This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives

2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

I have finished my Wikipedia draft of "General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena" of Ecuador, South America. It is sitting in my Sandbox which in Spanish is called the (Taller).

I can use the Spanish version of Google to find "General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena" and Google will pull up the Bodvar Antonio Gregersen/Taller. One can see the entire Wikipedia article on General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena in Spanish.

I believe that I have passed the criteria for my images and their citations because they have not been deleted.

I believe my Wikipedia draft of "General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena" of Ecuador, South America is satisfactory because I have not been told that the draft did not meet Wikipedia's criteria.

I cannot get anyone to answer my questions about this matter on the Spanish version of Wikipedia.

What I need to know is there something that I have to do to get published on the Spanish version of Wikipedia or do I just wait until I can get the published version of my Sandbox/Taller when I use the Spanish version of Google? In other words, what happens in the English version of Wikipedia under the same circumstances?

Thank you.

Bodvar Antonio Gregersen-- Bodvar Antonio Gregersen ( talk) 20:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Bodvar Antonio Gregersen. I don't really know anything at all about Spanish Wikipedia, so I'm not sure how to answer your question. If you are working on a draft for an article on English Wikipedia, then you could submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. It looks like Spanish Wikipedia has its own version of "Articles for creation" at es:Wikiproyecto:Asistente para la creación de artículos so you can try asking there. I also don't understand any Spanish, so I wouldn't know how to go about asking for you. The best I can do is suggest that you take a look at es:Ayuda:Contenidos to see if you can find the information you need. You could also try asking for help at WT:SPAIN or even try es:Wikiproyecto Discusión:España which appears to be the same WikiProject on Spanish Wikipedia. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:58, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, thank you for your help with the Valamis logo. How can we protect our logo from removal? We want to provide more data about the company.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Valamis-logo-black-rgb.svg

Ivan.Andreev ( talk) 06:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Commons only accepts files uploaded according to c:Commons:Licensing. If your company wants to upload its logo to Commons under a free license, then someone at the company will need to follow c:Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. Your company, however, understand that the free licenses accepted by Commons are those which allow basically anyone anywhere in the world to download the file from Commons and then use pretty much for any purpose, including commerical purposes; moreover, once a file is released under a free license, it cannot be cancelled at a latter date if somebody changes their mind. Files on Commons need to be dealt with on Commons, so I will assume good faith here and change the speedy deletion template to another more suitable template explaining what your company needs to do.

Image issues aside, if you are an employee who is editing your companies Wikipedia article, you are considered to have a conflict of interest with respect to anything written about your company on Wikipedia. The Wikipedia community doesn't expressly prohibit conflict of interest editing, it is something highly discouraged. Please carefully read through Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and be sure to edit accordingly. You also need to be very careful with respect to any type of paid editing and make sure to follow Wikipedia:Paid editing disclosure if you are being compensated in anyway to edit on behalf of your company, or are third-party who has been contracted by the company to edit on its behalf. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 08:06, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments and help Marchjuly. This is my personal account, and yes I'm representing the mentioned company. At the same time, I understand the rules and terms our use of Wikipedia, and agree with them. My goal is to fill in the gaps in information about the company, in a neutral way. -- Ivan.Andreev ( talk) 08:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying that you represent the company. Since you do have a COI, I suggest that you follow WP:COIADVICE and WP:PSCOI#Steps for engagement in your attempts to “fill in the gaps” in the article, and use the article’s talk page to propose changes. I also suggest you follow WP:DISCLOSECOI and WP:PAID because doing these things will make others more likely to believe your intent to be WP:HERE and less likely to assume you’re WP:NOTHERE instead. — Marchjuly ( talk) 08:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Snuffle snuffle out of bed snuffle snuffle -- Ben9201996 ( talk) 21:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the information on the Spanish Wikipedia site.

I translated the Spanish Help Pages with Google Translate, but I felt that what I found did not give me the information that I needed.

I reached a Spanish Usario (User) who was a huge help to me and I asked him the questions about my article getting reviewed on the Spanish Wikipedia.

We will see what happens.

Thank you very much.

Bodvar Antonio Gregersen-- Bodvar Antonio Gregersen ( talk) 18:18, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,

Curious as to why you are removing the SamuraiPunkLogo.png from the Samurai Punk draft page. From what I can see that should be fine use while the page is pending review.

DraperDanMan ( talk) 01:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

As I mentioned in my edit sums here and here, non-free content can only be used in the article namespace per WP:NFCC#9. This means no drafts as explained in WP:DRAFTS#Preparing drafts. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:15, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Reported as promised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fhsig13 ( talk • contribs) 05:34, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

... that may be used in user space?

• File:Olive wreath.svg
• File:WikiProject Scouting fleur-de-lis dark.svg

IveGoneAway ( talk) 13:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi IveGoneAway. Generally, any file you find on Commons either (1) is licensed as public domain or (2) is licensed under a free license accepted by Commons. Commons doesn't accept non-free content so anything you find there should be fine for the userspace. The only reason I say "should be fine" is because people are always uploading files to Commons when they probably shouldn't, and these files tend to be deleted when they are found. So, if you use a Commons' file in your userspace which is eventually deleted from Commons, the file will no longer be visible and most likely you'll see just a red link. If that happens, there's not much that can be done other than to go to Commons and find out why the file was deleted.

The two files you mentioned above are Commons' files, so they are not subject to WP:NFCC#9 or any of WP:NFCC and can be used in the userspace. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Can we use multiple free images in Userbox id. Ashwini Gadade ( talk) 11:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ashwini Gadade. Any image that you find on Commons can probably be used in a userbox. I believe that some userboxes can handle multiple images, but you should probably ask about that at WT:UBX, WT:UB or maybe even WT:VPT for more specific information about how to do that. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 12:12, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

You know where you can stick that advice! Cordially IQ125 ( talk) 11:41, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,

On the basis of (WP:NFCC#9 and WP:UP#Non-free files) you commented out an image file of a Registered Trademark that I was using in the "Brand" Infobox on a draft of a new article that I am writing. See below

| logo =

The Section " Non-free files" on "User Pages indicates that it is acceptable to link to "Non-free files" so I have added the image back in as a link to the file. See below -

| logo = Tri-ang Minic Ships Logo|link=/info/en/?search=File:Tms_logo_low_res.svg

If this is not acceptable please let me know and I will remove it.

Cebs57 ( talk) 01:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Cebs57. Unfortunately, what you did is not what is meant by "link to file". Linking to a file page refers to WP:COLON in which a colon is added before the file name. The syntax looks like [[:File:Tms logo low res.svg]] and the file name will appear as a blue link like File:Tms logo low res.svg. What you did is to display the file and then linked the image itself to the file's page. This is still a problem though because non-free content is not allowed to be used (i.e., displayed) outside of the article namespace per WP:NFCC#9. Just for reference, once your draft has been approved as an article, the file can be re-displayed on that page.

FWIW, your draft is going to be evaluated on the article content and the sources you cite in support, so not having an infobox image is not going affect any of that. If by chance, the file is deleted before your draft is approved, don't panic. File which are deleted aren't gone for ever, but rather only hidden from public view. You can request that the file be "undeleted" at WP:REFUND when you're ready to add it to the article. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, just a query. I notice you removed this image ( File:Alieu Ebrima Cham Joof as Scout Master.jpg) from Portal:Alieu Ebrima Cham Joof - [1]. From my understanding, the uploader stated in their rationale that this image can be used in any articles relating to "Alhaji Alieu Ebrima Cham Joof or the Scout Movement in the Gambia (in any language)." This portal is specifically about Alieu Ebrima Cham Joof. I think that would satisfy the copyright holder's requirements. Also, if not, is there a way of using it by giving full credit? Help with wording would be appreciated. The same for this image as well: File:Bread and Butter Demonstration 1959 -Banjul, The Gambia.jpg. Thanks. Senegambianamestudy ( talk) 05:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Each use of a non-free file must comply with Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy. There are ten non-free content use criteria which need to be satisfied and one of these ( non-free content use criterion #9) states that non-free content can only be used in the article namespace, which means no portals. What the copyright holder wants is irrelevant to relevant non-free content use policy. If the copyright holder wants anyone to be able to use their photos, etc. with as little restriction as possible, they should consider WP:DONATEIMAGE. — Marchjuly ( talk) 07:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

The image has not been uploaded by me is from the Roland Corporation main page. Can you please revert your revert and remove your post on my page. Thanks Ijustwannabeawinner ( talk) 07:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

The file was uploaded to Roland Corporation page on 4 March 2016, you need to research this before reverting edits made by other editors. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk | contribs) at 20:12, 4 March 2016 (Updating filelink). Bold Ijustwannabeawinner ( talk) 07:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Non-free content can be used in articles like Roland Corporation as long as it satisfies Wikipedia's non-free content use criteria, but non-free content can never be used in templates per WP:NFCC#9. I understand that you didn't upload the file, but if you did add the file to the Wikipedia page and the template I added to you user talk page reads "However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page,..." (bold emphasis is mine). You can remove the notification and post I added to your user talk page yourself if you want per WP:BLANKING, but please do not re-add that file to Template:Roland again. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 08:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

I presume you are going to expain this also to the editor of the Korg page where this idea originates from? Ijustwannabeawinner ( talk) 10:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

You just wrote: "File:Logo korg.png, on the other hand, is licensed as public domain content, so it is not subject to Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy and therefore can used in a template, etc"

So i reverted the edit and yet you still complain. what are you doing? Ijustwannabeawinner ( talk) 12:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Let's try to keep this discussion in one place at User talk:EP111. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 12:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks EP111 :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Ijustwannabeawinner ( talk • contribs) 21:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, in answer to your question on my talk page, I was given those logos by a representative within MBS Radio back in 2009, they were given to me for official website use, and for use on websites such as this, however I let the years go long by without ever working on updating them for here, so I just recently did so, and will continue to, if you see an issue with any more of my uploads, you can reach me the same way. Thanks for your time. DJSharke ( talk) 22:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

That's fine, but a source still needs to be specified. Something online would be ideal. You can add it and other information about the logo using a Template:Information is you like. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey Marchjuly, Thank you for the feedback regarding Passports of the European Union - I thought I understood all the intricacies regarding image use on Wikipedia - but I'll have to take a look again - as it's clear that I definitely don't :). I'll make sure to keep away from adding images for now - as I'm still learning - but I definitely appreciate the pointers. In the meantime, I may add back the "Link to Images" - I'm just slightly concerned that it looks failrly inconsistent and actually slightly unreadable in table format. I'll probably move it to the talk page on the article to determine if it still makes sense. Davekern ( talk) 08:32, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for tagging the photo. I'm still having intermittent issues with images not being displayed in articles so I didn't see the free image already there. I'll get rid of my one. Cloudbound ( talk) 19:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

No problem. You don't really need to do anything since the file will be deleted in a few days unless someone contests the speedy deletion tag. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 23:57, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

I have provided some defense for your replaceability dispute , please have a check Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 19:43, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

An administrator will review what you posted and decide whether further discussion is needed or whether the file should be deleted. — Marchjuly ( talk) 22:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Why don't you understand again and again that I am not paid by her , I am on medical leave , I follow this actress as a die hard fan and not a paid agent or freinds or family , I enquired her phone no. and email from Instagram to get permissions for using her Instagram photos on wikicommons but my request was never answered , a clear evidence that I am not being paid or freinds or family , Already those photos I had to delete for having no permission , I am the top liker of her Instagram posts and probably of Twitter also , I made so many comments which never got any likes or replies , so I deleted them for once and all so you think that a person who knows me will treat me like that , but yes some day I day I look forward to meet her if I ever get a chance but you should know how much difficult to ever catch up with a star for the masses ! I live 1000 kms away from her , this is India , she is a Marathi , I am from north India instead , our paths never crossed , She is also elder than me by 5 yrs or something , restore my article , it's a kind request , I do it by passion and not for my bank account that's unikely to be ever credited. Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 00:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Now checked the edit history records , There is particular wikipedia user ManjariFadnis who joined 8 months ago , I believe they must be the hired agent team , the same who manage her Facebook account , Also check their last seven edits , I don't remember but I think I even left a message on their talk page , please check ,They should have answered my request for permission to use their photos on WikimediaCommons but they didn't , Why ? Not for a paid agent! please don't ask me that again , Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 00:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

I didn't know whether you're connected to her because you've never said you weren't connected to her unitl your post above. I only asked for clarification based upon your edit history. If you say you have no conflict of interest, then that's fine. You should just understand that others might also mistakenly assume that you have, so it would be a good thing for you to clarify this below the post I left on your user talk page. Just say you're a fan of Fadnis, but have no connection to her.

As for deleting articles or images. I am not an administrator so I cannot delete anything. If someone deleted an article you added to Wikipedia, or deleted an image you uploaded to Wikipedia or Commons, you will need to ask that person about it. I do think, however, that you don't have a very good understanding of Wikipedia's non-free content use policy just based upon the two files I tagged for review, and how you're trying to justify their non-free use. That, however, is something that an administrator will eventually review to determine whether the files should be deleted.

One thing about Wikipedia that you need to understand is that you have no real ownership rights over content (inlcuding images) you add to existing articles or create anew. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project and article content is determined through WP:CONSENSUS. It's OK to make mistakes per WP:IMPERFECT, and other editors will correct things that can be corrected per WP:PRESERVE; however, some things cannot be fixed so they need to go per WP:TNT. Using and uploading images can be especially tricky, and any files which don't comply with relevant Wikipedia policies or guidelines may be removed outright or tagged for review, and subsequently deleted per WP:DELETE. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding , I just joined probably a week ago , I don't understand editing much , just learning by looking at the existing source codes , teahouse is willing to offer some help also , certain image contributions I have myself deleted as I failed to get permission from the authors of the images , so I started trying non free fair use then as wikimedia Commons don't accept non free photos without permission anyway else

Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 01:29, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Being new means the chance of you making mistakes is probably higher than someone more familiar with how things work. Being a WP:SPA means that your focus is so narrow that you might not be as exposed to how different policies/guidelines are applied in various situations. Making mistakes will not become an issue as long as you try and learn from the ones you make and not repeat them over and over again. Being an SPA is not necessarily a bad thing, but you can learn much more about editing by trying to improve a variety of different articles because it gives you the opportunity to see how more experienced editors apply Wikipedia's various policies and guideline. May you should take a look at WP:WPPJ and see if there are other things on Wikipedia which interest you. You mentioned you live in India, so may be you'll be interested in helping out at WP:INDIA. You can always take a break from editing Manjari Fadnis and go work on other articles. Then, you can come back to the Fadnis and see how it's been improved by others. This is sometimes a good way to learn about how Wikipedia works. You can also take WP:ADVENTURE since you actually learn about Wikipedia by editing. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Alright ! To sort out your troubles , I have arranged the phone no. as well as email address of Mr. B Thiba , the personal secretary of the Indian film actress Miss Manjari Fadnis , Mumbai , India from her official Instagram profile , the no. is and his email address is .You may ask him to protect the actress wikipedia page from open editing or to check the authenticity of the content or whatever else you want! Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 04:22, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Please don't add personal information such as phone numbers or email address to any Wikipedia pages, unless they are your own, per WP:BLPPRIVACY. Even if its your own information, you should still be very careful per WP:REALWORLD. If you continue to do such things, you run the risk of having your account blocked by an administrator.

Furthermore, neither Fadnis or her management company have any final editorial control over the content found in Manjari Fadnis as explained in Wikipedia:Ownership of content; in other words, it's not her article to do with as she pleases. Wikipedia articles are not the property of the subjects they are written about and the subjects of articles don't have any authority to protect said article from being edited by others. Wikipedia has specific guidelines and policies dealing with this kind of thing. If Fadnis or her management company have a problem with something written about her on Wikipedia, then they need to follow the instructions given at WP:BLPCOMPLAIN. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

I saw the talk page , you are carefully following my edits , you tried to contact manjarifadnis even , so I shared this , and also That phone no. and email are publicly available to all of her followers in case you have downloaded the Instagram app , To know her secretary 's full name , you should have true caller app , that's meant to arrange works for the celebrity if you don't have access to her personal phone number , if he finds you reliable enough , then he may forward your call to the celebrity directly, 7 yrs back wiki articles troubled her calling her brand ambassador of certain firms whose contract has expired has expired a long time ago , the news was public so got published in the wikipedia even ,she had to file a legal notice to the firm to shut down her hoardings and stop using her as a brand ambassador as it costed her a fortune , the controversy your freind got deleted , I mistakingly added the same as I went through internet sources but some wise editor deleted it , then I came to know yesterday ,that information is not correct

Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 05:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

I have no idea who ManjariFadnis really is. People are constantly creating accounts using the names of famous people, but this is something which is not allowed per WP:IMPERSONATE. So, I posted a notification on ManjariFadnis's user talk page to let him/her know of the potential problem with his/her user name. If this user is really the actress Manjari Fadnis, and she wants to use her real name as her username, then she can. She might, however, be requested to verify her identity by contacting Wikimedia OTRS to prevent the account being soft-blocked as a precaution against damaging impersonation. She would also then be expected to comply with WP:COIADVICE and avoid directly editing anything written about her on Wikipedia, except under some very specific conditions.

Contact information publically available on someone's instagram account does not mean it should be made available anywhere on a Wikipedia page. If you want someone to know that information, you can provide a link to the instagram account instead. Nobody needs to call anyone associated with Manjar Fadnis to edit the Wikipedia article Manjari Fadnis; neither she nor anyone associated with her have any control over the page. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project that anyone around the world can contribute to as long as their edits are in accordance with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Once again, if Manjar Fadnis has concerns about the Wikipedia article written about her, she needs to follow WP:BLPCOMPLAIN and let other editors help her deal with them. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 05:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

The very user deleted an edit referencing Fadnis' false marriage as she is still single , The user then added her real birth place and how she grew up at various places because of her father's transferrable job, deleting all false info taken from poor sources , her Instagram photos and other reliable sources confirms her early life as the user herself specified , in her own talking tone, only upper middle class in India talk like this , the user visited the site just one day before her birthday to change her age to 88 from 84, the user had to do it twice , to appear younger and the same day her Facebook account Also changed her age! the user also added two popular awards that she has got , one 11 yrs back , another she is still sharing on the internet ! Carefully read all seven edits! Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 06:25, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Her Facebook account is managed by team Manjari , she personally manages only Twitter and Instagram personal profiles that's very much obvious as lots of communication with her near and dear ones in those accounts but with a lot of hashtags referenced at times that can be questionable , nothing I know of hashtags in her name , from where those post come from ! So that user can be team Manjari even , you call some COI or something, and not necessarily the Manjari Fadnis herself ! Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 06:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Anyone connected to Fadnis either personally or professionally is going to be expected to edit according to Wikipedia's guidelines on conflict-of-interest. Anyone paid or otherwise compensated by Fadnis or her management company, etc. to edit or create content related to her on Wikipedia is not only going to be expected to edit according to these aforementioned guidelines, they are also going to be expected to fully disclose their connection, etc. per WP:PAID; those that don't disclose their connection risk having their accounts blocked as a viloation of Wikipedia's terms of service. If you notice anything on other websties which suggests that others are indeed editing the article on behalf or Fadnis or anyone associated with her, then you can start a discussion about it at WP:COIN so that the Wikipedia community can figure out what to do. However, you need to be very careful about WP:OUTING anyone whom you suspect of doing this because OUTING other editors tends to be considered a serious violation of their privacy and might actually lead to your account being blocked. It's important to understand that Wikipedia's policy on biographies about living persons does not only cover content in articles, but also covers content on all Wikipedia pages per WP:BLP#Applicability of the policy. Moreover, it doesn't only cover content about living people who have Wikipedia articles written about them, it also covers content about all living persons. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Sir/madam

I love that woman , I won't be going after her aids , I am just learning what edits have taken place all these last 10 yrs or something and what sources they used, few people use her interviews even , and who (and when )did the last reliable and COI edit few years back, who turns up to add her upcoming films in filmography especially , who does the complicated editing as she herself can't , and especially interested in the user ManjariFadnis herself ,the aid team Manjari is of no use to me, I saw on the wikipedia , a lot of bigger Actresses have sealed their wikipedia from any open editing to protect their interest if you thought my unsourced comments were a threat so I told you all that to contact her and protect her page from my threats plus your COI doubts yet not resolved , as you suggested me things which you were supposed to tell to Fadnis only ,as you couldn't trace , you put a delete image caption in no time, OUTING is a mistake I admit but that was only meant to assure that I wasn't paid and bring out the real Manjari Fadnis or her aids , you even threatened to revert my valuable edits made to the outdated page or rewrite the article which I myself did just after year 2015 after which her aids went missing for adding anything large , I am tracing each and everything about that woman to either write this article here , and I want her to cherish the page whenever she comes back again to have a look at it the way she did this July , to make Instagram or twitter comments but those celebs don't talk to commoners, and also because following her social media makes me feel good,you need not to extend this discussion further ! Keep this thing in mind I will create a separate discussion for anything else or you can leave a message on my talk page.Thank you .

Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 08:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

You can love her and be her biggest fan in the whole world, but the Wikipedia community is going to expect you to put all of that aside and be WP:HERE if edit anything about her on Wikipedia; if you’re unable to do that and prefer instead to be WP:NOTHERE, you’re quickly going to start having problems with other editors. I think you mean well, but you also seem to misunderstand the purpose of a WP:ARTICLE; so, you probably should take a careful look at WP:NOT. Wikipedia articles are not fan pages, etc. designed to make their subjects feel good about themselves; they are not presents you give to others to cherish. So, Wikipedia doesn’t really care whether she likes the article. Wikipedia does try to make sure article content accurately reflects what is written about her in reliable sources in a neutral manner, but the article content needs to be in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines regardless of whether it’s positive or negative in nature. I believe you when you say you have no COI, but the things you’ve posted so far on just this talk page alone give the impression that you might have a hard time editing anything about her in neutral manner.

Finally, I’m not an administrator so I cannot delete image files or pages. I tagged the two files you uploaded for review because I don’t believe they satisfy Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy. You’ve contested the tags because you feel they do. An administrator will review the files and decide what if anything needs to be done. I added the templates to the image captions because that’s what is supposed to be done. The templates will be removed once an administrator has completed their review of the files. —- Marchjuly ( talk) 11:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Can you delete the page issues templates on the article titled Manjari Fadnis if the issue has been resolved ? Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 17:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

you can still keep it on the watchlist if you think I will add some flattery or unsourced statements Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 17:52, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

her page issues were one of the reasons why I chose to edit that article but I was poor at source editing the day I did that Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 17:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

poor at source editing to add reference or replacing speedy Deletion tags with the regular ones and any knowledge of the wikipedia copyright rules or types of license Crispgatoglitz ( talk) 17:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Maintenance templates can be removed from articles as explained in Help:Maintenance template removal. So, if you feel that the issues indicated on the template have been addresed, you can be WP:BOLD and remove them yourself, but just make sure to leave a clearly worded edit sum which explains why you're removing the template. If another editor disagrees with your assessment and re-adds the template(s), you should avoid any edit warring over them and instead engage in discussion on the article's talk page per WP:DR. In some cases, it can even help to be a little WP:CAUTIOUS and discuss removing a template first on the article's talk page, especially if it was one which was just recently added. There apppear to be two pretty experienced editors ( Bonadea and Hullaballoo Wolfowitz) who are helping improve the article it and bring it more inline with relevant policies and standards; so, maybe it would actually be a good idea for you to use article talk page from now on to discuss any concerns you have about the article since that's really the best place for such discussion because it makes it easier for more editors to join in. Most editors interested in Fadnis are probably watching the ariticle and its talk page and not watching my user talk page.

Finally, you've probably should take a look at H:TALK just to better get a feel on how to edit talk pages. There are some formating things such as indentation, etc. which will make it much easier for you to communicate with others via talk pages. It's not such a big deal here where it's just the two of us posting, but proper formatting can really be important on article talk pages where multiple editors are posting comments. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 21:49, 27 July 2018 (UTC)