This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi Marchjuly.
I just read your reply now. Thank you for your help!
Best,
Alexandre — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexandreDevil ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
You are receiving this message because you are invited to take part at
Wikipedia:Advice for newcomers where you can provide advice that will help our newcomers in the future. It is not a discussion forum, just a place where you say what advice would be helpful to our future editors. I would like to get at least 100 editors to take part in this so please feel free to spread the word to other editors as well. I look forward to seeing what you say to newcomers.
Interstellarity (
talk) 13:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
I have a question regarding a review that was added to this article:
/info/en/?search=The_Call_of_the_Wild:_Dog_of_the_Yukon
The Call of the Wild: Dog of the Yukon
The TVGUIDE.Com review for this title was published on May 10th, 2020. The film was released in 1997. The reviewer did not even get the release date of the film correct (they said 1996, but it was actually 1997). The reviewer took a line from the original New York Post review and poked fun at the film and the NYP review - more than 23 years later. I don't see why a review of a film - made 23 years after its original release - should be included in this article. Film tastes and styles change over the years, as do audience tastes and styles. It has been my experience that Wikipedia includes pertinent reviews of a film made just prior to - or shortly after - the film's original release, not more than 23 years later. This seems irregular, unfair to the original filmmakers and mean-spirited. I tried to remove the additional reference, which was reversed by you - user Marchjuly. I'd sincerely like to understand why.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RandySWT1 ( talk • contribs) 06:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
~~~~
. Click "Show preview" once again to check your signature and then click "Publish changes" if everything looks OK. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 08:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Yes, sorry... I've now replied on the Teahouse page. Kindly take a peek. I don't agree with Nick's assessment. But it appears I'm outnumbered. RandySWT1 ( talk) 17:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Marchjuly: - I followed you here from your post / comment on WP:TEAHOUSE. Wanted to let you know that I saw the way you want back into the disappointed user's posts, and connected the user back with the person who was providing feedback / review assistance.
Empathy can seem in short supply in many places around here, and I want to let you know that you displayed tremendous amount in the forum!
Thanks for being a role model for the community! Good luck. Kaisertalk ( talk) 04:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the disturbance, but how would i make a template? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.69.251 ( talk) 09:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello...I saw that you made some changes to the page I'm trying to create on Everett McCorvey. It is, as I'm sure you can tell, my first effort at a Wiki page although I've done some editing and gone through some of the tutorials. I didn't understand what you meant about copying the work and am not sure now that I am looking at the version that you created rather than my last version. Any help appreciate! Jacalyn Carfagno ( talk) 17:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. I have noticed that you have removed an image from Timelapse of the Future. Being someone new who is still trying to learn, I respect your decision to do so. Do you have any suggestions to how the picture can be placed back? In what ways can it be recognized as fair use? I am new to these stuff, so this can be a way for me to learn something. A reply would be highly appreciated. Gerald WL 14:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Sōta Fujii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Esculenta ( talk) 17:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
bsd. Hi. I was wondering why doesn't File:Cuyahoga County Council logo.svg comply with NFCC? Thank you. -- Ben Stone 13:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
An article popped up on my watchlist, which has lead me to remember a "situation" that occurred @ March 2018 involving Laramie1960. She was a passionate person who was editing Juliette Benzoni and related articles. She ran afoul of our *rules*, etc, and took it very personally.
You, Curdle and I spent some time working with this worthwhile, absolutely good faith editor, who had great difficulty understanding WP copyright rules, encyclopedic tone, etc., etc.
I recently reread our various exchanges on her talk, and was struck, once again, by your kindness, helpfulness and your supportive, yet factual comments. Back in 2018, I was already aware that you are a busy, well-respected and very competent editor. This was not the first time that I had seen you expend a great deal of time, reaching out to assist a "lowly newbie". I was pleased and "impressed" that a editor of your stature would choose (once again) to get involved. Years later, your pattern continues, and I notice you are still giving kind and helpful advice, by answering at the Teahouse.
So, best wishes to you, and many thanks. Sincerely, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 22:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
My name is John J Flood and my name is on a Wikipedia page
It has been brought to my attention that the entry might be deleted
Be advised that I have a national reputation as a police union labor relations leader and expert on organized crime in the United States.
Considered as one of the founders of police union labor movement in the United States of America
Any person - student of college or university police administration curriculum would be missing police unionization history should such miss a search upon the name
This posting of my history was not placed upon Wikipedia by I - but I have been cognizant of its posting by students who advised finding the information on this website
I am not computer astute and no longer employ a staff that would have such expertise - so unable to be aware of problems as to this police information and the name being on Wikipedia
Should there be any questions I can be contacted directly by phone at the below number
Thanking you for your attention to this matter and awaiting your reply, I remain
John J Flood — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJFCCPA ( talk • contribs) 00:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm responding to your message because I feel really attacked by this website. It feels like every single thing I try to do is overtly examined and criticized when all I wanted to do was help a friend out. His name is Joel Newton, he is a producer who co runs a VR company and he asked if I could set up a wiki page for him and his company. He offered compensation, which I've declared now though I didn't see it necessary at first because it wasn't like I was creating anything major, merely a little info page with pure facts, no bias and references to back it up. Now I understand that Wikipedia wants you to declare external relationships though at the time I didn't realise how serious it was, I'd literally joined Wikipedia just for this so everything was new to me. But having a profile picture removed because you don't think it falls under fair use? Really? What alternative do I have? Why are all the other articles allowed simple pictures of the person in question and I'm not? To put it simply, I think Wikipedia does a terrible job of easing newcomers in. The standards are absurd, it feels like I have to jump through a million hoops just to do a simple thing and all I'm trying to do is make an info page like any other one you'd find. Please, tell me what I'm supposed to do to achieve that, because I've given up trying to do it like a normal human. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone right? How about you upload the profile picture for me? It's clearly far beyond my capability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CongregationDaniel ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Why are all the other articles allowed simple pictures of the person in question and I'm not?, please see WP:OTHERIMAGE. Not all images are licensed the same and its the way an image is licensed that determines whether and how it can be used. Some of the images you're referring to may actual be ones uploaded to Wikimedia Commons under a free license that Wikipedia accepts, or their might be other things about the particular use which satisfies relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines in a way that the one you uploaded doesn't. Another possibilty could simply be that the other image(s) you saw are ones that aren't allowed and it's just a case that nobody has noticed them yet. If you disagree with what I've posted above and still feel that the file you upload does satisfy relevant Wikipedia policy (please read WP:ITSFAIRUSE and WP:NFC#Background for how Wikipedia's policy differs from fair use), then you can follow the instructions in the template I added to the file's page and explain why by posting on the file's talk page. The administrator who reviews the file will see your post and take it into account when they decide whether the file should be deleted. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 08:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, thank you for your notice on File:Indian_Summer_2019_Press_Photo.jpeg. Looks like I misunderstood the fair-use criterion, will contact the rights holder for release. In the mean time I'm happy for the image to be taken down - PandaSuit2 ( talk) 01:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi Marchjuly.
I just read your reply now. Thank you for your help!
Best,
Alexandre — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexandreDevil ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
You are receiving this message because you are invited to take part at
Wikipedia:Advice for newcomers where you can provide advice that will help our newcomers in the future. It is not a discussion forum, just a place where you say what advice would be helpful to our future editors. I would like to get at least 100 editors to take part in this so please feel free to spread the word to other editors as well. I look forward to seeing what you say to newcomers.
Interstellarity (
talk) 13:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
I have a question regarding a review that was added to this article:
/info/en/?search=The_Call_of_the_Wild:_Dog_of_the_Yukon
The Call of the Wild: Dog of the Yukon
The TVGUIDE.Com review for this title was published on May 10th, 2020. The film was released in 1997. The reviewer did not even get the release date of the film correct (they said 1996, but it was actually 1997). The reviewer took a line from the original New York Post review and poked fun at the film and the NYP review - more than 23 years later. I don't see why a review of a film - made 23 years after its original release - should be included in this article. Film tastes and styles change over the years, as do audience tastes and styles. It has been my experience that Wikipedia includes pertinent reviews of a film made just prior to - or shortly after - the film's original release, not more than 23 years later. This seems irregular, unfair to the original filmmakers and mean-spirited. I tried to remove the additional reference, which was reversed by you - user Marchjuly. I'd sincerely like to understand why.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RandySWT1 ( talk • contribs) 06:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
~~~~
. Click "Show preview" once again to check your signature and then click "Publish changes" if everything looks OK. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 08:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Yes, sorry... I've now replied on the Teahouse page. Kindly take a peek. I don't agree with Nick's assessment. But it appears I'm outnumbered. RandySWT1 ( talk) 17:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
@ Marchjuly: - I followed you here from your post / comment on WP:TEAHOUSE. Wanted to let you know that I saw the way you want back into the disappointed user's posts, and connected the user back with the person who was providing feedback / review assistance.
Empathy can seem in short supply in many places around here, and I want to let you know that you displayed tremendous amount in the forum!
Thanks for being a role model for the community! Good luck. Kaisertalk ( talk) 04:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the disturbance, but how would i make a template? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.69.251 ( talk) 09:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello...I saw that you made some changes to the page I'm trying to create on Everett McCorvey. It is, as I'm sure you can tell, my first effort at a Wiki page although I've done some editing and gone through some of the tutorials. I didn't understand what you meant about copying the work and am not sure now that I am looking at the version that you created rather than my last version. Any help appreciate! Jacalyn Carfagno ( talk) 17:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey there. I have noticed that you have removed an image from Timelapse of the Future. Being someone new who is still trying to learn, I respect your decision to do so. Do you have any suggestions to how the picture can be placed back? In what ways can it be recognized as fair use? I am new to these stuff, so this can be a way for me to learn something. A reply would be highly appreciated. Gerald WL 14:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Sōta Fujii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Esculenta ( talk) 17:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
bsd. Hi. I was wondering why doesn't File:Cuyahoga County Council logo.svg comply with NFCC? Thank you. -- Ben Stone 13:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
An article popped up on my watchlist, which has lead me to remember a "situation" that occurred @ March 2018 involving Laramie1960. She was a passionate person who was editing Juliette Benzoni and related articles. She ran afoul of our *rules*, etc, and took it very personally.
You, Curdle and I spent some time working with this worthwhile, absolutely good faith editor, who had great difficulty understanding WP copyright rules, encyclopedic tone, etc., etc.
I recently reread our various exchanges on her talk, and was struck, once again, by your kindness, helpfulness and your supportive, yet factual comments. Back in 2018, I was already aware that you are a busy, well-respected and very competent editor. This was not the first time that I had seen you expend a great deal of time, reaching out to assist a "lowly newbie". I was pleased and "impressed" that a editor of your stature would choose (once again) to get involved. Years later, your pattern continues, and I notice you are still giving kind and helpful advice, by answering at the Teahouse.
So, best wishes to you, and many thanks. Sincerely, Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect! 22:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
My name is John J Flood and my name is on a Wikipedia page
It has been brought to my attention that the entry might be deleted
Be advised that I have a national reputation as a police union labor relations leader and expert on organized crime in the United States.
Considered as one of the founders of police union labor movement in the United States of America
Any person - student of college or university police administration curriculum would be missing police unionization history should such miss a search upon the name
This posting of my history was not placed upon Wikipedia by I - but I have been cognizant of its posting by students who advised finding the information on this website
I am not computer astute and no longer employ a staff that would have such expertise - so unable to be aware of problems as to this police information and the name being on Wikipedia
Should there be any questions I can be contacted directly by phone at the below number
Thanking you for your attention to this matter and awaiting your reply, I remain
John J Flood — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJFCCPA ( talk • contribs) 00:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm responding to your message because I feel really attacked by this website. It feels like every single thing I try to do is overtly examined and criticized when all I wanted to do was help a friend out. His name is Joel Newton, he is a producer who co runs a VR company and he asked if I could set up a wiki page for him and his company. He offered compensation, which I've declared now though I didn't see it necessary at first because it wasn't like I was creating anything major, merely a little info page with pure facts, no bias and references to back it up. Now I understand that Wikipedia wants you to declare external relationships though at the time I didn't realise how serious it was, I'd literally joined Wikipedia just for this so everything was new to me. But having a profile picture removed because you don't think it falls under fair use? Really? What alternative do I have? Why are all the other articles allowed simple pictures of the person in question and I'm not? To put it simply, I think Wikipedia does a terrible job of easing newcomers in. The standards are absurd, it feels like I have to jump through a million hoops just to do a simple thing and all I'm trying to do is make an info page like any other one you'd find. Please, tell me what I'm supposed to do to achieve that, because I've given up trying to do it like a normal human. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone right? How about you upload the profile picture for me? It's clearly far beyond my capability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CongregationDaniel ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Why are all the other articles allowed simple pictures of the person in question and I'm not?, please see WP:OTHERIMAGE. Not all images are licensed the same and its the way an image is licensed that determines whether and how it can be used. Some of the images you're referring to may actual be ones uploaded to Wikimedia Commons under a free license that Wikipedia accepts, or their might be other things about the particular use which satisfies relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines in a way that the one you uploaded doesn't. Another possibilty could simply be that the other image(s) you saw are ones that aren't allowed and it's just a case that nobody has noticed them yet. If you disagree with what I've posted above and still feel that the file you upload does satisfy relevant Wikipedia policy (please read WP:ITSFAIRUSE and WP:NFC#Background for how Wikipedia's policy differs from fair use), then you can follow the instructions in the template I added to the file's page and explain why by posting on the file's talk page. The administrator who reviews the file will see your post and take it into account when they decide whether the file should be deleted. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 08:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, thank you for your notice on File:Indian_Summer_2019_Press_Photo.jpeg. Looks like I misunderstood the fair-use criterion, will contact the rights holder for release. In the mean time I'm happy for the image to be taken down - PandaSuit2 ( talk) 01:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)