![]() |
The result was keep. There is consensus that the fr-wiki article provides references adequate to meet en-wiki notability standards. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 06:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 20:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
22:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed as "delete", but restored per
Nfitz's request on my talk page as they meant to !vote "keep" above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of some John Doe "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails WP:GEOLAND because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails WP:GNG for lack of SIGCOV. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Victoria first-class cricketers. ✗ plicit 23:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Shaun Prescott
Stub article by User:Lugnuts that does not satisfy sports notability in general or cricket notability in particular. The only reference is a database entry. The cricket notability guideline states that significant coverage may exist for individuals who have played first-class cricket at the highest domestic levels, but should not be presumed (and is not present).
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Another non-notable railroad waypoint being falsely called a community; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. PROD was declined on the basis of geographic nominations being controversial. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD was declined on the basis of geographic nominations being controversial. But this is just a non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": [1]. Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD was contested on the grounds that geographic nominations are usually controversial. I don't think there's anything controversial in saying this is a non-notable and not generally recognized location. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: [5], as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was for the road, not any "community". Fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no such place in official sources. It has also been deleted from Azerbaijani Wikipedia. Redivy ( talk) 23:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 03:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a singer, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NMUSIC criteria. The strongest attempt at a notability claim here is that she's been a contributor to Grammy-nominated albums -- but NMUSIC #8 requires the subject to have personally been singled out as an award nominee in her own name for her own contributions, and simply having appeared as a guest musician on an album that somebody else got a Grammy nomination for doesn't count.
But nothing else here meets any NMUSIC criteria at all, and the referencing is depending far too heavily on bad
primary and/or unreliable sources that aren't support for notability -- Bandcamp, blogs, IMDB, etc. -- while the only reliable sources in the bunch are a couple of hits of in the hyperlocal community media of her own hometown (but just having a couple of hits of "local person does stuff" coverage in her own hometown media isn't enough to get her over the bar all by itself if it's the best sourcing she has), a PopMatters album review that briefly mentions Destani Wolf's name without being about her in any non-trivial sense, and a Pitchfork article that fails to name Destani Wolf at all, serving only as tangential verification of one of the Grammy nominations that she wasn't actually the recipient of.
Again: she can't claim "notable because Grammy", because she wasn't personally named as the recipient of any Grammy nominations in her own name, and was merely a contributor to albums that other people got Grammy nominations for, so nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass
WP:GNG on much better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Looks like a minor incident, the only source cited is brief mention from a primary source. But no reliable secondary sources found addressing the topic directly and in-depth. Socialwave597 ( talk) 22:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bobby Miller (musician). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 03:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Originally redirected to Bobby Miller (musician), redirection was contested but I still believe it to be a valid target as I cannot find any WP:SIGCOV for this album to be its own article. Tooncool64 ( talk) 21:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus with a satisfaction of WP:NPOL. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN yet. These people may have won the recent election there's no official ECP notification yet.. As per reports, ECP will publish the notifications of successful candidates by 21 Feb 2024. Furthermore, the results of many seats are being challenged in court due to allegations of rigging. It would be premature for us to declare those individuals as MNAs. Saqib ( talk) 21:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them. Curbon7 ( talk) 04:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject, a Fijian women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG. The closest to WP:SIGCOV I found was a half-dozen sentences of coverage here from the Fiji Sun, which probably fails WP:YOUNGATH. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eugene Jarecki#Public policy. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:NSUSTAINED, see also Talk:Trump Death Clock#Is this still active? FMSky ( talk) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No particular evidence of notability. Article was created by User:ServareManere, the name of the organization that commissioned his supposed masterpiece. Hm. — Biruitorul Talk 20:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 05:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 20:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
A medal created by the head of a minor royal house over a century after it was overthrown and handed out to various random people doesn’t strike me as particularly notable. — Biruitorul Talk 20:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Initially created by the promotional account FleetStreetFilms it is an almost completely unsourced bio with the only two sources being links to winners list for a short film festival, one of which the subject got second place and the other he won best experimental short. The two films wikilinked here were also created by the same promotional account and probably don't pass muster themselves. Appears to fail WP:FILMMAKER. ThaddeusSholto ( talk) 19:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of over-the-air HSN affiliates. Consensus from experience editors, nominator noted a mention. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. In fact, the only time it got mentioned in Tucson's newspapers was in public notices in the classifieds section. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per consensus met for GNG after the additon of new sources. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, and there is no obvious WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can resolve it now. No consensus in 2005 AfD when standards for inclusion were significantly lower. Boleyn ( talk) 10:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of informally named pterosaurs. The consensus is established to redirect and move the article content to List of informally named pterosaurs. The redirect can be done after the merging is complete. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Direct translation of ja-wiki article with no attribution, possible machine translation. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
*Keep. I’m not clear what the deletion rationale is here. If it’s a translation from ja.wiki, add the translation template to the talk page. (The ja.wiki article was created by the same user by the way). If it’s a machine translation it’s not a bad one, but tag it for improvement if you want to. The sources aren’t brilliant but they seem to amount to a GNG pass.
Mccapra (
talk) 16:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC) changing my !vote after reading other editors’ comments
Mccapra (
talk)
07:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Due to the already borderline notability, and taking into account the subject's own request, I find that WP:BLPDELETE / WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE apply. This bio entry of a living person should not be recreated unless there's evidence of significant upward movement to the subject's notability (as WP:NPROF or whatever). El_C 06:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Katchanovski is notable neither as an academic nor as an author, and is not known by the wider public for any reason. His sole claim on public attention is as the origin of a WP:FRINGE theory that the Maidan massacre was a false flag operation. The conspiracy theory has subsequently been disseminated by Russian propaganda sources. The biographical article on Katchanovski is a WP:COATRACK for this contentious political viewpoint, and should be subsumed into the main article on Maidan casualties, should anything be worth rescuing. Nangaf ( talk) 17:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. BeanieFan11's findings provided consensus. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to National University, Bangladesh#Prominent affiliated colleges. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
The consensus of the 2014 discussion was keep, based on it being an accredited degree-granting institution. The days when verifiable existence was enough per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES are long gone. The only source that has ever been cited is the college website.
Searches in English and Bengali found passing mentions, an opinion piece that describes its founding (but is not reliable for facts, per WP:RSEDITORIAL), [53], routine coverage and press releases. [54] There is also a pair of stories from December 2023 alleging corruption. [55] [56] The scenario is difficult to follow, the principal denies everything, and nothing more has been written, so it's unclear what weight to give them towards establishing notability. Worldbruce ( talk) 19:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Rcsprinter123
(collogue)
17:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of educational institutions in Barisal District. Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is not covered in any sources except for one reference provided. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. UserMemer ( chat) Tribs 21:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Rcsprinter123
(parlez)
17:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
This list does not meet MOS:LIST, as less reliable sources and most of them are original research - Jjpachano ( talk) 16:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Armando Diena. Closing as merge to Armando Diena which can then be redirected. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG with a lack of sigcov. Being in the Dizionario della grande Juventus (if reliable and if sigcov) isn't enough. Dougal18 ( talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Aoidh ( talk) 16:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable rural intersection. Was PROD'ed once before in 2020, then dePRODded by the article's creator, who cited WP:GEOLAND, but the article utterly fails WP:GEOLAND since it is sourced entirely to GNIS. No other coverage could be found other than passing mentions in the local press (as a point of reference for where a car accident or property was located). Many rural crossroads were informally named ______'s Corners after the local landowner, for the sake of navigation; this does not mean they were ever a "community". WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Possible hoax, but not notable in any case. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I PRODded the article only for it to be removed with the rationale "deprod, looks like there's already significant coverage". Being mentioned in a paragraph and in a video that is a copyvio is not "significant coverage". I can't find sigcov of Oprey so he fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 15:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Looks like the new sources raised by A412 and clean-up from StreetcarEnjoyer and Lightburst solidifies this consensus. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Merge/redirect to Nokia would give undue relevance in that article. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. However, please note that companies do not need to be extant to be notable, and archived sources do count provided they are otherwise reliable, independent, etc. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. I have got a lot of false positives when looking at this. Boleyn ( talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 23:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 23:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Worthy organisation, but I am not convinced it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 15:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to MNC Vision as a reasonable ATD. Owen× ☎ 23:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Not sure if MNC Channels would be unbalanced by a merge/redirect there. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ARTIST / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. I considered merge/redirect to Waddell & Reed but it doesn't even have a mention in that article at the moment, so may unbalance it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but doesn't appear to meet WP:N as a single event. It doesn't seem to have a suitable WP:ATD - although it could merge/redirect to Dally M Awards, it could cause confusion or unbalance that article. Boleyn ( talk) 15:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 11:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Trying to do some digging to find discussion of him as a character for notability, and at most I've only found scraps. He's a *known* character in terms of Smash and Fire Emblem, but in terms of actual commentary there's nothing I was able to find. Scholar itself also offered no useful results. WP:BEFORE just gives all indications that this is another Smash Bros. character in a long line of them with little said. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bronze Age Europe. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 15:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is a POVFORK of Prehistoric Europe with material also forked from Celts. The article attracts edits about linguistic theories, migration theories etc, that are all treated in better articles, such as Yamnaya culture, Bronze Age Europe, etc., and the only thing distinguishing this from any of these is the term "Celt", but the article is about the time before the Celts, so it is not actually about that. Note that this nomination is not saying pre-celtic history is not notable. For the avoidance of doubt, it certainly is. The European bronze age and earlier are all very notable topics. The nomination is saying the treatment of the subject in this format, with this specific framing, is redundant (and perhaps contradicts better articles). Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable Summit. As grand as it sound this summits actually lacks any depth of coverage in independent reliable sources. Notability is not inherited from those who attended or those who were honoured. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NPOL. Macbeejack ☎ 13:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Stats stub on a footballer that only ever played one match at professional level. In Japanese, I found Kazuamata no Tsuzuri, which is evidently a fan blog for Yokohama FC. I also found a user-submitted blog post on Naver about his wedding, which is no better than a social media post in terms of notability. Neither of these are examples of reliable, independent journalism with high standards for fact checking, therefore they do not confer notability. Doesn't seem to meet WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR/ WP:GNG or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 12:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Racism in English football. ✗ plicit 14:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 12:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Played about 6 minutes of football before retiring. This source is not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG on its own. The only other source on the footballer of this name seems to be Emine Cross, which is not independent as it appears to be his employer. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:N, or have a good WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 12:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Badly sourced BLP on a footballer that only ever played one football match. The best coverage found in Japanese was Goo, a blog post that mentions him in a list of players being released and confirms his date of birth, height, weight and position (so nothing more than a database entry, really) and Targma, which contains a couple of trivial mentions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything in his native language (فرید احمدی) or otherwise to suggest that he meets even WP:SPORTBASIC #5, which is not surprising given that he only played a handful of games in 2003 before seemingly disappearing. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure) --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 16:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable album Jax 0677 ( talk) 11:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Viasat (Nordic television service)#TV channels. ✗ plicit 00:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
The notion that the channels represent 'one brand' and a shared character feels very WP:OR-ish. The channels are obviously notable but I can't find any coverage for the "TV3 brand name" so this article most likely doesn't meet WP:GNG either. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 11:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. The only source that I can find about the season is a Blogspot post, which is not an acceptable source. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this is notable, I know there are some citations given from third parties, but the majority are from primary government sources. The article is discussing a piece of obscure jargon at length, with numerous POV, style, prose, and sourcing issues. If this isn't deleted, it needs to be significantly cut down. toobigtokale ( talk) 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Soccerway does not count towards WP:SPORTBASIC #5 and I couldn't find any evidence of notability in my Burmese and English searches. The MNL is not independent and is only a passing mention and Tribun News is just an image caption from an under-19 fixture. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable person, not pass Wikipedia:Notability. Кронас ( talk) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
As this has passed New Page Patrol and is relatively old now, I am not allowed to send to draft. That said, it currently has no acceptable sources and probably shouldn't have passed. I don't consider a Facebook photo to be acceptable justification for an article. Searching in Burmese (မြန်မာဖူဆယ်လိဂ်), I was unable to find any significant coverage of the 2024 season. News Eleven contains a passing mention of the 2020 season, MT News seems to be about a different tournament and is from 2023, this News Eleven article is from 2024 but is about the national team rather than the league. Searching in English, I can find GNLM but that's about the 2023 season and is painfully brief besides.
In summary, this article is totally inappropriate for mainspace and I can't find any sources to justify it. If someone can find sources that show in-depth coverage of the 2024 season of this competition, I would suggest moving this to draft space. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourcing was cleaned-up/updated, ref-bomb issues were fixed. Hence, recent delete vote was addressed. asilvering did a great job managing this process. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
All the sources are very base: Business exists, business does business things. No notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
20:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
09:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Better sourcing seems to be requested, though – will be tagging this for that. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 08:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NEVENTS per the conditions in WP:COVERAGE. The article was created in 2005 and has been sparsely edited in the 20 years since. There has not been subsequent in-depth coverage that puts the interview into context, such as is often found in books, feature length articles in major news magazines and does not appear to have the lasting significance that notable interviews with other political figures have had, such as An Interview with HRH The Princess of Wales, Nixon interviews, Betty Ford's August 1975 60 Minutes interview, Palin–Couric interviews. True, the interview was on the eve of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but nothing said during the interview or the coverage seems to point to its lasting notability. Longhornsg ( talk) 07:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was a few sentences of coverage here. Everything else that came up in my searches were passing mentions, mostly in Armenian media. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
non-notable User4edits ( talk) 06:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
20:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist for clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
05:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Searches found little to nothing. v/r - Seawolf35 T-- C 04:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Local election for a small city with very little outside coverage, failing WP:GEOSCOPE and WP:GNG. The largest newspaper in its metropolitan area (the Omaha World-Herald) has only a handful of articles and none since the result was determined, failing WP:LASTING. Sounder Bruce 02:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced biography. Unclear notability. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination and single deletion !vote withdrawn, speedy keep per SK1. (non-admin closure) ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 03:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced biography since its creation in 2005. Unclear notability as a Han dynasty eunuch. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. Withdrawn by nominator per sources found by Cunard. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 17:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced biography. Does not seem notable, but unsure if "founding general" means anything, or if his medals confer notability. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The book notes: "【邢荣杰】( 1911 ~ ) 1964 年晋升为中国人民解放军少将军衔。河北省无极县人。 1933 年任国民党保卫团大队长。1937 年参加八路军,同年加入中国共产党。抗日战争时期,任冀西游击队第五大队大队长,司令部参谋长兼三支队支队长,冀豫抗日义勇军参谋长,太行军区第五军分区三十四团参谋长,第八军分区参谋长。解放战争时期,任太行军区第五军分区参谋长,晋冀鲁豫野战军第六纵队十六旅参谋长,第十八旅副旅长兼参谋长,中原军区军政大学总队长,第二野战军十二军三十六师师长。中华人民共和国成立后,任第三兵团师长兼川东军区涪陵军分区司令员,南京军事学院训练部战术教授会教员、副主任,驻越南社会主义共和国大使馆武官,重庆步兵学校校长,陕西省军区副司令员。"
From Google Translate: "[Xing Rongjie] (1911 ~ ) was promoted to the rank of Major General of the Chinese People's Liberation Army in 1964. A native of Wuji County, Hebei Province. In 1933, he was appointed captain of the Kuomintang security regiment. He joined the Eighth Route Army in 1937 and joined the Communist Party of China in the same year. During the Anti-Japanese War, he served as captain of the Fifth Brigade of the Western Hebei Guerrilla Army, chief of staff of the headquarters and captain of the third detachment, chief of staff of the Hebei-Henan Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army, chief of staff of the 34th Regiment of the Fifth Military Division of the Taihang Military Region, and chief of staff of the Eighth Military Division. long. During the War of Liberation, he served as chief of staff of the Fifth Military Division of the Taihang Military Region, chief of staff of the 16th Brigade of the 6th Column of the Shanxi-Hebei-Luyu Field Army, deputy brigade commander and chief of staff of the 18th Brigade, captain of the Military and Political University of the Central Plains Military Region, and 10th Brigade of the Second Field Army. Commander of the 36th Division of the Second Army. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, he served as division commander of the Third Corps and commander of the Fuling Military Division of the Eastern Sichuan Military Region, instructor and deputy director of the Tactics Professor Association of the Training Department of Nanjing Military Academy, military attache of the Embassy in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, principal of Chongqing Infantry School, Shaanxi Province Deputy Commander of the Military Region."
The article notes: "邢荣杰( 1911- )河北省无极县人。 1937 年参加八路军。曾任冀豫抗日义勇军参谋长、陕西省军区副司令员等职。 1964 年晋升为少将军衔。"
From Google Translate: "Xing Rongjie (1911- ) was born in Wuji County, Hebei Province. Joined the Eighth Route Army in 1937. He once served as chief of staff of the Hebei-Henan Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army and deputy commander of the Shaanxi Provincial Military Region. Promoted to the rank of major general in 1964."
The book notes: "邢荣杰( 1911- )原名宝堂,号明山,山东曹县人。东北抗日联军第 11 军军长,东北抗联总司令部副官长。河北无极人。解放军军事学院训练部战术教授会副主任,驻越南社会主义共和国武官,重庆步校校长,少将,陕西省军区副司令员。"
From Google Translate: "Xing Rongjie (1911-), formerly known as Baotang and named Mingshan, was born in Caoxian County, Shandong Province. Commander of the 11th Army of the Northeast Anti-Japanese Allied Forces and deputy commander of the Northeast Anti-Japanese Allied General Headquarters. Hebei Wuji people. Deputy director of the Tactical Professors Association of the Training Department of the PLA Military Academy, military attache stationed in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, principal of Chongqing Infantry School, major general, and deputy commander of the Shaanxi Provincial Military Region."
The book notes: "邢荣杰授衔边疆少将 1911 年出生,河北无极人。刘邓大军进军大别山强渡河时, 18 旅参谋长邢荣杰率 53 团护卫,部队端着刺刀攻击前进,打下一个村庄,又扑向另一个村庄。碰上敌人就打,打完又往前冲。53 团在扫清了沿河几个村庄的敌人之后,歼灭了位于公路北侧"
From Google Translate: "Xing Rongjie was awarded the title of Frontier Major General. Born in 1911, he was born in Wuji, Hebei Province. When Liu and Deng's armies marched into the Dabie Mountains and forcibly crossed the river, Xing Rongjie, chief of staff of the 18th Brigade, led the 53rd Regiment to escort them. The troops attacked and advanced with bayonets in hand. They captured one village and then rushed to another. When you encounter an enemy, fight, and then rush forward after fighting. After clearing out the enemies in several villages along the river, the 53rd Regiment annihilated the enemy on the north side of the highway..."
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Played about 2 minutes of professional league football before disappearing. No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC in my Arabic searches. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. There is consensus that the fr-wiki article provides references adequate to meet en-wiki notability standards. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 06:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 20:40, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
22:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Originally closed as "delete", but restored per
Nfitz's request on my talk page as they meant to !vote "keep" above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of some John Doe "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails WP:GEOLAND because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails WP:GNG for lack of SIGCOV. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Victoria first-class cricketers. ✗ plicit 23:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Shaun Prescott
Stub article by User:Lugnuts that does not satisfy sports notability in general or cricket notability in particular. The only reference is a database entry. The cricket notability guideline states that significant coverage may exist for individuals who have played first-class cricket at the highest domestic levels, but should not be presumed (and is not present).
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Another non-notable railroad waypoint being falsely called a community; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. PROD was declined on the basis of geographic nominations being controversial. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD was declined on the basis of geographic nominations being controversial. But this is just a non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": [1]. Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
PROD was contested on the grounds that geographic nominations are usually controversial. I don't think there's anything controversial in saying this is a non-notable and not generally recognized location. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: [5], as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was for the road, not any "community". Fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
There is no such place in official sources. It has also been deleted from Azerbaijani Wikipedia. Redivy ( talk) 23:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 03:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a singer, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NMUSIC criteria. The strongest attempt at a notability claim here is that she's been a contributor to Grammy-nominated albums -- but NMUSIC #8 requires the subject to have personally been singled out as an award nominee in her own name for her own contributions, and simply having appeared as a guest musician on an album that somebody else got a Grammy nomination for doesn't count.
But nothing else here meets any NMUSIC criteria at all, and the referencing is depending far too heavily on bad
primary and/or unreliable sources that aren't support for notability -- Bandcamp, blogs, IMDB, etc. -- while the only reliable sources in the bunch are a couple of hits of in the hyperlocal community media of her own hometown (but just having a couple of hits of "local person does stuff" coverage in her own hometown media isn't enough to get her over the bar all by itself if it's the best sourcing she has), a PopMatters album review that briefly mentions Destani Wolf's name without being about her in any non-trivial sense, and a Pitchfork article that fails to name Destani Wolf at all, serving only as tangential verification of one of the Grammy nominations that she wasn't actually the recipient of.
Again: she can't claim "notable because Grammy", because she wasn't personally named as the recipient of any Grammy nominations in her own name, and was merely a contributor to albums that other people got Grammy nominations for, so nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass
WP:GNG on much better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Looks like a minor incident, the only source cited is brief mention from a primary source. But no reliable secondary sources found addressing the topic directly and in-depth. Socialwave597 ( talk) 22:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bobby Miller (musician). (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn ( talk) 03:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Originally redirected to Bobby Miller (musician), redirection was contested but I still believe it to be a valid target as I cannot find any WP:SIGCOV for this album to be its own article. Tooncool64 ( talk) 21:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus with a satisfaction of WP:NPOL. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN yet. These people may have won the recent election there's no official ECP notification yet.. As per reports, ECP will publish the notifications of successful candidates by 21 Feb 2024. Furthermore, the results of many seats are being challenged in court due to allegations of rigging. It would be premature for us to declare those individuals as MNAs. Saqib ( talk) 21:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them. Curbon7 ( talk) 04:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject, a Fijian women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG. The closest to WP:SIGCOV I found was a half-dozen sentences of coverage here from the Fiji Sun, which probably fails WP:YOUNGATH. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:26, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eugene Jarecki#Public policy. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:NSUSTAINED, see also Talk:Trump Death Clock#Is this still active? FMSky ( talk) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 23:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No particular evidence of notability. Article was created by User:ServareManere, the name of the organization that commissioned his supposed masterpiece. Hm. — Biruitorul Talk 20:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) GSS 💬 05:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 20:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
A medal created by the head of a minor royal house over a century after it was overthrown and handed out to various random people doesn’t strike me as particularly notable. — Biruitorul Talk 20:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Initially created by the promotional account FleetStreetFilms it is an almost completely unsourced bio with the only two sources being links to winners list for a short film festival, one of which the subject got second place and the other he won best experimental short. The two films wikilinked here were also created by the same promotional account and probably don't pass muster themselves. Appears to fail WP:FILMMAKER. ThaddeusSholto ( talk) 19:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of over-the-air HSN affiliates. Consensus from experience editors, nominator noted a mention. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. In fact, the only time it got mentioned in Tucson's newspapers was in public notices in the classifieds section. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per consensus met for GNG after the additon of new sources. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 06:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, and there is no obvious WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can resolve it now. No consensus in 2005 AfD when standards for inclusion were significantly lower. Boleyn ( talk) 10:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of informally named pterosaurs. The consensus is established to redirect and move the article content to List of informally named pterosaurs. The redirect can be done after the merging is complete. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Direct translation of ja-wiki article with no attribution, possible machine translation. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
*Keep. I’m not clear what the deletion rationale is here. If it’s a translation from ja.wiki, add the translation template to the talk page. (The ja.wiki article was created by the same user by the way). If it’s a machine translation it’s not a bad one, but tag it for improvement if you want to. The sources aren’t brilliant but they seem to amount to a GNG pass.
Mccapra (
talk) 16:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC) changing my !vote after reading other editors’ comments
Mccapra (
talk)
07:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Due to the already borderline notability, and taking into account the subject's own request, I find that WP:BLPDELETE / WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE apply. This bio entry of a living person should not be recreated unless there's evidence of significant upward movement to the subject's notability (as WP:NPROF or whatever). El_C 06:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Katchanovski is notable neither as an academic nor as an author, and is not known by the wider public for any reason. His sole claim on public attention is as the origin of a WP:FRINGE theory that the Maidan massacre was a false flag operation. The conspiracy theory has subsequently been disseminated by Russian propaganda sources. The biographical article on Katchanovski is a WP:COATRACK for this contentious political viewpoint, and should be subsumed into the main article on Maidan casualties, should anything be worth rescuing. Nangaf ( talk) 17:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. BeanieFan11's findings provided consensus. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 17:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to National University, Bangladesh#Prominent affiliated colleges. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
The consensus of the 2014 discussion was keep, based on it being an accredited degree-granting institution. The days when verifiable existence was enough per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES are long gone. The only source that has ever been cited is the college website.
Searches in English and Bengali found passing mentions, an opinion piece that describes its founding (but is not reliable for facts, per WP:RSEDITORIAL), [53], routine coverage and press releases. [54] There is also a pair of stories from December 2023 alleging corruption. [55] [56] The scenario is difficult to follow, the principal denies everything, and nothing more has been written, so it's unclear what weight to give them towards establishing notability. Worldbruce ( talk) 19:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Rcsprinter123
(collogue)
17:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of educational institutions in Barisal District. Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is not covered in any sources except for one reference provided. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. UserMemer ( chat) Tribs 21:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Rcsprinter123
(parlez)
17:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
This list does not meet MOS:LIST, as less reliable sources and most of them are original research - Jjpachano ( talk) 16:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Armando Diena. Closing as merge to Armando Diena which can then be redirected. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG with a lack of sigcov. Being in the Dizionario della grande Juventus (if reliable and if sigcov) isn't enough. Dougal18 ( talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Aoidh ( talk) 16:14, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable rural intersection. Was PROD'ed once before in 2020, then dePRODded by the article's creator, who cited WP:GEOLAND, but the article utterly fails WP:GEOLAND since it is sourced entirely to GNIS. No other coverage could be found other than passing mentions in the local press (as a point of reference for where a car accident or property was located). Many rural crossroads were informally named ______'s Corners after the local landowner, for the sake of navigation; this does not mean they were ever a "community". WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 16:02, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Possible hoax, but not notable in any case. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I PRODded the article only for it to be removed with the rationale "deprod, looks like there's already significant coverage". Being mentioned in a paragraph and in a video that is a copyvio is not "significant coverage". I can't find sigcov of Oprey so he fails GNG. Dougal18 ( talk) 15:58, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Looks like the new sources raised by A412 and clean-up from StreetcarEnjoyer and Lightburst solidifies this consensus. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Merge/redirect to Nokia would give undue relevance in that article. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. However, please note that companies do not need to be extant to be notable, and archived sources do count provided they are otherwise reliable, independent, etc. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. I have got a lot of false positives when looking at this. Boleyn ( talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 23:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 23:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Worthy organisation, but I am not convinced it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 15:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to MNC Vision as a reasonable ATD. Owen× ☎ 23:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Not sure if MNC Channels would be unbalanced by a merge/redirect there. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 18:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ARTIST / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:45, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. I considered merge/redirect to Waddell & Reed but it doesn't even have a mention in that article at the moment, so may unbalance it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but doesn't appear to meet WP:N as a single event. It doesn't seem to have a suitable WP:ATD - although it could merge/redirect to Dally M Awards, it could cause confusion or unbalance that article. Boleyn ( talk) 15:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 11:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Trying to do some digging to find discussion of him as a character for notability, and at most I've only found scraps. He's a *known* character in terms of Smash and Fire Emblem, but in terms of actual commentary there's nothing I was able to find. Scholar itself also offered no useful results. WP:BEFORE just gives all indications that this is another Smash Bros. character in a long line of them with little said. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bronze Age Europe. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 15:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
This article is a POVFORK of Prehistoric Europe with material also forked from Celts. The article attracts edits about linguistic theories, migration theories etc, that are all treated in better articles, such as Yamnaya culture, Bronze Age Europe, etc., and the only thing distinguishing this from any of these is the term "Celt", but the article is about the time before the Celts, so it is not actually about that. Note that this nomination is not saying pre-celtic history is not notable. For the avoidance of doubt, it certainly is. The European bronze age and earlier are all very notable topics. The nomination is saying the treatment of the subject in this format, with this specific framing, is redundant (and perhaps contradicts better articles). Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 14:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable Summit. As grand as it sound this summits actually lacks any depth of coverage in independent reliable sources. Notability is not inherited from those who attended or those who were honoured. duffbeerforme ( talk) 12:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
14:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NPOL. Macbeejack ☎ 13:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Stats stub on a footballer that only ever played one match at professional level. In Japanese, I found Kazuamata no Tsuzuri, which is evidently a fan blog for Yokohama FC. I also found a user-submitted blog post on Naver about his wedding, which is no better than a social media post in terms of notability. Neither of these are examples of reliable, independent journalism with high standards for fact checking, therefore they do not confer notability. Doesn't seem to meet WP:SPORTBASIC. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR/ WP:GNG or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 12:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Racism in English football. ✗ plicit 14:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 12:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Played about 6 minutes of football before retiring. This source is not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG on its own. The only other source on the footballer of this name seems to be Emine Cross, which is not independent as it appears to be his employer. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't appear to meet WP:N, or have a good WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 12:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Badly sourced BLP on a footballer that only ever played one football match. The best coverage found in Japanese was Goo, a blog post that mentions him in a list of players being released and confirms his date of birth, height, weight and position (so nothing more than a database entry, really) and Targma, which contains a couple of trivial mentions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find anything in his native language (فرید احمدی) or otherwise to suggest that he meets even WP:SPORTBASIC #5, which is not surprising given that he only played a handful of games in 2003 before seemingly disappearing. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure) --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 16:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable album Jax 0677 ( talk) 11:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Viasat (Nordic television service)#TV channels. ✗ plicit 00:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
The notion that the channels represent 'one brand' and a shared character feels very WP:OR-ish. The channels are obviously notable but I can't find any coverage for the "TV3 brand name" so this article most likely doesn't meet WP:GNG either. AlexandraAVX ( talk) 11:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
11:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. The only source that I can find about the season is a Blogspot post, which is not an acceptable source. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this is notable, I know there are some citations given from third parties, but the majority are from primary government sources. The article is discussing a piece of obscure jargon at length, with numerous POV, style, prose, and sourcing issues. If this isn't deleted, it needs to be significantly cut down. toobigtokale ( talk) 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Soccerway does not count towards WP:SPORTBASIC #5 and I couldn't find any evidence of notability in my Burmese and English searches. The MNL is not independent and is only a passing mention and Tribun News is just an image caption from an under-19 fixture. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable person, not pass Wikipedia:Notability. Кронас ( talk) 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
As this has passed New Page Patrol and is relatively old now, I am not allowed to send to draft. That said, it currently has no acceptable sources and probably shouldn't have passed. I don't consider a Facebook photo to be acceptable justification for an article. Searching in Burmese (မြန်မာဖူဆယ်လိဂ်), I was unable to find any significant coverage of the 2024 season. News Eleven contains a passing mention of the 2020 season, MT News seems to be about a different tournament and is from 2023, this News Eleven article is from 2024 but is about the national team rather than the league. Searching in English, I can find GNLM but that's about the 2023 season and is painfully brief besides.
In summary, this article is totally inappropriate for mainspace and I can't find any sources to justify it. If someone can find sources that show in-depth coverage of the 2024 season of this competition, I would suggest moving this to draft space. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sourcing was cleaned-up/updated, ref-bomb issues were fixed. Hence, recent delete vote was addressed. asilvering did a great job managing this process. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
All the sources are very base: Business exists, business does business things. No notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
20:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
09:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Better sourcing seems to be requested, though – will be tagging this for that. (non-admin closure) TLA (talk) 08:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NEVENTS per the conditions in WP:COVERAGE. The article was created in 2005 and has been sparsely edited in the 20 years since. There has not been subsequent in-depth coverage that puts the interview into context, such as is often found in books, feature length articles in major news magazines and does not appear to have the lasting significance that notable interviews with other political figures have had, such as An Interview with HRH The Princess of Wales, Nixon interviews, Betty Ford's August 1975 60 Minutes interview, Palin–Couric interviews. True, the interview was on the eve of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but nothing said during the interview or the coverage seems to point to its lasting notability. Longhornsg ( talk) 07:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was a few sentences of coverage here. Everything else that came up in my searches were passing mentions, mostly in Armenian media. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
non-notable User4edits ( talk) 06:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Seraphimblade
Talk to me
07:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
20:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist for clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
05:07, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Searches found little to nothing. v/r - Seawolf35 T-- C 04:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. No sources found to indicate that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:30, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Local election for a small city with very little outside coverage, failing WP:GEOSCOPE and WP:GNG. The largest newspaper in its metropolitan area (the Omaha World-Herald) has only a handful of articles and none since the result was determined, failing WP:LASTING. Sounder Bruce 02:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced biography. Unclear notability. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination and single deletion !vote withdrawn, speedy keep per SK1. (non-admin closure) ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 03:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced biography since its creation in 2005. Unclear notability as a Han dynasty eunuch. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. Withdrawn by nominator per sources found by Cunard. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 17:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced biography. Does not seem notable, but unsure if "founding general" means anything, or if his medals confer notability. Natg 19 ( talk) 01:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The book notes: "【邢荣杰】( 1911 ~ ) 1964 年晋升为中国人民解放军少将军衔。河北省无极县人。 1933 年任国民党保卫团大队长。1937 年参加八路军,同年加入中国共产党。抗日战争时期,任冀西游击队第五大队大队长,司令部参谋长兼三支队支队长,冀豫抗日义勇军参谋长,太行军区第五军分区三十四团参谋长,第八军分区参谋长。解放战争时期,任太行军区第五军分区参谋长,晋冀鲁豫野战军第六纵队十六旅参谋长,第十八旅副旅长兼参谋长,中原军区军政大学总队长,第二野战军十二军三十六师师长。中华人民共和国成立后,任第三兵团师长兼川东军区涪陵军分区司令员,南京军事学院训练部战术教授会教员、副主任,驻越南社会主义共和国大使馆武官,重庆步兵学校校长,陕西省军区副司令员。"
From Google Translate: "[Xing Rongjie] (1911 ~ ) was promoted to the rank of Major General of the Chinese People's Liberation Army in 1964. A native of Wuji County, Hebei Province. In 1933, he was appointed captain of the Kuomintang security regiment. He joined the Eighth Route Army in 1937 and joined the Communist Party of China in the same year. During the Anti-Japanese War, he served as captain of the Fifth Brigade of the Western Hebei Guerrilla Army, chief of staff of the headquarters and captain of the third detachment, chief of staff of the Hebei-Henan Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army, chief of staff of the 34th Regiment of the Fifth Military Division of the Taihang Military Region, and chief of staff of the Eighth Military Division. long. During the War of Liberation, he served as chief of staff of the Fifth Military Division of the Taihang Military Region, chief of staff of the 16th Brigade of the 6th Column of the Shanxi-Hebei-Luyu Field Army, deputy brigade commander and chief of staff of the 18th Brigade, captain of the Military and Political University of the Central Plains Military Region, and 10th Brigade of the Second Field Army. Commander of the 36th Division of the Second Army. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, he served as division commander of the Third Corps and commander of the Fuling Military Division of the Eastern Sichuan Military Region, instructor and deputy director of the Tactics Professor Association of the Training Department of Nanjing Military Academy, military attache of the Embassy in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, principal of Chongqing Infantry School, Shaanxi Province Deputy Commander of the Military Region."
The article notes: "邢荣杰( 1911- )河北省无极县人。 1937 年参加八路军。曾任冀豫抗日义勇军参谋长、陕西省军区副司令员等职。 1964 年晋升为少将军衔。"
From Google Translate: "Xing Rongjie (1911- ) was born in Wuji County, Hebei Province. Joined the Eighth Route Army in 1937. He once served as chief of staff of the Hebei-Henan Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army and deputy commander of the Shaanxi Provincial Military Region. Promoted to the rank of major general in 1964."
The book notes: "邢荣杰( 1911- )原名宝堂,号明山,山东曹县人。东北抗日联军第 11 军军长,东北抗联总司令部副官长。河北无极人。解放军军事学院训练部战术教授会副主任,驻越南社会主义共和国武官,重庆步校校长,少将,陕西省军区副司令员。"
From Google Translate: "Xing Rongjie (1911-), formerly known as Baotang and named Mingshan, was born in Caoxian County, Shandong Province. Commander of the 11th Army of the Northeast Anti-Japanese Allied Forces and deputy commander of the Northeast Anti-Japanese Allied General Headquarters. Hebei Wuji people. Deputy director of the Tactical Professors Association of the Training Department of the PLA Military Academy, military attache stationed in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, principal of Chongqing Infantry School, major general, and deputy commander of the Shaanxi Provincial Military Region."
The book notes: "邢荣杰授衔边疆少将 1911 年出生,河北无极人。刘邓大军进军大别山强渡河时, 18 旅参谋长邢荣杰率 53 团护卫,部队端着刺刀攻击前进,打下一个村庄,又扑向另一个村庄。碰上敌人就打,打完又往前冲。53 团在扫清了沿河几个村庄的敌人之后,歼灭了位于公路北侧"
From Google Translate: "Xing Rongjie was awarded the title of Frontier Major General. Born in 1911, he was born in Wuji, Hebei Province. When Liu and Deng's armies marched into the Dabie Mountains and forcibly crossed the river, Xing Rongjie, chief of staff of the 18th Brigade, led the 53rd Regiment to escort them. The troops attacked and advanced with bayonets in hand. They captured one village and then rushed to another. When you encounter an enemy, fight, and then rush forward after fighting. After clearing out the enemies in several villages along the river, the 53rd Regiment annihilated the enemy on the north side of the highway..."
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Played about 2 minutes of professional league football before disappearing. No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC in my Arabic searches. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)