![]() |
The result was redirect to America's Test Kitchen. Overall consensus is to redirect, Anyone wanting to Merge should obviously start a discussion on the TP ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable. The editor in chief of the magazine would be notable, but managing editor is a subsidiary position. There are no third party sources except a local newspaper DGG ( talk ) 23:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 22:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Scene awards dont count so now fails Pornbio. A mention on 1 page of a book doesnt cut it for the GNG Spartaz Humbug! 22:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails Pornbio and gng. Scene awards no longer count. Spartaz Humbug! 22:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I wish this young cyclist success but for now this is WP:TOOSOON - there is no indication that she meets WP:GNG or WP:NCYC. RichardOSmith ( talk) 22:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Farmall Cub. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient information and notability to have a fully separate page from Farmall Cub (i.e. topic is sufficiently covered already). Primefac ( talk) 21:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Soft delete. The article may be restored by any administrator on request. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unable to find sources why this is significant or important. The web URL provided in the original edit no longer works (another link is zazaro.com, and here it is from several years ago), and there's a Youtube channel, likely not enough. TheGGoose ( talk) 23:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
It may've been associated with notables but I'm finding anything to suggest improvement including better sourcing, with the best results here, here, here and here. Pinging past editors @ Meatsgains, Mean as custard, and Hmains:. SwisterTwister talk 23:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Article's been expanded since nomination, Consensus is to keep ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Disputed PROD on a mall because of the size. Can't find any reliable sources(fails WP:GNG) and after some searching the best I could find was this [2] indicating that the size mentioned is actually the total area and the total gross leasable area is only 357,846 square feet. Me5000 ( talk) 21:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This is just a coach who has not done anything to be considered notable under WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 19:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why this person is notable, fails WP:BIO. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. JMHamo ( talk) 19:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Player fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD contested as the player has signed for Mohun Bagan and that he will eventually play for the team in the I-League and AFC Cup... that is most likely true but for now he is not and the league and cup don't start till 2016 so this article should not be created till then. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 19:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Courcelles ( talk) 21:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Tagged for lack of refs since 2008, and for notability since Oct 2014. May not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (music). Edison ( talk) 19:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable athlete. Quis separabit? 19:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Livingston Public Schools. Consensus is that the sources provided by Z22 are not enough to establish notability for this school. Swarm ♠ 22:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This middle school article with no clear claim to notability should be redirected (again) to Livingston Public Schools. It was previously redirected here in 2007, it still has only routine coverage; the redirect should be restored.. Jacona ( talk) 19:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
One ref is a press release, this stub looks like the start of a promotional article. No indication of notability. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Other than some obvious puppetry, the only cogent argument to keep was DGG's assertion that a journal published by a major university press implies notability. That argument doesn't seem to have gained any traction from the other participants. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Hate to go to AFD so quickly, but I've been digging since it was created and there just isn't enough significant coverage to demonstrate notability here. It is fairly new and you find a mention or two, but I didn't see any real coverage, thus it fails WP:ORG. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, SBCA is eight years old, is well-established, is growing quickly, and has recently expanded internationally. It meets annually in Washington DC, and most recently attracted more than 300 attendees, including some from as far away as Italy, Australia, and New Zealand. The current President is Kip Viscusi, a prominent academic who merits a page of his own. As does the President-Elect, Susan Dudley. The SBCA is the professional organization for practitioners of BCA, including academics and government economists, both in the U.S. and around the world. The last five Presidents of the United States, of both parties, have issued Executive Orders making Benefit-Cost Analysis the primary tool for making regulatory decisions; other countries have followed suit. The U.S. Congress is considering legislation to codify the BCA principle into federal law, and the Senate recently held hearings on that topic, with Dudley as a key witness. In fact, the full Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee is holding another hearing tomorrow to consider such a bill, with Dudley again appearing as a witness. SBCA is well known within the subset of economists who practice BCA. It may be a somewhat obscure field to those outside the profession; but, given its influence over public policy, it certainly is notable. I am a member of the Society, and created the page. User:EMF2GO —Preceding undated comment added 19:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Benefit-cost analysis is where economic research concerning the allocation of scarce (public) resources among competing end uses meets the nuts and bolts of actual policy-making by government agencies. The SBCA has just published Volume 6, Issue 2 (Summer 2015) of its journal, the Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, edited by Glenn Blomquist and William Hoyt at the University of Kentucky. For just the year 2015 so far, the SBCA's official journal has apparently had 8,580 home-page views, 19,860 Table-of-Contents views, 7,924 Abstract views, and 3,090 Full-text views (Source: 9-15-15 emailed Report from the Editors of the Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, with data from Amy Laurent, Cambridge University Press, September 4, 2015). The SBCA's official journal was published by <a href=" http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jbca">de Gruyter</a> until the end of 2014, but moved to Cambridge University Press at that time. As of today, Cambridge is apologizing for some loss of functionality at the <a href=" http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BCA#">JBCA website</a>, but when this site is working, it should be possible to verify the caliber and scope of the research associated with the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Disclosure: I am a past member of the Board of Directors of the Association, I have served on the selection committee for their annual conferences, and I have organized sessions for these conferences. - Trudy Ann Cameron, Mikesell Professor of Environmental and Resource Economics, University of Oregon — 128.223.109.234 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Additional notable economists associated with the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis include Arnold C. Harberger (Past President) and Editorial Board members Richard Revesz, Richard Zeckhauser and John D. Graham. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis was launched in 2010, so it is fairly new but its reputation and citations are growing. An article from the Spring 2015 issue regarding EPA air pollution rules received press coverage, including this article: http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/25954/20150526/epa-air-pollution-rules-more-uncertain-effects-expected.htm. Disclosure: I am the Executive Director of the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Emdowd ( talk) 20:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC) — Emdowd ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
ScrapIronIV, in response to Dennis Brown's initial comment, I sought help from some members of the Society who might be in a better position than I am to document the notability of the Society to the satisfaction of Wikipedia editors. Nobody's trying to pile on here; they simply tried to provide what was asked for. And, indeed, I am member of the Society, which I disclosed. As a member, I pay dues, but I do not receive any compensation nor any other material benefit. I don't see this as a COI, any more than my donating to a charity (or contributing to Wikipedia) would disqualify me from writing about it. This is a professional academic society, not to my knowledge involved in any public controversy. I think my description of it was factual, verifiable, and neutral in tone. I understand we disagree about whether it is notable. What prompted me to create the page is that, during a web search, I landed on Wikipedia's "SBCA" disambiguation page. It listed four organizations -- none of them, in my view, nearly as notable as the Society. This struck me, and would strike anyone familiar with the Society, as a weakness in Wikipedia -- one that I sought to remedy.
As a further indication of the Society's international character, here are a couple of cites by a British think tank [30], and one in Sweden [31]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMF2GO ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Silverman's positions at Barnard College as Associate Dean of the College, Dean for Student Development, and Adjunct Professor of Psychology do not appear to satisfy the requirements of the most promising provision of Wikipedia:Notability (academics) : "6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society." The publication record does not seem to satisfy the guideline either. She seems to be a fine and productive college administrator, but that is not enough. Edison ( talk) 18:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
" Delete I'm not seeing notability here, as a scholar or as an administrator. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 20:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Uncited and fairly non notable band. It is a borderline A7, which I used in the past here but I decided to go with a PROD which was contested. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 22:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
non-notable software - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. PROD declined, 2011 AFD closed as no consensus -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 17:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 22:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:NEO sourced only to a self-promotional piece written by the chair of Madura Microfinance. Using "dark data" to mean "data about non-internet users" seems idiosyncratic, and most usage of the term online refers instead to data which has been gathered but uninspected, as defined at Dark data (business). (The previous AfD is unrelated, and seems to be about this other meaning.) McGeddon ( talk) 16:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable organization. OEKC itself is barely notable enough to have an article; the individual teams that have led its ranks over the years do not have their own articles, so this newcomer team that has not yet ranked in the top 30 of the field doesn't seem to merit an article. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Declined Prod. non-notable person/ non-notable author - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 15:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Without reliable, secondary sources, there is no indication that this person meets the relevant notability criterion at WP:BASIC. PROD was contested without comment. VQuakr ( talk) 15:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unremarkable motorsports organization. CSD tag removed by IP user but I still believe it fits well within WP:A7. -- Non-Dropframe talk 15:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet the guideline. Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 12:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Article about a one year old website. There are sources, but they seem to be almost entirely advertorials and PR content written by employees of company. Fails WP:WEBCRIT. - Mr X 12:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. - Mr X 12:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. - Mr X 12:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. An article on the crime, or a section of the university's article should be judged independently, but as a biography, no, this is 1E, and BLP does apply to the recently deceased. Courcelles ( talk) 21:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Believe this is a case of 1E Gbawden ( talk) 11:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
does not meet wiki:notability, also fails miserably on wp:ref Shrikanthv ( talk) 11:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
non-notable person - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 11:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable martial art - basically a school with a couple of locations (based on website) and a few pretentions. References are essentially primary or about the founder and those are not enough to confer notability. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Reads like an advertisement, fails WP:ORG and WP:ORGDEPTH JMHamo ( talk) 10:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Longevity claims. Courcelles ( talk) 21:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure there's sufficient notability from being a pretender to a claim of longevity. Longevity claims which is where it could go is a complete amalgamation of all sorts of claims like this. Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This is an unfortunate case of a promising music career that quickly stalled and frankly never got off the ground. He has released one EP and a single (Doctors) neither of which charted. There are few third-party sources around (reviews, an interview and a few local gig listings) from the period 2007 and 2008. These are problematic, partly because they are listings or they just outline the start of his career and have an air of the promotional. I tried to find more recent sources, but Mr. Walker has disappeared, it seems. As it stands, one EP and a single while performing some support slots around the London area is not enough to qualify through WP:MUSIC. Part of me thinks he perhaps prefers to be forgotten? Karst ( talk) 09:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Swarm ♠ 22:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
CRIME article but the person is not famous and hasn't been convicted.
I want to delete this because I found these instructions at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons and he has not been convicted.
Persons accused of crime[edit] See also: Wikipedia:Notability (events) § Criminal acts and Wikipedia:Notability (people) § Crime victims and perpetrators Shortcut: WP:BLPCRIME A person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a court of law. For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured.[6] If different judicial proceedings result in seemingly contradictory judgements that do not override each other,[7] refrain from using pithy descriptors or absolutes and instead use more explanatory information. Punstress ( talk) 09:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
"there have been plenty of accused terrorists who have been charged, and had articles about them created on Wikipedia", see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and nominate them for deletion if you so choose; they're not relevant here. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I am creating this discussion for the original nominator and the article's creator Sn0fl4k3 who didn't complete the process correctly. His/her reason was that the article was a confused merge of two different organizations and was out of date. See: [38]. The article is about a research group based at Simon Fraser University in Canada. Note that while the original nominator's rationale is primarily based on WP:BLOWITUP, there are other more valid reasons for deletion. See my comments below. Voceditenore ( talk) 09:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable amateur club who play in a non competitive league Gbawden ( talk) 07:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe that this person meets GNG. The telegraph article is about the son and the other article just mentions that the Duke of Ediburgh met him. Gbawden ( talk) 07:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep ( non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 01:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Vinay68 ( talk) 09:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)It's just an educational college website which I feel necessary for people to check the details of the college. This is where I took reference from List of engineering colleges affiliated to Osmania University — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinay68 ( talk • contribs) 11:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC) WP:TOOSOON Action Hero Shoot! 06:58, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Sources may also be found in the Telugu language. AusLondonder ( talk) 04:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
All references are from Youtube, Twitter, social networking sites. Action Hero Shoot! 06:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing good (aside from two links almost to the bottom) and there's no good target for moving elsewhere for this article from February 2006 after it was split from the Kristang language article. SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. I'd relist due to the lack of responses, but the reasoning given by the keeps are particularly strong. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Is this person notable? I dream of horses ( T) @ 04:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 18:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I checked ANN and GamePlaza Haruka. While the actor has a bunch of roles, they are all supporting or guest roles, so it is not clear what role he is most famous for to meet WP:ENT. JA wikipedia does not have any useful information to beef up the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 16:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Granted, there's always a possibility of non-accessible sources but my searches simply found nothing better with searches at Books, News, browser, highbeam, thefreelibrary (I only found this which appears to be related to this one), The Hindu, Times of India, NDTV, DNA, Hindustan Times, Zee News and Indian Express. Without a single good source and move target as an alternative to deletion, there's not much to suggest keeping (you would've at least expected something close to good coverage). Pinging probably the only interested editor (BLPPRODer) Joe Decker. SwisterTwister talk 00:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. per SK4 (I'm not entirely sure Sk4 covers it but not bothered either way!) - Nom's blocked and there's no !delete votes, If anyone wants to renominate today, tomorrow or whatever I have no objections. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Taking part in only one event and finishing 108th is not enough for an article. Action Hero Shoot! 04:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 17:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Another article with a {{ notability}} tag. Again, let's establish whether or not this person is notable. I dream of horses ( T) @ 04:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Video game which failed Google test. I dream of horses ( T) @ 03:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete G12 by Jimfbleak. ( non-admin closure) NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This organization has gotten a bit of attention, but it seems like we don't have the kind of sustained reliable source coverage that we need. It seems like CORU would be best discussed in a section on the main University of British Columbia page itself. I thought about proposing a merge, but then I'm not even sure if CORU is even notable enough to be mentioned in detail even over there. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 03:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This song doesn't appear notable at all, with searches giving no real information other than it exists. It doesn't appear to have charted anyplace. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 03:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Contested CSD. I'm not sure if this person is notable. I dream of horses ( T) @ 03:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument that, it was on Did you know? so it must be notable, has no basis in policy. DYK's acceptance criteria are mostly mechanical and do not confer any special aura of notability. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
okay, there are lots of decorated army guys, nothing to say why he is notable Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 03:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
The sources totally fail in WP:DEPTH. Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources totally fail in WP:DEPTH.; no other reliable, independent sources found. Small, start-up web based operation, with only 13 employees, without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I simply found nothing good with the best results here (only a few links) and it's worth noting the author made one other article, Manfred Jung which is also similar especially being unsourced. The best results for searching for Manfred Jung were this and this but I'm not entirely sure if that's him as this suggests there is a German doctor Manfred Jung. With this existing since June 2008 and the user's contributions interesting and all unsourced, this certainly needs attention. Pinging Calamondin12 for comment. SwisterTwister talk 02:52, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ged UK 12:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails on WP:GNG. Sources are unreliable. Hitro talk 20:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone wants to redirect this title to Work breakdown structure, go ahead. Deor ( talk) 18:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
This is a promotional article for Advanced Work Processing, a technique for which I can find almost no references except the publications of the Work Packaging Institute. Almost everything cited here is the work --see the adjacent AfD for Olfa Hamdi. DGG ( talk ) 22:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I came across this as a speedy and there's just enough of an assertion of notability via the beauty contest win and her working for OAN and AWE TV to where this might barely squeak by speedy criteria.
A search, however, showed that she is solidly non-notable per Wikipedia's guidelines and this looks to be just a bit too soon for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure if this is notable and my searches found nothing to suggest meaningful improvement, here, here, here and here, and mostly results that seem based from this including the first Books result which is a mirror. This has existed since September 2006 and has hardly gotten worthwhile improvement and there's probably no signs of improvement happening. Pinging the only seemingly interested user Mr. Stradivarius. SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
In 2006 the AfD verict was "rewrite", well, nobody did so. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)/ Wikipedia:Notability (websites) requirement. While it is occasionally cited in mass media, I don't see any articles (newspaper or scholarly), nor books, discussing it. The best I found is [46], and I don't think that suffices. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I see no claim or evidence of notability. ELEKHH T 10:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
No ref's, seems non-notable. Couldn't find RS. Jcmcc ( Talk) 16:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable mall fails WP:GNG Me5000 ( talk) 16:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 18:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Qualifies for deletion as per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and also because the topic does not meet WP:GNG. Source searches are only providing passing mentions (e.g. [50], [51], [52]). North America 1000 02:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
The first AfD was keep (but standards have changed since then) and sure it has sources and I could've let this pass by but my searches found nothing good to suggest better improvement (mostly for Building Performance Institute (BPI). I'm not sure how much activity they've had with their bankruptcy but, again, I found nothing to suggest much good and they seem to no longer be listed at the stock exchanges. Finally, emphasizing their low profile, this article has literally not been edited since August 2011 much less significantly. Pinging the only still active user Eastmain. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
DGG I'd appreciate your input here. SwisterTwister talk 21:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Internet searches yield nothing in the way of notability for this person. They have an ANN page with three listed works and some mentions. One of their manga obtained an Oricon ranking, but if anything, it is the manga which may be notable and not the author via WP:ITSA. KirtZJ ( talk) 02:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable rugby league team. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources are all primary; no other reliable, independent sources found. Small bank, with only 150 employees, without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 01:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Purely promotional, this is another paid-for article by blocked user:BiH. Wikipedia cannot be allowed to be used for profit in this way at the abuse of the voluntary unpaid time that dedicated users spend building this encyclopedia which in spite of some biographies and articles about some companies, was never intended to be an additional business networking platform. Whether the text itself sounds promotional or not, the article is an advert. The sources are either dead links or one primary source. Fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Originally PROD'ed but the tag was removed by an IP user without any claims [67]. No notability claims made in article. References are for the company's website/generic and make no notability claims. Does not appear to meet WP:COMPANY notability criteria. -- R45 talk! 01:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 10:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Objected PROD. Has many primary sources as well as sources of questionable reliability. I don't know Korean so I can't check if there is "presence of at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person" ( WP:BLPPROD#Objecting). Finnusertop ( talk | guestbook | contribs) 00:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
I will respectfully disagree.Lee Tae-yong not only is a trainee under one of the most powerful music labels in South Korea(which is well-known globally as well with a huge international fanbase),but he among other artists performed consistently in very popular events like SMTown shows.His company uploaded (in YouTube) some of his work that more than 1 million views and collaborated with Red Velvet in the song Be Natural which is formally a girlgroup band for which wikipedia already has an article about and refers to Taeyong.The website SMRookies that his company created refers to his basic bigraphical facts like the Name,Date of Birth etc. so it cannot possibly be incorrect since the company itself claimed it.Also I provided photographs for his magazine photoshoot and high school graduation which makes the facts obviously correct.Also he appears in a decent part of the show EXO90:2014 like it's shown in a reference,a video that was uploaded my Mnet which is a South Korean entertainment company which produces, broadcasts, distributes and provides a variety of music and entertainment. His band hasn't had their official bedut,yet but perform in big events.Taeyong is a popular personality,a rapper and a dancer.He is a celebrity that has recently began his career,performs live,takes part in photoshoots of popular magazines and TVshows and his rap is already known from YouTube.
If it's not possible to find relieble resources for this wiki article in the moment,can I rewrite the article sometime in the future when more sources(and reliable ones) will be available? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaSaram ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Isn't Mnet's Youtube Channel a reliable source??? Wikipedia considers Mnet a reliable source,though? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaSaram ( talk • contribs) 14:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
@ LaMona Thanks for the information.I'll wait for a while then until the group makes its official debut. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaSaram ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources are all either dead, unreliable, primary, blogs, or very fleeting mentions. Bluntly said, the references are the result of scraping the Internet barrel. Without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG and is only one of hundreds of political parties in the country (one for every million population). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 05:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable bio based on self-published sources. The one main claim for notability, the MakerSquare school, has its own article, and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Google search found no in-depth coverage (a few passing mentions and an apparently different second "Harsh Patel"). GermanJoe ( talk) 00:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Clear consensus for keeping the page, although it needs improvement. Aervanath ( talk) 08:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
This is a weird article. I think the biggest issue is simple notability - it's a questionably encyclopedic article, and whether the intersection is notable enough is dubious. Secondary issues include a major demarcation problem - for most members of this list, Christianity has no part of their notability - and a simple failure to hold up its stated purpose - this is supposedly meant to be a resource to links on science and religion; you'd be hard pressed to find any significant discussion on that in most of the biographies linked. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 00:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete - The first AfD indicates it was initially an article on Catholic scientists, which, honestly, might be notable. But, for all the individual sourcing for each entry, which I admit is at least acceptable, I'm not seeing any evidence that the topic itself is individually notable. Having said all that, it might well be possible that separate articles on Catholic scientists, Eastern Orthodox scientists, Anglican scientists, and so on might conceivably be able to establish separate notability, maybe. Also, in response to the above, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS might seem to apply, and, honestly, the simple declaration that other articles may not have specific notability without support isn't sufficient argument that they are similar. John Carter ( talk) 00:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep. I agree with Roches considering that the Muslim list of scientists does not have much detail on the entries and the atheist page all it says is "Living persons in this list are people whose atheism is relevant to their notable activities or public life". It is pretty clear that many of the people on the atheist list are not really using atheism in their lives nor is atheism relevant to their "notable activities", but merely identified as not having belief in God. Of course, just like others have mentioned about "what is a christian?", the same could be said of "what is a Muslim?" or "what is an atheist?". There certainly are different kinds of atheists like secular humanists, nominal atheists and even religious atheists too (see nontheistic religions). These pages look like merely FYI pages of notable scientists who have had a particular worldview and that is it. Mayan1990 ( talk) 09:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC).
The result was redirect to Ministry of Gender Equality and Family#Controversy. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Appears to advocate political views without referencing. Contains a minimal amount of encyclopedic information with unclear wording due to grammar issues. The Average Wikipedian ( talk) 12:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to America's Test Kitchen. Overall consensus is to redirect, Anyone wanting to Merge should obviously start a discussion on the TP ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable. The editor in chief of the magazine would be notable, but managing editor is a subsidiary position. There are no third party sources except a local newspaper DGG ( talk ) 23:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 22:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Scene awards dont count so now fails Pornbio. A mention on 1 page of a book doesnt cut it for the GNG Spartaz Humbug! 22:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Fails Pornbio and gng. Scene awards no longer count. Spartaz Humbug! 22:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I wish this young cyclist success but for now this is WP:TOOSOON - there is no indication that she meets WP:GNG or WP:NCYC. RichardOSmith ( talk) 22:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Farmall Cub. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Insufficient information and notability to have a fully separate page from Farmall Cub (i.e. topic is sufficiently covered already). Primefac ( talk) 21:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Soft delete. The article may be restored by any administrator on request. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unable to find sources why this is significant or important. The web URL provided in the original edit no longer works (another link is zazaro.com, and here it is from several years ago), and there's a Youtube channel, likely not enough. TheGGoose ( talk) 23:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
It may've been associated with notables but I'm finding anything to suggest improvement including better sourcing, with the best results here, here, here and here. Pinging past editors @ Meatsgains, Mean as custard, and Hmains:. SwisterTwister talk 23:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Article's been expanded since nomination, Consensus is to keep ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Disputed PROD on a mall because of the size. Can't find any reliable sources(fails WP:GNG) and after some searching the best I could find was this [2] indicating that the size mentioned is actually the total area and the total gross leasable area is only 357,846 square feet. Me5000 ( talk) 21:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This is just a coach who has not done anything to be considered notable under WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 19:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Not clear why this person is notable, fails WP:BIO. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. JMHamo ( talk) 19:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Player fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD contested as the player has signed for Mohun Bagan and that he will eventually play for the team in the I-League and AFC Cup... that is most likely true but for now he is not and the league and cup don't start till 2016 so this article should not be created till then. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 19:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Courcelles ( talk) 21:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Tagged for lack of refs since 2008, and for notability since Oct 2014. May not satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (music). Edison ( talk) 19:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable athlete. Quis separabit? 19:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Livingston Public Schools. Consensus is that the sources provided by Z22 are not enough to establish notability for this school. Swarm ♠ 22:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This middle school article with no clear claim to notability should be redirected (again) to Livingston Public Schools. It was previously redirected here in 2007, it still has only routine coverage; the redirect should be restored.. Jacona ( talk) 19:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
One ref is a press release, this stub looks like the start of a promotional article. No indication of notability. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Other than some obvious puppetry, the only cogent argument to keep was DGG's assertion that a journal published by a major university press implies notability. That argument doesn't seem to have gained any traction from the other participants. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Hate to go to AFD so quickly, but I've been digging since it was created and there just isn't enough significant coverage to demonstrate notability here. It is fairly new and you find a mention or two, but I didn't see any real coverage, thus it fails WP:ORG. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:45, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, SBCA is eight years old, is well-established, is growing quickly, and has recently expanded internationally. It meets annually in Washington DC, and most recently attracted more than 300 attendees, including some from as far away as Italy, Australia, and New Zealand. The current President is Kip Viscusi, a prominent academic who merits a page of his own. As does the President-Elect, Susan Dudley. The SBCA is the professional organization for practitioners of BCA, including academics and government economists, both in the U.S. and around the world. The last five Presidents of the United States, of both parties, have issued Executive Orders making Benefit-Cost Analysis the primary tool for making regulatory decisions; other countries have followed suit. The U.S. Congress is considering legislation to codify the BCA principle into federal law, and the Senate recently held hearings on that topic, with Dudley as a key witness. In fact, the full Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee is holding another hearing tomorrow to consider such a bill, with Dudley again appearing as a witness. SBCA is well known within the subset of economists who practice BCA. It may be a somewhat obscure field to those outside the profession; but, given its influence over public policy, it certainly is notable. I am a member of the Society, and created the page. User:EMF2GO —Preceding undated comment added 19:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Benefit-cost analysis is where economic research concerning the allocation of scarce (public) resources among competing end uses meets the nuts and bolts of actual policy-making by government agencies. The SBCA has just published Volume 6, Issue 2 (Summer 2015) of its journal, the Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, edited by Glenn Blomquist and William Hoyt at the University of Kentucky. For just the year 2015 so far, the SBCA's official journal has apparently had 8,580 home-page views, 19,860 Table-of-Contents views, 7,924 Abstract views, and 3,090 Full-text views (Source: 9-15-15 emailed Report from the Editors of the Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, with data from Amy Laurent, Cambridge University Press, September 4, 2015). The SBCA's official journal was published by <a href=" http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jbca">de Gruyter</a> until the end of 2014, but moved to Cambridge University Press at that time. As of today, Cambridge is apologizing for some loss of functionality at the <a href=" http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BCA#">JBCA website</a>, but when this site is working, it should be possible to verify the caliber and scope of the research associated with the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Disclosure: I am a past member of the Board of Directors of the Association, I have served on the selection committee for their annual conferences, and I have organized sessions for these conferences. - Trudy Ann Cameron, Mikesell Professor of Environmental and Resource Economics, University of Oregon — 128.223.109.234 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Additional notable economists associated with the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis include Arnold C. Harberger (Past President) and Editorial Board members Richard Revesz, Richard Zeckhauser and John D. Graham. The Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis was launched in 2010, so it is fairly new but its reputation and citations are growing. An article from the Spring 2015 issue regarding EPA air pollution rules received press coverage, including this article: http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/25954/20150526/epa-air-pollution-rules-more-uncertain-effects-expected.htm. Disclosure: I am the Executive Director of the Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis. Emdowd ( talk) 20:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC) — Emdowd ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
ScrapIronIV, in response to Dennis Brown's initial comment, I sought help from some members of the Society who might be in a better position than I am to document the notability of the Society to the satisfaction of Wikipedia editors. Nobody's trying to pile on here; they simply tried to provide what was asked for. And, indeed, I am member of the Society, which I disclosed. As a member, I pay dues, but I do not receive any compensation nor any other material benefit. I don't see this as a COI, any more than my donating to a charity (or contributing to Wikipedia) would disqualify me from writing about it. This is a professional academic society, not to my knowledge involved in any public controversy. I think my description of it was factual, verifiable, and neutral in tone. I understand we disagree about whether it is notable. What prompted me to create the page is that, during a web search, I landed on Wikipedia's "SBCA" disambiguation page. It listed four organizations -- none of them, in my view, nearly as notable as the Society. This struck me, and would strike anyone familiar with the Society, as a weakness in Wikipedia -- one that I sought to remedy.
As a further indication of the Society's international character, here are a couple of cites by a British think tank [30], and one in Sweden [31]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMF2GO ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Silverman's positions at Barnard College as Associate Dean of the College, Dean for Student Development, and Adjunct Professor of Psychology do not appear to satisfy the requirements of the most promising provision of Wikipedia:Notability (academics) : "6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society." The publication record does not seem to satisfy the guideline either. She seems to be a fine and productive college administrator, but that is not enough. Edison ( talk) 18:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
" Delete I'm not seeing notability here, as a scholar or as an administrator. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 20:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Uncited and fairly non notable band. It is a borderline A7, which I used in the past here but I decided to go with a PROD which was contested. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 22:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
non-notable software - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. PROD declined, 2011 AFD closed as no consensus -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 17:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 22:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
WP:NEO sourced only to a self-promotional piece written by the chair of Madura Microfinance. Using "dark data" to mean "data about non-internet users" seems idiosyncratic, and most usage of the term online refers instead to data which has been gathered but uninspected, as defined at Dark data (business). (The previous AfD is unrelated, and seems to be about this other meaning.) McGeddon ( talk) 16:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable organization. OEKC itself is barely notable enough to have an article; the individual teams that have led its ranks over the years do not have their own articles, so this newcomer team that has not yet ranked in the top 30 of the field doesn't seem to merit an article. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Declined Prod. non-notable person/ non-notable author - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 15:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Without reliable, secondary sources, there is no indication that this person meets the relevant notability criterion at WP:BASIC. PROD was contested without comment. VQuakr ( talk) 15:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unremarkable motorsports organization. CSD tag removed by IP user but I still believe it fits well within WP:A7. -- Non-Dropframe talk 15:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 18:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet the guideline. Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 12:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Article about a one year old website. There are sources, but they seem to be almost entirely advertorials and PR content written by employees of company. Fails WP:WEBCRIT. - Mr X 12:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. - Mr X 12:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. - Mr X 12:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. An article on the crime, or a section of the university's article should be judged independently, but as a biography, no, this is 1E, and BLP does apply to the recently deceased. Courcelles ( talk) 21:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Believe this is a case of 1E Gbawden ( talk) 11:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
does not meet wiki:notability, also fails miserably on wp:ref Shrikanthv ( talk) 11:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
non-notable person - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources -- 1Wiki8........................... ( talk) 11:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable martial art - basically a school with a couple of locations (based on website) and a few pretentions. References are essentially primary or about the founder and those are not enough to confer notability. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Reads like an advertisement, fails WP:ORG and WP:ORGDEPTH JMHamo ( talk) 10:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Longevity claims. Courcelles ( talk) 21:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure there's sufficient notability from being a pretender to a claim of longevity. Longevity claims which is where it could go is a complete amalgamation of all sorts of claims like this. Ricky81682 ( talk) 06:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This is an unfortunate case of a promising music career that quickly stalled and frankly never got off the ground. He has released one EP and a single (Doctors) neither of which charted. There are few third-party sources around (reviews, an interview and a few local gig listings) from the period 2007 and 2008. These are problematic, partly because they are listings or they just outline the start of his career and have an air of the promotional. I tried to find more recent sources, but Mr. Walker has disappeared, it seems. As it stands, one EP and a single while performing some support slots around the London area is not enough to qualify through WP:MUSIC. Part of me thinks he perhaps prefers to be forgotten? Karst ( talk) 09:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Swarm ♠ 22:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
CRIME article but the person is not famous and hasn't been convicted.
I want to delete this because I found these instructions at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons and he has not been convicted.
Persons accused of crime[edit] See also: Wikipedia:Notability (events) § Criminal acts and Wikipedia:Notability (people) § Crime victims and perpetrators Shortcut: WP:BLPCRIME A person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a court of law. For relatively unknown people, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured.[6] If different judicial proceedings result in seemingly contradictory judgements that do not override each other,[7] refrain from using pithy descriptors or absolutes and instead use more explanatory information. Punstress ( talk) 09:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
"there have been plenty of accused terrorists who have been charged, and had articles about them created on Wikipedia", see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and nominate them for deletion if you so choose; they're not relevant here. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I am creating this discussion for the original nominator and the article's creator Sn0fl4k3 who didn't complete the process correctly. His/her reason was that the article was a confused merge of two different organizations and was out of date. See: [38]. The article is about a research group based at Simon Fraser University in Canada. Note that while the original nominator's rationale is primarily based on WP:BLOWITUP, there are other more valid reasons for deletion. See my comments below. Voceditenore ( talk) 09:05, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable amateur club who play in a non competitive league Gbawden ( talk) 07:48, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe that this person meets GNG. The telegraph article is about the son and the other article just mentions that the Duke of Ediburgh met him. Gbawden ( talk) 07:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Keep ( non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 01:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Vinay68 ( talk) 09:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)It's just an educational college website which I feel necessary for people to check the details of the college. This is where I took reference from List of engineering colleges affiliated to Osmania University — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinay68 ( talk • contribs) 11:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC) WP:TOOSOON Action Hero Shoot! 06:58, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Sources may also be found in the Telugu language. AusLondonder ( talk) 04:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
All references are from Youtube, Twitter, social networking sites. Action Hero Shoot! 06:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing good (aside from two links almost to the bottom) and there's no good target for moving elsewhere for this article from February 2006 after it was split from the Kristang language article. SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. I'd relist due to the lack of responses, but the reasoning given by the keeps are particularly strong. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:10, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Is this person notable? I dream of horses ( T) @ 04:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 18:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I checked ANN and GamePlaza Haruka. While the actor has a bunch of roles, they are all supporting or guest roles, so it is not clear what role he is most famous for to meet WP:ENT. JA wikipedia does not have any useful information to beef up the article. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 16:29, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Granted, there's always a possibility of non-accessible sources but my searches simply found nothing better with searches at Books, News, browser, highbeam, thefreelibrary (I only found this which appears to be related to this one), The Hindu, Times of India, NDTV, DNA, Hindustan Times, Zee News and Indian Express. Without a single good source and move target as an alternative to deletion, there's not much to suggest keeping (you would've at least expected something close to good coverage). Pinging probably the only interested editor (BLPPRODer) Joe Decker. SwisterTwister talk 00:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. per SK4 (I'm not entirely sure Sk4 covers it but not bothered either way!) - Nom's blocked and there's no !delete votes, If anyone wants to renominate today, tomorrow or whatever I have no objections. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Taking part in only one event and finishing 108th is not enough for an article. Action Hero Shoot! 04:19, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 17:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Another article with a {{ notability}} tag. Again, let's establish whether or not this person is notable. I dream of horses ( T) @ 04:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Video game which failed Google test. I dream of horses ( T) @ 03:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete G12 by Jimfbleak. ( non-admin closure) NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 23:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
This organization has gotten a bit of attention, but it seems like we don't have the kind of sustained reliable source coverage that we need. It seems like CORU would be best discussed in a section on the main University of British Columbia page itself. I thought about proposing a merge, but then I'm not even sure if CORU is even notable enough to be mentioned in detail even over there. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 03:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
This song doesn't appear notable at all, with searches giving no real information other than it exists. It doesn't appear to have charted anyplace. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 03:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 21:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Contested CSD. I'm not sure if this person is notable. I dream of horses ( T) @ 03:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The argument that, it was on Did you know? so it must be notable, has no basis in policy. DYK's acceptance criteria are mostly mechanical and do not confer any special aura of notability. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
okay, there are lots of decorated army guys, nothing to say why he is notable Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 03:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
The sources totally fail in WP:DEPTH. Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources totally fail in WP:DEPTH.; no other reliable, independent sources found. Small, start-up web based operation, with only 13 employees, without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 02:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I simply found nothing good with the best results here (only a few links) and it's worth noting the author made one other article, Manfred Jung which is also similar especially being unsourced. The best results for searching for Manfred Jung were this and this but I'm not entirely sure if that's him as this suggests there is a German doctor Manfred Jung. With this existing since June 2008 and the user's contributions interesting and all unsourced, this certainly needs attention. Pinging Calamondin12 for comment. SwisterTwister talk 02:52, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ged UK 12:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails on WP:GNG. Sources are unreliable. Hitro talk 20:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. If anyone wants to redirect this title to Work breakdown structure, go ahead. Deor ( talk) 18:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
This is a promotional article for Advanced Work Processing, a technique for which I can find almost no references except the publications of the Work Packaging Institute. Almost everything cited here is the work --see the adjacent AfD for Olfa Hamdi. DGG ( talk ) 22:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I came across this as a speedy and there's just enough of an assertion of notability via the beauty contest win and her working for OAN and AWE TV to where this might barely squeak by speedy criteria.
A search, however, showed that she is solidly non-notable per Wikipedia's guidelines and this looks to be just a bit too soon for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure if this is notable and my searches found nothing to suggest meaningful improvement, here, here, here and here, and mostly results that seem based from this including the first Books result which is a mirror. This has existed since September 2006 and has hardly gotten worthwhile improvement and there's probably no signs of improvement happening. Pinging the only seemingly interested user Mr. Stradivarius. SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
In 2006 the AfD verict was "rewrite", well, nobody did so. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)/ Wikipedia:Notability (websites) requirement. While it is occasionally cited in mass media, I don't see any articles (newspaper or scholarly), nor books, discussing it. The best I found is [46], and I don't think that suffices. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
I see no claim or evidence of notability. ELEKHH T 10:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
No ref's, seems non-notable. Couldn't find RS. Jcmcc ( Talk) 16:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Non notable mall fails WP:GNG Me5000 ( talk) 16:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deor ( talk) 18:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Qualifies for deletion as per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and also because the topic does not meet WP:GNG. Source searches are only providing passing mentions (e.g. [50], [51], [52]). North America 1000 02:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
The first AfD was keep (but standards have changed since then) and sure it has sources and I could've let this pass by but my searches found nothing good to suggest better improvement (mostly for Building Performance Institute (BPI). I'm not sure how much activity they've had with their bankruptcy but, again, I found nothing to suggest much good and they seem to no longer be listed at the stock exchanges. Finally, emphasizing their low profile, this article has literally not been edited since August 2011 much less significantly. Pinging the only still active user Eastmain. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
DGG I'd appreciate your input here. SwisterTwister talk 21:43, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:02, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Internet searches yield nothing in the way of notability for this person. They have an ANN page with three listed works and some mentions. One of their manga obtained an Oricon ranking, but if anything, it is the manga which may be notable and not the author via WP:ITSA. KirtZJ ( talk) 02:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable rugby league team. Charlie the Pig ( talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources are all primary; no other reliable, independent sources found. Small bank, with only 150 employees, without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. I can't find any evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 01:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Purely promotional, this is another paid-for article by blocked user:BiH. Wikipedia cannot be allowed to be used for profit in this way at the abuse of the voluntary unpaid time that dedicated users spend building this encyclopedia which in spite of some biographies and articles about some companies, was never intended to be an additional business networking platform. Whether the text itself sounds promotional or not, the article is an advert. The sources are either dead links or one primary source. Fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 01:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Originally PROD'ed but the tag was removed by an IP user without any claims [67]. No notability claims made in article. References are for the company's website/generic and make no notability claims. Does not appear to meet WP:COMPANY notability criteria. -- R45 talk! 01:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 10:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Objected PROD. Has many primary sources as well as sources of questionable reliability. I don't know Korean so I can't check if there is "presence of at least one reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person" ( WP:BLPPROD#Objecting). Finnusertop ( talk | guestbook | contribs) 00:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
I will respectfully disagree.Lee Tae-yong not only is a trainee under one of the most powerful music labels in South Korea(which is well-known globally as well with a huge international fanbase),but he among other artists performed consistently in very popular events like SMTown shows.His company uploaded (in YouTube) some of his work that more than 1 million views and collaborated with Red Velvet in the song Be Natural which is formally a girlgroup band for which wikipedia already has an article about and refers to Taeyong.The website SMRookies that his company created refers to his basic bigraphical facts like the Name,Date of Birth etc. so it cannot possibly be incorrect since the company itself claimed it.Also I provided photographs for his magazine photoshoot and high school graduation which makes the facts obviously correct.Also he appears in a decent part of the show EXO90:2014 like it's shown in a reference,a video that was uploaded my Mnet which is a South Korean entertainment company which produces, broadcasts, distributes and provides a variety of music and entertainment. His band hasn't had their official bedut,yet but perform in big events.Taeyong is a popular personality,a rapper and a dancer.He is a celebrity that has recently began his career,performs live,takes part in photoshoots of popular magazines and TVshows and his rap is already known from YouTube.
If it's not possible to find relieble resources for this wiki article in the moment,can I rewrite the article sometime in the future when more sources(and reliable ones) will be available? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaSaram ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Isn't Mnet's Youtube Channel a reliable source??? Wikipedia considers Mnet a reliable source,though? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaSaram ( talk • contribs) 14:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
@ LaMona Thanks for the information.I'll wait for a while then until the group makes its official debut. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MariaSaram ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Another article created by indef blocked editor user:BiH, many of whose paid creations have been deleted or are currently under AfD. The sources are all either dead, unreliable, primary, blogs, or very fleeting mentions. Bluntly said, the references are the result of scraping the Internet barrel. Without better sources it fails notability per WP:ORG and is only one of hundreds of political parties in the country (one for every million population). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 05:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable bio based on self-published sources. The one main claim for notability, the MakerSquare school, has its own article, and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Google search found no in-depth coverage (a few passing mentions and an apparently different second "Harsh Patel"). GermanJoe ( talk) 00:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Clear consensus for keeping the page, although it needs improvement. Aervanath ( talk) 08:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
This is a weird article. I think the biggest issue is simple notability - it's a questionably encyclopedic article, and whether the intersection is notable enough is dubious. Secondary issues include a major demarcation problem - for most members of this list, Christianity has no part of their notability - and a simple failure to hold up its stated purpose - this is supposedly meant to be a resource to links on science and religion; you'd be hard pressed to find any significant discussion on that in most of the biographies linked. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 00:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Delete - The first AfD indicates it was initially an article on Catholic scientists, which, honestly, might be notable. But, for all the individual sourcing for each entry, which I admit is at least acceptable, I'm not seeing any evidence that the topic itself is individually notable. Having said all that, it might well be possible that separate articles on Catholic scientists, Eastern Orthodox scientists, Anglican scientists, and so on might conceivably be able to establish separate notability, maybe. Also, in response to the above, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS might seem to apply, and, honestly, the simple declaration that other articles may not have specific notability without support isn't sufficient argument that they are similar. John Carter ( talk) 00:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep. I agree with Roches considering that the Muslim list of scientists does not have much detail on the entries and the atheist page all it says is "Living persons in this list are people whose atheism is relevant to their notable activities or public life". It is pretty clear that many of the people on the atheist list are not really using atheism in their lives nor is atheism relevant to their "notable activities", but merely identified as not having belief in God. Of course, just like others have mentioned about "what is a christian?", the same could be said of "what is a Muslim?" or "what is an atheist?". There certainly are different kinds of atheists like secular humanists, nominal atheists and even religious atheists too (see nontheistic religions). These pages look like merely FYI pages of notable scientists who have had a particular worldview and that is it. Mayan1990 ( talk) 09:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC).
The result was redirect to Ministry of Gender Equality and Family#Controversy. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 05:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Appears to advocate political views without referencing. Contains a minimal amount of encyclopedic information with unclear wording due to grammar issues. The Average Wikipedian ( talk) 12:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)