![]() |
The result was keep. – bradv 🍁 00:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be an essay rather than an article. Couldn't establish that it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 16:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. JGHowes talk 01:06, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Badly made, no references at all (but somehow lasted from 2009 to now?) Creator has also been given a warning about promotional content on another article. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/ ✏ 22:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. JGHowes talk 01:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic list of non-notable radio content. Fails WP:FANCRUFT and WP:NOR Ajf773 ( talk) 22:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. JGHowes talk 01:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The article is filled with unreliable sources that are either gossip blogs or promotional websites. A Google search of the subject doesn't show the subject being discussed in reliable sources. The awards and nominations the subject has received are not notable. The subject is still an up-and-coming artist who has not made a mark in the Ghanaian music industry. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 21:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 00:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails GNG IW. (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
fails GNG IW. (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 04:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Seems to fail ANYBIO and WP:WINEMAKER IW. (talk) 21:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. JGHowes talk 01:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails GNG IW. (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 05:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The article is filled with unreliable sources that are either gossip blogs or promotional websites. A Google search of the subject doesn't show the subject being discussed in reliable sources. The awards and nominations the subject has received are not notable. The subject is still an up-and-coming artist who has not made a mark in the Ghanaian music industry. The page creator is notorious for creating articles about non-notable musicians. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 20:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
It's a subdivision with no independent notability. For an example of a delete outcome for this kind of page, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildwood Estates, Arizona.
While not adjacent, it is nearby and it appears the same developer (Homes by Dave Brown) built it, so I'm adding Amberwood II, Arizona to this specific nomination. Apparently there were other Amberwood subdivisions around the Valley, too. Raymie ( t • c) 20:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 00:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
It's a subdivision with no independent notability. For an example of a delete outcome for this kind of page, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildwood Estates, Arizona. Raymie ( t • c) 20:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 15:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
neologism and article created to promote some consulting firm. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. BD2412 T 04:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Zero independant coverage, not even passing mentions. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 23:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Pretty much all the sources here are affiliated, unreliable, or passing mentions. I looked for better ones but didn't find anything I would call RS. It's possible the format is notable but even there I just find mentions, not substantive coverage - but there are sufficient namechecks that this may be a wheat vs. chaff issue. Needless to say, the article is full of personal observations. Guy ( help!) 09:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect was suggested, but the subject is not mentioned at the proposed target article. MelanieN ( talk) 00:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
No indication this mixtape is notable per WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. It did not chart in any notable list, and a Google search only brings up places to buy / listen to it. ... discospinster talk 18:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arguments to keep - even if it is ultimately cancelled - are stronger, and point out that in the past we have kept articles about cancelled events. Arguments to delete are based on assumptions of what may or may not happen. MelanieN ( talk) 23:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Normally we would create an article for a forthcoming league season as and when teams secure a place in it, by winning enough points in the previous season. In theory three teams have done this so far, but the 2019/20 season has now been suspended due to the Coronavirus pandemic.
There is now a lot of speculation about what may happen, and therefore any assumption about who may have qualified for the next season is unsafe. WP:CRYSTAL. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 17:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America 1000 05:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A non notable award designed for PR purposes Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 13:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MelanieN ( talk) 23:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and fails to comply with WP:NPOV. The article clearly has been written as WP:PROMO. The content has been cited by only handful of sources which are bare urls. Abishe ( talk) 13:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
2020-03 ✍️ create
The result was merge to List of creatures in Meitei folklore. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Reason North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
As left at article talk page: Reviewed under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process
Thanks for your work on this article. As a part of Wikipedia's new article review / curation process I just reviewed the article.
In my opinion, this topic, to the extent visible in the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines which is a requirement for existence of a separate article on topic. This guideline is described at WP:Notability (there are no applicable SNG's for fictional characters) The core element of wp:notability is that there are some independent published sources which covered the topic of the article in depth. Of the three references given, at two there is no relevant material at all, and the third appears to be a story itself from folklore that contains this character. And without coverage, there is no sourcable material for a full article. I will be nominating the article for deletion so that the community may decide. I believe that the two sentences which this article consists of would be good to have somewhere in Wikipedia. Probably the best place is in the Manipuri mythology article which in Wikipedia terms means "Merge to Manipuri mythology. If a close on the AFD is headed towards this, and somebody pings me I'd be happy to copy/move that material. I also note that this article has previously been deleted. North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 19:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A biography of an actor, unsourced except to IMDb (which is not WP:RS) since its creation in 2005. A WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing better. He does not seem ever to have played a leading role (his IMDb entry for convenience). Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Narky Blert ( talk) 17:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect can be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 15:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. The actor has featured in only one film and makes it WP:TOOSOON. Abishe ( talk) 16:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Article appears to be mainly WP:PROMO and does not seem to meet WP:GNG, because it doesn't look like there are multiple references that are independent, significant, reliable and secondary at the same time. Streepjescode ( talk) 14:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as hoax ... discospinster talk 17:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
This article seems to be part of a bizarre WP:HOAX campaign by several IPs and their (presumed) sockmaster to claim Italian as an official language in Albania, although it is not an official language in the country. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 14:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to List of Jungle Junction episodes. (non-admin closure) Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 18:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Two episodes of the show have already had their pages deleted for fancruft and lack of notability, and just like what someone mentioned in their deletion discussions, I don't think it's best to redirect them, which I could have done right now, because they wouldn't be useful for redirects anyway. They also just repeat what's already on the main list of episodes. Thanks. 118.148.82.63 ( talk) 23:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination on behalf of IP.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
13:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to List of Jungle Junction episodes. ( non-admin closure) Ajf773 ( talk) 18:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Two episodes of the show have already had their pages deleted for fancruft and lack of notability, and just like what someone mentioned in their deletion discussions, I don't think it's best to redirect them, which I could have done right now, because they wouldn't be useful for redirects anyway. They also just repeat what's already on the main list of episodes. Thanks. 118.148.82.63 ( talk) 23:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination on behalf of IP.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
13:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 23:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails every criterion of WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 13:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG / WP:NCORP. On the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, there are total of 16 results (first it says 1,860 results, click on page 2 to see the real number), but they're mostly just passing mentions of the company. Like the Russian website Igromania, where Acheron Design is mentioned on page 2,697 of all games listed on the site, or page 76 of all PSP games, or the Brian Lara cricket games. The Kotaku AU is actually a link to another website, and an interview at that. In 2007, IGN UK reported that it was nominated for best start-up. Gamasutra says it received a "special commendation".
MobyGames' entry on the company has one game listed, and so does GiantBomb. The other developed game listed, Pony Friends 2, doesn't seem to be developed by Acheron Design either. At least, that's not what publisher Square Enix says on their website, apparently is developer Tantalus Media, also from Melbourne, Australia. I can't find any information on the other products listed. Like AFL DVD Trivia Challenge, BoardGameGeek has an entry on it, but it doesn't mention Acheron Design. As far as I can tell, Acheron Design has developed one game for sure, and that's it. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Never mind that this is still written like a beamer presentation even after the last AfD. Whatever this is exactly, it doesn't seem to be sufficiently notable to write an article about. A single newspaper article can't really sustain this. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 13:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP since all the sources are trivial coverage of the subject and just discuss topics, like funding rounds and being acquired, that WP:NCORP says aren't notable. I couldn't find anything else on Google News either. Adamant1 ( talk) 11:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Forced confession#Forced televised confessions in China. Since a logical redirect is proposed, this seems preferable to deletion. MelanieN ( talk) 00:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
But for his forced confession on Chinese TV, the subject would not be considered notable. Indeed, there is nothing in the sources that indicate that the article was not based on one event. I therefore nominate the article for deletion. Ohc ¡digame! 08:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The article clearly has been written as a WP:PROMO and also fails to comply with WP:NPOV. The subject has only worked in only a handful of films including short films. Abishe ( talk) 08:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject fails WP:GNG and the tone is unclear. The content has primarily been supported by bare URLs. Abishe ( talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Still. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Survived AfD in 2013 and 2014 but I still can’t find reliable independent sources to support it. Mccapra ( talk) 22:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Company fails WP:GNG. Page fails WP:Advert. Survived first AFD thanks to a user named, oddly enough, after the company. Dorama285 ( talk) 01:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect and keep. Duncan found not to be notable - there was borderline consensus to delete and redirect even, while his theory was found notable but not of such notability as to confer notability to Dunacn. Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Possible BLP sourced entirely from sources published by the subject of the article. No evidence that it meets the general notability guidelines. Seems to be known only for a self-promoted peak oil theory that itself was never particularly notable. Spasemunki ( talk) 22:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC) Also nominating this related article which has the same sourcing and notability issues:
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has been written as WP:PROMO. The content has been written by not complying with the WP:NPOV. Abishe ( talk) 08:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The content has been written as WP:PROMO and couldn't obtain much reliable information from Google search index. The content here has been written as an advertisement with the intention of promoting this institute. The article has to be rewritten. Abishe ( talk) 07:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Delete arguments cite BLP1E along with the possibility of COI. The Keep arguments cite rather weak general notability claims, along with concern that deleting the article might be criticized by some outsiders. The Delete arguments are clearly stronger. MelanieN ( talk) 01:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
I struggle to see how this individual may be notable. He has a fairly routine career, but there’s really nothing that sets him apart. - Biruitorul Talk 07:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Mentioned a tiny amount on local radio and newspaper. Most links took me back to this article. Very worthy, so I'm hoping someone can prove me wrong. Boleyn ( talk) 07:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
This article is not sufficiently notable child actor, it also had a fewer roles, per WP:BIO. SwissArmyGuy ( talk) 05:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
This list is very out of date and seems to duplicate a lot of content on other lists. I can’t see a reason for this separate list to exist. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 18:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:04, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
This article has an impressive number of "references", but most of them are just links to his tracks. No critical reception or any indication that his work received any reknown. There's a lot of name dropping in this bio, but I can't find any evidence to verify his work with them. Disclosure: Yes, I did just gut the ELs, but none of them including his own social handles worked anyway. StarM 03:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Does not satisfy either general notability or acting notability. Google search shows that the actor exists, and that there are other people, including an astronomer, with the same name. The article does not list any in-depth coverage, probably because there is no in-depth coverage. Article is categorized as a stub, although it is Start-Class length, and the categorization is reasonable. Although the article has a lengthy filmography, only one of the entries is blue-linked, because only one of the entries, Shahrzad (TV series), has an article. Acting notability depends on multiple roles, not one role.
This article was draftified twice as undersourced as an alternative to deletion. It was then created in article space, resulting in the fait accompli that it could not be draftified a third time. The draft and the article were then history-merged. But it was draftified because it doesn't satisfy biographical notability, and it still doesn't satisfy notability.
The actor may be up-and-coming, but does not currently pass notability, so that this may be too soon. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination has been withdrawn, clear consensus to keep (non-admin closure) Eddie891 Talk Work 17:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that he meets
WP:BIO or
WP:GNG, but very aware this is pre-Internet times. Has been in
CAT:NN for 12 years.
Boleyn (
talk)
08:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. However, consensus is clear that this article needs to be re-written from a neutral standpoint. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability - no reliable sources in the article and I couldn’t find anything to add. Previous tag indicating evidence of COI issues. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 17:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn ( talk) 16:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Merge and spilt can be discussed outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Loraine Barry is already an article. They are not notable for being a couple. All refs are primary sources. ツ Stacey ( talk) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
While there's a lot of trivial passing mentions of Hubert out there, significant coverage of him seems absent. The sources currently cited are either among the trivial passing mentions that don't say much beyond his name, are not reliable independent coverage, or rely very heavily on what Hubert says about himself or other topics. I couldn't find better ones, and apparently doubts about the notability and the sources were already raised in 2017. Huon ( talk) 21:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Black Kite (talk) 10:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
This article is poorly / unreferenced. Some of the refs present do not support the content in question for example "Co-director Ryan Prior, as a journalist, sets out to investigate the reality of patients struggling with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) which has become to be known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) after enduring a journey of his own with the disease. "What is ME/CFS? | Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) | CDC". www.cdc.gov. 2019-05-15. Retrieved 2020-03-05."
The CDC does not mention this film or individual. This site ProHealth is not reliable for anything. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Mostly just WP:GNG and maybe WP:PROD AtlasDuane ( talk) 16:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
An article on a midrash that is completely unsourced. The two sentence text of the article is copied verbatim from the public domain source indicated in the article, and that seems to be the extent of coverage on the topic. Every other source I was able to find was simply just the same two sentences, word for word. I am certainly no expert on the topic, though, so I am bringing it to AFD in case others may know more about the subject, and thus know where further sources can be found. If further sources are not presented, however, this should not be retained, as the single, brief reference to the text is not enough to pass the WP:GNG. Rorshacma ( talk) 05:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NCHESS. i tried with bengali name but didn't found any significant coverage. Anyway, there is a ref from sylhettoday24.news (i have doubt about this site), it says "there was a seminar, 17 players have been nominated for various World Chess Instructor titles based on the number received." but articles claims he won National Instructor title?? Looks like it was created for promotional purpose. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 04:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Contested PROD and CSD. There is no evidence that this passes our notability guidelines. All 4 results of typing this into Google lead to some rather sketchy websites. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 03:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Obvious pass of WP:NPOL so this has no chance of closing as delete. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 18:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
No clear claim to notability. Promotional article. While there are lots of low-quality sources around, there's nothing particularly reliable. Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. SD0001 ( talk) 03:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Elected member of the Rajya Sabha. [1] [2] [3] Meets GNG/BASIC/POLITICIAN.
References
-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
An old article but this seems dubious. The article implies that the person's death sparked a rebellion, but the sentence cites no source. The only citation is an inaccessible journal article (so possibly failing WP:Notability (people)). However, I cannot find any mention of this figure in Chinese-language sources related to the event. I searched Google Books and the only result is a novel. The sources are too lacking compared to the claimed importance of the subject. Esiymbro ( talk) 03:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 03:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable book per WP:NBOOK. Article reads like a poor review/book report. KidAd ( talk) 02:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The article fails to comply with WP:NPOV and seems to be WP:PROMO. Abishe ( talk) 13:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 18:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Little to no coverage of writer in secondary sources, or unverifiable social media posts and info on book discovery sites.
The result was redirect to APRA Awards (Australia)#Screen Music Awards (with AGSC). (non-admin closure) b uidh e 18:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 08:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. You are in a twisty maze of D&D AfDs, all alike. Merge, maybe? But for now, makes its saving throw against deletion. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Totally non-notable article that fails WP:GNG and WP:GAMEGUIDE. Sourced almost entirely to WP:PRIMARY sources. Vampires in the context of a single game are not encyclopedic enough for a standalone article. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 01:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
--it seems possible and perhaps even probable that this topic could be an appropriate topic for an encyclopedia. However, such an article would not resemble this article in the slightest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.13.88 ( talk) 22:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG quite clearly. A lot of poor quality coverage includes passing mentions or what looks like paid features of no real substance. PK650 ( talk) 00:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Not in tune with Wikipedia standards Rickyurs ( talk) 00:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. He is the CEO of a non-notable company. None of the info in the article establishes him as a notable figure. The sources cited in the article do not discuss the subject. A Google search of the subject doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources. The article is pretty much a promotional piece. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 00:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. – bradv 🍁 00:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be an essay rather than an article. Couldn't establish that it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 16:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. JGHowes talk 01:06, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Badly made, no references at all (but somehow lasted from 2009 to now?) Creator has also been given a warning about promotional content on another article. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/ ✏ 22:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. JGHowes talk 01:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic list of non-notable radio content. Fails WP:FANCRUFT and WP:NOR Ajf773 ( talk) 22:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. JGHowes talk 01:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The article is filled with unreliable sources that are either gossip blogs or promotional websites. A Google search of the subject doesn't show the subject being discussed in reliable sources. The awards and nominations the subject has received are not notable. The subject is still an up-and-coming artist who has not made a mark in the Ghanaian music industry. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 21:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 00:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails GNG IW. (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
fails GNG IW. (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 04:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Seems to fail ANYBIO and WP:WINEMAKER IW. (talk) 21:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. JGHowes talk 01:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails GNG IW. (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 05:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The article is filled with unreliable sources that are either gossip blogs or promotional websites. A Google search of the subject doesn't show the subject being discussed in reliable sources. The awards and nominations the subject has received are not notable. The subject is still an up-and-coming artist who has not made a mark in the Ghanaian music industry. The page creator is notorious for creating articles about non-notable musicians. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 20:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
It's a subdivision with no independent notability. For an example of a delete outcome for this kind of page, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildwood Estates, Arizona.
While not adjacent, it is nearby and it appears the same developer (Homes by Dave Brown) built it, so I'm adding Amberwood II, Arizona to this specific nomination. Apparently there were other Amberwood subdivisions around the Valley, too. Raymie ( t • c) 20:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 00:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
It's a subdivision with no independent notability. For an example of a delete outcome for this kind of page, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wildwood Estates, Arizona. Raymie ( t • c) 20:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 15:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
neologism and article created to promote some consulting firm. Praxidicae ( talk) 19:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. BD2412 T 04:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Zero independant coverage, not even passing mentions. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. MelanieN ( talk) 23:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Pretty much all the sources here are affiliated, unreliable, or passing mentions. I looked for better ones but didn't find anything I would call RS. It's possible the format is notable but even there I just find mentions, not substantive coverage - but there are sufficient namechecks that this may be a wheat vs. chaff issue. Needless to say, the article is full of personal observations. Guy ( help!) 09:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect was suggested, but the subject is not mentioned at the proposed target article. MelanieN ( talk) 00:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
No indication this mixtape is notable per WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. It did not chart in any notable list, and a Google search only brings up places to buy / listen to it. ... discospinster talk 18:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Arguments to keep - even if it is ultimately cancelled - are stronger, and point out that in the past we have kept articles about cancelled events. Arguments to delete are based on assumptions of what may or may not happen. MelanieN ( talk) 23:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Normally we would create an article for a forthcoming league season as and when teams secure a place in it, by winning enough points in the previous season. In theory three teams have done this so far, but the 2019/20 season has now been suspended due to the Coronavirus pandemic.
There is now a lot of speculation about what may happen, and therefore any assumption about who may have qualified for the next season is unsafe. WP:CRYSTAL. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 17:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America 1000 05:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A non notable award designed for PR purposes Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 13:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MelanieN ( talk) 23:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and fails to comply with WP:NPOV. The article clearly has been written as WP:PROMO. The content has been cited by only handful of sources which are bare urls. Abishe ( talk) 13:04, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
2020-03 ✍️ create
The result was merge to List of creatures in Meitei folklore. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Reason North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
As left at article talk page: Reviewed under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process
Thanks for your work on this article. As a part of Wikipedia's new article review / curation process I just reviewed the article.
In my opinion, this topic, to the extent visible in the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines which is a requirement for existence of a separate article on topic. This guideline is described at WP:Notability (there are no applicable SNG's for fictional characters) The core element of wp:notability is that there are some independent published sources which covered the topic of the article in depth. Of the three references given, at two there is no relevant material at all, and the third appears to be a story itself from folklore that contains this character. And without coverage, there is no sourcable material for a full article. I will be nominating the article for deletion so that the community may decide. I believe that the two sentences which this article consists of would be good to have somewhere in Wikipedia. Probably the best place is in the Manipuri mythology article which in Wikipedia terms means "Merge to Manipuri mythology. If a close on the AFD is headed towards this, and somebody pings me I'd be happy to copy/move that material. I also note that this article has previously been deleted. North8000 ( talk) 18:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 19:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
A biography of an actor, unsourced except to IMDb (which is not WP:RS) since its creation in 2005. A WP:BEFORE search turned up nothing better. He does not seem ever to have played a leading role (his IMDb entry for convenience). Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. Narky Blert ( talk) 17:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. A redirect can be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 15:11, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. The actor has featured in only one film and makes it WP:TOOSOON. Abishe ( talk) 16:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Article appears to be mainly WP:PROMO and does not seem to meet WP:GNG, because it doesn't look like there are multiple references that are independent, significant, reliable and secondary at the same time. Streepjescode ( talk) 14:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as hoax ... discospinster talk 17:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
This article seems to be part of a bizarre WP:HOAX campaign by several IPs and their (presumed) sockmaster to claim Italian as an official language in Albania, although it is not an official language in the country. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 14:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to List of Jungle Junction episodes. (non-admin closure) Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then ( ping me) 18:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Two episodes of the show have already had their pages deleted for fancruft and lack of notability, and just like what someone mentioned in their deletion discussions, I don't think it's best to redirect them, which I could have done right now, because they wouldn't be useful for redirects anyway. They also just repeat what's already on the main list of episodes. Thanks. 118.148.82.63 ( talk) 23:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination on behalf of IP.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
13:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy redirect to List of Jungle Junction episodes. ( non-admin closure) Ajf773 ( talk) 18:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Two episodes of the show have already had their pages deleted for fancruft and lack of notability, and just like what someone mentioned in their deletion discussions, I don't think it's best to redirect them, which I could have done right now, because they wouldn't be useful for redirects anyway. They also just repeat what's already on the main list of episodes. Thanks. 118.148.82.63 ( talk) 23:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination on behalf of IP.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me)
13:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 23:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails every criterion of WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 13:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG / WP:NCORP. On the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, there are total of 16 results (first it says 1,860 results, click on page 2 to see the real number), but they're mostly just passing mentions of the company. Like the Russian website Igromania, where Acheron Design is mentioned on page 2,697 of all games listed on the site, or page 76 of all PSP games, or the Brian Lara cricket games. The Kotaku AU is actually a link to another website, and an interview at that. In 2007, IGN UK reported that it was nominated for best start-up. Gamasutra says it received a "special commendation".
MobyGames' entry on the company has one game listed, and so does GiantBomb. The other developed game listed, Pony Friends 2, doesn't seem to be developed by Acheron Design either. At least, that's not what publisher Square Enix says on their website, apparently is developer Tantalus Media, also from Melbourne, Australia. I can't find any information on the other products listed. Like AFL DVD Trivia Challenge, BoardGameGeek has an entry on it, but it doesn't mention Acheron Design. As far as I can tell, Acheron Design has developed one game for sure, and that's it. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:34, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Never mind that this is still written like a beamer presentation even after the last AfD. Whatever this is exactly, it doesn't seem to be sufficiently notable to write an article about. A single newspaper article can't really sustain this. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 13:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 23:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP since all the sources are trivial coverage of the subject and just discuss topics, like funding rounds and being acquired, that WP:NCORP says aren't notable. I couldn't find anything else on Google News either. Adamant1 ( talk) 11:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Forced confession#Forced televised confessions in China. Since a logical redirect is proposed, this seems preferable to deletion. MelanieN ( talk) 00:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
But for his forced confession on Chinese TV, the subject would not be considered notable. Indeed, there is nothing in the sources that indicate that the article was not based on one event. I therefore nominate the article for deletion. Ohc ¡digame! 08:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The article clearly has been written as a WP:PROMO and also fails to comply with WP:NPOV. The subject has only worked in only a handful of films including short films. Abishe ( talk) 08:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject fails WP:GNG and the tone is unclear. The content has primarily been supported by bare URLs. Abishe ( talk) 08:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Still. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Survived AfD in 2013 and 2014 but I still can’t find reliable independent sources to support it. Mccapra ( talk) 22:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Company fails WP:GNG. Page fails WP:Advert. Survived first AFD thanks to a user named, oddly enough, after the company. Dorama285 ( talk) 01:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was redirect and keep. Duncan found not to be notable - there was borderline consensus to delete and redirect even, while his theory was found notable but not of such notability as to confer notability to Dunacn. Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Possible BLP sourced entirely from sources published by the subject of the article. No evidence that it meets the general notability guidelines. Seems to be known only for a self-promoted peak oil theory that itself was never particularly notable. Spasemunki ( talk) 22:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC) Also nominating this related article which has the same sourcing and notability issues:
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has been written as WP:PROMO. The content has been written by not complying with the WP:NPOV. Abishe ( talk) 08:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The content has been written as WP:PROMO and couldn't obtain much reliable information from Google search index. The content here has been written as an advertisement with the intention of promoting this institute. The article has to be rewritten. Abishe ( talk) 07:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Delete arguments cite BLP1E along with the possibility of COI. The Keep arguments cite rather weak general notability claims, along with concern that deleting the article might be criticized by some outsiders. The Delete arguments are clearly stronger. MelanieN ( talk) 01:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
I struggle to see how this individual may be notable. He has a fairly routine career, but there’s really nothing that sets him apart. - Biruitorul Talk 07:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv 🍁 17:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Mentioned a tiny amount on local radio and newspaper. Most links took me back to this article. Very worthy, so I'm hoping someone can prove me wrong. Boleyn ( talk) 07:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 14:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
This article is not sufficiently notable child actor, it also had a fewer roles, per WP:BIO. SwissArmyGuy ( talk) 05:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
This list is very out of date and seems to duplicate a lot of content on other lists. I can’t see a reason for this separate list to exist. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 18:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:04, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
This article has an impressive number of "references", but most of them are just links to his tracks. No critical reception or any indication that his work received any reknown. There's a lot of name dropping in this bio, but I can't find any evidence to verify his work with them. Disclosure: Yes, I did just gut the ELs, but none of them including his own social handles worked anyway. StarM 03:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Does not satisfy either general notability or acting notability. Google search shows that the actor exists, and that there are other people, including an astronomer, with the same name. The article does not list any in-depth coverage, probably because there is no in-depth coverage. Article is categorized as a stub, although it is Start-Class length, and the categorization is reasonable. Although the article has a lengthy filmography, only one of the entries is blue-linked, because only one of the entries, Shahrzad (TV series), has an article. Acting notability depends on multiple roles, not one role.
This article was draftified twice as undersourced as an alternative to deletion. It was then created in article space, resulting in the fait accompli that it could not be draftified a third time. The draft and the article were then history-merged. But it was draftified because it doesn't satisfy biographical notability, and it still doesn't satisfy notability.
The actor may be up-and-coming, but does not currently pass notability, so that this may be too soon. Robert McClenon ( talk) 00:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination has been withdrawn, clear consensus to keep (non-admin closure) Eddie891 Talk Work 17:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that he meets
WP:BIO or
WP:GNG, but very aware this is pre-Internet times. Has been in
CAT:NN for 12 years.
Boleyn (
talk)
08:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. However, consensus is clear that this article needs to be re-written from a neutral standpoint. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of notability - no reliable sources in the article and I couldn’t find anything to add. Previous tag indicating evidence of COI issues. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 17:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn ( talk) 16:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Merge and spilt can be discussed outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Loraine Barry is already an article. They are not notable for being a couple. All refs are primary sources. ツ Stacey ( talk) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. – bradv 🍁 16:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
While there's a lot of trivial passing mentions of Hubert out there, significant coverage of him seems absent. The sources currently cited are either among the trivial passing mentions that don't say much beyond his name, are not reliable independent coverage, or rely very heavily on what Hubert says about himself or other topics. I couldn't find better ones, and apparently doubts about the notability and the sources were already raised in 2017. Huon ( talk) 21:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Black Kite (talk) 10:33, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
This article is poorly / unreferenced. Some of the refs present do not support the content in question for example "Co-director Ryan Prior, as a journalist, sets out to investigate the reality of patients struggling with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) which has become to be known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) after enduring a journey of his own with the disease. "What is ME/CFS? | Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) | CDC". www.cdc.gov. 2019-05-15. Retrieved 2020-03-05."
The CDC does not mention this film or individual. This site ProHealth is not reliable for anything. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
References
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 04:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Mostly just WP:GNG and maybe WP:PROD AtlasDuane ( talk) 16:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
An article on a midrash that is completely unsourced. The two sentence text of the article is copied verbatim from the public domain source indicated in the article, and that seems to be the extent of coverage on the topic. Every other source I was able to find was simply just the same two sentences, word for word. I am certainly no expert on the topic, though, so I am bringing it to AFD in case others may know more about the subject, and thus know where further sources can be found. If further sources are not presented, however, this should not be retained, as the single, brief reference to the text is not enough to pass the WP:GNG. Rorshacma ( talk) 05:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NCHESS. i tried with bengali name but didn't found any significant coverage. Anyway, there is a ref from sylhettoday24.news (i have doubt about this site), it says "there was a seminar, 17 players have been nominated for various World Chess Instructor titles based on the number received." but articles claims he won National Instructor title?? Looks like it was created for promotional purpose. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk) 04:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 08:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Contested PROD and CSD. There is no evidence that this passes our notability guidelines. All 4 results of typing this into Google lead to some rather sketchy websites. – John M Wolfson ( talk • contribs) 03:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Obvious pass of WP:NPOL so this has no chance of closing as delete. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 18:56, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
No clear claim to notability. Promotional article. While there are lots of low-quality sources around, there's nothing particularly reliable. Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. SD0001 ( talk) 03:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Elected member of the Rajya Sabha. [1] [2] [3] Meets GNG/BASIC/POLITICIAN.
References
-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
An old article but this seems dubious. The article implies that the person's death sparked a rebellion, but the sentence cites no source. The only citation is an inaccessible journal article (so possibly failing WP:Notability (people)). However, I cannot find any mention of this figure in Chinese-language sources related to the event. I searched Google Books and the only result is a novel. The sources are too lacking compared to the claimed importance of the subject. Esiymbro ( talk) 03:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 03:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Non-notable book per WP:NBOOK. Article reads like a poor review/book report. KidAd ( talk) 02:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 03:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The article fails to comply with WP:NPOV and seems to be WP:PROMO. Abishe ( talk) 13:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 18:54, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Little to no coverage of writer in secondary sources, or unverifiable social media posts and info on book discovery sites.
The result was redirect to APRA Awards (Australia)#Screen Music Awards (with AGSC). (non-admin closure) b uidh e 18:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 08:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. You are in a twisty maze of D&D AfDs, all alike. Merge, maybe? But for now, makes its saving throw against deletion. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Totally non-notable article that fails WP:GNG and WP:GAMEGUIDE. Sourced almost entirely to WP:PRIMARY sources. Vampires in the context of a single game are not encyclopedic enough for a standalone article. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 01:04, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
--it seems possible and perhaps even probable that this topic could be an appropriate topic for an encyclopedia. However, such an article would not resemble this article in the slightest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.13.88 ( talk) 22:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG quite clearly. A lot of poor quality coverage includes passing mentions or what looks like paid features of no real substance. PK650 ( talk) 00:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 03:05, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Not in tune with Wikipedia standards Rickyurs ( talk) 00:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 07:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. He is the CEO of a non-notable company. None of the info in the article establishes him as a notable figure. The sources cited in the article do not discuss the subject. A Google search of the subject doesn't show him being discussed in reliable sources. The article is pretty much a promotional piece. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 00:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)