This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
How is it possible that an image that is in commons since 2015 is not suitable for use in an article? Lironcareto ( talk) 09:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Marchjuly - just a note to thank you for your contribution on User:Steel1943. I went ballistic when Steel listed all my images on Kendra Haste for discussion. He, and you, and everyone else who commented were kind to contribute in the discussion - I simply lost my temper. When I'm working on an article I consider it MINE for as long as I'm working on it - and those high res images are gold - except they don't work together as "Fair use" in one article. Silly me - but no matter - the author will now be forced to upload them to Commons if he wants them used so no matter - the article will survive. Happy New Year by the way. Mark Dask 19:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
DPLopes ( talk) 18:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Dear Marchjuly, I noticed you removed the images I uploaded last year to illustrate a Wikipedia entry I submitted to. The reason you invoked is I don't have the rights of the images, an assumption that is not correct. Could you please look in to this? Thanks much in advance. Best, Daniel DPLopes ( talk) 18:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
See the closure. I'll leave it to you as nominator to convert the files to {{ PD-simple}} as suggested. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
|author=
and |date=
blank in the {{
Information}} because I wasn't sure what should go there. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 04:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
you say you are not discriminating but if thats true, why have you not nominated the france logo, italy logo, portugal logo or netherlands logo to be deleted. these are four of the biggest national teams in the world, but instead of looking at their page you decide to pick on a small team like iraq? why you nominated iraq's logo and ignored other teams? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:DC08:7E00:346D:1E8D:D50E:83F7 ( talk) 20:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Deal with it bro. Your mods are crooked and I could care less. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 ( talk • contribs) 05:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Your mods are crooked and I don't care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 ( talk • contribs) 05:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Do what you gotta do. This is why I haven't contributed in years and this is why I won't be any longer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 ( talk • contribs) 05:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2.28.71.127 ( talk) 23:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you SO much for your very informative answer. This helped me SO much!! Thank you!!! Songuitar333 ( talk) 00:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Category:British soccer logos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 17:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
How is it possible that an image that is in commons since 2015 is not suitable for use in an article? Lironcareto ( talk) 09:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Marchjuly - just a note to thank you for your contribution on User:Steel1943. I went ballistic when Steel listed all my images on Kendra Haste for discussion. He, and you, and everyone else who commented were kind to contribute in the discussion - I simply lost my temper. When I'm working on an article I consider it MINE for as long as I'm working on it - and those high res images are gold - except they don't work together as "Fair use" in one article. Silly me - but no matter - the author will now be forced to upload them to Commons if he wants them used so no matter - the article will survive. Happy New Year by the way. Mark Dask 19:56, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
DPLopes ( talk) 18:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Dear Marchjuly, I noticed you removed the images I uploaded last year to illustrate a Wikipedia entry I submitted to. The reason you invoked is I don't have the rights of the images, an assumption that is not correct. Could you please look in to this? Thanks much in advance. Best, Daniel DPLopes ( talk) 18:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
See the closure. I'll leave it to you as nominator to convert the files to {{ PD-simple}} as suggested. ~ Rob13 Talk 01:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
|author=
and |date=
blank in the {{
Information}} because I wasn't sure what should go there. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 04:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
you say you are not discriminating but if thats true, why have you not nominated the france logo, italy logo, portugal logo or netherlands logo to be deleted. these are four of the biggest national teams in the world, but instead of looking at their page you decide to pick on a small team like iraq? why you nominated iraq's logo and ignored other teams? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:DC08:7E00:346D:1E8D:D50E:83F7 ( talk) 20:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Deal with it bro. Your mods are crooked and I could care less. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 ( talk • contribs) 05:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Your mods are crooked and I don't care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 ( talk • contribs) 05:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Do what you gotta do. This is why I haven't contributed in years and this is why I won't be any longer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzombie1988 ( talk • contribs) 05:57, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2.28.71.127 ( talk) 23:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you SO much for your very informative answer. This helped me SO much!! Thank you!!! Songuitar333 ( talk) 00:03, 26 January 2017 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Category:British soccer logos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 17:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)