 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Logo removal
Hi, why did you remove the logo File:Sony Channel logo.png from the page Great! TV? in That logo page it's written that this logo can be used on this page, because it is written "Non-free media rationale for Sony Channel (British and Irish TV channel)". Just read the page /info/en/?search=File:Sony_Channel_logo.png 79.21.5.205 ( talk) 19:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- That logo is approved for use in two specific articles only, and Great! TV is not one of them.
Cullen328 (
talk) 20:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi
Cullen328. Thanks for responding. Just to clarify, though, a non-free use rationale can be added to a file's page by anyone at anytime. There's no formal approval process that a rationale needs to go through; so, they're not really approved in per se. They may be discussed after the fact and a consensus established that the use is OK, however. In this case, there is a rationale, but it's for the way the file was being previously being used when the article was titled "Sony Channel (British and Irish TV channel)" before it was moved to
Great! TV in May 2021. The prior use of the file might've been OK, but it's subsequent use in the "new" article was not. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- thank you 79.21.5.205 ( talk) 08:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi
Cullen328. Thanks for responding. Just to clarify, though, a non-free use rationale can be added to a file's page by anyone at anytime. There's no formal approval process that a rationale needs to go through; so, they're not really approved in per se. They may be discussed after the fact and a consensus established that the use is OK, however. In this case, there is a rationale, but it's for the way the file was being previously being used when the article was titled "Sony Channel (British and Irish TV channel)" before it was moved to
Great! TV in May 2021. The prior use of the file might've been OK, but it's subsequent use in the "new" article was not. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi IP 79.21.5.205. Did you read the edit summary I left when removing the logo? It contained links to pages which explain why the logo was removed. While it may be true that the logo had a non-free use rationale for that article, just having such rationale doesn't make a non-free use compliant as explained in WP:JUSTONE. A non-free use needs to satisfy all ten non-free content use criteria for it to be valid; failing even one of the criteria means the file is subject to removal. Did you read the rationale provided for that particular use on the file's page? Do you think that rationale accurately reflects the way the file was being used? I didn't remove the file because of WP:NFCC#10c. Since the article parameter for the rationale redirects to the "Great! TV", there is a rationale provided so to speak. I removed the file because it was being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in an image gallery which is something that's not allowed for non-free content. If you disagree with this assessment and feel further discussion is needed, you can ask for input informally at WP:MCQ or WT:NFC, or formally at WP:FFD. If there was some simple way to fix the rationale or the file's use, I would've done so. I generally only remove non-free files when it seems clear that there way they're being used isn't policy compliant. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
You’ve been awarded ‘The Fundamental Wikipedian’!
|
Lowercase sigmabot III has given you The Fundamental Wikipedian! Copies of the Fundamental Wikipedian promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else The Fundamental Wikipedian, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
This user would like to express their apologies regarding a recent dispute with you in which they were incorrect. Explanation:
What is WikiLove?
† |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4theloveofallthings ( talk • contribs) 05:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Declined speedy deletion
I've declined your speedy deletion request, as F1 applies only to unused files. This file is in use. I suggest you nominate it through FFD. -- Whpq ( talk) 20:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Logo removal
Hi, why did you remove the logo File:Sony Channel logo.png from the page Great! TV? in That logo page it's written that this logo can be used on this page, because it is written "Non-free media rationale for Sony Channel (British and Irish TV channel)". Just read the page /info/en/?search=File:Sony_Channel_logo.png 79.21.5.205 ( talk) 19:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- That logo is approved for use in two specific articles only, and Great! TV is not one of them.
Cullen328 (
talk) 20:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi
Cullen328. Thanks for responding. Just to clarify, though, a non-free use rationale can be added to a file's page by anyone at anytime. There's no formal approval process that a rationale needs to go through; so, they're not really approved in per se. They may be discussed after the fact and a consensus established that the use is OK, however. In this case, there is a rationale, but it's for the way the file was being previously being used when the article was titled "Sony Channel (British and Irish TV channel)" before it was moved to
Great! TV in May 2021. The prior use of the file might've been OK, but it's subsequent use in the "new" article was not. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- thank you 79.21.5.205 ( talk) 08:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi
Cullen328. Thanks for responding. Just to clarify, though, a non-free use rationale can be added to a file's page by anyone at anytime. There's no formal approval process that a rationale needs to go through; so, they're not really approved in per se. They may be discussed after the fact and a consensus established that the use is OK, however. In this case, there is a rationale, but it's for the way the file was being previously being used when the article was titled "Sony Channel (British and Irish TV channel)" before it was moved to
Great! TV in May 2021. The prior use of the file might've been OK, but it's subsequent use in the "new" article was not. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi IP 79.21.5.205. Did you read the edit summary I left when removing the logo? It contained links to pages which explain why the logo was removed. While it may be true that the logo had a non-free use rationale for that article, just having such rationale doesn't make a non-free use compliant as explained in WP:JUSTONE. A non-free use needs to satisfy all ten non-free content use criteria for it to be valid; failing even one of the criteria means the file is subject to removal. Did you read the rationale provided for that particular use on the file's page? Do you think that rationale accurately reflects the way the file was being used? I didn't remove the file because of WP:NFCC#10c. Since the article parameter for the rationale redirects to the "Great! TV", there is a rationale provided so to speak. I removed the file because it was being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in an image gallery which is something that's not allowed for non-free content. If you disagree with this assessment and feel further discussion is needed, you can ask for input informally at WP:MCQ or WT:NFC, or formally at WP:FFD. If there was some simple way to fix the rationale or the file's use, I would've done so. I generally only remove non-free files when it seems clear that there way they're being used isn't policy compliant. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
You’ve been awarded ‘The Fundamental Wikipedian’!
|
|
Lowercase sigmabot III has given you The Fundamental Wikipedian! Copies of the Fundamental Wikipedian promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else The Fundamental Wikipedian, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
This user would like to express their apologies regarding a recent dispute with you in which they were incorrect. Explanation:
What is WikiLove?
† |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4theloveofallthings ( talk • contribs) 05:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Declined speedy deletion
I've declined your speedy deletion request, as F1 applies only to unused files. This file is in use. I suggest you nominate it through FFD. -- Whpq ( talk) 20:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)