This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
On 1 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karolina Styczyńska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Karolina Styczyńska (pictured) is the first non-Japanese individual to be awarded professional status by the Japan Shogi Association? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karolina Styczyńska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Karolina Styczyńska), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, i thought the tea party site was run by people from usa, not UK the ones from england have not helped me. your comments Paulboll ( talk) 22:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC) were great thanks. 22:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Paulboll ( talk)
Thank you so much for your help re: YouTube videos! This was very thorough and very helpful. Songuitar333 ( talk) 07:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hi,
I want to give a rationale to your challenge to delete the image, but I can't work out where exactly to write it. It says:
"Go to the file description page and add the text {{ di-replaceable fair use disputed}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable."
Where exactly is "below the original fair use template?"
I find the language used highly technical and intimidating.
If you can help, I would appreciate it. I'm aware the file is soon to be deleted.
Beryl reid fan ( talk) 23:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
N.B: I've just added my "reason that a free replacement can not be found or created," on the file page, though I'm not confident I've added it to the correct place. Beryl reid fan ( talk) 23:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Marchjuly, thank you for your helpful response. Beryl reid fan ( talk) 11:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I have asked Bliss Media's company HR to send the template letter to permissions-en@wikimedia.org to demonstrate copyright and authorize release of the picture. Thanks, Supermann ( talk) 09:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the information and education. I am seeking to resolve the matter you brought to my attention. (I didn't even see your message on my talk page until after I already started my attempted resolution!) I appreciate your help.-- SidP ( talk) 16:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi...
The photo I had uploaded to my Wiki page was taken by me with my own phone as a selfie. Your process for doing anything in Wikipedia is cumbersome and difficult for someone who does not do web design for a living, and I don't understand how I'm supposed to go about 'proving' that the pic is mine.
Please let me know in simple terms what I have to do to convince you that the pic is my property and I am free to use it as I see fit.
Thank you,
Lora Lora Elise ( talk) 22:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I moved the profanity to its own archive. The editor in question didn't both to remove the PROD, which is his privilege to do (unlike a CSD tag or an AFD tag, which may not be removed). Oh well. It was and is crud, and will be deleted in seven days. If he had removed the PROD rather than just cursing, I would have AFD'd the crud anyway. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
What I meant by timeline is for the key accomplishments to be put into WP:PROSE under subheadings that indicate some span of a couple years. So pretty much what you said except just put into chronological order under separate subheadings.
Gomez.alexa ( talk) 23:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The court articles say that the officers were acquitted of all charges. What I originally added to it was true. Apparently you have some type of agenda to be had. Sad Skippy0321 ( talk) 01:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
no agenda to be had, unless you consider trying to help ensure article content is in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines to be an "agenda". If the officers were acquitted of all charges, then there should be coverage in independent reliable sources which says such a thing. If you are aware of such sources, just add it as an inline citation in support of the content you wish to add. If you're not sure how to do this, then please take a look at WP:REFBEGIN.
Marchjuly, since the nominator and his sockpuppet reviewer have been blocked, I have completely undone the nomination and GA listing of the article. Since the GA review has been undone, the reassessment is effectively orphaned. I removed the link to it from the talk page. You might want to have both of them deleted; at a minimum, you should have the duplicate one (the "/2") deleted; the numbering of community reassessments and GA reviews is, in any event, independent of one another (both can be "1"). If you need any help in doing this, please feel free to let me know. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
On 1 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karolina Styczyńska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Karolina Styczyńska (pictured) is the first non-Japanese individual to be awarded professional status by the Japan Shogi Association? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karolina Styczyńska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Karolina Styczyńska), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, i thought the tea party site was run by people from usa, not UK the ones from england have not helped me. your comments Paulboll ( talk) 22:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC) were great thanks. 22:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Paulboll ( talk)
Thank you so much for your help re: YouTube videos! This was very thorough and very helpful. Songuitar333 ( talk) 07:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hi,
I want to give a rationale to your challenge to delete the image, but I can't work out where exactly to write it. It says:
"Go to the file description page and add the text {{ di-replaceable fair use disputed}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable."
Where exactly is "below the original fair use template?"
I find the language used highly technical and intimidating.
If you can help, I would appreciate it. I'm aware the file is soon to be deleted.
Beryl reid fan ( talk) 23:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
N.B: I've just added my "reason that a free replacement can not be found or created," on the file page, though I'm not confident I've added it to the correct place. Beryl reid fan ( talk) 23:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Marchjuly, thank you for your helpful response. Beryl reid fan ( talk) 11:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I have asked Bliss Media's company HR to send the template letter to permissions-en@wikimedia.org to demonstrate copyright and authorize release of the picture. Thanks, Supermann ( talk) 09:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the information and education. I am seeking to resolve the matter you brought to my attention. (I didn't even see your message on my talk page until after I already started my attempted resolution!) I appreciate your help.-- SidP ( talk) 16:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi...
The photo I had uploaded to my Wiki page was taken by me with my own phone as a selfie. Your process for doing anything in Wikipedia is cumbersome and difficult for someone who does not do web design for a living, and I don't understand how I'm supposed to go about 'proving' that the pic is mine.
Please let me know in simple terms what I have to do to convince you that the pic is my property and I am free to use it as I see fit.
Thank you,
Lora Lora Elise ( talk) 22:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I moved the profanity to its own archive. The editor in question didn't both to remove the PROD, which is his privilege to do (unlike a CSD tag or an AFD tag, which may not be removed). Oh well. It was and is crud, and will be deleted in seven days. If he had removed the PROD rather than just cursing, I would have AFD'd the crud anyway. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
What I meant by timeline is for the key accomplishments to be put into WP:PROSE under subheadings that indicate some span of a couple years. So pretty much what you said except just put into chronological order under separate subheadings.
Gomez.alexa ( talk) 23:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The court articles say that the officers were acquitted of all charges. What I originally added to it was true. Apparently you have some type of agenda to be had. Sad Skippy0321 ( talk) 01:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
no agenda to be had, unless you consider trying to help ensure article content is in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines to be an "agenda". If the officers were acquitted of all charges, then there should be coverage in independent reliable sources which says such a thing. If you are aware of such sources, just add it as an inline citation in support of the content you wish to add. If you're not sure how to do this, then please take a look at WP:REFBEGIN.
Marchjuly, since the nominator and his sockpuppet reviewer have been blocked, I have completely undone the nomination and GA listing of the article. Since the GA review has been undone, the reassessment is effectively orphaned. I removed the link to it from the talk page. You might want to have both of them deleted; at a minimum, you should have the duplicate one (the "/2") deleted; the numbering of community reassessments and GA reviews is, in any event, independent of one another (both can be "1"). If you need any help in doing this, please feel free to let me know. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)