and promotional-type interviews or blog postings. ... discospinster talk 19:40, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This two-paragraph news article seems like a slam-dunk (i.e. SPEEDY) Merge&Redirect per WP:NOTNEWS; does not seem to meet WP:EVENT. I'm not sure why the two paragraphs were not simply added to British Library, with its own Level 4 header if necessary, under British Library#Electronic collections. Softlavender ( talk) 10:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:29, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources, especially if also re-analyzed afterwards. All three of these prongs are met: this event had widespread national impact in the U.K., with the national library being taken offline for several months; it was widely covered in mainstream international news outlets such as the The New Yorker and New York Times, IT and cybersecurity-focused media such as The Register and Infosecurity Magazine, and museum and library journals such as Museums Journal and The Art Newspaper; and many of these articles contain detailed analysis or commentary about the wider impact of the event, e.g.
Museums, galleries and archives have been urged to tighten their cyber security following the massive ransomware attack on the British Libraryand
what can arts bodies do to combat ransomware threats?. Jfire ( talk) 19:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. This is more of a procedural Keep because after going to a lot of trouble editing this article and putting together a source table, the nominator twice said they wanted to Keep this article.
Please do not start an AFD discussion unless you are seeking to delete an article. It's not an appropriate vehicle to encourage other editors to find new sources for you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing this page for a couple of days mostly removing excessive external links to the organisation's website, boldly removing unsourced or improperly sourced content, verifying what I can and tagging what I can't verify. Then, I tried to improve the page by incorporating some secondary and tertiary sources but I've drawn a blank. I am confident that at this point I have explored WP:ATD but after putting together the source assessment table below it's become clear to me that there isn't actually enough significant coverage in independent secondary sources to form an objective overview of this British charity. I contemplated doing prod but doing so would have sent other editors on a wild goose chase for reliable secondary sources which I don't want to do. So I've arrived at the conclusion that AfD is the only way forward. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 16:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-search/-/charity-details/290767/governance | ? I think the charities register functions like Companies House in that organisations have to submit their own details but I could be wrong. | It's a legally binding document | Just a registry | ✘ No |
https://archive.org/details/menofvision00amyz/page/99/mode/2up | In this interview https://portal.ehri-project.eu/units/us-005578-irn504457-irn507288 this book's author discusses joining the "Jewish Relief Unit of the Jewish Committee for Relief Abroad, sponsored by the Central British Fund for German Jewry". Therefore, this source isn't independent because she's writing about an organisation that she was a member of. | I've had a good flick through the book and it's very well written, very thorough and well citated. | The book goes into a lot of depth about this organisation's formation. It's just a shame it's not independent. | ✘ No |
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2020/jan/05/windermere-children-arek-hersh-survivor-bbc-drama | It's The Guardian | It's The Guardian | I added this source for verification purposes but it doesn't actually mention World Jewish Relief. | ✘ No |
http://www.wjr.org.uk/about-us/ | One of many links to the organisation's website that I removed from the page. | ~ Organisation's websites are reliable up to a point but we can't use them to support notability. | There's lot's of coverage about the organisation's history on their website but it's not independent and can't support notability | ✘ No |
https://search.worldcat.org/title/31047514?oclcNum=31047514 | World Cat lists this books publisher as (you guessed it) World Jewish Relief. | ~ Probably reliable up to a point but because it's not independent it's not reliable enough to support notability | It's a book about the organisation. | ✘ No |
https://www.gale.com/intl/essays/amy-zahl-gottlieb-central-british-fund-world-jewish-relief-first-ten-years | I added this source because it's easier to verify than checking Gottlieb's book out of a library but when I researched the author I realised that the author was part of the "Jewish Relief Unit of the Jewish Committee for Relief Abroad, sponsored by the Central British Fund for German Jewry" | I'm not disputing this historian's research skills and literary prowess. It's just a shame it's not independent because WP requires independent secondary sources to verify notability. | It's incredibly detailed and very well-referenced. | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails NLIST. List was split from main article without discussion on Aug 30, 2023. This is an unneeded CFORK, much of the content violates WP:NOTTVGUIDE. No objection to restoring properly sourced material to main article. // Timothy :: talk 17:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Corruption in Azerbaijan. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is nothing that indicates that the subject is notable. There is no coverage of this organization from sources that are independent of the Azerbaijan government. If there is any content worth keeping, it can be merged with Corruption in Azerbaijan. Thenightaway ( talk) 19:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was draftify. Daniel ( talk) 22:21, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG, only a single source mentioning the topic (no other sources could be found). ChaotıċEnby( t · c) 17:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Context not found in any of the cited references. The battle name is not recognized by any of the historians. Seems like source manipulation Imperial [AFCND] 15:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Recently restored after a previous deletion, but without improvements. The article on this topic on Turkish Wikipedia has now been deleted ten times for lack of notability. Can we call it a day now? Mccapra ( talk) 13:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
This was a tourism initiative launched by the Saudi government in February 2019 and which a likely COI account immediately created a Wikipedia article for. There is nothing to indicate that this is notable. It has not been covered by reliable sources. It has solely been covered by sources that are not independent of the Saudi government. This Wikipedia article appears intended to promote a non-notable subject. Thenightaway ( talk) 14:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see no case made for draftification within the last !vote Star Mississippi 14:29, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Non notable musician. Jax 0677 ( talk) 13:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Mentions in Google Books seem to be trivial and not significant coverage. I can only find one source, and that's only about a data breach. I doubt one article about a data breach that happened to a website makes it notable. — MATRIX! ( a good person!) citation unneeded 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Despite playing 3 games of football in previous seasons, I can't find any evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG. Best sources appear to be a squad listing in Alyaum and a youth camp call up announcement in Sport KSA. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Played a single game in the second tier of Russia about 3 years ago before disappearing. I am not convinced that this passes WP:SPORTBASIC and WP:GNG and the current article only uses database sources, which fail to confer notability. The best Russian sources that I could find were Redyarsk and FCDM, both of which were only passing mentions of the subject. Given that he seems to have disappeared, I don't think notability in the near future is that likely either. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was not delete. There is no consensus about whether to merge the content instead, but that can continue to be discussed on the article talk page. Sandstein 13:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable interactive fiction title. The article currently contains significant coverage from one secondary source. A WP:BEFORE yields one more reliable review from GameTrailers [23]. But even with that considered, the article unfortunately falls short when taking a WP:THREE approach - if there is something else out there that is pretty clearly reliable significant coverage, happy to withdraw this nomination.
It may be said that the article inherits notability from its one award and IFDB status. The article's reliance on the IFDB is not in my view significant as a WP:USERG source. Even putting that aside, the cited #1 listings are based on an all-time poll of 223 users and a 2023 poll of 59 users - this is not particularly wide or significant.
It is hard to gauge the significance of the game receiving a XYZZY Award in 2012. It does have some clout. It seems to be a legacy community-voted award started by a defunct interactive fiction e-magazine and continued on a Wordpress blog by what I assume were original affiliates or community veterans. But the website lacks information and it doesn't seem to generate much external coverage outside that community, although I'm no expert in this space. I think the Wikipedia page overstates the importance of the awards based on how its sources are being quoted, but it's probably a needless rabbit hole to get deeper into that side of things. Open to views on whether these sort of awards do create an inheritable sort of notability of their own absent other coverage.
Thanks for any thoughts. VRXCES ( talk) 11:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Popular Resistance Committees. I find the rationale for redirecting more strong relative to our policies & guidelines than keep, and more numerous in support. Daniel ( talk) 07:16, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no WP:SIGCOV of him beyond the report of his death. I also tried searching for him on google before Oct 1, 2023, and found nothing on him. Given that sources only mention his death, I'd have proposed moving the page to Killing of Rafat Abu Hilal, but even that would not meet WP:GNG. VR talk 21:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted following a contested "keep" closure per
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 December 22.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to Popular Resistance Committees - Where he is already mentioned. The reports of his death are primary sources and do not demonstrate notability. Are there any secondary sources that discuss the signficance of this person? Longhornsg adds one source but this is just an obituary put out by the popular resistance movement. It lacks independence, and, in that form, is a primary source. It is also very brief and has nothing from which an encyclopaedic article could be written. Without some secondary surces describing why this person is significant, I would suggest an encyclopaedic treatment is not possible. All we have is that he was the head of PRC's armed wing and killed in an airstrike, and we have that on two pages. Unless significance beyond this can be shown, redirect is the appropriate WP:ATD. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 09:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Fictional D&D city with major GNG issues; the article's only claim of notability is that this city has inspired the better-known fictional city of Ankh-Morpork. I don't see any SIGCOV sources in the article or elsewhere (although I could not access Bryce 2008 cited in Further reading; Lovett-Graff 1996 cited there as well mentions the city in passing but does not provide any in-depth analysis. I wouldn't hold much hopes as the source was found in the prior AfD, nobody could access it and that AfD which ended with keep verdict was sadly influenced by claims that I can at best describe as incorrect if not misleading (ex. "Covered in Encyclopedia of Fantasy and Horror Fiction." - false, as can be seen from the entry here). I suggest redirecting to Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser (merge is not necessary, the Ankh-Morpork reference is already there; that article probably should be renamed to the Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser series - I started a discussion at that article's talk about refocusing it, feel free to comment there) or perhaps Lankhmar – City of Adventure. PS. See also related older AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nehwon. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 09:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
There are no reliable sources in the article. There appears to be very little RS coverage of the subject, if any. The article appears to be intended to promote a non-notable consultant, which is not what WP is for. Thenightaway ( talk) 11:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While opinion seems close here, those arguing to Keep this article all have low edit counts and limited experience evaluating articles at AFD. I don't always look at the article in question but considering the previous AfD closed as Delete I thought I should look it over and I agree with those editor supporting Deletion about the low quality of the sources in this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Every source in the article is either non-independent (including interviews) or provided no significant coverage. BEFORE searches on Google and ProQuest remain unpromising Mach61 ( talk) 07:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Album produced by an artist deleted as not notable. See deletion discussions: for artist, and album Loved One. Imaginatorium ( talk) 06:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Album produced by an artist deleted as not notable. See deletion discussions: for artist, and album Loved One. Imaginatorium ( talk) 06:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to WVBG-LD. Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; little if any WP:SIGCOV. Translator WVBG-LD can be kept because that station has a storied history (it used to relay a PBS station). Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:51, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Sources are not satisfactory. Surə 🗯 16:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thank you for doing the source analysis. Liz Read! Talk! 02:25, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Being executive head of a region with a population of 64k in a non federal state does not confer notability. Effectively a mayor. Mccapra ( talk) 08:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Anyone out there willing to investigate this article and offer their educated opinion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Annoucement of government appointment, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 1. "E. N. Paşayevin Göygöl Rayon İcra Hakimiyyətinin başçısı təyin edilməsi haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Sərəncamı". Archived from the original on 2023-07-08. Retrieved 2022-07-27. |
Resume style biography published when they were appointed. Fails WP:IS this is pretty clearly from government sources | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b c "Arxivlənmiş surət". Archived from the original on 2022-08-18. Retrieved 2022-08-18. |
Same reasoning as above, article opens with "According to the order signed by President Ilham Aliyev today, Elvin Nazim oglu Pashayev was appointed the head of Goygol District Executive Power" again I think this fails WP:IS | 3. ^ "Göygölün 39 yaşlı icra başçısı". Archived from the original on 2023-07-08. Retrieved 2022-07-27. |
From az.wp [31] | |
Government annoucement, fails WP:IS | 1. "Arxivlənmiş surət". 2022-07-27 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-08-18. |
Annoucement of government appointment, fails WP:IS, no WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 2. ↑ "E. N. Paşayevin Göygöl Rayon İcra Hakimiyyətinin başçısı təyin edilməsi haqqında Azərbaycan Respublikası Prezidentinin Sərəncamı". 2023-07-08 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-07-27. |
Dup of #2 on en.wp (see above) | 3. ↑ "Arxivlənmiş surət". 2022-08-18 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-08-18. |
Dup of #3 on en.wp (see above) | 4. ↑ "Göygölün 39 yaşlı icra başçısı". 2023-07-08 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-07-27. |
Resume style biography published when they were appointed. Fails WP:IS this is pretty clearly from government sources | 5. ↑ "Göygölün yeni icra başçısı". 2023-07-08 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-07-27. |
Government annoucement, fails WP:IS | 6. ↑ "Arxivlənmiş surət". 2022-06-22 tarixində arxivləşdirilib. İstifadə tarixi: 2022-08-18. |
Youtube, video not available | EL: [32] |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Pursuant to the above, the sources I gathered were all company announcements: no significant coverage. बिनोद थारू ( talk) 03:54, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Married to the Sea#Drew. Daniel ( talk) 03:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Obscure, lacks enough coverage for WP:MUSICBIO DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 02:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No need for a redirect from this specific title. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 03:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Egregious POV fork originating from Wikipedia's fraught relationship with the use–mention distinction. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and any notable claims in this article should go on an article like history of cannabis. Remsense 留 01:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, I don't see a consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:13, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Other sources report that the first known record of marijuana use is in the Book of Drugs, written about 2737 BC by the Chinese Emperor Shen Nung...Shennong (the Divine Farmer) is a myth, and no Chinese writing survives from anywhere within a millennium of the date given in the source. I haven't looked into what the "Book of Drugs" might refer to, but I'm guessing purely on subject matter background knowledge it's not attested pre-Han dynasty.History and migration of the word ma: unsourced, and given the statement má has been used to describe the hemp plant since before the invention of writing five-thousand years ago, not verifiable.Ma in poetry and song: Shi Jing mentions using 麻 as a fiber. Ok, this can go in Five Grains or Cannabis in China.Use of the word ma in other languages: the Japanese word is fully cognate. So what? Journalists used the word (which? 麻 or 大麻?)
when discussing cannabis regulations and law publicly (due to prohibition).When? Where? Which scholars and journalists? There's no source cited. And if there is a source for this, why can't it go in History of cannabis or Legal status of cannabis?Root of Mexican Spanish word marijuana: already at Marijuana (word) § Etymology, as noted above.Variations: belongs in Cannabis in China.Overall, there's no need for this article in an encyclopaedia. I'm sympathetic to syncretic articles that can exist so people don't have to chase down bits of information from three different articles, but I don't think this one passes muster. There's a deeply incorrect statement in the brief lead paragraph, unverifiable speculation, and the rest is misfiled. Still feeling Redirect. Folly Mox ( talk) 17:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, to get more feedback on the latest comment and Merge suggestion to a different target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I would just like to see further review of sources mentioned in the discussion and added to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:26, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Yet another short-lived post office in Kansas, this one is almost completely hopeless: there's no trace of it on the topos, and the GNIS entry is gone so there's no way to find out where that came from. And of course there's nothing there, although older topos show a "Brubaker Sch." a bit to the east of the spot indicated in the article. Mangoe ( talk) 04:15, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. UtherSRG (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails NCORP. Almost all of the sources cited here are promotional, sponsored segments or interviews with the founder published in local news sources. Other sources I've been able to find via Google and Google News are likewise sponsored content. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 03:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed at "soft delete", but contested at
WP:REFUND.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Limmji ( talk) 22:26, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It would be great to hear from more editors. It would also be helpful to review recently added sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources provided in the discussion suggest that GNG is met. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 04:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient reliable third-party sources for the establishment of the article/Wikipedia page. Helper201 ( talk) 03:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Support per the reasons I noted regarding lack of sources and notability. One news source from the Morning Star with limited information is not enough to make the party notable or to establish a Wikipedia page. Also, per the above oppose comment, not every UK political party has a Wikipedia page. There's no evidence for that. See
List of political parties in the United Kingdom#Local where there are many parties listed with elected representation that don't have a Wikipedia page and nor does the National Flood Prevention Party seen at
List of political parties in the United Kingdom#Nationwide. Transform doesn't even have a single elected representative at any level. The party as seen from the establishment of its website and when it uploaded its first YouTube video has actually existed for over 6 months, it was just officially founded just over a month ago (25 November 2023). However, its recent establishment is not a good reason to justify that it has a Wikipedia page, if anything it’s a reason against it having one until the party gets more recognition.
Helper201 (
talk) 01:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Keep There are sources on it already as mentions above, and seen Pink News talk to India W about it too. Jonjonjohny ( talk) 12:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG. This technically survived a bulk AfD earlier this year but there is a lack of sourcing to show this meets WP:N. Let'srun ( talk) 03:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. It looks like the participating editors disagree with the nominator's judgment about existing SIGCOV. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
This article is little more than a play-by-play recap of a made for TV Desert Storm doc which, so far as I can tell, won no awards and shows no SIGCOV. If not TNT'd, it may be a candidate for merging into an article about Desert Storm or films related to same. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 03:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
I encourage editors to create that list article for Bolivian players and then this page could be redirected there. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
All I am able to find on this Bolivian women's footballer are a half-dozen sentences of independent coverage here, and two sentences from the same publication here. I do not believe this to be enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, though there might be some sources out there that I missed. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
The subject, a Dominican women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this interview. There's a few quotes from her here as well, but everything else is just passing mentions. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kirtivarman II. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in the article and BEFORE and mentions, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. A basic genealogy expanded into a non-notable article. No objection to a redirect to Kirtivarman II // Timothy :: talk 02:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article and, maybe more importantly, no support for Deletion other than the nominator. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Clearly not notable for a standalone article. Per WP:NOPAGE, this more suitable as a section on the main Apple Watch page than an entire article. Fails WP:NEVENT, WP:NOTNEWS, and WP:10YEAR. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 01:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Skweez Media. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
While Monarchy might have been notable for the awards its shows won, that doesn't roll up to Kulich, and I see no other path to biographic notability for him. Star Mississippi 00:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 01:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This article survived two no-consensus AfDs a number of years ago, but the arguments there are not convincing. The only source identified so far that discusses Anwar in detail is the self-published iUniverse Rebel Moms book, which is clearly not a reliable source per WP:RSSELF. My WP:BEFORE search found only a handful of non-independent interviews in various outlets as well as a little bit of Atlanta Voice coverage that doesn't rise to the level of WP:SIGCOV. That's not enough for notability under WP:BASIC or the GNG, in my view. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 01:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus below for the article to be renamed, but no agreement on exactly what (three variations of the same thing). Any editor is encouraged to editorially move this to the desired target as per normal processes for renaming articles, based on the support of the rename position here establishing a local consensus. Daniel ( talk) 03:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Not notable per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Redirect to University of Warsaw reverted. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:57, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Faculties, departments or degree programs within a university, college, or school are generally not considered notable unless they have made significant contributions to their field.Have you checked if this isn't one of those exceptions? – Joe ( talk) 01:12, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 00:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced BLP on an Indian men's footballer who played seven pro games a few years ago and has been playing in state leagues ever since. All I found were passing mentions ( 2016, 2018, 2019, 2022, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 00:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)