![]() |
The result was no consensus. This does not preclude merging or redirecting the article. – Joe ( talk) 10:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Can't find anything but postal directories about this village — not even its coordinates. Unsourced since creation in 2011. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 13:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
22:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Census tracts, abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.– I've looked through all the links provided here and have not been convinced this isn't some census-generated subdivision of Arakuzha. The links to news sites showing that there is a post office in Memadangu are irrelevant to me. The existence of a post office does not prove that the location it's named after is a populated place, and as Geschichte pointed out, there's also one of those post office entries for a bus stand, which is clearly not notable. Toadspike [Talk] 09:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Alexandria, Minnesota#Television. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 03:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the necessary coverage to meet the WP:NCORP. A 2010 AfD closed as no consensus but notability thresholds have changed significantly in the past 14 years. Let'srun ( talk) 21:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
22:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
An article that doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. While the notability of Chapter Four Uganda is questioned, I simply may conclude deletion. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
21:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
22:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
There are now only two articles about this topic: Ballymurreen (also known as Ballymoreen), an article which includes the electoral district; and Ballymoreen (townland). See Talk:Ballymoreen (disambiguation)#Merger proposal which appears to have been executed. A disambiguation page is therefore not now required ( WP:ONEOTHER). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed this article thrice to determine whether it is considered worthy of a Wikipedia entry. Firstly, I saw there were good sources as though a reviewer will do. I now checked the sources and almost a good percentage weren't reliable per WP:RS. Religion of sources and lack of WP:SIRS definitely defined this type of article.
In second checking for confirmation, I discovered so many sources lined her perhaps a single line other quote while addressing her as a worker at Penal. I would have said this should be redirected to the organisation page but didn't see any advocacy worthy enough for WP:ATD. Another subtle was drive by the award nomination. This cannot be called WP:ANYBIO since it was once nominated and wasn't won (it's is also a lesser award, thus not major like ANYBIO. I've therefore brought this to the table proper discussion. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A review of newly found sources would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
21:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very poorly cited and not at all neutral
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 20:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of this American football player to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSPERSON. The most I did find was a few sentences here, which is not totally unsurprising considering he was a replacement player who played three NFL games. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources found. Zero citations for 16 years. External link is a YouTube video called "KHARPOLICE 2" purporting to show "Iranian men playing Kharpolis" at Cachuma Lake, California, in 2010. (And the only comment on the video is "CHINCHE AL AGUA" which I guess is supposed to verify that the Mexican game is the same as the Iranian game.) Either this is WP:OR or possibly even WP:HOAX. Cielquiparle ( talk) 20:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
20:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The sources are almost entirely PR-based or non-independent. No actual in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources, just press releases and blog posts. Wikilover3509 ( talk) 14:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
19:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
20:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 10:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm a bit unsure about this one, as he seemed to have a rather robust career, but it was entirely at the non-league, semi-pro level. There doesn't seem to be much of any WP:SIGCOV outside of this local newspaper coverage. I'd like to see what consensus is here, as it feels like a "delete" for me, but I'm curious what others think. Anwegmann ( talk) 17:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like delete, but out of respect to the previous relister who sought a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus, this should have one final relisting to allow for some additional discussion, any at all.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
19:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to assess newly found sources. Otherwise a Redirect to a players' list might be appropriate.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 20:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political figure, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NPOL. As usual, unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates -- the notability test at NPOL is winning the election and thereby holding the office, while a candidate gets to have an article in advance of the election only if he can credibly claim to have already established permanent notability for other reasons besides the mere fact of being a candidate per se. But this makes no such claim, and is not referenced anywhere near well enough to claim that he would somehow pass
WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation after July 4 if he wins the seat, but nothing here is grounds for him to already have an article now.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very minimal significant coverage from reliable sources; majority of sources are from a suspected fan site. Could not find recent coverage in a WP:BEFORE. Fails WP:GNG. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 15:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
17:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and the article only links to primary sources. toweli ( talk) 17:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, and probably WP:BLP1E and WP:NCRIME. Mdann52 ( talk) 14:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NBAND / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Chronology of early-modern British women playwrights. Moving to a new title can be discussed separately on the merged Talk page. Owen× ☎ 19:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This is a duplicate list of Chronology of early-modern British women playwrights, just sorted alphabetically. Either this functionally should be merged into that article, or just use a category like Category:Women writers (early modern), which already sorts alphabetically. Having to maintain two identical lists is pointless. Gonnym ( talk) 16:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. PROD removed back in 2009 by article creator. Sources are non-independent (e.g. press releases) or trivial (e.g. The Telegraph piece briefly mentions the company appears in a top-50 list). There's a lot in the FT Adviser but these seem to be thinly rehashed press releases ( example), not independent analysis. – Tera tix ₵ 16:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Subject isn’t inherently notable based on NPOL nor passes any of the other basic and general criteria. Sources are either routine converses or dependent on the subject. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 16:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Subject isn’t inherently notable based on NPOL nor passes any of the other basic and general criteria. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 15:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cyber Group Studios#Animated television series as a sensible ATD. Owen× ☎ 19:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022.
None of the other 6 language articles appears to have any citations that can be used to establish notability.
Previous AfD ended in no consensus, so I am trying again to determine if this is notable and should be kept, or if it isn't and should be deleted or redirected. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Only 1 article links to this, the suburb where he is from. The sources are all primary and mostly not significant coverage. The obituary cited is by the organisation he was involved in so it's not independent. Article worked on by an editor with same surname. LibStar ( talk) 13:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete. No notable information. A similar article could be written about just about anyone. Athel cb ( talk) 14:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. – Joe ( talk) 10:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
I nominated this before but it was closed as no consensus since there were no other participates. Same reasoning as before applies: fails WP:MUSICBIO and quite promotional. Can’t find any in-depth sources on the subject. The cited Washington Post article [24] is about the subject’s father, Wayne Stetina. Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 21:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
The articles below are relaible,
And these below are helpful,
Easily notable! He's had a huge influence on a good amount of major notable guitarists. I can find more but I have been drawn into this as I do sometimes and have neglected other stuff.
Thanks
Going on what user Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert said earlier with "together they peek just over the edge", well with what I've come up with, the interviews by respected news sources etc., his contributions to major music magazines etc., collectively they well and truly sit on top of the table. And the Modern Drummer review proves it more. And this below, a C&P of what I edited into the article page,
According to La Scena Musicale, Stetina was booked along with Leo Kottke, Antoine Dufour, Ana Vidovic, and Jonathan Kreisberg to appear at the Wilson Center Guitar Competition & Festival which ran from August 13 to 15, 2015, at the Sharon Lynne Wilson Center for the Arts. La Scena Musicale, 3 August 2015 - International Guitar Legends Headlining Wilson Center Guitar Competition & Festival: 2015 Artists include Leo Kottke, Antoine Dufour, Ana Vidovic, Jonathan Kreisberg, Troy Stetina
It's obvious when Stetina is mentioned in the same headline such as these premier artists, he's well and widely known in various fields and notable. His volume of work speaks for itself, especially when artists such as Mark Tremonti, Michael Angelo Batio, Bill Peck, and Eric Friedman appear on Troy Stetina: The Sound and the Story etc. etc.. For him not to be notable would be an exception to the rule.
Yes, I see that you've opened an RSN discussion on Metal Shock. OK, what can I say.
The fact that Stetina has written for two of the two of the biggest selling guitar mags is additional proof of his status. He was employed by Guitar One and wrote for Guitar World. Just a quick grab of the Ozwinds site where it says, "Go inside the mind of one of the most accomplished guitar instructors in history", you said something previously that this was copied from his website. Well, perhaps one or two others may have done this, or he has copied on to his website what has been said about him. Most to the majority of sites refer to him as something similar, I guess this is because this is what he is!
To tell the truth I'm not that keen on heavy metal or this type of music. I had heard of Stetina in the past but didn't know that much about him. If I didn't think he was notable I would have just gone for a re-direct or maybe wouldn't have bothered at all.
Karl Twist ( talk) 06:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as I don't see a consensus yet and different assessments of the existing sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Left-Handed Guitar: The Complete Method by Stetina, Troy | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Fretboard Mastery [With CD] by Troy Stetina | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Guitar Noise | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Modern Drummer Issue 166 | ![]() |
![]() |
~ This is a review of one of Stetina's books. There is no mention/ WP:SIGCOV of Stetina at all | ~ Partial |
Guitar One Magazine February 2006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
OnMilwaukee Interview | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Metalshockfinland | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Maximum Ink Interview | ![]() |
? A non-notable, local music magazine. Can't find editorial polices, editorial board, etc.. The interview also contains a link to Stetina's Wikipedia page at the bottom and links to purchase the subject's CDs. Appears WP:QS and WP:PROMOTIONAL | ![]() |
✘ No |
guitariste-metal.fr | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Ad in La Seine Musicale | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
The Journal Times | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Billboard Jan 1995 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
www.ultimate-guitar.com | ? Likely a press release | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Musicradar | ![]() |
![]() |
~ | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 20:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I even more stand by what I said that Stetina is a notable subject. His being a writer for two of the largest guitar mags in the US as well as holding guitar clinics in events that have internationally known prestigious artists is just one aspect. Many others ... etc. etc. etc. Below is an interesting indicator from Jstor,
...and Heavy Metal Lead Guitar Vol. 1&2 by Troy Stetina are two such examples. Also noteworthy is his 1991,
Speed Mechanics for Lead Guitar In an interview with Guitariste Métal, Stetina was asked about his sales figure
he replied: Speed Mechanics for Lead Guitar is the biggest seller now. Maybe 300,000...
Thanks Karl Twist ( talk) 04:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
11:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Slovakia at the 2014 Winter Olympics#Luge. ✗ plicit 13:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Slovakia at the 2014 Winter Olympics#Luge as ATD because I could not find any in-depth coverage about this luger to meet WP:GNG. All I found on news websites were passing mentions about his participation at the tournament. He was not even on top three luge winners. There are two interlanguage Wikipedia in Norsk Bokmål (Norwegian) and Slovak, the latter of which might help copy over English article, but neither said wiki's provide significant coverage. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 11:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
It is still WP:TOOEARLY to create this article. There are no sources discussing the topic and the election can be held earlier than in 2027. For example, the article for the previous 2022 presidential election was created 1 year before the elections, considering that we had sources discussing the topic and potential presidential candidates. This is not the case for the 2027 election. Vacant0 ( talk) 10:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTDIRECTORY. According to S. P. Sailaja article, she sang over 10,000 songs. A full (and unreferenced!) list of them is completely unwarranted. Broc ( talk) 09:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
Broc ( talk) 09:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wiślica#History. Despite all the time and effort, no additional sources were found. If and when sources are found that establish independent notability beyond what was presented here, any editor is welcome to restore this page as a standalone article. Owen× ☎ 19:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
As
no consensuson 6 April 2024); and
I hereby formally propose to either draftify Sack of Wiślica (if any editor is willing to adopt it), or to redirect it to Wiślica#History. (Note: Ruthenian raid on Poland (1135) was renamed to Sack of Wiślica on 3 June 2024 by agreement between NLeeuw and Piotrus on the talk page, so this could be regarded as a 2nd nomination of Ruthenian raid on Poland (1135)).
Rationale:
WP:NOPAGE; fails
WP:SIGCOV for
WP:GNG for a stand-alone page, and the sources used so far create
WP:POV issues as well. It is one of several dubious articles written by now-blocked
User:SebbeKg (previously we agreed to delete
SebbeKg's article
Bolesław II the Bold's expedition to Kiev (1076–1077) on 27 May). Editors seem to agree that the event took place, but nothing for certain can be said about in detail, as all the sources cited are either
WP:PRIMARY (Kadłubek, and in the case of Długosz someone who wrote centuries later and added details that are not historically credible), or
WP:USERGENERATED &
WP:POV (in the case of KWORUM), or
WP:SELFPUB (in the case of Dawne Kieleckie). Everyone agrees that the only substantial
WP:RS is Benyskiewicz (2020), and that this source alone is not enough.
The disagreement is that User:Piotrus would like to keep a stand-alone page based on RS that are yet to be found, and that someone else should find and add these yet-to-be-found RS (citing WP:BEFORE), whereas User:Marcelus and I think that this event could easily be summarised in 1 to 3 sentences in Wiślica#History by reference to Benyskiewicz (2020), at least for now. Alternately, Marcelus and I think the current article could be draftified for now, but Piotrus has declined my offer to adopt it as a draft, citing having too little time to do it himself, and proposing to add Template:Sources exist to motivate other users to do it instead. However, the template does not allow such usage (see also Wikipedia:But there must be sources!). I have argued that the present situation of keeping the article in the mainspace as is, is not acceptable either, because it evidently is not ready for the mainspace (if it ever merits a stand-alone article at all).
So, if nobody is willing to adopt the draft, Marcelus and I are proposing to redirect Sack of Wiślica to Wiślica#History until an editor (Piotrus or someone else) finds enough material, based on WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS, written with an WP:NPOV, for a stand-alone page, and has written that page. I already created such a redirect WP:BOLDly, which was BOLDly reverted by Piotrus, and that is fine per WP:BRD. But if there is consensus in this AfD to create a redirect, this may not be reverted BOLDly again until the conditions above for a stand-alone page are met.
Other than that I would like to say that I have generally enjoyed cooperating with Piotrus on this topic amicably. But a formal decision seems to be necessary to break the deadlock on the future of this article, and Piotrus has suggested that taking it to AfD a second time might settle the matter, so here I am. Good day to everyone. :) NLeeuw ( talk) 06:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
02:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
08:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
In 1182, Casimir was involved in disputes over power in Halicko-Wlodzimierska Rus'. In that year, Casimir's army attacked Brest, with the intention of installing Svyatoslav Mstislavovich, son of Agnes, daughter of Boleslav the Wry-mouthed and Salomea of Berg, on the throne there.
Svyatoslav's candidacy was opposed by Agnes's younger sons, with whom Prince Vsevolod of Bełsk set out for Brest, along with reinforcements from the principalities of Vladimir and Halych, and the Yotvingians and Polovtsians. Casimir eventually won a victory over the reinforcements coming to Brest's rescue, and also captured the city itself. He achieved his political goal, and installed his chosen prince Sviatoslav on the throne. The 1182 expedition to Brest was thus his complete success. This state of affairs did not last long - after a short time the established prince was poisoned. The exact date of this event is not clear; it probably happened as early as 1183. Casimir did not fail to act, and installed his other nephew, Prince Roman Mstislavovich of Vladimir, on the throne
The result was Duplicate AFD. This is a duplicate nomination, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isha Malviya (2nd nomination). Feel free to move any comments to the other AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 07:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
The article heavily relies on unreliable sources as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Single significant role in Udaariyaan. Does not meet WP:SIGCOV and WP:N. Editingmylove ( talk) 02:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
The article concerns a single incident of the ongoing
English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present) and does not need to have its own article.
Firsttwintop (
talk)
22:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC) —
Firsttwintop (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. ( Blocked
sockpuppet)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus. As an aside, it's interesting that this nomination (originally a PROD) was one of this editor's first edits. How did you even know about AFDs?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
*Merge to
English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present). The article is one separate event of a series of migrant crossings that have been going on for years. It may be overtaken in the future by a higher number of deaths. There is no reason for individual events of this series of migrant crossings to have their own page when they can be properly accommodated in
English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present).
Mariawest1965 (
talk)
17:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked
sockpuppet)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far, no one has supported the nomination with a specific delete !vote, but the !votes are divided between keep and merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 04:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 21:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to see an evaluation of recently located sources, perhaps from the nominator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet any notability standards. The most notable thing about him is that he is the father of two players, but this is Wikipedia, not WikiTree. That he managed a high school team may get him some mentions in newspaper articles, but where those don't relate to his more famous sons, they are "local newspapers", which also don't make him notable. The rest is best handled on his sons' pages. Renerpho ( talk) 22:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of radio stations in New York. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient-notability low-power religious FM. Redirect conversion reverted by IP. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 03:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Working actor, reasonable career, but I couldn't find sources available to confirm he meets WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Lots of mentions on less reliable sites/blogs. Weak keep in 2006 when our standards were much lower. Boleyn ( talk) 07:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
07:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jon Haylett. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK. Can't find any reviews, not even in PW/Kirkus/Booklist afaict. Please ping me if coverage can be found. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 03:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This list is much too broad and conflicts with WP:SALAT. gidonb ( talk) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vietnam representatives at international male beauty pageants, this list of pageant contestants lacks notability under WP:LISTN. The only source in the article currently is to Miss World, which is primary. Let'srun ( talk) 00:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was no consensus. This does not preclude merging or redirecting the article. – Joe ( talk) 10:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Can't find anything but postal directories about this village — not even its coordinates. Unsourced since creation in 2011. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 13:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
22:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Census tracts, abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.– I've looked through all the links provided here and have not been convinced this isn't some census-generated subdivision of Arakuzha. The links to news sites showing that there is a post office in Memadangu are irrelevant to me. The existence of a post office does not prove that the location it's named after is a populated place, and as Geschichte pointed out, there's also one of those post office entries for a bus stand, which is clearly not notable. Toadspike [Talk] 09:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Alexandria, Minnesota#Television. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 03:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the necessary coverage to meet the WP:NCORP. A 2010 AfD closed as no consensus but notability thresholds have changed significantly in the past 14 years. Let'srun ( talk) 21:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
22:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
An article that doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. While the notability of Chapter Four Uganda is questioned, I simply may conclude deletion. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
21:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
22:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
There are now only two articles about this topic: Ballymurreen (also known as Ballymoreen), an article which includes the electoral district; and Ballymoreen (townland). See Talk:Ballymoreen (disambiguation)#Merger proposal which appears to have been executed. A disambiguation page is therefore not now required ( WP:ONEOTHER). Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed this article thrice to determine whether it is considered worthy of a Wikipedia entry. Firstly, I saw there were good sources as though a reviewer will do. I now checked the sources and almost a good percentage weren't reliable per WP:RS. Religion of sources and lack of WP:SIRS definitely defined this type of article.
In second checking for confirmation, I discovered so many sources lined her perhaps a single line other quote while addressing her as a worker at Penal. I would have said this should be redirected to the organisation page but didn't see any advocacy worthy enough for WP:ATD. Another subtle was drive by the award nomination. This cannot be called WP:ANYBIO since it was once nominated and wasn't won (it's is also a lesser award, thus not major like ANYBIO. I've therefore brought this to the table proper discussion. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 19:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A review of newly found sources would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
21:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very poorly cited and not at all neutral
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 20:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of this American football player to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTSPERSON. The most I did find was a few sentences here, which is not totally unsurprising considering he was a replacement player who played three NFL games. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
No sources found. Zero citations for 16 years. External link is a YouTube video called "KHARPOLICE 2" purporting to show "Iranian men playing Kharpolis" at Cachuma Lake, California, in 2010. (And the only comment on the video is "CHINCHE AL AGUA" which I guess is supposed to verify that the Mexican game is the same as the Iranian game.) Either this is WP:OR or possibly even WP:HOAX. Cielquiparle ( talk) 20:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
20:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The sources are almost entirely PR-based or non-independent. No actual in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources, just press releases and blog posts. Wikilover3509 ( talk) 14:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
19:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
20:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 ( talk) 10:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm a bit unsure about this one, as he seemed to have a rather robust career, but it was entirely at the non-league, semi-pro level. There doesn't seem to be much of any WP:SIGCOV outside of this local newspaper coverage. I'd like to see what consensus is here, as it feels like a "delete" for me, but I'm curious what others think. Anwegmann ( talk) 17:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
08:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like delete, but out of respect to the previous relister who sought a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus, this should have one final relisting to allow for some additional discussion, any at all.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
19:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to assess newly found sources. Otherwise a Redirect to a players' list might be appropriate.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 20:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political figure, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:NPOL. As usual, unelected candidates for office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates -- the notability test at NPOL is winning the election and thereby holding the office, while a candidate gets to have an article in advance of the election only if he can credibly claim to have already established permanent notability for other reasons besides the mere fact of being a candidate per se. But this makes no such claim, and is not referenced anywhere near well enough to claim that he would somehow pass
WP:GNG in lieu of having to pass NPOL.
Obviously no prejudice against recreation after July 4 if he wins the seat, but nothing here is grounds for him to already have an article now.
Bearcat (
talk)
17:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Very minimal significant coverage from reliable sources; majority of sources are from a suspected fan site. Could not find recent coverage in a WP:BEFORE. Fails WP:GNG. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 15:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
17:32, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:34, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and the article only links to primary sources. toweli ( talk) 17:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, and probably WP:BLP1E and WP:NCRIME. Mdann52 ( talk) 14:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NBAND / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Chronology of early-modern British women playwrights. Moving to a new title can be discussed separately on the merged Talk page. Owen× ☎ 19:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This is a duplicate list of Chronology of early-modern British women playwrights, just sorted alphabetically. Either this functionally should be merged into that article, or just use a category like Category:Women writers (early modern), which already sorts alphabetically. Having to maintain two identical lists is pointless. Gonnym ( talk) 16:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 22:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. PROD removed back in 2009 by article creator. Sources are non-independent (e.g. press releases) or trivial (e.g. The Telegraph piece briefly mentions the company appears in a top-50 list). There's a lot in the FT Adviser but these seem to be thinly rehashed press releases ( example), not independent analysis. – Tera tix ₵ 16:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Subject isn’t inherently notable based on NPOL nor passes any of the other basic and general criteria. Sources are either routine converses or dependent on the subject. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 16:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL, WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Subject isn’t inherently notable based on NPOL nor passes any of the other basic and general criteria. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 15:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Cyber Group Studios#Animated television series as a sensible ATD. Owen× ☎ 19:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022.
None of the other 6 language articles appears to have any citations that can be used to establish notability.
Previous AfD ended in no consensus, so I am trying again to determine if this is notable and should be kept, or if it isn't and should be deleted or redirected. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Only 1 article links to this, the suburb where he is from. The sources are all primary and mostly not significant coverage. The obituary cited is by the organisation he was involved in so it's not independent. Article worked on by an editor with same surname. LibStar ( talk) 13:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete. No notable information. A similar article could be written about just about anyone. Athel cb ( talk) 14:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. – Joe ( talk) 10:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
I nominated this before but it was closed as no consensus since there were no other participates. Same reasoning as before applies: fails WP:MUSICBIO and quite promotional. Can’t find any in-depth sources on the subject. The cited Washington Post article [24] is about the subject’s father, Wayne Stetina. Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 21:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
The articles below are relaible,
And these below are helpful,
Easily notable! He's had a huge influence on a good amount of major notable guitarists. I can find more but I have been drawn into this as I do sometimes and have neglected other stuff.
Thanks
Going on what user Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert said earlier with "together they peek just over the edge", well with what I've come up with, the interviews by respected news sources etc., his contributions to major music magazines etc., collectively they well and truly sit on top of the table. And the Modern Drummer review proves it more. And this below, a C&P of what I edited into the article page,
According to La Scena Musicale, Stetina was booked along with Leo Kottke, Antoine Dufour, Ana Vidovic, and Jonathan Kreisberg to appear at the Wilson Center Guitar Competition & Festival which ran from August 13 to 15, 2015, at the Sharon Lynne Wilson Center for the Arts. La Scena Musicale, 3 August 2015 - International Guitar Legends Headlining Wilson Center Guitar Competition & Festival: 2015 Artists include Leo Kottke, Antoine Dufour, Ana Vidovic, Jonathan Kreisberg, Troy Stetina
It's obvious when Stetina is mentioned in the same headline such as these premier artists, he's well and widely known in various fields and notable. His volume of work speaks for itself, especially when artists such as Mark Tremonti, Michael Angelo Batio, Bill Peck, and Eric Friedman appear on Troy Stetina: The Sound and the Story etc. etc.. For him not to be notable would be an exception to the rule.
Yes, I see that you've opened an RSN discussion on Metal Shock. OK, what can I say.
The fact that Stetina has written for two of the two of the biggest selling guitar mags is additional proof of his status. He was employed by Guitar One and wrote for Guitar World. Just a quick grab of the Ozwinds site where it says, "Go inside the mind of one of the most accomplished guitar instructors in history", you said something previously that this was copied from his website. Well, perhaps one or two others may have done this, or he has copied on to his website what has been said about him. Most to the majority of sites refer to him as something similar, I guess this is because this is what he is!
To tell the truth I'm not that keen on heavy metal or this type of music. I had heard of Stetina in the past but didn't know that much about him. If I didn't think he was notable I would have just gone for a re-direct or maybe wouldn't have bothered at all.
Karl Twist ( talk) 06:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as I don't see a consensus yet and different assessments of the existing sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Left-Handed Guitar: The Complete Method by Stetina, Troy | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Fretboard Mastery [With CD] by Troy Stetina | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Guitar Noise | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Modern Drummer Issue 166 | ![]() |
![]() |
~ This is a review of one of Stetina's books. There is no mention/ WP:SIGCOV of Stetina at all | ~ Partial |
Guitar One Magazine February 2006 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
OnMilwaukee Interview | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Metalshockfinland | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Maximum Ink Interview | ![]() |
? A non-notable, local music magazine. Can't find editorial polices, editorial board, etc.. The interview also contains a link to Stetina's Wikipedia page at the bottom and links to purchase the subject's CDs. Appears WP:QS and WP:PROMOTIONAL | ![]() |
✘ No |
guitariste-metal.fr | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Ad in La Seine Musicale | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
The Journal Times | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Billboard Jan 1995 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
www.ultimate-guitar.com | ? Likely a press release | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Musicradar | ![]() |
![]() |
~ | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Dr. Swag Lord ( talk) 20:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
I even more stand by what I said that Stetina is a notable subject. His being a writer for two of the largest guitar mags in the US as well as holding guitar clinics in events that have internationally known prestigious artists is just one aspect. Many others ... etc. etc. etc. Below is an interesting indicator from Jstor,
...and Heavy Metal Lead Guitar Vol. 1&2 by Troy Stetina are two such examples. Also noteworthy is his 1991,
Speed Mechanics for Lead Guitar In an interview with Guitariste Métal, Stetina was asked about his sales figure
he replied: Speed Mechanics for Lead Guitar is the biggest seller now. Maybe 300,000...
Thanks Karl Twist ( talk) 04:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
11:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Slovakia at the 2014 Winter Olympics#Luge. ✗ plicit 13:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Slovakia at the 2014 Winter Olympics#Luge as ATD because I could not find any in-depth coverage about this luger to meet WP:GNG. All I found on news websites were passing mentions about his participation at the tournament. He was not even on top three luge winners. There are two interlanguage Wikipedia in Norsk Bokmål (Norwegian) and Slovak, the latter of which might help copy over English article, but neither said wiki's provide significant coverage. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 11:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
It is still WP:TOOEARLY to create this article. There are no sources discussing the topic and the election can be held earlier than in 2027. For example, the article for the previous 2022 presidential election was created 1 year before the elections, considering that we had sources discussing the topic and potential presidential candidates. This is not the case for the 2027 election. Vacant0 ( talk) 10:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTDIRECTORY. According to S. P. Sailaja article, she sang over 10,000 songs. A full (and unreferenced!) list of them is completely unwarranted. Broc ( talk) 09:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
Broc ( talk) 09:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wiślica#History. Despite all the time and effort, no additional sources were found. If and when sources are found that establish independent notability beyond what was presented here, any editor is welcome to restore this page as a standalone article. Owen× ☎ 19:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
As
no consensuson 6 April 2024); and
I hereby formally propose to either draftify Sack of Wiślica (if any editor is willing to adopt it), or to redirect it to Wiślica#History. (Note: Ruthenian raid on Poland (1135) was renamed to Sack of Wiślica on 3 June 2024 by agreement between NLeeuw and Piotrus on the talk page, so this could be regarded as a 2nd nomination of Ruthenian raid on Poland (1135)).
Rationale:
WP:NOPAGE; fails
WP:SIGCOV for
WP:GNG for a stand-alone page, and the sources used so far create
WP:POV issues as well. It is one of several dubious articles written by now-blocked
User:SebbeKg (previously we agreed to delete
SebbeKg's article
Bolesław II the Bold's expedition to Kiev (1076–1077) on 27 May). Editors seem to agree that the event took place, but nothing for certain can be said about in detail, as all the sources cited are either
WP:PRIMARY (Kadłubek, and in the case of Długosz someone who wrote centuries later and added details that are not historically credible), or
WP:USERGENERATED &
WP:POV (in the case of KWORUM), or
WP:SELFPUB (in the case of Dawne Kieleckie). Everyone agrees that the only substantial
WP:RS is Benyskiewicz (2020), and that this source alone is not enough.
The disagreement is that User:Piotrus would like to keep a stand-alone page based on RS that are yet to be found, and that someone else should find and add these yet-to-be-found RS (citing WP:BEFORE), whereas User:Marcelus and I think that this event could easily be summarised in 1 to 3 sentences in Wiślica#History by reference to Benyskiewicz (2020), at least for now. Alternately, Marcelus and I think the current article could be draftified for now, but Piotrus has declined my offer to adopt it as a draft, citing having too little time to do it himself, and proposing to add Template:Sources exist to motivate other users to do it instead. However, the template does not allow such usage (see also Wikipedia:But there must be sources!). I have argued that the present situation of keeping the article in the mainspace as is, is not acceptable either, because it evidently is not ready for the mainspace (if it ever merits a stand-alone article at all).
So, if nobody is willing to adopt the draft, Marcelus and I are proposing to redirect Sack of Wiślica to Wiślica#History until an editor (Piotrus or someone else) finds enough material, based on WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS, written with an WP:NPOV, for a stand-alone page, and has written that page. I already created such a redirect WP:BOLDly, which was BOLDly reverted by Piotrus, and that is fine per WP:BRD. But if there is consensus in this AfD to create a redirect, this may not be reverted BOLDly again until the conditions above for a stand-alone page are met.
Other than that I would like to say that I have generally enjoyed cooperating with Piotrus on this topic amicably. But a formal decision seems to be necessary to break the deadlock on the future of this article, and Piotrus has suggested that taking it to AfD a second time might settle the matter, so here I am. Good day to everyone. :) NLeeuw ( talk) 06:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
02:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
08:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
In 1182, Casimir was involved in disputes over power in Halicko-Wlodzimierska Rus'. In that year, Casimir's army attacked Brest, with the intention of installing Svyatoslav Mstislavovich, son of Agnes, daughter of Boleslav the Wry-mouthed and Salomea of Berg, on the throne there.
Svyatoslav's candidacy was opposed by Agnes's younger sons, with whom Prince Vsevolod of Bełsk set out for Brest, along with reinforcements from the principalities of Vladimir and Halych, and the Yotvingians and Polovtsians. Casimir eventually won a victory over the reinforcements coming to Brest's rescue, and also captured the city itself. He achieved his political goal, and installed his chosen prince Sviatoslav on the throne. The 1182 expedition to Brest was thus his complete success. This state of affairs did not last long - after a short time the established prince was poisoned. The exact date of this event is not clear; it probably happened as early as 1183. Casimir did not fail to act, and installed his other nephew, Prince Roman Mstislavovich of Vladimir, on the throne
The result was Duplicate AFD. This is a duplicate nomination, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isha Malviya (2nd nomination). Feel free to move any comments to the other AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 07:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
The article heavily relies on unreliable sources as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Single significant role in Udaariyaan. Does not meet WP:SIGCOV and WP:N. Editingmylove ( talk) 02:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
The article concerns a single incident of the ongoing
English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present) and does not need to have its own article.
Firsttwintop (
talk)
22:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC) —
Firsttwintop (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. ( Blocked
sockpuppet)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus. As an aside, it's interesting that this nomination (originally a PROD) was one of this editor's first edits. How did you even know about AFDs?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
*Merge to
English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present). The article is one separate event of a series of migrant crossings that have been going on for years. It may be overtaken in the future by a higher number of deaths. There is no reason for individual events of this series of migrant crossings to have their own page when they can be properly accommodated in
English Channel migrant crossings (2018–present).
Mariawest1965 (
talk)
17:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC) ( Blocked
sockpuppet)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far, no one has supported the nomination with a specific delete !vote, but the !votes are divided between keep and merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 04:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 21:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to see an evaluation of recently located sources, perhaps from the nominator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 04:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet any notability standards. The most notable thing about him is that he is the father of two players, but this is Wikipedia, not WikiTree. That he managed a high school team may get him some mentions in newspaper articles, but where those don't relate to his more famous sons, they are "local newspapers", which also don't make him notable. The rest is best handled on his sons' pages. Renerpho ( talk) 22:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
05:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of radio stations in New York. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient-notability low-power religious FM. Redirect conversion reverted by IP. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 03:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Working actor, reasonable career, but I couldn't find sources available to confirm he meets WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Lots of mentions on less reliable sites/blogs. Weak keep in 2006 when our standards were much lower. Boleyn ( talk) 07:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
07:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jon Haylett. Liz Read! Talk! 02:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK. Can't find any reviews, not even in PW/Kirkus/Booklist afaict. Please ping me if coverage can be found. ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 03:06, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This list is much too broad and conflicts with WP:SALAT. gidonb ( talk) 01:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:33, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Vietnam representatives at international male beauty pageants, this list of pageant contestants lacks notability under WP:LISTN. The only source in the article currently is to Miss World, which is primary. Let'srun ( talk) 00:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)