Read how to nominate an article for deletion.
![]() |
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 22:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
POV fork of Souliotes created after this edit by the author was reverted. Article also contains text copied from https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Souliotes or another page originally copied from Souliotes circa 2013. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 21:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not have the WP:CORPDEPTH needed for a standalone article. The only sources currently in the article are primary and a search elsewhere didn't come up with anything better. Let'srun ( talk) 21:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
While I am reasonably sure that the (also unreferenced...) Uplift Storm trilogy can be rescued (all three books that compose it meet NBOOK, see ISFDb), I fear this novella does not merit a stand-alone article and for now should be redirected to the trilogy it is a part of. What we have here is just a pure plot summary and my BEFORE failed to find anything of value (see also ISFDb with zero linked reviews...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Not enough media coverage to justify the biography. Fails WP:NBAND. Binksternet ( talk) 20:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. Note: this is the second time this is article is nominated, the first was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2MASX J22550681+0058396 WP:TRAINWRECK discussion. C messier ( talk) 17:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please do not propose a Redirect or Merge without identifying an existing target article or it will be impossible to carry out your recommendation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. Note: this is the second time this is article is nominated, the first was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2MASX J22550681+0058396 WP:TRAINWRECK discussion. C messier ( talk) 17:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please don't propose a Merge or Redirect without identifying a target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
A biographical article about a Nigeria man that doesn't meet WP:GNG. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Nominator 2 has also been a block user for 4 years now I just noticed that. Theirs no point AFD nominator replying. Look forward to other editors as I will be busy.Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to add to prove it meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Baronets are not normally notable and there doesn’t seem to be anything that would amount to a claim of notability with this subject. Mccapra ( talk) 19:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This entire thing seems made up. For one it seems to claim that this "order" still exists and is operating since ancient times. ★Trekker ( talk) 20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC) The last deletion discussion is incredibly confusing as it seems to have resulted in a "Keep" without the votes actually making any sense (similar to the article itself). ★Trekker ( talk) 20:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Run of the mill social services/rehab/treatment serving the local community that we can expect every medium to large cities to have. The NJ.com source is about a roundtable that was held at the organization but not really about the organization. An article like this has no place in a global scale encyclopedia. Graywalls ( talk) 23:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) BilledMammal ( talk) 20:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Publication of non-notable and unverified information. Kamala Harris has not begun a presidential campaign nor has announced the intention of doing so. Following what to do before an AFD, the article was moved into draftspace to wait until an official announcement. Drafticiation failed, so next step is deletion. Fails WP:V, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:OR, and currently due to lack of actual sources, WP:Notability. Honestly, since this is 100% unverified, this might actual count as a WP:HOAX violation, since the "Kamala Harris 2024 presidential campaign" does not even exist yet. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 19:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
References
I could be wrong, but I am not able to find any evidence this place exists. The coordinates listed don't go to a place with this name. Googling reveals just Wikipedia mirrors and Mari Shah Sakhira, which is a real place but already has a separate Wikipedia article. Article creator was no doubt working in good faith but seems to have had some other Pakistan place articles deleted for this same issue. Here2rewrite ( talk) 19:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear notable, redirect to Digital Eel? IgelRM ( talk) 19:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear notable, redirect to Pelaaja? IgelRM ( talk) 19:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 18:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
18:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up from this AfD. Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG, and lack of sources for existing content in article Mdann52 ( talk) 13:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
18:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up from this AfD. Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG, and struggling to find any sources to support existing information in article. Mdann52 ( talk) 13:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This debate has recently trended towards 'keep' somewhat, but relisting to allow further analysis of GoldenAgeFan1's sources and additional input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
18:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable politician who hasn't held elected office. He ran for the Magura-1 seat of parliament in 2001, but finished a distant third. The cited sources are passing mentions, not significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Worldbruce ( talk) 17:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Song by Keane (not to be confused with the song by Radiohead). Fails WP:NSONGS: no coverage in multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. Popcornfud ( talk) 17:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a single source was given, and I was unable to find a single source regarding this that was neither user-generated nor a mere mention, so very far from having enough coverage for WP:GNG. — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong) 17:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. فيصل ( talk) 16:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. Additionally, the article is written in a promotional tone.-- فيصل ( talk) 16:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. فيصل ( talk) 16:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Scope is vague and due to the nature of the article it attracts unsourced information to be added ( u t c m l ) 🔒 ALL IN 🧿 16:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD. Normal editing can fix the unsourced additions concern since undoing edits and rolling back to revisions are core embedded features to both Wikipedia and its extensions like Twinkle and RedWarn. Lack of will to work on a page is not a reason to delete it. InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 22:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. فيصل ( talk) 16:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable band. -- Viennese Waltz 11:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:GNG. I have been unable to find reliable significant coverage on both topics, let alone any. Sources do exist albeit unreliable or non-independent such as Planespotters, OneSpotter and Airfleets and Airbus news releases just to list a few.
Per WP:NLIST. Whilst "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been", I have been unable to find any reliable sources talking about a list of preserved Airbus aircraft nor a list of preserved A320s. Some entries do have sources talking about their respective aircraft individually but the majority of the entries seem unverifiable with most of the information coming from the said sources above. Aviationwikiflight ( talk) 16:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I have also nominated the following related page < List of preserved Airbus A320 aircraft> because both topics are similar enough as they both cover preserved Airbus aircraft and also share the same issues. Aviationwikiflight ( talk) 16:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This Slovak men's footballer played in his country from 2013 until 2016 before moving to lower leagues in the Czech Republic and Poland. Secondary sources analysis from my searches through translation:
In my opinion, none of those sources above actually approach WP:SIGCOV that are required for encyclopedia. I have checked corresponding articles on him in other Wikipedia languages, but all of them likewise provide match reports, primary sources, and database. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This page clearly does not satisfy WP:NGEO Warm Regards, Miminity ( talk) ( contribs) 13:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Twitter as it is the clear primary topic in a WP:2DABS situation. Page view stats show views for the DAB peaked in late July 2023, when the rebranding was announced. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 12:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced, doesn't appear notable. IgelRM ( talk) 11:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. No third party sources. A google news search comes up with a namesake jazz musician who seems more notable. LibStar ( talk) 10:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability IgelRM ( talk) 09:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This article clearly fails WP:GNG & full of WP:SYNTH mess and WP:OR. There is not any battle named as the "Battle of Jhain", the name of the battle is fabricated Ha shid 09:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't see the person passes WP:NPROF as well as WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 08:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
MOS:DABMENTION requires "If the topic is not mentioned in the other article, that article should not be linked to in the disambiguation page". "Bhimadeva" is mentioned only in Bhima of Mahikavati, probably not a good target for a redirect. I suggest this page is deleted in order to enable uninhibited use of Search. A PROD was reverted by @ Utcursch: with edit summary ( https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=bhimadeva+caulukya) without editing any targeted article. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 18:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP Imcdc Contact 09:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this school, which opened in 2020,and cannot see significant coverage in reliable sources which is not run of the mill. I think it is WP:TOOSOON for the school to be notable. Tacyarg ( talk) 09:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Try to focus on one Merge target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The creator of this BLP SheriffIsInTown claims that this BLP falls under NPOL, but NPOL is not applicable here. Any advisor to Chief Minister of a province, must meet the GNG, which they do not. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 07:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
06:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think there is a consensus that
WP:NPOL is not the standard to meet here but instead it's GNG and there are different opinions on whether coverage mention is SIGCOV or passing mentions or routine. The burden falls on those arguing to Keep to supply RS. Don't just mention publications, please provide links to articles that can establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
could not find secondary sources besides the BoxRec website that's already used as (the only) source LR.127 ( talk) 06:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:RS. Redirect to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, of which it is a part. Longhornsg ( talk) 23:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is additional support for a Keep, Redirect or Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
06:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Do the sources brought up in this discussion contribute to the "multiple RS" required?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet the criteria for a stand-alone list. This is not a general format or a specialized list. This article is just a list of navigation boxes that are designed to sit at the very bottom of articles. Additionally, navboxes are not displayed on the mobile website for Wikipedia, which accounts for around half of our readers, see mobile view. It also has accessibility issues, neither one of my screen readers could read this article properly. No prejudice if someone wanted to convert the articles in these navboxes into an actual list article. Isaidnoway (talk) 05:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:OR with no indication of notability. Not enough coverage by reliable sources according to WP:BEFORE. Jontesta ( talk) 04:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If you are arguing for a Redirect or Merge, please offer an existing target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I cannot find any independent, substantive coverage about this institute. Their FB-page was discontinued in 2014. Fails WP:NORG Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 03:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. The SNG for p[laces explicitly says that they are not presumed notable and must meet GNG. Has not even one reference anywhere near GNG. North8000 ( talk) 01:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's all about the sources and those arguing to Keep this article has to demonstrate that RS exist to support claims in this article. A source review would be useful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t see how this subject passes WP:GNG. The only thing here was that he won the Gulder ultimate search. The rest are just biography with no source. No evidence he won those awards.Since 2023 the issue tag was placed no fixed has been made. Even when I had to google. The news source fails independent as they are likely stating his quote. Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 16:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This shooting lacks sustained and continued coverage. This should be redirected to List of mass shootings in the United States, where it already has an entry. The additional detail in this article is (1) a play-by-play of the shooting, (2) an extensive biography of the shooter, and (3) the aftermath section. I do not think merging that information would be appropriate per WP:NOTNEWS. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Local roadway fails WP:GNG, WP:GEOROAD. One source fails verification, one source is primary ( WP:GOOGLEMAPS), and the last does not show evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Sources found during a WP:BEFORE search are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS mentioning the road in the context of news coverage of events that happened to take place on or near it but not focusing on the road itself. (This had been a stable redirect for years until an editor recently began restoring and adding unsourced content without responding to discussion; and I propose this AfD as a basis to restore a stable redirect to List of numbered roads in York Region.) Dclemens1971 ( talk) 00:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Read how to nominate an article for deletion.
![]() |
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 22:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
POV fork of Souliotes created after this edit by the author was reverted. Article also contains text copied from https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Souliotes or another page originally copied from Souliotes circa 2013. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 21:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not have the WP:CORPDEPTH needed for a standalone article. The only sources currently in the article are primary and a search elsewhere didn't come up with anything better. Let'srun ( talk) 21:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
While I am reasonably sure that the (also unreferenced...) Uplift Storm trilogy can be rescued (all three books that compose it meet NBOOK, see ISFDb), I fear this novella does not merit a stand-alone article and for now should be redirected to the trilogy it is a part of. What we have here is just a pure plot summary and my BEFORE failed to find anything of value (see also ISFDb with zero linked reviews...). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Not enough media coverage to justify the biography. Fails WP:NBAND. Binksternet ( talk) 20:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. Note: this is the second time this is article is nominated, the first was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2MASX J22550681+0058396 WP:TRAINWRECK discussion. C messier ( talk) 17:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please do not propose a Redirect or Merge without identifying an existing target article or it will be impossible to carry out your recommendation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. Note: this is the second time this is article is nominated, the first was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2MASX J22550681+0058396 WP:TRAINWRECK discussion. C messier ( talk) 17:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please don't propose a Merge or Redirect without identifying a target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
A biographical article about a Nigeria man that doesn't meet WP:GNG. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Nominator 2 has also been a block user for 4 years now I just noticed that. Theirs no point AFD nominator replying. Look forward to other editors as I will be busy.Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to add to prove it meets WP:NPLACE / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 19:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Baronets are not normally notable and there doesn’t seem to be anything that would amount to a claim of notability with this subject. Mccapra ( talk) 19:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This entire thing seems made up. For one it seems to claim that this "order" still exists and is operating since ancient times. ★Trekker ( talk) 20:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC) The last deletion discussion is incredibly confusing as it seems to have resulted in a "Keep" without the votes actually making any sense (similar to the article itself). ★Trekker ( talk) 20:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Run of the mill social services/rehab/treatment serving the local community that we can expect every medium to large cities to have. The NJ.com source is about a roundtable that was held at the organization but not really about the organization. An article like this has no place in a global scale encyclopedia. Graywalls ( talk) 23:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) BilledMammal ( talk) 20:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Publication of non-notable and unverified information. Kamala Harris has not begun a presidential campaign nor has announced the intention of doing so. Following what to do before an AFD, the article was moved into draftspace to wait until an official announcement. Drafticiation failed, so next step is deletion. Fails WP:V, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:OR, and currently due to lack of actual sources, WP:Notability. Honestly, since this is 100% unverified, this might actual count as a WP:HOAX violation, since the "Kamala Harris 2024 presidential campaign" does not even exist yet. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 19:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
References
I could be wrong, but I am not able to find any evidence this place exists. The coordinates listed don't go to a place with this name. Googling reveals just Wikipedia mirrors and Mari Shah Sakhira, which is a real place but already has a separate Wikipedia article. Article creator was no doubt working in good faith but seems to have had some other Pakistan place articles deleted for this same issue. Here2rewrite ( talk) 19:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear notable, redirect to Digital Eel? IgelRM ( talk) 19:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear notable, redirect to Pelaaja? IgelRM ( talk) 19:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 18:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
18:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up from this AfD. Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG, and lack of sources for existing content in article Mdann52 ( talk) 13:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
18:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Follow-up from this AfD. Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG, and struggling to find any sources to support existing information in article. Mdann52 ( talk) 13:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This debate has recently trended towards 'keep' somewhat, but relisting to allow further analysis of GoldenAgeFan1's sources and additional input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
18:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable politician who hasn't held elected office. He ran for the Magura-1 seat of parliament in 2001, but finished a distant third. The cited sources are passing mentions, not significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Worldbruce ( talk) 17:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Song by Keane (not to be confused with the song by Radiohead). Fails WP:NSONGS: no coverage in multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. Popcornfud ( talk) 17:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a single source was given, and I was unable to find a single source regarding this that was neither user-generated nor a mere mention, so very far from having enough coverage for WP:GNG. — Alien333 ( what I did & why I did it wrong) 17:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. فيصل ( talk) 16:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. Additionally, the article is written in a promotional tone.-- فيصل ( talk) 16:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. فيصل ( talk) 16:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Scope is vague and due to the nature of the article it attracts unsourced information to be added ( u t c m l ) 🔒 ALL IN 🧿 16:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD. Normal editing can fix the unsourced additions concern since undoing edits and rolling back to revisions are core embedded features to both Wikipedia and its extensions like Twinkle and RedWarn. Lack of will to work on a page is not a reason to delete it. InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 22:12, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines, and there are no reliable, independent sources to verify its notability. فيصل ( talk) 16:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable band. -- Viennese Waltz 11:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:GNG. I have been unable to find reliable significant coverage on both topics, let alone any. Sources do exist albeit unreliable or non-independent such as Planespotters, OneSpotter and Airfleets and Airbus news releases just to list a few.
Per WP:NLIST. Whilst "The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been", I have been unable to find any reliable sources talking about a list of preserved Airbus aircraft nor a list of preserved A320s. Some entries do have sources talking about their respective aircraft individually but the majority of the entries seem unverifiable with most of the information coming from the said sources above. Aviationwikiflight ( talk) 16:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I have also nominated the following related page < List of preserved Airbus A320 aircraft> because both topics are similar enough as they both cover preserved Airbus aircraft and also share the same issues. Aviationwikiflight ( talk) 16:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This Slovak men's footballer played in his country from 2013 until 2016 before moving to lower leagues in the Czech Republic and Poland. Secondary sources analysis from my searches through translation:
In my opinion, none of those sources above actually approach WP:SIGCOV that are required for encyclopedia. I have checked corresponding articles on him in other Wikipedia languages, but all of them likewise provide match reports, primary sources, and database. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 13:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This page clearly does not satisfy WP:NGEO Warm Regards, Miminity ( talk) ( contribs) 13:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Twitter as it is the clear primary topic in a WP:2DABS situation. Page view stats show views for the DAB peaked in late July 2023, when the rebranding was announced. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 12:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced, doesn't appear notable. IgelRM ( talk) 11:50, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. No third party sources. A google news search comes up with a namesake jazz musician who seems more notable. LibStar ( talk) 10:09, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability IgelRM ( talk) 09:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This article clearly fails WP:GNG & full of WP:SYNTH mess and WP:OR. There is not any battle named as the "Battle of Jhain", the name of the battle is fabricated Ha shid 09:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't see the person passes WP:NPROF as well as WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 08:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
MOS:DABMENTION requires "If the topic is not mentioned in the other article, that article should not be linked to in the disambiguation page". "Bhimadeva" is mentioned only in Bhima of Mahikavati, probably not a good target for a redirect. I suggest this page is deleted in order to enable uninhibited use of Search. A PROD was reverted by @ Utcursch: with edit summary ( https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=bhimadeva+caulukya) without editing any targeted article. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 18:00, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP Imcdc Contact 09:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this school, which opened in 2020,and cannot see significant coverage in reliable sources which is not run of the mill. I think it is WP:TOOSOON for the school to be notable. Tacyarg ( talk) 09:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Try to focus on one Merge target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The creator of this BLP SheriffIsInTown claims that this BLP falls under NPOL, but NPOL is not applicable here. Any advisor to Chief Minister of a province, must meet the GNG, which they do not. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 07:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
06:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think there is a consensus that
WP:NPOL is not the standard to meet here but instead it's GNG and there are different opinions on whether coverage mention is SIGCOV or passing mentions or routine. The burden falls on those arguing to Keep to supply RS. Don't just mention publications, please provide links to articles that can establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
could not find secondary sources besides the BoxRec website that's already used as (the only) source LR.127 ( talk) 06:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:RS. Redirect to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, of which it is a part. Longhornsg ( talk) 23:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is additional support for a Keep, Redirect or Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
06:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Do the sources brought up in this discussion contribute to the "multiple RS" required?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet the criteria for a stand-alone list. This is not a general format or a specialized list. This article is just a list of navigation boxes that are designed to sit at the very bottom of articles. Additionally, navboxes are not displayed on the mobile website for Wikipedia, which accounts for around half of our readers, see mobile view. It also has accessibility issues, neither one of my screen readers could read this article properly. No prejudice if someone wanted to convert the articles in these navboxes into an actual list article. Isaidnoway (talk) 05:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:OR with no indication of notability. Not enough coverage by reliable sources according to WP:BEFORE. Jontesta ( talk) 04:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If you are arguing for a Redirect or Merge, please offer an existing target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I cannot find any independent, substantive coverage about this institute. Their FB-page was discontinued in 2014. Fails WP:NORG Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 03:20, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No indication of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. The SNG for p[laces explicitly says that they are not presumed notable and must meet GNG. Has not even one reference anywhere near GNG. North8000 ( talk) 01:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It's all about the sources and those arguing to Keep this article has to demonstrate that RS exist to support claims in this article. A source review would be useful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t see how this subject passes WP:GNG. The only thing here was that he won the Gulder ultimate search. The rest are just biography with no source. No evidence he won those awards.Since 2023 the issue tag was placed no fixed has been made. Even when I had to google. The news source fails independent as they are likely stating his quote. Gabriel (talk to me ) 00:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 16:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
This shooting lacks sustained and continued coverage. This should be redirected to List of mass shootings in the United States, where it already has an entry. The additional detail in this article is (1) a play-by-play of the shooting, (2) an extensive biography of the shooter, and (3) the aftermath section. I do not think merging that information would be appropriate per WP:NOTNEWS. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Local roadway fails WP:GNG, WP:GEOROAD. One source fails verification, one source is primary ( WP:GOOGLEMAPS), and the last does not show evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Sources found during a WP:BEFORE search are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS mentioning the road in the context of news coverage of events that happened to take place on or near it but not focusing on the road itself. (This had been a stable redirect for years until an editor recently began restoring and adding unsourced content without responding to discussion; and I propose this AfD as a basis to restore a stable redirect to List of numbered roads in York Region.) Dclemens1971 ( talk) 00:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)